Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Consultation Report

Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan - Consultation Report

Burnley Borough Council Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan - Consultation Report

1 Introduction 3 2 Consideration of representations to Issues and Options 5

Burnley Borough Council Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan - Consultation Report

1 Introduction

1.1 This Consultation Report sets out the consultation responses that were received during the Issues and Options Consultation on the Daneshouse, Duke bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan and how they have informed the Preferred Option Plan.

Burnley Borough Council 3 Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan - Consultation Report

4 Burnley Borough Council 2 Consideration of representations to Issues and Options

Table 2.1 2.0 Issues and Options Daneshouse,

Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Bar

2.0 Issues and and Options Stoneyholme 2.1 Environment - Issues 41/DS/154 –C Starkie Noted Yes The Preferred Option, in additional to considering long In relation to cleared sites term use of cleared sites, Area temporarily grassed says should consider the short and that they need developing medium term uses in order to Action within 2 years maximum prevent tipping and other

otherwise tipping is a problems. Plan Burnley problem. - Consultation

51/DS/209-G. Barrett Under the Environmental Yes The Preferred Options should Borough Protection Act the Council consider means of using the

Commercial businesses in can require businesses to Environmental Protection Act

the area should be forced install a litter bin outside to require businesses causing Council

to take a more active role their premises and can litter to keep the streets Report in keeping the streets 5 6 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar around their property free require businesses to around their property litter of litter (especially clean a wider area around free. and take-aways) their property if a nuisance Stoneyholme is caused. 112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Noted Yes The AAP process includes a Sustainability Appraisal of all Area 7 Low car ownership options in order to assess the

is a good thing!! Here in the social, environmental and Area south you have to pay to economic effects of the Area

park. What also about Action Plan Action climate change and greenhouse gases. Plan

113/DS/319-Harry Fly tipping and litter is an Yes The Preferred Option should - Brennand issue in many areas and consider the most effective Consultation individual and recurring means of addressing fly Fly tipping and litter at end reports are dealt with on an tipping and litter problems. of Lawn Street, canalside. ongoing basis. Preventative Apparently Burnley Parks action, including Report responsible. enforcement, is also taken where appropriate. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

118/DS/349-Mrs S Five Area Action Plans In Part The Preferred Option should Grennan which cover the next 10 to take a balanced approach to Duke 15 years are being redevelopment and A lot of houses on Bar prepared for areas where improvement and consider Bar Street are an eyesore. If housing market decline, the most effective means of and this continues they want environmental problems addressing problems in the

demolishing and a green and social deprivation are Bar Street area. Stoneyholme space, landscape left. No particularly concentrated. more building in this area, Across each area the it should be more open. conditions vary and the Area Action Plan aims to

consider the area as a Area whole and also to consider

the four other Area Action Action Plans. With limited resources available difficult Plan

Burnley decisions have to be made about their most effective -

use. Consultation

Borough 01/ALL/67 The Coal Agree - The AAP is at an Yes The Preferred Option should

Authority early stage and as the take account of known ground plans and proposals are conditions but as plans and

Council The proposed development

developed the Coal proposals are developed in Report lies within a coal mining Authority will continue to be more detail, the Coal area. In the circumstances consulted. Authority will be consulted. 7 8 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Applicants should take account of any coal mining and related hazards to stability Stoneyholme to their proposals. Developers must also seek permission from the Authority before undertaking any operations Area that involve entry into any coal or mines of coal, Action including coal mine shafts and adits and the

implementation of site Plan investigations or other

works. Property specific - Consultation summary information on any past, current and proposed surface and underground coal mining

activity to affect the Report development can be obtained from the Coal Authority. The Coal Authority Mining Reports Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Service can be contacted on 0845 762 6848 or at Duke www.coal.gov.uk. Bar

08/ALL/385- Noted Yes The Environment Agency will and Environment Agency be consulted at all stages of the AAP process and on Stoneyholme The Daneshouse, Duke Bar planning applications where and Stoneyholme area is relevant, including sites an area with few EW1/5 and areas 5 and 6. environmental constraints. The only flood risk area lies Area to the south-west of the area, adjacent to EW1/5. Action Having considered all of the

development proposals for Plan

Burnley each of the identified areas

within the action plan area, - we have no issues or Consultation

Borough concerns in relation to any

of development options for

any area although Areas 5

Council and 6 have potential to be contaminated (See areas Report for details). 9 10 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 12/ALL/427-Lancashire The AAP aims to protect Yes The Preferred Option will CC, Planning and areas of biodiversity and seek to retain and enhance and Environmental Services geological conservation areas of biological and Stoneyholme through the consideration geological interest in line with The AAPs need to of areas protected by the Local and County policies. recognise guidance in Local Plan such as wildlife PPS9: ‘Biodiversity and corridors and green All 5 AAPs are being Geological Conservation’ spaces. A wildlife survey developed together, at the Area which states among other has also been same time, thus providing things that “plan policies commissioned to provide opportunities for more joined Action and planning decisions updated information on up thinking. should aim to maintain, and biodiversity across the

enhance, restore or add to Borough and this will be Plan biodiversity and geological used to inform the AAP.

conservation interests” and - in relation to networks of The AAPs are being Consultation natural habitats “Local developed concurrently and authorities should aim to this provides the maintain networks by opportunity to consider avoiding or repairing the cross boundary issues such Report fragmentation and isolation as transport links more of natural habitats through strategically. policies and plans”. Policy ER4 ‘Contribution of Built Heritage to Regeneration’ Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

in the approved RSS (formerly RPG) requires Duke that Planning Authorities in their plans, policies and Bar proposals should set out a and coherent and functional

ecological framework. Stoneyholme Policy EM3, ‘Green Infrastructure’ in the submitted draft of RSS introduces green

infrastructure into urban Area and rural planning. The

proposals set out in the Action AAPs need to be set in the district framework of Plan

Burnley ecological networks and green space infrastructure. - Consultation

Borough 14/ALL/456 The Noted Yes The Preferred Options should Countryside Agency consider links to the countryside and recreational

Council The CA’s key opportunities to encourage Report

environmental interest, in their enjoyment and to

the context of SEA/SA are promote healthy life styles.

1 1 12 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar landscape character and quality; visual amenity and and enjoyment of the Stoneyholme countryside; recreational opportunities; and enjoyment of access land or a public right of way. Enclosed copy of Area publication “The Countryside in and around Action towns CA207 Jan 2005” – indicates vision for the

green spaces within and Plan around built up area that

could be of interest for the - Consultation AAPs. The subject matters covered by the AAPs are largely urban in nature and therefore unlikely to affect

the Agency’s key Report environmental interests. The Agency therefore has no comment to make on the documents. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

15/ALL/459-John Sharp, Although physical property Yes The Preferred Option should East Lancs Landlords conditions in this and other consider means of addressing Duke Association areas are an issue, it is social, environmental and recognised that social and economic issues within the Bar Lots of efforts need to be environmental conditions area. and put in to crime, street scene need to be tackled in the

and a general improvement interests of long term Stoneyholme in the local environment. sustainability.

2.1 Environment - Opportunities Area 44/DS/168-Ms. C. Gauder Agree Yes The Preferred Option should

Under the Elevate consider the potential for new Action Vision – In building new Programme new houses development to include the homes, Burnley should be are required to meet the highest standard of in the forefront of energy Plan

Burnley EcoHomes Very Good eco-homes and for

saving – to be an example Standard or equivalent. encouraging sustainable -

to the rest of the country – improvements to existing Consultation not a ‘run down area up The Council operates a properties in line with the Borough

north’ range of Energy Efficiency Design Guidance SPD. Grants and Schemes for existing properties. Council Report 13 14 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Cowley, Planning Officer, take advantage of and Lancashire County improvements and links to the Stoneyholme Council Brun Valley Greenway and investigate a wide range of The proposed Brun Valley funding sources. Greenway Improved Route which links Burnley Central Station with Harle Syke, Area Pike Hill and Brownside through parks and open Action space will open up the Brun

and Don Valleys to public Plan access, create a green

corridor leading into the - centre Burnley and create Consultation a cycle, bridle and walking route into the town. It will be an important leisure asset for the area enabling Report easy access to the countryside from local urban areas. The project has secured £150k grant from SITA Trust, a landfill Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

tax credit scheme, and awaits a decision from LEP Duke on further funding to meet the outstanding costs of Bar £150k. and

There has been a positive Stoneyholme response to consultation with 7 local schools wanting to be involved with potential environmental arts and

conservation projects and Area over 70 responses

supporting the Greenway Action from a variety of users across the area. Plan Burnley The Greenway links into -

the Daneshouse Duke Bar Consultation

and Stoneyholme area from

Borough Thursby Gardens and the

Leeds Liverpool Canal and

would be complementary Council

to the proposals in the area Report action plan and a great 15 16 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar recreational asset for the area. It supports the and opportunities identified in Stoneyholme the Environmental Section, particularly access to the canal and areas of open space.

A number of improvements Area would be carried out along the canal as part of the Action enhancement of the

Burnley Way including Plan repairs to stone seating,

better signage and - interpretation. This could Consultation complement the proposals in this option.

A number of the area action plan options refer to Report clearance and creation of public open space, neighbourhood parks or landscaped areas. LCC’s Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

environmental projects team manage a NWDA Duke funded programme called Lancashire Small Sites Bar Reclamation Programme to and assist

community-led/supported Stoneyholme environmental projects focused on derelict, underused and neglected sites, with the focus on

previously developed land. Area

163/DS/434-James Heelan Noted. Yes The Preferred Option should Action Bank Hall Marina site, consider improvements to the

Would like to see more use immediately outside the canal and its environs in order Plan Burnley made of the canal within AAP boundary is identified to encourage better and

the Bank Hall area. More in the Local Plan for canal wider use. - privately owned barges related leisure use (EW3/1) Consultation

Borough would be attracted to this.

2.2 Economy - Council Report Issues 17 18 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No Woolnough conditions in this area of and north Daneshouse, with a Stoneyholme Disagrees with Economic high degree of vacancy, issues and opportunities in abandonment, previously relation to demolition of cleared sites and unfit Hurtley Street in area 7 & properties, are some of the area 8 opt 2 worst in the area and the Area Borough. This situation was reflected in the decision to Action show redevelopment of this area on all three AAP

options produced for this Plan area. The response to the

Neighbourhood Action Plan - Consultation consultation in 2003 favoured redevelopment for this area and influenced this decision. Report The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems. In recognition of the severe Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

problems, English Partnerships are supporting Duke regeneration activity in Daneshouse. Bar

Redevelopment in this area and

is seen as the key to the Stoneyholme regeneration of the whole AAP area. It will create a key gateway site into the area encouraging further

investment. Through Area redevelopment there is the

potential to widen Hurtley Action Street to create a landscaped gateway Plan

Burnley providing a better environment for walking -

and cycling into, through Consultation and within the area. Borough

12/DS/36-Mr Jeckman The Vision for the area is Yes The Preferred Options should

Council that "existing local consider the needs of local Has concerns over local businesses can develop businesses and encourage Report businesses. and thrive; entrepreneurs and support all businesses. 19 20 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar are encouraged and supported; and new and businesses want to Stoneyholme locate". 24/DS/48-Frieda Berry Noted, individual property No owners are contacted when (Area 11) She has a compulsory purchase

concerns over her order is approved in Area husbands workshop being principle although advice

pulled down and would and information can be Action need more information on provided beforehand if compensation offered and requested. any other options. Plan - 33/DS/59-Irshad Begum Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation consider the most effective Is in support of rebuilding means of supporting and employment areas. encouraging businesses. Report 122/DS/359- Gren Logue The Council and many of Yes The Preferred Option should (Saco Ltd) its partners carry out consider the most effective environmental education means of Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Educate people not to use activities and enforcement preventing/discouraging fly the area as a dumping action to prevent and tipping and littering. Duke ground. Its disgraceful and discourage fly tipping and drives businesses away. littering. Bar and 150/DS/412-S. Sinniors, Illegal parking is an issue In Part The Preferred Option should Isis Mortages & Finance in many areas and consider the parking needs of Stoneyholme enforcement is undertaken local business but must Get rid of traffic wardens, to discourage it. balance these needs against they are driving business current policies which also away from Burnley. aim to encourage other modes of transport. Area

153/DS/415-G. Gresham, It is recognised that local Yes The Preferred Option should Action George Wilkinson businesses and residents consider the parking needs of (Burnley) Ltd. consider that the lack of car local business but must Plan

Burnley parking space for local balance these needs against

The lack of adequate and businesses is an issue. current policies which also -

appropriate car parking aim to encourage other Consultation spaces adversely affects Borough modes of transport.

employees and customers of the business (Area 8) Council Report 21 22 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 156/DS/418-Ian Rhodes, It is recognised that local Yes The Preferred Option should Rhodes Technical businesses and residents consider the parking needs of and Services consider that the lack of car local business but must Stoneyholme parking space for local balance these needs against It is important that visitors businesses is an issue. current policies which also to the area whether for aim to encourage other business or for the new modes of transport. shops can park safely and for long periods, up to full Area working day. Action

158/DS/420-Hayley It is recognised that local Yes The Preferred Option should Maudsley, Elm Street businesses and residents consider the parking, access, Plan Business Park consider that the lack of car servicing and turning needs -

Association parking space, poor of existing local businesses Consultation access and turning for and potential new businesses Bringing in new business existing local businesses but must balance parking and investment would is an issue. needs against current policies result in a greater demand which also aim to encourage

for better access and more other modes of transport. Report parking.

159/DS/421-Sara Badrock, Agree Yes The Preferred Option should The Prince’s Trust investigate the possibilities for Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

If an opportunity exists to creating a fully open M65 influence the Dept. of Junction 11. Duke Transport to fully open Junction 11 it should be Bar pursued as it would be to and the benefit of the town

centre as well as residents Stoneyholme and businesses in this area.

163/DS/434-James Heelan Agree Yes The Preferred Option should consider improving these Area The shop fronts in the main road frontages. immediate Duke Bar area, Action are in desperate need of

improvement. From Plan

Burnley Queensgate as far as the

Victoria Inn. - Consultation

Borough 2.2 Economy -

Opportunities

Council 122/DS/359- Gren Logue Five Area Action Plans No (Saco Ltd) which cover the next 10 to Report 15 years are being 23 24 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Area 8 – Jobs – Factories prepared for areas where create wealth not houses. housing market decline, and The rest will follow. environmental problems Stoneyholme and social deprivation are particularly concentrated. Across each area the conditions vary and the Area Action Plan aims to Area consider the area as a whole, including Action employment opportunities and business development

and also to consider the Plan four other Area Action

Plans. With limited - Consultation resources available difficult decisions have to be made about their most effective use.

2.3 Housing and Report Social Issues - Issues Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

01/DS/11-Denise Blake The Council works with a Yes The Preferred Options should range of partner to address consider measures to address Duke Drug dealing on back Lawn drug related issues social issues, including those street relating to drug use. Bar and 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No Woolnough conditions in this area of Stoneyholme north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with housing and high degree of vacancy, social issues & abandonment, previously opportunities in relation to cleared sites and unfit demolition of Hurtley Street properties, are some of the Area in Area 7 worst in the area and the Borough. This situation was Action reflected in the decision to

show redevelopment of this Plan

Burnley area on all three AAP

options produced for this -

area. The response to the Consultation

Borough Neighbourhood Action Plan

consultation in 2003

favoured redevelopment for

Council this area and influenced Report this decision. 25 26 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides and an opportunity to tackle Stoneyholme these problems. In recognition of the severe problems, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity in Area Daneshouse.

Redevelopment in this area Action is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Plan AAP area. It will create a

key gateway site into the - area encouraging further Consultation investment. Through redevelopment there is the potential to widen Hurtley Street to create a Report landscaped gateway providing a better environment for walking and cycling into, through and within the area. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

05/DS/29-Ralph Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Woolnough consider phasing of Duke demolition to ensure that new Stopping demolition properties are available for Bar expansion until rebuilding residents displaced by and would ensure community clearance.

stays together Stoneyholme

06/DS/30-Maskeen One of the contributory Yes The Preferred Option should Hussain (Area 7) factors to housing market provide a range of house failure is the over provision types, sizes and tenure to Concern that the new of small terraced houses. meet local needs, including Area housing won’t cater for The Housing Market possible self build extended families and that Renewal Programme aims opportunities, now and in the Action families will have to move to provide a range of house future. It should also consider from the area which they’ve

types and sizes. phasing of demolition to Plan

Burnley live in all their lives. ensure that new properties

are available for residents - New houses should be built displaced by clearance. Consultation

Borough before demolition takes

place.

Wants self build Council Report opportunities. 27 28 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 07/DS/31-Usman Alf (Area One of the contributory Yes The Preferred Option should 7) factors to housing market provide a range of house and failure is the over provision types, sizes and tenure to Stoneyholme Concern that the new of small terraced houses. meet local needs, including housing won’t cater for The Housing Market self build opportunities, now extended families and that Renewal Programme aims and in the future. It should families will have to move to provide a range of house also consider phasing of from the area when they types and sizes. demolition to ensure that new Area don’t want to. properties are available for residents displaced by Action New houses should be built clearance. before demolition takes

place. Plan

Wants selfbuild -

opportunities. Consultation

08/DS/32-Jehan Ali (Area One of the contributory Yes The Preferred Option should 7) factors to housing market provide a range of house

failure is the over provision types, sizes and tenure to Report Resigned to house being of small terraced houses. meet local needs, including demolished but Concern The Housing Market self build opportunities, now that the new housing won’t Renewal Programme aims and in the future. It should cater for extended families to provide a range of house also consider phasing of and that families will have types and sizes. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

to move. Want to remain in demolition to ensure that new the area where their properties are available for Duke extended family is very residents displaced by happy. clearance. Bar

New houses should be built and

before demolition takes Stoneyholme place.

Wants self build opportunities. Area 10/DS/34-Sandra Parker The Council operates an Yes All options have been subject

equal opportunities policy to Sustainability Appraisal Action Equal rights, both cultures across all its services. which considers equality and & colours. Funding should Five Area Action Plans social inclusion impacts. Plan

Burnley be across all areas, which cover the next 10 to housing, something for 15 years are being -

elderly to sit peacefully. prepared for areas where Consultation

Borough housing market decline,

environmental problems

and social deprivation are

particularly concentrated. Council Across each area the Report conditions vary and the 29 30 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Area Action Plan aims to consider the area as a and whole and also to consider Stoneyholme the four other Area Action Plans. With limited resources available difficult decisions have to be made about their most effective Area use.

13/DS/37-Mr Jeckman Affordability is a key issue In part The Preferred Option should Action and the Council has an consider policies/ initiatives Doesn’t want to see his Affordable Housing Policy that would enable existing Plan house cleared as he is and is working with residents to remain in their worried about the

partners to provide a range homes or find suitable - compensation allowance of options for affordable alternative properties. Consultation and that he may struggle to rent and purchase to meet purchase another house as housing need. he only has his pension. The Council has an Would much rather see established advice team in properties remodelled. place to help householders Report find suitable new homes.

Other than in very exceptional circumstances, Elevate will not fund Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key Duke gateway locations. Bar

14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey Affordability is a key issue Yes The Preferred Option should and and the Council has an consider policies/ initiatives Concerns over taking out a Affordable Housing Policy that would enable existing Stoneyholme mortgage in order to buy and is working with residents to remain in their another house. Also partners to provide a range homes or find suitable suggests alleygating, of options for affordable alternative properties. children friendly streets, rent and purchase to meet It should also consider more police, community housing need. measures to improve safety, Area activities and encourage The Council has an security, environmental more multi-cultural established advice team in conditions and community Action activities. place to help householders cohesion.

find suitable new homes. Plan Burnley Environmental and social

issues are an issue in many - areas. Consultation Borough

Council Report 31 32 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 19/DS/43-Kathleen Smith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider means of tackling and Concerned in Area 10 that social problems including Stoneyholme houses shut up, landlords those associated with badly letting to problem families managed privately rented – improve. properties.

25/DS/49-Ken Clayton Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Area consider means of tackling Trees across road very anti-social behaviour through Action dense – youths hide a variety of means including amongst them and drink management of landscaped alcohol & ASB & areas. Plan prostitution in the area. - Consultation 26/DS/50-Mr Feser Ali In areas of densely built In Part The Preferred Option should traditional terraced housing consider policies/ initiatives Would like to see new few opportunities exist to that would enable existing houses being built, not create open space. The residents to find suitable leisure areas. Also has Housing Market Renewal alternative properties. Report concerns over the price of Programme provides and the new housing, where opportunity to provide new can he get the money from. housing of a range of type and size and to incorporate open space/recreational Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

facilities which meets local need. Duke Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Bar Affordable Housing Policy and and is working with

partners to provide a range Stoneyholme of options for affordable rent and purchase to meet housing need. The Council has an

established advice team in Area place to help householders

find suitable new homes. Action 27/DS/51-Mr Biladar Khan Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

provide new housing with a Plan Burnley Has himself done a 2 into range of type and size to

1 conversion, but would like meet local need. - Consultation a flat garden, more open It should also consider the

Borough space for children to play. open space needs of the area

There is already a problem and means of tackling littering

with rubbish in the area, and fly tipping.

Council and would like to see a Report greater presence of the cleansing dept. 33 34 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 28/DS/52-Alan Sturdy Five Area Action Plans In part The Preferred Option should which cover the next 10 to take a balanced approach to and Would like us to invest in 15 years are being redevelopment, across all five Stoneyholme the area, housing grants & prepared for areas where areas and should phase play areas to keep the housing market decline, redevelopment in order that existing communities environmental problems existing communities are together. and social deprivation are given the opportunity to stay particularly concentrated. together Area Across each area the conditions vary and the Action Area Action Plan aims to consider the area as a

whole and also to consider Plan the four other Area Action

Plans. With limited - Consultation resources available difficult decisions have to be made about their most effective use.

Other than in very Report exceptional circumstances, Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

29/DS/53-Zia Uddin Anti-social behaviour is an In part The Preferred Option should issue in many of the AAP consider means of tackling Duke Wants anti social behaviour areas. anti-social behaviour issues.

to be looked at. Also wants Bar to see improvements within Other than in very properties i.e central exceptional circumstances, and

heating, gas fires, cavity Elevate will not fund Stoneyholme wall insulation etc. improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations.

30/DS/54-Mrs Asira Bibi Other than in very In part The Preferred Option should Area exceptional circumstances, take advantage of the Agrees with change. Wants Elevate will not fund opportunity to introduce tree Action houses to be face lifted not improvements to properties planting and greenery into the demolished. The vision

beyond facelifting to key area. Plan

Burnley should be to plant trees. gateway locations.

The Housing Market - Renewal Programme Consultation

Borough provides and opportunity to

introduce tree planting and

greenery into areas of

Council densely built, traditional terraced housing with little Report green space. 35 36 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 33/DS/59-Irshad Begum Five Area Action Plans In part The Preferred Option should which cover the next 10 to balance regeneration works and Thinks that the whole of 15 years are being in each area and across all 5 Stoneyholme Stoneyholme, Daneshouse prepared for areas where Area Action Plans areas and Duke Bar should be housing market decline, according to need and renovated and improved. environmental problems funding available. Agrees with all the options and social deprivation are listed and supports particularly concentrated. Area demolition, re-housing. Across each area the conditions vary and the Action Area Action Plan aims to consider the area as a

whole and also to consider Plan the four other Area Action

Plans. With limited - Consultation resources available difficult decisions have to be made about their most effective use.

34/DS/60-Emma Howarth Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Report consider means of addressing Thinks the changes that are social problems in order to going to be made are great, complement physical but has concerns over the improvements and create problems of drugs and anti sustainable communities. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

social behaviour, things that cant be dealt with by Duke changing the area. Bar

35/DS/63-Mr A Kenyon Noted Yes The Preferred Option should and (Area10) consider means of addressing social problems, including a Stoneyholme Suggests that the druggies, range of activities for young ASBO people and people, in order to prostitutes being moved complement physical into the area from other improvements and create parts of the town be sustainable communities. Area removed from the area. Also lack of things to do for Action the kids. Plan Burnley 37/DS/118-Mrs M E Bailey Other than in very Yes The Preferred Option should -

exceptional circumstances, consider whether James Consultation

Wants to see the Elevate will not fund Street can be face lifted under

Borough enhancement of James improvements to properties Elevate Policy.

Street. beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations and to Council

properties which overlook Report development sites. 37 38 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar James Street is adjacent to the new 6th Form School and Development. Stoneyholme

39/DS/125-T Bottomley Local Plan policies are Yes The Preferred Option should used to determine planning consider defining the local Wants to stop planning applications for new hot and district centres in order to

permissions for hot food food premises. clarify planning policy in Area takeaways – says there relation to hot food premises.

must be a dozen in the Action area. Plan 40/DS/139-Mrs A Topping The Council operates a Yes The Preferred Option should

voluntary good landlord and consider means of addressing - Admits that a number of tenant scheme and is problems caused by badly Consultation properties within the Heap introducing the first managed privately rented St area are a mess, but it Selective Licensing property and should consider is the fault of landlords who Scheme in the SW Burnley policies/ initiatives that would let their properties to AAP area. enable existing residents to undesirables and let them Affordability is a key issue find suitable alternative Report fall into disrepair. She says and the Council has an properties. this needs to be looked into Affordable Housing Policy and controlled – that this is and is working with a problem all over partners to provide a range Burnley. Also older people Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

tend to get more worried of options for affordable about where they are going rent and purchase to meet Duke to live. Says people whose housing need. homes are to be The Council has an Bar demolished have to be established advice team in and given highest place to help householders

consideration. Finance is find suitable new homes. Stoneyholme an issue because of affordability of housing now and not wanting to take out a mortgage at a later time

of life. Area

41/DS/154-C Starkie The Council operates a Yes The Preferred Option should Action voluntary good landlord and consider means of addressing

A lot of rented housing is tenant scheme and is problems caused by badly Plan Burnley no good if people cannot introducing the first managed privately rented

afford it or not fit to live in. Selective Licensing property and encourage the - Good housing attracts good Scheme in the SW Burnley provision of good quality Consultation Borough people even if they are on AAP area. homes across all sectors.

benefits and under 25. All areas. Council Report 39 40 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 42/DS/161-June Proctor It is appreciated that the In part The Preferred Option should (Area 11) loss of a long occupied take a balanced approach to and home is a traumatic redevelopment and retention Stoneyholme Uprooting long standing experience but of properties and should residents is too upsetting unfortunately in some areas consider retaining properties for all concerned. Houses redevelopment is seen as whenever practicable. should be improved. the most appropriate option to give long term Area sustainability. The Council has an established advice Action team in place to help householders find suitable

new homes. Plan

Other than in very - exceptional circumstances, Consultation Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Report Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

43/DS/167-C. Constantine The Housing Market Yes The Preferred Option should Renewal Programme aims give priority to tackling Duke Clearance of derelict to tackle the issue of abandoned and derelict streets and known drug abandoned and derelict houses and related drug use Bar areas should be a priority houses and the associated problems. and for funding. problems caused by drug

use in the AAP areas. Stoneyholme 52/DS/217-Mrs. S. E. One of the contributory No Emsley factors to Housing Market Failure is the over provision Disagrees with of small terraced houses. Area unnecessary demolition. The Housing Market Solid Victorian properties Renewal Programme aims Action should not be replaced by to provide a wide range of inferior new buildings. new house types and sizes

Within 10 years a lot of new in order to address this Plan Burnley developments deteriorate issue.

dramatically. If current The new housing should be - Consultation vendors have certainty of high quality and design

Borough regarding the future of their which incorporates modern

Victorian houses, the standards for eco and

investment would be more decent homes.

Council secure and this would Report justify more improvements. Improved areas should be 41 42 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar further encouraged. Neglected areas should be and considered for selective Stoneyholme CPO and development.

53/DS/227- John Estall Agree Yes The Preferred Option should balance the supply of

Need to retain a supply of There is likely to be only traditional terraced houses Area small 1-2 bed terraces, not limited funding available for and the construction of new

convert all properties from converting 2 or more houses in order to meet all Action 2 into 1. Otherwise the properties into 1. housing need within the area. price of new conversions Other than in very and new build will be too exceptional circumstances, Plan high for some people. Elevate will not fund -

There needs to be a mix of improvements to properties Consultation older and smaller terraces beyond facelifting to key left intact and also both gateway locations. more new houses and conversions. Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an Report Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

of options for affordable rent and purchase to meet Duke housing need. Bar

83/DS/272-Mr Starkie Properties are acquired, No and under Statute, at full market Does not want to see value. Home loss and Stoneyholme builders profiting from doing disturbance allowance houses up that are then payments are subject to going to be knocked down. length of occupancy controls. Area 85/DS/278-Anonymous Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

consider means of tackling Action Drugs has polluted the anti-social behaviour and whole area of Daneshouse, other problems associated Plan

Burnley Duke Bar and with drug use in the area.

