Stakeholder Engagement Data Page 2 of 61 Area Comp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stakeholder Engagement Data Page 2 of 61 Area Comp Integrated ESIA Greece Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Page 2 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00/ at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DATA 3 7.1 ANNEX 7-1 Stakeholder Meetings – ESIA Phase 3 7.2 ANNEX 7-2 Detailed Review of Stakeholder Issues and Voices 25 List of Tables Table 7-1 Settlement/Local Level Meetings for TAP Greece West 3 Table 7-2 Settlement/Local Level Meetings for TAP Greece East 7 Table 7-3 Key Informant Interview Meetings for TAP Greece West 12 Table 7-4 Key Informant Interview Meetings for TAP Greece East 14 Table 7-5 Focus Group Meetings for TAP Greece West 17 Table 7-6 Focus Group Meetings for TAP Greece East 19 Table 7-7 Detailed Review of Stakeholder Issues and Voices for TAP Greece West 25 Table 7-8 Detailed Review of Stakeholder Issues and Voices for TAP Greece East 42 Page 3 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data 7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DATA 7.1 ANNEX 7-1 Stakeholder Meetings – ESIA Phase Table 7-1 Settlement/Local Level Meetings for TAP Greece West Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments Region of Central Macedonia Chalkidona Municipality 25 September 2011 Aghialos 40 - Aghialos is located outside the pipeline corridor close to a potential compressor station site, which is no longer an option. 25 September 2011 Mikron Monastirion 20 25 September 2011 Valtochorion 28 09 October 2011 Nea Mesimvria 60 09 October 2011 Parthenion 20 01 November 2011 Gefira 30 Pella Municipality 26 September 2011 Agios Loukas 20 26 September 2011 Liparon 45 Skydra Municipality 26 September 2011 Kalivia 30 27 September 2011 Aspron 20 27 September 2011 Rizon 25 28 September 2011 Loutrochorion 35 Page 4 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments 28 September 2011 Plevroma 20 29 September 2011 Petrea 25 Naousa Municipality 28 September 2011 Pollla Nera 10 Edessa Municipality 30 September 2011 Agia Fotini 30 01 October 2011 Ano Grammatiko 6 01 October 2011 Kato Grammatiko 6 Region of West Macedonia Eordea Municipality 01 October 2011 Purgoi Purgoi settlement is outside the 2 km corridor. However, a meeting was scheduled there due to the proximity with potential campsite locations. Despite the late afternoon time that the meeting was scheduled, the meeting was not held due to the fact that people were still in their fields gathering apples. Regardless of this, a meeting was held with the head of local community who provided settlement level information. The TAP representatives asked when would be the best time to re- schedule and the head of the community suggested that a couple of months later would be more appropriate. He said he would inform the community about the Project. The representatives left the scoping report, leaflets and QA to distribute. They mentioned that it may be difficult to come back in December due to the time schedule of Project, but they would return for ESIA disclosure. 02 October 2011 Pentavrussos 25 02 October 2011 Perdikkas 21 02 October 2011 Galateia 26 02 October 2011 Droseron 20 Page 5 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments 09 October 2011 Foufas 23 - The settlement is located outside the 2 km corridor and no community meeting was originally scheduled. However, the head of local community requested a community meeting suggesting that people might own properties in the pipeline corridor. Amyntaio Municipality 01 October 2011 Maniaki 6 - Maniaki settlement is located outside the 2 km corridor, however a community meeting was planned due to proximity to potential campsite locations 01 October 2011 Antigonos 25 03 October 2011 Variko 14 Kastoria Muncipality 03 October 2011 Kleisoura 13 03 October 2011 Lithia 14 04 October 2011 Verga Agia Paraskevi (monastery) 25 06 October 2011 Krepeni 7 06 October 2011 Dispilio 10 05 October 2011 Korissos 27 07 October 