The Changing Face of Western Botany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Changing Face of Western Botany The Changing Face Of Western Botany By BARBARA ERTTER Adapted from a talk at the Native Plant Society of Oregon An- creased to nearly 10,000. Linnaeus, like his contemporaries, nual Banquet, 14 May 1994, in Ash/and, Oregon; dedicated to tried to assign each of these plants a descriptive phrase in Latin John Thomas (Tom) Howell, 1904-1994. As general references (the universal tongue used by scholars throughout Europe). on the following history of botany in the western United States, However, he also provided a single-word epithet for each see McKelvey (1955), Keeney (1992), Reveal (1972), and Reveal species in a genus. Linnaeus himself considered the resultant and Pringle (1993). binomial to be a trivial nickname, of little significance, but this "trivial name" is what caught on and earned Linnaeus Science does not occur in a vacuum, and the juxtaposition his own descriptive phrase, "Father of Taxonomy." of philosophies and realities that shape the face of science undergo major shifts over extended periods of time. My Once his fame was established, Linnaeus seldom ventured far original title, "The New Face of Western Botany;' became from home, depending instead on the steady stream of "The Changing Face" when I realized that "Western Botany" novelties collected by his disciples and correspondents from has already gone through several "New Faces." The contem- around the globe. This system of an institution-based expert porary shift that first caught my attention is only the latest providing a clearinghouse for a network of field-based con- in a long series. Furthermore, the develoment of "Western tributors proved to be very effective. Plant exploration requires Botany;' intended to refer to the western United States, is covering vast areas, generally far from population centers, bur rooted in the history of western civilization in general, begin- the analysis of the resultant collections requires the resources ning in Europe. of a major herbarium, with abundant comparative material and library facilities. The initial cataloguing of the New World Folk Taxonomy And Classical Roots flora therefore occurred as a function of travelling collectors sending specimens to the great herbaria in Europe, where the In prehistoric Europe, as in the rest of the world, the first type specimens of so many common American species are Face of Botany, the first knowledge of plants by humans, was located as a result. not a specialized branch of learning belonging only to an elite (or eccentric) intelligentsia. Rather, every member of a pre- Establishment Of American Botany agricultural society depended on an intimate knowledge of the local flora, for food, medicine, and a diversity of other In the decades following the American Revolution, resident uses. Taxonomic and floristic information were part of the botanists in the eastern United States gradually built up suf- essential cultural heritage of a society, amassed and transmit- ficient expertise and herbaria to declare botanical in- ted orally over the span of uncounted generations. For this dependence from European centers. The first center of transmission to occur, the components of the surrounding flora American botany was, appropriately enough, Philadelphia, needed to be labeled. The folk taxonomies resulting from this where American political independence had been declared. preliterate naming of plants have been studied by ethnobot- anists such as Brent Berlin (1992). Those of Greece and Rome The center shifted in fact provide the core of our current taxonomic north in the early nomenclature, introduced into written history by Theo- 1800's, triggered by phrastus, the "Father of Botany." the establishment by David Hosack of the The works of Theophrastus and the equally esteemed early Elgin Botanic Gar- Roman authority Dioscorides suffered the same fate as did den in New York, those of other classical sources during the Middle Ages, the first public gar- becoming allegorized for their putative Christian symbolism den in the United and enshrined as immutable, unchallengeable authorities. States. The garden Also parallel to other disciplines, botanical knowledge expand- itself failed (situated ed during the Renaissance. The development of the printing at the current site of press played a significant role, in that the beautiful herbals Rockefeller Center, that had previously been laboriously hand-copied could now it was considered too be more widely available. As a result, it became increasingly far from New York evident that the 600 or so plants known to classical authorities City), but Hosack were not in fact all that existed, as had once been believed. influenced Amos Eaton, a law student, Linnaean Names And Networks to take up botany. In Asa Gray turn, "When he was Any final resistance to the heresy that different kinds of jailed for his dealings in a troublesome land sale, Eaton taught plants occurred in different parts of the world was washed away the young son of the prison's fiscal agent his first lessons in by the tidal wave of novelties arriving from