Russian, Islamic and American Influences in Central Asia Since 1991

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russian, Islamic and American Influences in Central Asia Since 1991 RUSSIAN, ISLAMIC AND AMERICAN INFLUENCES IN CENTRAL ASIA SINCE 1991 HALA HADDAD PhD THESIS SCHOOL OF SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON 2007 UMI Number: U591218 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591218 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS ABSTRACT _____________________________________________________________________________ 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ____________________________________________________________ 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS __________________________________________________________ 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________________ 9 1.1 A im s o f t h e T h e s is _____________________________________________________________ 9 1.2 The Meaning of Power a n d I n f lu e n c e _____________________________________ 10 1.3 Contributions ________________________________________________________________19 1.4 L iterature R e v i e w __________________________________________________________21 1.5 M e t h o d o l o g y ______________________________________________________________ 47 1.6 O u t l in e o f C h a p t e r s ________________________________________________________ 50 2.0 THE INTERNAL POLITICS OF CENTRAL ASIA _______________________ 56 2.1 P erestroika a n d t h e D isintegration o f t h e U S S R _____________________ 56 2.2 D emocratisation T h e o r y __________________________________________________60 2.3 T he Reversal a n d F a il u r e of D emocratisation in C en tr a l A s ia 67 2.3.1 Kyrgyzstan____________________________________________________ 7 1 2.3.2 Kazakhstan_____________________________________________________ 78 2.3.3 Uzbekistan____________________________________________________ 82 2.3.4 Turkmenistan__________________________________________________ 88 2.3.5 Tajikistan______________________________________________________ 91 2.4 C o n c l u s io n __________________________________________________________________ 95 3.0 RUSSIAN INFLUENCES IN CENTRAL ASIA SINCE 1991 ____________ 99 3.1 R ussia ’s H isto rica l L e g a c y in C en tr a l A s i a ___________________________ 99 3.1.1 The Tsarist Empire and Central____________________________ A sia 99 3.1.2 The Soviet Union and Central_____________________________ Asia 103 3.2 Patterns o f Russian Foreign Policy since the Disintegration of the U S S R 107 3.3 R ussia ’s Po litical In f l u e n c e in C e n tr a l A s ia __________________________111 3.4 R ussification in C e n t r a l A s i a ___________________________________________ 113 2 3.5 R ussia ’s C ontribution t o C en tr a l A sian S e c u r it y ____________________ 119 3.6 T he R ole o f C e n t r a l A sia in the S e cu rity of t h e R u ssia n F ed era tio n 131 3.7 Econom ic D evelopments betw een R ussia a n d C e n tr a l A sia _________ 152 3.8 Conclusion _________________________________________________________________ 159 4.0 AMERICAN INFLUENCES IN CENTRAL ASIA SINCE 1991_______162 4.1 Patterns o f A m e r ic a n Fo reig n P o lic y T o w a r d s C e n tr a l A sia S ince 1991 163 4.2 A m erica ’s C ontribution to C en tra l A sian S e c u r it y _________________ 166 4.2.1 NATO's Partnership for Peace, Centrashat and GUUAM__________ 166 4.2.2 The War on Terror_______________________________________ 169 4.3 A m erica ’s P o l it ic a l In fl u e n c e in C en tr a l A s i a _______________________181 4.4 A m erica ’s E c o n o m ic In fl u e n c e in C en tr a l A s i a _______________________190 4.5 A m erica ’s Im p a c t o n C en tr a l A sian C u ltu r e a n d S o c ie t y ___________196 4.6 Conclusion _________________________________________________________________201 5.0 THE ENERGY RESOURCE DIMENSION_________________________203 5.1 Resource W a r s a n d P e t r o -Po l it ic s ______________________________________203 5 .1.1 The Status of the Caspian and its Division_______________________ 208 5.1.2 Competing Influences over Kazakhstan's Energy Resources_______ 210 5.1.3 Competing Influences over Turkmen Energy Resources____________ 219 5.1.4 The Importance o f Uzbek, Kyrgyz and Tajik Energy Resources 226 5.2 Conclusion _________________________________________________________________229 6.0 ISLAMIC INFLUENCES AND CENTRAL ASIA___________________231 6.1 Islam befo re Independence _______________________________________________ 233 6.1.1 The Birth o f Islam in Central_______________________________ Asia 233 6.1.2 Islam in Central Asia During the Russian Empire________________ 234 6.1.3 Islam in Central Asia during the Soviet______________________ Era 234 6.2 Islam as a D o m e s t ic R elig ion and C u l tu r a l P h e n o m e n o n in C en tra l A s ia . 