Efficacy and Safety of Corpus Callosotomy After Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Efficacy and Safety of Corpus Callosotomy After Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy CLINICAL ARTICLE J Neurosurg 128:277–286, 2018 Efficacy and safety of corpus callosotomy after vagal nerve stimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy Jennifer Hong, MD,1 Atman Desai, MD,2 Vijay M. Thadani, MD,3 and David W. Roberts, MD1,3 1Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 3Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California OBJECTIVE Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and corpus callosotomy (CC) have both been shown to be of benefit in the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy. Recent case series have reviewed the efficacy of VNS in patients who have undergone CC, with encouraging results. There are few data, however, on the use of CC following VNS therapy. METHODS The records of all patients at the authors’ center who underwent CC following VNS between 1998 and 2015 were reviewed. Patient baseline characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Ten patients met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 72 months, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (range 12–109 months). The mean time between VNS and CC was 53.7 months. The most common reason for CC was progression of seizures after VNS. Seven patients had anterior CC, and 3 patients returned to the operat- ing room for a completion of the procedure. All patients had a decrease in the rate of falls and drop seizures; 7 patients experienced elimination of drop seizures. Nine patients had an Engel Class III outcome, and 1 patient had a Class IV outcome. There were 3 immediate postoperative complications and 1 delayed complication. One patient developed pneumonia, 1 developed transient mutism, and 1 had persistent weakness in the nondominant foot. One patient pre- sented with a wound infection. CONCLUSIONS The authors demonstrate that CC can help reduce seizures in patients with medically refractory epi- lepsy following VNS, particularly with respect to drop attacks. https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2016.10.JNS161841 KEY WORDS atonic seizure; corpus callosotomy; drug-resistant epilepsy; vagal nerve stimulation AGAL nerve stimulation (VNS) and corpus calloso- be patients with secondarily generalized seizures or mul- tomy (CC) are palliative surgical procedures that tiple seizure types.28,34 In the absence of Level I evidence can reduce seizure frequency, attenuate seizure comparing VNS to CC, the experience and preferences of Vseverity, and improve quality of life for patients with non- individual neurologists and surgeons heavily influence the localizing or unresectable drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). recommendation for either VNS or CC in patients with This is in contrast to focal resection, where the goal is DRE who present for palliative surgery. complete control of seizures. Patient selection criteria Corpus callosotomy, which was first described by Van for VNS and for CC are not strictly defined. In general, Wagenen and Herren in the 1940s, predates by many de- VNS is recommended for patients with nonlocalizable cades the FDA approval of VNS for epilepsy in 1997.41 As or unresectable seizure disorders or those who either are a result, much of the literature describing the efficacy of unable to tolerate or choose not to undergo craniotomy, CC for DRE comes from patients who did not have the op- and is FDA approved for children older than 12 years and tion of VNS. The mechanisms of action of each treatment adults with multifocal epilepsy and multiple seizure types. are very different. Callosotomy is a disconnection proce- Patients who predominantly have drop attacks are typi- dure wherein fibers that allow seizures to propagate and cally thought to be very good candidates for CC, as may secondarily generalize are severed.13,51 In contrast, VNS is ABBREVIATIONS CC = corpus callosotomy; CPS = complex partial seizures; DRE = drug-resistant epilepsy; EEG = electroencephalography; GTC = generalized tonic- clonic; LGS = Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; LITT = laser interstitial thermal therapy; SPS = simple partial seizures; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; VNS = vagal nerve stimu- lation. SUBMITTED July 14, 2016. ACCEPTED October 4, 2016. INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 3, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161841. ©AANS 2018, except where prohibited by US copyright law J Neurosurg Volume 128 • January 2018 277 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/30/21 06:21 PM UTC J. Hong et al. a form of neuromodulation, in which continuous, intermit- in the direction of rapid cycling, until stimulation occurred tent, low-intensity electrical stimulation of the vagal nerve every 1.1 minute for 14 seconds. Patients underwent a full results in afferent spread of action potentials to subcortical year of VNS therapy before they were considered to have nuclei and the cortex; this is thought to attenuate the dura- had an adequate trial. tion and frequency of