Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #7 Notes Thursday, June 21, 2017 | 5–8:20 p.m. – Auditorium 150 E Main St, Hillsboro, OR 97123

Committee Member Seat Attendance Jerry Willey Chair (ex officio) Present Steve Nagy Hillsboro Airport Manager (ex officio) Present Colin Cooper City of Hillsboro Present Casey Sherwood FAA Local Air Traffic Control Present Jadene Stensland Environmental / regulatory Absent Andrew Singelakis Washington County Present Henry Oberhelman Community Planning Organization 8 Absent Kimberly Culbertson Community Planning Organization 9 Present Charles Hagele Citizen at Large Present Keyanus Jacobo Citizen at Large Absent Alison Elmer Citizen at Large Present Juan Carlos González Citizen at Large Present Tasha Robinson and Ryan Smith / alternates Youth Citizen at Large Present for Trent Robinson Dirk Wittig Airport Business Present Ryan McCartney Airport Business Present Monika Johnson Airport Equity Business Absent Deanna Palm Local Business Present Scott Gratsinger Aviation Industry Professional Present

Port of Portland Staff Present Consultant Staff Present Ryan Parker Richard Vincent Dave Nafie WHPacific Sean Loughran Stephen Winkle Chris White Steve Johnson Anne Pressentin EnviroIssues Jayson Shanafelt Dan Pippenger Seth Baker Samantha Magana Darren Griffin Dirk Anderson Jr Patrick Christopher

Welcome

Anne Pressentin, Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) facilitator, opened the meeting with the following announcements.

• Sean Loughran, Long Range Planning Manager of the Port of Portland, will present in place of Patrick Taylor of Coffman Associates, who is ill. • A televised news piece aired earlier in the day stating the master plan process was considering changes to Hillsboro Airport runways. There are no changes to the runways proposed beyond a reconstruction of the main to its current size. • Tasha Robinson and Ryan Smith from the Hillsboro Youth Advisory Committee will substitute for Trent Robinson, who could not attend the meeting.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 1

• Portland State University students in a real estate master’s program are observing the meeting for a student project. The students’ professor is on the consultant team. The students will use the work from the PAC process and other master plan work to produce some development concepts as part of their capstone experience. • The meeting ground rules that PAC members agreed upon at the beginning of the master plan process are still in effect and also apply to meeting observers during public comment.

Ms. Pressentin asked PAC members for comments or corrections to the PAC Meeting #6 meeting summary. There were no corrections.

Ms. Pressentin said Port of Portland staff had emailed master plan chapters (3 and 4) to PAC members to review, but to date Port of Portland staff have not received any comments back. Although not required, the purpose of the review was to provide PAC members opportunity to ensure their input is reflected accurately in the master plan. PAC members asked Port of Portland staff to distribute the chapters again. Comments are due within one week.

PAC Chair Jerry Willey provided opening comments.

• The PAC has maintained an aspirational vision of what Hillsboro Airport could look like in the future. Remember the master plan will be implemented over a 20-year period – construction will not come quickly, and the plan may be modified over time. • The first project that will take shape in the area is the Washington County Event Center with ground breaking scheduled late fall.

Business Report

Steve Nagy, General Aviation Manager of the Port of Portland, provided background information and updates on the reconstruction of Hillsboro Airport’s main runway.

• The 2005 Hillsboro Airport Master Plan primarily focused on building out the airfield including the parallel runway and taxiways. The current master plan process has more emphasis on amenities around and outside the airfield. • Implementing master plan recommendations to preserve and maintain airfield pavements requires main runway reconstruction about every 20 years. The upcoming work is a full depth reconstruction, which involves digging up and replacing the runway. • Runway reconstruction will begin summer 2019. The runway will be reconstructed to its current length, and width of 150 feet. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will fund up to 100-foot width; the Port of Portland must find other funds to pay for the rest of the width. • Construction will be finished in five years. • Construction will begin in 2019 on the northern two-thirds of the runway, which needs the most work. The southern third of the runway will be rehabilitated in 2020. Taxiways and exit connections will be reconstructed in 2021. • Construction will require runway closures for up to four months. Many airport tenants will be affected and need to be temporarily relocated. The Port of Portland is working with tenants to keep them in business during construction. • Reconstruction also provides opportunity to replace drainage systems and address stormwater issues. • The Port of Portland has awarded construction contracts and the FAA has issued grants for the work.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 2