2011 Chiliodentro 13 07 October 2011 Poreia 7 08 October 2011 Tsakoni 15 08 October 2011 Mesopotamia 5 08 October 2011 Agia Kuriaki 14 08 October 2011 Oinoi 32 Page 6 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments Orestida Municipality 05 October 2011 Militsa 17 06 October 2011 Ampelokipi 7 Page 7 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Table 7-2 Settlement/Local Level Meetings for TAP Greece East1 Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments Region of Eastern Macedonia – Thrace Soufli Municipality 29 January 2013 Tavri 7 – Located outside the 2 km corridor. However due to the compressor station site, a meeting was held. Alexandroupoli Municipality 10 January 2013 Peplos 18 10 January 2013 Kavissos 22 11 January 2013 Pefka 9 11 January 2013 Aetochori 27 12 January 2013 Anthia 38 12 January 2013 Agnantia 21 13 January 2013 Amfitriti 9 Maronia – Sapes Municipality 13 January 2013 Chamilo 43 14 January 2013 Pamforo 14 14 January 2013 Amaranta 42 Komotini Municipality 15 January 2013 Fylakas 17 27 January 2013 Kosmio 28 1 All meetings in TAP Greece East include meetings held with 5 communities in Paggaio municipality and 1 community in Kavala municipality that are no longer located within the pipeline corridor after a re-route in the turf area. Page 8 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments - Itea Combined meeting held in Kosmio due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. - Mesochori Combined meeting held in Kosmio due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. - Scholi Astynomias No meeting was held – Settlement inhabited. 26 January 2013 Meleti 17 Iasmos Municipality - Galini Combined meeting held in Iasmos due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. 27 January 2013 Koptero 18 26 January 2013 Amaxades 32 Avdira Municipality 25 January 2013 Ano Polysitos 9 24 January 2013 Vafeika 43 26 January 2013 Feloni 18 25 January 2013 Diomidia 27 - Tektonas Combined meeting held in Diomidia due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. 24 January 2013 Palaio Katramio 5 25 January 2013 Magiko 25 Topiros Municipality - Vaniano Combined meeting held in Thalassia due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. - Pimni Combined meeting held in Thalassia due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. 22 January 2013 Thalassia 9 Page 9 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments Nestos Municipality 22 January 2013 Krini 12 22 January 2013 Neos Xerias 15 21 January 2013 Grabouna 31 21 January 2013 Pontolivado 15 Kavala Municipality 21 January 2013 Nea Karvali 35 21 January 2013 Chalkero 14 20 January 2013 Amygdaleonas 17 20 January 2013 Neos Zygos (Prosfyges) 8 08 May 2013 Polistilo 34 10 May 2013 Krinides 20 Doxato Municipality 09 May 2013 Kalamonas 26 11 May 2013 Agia Paraskevi 13 Paggaio Municipality 19 January 2013 Palaiochori 37 20 January 2013 Kokkinochoma 12 20 January 2013 Eleftehroupoli 0 – The meeting was arranged but not held due to the lack of participants. According to the deputy mayor the people of Eleftheroupoli weren’t interested in the Project. 19 January 2013 Antifilippoi 31 19 January 2013 Ano Chortokopi 2 Page 10 of 61 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0055 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 / at01 Annex 7 - Stakeholder Engagement Data Date Settlement Number of Participants & Comments Region of Central Macedonia Amfipoli Municipality 19 January 2013 Symvoli 12 18 January 2013 Stathmos Lefkothea 14 Nea Zichni Municipality 18 January 2013 Nea Zichni 9 18 January 2013 Tholos 32 18 January 2013 Gazoros 20 Emmanouil Pappa Municipality 22 January 2013 Pentapoli 42 17 January 2013 Neochori 48 Kilkis Municipality 30 January 2013 Isoma 19 Serres Municipality - Krinos Combined meeting held in Neochori due to small number of households and therefore lack of appropriate facilities to hold a meeting. 16 January 2013 Mitrousi 43 16 January 2013 Monoklisia 30 17 January 2013 Ano Kamila 25 – Located outside the 1 km corridor.
