DOCSLIB.ORG

Hansard VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING BILL 2017 NSW 16 November 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hansard VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING BILL 2017 NSW 16 November 2017 VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING BILL 2017 Second Reading Debate The PRESIDENT: Before I call the Hon. Walt Secord, on behalf of all members I welcome all visitors in the public gallery to the New South Wales Legislative Council. I know they are here to watch the proceedings. A number of rules apply not only to members but also to people in the public gallery who will be listening to the debate. No matter what they think about what is said, they need to listen to the debate quietly. Applause, jeering or any other gestures are not permitted. Visitors are also not to attempt to talk to members in the Chamber. If they have something to say to those who are seated next to them I ask them to do so quietly. There should be no audible conversation. Photographs and filming are not permitted apart from the media photographers who have been authorised to do so. Please follow any instructions by officers of Parliament. No signs or other props are to be utilised during the debate. The Hon. WALT SECORD ( 10:41 ): I contribute to debate on the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2017 which was introduced by the Hon. Trevor Khan, Deputy President and Chairman of Committees and a Nationals member of Parliament. I acknowledge that this bill was developed in conjunction with an informal parliamentary working group comprising a number of members from various parties. This bill, while simple, is historic. It has significant and far-reaching implications and it encapsulates more than the simple slogan of the right to die. Today we are debating laws to regulate medical intervention to end a patient's life and to prescribe drugs with the intention of ending a patient's life. The PRESIDE NT: Order! If members wish to converse they should leave the Chamber. The Hon. WALT SECORD: I know that doctors and nurses, like the whole community, are divided on this issue. Young doctors will tell us that early in their training they quickly realise there are three key prohibitions in medicine: they should not have intimate relationships with their patients; they should not financially benefit beyond what is seen as reasonable compensation for their professional services; and, finally, and most importantly, they should never intentionally kill a patient. I note that there are very different views within the medical profession on euthanasia. On 18 October in Victoria, Australian Medical Association national president Michael Gannon indicated that his views differed from various State and Territory bodies of the Australian Medical Association. However, I note that in New South Wales the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association supports this legislation. Opinion is divided. I have spoken with many doctors and nurses in a private capacity about this matter and I have heard the arguments on both sides. Very few doctors and nurses outside official organisations are comfortable going on the record about their own professional experiences involving euthanasia or end-of-life matters. They flatly refuse to say whether they have informally experienced or been involved in this area. However, nurses and doctors acknowledge that they have always had more power than their patients, particularly in terminal illnesses, and their patients almost always defer to them, their judgement and advice. There is a real power imbalance that should be, and that has to be, acknowledged. The recent select committee on off-protocol prescribing of chemotherapy in New South Wales heard evidence from families, including in-camera evidence, that they accepted without question their doctor's recommendation for treatment. From a personal perspective I do too—that is, until recently. In recent months I found myself pressing specialist doctors about their approaches to my treatment. They were surprised but pleased to respond to my questions on why they were ordering particular tests and not others. Without going into details, I asked one specialist why he had not sought a particular test and he replied that he had ruled out a particular ailment in a previous test. I said to the specialist, "It would have been nice if you had shared that information with me earlier." He nodded, agreed and was slightly embarrassed. Doctors, nurses and other allied health professionals often observe that there HANSARD 16 NOVEMBER 2017 – NSW VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING BILL PAGE | 1 is a conflict or paradox in the euthanasia debate. As a society we have the desire for unlimited medical treatment and procedures, especially for the extremely frail and aged, which is almost a desire to master mortality. There is also a movement in some circles towards physician-assisted death. Today we must attempt to navigate and resolve this paradox. I have thought long, hard and often about this law. When it comes to a division I will be voting against the bill. My views have been on the public record for a long time but I again wish to express them clearly. I