Charles Hagele asked how long the reconstruction will last. Steve Nagy said the construction schedule is 16 weeks. Mr. Hagele asked when the runway will need to be worked on again. Mr. Nagy said surface pavement lasts 10 to 20 years. However, the upcoming full-depth reconstruction has not been done since the 1940s and should not be required again for 50 years.

Jerry Willey asked what will be done for aircraft that cannot land on Hillsboro Airport’s smaller runways. Steve Nagy said about three dozen aircraft will be affected by the construction, which is a relatively small portion of Hillsboro Airport’s fleet mix. Mr. Nagy said the Port of Portland will temporarily relocate most businesses to Portland International Airport (PDX). is planning to transport its employees to PDX where the Intel shuttle will operate temporarily.

Spring Outreach Summary

Chris White provided a summary of outreach events and results since the previous PAC meeting.

• The Port of Portland hosted two public open houses with ice cream socials. The open houses occurred at the Hillsboro Brookwood Community Library and Centro Cultural. Ninety people attended in total. Participants had good conversations with project staff and shared comments on maps, flip charts and comment forms. Project staff integrated community comments into the draft preferred alternative. • Port staff have discussed the alternatives with airport tenants and community participatory organization (CPO) 8 to get their input on the alternatives and airport operations in general. • The themes of recent comments are well aligned with comments heard through online open houses and previous engagement efforts: o General agreement with the commercial development and layout proposed in Alternative 3 o Request amenities such as airfield observation areas, restaurants, and retail o Address roadway congestion and accommodate future population growth with transportation improvements around the airport o Reserve the ability for Hillsboro Airport to gain commercial passenger service in the future o Identify how Hillsboro Airport will be used following a major seismic event • Port of Portland staff will attend and share information at many summer activities in Washington County.

Wrap up of Subarea Alternatives

Sean Loughran reviewed the process and decisions that led to the draft preferred alternative.

• The alternatives analysis process began in PAC Meeting #4 where PAC members discussed evaluation criteria used to consider alternatives. • Prior to the evaluation criteria, the project team conducted a strategic analysis of the role of Hillsboro Airport and completed forecasts of the number and type of aircraft expected to use the airport over the next 20 years. • The forecasts informed facility requirements, which prescribe dimensions of airfield facilities like the size and shape of runways and taxiways. • The airfield decision process included consideration of FAA requirements, safety regulations and the needs of the FAA air traffic control tower. • The alternatives included a plan for 20 years of development on airport property and reserved land for 50 years of further development. • The master plan needs to be flexible to address new needs that emerge over time.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 3

• The Port of Portland wants to retain the value of recent investments and partnerships such as the municipal fire station located on airport property. • The Cornell Subarea alternatives focused on creating an airport district or gateway, creating a sense of place for the airport and adjacent fairgrounds. • All Cornell Subarea alternatives assumed relocation of flight schools north to the training runway, making space for non-aviation and mixed uses desired by the community. • Evergreen Subarea alternatives focused on reserving aviation uses for land adjacent to the airfield, such as flight schools, hangars and corporate aviation uses, and using surplus land for commercial or industrial uses.

Sean Loughran reviewed the three alternatives considered by PAC and community members during the winter and spring outreach activities.

