DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Base Andrews (Previously Andrews Air Force Base) Clinton, Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Base Andrews (Previously Andrews Air Force Base) Clinton, Maryland ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP Date TO: (Name, office symbol, room number' 4. 5. File Note lind Return For Clearance Per Conversation For Correction Prepare Reply For Your Information See Me Investigate. ignature Justify hA-V.f!.: 6~en. .~ FROM: (Nam8l1..j)jrg.,.,<l:vrtfl"" *U.SG" ". PO"199'3'""~ 342-198180007 . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 DATE: Department of the US Air Force Kenneth R.Rizer, Colonel th ' Commander, 11 Wing MAY 1 7 2011 1535 Command Drive " Suite A-B 203 , lointBase Andrews, MD 20762 RE: 2010 (Revised March 2011) Five-Year Review Joint Base Andrews (Previously Andrews Air Force Base) Clinton, Maryland Dear Colonel Rizer: , , , Thank you for submitting the report, entitled First Five-Year Review Joint Base Andrews NavalAir Facility Washington, NFA8903-08-D-8775, Delivery Order 52, November 2010 (Revised March 2011) to the EPA for review and concurrence. The report was prepared to address the Comprehensive Environmental" Response, Compensation and ,Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 121 (c) five-year review requirements. ·EPA has reviewed this five-year review report and found it consistent with EPA's June 2001 guidance document, Comprehensive Five Year Review Guidance (OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P, EPA 540-R-OI-007). EPA concurs with the US Air Force's determination that the remedies for FT-04,ST-IO~ and ST-14are protective of human health and the environment. In addition, Site 23 had a no action record of decision (ROD) and is protective. Furthermore, as part of this five-year review, EPA has evaluated the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for this site and has determined their status is as follows: Environmental Indicators l.Human Health: Current Exposure Controlled , Groundwater Migration:' Groundwater' Migration Is Under Control, specifically for LF;.05 Leroy's Lane Landfill. ,The remedy was being implemented when the Five­ Year Review, was written. There is no completed pathway for human, health and/or the environment. The remedy at LF-05 is anticipated to be complete in 2011 with issua'1ce ofa remedial action completion report (RACR)/or the landfillcapandan interim rem~dial action completion report (IRACR) for groundwater. " {) Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine/ree. , Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474 .Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use Joint Base Andrews is Site-Wide Ready for Anticipated Use. The requirement for this five-year review at Joint Base Andrews (formerly Andrews Air Force Base) was triggered by the Remedial Action start date and ROD date of November 22, 2005 at FT..:04. The next five-year review is due five years from the original due date and is due November 22,2015. If you have any questions, please contact Ben Mykijewycz, Chief of the NPLIBRAC Federal Facilities Branch at 215-814-3351 or S Andrew Sochanskiat (215) 814-3370 or at [email protected]. cc: S Andrew Sochanski (3HS11) Rick Grills,MDE W AS/EERP William Burris, Chief, ER JBA o .Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paperwitll 100% post-consumer fiber and process clllorine free. Customer Se,y;ce Hotline: 1-800-438-2474 FIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW JOINT BASE ANDREWS NAVAL AIR FACILITY WASHINGTON Prepared for:- The Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Contract No. FA8903-08-D-8775 Delivery Order 52 Prepared by: IlMACTEC MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Portland, Maine November 2010 (Revised March 2011) FIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW JOINT BASE ANDREWS . NAVAL AIR FACILITY WASHINGTON United States Air Force Prepared for: The Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Contract No. FAS903-0S-D-S775 Delivery Order 52 Prepared by: ,MACTEC MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Portland, Maine November 2010 (Revised March 2011) • • FIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW JOINT BASE ANDREWS NAVAL AIR FACILITY WASHINGTON PreparedJor: The Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Contract No. F A8903-08-D-8775 Delivery Order 52 Prepared by: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Portland, Maine November 2010 (Revised March 2011) . S;nley.W.Rccd· .. - Principal Engineer MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc. Joint Base Andrews - First Five-Year Review November 2010 MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Project Number 3350092494 (Revised March 2011) , TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... viii • LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................ix LIST OF APPENDICES.....................................................•.............................................................x LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................