DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Poetics and Possibility: Richard Kearney's “Re-Imagining God” By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Of poetics and possibility: Richard Kearney’s “Re-imagining God” by Yolande Steenkamp 21191353 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree M.Div Department of Dogmatics and Christian Ethics Faculty of Theology University of Pretoria Pretoria Supervisor: Prof. Daniel P. Veldsman September 2011 Page 2 of 119 Eigenlijk geloof ik niets Eigenlijk geloof ik niets, en twijfel ik aan alles, zelfs aan U. Maar soms, wanneer ik denk dat Gij waarachtig leeft, dan denk ik, dat Gij Liefde zijt, en eenzaam, en dat, in zelfde wanhoop, Gij mij zoekt, zoals ik U. Gerard Reve Page 3 of 119 TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration of independent work 5 Summary 6 Acknowledgements 7 1 Introduction 10 2 Richard Kearney: an exercise in diversity 13 3 “Re-imaging God”: a post-metaphysical reflection on transcendence 19 3.1 The Scriptural circle 19 3.2 The testimonial circle 21 3.3 The literary circle 24 3.4 The meaning of the possible 25 3.5 Conclusion: risks of a possibilising God 26 4 Questions emerging 31 4.1 Posse and esse: Kearney‟s post-metaphysical God 31 4.1.1 Readings of Exodus 3:14 32 The ontological reading of 33 The eschatological reading of 34 4.1.2 Perspectives on the possible 39 Metaphysical readings of the possible 39 Post-metaphysical readings of the possible 40 4.1.3 The desire of God 43 4.2 Enabling God: Kearney‟s God of small things 44 4.3 Presence from the beyond: Kearney‟s eschatological God 47 4.4 Love and justice: Kearney‟s theological ethics 50 4.4.1 Ethics as integrating force of Kearney‟s hermeneutics 50 4.4.2 The “Other” 51 Persona: Figure of the Other 52 Persona as Eschaton 53 Beyond fusion 54 Persona as chiasm 55 Persona as prosopon 56 Transfiguration 57 Page 4 of 119 Desiring God 59 4.5 Poetics: naming the unnameable 61 4.5.1 Reclaiming metaphors: hermeneutic retrievals 62 Aristotle‟s “nous poetikos” 62 Nicholas of Cusa‟s “possest” 63 Schelling‟s “Seyn-könnende” 64 4.5.2 Godplay 64 4.5.3 Perichoresis 66 4.6 Circles of meaning: Kearney‟s hermeneutics 67 4.7 Imagination now: Producing new worlds 74 4.7.1 An ethical imagination 80 4.7.2 A poetical imagination 81 4.7.3 An ethical-poetical imagination: moving beyond the labyrinth 83 The hermeneutical, historical and narrative tasks 84 5 New possibilities: Kearney‟s invitation to systematic theology 88 5.1 Ecumenics 90 5.2 The nature of religious discourse 92 5.3 Kearney‟s post-metaphysical God and post-religious faith 93 5.4 Working out Kearney‟s philosophy theologically 96 6 Conclusion 104 Bibliography 113 Page 5 of 119 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENT WORK Student full name: Yolande Steenkamp Student number: 21191353 Subject of dissertation: Of poetics and possibility: Richard Kearney‟s “Re-imagining God” Declaration: (i) I understand the concept plagiarism and am aware of the University‟s policy in this regard. (ii) I declare that this dissertation is my own, original work. Where the work of others was used (whether from a printed source, the Internet or any other), such sources were duly recognised and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. (iii) No work previously created by any other student or person was used under the pretence that it is my own. (iv) I have not, nor will I allow anybody to copy my work with the purpose of presenting it as his/her own work. _____________________ ___________ Ms Y. Steenkamp Date Page 6 of 119 SUMMARY The study explores Richard Kearney‟s 2007 essay, “Re-imagining God,” as an example of his characteristic hermeneutic exploration of the possible as a means of steering a middle way through philosophical extremes. Specifically, the essay is approached as a portal into Kearney‟s post-metaphysical proposal of re-imagining God eschatologically, that is to say as neither Being nor non-Being, but as the possibility-to-be. The hypothesis is that Kearney‟s notion of possibility engenders new prospects for discourse about God that moves us beyond metaphysical categories to allow for an eschatological understanding of God in terms of post- metaphysical thought. After an overview of Kearney‟s recent work and a discussion of “Re-imagining God,” the body of the dissertation identifies seven main aspects of Kearney‟s proposal (post-metaphysical discourse about God; the idea of enabling God; Kearney‟s eschatology and ethics; poetics; his hermeneutics; and imagination), and reflects on these largely by means of a literary study of Kearney‟s own writings on the topics in his other publications. Finally, the study considers the possibilities disclosed by Kearney‟s approach as an invitation to Systematic Theology to engage with philosophy in exploring post-metaphysical ways of speaking about God. Apart from providing an explication on the most significant of Kearney‟s philosophical motifs in light of his