Stoneyholme. Anti social -

behaviour & asbos could Consultation help reduce the problem. Borough

Council Report 43 44 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 86/DS/277-Anonymous Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider means of tackling and Drugs are everywhere anti-social behaviour and Stoneyholme around the area. It is a other problems associated major issue that needs with drug use in the area. tackling in a more adverse way. Area 114/DS/322 & 115/DS/323- The Council promotes and Yes The Preferred Option should

B A Khan encourages social incorporate social cohesion Action cohesion. measures into new Would like to see more development and integration amongst English improvements and should Plan and Asian people. consider means of -

encouraging community Consultation integration. 118/DS/349-Mrs S Noted In part The Preferred Option should Grennan balance redevelopment and retention of existing houses Report A lot of houses on Bar and consider a range of uses Street are an eyesore. If for cleared sites in order to this continues they want meet local need. demolishing and a green Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

space, landscape left. No more building in this area, Duke it should be more open. Bar

15/AL/459-John Sharp, Other than in very No and East Lancs Landlords exceptional circumstances, Association Elevate will not fund Stoneyholme improvements to properties We believe that much more beyond facelifting to key emphasis should be put on gateway locations. selective clearance The degree of housing accompanied by market failure in some Area regeneration involving the areas requires significant creation of gardens and intervention through the Action garage areas. As a creation of redevelopment

youngster my main aim in sites for new housing Plan Burnley life was to own a house providing a range of house

with a garden and garage, types, size and tenure. -

this still applies to many Consultation

Borough people today.

2.3 Housing and Council

Social Issues - Report Opportunities 45 46 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 04/DS/26-Ceridwen Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Chapman consider phasing of and demolition to ensure that new Stoneyholme Demolition should be done properties are available for before facelifting. It's no residents displaced by use putting good money clearance and should into areas with bad consider means of addressing landlords and tenants as its problems associated with Area throwing money away. badly managed privately rented properties. Action 04/ALL/275 J Percival, Noted No Paperlane Properties Ltd. Plan

Our company are long term -

investors and not short Consultation term speculators. Most of the properties we have bought have required total modernisation, something we do using local Report tradesman. We tend to charge reasonable rents, unlike some companies. On the rare occasions we sell properties we always Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

try and sell at a little below market value if this will help Duke a first time buyer. In other words we try to be Bar responsible in all our and dealings. Consequently I

was very interested to read Stoneyholme in your plans that you may offload some neglected properties instead of sending in the bulldozers.

If this is the case, and you Area wish to use private money,

rather than Government Action funding, I would be very interested. Our contact Plan

Burnley numbers are 01323 479766

or 01323 502145 - Consultation

Borough 15/AL/459-John Sharp, The Council operates a Yes The Preferred Option should

East Lancs Landlords good landlord and tenant encourage responsible Association scheme and has approved management within the

Council the first Selective Licensing privately rented sector. Report 47 48 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The PRS is by far the most scheme in the Trinity area tax efficient way of in South West Burnley. and providing rental Stoneyholme accommodation i.e.at virtually no capital cost to the LA or Government. A huge amount of money has been invested in Burnley of Area recent times by the PRS resulting in vast Action improvements to the standards within the sector

whilst limiting the numbers Plan of empty properties, all at

no cost to the taxpayer or - Consultation Council tax payer. The work done by the LA in respect of Tenant and Landlord Accreditation

must also be supported and Report fully funded in my view, the positive aspects of these 2 projects are huge and should be further developed. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

2.4 Education, Recreation and Duke Community Facilities - Issues Bar

05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No and Woolnough conditions in this area of Stoneyholme north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with Recreation high degree of vacancy, Issues & opportunities in abandonment, previously relation to Area 7 cleared sites and unfit demolition of Hurtley Street properties, are some of the Area worst in the area and the Borough. This situation was Action reflected in the decision to show redevelopment of this

area on all three AAP Plan Burnley options produced for this

area. The response to the - Consultation Neighbourhood Action Plan Borough consultation in 2003

favoured redevelopment for this area and influenced Council Report this decision. 49 50 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Redevelopment in this area Action is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Plan AAP area. It will create a

Y/N

14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey No details given No Duke “Leisure Areas ok “ but

does not state which Bar area/option. Lives in area 8. and Stoneyholme 26/DS/50-Mr Feser Ali There are a range of No medical services within the Would like to see more area. Decisions about medical services within the further services would be area. made by the Local Health Area Service. Action 33/DS/59-Irshad Begum The lack of provision of In part The Preferred Option should NHS dental services is a consider the creation of Would like to see more Plan

Burnley national issue and employment opportunities, the NHS dental practices within decisions about services provision of recreation areas. -

the area. Is in support of within Burnley and this AAP Consultation

rebuilding employment and area would be made by the Borough recreation areas as well as Local Health Service.

a university establishment A new sixth form school and a college campus are Council being developed within the Report area. 51 52 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 36/DS/106-S Khan An audit of green spaces Yes The Preferred Option should has been completed and make provision for green and There should be more will inform the AAP spaces to meet local need in Stoneyholme parks especially near New preferred option. accordance with the Hall Street. Greenspace Strategy.

05/ALL/326 Towneley for The Building Schools for No

the People the Future Programme Area is developing a Sixth Form The new secondary school School in the area and Action should be built within Burnley College is Burnley Wood as it would developing a site for the act as a centre for relocation of it campus. Plan community regeneration -

and facilities. There are a Consultation number of potential locations for a school – some of them cover more than one area. The Vision

should be centred around Report a community college. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

10/ALL/424 The Theatres The need to protect and In part The Preferred Option does Trust improve venues for cultural not include a proposal for a Duke activities is recognised but cultural venue but does The Theatres Trust would Burnley is only a small town protect existing community Bar like to emphasise the and it may be more centres, identifies open and importance of providing appropriate to concentrate spaces and embeds arts

suitable venues for cultural such activities in Burnley projects into the planning and Stoneyholme activities which can be town centre and the regeneration processes. used by local communities. Weavers' Triangle Such centres are able to area. The Burnley Youth host a number of activities Theatre is situated close to

for the benefit of local the eastern boundary of the Area people and provide a hub AAP.

for a variety of leisure Action interests including creative and cultural industries. A Plan

Burnley flourishing arts scene will

help to give a sense of local -

identity and vitality, and will Consultation entertain and stimulate Borough

local residents and businesses. Council Report 53 54 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The protection and promotion of cultural and activities, in particular Stoneyholme theatre, is of course an essential element of local development documents. Sustainable communities: people Places and Area Prosperity (ODPM 2005) points out that a sense of Action place, good quality community and cultural

facilities are essential Plan components in the

development of sustainable - Consultation communities. Cultural energy and creative activity is the mark of an innovative sustainable

community, helping attract Report and retain well-qualified people and businesses. It fosters high inward investment, more partnership working and Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

greater diversity in the workforce. In order to Duke increase participation in cultural activity and meet Bar future community needs for and cultural facilities, local

authorities and their Stoneyholme partners should give consideration to providing neighbourhood and local facilities that combine

space or resources for a Area range of cultural,

commercial and community Action activities in one place. It is important that local Plan

Burnley authorities carry out thorough and rigorous -

assessments of need for Consultation

Borough open space, sport,

recreation, theatre and

cultural facilities in line with

PPG17 to reflect local Council distinctiveness. Efforts Report must be made to ensure 55 56 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar that young people and other hard to reach groups and are engaged in discussions Stoneyholme about the use of space and community design. Opportunities for the provision of combined cultural activity spaces Area should be explored. Action 2.5 Transport and Movement – Issues Plan 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No

Woolnough conditions in this area of - Consultation north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with Transport high degree of vacancy, and Movement Issues & abandonment, previously opportunities in relation to cleared sites and unfit Area 7 and Area 8 opt 2 properties, are some of the Report demolition of Hurtley Street worst in the area and the Borough. This situation was reflected in the decision to show redevelopment of this area on all three AAP Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

options produced for this area. The response to the Duke Neighbourhood Action Plan consultation in 2003 Bar favoured redevelopment for and this area and influenced

this decision. Stoneyholme

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle

these problems. In Area recognition of the severe

problems, English Action Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity in Plan

Burnley Daneshouse. -

Redevelopment in this area Consultation

is seen as the key to the

Borough regeneration of the whole

AAP area. It will create a

key gateway site into the Council

area encouraging further Report investment. Through 57 58 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar redevelopment there is the potential to widen Hurtley and Street to create a Stoneyholme landscaped gateway providing a better environment for walking and cycling into, through and within the area. Area

110/DS/306 –Alasdair Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Action Simpson LCC Senior consider the provision of cycle Cycling Officer routes to key destinations for a wide range of uses. Plan Lists the key destinations -

which people are being Consultation encouraged to cycle to both within and adjoining the Area:

Within: Shopping facilities, Report Employment Areas, Schools, Health & Community facilities. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Adjoining: Barden Lane 6th Form Centre, Walshaw Duke High school, Catholic High School, Hospital, Bar Heasandford Industrial and Estate, Town Centre, Retail

Parks including Stoneyholme supermarkets, Railway Station, Parks and Canals, Wheeled Sport Facility. He lists the main problems

and deterrents to cycling Area in the area: Busy main

roads (Colne and Briercliffe Action Roads), Minor roads carrying more than their fair Plan

Burnley share of traffic (Daneshouse Rd & -

Brougham St), Need to Consultation

Borough cross main roads (Colne

Rd & Princess Way),

Problem Junctions

(Dukebar), Poor access to Council and through the town Report centre because of the inner 59 60 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar ring road and traffic management system, Little and tradition of cycle use in the Stoneyholme area. (See also 2.5 Opportunities)

General Principles: To encourage cycling and walking make the area Area more permeable on foot/bicycle than by car, Action Joining up side streets can

create cycle routes on quiet Plan streets away from busy

main roads, Important that - cycle routes are direct, Consultation attractive, easy to use and follow and safe, Where there is a one way street consider contra flow Report cycling, as this will give a shorter route and may be a safer option than via a one way system, Need to ensure there is enough on Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

and off street cycle parking and measures to control Duke vehicle speed and deter through traffic will also help Bar cyclists. and

The canal and railway line Stoneyholme act as barriers to east-west movement by cyclists and pedestrians.

See also individual areas Area

117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will Action Maunsell for Highways continue to be consulted at all Agency stages of the AAP process Plan

Burnley and as and when The DDS AAP does not development proposals come -

contain details of the likely forward. Consultation

Borough scale of the developments

proposed. Consequently it

is difficult to assess the likely traffic impact of the Council Report Options within the Plan. 61 62 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Given the level of details provided with respect to the and Option development Stoneyholme schemes, the Agency has been unable to accurately compare and contrast the proposals therein and the comparative level of Area potential impact on the strategic highway network. Action

The Agency has therefore

made comments on each Plan of the Options within the

Plan based upon estimates - of development generated Consultation traffic, proximity to the trunk road network, potential routing of development traffic, options for travel by Report other modes of transport, and existing built development on the site. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The Agency welcomes the fact that the AAP Duke documents clearly define the whole process, detailing Bar the next steps involved in and developing the Preferred

Options report. Stoneyholme

In summary the Agency requires the following information in support of

any proposals taken Area forward: Action To be consulted at every stage of the

consultation process Plan Burnley Development -

proposals need to be Consultation

considered in Borough

accordance with the

Agency’s policy

requirements. Council Proposals need to Report include detail of the 63 64 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar likely scale of developments (where and possible). Stoneyholme Each development proposal needs to be supported by a Transport Assessment and Travel Plan as a Area minimum particularly where the proposals Action have the potential to have a material impact

on the trunk road Plan network is seen again, -

in accordance with the Consultation policy framework highlighted in the Agency’s letter. 153/DS/415-G. Gresham, Noted Yes The Preferred Option should George Wilkinson consider investigating Report (Burnley) Ltd. improvements in public transport to the area and of The lack of public transport encouraging other means of affects recruitment to the accessing employment areas. business (Area 8) Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

02/ALL/179 T Letch - Noted Yes The Preferred Option Burnley and Pendle identifies a number of green Duke Ramblers Assocn routes. Further work is ongoing in relation to Bar As ramblers we are in targeting user groups, and and favour of any scheme that resolving issues of conflict,

enables and encourages as part of the process of Stoneyholme people to walk. There are design and development. however, some concerns over paths with multiple use. For example, walkers,

cyclists and horse riders do Area not mix well. The differing

speeds bring problems, Action evident on canal towpaths, especially as many cyclists Plan

Burnley carry no audible warning of

approach, and accidents -

are a distinct possibility. Consultation Borough

Council Report 65 66 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 12/ALL/427-Lancashire The AAPs are being Yes All 5 AAPs are being CC, Planning and developed concurrently and developed together, at the and Environmental Services this provides the same time, thus providing Stoneyholme opportunity to consider opportunities for more joined While issues regarding cross boundary issues such up thinking. accessibility are discussed as transport links more under the different options, strategically. the AAPs would benefit from an overview Area describing how the different proposals fit together and Action how overall accessibility

issues will be addressed. Plan More joined up thinking is

required on this issue. - Consultation Section 2.5 of the consultation report should be expanded to acknowledge train frequency. Report

2.5 Transport and 110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Movement – Simpson LCC Senior maximise the opportunities to Opportunities Cycling Officer encourage, improve and Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

See also issues above at develop cycling and walking 2.4. Opportunities are routes within and outside the Duke listed as: Canal (though area and particularly those the canal side environment presented by the canal, parks Bar deters use at present. and green spaces and and M.Darbyshire is carrying regeneration proposals.

out a scheme to improve Stoneyholme the towpath.) Increased use of the canal by boaters would help promote towpath cycling and more

access points might help Area increase use; Parks and

Green Spaces; Growing Action network of cycle routes and increasing interest in Plan

Burnley cycling; Neighbourhood Renewal Scheme -

Opportunities; Network of Consultation

Borough minor roads with little

through traffic.

Greenway Scheme is Council being developed by LCC Report along the Brun Valley and 67 68 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar a SW/NE route across the Daneshouse Area linking and Pendle Way with the Stoneyholme Hospital/Heasandford Area.

See also individual areas for details of a plan showing possible cycle routes using side streets Area and green spaces which take advantage of Action opportunities and overcome

some of the problem Plan issues. The plan is

diagrammatic and would - need further refinement as Consultation proposals are developed.

122/DS/359- Gren Logue Agree Yes The Preferred Option should

(Saco Ltd) investigate the possibilities for Report creating a fully open M65 Poor access to M65-West Junction 11. direction. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

04/ALL/275 J Percival, Agree In part The Piccadilly and Trafalgar Paperlane Properties Ltd. Manchester Road Station Preferred Option should Duke which serves the line which consider proposals to I would suggest that would link to Manchester is investigate rail links with Bar improved rail links to major within the Piccadilly and Manchester. and cities ie Manchester, would Trafalgar Area Action Plan

have a huge impact on the boundary. Stoneyholme local economy. I appreciate that road links are excellent, but I feel that trains can bypass the

delays that inevitably occur Area on the roads. Action Other Issues? Plan

Burnley 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No Woolnough conditions in this area of -

north Daneshouse, with a Consultation

Enhance old housing area high degree of vacancy, Borough

in Area 8 by retaining abandonment, previously

Hurtley Street in Area 7 and cleared sites and unfit

remodelling backs to fit with properties, are some of the Council new housing. worst in the area and the Report Borough. This situation was 69 70 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar reflected in the decision to show redevelopment of this and area on all three AAP Stoneyholme options produced for this area. The response to the Neighbourhood Action Plan consultation in 2003 favoured redevelopment for Area this area and influenced this decision. Action

The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative provides Plan an opportunity to tackle

these problems. In - recognition of the severe Consultation problems, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity in Daneshouse. Report

Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole AAP area. It will create a Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

key gateway site into the area encouraging further Duke investment. Through redevelopment there is the Bar potential to widen Hurtley and Street to create a

landscaped gateway Stoneyholme providing a better environment for walking and cycling into, through and within the area. Area

06/DS/30-Maskeen Agree - the AAP should Yes The Preferred Option will Hussain (Area 7) include timescales include phasing details of all Action proposals.

Timescales – when are the Plan

Burnley properties to be

demolished. - Consultation

Borough 07/DS/31-Usman Alf (Area Agree - the AAP should Yes The Preferred Option will 7) include timescales include phasing details of all

proposals.

Council Timescales – when are the Report properties to be demolished. 71 72 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 08/DS/32-Jehan Ali(Area Agree - the AAP should Yes The Preferred Option will 7) include timescales include phasing details of all and proposals. Timescales – when are the Stoneyholme properties to be demolished.

15/DS/39-Mr Ray Winter The Neighbourhood Action No Area Plan, Master Plan and Area Wants the Council to stop Action Plan consultation Action spending money & wasting process had been lengthy time talking – get on and do but has not delayed the something. Lack of implementation of works Plan decisions has led to people under the Housing Market -

stopping spending on their Renewal Programme. Consultation properties. Concentrate on one area before moving on. It is appreciated that Residents are fed up with uncertainty about the uncertainty. longer term future of

houses does deter some Report investment.

Five Area Action Plans are being prepared simultaneously in order that Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

proposals across all areas can be co-ordinated to Duke being about improvements in the Housing Market Bar across the Borough and in and accordance with need for

each area. Stoneyholme

26/DS/50-Mr. Feser Ali The Statement of No Community Involvements would like to see more face sets out the consultation to face consultation. process in order that the Area process is front loaded and inclusive. Action 28/DS/52-Alan Sturdy The Statement of No Plan

Burnley Community Involvements says the council should sets out the consultation -

have a bottom up not top process in order that the Consultation

down approach and listen Borough process is front loaded and

to residents and keep the inclusive.

community intact. Community consultation is

one element of the Council consultation process and Report the Area Action Plan must 73 74 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar also take account of National, Regional and and Local Policies, comments Stoneyholme from a range of organisations and funders. 32/DS/57-J & A. Schofield Community cohesion within No this AAP area and across

feel that opportunities to Burnley as a whole is an Area help communities mix are issue which the Council

constantly missed due to gives high priority. The Action lack of foresight and Council works in understanding of people partnership with a range of Plan from outside the specialist organisations to community.

tackle this issue. - Areas 7 and 8 have Consultation Also think that Area 8 (not suffered from housing the area in which they live) market failure for many is most deprived and years and show some of should be priority for the worst conditions across investment. the Borough. In recognition Report of this English Partnerships are supporting regeneration proposals in this AAP. However, other Area Action Plan areas suffer from Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

significant market failure and with limited resources Duke available difficult decisions have to be made about Bar their most effective use. and 33/DS/59- Irshad Begum Bar Street, Cleaver Street No Stoneyholme and Brennand Street are thinks that Bar St, Cleaver included within the AAP. St, Brennand St should also be considered. Area 41/DS/154-C Starkie Areas 7 and 8 have No

suffered from housing Action Areas 10, 11 & 12 should market failure for many be a priority for investment years and show some of as it will make a greater Plan

Burnley the worst conditions across impact on Area 10. the Borough. In recognition -

of this English Partnerships Consultation

are supporting regeneration Borough

proposals in this AAP.

Other areas suffer from

varying degrees of market Council failure which need to be Report addressed and with limited 75 76 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar resources available difficult decisions have to be made and about their most effective Stoneyholme use. 43/DS/167- C Constantine Housing market failure No across the Borough is a Burnley is a dead end place complex issue which will

for professionals to live it take time to resolve. The Area has nothing to offer – I am Housing Market Renewal

planning to relocate back Programme is a 10 to 15 Action to London. Ten year plan year programme. time scale is too long, people want to see things Plan change now in 10 year a -

new govt may stop Consultation proposed changes.

53/DS/227- John Estall Heritage Appraisals have Yes The Preferred Option should been produced to identify consider the special character Report good to see that the older the special character of the of the area as described in parts of Burnley are being area in order that its the Heritage Appraisal. preserved as heritage character is not lost and is (cobblestones, etc.). respected in development proposals. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

161/DS/430-Judith Deliverability is key to the In part The Preferred Option will give Furlonger, Development AAP process. equal consideration to all Duke Manager, Elevate comments received from a As part of the AAP process wide range of individuals and Bar Deliverability should be a a wide range of individuals organisations. key ingredient in the AAP and organisations have and

process. Alongside been consulted at various It will describe individual Stoneyholme Elevate, there are a stages. proposals, their phasing and number of other partners funding sources. critical to informing and It is recognised that the delivering a Lead Developer is a major The Preferred Option will take partner but the views and an holistic and spatial view transformational change. Area These include The aspirations of the lead to achieve the sustainable developer must be regeneration of this area and community, NWDA, Action Housing Corporation, balanced against the views the other 4 Area Action Plan Government Office NW, of other consultees. areas. Amongst other issues

the Preferred Option will Plan

Burnley Gleeson, Lancashire CC and Great Places HA. All It is agreed that there consider providing a range of needs to be a realistic - partner views will need to house types and sizes, Consultation be incorporated into the assessment of funding, supporting employment uses Borough

Preferred Option. The phasing and deliverability. and improving key routes and

Lead Developer Partner a range of linkages. It is likely that Elevate will

provides a major

Council be providing just one opportunity to help deliver Report stream of regeneration a range of improvements in funding and that other 77 78 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar the area when combined streams for non HMR with other public and activity will be explored. and private sector The Area Action Plan will Stoneyholme interventions. Elevate give a degree of certainty would wish to maximise the about the area's future and input of lead developer into encourage private as well the Preferred Option stage as public investment. and used to maximum Area effect in delivering the All these routes, gateways regeneration of the area. and linkages are considered in the Action The Preferred Options Daneshouse, Duke Bar

stage needs to be and Stoneyholme AAP. All Plan achievable and realistic. 5 AAPs are being

We wish to see options developed concurrently to - which are considered and ensure consistency of Consultation which demonstrate that approach and that strategic they are deliverable given linkages are made between the necessary agreements and across areas. and available funding. There is a need to provide Report We would ask that there a greater mix of house should be more types, size and tenure consideration when putting across the area and to options such as improve the public realm. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

“comprehensive The employment area and refurbishment” as it is not local and new businesses Duke clear what this means and will be supported and their there is a danger or raising views taken into Bar aspirations beyond the consideration. and availability of financing this

option. Stoneyholme

We would suggest that pathfinder investment is focused round delivering

benefits to the wider public Area and not individual house

owners. It would be Action Elevate’s position that property owners undertake Plan

Burnley as much of any investment as possible. Only where -

the need for intervention is Consultation

acute and demonstrated Borough

will the possibility of funding

more than face lifting or

other such confidence Council building public sector Report investment be considered. 79 80 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar All our comments are therefore subject to further and details relating to funding, Stoneyholme phasing, costs, values, further community consultation, discussions with Council departments and owners/developers. Area

We would like to see in the preferred options stage Action proposals which represent

a holistic approach to Plan guiding new development

and co-ordinating - regeneration activity. Consultation

A key issue is linkages. We would like to see reference made to different routes through the area, Report noting gateway routes with environmental linked improvements but at this stage there is still not Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

enough information about connectivity within and Duke from/to the area. Elevate believes that Bar transformational themes and are the creation of much

stronger linkages into the Stoneyholme town centre, and the new BSF school, new sources of employment, the retail centre on Colne Rd and the

Chai Centre to name a Area few. We would like to see

in the preferred options Action stage representations as to how these linkages will be Plan

Burnley made. We feel that to ignore these key linkages -

would be detrimental to Consultation

Borough securing the effective

regeneration of the area.

A key issue for the Council transformation of the area Report is the introduction of larger 81 82 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar and more varied house choices in the area, and creation of public realm and Stoneyholme open space and continued support for the current business and employment activities in the area.

We would also be keen to Area understand how the AAP will deal with phasing, at Action present there is no

indication of this, and it is Plan critical when considering

issues relating to - decanting, values, costs Consultation and value for money issues associated with delivery. We would anticipate close partnership involvement Report with Lead Developers and other key agencies working through the options to provide a deliverable preferred option. Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

See individual areas for more detailed comments. Duke Bar 162/DS/433-Chapman Noted In part The Preferred Option will

Robinson, Architects, for Some of the Lead balance the Lead Developer and Gleeson Developer's proposals were proposals with other integrated with the options comments received as part of Stoneyholme Submitted their Developer produced for the the consultation process. Plan as a response. The Consultation Issues and key elements of the Options Report in July developer’s proposal are: 2006. Area Provision of well designed,

high quality housing in a Action mix of types, sizes and tenure (tenure blind). Plan Burnley Creation of clear hierarchy -

of streets & high quality Consultation

Borough public spaces which are

well overlooked.

Improvements and Council

widening to E/W & N/S Report routes which will enhance 83 84 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar views through and out of the area & exploit the and unique canalside setting & Stoneyholme proximity to Burnley town centre.

Integration of new development with local community assets. Area Allowance made for addition of more facilities Action as the community grows. Plan Identification and

exploitation of all available - sites for development. Consultation

The response sets out:

Existing building strategy

and site clearance Report

Movement strategy and key routes Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Public realm squares, gardens and green space Duke

Mix and location of Bar dwellings and

Parking strategy Stoneyholme

Neighbourhood management planning

Identifiable business and community needs and Area infrastructure Action Integration of new development with the Plan

Burnley existing properties

See individual areas for Consultation

Borough more detailed comments.

Council Report 85 86 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 07/AL/363 GONW The options were largely In part The Preferred Option will drawn from previous reflect the advice received and Primary concern that for a rounds of consultations from GONW, PINs and the Stoneyholme majority of areas only a including the NAPs, master 'critical friend'. “preferred” and “do nothing” plans and proposals put option has been put forward as part of the Lead forward. We do not developer plans. The consider this sufficient. vision and objectives were Area Also whilst the feedback placed at the back of the form invites respondents to document on the advice of Action present alternative options, the Communications Unit we are concerned that they to allow consultees to go

may not have sufficient straight to the section with Plan information at their disposal proposals for their area.

to inform their judgement. - It is fundamental to the Comments noted and more Consultation principle of “frontloading” detailed explanations will that the local community is be provided in background involved in, and takes documents. ownership of the options for Report addressing the needs of There have been further their areas at an early discussions with GONW stage. The options should and PINs about the Issues flow from the vision and and options documentation objectives for the area. It and about the content of Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

might therefore be more the Preferred Option AAPs. helpful to have that material The advice of a 'critical Duke (currently contained at the friend' has also been end of the documents) as sought. Bar part of the contextual and material at the beginning.

In developing the DPD we Stoneyholme would strongly encourage you to make use of the self assessment guidance available for SA/SEA and

DPDs. Looking ahead, it is Area important that the report

produced at the Reg 26 Action Preferred Options Stage includes details of Plan

Burnley alternative options being

considered and of any -

options it is suggested be Consultation

Borough rejected as well as the

reasons behind those choices. Council Report 87 88 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09/AL/386-Lancashire CC, LCC's Highway Depot site In part As part of Local Plan EW1/5 Property Group within the AAP area was proposal discussion will take and required for the Burnley place with Lancashire Country Stoneyholme LCC is currently looking for College Campus now being Council concerning the a 5 acre site for a highway developed. The Depot has re-location of the Waste depot and gritting facility to now been re-located to Transfer Station to a suitable service the M65. This is an Heasandford Industrial alternative site. immediate requirement Estate. however if a site can’t be Area found it would be useful if The waste recycling centre one could be identified as is also within this AAP area Action part of this exercise. and is within an area

allocated in the Local Plan Plan A 2 acre site is required for for Employment Use. A

a waste recycling centre. feasibility study final report - is to be finalised by Consultation December 2007 and a project development team is in place to deliver the proposed new Education Report and Enterprise Park.

11/AL/425-United Utilities Noted No Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

has no comments on consultations Duke Bar 13/AL/441- Sanderson Noted No

Weatherall for Royal Mail These sites are not within and Group Plc the Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Stoneyholme In general we agree with AAP boundary and would the content of the not be undermined or document, however we access restricted by any of would like to ensure that the AAP proposals. our client’s sites within Area Burnley would not be undermined following any Action proposals. Our client’s

sites include: Plan Burnley

27 Hargreaves Street, -

Burnley Consultation Borough

St Peter’s Car Park, Burnley. Council Report 89 90 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Our client requires 24 hour unrestricted access to the and above sites and we would Stoneyholme therefore like to ensure that any proposed initiatives would not negatively impact upon the operations of our client. Area

178/DS/469 – British Agree with the Yes British Waterways will be Action Waterways development and design consulted at all stages of the principles set out in the AAP process and on all Unable to provide detailed Advice Note. planning applications and Plan comments because the development briefs for sites -

documents are at an early The Leeds Liverpool canal adjacent to the canal. Consultation stage of development but runs through the heart of The Preferred Option should provided a copy of the area and could play a consider the role of the canal ‘Standard Advice from significant role in the in regeneration and take Statutory Consultee regeneration of the area. advantage of the Perspective’ for opportunities it presents Report information. Development proposals adjacent to the canal will be required to have regard to Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

In summary the basic British Waterways Advice development and design Note and the Daneshouse Duke principles for all new Duke Bar and Stoneyholme canalside developments Design Guidance SPD in Bar are: order to create a high and quality develpment which

Water should be takes advantage of its Stoneyholme treated not just as a waterside location and setting or backdrop for respects the character of development but as a the area. space/leisure and

commercial resource Area in its own right

The view from the Action water outwards, ie by users of the canal and Plan

Burnley towpath should be considered along with -

views from the Consultation

Borough development to the

canal

A waterway and its

environs should form Council an integral part of the Report public realm in terms 91 92 Burnley Daneshouse, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar of the design and management of a and development Stoneyholme The siting, configuration and orientation of buildings should maximise views of the water, generate Area natural surveillance of the waterspace and Action encourage access to, along and from the

water Plan New waterside -

development needs to Consultation be considered holistically with the opportunities for waterbased

development, use and Report enhancement.

