Tsuinfo Alert, August 2002
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August 1994 New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement by Donald L. Wells and Kevin J. Coppersmith Abstract Source parameters for historical earthquakes worldwide are com piled to develop a series of empirical relationships among moment magnitude (M), surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, rupture area, and maximum and average displacement per event. The resulting data base is a significant update of previous compilations and includes the ad ditional source parameters of seismic moment, moment magnitude, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, and average surface displacement. Each source parameter is classified as reliable or unreliable, based on our evaluation of the accuracy of individual values. Only the reliable source parameters are used in the final analyses. In comparing source parameters, we note the fol lowing trends: (1) Generally, the length of rupture at the surface is equal to 75% of the subsurface rupture length; however, the ratio of surface rupture length to subsurface rupture length increases with magnitude; (2) the average surface dis placement per event is about one-half the maximum surface displacement per event; and (3) the average subsurface displacement on the fault plane is less than the maximum surface displacement but more than the average surface dis placement. Thus, for most earthquakes in this data base, slip on the fault plane at seismogenic depths is manifested by similar displacements at the surface. Log-linear regressions between earthquake magnitude and surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, and rupture area are especially well correlated, show ing standard deviations of 0.25 to 0.35 magnitude units. -
A Storm Is Coming! Lessons in Hurricane Preparedness
A Storm is Coming! Lessons in Hurricane Preparedness Georgia Redonet Long Middle School INTRODUCTION The busy 2004 hurricane season, with fifteen Atlantic storms certainly served to remind us that we should learn the essentials of hurricane preparedness. I find that a study of hurricanes and their effect on our state’s coastal areas provides an exciting and interesting start to the school year in my seventh grade Texas History classes. We study the causes and effects of the storms and how to prepare for emergency situations. While this unit will focus only on hurricane preparedness, in the classroom we will first study the formation and structure of hurricanes and round out our studies by investigating the Great Galveston Storm of 1900. I would suggest that those teachers living in coastal areas choose a storm from their own locale. When there was the possibility that our area might be struck by an approaching storm, as was the case with Ivan in September 2004, the energy level in my classroom was electrifying. Students eagerly watched the news and weather and were going to the school computer lab to check out weather web sites. On May 24, 2005, the American Red Cross reported that they had found many Americans in coastal regions who were not prepared for the coming hurricane season that lasts from June 1 to November 30: Waiting until the last minute to prepare for a hurricane, or assuming that a major storm will not hit your community is a mistake, said Joe Becker, Senior Vice President, Preparedness and Response for the American Red Cross. -
Koleksi Cd Non Fiksi
KOLEKSI CD NON FIKSI No Judul Film Call Number No Urut Format CD 1 Best In Asia 1 910.45 BEI V-1 A247 VCD 2 Best In Asia 2 910.45 BEI V-2 A248 VCD 3 Best In Asia 3 910.45 BEI V-3 A249 VCD 4 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 1 623.81 SMI s A09 VCD 5 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 2 624.2 SMI s A10 VCD 6 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 3 627.922 SMI s A11 VCD 7 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 4 628.24 SMI s A12 VCD 8 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 5 627.13 SMI s A13 VCD 9 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 6 625.2 SMI s A14 VCD 10 Seven Wonders of The Industrial World: Eps. 7 627.8 SMI s A15 VCD 11 Exploring Korea's Culture 951 KOR e A07 VCD 12 ASEAN 951 ASE t A08 VCD 13 Tsunami Killer Wave 551.470 24 ROS t A03 VCD 14 Diana: Last Days of a Princess 920.008 DAL d A39 VCD 15 Ramayana: The Legend Danced & Sung 792.859 8 PUR V-2 A142 VCD 16 The Hiunt For Osama Bin Laden 363.32 WIL h A25 VCD 17 Megafactories apache Helicopter 355.83 GRE m A274 DVD 18 Inside the Pentagon 355.030 973 A28 DVD 19 The World Heritage Vol.1 338.47 UNE w V-1 A75 DVD 20 The World Heritage Vol.2 338.47 UNE w V-2 A76 DVD 21 The World Heritage Vol.3 338.47 UNE w V-3 A77 DVD 22 World Cafe Asia: Bali & Tokyo 338.47 CHA w A35 VCD 23 Travelers: Asia 338.47 BRO t A74 DVD 24 Science Frontier: Technology 327 LAM s A157 VCD 25 By The People: The Election of Barrack Obama 324.092 RIC b A197 DVD 26 Magacities Vol. -
Enterprise Program Update