• Alternative 1 o Most similar to Hillsboro Airport’s current layout, refined to optimize space o Flight school is pushed farthest north, considering noise impacts and flight school needs • Alternative 2 o Expanded corporate aviation campus concept o Considered how to replace hangar capacity along the training runway o Added more commercial use to the Cornell parcel • Alternative 3 o Different orientation of airport terminal – toward runway instead of facing o Expanded space for parking o Expanded commercial uses along Cornell Road o Noise impacts most constrained to airport property Draft Preferred Alternative

Sean Loughran presented the draft preferred alternative and explained how community input and further analysis informed its development.

• The draft preferred alternative was developed in an iterative process informed by evaluation criteria, community feedback, and the regional need for a sustainable airport that is adaptable to changing circumstances. • Community comments have been consistent with PAC member comments: o Keep the terminal building in the Cornell Subarea o Move flight schools closer to the center of the airfield, near the training runway o Add commercial and industrial uses on airport property to create community jobs and non- aviation uses for community members o Create shuttle connections between MAX light rail and flight schools o Celebrate historical resources of the airport o Consider impacts to traffic and possible street system changes o Consider opportunities for education and jobs at the airport o Identify Hillsboro Airport’s role in a seismic event o Create renewable energy generation opportunities on airport property • Cornell Subarea comments: o Adjust the amount of commercial uses and the orientation of development along Cornell Road to create viewscapes and connections between MAX light rail and the terminal building

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 4

o Make sure vehicle parking is adequate o Preserve historic resources like the fuel island and historic hangar • Evergreen Subarea comments: o Adjust flight school locations to reduce infrastructure costs o Optimize roadway designs to make a simplified and connected system o Ground decisions in market data Sean Loughran described features of the draft preferred alternative:

• Retained features from Alternative 3 that were valued in comments and made refinements to address concerns. • The airfield’s runways and taxiways are generally sufficient to meet aviation needs for the upcoming 20 years; some safety and connectivity issues will be addressed in the master plan. • Make adaptive reuse of historic structures as part of redevelopment. • The cost of the preferred alternative is similar to the three alternatives considered. • The layout includes over 1,000 parking spaces distributed throughout the airport, which provides a buffer over the 960 parking spaces identified in the Facility Requirements analysis. • The Port of Portland will create opportunities for privately-funded hangar development as market needs occur. • Noise contours (displaying day-night average sound level) are shifted slightly north in the preferred alternative compared to the current airport due to the new location of flight schools– farther from dense residential areas to the south, moving over less dense areas that are planned to transition to industrial uses over time.

Steve Nagy explained that development will occur in phases over 20 years. There will be redevelopment of some current structures as leases expire, followed by opportunities to expand. There may be temporary community uses of some spaces prior to full build out. Temporary uses may include some kind of marketplace, food cart pod, observation area or other uses that allow people to congregate. These spaces could also serve as business incubators.

Mary Vigilante of Synergy Consulting provided an overview of the environmental analysis that will be conducted as part of the master plan process.

• Analyzing the effects of the alternatives, mostly preferred alternative, on the environment • The analysis for the master plan is not a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process; NEPA analyses will be completed as applicable projects from the master plan move forward • FAA advisory circular recommends early consideration of potential effects of development to the environment and community, including: o Are there environmental laws that would be triggered by proposed development? Examples include impacts to wetlands and historic resources. o Analyze existing data and assemble an environmental inventory. o Assess which projects may occur early and what level of environmental review may be required. Anne Pressentin asked PAC members to consider the following questions and share their thoughts with the project team.

• What should be considered to make the draft preferred alternative successful? • Is anything missing?