It should also be noted that BW are likely to seek the use of planning conditions, Section/Guideline Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

obligations or agreements as tools to secure waterway Duke improvements. Site-specific waterway Bar infrastructure, environment and and access improvements

including towpath upgrades Stoneyholme and maintenance costs should be included in S.106 Agreements in relation to major applications adjacent

to the canal or otherwise Area benefiting from it. Such

contributions mitigate for Action the additional burden placed on the waterway as Plan

Burnley a result of increased use and pressure to maintain

an attractive environment. Consultation Borough

BW supports the increased

use of the waterways for leisure, recreation and Council Report sporting activities. 93 94 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.2 Area 1

Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred

Borough Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred

Street Option? Duke Council

Y/N Bar and Option 1 –

Homezone Stoneyholme 29/DS/53-Zia Uddin Elevate and Burnley Yes Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts to encourage environmental and Agrees with this option facelifting to properties property improvements the area and wants houses to be fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target face-lifted and not locations area for Intensive Area demolished. Neighbourhood Management. Demolition is not proposed Action 30/DS/54-Mrs Asira Bibi Elevate and Burnley Yes Facelifting is not proposed but Plan Council policy restricts to encourage environmental and Agrees with this option facelifting to properties property improvements the area -

and wants houses to be fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Consultation face-lifted and not locations ) area for Intensive demolished. Neighbourhood Management. Demolition is not proposed

117/DS/344-Faber Noted Report Maunsell for Highways Agency Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Unlikely to have a material impact on traffic Duke flows on the strategic highway network Bar and 146/DS/408-Henryck Homezones provide safe Yes The Preferred Option proposes Peterson, Sport England streets enabling to designate the area as a target Stoneyholme North West Region play/physical activity area for Intensive Neighbourhood Management. Support this option. One of the issues which will be considered as part of the improvement of the area is Area giving priority to people rather than the car. Action Option 2 29/DS/53-Zia Uddin Elevate and Burnley Yes Facelifting is not proposed but Plan

Burnley –Remodelling Council policy restricts to encourage environmental and Agrees with gateways facelifting to properties property improvements the area -

and facelifts, but not fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Consultation demolition. Borough locations area for Intensive

Neighbourhood Management.

Demolition is not proposed

Council

09 & 58/DS/33 & 244 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Report -Maharan Nessa proposed in the Preferred Option. It is proposed to 95 96 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive and remodelling Castle Neighbourhood Management Stoneyholme Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. 09 & 59/DS/33 & 245 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Abdul Motin proposed. It is proposed to Area designate the area as a target

Totally against the idea area for Intensive Action of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Plan Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. - Consultation 09 & 60/DS/33 & 246 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Shohida Begum proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Report remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

09 & 61/DS/33 & 247 Agree Yes Demolition/remodeling is not -Halena Begum proposed. It is proposed to Duke designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Bar of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 09 & 62/DS/33 & 248-Vic Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Knapp proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

09 & 63/DS/33 & 249 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - -Abdul Mutahir proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Council Street. property improvements will be Report encouraged. 97 98 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 64/DS/33 & 250-Mr. Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not G. A. Miah proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09 & 65/DS/33 & 251 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Rajia Suitana proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 09 & 66/DS/33 & 252 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Esub Khan proposed. It is proposed to

designate the area as a target Report Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

09 & 67/DS/33 & 253 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Heda Begum proposed. It is proposed to Duke designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Bar of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 09 & 68/DS/33 & 254 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Sheiim Baksh proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

09 & 69/DS/33 & 255 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - -Jebin Nehar proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Council Street. property improvements will be Report encouraged. 99 100 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 70/DS/33 & 256 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Rofiqul Islam proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09, 49 & 71/DS/33, 203 Agree Yes Demolition/selective clearance

& 257-Moynul Islam is not proposed. It is proposed Action to designate the area as a target Agrees with remodelling area for Intensive Plan but not with Neighbourhood Management clearance/selective

where environmental and - clearance. Totally property improvements will be Consultation against the idea of encouraged. Remodelling, demolishing Castle carried out by the owner to an Street. acceptable standard would be encouraged as an improvement. Report 09 & 72/DS/33 & 258-M Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Iqbal proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Duke remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Bar encouraged. and 09 & 73/DS/33 & 259 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Stoneyholme -Mary Edleston proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Area Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Action 09 & 74/DS/33 & 260 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Shaheda Begum proposed. It is proposed to Plan

Burnley designate the area as a target Totally against the idea

area for Intensive -

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Consultation

Borough remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged.

Council

09 & 75/DS/33 & 261 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Report -Mrs. J. Lord proposed. It is proposed to 101 102 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive and remodelling Castle Neighbourhood Management Stoneyholme Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. 09 & 76/DS/33 & 262 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Roy Palmer proposed. It is proposed to Area designate the area as a target

Totally against the idea area for Intensive Action of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Plan Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. - Consultation 09 & 77/DS/33 & 263 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Sawar Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive

Y/N

09 & 78/DS/33 & 264 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Mohammed Miah proposed. It is proposed to Duke designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Bar of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 09 & 79/DS/33 & 265 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Mr.M.J. Knights proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

09,30 & 80/DS/33, 54 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - 266-Mrs Asira Bibi proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough designate the area as a target

Does not agree with this area for Intensive option. Totally against Neighbourhood Management

the idea of demolishing where environmental and Council or remodelling Castle property improvements will be Report Street. encouraged. 103 104 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 81/DS/33 & 267 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Toymus Ali proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09 & 82/DS/33 & 268 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Mazida Begum proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 88/DS/284- U Abbas Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Report of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

89/DS/285 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not 90/DS/286-Parveen proposed. It is proposed to Duke Akhtar designate the area as a target area for Intensive Bar Totally against the idea Neighbourhood Management and of demolishing or where environmental and

remodelling Hubie property improvements will be Stoneyholme Street. encouraged.

91/DS/287-Safia Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Area of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Action Street. where environmental and

property improvements will be Plan

Burnley encouraged. -

92/DS/288-Q Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Consultation

Muhammad proposed. It is proposed to Borough designate the area as a target

Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Council remodelling Hubie where environmental and Report Street. 105 106 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar property improvements will be encouraged. and

93/DS/289-Ednan Akbar Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Stoneyholme proposed. It is proposed to Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management

Street. where environmental and Area property improvements will be

encouraged. Action 94/DS/290-Fahima Khan Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to Plan Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or - area for Intensive Consultation remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. Report 95/DS/291-S Chaudrey Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Street. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

where environmental and property improvements will be Duke encouraged. Bar 96/DS/292 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not 97/DS/293-Ayesha proposed. It is proposed to and Choudury designate the area as a target Stoneyholme area for Intensive Totally against the idea Neighbourhood Management of demolishing or where environmental and remodelling Hubie property improvements will be Street. encouraged. Area

98/DS/294 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Action 99/DS/295-Barbara Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea Plan

Burnley area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management -

remodelling Hubie where environmental and Consultation Street. property improvements will be Borough

encouraged. Council Report 107 108 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 100/DS/296-Shakila Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to and Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Stoneyholme of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Canning Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. Area 101/DS/297 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

102/DS/298 -Nasima proposed. It is proposed to Action Akhtar designate the area as a target area for Intensive Plan Totally against the idea Neighbourhood Management of demolishing or

where environmental and - remodelling Gordon property improvements will be Consultation Street. encouraged.

103/DS/299-Salim Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Mahmood proposed. It is proposed to Report designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

property improvements will be encouraged. Duke

104/DS/300-Kosuroth Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Bar Bibi proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target and Totally against the idea area for Intensive Stoneyholme of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged.

105/DS/301-Samini Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Area proposed. It is proposed to

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Action of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Gordon Neighbourhood Management Plan

Burnley Street. where environmental and

property improvements will be - encouraged. Consultation Borough

106/DS/302-Fozlur Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Rahman proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Council Report 109 1 10 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Gordon where environmental and Stoneyholme Street. property improvements will be encouraged. 107/DS/303-Syed Saifur Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Rahman proposed. It is proposed to

designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Plan encouraged. -

108/DS/304-Manjan Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Consultation Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management

remodelling Gordon where environmental and Report Street. property improvements will be encouraged. 109/DS/305-Reza H Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Syed proposed. It is proposed to Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive Duke remodelling Gordon Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and Bar property improvements will be and encouraged. Stoneyholme 117/DS/344-Faber Noted Maunsell for Highways Agency

Unlikely to have a material impact on traffic Area flows on the strategic highway network Action Plan

Burnley Option 3 – 09 & 62/DS/33 & 248-Vic Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Demolition and Knapp proposed. It is proposed to

Redevelopment designate the area as a target Consultation Totally against the idea area for Intensive Borough

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Council Report encouraged.

1 1 1 1 12 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 63/DS/33 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not 249-Abdul Mutahir proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09 & 64/DS/33 & 250-Mr. Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

G. A. Miah proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 09 & 65/DS/33 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not 251-Rajia Suitana proposed. It is proposed to

Y/N

09 & 66/DS/33 & 252 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Esub Khan proposed. It is proposed to Duke designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Bar of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 09 & 67/DS/33 & 253 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Heda Begum proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

09 & 68/DS/33 & 254 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - -Sheiim Baksh proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Council

Street. property improvements will be Report

encouraged.

1 13 1 14 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 69/DS/33 & 255 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Jebin Nehar proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09 & 63/DS/33 & 249 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Abdul Mutahir proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 09 & 64/DS/33 & 250-Mr. Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not G. A. Miah proposed. It is proposed to

Y/N

09 & 65/DS/33 & 251 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Rajia Suitana proposed. It is proposed to Duke designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Bar of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 09 & 66/DS/33 & 252 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Esub Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

09 & 67/DS/33 & 253 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - -Heda Begum proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Council

Street. property improvements will be Report

encouraged.

1 15 1 16 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 68/DS/33 & 254 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Sheiim Baksh proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09 & 69/DS/33 & 255 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Jebin Nehar proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 09 & 70/DS/33 & 256 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Rofiqul Islam proposed. It is proposed to

Y/N

09, 49 & 71/DS/33, 203 Agree Yes Demolition is not proposed. It & 257-Moynul Islam is proposed to designate the Duke area as a target area for Disagrees with this Intensive Neighbourhood Bar option as against Management where and clearance in area 1. environmental and property

Totally against the idea improvements will be Stoneyholme of demolishing Castle encouraged. Street.

09 & 72/DS/33 & 258-M Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Iqbal proposed. It is proposed to Area designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Action of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle

where environmental and Plan

Burnley Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. - Consultation 09 & 73/DS/33 & 259 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Borough -Mary Edleston proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target

Council Report

1 17 1 18 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management and remodelling Castle where environmental and Stoneyholme Street. property improvements will be encouraged. 09 & 74/DS/33 & 260 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Shaheda Begum proposed. It is proposed to

designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive

of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Plan encouraged. -

09 & 75/DS/33 & 261 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Consultation -Mrs. J. Lord proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management

remodelling Castle where environmental and Report Street. property improvements will be encouraged. 09 & 76/DS/33 & 262 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Roy Palmer proposed. It is proposed to Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive Duke remodelling Castle Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and Bar property improvements will be and encouraged. Stoneyholme 09 & 77/DS/33 & 263 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Sawar Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Area remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Action encouraged. 09 & 78/DS/33 & 264 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Plan

Burnley -Mohammed Miah proposed. It is proposed to

designate the area as a target - Totally against the idea area for Intensive Consultation

Borough of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be

encouraged. Council Report

1 19 120 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 79/DS/33 & 265 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Mr.M.J. Knights proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 09, 30 & 80/DS/33,54 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

266-Asira Bibi proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Does not agree with this area for Intensive Plan option. Totally against Neighbourhood Management the idea of demolishing

where environmental and - or remodelling Castle property improvements will be Consultation Street. encouraged.

09 & 81/DS/33 & 267 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Toymus Ali proposed. It is proposed to Report designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Castle where environmental and Street. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

property improvements will be encouraged. Duke

09 & 82/DS/33 & 268 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Bar -Majeda Begum Totally proposed. It is proposed to against the idea of designate the area as a target and demolishing or area for Intensive Stoneyholme remodelling Castle Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged.

88/DS/284- U Abbas Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Area proposed. It is proposed to

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Action of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Plan

Burnley Street. where environmental and

property improvements will be -

encouraged. Consultation Borough 89/DS/285 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

90/DS/286-Parveen proposed. It is proposed to Akhtar designate the area as a target Council Report area for Intensive 121 122 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Totally against the idea Neighbourhood Management of demolishing or where environmental and and remodelling Hubie property improvements will be Stoneyholme Street. encouraged.

91/DS/287-Safia Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Area of demolishing or area for Intensive

remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Action Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. Plan

92/DS/288-Q Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - Consultation Muhammad proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Hubie where environmental and Report Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

93/DS/289-Ednan Akbar Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to Duke Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive Bar remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management and Street. where environmental and

property improvements will be Stoneyholme encouraged. 94/DS/290-Fahima Khan Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Area of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Action Street. where environmental and property improvements will be

encouraged. Plan Burnley

95/DS/291-S Chaudrey Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not - proposed. It is proposed to Consultation

Borough Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive

remodelling Hubie Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and Council property improvements will be Report encouraged. 123 124 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 96/DS/292 & 97/DS/293 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not -Ayesha Choudury proposed. It is proposed to and designate the area as a target Stoneyholme Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Hubie where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Area 98/DS/294 & 99/DS/295 Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not

-Barbara Khan proposed. It is proposed to Action designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive Plan of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Hubie

where environmental and - Street. property improvements will be Consultation encouraged. 100/DS/296-Shakila Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not proposed. It is proposed to

Totally against the idea designate the area as a target Report of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Canning Neighbourhood Management Street. where environmental and property improvements will be encouraged. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

101/DS/297 & Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not 102/DS/298 -Nasima proposed. It is proposed to Duke Akhtar designate the area as a target area for Intensive Bar Totally against the idea Neighbourhood Management and of demolishing or where environmental and

remodelling Gordon property improvements will be Stoneyholme Street. encouraged.

103/DS/299-Salim Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Mahmood proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Action remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street.

property improvements will be Plan

Burnley encouraged. -

104/DS/300-Kosuroth Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Consultation

Bibi proposed. It is proposed to Borough designate the area as a target

Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Council remodelling Gordon where environmental and Report Street. 125 126 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar property improvements will be encouraged. and

105/DS/301-Samini Bibi Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Stoneyholme proposed. It is proposed to Totally against the idea designate the area as a target of demolishing or area for Intensive remodelling Gordon Neighbourhood Management

Street. where environmental and Area property improvements will be

encouraged. Action 106/DS/302-Fozlur Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Rahman proposed. It is proposed to Plan designate the area as a target Totally against the idea - area for Intensive Consultation of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Report 107/DS/303-Syed Saifur Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Rahman proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Duke remodelling Gordon where environmental and Street. property improvements will be Bar encouraged. and 108/DS/304-Manjan Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Stoneyholme Khan proposed. It is proposed to designate the area as a target Totally against the idea area for Intensive of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management remodelling Gordon where environmental and Area Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Action 109/DS/305-Reza H Agree Yes Demolition/remodelling is not Syed proposed. It is proposed to Plan

Burnley designate the area as a target

Totally against the idea

area for Intensive - of demolishing or Neighbourhood Management Consultation

Borough remodelling Gordon where environmental and

Street. property improvements will be encouraged. Council Report 127 128 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 117/DS/344-Faber Redevelopment is not No Redevelopment is not being Maunsell for Highways proposed proposed in the preferred option and Agency Stoneyholme

The Agency will need to be consulted on the proposals for redevelopment in order to consider the likely Area traffic impact of the new housing development on Action the strategic highway

network. The Agency Plan would be keen to ensure

that the site is designed - in a sustainable manner Consultation to encourage access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle. The site should be Report developed wholly in accordance with PPS3, Housing to ensure that the site is not over developed resulting in Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

negative impacts in traffic terms on the trunk Duke road network. Bar Development should be in a manner to ensure and

the need to travel is Stoneyholme reduced ensuring that traffic impact is minimised. Improvements in public

transport should be Area proposed where

appropriate. Action

Assessment of the

impact of the Plan Burnley

development on the -

trunk road network will Consultation need to be undertaken in

Borough accordance with PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the Council Report 129 130 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar provision of adequate Transport Assessment and and Travel Plan reports. Stoneyholme

12/AL/427-Lancashire Noted No Redevelopment is not being CC, Planning and proposed in the preferred option. Environmental Services Area Policy 13 of the JLSP

allows for the Action replacement of cleared dwellings on up to a one for one basis. Additional Plan dwellings in excess of -

one for one will be Consultation counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP.

Other Options? Report Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

29/DS/53-Zia Uddin Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Duke Wants the council to look facelifting to properties property improvements the area at face-lifting all the fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Bar houses in Stoneyholme. locations area for Intensive and Neighbourhood Management. Stoneyholme 09 & 58/DS/33 & 244 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Maharan Nessa Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations Other than in area for Intensive Area glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Action improvements to properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway Plan Burnley locations. - 09 & 59/DS/33 & 245 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Consultation

Borough -Abdul Motin Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

sandblasting, double locations Other than in area for Intensive Council glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Report fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund 131 132 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar improvements to properties beyond and facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 09 & 60/DS/33 & 246 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Shohida Begum Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Suggests facelifting, eg. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Area sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive

glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Action fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to Plan properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - locations. Consultation 09 & 61/DS/33 & 247 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Halena Begum Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Report sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

facelifting to key gateway locations. Duke

09 & 62/DS/33 & 248-Vic Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Bar Knapp Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area and Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Stoneyholme sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond Area facelifting to key gateway locations. Action 09 & 63/DS/33 & 249 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Abdul Mutahir Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Plan

Burnley facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g.

fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target - sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive Consultation

Borough glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties beyond Council facelifting to key gateway Report locations. 133 134 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 09 & 64/DS/33 & 250-Mr. Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but G. A. Miah Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Stoneyholme Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to Area properties beyond facelifting to key gateway Action locations. 09 & 65/DS/33 & 251 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Plan -Rajia Sultana Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

facelifting to properties property improvements the area - Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Consultation sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond Report facelifting to key gateway locations. 09 & 66/DS/33 & 252 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Esub Khan Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area sandblasting, double fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Duke glazing, new doors, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive fires, central heating etc. very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Bar Elevate will not fund and improvements to

properties beyond Stoneyholme facelifting to key gateway locations. 09 & 67/DS/33 & 253 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Heda Begum Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Area facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Action sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management.

fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Plan Burnley improvements to

properties beyond - Consultation

facelifting to key gateway Borough locations.

09 & 68/DS/33 & 254 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Sheiim Baksh Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Council Report facelifting to properties property improvements the area 135 136 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive and glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Stoneyholme fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 09 & 69/DS/33 & 255 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

-Jebin Nehar Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Action facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Plan sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new

very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. - fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Report 09 & 70/DS/33 & 256 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Rofiqul Islam Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive Duke glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Bar improvements to and properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 09, 49 & 71/DS/33, 203 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but & 257-Moynul Islam Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area Grants rather then just fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target facelifting should be locations. Other than in area for Intensive Action considered. Suggests very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. e.g. sandblasting, double Elevate will not fund

glazing, new doors, new improvements to Plan Burnley fires, central heating etc. properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - Consultation locations. Borough

09 & 72/DS/33 & 258-M Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Iqbal Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Council Report 137 138 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive and glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Stoneyholme fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 09 & 73/DS/33 & 259 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

-Mary Edleston Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Action facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Plan sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new

very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. - fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Report 09 & 74/DS/33 & 260 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Shaheda Begum Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 09 & 75/DS/33 & 261 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Mrs. J. Lord Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive Action glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund

improvements to Plan Burnley properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - Consultation locations. Borough

09 & 76/DS/33 & 262 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Roy Palmer Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Council Report 139 140 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive and glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Stoneyholme fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 09 & 77/DS/33 & 263 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

-Sawar Khan Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Action facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Plan sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new

very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. - fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Report 09 & 78/DS/33 & 264 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Mohammed Miah Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 09 & 79/DS/33 & 265 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Mr.M.J.Knights Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive Action glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund

improvements to Plan Burnley properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - Consultation locations. Borough

09 & 80/DS/33 & 266 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Asira Bibi Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Council Report 141 142 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive and glazing, new doors, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Stoneyholme fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 09 & 81/DS/33 & 267 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

-Toymus Ali Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Action facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Plan sandblasting, double locations. Other than in area for Intensive glazing, new doors, new

very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. - fires, central heating etc. Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Report 09 & 82/DS/33 & 268 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Majeda Begum Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 84/DS/274-Mr T Hussain This proposal was Yes, in The preferred option proposes included in option 2 and in part that this area and other parts of Would like to see every other options within the Stoneyholme be designated as Area other block cleared to Stoneyholme area but did an Intensive Neighbourhood make garden space to not receive strong Management Area and some Action the rear of terraced support. limited remodelling could be properties in Vacancy/abandonment considered as part of this

Stoneyholme. rates are not high in initiative. Plan Burnley Stoneyholme. -

88/DS/284- U Abbas Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Consultation

Borough Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive Council central heating, Report very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. 143 144 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to and where necessary. properties beyond Stoneyholme facelifting to key gateway locations. 89/DS/285 & 90/DS/286 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but -Parveen Akhtar Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive Action doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund Plan sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing

properties beyond - where necessary. facelifting to key gateway Consultation locations. 91/DS/287-Safia Bibi Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area Report Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive central heating, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to Duke where necessary. properties beyond facelifting to key gateway Bar locations. and 92/DS/288-Q Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Stoneyholme Muhammad Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Area central heating, Elevate will not fund sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to Action and damp proofing properties beyond where necessary. facelifting to key gateway

locations. Plan Burnley

93/DS/289-Ednan Akbar Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but - Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Consultation

Borough Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive central heating, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Council Report 145 146 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to and where necessary. properties beyond Stoneyholme facelifting to key gateway locations. 94/DS/290-Fahima Khan Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area Area Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive Action central heating, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund Plan and damp proofing improvements to where necessary.

properties beyond - facelifting to key gateway Consultation locations. 95/DS/291-S Chaudrey Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and

Y/N

sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to Duke where necessary. properties beyond facelifting to key gateway Bar locations. and 96/DS/292 & Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Stoneyholme 97/DS/293-Ayesha Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Choudury facelifting to properties property improvements the area fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Suggests facelifting, e.g. locations. Other than in area for Intensive Double glazing, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Area doors and gas fires, Elevate will not fund central heating, improvements to Action sandblasting, cavity walls properties beyond and damp proofing facelifting to key gateway

where necessary. locations. Plan Burnley -

98/DS/294 &99/DS/295- Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Consultation Barbara Khan Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Borough

facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive Council doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Report central heating, Elevate will not fund 147 148 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing properties beyond and where necessary. facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 100/DS/296-Shakila Bibi Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Area doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive

central heating, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Action sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to Plan where necessary. properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - locations. Consultation 101/DS/297 Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but &102/DS/298-Nasima Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Akhtar facelifting to properties property improvements the area

fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Report Suggests facelifting, e.g. locations. Other than in area for Intensive Double glazing, new very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. doors and gas fires, Elevate will not fund central heating, improvements to Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

sandblasting, cavity walls properties beyond and damp proofing facelifting to key gateway Duke where necessary. locations. Bar

103/DS/299-Salim Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but and Mahmood Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area Stoneyholme Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to Area and damp proofing properties beyond where necessary. facelifting to key gateway Action locations. Plan

Burnley 104/DS/300-Kosuroth Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

Bibi Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and -

facelifting to properties property improvements the area Consultation Suggests facelifting, e.g. Borough fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund Council Report 149 150 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing properties beyond and where necessary. facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 105/DS/301-Samina Bibi Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Suggests facelifting, e.g. facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Double glazing, new fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Area doors and gas fires, locations. Other than in area for Intensive

central heating, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Action sandblasting, cavity walls Elevate will not fund and damp proofing improvements to Plan where necessary. properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway - locations. Consultation 106/DS/302-Fozlur Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Rahman Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Report Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing properties beyond Duke where necessary. facelifting to key gateway locations. Bar

107/DS/303-Syed Saifur Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but and Rahman Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and Stoneyholme facelifting to properties property improvements the area Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund Area sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing properties beyond Action where necessary. facelifting to key gateway locations. Plan

Burnley 108/DS/304-Manjan Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but

Khan Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and - facelifting to properties property improvements the area Consultation

Borough Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target

Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. central heating, Elevate will not fund Council Report 151 152 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to and damp proofing properties beyond and where necessary. facelifting to key gateway Stoneyholme locations. 109/DS/305-Reza H Elevate and Burnley Yes, in Facelifting is not proposed but Syed Council policy restricts part to encourage environmental and facelifting to properties property improvements the area

Suggests facelifting, e.g. fronting key gateway has been proposed as a target Area Double glazing, new locations. Other than in area for Intensive

doors and gas fires, very exceptional cases Neighbourhood Management. Action central heating, Elevate will not fund sandblasting, cavity walls improvements to Plan and damp proofing properties beyond where necessary.

facelifting to key gateway - locations. Consultation 161/DS/430-Judith Agree Yes The preferred option proposes Furlonger, Development that this area and other parts of Manager, Elevate Stoneyholme be designated as

an Intensive Neighbourhood Report Before further demolition Management Area. This will or remodelling is encourage environmental and proposed the property improvements in the implications of any new area but will also allow further housing introduced to the monitoring to assess Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

area as a whole needs implications of regeneration to be considered and a works in the wider area. Duke view formed as to the impact on this area. Bar Further monitoring is and required to establish a

view on the long term Stoneyholme sustainability of this area.

162/DS/433-Chapman Agree. Yes The preferred option proposes Robinson Architects for the designation of an Intensive Gleesons Neighbourhood Management Area Area to encourage Initially new environmental and property Action development will be improvements. The

limited to building on an development of the vacant site Plan Burnley existing vacant site to the and new houses at the end of

south of existing terraces and works to - Brougham/Gordon St. existing properties can all be Consultation Borough The new development considered as part of the

will form a stop end to designation. the existing terraces. By

Council building some larger Report 153 154 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 1 – Hubie Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Street, Castle Street on Option

Borough and 2 – 30 Gordon Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar houses this will create a wider range of housing and in the area. Stoneyholme

There is also the opportunity for our RSL partner to buy up properties to carry out lateral conversions if Area there is a sustained demand. Action Plan Table 2.3 Area 2 -

Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Consultation Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? St/Burleigh St

Y/N Report

Option 1 – Facelifting Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

50/DS/204-Mr. S. Ahmed A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Agrees with facelifting, does commissioned by the houses in the wider area but not want to see any Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar properties cleared, recommended that, properties to the north of the and especially with the new because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

mosque on its way. incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme Category 1 Hazards of a more varied mix of housing Transformational to meet local needs. The Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site will best option for the be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties in necessary, a new mosque Area this area. site integrated into the

development site. Action In addition development of the mosque site Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago and its future appears -

uncertain. Consultation

Borough Some properties in the

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 155 156 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 85/DS/278-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing and Agrees with this option as it commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Stoneyholme would form part of a stronger Council has proposes that the mainly unfit community. recommended that, properties to the north of the because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Category 1 Hazards of a more varied mix in order Area Transformational to meet local needs. The Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site will Action best option for the be reassessed and, if pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque

area. site integrated into the Plan development site.

In addition development The phasing of development - Consultation of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears retaining and developinging a uncertain. stronger community

Some properties in the Report wider area have been improved under past housing improvement programmes Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

86/DS/277-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Agrees with this option and commissioned by the houses in the wider area. wants to be part of the Council has However, the mainly unfit Bar strong community as it recommended that, properties to the north of the and develops. because of the high mosque site are proposed for

incidence of unfitness and redevelopment to create a site Stoneyholme Category 1 Hazards for new housing of a more Transformational varied mix in order to meet Redevelopment is the local needs. The future of the best option for the mosque site will be reassessed

pre-1919 properties this and, if necessary, a new Area area. mosque site integrated into

the development site. Action In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears retaining and developinging a -

uncertain. stronger community Consultation

Borough Some properties in the

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes 157 158 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 87/DS/283-Petition with A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes signatures from 29 Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing and properties commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Stoneyholme Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Agree with facelifting to the recommended that, properties to the north of the front properties which because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to overlook the Mosque and incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing rear of properties to be Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Area improved. Transformational to meet local needs. The Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can Action best option for the be reassessed and, if pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque

area. site integrated into the Plan development site.

In addition development - of the mosque site Consultation stopped some time ago and its future appears uncertain.