Issue 39 September 2009 Safety System Enterprises and Creative Enterprise Program Update I have two things to update you on: the employee Conflict Resolution Join Forces and client surveys and the Enterprise Program In serious mishaps where injury, death, or emotional “framework document”. duress is encountered, there is a need for persons We now have data from the client survey and, skilled in dealing with personal stress and related while the results of it are in progress, I can offer a emotional issues to provide Critical Incident Stress few generalizations. A large majority of clients Management services such as one-on-one are satisfied with the work enterprisers are doing; psychological first aid and group critical incident I’m guessing this comes as no surprise to you. I stress debriefings. When a Serious Accident found it really interesting that, in three questions I Investigation Team responds to accidents for the had asked of you and your clients, the answers purpose of investigating, they may encounter were nearly mirror images of one another. On situations that run from zero support, to outside top of that, the same goes for a client survey contractors conducting debriefings that may conflict done five years ago. The results of these with timely assembly of critical investigative questions are in this issue (see page 3). Keep up information. There is a need to establish a clear and the good work! consistent process for rendering assistance The Enterprise Program Framework to units suffering from catastrophic loss that came out of many conversations around coordinates well with all activities that will a program-wide business plan. -
Creating Educational Media for Students in the United Kingdom
CREATING EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOR STUDENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By _____________________________ Nicholas Baker _____________________________ Allyson Barford _____________________________ Seth Borg ___________________________ Elizabeth Heneberry Date: March 1, 2002 Approved: _____________________________________ Professor Gregory Theyel, Major Advisor _____________________________________ Professor Stephen Matson, Major Advisor Authorship We, the Science Year IQP team submit that this report and our project work reflects a collaborative team effort from all four group members. 1. Abstract The WPI Science Year IQP intends to contribute to efforts to revitalise interest in science among students ages ten to nineteen by capturing their attention and interest with interactive web-based computer games focusing on the popular themes of sports and inventions. In developing these games, the project team researched student interest in science and web- based games, the UK national curriculum, and educational game design and production. Final deliverables include comprehensive game design documents, detailed storyboards, and two Flash-based Internet games. 2. Executive Summary Educators and industry representatives in the United Kingdom have expressed concern about the decline of interest in scientific study among children and young adults between 10 and 19 years of age. Resources and initiatives are needed for making science provocative and exciting to today’s youth. Science Year is a UK government-based initiative that seeks to spawn interest in this target age group through various educational resources such as web-based games, nationwide projects, and CD-ROMs for use in the classroom. -
Results in $5,000 Fine
T ;•=• T-jpr-r"-;1" -^ri-""-T-^--;~^| ni I • ' ' _ I f J t -• J_«. J -I.J __| Week of May 24-30,2001 SANIBEL&CAPTIVA, FLORIDA VOLUME 28, NUMBER 21, 28 PAGES 75 CENTS Refuge boundaries The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service holds hearings on expanding J.N. "Ding" Darling refuge boundaries. results in $5,000 fine —See page 2 By Pete Bishop Hurricane season Staff writer Part one of a two part series The $5,000 fine given last week on the upcoming 2001 hur- to Richard and Fleur Cook for ricane season. destroying two. gopher tortoise burrows, tortoise habitat vegeta- —See page 3 tion and 10 cabbage palms on two vacant lots in the Wulfert Road Pepper eradication area is the largest one-shot penalty imposed in the city's history, Eliminating Brazilian pep- Michael Pistella according to city officials. A stop work order halted per on Sanibel continues Michael Pistella although 70 property own- The county's chief hearing construction on Richard ers have been given notices Arsenic levels at the school ranged from 2.81 to 32 mil- examiner, Diane Parker, autho- and Fleur Cook's properties of violation for not remov- ligrams per kilogram of soil. Florida DEP targets 0.8 mil- rized the fine as part of a stipulat- March 16. ing their pepper. ligrams of arsenic per kilogram for soil cleanup projects. ed agreement between the Cooks gopher tortoise forage species and the city during a May 17 code plants; replace the cabbage palms —See page 20 enforcement hearing. with 10 cabbage palms plus 20 In addition to the fine, plus High levels of arsenic found in nearly $400 in administrative costs, the Cooks have agreed to t> See Tortoise Sanibel School's Kids Play area replace habitat vegetation with 90 page 20 Volunteers reeled DONE DEAL! Sanibel environmental Officials say there Is enough to pose immediate danger organizations are in dire to the island's schoolchildren, need of volunteers to help no danger to children; Principal Barabara Von Harten has them with a variety of tasks cleanup set for July posted signs near the area and told this summer. -