seizures.49 It is plausible that the 2 approaches are complementary Operative Technique and can work synergistically in particularly refractory pa- All CCs were performed after induction of general tients. Based on data from the VNS registry, 57% of pa- anesthesia. Patients were usually positioned supine with tients with DRE who underwent VNS after CC reported a 20 the head neutral and held in 3-point fixation by using a > 50% reduction in seizure frequency. The potential ben- Mayfield clamp. The scalp was partially shaved, and a efit of CC in patients who have already undergone VNS is transverse incision was made anterior to the coronal su- not well described. Here we review our institutional expe- ture, with two-thirds of the incision placed right of mid- rience with patients who elected to undergo CC after VNS line. A pneumatic-powered perforator and craniotome to test the hypothesis that in patients with seizures who (or, earlier in the series, a 5-cm trephine) were used to have undergone VNS without satisfactory response, CC elevate a 5-cm-long × 4-cm-wide bone flap, of which two- may produce meaningful further benefit. thirds were to the right of midline. The dura mater was opened in a curvilinear fashion based usually on the right Methods side of the superior sagittal sinus. Using a microsurgical Participants and Study Design technique, dissection was continued down the interhemi- Following approval by the Dartmouth Institutional Re- spheric fissure, with exposure of the corpus callosum at view Board, hospital records and a prospectively main- its base. A Greenberg self-retaining retractor was placed. tained epilepsy database were queried for all patients who The CC was performed extraventricularly by using a underwent CC after implantation of a VNS between 1999 microdissector, commonly with the assistance of micro- and 2015. The Current Procedural Terminology codes for suction, beginning in the midline at the junction of the both VNS (64568, 64573) and CC (61541) and the ICD-9 posterior genu and the anterior body. The dissection was code for epilepsy (345.XX) were used to identify eligible continued down to the midline cleft formed by the leaves patients. Patients were included in the study only if the of the septum pellucidum, and the existing or potential VNS surgery predated the CC surgery. cavum septum pellucidum was entered. Dissection was then continued anteriorly around the genu and posteriorly Clinical Variables and Outcomes Assessment to the narrowed isthmus of the posterior body. A ligat- ing clip was placed at the most posterior extent of the Clinical data were retrieved through retrospective CC. Hemostasis was obtained and the dura was closed chart review. Data available included age, sex, presenting with 4-0 Vicryl suture. The bone flap was replaced with symptoms, duration of seizures, seizure subtypes, medi- titanium hardware. The galea and skin were then reap- cations, VNS parameters, clinical examination, opera- proximated. Blood loss was generally < 100 ml, and the tive notes, postoperative hospital course, and outpatient time of surgery was between 2.5 and 4 hours. Barring follow-up. complications, discharge was most often on postoperative All patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary sur- Day 3 or 4. gical epilepsy conference prior to the CC. Routine pre- Completion CCs were undertaken in a similar manner, surgical workup included history and physical examina- usually with a second, more posterior craniotomy. If the tion, long-term noninvasive video electroencephalography patient had undergone prior intracranial EEG or resection, (EEG), and imaging including MRI as well as ictal and every effort was made to anticipate a potential CC at the interictal SPECT in some patients. The recommendation first operation, or, if the initial surgery was performed at for CC was made based on persistence of drop attacks or another institution, to incorporate the previous incision secondarily generalized seizures as well as failure of VNS and bone flap into the CC surgery. This surgery is facili- therapy, defined as a < 50% reduction in seizure frequency tated by the deeper extending posterior falx and smaller with maximal titration of stimulation. residual callosum. Patients were seen in clinic for routine follow-up ap- Protocol for VNS Titration proximately 4 weeks after discharge from the hospital. All patients who underwent VNS implantation at our institution were evaluated at a multidisciplinary epilepsy Results conference. Postoperatively, adjustments were made to VNS stimulation parameters every 6 weeks as tolerated, Patient Demographic Data and then every 3 months when response to therapy began We identified 10 patients in our epilepsy registry who to plateau, or sooner if side effects became pronounced and had undergone CC following VNS. Eight patients under- intolerable. The frequency of 30 cycles per second (range went VNS placement at our institution. The median age 20–30), and pulse width 250 or 500 μsec, was usually held at the time of consideration for CC was 37 years (range constant. The current was titrated up from 0.25 mA by 8–60 years). Full-scale IQ ranged from low average to ex- 0.25 mA at each visit.