invitation to re-imagine God as posse, the study outlines certain possibilities for the theological application of Kearney‟s proposal. Kearney‟s ultimate contention – that an eschatological revision of God may enable us to “retrieve certain neglected texts of our intellectual heritage and offer an account more consonant with the Messianic promise of theism,” receives attention in the light of his invitation to theologians to enter into dialogue with philosophy and make their contribution to the “religious turn” in Continental Philosophy (Kearney 2001:80). Keywords: Richard Kearney; postmodern theology; post-metaphysical theology; Exodus 4:13; possibility/impossibility; philosophy-theology debate; “Religious turn” in Continental Philosophy; imagination and theology; God-who-may-be. Page 7 of 119 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I feel grateful to life and God for bringing me to this point. A heartfelt thanks to: My mother, father, and sister, for your unwavering support in view of a somewhat unconventional life. Thank you for inspiring me to understand, love, and laugh before passing judgment. I love you. Annene Mullins, for the sheer joy of your friendship, your wise and gentle guidance and understanding, for not judging my faults, for receiving me into your home and family, and for the many cups of Jacob‟s Krönung without which these pages would not have been written. Anne-Marth Mullins, for the wonderful and unexpected gift of extended sisterhood, the bigness of your heart, your patience with my going-left-before-I-go- right-ways, allowing me to feel free, and for keeping my feet on the ground when I would gladly spend all my time in the clouds. Dr. Kobus Myburgh, for your “Incredible Lightness of Wisdom,” inspiring hermeneutic insight, commitment to sharing power, refreshing honesty and generosity, and for first helping me understand sola gratia on a boat in Turkey years ago. Randolph Potter, for proof reading and being awesome! Thank you (and Dr. Marinus van der Westhuizen) for looking after my sister on the other side of the planet, and for writing me encouraging Facebook messages when I‟m working while everyone on this side of the world is fast asleep. Oom Bobby, whom I know only through the stories of the lives you‟ve touched. Thank you to the WR Hartman Trust for the financial support that has enabled me to devote myself to my studies this year, and to NG Oosterlig for their financial contribution during the first year of the Master‟s programme. NG Wierdapark, for allowing me a safe and constructive space to learn and experiment during my internship year. I am grateful to the Revv Kobus Myburgh, Jan Bester and Pieter Visser for the way in which you‟ve shared your experience and time. Page 8 of 119 Dr. Fanie Cronjé, for your friendship, mentorship, encouragement and hospitality. I will always remember your life, scholarship and ministry as a first pointer to new possibilities at a time when I had thought myself lost to faith. Dr. Willem Nicol, for walking with me and embodying the richness of silence in the face of knowledge arrogantly insisting on frustrating my every effort of making it into a saviour. Thank you for welcoming whatever shows up in the space of the candle, and for facilitating my journey back home. My wonderful, patient, and always encouraging friends and family. Thank you Anjenita Hugo (for your unconditional acceptance, and for teaching me about allowing life to be as it is), Keran Ducasse (for being so creative, giving, intuitive and supportive), Stephan Greyling (for listening to me complain about whatever latest thing I‟m not understanding), Rudi Olivier (for being you and wonderful), Olga Coetzee (for finding my work interesting), the Rev. Stefan Botha (for giving so freely of yourself, your time and your acceptance), Tania Kotzé (for that “connection”), Nicol Mullins and Una Wilson (for your support, your chair and your understanding), Pierre Lourens (for your advice and your faith in me), Wanelda Terreblanche (for giving me my longest friendship and a wonderful Tuesday when I needed it), Prof. Frances Klopper (for your enthusiasm and beauty), Erik Immelman (for your cut-to- the-bone approach to life), Hanno Langenhoven (for reminding us all to “tread lightly upon the earth”), Benjan Knoetze (for asking), Corné Waldeck (for being so interesting, caring and understanding – you are awesome!), Dawie Venter (for seeing), Doret Jordaan (for translating, entertaining and listening), Pat Louw (for your unconditional approval and enthusiasm), Frans van Loggerenberg (for first instilling in me the love for the Reformed tradition), Ronald van der Bergh (for the innocent joy with which you live), Jo-Marí Schäder (for being strong), Sharon and John Gowland (for always having me in your prayers), Tommy Dry (for loving me even if you‟ll never understand me), Tshepo Morokong (for broadening my horizons), Prof.
Recommended publications
  • (Narrative) Introduction to Richard Kearney's