116/DS/331-Sadiq Akbar A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Supports this option commissioned by the houses in the wider area but because it does not displace Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar residents who wish to live recommended that, properties to the north of the and close by the mosque because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Transformational to meet local needs. The Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can best option for the be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque Area area. site integrated into the

development site. Action In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears ensuring that existing residents -

uncertain. can remain in the area and Consultation

Borough close to a new mosque Some properties in the development.

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 159 160 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Disagree Yes The preferred option proposes for Highways Agency some redevelopment which and may have some impact on Stoneyholme This option unlikely to have traffic flows - further a material impact on traffic consultation will be carried out. flows on the strategic highway network. Area Option 2 –Limited

Demolition and Action Improvements

50/DS/204-Mr. S. Ahmed A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Plan Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing

Disagrees – does not want commissioned by the houses in the wider area but - to see any properties Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Consultation cleared, especially with the recommended that, properties to the north of the new mosque on its way. because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Report Transformational to meet local needs. The Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can best option for the be reassessed and, if pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque area. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

In addition development site integrated into the of the mosque site development site. Duke stopped some time ago The phasing of development and its future appears and redevelopment in the wider Bar uncertain. Stoneyholme area is critical to and ensuring that existing residents

Some properties in the can remain in the area and Stoneyholme wider area have been close to a new mosque improved under past development. housing improvement programmes Area 85/DS/278-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Action Disagrees with this option as commissioned by the houses in the wider area but it would cost more to

Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Plan

Burnley demolish homes & use recommended that, properties to the north of the heavy machinery, buildings because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to -

are strong. incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Consultation

Borough Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order

Transformational to meet local needs.

Redevelopment is the The future of the mosque site

Council best option for the can be reassessed and, if Report pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque 161 162 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar area. The cost of site integrated into the demolition balanced development site. and against the cost of Stoneyholme renovation, sustainability and the availability of funding was considered in the NRA

In addition development Area of the mosque site stopped some time ago Action and its future appears

uncertain. Plan

Some properties in the - wider area have been Consultation improved under past housing improvement programmes. Report Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

86/DS/277-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Disagrees with this option as commissioned by the houses in the wider area but the buildings are structurally Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar strong, don’t need recommended that, properties to the north of the and demolishing, it doesn’t make because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

marketing sense. incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Transformational to meet local needs. Redevelopment is the The future of the mosque site best option for the can be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque Area area. The cost of site integrated into the

demolition balanced development site. Action against the cost of renovation, sustainability Plan

Burnley and the availability of funding was considered in -

the NRA Consultation

Borough In addition development

of the mosque site stopped some time ago Council and its future appears Report uncertain. 163 164 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Some properties in the wider area have been and improved under past Stoneyholme housing improvement programmes.

87/DS/283-Petition with A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes

signatures from 29 Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the Area properties. commissioned by the existing houses in the wider

Council has area but proposes that Action Disagree with this option. recommended that, the mainly unfit properties to Demolition is not deemed to because of the high the north of the mosque site be be the best option as the incidence of unfitness and redeveloped to create a site for Plan properties are of sound Category 1 Hazards, new housing of a more varied -

structure and the whole Transformational mix in order to meet local Consultation purpose of supporting the Redevelopment is the needs. The future of the development of the mosque best option for the mosque site can be is to remain in the vicinity to pre-1919 properties this reassessed and, if necessary, benefit from the stronger area. a new mosque site integrated community links. into the development site. Report In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears ensuring that existing residents uncertain. can remain in the area and Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

Some properties in the close to a new mosque wider area have been development. Duke improved under past housing improvement Bar programmes. and

116/DS/331-Sadiq Akbar A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Stoneyholme Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Does not support this option commissioned by the houses in the wider area but because it will involve the Council has proposes that the mainly unfit displacement of residents recommended that, properties to the north of the who may wish to live close because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to Area by the mosque incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Action Transformational to meet local needs. The

Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can Plan Burnley best option for the be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque - area. site integrated into the Consultation Borough development site.

In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider

Council stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to Report and its future appears ensuring that existing residents uncertain. can remain in the area and 165 166 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Some properties in the close to a new mosque wider area have been development. and improved under past Stoneyholme housing improvement programmes.

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Disagree Yes The preferred option proposes

for Highways Agency some redevelopment which Area may have some impact on

This option unlikely to have traffic flows - further Action a material impact on traffic consultation will be carried out. flows on the strategic highway network. Plan - 161/DS/430-Judith A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Consultation Furlonger, Development Renewal Assessment that the mainly unfit properties Manager, Elevate commissioned by the to the north of the mosque site Council has be redeveloped to create a site Assuming the mosque recommended that, for new housing of a more development continues to because of the high varied mix in order to meet Report completion it would make incidence of unfitness and local needs. sense to enhance the area Category 1 Hazards, The future of the mosque site immediately adjacent. Transformational can be reassessed and, if Selective demolition to Redevelopment is the necessary, a new mosque Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

provide an improved setting best option for the site integrated into the for the mosque would pre-1919 properties this development site. Duke appear to be reasonable. area. In addition development Bar of the mosque site and stopped some time ago

and its future appears Stoneyholme uncertain. 167/DS/445-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred proposes that Renewal Assessment the mainly unfit properties to Disagree with any form of commissioned by the the north of the mosque site be Area demolition on Belford Street. Council has redeveloped to create a site for recommended that, new housing of a more varied Action because of the high mix in order to meet local incidence of unfitness and needs.

Category 1 Hazards, The future of the mosque site Plan Burnley Transformational can be reassessed and, if

Redevelopment is the necessary, a new mosque - Consultation best option for the site integrated into the

Borough pre-1919 properties this development site. area. Council Report 167 168 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar In addition development of the mosque site and stopped some time ago Stoneyholme and its future appears uncertain.

Some properties in the wider area have been improved under past Area housing improvement programmes. Action

168/DS/446-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Plan Renewal Assessment that the mainly unfit properties -

Against the idea of any commissioned by the to the north of the mosque site Consultation demolition taking place on Council has be redeveloped to create a site Belford Street. recommended that, for new housing of a more because of the high varied mix in order to meet incidence of unfitness and local needs.

Category 1 Hazards, The future of the mosque site Report Transformational can be reassessed and, if Redevelopment is the necessary, a new mosque best option for the site integrated into the pre-1919 properties this development site. area. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

In addition development of the mosque site Duke stopped some time ago and its future appears Bar uncertain. and

Some properties in the Stoneyholme wider area have been improved under past housing improvement programmes. Area 169/DS/447-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Action Making open space will commissioned by the houses in the wider area but reduce strong local

Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Plan

Burnley neighbourhood links, recommended that, properties to the north of the

relationships and because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to - opportunities for young incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Consultation

Borough children and the elderly. of a more varied mix in order

Disagrees with any form of to meet local needs. demolition on Belford Street. Council Report 169 170 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Category 1 Hazards, The future of the mosque site Transformational can be reassessed and, if and Redevelopment is the necessary, a new mosque Stoneyholme best option for the site integrated into the pre-1919 properties this development site. area. The phasing of development In addition development and redevelopment in the wider of the mosque site Stoneyholme area is critical to Area stopped some time ago retaining and developing a and its future appears stronger community. Action uncertain. Plan Some properties in the

wider area have been - improved under past Consultation housing improvement programmes.

170/DS/448-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Report Renewal Assessment to retain the existing houses in Does not agree with the commissioned by the the wider area but proposes demolition of Belford Street. Council has that the mainly unfit properties There are no abandoned or recommended that, to the north of the mosque site derelict properties on the because of the high be redeveloped to create a site Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

street. All the houses are incidence of unfitness and for new housing of a more owner occupied, no council Category 1 Hazards, varied mix in order to meet Duke houses. Neighbours have Transformational local needs. made a good settlement on Redevelopment is the Bar the street. best option for the The future of the mosque site and pre-1919 properties this can be reassessed and, if

area. necessary, a new mosque Stoneyholme site integrated into the In addition development development site. of the mosque site stopped some time ago The phasing of development and redevelopment in the wider and its future appears Area uncertain. Stoneyholme area is critical to retaining and developing a Action Some properties in the stronger community wider area have been

improved under past Plan Burnley housing improvement -

programmes. Consultation Borough

172/DS/450-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing

Disagrees with the options commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Council to take action on Belford Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Report Street. Knocking down recommended that, properties to the north of the 171 172 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Belford Street will create because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to bitter residents. Staying incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing and nearer to the mosque will Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Stoneyholme keep strong culture and faith Transformational to meet local needs. in religion and educate Redevelopment is the young people more better. best option for the The future of the mosque site pre-1919 properties this can be reassessed and, if area. necessary, a new mosque site integrated into the Area In addition development development site. of the mosque site Action stopped some time ago The phasing of development

and its future appears and redevelopment in the wider Plan uncertain. Stoneyholme area is critical to

retaining and developing a - Some properties in the stronger community and Consultation wider area have been ensuring residents are close to improved under past the new mosque. housing improvement programmes. Report Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

173/DS/451-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Disagrees with the plans to commissioned by the houses in the wider area but demolish Belford Street. Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar People feel safe and secure, recommended that, properties to the north of the and and have a strong neighbour because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

link and do not want to leave incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme each other. Thinks that by Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order demolishing Belford Street Transformational to meet local needs. will minimise resources and Redevelopment is the would like to keep the best option for the The future of the mosque site

community closer to the pre-1919 properties this can be reassessed and, if Area mosque. area. necessary, a new mosque

site integrated into the Action In addition development development site. of the mosque site

The phasing of development Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago and its future appears and redevelopment in the wider -

uncertain. Stoneyholme area is critical to Consultation retaining and developing a Borough Some properties in the stronger community and

wider area have been ensuring residents are close to improved under past the new mosque. Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 173 174 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Option 3 – Demolition and and Redevelopment Stoneyholme 50/DS/204-Mr. S. Ahmed A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the Disagrees - does not want commissioned by the existing houses in the wider to see any properties Council has area but proposes that

cleared, especially with the recommended that, the mainly unfit properties to Area new mosque on its way. because of the high the north of the mosque site be

incidence of unfitness and redeveloped to create a site for Action Category 1 Hazards, new housing of a more varied Transformational mix in order to meet local Plan Redevelopment is the needs. The future of the

best option for the mosque site can be - pre-1919 properties this reassessed and, if necessary, Consultation area. a new mosque site integrated into the development site. In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to Report and its future appears ensuring that existing residents uncertain. can remain in the area and close to a new mosque development. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

Some properties in the wider area have been Duke improved under past housing improvement Bar programmes and

85/DS/278-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Stoneyholme Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Disagrees with this option as commissioned by the houses in the wider area but it would cost more to Council has proposes that the mainly unfit demolish homes & use recommended that, properties to the north of the heavy machinery, buildings because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to Area are strong. incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Action Transformational to meet local needs.

Redevelopment is the The future of the mosque site Plan Burnley best option for the can be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque - area. The cost of site integrated into the Consultation

Borough demolition balanced development site.

against the cost of

renovation, sustainability

Council and the availability of Report funding was considered in the NRA. 175 176 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar In addition development of the mosque site and stopped some time ago Stoneyholme and its future appears uncertain.

Some properties in the wider area have been improved under past Area housing improvement programmes. Action

86/DS/277-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Plan Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the -

Disagrees with this option as commissioned by the existing houses in the wider Consultation the buildings are structurally Council has area but proposes that strong, don’t need recommended that, the mainly unfit properties to demolishing, it doesn’t make because of the high the north of the mosque site be marketing sense. incidence of unfitness and redeveloped to create a site for

Category 1 Hazards, new housing of a more varied Report Transformational mix in order to meet local Redevelopment is the needs. best option for the The future of the mosque site pre-1919 properties this can be reassessed and, if area. The cost of necessary, a new mosque Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

demolition balanced site integrated into the against the cost of development site. Duke renovation, sustainability and the availability of Bar funding was considered in and the NRA. Stoneyholme In addition development of the mosque site stopped some time ago and its future appears

uncertain. Area

Some properties in the Action wider area have been improved under past

housing improvement Plan Burnley

programmes - Consultation

Borough 87/DS/283-Petition with A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes

signatures from 29 Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing properties. commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Council Report 177 178 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Disagree with this option. recommended that, properties to the north of the Demolition is not deemed to because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to and be the best option as the incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme properties are of sound Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order structure and the whole Transformational to meet local needs. The purpose of supporting the Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can development of the mosque best option for the be reassessed and, if is to remain in the vicinity to pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque Area benefit from the stronger area. site integrated into the community links. development site. Action In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider

stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to Plan and its future appears ensuring that existing residents

uncertain. can remain in the area and - Consultation close to a new mosque Some properties in the development. wider area have been improved under past housing improvement programmes. Report Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

116/DS/331-Sadiq Akbar Agree Yes The preferred option proposes to retain the best of the existing Duke Supports this option houses in the wider area but because it will allow proposes that the mainly unfit Bar residents who may wish to properties to the north of the and live close by the mosque to mosque site be redeveloped to

do so. create a site for new housing Stoneyholme of a more varied mix in order to meet local needs. The future of the mosque site can be reassessed and, if

necessary, a new mosque Area site integrated into the

development site. Action The phasing of development and redevelopment in the wider Plan

Burnley Stoneyholme area is critical to ensuring that existing residents -

can remain in the area and Consultation

Borough close to a new mosque development.

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Council

for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the Report AAP development process and 179 180 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar The Agency will need to be beyond when detailed consulted on the proposals proposals are received and for redevelopment in order Stoneyholme to consider the likely traffic impact of the new housing development on the strategic highway network. The Agency would be keen to Area ensure that the site is designed in a sustainable Action manner to encourage access by modes of

transport other than the Plan private vehicle. The site

should be developed wholly - Consultation in accordance with PPS3, Housing to ensure that the site is not over developed resulting in negative impacts

in traffic terms on the trunk Report road network.

Development should be in a manner to ensure the need to travel is reduced ensuring Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

that traffic impact is minimised. Improvements Duke in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Bar

Assessment of the impact of and

the development on the Stoneyholme trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Policy

including the provision of Area adequate Transport

Assessment and Travel Plan Action reports. Plan

Burnley 167/DS/445-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes

Renewal Assessment that the mainly unfit properties - Disagree with any form of commissioned by the to the north of the mosque site Consultation

Borough demolition on Belford Street. Council has be redeveloped to create a site

recommended that, for new housing of a more

because of the high varied mix in order to meet

Council incidence of unfitness and local needs. Category 1 Hazards, The future of the mosque site Report Transformational can be reassessed and, if 181 182 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Redevelopment is the necessary, a new mosque best option for the site integrated into the and pre-1919 properties this development site. Stoneyholme area.

In addition development of the mosque site stopped some time ago and its future appears Area uncertain. Action Some properties in the

wider area have been Plan improved under past

housing improvement - programmes Consultation

168/DS/446-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment that the mainly unfit properties

Against the idea of any to the north of the mosque site Report demolition taking place on be redeveloped to create a site Belford Street. for new housing of a more varied mix in order to meet local needs. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

commissioned by the The future of the mosque site Council has can be reassessed and, if Duke recommended that, necessary, a new mosque because of the high site integrated into the Bar incidence of unfitness and development site. and Category 1 Hazards,

Transformational Stoneyholme Redevelopment is the best option for the pre-1919 properties this area. Area In addition development

of the mosque site Action stopped some time ago and its future appears Plan

Burnley uncertain.

Some properties in the Consultation wider area have been

Borough improved under past housing improvement programmes Council Report 183 184 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 169/DS/447-Anonymous A Neighbourhood No The preferred option retains Renewal Assessment the best of the existing houses and Disagree with any form of commissioned by the in the wider area but proposes Stoneyholme demolition on Belford Street. Council has that the mainly unfit properties recommended that, to the north of the mosque site because of the high be redeveloped to create a site incidence of unfitness and for new housing of a more Category 1 Hazards, varied mix in order to meet Area Transformational local needs. The future of the Redevelopment is the mosque site can be Action best option for the reassessed and, if necessary, pre-1919 properties in a new mosque site integrated

this area. into the development site. Plan The phasing of development

In addition development and redevelopment in the wider - Consultation of the mosque site Stoneyholme area is critical to stopped some time ago retaining and developing a and its future appears stronger community uncertain.

Some properties in the Report wider area have been improved under past housing improvement programmes. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

170/DS/448-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option retains Renewal Assessment the best of the existing houses Duke Does not agree with the commissioned by the in the wider area but proposes demolition of Belford Street. Council has that the mainly unfit properties Bar There are no abandoned or recommended that, to the north of the mosque site and derelict properties on the because of the high be redeveloped to create a site

street. All the houses are incidence of unfitness and for new housing of a more Stoneyholme owner occupied, no council Category 1 Hazards, varied mix in order to meet houses. Neighbours have Transformational local needs. The future of the made a good settlement on Redevelopment is the mosque site can be the street. best option for the reassessed and, if necessary,

pre-1919 properties in a new mosque site integrated Area this area. into the development site.

The phasing of development Action In addition development and redevelopment in the wider of the mosque site Stoneyholme area is critical to Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago retaining and developing a and its future appears stronger community -

uncertain. Consultation

Borough Some properties in the

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 185 186 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are Planning and Environmental being prepared so that housing and Services numbers and the mix of type, Stoneyholme size and tenure can be Policy 13 of the JLSP allows managed across the Borough for the replacement of in accordance with national, cleared dwellings on up to a regional and local Planning one for one basis. Policy. Additional dwellings in Area excess of one for one will be counted against the housing Action provision of Policy 12 of the

JLSP. Plan -

172/DS/450-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option retains Consultation Renewal Assessment the best of the existing houses Disagrees with the options commissioned by the in the wider area but proposes to take action on Belford Council has that the mainly unfit properties Street. Knocking down recommended that, to the north of the mosque site

Belford Street will create because of the high be redeveloped to create a site Report bitter residents. Staying incidence of unfitness and for new housing of a more nearer to the mosque will Category 1 Hazards, varied mix in order to meet keep strong culture and faith local needs. The future of the in religion and educate mosque site can be young people more better. reassessed and, if necessary, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

Transformational a new mosque site integrated Redevelopment is the into the development site. Duke best option for the The phasing of development pre-1919 properties this and redevelopment in the wider Bar area. Stoneyholme area is critical to and retaining and developing a

In addition development stronger community and Stoneyholme of the mosque site ensuring residents are close to stopped some time ago the new mosque. and its future appears uncertain. Area Some properties in the wider area have been Action improved under past housing improvement

programmes Plan Burnley -

173/DS/451-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Consultation

Borough Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing

Disagrees with the plans to commissioned by the houses in the wider area but demolish Belford Street. Council has proposes that the mainly unfit

People feel safe and secure, recommended that, properties to the north of the Council and have a strong neighbour because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to Report link and do not want to leave incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing 187 188 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar each other. Thinks that by Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order demolishing Belford Street Transformational to meet local needs. The and will minimise resources and Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can Stoneyholme would like to keep the best option for the be reassessed and, if community closer to the pre-1919 properties this necessary, a new mosque mosque. area. site integrated into the development site. In addition development The phasing of development Area of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to Action and its future appears retaining and developing a uncertain. stronger community and

ensuring residents are close to Plan Some properties in the the new mosque.

wider area have been - improved under past Consultation housing improvement programmes.

Other Options? 50/DS/204-Mr. S. Ahmed Burnley Council and Yes Houses on Burns Street back Report Elevate facelifting policies on to the proposed Facelifting to rear, not just restrict facelifting to key redevelopment site and should fronts should be considered. strategic routes and rear be considered for rear facelifting can only be facelifting in the preferred option. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

considered for sites which back on to strategic sites. Duke

84/DS/274-Mr T Hussain A Neighbourhood No The preferred option proposes Bar Renewal Assessment redevelopment of this area. Would like to see every commissioned by the and other block cleared to make Council has Stoneyholme garden space to the rear of recommended that, terraced properties in because of the high Stoneyholme. incidence of unfitness and Category 1 Hazards, Transformational Area Redevelopment is the best option for the Action pre-1919 properties in this area. Plan Burnley In addition development

of the mosque site - stopped some time ago Consultation Borough and its future appears

uncertain. Council Report 189 190 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar Some properties in the wider area have been and improved under past Stoneyholme housing improvement programmes.

85/DS/278-Anonymous CCTV in residential areas Yes The preferred option proposes

is a sensitive issue. It redevelopment. As part of the Area Would like to have CCTV in may be appropriate within design/ consultation

operation. areas which have specific it may be possible to consider Action problems. cctv and other security measures. Plan 86/DS/277-Anonymous CCTV in residential areas Yes The preferred option proposes

is a sensitive issue. It redevelopment. As part of the - Consultation Would like to have CCTV in may be appropriate within design/ consultation operation. areas which have specific it may be possible to consider problems. cctv and other security measures.

110/DS/306 –Alasdair Improving alternative Yes The preferred option for Report Simpson modes of transport to redevelopment borders the vehicles is a key part of suggested route and the AAP process. Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

LCC Senior Cycling Officer Every opportunity will be redevelopment proposals may taken to provide better be able to consider a new route Duke Proposes an alternative walking/cycling routes. or look at improving links to the quiet route cycle link from wider area. Bar Daneshouse Rd/Brougham St/Oswald St junction along and

Burns St to Princess Way Stoneyholme giving improved access to Town Centre and new access to Asda. A short section of Burns St would be

2 way for cyclists to create Area a through route for cyclists. Action Also an alternative route northwards along Oswald

Street to link up with the Plan Burnley canal towpath and New -

Hall/Old Hall Streets. Consultation Borough

116/DS/331-Sadiq Akbar A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the

Believes that 40-64 Belford commissioned by the existing houses in the wider Council Street and properties on Council has area but proposes that Report Brougham St should be recommended that, the mainly unfit properties to 191 192 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar included in Area 2. 40-64 because of the high the north of the mosque site Belford St should at least be incidence of unfitness and (including 40-64 Belford Street and considered for facelift if the Category 1 Hazards, and properties on Brougham Stoneyholme image of the area is to be Transformational Street to the rear) be improved. Properties on Redevelopment is the redeveloped to create a site for Brougham St backing best option for the new housing of a more varied Belford St need to be pre-1919 properties in mix in order to meet local considered for development this area. needs. The future of the Area to give a better frontage to mosque site can be the area if a better image of In addition development reassessed and, if necessary, Action the area is desired. of the mosque site a new mosque site integrated stopped some time ago into the development site.

and its future appears Plan uncertain. - Some properties in the Consultation wider area have been improved under past housing improvement programmes. Report

162/DS/433-Chapman A Neighbourhood Yes The proposed option proposes Robinson Architects for Renewal Assessment to redevelop the properties to Gleesons commissioned by the the north of the mosque site Council has and, if necessary, integrate a Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option? Daneshouse, St/Burleigh St Y/N

Propose the demolition of 2 recommended that, new mosque and its associated rows of terraced housing to because of the high uses into redevelopment Duke integrate the substantial new incidence of unfitness and proposals thus ensuring that a mosque within the housing Category 1 Hazards, high quality integrated design Bar area and to accommodate Transformational is possible. and the associated car parking. Redevelopment is the

best option for the Stoneyholme High quality design of the pre-1919 properties in public realm is essential to this area. enhance the setting of the mosque and to integrate the In addition development

car parking successfully into of the mosque site Area this area. stopped some time ago

and its future appears Action uncertain.

Some properties in the Plan Burnley

wider area have been -

improved under past Consultation housing improvement

Borough programmes. Council Report 193 194 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 167/DS/445-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing and Properties on Belford Street commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Stoneyholme are in a good condition, Council has proposes that the mainly unfit good neighbourhood and will recommended that, properties to the north of the keep together because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to family/community links. The incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing mosque plans should have Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Area been situated elsewhere, Transformational to meet local needs. The where it wouldn’t have Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can Action caused any problems for best option for the be reassessed and, if others. pre-1919 properties in necessary, a new mosque

this area. site integrated into the Plan development site.

168/DS/446-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Renovate Belford Street, do commissioned by the houses in the wider area but work outside of the houses Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar to give the mosque a good recommended that, properties to the north of the and image. Belford Street is a because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

main street where incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme communities gather near Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order parks, post offices, local Transformational to meet local needs. The shop, keeping strong links. Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can best option for the be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties in necessary, a new mosque Area this area. site integrated into the

development site. Action In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears retaining and developing a -

uncertain. stronger community. Consultation

Borough Some properties in the

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 195 196 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 2 – Area Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bounded by Back on Preferred Option

Borough Brougham St/Folds Preferred St/Burns Option?

St/Burleigh St Duke Y/N Council Bar 171/DS/449-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing and Belford Street is a well commissioned by the houses in the wider area but Stoneyholme known Street, every Council has proposes that the mainly unfit neighbour gets on really recommended that, properties to the north of the well. The houses are of good because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to quality and size and suitable incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing for all family members. Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order Area Re-amalgamating Belford Transformational to meet local needs. The Street for the purpose of Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can Action making the mosque stand best option for the be reassessed and, if out, then improve Belford pre-1919 properties in necessary, a new mosque

Street to make it look better this area. site integrated into the Plan to blend in with the mosque. development site.

172/DS/450-Anonymous A Neighbourhood Yes The preferred option proposes Renewal Assessment to retain the best of the existing Duke Thinks that it by taking commissioned by the houses in the wider area but action on Belford Street, it Council has proposes that the mainly unfit Bar will create poor relation by recommended that, properties to the north of the and scattering the neighbours because of the high mosque site be redeveloped to

elsewhere. The historic side incidence of unfitness and create a site for new housing Stoneyholme of long lasting Bangladeshi Category 1 Hazards, of a more varied mix in order people on Belford Street will Transformational to meet local needs. The fade out, creating barriers. Redevelopment is the future of the mosque site can best option for the be reassessed and, if

pre-1919 properties in necessary, a new mosque Area this area. site integrated into the

development site. Action In addition development The phasing of development of the mosque site and redevelopment in the wider Plan

Burnley stopped some time ago Stoneyholme area is critical to and its future appears retaining and developing a -

uncertain. stronger community. Consultation

Borough Some properties in the

wider area have been improved under past Council

housing improvement Report programmes. 197 198 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.4 Area 3

Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of

Borough Cronkshaw on Preferred Option St/Dane Preferred

St/Norman Option? Duke

Council St/Saxon

St/Daneshouse Y/N Bar Road and Option 1 – Homezone Stoneyholme 32/DS/57-J&A Schofield Agree although there are Yes The preferred option housing issues which need to proposes an intensive Agree with this option as be addressed. neighbourhood management they think that the area initiative in this area to Area needs little physical encourage environmental change. and property improvements. Action

117/DS/344-Faber Noted Plan Maunsell for Highways Agency - Consultation This option unlikely to have a material impact on traffic flows on the strategic highway network. Report

Option 2 – Remodelling Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option? Daneshouse, St/Saxon St/Daneshouse Y/N Road

32/DS/57-J&A Schofield Agree Yes The preferred option Duke proposes an intensive Disagree with this option as neighbourhood management Bar it will only destroy an initiative in this area to

existing community. encourage environmental and and property improvements with the existing community. Stoneyholme 117/DS/344-Faber Noted Maunsell for Highways Agency Area This option unlikely to have

a material impact on traffic Action flows on the strategic highway network. Plan Burnley

Option 3 – - Demolition and Consultation

Borough Redevelopment

32/DS/57-J&A Schofield Agree Yes The preferred option

proposes an intensive Council

Disagree with this option as neighbourhood management Report it will only destroy an initiative in this area to existing community. 199 200 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option

Borough St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option?

St/Saxon Duke St/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road Bar encourage environmental and and property improvements

with the existing community. Stoneyholme 117/DS/344-Faber The preferred option does not No The preferred option Maunsell for Highways propose any redevelopment. proposes an intensive Agency neighbourhood management initiative in this area to The Agency will need to be encourage environmental Area consulted on the proposals and property improvements. for redevelopment in order Action to consider the likely traffic

impact of the new housing Plan development on the

strategic highway network. - The Agency would be keen Consultation to ensure that the site is designed in a sustainable manner to encourage access by modes of Report transport other than the private vehicle. The site should be developed wholly in accordance with PPS3, Housing to ensure that the Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option? Daneshouse, St/Saxon St/Daneshouse Y/N Road

site is not over developed Duke resulting in negative impacts in traffic terms on Bar the trunk road network. and Development should be in a manner to ensure the Stoneyholme need to travel is reduced ensuring that traffic impact is minimised. Improvements in public

transport should be Area proposed where

appropriate. Action

Assessment of the impact Plan

Burnley of the development on the trunk road network will -

need to be undertaken in Consultation

Borough accordance with PPG 13

and the relevant DoT

Policy including the

provision of adequate Council Transport Assessment and Report Travel Plan reports. 201 202 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option

Borough St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option?