· ..... xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 JOINT BASE ANDREWS HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION .......................................... 2 1.2.1 History................................................................................................................. :........... 2 1.2.2 Topography ................... : ................................................................................................... 4 1.2.3 ·Climate .................................................. ,......................................................................... 4 1.2.4 Soil and Drainage ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.5 Geology ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.6 Groundwater.................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.7 Current and Anticipated Future Land Use ............................................................... ~ ...... 6 1.3 REFERENCES .................................................. , ................................................ ,............... 8 2.0 FT-04 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW ............................................................................................9 2.1 FT-04 DESCRIPTION AND CHRONOLOGY.......................... : ...................................... 9 2~2 FT-04 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Physical Characteristics ........................................................................................... ~ .... 10 2.2.2 Land and Resource Use ............. : ............................ ,...................................................... 11 .2.2.3 History of Contamination....................................................... ~ ...................................... 11 2.2.4 Initial Response ....................... , .............................................................. , ...................... 13 2.2:5 Basis for Taking Action ................................................................................................ 16 • 2.3 FT-04 REMEDIAL ACTIONS ..................................................................... :.................. 16 2.3.1 Remedial Action Objectives ......................................................................................... 17 2.3.2 The Selected Remedy ...................................... ·........................... ;.................................. 17 2.3.3 Remedy Implementation .................. , ............. ;............................................................... 21 2.3.4 System Operations/Operation and Maintenance ........................................................... 22 2.4 FT-04 PROGRESS SINCE FIRST FIVE-YEAR REVIEW ............................................ 22 2.5 FT-04 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS ....................................................................... 22 2.5.1 Community Involvement ............................................................................ ,................... 22 2.5.2 Document Review ........................................................................................................... 22 2.5.3 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement Review .......... , ......................... 23 2.5.4 Data Review .................................................................................................................. 23 2.5.5 Site Inspection ............................................................................. , ............. :.................... 27 2.5.6 Interviews ........................................................................................................... :............ 27 2.6 FT-04 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 28 2.6.1 Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? ......... 28 2.6.2 Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and RAOs used at the time of the remedy still valid? ......................................................... , 30 2.6:3 Question C: Has any other information come to lightthat could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page Key to Index
    PAGE KEY TO INDEX AIRCRAFT — B-17 "Flying Fortresses" 1 AIRCRAFT — Other 2 AWARDS — Military 2 AWARDS —Other 3 CITIES 3 ESCAPES and EVASIONS 10 GENERAL 10 INTERNEES 19 KILLED IN ACTION 19 MEMORIALS and CEMETERIES 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — 303rd BG 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — Other 21 MISSIONS — Target and Date 25 PERSONS 26 PRISONERS OF WAR 51 REUNIONS 51 WRITERS 52 1 El Screamo (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Miss Lace (Feb. 2004, pg. 18), (May 2004, Fast Worker II (May 2005, pg. 12) pg. 15) + (May 2005, pg. 12), (Nov. 2005, I N D E X FDR (May 2004, pg. 17) pg. 8) + (Nov. 2006, pg. 13) + (May 2007, FDR's Potato Peeler Kids (Feb. 2002, pg. pg. 16-photo) 15) + (May 2004, pg. 17) Miss Liberty (Aug. 2006, pg. 17) Flak Wolf (Aug. 2005, pg. 5), (Nov. 2005, Miss Umbriago (Aug 2003, pg. 15) AIRCRAFT pg. 18) Mugger, The (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flak Wolf II (May 2004, pg. 7) My Darling (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) B-17 "Flying Fortress" Floose (May 2004, pg. 4, 6-photo) Myasis Dragon (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bison (Nov. 2006, pg. 19-photo) Nero (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bitch (Aug. 2002, pg. 17) + (Feb. Neva, The Silver Lady (May 2005, pg. 15), “451" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) 2004, pg. 18) (Aug. 2005, pg. 19) “546" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) Fox for the F (Nov. 2004, pg. 7) Nine-O-Nine (May 2005, pg. 20) + (May 41-24577 (May 2002, pg. 12) Full House (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) 2007, pg. 20-photo) 41-24603 (Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • JBAB Inducts Inaugural Group of Honorary Commanders
    Search DVIDS... JBAB Inducts inaugural group of honorary commanders Photo By Senior Airman Kevin Tanenbaum | U.S. Air Force Col. Erica Rabe,... read more WASHINGTON, D.C., DC, UNITED STATES 05.14.2021 Story by Senior Airman Kevin Tanenbaum Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Subscribe 6 JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING, Washington, D.C.- Sixteen units from across Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling inducted their first group of honorary commanders at a ceremony in the Bolling Club, on May 14, 2021. The Honorary Commanders program serves as a vehicle to connect Team JBAB with key leaders in the surrounding community as the program aims to increase understanding of military culture and support of its various missions in the National Capital Region, as well as cultivate military involvement in civic endeavors and organizations. “I had only one requirement for who I wanted recruited into the program – leaders,” said U.S. Air Force Col. Michael ‘Goose’ Zuhlsdorf, 11th Wing and Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling commander. “Exactly like the squadron commanders that I have here on base, I wanted leaders that would make great teammates for us and we would make great teammates for them.” The first class included sixteen new honorary commanders and an emeritus commander who had been with the U.S. Air Force Band since the band’s time with 316th Wing at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland: -11th Wing Commander: Col. Michael Zuhlsdorf/Mayor Muriel Bowser, Mayor, Washington, D.C. -11th Wing Vice Commander: Col. Erica Rabe/Chairman Phil Mendelson, Chairman, DC Council -11th Wing Command Chief: Command Chief Master Sgt. Christy Peterson/Wanda Lockridge, Chief of Staff, Ward 8, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Base Andrews Suitland, Md
    FEDERAL RECORDS STORAGE FACILITY — JOINT BASE ANDREWS LOCATION: SUITLAND, SUITLAND, MD MARYLAND PROJECTED DATE OF NARA APPROVAL: WINTER 2017 TOTAL ESTIMATED NARA-COMPLIANT CAPACITY: 1.5M CFT STORAGE BAYS: ACCESS: > 6 NARA-compliant storage > 24 hours / 365 days per year TOTAL ESTIMATED chambers NARA-COMPLIANT, > 1 NARA / DoD NISPOM-compliant ADVANCED FIRE CLASSIFIED classified storage chamber SUPPRESSION SYSTEM: > 3 hour fire resistant walls between CAPACITY: ENVIRONMENTAL storage chambers 250K CFT PROTECTION: > Roofs constructed with > 24 hour central station monitoring noncombustible steel, protected > Automated fire suppression system with NFPA-compliant sprinklers > Stand-by, emergency power > Patent-pending roof support generator structures for added protection in > Fully enclosed redundant water the event of fire or natural disaster supply / fire loop > Fire detection and suppression systems built to National Fire SECURITY: Protection Association guidelines > Low profile, unmarked facility > 24 hour central station monitored & alarmed entry system > Fenced truck access & parking with security card activation gate > Exterior and interior steel doors Iron Mountain Records Management Services available on GSA Schedule 36 Contract # GS03F-049GA. 800.899.IRON | IRONMOUNTAIN.COM/FEDERAL FEDERAL RECORDS STORAGE FACILITY — JOINT BASE ANDREWS SUITLAND, MD LOCATION Iron Mountain’s Suitland, MD location ( ) provides NARA-compliant storage space in close proximity to key metropolitan areas in Washington DC, Virginia, and Maryland, as shown below. Key Dist. to Locations IRM F A Washington, DC 13 miles D B Alexandria, VA 12 miles C Fairfax, VA 27 miles D Gaithersburg, 39 miles MD E E Bethesda, MD 27 miles A F Baltimore, MD 39 miles C G NARA 5 miles B Washington G National Records Center Iron Mountain’s Joint Base Andrews – Suitland Federal records storage facility is located at Andrews Federal Campus, an 80-acre business complex located at the intersection of Suitland Parkway and the Capital Beltway, I-95/495.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Base Installation Directory