distant shores. Dur- the Linnaean method; the youngster was John Torrey" (Reveal ing the 250 years between Columbus and Linnaeus, the & Pringle, 1993). Torrey (Torreya) ended up at Columbia Col- number of different plants known to European botanists in- lege; he in turn inspired Asa Gray (Grayia), who founded the 18 Kalmiopsis 1995 Gray Herbarium at Harvard University. Together, Torrey and leaving the land battle to European claimants, particularly Gray ("T. & a") formed the clearinghouse and new voice of Spain, Russia, and Great Britain. The latter's presence in the authority for American botany during much of the 19th century. region was primarily in the form of fur-trading enterprises; British trading posts on the Columbia River provided bases for British botanical explorers, generally in the company of Early Exploration Of Western North America fur trappers and other explorers. Turning finally to western North America, the pattern of Douglas And Nuttall increasing autonomy is continued. We tend to forget how far the West Coast was from the centers of Western civilization during this period. The Panama Canal did not exist, so the Undoubtedly the entire coast of South America was more accessible to explora- most significant of the botanical collec- tion than was western North America. Even Australia was bet- tors during this ter known, by virtue of its status as a British colony. Further- period was David more, the United States was only a minor player during this Douglas (Douglas-fir, period, having just recently come into existence as an indepen- Douglasia), from dent nation. Scotland. Douglas collected plants The earliest collections from western North America were throughout the Brit- therefore samplings taken along the Pacific coast by European ish territories of exploring expeditions, who were primarily interested in seek- western North Am- ing profitable trade items and unclaimed lands. The first erica in the 1820's species described from the West Coast was the sand verbena, and 1830's. As a Abronia umbeUata (Nyctaginaceae), grown from seed sent to British subject, France from California in 1786 (the ill-fated Laperouse expedi- Douglas had access tion itself subse- to the resources of quently perished in the Hudson's Bay the South Pacific). Company, a distinct Other expeditions advantage unavail- David Douglas nibbled the coast- able to explorers of line, such as a Brit- other nationalities. Douglas was part of William Jackson ish surveying expedi- Hooker's network; his descriptions and names routinely ap- tion commanded by- pear in Lindley's Botanical Register ("Dougl. ex Lindl."). Captain George Vancouver (Van- Another particularly noteworthy collector during this early couveria) in the period was Thomas Nuttall ("Nutt.," Comas nuttallii), an 1790's, which in- Englishman working out of Philadelphia. In 1834, at the age cluded the Scottish of 48, Nuttall made the strenuous overland journey across the naturalist-surgeon Rocky Mountains, in the company of Nathanial Wyeth Archibald Menzies (Wyethia), a merchant from Boston who wanted to break into OvIenziesia, Pseudo- the lucrative fur-trading business (Wyeth built Fort Hall in tsuga menziesii). The what is now southern Idaho, but the venture failed when the Russian presence British built Fort Boise in direct competition). While Nuttall during this period is described much of his own material, many names first appear evidenced by such in Torrey and Gray's Flora of North America. eponyms as Roman- zoffia. Archibald Menzies The hazards and handicaps encountered beyond the frontiers by these early collectors were considerable, and not always ap- The only expedition from the United States during this early preciated by their institution-based collaborators. Douglas' rela- period was the one led by Meriwether Lewis (Lewisia) and tionship with his sponsor Hooker, for example, was often William Clark (Clarkia) in 1805-1806, up the Missouri River strained as a result. Keep in mind the limited transportation and across the Continental Divide to the mouth of the Col- options, or the lack of medical treatment when constantly umbia River. The expedition was established by President encountering grizzly bears, rattlesnakes, and other dangers. Thomas Jefferson to survey the newly acquired Louisiana Ter- And how do you dry your collections after your boat has cap- ritory (which Napoleon had sold in order to concentrate on sized, as happened to Nuttall? Consider also that you were European domination). By a complicated turn of events, the likely to be trespassing into the territory of various Native plants collected as part of the Lewis and Clark expedition were Americans who might not welcome interlopers. The amel- described not in Philadelphia, where the specimens are now iorating factor was that the natives often treated foreign plant housed, but in England. collectors with the same combination of respect and fear ac- corded to their own plant-collecting shamans and healers (or The fledgling United States, however, was not in a position maybe just considered them "touched by spirits" and well to follow up on any incipient claims to the West Coast, worth leaving alone).