St/Saxon Duke St/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road Bar 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, The preferred option does not No The preferred option and Planning and propose any redevelopment. proposes an intensive

Environmental Services neighbourhood management Stoneyholme initiative in this area to Policy 13 of the JLSP encourage environmental allows for the replacement and property improvements. of cleared dwellings on up

to a one for one basis. Area Additional dwellings in

excess of one for one will Action be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Plan - Other Options? Consultation 32/DS/57-J&A Schofield Elevate and Burnley Council Yes The preferred option policy restricts facelifting to proposes an intensive Think that Council should properties fronting key gateway neighbourhood management

consider the refurbishment locations. Other than in very initiative in this area to Report of homes that need it, in exceptional cases Elevate will encourage environmental consultation with the not fund improvements to and property improvements community. properties beyond facelifting to with the local community. key gateway locations. Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option? Daneshouse, St/Saxon St/Daneshouse Y/N Road

161/DS/430-Judith The preferred option does not Yes The preferred option Duke Furlonger, Development propose any remodelling or proposes an intensive Manager, Elevate redevelopment. neighbourhood management Bar The Annual Monitoring Report initiative in this area to

Although adjacent to the and Burnley Council's Elevate encourage environmental and canal the area is on a monitoring procedures will and property improvements. higher level and sits above enable appraisal of the long The effect of this initiative Stoneyholme the canal. term sustainability of the area will be monitored. and the effect of the preferred Before further demolition or option proposal. remodelling is proposed the Agree- see Route C.

implications of any new Area housing introduced to the

areas as a whole needs to Action be considered and a view formed as to the impact on Plan

Burnley this area. Further monitoring is required to -

establish a view on the long Consultation

Borough term sustainability of this

area.

The area provides a direct Council link through from Report Stoneyholme to Colne 203 204 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 3 – Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Cronkshaw on Preferred Option

Borough St/Dane Preferred St/Norman Option?

St/Saxon Duke St/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road Bar Road and the town Centre. and Improvements and

enhancement of this route Stoneyholme could form a key pedestrian/cycle and green route through the area.

162/DS/433-Chapman The over supply of 2 up 2 down Yes The preferred option Area Robinson Architects for terraced housing is recognised proposes an intensive Gleesons as one of the contributory neighbourhood management Action factors of housing market initiative in this area to If a demand for a more decline in this area and one of encourage environmental Plan diverse range of houses is the overall aims of the Area and property improvements.

identified, our RSL partner Action Plan is to introduce a Great Places, the RSL - will look into the options for more diverse range of housing partner for this area, has Consultation acquiring properties in types. expressed an interest in this order to carry out lateral initiative. conversions to create some larger houses. Report Table 2.5 Area 4

Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option Daneshouse, St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option? St/Gordon St/Brougham St Y/N Duke Option 1 – Alleygating Bar 27/DS/51-Mr Biladar Khan Agree that alleygating would Yes The preferred option should and prevent fly-tipping. consider initiatives in this area

Agrees to this option as it Elevate and Burnley Council to encourage environmental Stoneyholme would prevent fly-tipping but policy restricts facelifting to and property improvements. would like face-lifting too as properties fronting key This could include alleygating in Option 3 gateway locations and facelifting on strategic sites.

Option 2 – Area Heritage Led Regeneration Action 27/DS/51-Mr Biladar Khan Disagree. English Heritage No Plan

Burnley has expressed concern that Disagrees with this option as the 19th Century industrial -

it would not fit with modern heritage of Housing Market Consultation

Borough times. Renewal areas will be lost

as part of clearance of

pre-1919 terraced houses.

The Daneshouse, Duke Bar Council and Stoneyholme Heritage Report Appraisal identifies this area 205 206 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option

Borough St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option?

St/Gordon Duke St/Brougham St Y/N Council Bar for Heritage Enhancement but also recognises that a and significant factor and Stoneyholme influence on the heritage of the area are the large numbers of Asian immigrants brought by the manufacturing industries in Area the 1960's and succeeding generations who have made Action the area their home. Option 3 – Plan Remodelling -

27/DS/51-Mr Biladar Khan Elevate and Burnley Council Yes The preferred option should Consultation policy restricts facelifting to consider initiatives in this area Agrees with this option. properties fronting key to encourage environmental Already lives in a converted gateway locations. Other and property improvements. 2 into 1, but would like than in very exceptional This could include alleygating

face-lifting and alley gating cases Elevate will not fund and facelifting on strategic Report as in option 1 improvements to properties sites. beyond facelifting to key Remodelling could also be gateway locations. considered where opportunities arose. Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option? Daneshouse, St/Gordon St/Brougham St Y/N

203/DS/529-Mrs. Saiaq Elevate and Burnley Council Yes The preferred option should Shah Remodelling of policy restricts facelifting to consider initiatives in this area Duke properties is a good idea, properties fronting key to encourage environmental two into one conversions gateway locations. Other and property improvements. Bar means getting the property than in very exceptional This could include alleygating and you want where you want. cases Elevate will not fund and facelifting on strategic

The whole of option 3 is a improvements to properties sites. Stoneyholme good idea. Just depends beyond facelifting to key Remodelling would also be how far in the future we are gateway locations. considered where looking. We don't want to Other areas within opportunities arose. move out of the area looking Stoneyholme are also being

for a bigger house and proposed for development Area facilities when plans are and redevelopment to

there in place. provide a wider range of Action house types, sizes and tenure. (See Areas 2 and 5) Plan Burnley Other Options? - 84/DS/274-Mr T Hussain This proposal was included Yes, in Some limited remodelling in Consultation

Borough in option 3 and in other part Stoneyholme could be Would like to see every options within the considered in developing the

other block cleared to make Stoneyholme area but did Preferred Option garden space to the rear of not receive strong support. Council terraced properties in Vacancy/abandonment rates Report Stoneyholme. 207 208 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option

Borough St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option?

St/Gordon Duke St/Brougham St Y/N Council Bar are not high in Stoneyholme. and

84/DS/274-Mr T Hussain Clearance and Yes New housing in Stoneyholme Stoneyholme redevelopment and and Daneshouse should Clearance should take place development of brownfield provide a mix in terms of type, & quality new housing sites for a range of house size and tenure. should be built – preferably types, sizes, and tenure is

brick built & or a combination proposed throughout the Area with ‘quality’ artificial wider area and within the

stonework. Five bed Stoneyholme area. Action properties need to be built A balanced approach to like Blackburn Council for clearance is taken, targetting Plan private ownership and also the worst 7 bed housing association

housing/environmental conditions - properties similar to Oldham and previously cleared sites Consultation Borough Council. to create significant sites for transformational redevelopment. Design Guidelines have been produced for each AAP Report area to ensure that development is to a high standard and takes account of the area's distinct character. Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option? Daneshouse, St/Gordon St/Brougham St Y/N

110/DS/306 –Alasdair The suggested quiet route Yes The proposed route should be Simpson runs along the northern included as one of the routes Duke boundary of the area and on the AAP. It could also be LCC Senior Cycling Officer was not previously shown as considered for improvement Bar a route on the Area Action as part of the wider proposals and Proposes an alternative Plan. for the area.

quiet route cycle link from Stoneyholme Princess Way to Oswald A section of the street is Street along March Street unmade giving improved access to Town Centre and an alternative route northwards Area along Oswald Street to link up with the canal tow path Action and New Hall/Old Hall Streets. Would also link to

Greenway Route to Pendle Plan Burnley

Way. - Consultation

Borough 161/DS/430-Judith This area does not suffer No

Furlonger, Development from vacancy and Manager, Elevate abandonment to the same extent as other areas Council Report 209 210 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option

Borough St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option?

St/Gordon Duke St/Brougham St Y/N Council Bar Difficult to comment on the although the Neighbourhood options other than this area Renewal Assessment and currently appears to be commissioned by Burnley Stoneyholme popular and functioning Council showed some although being aware of degree of unfitness and considerable overcrowding Category 1 hazards. There issues. Further monitoring is also known to be and assessment is required overcrowding and a Area to establish the long term shortage of larger family sustainability of the area. houses for succeeding Action generations to live close to their families.

The Local Plan and Area Plan Action Plan Annual

Monitoring Report and - Consultation Burnley Council Elevate monitoring procedures will enable appraisal of the long term sustainability of the

area and the effect of the Report preferred option proposal. 162/DS/433-Chapman There is known to be Yes The preferred option should Robinson Architects for overcrowding and a consider initiatives in this area Gleesons shortage of larger family to encourage environmental houses for succeeding and property improvements. Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option? Daneshouse, St/Gordon St/Brougham St Y/N

We propose to develop generations to live close to This could include developing larger houses on the vacant their families. "book ends" on end of Duke plots at the end of existing This area does not suffer terraces and carrying out terraces to complete the from vacancy and other remodelling changes to Bar existing rows. abandonment to the same houses. and extent as other areas Access into the area should

The new housing will provide although the Neighbourhood be reviewed as part of the Stoneyholme an element of housing Renewal Assessment consideration of proposals for choice. It will be difficult to commissioned by Burnley the wider area.. carry out lateral conversions Council showed some to create larger houses, degree of unfitness and

owing to the steep slope of Category 1 hazards. Area the terraces. The Local Plan and Area

Action Plan Annual Action Some redevelopment of Monitoring Report and existing properties may take Burnley Council Elevate place in the future if Plan Burnley monitoring procedures will significant de-population enable appraisal of the long -

occurs. term sustainability of the Consultation

Borough area and the longer term Public realm improvements impact of the AAP proposed for Folds St and proposals. Oswald Street the main Access/egress into/from the Council access roads into the area

area is currently blocked off Report

along Folds Street. This 21 1 212 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 4 – The Core Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Area of March on Preferred Option

Borough St/Clive Preferred St/Cromwell Option?

St/Gordon Duke St/Brougham St Y/N Council Bar will enhance the setting of could be reviewed as part of this area and improve the proposed Intensive and access into it. Neighbourhood Action Plan Stoneyholme Initiative.

Table 2.6 Area 5

Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Area Preferred Option? Action

Y/N Plan

Option 1 – - Consultation Replacement Playing Field 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree The Highways Agency will be for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the AAP process and on any future Report This option has the potential to planning proposal for this use. result in significant impacts on traffic on the trunk road network. The agency requests to be consulted to ensure the Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

minimisation of negative impacts on the strategic Duke highway network. Bar Development should be in a manner to ensure the need to and

travel is reduced ensuring that Stoneyholme traffic impact is minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Area Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk Action road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with

PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Plan Burnley Policy including the provision -

of adequate Transport Consultation

Assessment and Travel Plan

Borough reports.

145/DS/407-Roy Halliday, REMADE and the Yes The Preferred Option should Council REMADE Development Officer, Community Farm group explore the potential of locating Report LCC have been working together the playing field and the 213 214 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Although option 2 Community on proposals to develop the community farm on Green Belt Farm is most strongly site (west of the rail line) as land to the north of March and supported, there could be the a community Street which is in Lancashire Stoneyholme potential for REMADE farm/recreation area. County Council ownership. If investment if it was decided to replacement playing fields can provide a replacement playing The site is allocated in the be located on the existing field on the coalyard site. Burnley Local Plan as a school site, the Preferred However, REMADE would replacement playing field Option could then propose the Area need to be satisfied that this for the Holme coal yard as a residential was in accordance with the Road/Princess Way development site. Action wishes of the local community Stoneyholme playing field. before agreeing funding.

Ridgewood Community Plan College on Green Belt land

to the north of March street - is likely to become Consultation redundant in 2008/9 and may offer the opportunity for the replacement playing field and community farm to be located here and the Report coal yard site to be developed for housing. Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

146/DS/408-Henryck Peterson, It is accepted that the Yes The Preferred Option should Sport England North West playing field option has explore the potential of locating Duke Region priority. However, because the playing field and the there is a need for a greater community farm on Green Belt Bar This option preferred. Any mix of housing in this area land to the north of March and assessment for alternative and few development Street which is in Lancashire

uses to public playing field use opportunities and because County Council ownership. If Stoneyholme e.g. school use – to be the planned closure of replacement playing fields can assessed in the context of Ridgewood Community be located on the existing Sport England playing fields college offers a potential school site, the Preferred policy and in the context of a alternative site, informal Option could then propose the

Borough wide open space, discussions have been held coal yard as a residential Area sport and recreation strategy. with Sport England about development site.

If not supported by the improving the existing little Action policy base/evidence base used playing field on the and, no special circumstance March Street School site. Plan

Burnley can be demonstrated, an Sport England has

objection to an alternative indicated that it is prepared -

use may be raised. to be pragmatic, subject to Consultation

Borough an improved and

sustainable facility being created at the March Street site. Council Report 215 216 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 161/DS/430-Judith Furlonger, Agree that this should be Yes The Preferred Option should Development Manager, explored. explore the potential of locating and Elevate the playing field and the Stoneyholme community farm on Green Belt The replacement of the playing land to the north of March field allocation could go to the Street which is in Lancashire potential green field school site County Council ownership. If once the school relocates to replacement playing fields can Area Burnley campus in 2008 be located on the existing leaving this site for new school site, the Preferred Action housing development in order Option could then propose the to increase the choice and coal yard as a residential

variety of housing to address development site. Plan the overcrowding issues in

Stoneyholme. - Consultation

Please note the plans in the 3 part of the site which is community farm on Green Belt Report options shown include land known as the coal yard site land to the north of March which is not part of the coal is in Burnley Council's Street which is in Lancashire yard site ownership. County Council ownership. If Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Burnley Community Farm Trust Planning approval was replacement playing fields can discussed this option with granted with conditions in be located on the existing Duke Burnley Leisure Services and 2003 (2003/0903) as the school site, the Preferred Planning in 2003 prior to use was considered not to Option could then propose the Bar submitting a successful outline conflict with existing policy coal yard as a residential and planning application for a including that relating to development site.

community form on the site. public open space and Stoneyholme Leisure Services stated then recreation. that they would not be in a position to either finance the Discussions are taking capital development or a place with Lancashire

playing field, nor have the County Council, following Area resources to maintain it, and informal discussions with

therefore no longer intended to Sport England, to Action develop and manage the site investigate the potential for as a replacement playing field using the school playing Plan

Burnley in the area. field off March Street as a replacement playing field. -

The school playing field site off Consultation

March St is currently used by In addition the Housing Borough local young people for informal Market Renewal initiative

recreation and ball games and has provided the impetus

would be suitable for long term for renewal and new Council use when the school site is investment in the area to Report tackle housing market 217 218 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar vacated as part of the Burnley decline. There is known to Schools for the Future be overcrowding and a and Programme. shortage of larger family Stoneyholme houses for succeeding generations to live close to their families in the Stoneyholme Area. Development opportunities Area are limited in this area and this site could provide a mix Action of housing including larger family homes. Plan

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic It is accepted that the Yes The playing field allocation will -

Society playing field option (west of be the preferred option for this Consultation the rail line) has priority. site (west of the rail line) unless Option 1 - Yes Because of the competing a suitable alternative site can options and the need for a be allocated. greater mix of housing in However, discussions are this area where taking place with Lancashire Report development is restricted, County Council and Sport informal discussions have England to provide an been held with Sport improved playing field site on England about improving the March Street School site. the existing little used Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

playing field on the March Street School site. Sport Duke England are prepared to be pragmatic, subject to an Bar improved and sustainable and facility being created at the

March Street site. Stoneyholme 08/AL/385-Environment Agree. Site surveys (west Yes The feasibility of developing Agency of the rail line) have been the site for the different uses carried out in the past and identified as options will be There is potential for this site further site investigations considered in developing the Area to be contaminated to a made as part of the Preferred Option. significant degree and this may Community Farm proposals Action have a bearing on an by REMADE. appropriate development

option for this area. Plan Burnley -

Option 2 Consultation –Community Borough

Farm

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be

Council for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the Report AAP process and on any future planning proposal for this use. 219 220 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar This option has the potential to result in significant impacts on and traffic on the trunk road Stoneyholme network. The agency requests to be consulted to ensure the minimisation of negative impacts on the strategic highway network. Area

Development should be in a manner to ensure the need to Action travel is reduced ensuring that

traffic impact is minimised. Plan Improvements in public

transport should be proposed - where appropriate. Consultation

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with Report PPG13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

of adequate Transport Assessment and Travel Plan Duke reports. Bar

145/DS/407-Roy Halliday, The site (west of the rail Yes The Preferred Option should and REMADE Development Officer, line) is allocated in the explore the potential of locating LCC Burnley Local Plan as a the playing field and the Stoneyholme replacement playing field community farm on Green Belt most strongly supports a for the Holme land to the north of March community farm on this site. Road/Princess Way Street which is in Lancashire REMADE has been working in Stoneyholme playing field. County Council ownership. If partnership with the Burnley replacement playing fields can Area Community Farm group since Planning approval for the be located on the existing 2003 to progress the community farm was school site, the Preferred Action community farm project on the granted with conditions in Option could then propose the

coalyard site and so far has 2003 (2003/0903) as the coal yard as a residential Plan Burnley invested approx £50k in use was considered not to development site.

appraising the site, including conflict with existing policy - contaminated land including that relating to Consultation

Borough investigations and reclamation public open space and

design. REMADE is also recreation.

funding the community farm

NWDA/REMADE

Council group to develop a business plan for the farm. commitment and Report investment in the 221 222 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Funding was committed on the community farm proposal basis that planning permission is acknowledged but more and had been granted for a recently, the Housing Stoneyholme community farm and that BBC Market Renewal initiative had agreed in principle to grant has provided the impetus a lease for the land to develop for renewal and new a farm on the site. investment in the area to tackle housing market Area NWDA who fund REMADE decline. There is known to view a community farm at the be overcrowding and a Action coalyard site as priority shortage of larger family scheme that could assist houses for succeeding

greatly with community generations to live close to Plan cohesion in the area and have their families in the

£180k potentially available to Stoneyholme Area. - Consultation undertake remediation and Development opportunities landscape works at the site. If are limited in this area and this option was the preferred this site is key to providing option and a lease agreed for a mix of housing including the land REMADE would be larger family homes. Report looking to undertake reclamation works in summer The Council is investigating 2007 the potential of locating the playing field and the community farm on Green Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Belt land to the north of March Street which is in Duke Lancashire County Council ownership -Ridgewood Bar Community College on the and site will become redundant

in 2008/9 Stoneyholme

174/DS/460-Jenny Slaughter, The northern tip of the site Yes The Preferred Option should Burnley Community Farm. (west of the rail line) is explore the potential of locating privately owned. The main the playing field and the Please note the plans in the 3 part of the site which is community farm on Green Belt Area options shown include land known as the coal yard site land to the north of March which is not part of the coal is in Burnley Council's Street which is in Lancashire Action yard Site ownership. County Council ownership. If

replacement playing fields can Plan Burnley As the Burnley Community The site is allocated in the be located on the existing Farm Trust (BCF) we naturally

Burnley Local Plan as a school site, the Preferred -

support this proposal. replacement playing field Option could then consider the Consultation Borough for the Holme coal yard as a residential

BCF’s feasibility study

Road/Princess Way development site. demonstrates almost Stoneyholme playing field. unanimous support for the Council Report Community Farm proposals on 223 224 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar the coal yard site from local Planning approval for the residents, over 30 Burnley community farm was and based organisations and over granted with conditions in Stoneyholme 300 young people from schools 2003 (2003/0903) as the throughout Burnley. use was considered not to conflict with existing policy Burnley BC Executive including that relating to supported BCF in principle in public open space and Area Jan 03 to lease the coalyard recreation. site at a peppercorn rent for use as a Community Farm and The commitment and Action approved an outline planning investment in the

application for the Community community farm proposal Plan Farm later the same year, of the Community Farm

which is valid until 2008. Group, its partners, - NWDA/REMADE are Consultation The farm project has gained acknowledged. Its links to momentum and revenue a range of projects and resources in the past few initiatives in the months and is ready to move Stoneyholme and wider Report forward with detailed planning area and its potential to and implementation over the contribute to the next 2 to 3 years, if the site is sustainable regeneration of approved for lease by Burnley the area are accepted and BC. welcomed. Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

BCF has secured revenue Since the original funding to employ a discussions about the coal Duke development manager who will yard Site took place, the be in post from early 2007. Housing Market Renewal Bar initiative has provided the and BCF are currently working with impetus for

primary transformational renewal Stoneyholme (Stoneyholme/Excellence and new investment in the Cluster) and secondary area to tackle housing schools (Sir John market decline. Thursby/BSF), LCC Youth &

Community service and other There is known to be Area agencies to plan facilities that overcrowding and a

will be used for community shortage of larger family Action cohesion, education and health houses for succeeding initiatives and activities once generations to live close to Plan

Burnley the site is approved for use as their families in the a Community Farm. Stoneyholme Area. -

Development opportunities Consultation

Burnley Schools for the Future are limited in this area and Borough BSF have indicated good this site is key to providing

potential for the Farm to be a mix of housing including

used as a resource by all the larger family homes. Council

secondary schools in Burnley, Report also providing opportunities to 225 226 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar bring students together from Ridgewood Community different areas. Stoneyholme College on the site will and PS and Excellence Cluster become redundant in Stoneyholme have supported the Farm 2008/9 project from the inception of the project, as a base for cross A meeting has been held and extra curricular activities. with the new Community Farm Development The BPR (soon to be East Manager and other Area Lancs) Primary Care Trust has representatives from the expressed a desire to see the Community Farm. The Action farm developed as a public group have re-assessed

health resource benefiting their proposals and this Plan mental and physical health. process is continuing.

Discussions are on going - regarding submitting the farm It was agreed that through Consultation project as a flagship initiative the Area Action Plan as part of the North West Bid process the potential for to the Big Lottery Health and siting the community farm Well being strand. and the playing field on Green Belt land on the Report The BCF Feasibility Study and March Street School site Business Plan are currently and adjacent land would be being revised and will be investigated. available shortly on request, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

indicating in detail how the Farm can be developed on the Duke coal yard site. Bar BCF have met with Burnley BC councillors on a regular basis and

in 2006 to inform and develop Stoneyholme the prospects and perception of the Farm project and will be submitting the revised study and business plan to Burnley

BC Executive in November Area 2006 seeking agreement to

manage the coal yard site for Action a 99 year peppercorn lease.

A detailed supporting Plan Burnley statement was submitted by -

BCF to Sue Barker in the Consultation Planning Dept earlier in the

Borough year (Feb 06).

The LCC/NWDA Remade

Council programme proposal for the Report site will prepare the way for the BCF use of the site as a mainly 227 228 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar open space end use. Remade has already invested in the site and decontamination proposals and Stoneyholme has indicated the intention to fund this decontamination and preparation work, if the farm proposals are approved.

The investment potential for Area the site both from Remade and BCF is time limited and must Action be approved and supported

soon for the opportunity of this Plan exciting project not to be lost. - The Community Farm will Consultation develop a community cohesion project in the Burnley and East Lancashire area, focused on engaging people of all ages and backgrounds in creative, Report sustainable, environmental, education, healthy lifestyle and social activities; Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The farm will benefit young people, schools and colleges, Duke health groups and trusts, culturally diverse groups, Bar community organisation, and families and people of all ages; Stoneyholme The project will also contribute to strategic housing renewal area, regeneration, environmental, sustainability,

and tourism objectives and Area outputs. Action 08/AL/385-Environment Agree. Site surveys have Yes The feasibility of developing

Agency been carried out in the past the site for the different uses Plan

Burnley and further site identified as options will be

There is potential for this site investigations made as part considered in developing the - to be contaminated to a of the Community Farm Preferred Option. Consultation

Borough significant degree and this may proposals by REMADE.

have a bearing on an appropriate development option for this area. Council Report 229 230 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Option 3 – New Housing and

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Stoneyholme for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the AAP process and on any future The Agency will need to be planning proposal for this use. consulted on the proposals for

redevelopment in order to Area consider the likely traffic impact

of the new housing Action development on the strategic highway network. The Agency would be keen to ensure that Plan the site is designed in a -

sustainable manner to Consultation encourage access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle. The site should be developed wholly in accordance with PPS3: Report Housing to ensure that the site is not over developed resulting in negative impacts in traffic terms on the trunk road network. Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Development should be in a manner to ensure the need to Duke travel is reduced ensuring that traffic impact is minimised. Bar Improvements in public and transport should be proposed

where appropriate. Stoneyholme

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be

undertaken in accordance with Area PPG 13 and the relevant DoT

Policy including the provision Action of adequate Transport Assessment and Travel Plan Plan

Burnley reports. - 145/DS/407-Roy Halliday, Agree No Consultation

Borough REMADE Development Officer,

LCC

Housing redevelopment on the Council site would not be eligible for Report REMADE funding as the 231 232 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar programme is only concerned with reclaiming derelict land for and soft end uses. Stoneyholme

161/DS/430-Judith Furlonger, Agree. However, the Local Yes Discussions are taking place Development Manager, Plan playing field allocation with Lancashire County Elevate must be accommodated Council and Sport England to

elsewhere within the investigate the potential of Area In view of the overcrowding Stoneyholme area. allocating and improving the

issues in Stoneyholme, existing underused playing field Action increasing the choice and at the March Street School site. variety of housing through new The outcome of these development would appear a discussions will determine the Plan reasonable response. Preferred Option. -

Replacement of the playing Consultation field allocation could go to the potential green field school site once the school relocates to Burnley campus in 2008. Report

166/DS/439-De Pol Associates Agree. However, the Local Yes Discussions are taking place Ltd, Planning and Development Plan playing field e with Lancashire County Consultants, for Keyworker allocation must be Council and Sport England to Homes (NW) Ltd. accommodated elsewhere investigate the potential of Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The former Oswald Street coal within the Stoneyholme allocating and improving the yard is a previously developed area. existing underused playing field Duke site in close proximity to at the March Street School site. schools and other facilities and The outcome of these Bar as such would be a most discussions will determine the and appropriate redevelopment site Preferred Option.

for housing. In this respect it Stoneyholme is considered that Option 3 is the preferred option.

174/DS/460-Jenny Slaughter, The northern tip of the site Yes The possibility of re-locating Burnley Community Farm. (west of the rail line) is the allocated playing field use Area privately owned. The main to the March Street school site Please note the plans in the 3 part of the site which is should be explored.. Additional Action options shown include land known as the coal yard site open space, to meet local

which is not part of the coal is in Burnley Council's need, would be considered as Plan Burnley yard Site ownership. an integral part of any new

There is a need for both a residential development. - wider range of housing Consultation Borough types, size and tenure and The Preferred Option should

for playing field/open explore the potential of locating space. the playing field and the Council Report 233 234 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The need for new larger The Local Development community farm on Green Belt extended family housing for the Framework/Area Action land to the north of March and Bangladeshi community has Plan process allows the Street which is in Lancashire Stoneyholme been expressed by some management of housing County Council ownership. If members of the local numbers throughout the replacement playing fields can community. This issue has Daneshouse, Duke Bar and be located on the existing been discussed over many Stoneyholme Area, the school site, the Preferred years as part of the other AAP areas and Option could then consider the Area Neighbourhood Action Plan Burnley as a whole. coal yard as a residential process, although no site was Burnley Local Plan aims to development site. Action identified in the immediate meet the housing needs of Stoneyholme area. the whole community. Plan Some of those expressing an The Bangladeshi

interest in building new housing community have made the - for the local community have Stoneyholme Consultation now moved on and are building neighbourhood their home in other parts of Burnley and are restricted in outside the Stoneyholme area. choosing to remain in this locality by the lack of Report The limited numbers of new appropriate housing. housing starts currently allowed in Burnley Borough by Government will be taken up by developments in other areas Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

and the Daneshouse area should offer local opportunities Duke for new housing if required, following the demolition Bar programme. and

There is already a high density Stoneyholme of existing housing in the Stoneyholme area, with only limited planned demolition, and the need for open space

should take precedent. Area

08/AL/385-Environment Agree. Site surveys have Yes The feasibility of developing Action Agency been carried out in the past the site for the different uses

and further site identified as options will be Plan

Burnley There is potential for this site investigations made as part considered in developing the to be contaminated to a of the Community Farm Preferred Option. -

significant degree and this may proposals by REMADE. Consultation

Borough have a bearing on an

appropriate development

option for this area. Council Report Other Options? 235 236 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 110/DS/306-Alasdair Simpson This link would be Yes This could be considered as dependent on the creation part of the development of this and LCC Senior Cycling Officer of a bridge across the rail site. Stoneyholme line. Suggests a cycle route along The creation of a bridge Oswald Street and across the and route linking northern part of this area, Daneshouse and giving access to a variety of Stoneyholme at this point Area other links. (see plan for fuller has been put forward as picture) part of past regeneration Action programmes but funding not identified. Plan 160/DS/422 & Area 5 (west of the rail line) Yes In relation to Area 5 (West of

177/DS/463-RPS Planning for is allocated in the Burnley the rail line) discussions are - Bett Homes Local Plan as a ongoing for re-locating the Consultation replacement playing field allocated playing field use on In response to consultation for the Holme the March Street school site. RPS Planning have submitted Road/Princess Way proposals for land in Area 5 Stoneyholme playing field. The Preferred Option should and Local Plan Site E2 explore the potential of locating Report together with land to the west However, discussions are the playing field and the (Old Hall Farm site and taking place with community farm on Green Belt adjacent garage/yard site) off Lancashire County Council, land to the north of March Oswald Street. (see Plans following informal Street which is in Lancashire forwarded with letters) discussions with Sport County Council ownership. If Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The site is promoted for England, to investigate the replacement playing fields can residential development, potential for using the be located on the existing Duke together with open space and school playing field off school site, the Preferred possibly other March Street as a Option could then consider the Bar sports/community facilities. replacement playing field. coal yard as a residential and The site is considered to be an Area 5 could then be development site.

excellent housing opportunity considered for housing Stoneyholme for the following reasons: development.