    Military Handbooks – 2010 Base Installation Directory 2010 Base Installation Directory Published by Military Handbooks, FREE Military Handbooks and Guides Since 2001 ________________________________________________________________________ Copyright © 2001-2010. Military Handbooks, 7200 NW 86th Street Kansas City, MO 64153. Military Handbooks Web site: http://www.militaryhandbooks.com. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Publisher. Printed in the U.S.A. “This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.”– From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a committee of the American Bar Association and a committee of publishers and associations. Go to http://www.militaryhandbooks.com to sign up for your FREE Military Handbooks today! www.militaryhandbooks.com FREE Military Handbooks and Guides – Since 2001 1 Military Handbooks – 2010 Base Installation Directory AANNNNIISSTTOONN AARRMMYY DDEEPPOOTT ALABAMA MAIN INFORMATION State/Base Address Phone Number(s) Public Affairs Office 7 Frankford Ave., Building 94 (256) 235-7445 No Information Provided Anniston, AL 36201-4199 DSN: 571-7445 URL Housing Community Info (MWR/Centers) www.anad.army.mil MWR Bldg. 220 Anniston, AL 36201-4199 (256) 235-7160 No Information Provided Army Community Service 7 Frankford Avenue Building 94, Facilities Plaza Anniston, AL 36201-4199 (256) 235-7445 (256) 235-7170 Fax: (256) 235-4878 EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT Base Education DoD/Public School Employment Readiness Calhoun County School System Employment Readiness 4400 McClellan Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale Or Lease
    Dogtown Yeakle Mill Rouzerville Zora Pleasant Hill New Freedom Pike Creek Coseytown Blue Ridge Summit Fawn Grove Delta White Clay Creek Preserve Penns Grove 456 State Line 851 95 UV Georgetown Stiltz UV Wiley Sylmar Elk Twpj ¦¨§ Highfield-Cascade UV94 Lineboro Maryland Line Stanton Carneys Point Harney Rock Springs Dry Run 81 £¤11 UV136 ¦¨§ McClellandville ¦¨§495 Cohill Emmitsburg Freeland Norrisville Fair Hill Hancock Maugansville Rising Sun j UV2 UV144 ¦¨§68 Hancock South Mountain State Park Harkins Harrisville UV273 Fairfield j Longville Pylesville Richardsmere Spring Valley Silver Run Eklo West Liberty Andora New Castle Airport ¦¨§295 Martins Crossroads Lantz Kilby Corner Newark Ebbvale Zion College Park Sleepy Creek 140 Millers West Nottingham UV Bachman Mills Shane Street Brookside Pleasantville Park Head Wood Point Motters Taneytown Manchester Cherry Hill New Castle Clear SpringShady Bower Wolfs Mill Potomac Heights Smithsburg Liberty Grove Woodshade Pennsville Sir Johns Run Huyett Security Catoctin Mountain Park Stumptown 27 Rayville UV23 Dublin £¤1 Mt Pleasant UV Big Pool j 550 Federal Hill Scarboro Bay View Shady Grove £¤40 Hagerstown Cavetown UV Prettyboy Reservoir Darlington ¦¨§95 Penns Beach RobinwoodUV64 Albantown Centennial Village Jimtown Charlton Pondsville Foxville 97 j Poplar Grove UV9 Stohrs Crossroads UV77 Keysville Copperville UV Greenmount ¦¨§83 Mechanic Valley Berkeley Springs Colonial Park GlendaleBear Marshalltown Halfway Thurmont Leslie Great Cacapon Holton Otterdale Mill Tyrone Gunpowder Falls State Park-Hereford
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th CMSAF Takes First Look at Space by Tech
    CONGRATULATIONS TO PETERSON’S NEWEST STAFF SERGEANTS – PAGE 3 Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Thursday, August 10, 2006 Vol. 50 No. 32 15th CMSAF takes first look at space By Tech. Sgt. Kate Rust public, how well they take care of dorm Air Force Space Command Public Affairs rooms and facilities,” Chief McKinley said. “When we go to other countries to On his first visit here July 28 as do our job, we need to concentrate on the top enlisted servicemember in the how we perform or how we act when Air Force, Chief Master Sgt. of the Air we’re in another country, because we’re Force Rodney McKinley stressed the representing our country. Take pride in importance of recognizing, leading and being an Airman in our United States taking care of Airmen. Air Force.” “I want to focus on our junior Chief McKinley acknowledged enlisted to make sure we take care of the key to the challenges ahead for them,” he said. “We need to put leader- Airmen in a smaller force with a high- ship tools into the supervisors’ hands er operations tempo is good leadership and make them the best supervisors at all levels. they can be. “Because we are downsizing and “I also want Airmen across the have a smaller Air Force, the quality of Air Force to be proud to be Airmen,” every Airman has to be absolutely Chief McKinley said. “When an Photo by Tech. Sgt. Raheem Moore unquestioned,” he said. “It all stems Airman goes to basic training, he trans- Newly appointed Chief Master Sgt.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Airlift Aircraft Maintenance and Back Shop Support