have said in this Chamber before that at another time in my life and my career I supported the concept of legislation on euthanasia. Years later I now see that I did so without fully considering or understanding why, or the implications of the legislation. Previously I would have supported the concept of ending someone's life if that person thought it was no longer possible to go on. I no longer hold that view; I realise it is much more complex. To this day I have great sympathy for any person for whom voluntary end of life is a real consideration. I have met with proponents who want laws passed and with those opposed to its passage. After those meetings I still believe that the best course forward is to provide better palliative care. The moral worth or measure of a society is how it cares for the vulnerable. By that measure we do not do so well. I have spoken to many doctors, especially those in palliative care, and they believe that much of the suffering of patients with advanced illnesses is entirely preventable or manageable. A look at my parliamentary and public record will show that I have been a strong advocate on this point—that is, supporting palliative care and opposing legalising euthanasia. In June 2012 I gave a lengthy adjournment speech expressing my reservations about euthanasia laws and supporting palliative care. The bill before us today is a legal framework—a legal codification for assisted death. In around 2008 I reached the conclusion that it was not possible to codify this aspect of human desire—that is, the desire to decide the time and manner of a person's death. I acknowledge the strength and perennial nature of that desire. To argue against this bill is not to deny the strong emotional and compassionate desire behind it but rather the capacity of our legal system to codify that desire. I have not yet seen—I do not believe it is possible to develop—adequate legislative safeguards to protect people from the misuse of these laws. I have not seen a legislative model in this area that cannot be exploited or manipulated. I cannot support any gaps for exploitation when the consequences are so final. Furthermore, I agree with former Prime Minister Paul Keating. On 20 October he warned that protections for the most vulnerable of all people—those in the end stages of life—were highly problematic. He said: … the advocates support a bill to authorise termination of life in the name of compassion, while at the same time claiming they can guarantee protection of the vulnerable, the depressed and the poor. No law and no process can achieve that objective. Currently, 14 jurisdictions in the world provide access to assisted dying or voluntary euthanasia. In North America experts for and against euthanasia look to Oregon and Canada. In Europe, they look to Switzerland and the Benelux countries of Belgium and the Netherlands for data, research and legislative frameworks. Humans have always grappled with this issue. In 1906 the Ohio state legislature debated an Act concerning administration of drugs to mortally injured and diseased persons, which tried to legalise euthanasia. After debate it was overwhelmingly rejected. I note in the words of the Hon. Trevor Khan that the bill follows the State of Oregon model of voluntary assisted dying, which requires self-administration. It does not follow the broader European model of voluntary euthanasia like the Netherlands and Belgium. I do not believe it is possible to put in place sufficient safeguards and protections to prevent abuses in this law. This is before we consider the invidious pressures of spiralling medical costs, which will become more pressing in Australia as our population grows due to the rising birth rate, immigration compounded with our longevity, financial burdens on families, emotional burdens on relatives who see a loved one's protracted death as a problem to be fixed rather than a process in life to be accepted, or the process of manipulation due to inheritances—or what some have described as inheritance impatience. HANSARD 16 NOVEMBER 2017 – NSW VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING BILL PAGE | 2 I appreciate that my stance today will seem to be in conflict for some compared with my position on many other so-called conscience issues. Members would be aware of my support for a progressive social agenda, which I hope to bring to the area of health policy if I am fortunate enough to be the health Minister in a future State Labor government. I have been on the record for years in support of marriage equality and I am pleased with yesterday's result of the national plebiscite. Several years ago, I was the only New South Wales right-wing Australian Labor Party member to march in the Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras alongside Rainbow Labor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transcript of Committee Proceedings
    PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE NO. 5 – LEGAL AFFAIRS Thursday 12 September 2019 Examination of proposed expenditure for the portfolio area SPORT, MULTICULTURALISM, SENIORS AND VETERANS CORRECTED The Committee met at 9:30 MEMBERS The Hon. Robert Borsak (Chair) The Hon. Niall Blair The Hon. Rose Jackson The Hon. Taylor Martin The Hon. Shaoquett Moselmane The Hon. Walt Secord The Hon. Penny Sharpe Mr David Shoebridge (Deputy Chair) The Hon. Natalie Ward PRESENT The Hon. John Sidoti, Minister for Sport, Multiculturalism, Seniors and Veterans CORRECTIONS TO TRANSCRIPT OF COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS Corrections should be marked on a photocopy of the proof and forwarded to: Budget Estimates secretariat Room 812 Parliament House Macquarie Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Thursday, 12 September 2019 Legislative Council Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the public hearing for the inquiry into budget estimates 2019-2020. Before I commence I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. I would also like to pay respect to elders past and present of the Eora nation and extend that respect to other Aboriginals present. I welcome Minister John Sidoti and accompanying officials to this hearing. Today the Committee will examine the proposed expenditure for the portfolio of Sport, Multiculturalism, Seniors and Veterans. Today's hearing is open to the public and is being broadcast live via the Parliament's website. In accordance with the broadcasting guidelines, while members of the media may film or record Committee members and witnesses, people in the public gallery should not be the primary focus of any filming or photography. I would also remind media representatives that they must take responsibility for what they publish about the Committee's proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • 191-Greg-Donnelly.Pdf
    LE G I S LA TI V E A S S EM B LY FO R TH E AU S TR A LI A N CA PI TA L TER RI TO R Y SELECT COMMITTEE ON END OF LIFE CHOICES IN THE ACT Ms Bec Cody MLA (Chair), Mrs Vicki Dunne MLA (Deputy Chair) , Ms Tara Cheyne MLA, Mrs Elizabeth Kikkert MLA, Ms Caroline Le Couteur MLA. Submission Cover Sheet End of Life Choices in the ACT Submission Number : 191 Date Authorised for Publication : 29/3/18 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL The Honourable Greg Donnelly MLC 9th March 2018 Committee Secretary Select Committee on End of Life Choices in the ACT Legislative Assembly for the ACT GPO Box 1020 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Dear Committee Secretary, RE: Inquiry into End of Life Choices in the ACT My name is Greg Donnelly and I am a member of the New South Wales Legislative Council. As the Committee may be aware, late last year the New South Wales Legislative Council debated a bill that provided for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The bill was entitled the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2017. The following link will take you to the webpage relating to the bill https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bills/Pages/bill-detai1s.aspx?pk=3422. The bill was debated, voted on and defeated. As you would expect both MLCs and MLAs received a significant number of submissions and letters from organisations and constituents expressing serious concerns regarding the proposed legislation and calling on both Houses to unanimously oppose the bill. With respect to the submissions and letters, they dealt with both the broader concerns relating to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia legislation as well as particular deficiencies and shortcomings regarding the bill that was before the Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council- PROOF Page 1
    Tuesday, 15 October 2019 Legislative Council- PROOF Page 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Tuesday, 15 October 2019 The PRESIDENT (The Hon. John George Ajaka) took the chair at 14:30. The PRESIDENT read the prayers and acknowledged the Gadigal clan of the Eora nation and its elders and thanked them for their custodianship of this land. Governor ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of a message regarding the administration of the Government. Bills ABORTION LAW REFORM BILL 2019 Assent The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of message from the Governor notifying Her Excellency's assent to the bill. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL 2019 Protest The PRESIDENT: I report receipt of the following communication from the Official Secretary to the Governor of New South Wales: GOVERNMENT HOUSE SYDNEY Wednesday, 2 October, 2019 The Clerk of the Parliaments Dear Mr Blunt, I write at Her Excellency's command, to acknowledge receipt of the Protest made on 26 September 2019, under Standing Order 161 of the Legislative Council, against the Bill introduced as the "Reproductive Health Care Reform Bill 2019" that was amended so as to change the title to the "Abortion Law Reform Bill 2019'" by the following honourable members of the Legislative Council, namely: The Hon. Rodney Roberts, MLC The Hon. Mark Banasiak, MLC The Hon. Louis Amato, MLC The Hon. Courtney Houssos, MLC The Hon. Gregory Donnelly, MLC The Hon. Reverend Frederick Nile, MLC The Hon. Shaoquett Moselmane, MLC The Hon. Robert Borsak, MLC The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox, MLC The Hon. Mark Latham, MLC I advise that Her Excellency the Governor notes the protest by the honourable members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aboriginal Languages Bill 2017
