DOCSLIB.ORG

Additional Study on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Additional Study on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine The State Agency of Automobile Roads of Ukraine (Ukravtodor) ADDITIONAL STUDY ON THE PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MYKOLAIV BRIDGE IN UKRAINE Final Report (Advanced Version) December 2019 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Central Consultant Inc. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. 7R JR(P) 19-018 The State Agency of Automobile Roads of Ukraine (Ukravtodor) ADDITIONAL STUDY ON THE PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MYKOLAIV BRIDGE IN UKRAINE Final Report (Advanced Version) December 2019 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Central Consultant Inc. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Project Location Map Outline of the Project 1.Country： Ukraine 2.Project Name： Additional Study on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine 3.ExecutionAgency： The State Agency of Automobile Roads of Ukraine (Ukravtodor) 4.Survey Objective： Considering the time elapsed since the feasibility study for a Japanese ODA Loan project in 2011, the main objectives of this Study are as follows: ･Reassessment of the project cost (including land compensation and O&M costs), reanalysis of cost benefits, and reexamination of the implementation method (procurement and construction); ･Reconsideration of the applicability of the latest technologies; and ･Confirmation of the environmental and social considerations and other matters related to project implementation under the latest conditions. 5.Survey Contents： (1)Background (10)Environmental and Social Considerations (2)Implementation Flow and Work Process (11)Review of the Construction and Procurement Plans (3)Project Approval Procedure in Ukraine (12)The Safety Measures during the Construction (4)Supplementing Surveys of Natural Conditions (13)Project Operation and Maintenance Plans (5)Review of Routes and Locations of Bridges (14)Recalculation of Estimated Project Cost (6)Review of Road Plans (15)Review of Project Risk Analysis (7)Review of Bridge Plans (16)Consideration of Cost Reduction Effects (8)Traffic Demand Forecast (17)Economic and Financial Analysis (9)Study on the Slope Stability at the Bridge Construction Site (18)Survey of Obstructions and Partner Country Responsibilities 6.Conclusion and Recommendations： (1)Conclusion 1) The Project is technically and economically feasible. 2) Bypass route and the location of Mykolaiv Bridge are changed due to the following reasons. ･The newly selected route has the best economic benefits (B / C), and the location of the interchange at its terminus is the best from the viewpoint of the ring road concept. ･River channel alignment where the bridge crosses is close to straight, therefore it is superior in river condition and inland waterway condition. ･Although there is a possibility of landslide, the range is narrow and the location of the abutment is outside of the landslide area. 3) The cable-stayed bridge with center span length of 420m is the most appropriate for the main bridge based on comprehensive evaluation of construction cost, navigation safety, merits for Ukraine (less environmental impact, possibility of technical transfer), aesthetic feature, construction difficulty and maintenance cost. Steel pipe sheet pile foundation is adopted for foundation based on the same evaluation except aesthetic feature. The center span length is determined from the minimum navigation width of 280m and an additional width (distance from the edge of the navigation channel to the main tower) of 140m. The minimum navigation width is determined with Ukrainian standard based on the maximum size of the vessels; the additional width based on the relationship between the navigation channel width and center span length of cable-stayed bridges in Japan (half of the minimum navigation width). 4) Precast PC slab and steel small number girder bridge with maximum span length of 60m is the most appropriate for the approach bridge based on comprehensive evaluation of construction cost, merits for Ukraine (less environmental impact, possibility of technical transfer), construction difficulty and maintenance cost. PC well method is adopted based on the same evaluation. 5) The Road Width which includes Lane width, Shoulder, Median and Pedestrian walkway and so on is changed to 25.5m for road section and 26.3m for bridge section due to the revision of Ukrainian standards. Maximum longitudinal gradient at bridge section is 2.5%, considering prevention of slipping by cross wind and winter freeze. 