    EXECUTIVE AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND BACK SHOP SUPPORT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC (5-RC-15850 & 5-RC-074500) AND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, DISTRICT LODGE 4, LOCAL LODGE 24 AT JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MD EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2020 through AUGUST 31, 2023 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT .................................................................................................................. 4 ARTICLE 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT ................................................................................. 4 SECTION 1- GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2 - RECOGNITION AND EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION ............................................................................................... 5 SECTION 3 - PERIOD OF AGREEMENT AND RATIFICATION ........................................................................................................ 7 SECTION 4 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS ................................................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 5 - SEPARABILITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 6 - STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the AIR FORCE Pentagon, 1670 Air Force, Washington, DC 20330–1670 Phone (703) 697–7376, Fax 695–8809
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE Pentagon, 1670 Air Force, Washington, DC 20330–1670 phone (703) 697–7376, fax 695–8809 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE Secretary of the Air Force.—Hon. Heather Wilson, Room 4E878. Confidential Assistant.—Rudy Sheffer. Senior Military Assistant.—Brig. Gen. David Iverson. Deputy Military Assistant.—Lt. Col. Tyler Lewis. Military Aid.—Lt. Col. Nicci Rucker. Executive Assistants: MSgt. Charles Allen, MSgt. Ashlie Chacon. SECAF / CSAF EXECUTIVE ACTION GROUP Director.—Col. Rodney Lewis (703) 697–5540. Deputy Chief.—Catherine Perro. UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE Pentagon, 1670 Air Force, Room 4E858, 20330–1670, phone (703) 697–1361 Under Secretary.—Hon. Matthew Donovan. Confidential Assistant.—Rosa Ramirez. Senior Military Assistant.—Col. Doug Schiess. Military Assistant.—Maj. Scott Korell. Executive Assistant.—MSgt Taisha Ross. CHIEF OF STAFF Pentagon, 1670 Air Force, Room 4E924, 20330 phone (703) 697–9225 Chief of Staff.—Gen. David Goldfein. Confidential Assistant.—Terri Stern. Special Assistant.—Samuel Neill, Room 4E929, 697–1930. Executive Officer.—Col. Matthew Davidson. Vice Chief of Staff.—Gen. Stephen Wilson, Room 4E938, 695–7911. Director of Staff.—Lt. Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost, Room 4E944, 695–7913. Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force.—CMSAF Kaleth Wright, Room 4E941, 695– 0498. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Pentagon, 1080 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4E192, 20330–1080 Deputy Under Secretary.—Heidi H. Grant (703) 695–7263. Assistant Deputy.—Maj. Gen. Stephen ‘‘Steve’’ Oliver, 695–7261. Executive Officers: Maj. Robert Radesky, 693–1941; Georgia Smothers, 695–7263. Pentagon, 1080 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4C253, 20330–1080 Director of Policy.—Anthony P. Reardon (571) 256–7491.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince George's County
    Brief Economic Facts PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND New Yo rk Prince George’s County wraps around the eastern boundary of Washington, Washington, DC D.C. and offers urban, suburban and rural Baltimore settings. The region is served by three international airports and the Port of Upper Baltimore. The county boasts a friendly Marlboro Washington, DC business climate, skilled workers and an outstanding quality of life. Prince George’s County wraps around the eastern boundary Prince George’s has one of the largest of Washington, D.C. and offers technology and aerospace sectors in the urban, suburban and rural settings for employers and state and a growing hospitality sector. residents. Major private employers include SGT, Inovalon, Verizon, and MGM National Harbor, with private sector industries generating $25.6 billion the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services headquarters in economic output. Woodmore Towne Centre and National currently under construction. Academic facilities include the Harbor are recent, high-quality mixed-use developments, and University of Maryland College Park, the state’s flagship public Westphalia Town Center and Towne Square at Suitland Federal university, and other major institutions. The county’s com- Center are currently under development. mitment to business growth is reflected by the recent location or expansion of 2U and Kaiser Permanente of the Mid-Atlantic. Prince George’s County has significant federal facilities, such The county’s healthcare sector is also growing, led by the UM as Joint Base Andrews,
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Commission Order, Jan 31 2020
