DOCSLIB.ORG

Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) California High-Speed Rail Authority Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) March 2019 This page intentionally left blank March 2019 California High-Speed Rail Project Environmental Document ii | Page Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................1-1 1.1 California High-Speed Rail System Background ........................................ 1-1 1.2 Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Background ................................. 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Findings of the Historic Architectural Survey Report .............. 1-4 2 REGULATORY SETTING .....................................................................................2-1 2.1 Federal ....................................................................................................... 2-1 National Environmental Policy Act ............................................... 2-1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act .................. 2-1 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. Section 303) ..................................................................... 2-4 2.2 State .......................................................................................................... 2-4 California Environmental Quality Act ............................................ 2-4 2.3 Local Regulations ....................................................................................... 2-5 Los Angeles County General Plan ............................................... 2-5 City of Burbank General Plan....................................................... 2-5 City of Glendale General Plan...................................................... 2-6 City of Los Angeles General Plan ................................................ 2-6 Local Jurisdiction Ordinances and Codes .................................... 2-7 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................3-1 3.1 No Project Alternative ................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 High-Speed Rail Build Alternative .............................................................. 3-1 HSR Build Alternative Description ................................................ 3-5 Roadway Crossings ................................................................... 3-13 3.3 Station Sites ............................................................................................. 3-15 Burbank Airport Station .............................................................. 3-15 Los Angeles Union Station ......................................................... 3-17 3.4 Maintenance of Infrastructure ................................................................... 3-18 Maintenance of Infrastructure Facilities ...................................... 3-19 Maintenance of Infrastructure Sidings ........................................ 3-19 Heavy Maintenance Facility ....................................................... 3-19 Light Maintenance Facility ......................................................... 3-19 3.5 Ancillary and Support Facilities ................................................................ 3-19 Electrification ............................................................................. 3-19 Signaling and Train-Control Elements ........................................ 3-20 3.6 Early Action Projects ................................................................................ 3-21 Downtown Burbank Metrolink Station ........................................ 3-21 Sonora Avenue Grade Separation ............................................. 3-21 Grandview Avenue Grade Separation ........................................ 3-23 Flower Street Grade Separation ................................................ 3-23 Goodwin Avenue/Chevy Chase Drive Grade Separation ........... 3-24 Main Street Grade Separation ................................................... 3-25 3.7 Project Construction ................................................................................. 3-26 3.8 Independent Utility of the Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section .......... 3-27 3.9 Operations of the Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section ...................... 3-27 4 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS .........................................................................4-1 5 POTENTIALLY INTERESTED PARTIES AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............5-1 5.1 NEPA/CEQA Public Scoping Meetings ...................................................... 5-1 California High-Speed Rail Project Environmental Document March 2019 Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) Page | i Table of Contents 5.2 Community Open House Meetings ............................................................. 5-1 5.3 Section 106 Outreach ................................................................................. 5-1 6 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFICATION EFFORTS AND METHODS ............................ 6-1 6.1 Prior High-Speed Rail Reports .................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Prior Surveys Conducted and Historic Contexts Written in the Study Area ............................................................................................................ 6-1 6.3 Records Search Results ............................................................................. 6-2 6.4 Field Survey ................................................................................................ 