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 5

PAC members shared the following thoughts:

• Parking is a substantial issue at the current airport; confirm the draft preferred alternative will provide adequate parking for the next 20 years (Scott Gratsinger) • Consider completing the perimeter road around the airfield (Scott Gratsinger) • Does the Port of Portland need to notify community members who are expected to experience an increase in noise levels as a result of future development? (Alison Elmer) • The Washington County Event Center was designed to have an aviation feel that complements Hillsboro Airport; commercial and retail development along Cornell should have the same look and feel as the Event Center (Deanna Palm) • Commercial and retail space will need adequate signage to inform drivers traveling at 45 miles per hour on Cornell Road (Deanna Palm) • Commercial and retail space need adequate parking for their customers; don’t assume customers will take transit and bicycle (Deanna Palm) • Provide a more thorough plan for the connection between MAX light rail and Cornell Road, and how the turn-outs will work to ensure they have an efficient design (Kimberly Culbertson) • The City of Hillsboro does not want to see strip commercial development along Cornell Road; there is a desire for iconic architecture (Colin Cooper) • Consider a sky bridge to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian crossings across Cornell Road (Casey Sherwood) • Clarify that the FAA is the decision-making authority on the air traffic control tower location and construction (Casey Sherwood) • The preferred alternative shows airfield pavement that doesn’t exist yet but is not labeled new (Ryan McCartney) – (This is a proposed helicopter training facility near Hillsboro Aviation Inc. that should have been identified in the preferred alternative as a new facility – editor) • There is high probability that investors will develop the area depicted as future T-hangars in the Evergreen parcel before new hangars are needed (Ryan McCartney) • Ensure general aviation uses have access to fuel and services (Ryan McCartney) • The synergy between Hillsboro Airport and the Event Center will occur in the retail development along Cornell Road; ensure retail development does not block views of the airport (Andrew Singelakis) • Take an intentional equity approach to the procurement process to include local businesses of color in commercial development opportunities (Juan Carlos Gonzalez) • Use iconic architecture to create a sense of place (Juan Carlos Gonzalez) • Analyze how new businesses will affect transportation uses and parking needs (Tasha Davis) • Ensure businesses understand up front if their use of a space is temporary (Tasha Davis) • Involve the community to develop a look and feel desired by community members (Ryan Smith) • Ensure roadways support growth of Hillsboro Airport (Charles Hagele) • The intersection of Cornell Road and Brookwood Parkway is congested now; identify ways to improve traffic flow and safety (Juan Carlos Gonzalez)

Design Preference Activity

Anne Pressentin encouraged PAC members and community members to participate in a dot exercise during the meeting break to help the project team understand the community vision of the look and feel for future development in the Cornell Subarea. In the back of the room, there were several posters with visual examples of various airports and non-aviation development styles. PAC members and community members were given eight dots to place next to examples they liked. Pens and post-it notes were also available to provide comments on

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 6

the examples. Ms. Pressentin explained that the results of the activity would be an advisory input to be considered during master plan implementation.

The results of the dot exercise activity are included at the end of the meeting summary.

Seismic Resilience

Sean Loughran introduced the seismic resilience topic.

• Seismic resilience was a topic that community members and the Hillsboro Airport Roundtable Exchange identified as a special area of interest, particularly concerning Hillsboro Airport’s role following a seismic event in the context of statewide preparation and planning efforts. • The Port of Portland is coordinating with other local, state and federal emergency planning agencies to understand how they plan to use Hillsboro Airport and whether the Port of Portland needs to make facility investments to fulfill the role. • The FAA does not fund seismic work currently. The Port of Portland is using separate funding mechanisms for the seismic work related to the master plan process.

Dan Pippenger, Director of Planning and Development at the Port of Portland, provided information on the Port of Portland’s seismic planning efforts.