6) Cloverleaf type is the most appropriate for the interchange at the origin, considering drivability, safety, impact on farmland, involuntary resettlement, workability, and economy. Half-clover type is the most appropriate for the interchange at the terminus, considering the ring road concept. 7) Since the new route is selected, it is required to conduct the feasibility study by Ukraine again. The necessity of reapproval from the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is currently being confirmed. 8) The execution agency for this project will be the State Agency of Automobile Roads of Ukraine (Ukravtodor). In case of applying for Japanese ODA Loan, the procurement of consultants for detailed design, preparation of tender documents, construction supervision and detailed design including procurement of contractor for construction are expected to take approx. three and half years after signing L/A. The estimated schedule is based on general process and cooperation from Ukravtodor and related organization is required. (2)Recommendations 1) It is necessary to consider the impact of the project on the natural, social, and living environments. Especially, efforts must be made to prevent river contamination, to protect fishery resources and to mitigate impacts along the access roads during the bridge construction work. The construction schedule for bridge section must reflect aspects of measures against impacts on the natural, social, and living environments as well as river freeze in winter. In addition, JICA’s Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations have been updated since the previous feasibility study and the latest version was published in 2010. 2) The newly selected route passes through the residential area on the right bank of the Southern Bug River and would require demolition of dozens of houses and relocation of their inhabitants. Therefore, the selection of this route would result in environmental and social impacts not discussed in the feasibility study conducted by Ukraine in 2012. In light of this fact, new approval for the Project is required. 3) The project contains the cable-stayed bridge with the longest maximum center span in Ukraine and application of Japanese technology on superstructure, substructure, and foundation works to envision project cost reduction. Therefore it is recommended to prepare documents for project approval to fully utilize the result of this study. In addition, it is important to select consultants and contractors with advanced technical capabilities and experiences in basic design, detailed design, construction supervision and management. 4) It is recommended that Ukraine continues the landslide monitoring implemented in this Study. Executive Summary Background 1-1 Background Mykolaiv City is the capital of Mykolaiv Oblast, which developed mainly around the shipbuilding industry. The city is located in the southern Ukraine and acts as a key hub of the Black Sea coast connecting Europe and Asia. The city is a transport hub uniting the P-06, H-14 and H-11, which run north and south and the M-14 that runs east and west within the major road network. It extends from the granary of inland areas to the ports of Odesa, Yuzhny and Ilichevsk. As the junction of the said road network, the city suffers from high traffic volumes. Around 35,000 vehicles, both large and of other types, are forced into the city center every day, causing serious traffic jams and declines in the quality of life for citizens. There are two bridges constructed in 1964 over the rivers that traverse the city: the Vavarovsky Bridge over the Southern Bug River and the Ingul Bridge over the Ingul River. However, Since both of the bridges are deteriorating, loaded vehicles weighing more than 24 tons are not permitted to cross them. The loading weight restriction has increased the cost of road transport via Mykolaiv City, exacerbating congestion and hindering smooth logistics. To streamline and expand the distribution network for grain and other products, the city expects a new bridge and an approach road that bypass the downtown area of the city immediately. It is worth noting that the importance of this work has been recognized for quite some time; the first feasibility study dealing with Mykolaiv Bridge Construction Project (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”) was conducted in 1989 by Kyivsoiuzshliakhproekt, which was assigned the study by the Government of Soviet Union. Based on the Ukraine-European Union Association Agreement signed in June 2014, the Government of Ukraine (hereinafter referred as “GOU”) established “the Strategic Plan for Development of Road Transport and Road Infrastructure of Ukraine up to 2020” in December 2015, which highlights the importance of improving and modernizing road networks that take safety and the