2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
City of Los Angeles 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Eric Garcetti, Mayor Aram Sahakian, General Manager Emergency Management Department EMERGE Ill MANAGEM August 2017 DEPART City of Los Angeles 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan August 2017 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY City of Los Angeles Emergency Management Department Tetra Tech 200 N. Spring Street 1999 Harrison Street Phone: 510.302.6300 Room 1533 Suite 500 Fax: 510.433.0830 Los Angeles, California 90012 Oakland, CA 94612 tetratech.com Tetra Tech Project # 103S4869 \\IWRS065FS1\Data\Active\0_HazMitigation\103s4869.emi_LACity_HMP\2017-08_ApprovedFinal\2017_LA_HMP_Final_2017-08-23.docx City of Los Angeles 2017 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Contents CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ xxii PART 1— PLANNING PROCESS AND COMMUNITY PROFILE 1. Introduction to Hazard Mitigation Planning ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Why Prepare This Plan? ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 The Big Picture ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Purposes for Planning ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Who Will Benefit From This Plan? .......................................................................................................... -
Concept Progress a Science Fiction Metaphysics
CONCEPT PROGRESS A SCIENCE FICTION METAPHYSICS LEO INDMAN Copyright © 2017 by Leo Indman All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental. Although every precaution has been taken to verify the accuracy of the information contained herein, the author assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for damages that may result from the use of information contained within. The views expressed in this book are solely those of the author. The author is not responsible for websites (or their content) that are not owned by the author. The author is grateful to: NASA, for its stellar imagery: www.nasa.gov Wikipedia, for its vast knowledge and reference: www.wikipedia.org Cover and interior design by the author ePublished in the United States of America Available on Apple iBooks: www.apple.com/ibooks/ ISBN: 978-0-9988289-0-9 Concept Progress: A Science Fiction Metaphysics / Leo Indman First Edition www.conceptprogress.com ii For Marianna, Ariella, and Eli iii CONCEPT PROGRESS iv Table of Contents Copyright Dedication Introduction Chapter One Concept Sound Chapter One | Science, Philosophy, and -
Curriculum Vitae DON HELMBERGER Professor of Geophysics
Curriculum Vitae DON HELMBERGER Professor of Geophysics Seismological Laboratory 252-21 California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 Tel. (626) 395-6998; Fax (626) 564-0715 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION: B. A. (Geophysics) University of Minnesota (five year curriculum), 1962 M. S. University of California, San Diego, 1965. Ph.D. University of California, San Diego, 1967. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Research Associate, Department of Geology and Geophysics, MIT, 1968 Assistant Professor of Geophysics, Princeton University, 1969 Assistant Professor of Geophysics, California Institute of Technology, 1970-1974 Associate Professor of Geophysics, California Institute of Technology, 1974-1979 Professor of Geophysics, California Institute of Technology, 1979 - present. Director, Seismological Laboratory, Caltech, May 1998-May 2003 RECENT HONORS AND AWARDS: First American Geophysical Union recipient of the Inge Lehmann Medal, 1997 Smits Family Professorship, California Institute of Technology, 2000-2011 Medal of the Seismological Society of America, 2002 National Academy of Sciences Member, 2004 RESEARCH INTERESTS: Seismic wave propagation and the inversion of waveforms to recover detailed information about earthquake characteristics and earth structure; particularly interested in mapping ultra-low-velocity zones and possible post-perovskite effects at the Core-Mantle Boundary. PUBLICATIONS: Helmberger, D. V. (1967). Head Waves from the Oceanic Mohorovicic Discontinuity, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Helmberger, D. V. (1968). The crust-mantle transition in the Bering Sea, Seismol. Soc. Am. Bull., 58, No. 1, 179-214. Helmberger, D. V. and G. B. Morris (1969). A travel time and amplitude interpretation of a marine refraction profile, primary waves, J. Geophys. Res., 74, No. 2, 438-494. -