Recommended publications
  • An Antillean Plant of Beauty, a French Botanist, and a German Name: Naming Plants in the Early Modern Atlantic World
    Estonian Journal of Ecology, 2012, 61, 1, 37–50 doi: 10.3176/eco.2012.1.05 An Antillean plant of beauty, a French botanist, and a German name: naming plants in the Early Modern Atlantic world Laura Hollsten Faculty of Arts, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Åbo, Finland; [email protected] Received 10 December 2010, revised 7 March 2011, accepted 27 June 2011 Abstract. This paper investigates the naming of plants in the work of the French botanist Charles Plumier (1646–1704). Plumier made three trips to the French Antilles between 1690 and 1697, was appointed royal botanist in 1693, and published his first work, Description des Plantes de l’Amérique, in the same year. Plumier was the first ‘modern’ botanist to describe the flora of the Caribbean in a time when natural history underwent significant qualitative changes as a result of the European expansion and transatlantic contacts. Plumier’s ambition was to replace the confusing multitude of names given to New World plants with a universal taxonomically based nomenclature. His modernity and scientific ethos manifest themselves in his neutral way of organizing the plants according to a taxonomic system and his use of a Latin nomenclature, often naming plants after well-known botanists. Through Plumier’s naming process, I argue, it is possible to highlight the colonial and Atlantic context of his work, his network as part of the scientific elite of his country, and his professionalism resulting from years of botanical studies. Key words: history of botany, early modern natural history, plant nomenclature. INTRODUCTION According to a story entitled ‘The Tree of Riches’, the French botanist Charles Plumier decided that he would like to travel the world and get rich (Pellowski, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • History Department Botany
    THE HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY 1889-1989 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SHERI L. BARTLETT I - ._-------------------- THE HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY 1889-1989 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SHERI L. BARTLETT TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1-11 Chapter One: 1889-1916 1-18 Chapter Two: 1917-1935 19-38 Chapter Three: 1936-1954 39-58 Chapter Four: 1955-1973 59-75 Epilogue 76-82 Appendix 83-92 Bibliography 93-94 -------------------------------------- Preface (formerly the College of Science, Literature and the Arts), the College of Agriculture, or The history that follows is the result some other area. Eventually these questions of months ofresearch into the lives and work were resolved in 1965 when the Department of the Botany Department's faculty members joined the newly established College of and administrators. The one-hundred year Biological Sciences (CBS). In 1988, The overview focuses on the Department as a Department of Botany was renamed the whole, and the decisions that Department Department of Plant Biology, and Irwin leaders made to move the field of botany at Rubenstein from the Department of Genetics the University of Minnesota forward in a and Cell Biology became Plant Biology's dynamic and purposeful manner. However, new head. The Department now has this is not an effort to prove that the administrative ties to both the College of Department's history was linear, moving Biological Sciences and the College of forward in a pre-determined, organized Agriculture. fashion at every moment. Rather I have I have tried to recognize the attempted to demonstrate the complexities of accomplishments and individuality of the the personalities and situations that shaped Botany Department's faculty while striving to the growth ofthe Department and made it the describe the Department as one entity.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOL/APBI 324 – Introduction to Seed Plant Taxonomy
    This syllabus is a general representation of the course as previously offered and is subject to change. BIOL/APBI 324 – Introduction to Seed Plant Taxonomy General Course Syllabus (as of September 2019) About the Course: Course Description: An introduction to seed plant taxonomy emphasizing descriptive morphology and identification. Each student will be required to submit a plant collection. Correct understanding of the actual relationships between plants, rather than superficial resemblance, is the basis of comparative biology required to analyze the diversity of plant forms. The species diversity of plants is considerable, and this course will pay particular attention to very diverse and important groups such as the grasses and the orchids, focusing on reasons for their evolutionary success. Identification skills will be inculcated by the lectures working in tandem with the laboratory sessions. This course aims to give students a good working knowledge of plant taxonomy as a preparation for work in any biological discipline. Course Format: Lecture and Laboratory Credits: 3 Pre-requisites: BIOL 121 Course Learning Objectives: By the end of this course, students will be able to: • Achieve a good working knowledge of concepts, principles, and recent discoveries in plant taxonomy. • Gain an overview of seed plant diversity, including the most species-rich plant families and so be able to place any botanical information in the overall context of plant diversity. • Learn ways in which their knowledge can be applied to ecology and evolutionary biology. • Gain an appreciation of how current research in the field is being done by reading recent research papers. Textbooks and Additional Resources: Laboratory fee: $25; please bring to first lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Botanists in San Diego Nancy Carol Carter
