DOCSLIB.ORG

MONDAY, AUGUST 12 the Length of Each Daytime Session/Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MONDAY, AUGUST 12 the Length of Each Daytime Session/Meeting MONDAY, AUGUST 12 world economic relations. Others will consider how and why elite relations (both among the economic elite and between economic and The length of each daytime session/meeting activity political elites) may present a strategic point of agency in how nations is one hour and forty minutes, unless noted navigate their position within the potent constraints of world economic otherwise. The usual turnover schedule is as hierarchies. follows: 8:30 am – 10:10 am 289. Thematic Session. Ending an Epidemic in an Era 10:30 am – 12:10 pm of Rising Inequality? The AIDS Paradox in the 12:30 pm – 2:10 pm United States 2:30 pm – 4:10 pm 4:30 pm – 6:10 pm Session Organizer: Celeste M. Watkins-Hayes, Northwestern University Session presiders and committee chairs are Presider: Judith D. Auerbach, Independent Science and requested to see that sessions and meetings end on Policy Consultant time to avoid conflicts with subsequent activities Betwixt and Between: Navigating HIV Treatment scheduled into the same room. Through Cycles of Incarceration. Megan Lee Comfort, RTI International 7:00 am Meetings A Transdisciplinary Social Network, Venue, and Section on Aging and the Life Course Council Meeting -- Community Intervention to Healp Recently-infected African American Men Who Have Sex with Men Section on Peace, War, and Social Conflict Council (MSM). Samuel R. Friedman, Natl. Development & Meeting -- Research Inst. The HIV Epidemic among African Americans in Section on Sociology of Religion Council Meeting -- Washington DC. Sanyu A. Mojola, University of 8:30 am Meetings Colorado-Boulder Resources Gained, Resources Lost: Negotiating 2014 Dissertation Award Selection Committee -- Economic Survival and Mobility while Living with HIV/AIDS. Celeste M. Watkins-Hayes, Northwestern 2014 Program Committee -- University For the first time since the discovery of the disease, researchers, Department Resources Group (DRG) Training -- clinicians, activists, and advocates see promising opportunities to end the AIDS pandemic due to recent innovations in prevention and Fund for the Advancement of the Discipline (FAD) -- treatment strategies. However, the most consequential medical advances must be coupled with structural shifts to ensure that the Journal of Health and Social Behavior Editorial Board -- access and efficacy of these discoveries are not hampered by pervasive inequalities. This session will focus on the ways in which Orientation for New Section Officers -- HIV/AIDS highlights structural, institutional, and interpersonal inequalities and will require a focused and thoughtful engagement with Social Psychology Quarterly Editorial Board -- issues of economic, political, and social inequality in order to end the epidemic. Panelists will speak to the social determinants of HIV risk, Teaching Sociology Editorial Board -- prevention, and treatment as well as the sociological lessons that the epidemic reveals about the relationship between inequality and health. 8:30 am Sessions Special attention will be paid to the disparate and ongoing impact of the epidemic on particular populations (e.g. Blacks, gay men/Men who 288. Thematic Session. Elites: A Micro Foundation of have sex with men, low-income groups) in the United States. Global Inequality? 290. Thematic Session. Qualitative Approaches to Session Organizer: Leslie C. Gates, State University of Studying Inequality New York-Binghamton Presider: Leslie C. Gates, State University of New York- Session Organizer: Kathryn J. Edin, Harvard University Binghamton Presider: Linda Marie Burton, Duke University Panelists: Vivek Chibber, New York University Panelists: Sudhir A. Venkatesh, Columbia University Nitsan Chorev, Brown University Katherine Shelley Newman, Johns Hopkins University Richard Lachmann, State University of New York- Andrew J. Cherlin, Johns Hopkins University Albany Sara S. McLanahan, Princeton University Discussant: Linda Marie Burton, Duke University James Mahoney, Northwestern University This session explores the contributions that various applications of This panel redirects attention from within country inequality to the qualitative and mixed methods research have made to illuminating key main component of global inequality: national differences in economic features of inequality in American society over the last 20 years. The development. This redirection demands a concomitant shift in the panel features scholars who have conducted ethnography focused on primary