6-5 6.5 Streamlining Methods ................................................................................. 6-6 7 HISTORIC CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Overview .................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Communities That Intersect the Area of Potential Effect ............................. 7-1 Burbank ........................................................................................ 7-1 Glendale ....................................................................................... 7-1 Los Angeles ................................................................................. 7-1 7.3 Relevant Historical Trends in the Project Section ....................................... 7-3 Native Americans in Los Angeles County ..................................... 7-3 The Spanish and Mexican Periods: 1781–1849 ........................... 7-3 Passenger and Freight Railroad Development: 1876–1939 .......... 7-6 Twentieth-Century Bridge Building and Development: 1900– 1939 ........................................................................................... 7-12 River Channelization and Flood Control: 1920–1960 .................. 7-12 Freeway Development: 1940–1966 ............................................ 7-14 Industrial Development: 1876–1966 ........................................... 7-17 Commercial Development: 1903–1966 ....................................... 7-19 Residential Development: 1903–1966 ........................................ 7-22 Government Infrastructure and Services .................................... 7-25 8 PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED—FINDINGS .............................................................. 8-1 8.1 Newly Identified NRHP-Eligible Properties .................................................. 8-5 D1-1: Standard Oil Company Facilities ......................................... 8-6 D1-2: Kelite Factory ...................................................................... 8-7 D1-3: The R. Schiffman Medical Company ................................... 8-8 D1-4: Folk Victorian Residence .................................................... 8-9 D1-5: Lanza Brothers Market ..................................................... 8-10 D1-6: Taylor Yard Signal Tower ................................................. 8-11 D1-7: Valley Maid Creamery ...................................................... 8-12 D1-8: L.W. Grayson Steam-Electric Generating Station ............. 8-13 D1-9: Aero Industries Technical Institute .................................... 8-14 D1-10: Municipal Power & Light, Glendale ................................. 8-15 D1-11: Los Angeles Basket Company ........................................ 8-16 D1-12: Vignes Street Underpass (California Department of Transportation Bridge# 53C1764) .............................................. 8-17 D1-13: Los Angeles River Channel ............................................ 8-18 8.2 Previously Identified NRHP-Eligible Properties ......................................... 8-19 D2-1: Post Office Terminal Annex .............................................. 8-20 D2-2: Los Angeles Union Station Passenger Terminal and Grounds ..................................................................................... 8-21 D2-3: Glendale Southern Pacific Railroad Depot ........................ 8-21 D2-4: Arroyo Seco Parkway Historic District ............................... 8-22 March 2019 California High-Speed Rail Project Environmental Document ii | Page Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Historic Architectural Survey Report (HASR) Table of Contents D3-1: William Mead Homes ....................................................... 8-23 D3-2: Mission Tower (Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Organic Chemicals (AB 1803) in San Fernando Basin I Including the Cities of Los Angeles, Burbank & Glendale
    SFUND RECORDS CTR 2166-04848 df AR0007 " 1 SFUND RECORDS CTR \ 88134269 rl Groundwater Monitoring Plan For Organic Chemicals (AB 1803) In San Fernando Basin I Including The Cities Of Los Angeles, Burbank & Glendale 1 I Prepared For California State Department Of Health Services Prepared By .* Department of Water and Power | Water Quality Division _l City Of Los Angeles J October 1984 J J 00007 If-,. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary . 1 DETAILS OF MONITORING PLAN. 1. BACKGROUND 1.1. San Fernando Valley Basin 1 1.1.1. San Fernando Basin 2 A. City of Los Angeles 2 B. City of Burbank 3 C. City of Glendale 3 • • •*• 2. POTENTIAL SOURCES OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION BY ORGANIC CHEMICALS 2.1. Introduction 3 '2.1.1. Industrial Sources 3 2.1.2. Agricultural Areas 4 2.1.3. Unsewered... Areas and Private Disposal Systems 4 2.1.4. Landfills. ..." 5 3. SELECTION OF WELLS FOR ORGANIC MONITORING PLAN 3.1 City of Los Angeles 5 3.1.1. North Hollywood Well Field 6 3.1.2. Headworks, Crystal Springs and Pollock Well Fields 6 3.2. Burbank Wells 7 3.3. Glendale (Grandview Well Field) Wells. 7 4. SAMPLE COLLECTION 10 5. SAMPLING, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE CONDITIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC.MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR AB1803 5.1. Sample Container 10 5.2. Pretreatment of Container 10 5.3. Sampling Procedure 11 • 5.4. Sampling Preservation and Storage 11 6. LABORATORY ANALYSIS 13 LIST OF FIGURES NO. DESCRIPTION 1 San Fernando Valley Basin 2 Location of Wells (San Fernando Basin) 3 North Hollywood and Vicinity 4 Crystal Springs and Vicinity 5 Pollock Wells and Vicinity 6 Location of Private Disposal Systems and Areas without Sewer Service 7 Landfill Locations in San Fernando Valley Basin 11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment E Part 2