    Journal of the California Garden & Landscape History Society Vol. 14, No. 4 • Fall 2011 The Brandegees: Leading Botanists in San Diego Nancy Carol Carter [This article, originally published in The Journal of San Diego History, is reprinted here, by permission, in a somewhat abridged form.1] he most renowned botanical couple of 19th-century and generally agreeing with his scientific principles, the T America lived in San Diego from 1894 until 1906. Brandegees eventually claimed a superior ability to classify They were early settlers in the Bankers Hill area, initially and appropriately name the plants they had collected and constructing a brick herbarium to house the world’s best observed in situ. Fully aware of delays and impatient with private collection of plant specimens from the western the imprecision of more distant classification work, both United States and Mexico. They lived in a tent until their resisted the tradition of submitting new species to Gray or treasured plant collection was properly protected, then built other East Coast scientists for botanical description.3 They a house connected to the herbarium. Around their home became expert taxonomists who described and defended they established San Diego’s first botanical garden—a col- their science in West Coast journals. During their lifetimes, lection of rare and exotic plants that furthered their research the Brandegees published a combined total of 159 scientific and delighted visitors. papers.4 Their example in- Botanists and plant ex- spired other Pacific Coast perts from around the botanists to greater confidence world knew of this garden in their own field experience and traveled to San Diego and the value of botanically to study its plants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Botanical Survey of Joseph Quer's Flora Española
    A botanical survey of Joseph Quer's Flora española Author(s): Carlos Aedo, Marta Fernández-Albert, Patricia Barberá, Antoni Buira, Alejandro Quintanar, Leopoldo Medina & Ramón Morales Source: Willdenowia, 47(3):243-258. Published By: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin (BGBM) https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.47.47308 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3372/wi.47.47308 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem CARLOS AEDO1*, MARTA FERNÁNDEZ-ALBERT1, PATRICIA BARBERÁ1, ANTONI BUIRA1, ALEJANDRO QUINTANAR1, LEOPOLDO MEDINA1 & RAMÓN MORALES1 A botanical survey of Joseph Quer’s Flora española Version of record first published online on 15 November 2017 ahead of inclusion in December 2017 issue. Abstract: We examine various aspects of Joseph Quer’s Flora española (1762 – 1764, 1784), taking into considera- tion the contributions made by Casimiro Gómez Ortega and proposing that he be credited as a co-author on the last two volumes of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Germination and Seedling Establishment of Spiny Hopsage (Grayia Spinosa [Hook.] Moq.)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Nancy L. Shaw for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Crop and Soil Sciences presented on March 19, 1992 Title: Germination and Seedling Establishment of Spiny Hopsage (Grayia Spinosa [Hook.] Moq.) Abstract approved:_Redactedfor Privacy von r. ULdUe Reestablishment of spiny hopsage(Grayia spinosa [Hook.] Moq.) where depleted or lost on shrub steppe sites can improve forage, plant cover, and soil stabilization. The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine direct-seeding requirements; 2) develop optimum germination pretreatments; and 3) examine dormancy mechanisms in spiny hopsage fruits and seeds. The effects of seed source, planting date,and site preparation method onseed germination and seedling establishment (SE) were examined at Birds of Prey and Reynolds Creek in southwestern Idaho. Three seed sources were planted on rough or compact seedbeds on 4 dates in 1986-87 and 3 dates in 1987-88. Exposure to cool-moist environments improved spring SE from early fall (EF) and late fall (LF) plantings. Few seedlings emerged from early (ESp) or late spring (LSp) plantings. SE was low at: 1 site in 1986-87 and atboth sites in 1987-88, probably due to lack of precipitation. For the successful 1986-87 planting, seedling density was greater on rough compared to compact seedbeds in April andMay, possiblydue to improved microclimate conditions. Growth rate varied among seed sources, but seedlings developed a deep taproot (mean length 266 mm) with few lateral roots the first season. Seeds were planted on 3 dates in 1986-87 and 1987-88, andnylon bags containing seeds were planted on 4 dates each year to study microenvironment effects on germination (G), germination rate (GR), and SE.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Bacteriology and Bacterial Structure/Function
    INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIOLOGY AND BACTERIAL STRUCTURE/FUNCTION LEARNING OBJECTIVES To describe historical landmarks of medical microbiology To describe Koch’s Postulates To describe the characteristic structures and chemical nature of cellular constituents that distinguish eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells To describe chemical, structural, and functional components of the bacterial cytoplasmic and outer membranes, cell wall and surface appendages To name the general structures, and polymers that make up bacterial cell walls To explain the differences between gram negative and gram positive cells To describe the chemical composition, function and serological classification as H antigen of bacterial flagella and how they differ from flagella of eucaryotic cells To describe the chemical composition and function of pili To explain the unique chemical composition of bacterial spores To list medically relevant bacteria that form spores To explain the function of spores in terms of chemical and heat resistance To describe characteristics of different types of membrane transport To describe the exact cellular location and serological classification as O antigen of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) To explain how the structure of LPS confers antigenic specificity and toxicity To describe the exact cellular location of Lipid A To explain the term endotoxin in terms of its chemical composition and location in bacterial cells INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIOLOGY 1. Two main threads in the history of bacteriology: 1) the natural history of bacteria and 2) the contagious nature of infectious diseases, were united in the latter half of the 19th century. During that period many of the bacteria that cause human disease were identified and characterized. 2. Individual bacteria were first observed microscopically by Antony van Leeuwenhoek at the end of the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliwomenbotany00hollrich.Pdf
    88/51 Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California CALIFORNIA WOMEN IN BOTANY Annetta Carter UC Herbarium Botanist, Collector and Interpreter of Baja California Plants Mary DeDecker Botanist and Conservationist of the Inyo Region Elizabeth McClintock California Academy of Sciences Curator, Ornamental Plant Specialist With Interview Introductions by Lincoln Constance, Betty Gilchrist, Peter Rowlands, John Hunter Thomas Interviews Conducted by Carol Holleuffer 1985 Copyright (c) 1987 by The Regents of the University of California This manuscript is made available for research purposes. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: To cite the volume: California Women in Botany, an oral history conducted in 1985, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1987. To cite individual interview: Annetta Carter, "UC Herbarium Botanist, Collector and Interpreter of Baja California Plants," an oral history conducted 1985 by Carol Holleuffer, in California Women in Botany, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1987. Copy No. /| OAKLAND THE DAILY CALIFORNIAN TRIBUNE 1991 May 17, 1991 May 16, I ' . .-,<. TVjW'-wiKjs Annetta Carter, ^UC'Berkeleyl 'botanist dies UC botanist ' I" W-! f . -: ^.,.v X **\; -':.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Plant Taxonomy, V.*
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXVIII MARCH, 1928 No. 2 PRINCIPLES OF PLANT TAXONOMY, V.* JOHN H. SCHAFFNER, Ohio State University. After studying the taxonomy of plants for twenty-five years the very remarkable fact became evident that there is no general correspondence of the taxonomic system with the environment, but as the great paleontologist, Williams, said in 1895: "environmental conditions are but the medium through which organic evolution has been determinately ploughing its way." Of course, the very fact that there is a system of phylogenetic relationships of classes, orders, families, and genera and that these commonly have no general correspondence to environment shows that, in classifying the plant material, we must discard all notions of teleological, utilitarian, and selective factors as causative agents of evolution. The general progressive movement has been carried on along quite definite lines. The broader and more fundamental changes appeared first and are practically constant, and on top of these, .potentialities or properties of smaller and smaller value have been introduced, until at the end new factors of little general importance alone are evolved. These small potentialities are commonly much less stable than the more fundamental ones and thus great variability in subordinate characters is often present in the highest groups. We must then think of the highest groups as being full of hereditary potentialities while the lower groups have comparatively few. As stated above, there is a profound non-correspondence of the .taxonomic system and the various orthogenetic series with the environment. The system of plants, from the taxonomic point of view, is non-utilitarian.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Diversity: a Phylogenetic Framework Phenetics