    (Narrative) Introduction to Richard Kearney's

    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 9 Original Research Reading ‘blackface’: A (narrative) introduction to Richard Kearney’s notion of carnal hermeneutics Author: Prominent Irish philosopher Richard Kearney’s notion of ‘carnal hermeneutics’ is introduced 1,2 Helgard Pretorius by applying it to a case study of a recent event that took place at one of South Africa’s university Affiliations: campuses. The narrative assists in illuminating some of the core principles of carnal 1Faculty of Theology, Vrije hermeneutics and illustrates the applicability of carnal hermeneutics as a ‘diagnostic caring for Universiteit, the Netherlands lived existence’. In the process, an analysis is also given of the event in question, which is connected to what has widely been labelled as ‘blackface’. In conclusion, the contextual, 2 Faculty of Theology, philosophical, ethical, and theological implications of carnal hermeneutics are explored with Stellenbosch University, South Africa an eye on theological praxes in South Africa today. Corresponding author: Helgard Pretorius, Introduction [email protected] How do we sense, figure, and discern the other in our midst? Dates: Received: 21 July 2015 It is in response to this enigmatic challenge that I would like to facilitate a dialogue with Accepted: 28 Oct. 2015 Richard Kearney’s1 notion of ‘carnal hermeneutics’.2 The question of otherness and the : Published 31 May 2016 stranger has occupied Western thought and culture from its earliest beginnings. Yet it has How to cite this article: most often been dealt with from a perspective that holds reason as superior, even divorced Pretorius, H., 2016, ‘Reading from bodily existence.
  • Humanity and Hospitality an Approach to Theology in the Times of Migration

    Humanity and Hospitality an Approach to Theology in the Times of Migration

    Humanity and hospitality An approach to theology in the times of migration RENÉ DAUSNER n contrast to discourses on the relation between religion and violence, this project focuses Ion the biblical commitment that God can be understood as the one who ‘loves the stranger’ (Deut. 10:18). With regard to this central passage it will be asked what are the implications that this image of God can offer? In what way can monotheism be interpreted as ‘a school of xenophilia’ (E. Levinas)? What does the inclination of God to the stranger mean for the understanding of humanity, metaphysics, and migration? Jacques Derrida (1930–2004) has suggested that we understand metaphysics, in the context of the thinking of Levinas, as ‘an experience of hospitality’ (Derrida 1999a: 46). With regard to this idea, I would like to ask what role can (the question of) God play within the political, sociological, ethical, etc. discourses of diversity and migration? Introduction In the following contribution, I will not discuss the negative effects of religion (cf. Assmann 2003, 2015; Schieder 2014); instead, I will ask what one can – positively – learn from the biblical narratives concerning God with regard to the wide field of the issue of migration – and the other way around. Migration is, without any doubt, one of the most urgent issues of a common and coming society of Europe. In Germany, as well as in other European countries such as the Netherlands, Hungary, Austria, and Finland, we can observe a tendency towards an acceptance of nationalist and right- wing parties . Xenophobia, that is, the fear, and sometimes even hatred, of strangers, is the expression of a politics of national self-isolation and what one refers to, with a German term, as Angst.
  • On the Life and Times of the Dutch Blasphemy Law (1932-2014)

