DOCSLIB.ORG

The Human Brain Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Human Brain Project Lorem ipsum The Human Brain Project A Report to the European Commission April 2012 | The HBP Report | 1 Abstract Understanding the human brain is one of the greatest radical transformation of ICT and brain research, and en- challenges facing 21st century science. If we can rise to the abling European bio-tech, pharmaceutical and computing challenge, we can gain fundamental insights into what it companies to pioneer the development of what are likely to means to be human, develop new treatments for brain dis- become some of the largest and most dynamic sectors of the eases and build revolutionary new Information and Commu- world economy. nications Technologies (ICT). In this report, we argue that the Realising this vision and ensuring a leading role for convergence between ICT and biology has reached a point at European companies and researchers will require a mas- which it can turn this dream into reality. It was this realisation sive long-term research effort, going far beyond what can be that motivated the authors to launch the Human Brain Proj- achieved in a typical European research project or by any one ect – Preparatory Study (HBP-PS) – a one-year EU-funded country. As a foundation for this effort, we propose to build Coordinating Action in which nearly three hundred experts an integrated system of ICT-based research platforms, which in neuroscience, medicine and computing came together to without resolving all open problems, would allow neurosci- develop a new “ICT-accelerated” vision for brain research and entists, medical researchers and technology developers to its applications. Here, we present the conclusions of our work. dramatically accelerate the pace of their research. We find that the major obstacle that hinders our under- Building and operating the platforms will require a standing of the brain is the fragmentation of brain research clear vision, strong, flexible leadership, long-term invest- and the data it produces. Our most urgent need is thus a con- ment in research and engineering, and a strategy that lever- certed international effort that can integrate this data in a uni- ages the diversity and strength of European research. It will fied picture of the brain as a single multi-level system. To reach also require continuous dialogue with civil society, creating this goal, we propose to build on and transform emerging ICT consensus and ensuring the project has a strong grounding technologies. in ethical standards. In neuroscience, neuroinformatics and brain simula- We estimate that the total cost would amount to tion can collect and integrate our experimental data, iden- Eur 1,190 million, spread over a period of ten years. Of tifying and filling gaps in our knowledge, prioritizing and this sum, Eur 643 million would come from the European enormously increasing the value we can extract from future Commission, the remainder from other sources. We expect experiments. that, as the value of the platforms becomes apparent, this In medicine, medical informatics can identify biologi- initial investment would trigger an avalanche of additional cal signatures of brain disease, allowing diagnosis at an early public and industrial funding, making it possible to per- stage, before the disease has done irreversible damage, and form research that goes beyond the precise limits we have enabling personalised treatment, adapted to the needs of in- indicated in this report. dividual patients. Better diagnosis, combined with disease These requirements can only be met by a project on the and drug simulation, can accelerate the discovery of new scale of a FET Flagship. In this report, therefore, we propose treatments, speeding up and drastically lowering the cost of that the European Commission launches such a Flagship. We drug discovery. call it The Human Brain Project (HBP). We summarise the In computing, new techniques of interactive supercom- goal of the project as follows. puting, driven by the needs of brain simulation, can impact a vast range of industries, while devices and systems, mod- elled after the brain, can overcome fundamental limits on the The Human Brain Project should lay the technical energy-efficiency, reliability and programmability of current foundations for a new model of ICT-based brain technologies, clearing the road for systems with brain-like research, driving integration between data intelligence. and knowledge from different disciplines, and The supercomputer and hardware technologies we need catalysing a community effort to achieve a new are rapidly improving their performance, following well-es- tablished industry roadmaps. In other essential technologies, understanding of the brain, new treatments for European academic institutions