238 6.3 O fficial Isla m in C e n t r a l A sia ___________________________________________ 244 6.4 Political Isla m a n d Isla m ic O rganisations in C e n tr a l A s i a ________250 3 6.5 E x t e r n a l Is l a m i c In f l u e n c e s o n C e n t r a l A s i a : T h e Im p a c t o f A f g h a n i s t a n a n d t h e A r a b C o u n t r i e s o n P o l i t i c s a n d S o c i e t y in C e n t r a l A s i a 261 6.6 C o n c l u s i o n ________________________________________________________________________ 270 7.0 CONCLUSION ________________________________________________271 7.1 C o o p e r a t i o n o r C o m p e t i t i o n ? __________________________________________________271 7.2 S u m m a r y o f C h a p t e r s ___________________________________________________________ 273 7.2.1 The Internal Politics of the Central Asian Countries______________ 273 7.2.2 Russian Influences in Central______________________________ Asia 2 74 7.2.3 American Influences in Central_____________________________ Asia 279 7.2.4 The Energy Resource Dimension________________________________ 281 7.2.5 Islamic Influences and Central _____________________________Asia 283 7.3 W h ic h P o w e r h a s t h e s t r o n g e s t C o m p e t i n g In f l u e n c e s a n d W h y ? 285 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES______________________________________287 4 ABSTRACT This thesis looks at competing influences in Central Asia since 1991. It looks at all five Central Asian countries, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, and identifies the three main powers with competing influences as Russia, Islam and America. It aims at showing which of these three powers is the most enduring and powerful in the region according to how strong its influences are. The strengths of these influences are investigated in relation to the fields of security, politics, culture and economics. This thesis argues that Russian influences are at present the strongest amongst most strata of the Central Asian population. Russification (which falls under cultural influence) in both its linguistic and behavioural forms is a profound contributor to Russia’s firm role in the region. Russia’s security, economic and particularly political influences have gradually grown in strength, giving the other two powers a larger challenge. According to this work, Islam is a growing power in the region and has gained momentum primarily as a result of internal factors in the region, although regional and global Islamic forces are also looked at. Islam’s cultural and political influences are particularly effective in the development of Islam as a power in the region. Central Asia’s geo-strategic importance was soon realised by Washington after independence. This thesis argues that competition and not cooperation characterised the relationship between Russia and America throughout the 1990’s and in particular after September 11, which led to America’s increased involvement in the region. The USA’s economic and security-related influences have been the strongest and most successful. Its political influences have often been seen as counter-productive by pushing different segments of the population towards the other two powers. America’s cultural influences come last. This thesis has consequently provided a platform for measuring competing influences from Russia, Islam and America in Central Asia. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere thanks to my supervisor Dr Peter Duncan, not only for his advice and support over the course of my PhD but also for greatly contributing to my interest in the Former Soviet Union and particularly Central Asia.