City of Glendale Hazard Mitigation Plan Available to the Public by Publishing the Plan Electronically on the City’S Websites
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California City of Glendale Hazard Mitigati on Plan 2018 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 Introduction 1-2 Why Develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Who is covered by the Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California 1-4 Support for Hazard Mitigation 1-6 Plan Methodology 1-6 Input from the Steering Committee 1-7 Stakeholder Interviews 1-7 State and Federal Guidelines and Requirements for Mitigation Plans 1-8 Hazard Specific Research 1-9 Public Workshops 1-9 How is the Plan Used? 1-9 Volume I: Mitigation Action Plan 1-10 Volume II: Hazard Specific Information 1-11 Volume III: Resources 1-12 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILE 2-1 Why Plan for Natural and Manmade Hazards in the City of Glendale? 2-2 History of Glendale 2-2 Geography and the Environment 2-3 Major Rivers 2-5 Climate 2-6 Rocks and Soil 2-6 Other Significant Geologic Features 2-7 Population and Demographics 2-10 Land and Development 2-13 Housing and Community Development 2-14 Employment and Industry 2-16 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 2-17 Extensive Transportation Network 2-18 SECTION 3: RISK ASSESSMENT 3-1 What is a Risk Assessment? 3-2 2018 i Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Federal Requirements for Risk Assessment 3-7 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure 3-8 Summary 3-9 SECTION 4: MULTI-HAZARD GOALS AND ACTION ITEMS 4-1 Mission 4-2 Goals 4-2 Action -
June 17, 2004 10:13 WSPC/124-JEE 00165 CAN SITE
June 17, 2004 10:13 WSPC/124-JEE 00165 Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8, Special Issue 1 (2004) 1–41 c Imperial College Press CANSITERESPONSEBEPREDICTED? DAVID M. BOORE US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Large modifications of seismic waves are produced by variations of material properties near the Earth’s surface and by both surface and buried topography. These modifica- tions, usually referred to as “site response”, in general lead to larger motions on soil sites than on rock-like sites. Because the soil amplifications can be as large as a factor of ten, they are important in engineering applications that require the quantitative spec- ification of ground motions. This has been recognised for years by both seismologists and engineers, and it is hard to open an earthquake journal these days without finding an article on site response. What is often missing in these studies, however, are discus- sions of the uncertainty of the predicted response. A number of purely observational studies demonstrate that ground motions have large site-to-site variability for a single earthquake and large earthquake-location-dependent variability for a single site. This variability makes site-specific, earthquake-specific predictions of site response quite un- certain, even if detailed geotechnical and geological information is available near the site. Predictions of site response for average classes of sites exposed to the motions from many earthquakes can be made with much greater certainty if sufficient empirical observations are available. Keywords: Site response; amplification; transfer functions; ground motion; variability; prediction. 1. -
Hazard Mitigation Plan
2020 Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption Date: mm dd, 2020 Monte Vista Water District Justin Scott-Coe, General Manager 10575 Central Avenue Montclair, California 91763 Monte Vista Water District 2020 Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose of the Plan ................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Authority ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Community Profile .................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Physical Setting ....................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 History ...................................................................................................... 7 1.3.3 Demographics .......................................................................................... 8 1.3.4 Existing Land Use .................................................................................... 9 1.3.5 Development Trends .............................................................................. 11 Section 2 Plan Adoption .............................................................................. 12 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ....................................................................... 12 2.2 Promulgation Authority ........................................................................................