environment into consideration as a means of boosting the economy in Ukraine. The Project ensures smooth vehicle transportation in line with the plan and improves the road transport network in southern Ukraine. The Project is recognized as one of the priority projects among the five bypass projects under “The State Target Economic Program for Development of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dry Grassland Vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a Preliminary Overview of Its Syntaxonomy, Ecology and Biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Tuexenia - Mitteilungen der Floristisch-soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: NS_34 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuzenko Anna A., Becker Thomas, Didukh Yakiv P., Ardelean Ioana Violeta, Becker Ute, Beldean Monika, Dolnik Christian, Jeschke Michael, Naqinezhad Alireza, Ugurlu Emin, Unal Aslan, Vassilev Kiril, Vorona Evgeniy I., Yavorska Olena H., Dengler Jürgen Artikel/Article: Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430. Göttingen 2014. doi: 10.14471/2014.34.020, available online at www.tuexenia.de Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) – a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity Die Trockenrasenvegetation Zentral-Podoliens (Ukraine) – eine vorläufige Übersicht zu Syntaxonomie, Ökologie und Biodiversität Anna A. Kuzemko1, Thomas Becker2, Yakiv P. Didukh3, Ioana Violeta Arde- lean4, Ute Becker5, Monica Beldean4, Christian Dolnik6, Michael Jeschke2, Alireza Naqinezhad7, Emin Uğurlu8, Aslan Ünal9, Kiril Vassilev10, Evgeniy I. Vorona11, Olena H. Yavorska11 & Jürgen Dengler12,13,14,* 1National Dendrological Park “Sofiyvka”, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyivska Str. 12a, 20300 Uman’, Ukraine, [email protected];2Geobotany, Faculty of Geography and Geosciences, University of Trier, Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier, Germany, [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Economic Impact of Hiv and Aids in Ukraine : a Re-Study
    BRITISH COUNCIL UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH This Project was implemented with financial support from the Department of International Development of the United Kingdom (DFID) and the British Council for the Government of Ukraine THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HIV AND AIDS IN UKRAINE : A RE-STUDY Olga Balakireva Alla Scherbyns’ka Yulia Galustian Yuriy Kruglov Olexander Yaremenko Ukrainian AIDS Centre at the Health Ukrainian Institute of Social Ministry of Ukraine Research Nataliya Levchuk Volodymyr Onikienko Institute of Economy, National Council for Studying Productive Academy of Science of Ukraine Forces, National Academy of Science of Ukraine Lidiya Andruschak UNAIDS In co-operation with international consultants Tony Barnett, University of East Anglia, UK and Alan Whiteside, University of Natal, South Africa Edited by Veena Lakhumalani, The British Council, Ukraine 14 Kyiv City - 2001 Contents INTRODUCTION Executive summary Section 1. THE NATURE OF HIV/AIDS AND THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIC Section 2. HIV AND AIDS DATA 2.1 HIV Data 2.2 AIDS Data 2.3 General conclusions Section 3. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES 3.1. Concepts of Susceptibility and Vulnerability 3.2. Description of Models for Projecting the Development of HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine and Incoming Data 3.3. Projecting the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine: main results Section 4. UKRAINE AS A RISK ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Demographic Situation in Ukraine 4.2 Social and Economic Characteristics of the Contemporary Ukrainian Society 4.3 Attitudes to People with HIV and AIDS in Ukraine 4.4 Behavioural Factors Contributing to HIV/AIDS Epidemic 4.5 Bio-Medical Factors and HIV Susceptibility 4.6 Regressive Analysis of Influence of Regional Development Factors on HIV-Infection Prevalence 4.7 Conclusions Section 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Transgender Persons in Ukraine