    INTRODUCTION OF THE ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES BILL 2017 Paper presented by The Hon. John Ajaka MLC President of the Legislative Council Parliament of New South Wales 49th Presiding Officers and Clerks Conference Wellington, New Zealand Tuesday 10 July 2018 Introduction of the Aboriginal Languages Bill 2018 The Aboriginal Languages Bill 2017 On 11 October 2017 the New South Wales (NSW) Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, the Hon Sarah Mitchell MLC, introduced the Aboriginal Languages Bill into the Legislative Council. Debate on the Bill commenced that day and continued the following week. The Bill received unanimous support in both Houses and, following the making of five amendments, the Bill was agreed to and received assent on 24 October. The Act will commence on proclamation, expected later this year. The objects of the bill were: to acknowledge the significance of Aboriginal Languages to the culture and identity of Aboriginal people to establish an Aboriginal Languages Trust governed solely by Aboriginal people to facilitate and support Aboriginal language activities to reawaken, nurture and grow Aboriginal Languages, and to require the development of a strategic plan for the growth and development of Aboriginal Languages. Unusually, the bill included a preamble, a particularly powerful preamble, which has both symbolic and practical meaning: “WHEREAS (a) The languages of the first peoples of the land comprising New South Wales are an integral part of the world's oldest living culture and connect Aboriginal people to each other and to their
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Shadow Cabinet ***Strictly Embargoed Until 12.01Am Thursday, 9 April 2015***
    NEW SOUTH WALES SHADOW CABINET ***STRICTLY EMBARGOED UNTIL 12.01AM THURSDAY, 9 APRIL 2015*** Mr Luke Foley Leader of the Opposition Shadow Minister for the Arts Shadow Minister for Racing Shadow Minister for Western Sydney Ms Linda Burney Deputy Leader of the Opposition Shadow Minister for Education Shadow Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Mr Adam Searle Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council Shadow Minister for Industry, Resources and Energy Shadow Minister for Industrial Relations Mr Walt Secord Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council Shadow Minister for Health Shadow Minister for the North Coast Mr Michael Daley Shadow Treasurer Mr Ryan Park Shadow Minister for Transport and Infrastructure Shadow Minister for the Illawarra Mr Paul Lynch Shadow Attorney General Ms Penny Sharpe** Shadow Minister for Planning Shadow Minister for the Environment Shadow Minister for Heritage Ms Tania Mihailuk Shadow Minister for Family & Community Services Shadow Minister for Social Housing Shadow Minister for Mental Health Shadow Minister for Medical Research Ms Jodi McKay Shadow Minister for Justice and Police Shadow Minister for Roads, Maritime and Freight Ms Sophie Cotsis Shadow Minister for Ageing Shadow Minister for Disability Services Shadow Minister for Multiculturalism Mr Peter Primrose Shadow Minister for Local Government Shadow Minister for Innovation and Better Regulation Mr Guy Zangari Shadow Minister for Trade, Tourism and Major Events Shadow Minister for Sport Shadow Minister for Corrections Shadow Minister for
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nsw State Budget Estimates – Relevant Committee Members
    2019 NSW STATE BUDGET ESTIMATES – RELEVANT COMMITTEE MEMBERS There are seven “portfolio” committees who run the budget estimate questioning process. These committees correspond to various specific Ministries and portfolio areas, so there may be a range of Ministers, Secretaries, Deputy Secretaries and senior public servants from several Departments and Authorities who will appear before each committee. The different parties divide up responsibility for portfolio areas in different ways, so some minor party MPs sit on several committees, and the major parties may have MPs with titles that don’t correspond exactly. We have omitted the names of the Liberal and National members of these committees, as the Alliance is seeking to work with the Opposition and cross bench (non-government) MPs for Budget Estimates. Government MPs are less likely to ask questions that have embarrassing answers. Victor Dominello [Lib, Ryde], Minister for Customer Services (!) is the minister responsible for Liquor and Gaming. Kevin Anderson [Nat, Tamworth], Minister for Better Regulation, which is located in the super- ministry group of Customer Services, is responsible for Racing. Sophie Cotsis [ALP, Canterbury] is the Shadow for Better Public Services, including Gambling, Julia Finn [ALP, Granville] is the Shadow for Consumer Protection including Racing (!). Portfolio Committee no. 6 is the relevant committee. Additional information is listed beside each MP. Bear in mind, depending on the sitting timetable (committees will be working in parallel), some MPs will substitute in for each other – an MP who is not on the standing committee but who may have a great deal of knowledge might take over questioning for a session.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Education NSW 2016-2017 Annual Report I Have Fond Memories of the Friendly, Knowledgeable Giraffe