    Speciation is a Phylogeny process by which lineages split. -the evolutionary relationships among We should be able organisms to the reconstruct the history of these (millions of Time years) -the patterns of lineage branching produced splits (i.e., build an by the true evolutionary history evolutionary tree) Linnaean System Diversity: of Classification A Phylogenetic Framework I. Taxonomy II. Phenetics III. Cladistics Carl von Linné a.k.a. Linnaeus (1707-1778) Phenetics Taxonomy does not always reflect evolutionary history. • Grouping is based on phenotypic similarity • Does not distinguish the cause of similarities • Not widely used today because many Example: Example: Example: similarities are not due to common ancestry. Class Aves Kingdom Protista Class Reptilia 1 Convergent Evolution Cladistics • Emphasizes common ancestry (≠ similarity) • Distinguishes between two kinds of similarities: 1) similarity due to common ancestry 2) similarity due to convergent evolution • Most widely used approach to reconstructing phylogenies. Homology Bird feathers are made of keratin. a phenotype that is similar in two species because it was inherited from a common ancestor. fly wings ≠ bird wings Homoplasy a phenotype that is similar in two species because of convergent evolution. Insect wings are made of chiton. An Example of Cladistics Relate the following taxa: • Horse • Seal • Lion • House Cat Homoplasy 2 Data for Cladistic Analysis How to do a Cladistic Analysis * * Cat Lion Horse Seal Cat Lion Horse 1. Define a set of traits. Seal Lizard Trait Lizard 2. Analyze traits for homology. Retractable Claws 1 0 0 0 0 Pointed Molars 1 1 0 0 0 3. Assign phenotypic states to each taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Realm of Hard Evidence': Novelty, Persuasion And
    Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 343–360, 2001 Pergamon 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain 1369-8486/01 $ - see front matter www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc ‘The Realm of Hard Evidence’: Novelty, Persuasion and Collaboration in Botanical Cladistics Jim Endersby* In 1998 a new classification of flowering plants generated headlines in the non- specialist press in Britain. By interviewing those involved with, or critical of, the new classification, this essay examines the participants’ motives and strategies for creating and maintaining a research group. It argues that the classification was produced by an informal alliance whose members collaborated despite their disagreements. This collaboration was possible because standardised methods and common theoretical assumptions served as ‘boundary objects’. The group also created a novel form of collective publication that helped to unite them. Both the collaboration and the pub- lishing strategy were partly motivated by the need to give taxonomy a degree of ‘big science’ credibility that it had previously lacked: creating an international team allowed more comprehensive results; and collective publication served to emphasise both the novelty of the work and its claims to objectivity. Creating a group identity also served to exclude practitioners of alternative forms of taxonomy. Finally, the need to obtain funding for continuing work both created the need to collaborate and influenced the way the classification was presented to the public. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cladistics; Botanical Taxonomy; Boundary Objects; Sociology of Science; Rhetoric of Science. 1. Introduction: ‘A Rose is Still a Rose’ On 23rd November 1998, the Independent newspaper announced that ‘A rose is still a rose, but everything else in botany is turned on its head’.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Botany and Use of Plants
    SECTION 1: CLASSIFICATION OF BOTANY AND USE OF PLANTS 1. Introduction Botany refers to the scientific study of the plant kingdom. As a branch of biology, it mainly accounts for the science of plants or ‘phytobiology’. The main objective of the this section is for participants, having completed their training, to be able to: 1. Identify and classify various types of herbs 2. Choose the appropriate categories and types of herbs for breeding and planting 1 2. Botany 2.1 Branches – Objectives – Usability Botany covers a wide range of scientific sub-disciplines that study the growth, reproduction, metabolism, morphogenesis, diseases, and evolution of plants. Subsequently, many subordinate fields are to appear, such as: Systematic Botany: its main purpose the classification of plants Plant morphology or phytomorphology, which can be further divided into the distinctive branches of Plant cytology, Plant histology, and Plant and Crop organography Botanical physiology, which examines the functions of the various organs of plants A more modern but equally significant field is Phytogeography, which associates with many complex objects of research and study. Similarly, other branches of applied botany have made their appearance, some of which are Phytopathology, Phytopharmacognosy, Forest Botany, and Agronomy Botany, among others. 2 Like all other life forms in biology, plant life can be studied at different levels, from the molecular, to the genetic and biochemical, through to the study of cellular organelles, cells, tissues, organs, individual plants, populations and communities of plants. At each of these levels a botanist can deal with the classification (taxonomy), structure (anatomy), or function (physiology) of plant life.
    [Show full text]