micro-foundation of inequality from identities and their role in crime and youth violence in public housing, the texture of off-the-books shaping interactions among individuals to elite relations. Taking as their work in jobless ghettos, the experience of downward mobility, and the starting point a world-historical perspective, some will discuss the lives of low wage “burger barn” workers. It also features the principal relative value of studying elite relations within the handful of societies investigators of two large mixed method studies; a welfare reform study and international institutions that have historically defined the terms of conducted in three cities a study of unwed births to mothers and fathers addition, the panelists will share their unique insights as department living in large U.S. cities. Two ethnographers, Venkatesh and Newman, chairs, recently tenured faculty, and faculty with joint appointments. will reflect on the contributions of ethnographic and in-depth interview This is an interactive workshop. The panelists will share brief approaches to our understanding of inequality, and of life at the bottom comments, and participants will then be invited to join in the discussion. of the class distribution. Two quantitative sociologists, Cherlin and McLanahan, along with presider/discussant, Linda Burton, will share 294. Policy and Research Workshop. Data for Social their views of the contributions of mixed method research to Science Research: Availability, Accessibility and understanding broad policy shifts that have attempted to address inequality and social trends that are associated with inequality. Research Possibilities 291. Thematic Session. The Limits of Resistance Session Organizer: Patricia E. White, National Science Foundation Session Organizer: Susan S. Silbey, Massachusetts Leader: Patricia E. White, National Science Foundation Institute of Technology Co-Leaders: Janet Gornick, City University of New York- Presider: Salo Vinocur Coslovsky, New York University Graduate Center Panelists: Patricia M. Ewick, Clark University Sheela Kennedy, University of Minnesota Marc W. Steinberg, Smith College Jim Saliba, University of Minnesota Ruthanne Huising, McGill University Tom W. Smith, National Opinion Research Center John Lyneis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology The Sociology Program at the National Science Foundation (NSF) Susan S. Silbey, Massachusetts Institute of supports large-scale data infrastructure projects. These data resources are widely used by scholars across the social sciences and provide Technology excellent tools for sociologists seeking high quality data to complete Discussant: John-Paul Ferguson, Stanford University comparative research, assess trends in public attitudes, and examine In his essay, “On Superordination and Subordintion,” Simmel wrote educational outcomes in more precise geographical locations. They that absolute coercion, even with the most cruel tyrant, is always are also excellent resources for both undergraduate and graduate distinctly relative, that even in the most tyrannical situation the research classes. Representatives for the General Social Survey subordinate has some degrees of freedom. Short of physical violation (GSS), Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), International Integrated Public and death, resistance only demands a price for its realization. The Micro-Data Series (IPUMS-International), and the School Attendance research presented on this panel draws from diverse settings (union Boundary Information System (SABINS), will describe these data , organizing, scientific laboratories, chemical processing plants, and accessibility and availability, and examples of major research findings.. religious social movements) to explore the ways in which both the The session is interactive; audience participation is encouraged. willingness and capacity to resist greater authority and power (i.e., attitudes and behaviors of resistance) are developed in different 295. Teaching Workshop. Teaching Social Theory - organizational settings and with varying moral and political New Approaches for Bringing Social Theory to commitments. Life 292. Author Meets Critics Session. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses Session Organizer: Charles H. Powers, Santa Clara (University of Chicago Press, 2011) by Richard University Arum and Josipa Roksa Leader: Charles H. Powers, Santa Clara University This workshop introduces one approach for helping students to (a) ground their inquires in theory, (b) seek theoretically meaningful Session Organizer: Catherine White Berheide, Skidmore answers to big questions, and (c) appreciate the living character of College theory in sociology. Authors: Richard Arum, New York University Josipa Roksa, University of Virginia 296. MFP Research Session. Issues in Youth Critics: Roberta Espinoza, Pitzer College Experiences, Community, and Education Kathleen McKinney, Illinois State University Mitchell L. Stevens, Stanford University Session Organizers: Jean H. Shin, American TBD Sociological Association Beth Floyd, American Sociological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downloadable Results (Pdf)