Recommended publications
  • IAU OAD TF2E Final Report
    Astronomical Measurements in Ancient Greece IAU OAD Project TF2E Final Report Astronomical Measurements in Ancient Greece (project TF2E) Final report Introduction – Project goals Although it is not widely known to students and the public, the ancient Greek philosophers had made a number of accurate astronomical measurements and created successful models in an effort to describe the wonders of the Cosmos. With the power of the human mind they carried out reasonable estimates of the sizes of the earth, the moon and the sun and the distances of the sun and moon from the earth. This project’s aim is two-fold. Firstly it aims at bringing this knowledge to the secondary education students, who, by carrying out these measurements, will appreciate how an innovative mind can explore the universe from our little planet. The students will carry on exploring the universe beyond the earth, moon and sun and by analysing their observations will evolve their knowledge of the universe and change any alternative ideas held to the scientific accepted ones. Secondly, it is this project’s aim to support these students in reaching out the community and spreading this knowledge to the public so that everyone can realize that the cosmos is not far out of reach but is within everybody’s grasp to explore it even from their own backyard, as the Ancient Greek astronomers did. 1. Short summary A series of workshops was designed to support students of the senior High School (called Lyceum) of Nea Zichni to get acquainted to the acomplishments of ancient Greek philosophers regarding astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile
    Company Profile DEPA at a glance The history of DEPA The natural gas system in Greece DEPA Group Strategic Goals of DEPA Legislative – regulative framework of natural gas Commercial activities of DEPA Sectors of natural gas consumption – Customers Distribution System Gas Supply Companies (EPAs) DEPA at the international setting Human resources Vision for sustainable development Corporate Social Responsibility The gas networks in Europe Statistics on natural gas and energy in Europe Financial statement 2010 >01 Natural gas is the fastest growing form of primary energy world-wide, given - on the one hand - its advantages compared to other forms of energy based on fossil fuels and - on the other hand - its decisive contribution in the defense of the necessary elements for Sustainable Development, i.e. “Environment, Society, Economy”. And this is because: • Natural gas allows greater energy efficiency compared to other fuels on all production segments, primarily for power generation using combined cycle technology, • Natural gas is more environmentally friendly since, per unit of energy produced, it is less damaging to the environment by 38% compared to coal, by 28% compared to crude oil and by 24% compared to diesel oil. Those percentages are in reality increased taking into account the greater efficiency rate of gas against the above fuels under comparison, • Natural gas provides greater flexibility as a fuel and is easy to use and handle in all domestic, commercial or industrial applications. The combination of all those characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Greece Cultural Heritage Management Procedure
    Greece Cultural Heritage Management Procedure Document Title: Greece Cultural Heritage Management Procedure Document No.: GPL00-TAP-QHSE-Y-TPA-0001 Rev. 0 Classification: INTERNAL: Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Abbreviations and Definitions ............................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 Operations and Maintenance Country Manager ............................................................................ 5 1.4.2 Competent Ephorate(s) of Antiquities ............................................................................................ 6 1.4.3 TAP RoW Manager ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.4.4 O&M Contractor ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.4.5 Field Archaeologist(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Fhu2xellcj7lgbnexipovzl4g6a.Pdf