Recommended publications
  • Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients
    CORPUS CALLOSOTOMY OUTCOMES IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS David Graham Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Supervisor: Russell C Dale, MBChB MSc PhD MRPCH FRCP Co-Supervisors: Deepak Gill, BSc MBBS FRCP Martin M Tisdall, MBBS BA MA MD FRCS This dissertation is submitted for total fulfilment of the degree of Master of Philosophy in Medicine March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients David Graham - March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients For Kristin, Isadora, and Oscar David Graham - March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients David Graham - March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients Perhaps no disease has been treated with more perfect empiricism on the one hand, or more rigid rationalism on the other than has epilepsy. John Russell Reynolds, 1861 David Graham - March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients David Graham - March 2018 Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes in Paediatric Patients – David Graham DECLARATION This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text. It has not been previously submitted, in part or whole, to any university of institution for any degree, diploma, or other qualification. The work presented within this thesis has resulted in one paper that has been published in the peer-review literature: Chapters 2-3, Appendix C: Graham D, Gill D, Dale RC, Tisdall MM, for the Corpus Callosotomy Outcomes Study Group. Seizure outcome after corpus callosotomy in a large pediatric series. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology; doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13592 The work has also resulted in one international conference podium presentation, one local conference podium presentation, and one international conference poster: Graham D, Barnes N, Kothur K, Tahir Z, Dexter M, Cross JH, Varadkar S, Gill D, Dale RC, Tisdall MM, Harkness W.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation of Electrophysiological Functional Connectivity After Partial Corpus Callosotomy: Case Report
    CASE REPORT J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:214–219, 2018 Preservation of electrophysiological functional connectivity after partial corpus callosotomy: case report Kaitlyn Casimo, BA,1,2 Fabio Grassia, MD,3 Sandra L. Poliachik, PhD,3–5 Edward Novotny, MD,6,7 Andrew Poliakov, PhD,3,4 and Jeffrey G. Ojemann, MD1,2,8 1Graduate Program in Neuroscience and 2Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Milan, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy; and 4Department of Radiology, 5Center for Clinical and Translational Research, 6Department of Neurology, 7Center for Integrated Brain Research, and 8Department of Neurosurgery, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington Prior studies of functional connectivity following callosotomy have disagreed in the observed effects on interhemispheric functional connectivity. These connectivity studies, in multiple electrophysiological methods and functional MRI, have found conflicting reductions in connectivity or patterns resembling typical individuals. The authors examined a case of partial anterior corpus callosum connection, where pairs of bilateral electrocorticographic electrodes had been placed over homologous regions in the left and right hemispheres. They sorted electrode pairs by whether their direct corpus callosum connection had been disconnected or preserved using diffusion tensor imaging and native anatomical MRI, and they estimated functional connectivity between pairs of electrodes over homologous regions using phase-locking value. They found no significant differences in any frequency band between pairs of electrodes that had their corpus callosum connection disconnected and those that had an intact connection. The authors’ results may imply that the corpus callosum is not an obligatory mediator of connectivity between homologous sites in opposite hemispheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Methods in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Diagnostic Methods in Traumatic Brain Injury Johan Ljungqvist Department of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg Gothenburg 2017 Cover illustration: Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum, by Johan Ljungqvist. Diagnostic Methods in Traumatic Brain Injury © Johan Ljungqvist 2017 [email protected] ISBN 978-91-629-0166-0 (PRINT) ISBN 978-91-629-0165-3 (PDF) Printed in Gothenburg, Sweden 2017 INEKO AB To Christina, Astrid and August “Fibres as delicate as those of which the organ of mind is composed are liable to break.” 1 – Gama, 1835 ABSTRACT Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Early detection and quantification of TBI is important for acute management, for making early accurate prognoses of outcome, and for evaluating potential therapies. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is a distinct manifestation of TBI that often leads to cognitive and neurologic impairment. Conventional neuroimaging is known to underestimate the extent of DAI, and intracranial hematomas can usually be detected only in hospitals with radiology facilities. In this thesis, studies I and II were longitudinal investigations using a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR- DTI) technique to quantify DAI. Study III tested whether a novel blood biomarker, neurofilament light (NFL) could identify DAI. Study IV tested whether a microwave technology (MWT) device, designed for use also in a prehospital setting, could detect intracranial hematomas. Patients and methods In study I, MR-DTI of the corpus callosum (an anatomical region prone to DAI) was performed in eight patients with suspected DAI in the acute phase and at 6 months postinjury.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Callosotomy E21 (1)