    Response to Correspondence from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Regarding the ArtCenter Master Plan Note that the emails (Attachment A) dated after April 25, 2018, were provided to the City after the end of the CEQA comment period, and, therefore, the emails and the responses below are not included in the EIR, and no response is required under CEQA. However, for sake of complete analysis and consideration of all comments submitted, the City responds herein and this document is made part of the project staff report. Response to Correspondence This correspondence with the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy occurred in the context of the preparation of the EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The formal comment letter from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy included in this correspondence was responded to as Letter No. 6 in Section III, Response to Comments, of the April 2018 Final EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The primary correspondence herein is comprised of emails between John Howell and Mickey Long discussing whether there is a wildlife corridor within the Hillside Campus, as well as emails between John Howell and CDFW regarding whether there is a wildlife corridor and whether CDFW will provide a comment letter regarding the ArtCenter Project for the Planning Commission hearing on May 9, 2018. Note that CDFW submitted a comment letter on May 9, 2018, after completion of the Draft EIR and Final EIR. The City has also provided a separate response to this late comment letter. This correspondence centers around the potential for the Hillside Campus to contribute to a wildlife corridor. The CDFW was contacted during preparation of the Final EIR to obtain specific mapping information to provide a more comprehensive description of the potential for wildlife movement within the Hillside Campus within the Final EIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service
    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bow Tie Yard Lofts Project Initial Study
    City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Major Projects & Environmental Analysis Section City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 INITIAL STUDY Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan Area Bow Tie Yard Lofts Project Case Number: ENV-2016-2862-EIR Project Location: 2750-2800 W. Casitas Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90039 Council District: 1, Gilbert A. Cedillo Project Description: The Applicant proposes the development of a mixed-use project in the Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan area that would consist of five buildings with a total of 419 multi-family residential units (approximately 423,872 square feet) and approximately 64,000 square feet of commercial space. The 5.7-acre Project Site is located at the terminus of Casitas Avenue in Glassell Park in Northeast Los Angeles. The Los Angeles River is adjacent to the Project Site’s southern boundary line, and the Glendale Freeway (SR-2) is located to the north and west of the Project Site. The existing zoning designation of the Project Site is [Q]PF-1-CDO-RIO. Existing on-site uses, including a light manufacturing/warehouse/film production building (approximately 117,000 square feet) and its associated surface parking, would be demolished as part of the Proposed Project. The proposed residential units would include a combination of 119 studios, 220 one-bedroom, and 80 two-bedroom units in four buildings ranging from five to six stories (60 to 81 feet above grade). Eleven percent of the base-density residential units (approximately 35 units) would be reserved as Very Low Income Units.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality
    January 2018 CHAPTER 4 Environmental Analysis SECTION 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section of the EIR analyzes the potential environmental effects on hydrology and water quality from implementation of the proposed project. Data for this section were taken from the Glendale Emergency Plan, Glendale General Plan Safety Element Technical Background Report, the EPA, and Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Watermaster. Full reference-list entries for all cited materials are provided in Section 4.8.5 (References). 4.8.1 Environmental Setting Surface Water The proposed SGCP area is within the Los Angeles River watershed, which includes 834 square miles of Los Angeles County. The eastern portion of the watershed spans from the Santa Monica Mountains to the Simi Hills and in the west from the Santa Susana Mountains to the San Gabriel Mountains. The watershed encompasses and is shaped by the Los Angeles River. The river flows adjacent to the western and southern borders of the proposed SGCP area in a concrete lined channel. The upper portion of the watershed (Upper Los Angeles River Watershed), where the proposed SGCP area is located, contains a network of flood control dams and debris basins that flow to the Los Angeles River (LACDPW 2016). The Upper Los Angeles River watershed is home to approximately 2.3 million people, mostly in high density development in the interior valleys and foothills. Precipitation within the Upper Los Angeles River watershed typically falls in a few major storm events between November and March to an average of 19 inches per year.