    ORDER NO. 89520 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION * BEFORE THE OF SPECTRUM SOLAR, LLC FOR A PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE * OF MARYLAND AND NECESSITY TO CONSTRUCT A 5.6 MW SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC GENER- * ATING FACILITY IN PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND * CASE NO. 9608 Issued: January 31, 2020 PROPOSED ORDER OF PUBLIC UTILITY LAW JUDGE Appearances: David W. Beugelmans, Esquire, and Todd R. Chason, Esquire, on behalf of Spectrum Solar, LLC. Sondra S. McLemore, Esquire, and Steven M. Talson, Esquire, on behalf of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant Research Program. Philip Sheehan, Jr., Esquire, on behalf of the Maryland Office of People's Counsel. Kenneth Albert, Esquire, and Peter A. Woolson, Esquire, on behalf of the Technical Staff of the Maryland Public Service Commission. Procedural History 1. On May 17, 2019, Spectrum Solar, LLC ("the Applicant" or "the Company") filed an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ("CPCN") for authority to construct a 5.6 megawatt ("MW") solar photovoltaic generating facility in Prince George's County, Maryland ("the Project"). Accompanying the Application was the Environmental Review Document ("ERD") for the Project.1 2. By letter dated May 20, 2019, the Public Service Commission of Maryland ("Commission") initiated a new docket, Case No. 9608, to consider the Application and delegated the proceedings in this matter to the Public Utility Law Judge Division. 3. On June 21, 2019, Spectrum Solar filed a copy of the notices sent by the Applicant to members of the General Assembly pursuant to PUA § 7-207(c)(1)(ii)-(v).2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Base Andrews Taxiway Whiskey
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2020 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Joint Base Andrews Taxiway Whiskey 7711 Joint Base Andrews Camp Springs, Maryland NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER 00:00(38.00)45070 SUBMITTED BY United States Department of Defense, APPLICANT’S REQUEST Department of the Navy Approve preliminary site development plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Federal Projects in the Environs Approve preliminary site per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(b)(1) development plans ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY The United States Department of the Navy, on behalf of the Joint Base Andrews, proposes to construct a new taxiway connection (TWY W6) in the southwestern area of the airfield at Joint Base Andrews. The taxiway would connect an existing hangar apron to another north-south taxiway. The project would remove some existing above-ground storm water facilities and regrade the site in compliance with Air Force airfield design standards. KEY INFORMATION • The Department of the Navy has submitted the proposed project on behalf of the Air Force. • The project is included in the Joint Base Andrews Installation Development Plan, which was reviewed by NCPC for draft comments in January 2018. The plan has not been resubmitted for final review by the Commission. • The project’s stormwater management plan is still under development; however, the design will be finalized at the time of the final project submission. The design will meet State and federal requirements using underground storage and treatment. • The project will impact approximately 4,200 square feet of emergent wetlands and 13,100 square feet of wetland buffer areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Base Andrews Firing Range Facility Expansion Camp Springs, Maryland
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: October 3, 2019 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Firing Range Facility Expansion 8056 Joint Base Andrews Camp Springs, Maryland NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER 3207.00(38.00)45003 SUBMITTED BY United States Department of Defense APPLICANT’S REQUEST Department of the Navy Approve final site and building plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Federal Projects in the Environs Approve final site and building plans per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(b)(1) ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY The Navy has submitted a proposal to expand and improve the existing firing range facility at Joint Base Andrews. The project entails: construction of two new buildings (identified as Buildings A and B); refurbishment of an existing administrative building (identified as Building C); expansion of (and restriping of) the existing parking lot; and development of new on-site bio-retention areas, new sidewalks, new fire/emergency/service access roads, and additional chain-link perimeter fencing, to encompass the expanded facility area. The project will not increase on-site parking capacity, nor increase site employment. The new enclosed firing range building (Building A) will have an area of approximately 20,800 square feet and the new administrative building (Building B) is designed with an area of approximately 4,300 square feet. KEY INFORMATION • The Department of the Navy has submitted the project on behalf of the Air Force. • The firing range expansion is included in the 2016 JBA Installation Development Plan, which was reviewed by NCPC in January 2018 as a draft. The Plan has not yet been resubmitted for final review by the Commission.
    [Show full text]