    Griechenland Attika...................................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Zentrum.....................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Nord...........................................................................................................................................5 Athen-Süd.............................................................................................................................................6 Athen-West...........................................................................................................................................7 Piräus....................................................................................................................................................8 Inseln....................................................................................................................................................9 Ostattika..............................................................................................................................................10 Westattika............................................................................................................................................11 Epirus.................................................................................................................................................12 Arta.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018
    69941 GREEK GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Series B- 5922/31.12.2018 TRUE COPY 69941 OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Greek Government Gazette December 31st 2018 SERIES B Issue No. 5922 Β' 464/19-4-2010). DECISIONS 9. The provisions of ministerial decision “Natural Gas Dec. No 1314/2018 Licensing Regulation” ref. no. 178065 (Government Gazette Β' 3430/17.08.2018, hereinafter referred to as For the granting of a Natural Gas Distribution “Licensing Regulation”). License to the company under the trade name 10. The Tariffs Regulation for the Main Distribution “Gas Distribution Company Thessaloniki- Activity of distribution networks in Attica, Thessaloniki, Thessaly S.A.” and the distinctive title “EDA Thessaly and other Greece (Government Gazette Β' THESS”. 3067/26.09.2016) (hereinafter referred to as “Tariffs Regulation”). THE REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR ENERGY 11. The RAE's Decision No 346/2016 on the Approval Taking into consideration the following: of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas 1. The provisions of Law 4001/2011 “For the Distribution Activity on Thessaloniki distribution network operation of the Energy Markets of Electricity and (Government Gazette Β' 3490/31.10.2016). Natural Gas, for Research, Production and transmission 12. The RAE's Decision No 347/2016 on the Approval networks of Hydrocarbons and other arrangements” of the Tariff for the Charge of the Main Natural Gas (Government Gazette A’179/22.08.2011), as amended Distribution Activity on Thessaly distribution network and in force (hereinafter referred to as “the Law”), and (Government Gazette Β'3537/03.11.2016). especially articles 13 and 80C thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Visa & Residence Permit Guide for Students
    Ministry of Interior & Administrative Reconstruction Ministry of Foreign Affairs Directorate General for Citizenship & C GEN. DIRECTORATE FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS Immigration Policy C4 Directorate Justice, Home Affairs & Directorate for Immigration Policy Schengen Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.ypes.gr www.mfa.gr Visa & Residence Permit guide for students 1 Index 1. EU/EEA Nationals 2. Non EU/EEA Nationals 2.a Mobility of Non EU/EEA Students - Moving between EU countries during my short-term visit – less than three months - Moving between EU countries during my long-term stay – more than three months 2.b Short courses in Greek Universities, not exceeding three months. 2.c Admission for studies in Greek Universities or for participation in exchange programs, under bilateral agreements or in projects funded by the European Union i.e “ERASMUS + (placement)” program for long-term stay (more than three months). - Studies in Greek universities (undergraduate, master and doctoral level - Participation in exchange programs, under interstate agreements, in cooperation projects funded by the European Union including «ERASMUS+ placement program» 3. Refusal of a National Visa (type D)/Rights of the applicant. 4. Right to appeal against the decision of the Consular Authority 5. Annex I - Application form for National Visa (sample) Annex II - Application form for Residence Permit Annex III - Refusal Form Annex IV - Photo specifications for a national visa application Annex V - Aliens and Immigration Departments Contacts 2 1. Students EU/EEA Nationals You will not require a visa for studies to enter Greece if you possess a valid passport from an EU Member State, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations Department [email protected] Tel