    On the Life and Times of the Dutch Blasphemy Law (1932-2014)

    The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law EDITED BY Paul Cliteur & Tom Herrenberg tt LEIDEN UNIVERSITY PRESS ;. i': .r' ', 4 On the Life and Times of the Dutch Blasphemy Law (1932 -2014) Pctul Cliteur & Tom Herrenberg Cliteur, Paul, and Herrenberg, Tom, " On the Life and Times of the Dutch Blasphemy Law (L993-2014)" , in: The FaII ønd Rise of Press, Leiden 20L6, pp' 71-71'1' TNTRSDUCTT9N Bløsphemy Løw, Leiden University when the Dutch criminal code entered into force in 18B6 it did not contain a general provision against blasphemy. In r88o, during a debate in Parliament about the Criminal Code, the minister of justice at the time, Mr. "God Anthony Ewoud Jan Modderman (1838-1885), opined that is able to preserve His own rights by Himself; no human laws are required for this proposal irrpor".,,'yet, five dãcades later things had changed. A legislative ãf z5 April r93r entitled "Amendment to the Criminal Code with provisions regarding certain utterances hurtful to religious feelings"' sought to add t-o provisions relating to the defamation of religion to the Criminal Code- Article l47 no. r was intended to criminalise "he who verbally, in writing, or in image, publicly exPresses himself by scornful blasphemy in a manner offensive to religious feelingsJ' In addition, Article 4z9bis made it illegal for people to 'displa¡ in a place visible from a public road, words or images that, as e"pressions of scornful blasphemy, are hurtful to religious feelings."3 In this chapter we will give an account of this blasphemy law. We will address the law's evolution in chronological order and start by describing the parliamentary debate on the introduction of the law in the r93os.
  • Spring 2019 2 Books from Holland

    Spring 2019 2 Books from Holland

    10 Books from Holland London Book Fair Issue ederlands N letterenfonds dutch foundation for literature Spring 2019 2 Books from Holland Frequently Asked Questions 10 Books from Holland? Who decides the contents? Do you subsidise production costs? Our editors. We want to showcase the best fiction from the This is possible in the case of editions of poetry, illustrated Netherlands for our audience of literary publishers. Most titles children’s books or graphic novels. For regular fiction and have been published recently and have enjoyed good sales, non-fiction, we support translation costs only. excellent reviews and one or more literary awards or nomina- tions. Though sometimes one of these factors is enough. Equally We would like to invite a Dutch author for a promotional visit. important is the question: ‘Does it travel?’ Our advisors talk to If you organise a good programme and offer the author publishers from all over the world and while it is impossible to accommodation, we can cover the travel costs. say with certainty which novels will travel where, we have the expertise to make an educated guess. How to apply for the Amsterdam Fellowship. Every September, we organise a fellowship (4 days) for publish- At book fairs, do you talk about these books exclusively? ers and editors. We do not have an application procedure, but While we like to discuss our catalogue, there are always other you can always send us an e-mail stating your interest. titles: books that have just appeared or are about to come out or books that just missed our selection.
  • Literature of the Low Countries