Recommended publications
  • Investment Projects of the Republic of Dagestan Index
    INVESTMENT PROJECTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN INDEX INNOVATION Construction of a round and shaped steel tubes ............................. 00 producing plant Construction of the “Mountain Resources” .........................................00 Development of in-car electronics manufacturing .........................00 education and display center in Makhachkala (audio sets, starters, alternators) Construction of an IT-park of complete ............................................... 00 Construction of the “Viaduk” customs ..................................................00 “idea-series” cycle type and logistics centre Development of high-effi ciency .............................................................00 Reconstruction of the Makhachkala ..................................................... 00 solar cells and modules production commercial sea port (facilities of the second stage) Construction of the KamAZ vehicles trade ......................................... 00 INDUSTRY AND TRANSPORT and service centers in the districts of the Republic of Dagestan Development of fl oat glass production............................................... 00 Investment sites ...........................................................................................00 Development of nitric and sulfuric acid, .............................................00 and high analysis fertilizer production FUEL AND ENERGY COMPLEX onsite the “Dagfos” OJSC – II stage Construction of an intra-zone .................................................................00
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Terrorist Organizations
    Order Code RL32223 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Foreign Terrorist Organizations February 6, 2004 Audrey Kurth Cronin Specialist in Terrorism Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Huda Aden, Adam Frost, and Benjamin Jones Research Associates Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Foreign Terrorist Organizations Summary This report analyzes the status of many of the major foreign terrorist organizations that are a threat to the United States, placing special emphasis on issues of potential concern to Congress. The terrorist organizations included are those designated and listed by the Secretary of State as “Foreign Terrorist Organizations.” (For analysis of the operation and effectiveness of this list overall, see also The ‘FTO List’ and Congress: Sanctioning Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations, CRS Report RL32120.) The designated terrorist groups described in this report are: Abu Nidal Organization (ANO) Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade Armed Islamic Group (GIA) ‘Asbat al-Ansar Aum Supreme Truth (Aum) Aum Shinrikyo, Aleph Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA) Communist Party of Philippines/New People’s Army (CPP/NPA) Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group, IG) HAMAS (Islamic Resistance Movement) Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM) Hizballah (Party of God) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) Jemaah Islamiya (JI) Al-Jihad (Egyptian Islamic Jihad) Kahane Chai (Kach) Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK, KADEK) Lashkar-e-Tayyiba
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus: the Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law
    The North Caucasus: The Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law Europe Report N°226 | 6 September 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Russia between Decentralisation and the “Vertical of Power” ....................................... 3 A. Federative Relations Today ....................................................................................... 4 B. Local Government ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Funding and budgets ................................................................................................. 6 III. Elections ........................................................................................................................... 9 A. State Duma Elections 2011 ........................................................................................ 9 B. Presidential Elections 2012 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Implications of the Evolving Shanghai Cooperation Organization
    The United States Army War College The United States Army War College educates and develops leaders for service at the strategic level while advancing knowledge in the global application of Landpower. The purpose of the United States Army War College is to produce graduates who are skilled critical thinkers and complex problem solvers. Concurrently, it is our duty to the U.S. Army to also act as a “think factory” for commanders and civilian leaders at the strategic level worldwide and routinely engage in discourse and debate concerning the role of ground forces in achieving national security objectives. The Strategic Studies Institute publishes national security and strategic research and analysis to influence policy debate and bridge the gap between military and academia. The Center for Strategic Leadership and Development CENTER for contributes to the education