    Public Relations Department [email protected] Tel.: 210 6505600 fax : 210 6505934 Cholargos, Wednesday, March 6, 2019 PRESS RELEASE Hellenic Cadastre has made the following announcement: The Cadastre Survey enters its final stage. The collection of declarations of ownership starts in other two R.U. Of the country (Magnisia and Sporades of the Region of Thessalia). The collection of declarations of ownership starts on Tuesday, March 12, 2019, in other two regional units throughout the country. Anyone owing real property in the above areas is invited to submit declarations for their real property either at the Cadastral Survey Office in the region where their real property is located or online at the Cadastre website www.ktimatologio.gr The deadline for the submission of declarations for these regions, which begins on March 12 of 2019, is June 12 of 2019 for residents of Greece and September 12 of 2019 for expatriates and the Greek State. Submission of declarations is mandatory. Failure to comply will incur the penalties laid down by law. The areas (pre-Kapodistrias LRAs) where the declarations for real property are collected and the competent offices are shown in detail below: AREAS AND CADASTRAL SURVEY OFFICES FOR COLLECTION OF DECLARATIONS REGION OF THESSALY 1. Regional Unit of Magnisia: A) Municipality of Volos: pre-Kapodistrian LRAs of: AIDINIO, GLAFYRA, MIKROTHIVES, SESKLO B) Municipality of Riga Ferraiou C) Municiplaity of Almyros D) Municipality of South Pelion: pre-Kapodistrian LRAs of: ARGALASTI, LAVKOS, METOCHI, MILINI, PROMYRI, TRIKERI ADDRESS OF COMPETENT CADASTRAL SURVEY OFFICE: Panthesallian stadium of Volos: Building 24, Stadiou Str., Nea Ionia of Magnisia Telephone no: 24210-25288 E-mail: [email protected] Opening hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM and Wednesday from 8:30 AM to 8:30 PM 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia in Greek Administration
    Preface When in 1821 Greeks started their revolt against the Ottoman Empire and fought for an independent state they had two major ideological issues to deal with: the identity of the new state and its future borders. If Hellas (Ελλάς) was the appropriate name for Modern Greece and ancient glory the most valuable argument for Greek independence, then how could Macedonia been kept apart? After all it was an integral part of Greek ancient history, which had nourished every single generation of educated people—not only Greeks—even before the war of Greek independence. The legendary figure of Alexander the Great had surfed smoothly over centuries of ignorance escorted by powerful myths and tales to find its appropriate position in the last part of 19th century, ancient history textbooks. They were the chapters of the Macedonian Hegemony and the Hellenistic period (4th and 3rd centuries B.C.), which had brought Greek culture to the frontiers of the then known world. Ancient History proved a very solid and enduring foundation for the modern Greek state. In this context, in the last quarter of the 19th century the case of Macedonia, this ill-defined region, was regarded as the final frontier of Hellenism, which Greece had to defend against the Slavs, if it was to survive as a state and not to end up as a sad caricature of Ancient Hellas. The romantic fight of the Greeks for Macedonia—in fact for the littoral part of it—created its own legend, which was shaped through a series of declared and undeclared wars from the 1878 Eastern Crisis to World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 51 Thracia Compiled by E.N
    Map 51 Thracia Compiled by E.N. Borza, 1994 with the assistance of G. Reger Introduction Mainland: see Introduction to Map 50. Islands For Thasos in particular, the harvest of toponyms and sites is very rewarding, and grows every year with the work of the Franco-Hellenic archaeological teams that continue to scour the island. The map marks only a selection of the sites that could have been shown here, and possibly a rather arbitrary one at that. As on other islands rich in towers, only a selection is marked (again, perforce somewhat arbitrarily); all are shown as forts without prejudice to their actual function (see Bon 1930; and above all Osborne 1986), except for two of the three structures identified as lighthouses by Kozelj (1989). Omitted are the potteries that seem to be coming to light with bewildering frequency (Garlan 1996). For a variety of reasons, Imbros remains underexplored. Directory All place names are in Greece unless otherwise noted Abbreviations IGBulg G. Mihailov (ed.), Inscriptiones Graecae in Bulgaria Repertae, 4 vols., Sofia, 1956-70 TIB Thrakien P. Soustal, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 6, Thrakien, DenkWien 221, Vienna, 1991 TIR Naissus Tabula Imperii Romani K 34, Naissus, Dyrrhachion–Scupi–Serdica–Thessalonike, Ljubljana, 1976 TIR Philippi Tabula Imperii Romani K 35, I, Philippi, Athens, 1993 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name/ Location References H4 Abarnis CH Çardak? TKY RE Abarnias; NPauly Abarnias §Abarnias § Abarnos D3 Abdera ACHR Avdira Isaac 1986, 73-108; TIR Philippi 17 B1 Ablanica Rodopi HRL BUL IGBulg 4.2335-37; TIB Thrakien 159 G4 Abydos ACHRL Maltepe TKY PECS; Hakkert, Lex.