    Situation of Transgender Persons in Ukraine Research report Kyiv 2010 Ситуация трансгендеров в Украине Отчет по исследованию Киев Situation of transgender persons in Ukraine Research report The research and publication were accomplished with the financial support of Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice and ILGA-Europe Human Rights Violations Documentation Fund within the framework of “Transgender Research Project” implemented by Insight non-governmental organization. Insight NGO © CONTENT Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................................................2 Glossary...........................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................5 1. Methodology of the research................................................................................................................6 2. Analysis of the data................................................................................................................................8 2.1. Self-awareness and identification............................................................................................8 2.2. Social networks and relations.................................................................................................15 2.2.1. Family...............................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: Travel Advice
    Ukraine: Travel Advice WARSZAWA (WARSAW) BELARUS Advise against all travel Shostka RUSSIA See our travel advice before travelling VOLYNSKA OBLAST Kovel Sarny Chernihiv CHERNIHIVSKA OBLAST RIVNENSKA Kyivske Konotop POLAND Volodymyr- OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Volynskyi Korosten SUMSKA Sumy Lutsk Nizhyn OBLAST Novovolynsk ZHYTOMYRSKA MISTO Rivne OBLAST KYIV Romny Chervonohrad Novohrad- Pryluky Dubno Volynskyi KYIV Okhtyrka (KIEV) Yahotyn Shepetivka Zhytomyr Lviv Kremenets Fastiv D Kharkiv ( ni D pr ni o Lubny Berdychiv ep Kupiansk er LVIVSKA OBLAST KHMELNYTSKA ) Bila OBLAST Koziatyn KYIVSKA Poltava Drohobych Ternopil Tserkva KHARKIVSKA Khmelnytskyi OBLAST POLTAVSKA Starobilsk OBLAST OBLAST Stryi Cherkasy TERNOPILSKA Vinnytsia Kremenchutske LUHANSKA OBLAST OBLAST Vodoskhovyshche Izium SLOVAKIA Kalush Smila Chortkiv Lysychansk Ivano-Frankivsk UKRAINEKremenchuk Lozova Sloviansk CHERKASKA Luhansk Uzhhorod OBLAST IVANO-FRANKIVSKA Kadiivka Kamianets- Uman Kostiantynivka OBLAST Kolomyia Podilskyi VINNYTSKA Oleksandriia Novomoskovsk Mukachevo OBLAST Pavlohrad ZAKARPATSKA OBLAST Horlivka Chernivtsi Mohyliv-Podilskyi KIROVOHRADSKA Kropyvnytskyi Dnipro Khrustalnyi OBLAST Rakhiv CHERNIVETSKA DNIPROPETROVSKA OBLAST HUNGARY OBLAST Donetsk Pervomaisk DONETSKA OBLAST Kryvyi Rih Zaporizhzhia Liubashivka Yuzhnoukrainsk MOLDOVA Nikopol Voznesensk MYKOLAIVSKA Kakhovske ZAPORIZKA ODESKA Vodoskhovyshche OBLAST OBLAST OBLAST Mariupol Berezivka Mykolaiv ROMANIA Melitopol CHIȘINĂU Nova Kakhovka Berdiansk RUSSIA Kherson KHERSONSKA International Boundary Odesa OBLAST
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Pro 2 Annual Progress Report 2011 Report
    ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2011 MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME www.undp.org.ua http://msdp.undp.org.ua UNDP Municipal Governance and Sustainable Development Programme Annual Progress Report 2011 Acknowledgement to Our Partners National Partners Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality of of Ivano- of Zhytomyr of Rivne Kalynivka Frankivsk Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality of Novograd- of Galych of Mykolayiv of Saky Volynskiy Municipality Municipality Municipality of Municipality of of Hola of Dzhankoy Kirovske Kagarlyk Prystan’ Municipality of Municipality Municipality of Municipality Voznesensk of Ukrayinka Novovolynsk of Shchelkino Municipality of Municipality Municipality of Municipality Mogyliv- of Lviv Dolyna of Rubizhne Podilskiy Academy of Municipality Municipality of Municipality Municipal of Tulchyn Yevpatoria of Bakhchysaray Management Committee of Settlement Vekhovna Rada on Settlement Settlement of Pervomayske State Construction of Nyzhnegorskiy of Zuya Local Self- Government Ministry of Regional Settlement Development, Settlement Construction, Municipality of of Krasno- of Novoozerne Housing and Vinnytsya gvardiyske Municipal Economy of Ukraine International Partners Acknowledgement to Our Partners The achievements of the project would not have been possible without the assistance and cooperation of the partner municipalities of our Programme, in particular Ivano-Frankivsk, Rivne, Zhytomyr, Galych, Novograd-Volynskiy, Mykolayiv, Kirovske, Hola Prystan’, Kagarlyk, Voznesensk,
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Assessment of the Surface Water of the Southern Bug River Basin by Complex Indices