    [Show full text]
  • 1916 - the Missions and Missionaries of California, Index to Volumes II-IV, Zephyrin Engelhardt
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Franciscan Publications Spanish Viceroyalty [AD 1542/1769-1821] 2-14-2019 1916 - The Missions and Missionaries of California, Index to Volumes II-IV, Zephyrin Engelhardt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_spa_2 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Education Commons, Law Commons, Life Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "1916 - The Missions and Missionaries of California, Index to Volumes II-IV, Zephyrin Engelhardt" (2019). Franciscan Publications. 12. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_spa_2/12 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Spanish Viceroyalty [AD 1542/1769-1821] at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Franciscan Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. T C 1/ v-snmne v *<t) \^H A Slsd. -^V^^^NV^ SraS^^iL' \\yfr THE, FBANOISOAN MISSIONS E THE MISSIONS AND MISSIONARIES OF CALIFORNIA BY FR. ZEPHYRIN ENGELHARDT, O. F. M. AUTHOR OF <p I "The Franciscans in California" "The Franciscans in Arizona" ' ' ' ' The Holy JXCan of Santa Clara INDEX TO VOLS. II -IV ' El alma de la hUtoria es la verdad sencilla. Pal6u, Prol. de la Vida SUPERIORUM PERMISSU ST. PETER'S GmTO 816 SOUTH C CHICAGO, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL. THE JAMES H. BARRY COMPANY 1916 COPYRIGHT BY ZEPHYRIN ENGELHARDT is m TO ST. ANTHONY OF PADUA In a work of this kind, notwithstanding scrupu- lous care, it is scarcely possible to avoid all mistakes. It is hoped, however, that errors may not be so nu- merous nor so important as to cause difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill List- LA County
    Project No. Project Name City Amount 41 California State Route 57/60 Confluence Chokepoint Relief Program Diamond Bar 18,000,000 43 Commerce Center Drive Bridge, Los Angeles County Unincorporated Los Angeles County 3,666,666 54 Plant 42 Access and Safety Enhancements Palmdale 8,666,666 55 Quick Fix Circulation Improvement Project Santa Clarita 3,666,666 58 Sequoia Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing Upgrade Simi Valley 4,000,000 68 5 and 134 Freeway Electric Vehicle DC Fast Charging Network Burbank 1,000,000 70 ADA Curb-Ramp and Sidewalk Improvements Long Beach 1,450,000 74 Altadena Community Safe Routes to School Plan Altadena 480,000 Amar Road Complete Streets fromBaldwin Park Boulevard to Unruh Avenue, 75 Unincorporated West Puente Valley,CA La Puente 2,250,000 76 Anaheim Street Corridor Improvements Long Beach 12,000,000 Arrow Highway Median Island Installation Project from Azusa 80 Avenue to Citrus Avenue Azusa 3,000,000 Arrow Highway Rehabilitation Project from East 81 City Limit to West City Limit San Dimas 1,600,000 82 Artesia Great Boulevard Long Beach 8,000,000 84 Atlantic Avenue Improvements Los Angeles 5,200,000 Azusa Avenue Pedestrian Handicap Accessibility 86 & Signal Synchronization Improvements Project West Covina 3,000,000 Beverly and Robertson 91 Boulevards Complete Street Improvements West Hollywood 3,000,000 93 Broadway Rehabilitation Project Glendale 2,008,000 96 Cabrillo Mole Phase II Avalon 6,700,000 102 Chandler Blvd Bike Path Gap Closure Los Angeles 400,000 106 City of San Fernando Fixed Trolley Service – Electric Buses
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Amendment Group Files Lawsuit Over Labonge
    Los Feliz Ledger Read by 100,000+ Residents and Business Owners in Los Feliz, Silver Lake, Vol 12. No. 3 September 2016 Atwater Village, Echo Park & Hollywood Hills Possible DASH Not Vote Changes Trading Eliminate But Definitely Service on Something Hillhurst Ave By Allison B. Cohen By Allison B. Cohen and Belen Cahill A popular notion amongst the online blogging commu- LOS FELIZ—Initial find- nity is that the Los Angeles ings from an analysis con- City Council engages in what ducted by the city’s Dept. of is called “vote trading,” the Transportation (LADOT) illegal activity where a coun- recommends eliminating cilmember promises a “yes” the DASH bus line north of vote on a colleague’s motion, Franklin Avenue on Vermont provided they receive the same Avenue and entirely from courtesy later on their own. Hillhurst