    Müller British Athletics Championships Manchester Regional Arena - Manchester Regional Arena Friday 4 and Saturday 5 September 2020 Women 's Discus Throw HLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS Final RESULTS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS ATHLETICS A 4 September 2020 TIME TEMPERATURE Start 19:06 14°C 79 % End 19:5714°C 79 % MARK COMPETITOR NAT AGE Record Date WR76.80 Gabriele REINSCH GER 24 9 Jul 1988 NR67.48 Meg RITCHIE GBR 28 26 Apr 1981 SR58.57 Philippa ROLES GBR 26 11 Jul 2004 POSSTART COMPETITOR AGE MARK 1 5 Kirsty LAW 33 57.95 PB SALE H MANCHESTER 2 3 Jade LALLY 33 57.20 SHAFTESBURY B 3 2 Shadine DUQUEMIN 25 52.52 SHAFTESBURY B 4 1 Phoebe DOWSON 26 50.21 BOURNEMOUTH 5 7 Samantha CALLAWAY 18 46.00 NEWHAM E B 6 6 Heather CUBBAGE 19 44.81 SB C OF PORTSMOUTH 7 4 Sophie MACE 21 44.07 WALTON A C 8 8 Sophie LITTLEMORE 24 42.20 SB GATESHEAD 9 9 Taia TUNSTALL 19 39.76 HARROW A C SERIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Phoebe DOWSON BOURNE'MTH 47.55 48.95 X 50.21 50.16 49.81 2 Shadine DUQUEMIN SHAFT'BURY 50.58 49.79 52.52 51.38 49.48 52.04 3 Jade LALLY SHAFT'BURY X 55.13 X 54.10 X 57.20 4 Sophie MACE WALTON 40.36 40.66 42.14 44.07 38.43 38.83 5 Kirsty LAW SALE 50.63 49.54 53.24 53.07 53.70 57.95 6 Heather CUBBAGE PORTSMOUTH 44.81 X 43.30 40.20 41.31 X 7 Samantha CALLAWAY NEWHAM EB 43.90 43.66 45.27 39.73 46.00 45.35 8 Sophie LITTLEMORE GATESHEAD 42.14 41.37 X X 42.20 X 9 Taia TUNSTALL HARROW 39.76 X X GREAT BRITAIN & N.I.
    [Show full text]
  • P 001 – F Front Inside & P001
    186 DAEGU 2011 ★ PAST RESULTS/WORLD CHAMPS WOMENʼS 100m WOMEN 4, Diane Williams USA 11.07 0.240 5, Aneliya Nuneva BUL 11.09 0.169 100 Metres Helsinki 1983 6, Angela Bailey CAN 11.18 0.191 7, Pam Marshall USA 11.19 0.242 Final (Aug 8) (-0.5) Angella Issajenko CAN DQ (11.09) 0.203 1, Marlies Göhr GDR 10.97 The semi-finals indicated that the GDR were likely to repeat their 2, Marita Koch GDR 11.02 Helsinki success. Gladisch won the first race in a windy 10.82, while 3, Diane Williams USA 11.06 the other went to Drechsler in a legal championship record of 10.95. 4, Merlene Ottey JAM 11.19 The standard was fierce, with clockings of 11.07w and 11.15 insuffi- 5, Angela Bailey CAN 11.20 cient for a place in the final. Defending Champion Göhr was among the 6, Helinä Marjamaa FIN 11.24 non-qualifiers. 7, Angella Taylor CAN 11.30 Following the exploits of Ben Johnson in the men’s 100m final 20 Evelyn Ashford USA DNF minutes earlier, there were hopes of a record in the women’s race. One of the most eagerly awaited women’s clashes in Helsinki ended These were blighted by a change in direction of the wind. shockingly when Evelyn Ashford tore her right hamstring halfway Gladisch dominated the final from start to finish. At halfway she through the final. led with 6.07 from Nuneva (6.10), Ottey and Issajenko (both 6.12). At Both Marlies Göhr (10.81) and Ashford (10.79) had set world this point Drechsler – who was clearly last out of the blocks – was sixth records in 1983, so it was a surprise to see them drawn together in the (6.18), but she produced the best finish to claim the silver.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    Final Program 100th Annual Meeting August 13-16, 2005 Philadelphia Marriott, Philadelphia Loews, and Philadelphia Downtown Courtyard by Marriott Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Comparative Perspectives, Competing Explanations Accounting for the Rising and Declining Significance of Sociology This is the centennial for the Association, so the meeting theme should be sufficiently expansive to address a wide historical sweep, and yet have sufficient focus to provide a framework in which to address key aspects of the social history of the discipline—its contemporary situation and its potential future development. Each of the three elements from the title “Comparative Perspectives, Competing Explanations” is designed to produce a fruitful meeting frame: First, the notion of “comparative perspectives” is itself “accordion-like” and can fit a number of purposes and goals. There is the international aspect, so that we can incorporate a comparison of American sociology with international developments. There is the internal evolution of perspectives inside of the United States, which would include the development and emergence of challenging and oppositional perspectives in the discipline, from the Society for the Study of Social Problems, to Sociologists for Women in Society, to the Association of Black Sociologists, to name but a few organizational manifestations of the challenges of the last half century. There are others that will surely surface from the general call. Second, there is the notion of “competing explanations.” Competing explanations