    CORPUS CALLOSOTOMY E21 (1) Corpus Callosotomy Last updated: September 9, 2021 HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXTENT OF PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................ 1 INDICATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 2 PREOPERATIVE TESTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Anesthesia .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Position ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Incision & dissection .............................................................................................................................. 3 Callosotomy ........................................................................................................................................... 3 End of procedure ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Callosotomía: Técnicas, Resultados Y Complicaciones. Revisión De La Literatura Callosotomy: Techniques, Results and Complications - Literature Review
    Revista Chilena de Neurocirugía 42: 2016 Callosotomía: técnicas, resultados y complicaciones. Revisión de la literatura Callosotomy: techniques, results and complications - Literature Review Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar1,3,4,5, Alain Bouthillier2, Iracema Araújo Estevão6, Bruno Camporeze6, Mariany Carolina de Melo Silva6, Ivan Fernandes Filho7, Luciana Rodrigues8, Renata Simm8, José Faucetti9. 1 Division of Neurosurgery, Santa Paula Hospital - São Paulo - SP, Brazil. 2 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Montreal - Quebec, Canada. 3 Division of Neurosurgery, Oswaldo Cruz Hospital - São Paulo - SP, Brazil. 4 Division of Post-Graduation, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil. 5 Professor of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo - Sorocaba - SP, Brazil. 6 Medical School of São Francisco University - Bragança Paulista - SP - Brazil. 7 Medical School of Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo - Sorocaba - SP, Brazil. 8 Division of Neurology of Santa Paula Hospital - São Paulo - SP, Brazil. 9 Medical artist at the University of São Paulo - São Paulo - SP, Brazil. Rev. Chil. Neurocirugía 42: 94-101, 2016 Abstract Background: Patients with intractable seizures who are not candidates for focal resective surgery are indicated for a pallia- tive surgical procedure, the callosotomy. This procedure is based on the hypothesis that the corpus callosum is an important pathway for interhemispheric spread of epileptic activity and, for drug resistant epilepsy. It presents relatively low permanent morbidity and an efficacy in the control of seizures. Based on literature, the corpus callosotomy improves the quality of life of patients that has the indication to perform this procedure because it allows reducing the frequency of seizures, whether tonic or atonic, tonic-clonic, absence or frontal lobe complex partial seizures.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Callosotomy—Open and Endoscopic Surgical Techniques *Matthew D
    EPILEPSY SURGERY TECHNIQUES Corpus callosotomy—Open and endoscopic surgical techniques *Matthew D. Smyth, *Ananth K. Vellimana , †‡Eishi Asano , and §Sandeep Sood Epilepsia, 58(Suppl. 1):73–79, 2017 doi: 10.1111/epi.13681 SUMMARY Corpus callosotomy is a palliative surgical procedure for patients with refractory epi- lepsy. It can be performed through an open approach via a standard craniotomy and the aid of an operating microscope, or alternatively via a mini-craniotomy with endo- scope assistance. The extent of callosal disconnection performed varies according to indications and surgeon preference. In this article, we describe both open and endo- scopic surgical techniques for anterior and complete corpus callosotomy. KEY WORDS: Corpus callosotomy, Callosotomy technique, Complete callosotomy, Endoscopic callosotomy, Epilepsy surgery. Dr. Smyth is a Professor of Neurosurgery at Washington University and St. Louis Children’s Hospital. Corpus callosotomy was introduced by Van Wagenen surgery.2,3,6 Although corpus callosotomy is generally well and Herren in 1940.1 Over time, numerous refinements in tolerated, transient or permanent postoperative neurologic surgical technique have occurred and corpus callosotomy is deficits including hemiparesis, aphasia, mutism, akinesia, now a widely accepted surgical option in appropriately and disconnection syndromes may occur.2,3,6 selected patients. Surgical disconnection of the corpus cal- The extent of callosotomy performed varies across sur- losum disrupts synchronization of epileptiform discharges gical centers, and many surgeons prefer an anterior half or between bilateral cerebral hemispheres and is therefore two thirds callosotomy sparing the splenium, as this has a effective in reducing the severity and frequency of general- lower incidence of postoperative complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopic Epilepsy Surgery: Emergence of a New Procedure