It is centrally located within the Site E2 has recently been Elevate HMR boundary where re-assessed in a

housing and its associated borough-wide wildlife Area regeneration benefits are survey and is judged to be

promoted. This is clearly a of significant Biological Action major consideration for the Heritage Value. Refusal of future use of the site. planning permission on the Plan

Burnley former garage site to the It is central within the Area west of area E2 has -

Action Plan and is seen as an recently been upheld on Consultation area demanding special focus appeal because Borough

and intervention, dovetailing development of this site

with the HMRI. would intrude into the urban

fringe. Although there has

Council The Council itself has been a past planning Report promoted the site (2004/5) as permission for residential a housing opportunity site. 237 238 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The above factors lead us to development on the Old the view that the site is ideally Hall Farm Site, the need for and suited for residential this site to be brought Stoneyholme development that would deliver forward for housing needs a type of housing that is to be reassessed through currently not available in the the AAP process bearing in locality. mind the need to meet housing needs and Area Careful soundings have been manage housing numbers taken from a number of in accordance with national, Action community representatives regional and local policies. working in or close to the

Daneshouse area. The overall The issue of the use of part Plan response has been entirely of the site for removal of

positive, particularly if the clay is a separate matter. - proposal was to deliver a The Council's view is that Consultation significant element of houses this would constitute designed to accommodate development for which large families. It is very evident planning permission would that there is a serious shortage be required. Report of large family units in the local area and the result of this is either overcrowding of properties of insufficient size or the loss of more affluent Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

residents who can afford to purchase larger properties Duke outside the area. It is apparent that this housing problem is Bar one of considerable sensitivity and to many local people and their

representatives. The land at Stoneyholme Oswald street is ideally located adjacent to the established residential area to deliver the type of housing aspired to by

the community and possibly Area additional planning gains

needed by and aspired to the Action local community on the site or adjacent land. Bett Homes Plan

Burnley intend to obtain more empirical

information via surveys of the -

local community and /or Consultation

Borough community consultation event

which will be provided to the Council in due course, probably as a Statement of Council Report 239 240 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Community Involvement to reflect best practice on ‘front and loading’. Stoneyholme

Bett Homes acknowledge two important matters to be addressed as part of any development scheme: Area First the Biological Heritage Site designation. Two Action independent advice notes

prepared by qualified Plan ecologists, suggest that this

designation is not warranted, - or at the very least Consultation questionable. Bett Homes intend to properly consider the ecological value (if any) of the site and perhaps retain a managed proportion as part of Report a future development scheme.

Secondly requiring further consideration, the use of the site for the deposit of clay. Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Discussions have taken place about the need for planning Duke permission for removing clay deposits. If permission is not Bar required for removal it would and arguably render the site as

previously developed land, Stoneyholme regardless of its current ‘greened over’ appearance.

162/DS/433-Chapman The Elm Street site is not Yes, The Preferred Option should Robinson Architects for considered to be a suitable in explore the potential of locating Area Gleesons site for relocation of the part the playing field and the playing field. It is not within community farm on Green Belt Action Residential development is the Stoneyholme land to the north of March

proposed for the cleared sites neighbourhood, it would be Street which is in Lancashire Plan Burnley to the east and west of the of insufficient size and is it County Council ownership. If

railway line. closely surrounded by replacement playing fields can - residential properties. be located on the existing Consultation Borough The playing field is to be Discussions are taking school site, the Preferred

re-located off Daneshouse place with Lancashire Option could then consider the Road on Elm Street or adjacent County Council, following coal yard as a residential to the primary school in the Council informal discussions with development site. Report 241 242 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Stoneyholme area, subject to Sport England, to consultation with the local investigate the potential for and community. using the school playing Stoneyholme field off March Street as a The level site west of the replacement playing field. railway fronts onto Oswald Area 5 could then be Street and has an attractive considered for housing open aspect. This is a key site development to provide a Area which will provide a substantial mix of house types and quantity of new housing with a sizes to meet local need. Action mix of house types and sizes The part of the site to the including some larger houses east of the rail line is a well

which will provide local used community facility Plan residents with real housing including an equipped

choice. children's playground and - Consultation a fenced ball court with As a result some residents may links to the informal move out of the adjacent Byerden Holme Park to the terraces creating voids and the north. This use meets local need for future redevelopment

need and there is not Report of some terraces. considered to be any justification for The site to the east of the redeveloping this part of railway overlooks the canal. the site. There are a number of challenges in developing this Area 5 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Coal Yard on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

site including poor access from Daneshouse Road and Duke changes of level. Our design will address these issues and Bar integrate the community centre and within the design to create an

attractive main entrance and Stoneyholme rationalise the car parking. Area Action Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 243 244 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.7 Area 6

Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of

Borough Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred

Option? Duke Council

Y/N Bar and Option 1 – 117/DS/344- Faber Agree. Yes This proposal should not be

Employment Site Maunsell for the Highways included in the preferred Stoneyholme Agency This proposal was option. included within the This option is likely to consultation options There are more sustainable have a traffic impact on because it was included employment opportunities in

the strategic highway within the Masterplan the area. Area network which is located produced by GVA

adjacent to this area. It Grimley/Taylor Young in Action has the potential to 2005 significantly affect the trunk road network due to It is considered that the Plan its proximity, the size of the site would not justify the cost of - development proposed Consultation and the size of the providing access from development. The Junction 11 of the M65 Agency will need to be as proposed. consulted on the Other proposals for

forthcoming stages of the employment sites are Report LDF process, with these included within the AAP stages being supported by (Area EW1/5 & Areas assessments of the likely 7/8) and this additional impact of that traffic on the site is remote from these highway network. The sites. Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

site needs to be developed in a Duke sustainable manner to ensure the need to travel Bar is reduced. Sites should and be developed with

attention to access by Stoneyholme modes of transport other than the private vehicle in order that the traffic impact of such

developments is Area minimised. Improvements

in public transport should Action be proposed where appropriate. Plan Burnley

The Agency will need to -

be consulted in more Consultation detail so that the impact Borough

of traffic on the strategic highway network can be assessed. Presently the Council Report 245 246 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar AAP contains insufficient details for the appraisal to and be undertaken. Stoneyholme

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG13 Area and the relevant DoT Policy including the Action provision of adequate

Transport Assessment Plan and Travel Plan reports. - Consultation 145/DS/407-Roy Halliday, This proposal was No REMADE Development included within the Officer, LCC consultation options because it was included

This area is within the within the Masterplan Report REMADE Phase 2 produced by GVA scheme at Oswald Street Grimley/Taylor Young in in order to explore 2005. potential points to gain access into the area of Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

land to the north. The It is considered that the Oswald Street Phase 2 size of the site would not Duke site is also a first priority justify the cost of site within the REMADE providing access from Bar Programme. Junction 11 of the M65 and as proposed.

The proposed end use of The REMADE Phase 2 Stoneyholme the scheme has not yet scheme is outside the been determined but the boundary of the AAP and current thinking is that it future proposals for this could be reclaimed for scheme and any

uses associated with a adjoining land would be Area proposed community considered in relation to

farm. Alternatively the relevant LDF policies. Action REMADE site could be developed for uses as Plan

Burnley recreational open space. Links to the new Burnley -

Sixth Form College are Consultation

also likely to be explored Borough

as part of any REMADE

scheme. The appraisal of

phase 2 land has Council commenced with the aim Report of commencing a design 247 248 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar for the site early 2007 and a proposed start on site and late next year. Stoneyholme

REMADE has no objections to the development of the gasworks for employment providing that a new Area means of access to the land to the north was Action provided. The

development of this site Plan should be considered on

a more comprehensive - basis to include looking at Consultation the potential future uses of all areas of land between the railway line and the M65 including the Report REMADE Phase 2 land.

161/DS/430-Judith This proposal was No Furlonger, Development included within the Manager, Elevate consultation options Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

It would appear because it was included reasonable to keep the within the Masterplan Duke area as employment site produced by GVA for future expansion if Grimley/Taylor Young in Bar required. Proximity to the 2005 and motorway junction would

obviously be an It is considered that the Stoneyholme advantage for business size of the site would not users. justify the cost of providing access from Junction 11 of the M65

as proposed. Area

Other proposals for Action employment sites are included within the AAP

(Area EW1/5 & Areas Plan Burnley 7/8) and this additional -

site is remote from these Consultation

sites. Borough

166/DS/439-De Pol The site is currently No Associates Ltd, Planning Transco operational land Council Report and Development but is underused. 249 250 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Consultants, for This proposal was Keyworker Homes (NW) included within the and Ltd. consultation options Stoneyholme because it was included This option does seem to within the Masterplan be appropriate, produced by GVA particularly as there are Grimley/Taylor Young in already employment uses 2005. on the site. It is however Area noted that it is proposed It is considered that the to access the site by an size of the site would not Action access taken from justify the cost of

junction 11 of the M65 and providing access from Plan if this is possible then it Junction 11 of the M65

would indeed seem to be as proposed. - the most appropriate Consultation access for such a use.

174/DS/460-Jenny This proposal was No

Slaughter, Burnley included within the Report Community Farm. consultation options because it was included The BCF Trust intends to within the Masterplan work with LCC/NWDA Remade programme to Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

reclaim the large open produced by GVA space site (22 acres) Grimley/Taylor Young in Duke behind the gasworks site, 2005. for a range of community Bar farm uses including It is considered that the and animal grazing, biomass size of the site would not

demonstration coppice justify the cost of Stoneyholme planting, and community providing access from woodland/tree nursery, Junction 11 of the M65 with additional potential as proposed. for mountain bike and The REMADE Phase 2

other amenity/health scheme is outside the Area related recreational uses. boundary of the AAP and

future proposals for this Action There is the potential for scheme and any an investment of several adjoining land would be Plan

Burnley hundred thousand pounds considered under from LCC/NWDA Remade policies in the LDF. -

and BCF to bring this land Consultation

into amenity use. Borough

Increased access to this

area via Oswald St Council

through the gasworks site Report will benefit the Community 251 252 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Farm proposals and potential for access to the and farm site(s) for visitors Stoneyholme from Burnley, East Lancashire and tourists coming into the area.

If proposals are developed for the Gasworks site, Area BCF would seek to be part of any detailed planning Action considerations for this

area. Plan -

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic This proposal was No Consultation Society included within the consultation options Option 1 Yes because it was included within the Masterplan

produced by GVA Report Grimley/Taylor Young in 2005. Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

It is considered that the size of the site would not Duke justify the cost of providing access from Bar Junction 11 of the M65 and as proposed.

Other proposals for Stoneyholme employment sites are included within the AAP (Area EW1/5 & Areas 7/8) and this additional

site is remote from these Area sites. Action

08/AL/385-Environment Agree Yes This proposal should not be

Agency included in the Preferred Plan Burnley option.

There is potential for this A number of concerns have -

site to be contaminated to been raised in respect of this Consultation Borough a significant degree and option. Furthermore, there are

this may have a bearing more sustainable employment

on an appropriate sites in the area.

Council development option for Report this area. 253 254 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, This proposal was Yes This proposal should not be Planning and included within the included in the Preferred and Environmental Services consultation options option. Stoneyholme because it was included A number of concerns have It should be noted that the within the Masterplan been raised in respect of this provision of a new produced by GVA option. Furthermore, there are motorway junction, as Grimley/Taylor Young in more sustainable employment discussed under Area 6 2005. sites in the area. would be very expensive Area to develop and would also It is accepted that the require planning provision of a new Action permission from the motorway junction would

County Council as the be very expensive. Plan Highway Authority. Other proposals for

employment sites are - included within the AAP Consultation (Area EW1/5 & Areas 7/8) and this additional site is remote from these sites. Report

Option 2 – No Changes Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

166/DS/439-De Pol Disagree. The site is No Associates Ltd, Planning remote and peripheral. It Duke and Development is serviced from Oswald Consultants, for Street through residential Bar Keyworker Homes (NW) streets and, although and Ltd. underused, is an

operational Transco site. Stoneyholme No change to this area is Transco, a consultee not appropriate. It is an , has commented on the under-used previously AAP. developed site in the

urban area adjacent to Area schools and close to other

facilities and as such Action should be identified as a redevelopment Plan

Burnley opportunity. - 174/DS/460-Jenny Agree. This is a highly No Consultation

Borough Slaughter, Burnley visible site and would

Community Farm. benefit from

improvements. However,

The Gasworks site

Council it is currently an requires improvements to operational Transco site. Report complement other 255 256 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar regeneration initiatives in the area, whether it is and developed for employment Stoneyholme use or not, as it is a highly visible site in need of environmental improvements at the very least. Area

Other Options? Action 110/DS/306-Alasdair This proposal was No

Simpson included within the Plan consultation options

LCC Senior Cycling because it was included - Consultation Officer in the Masterplan produced by GVA Suggests a cycle route Grimley/Taylor Young in along Oswald St to the 2005. northern tip of the BHS Report and eastwards under the There is no public railway to link to the canal access within this site tow path and New Hall which is classified as a Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Street with links hazardous site This westwards to Pendle Way suggestion is unlikely to Duke (See plan) be feasible unless the site is proposed for Bar redevelopment at some and time in future. There is

no indication that this is Stoneyholme likely to happen within the lifetime of the AAP.

It may be possible to

incorporate a cycle route Area into the REMADE

proposals for their Phase Action 2 site which would require access through Plan

Burnley area 6. -

166/DS/439-De Pol Disagree. No Consultation

Borough Associates Ltd, Planning and Development The site is remote and

Consultants, for peripheral. It is serviced from Oswald Street

Council Keyworker Homes (NW) through residential Report Ltd. 257 258 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 6 – Oswald Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Street Gas Works on Preferred Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar If an access from junction streets and, although 11 of the M65 is not underused, is an and viable, option 2 may not operational Transco site. Stoneyholme be the most appropriate option, instead it could be Contamination with redeveloped for perhaps heavy metals would also a mix of uses including B1 be a restricting factor on employment, workshops, parts of the site. Area housing etc and accessed from Oswald Street. Action Plan - Consultation Report Table 2.8 Area 7

Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option Daneshouse, (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane Duke and Colne Road) Bar Option 1 – 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No Demolition and Woolnough conditions in this area of and

Redevelopment north Daneshouse, with a Stoneyholme (A) Does not agree with any high degree of vacancy, demolition of Hurtley abandonment, previously Street. Keep Hurtley Street cleared sites and unfit to enhance old housing properties, are some of the area. Remodel back of worst in the area and the Area Hurtley Street to fit in with Borough. This situation was new housing. reflected in the decision to Action show redevelopment of this area on all three AAP

options produced for this Plan Burnley

area. The response to the Neighbourhood Action Plan - Consultation consultation in 2003

Borough favoured redevelopment for this area and influenced this decision. Council Report 259 260 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The Housing Market Stoneyholme Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems. In recognition of the severe

problems, English Area Partnerships are supporting

regeneration activity in Action Daneshouse.

Redevelopment in this area Plan is seen as the key to the -

regeneration of the whole Consultation AAP area. It will create a key gateway site into the area encouraging further investment. Through

redevelopment there is the Report potential to widen Hurtley Street to create a landscaped gateway providing a better Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke environment for walking Bar and cycling into, through

and within the area. and Stoneyholme 13/DS/37-Mr Jeckman Housing and environmental No conditions in this area of Doesn’t want to see his north Daneshouse are house cleared as he is some of the worst in the worried about the

area and the Borough. Area compensation allowance and that he may struggle to The Housing Market Action purchase another house as Renewal Initiative provides he only has his pension. an opportunity to tackle

Would much rather see these problems. Plan Burnley properties remodelled.

Redevelopment in this area - is seen as the key to the Consultation

Borough regeneration of the whole

AAP area.

Council Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate Report will not fund improvements 261 262 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

to properties beyond Stoneyholme facelifting to key gateway locations.

Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an Area Affordable Housing Policy

and is working with Action partners to provide a range of options for affordable rent and purchase to meet Plan housing need. -

The Council has an Consultation established advice team in place to help householders find suitable new homes.

52/DS/217-Mrs. S. E. Housing and environmental No Report Emsley conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Disagrees with demolition high degree of vacancy, Bar of Evelyn Street because abandonment, previously

this street has improved a cleared sites and unfit and great deal. properties, are some of the worst in the area and the Stoneyholme Borough. The response to the Neighbourhood Action Plan consultation in 2003 favoured redevelopment for this area. Area

The Housing Market Action Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle Plan

Burnley these problems.

Redevelopment in this area Consultation

Borough is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole AAP area. Council Report 263 264 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

There are pockets of well Stoneyholme maintained and improving properties dotted about the area but in order to create the transformational and

sustainable change to Area overcome severe market

failure it is necessary to Action create significant redevelopment sites which can provide a range of Plan house types, sizes and -

tenure. Consultation

112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Housing and environmental No conditions in this area of Evelyn & Howsin St should north Daneshouse are Report not be demolished. Bought some of the worst in the 51 Evelyn St as a wreck, area and the Borough. The spent £8k doing up to a response to the very high standard, Neighbourhood Action Plan acquired accreditation as a consultation in 2003 good landlord and now an Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke accredited tenant is favoured redevelopment for Bar bringing up her children this area.

close to the school where and she went as a youngster. The Housing Market Once refurbished these Renewal Initiative provides Stoneyholme houses look very attractive an opportunity to tackle alongside the new build. these problems. Redevelopment in this area is seen as the

key to the regeneration of Area the whole AAP area. Action There are pockets of well maintained and improving Plan

Burnley properties dotted about the area but in order to create -

the transformational and Consultation

Borough sustainable change to

overcome severe market

failure it is necessary to create significant Council Report redevelopment sites which 265 266 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

can provide a range of Stoneyholme house types, sizes and tenure.

117/DS/344-Faber Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP Area Agency process and on any planning applications submitted. Action All options for this area are likely to have a traffic Plan impact on the strategic

highway network which is - located adjacent to this Consultation Area which is being considered for a variety of uses. This has the potential to significantly affect the trunk road network due to Report its proximity, the development proposed and the size of the development. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Whichever option is taken Bar forward the Agency will

need to be consulted on the and forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these Stoneyholme stages being supported by assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the highway network. The site needs to be developed in a Area sustainable manner to ensure that the need to Action travel is reduced. Site

should be developed with Plan Burnley attention to access by

modes of transport other - than the private vehicle in Consultation

Borough order that the traffic impact of such developments is

minimised. Improvements

Council in public transport should be proposed where Report appropriate. 267 268 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The Agency will need to be Stoneyholme consulted in more detail in order that the impact of that traffic on the strategic highway network can be

assessed. Presently, the Area AAP contains insufficient

detail for that appraisal to Action be undertaken.

Assessment of the impact Plan of the development on the -

trunk road network will Consultation need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the

provision of adequate Report Transport Assessment and Travel Plan reports.

119/DS/351-Brian Housing and environmental No Smallcombe conditions in this area of Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Disagrees with this option north Daneshouse, with a Bar because it is too drastic - high degree of vacancy,

suggests moderate abandonment, previously and demolition and canal cleared sites and unfit development. properties, are some of the Stoneyholme worst in the area and the Borough.

The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative provides Area an opportunity to tackle

these problems. Action Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the Plan

Burnley regeneration of the whole

AAP area. - Consultation

Borough The Design Guidelines

produced for the area aim

to ensure that any new

development respects its Council distinctive character. The Report Leeds and Liverpool Canal 269 270 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

is a key feature in the area Stoneyholme and the guidelines address issues relating to the canal and its environs.

125/DS/362-Mary Housing and environmental No Area Bradshaw conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Action Disagrees with all the high degree of vacancy, options. She has lived in abandonment, previously Plan her home for 52 years. The cleared sites and unfit

row is in good condition, all properties, are some of the - owner occupiers and fully worst in the area and the Consultation occupied. It should be Borough. The response to face-lifted/improved and not the Neighbourhood Action redeveloped. Plan consultation in 2003 favoured redevelopment for Report The leisure use could be this area. moved further south. The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Redevelopment in this area Bar is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole and AAP area. Stoneyholme There are pockets of well maintained and improving properties dotted about the area but in order to create

the transformational and Area sustainable change to

overcome severe market Action failure it is necessary to create significant Plan

Burnley redevelopment sites which

can provide a range of - house types, sizes and Consultation

Borough tenure.

A proposed leisure use at

this location would be Council suitably placed to Report complement the 271 272 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

regeneration of the Stoneyholme canalside, new and existing housing and business use in the economic area to the south. 06/AL/345-Burnley Civic Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Area Society consider the comprehensive redevelopment of this area in Action Option 1 Yes order to tackle severe housing

market decline. Plan 09/AL/386- Lancashire CC, Agree Yes The long term use of the Elm -

Property Group Street Nursery School site should Consultation be considered as part of the Option 1 is favoured as Elm wider regeneration proposals for Street Nursery School is this area. highly likely to be vacated The location of the school on a in the short to medium key access route to the canal Report term. where there is potential to widen and green the routeway and canalside should inform the Preferred Option along with its Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke potential for use in conjunction Bar with the Elm Street Business

Park. and

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being Stoneyholme Planning and It is important that housing prepared at the same time so that Environmental Services land supply is managed in housing numbers and the mix of a way that does not type, size and tenure can be Policy 13 of the JLSP undermine the Housing managed more strategically.

allows for the replacement Market Renewal Initiative. Area of cleared dwellings on up

to a one for one basis. Action Additional dwellings in excess of one for one will be counted against the Plan Burnley housing provision of Policy -

12 of the JLSP. Consultation

Borough

202/DS/528 – Haroon Agree Yes The Preferred Option should give

Ahmed further consideration to the

redevelopment of this area in Council Agrees with this option. order to tackle severe housing Report market decline. 273 274 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Option 2 – Stoneyholme Demolition and Redevelopment (B) 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and environmental No Woolnough conditions in this area of Area north Daneshouse, with a Does not agree with any high degree of vacancy, Action demolition of Hurtley abandonment, previously

Street. Keep Hurtley Street cleared sites and unfit Plan to enhance old housing properties, are some of the

area. Remodel back of worst in the area and the - Consultation Hurtley Street to fit in with Borough. The response to new housing. the Neighbourhood Action Plan consultation in 2003 favoured redevelopment for

this area. Report

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Redevelopment in this area Bar is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole and AAP area. It will create a key gateway site into the Stoneyholme area encouraging further investment.

13/DS/37-Mr Jeckman Housing and environmental No Area conditions in this area of Doesn’t want to see his

north Daneshouse are Action house cleared as he is some of the worst in the worried about the area and the Borough. The compensation allowance response to the Plan Burnley and that he may struggle to Neighbourhood Action Plan purchase another house as - consultation in 2003 Consultation he only has his pension. favoured redevelopment for Borough

Would much rather see this area.

properties remodelled.

The Housing Market Council

Renewal Initiative provides Report an opportunity to tackle these problems. 275 276 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Redevelopment in this area Stoneyholme is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole AAP area.

Other than in very Area exceptional cases Elevate

will not fund improvements Action to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Plan

Affordability is a key issue - Consultation and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range

of options for affordable Report rent and purchase to meet housing need. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke The Council has an Bar established advice team in

place to help householders and find suitable new homes. Stoneyholme

52/DS/217-Mrs. S. E. Housing and environmental No Emsley conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with demolition

high degree of vacancy, Area of Evelyn Street because abandonment, previously this street has improved a

cleared sites and unfit Action great deal. properties, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. The response to Plan Burnley the Neighbourhood Action -

Plan consultation in 2003 Consultation favoured redevelopment for Borough

this area.

The Housing Market Council

Renewal Initiative provides Report an opportunity to tackle these problems. 277 278 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Redevelopment in this area Stoneyholme is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole AAP area.

There are pockets of well Area maintained and improving

properties dotted about the Action area but in order to create the transformational and sustainable change to Plan overcome severe market -

failure it is necessary to Consultation create significant redevelopment sites which can provide a range of house types, sizes and

tenure. Report Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke 112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Housing and environmental No Bar conditions in this area of

Evelyn & Howsin St should north Daneshouse are and not be demolished. Bought some of the worst in the 51 Evelyn St as a wreck, area and the Borough. The Stoneyholme spent £8k doing up to a response to the very high standard, Neighbourhood Action Plan acquired accreditation as a consultation in 2003 good landlord and now an favoured redevelopment for accredited tenant is this area. Area bringing up her children

close to the school where The Housing Market Action she went as a youngster. Renewal Initiative provides Once refurbished these an opportunity to tackle Plan

Burnley houses look very attractive these

alongside the new build. problems. Redevelopment - in this area is seen as the Consultation

Borough key to the regeneration of

the whole AAP area.

There are pockets of well Council maintained and improving Report properties dotted about the 279 280 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

area but in order to create Stoneyholme the transformational and sustainable change to overcome severe market failure it is necessary to

create significant Area redevelopment sites which

can provide a range of Action house types, sizes and tenure. Plan

117/DS/344-Faber Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be - Maunsell for Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP Consultation Agency and in relation to any planning applications. All options for this area are likely to have a traffic impact on the strategic Report highway network which is located adjacent to this Area which is being considered for a variety of uses and has the potential Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke to significantly affect the Bar trunk road network due to

its proximity, the and development proposed and the size of the Stoneyholme development.

Whichever option is taken forward the Agency will

need to be consulted on the Area forthcoming stages of the

LDF process, with these Action stages being supported by assessments of the likely Plan

Burnley impact of that traffic on the

highway network. The site - needs to be developed in a Consultation

Borough sustainable manner to

ensure that the need to

travel is reduced. Site

should be developed with Council attention to access by Report modes of transport other 281 282 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

than the private vehicle in Stoneyholme order that the traffic impact of such developments is minimised. Improvements in public transport should

be proposed where Area appropriate. Action The Agency will need to be consulted in more detail in order that the impact of that Plan traffic on the strategic -

highway network can be Consultation assessed. Presently, the AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be undertaken. Report Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG13 Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke and the relevant DoT Bar Policy including the

provision of adequate and Transport Assessment and Travel Plan reports Stoneyholme

119/DS/351-Brian Housing and No Smallcombe environmental conditions in

this area of north Area Disagrees with this option Daneshouse, with a high because it is too drastic -

degree of vacancy, Action suggests moderate abandonment, previously demolition and canal cleared sites and unfit development. properties, are some of the Plan Burnley worst in the area and the -

Borough. Consultation

Borough The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative provides

an opportunity to tackle Council

these problems. Report Redevelopment in this area 283 284 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

is seen as the key to the Stoneyholme regeneration of the whole AAP area.

The Design Guidelines

produced for the area aim Area to ensure that any new

development respects its Action distinctive character. The Leeds and Liverpool Canal is a key feature in the area Plan and the guidelines address -

issues relating to the canal Consultation and its environs.

125/DS/362-Mary Housing and environmental No Bradshaw conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Report Disagrees with all the high degree of vacancy, options. She has lived in abandonment, previously her home for 52 years. The cleared sites and unfit row is in good condition, all properties, are some of the owner occupiers and fully worst in the area and the Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke occupied. It should be Borough. The response to Bar face-lifted/improved and not the Neighbourhood Action

redeveloped. Plan consultation in 2003 and favoured redevelopment for this area. Stoneyholme

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle

these problems. Area

Redevelopment in this area Action is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole Plan

Burnley AAP area. -

There are pockets of well Consultation

maintained and improving Borough

properties dotted about the

area but in order to create

the transformational and Council sustainable change to Report overcome severe market 285 286 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

failure it is necessary to Stoneyholme create significant redevelopment sites which can provide a range of house types, sizes and

tenure. Area

A proposed leisure use at Action this location would be suitably placed to complement the Plan regeneration of the -

canalside, new and existing Consultation housing and business use in the economic area to the south.