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated ESIA Greece Section 4 - Project Description Page 2 of 88 Area Comp
    Integrated ESIA Greece Section 4 - Project Description Page 2 of 88 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0052 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 01 Section 4- Project Description TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 4.1 TAP Project Overview 6 4.1.1 Purpose of the Project Description 6 4.1.2 TAP Project Scope and Location 7 4.1.3 TAP Project Rationale 8 4.1.4 TAP Project Schedule 8 4.1.5 Gas Properties 8 4.1.6 TAP System Throughput 9 4.1.7 TAP Design Philosophy 9 4.1.8 Applicable Codes and Standards 10 4.1.9 Contracting Goods and Services and Provision of Local Content 13 4.2 Main Project Components in Greece 14 4.2.1 Overview 14 4.2.2 Pipeline 15 4.2.3 Block Valve Stations (BVS) 17 4.2.4 Compressor Stations 17 4.2.4.1 EU Standards 19 4.2.4.2 World Bank Group (WBG) Standards 20 4.3 Project Construction 21 4.3.1 Introduction 21 4.3.2 Project Duration and Timing 22 4.3.3 Machinery, Equipment, Transportation and Traffic 23 4.3.4 Storage and Pipe Yards 26 4.3.4.1 Intermediate Storage Yard 26 4.3.4.2 Pipe Yards 26 4.3.5 Construction Camps 28 4.3.5.1 Pipeline Construction Camps 28 4.3.5.2 Compressor Station Construction Camps 30 4.3.5.3 Special Crossings and BVS Construction Camps 30 4.3.6 Access Transportation and Traffic 31 4.3.6.1 Overview 31 4.3.6.2 Access to Compressor Stations 31 4.3.6.3 Access to Pipeline 31 4.3.7 Services and Utilities 32 4.4 Construction and Pre-commissioning of the Pipeline 33 4.4.1 Land Acquisition 33 4.4.2 Pre-Construction Activities 33 4.4.3 Construction Methods 34 4.4.3.1 Overview 34 4.4.3.2 Team 1: Route Surveying and Preparation of Strip 42 4.4.3.3 Team 2: Trenching of the Pipeline 42 4.4.3.4 Team 3: Pipe Stringing, Bending and Welding 42 4.4.3.5 Team 4: Pipe Laying Installation and Backfilling 44 4.4.3.6 Team 5: Site Clean-up and Restoration 44 4.4.4 Pressure Testing during Construction (Hydrotesting) 45 Page 3 of 88 Area Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chora Formation of the Greek Cities of Aegean Thrace. Towards a Chronological Approach to the Colonization Process
    The Chora Formation of the Greek Cities of Aegean Thrace. Towards a Chronological Approach to the Colonization Process Alexandre Baralis The notion of chora within the Greek colonial world still constitutes a difficult reality to agree upon, as regards the organisation of its space, the chronology of its formation or even its borders themselves. Defined as the territory imme- diately surrounding a city, the chora remains, according to most of the studies devoted to it, a space which the city is supposed to have dominated politically and economically, to have used for its necropolis and to have cultivated for its agricultural needs from the city’s foundation onwards or shortly thereaf- ter. A place of exchange or conflict, and sometimes of cohabitation, the chora raises the question of the relationship between cities traditionally considered to be of essentially Greek population and their immediate native hinterland. Answering this question is often done by drawing on models developed for Magna Graecia and a few examples from written sources. This paper attempts a survey of the situation in Aegean Thrace, a recent area of archaeological research and still poorly known by scholars. In this region of the Greek colonial world it is possible to approach the formation process of the city territory in a chronological way which allows a fruitful reconsideration of the complex relationship between the Greek settlers and the local populations.1 Greek colonization in context: Aegean Thrace before the arrival of the first Greek settlers The term “Aegean Thrace,” common nowadays in historical bibliographies, is a recent geographical notion. It is applied to an area strongly disputed at the beginning of the 20th century, which lies now entirely within the limits of the administrative district of western Thrace in northern Greece.
    [Show full text]