    Life Education NSW 2016-2017 Annual Report I have fond memories of the friendly, knowledgeable giraffe. Harold takes you on a magical journey exploring and learning about healthy eating, our body - how it works and ways we can be active in order to stay happy and healthy. It gives me such joy to see how excited my daughter is to visit Harold and know that it will be an experience that will stay with her too. Melanie, parent, Turramurra Public School What’s inside Who we are 03 Our year Life Education is the nation’s largest not-for-profit provider of childhood preventative drug and health education. For 06 Our programs almost 40 years, we have taken our mobile learning centres and famous mascot – ‘Healthy Harold’, the giraffe – to 13 Our community schools, teaching students about healthy choices in the areas of drugs and alcohol, cybersafety, nutrition, lifestyle 25 Our people and respectful relationships. 32 Our financials OUR MISSION Empowering our children and young people to make safer and healthier choices through education. OUR VISION Generations of healthy young Australians living to their full potential. LIFE EDUCATION NSW 2016-2017 Annual Report Our year: Thank you for being part of Life Education NSW Together we worked to empower more children in NSW As a charity, we’re grateful for the generous support of the NSW Ministry of Health, and the additional funds provided by our corporate and community partners and donors. We thank you for helping us to empower more children in NSW this year to make good life choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Today's Hearing Will Be Placed on the Committee's Website When It Becomes Available
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE NO. 4 – LEGAL AFFAIRS INQUIRY INTO MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES CORRECTED PROOF At Macquarie Room, Parliament House, Sydney on Tuesday, 29 August 2017 The Committee met at 2:45 pm PRESENT The Hon. Robert Borsak (Chair) The Hon. Scott Farlow The Hon. Ben Franklin The Hon. Shayne Mallard The Hon. Shaoquett Moselmane The Hon. Walt Secord Mr David Shoebridge Tuesday, 29 August 2017 Legislative Council Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the eighth hearing of the Portfolio Committee No. 4—Legal Affairs inquiry into museums and galleries. The inquiry was established to examine New South Wales government policy, funding and support for the State's cultural institutions including museums, gallery buildings and heritage collections. It will also consider the proposed sale of the Powerhouse site in Ultimo and whether there are alternative strategies to support museum development. I acknowledge the Gadigal people, the traditional custodians of this land, pay respect to elders past and present of the Eora nation, and extend that respect to other Aboriginals present. Today we will hear from Parramatta City Council and the Hon. Don Harwin, Minister for the Arts, who will be accompanied by representatives from the Department of Planning and Environment. I will make some brief comments about procedures for today's hearing. Today's hearing is open to the public and is broadcast live via the Parliament's website. A transcript of today's hearing will be placed on the Committee's website when it becomes available. In accordance with the broadcasting guidelines, while members of the media may film or record Committee members and witnesses, people in the public gallery should not be the primary focus of any filming or photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Committee Proceedings
    PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE NO. 2 - HEALTH Tuesday 3 September 2019 Examination of proposed expenditure for the portfolio areas MENTAL HEALTH, REGIONAL YOUTH AND WOMEN CORRECTED The Committee met at 9:30. MEMBERS The Hon. Greg Donnelly(Chair) The Hon. Lou Amato Ms Cate Faehrmann The Hon. Emma Hurst (Deputy Chair) The Hon. Rose Jackson The Hon. Trevor Khan The Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones The Hon. Tara Moriarty The Hon. Walt Secord PRESENT The Hon. Bronnie Taylor, Minister for Mental Health, Regional Youth and Women CORRECTIONS TO TRANSCRIPT OF COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS Corrections should be marked on a photocopy of the proof and forwarded to: Budget Estimates secretariat Room 812 Parliament House Macquarie Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Tuesday, 3 September 2019 Legislative Council Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the public hearing for the inquiry into budget estimates 2019-2020. Before I commence I acknowledge the Gadigal people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. I also pay respect to the Elders past and present of the Eora nation and extend that respect to other Aboriginals who may be present now or later today. I welcome Minister Bronnie Taylor to her first budget estimates—I am sure it will be a successful one—and accompanying officials to this hearing. Today the Committee will examine the proposed expenditure for the portfolios of Mental Health, Regional Youth and Women. Today's hearing is open to the public and is being broadcast live via the Parliament's website. In accordance with the broadcasting guidelines, while members of the media may film or record Committee members and witnesses, people in the public gallery should not be the primary focus of any filming or photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accountability Committee
    REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE BUDGET PROCESS FOR INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT BODIES AND THE PARLIAMENT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CORRECTED At Jubilee Room, Parliament House, Sydney, on Friday 23 October 2020 The Committee met at 1:00 p.m. PRESENT Mr David Shoebridge (Chair) The Hon. John Graham The Hon. Trevor Khan The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox The Hon. Natalie Ward Friday, 23 October 2020 Legislative Council Page 1 The CHAIR: Welcome to the third hearing of the Public Accountability Committee's inquiry into the budget process for independent oversight bodies and the Parliament of New South Wales. The inquiry is examining the budget process for how the quantum of funding for the key independent oversight bodies is determined and the transparency of that process. Before I commence, I acknowledge the Gadigal people, who are the traditional custodians of this land, and I pay my respects and the respects of the Committee and those in attendance to elders past, present and emerging and extend that respect to other First Nations people present. This is the third hearing for this inquiry and follows the tabling of our first report in March this year. That report examined the budget processes for four oversight bodies: the ICAC, the Electoral Commission, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and the Ombudsman. We will today hear from the Auditor-General and the Deputy Auditor-General for New South Wales. The Committee resolved to delay hearing from the Auditor- General at her office's request to avoid any perceived conflict of interest by allowing the Auditor-General to complete the audit requested by the Special Minister of State into the financial and management arrangements of the oversight bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • EMAIL ADDRESS Postal Address for All Upper House Members
    TITLE NAME EMAIL ADDRESS Phone Postal Address for all Upper House Members: Parliament House, 6 Macquarie St, Sydney NSW, 2000 Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party The Hon. Robert Borsak [email protected] (02) 9230 2850 The Hon. Robert Brown [email protected] (02) 9230 3059 Liberal Party The Hon. John Ajaka [email protected] (02) 9230 2300 The Hon. Lou Amato [email protected] (02) 9230 2764 The Hon. David Clarke [email protected] (02) 9230 2260 The Hon. Catherine Cusack [email protected] (02) 9230 2915 The Hon. Scott Farlow [email protected] (02) 9230 3786 The Hon. Don Harwin [email protected] (02) 9230 2080 Mr Scot MacDonald [email protected] (02) 9230 2393 The Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones [email protected] (02) 9230 3727 The Hon. Shayne Mallard [email protected] (02) 9230 2434 The Hon. Taylor Martin [email protected] 02 9230 2985 The Hon. Matthew Mason-Cox [email protected] (02) 9230 3557 The Hon. Greg Pearce [email protected] (02) 9230 2328 The Hon. Dr Peter Phelps [email protected] (02) 9230 3462 National Party: The Hon. Niall Blair [email protected] (02) 9230 2467 The Hon. Richard Colless [email protected] (02) 9230 2397 The Hon. Wes Fang [email protected] (02) 9230 2888 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Elder Abuse In
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL GENERAL PURPOSE STANDING COMMITTEE NO. 2 Inquiry into Elder Abuse That the General Purpose Standing Committee No. 2 inquire into and report on matters relating to elder abuse in New South Wales including: 1. The prevalence of abuse (including but not limited to financial abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse and neglect) experienced by persons aged 50 years or older in New South Wales 2. The most common forms of abuse experienced by older persons and the most common relationships or settings in which abuse occurs 3. The types of government and/or community support services sought by, or on behalf of, victims of elder abuse and the nature of service received from those agencies and organisations 4. The adequacy of the powers of the NSW Police Force to respond to allegations of elder abuse 5. Identifying any constraints to elder abuse being reported and best practice strategies to address such constraints 6. Identifying any strength based initiatives which empower older persons to better protect themselves from risks of abuse as they age 7. The effectiveness of NSW laws, policies, services and strategies, including the 2014 Interagency Policy Preventing and Responding to Abuse of Older People, in safeguarding older persons from abuse 8. The possible development of long-term systems and proactive measures to respond to the increasing numbers of older persons, including consideration of cultural diversity among older persons, so as to prevent abuse 9. The consideration of new proposals or initiatives which may enhance existing strategies for safeguarding older persons who may be vulnerable to abuse, and 10.
    [Show full text]