already lead the world. The brain disease and new brain-like computing vision we propose would leverage these strengths, driving a technologies. April 2012 | The HBP Report | 3 The Human Brain Project – Preparatory Study: Partners: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (DE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (ES), Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Research Limited – Genes to Cognition (UK), Technische Universität München - Fortiss GmbH (DE), Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC) (BE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Institut Pasteur (FR), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (FR) Coordinator: Henry Markram Co-directors: Henry Markram, Karlheinz Meier Executive Directors: Richard Frackowiak, Karlheinz Meier, Thomas Lippert, Sten Grillner, Henry Markram External Science Advisory Board: Torsten Wiesel (Chair), Yves Agid, Andreas von Bechtolsheim, Bob Bishop, Sydney Brenner, André Hoffmann, André Syrota Internal Advisory Board: Wolf Singer (Chair), Yadin Dudai, Thomas Schulthess Division leaders: Anastasia Ailamaki, Katrin Amunts, Jean-Pierre Changeux, Javier DeFelipe, Stanislas Dehaene, Alain Destexhe, Kathinka Evers, Richard Frackowiak, Steve Furber, Wulfram Gerstner, Seth Grant, Sten Grillner, Jeanette Hellgren- Kotaleski, Alois Knoll, Thomas Lippert, Henry Markram, Karlheinz Meier Editor: Richard Walker Contributing Authors: Ailamaki A., Alvandpour A., Amunts K., Andreoni W., Ashburner J., Axer M., Baaden M., Badia R., Bartolome J., Baum L., Baumans V., Baumela L., Bernèche S., Biddiscombe J., Bjaalie J., Blanke O., Bogorodzki P., Bolten M., Born J., Brice A., Brunel N., Buneman P., Burgess N., Canals S., Carloni P., Carsten Stahl B., Chandran S., Changeux J.-P., Clasca, F., Coenen C., Costa R., Curioni A., D’Angelo E., Dal Peraro M., Dartigues J-F., Davidson S., Davison A., Deco G., De Estudios A., DeFelipe J., Dehaene, S., Dehaene G., De Los Rios P., De Schutter E., Destexhe A., De Zeeuw C., Diesmann M., Draganski B., Dudai Y., Dürr A., Ehrmann O., Eicker N., Eickhoff S., Einevoll G., Erbacci G., Ertl T., Evans A., Evers K., Faugeras O., Fischer H., Frackowiak R., Frégnac T., Freund T., Fries P., Frisoni G., Frommer A., Fua P., Furber S., Gamrat C., Gehrke J., Gerstner W., Gewaltig M-O., Giaume C., Giese M., Girona S., Goebel R., Gottfried F., Grant K., Grant S., Griebel M., Grillner S., Grimes K., Grollier J., Grübl A., Grubmüller H., Grün S., Hagoort P., Halevy M., Hamaekers J., Hardt M., Hari R., Hausser M., Hautop Lund H., Hellgren-Kotaleski J., Herzog M., Hess Bellwald K., Hill S., Hille K., Hines M., Huret A., Husmann D., Ioannidis Y., Jérusalem A., Jirsa V., Jonas P., Karni A., Kersten M., Keyes D., Kherif F., Kindler B., Kleinfeld D., Klinker G., Klöppel S., Klüver L., Knoll A., Koch Christof, Koch Christoph, Kopanitsa M., Kuhlen T., Labarta J., Laio A., Lansner A., Laure E., Laurent G., Lavery R., Le Bihan D., Leblebici Y., Lester D., Lindahl E., Lippert T., Lujan R., Luthi-Carter R., Maass W., Macii E., Maestu F., Magistretti P., Mainen Z., Malach R., Mangin J-F., Marcus-Kalish M., Marin O., Markram H., Marris C., Martinez S., Martone M., Mayr C., Meier K., Menasalvas E., Michelle C., Miglino O., Migliore M., Mohammed A., Mohr B., Morrison A., Nieder A., Niederberger R., Noé F., Nolfi S., Nyberg L., Orgogozo J-M., Orozco M., Orth B., Owen M., Owen R., Ozguz V., Pallier C., Parkkonen L., Pastor L., Pavone F., Paz R., Peña JM., Pessiglione M., Petkov N., Pinel P., Pocklington A., Poline J-B., Ponting C., Pottmann H., Poupon C., Ramirez A., Reitmayr G., Renaud S., Robbins T., Robles V., Ros E., Rose N., Roth A., Röthlisberger U., Roweth D., Rückert U., Saksida L., Salles A., Sanchez-Vives M., Sandi C., Sansom M., Sanz R., Saria A., Scattoni ML., Schemmel J., Schneider F., Schrader S., Schrauwen B., Schüffny R., Schulthess T., Schürmann F., Segev I., Senn W., Shanahan M., Shillcock J., Sigman M., Singer W., Slater M., Smit A., Smith LS., Soriano E., Spijker S., Spiliopoulou M., Sporns O., Stampanoni A., Steinmacher-Burow B., Suarez E., Taly A., Tarek M., Tass P., Thill S., Thirion B., Thompson P., Thomson A., Tiesinga P., Toga A., Trappl R., Triller A., Tsodyks M., Ullmann S., Valero M., van der Smagt P., van Leeuwen C., van Wassenhove V., Vidal F., Villani C., Vincente M., Voet T., von Landesberger T., Wade R., Wang Y., Weber B., Weiskopf N., Wierstra D., Williams R., Wittum G., Wolf F., Wolkersdorfer K., Yokoyama C., Ziemke T., Zilken H. Graphics design: Marie-Eve Laurent © The HBP-PS Consortium, Lausanne, April 2012 Table of contents Abstract 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 The Human Brain Project 8 A new foundation for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microsoft's Internet Exploration: Predatory Or Competitive?
    Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 9 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall 1999 Microsoft’s Internet Exploration: Predatory or Competitive Thomas W. Hazlett Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hazlett, Thomas W. (1999) "Microsoft’s Internet Exploration: Predatory or Competitive," Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy: Vol. 9: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICROSOFT'S INTERNET EXPLORATION: PREDATORY OR COMPETITIVE? Thomas W. Hazlettt In May 1998 the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") accused Microsoft of violatirig the Sherman Antitrust Act by vigorously compet- ing against Netscape's Navigator software with Microsoft's rival browser, Internet Explorer. The substance of the allegation revolves around defensive actions taken by Microsoft to protect the dominant po- sition enjoyed by Microsoft's Windows operating system. The DOJ's theory is that, were it not for Microsoft's overly aggressive reaction to Netscape, Navigator software would have been more broadly distributed, thus enabling competition to Windows. This competition would have come directly from Java, a computer language developed by Sun Microsystems and embedded in Netscape software, allowing applications to run on any underlying operating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Mindbill® Billing and Customer Care Solution
    ® MINDBill Billing and Customer Care Solution End-to-End Billing and Customer Care Gain Competitive Advantage with a Truly Convergent Billing & Customer Care Solution ©2018 MIND CTI LTD CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW ...................................................................... 1 ARCHITECTURE HIGHLIGHTS .............................................................. 2 LOGICAL ARCHITECTURE ........................................................................... 2 The Access Layer ............................................................................ 2 The Business Layer ......................................................................... 3 The Data Layer ............................................................................... 4 The Management Layer ................................................................. 4 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT ........................................ 5 ACCOUNTS ............................................................................................. 5 Unlimited Hierarchy of Accounts ................................................... 5 Customer care ................................................................................ 6 Account Home Page ....................................................................... 6 Order Management ....................................................................... 7 Account Journal .............................................................................. 9 Trouble Ticketing ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface
    Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface Dongjin (DJ) Seo Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2018-146 http://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2018/EECS-2018-146.html December 1, 2018 Copyright © 2018, by the author(s). All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission. Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface by Dongjin Seo A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Michel M. Maharbiz, Chair Professor Elad Alon Professor John Ngai Fall 2016 Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface Copyright 2016 by Dongjin Seo 1 Abstract Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface by Dongjin Seo Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Professor Michel M. Maharbiz, Chair A seamless, high density, chronic interface to the nervous system is essential to enable clinically relevant applications such as electroceuticals or brain-machine interfaces (BMI). Currently, a major hurdle in neurotechnology is the lack of an implantable neural interface system that remains viable for a patient's lifetime due to the development of biological response near the implant.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceiving Invisible Light Through a Somatosensory Cortical Prosthesis
    ARTICLE Received 24 Aug 2012 | Accepted 15 Jan 2013 | Published 12 Feb 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2497 Perceiving invisible light through a somatosensory cortical prosthesis Eric E. Thomson1,2, Rafael Carra1,w & Miguel A.L. Nicolelis1,2,3,4,5 Sensory neuroprostheses show great potential for alleviating major sensory deficits. It is not known, however, whether such devices can augment the subject’s normal perceptual range. Here we show that adult rats can learn to perceive otherwise invisible infrared light through a neuroprosthesis that couples the output of a head-mounted infrared sensor to their soma- tosensory cortex (S1) via intracortical microstimulation. Rats readily learn to use this new information source, and generate active exploratory strategies to discriminate among infrared signals in their environment. S1 neurons in these infrared-perceiving rats respond to both whisker deflection and intracortical microstimulation, suggesting that the infrared repre- sentation does not displace the original tactile representation. Hence, sensory cortical prostheses, in addition to restoring normal neurological functions, may serve to expand natural perceptual capabilities in mammals. 1 Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Box 3209, 311 Research Drive, Bryan Research, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 2 Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute for Neuroscience of Natal (ELS-IINN), Natal 01257050, Brazil. 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 4 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 5 Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. w Present address: University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo 01246-000, Brazil. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.A.L.N.