• The Port of Portland is planning for short-term and long-term recovery efforts following a seismic event. • The Port of Portland has adopted the Cascadia subduction zone earthquake as the design event for seismic planning because a Cascadia earthquake is more likely to result in liquefaction, which will affect the soils beneath PDX and the Port of Portland’s other marine facilities along rivers. The Portland West Hills fault may also disrupt the area, but an earthquake from that fault is less likely to produce liquefaction. • The Port of Portland is using the Resilience Plan and Oregon Emergency Management Cascadia Playbook as guidance for Port of Portland planning. Port of Portland staff are considering the services and functions the Port of Portland should provide for short- and long-term recovery of the region. • These documents direct the region to focus resources on PDX first, followed by Hillsboro Airport or Scappoose Industrial Airpark. Troutdale Airport is in a similar environment as PDX, and likely will not receive investments in seismic resilience. • The Port of Portland is a revenue-based agency that does not receive local tax dollars for aviation projects. It has limited funds and must choose where to make facility investments. • The Port of Portland takes the opportunity to advocate that FAA be able to offer grants for seismic resilience work. • Oregon state government plans for Redmond Airport to be functional following a Cascadia earthquake. It would be better to have a functional airport closer to population centers west of the Cascades. State officials have indicated PDX is the most important asset for the Port of Portland to invest in. • It is more cost-effective to build facilities to be seismically resilient during initial construction than to retrofit a facility later. The Port of Portland is extending Concourse E of PDX and making new construction resilient. Concourse E will house the Port of Portland’s emergency management offices.

Sean Loughran described seismic resilience planning work conducted as part of the Hillsboro Airport Master Plan process.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 7

• The Port of Portland is dedicating staff resources to assess the resilience of Port of Portland facilities. The master plan consultant team is including the findings related to Hillsboro Airport in the master plan documentation. • The runways of both Hillsboro Airport and PDX will be affected by a Cascadia earthquake, but in different ways. The runways sit atop different soil types. • Key facilities of Hillsboro Airport following an earthquake are the terminal building and maintenance building. • Most utilities like water, electricity and sewer lines are expected to fail. • Fuel systems at Hillsboro Airport are privately owned, but those facilities could be secured to operate after an earthquake. • Equipment is stored in vulnerable buildings; it may be worthwhile to invest in resilient storage buildings. • Port of Portland staff could be trained to assess and report damage to Hillsboro Airport facilities, so agencies can decide how to make use of resources.

Sean Loughran explained that the Port of Portland convened a seismic resilience workshop with several agencies to coordinate planning efforts and communicate needs and assumptions. The outcomes of the workshop include:

• Agencies want to know what Hillsboro Airport can offer before they decide what they need. • The group of agencies had not been convened previously, and they recognized a need for more coordination. • There is no formal defined role for Hillsboro Airport following a Cascadia earthquake. • There are limited funds available for seismic investments. • There are no specific facility needs identified at Hillsboro Airport, though it would be helpful to have a functional terminal building and maintenance building.

Steve Nagy described seismic resilience considerations related to the planned reconstruction of Hillsboro Airport’s main runway.

• The Port of Portland assessed the vulnerabilities of the current runway and whether they could be mitigated in reconstruction. • The runway is several hundred feet above bedrock. An earthquake is likely to cause differential settling of soils of 1.5 – 5.5 inches, which will damage the runway. Soil profiles change between the ends of the runway. • Mitigation options include installing concrete columns 3 feet in diameter, 50 feet deep, every 50 feet in most places and every 8 feet along the centerline. This would add $15 million to construction costs, doubling the total cost of reconstruction. • Other options include adding an extra layer of pavement and smoothing the ridges caused by earthquake settling to make it flat again. This would add $2 million to the cost of reconstruction. • Since there is no FAA grant funding for seismic resilience, the Port of Portland cannot afford to make this investment at this time. The Port of Portland will look for opportunities to fund seismic improvements during future maintenance work. • The Port of Portland will investigate other mitigating factors, like having contractors on call to make repairs quickly following an earthquake.

Casey Sherwood asked if the Port of Portland considered limited investments to make the most vulnerable portion of the runway more resilient. Steve Nagy said the Port of Portland could consider that option.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 8

Public comment

Miki Barnes

Ms. Barnes said she listened to an interview on National Public Radio with a Pentagon official about the security threat China posed to the . She described Hillsboro Airport as a training mill for Chinese and other foreign pilots. The negative effects of flight training like noise, air pollution and decreased livability are also causing a security risk. Ms. Barnes said leadership in the U.S. government is causing a volatile environment for global politics. China has militarized 70 – 80 percent of its air space, leaving little space to train pilots. She asked to know why Chinese pilots are being trained at Hillsboro Airport, and why that decision is not subject to a vote.