    Journal of Ecological Engineering Received: 2020.09.10 Revised: 2020.10.19 Volume 22, Issue 1, January 2021, pages 195–205 Accepted: 2020.11.05 Available online: 2020.12.01 https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/128858 Water Quality Assessment of the Surface Water of the Southern Bug River Basin by Complex Indices Iryna Shakhman1, Anastasiia Bystriantseva1* 1 Kherson State University, Universitetska Str., 27, Kherson, 73000, Ukraine * Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article describes modern anthropogenic load on the surface water of the Southern Bug River Basin in a chang- ing climate. The main water users-pollutants of the Southern Bug River Basin in Vinnytska and Mykolaivska regions were identified. The water quality of the surface water of the Southern Bug River in time and space (along the river stream) was analyzed. The water quality of the Southern Bug River was assessed by complex indices for different water users. In order to assess water quality, it is recommended to use complex indices that take into account the effect of the total action of pollutants. The self-purification potential and capability of restoration in space (along the river stream) of the aquatic ecosystem of the Southern Bug River was established for 2019. The results of the study allow us to state that the use of surface water of the Southern Bug River Basin for drinking, fishery, cultural and recreational needs is related to certain environmental risks. It is recommended to carry out the environmental protection measures aimed at adjusting the priorities of economic activity, reduction of wastewater discharge and increase in the water content of the river by regulating the operation of energy complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • NPP South Ukraine Lifetime Extension EIA
    NPP South Ukraine Lifetime Extension EIA Expert Statement NPP SOUTH UKRAINE LIFETIME-EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Expert Statement Oda Becker Kurt Decker Gabriele Mraz REPORT REP-0774 VIENNA 2021 Project Manager Franz Meister Authors Oda Becker, technical-scientific consultant (content project management, chapters 7, 8, 10) Kurt Decker (chapter 9) Gabriele Mraz, pulswerk GmbH (project coordinator, chapters 4, 5, 6, 11) Translations and Patricia Lorenz english editing Layout/Type setting Thomas Loessl Title photograph © iStockphoto.com/imagestock Contracting authority Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology, Directorate VI/9 General Coordination of Nuclear Affairs GZ: BMNT-UW.1.1.2/0019-I/6/2018 Publications For further information about the publications of the Umweltbundesamt please go to: https://www.umweltbundesamt.at/ Imprint Owner and Editor: Umweltbundesamt GmbH Spittelauer Laende 5, 1090 Vienna/Austria This publication is only available in electronic format at https://www.umweltbundesamt.at/. © Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Vienna, 2021 All Rights reserved ISBN 978-3-99004-597-8 NPP South Ukraine Lifetime Extension EIA – Contents CONTENTS SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................6 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG................................................................................................ 11 РЕЗЮМЕ .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • F@G-JAN 2021 AHF Facts @ Glance- FINAL Intro Letter 2.9.21.Docx
    JANUARY 2021 AHF Facts at a Glance-- Key Highlights: Month-over-month changes—AHF clients & staff — DECEMBER 2020 – JANUARY 2021 AHF Clients: • As of January 2021, and with the February 5, 2021 Global Patient Report, AHF now has 1,501,058 clients in care. • This figure represents a slight census DECREASE (down 4,452 AHF clients or patients worldwide), month-to-month since the January 5, 2020 Global Patient Report. While two (2) new AHF global sites were opened (in VIETNAM and GUATEMALA), twelve sites were closed: 2 in GUATEMALA and 10 in UKRAINE. AHF Staff: • A net increase of 233 AHF employees overall worldwide to 6,728 total AHF employees worldwide, including: o An INCREASE of 16 U.S. staff o A DECREASE of 25 global staff, and o 2,047 other AHF-supported staff in global programs (bucket staff, casuals, etc., down 224) • This report also includes a breakout of the 2,872 clients now enrolled in our various Positive Healthcare (PHC &PHP) Medicare and Medicaid managed care programs in California, Florida and Georgia (page #2 of “Facts”--PHP = Medicare; PHC = Medicaid). US & GLOBAL & PROGRAMS & COUNTRIES: US • NO new domestic U.S. AHF Healthcare Centers, AHF Pharmacies, AHF Wellness or OTC sites opened in December 2020. GLOBAL • AHF's Global program now operates 730 global AHF clinics, ADDING two (2) new treatment sites globally, while CLOSING twelve (12). AHF GLOBAL SITES ADDED IN JANUARY 2021: Week of February 5, 2021 NO new AHF global treatment sites opened and none were closed this week: Week of January 29, 2021 One (1) new global treatment site was ADDED this week and ten (10) were CLOSED: ADDED: • VIETNAM — Tuyen Quang – TQ_Yenson While ten (10) sites were CLOSED, all in UKRAINE, with patients transferred to other treatment sites: • UKRAINE — Kiev – Boyarka (patients transferred to Kiev – Regional Center) • UKRAINE — Kiev – Lunacharskogo (patients transferred to Kyiv – Kiev CC [Kyiv Hospital No.
    [Show full text]