    Literature of the Low Countries

    Literature of the Low Countries A Short History of Dutch Literature in the Netherlands and Belgium Reinder P. Meijer bron Reinder P. Meijer, Literature of the Low Countries. A short history of Dutch literature in the Netherlands and Belgium. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague / Boston 1978 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/meij019lite01_01/colofon.htm © 2006 dbnl / erven Reinder P. Meijer ii For Edith Reinder P. Meijer, Literature of the Low Countries vii Preface In any definition of terms, Dutch literature must be taken to mean all literature written in Dutch, thus excluding literature in Frisian, even though Friesland is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, in the same way as literature in Welsh would be excluded from a history of English literature. Similarly, literature in Afrikaans (South African Dutch) falls outside the scope of this book, as Afrikaans from the moment of its birth out of seventeenth-century Dutch grew up independently and must be regarded as a language in its own right. Dutch literature, then, is the literature written in Dutch as spoken in the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the so-called Flemish part of the Kingdom of Belgium, that is the area north of the linguistic frontier which runs east-west through Belgium passing slightly south of Brussels. For the modern period this definition is clear anough, but for former times it needs some explanation. What do we mean, for example, when we use the term ‘Dutch’ for the medieval period? In the Middle Ages there was no standard Dutch language, and when the term ‘Dutch’ is used in a medieval context it is a kind of collective word indicating a number of different but closely related Frankish dialects.
  • John D. Caputo CURRICULUM VITAE

    John D. Caputo CURRICULUM VITAE

    John D. Caputo CURRICULUM VITAE EMPLOYMENT: Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Humanities, Syracuse University, 2004– David R. Cook Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Villanova University, 2004– David R. Cook Professor of Philosophy, Villanova University, 1993-2004 Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, Villanova University, 1968-2004 Visiting Professor, New School for Social Research, Spring, 1994 Distinguished Adjunct Professor, Fordham University Graduate Program, 1985-88 Visiting Professor, Fordham University, Fall, 1980 Visiting Professor, Duquesne University, Fall, 1978 Instructor, St. Joseph's University (Philadelphia, 1965-68) EDUCATION: Ph.D., 1968, Bryn Mawr College M.A., 1964, Villanova University B.A., 1962, La Salle University AWARDS Winner of the ForeWord Magazine Best Philosophy Book of 2007 award for What Would Jesus Deconstruct? 2008 Loyola Medal (Seattle University), 2007 American Academy of Religion Book Award for Excellence in Studies in Religion, “Constructive-Reflective Studies,” for The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event (Indiana UP, 2007). 2004, Appointed Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Humanities, Syracuse University; David R. Cook Professor Emeritus, Villanova University 1998, Choice Magazine, “Outstanding Academic Book Award” for Deconstruction in a Nutshell (Fordham UP, 1997) 1992, Appointed David R. Cook Professor of Philosophy 1991-92, National Endowment for the Humanities, Fellowship for College Teachers 1989, Phi Beta Kappa, Honorary Member, Villanova Chapter 1985, National Endowment for the Humanities, Summer Stipend 1983-84, American Council of Learned Societies, Fellowship 1982, Outstanding Faculty Scholar Award (V.U.) 1982, Summer Research Grant (V.U.) 1981, Distinguished Alumnus, V.U. Graduate School 1979-80, Phi Kappa Phi Honorary Society, Villanova University Chapter, President 1972, American Council of Learned Societies, Grant-in-aid (Summer grant) OFFICES Member, Book Awards Committee, American Academy of Religion, 2008-2009.
  • Book of War, Mortification and Love J Printed with Blood

    Book of War, Mortification and Love J Printed with Blood

    Ruud Linssen Book of war, mortification and love j Printed with blood. Read at own risk. Ruud Linssen Book of war, mortification and love About our voluntary suffering ! Underware Den Haag | Helsinki | Amsterdam 2010 Ruud Linssen znxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxnc for Roos Book of war, mortification and love Robin, Rosa About our voluntary suffering Chapter 1: The unmarked letter Chapter 2: Beyond the doctor’s advice Chapter 3: Among lepers Chapter 4: A grove Chapter 5: The meaning of life f Second warning: This book is printed with blood of the author. Continue reading at own risk. 8 Foreword Foreword 9 znxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxnc znxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxnc The history of this book is as perplexing as its content. Since When he delivered the final text, he mentioned that every releasing the typeface Fakir in 2006, we’ve been thinking sentence had been rewritten at least 5 times. Also: ‘this book about an appropriate sampler for this type family. Not being changed my life.’ It gave him a new dimension, as he had never satisfied with our ideas for a Fakir publication at that time, thought about the subject that much. We couldn’t believe we froze the whole publication until an idea would arise that to be true. ‘Yes, it is. Suffering has already been a major theme in which would satisfy us. my life for many years. But not voluntary suffering. This makes a big That happened one year later. In the first year of exist- difference.’ ence of the blackletter Fakir, activities around the typeface The writing of this book became an example of voluntary arose with the theme of voluntary suffering.
  • Intercultural Encounters As Hospitality. an Interview with Richard Kearney