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being Report Planning and prepared at the same time so that Environmental Services housing numbers and the mix of type, size and tenure can be managed across the Borough. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Policy 13 of the JLSP Bar allows for the replacement

of cleared dwellings on up and to a one for one basis. Additional dwellings in Stoneyholme excess of one for one will be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Area

Option 3 – Action Demolition and Redevelopment (C) Plan Burnley

05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and No -

Woolnough environmental conditions in Consultation

Borough this area of north Does not agree with any Daneshouse, with a high

demolition of Hurtley degree of vacancy, Street. Keep Hurtley Street Council abandonment, previously to enhance old housing Report cleared sites and unfit 287 288 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

area. Remodel back of properties, are some of the Stoneyholme Hurtley street to fit in with worst in the area and the new housing. Borough. The response to the Neighbourhood Action Plan consultation in 2003

favoured redevelopment for Area this area. Action The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle Plan these problems. - Consultation Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole AAP area. It will create a

key gateway site into the Report area encouraging further investment. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke 13/DS/37-Mr Jeckman Housing and No Bar environmental conditions in

Doesn’t want to see his this area of north and house cleared as he is Daneshouse are some of worried about the the worst in the area and Stoneyholme compensation allowance the Borough. and that he may struggle to purchase another house as The Housing Market he only has his pension. Renewal Initiative provides

Would much rather see an opportunity to tackle Area properties remodelled. these problems. Action Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the Plan

Burnley regeneration of the whole AAP area. - Consultation

Other than in very Borough exceptional cases Elevate

will not fund improvements to properties beyond Council facelifting to key gateway Report locations. 289 290 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Affordability is a key issue Stoneyholme and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range

of options for affordable Area rent and purchase to meet

housing need.The Council Action has an established advice team in place to help householders find suitable Plan new homes. - Consultation

52/DS/217-Mrs. S. E. Housing and environmental No Emsley conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with demolition high degree of vacancy, Report of Evelyn Street because abandonment, previously this street has improved a cleared sites and unfit great deal. properties, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. The response to Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke the Neighbourhood Action Bar Plan consultation in 2003

favoured redevelopment for and this area. Stoneyholme The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems. Area Redevelopment in this area

is seen as the key to the Action regeneration of the whole AAP area. Plan Burnley There are pockets of well -

maintained and improving Consultation

properties dotted about the Borough

area but in order to create

the transformational and

sustainable change to Council overcome severe market Report failure it is necessary to 291 292 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

create significant Stoneyholme redevelopment sites which can provide a range of house types, sizes and tenure. Area 112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Housing and environmental No conditions in this area of Action Evelyn & Howsin St should north Daneshouse are not be demolished, he has some of the worst in the Plan bought 51 Evelyn St as a area and the Borough. The

wreck, spent £8k doing up response to the - to a very high standard, Neighbourhood Action Plan Consultation acquired accreditation as a consultation in 2003 good landlord and now an favoured redevelopment for accredited tenant is this area. bringing up her children close to the school where The Housing Market Report she went as a youngster. Renewal Initiative provides Once refurbished these an opportunity to tackle houses look very attractive these alongside the new build. problems. Redevelopment Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke in this area is seen as the Bar key to the regeneration of

the whole AAP area. and

There are pockets of well Stoneyholme maintained and improving properties dotted about the area but in order to create the transformational and

sustainable change to Area overcome severe market

failure it is necessary to Action create significant redevelopment sites which Plan

Burnley can provide a range of

house types, sizes and - tenure. Consultation Borough

117/DS/344-Faber Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP Council Report Agency and on planning applications. 293 294 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

All options for this area are Stoneyholme likely to have a traffic impact on the strategic highway network which is located adjacent to this

Area which is being Area considered for a variety of

uses and has the potential Action to significantly affect the trunk road network due to its proximity, the Plan development proposed and -

the size of the Consultation development.

Whichever option is taken forward the Agency will

need to be consulted on the Report forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these stages being supported by assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke highway network. The site Bar needs to be developed in a

sustainable manner to and ensure that the need to travel is reduced. Site Stoneyholme should be developed with attention to access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle in order that the traffic impact Area of such developments is minimised. Improvements Action in public transport should

be proposed where Plan Burnley appropriate. -

The Agency will need to be Consultation

Borough consulted in more detail in

order that the impact of that

traffic on the strategic highway network can be Council Report assessed. Presently, the 295 296 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

AAP contains insufficient Stoneyholme detail for that appraisal to be undertaken.

Assessment of the impact

of the development on the Area trunk road network will

need to be undertaken in Action accordance with PPG13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the Plan provision of adequate -

Transport Assessment and Consultation Travel Plan reports

119/DS/351-Brian Housing and environmental No Smallcombe conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Report Disagrees with this option high degree of vacancy, because it is too drastic - abandonment, previously suggests moderate cleared sites and unfit demolition and canal properties, are some of the development. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke worst in the area and the Bar Borough. and The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides Stoneyholme an opportunity to tackle these problems. Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Area AAP area. Action The Design Guidelines produced for the area aim Plan

Burnley to ensure that any new development respects its -

distinctive character. The Consultation

Borough Leeds and Liverpool Canal

is a key feature in the area

and the guidelines address issues relating to the canal Council Report and its environs. 297 298 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

125/DS/362-Mary Housing and environmental No Stoneyholme Bradshaw conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a Disagrees with all the high degree of vacancy, options. She has lived in abandonment, previously

her home for 52 years. The cleared sites and unfit Area row is in good condition, all properties, are some of the

owner occupiers and fully worst in the area and the Action occupied. It should be Borough. The response to face-lifted/improved and not the Neighbourhood Action redeveloped. Plan consultation in 2003 Plan favoured redevelopment for -

this area. Consultation

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle

these problems. Report

Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole AAP area. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke There are pockets of well Bar maintained and improving

properties dotted about the and area but in order to create the transformational and Stoneyholme sustainable change to overcome severe market failure it is necessary to create significant redevelopment sites which Area can provide a range of house types, sizes and Action tenure. Plan

Burnley A proposed leisure use at

this location would be - suitably placed to Consultation

Borough complement the regeneration of the

canalside, new and existing housing and business use Council in the economic area to the Report south. 299 300 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being Stoneyholme Planning and prepared at the same time so that Environmental Services housing numbers and the mix of type, size and tenure can be Policy 13 of the JLSP managed across the Borough.

allows for the replacement Area of cleared dwellings on up

to a one for one basis. Action Additional dwellings in excess of one for one will be counted against the Plan housing provision of Policy -

12 of the JLSP. Consultation

205/DS/533-A Millett The Neighbourhood Action No All organisations and individuals Plan preferred option who have made representations Bought into this area in published in 2003 and the will be consulted on the Preferred 2006 when the plans was AAP Issues and Options Option AAP. This will include Report to refurbish the existing consultation document details about phasing. terraces and now feels that published in 2006 show this we are moving boundaries area for redevelopment. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke and changing our minds. Bar Would like to know the time

frame for all of this. and Stoneyholme Other Options? 05/DS/29-Ralph Housing and No Woolnough environmental conditions in this area of north Keep Hurtley Street to Daneshouse, with a high Area enhance old housing area degree of vacancy, and remodel back of abandonment, previously Action Hurtley Street to fit in with cleared sites and unfit new housing. Stop traffic properties, are some of the Plan Burnley on Hurtley Street worst in the area and the

Borough. This situation was - reflected in the decision to Consultation

Borough show redevelopment of this

area on all three AAP

options produced for this

Council area. The response to the Neighbourhood Action Plan Report consultation in 2003 301 302 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

favoured redevelopment for Stoneyholme this area and influenced this decision.

The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative provides Area an opportunity to tackle

these problems. In Action recognition of the severe problems, English Partnerships are supporting Plan regeneration activity in -

Daneshouse. Consultation

Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole

AAP area. It will create a Report key gateway site into the area encouraging further investment. Through redevelopment there is the potential to widen Hurtley Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke Street to create a Bar landscaped gateway

providing a better and environment for walking and cycling into, through Stoneyholme and within the area.

06/DS/30-Maskeen Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should

Hussain conditions in this area of consider redevelopment of this Area north Daneshouse, with a area in order to tackle severe Retain existing community

high degree of vacancy, housing market decline. Action and better housing. abandonment, previously This will provide better housing. cleared sites and unfit The Preferred Option should also properties, are some of the consider policies/ initiatives that Plan Burnley worst in the area and the would enable existing residents

Borough. The response to to remain in the area. Consultation the Neighbourhood Action Borough Plan consultation in 2003

favoured redevelopment for this area and influenced Council Report this decision. 303 304 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The Housing Market Stoneyholme Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems.

Redevelopment in this area Area is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Action AAP area.

There are pockets of well Plan maintained and improving

properties dotted about the - Consultation area but in order to create the transformational and sustainable change to overcome severe market

failure it is necessary to Report create significant redevelopment sites which can provide a range of house types, sizes and tenure. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke The Council has an Bar established advice team in

place to help householders and and occupants find suitable new homes to meet their Stoneyholme needs, including remaining in the existing community. 07/DS/31- Usman Alf Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should

conditions in this area of consider redevelopment of this Area Retain existing community, north Daneshouse, with a area in order to tackle severe

better housing, more high degree of vacancy, housing market decline. In order Action employment and education abandonment, previously to create sustainable opportunities. Priority for cleared sites and unfit communities, it is important that funding should be for Plan Burnley properties, are some of the the Preferred Option also looks development. worst in the area and the at employment and education -

Borough. The response to opportunities. Consultation

Borough the Neighbourhood Action This will provide better housing.

Plan consultation in 2003 The Preferred Option should also

favoured redevelopment for consider policies/ initiatives that this area and influenced would enable existing residents Council Report this decision. to remain in the area. 305 306 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The Housing Market Stoneyholme Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems.

Redevelopment in this area Area is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Action AAP area.

There are pockets of well Plan maintained and improving

properties dotted about the - Consultation area but in order to create the transformational and sustainable change to overcome severe market

and Colne Road) Duke The Council has an Bar established advice team in

place to help householders and and occupants find suitable new homes to meet their Stoneyholme needs, including remaining in the existing community. 08/DS/32- Jehan Ali Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should

conditions in this area of consider redevelopment of this Area Retain existing community, north Daneshouse, with a area in order to tackle severe

better housing, more high degree of vacancy, housing market decline. In order Action employment and abandonment, previously to create sustainable education. Priority for cleared sites and unfit communities, it is important that funding should be for Plan Burnley properties, are some of the the Preferred Option also looks Daneshouse. worst in the area and the at employment and education -

Borough. The response to opportunities. Consultation

Borough the Neighbourhood Action This will provide better housing.

Plan consultation in 2003 The Preferred Option should also

favoured redevelopment for consider policies/ initiatives that this area and influenced would enable existing residents Council Report this decision. to remain in the area. 307 308 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The Housing Market Stoneyholme Renewal Initiative provides an opportunity to tackle these problems.

Redevelopment in this area Area is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Action AAP area.

There are pockets of well Plan maintained and improving

properties dotted about the - Consultation area but in order to create the transformational and sustainable change to overcome severe market

failure it is necessary to Report create significant redevelopment sites which can provide a range of house types, sizes and tenure.The Council has an Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke established advice team in Bar place to help householders

and occupants find suitable and new homes to meet their needs, including remaining Stoneyholme in the existing community

13/DS/37-Mr Jeckman Housing and environmental No

conditions in this area of Area Would much rather see north Daneshouse are properties remodelled.

some of the worst in the Action Doesn’t want to see his area and the Borough. house cleared as he is

worried about the The Housing Market Plan Burnley compensation allowance Renewal Initiative provides

and that he may struggle to an opportunity to tackle - Consultation

purchase another house as these problems. Borough he only has his pension.

Redevelopment in this area

is seen as the key to the

Council regeneration of the whole Report AAP area. 309 310 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Other than in very Stoneyholme exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway

locations. Area

Affordability is a key issue Action and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with Plan partners to provide a range -

of options for affordable Consultation rent and purchase to meet housing need.The Council has an established advice team in place to help

householders find suitable Report new homes. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke 45 & 55/DS/169 & Housing and environmental No Bar 232-Peter Salts conditions in this area of

north Daneshouse are and Suggests facelifting or some of the worst in the remodelling as a priority area and the Borough. Stoneyholme option for Areas 7 & 8 as this would enable no The Housing Market moving of the local Renewal Initiative provides residents as majority are an opportunity to tackle

reluctant to move. Lived in these problems. Area house for over 50 years

and can’t afford to move Redevelopment in this area Action and can do without the is seen as the key to the stress. regeneration of the whole Plan

Burnley AAP area. -

Other than in very Consultation exceptional cases Elevate Borough will not fund improvements to properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway

Council locations. Report 31 1 312 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Affordability is a key issue Stoneyholme and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range

of options for affordable Area rent and purchase to meet

housing need.The Council Action has an established advice team in place to help householders find suitable Plan new homes. - Consultation

56/DS/233-Uzma Noreen Housing and environmental No conditions in this area of Suggests facelifting or north Daneshouse are remodelling as a priority some of the worst in the Report option for Areas 7 & 8 as area and the Borough. some of the houses look untidy. Remodelling and The Housing Market facelifting will enable the Renewal Initiative provides local people or residents to an opportunity to tackle stay put as most do not these problems. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke want to move or go through Redevelopment in this area Bar the stress of finding a new is seen as the key to the

property which are not regeneration of the whole and cheap. Most of us cannot AAP area. afford to move. Stoneyholme Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway Area locations. Action Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Plan

Burnley Affordable Housing Policy

and is working with -

partners to provide a range Consultation

Borough of options for affordable

rent and purchase to meet housing need.The Council has an established advice Council Report 313 314 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

team in place to help Stoneyholme householders find suitable new homes.

110/DS/306-Alasdair Agree although funding for Yes The Preferred Option should Simpson the suggested new bridges consider including the additional Area may be an issue. Some of suggested routes and their links LCC Senior Cycling Officer the suggested routes are to improving the wider area Action identified as key routes for Suggest quiet road cycle

improvements in the AAP Plan routes along Elm St & Abel (Route A - the canal; St (n/s) and New Hall Routes B & E - Colne - St/Hebrew Rd & Old Hall St Road; Route H - Barden Consultation (w/e) where it is important Lane). that safe crossing points of Colne Rd be provided. Possibly even a north south road through the area Report leading to Thursby Gardens involving a new bridge across the canal. A cycle link from Grey Street to the canal towpath across a Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke proposed new bridge over Bar the canal. Also cycle route th along Barden Lane to 6 and form centre. At Duke Bar there could be cycle paths Stoneyholme alongside the north side of Barden Lane and west of Briercliffe Rd to help cyclists make cross movements at the junction. Area Barden Lane between Duke Bar and New Hall St Action would be two way for

cyclists which would also Plan Burnley help cyclists going to the

sixth from centre. - Consultation

Borough LCC would like to get a

continuous cycle route up

Colne Road. Colne Rd is a

mixed use street– various Council councils such as Crewe & Report Hull have carried out 315 316 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

schemes on mixed used Stoneyholme streets that might be worthwhile considering.

112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Housing and environmental No conditions in this area of Area Keep Evelyn & Howsin St north Daneshouse are for refurbishment and some of the worst in the Action secure rear gated access. area and the Borough. This will maintain the Plan historic character on the The Housing Market

edge of Daneshouse. Renewal Initiative provides - an opportunity to tackle Consultation these problems.

Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the regeneration of the whole Report AAP area.

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke to properties beyond Bar facelifting to key gateway

locations. and

The Design Guidelines Stoneyholme produced for the area aim to ensure that any new development respects its distinctive character. Area

119/DS/351-Brian Housing and environmental No Action Smallcombe conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a

All of the above options are high degree of vacancy, Plan Burnley too drastic. Moderate abandonment, previously

demolition and canal cleared sites and unfit - Consultation

development. Use of loft properties, are some of the

Borough space to create an extra worst in the area and the bedroom. Demolition of Borough. The response to

houses & buildings close to the Neighbourhood Action

Council the canal for development

Plan consultation in 2003 Report only. favoured redevelopment for 317 318 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

this area and influenced Stoneyholme this decision.

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative provides

an opportunity to tackle Area these problems. Action Redevelopment in this area is seen as the key to the

regeneration of the whole Plan AAP area. - There are pockets of well Consultation maintained and improving properties dotted about the area but in order to create the transformational and Report sustainable change to overcome severe market failure it is necessary to create significant redevelopment sites which Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke can provide a range of Bar house types, sizes and

tenure. and Stoneyholme 125/DS/362-Mary Agree. Options 2 and 3 of Yes The Preferred Option should Bradshaw the AAP include a make provision for play for neighbourhood park which children and young people of all A play area for young would provide play areas ages as part of the regeneration children is needed close

for a range of ages. Area proposals. The wider Area by. A turning area for 8 of the AAP includes regeneration proposals should wagons on Elm street to

proposals for addressing also include proposals for Action make a circular route to poor access to and from managing traffic to, from and avoid manoeuvring Elm Street Business Park within the employment area in problems and driving on and the conflict between order to minimise conflict with Plan Burnley other narrow streets industrial and residential residential uses. (Vehicles going to Sweet - uses. Consultation

Dreams –Queens Mill). Borough

161/DS/430-Judith Agree Yes The Preferred Option will

Furlonger, Development consider all parts of the Council Manager, Elevate Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Report Stoneyholme AAP area together 319 320 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

Areas 7 & 8 need to be and also the other four Area Stoneyholme considered together. There Action Plans which are being are elements within these prepared. which could be supported but likewise elements which The Area Action Plan process will

may not be deliverable examine the deliverability of all Area unless funding from other proposals and the availability of

sources rather that HMR a range of funding sources. Action can be found e.g. canal side marina. EP funding is being sought for gap funding for new housing in Plan Elements which would this area and for complementary works in the wider area, - appear deliverable for Consultation example would be creation including refocusing the retail of a new gateway site activity and the possible creation fronting Colne Road and of a public square in the south of creating new public space Area 11. The Preferred Option

at this point. We would should define the District Report support the rationale of Shopping Area, assess the need refocusing retail activity at for a range of open spaces and a new gateway area. consider the need for a Complementary funding Development Brief for this key from EP is being sought to area. Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke accelerate progress in this In order to create the Bar area which we would transformational and sustainable

welcome. Continuing change to overcome severe and assembly of land for new market failure the Preferred housing to provide greater Option should create significant Stoneyholme choice and variety of redevelopment sites which can housing appears provide a range of house types, reasonable. sizes and tenure.

A further analysis of open Area space and provision

through the area needs to Action be considered given potential better utilisation of Plan

Burnley the running track and new

provision associated with - Burnley Campus. Consultation Borough

Council Report 321 322 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

162/DS/433-Chapman On the whole these Yes, The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Robinson Architects for proposals reflect those in consider redevelopment of this Gleesons shown in the AAP options. part area in order to tackle severe housing market decline. Most of this area is The landmark scheme

included within the proposal now focuses the In order to create sustainable Area ‘Exemplar’ regeneration public square, apartments, communities, it is important that

scheme which is being shops and commercial the Preferred Option also looks Action submitted to EP for funding. uses on site 11 immediately at employment and other to the east although a commercial opportunities in this The new development is landmark building on this and wider areas. EP funding is Plan primarily housing, in a northern side of Colne being sought for gap funding for range of different types and - Road/Barden Lane is new housing in this area and for Consultation sizes and providing a mix proposed. complementary works in the of tenure. The wider area, including refocusing development will be tenure There is a proposal to the retail activity and the creation blind. The housing layout is create a taller apartment of a public square in the south of

based on the existing grid building marking the bridge Area 11. The Preferred Option Report street pattern, rationalised over the canal on the Elm should define the District to create generous housing Street Nursery site to the Shopping Area, assess the need courtyards. All houses sourth of Hurtley Street but for a range of open spaces and front onto the street, with this site is part of an area Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke private gardens front and identified in the Local Plan consider the need for a Bar rear. Communal gardens as an Economic Development Brief for this key

and some secure parking Improvement Area area and is proposed within the (EW6/1). Some mainly courtyards. Three parking unused/underused land to . Stoneyholme options are proposed: the north bordering the The long term use of the Elm secure courtyard, curve of the canal, also Street Nursery School site should in-curtilage and on-street. identified within this be considered as part of the Economic Improvement wider regeneration proposals for A hierarchy of streets is Area, is being proposed for this area. The location of the Area proposed including the Residential Redevelopment nursery school on a key access enhancement of Holbeck as part of the AAP route to the canal where there is Action St as a pedestrian priority transformational potential to widen and green the route, providing a green link routeway and canalside should

approach. However, to the Plan Burnley between Colne Road and south of Hurtley Street it inform the Preferred Option along

the canal side. Key access has been proposed that the with its potential for use in -

routes including Hurtley St, Economic Improvement conjunction with the Elm Street Consultation

Borough New Hall St and Abel St will Area be consolidated and Business Park.

be improved and widened improved through a range

to allow landscaping and of measures to address on-street parking bays. Council issues including access, Report circulation and parking. 323 324 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Back Y/N Council Evelyn St/Abel Bar St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) and

The prime canalside The use of this site could Stoneyholme development sites will be address some of these developed with a range of issues and also provide an housing including some opportunity to create an apartments. improved gateway route to

the canal links beyond. Area The Colne Road/Barden

Lane junction is a key Action gateway into the site. A landmark scheme is proposed on this site as a Plan flagship for the area. -

Proposals include the Consultation creation of a new public square and the removal of the gyratory road system, to improve physical and

visual links between the Report Daneshouse and Duke Bar areas. The square will be framed by a tall iconic block of apartments with Area 7 – North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Back Y/N Evelyn St/Abel St/Barden Lane

and Colne Road) Duke shops/commercial Bar premises at ground floor

level. and

Additional public open Stoneyholme space includes a linear park within the heart of the new housing development, and a pocket park adjacent

to the canal which links to Area the canal towpath. Action Green route to the canal. Plan

Burnley A taller apartment building

marks the bridge over the -

canal, and overlooks the Consultation canal and park, with Borough

magnificent views to the open countryside beyond. Council Report 325 326 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.9 Area 8

Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of

Borough Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred

Hurtley St/Elm Option? Duke

Council St/The

Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Bar Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne and

Road) Stoneyholme Option 1 – 10/DS/34-Sandra Parker Housing and environmental No Employment conditions in this area of north Disagrees with this option Daneshouse, with a high but agrees with option 2 degree of vacancy, which retains Clegg Street abandonment, previously Area cleared sites, unfit properties and conflict between Action residential and industrial

uses, are some of the worst Plan in the area and the Borough. -

The Housing Market Renewal Consultation Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Report problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke surrounding areas as a whole Bar in order to achieve its

sustainable regeneration. and Stoneyholme 12/DS/36-Mr Jeckman Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Supports refurbishment of Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing houses in this option. Is degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the against demolition, can’t

abandonment, previously area. Area afford to move and. Also has cleared sites, unfit properties concerns over local

and conflict between Action businesses. residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Plan Burnley

The Housing Market Renewal - Consultation Initiative and the

Borough complementary funding it

attracts for non housing

related projects provides an Council

opportunity to tackle these Report problems and the AAP preferred option should 327 328 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

consider the area and Stoneyholme surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional Area cases Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties Action beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Plan Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an - Consultation Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range of options for affordable rent and purchase

to meet housing need. Report Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Bar conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives

Disagrees with houses being Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing and pulled down. Concerns over degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the taking out a mortgage in abandonment, previously area. Stoneyholme order to buy another similar cleared sites, unfit properties house. and conflict between residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Area

The Housing Market Renewal Action Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should

consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Council in order to achieve its Report sustainable regeneration. 329 330 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an Action Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range of options for Plan affordable rent and purchase -

to meet housing need. Consultation 31/DS/55-T Bennett Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Agrees with this option Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing because he does not want degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the Report to move. abandonment, previously area. cleared sites, unfit properties and conflict between Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke residential and industrial Bar uses, are some of the worst

in the area and the Borough. and

The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these Area problems and the AAP

preferred option should Action consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole Plan

Burnley in order to achieve its

sustainable regeneration. -

Consultation

Borough Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an

Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to Council Report provide a range of options for 331 332 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

affordable rent and purchase Stoneyholme to meet housing need. 45& 55/DS/169& 232-Peter Housing and environmental In Part The preferred option should Salts conditions in this area of north reflect the recommendations Daneshouse, with a high in the Daneshouse, Duke Bar Disagrees with this option - degree of vacancy, and Stoneyholme Heritage Area Clegg Street is part of abandonment, previously Appraisal. Burnley's history (red bricked cleared sites, unfit properties Action terraces linked to Elm St and conflict between

Mill) and should be retained residential and industrial Plan and improved uses, are some of the worst

in the area and the Borough. - Consultation

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing Report related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke surrounding areas as a whole Bar in order to achieve its

sustainable regeneration. and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area Heritage Appraisals have

been produced for each AAP Action area in order to ensure that the historic character of each Plan

Burnley area is not lost. However, the

significance of individual -

buildings must be balanced Consultation

Borough against the need to create a

well-planned and sustainable neighbourhood. Council Report 333 334 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

56/DS/233-Uzma Noreen Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Disagrees with this option Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing because this area is ideal for degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the living as every thing (i.e. abandonment, previously area and to retain/improve

shops, Asda, Asian meat cleared sites, unfit properties access to a wide range of Area shops, clothes shops, and conflict between amenities.

grocers, chemist, doctors, residential and industrial Action parks, town) is in walking uses, are some of the worst distance. in the area and the Borough. Plan The Housing Market Renewal -

Initiative and the Consultation complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

problems and the AAP Report preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 114/DS/322 & 115/DS/323- No details are given for No Bar B A Khan preference and each option

contains variables. and Disagrees with this Option and Option 3 but agrees with Stoneyholme Option 2

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the Area AAP process and on any All options for this area are planning applications Action likely to have a traffic impact submitted. on the strategic highway

network which is located Plan Burnley adjacent to this Area which

is being considered for a -

variety of uses and has the Consultation Borough potential to significantly

affect the trunk road network

due to its proximity, the

Council development proposed and Report the size of the development. 335 336 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Whichever option is taken Stoneyholme forward the Agency will need to be consulted on the forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these

stages being supported by Area assessments of the likely

impact of that traffic on the Action highway network. The site needs to be developed in a sustainable manner to Plan ensure that the need to -

travel is reduced. Site Consultation should be developed with attention to access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle in

order that the traffic impact Report of such developments is minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The Agency will need to be Bar consulted in more detail in

order that the impact of that and traffic on the strategic highway network can be Stoneyholme assessed. Presently, the AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be undertaken. Area Assessment of the impact of

the development on the Action trunk road network will need to be undertaken in Plan

Burnley accordance with PPG13 and

the relevant DoT Policy - including the provision of Consultation

Borough adequate Transport

Assessment and Travel Plan reports Council Report 337 338 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

120/DS/352- Mr & Mrs Syed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Disagree with this option as Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing prefers facelifting and not degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the demolition (Clegg St) as has abandonment, previously area.

done work to house which is cleared sites, unfit properties Area close to relatives and friends and conflict between

and which took a lot of time residential and industrial Action to find. Even thinking about uses, are some of the worst house being demolished is in the area and the Borough. upsetting. Plan The Housing Market Renewal -

Initiative and the Consultation complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

Road) Duke Affordability is a key issue Bar and the Council has an

Affordable Housing Policy and and is working with partners to provide a range of options for Stoneyholme affordable rent and purchase to meet housing need. The Council has an established advice team in place to support and help Area householders find suitable new homes. Action 122/DS/359- Gren Logue Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Plan

Burnley (Saco Ltd) address the concerns of local businesses and include -

Agrees with this option as policies and initiatives which Consultation the area needs local jobs.

Borough reinforce and develop Local

We employ a large Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm

percentage of local people, Street, Daneshouse but more needs to be done. Economic Improvement Area Council Report - identifying key actions 339 340 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

required and forming the Stoneyholme basis for funding bids. 126/DS/366-Mohammed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Bilal conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Disagrees with all options. degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Area Appalled at the policy of abandonment, previously through redevelopment destroying communities in cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Action this part of Daneshouse, and conflict between and should consider

destroying these blocks residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Plan consisting of very large uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

properties (three into ones) in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. - of superior quality for the Consultation sake of a park. The Council The Housing Market Renewal comes up with options Initiative and the without any sort of research, complementary funding it evidence or consideration to attracts for non housing Report back up their proposals. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these The area and its community problems and the AAP is very unique within the preferred option should town where many successful consider the area and 2 and 3 into 1 conversions Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke have taken place completely surrounding areas as a whole Bar changing the inner layout of in order to achieve its

the properties to the highest sustainable regeneration. and standards. Some of the properties have been used The Council has an Stoneyholme as examples by Urban established advice team in Splash, Housing place to help householders Associations and the find suitable new homes to Council. meet a wide range of needs. Area The community was planned

by the heart, built by the Action residents desires and the willingness to dig deep into Plan

Burnley their pockets.

Our homes will NOT be Consultation

Borough cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Council Report 341 342 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

127/DS/367-M. Kamran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

consisting of very large residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Action properties (three into ones) uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to of superior quality for the in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. sake of a park. The Council Plan comes up with options The Housing Market Renewal -

without any sort of research, Initiative and the Consultation evidence or consideration to complementary funding it back up their proposals. attracts for non housing related projects provides an The area and its community opportunity to tackle these

is very unique within the problems and the AAP Report town where many successful preferred option should 2 and 3 into 1 conversions consider the area and have taken place completely surrounding areas as a whole changing the inner layout of in order to achieve its the properties to the highest sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 343 344 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

128/DS/368-M. Zafran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 345 346 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

129/DS/369-M. Suleman Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 347 348 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

130/DS/370-Gulzar Begum Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 349 350 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

131/DS/371-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 351 352 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

132DS/372-Sultan Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 353 354 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

133/DS/373-Mohd Ramzan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 355 356 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

134/DS/374-M. Arshad Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 357 358 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

135/DS/375-Mrs. P. Roberts Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 359 360 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

136/DS/376-Mr. C. Howard Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 361 362 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

137/DS/377-Mrs. S. Akntar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 363 364 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

138/DS/378-Nadeem Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 365 366 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

139/DS/379-Afzal Iqbal Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 367 368 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

140/DS/380-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 369 370 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

141/DS/381-Mohamid Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Hussain conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Disagrees with all options. degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Appalled at the policy of abandonment, previously through redevelopment

destroying communities in cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area this part of Daneshouse, and conflict between and should consider

destroying these blocks residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Action consisting of very large uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to properties (three into ones) in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. of superior quality for the Plan sake of a park. The Council The Housing Market Renewal -

comes up with options Initiative and the Consultation without any sort of research, complementary funding it evidence or consideration to attracts for non housing back up their proposals. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

The area and its community problems and the AAP Report is very unique within the preferred option should town where many successful consider the area and 2 and 3 into 1 conversions surrounding areas as a whole have taken place completely in order to achieve its changing the inner layout of sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke the properties to the highest The Council has an Bar standards. Some of the established advice team in

properties have been used place to help householders and as examples by Urban find suitable new homes to Splash, Housing meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Associations and the Council.