    [Show full text]
  • W Web Portal Application Development Technologies
    1131 Web Portal Application Development W Technologies Américo Sampaio Lancaster University, UK Awais Rashid Lancaster University, UK INTRODUCTION The evolution of capabilities provided by Web portals, such as content management, personalization for different The growth of the Internet and the World Wide Web has users and groups of users, collaboration, and security, imposed contributed to significant changes in many areas of our so- difficulties for Web portal developers. The main challenges ciety. The Web has provided new ways of doing business, faced by the developers were: and many companies have been offering new services as well as migrating their systems to the Web. • How to integrate different applications inside the The main goal of the first Web sites was to facilitate the intranet and also over the Internet sharing of information between computers around the world. • How to provide specific content to different kinds These Web sites were mainly composed of simple hypertext of users and how to categorize users in groups and documents containing information in text format and links to provide the necessary information other documents that could be spread all over the world. The • How to obtain the information from other partners, or first users of thisnew technology were university researchers service providers, over the Web interested in some easier form of publishing their work, and • How to gather and tailor the information to the specific also searching for other interesting research sources from target users other universities. • How to secure the access of different kinds of users After a few years the popularity of the Web increased significantly, especially after the creation of user-friendly In order to address some of these issues, specific tools Web browsers and Internet services providers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Brain Project
    HBP The Human Brain Project Madrid, June 20th 2013 HBP The Human Brain Project HBP FULL-SCALE HBP Ramp-up HBP Report mid 2013-end 2015 April, 2012 HBP-PS (CSA) (FP7-ICT-2013-FET-F, CP-CSA, Jul-Oct, 2012 May, 2011 HBP-PS Proposal (FP7-ICT-2011-FET-F) December, 2010 Proposal Preparation August, 2010 HBP PROJECT FICHE: PROJECT TITLE: HUMAN BRAIN PROJECT COORDINATOR: EPFL (Switzerland) COUNTRIES: 23 (EU MS, Switzerland, US, Japan, China); 22 in Ramp Up Phase. RESEARCH LABORATORIES: 256 in Whole Flagship; 110 in Ramp Up Phase RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS (Partners): • 150 in Whole Flagship • 82 in Ramp Up Phase & New partners through Competitive Call Scheme (15,5% of budget) • 200 partners expected by Y5 (Project participants & New partners through Competitive Call Scheme) DIVISIONS:11 SUBPROJECTS: 13 TOTAL COSTS: 1.000* M€; 72,7 M€ in Ramp Up Phase * 1160 M€ Project Total Costs (October, 2012) HBP Main Scheme of The Human Brain Project: HBP Phases 2013 2015 2016 2020 2023 RAMP UP (A) FULLY OPERATIONAL (B) SUSTAINED OPERATIONS (C) Y1 Y2 Y3a Y3b Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 2014 2020 HBP Structure HBP: 11 DIVISIONS; 13 SUBPROJECTS (10 SCIENTIFIC & APPLICATIONS & ETHICS & MGT) DIVISION SPN1 SUBPROJECTS AREA OF ACTIVITY MOLECULAR & CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE SP1 STRATEGIC MOUSE BRAIN DATA SP2 STRATEGIC HUMAN BRAIN DATA DATA COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE SP3 BRAIN FUNCTION THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCE SP4 THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCE THEORY NEUROINFORMATICS SP5 THE NEUROINFORMATICS PLATFORM BRAIN SIMULATION SP6 BRAIN SIMULATION PLATFORM HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING (HPC) SP7 HPC
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Pathways Through Which Experiences Become Linked with Biology
    Development and Psychopathology 27 (2015), 637–648 # Cambridge University Press 2015 doi:10.1017/S0954579415000206 Epigenetic pathways through which experiences become linked with biology a b PATRICK O. MCGowan AND TANIA L. ROTH aUniversity of Toronto; and bUniversity of Delaware Abstract This article highlights the defining principles, progress, and future directions in epigenetics research in relation to this Special Issue. Exciting studies in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and psychiatry have provided new insights into the epigenetic factors (e.g., DNA methylation) that are responsive to environmental input and serve as biological pathways in behavioral development. Here we highlight the experimental evidence, mainly from animal models, that factors such as psychosocial stress and environmental adversity can become encoded within epigenetic factors with functional consequences for brain plasticity and behavior. We also highlight evidence that epigenetic marking of genes in one generation can have consequences for future generations (i.e., inherited), and work with humans linking epigenetics, cognitive dysfunction, and psychiatric disorder. Though epigenetics has offered more of a beginning than an answer to the centuries-old nature–nurture debate, continued research is certain to yield substantial information regarding biological determinants of central nervous system changes and behavior with relevance for the study of developmental psychopathology. Experiences, particularly those occurring during sensitive peri- To better understand the consequences of early and later- ods of development, are well recognized for their ability to ca- life stress on epigenetic mechanisms in this capacity, this nalize neurobiological trajectories and yield significant conse- has required the utilization of experimental rodent models quences for lifelong health and mental well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) 1
    Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) 1 Neurobiology and Behavior (NEURBIO) Courses NEURBIO 200A. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 200B. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 200A Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 200C. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 200B Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201A. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201B. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 201A Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 201C. Research in Neurobiology and Behavior. 2-12 Units. Individual research with Neurobiology and Behavior faculty. Prerequisite: NEURBIO 201B Grading Option: Satisfactory/unsatisfactory only. Repeatability: Unlimited as topics vary. Restriction: Graduate students only. Neurobiology and Behavior Majors only. NEURBIO 202A. Foundations of Neuroscience. 2 Units. Intended to expose students to critical reading and analysis of the primary neuroscience literature. Instructors from departments associated with the Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program participate and discuss topics of current interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Report BRAIN INITIATIVE
    Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report BRAIN INITIATIVE (US) Eva Arrilucea, Hanna Kuittinen February 2018 Case Study Report: Brain Initiative (United States) European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A.6 — Open Data Policy and Science Cloud Contact Arnold Weiszenbacher E-mail [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Manuscript completed in February 2018. This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-80162-4 doi:10.2777/1986 KI-01-18-153-EN-N © European Union, 2018. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Brain Initiative 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report Brain Initiative (United States) Eva Arrilucea Hanna Kuittinen A Study coordinated by the Joint Institute for Innovation Policy February 2018 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Table of Contents 1 Summary of the case study ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics on the Brain on 9 September, the Father of the Hydrogen Bomb Passed Away
    2003 in context Neuroscience GOODBYE Edward Teller Genomics on the brain On 9 September, the father of the hydrogen bomb passed away. He was a controversial he 1990s may have been designated the creating transgenic mice that carry these figure, who was vilified by many physicists after T‘Decade of the Brain’,but they will also be BACs,the researchers can identify — by sight testifying in 1954 that Robert Oppenheimer, remembered as the time when genomics — the cells in which a gene of interest is nor- leader of the wartime Manhattan Project, was a came to the fore.This year,neuroscience and mally active,and can work out how these cells security risk. Teller later championed President genomics teamed up in projects that promise connect with the rest of the brain. The same Ronald Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ missile-defence to propel the study of the brain into the realm BACs can also be used to introduce other initiative. But colleagues at the Lawrence of‘big science’. genetic modifications into these cells,provid- Livermore National Laboratory, co-founded by Working on Parkinson’s disease? One of ing a unique tool to investigate their biology. Teller, say that he should also be remembered the projects that surfaced this year might pro- GENSAT’s first images can already be seen for his passion for teaching physics. vide you with a transgenic mouse that offers on its website,which was launched in October fluorescent neurons in key neural pathways. alongside a paper introducing the project Galileo Another could offer you structural brain (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroplasticity in Children and Adolescents in Response to Cognitive Or Sensory-Motor Interventions
    Reviews/Mini-Reviews Clinical & Translational Neuroscience July-December 2020: 1–21 ª The Author(s) 2020 Neuroplasticity in children and Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/2514183X20974231 adolescents in response to treatment journals.sagepub.com/home/ctn intervention: A systematic review of the literature Lisa L Weyandt1, Christine M Clarkin2,3 , Emily Z Holding4, Shannon E May3, Marisa E Marraccini4, Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir5, Emily Shepard6, and Lauren Thompson3 Abstract The purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, regarding evidence of neuroplasticity in children and adolescents in response to cognitive or sensory-motor interventions. Twenty-eight studies employing seven different types of neuroimaging techniques were included in the review. Findings revealed that significant variability existed across the 28 studies with regard to the clinical populations examined, type of interventions employed, neuroimaging methods, and the type of neuroimaging data included in the studies. Overall, results supported that experience-dependent interventions were associated with neuroplastic changes among children and ado- lescents in both neurotypical and clinical populations. However, it remains unclear whether these molecular neuroplastic changes, including the degree and direction of those differences, were the direct result of the intervention. Although the findings are encouraging, methodological limitations of the studies limit clinical utility of the results. Future studies are warranted that rigorously define the construct of neuroplasticity, establish consistent protocols across measurement techniques, and have adequate statistical power. Lastly, studies are needed to identify the functional and structural neu- roplastic mechanisms that correspond with changes in cognition and behavior in child and adolescent samples.
    [Show full text]