Ms. Barnes commented that the FAA has announced a delay in the schedule to identify an unleaded aviation fuel to 2019. Ms. Barnes said she would like to see lead discussed more in master plan meetings because it is a more crucial topic than how to arrange the airfield.

Ms. Barnes submitted written comments to include in the meeting record (provided in the meeting notes).

Michael Gallagher

Mr. Gallagher appreciated the attention Port of Portland staff gave the seismic issue, but he said the resource allocation plan is missing a time dimension. A plan needs to be in place that describes actions following an earthquake that disables PDX. Mr. Gallagher said he spent 26 years in the U.S. Air Force and was involved in the development of the C-17, and he said Hillsboro Airport should be prepared to accommodate a C-17, not a C-130.

Mr. Gallagher encouraged staff to consider maintaining the air traffic control tower as a public viewing area when a new tower is constructed. He also suggested creating a driverless vehicle demonstration project that would shuttle passengers from the MAX light rail station to the airport, highlighting the region’s technological capabilities.

Following public comment, Steve Nagy commented that the Port of Portland is not in favor of the FAA’s new timeline to identify an unleaded aviation fuel. The Port of Portland is communicating its desire to maintain the earlier schedule through its legislative groups.

Phasing Future Development

Dave Nafie of WHPacific introduced the topic to be discussed at the next PAC meeting, which is the phasing of future development.

• Phasing is a strategy to fund and build development projects over the master plan’s 20-year timeline in a way that is affordable and achievable. • Since the FAA is funding the master plan, the phasing strategy will follow the FAA’s method of organizing phases into the first five years, the second five years, and the last 10 years. • The FAA will fund most projects on the airfield. Projects off the airfield will require different funding sources. • Need to identify implementation strategies, understand permitting, costs and potential partnerships to enable projects. • Phasing helps balance financial feasibility, using time and scale. • Need to consider the types of projects eligible for available FAA funds to maximize the 90 percent level of funding. Other development will be funded with private investment. • Need to recognize how existing projects like runway reconstruction fit in with the phasing plan.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 9

• Identify areas where Hillsboro Airport revenues can increase to meet self-sufficiency expectations of FAA grants. o 25 percent of money the airport consumes comes from (non-aviation) retail developments o Deficits are paid for by revenues from PDX o Need to balance cost of infrastructure to maximize return on investment Next Steps

Ryan Parker, Port of Portland project manager for the master plan process, explained next steps.

• PAC Meeting #8 on Oct. 4 will focus on implementation and flexibility for future growth. • Over the summer, Port of Portland staff will share the draft preferred alternative at community events. • PAC Meeting #9 is expected to be the final meeting, and it will focus on ongoing community engagement.

Colin Cooper complimented the project staff on the presentations and meeting activities.

Adjourn

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 10

Evaluation

1. Overall meeting quality Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 0 3 4 2. Pacing Too slow A little slow Just right A little fast Too fast 0 3 4 0 0 3. Presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 0 3 4 4. Meeting materials Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 0 3 4 5. Discussion Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 0 3 4 6. Most useful?