    [Downloaded free from http://www.neurologyindia.com on Monday, April 04, 2016, IP: 14.139.245.2] NI Feature: CENTS (Concepts, Ergonomics, Nuances, Therbligs, Shortcomings) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Endoscopic epilepsy surgery: Emergence of a new procedure Sarat P. Chandra, Manjari Tripathi1 Departments of Neurosurgery and 1Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India ABSTRACT Background: The use of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery is fast emerging in many subspecialties of neurosurgery as an effective alternative to the open procedures. Objective: The author describe a novel technique of using an endoscope for performing a corpus callosotomy and hemispherotomy. A description of endoscopic disconnection for a hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) and a review of the literature is also presented. Materials and Methods: Thirty four patients underwent endoscopic procedures between January 2010 and March 2015. These included endoscopic‑assisted inter‑hemispheric trans‑callosal hemispherotomy (EH; n = 11), endoscopic‑assisted corpus callosotomy with anterior/posterior commissurotomy (CCWC; n = 16), and endoscopic disconnection for HH (n = 7). EH and CCWC were performed with the use of a small craniotomy (4 cm × 3 cm). The surgeries were performed using a rigid high‑definition endoscope, bayonetted self‑irrigating bipolar forceps, and other standard endoscopic instruments along with the guidance of intra‑operative magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. HH disconnection was performed using endoscopic neuronavigation through a burr hole. Results: Hemispherotomy: Sequelae of middle cerebral artery infarct (5), Rasmussen’s syndrome (3), and hemimegalencephaly (3). Outcome: Class I Engel (9) and class II (2), mean follow‑up of 8.4 months, range: 3–18 months. Mean blood loss: 85 cc, mean operating time: 210 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Callosotomy: a Palliative Therapeutic Technique May Help Identify Resectable Epileptogenic Foci
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Seizure (2007) 16, 545—553 www.elsevier.com/locate/yseiz CASE REPORT Corpus callosotomy: A palliative therapeutic technique may help identify resectable epileptogenic foci Dave F. Clarke a,*, James W. Wheless a, Monica M. Chacon b, Joshua Breier c, Mary-Kay Koenig c, Mark McManis b, Edward Castillo c, James E. Baumgartner c a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Le Bonheur Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA b Cook Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Neurology, Fort Worth, TX, USA c The Texas Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA Received 2 March 2007; received in revised form 4 April 2007; accepted 16 April 2007 KEYWORDS Summary Corpus callosotomy has a long history as a palliative treatment for Corpus callosotomy; intractable epilepsy. Identification of a single epileptogenic zone is critical to Epilepsy surgery; performing successful resective surgery. We describe three patients in which corpus Pediatric epilepsy; callosotomy allowed recognition of unapparent seizure foci, leading to subsequent Seizure; successful resection. Intractable epilepsy We retrospectively reviewed our epilepsy surgery database from 2003 to 2005 for children who had a prior callosotomy and were candidates for focal resection. All underwent magnetic resonance imaging and scalp video electroencephalograph monitoring, and two had magnetoencephalography, electrocorticography and/or intracranial video electroencephalograph monitoring. The children were 8 and 9 years old, and seizure onset varied from early infancy to early childhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Rates and Predictors of Seizure Outcome After Corpus Callosotomy for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: a Meta-Analysis
    LITERATURE REVIEW J Neurosurg 130:1193–1202, 2019 Rates and predictors of seizure outcome after corpus callosotomy for drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis Alvin Y. Chan, MD,1 John D. Rolston, MD, PhD,2 Brian Lee, MD, PhD,3 Sumeet Vadera, MD,4 and Dario J. Englot, MD, PhD5 1Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California; and 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee OBJECTIVE Corpus callosotomy is a palliative surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy that reduces the severity and fre- quency of generalized seizures by disconnecting the two cerebral hemispheres. Unlike with resection, seizure outcomes remain poorly understood. The authors systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to investi- gate rates and predictors of complete seizure freedom and freedom from drop attacks after corpus callosotomy. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried for primary studies examining seizure outcomes after corpus callosotomy published over 30 years. Rates of complete seizure freedom or drop attack freedom were recorded. Variables showing a potential relationship to seizure outcome on preliminary analysis were subjected to formal meta- analysis. RESULTS The authors identified 1742 eligible patients from 58 included studies. Overall, the rates of complete seizure freedom and drop attack freedom after corpus callosotomy were 18.8% and 55.3%, respectively. Complete seizure free- dom was significantly predicted by the presence of infantile spasms (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.13–13.23), normal MRI findings (OR 4.63, 95% CI 1.75–12.25), and shorter epilepsy duration (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.23–5.38).