of world class senior STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP and DEVELOPMENT leaders, develops expert knowledge, and provides U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE solutions to strategic Army issues affecting the national security community. The Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute provides subject matter expertise, technical review, and writing expertise to agencies that develop stability operations concepts and doctrines. U.S. Army War College The Senior Leader Development and Resiliency program supports the United States Army War College’s lines of SLDR effort to educate strategic leaders and provide well-being Senior Leader Development and Resiliency education and support by developing self-awareness through leader feedback and leader resiliency. The School of Strategic Landpower develops strategic leaders by providing a strong foundation of wisdom grounded in mastery of the profession of arms, and by serving as a crucible for educating future leaders in the analysis, evaluation, and refinement of professional expertise in war, strategy, operations, national security, resource management, and responsible command.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan Brief No 1
    Issue 1, 2008 9 MARCH - APRIL 2007 � CONTENTS Informal institutes as “rules of a political CONTENTS BazarbayValentin Mambetov: Bogatyrev:: game” in Kyrgyzstan A lot“Development must be done by theis MuratbekCentral Imanaliev Asia in ................................. 2007: Dynamics .......of Change..........2 and Development peopleinstability. of Kyrgyzstan Any stability and is a StatusRegional of formal conference political institutessummary .....................2and interactions with informal political firstsign of of all stagnation by the leadership or a latent structuresEvaluation in Kyrgyzstan of Political Situation after April 19 to accumulationrecognize the ofimportance possible ValentinRound Bogatyrev table summary ........................ ..................................3...........................4 of socialwater problemsexplosions. in Central In the Kyrgyzstan:Kyrgyzstan: is democracy Democratic on the Success agenda or Threat to Stability? Asianview politics. of such - p. a 27paradigm of for the country? BakytValentin Beshimov Bogatyrev ....................... ......................................4................................13 BRIEF Issue KYRGYZSTAN development, Kyrgyzstan “Authorities-Opposition” Tandem in 2007 HowBakyt decisions Beshimov are made ...........................................6 in Kyrgyzstan is the most stable state Roundtable transcript ..............................................19 in Central Asia since the Issues of National Statehood in Central Asia A perspectiveMuratbek Imanalievfor Central ......................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education As a Bridge to the Future Triennial Report 2011-2014
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY (IAUP) PRESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONALHigher Education ASSOCIATION as OF a UNIVERSITY Bridge to PRESIDENTS the Future (IAUP) TRIENNIAL) TRIENNIAL) 2014 YOKOHAMA BAY BRIDGE, JAPAN ( JAPAN BRIDGE, BAY YOKOHAMA 2011-2014 TRIENNIAL TRIENNIAL REPORT 2011-2014 HIGHER EDUCATION AS A BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE TRIENNIAL REPORT 2011-2014 HIGHER EDUCATION AS A BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE TRIENNIAL REPORT 2011-2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing by the publisher. Copyright © 2014 by International Association of University Presidents Published in 2014 in the United States of America by the International Association of University Presidents, 809 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017-3580. For more information please contact IAUP at [email protected]. Book design by Mahesh Nair, EssEmm Arts, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Printed and bound in the United States of America by AlphaGraphics, Midland Park, NJ, USA. Bridge Image credits: Cover | Yokohama Bay Bridge, Japan (2014 Triennial) 1 | Sydney Harbour Bridge, Australia (2002 Triennial) CC- 25 | Baluarte Bridge, Mexico (1987 Triennial) CC-BY- CC BY 2.0 Skyseekerhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/ BY-SA 2.5 Adam.J.W.C.http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ NC-SA 2.0 Gobierno Federalhttps://www.flickr.com/ skyseeker/13550426/in/photostream/ Modifications: Crop, File:Sydney_harbour_bridge_dusk.jpg Modifications: Crop, photos/30118979@N03/8232173545/ Modifications:
    [Show full text]
  • Network of Concerned Historians NCH Annual Report 2011 Http