    Intercultural Encounters As Hospitality. an Interview with Richard Kearney

    Intercultural encounters as hospitality. An interview with Richard Kearney BreffniO’Rourke 1 Originally from Cork, Ireland, Richard Kearney is Charles B. Seelig Professor in Philosophy at Boston College. Among his many books, three titles in particular are representative of the themes discussed in this interview: Hosting the stranger (Continuum, 2011, co-edited with James Taylor); On stories (Routledge, 2002); and Strangers, gods, and monsters: interpreting otherness (Routledge, 2003). What will be of most immediate interest to readers of the Journal of Virtual Exchange is the Guestbook Project, which Kearney founded in 2009. Guestbook is an online experiment in conflict resolution through sharing stories across borders. The interview took place on the 10th of March 2018 in Dublin, where Professor Kearney was speaking at a conference and launching his new book with Sheila Gallagher, Twinsome Minds: An act of double remembrance (Cork University Press, 2017). This is an edited transcript of the conversation. Keywords: intercultural communication; conflict resolution; personal stories; hospitality; continental philosophy. BOR2 What is the Guestbook Project? What does it do? RK3 The Guestbook Project is an attempt to bring young people together, in divided communities – politically divided, socially divided, religiously divided, culturally divided – and to invite and 1. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; [email protected] Breffni O’Rourke (Trinity College Dublin) is Associate Professor in Applied Linguistics and Manager of Language Learning Technologies and Resources, and is a member of UNICollaboration’s Executive Board. His research focusses on online communication by language learners. He teaches Pedagogical Grammar of English, Discourse Analysis, Technology, Language, and Communication, and First Language Acquisition.
  • Post-Secular Return of Religion: a Religion of Being-For-The-Other

    Post-Secular Return of Religion: a Religion of Being-For-The-Other

    Post-Secular Return of Religion: A Religion of Being-for-the-Other Rogi Thomas Introduction Secularism in conventional understanding involves a strict separation of the state from religious institutions. It ensures that religious groups do not impede affairs of the state. Equally it also makes sure that the state does not interfere in religious affairs. In this respect post-modernity offers a paradigm shift in the hermeneutical understanding of the conception of ‘secular’ and ‘religion’. This would entail Post-Secular Return of Religion: A Religion of Being-for-the-Other which will be the crux of my argument. I draw cues from Charles Taylor, and Gianni Vattimo. (1) I claim that the basis of the post-secular return of religion is the ‘death of God’ (2) Thus, I argue for the hermeneutic recovery of the divine after the death of the metaphysical God. (3) It would be wrong to identify this hermeneutical recovery of God with a dimension of an individual belief system, something contained and conceded by it. Finally, (4) God is not seen as a being outside the universe, but within, being a potential promise present in language, culture, and in human lives, maturing the creature’s createdness. It enables ‘the self’ to realize its own being and of the other and thus to-be-for- the-other. Being-for-the-other is inevitable because the hermeneutic rediscovery of religion and sacred is (should be) primarily aimed at human flourishing and peaceful coexistence of the whole of creation, man and beast alike. This post-secular return of religion as ‘being- for-the-other’ visualises a pluralistic community which rejuvenates social discourse, practices of economic development, and new ecological policies within democratic countries.
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/111167 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-02 and may be subject to change. `Aan een boom zo volgeladen met Gard Siviki, mist men die ene mispel niet': Gard Sivik versus Podium, 1960-1964. z JEROEN DERA GARD SIVIK EN VIJFTIG Wanneer over het avant-gardetijdschrift Gard Sivik wordt geschreven, gebeurt dat doorgaans tegen de achtergrond van de koerswijziging die het onderging, namelijk die `van een Vlaams experimenteel tijdschrift naar een Nederlands nieuw-realistisch blad.' 2 Het is met name die tweede aandui- ding die in de literatuurgeschiedschrijving domineert. In zijn geschiedenis van de Nederlandse poëzie schrijft Redbad Fokkema bijvoorbeeld: [D]e dichters die in de jaren zestig aan het woord kwamen, boekten (...) succes (...) in Gard Sivik (1955-1964), Barbarber (1958-1971) en in De Nieuwe Stijl (1965-1966). Deze tijdschriften ver-tegenwoordigen in Nederland verschillende vormen van het nieuwe realisme, `ontsprongen uit een treffen met de werkelijkheid', zo schreef Hans Sleutelaar. En dit dan in tegenstelling tot de Vijftigers, die poëzie vooral lieten ontspringen aan een treffen met de taal - overigens zonder de werkelijkheid als inspira- tiebron te ontkennen.3 De door Fokkema gesignaleerde oppositie tussen Vijftigers en nieuw-realis- ten is evident. In de poëtica van de Zestigers 4 - in de redactie van Gard Sivik met name gerepresenteerd door Armando, Sleutelaar, Vaandrager en Ver- hagen - is geen ruimte voor moeilijk gebruik van taal en beeldspraak, maar komt een radicale nuchterheid centraal te staan: `Het "niet-poëtische", het alledaagse en banale wordt steeds belangrijker.
  • The Conservative Embrace of Progressive Values Oudenampsen, Merijn