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Callosotomy for Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery
    CORPUS CALLOSOTOMY FOR PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY SURGERY Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Pi Doanh Pediatric Neurosurgery Deparment •Epilepsy in children •Treatment of Intractable Epilepsy in Children •Corpus Callosum •Corpus Callosotomy •Researches •Indication PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY - Seizures: # 10% of children 1/3 epilepsy - General seizures: 45,4 % ( 51% idiopathic, 36% cryptogenic ) ( ILAE Classification 2010 ) - Epilepsy Syndromes: - Seizure Syndromes with onset in the first year of life - Lenox-Gastaut Syndrome. - Landau-Kleffner Syndrome. - … PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY - 10-40% pediatric patients : intractable seizure. impair cognitive and psychosocial development. - Medical Intractable Epilepsy: - Inadequate seizure control >= 2 EADs 18-24 months. - Adequate seizure control with unacceptable drug-related side effect. PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY Diagnostic Work-up • EEG and Video EEG EPILEPSY SURGERY • Neuroimaging: TEAM • Epileptologists • CT/ MRI • Neurosurgeons • Radiologists • PET/ SPECT • EEG technicians • Functional MRI • Neuropsychologists • Pediatricians • Wada test • Therapists • Neurocognitive testing • …. EPILEPSY SURGERY Curiable Surgery Palliative surgery Temporal Lobectomy Corpus Callosotomy Extratemporal Cortical Hemispherectomy Resection Corpus Callosum - 200 M fibers Roger Wolcott Sperry 1913-1994 Neuropsychology 1981 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine Split- Brain Syndrome Corpus Callosotomy • Palliative surgery • 1940s, Dr. William P. van Wagenen,10pts. • 1960s, Bogen & Vogel: Clinical and neuropsychological outcome of the surgery • 1970, Luessenhop:
    [Show full text]
  • Reversal of Cerebraldominance Forlanguage
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.49.6.628 on 1 June 1986. Downloaded from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986;49:628-634 Reversal of cerebral dominance for language and emotion in a corpus callosotomy patient R JOSEPH From the W. Haven V. A. Medical Center, CT UHS/The Chicago Medical School, Chicago, USA SUMMARY A case study of a right-handed individual with epilepsy and brain dysfunction of early onset is described who was found, following callosotomy (sparing the rostrum of the callosum) to be left hemisphere "dominant" for processing and/or expressing emotional and somesthetic information, and right hemisphere "dominant" in regard to the expression and comprehension of language and linguistic stimuli. Hence, a significant reversal in functional representation, due presumably to an injury suffered early in life, was observed. Moreover, following callosotomy the patient demonstrated severe disconnection syndromes in regard to right hand usage, the recognition of emotion, and the production and comprehension of linguistically related information. The left cerebrum appeared to be almost completely without linguistic representation except in regard to emotional language. The possible mechanisms involved in functional sparing and reversed repre- sentation are briefly discussed, and the effects of partial disconnection on the expression of these capacities is presented. Protected by copyright. Approximately 89% of the population are genotypic motor) and also comes hierarchically to represent
    [Show full text]
  • Deficits in Functional Connectivity of Hippocampal and Frontal Lobe Circuits After Traumatic Axonal Injury
    ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Deficits in Functional Connectivity of Hippocampal and Frontal Lobe Circuits After Traumatic Axonal Injury Carlos D. Marquez de la Plata, PhD; Juanita Garces, BS; Ehsan Shokri Kojori, MSc; Jack Grinnan, BS; Kamini Krishnan, MS; Rajesh Pidikiti, MS; Jeffrey Spence, PhD; Michael D. Devous Sr, PhD; Carol Moore, MA; Rodderick McColl, PhD; Christopher Madden, MD; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD Objective: To examine the functional connectivity of tive outcomes were assessed approximately 6 months af- hippocampal and selected frontal lobe circuits in pa- ter injury. tients with traumatic axonal injury (TAI). Main Outcome Measures: Interhemispheric func- Design: Observational study. tional connectivity, spatial patterns of functional con- nectivity, and associations of connectivity measures with Setting: An inpatient traumatic brain injury unit. Imaging functional and neurocognitive outcomes. and neurocognitive assessments were conducted in an outpatient research facility. Results: Patients showed significantly lower interhemi- spheric functional connectivity for the hippocampus and Participants: Twenty-five consecutive patients with brain ACC. Controls demonstrated stronger and more fo- injuries consistent with TAI and acute subcortical white cused functional connectivity for the hippocampi and matter abnormalities were studied as well as 16 healthy ACC, and a more focused recruitment of the default mode volunteers of similar age and sex. network for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ROI. The interhemispheric functional connectivity for the hippo- Interventions: Echo-planar and high-resolution T1- campus was correlated with delayed recall of verbal in- weighted images were acquired using 3-T scanners. Re- formation. gions of interest (ROI) were drawn bilaterally for the hip- pocampus, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and Conclusions: Traumatic axonal injury may affect inter- dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and were used to extract hemispheric neural activity, as patients with TAI show time series data.
    [Show full text]