Avenue, to provide But according to experts, service connecting Los Feliz such 15-0 unanimous vote and Silver Lake. tallies are instead the result The elimination would of an increasingly politically mean connectivity of Los Fe- and ideologically aligned city liz Village to Marshall High council and due to a decades and Thomas Starr King Mid- long weakening of political dle schools at the expense of As part of the Los Feliz Improvement Assoc.’s (LFIA) centennial celebration, the non-profit resident group is collabo- sway in Sacramento while service north on Vermont rating with Los Feliz Village businesses to exhibit, 100 Years: Historic Moments in Los Feliz through Sept. 12. Historic Los Angeles city politics has Avenue to Los Feliz Boule- photos can be seen at Alcove Café, Café Los Feliz, Chase Bank, Co-Op 28, Covell, Desert Rose, Farfalla, Los Feliz Branch strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Lake-Echo Park-Elysian Valley Community Plan Area
    Historic Resources Survey Report Silver Lake-Echo Park-Elysian Valley Community Plan Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: GPA Consulting, Inc. El Segundo, CA May 2014 Table of Contents Project Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 SurveyLA Methodology Summary ..................................................................................................1 Project Team ................................................................................................................................3 Survey Area ..................................................................................................................................3 Designated Resources ................................................................................................................. 14 Community Plan Area Survey Methodology ................................................................................. 16 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................. 18 Summary of Property Types ........................................................................................................ 18 Summary of Contexts and Themes............................................................................................... 20 For Further Reading...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Latourist Itinerary
    LAtourist Itinerary Five Days in Hollywood and Los Angeles Rental Car is Not Required! Highlights Grand Tour of Los Angeles and Hollywood L.A. City Night Tour Hollywood Boulevard / Walk of Fame / Hollywood Sign Hollywood Walking Tour Kodak Theatre Guided Tour Hop-On, Hop-Off Double Decker Fun Bus Rodeo Drive and Beverly Center Petersen’s Auto Museum The Grove at Farmers Market Universal Studios and CityWalk Beach Tour of Marina del Rey, Venice Beach and Santa Monica. Hollywood Museum Madame Tussaud’s Downtown LA Performing Arts Center Tour MOCA Grand Avenue Olvera Street This 5-day Tourist Itinerary includes major Hollywood and Los Angeles attractions and is designed to maximize your vacation time. You will hit the ground running with a Grand Tour of Los Angeles, and you will keep busy every day. A rental car is not required , because the Itinerary focuses on guided tours and attractions near the Red Line train. You can skip the driving hassles and use the extra money to have more fun! Purchase is not required to use this Itinerary, although order links are provided for your convenience Please read the Disclaimer and Terms of Use page, which follows the Itinerary Product List This Itinerary, including the arrangement and descriptions of the products, is copyright 2011 © Z-Drive Computer Service for LAtouristItinerary.com . This Itinerary must not be altered and distributed without express written permission from the author. If You Print Please Recycle A 5-day Self- guided Itinerary for Hollywood and Los Angeles Page 2 of 11 One-page Tourist Itinerary for Hollywood and Los Angeles Monday 8:00 AM Arrive LAX 9:00 AM Grand Tour of Los Angeles and Hollywood 3:30 PM End of Grand Tour / Drop off in Hollywood / Hotel Check-in 4:00 PM Hollywood Boulevard 5:00 PM Hollywood and Highland / Chinese Theatre 6:00 PM L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
    January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O.
    [Show full text]