All PAC members engaged in discussion Discussions about seismic preparedness and airport layout Visuals of future plans

7. Least useful?

Public comment

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 11

Draft Preferred Alternative Discussion – Flip Chart Notes

• Are 1000 cars in there? Maybe not enough parking. Make sure for 20 years. • Diagram – what it would take to complete perimeter road? For security, connectivity. • Minimal increase in employee parking. • Parking – how calculated? Why more commercial? • Noise contours – will impact some houses. Will those people be notified? • On Cornell, Event Center should be complementary to airport. Development should be complementary. • 45 miles per hour – Cornell – business signs must be visible. Be realistic about parking needs for businesses. • More plan for shuttle from MAX turnouts on Cornell; keep them safe. Is there enough room? • City Council – strong support for Hillsboro Airport. Top priority. Positive growth over years and economic development value. • City supports taxiway and runway improvements. • Event Center – creating a district. Make sure development knits together with Event Center. • Mindful of how much retail, location of retail, nodal development, no strip commercial. • Ongoing dialogue with City’s policies and procedures. • Connection to MAX. Skybridge for pedestrian crossing and bike riders. • FAA – Air traffic control tower – not part of this plan. Just reserving space. Many years out. • Helipad – mistake on diagram? • East side T-hangars – what is economic life for those? • High probability T-hangars may be developed earlier. Air field access is critical. • Perimeter Road – fuel suppliers are a long way away for future businesses. • Synergy between fairgrounds and Hillsboro Airport important. Retail balanced so we can see the airport. • Good job! • Communities – Port procurement / development take equity approach – businesses of color. • Food carts/incubators – be intentional from the start to use equity lens. • Iconic design very important as a gateway. • FAA Tower – sighting issues? (northeast part of Hillsboro Airport) • Make sure that retail in the future development affects retail/parking. Make sure incubator businesses know it’s temporary space. • Get community involved. Remember gateway feel. • Good job! Make sure roadways support Hillsboro Airport. • Make sure air traffic control tower is I line of sight. • Slight shift in Cornell (Brookwood intersection) – consider reevaluating intersection, to improve it.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 12

Design Preference Activity – Dot Exercise

Concept PAC Community Total Northwest Rustic 19 1 20 Atlantic Aviation 4 0 4 PDX Portland, OR

Bellingham 0 0 0 Airport Bellingham, WA

Jackson Hole 15 1 16 Airport Jackson, WY

Industrial Modern 3 0 3 Southwest 3 0 0 Oregon Regional Airport Coos Bay, OR

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 13

Concept PAC Community Total 0 0 0 Redmond, OR

Fort McMurray 0 0 0 Int’l Airport Fort McMurray, Alberta

Contemporary Sleek 30 1 31 Seneca College 0 0 0 Aviation Campus Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Comment: Should play off of Event Center. Rogue Valley- 1 0 1 Medford International Airport Medford, OR

Comment: I like the airport designs that have a covered area where passengers are dropped off/picked up. There are several examples of this in those showcased. PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 14

Concept PAC Community Total Missoula Int’l 29 1 30 Airport (Proposed Design) Missoula, MT

Concept PAC Community Total Non-Aviation: Urban Gateways Emphasized 9 1 10 Building Corners

Public Artwork at 7 1 8 Major Intersections

Street Archway at 2 0 0 District Entrance

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 15

Concept PAC Community Total Non-Aviation: Design Elements Washington County 22 1 23 Event Center

Comment: Provide a good sense of community while also maintaining the PDX feel. Corner Plaza Space 5 1 6

Food Cart Pod 8 0 8

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 16

Written Comments Adam Karp

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 17

Miki Barnes

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 18

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 19

Responses to Questions Answers to questions are currently under review and will be included prior to PAC Meeting #8

Q. Can you confirm the preferred alternative will have adequate parking for airport use and new commercial use over the next 20 years? [Scott Gratsinger, Deanna Palm]

A.

Q. Will the Port of Portland consider completing the perimeter road around the airport? [Scott Gratsinger]

A.

Q. Does the Port of Portland need to notify community members who are expected to experience an increase in noise due to the layout of the preferred alternative? [Alison Elmer]

A.

Q. Why are international flight students allowed to train at Hillsboro Airport? Does that create a security risk? [Miki Barnes]

A.

Q. There is pavement on the preferred alternative that is not marked as “new” but does not exist today. [Ryan McCartney]

A.

PAC Meeting #7 Notes | June 21, 2018 20