    Network of Concerned Historians NCH Annual Report 2011 http://www.concernedhistorians.org INTRODUCTION The seventeenth Annual Report of the Network of Concerned Historians (NCH) contains news about the domain where history and human rights intersect, especially about the censorship of history and the persecution of historians, archivists, and archaeologists around the globe, as reported by various human rights organizations and other sources. It covers events and developments of 2010 and 2011. The fact that NCH presents this news does not imply that it shares the views and beliefs of the historians and others mentioned in it. The complete set of Annual Reports (1995–2011) was compiled by Antoon De Baets. Please send any comments to: <[email protected]>. Please cite as: Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2011 (http://www.concernedhistorians.org). Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2011 (June 2011) 2 ____________________________________________________________ AFGHANISTAN Last Annual Report entry: 2010. In early 2010, the National Stability and Reconciliation bill was officially promulgated, granting immunity from criminal prosecution to people who committed serious human rights violations and war crimes over the past thirty years. In March 2007, a coalition of powerful warlords in parliament pushed through the amnesty law to prevent prosecution of individuals responsible for large-scale human rights abuses in the preceding decades. It was not publicized and promulgated until early 2010. It was revived in 2010 to facilitate amnesties for reconciliation and reintegration of the Taliban and the islamist political party Hezb-i Islami Gulbuddin. In the absence of a practical justice system to address the lack of accountability by the warring parties, the government was urged to ask the International Criminal Court to investigate allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by all parties to the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Minorities in the Post-Soviet Space: a Comparative Analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan
    Russian minorities in the Post-Soviet Space: a Comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan By Zhyldyz Abaskanova Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts CEU eTD Collection Supervisor: Associate Professor Thomas Fetzer Word count: 13, 428 Budapest, Hungary 2016 i Abstract Under the Soviet Union, Russians were spread out over the entire territory of the USSR. Russians held high positions in the Soviet Union. However, after the disintegration of the USSR, Russians who lived outside of Russia acquired the new status of being a minority. The sudden collapse of the USSR raised many concerns and fears for Russians who lived outside of Russia, since successor states prioritized nation-building processes. This study examines the treatment of Russian memories in Uzbekistan and in Kyrgyzstan by using Rogers Brubaker’s framework of triadic nexus. The research covers the relations between national minority with nationalizing state and relation of national minority with external national homelands. Primarily, this thesis considers Uzbekistan’s and Kyrgyzstan’s treatment of Russians minorities on the basis of language and access to politics. There are examined nationalizing policies of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan and Russian minorities’ opinion toward such policies. In addition, it provides an analysis of Russian Federation policies on supporting its compatriots in foreign countries and Russian minorities’ assessment of Russia as a state that support and pursue their interest. Based on qualitative and quantitative data, I claim that the treatments of Russians in both states are different in terms of language policies and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Reforms in the Kyrgyz Republic K.M
    ISSN 0971-9318 HIMALAYAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES (JOURNAL OF HIMALAYAN RESEARCH AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION) NGO in Consultative Status-Category II with ECOSOC, United Nations Vol. 2 Nos. 3-4 July - December 1998 KYRGYZSTAN SPECIAL Kyrgyzstan on the Eve of the 21st Century Askar Akaev Administrative Reforms in the Kyrgyz Republic K.M. Jumaliev The Political Culture in Kyrgyzstan A. Dononbaev Ethno-Political Boundaries of Kyrgyzstan N. Karimbekova On the Trail of Silk Route K. Warikoo Kyrgyzstan on the Great Silk Road and Cultural Relationship with India V. Voropoeva and V. Goryacheva Human Activities in the Mountains of Central Asia A.A. Aidaraliev EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Mr. T. N. Kaul Dr. T.N. Khoshoo 7, Poorvi Marg, Distinguished Fellow, Vasant Vihar, TERI, Habitat Place, N. Delhi (India) Lodhi Road, N. Delhi (India) Prof. Rahmatullah Khan Mr. Alexender Veigl Rector, Secretary General, Jawaharlal Nehru University, IOV, N. Delhi (India) Modling, Vienna (Austria) Prof. L.R. Verma Dr. O. Kasenov Vice Chancellor, Deputy Director, H.S Parmar University Kainar University, of Horticulture & Forestry, Alma Aty (Kazakhstan) Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh (India) Prof. A.A. Aidaraliev Prof. Bakyt Beshimov President, President, International University Osh State University, of Kyrgyzstan, Osh (Kyrgyzstan) Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) Prof. Devendra Kaushik Prof. Jayanta Kumar Ray School of International Studies University of Calcutta, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Calcutta (India) N. Delhi (India) Prof. B.R. Grover Prof. B.P. Misra Patel Nagar, N. Delhi (India) Centre for Himalayan Studies, University of North Bengal, Prof. K.N. Pandita Darjeeling (India) Jammu, J & K (India) Prof. Ved Kumari Ghai Dr. R.P. Khatana Jammu, J & K (India) Gurgaon (India) Himalayan and Central Asian Studies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • North Caucasus: Views from Within People’S Perspectives on Peace and Security