    The Conservative Embrace of Progressive Values Oudenampsen, Merijn

    Tilburg University The conservative embrace of progressive values Oudenampsen, Merijn Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Oudenampsen, M. (2018). The conservative embrace of progressive values: On the intellectual origins of the swing to the right in Dutch politics. [s.n.]. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. sep. 2021 The conservative embrace of progressive values On the intellectual origins of the swing to the right in Dutch politics The conservative embrace of progressive values On the intellectual origins of the swing to the right in Dutch politics PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. E.H.L. Aarts, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op vrijdag 12 januari 2018 om 10.00 uur door Merijn Oudenampsen geboren op 1 december 1979 te Amsterdam Promotor: Prof.
  • Coetzee, Reve, and the Post-Secular

    Coetzee, Reve, and the Post-Secular

    Coetzee, Reve, and the Post-Secular Research Master‟s Thesis Ted Laros August 15, 2010 Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities Program: Literary Studies: Literature in the Modern Age Thesis Supervisor: Prof. Paulo de Medeiros Second Reader: Prof. David Pascoe Laros 2 As for grace, no, regrettably no: I am not a Christian, or not yet. —J. M. Coetzee to David Attwell in Doubling the Point BEKENTENIS Voordat ik in de Nacht ga die voor eeuwig lichtloos gloeit, wil ik nog eenmaal spreken, en dit zeggen: dat ik nooit anders heb gezocht dan U, dan U, dan U alleen. —Gerard Reve, Nader tot U Laros 3 Contents Acknowledgments 4 1. Introduction: Literature and the Post-Secular 5 2. “Post-Secular Fiction”: The Post-Secular Hermeneutics of John A. McClure 14 2.1. Characteristics of Post-Secular Fiction 15 2.2. The Practical Projects that Post-Secular Fiction Converses with 19 2.3. The Theoretical Projects that Post-Secular Fiction Converses with 24 2.3.1. The Logic of (Partial) Belief 25 2.3.2. “Weak Religion” 27 2.3.3. “Crasser Supernaturalism” 33 2.3.4. “Preterite Spiritual” Communalism/“Neo-Monastic” Politics 35 2.4. Conclusion 41 3. Coetzee and the Post-Secular 43 3.1. A Change of Heart 44 3.2. Between the Real and the Anti-Real 59 3.3. “Ora et labora”/“A Project of Love” 66 3.4. Conclusion 73 4. Reve and the Post-Secular 76 4.1. A Profoundly Weakened Religiosity 81 4.2. “De dag is vol tekenen” 99 4.3. A Homosexual Covenant 102 4.4.