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, August 22 Global Climate Treaty and Charting Pathways Toward Deeply Sustainable Societies
    Climate Change will have convened in Paris to finalize a global climate PRELIMINARY PROGRAM (as of 5/12/2016) treaty. However, the process has been marked by a protracted This document is subject to change. Any stalemate between the interests of the global North and the global South. Simultaneously, a sprawling climate justice movement has been changes made will be made to the online growing in numbers, reach, and strength, interlinked in a vast network program. of networks. As December 2015 approaches and passes, these movements are hoping to persuade governments and global institutions to take decisive steps that include signing on to a fair and binding Monday, August 22 global climate treaty and charting pathways toward deeply sustainable societies. This session will address the post-2015 situation, asking whether it remains possible to “change everything,” as Naomi Klein The length of each daytime session/meeting activity puts it in her best-selling book (and 2015 film by the same name) This is one hour and forty minutes, unless noted Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Consisting of otherwise. The usual turnover is as follows: prominent public intellectuals, climate activists, and interdisciplinary 8:30am-10:10am scholars, the panel will collectively address the question: how can the global environmental and climate justice movements work creatively to 10:30am-12:10pm craft action plans that address the root causes and future impacts of 12:30pm-2:10pm climate change? In doing so, we will be rethinking the most important 2:30pm-4:10pm global social movement of the 21st century, and the issue of humanity’s 4:30pm-6:10pm response to the problem of climate change will define the conditions of life as the century wears on.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNDAY, AUGUST 11 the Length of Each Daytime Session/Meeting
    SUNDAY, AUGUST 11 produce consequences at more local levels? • What paradoxes of inequality do you see? Following brief presentations by the panelists, The length of each daytime session/meeting activity audience members will be invited to work in small groups to consider is one hour and forty minutes, unless noted whether there are there fundamental, generic processes that produce otherwise. The usual turnover schedule is as and reproduce inequality regardless of the type of inequality at issue follows: (and, if so, what they are) or whether it all “just depends” (and, if so, on what). Small groups will have an opportunity to share their 8:30 am – 10:10 am conversations with the larger group throughout the session. Panelists 10:30 am – 12:10 pm will close the session by reflecting on the groups’ comments and the 12:30 pm – 2:10 pm challenges and opportunities they suggest for fresh insight into the 2:30 pm – 4:10 pm nature of inequality and the processes that support it. 4:30 pm – 6:10 pm 136. Thematic Session. Does Having Children Make Session presiders and committee chairs are You Poor? requested to see that sessions and meetings end on time to avoid conflicts with subsequent activities Session Organizer: Kathryn J. Edin, Harvard University scheduled into the same room. Presider: Kelly Musick, Cornell University His Gain, Her Pain? The Motherhood Penalty and the 7:00 am Meetings Fatherhood Premium within Coresidential Couples. Alexandra A. Killewald, Harvard University; Javier Community College Faculty Breakfast -- Garcia-Manglano, University of Maryland Section on Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity What does Early and Umplanned Fertility Cost Women Council Meeting -- and Men, and What Can We Do about It? Ronald Mincy, Columbia University Section on Children and Youth Council Meeting -- Will Kids Make Me Poor? Prospective Views on the Price of Parenthood among Disadvantaged Youth.
    [Show full text]