    REPORT North Caucasus: views from within People’s perspectives on peace and security March 2012 North Caucasus: views from within People’s perspectives on peace and security SAFERWORLD MARCH 2012 Acknowledgements This report was written by Anna Matveeva, Honorary University Fellow, University of Exeter, with contributions from Igor Savin, Research Fellow, the Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences. It was edited by Craig Oliphant (Senior Advisor, Saferworld). Editorial contributions and comments were also provided by Luitgard Hammerer (Head of Europe and Central Asia, Saferworld). The report draws on participatory research conducted in five North Caucasus republics by Zhanna Khamdokhova (Kabardino-Balkaria), Igor Dulaev (North Ossetia), Musa Yusupov (Chechnya), Akhmet Yarlykapov (Dagestan), Anna Matveeva and Igor Savin (Ingushetia). The methodology for the research was developed by Anna Matveeva and Igor Savin with contributions from the Institute of Oriental Studies, Saferworld and the four researchers from the North Caucasus. For further reading, case studies from the individual republics can be accessed on the Saferworld website: www.saferworld.org.uk/PPP/chechnya www.saferworld.org.uk/PPP/northossetia www.saferworld.org.uk/PPP/kabardino-balkaria www.saferworld.org.uk/PPP/ingushetia www.saferworld.org.uk/PPP/dagestan The republic chapters were translated from Russian into English by Sophia Matveeva. John Newman copy-edited the report. The research was a collaboration between Saferworld and the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The People’s Peacemaking Perspectives project The People’s Peacemaking Perspectives project is a joint initiative implemented by Conciliation Resources and Saferworld and financed under the European Commission’s Instrument for Stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Tatarstan 15 I
    1 CONTENTS ABOUT AUTHORS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 10 THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN 15 I. POLITICAL ELITE 15 1. Vertical power structure 19 2. Governance model during the period of the President M. Shaimiev 20 3. Governance model during the period of the President R. Minnikhanov 22 4. Security forces as part of a consolidated project 27 5. Export of elites 28 II. PRESERVATION OF ETHNO-CULTURAL IDENTITY 30 1.The Tatar national movement 30 2. The Russian national movement 34 3. Language policy in Tatarstan 37 4. Results of post-Soviet language policy 47 5. Conclusion 50 THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN 51 I. DAGESTAN ELITES AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 51 1. Birth of «clans» 53 2. Adaptation to the growing influence of Moscow 56 3. Mukhu Aliev: attempt to be equidistant from clans 58 4. Elite and the Caucasus Emirate 62 5. Return of the «levashintsy» and attempt at a civil dialogue 64 6. First attempt to eliminate clans 66 II. «EXTERNAL GOVERNANCE» 70 III. PRESERVATION OF ETHNO-CULTURAL IDENTITY 79 1. National movements and conflicts 79 2. Preservation of national languages 82 3. Conclusion 91 FINAL CONCLUSIONS 93 2 ABOUT AUTHORS Dr. Ekaterina SOKIRIANSKAIA is the founder and director at Conflict analysis and prevention center. From 2011 to 2017, she served as International Crisis Group’s Russia/North Caucasus Project Director, supervising the organisation’s research and advocacy in the region. From 2008-2011, Sokirianskaia established and supervised the work of Human rights Center Memorial’s regional offices in Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan. Before that, from 2003-2008 Sokirianskaia was permanently based in Ingushetia and Chechnya and worked as a researcher and projects director for Memorial and as an assistant professor at Grozny State University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Publish Illegally Acquired Information Twenty Years After Bartnicki V
    Washington Law Review Volume 96 Number 1 3-1-2021 Hacks, Leaks, and Data Dumps: The Right to Publish Illegally Acquired Information Twenty Years After Bartnicki V. Vopper Erik Ugland Christina Mazzeo Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Erik Ugland & Christina Mazzeo, Hacks, Leaks, and Data Dumps: The Right to Publish Illegally Acquired Information Twenty Years After Bartnicki V. Vopper, 96 Wash. L. Rev. 139 (2021). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ugland & Mazzeo (Do Not Delete) 3/22/2021 11:58 AM HACKS, LEAKS, AND DATA DUMPS: THE RIGHT TO PUBLISH ILLEGALLY ACQUIRED INFORMATION TWENTY YEARS AFTER BARTNICKI V. VOPPER Erik Ugland* & Christina Mazzeo** Abstract: This Article addresses a fluid and increasingly salient category of cases involving the First Amendment right to publish information that was hacked, stolen, or illegally leaked by someone else. Twenty years ago, in Bartnicki v. Vopper, the Supreme Court appeared to give broad constitutional cover to journalists and other publishers in these situations, but Justice Stevens’s inexact opinion for the Court and Justice Breyer’s muddling concurrence left the boundaries unclear. The Bartnicki framework is now implicated in dozens of new cases— from the extradition and prosecution of Julian Assange, to Donald Trump’s threatened suit of The New York Times over his tax records, to the civil suits spawned by the hack of DNC servers—so there is a pressing need for clarity.
    [Show full text]