The community was planned

by the heart, built by the Area residents desires and the

willingness to dig deep into Action their pockets. Plan

Burnley Our homes will NOT be

cleared our cohesive and -

sustainable community will Consultation

Borough not be shattered and our

lives will not be destroyed. Council Report 371 372 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

142/DS/382-Abdul-Haq Mian Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 373 374 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

143/DS/383-Mr. Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and

sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

Council Report 375 376 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

144/DS/384-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider

Road) Duke standards. Some of the The Council has an Bar properties have been used established advice team in

as examples by Urban place to help householders and Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Stoneyholme Council.

The community was planned by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Area willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Action

Our homes will NOT be Plan

Burnley cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will -

not be shattered and our Consultation

Borough lives will not be destroyed.

153/DS/415-G. Gresham, Agree Yes The Preferred Option should

Council George Wilkinson (Burnley) address the concerns of local Report Ltd. businesses and include policies and initiatives which 377 378 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Agrees with this option. We reinforce and develop Local Stoneyholme are a major employer in the Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm area, and need to develop Street, Daneshouse our business in a Economic Improvement Area sympathetic environment. - identifying key actions

required and forming the Area basis for funding bids. 156/DS/418-Ian Rhodes, Agree. The conflict between Yes The Preferred Option should Action Rhodes Technical Services business and residential uses address the concerns of local

has been identified as a key businesses and include Plan Agrees with this option and issue in all consultation policies and initiatives which

says that care needs to be exercises from both reinforce and develop Local - Consultation taken with reference to the businesses and local Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm interface between business residents. Street, Daneshouse traffic and public. Economic Improvement Area - identifying key actions

required and forming the Report basis for funding bids. 158/DS/420-Hayley The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Maudsley, Elm Street parking and better access has address the concerns of local Business Park Association been raised by many of the businesses and include business consultees. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Agrees with a mixture of 1, The expansion of the policies and initiatives which Bar 2 and 3. Extra parking is business park must be reinforce and develop Local

urgently needed along Elm balanced against the need for Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm and St. The Access via Lee Housing Market Renewal and Street, Daneshouse Street gives much better the sustainable regeneration Economic Improvement Area Stoneyholme access and a turning circle of the area. - identifying key actions is a necessity. required and forming the basis for funding bids. Additional Comments

submitted 26th September Area 2007-Allocate more

industrial space as per the Action plan attached to letter or another plan to improve the Plan

Burnley presence and job creation.

A Business Park of this - nature is not purpose built Consultation

Borough and can only survive with

partnership type help, that

can only come from a

Council or other government Council bodies. Plan shows Report proposed new industrial 379 380 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

units and parking on the site Stoneyholme of existing housing east and south of Elm Street Mill bounded by Old Hall St, Hebrew Rd and Daneshouse

Road. Area

159/DS/421-Sara Bradrock, Agree although other than in Yes The Preferred Option should Action The Prince’s Trust very exceptional cases consider policies/initiatives for

Elevate will not fund improving properties, such as Plan A number of the ideas for improvements to properties remodelling, limited clearance

housing improvements in beyond facelifting to key to create gardens or parking - option 1 have a great deal of gateway locations. and facelifting where this Consultation merit would be supported by Elevate 179/DS/485- Petty Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, In part The Preferred Option should

Daneshouse Economic address the concerns of local Report Concerns relate to Elm Improvement Area - businesses and include Street Mill. At the time of recognises that older policies and initiatives which writing it is believed that only buildings can provide valuable reinforce and develop Local 20% of accommodation is low cost floorspace for local Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm vacant. This is the upper businesses. However, Street, Daneshouse Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke floors which is less suited to inadequate access Economic Improvement Area Bar manufacturing but may suit arrangements; buildings in - identifying key actions

office use. poor condition; and low required and forming the and environmental quality basis for funding bids. There is demand to occupy constrain attractiveness for The preferred option should Stoneyholme this type of accommodation. employers in the 21st century consider the Many businesses can and can have detrimental recommendations of the overcome the inherent effects on local residents. Daneshouse, Duke Bar and difficulties of northlight roof Stoneyholme Heritage stanchions and easily Parts of Elm Street Mill have Appraisal. Area function. been vacant for several years

and the mill has been divided Action Some companies do not into 3 ownerships and further wish to be based on subdivided into smaller units. Plan

Burnley Business Parks/Industrial Although parts of the mill Estates that tend to be

have been improved some -

located out of town with poor sections of the mill are in poor Consultation

Borough access and where bus and , in places, hazardous

services only add to the condition. One of the three

employee and employer divisions has an off street costs. parking, manoeuvring and Council Report service area the other 2 parts 381 382 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Some companies cannot are serviced from narrow Stoneyholme afford to operate from adjoining streets with no modern industrial units. Elm parking or manoeuvring Street Mill employs local provision. people from the local

community who are able to Area walk to work and re-invest Housing and environmental

their money within the area. conditions in this area of north Action Daneshouse, with a high As rent and rates are degree of vacancy, relatively low companies are abandonment, previously Plan able to employ more people cleared sites, unfit properties -

due to reduced outgoings. and conflict between Consultation residential and industrial The majority of Elm St Mill uses, are some of the worst property has been in the area and the Borough. substantially improved over

the years. It has an excellent The Housing Market Renewal Report yard and loading facilities, Initiative and the ample parking and has been complementary funding it re-roofed and is therefore attracts for non housing very appealing to a number related projects provides an of modern day industries. opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Within the mill there are problems and the AAP Bar currently 4 companies preferred option should

including a specialist consider the area and and anodising company who surrounding areas as a whole employ at least 35 people, in order to achieve its Stoneyholme an engineering company sustainable regeneration. employing 7, and engineering and foundry Heritage Appraisals have company employing 2. We been produced for each AAP are informed the other parts area in order to ensure that Area of the mill employ upwards the historic character of each of 50 people. area is not lost however, the Action significance of individual Whilst we appreciate that buildings must be balanced Plan

Burnley access to this area needs to against the need to create a

be improved, the demolition well-planned and sustainable - of Elm Street Mill would not neighbourhood. Consultation

Borough assist and to make more

sense it would appear a

more direct route along Old

Hall Street should be Council created. The mill retains Report much character and is a 383 384 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

source of local employment Stoneyholme in an area where people are re-locating.

192/DS/510-D.T.M.Melland Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, In part The Preferred Option, as part Daneshouse Economic of the AAP process, should Area In favour of basic intentions Improvement Area - take a balanced and of AAP-to provide recognises that older sustainable approach to Action disadvantaged area with buildings can provide valuable regeneration and look at improved housing; expand low cost floorspace for local wider issues for the area, the Plan local employment; conserve businesses. However, Borough and the Region. It

worthwhile heritage inadequate access should address the concerns - aspects. However deeply arrangements; buildings in of local businesses and Consultation concerned that Elm Street poor condition; and low include policies and initiatives Mill might be a possible environmental quality which reinforces and target for demolition and this constrain attractiveness for develops Local Plan Policy would be inappropriate employers in the 21st century EW6/1 - Elm Street, Report because: and can have detrimental Daneshouse Economic effects on local residents. Improvement Area - 1. Elm Street Mill an Parts of Elm Street Mill have identifying key actions industrially important been vacant for several years required and forming the building, which offers basis for funding bids. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke employment to many and is and the mill has been divided The preferred option should Bar of significant architectural into 3 ownerships and further consider the

merit, should not be subdivided into smaller units. recommendations of the and threatened with demolition Although parts of the mill Daneshouse, Duke Bar and but should be supported and have been improved some Stoneyholme heritage Stoneyholme encouraged as an example sections of the mill are in poor appraisal. of successful regeneration. and , in places, hazardous condition. One of the three (a) History and divisions has an off street transformation –Since Mr. parking, manoeuvring and Area Melland inherited the mill in service area the other 2 parts 1971 he has sold the are serviced from narrow Action southern half to fund adjoining streets with no improvements to the

parking or manoeuvring Plan Burnley northern part. With grant provision.

assistance he has created 3 - units in part of the former Housing and environmental Consultation

Borough weaving sheds and conditions in this area of north

demolished part to form a Daneshouse, with a high

fenced car degree of vacancy,

park/yard/turning/servicing abandonment, previously Council area. These have been in cleared sites, unfit properties Report constant demand since and conflict between 385 386 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

1983. Phase II started in residential and industrial Stoneyholme 1990’s to improve and uses, are some of the worst secure the multi-storey in the area and the Borough. section facing Elm Street. The first floor is not currently The Housing Market Renewal

let and there is scope for Initiative and the Area creating a variety of different complementary funding it

types of user space. attracts for non housing Action related projects provides an (b) Modern use & opportunity to tackle these employment -The mill has problems and the AAP Plan been used for a wide range preferred option should -

of uses and its potential is in consider the area and Consultation line with the key issue of surrounding areas as a whole “preparing for a changing in order to achieve its economy” (5.3.2.p27 sustainable regeneration. consultation

report-Community Strategy) Heritage Appraisals have Report and the Vision objectives “To been produced for each AAP seek to ensure the area in order to ensure that development and re-use of the historic character of each buildings that can meet area is not lost however, the different needs over time significance of individual Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke and that minimise the use of buildings must be balanced Bar resources”. Commercially against the need to create a

the mill offers versatile well-planned and sustainable and space for small or large neighbourhood. businesses at a significantly Stoneyholme lower cost than newly built The Council has an units. Some 45 people work established property advice on the premises in this half. team in place to help The mill is close to the M65 businesses find suitable new and to Burnley town centre. premises to meet their needs Area It is very much integrated and to deal with relocation into Elm Street Business issues. Action Park in that a major The conflict between business

occupant of Elm St Mill north Plan Burnley has their centre of and residential uses has been identified as a key issue in all operations less than a - quarter of a mile away in consultation exercises from Consultation

Borough another mill on the Business both businesses and local Park. Elm St Mill south has residents. Access and parking

also been developed over problems were raised as particular issues.

Council the last 30 years where a further 50 or so are Report employed. 387 388 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

(c)Heritage value – also Agree that a high level of Stoneyholme important for aesthetic, employment is important in architectural and historical terms of social cohesion and reasons. It is now rare to well being and that local come across a 19C redbrick employment opportunities

mill with its multi-storey have a crucial role to play in Area façade intact. The view the creation of sustainable

along Elm St is striking and communities. Action there are many interesting features. Consultation report 5.4.2 p28. Plan -

(d)Arguments against Consultation demolition-Would involve massive dislocation to existing occupants and serious problems of

relocation. Costly & would Report result in considerable loss of employment in the area. Loss of economically priced units and destruction of successfully transformed Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke building that has benefited Bar from public grants. Would

be contrary to the AAP aims and 5.4.3. One argument advanced for the Mill’s Stoneyholme demolition is that Elm Street should be widened to improve access to the remainder of the Business Park – a costly exercise for Area a road widening as there would appear to be the Action potential for good access to

the middle of the Business Plan Burnley Park down Old Hall Street,

a wide approach with good - turning space into both Elm Consultation

Borough and Abel St. See Option 1

link between Abel St and Colne Road via Lee St. Council Report 389 390 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

2. Elm Street Mill should Stoneyholme provide the nucleus for an expansion of employment in the area.

It cannot be sufficiently Area stressed that a high level of

employment is the key to a Action socially cohesive and well-adjusted community. High employment leads to Plan better public health and -

greater personal fulfillment Consultation to maintaining the motivation of the young in education training and to reducing levels of crime, anti-social

behaviour, drug use and Report other social ills. Local employment has the additional advantages of allowing easy access to Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke work full-time or part-time Bar and cutting down on travel

and transport. and

In Area 8 there is an existing Stoneyholme employment nucleus from which to expand. I understand this expansion would be through a suitable

combination of new units Area and different kinds of work

and/or live/work space which Action have yet to be formulated. I would therefore argue in Plan

Burnley favour of Option 1 provided

this involved the retention of - Elm Street Mill. This option Consultation

Borough gives scope for employment

and retail development. It

also offers the prospect of a

neighbourhood park which Council could be a valuable Report amenity. It appears to be in 391 392 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

line with objective number 8 Stoneyholme of 5.4.3. To foster economic growth within a diverse and modern local economy and improve access to

employment opportunities Area

The AAP is a marvelous Action opportunity to regenerate the housing stock and to boost the area economically. A Plan dynamic expansion of -

employment in Area 8 could Consultation be crucial to the plan as a whole. Elm Street Mill has already played a pioneering role in the development of

industrial units and seeks to Report do so in the future. The former northlight sheds are centres of industry, enterprise and employment. The multi-storey section of Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke the Mill is of architectural Bar and historical importance as

well as being of good and practical value. For all these reasons I would ask that Elm Stoneyholme Street Mill be considered as a positive asset and should not be considered for demolition. Area

197/DS/521-Barton Willmore Heritage Appraisals have In part The preferred option should Action for Mr. D. Melland been produced for each AAP consider the area in order to ensure that recommendations of the Elm Street Mill should be the historic character of each Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Plan Burnley retained as it fits with the area is not lost However, the Stoneyholme heritage vision at 5.4.2. (local - significance of individual appraisal. Consultation heritage will be valued and buildings must be balanced The Preferred Option should

Borough

enhanced. Mr. Melland and against the need to create a take a balanced and his family have owned the well-planned and sustainable sustainable approach to

mill since it was constructed neighbourhood. Council

by his great grandfather in Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, Report 1884. Mr. Melland now Daneshouse Economic 393 394 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

owns only the northern part Improvement Area - regeneration, address the Stoneyholme having the sold the recognises that older concerns of local businesses remainder in 1971. buildings can provide valuable and include policies and low cost floorspace for local initiatives which reinforce and This northern part employs businesses. However, develop Local Plan Policy

50 people & recently Saco inadequate access EW6/1 - Elm Street, Area have leased additional arrangements; buildings in Daneshouse Economic

space and employ about 40 poor condition; and low Improvement Area - Action people. environmental quality identifying key actions constrain attractiveness for required and forming the The mill forms part of the employers in the 21st century basis for funding bids. Plan established Elm St Business and can have detrimental Park. Retention of the mill - effects on local residents. Consultation for employment is therefore Parts of Elm Street Mill have important and would accord been vacant for several years with the objectives of the and the mill has been divided AAP in para 5.4.3. into 3 ownerships and further

especially “to seek to subdivided into smaller units. Report ensure that the development Although parts of the mill and re-use of buildings that have been improved some can meet different needs sections of the mill are in poor over time, and that minimise and , in places, hazardous the use of resources”. condition. One of the three Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The Heritage Appraisal divisions has an off street Bar identified the mill chimney as parking, manoeuvring and

a landmark feature and service area the other 2 parts and Section 2.1 of the AAP are serviced from narrow identifies the loss of historic adjoining streets with no Stoneyholme character through clearance parking or manoeuvring as an issue. The façade of provision. the building is also intact and very striking. Housing and environmental conditions in this area of north Area Additional comments Daneshouse, with a high

received 18th September degree of vacancy, Action 2007. Access to and from abandonment, previously Elm Street Business Park cleared sites, unfit properties Plan

Burnley can occasionally be and conflict between

problematic due to the long residential and industrial - traffic light junction at uses, are some of the worst Consultation

Borough Hebrew Rd/Colne Rd in the area and the Borough.

causing traffic to back up and block the roundabout at The Housing Market Renewal

Hebrew Rd/Abel Initiative and the Council St/Daneshouse Road. It complementary funding it Report attracts for non housing appears that this could 395 396 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

potentially be solved by related projects provides an Stoneyholme improving traffic flow on opportunity to tackle these Colne Road by street problems and the AAP widening on Hebrew Road preferred option should (which has wide consider the area and

pavements), changing traffic surrounding areas as a whole Area light priorities or by in order to achieve its

introducing a roundabout at sustainable regeneration. Action this junction instead. The need for additional car Access via Elm St would parking as well as better Plan seem to be impractical due access has been raised by -

to its narrowness and many of the business Consultation proximity to the constraint of consultees. the canal bridge on Colne Road. Densely packed terraced housing further

constrains the ability to Report improve traffic flow by road widening. In addition, industrial traffic would struggle turning into the narrow roads. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke A strength of the area is that Bar it is well catered for in terms

of car parking, with public and car parks on Elm Street, Travis Street and on Old Hall Stoneyholme Street. There are also a number of private car parks. The area is sufficiently catered for in terms of car parking and no further Area parking should be sought in the area. Instead the Action Council should endeavour to

promote sustainable modes Plan Burnley of travel to and from this

employment area. On a - separate note we believe Consultation

Borough that there may be some

concern about the safety of

Elm Street, west of Elm

Council Street Mill, due to its narrowness. In this Report instance, we urge the 397 398 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Council to seek Stoneyholme improvement to street lighting along Elm Street.

Option 2 – Employment/Housing Area

05/DS/29-Ralph Woolnough Housing and environmental No Action conditions in this area of north Disagrees with this option as Daneshouse, with a high he opposes any demolition degree of vacancy, Plan of Hurtley Street abandonment, previously -

cleared sites, unfit properties Consultation and conflict between residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Report The Housing Market Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke opportunity to tackle these Bar problems and the AAP

preferred option should and consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole Stoneyholme in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

10/DS/34-Sandra Parker Housing and environmental No Area conditions in this area of north Agrees with this Option in

Daneshouse, with a high Action keeping Clegg Street up. degree of vacancy, abandonment, previously cleared sites, unfit properties Plan Burnley and conflict between -

residential and industrial Consultation uses, are some of the worst Borough

in the area and the Borough.

The Housing Market Renewal Council

Initiative and the Report complementary funding it attracts for non housing 399 400 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

related projects provides an Stoneyholme opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Area in order to achieve its

sustainable regeneration. Action

14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Plan conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives

Disagrees with houses being Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing - pulled down. Concerns over degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the Consultation taking out a mortgage in abandonment, previously area. order to buy another similar cleared sites, unfit properties house. and conflict between residential and industrial Report uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough.

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke attracts for non housing Bar related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these and problems and the AAP preferred option should Stoneyholme consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an Action Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to Plan

Burnley provide a range of options for

affordable rent and purchase - to meet housing need. Consultation Borough

45 & 55/DS/169 & 232-Peter Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should

Salt conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Council

Agrees with this option but regeneration and consider the Report says that the car park at the parking requirements of rear of Throstle Mill is used 401 402 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

by people who come to the degree of vacancy, differing users in accordance Stoneyholme Mosque opposite and if that abandonment, previously with Local Plan Policies. was redeveloped for housing cleared sites, unfit properties Clegg St and Elm St would and conflict between be crowded with cars. He residential and industrial

believes that the car park is uses, are some of the worst Area essential and must stay. in the area and the Borough. Action The Housing Market Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan attracts for non housing -

related projects provides an Consultation opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Report in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 56/DS/233-Uzma Noreen Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should Bar conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

Agrees with this option but Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to and not with the new housing degree of vacancy, regeneration and consider the being built in the car park abandonment, previously parking requirements of Stoneyholme near Daneshouse Rd (rear cleared sites, unfit properties differing users in accordance of Throstle Mill) because that and conflict between with Local Plan Policy TM15. car park is used by the residential and industrial mosque on Clegg Street and uses, are some of the worst by local residents. in the area and the Borough. Area

The Housing Market Renewal Action Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should

consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Council in order to achieve its Report sustainable regeneration. 403 404 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

114/DS/322 & 115/DS/323- No details are given for No Stoneyholme B A Khan preference and each option contains variables. Agrees with this Option.

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Area for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the

AAP process and on any Action All options for this area are planning applications likely to have a traffic impact submitted. on the strategic highway Plan network which is located -

adjacent to this Area which Consultation is being considered for a variety of uses and has the potential to significantly affect the trunk road network due to its proximity, the Report development proposed and the size of the development. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Whichever option is taken Bar forward the Agency will need

to be consulted on the and forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these Stoneyholme stages being supported by assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the highway network. The site needs to be developed in a Area sustainable manner to ensure that the need to Action travel is reduced. Site

should be developed with Plan Burnley attention to access by

modes of transport other -

than the private vehicle in Consultation

Borough order that the traffic impact

of such developments is

minimised. Improvements

Council in public transport should be Report proposed where appropriate. 405 406 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

The Agency will need to be Stoneyholme consulted in more detail in order that the impact of that traffic on the strategic highway network can be

assessed. Presently, the Area AAP contains insufficient

detail for that appraisal to be Action undertaken. Assessment of the impact of the development on the Plan trunk road network will need -

to be undertaken in Consultation accordance with PPG13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of adequate Transport

Assessment and Travel Plan Report reports Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 120/DS/352-Mr & Mrs Syed Housing and environmental No Bar conditions in this area of north

Agree with this option for Daneshouse, with a high and facelifting and improvements degree of vacancy, of houses on Clegg Street. abandonment, previously Stoneyholme cleared sites, unfit properties and conflict between residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Area

The Housing Market Renewal Action Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should

consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Council in order to achieve its Report sustainable regeneration. 407 408 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 122/DS/359- Gren Logue Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should (Saco Ltd) conditions in this area of north address the concerns of local Action Daneshouse, with a high businesses and include Disagrees with this option as degree of vacancy, policies and initiatives which Plan the area needs local jobs. abandonment, previously reinforce and develop Local

We employ a large cleared sites, unfit properties Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm - percentage of local people, and conflict between Street, Daneshouse Consultation but more needs to be done. residential and industrial Economic Improvement Area uses, are some of the worst - identifying key actions in the area and the Borough. required and forming the basis for funding bids. The Housing Market Renewal Report Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke problems and the AAP Bar preferred option should

consider the area and and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its Stoneyholme sustainable regeneration.

Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, Daneshouse Economic

Improvement Area recognises Area the need to invest in

traditional industrial areas and Action local businesses Plan Burnley 123/DS/360-Gavin Ward Ltd The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should

parking has been raised by take a balanced and - Consultation

Agrees with this option. many of the business sustainable approach to Borough Extra car parking is consultees. regeneration and consider the

required. We require 18 car parking requirements of

park spaces, not including differing users in accordance

Council deliveries. Especially in the

with Local Plan Policies. Report winter months – 7 Nº. 409 410 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

vehicles have to be parked Stoneyholme in side streets mostly by our female office staff.

126/DS/366-Mohammed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Bilal conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Area Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Disagrees with all options. degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Action Appalled at the policy of abandonment, previously through redevelopment destroying communities in cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Plan this part of Daneshouse, and conflict between and should consider

destroying these blocks residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would - consisting of very large uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to Consultation properties (three into ones) in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. of superior quality for the sake of a park. The Council The Housing Market Renewal comes up with options Initiative and the without any sort of research, complementary funding it Report evidence or consideration to attracts for non housing back up their proposals. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The area and its community problems and the AAP Bar is very unique within the preferred option should

town where many successful consider the area and and 2 and 3 into 1 conversions surrounding areas as a whole have taken place completely in order to achieve its Stoneyholme changing the inner layout of sustainable regeneration. the properties to the highest standards. Some of the The Council has an properties have been used established advice team in as examples by Urban place to help householders Area Splash, Housing find suitable new homes to Associations and the meet a wide range of needs. Action Council. Plan

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into their pockets.

Council Report 41 1 412 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 127/DS/367-M. Kamran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

this part of Daneshouse, cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses - destroying these blocks and conflict between and should consider Consultation consisting of very large residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would properties (three into ones) uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to of superior quality for the in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. sake of a park. The Council comes up with options The Housing Market Renewal Report without any sort of research, Initiative and the evidence or consideration to complementary funding it back up their proposals. attracts for non housing related projects provides an Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

town where many successful preferred option should and 2 and 3 into 1 conversions consider the area and have taken place completely surrounding areas as a whole Stoneyholme changing the inner layout of in order to achieve its the properties to the highest sustainable regeneration. standards. Some of the properties have been used The Council has an as examples by Urban established advice team in Area Splash, Housing place to help householders Associations and the find suitable new homes to Action Council. meet a wide range of needs. Plan

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 413 414 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 128/DS/368-M. Zafran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 415 416 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 129/DS/369-M. Suleman Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 417 418 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 130/DS/370-Gulzar Begum Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 419 420 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 131/DS/371-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 421 422 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 132DS/372-Sultan Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 423 424 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 133/DS/373-Mohd Ramzan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 425 426 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 134/DS/374-M. Arshad Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 427 428 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 135/DS/375-Mrs. P. Roberts Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 429 430 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 136/DS/376-Mr. C. Howard Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 431 432 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 137/DS/377-Mrs. S. Akntar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 433 434 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 138/DS/378-Nadeem Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 435 436 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 139/DS/379-Afzal Iqbal Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 437 438 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 140/DS/380-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 439 440 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 141/DS/381-Mohamid Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Hussain conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Disagrees with all options. degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan Appalled at the policy of abandonment, previously through redevelopment

destroying communities in cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses - this part of Daneshouse, and conflict between and should consider Consultation destroying these blocks residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would consisting of very large uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to properties (three into ones) in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. of superior quality for the sake of a park. The Council The Housing Market Renewal Report comes up with options Initiative and the without any sort of research, complementary funding it evidence or consideration to attracts for non housing back up their proposals. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The area and its community problems and the AAP Bar is very unique within the preferred option should

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 441 442 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 142/DS/382-Abdul-Haq Mian Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 443 444 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 143/DS/383-Mr. Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 445 446 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 144/DS/384-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action Disagrees with all options. Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Appalled at the policy of degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan destroying communities in abandonment, previously through redevelopment

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 447 448 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 151/DS/413-Yvonne & The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Shelley Café parking and better access has address the concerns of local Action been raised by many of the businesses and include Agrees with this option as it business consultees. policies and initiatives which Plan provides better access and reinforce and develop Local

parking. Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm - Street, Daneshouse Consultation Economic Improvement Area - identifying key actions required and forming the basis for funding bids. Report The Preferred Option should take a balanced and sustainable approach to regeneration and consider the parking and access Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke requirements of differing Bar users in accordance with

Local Plan Policies. and

152/DS/414-Jack Crabtree, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Discount Signs parking has been raised by take a balanced and many of the business sustainable approach to Agrees with this option – consultees. regeneration and consider the extra parking is urgently parking requirements of

needed along Elm Street differing users in accordance Area with Local Plan Policies. 153/DS/415-G. Gresham, Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should Action George Wilkinson (Burnley) conditions in this area of north address the concerns of local

Ltd. Daneshouse, with a high businesses and include Plan Burnley degree of vacancy, policies and initiatives which

Disagrees with this option. abandonment, previously reinforce and develop Local - Consultation

We cannot afford our cleared sites, unfit properties Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm

Borough business activities to be and conflict between Street, Daneshouse impinged upon by the residential and industrial Economic Improvement Area

compromise of working uses, are some of the worst - identifying key actions

Council around domestic/private in the area and the Borough. required and forming the homes. Report basis for funding bids. 449 450 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these Area problems and the AAP

preferred option should Action consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its Plan sustainable regeneration. - Consultation The conflict between business and residential uses has been identified as a key issue in all consultation exercises from

both businesses and local Report residents. 154/DS/416-P. A. Gostelow, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Rapidsigns parking has been raised by address the concerns of local businesses and include Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Option 2 is the best, better many of the business policies and initiatives which Bar access and parking. consultees. reinforce and develop Local

Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm and Street, Daneshouse Economic Improvement Area Stoneyholme - identifying key actions required and forming the basis for funding bids. The Preferred Option should take a balanced and Area sustainable approach to regeneration and consider the Action parking and access

requirements of differing Plan Burnley users in accordance with

Local Plan Policies. - Consultation

Borough 155/DS/417-Gemma Does not give any reasons No

Sandford, Action for ASD

Agrees with option 2 Council Report 451 452 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

157/DS/419-Valerie O’Reilly, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Bovis Land Lease parking and better access has address the concerns of local been raised by many of the businesses and include Agrees with this option it is business consultees. policies and initiatives which the better option for access reinforce and develop Local

to business park and Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm Area parking. Street, Daneshouse

Economic Improvement Area Action - identifying key actions required and forming the basis for funding bids. Plan The Preferred Option should -

take a balanced and Consultation sustainable approach to regeneration and consider the parking and access requirements of differing

users in accordance with Report Local Plan Policies. 158/DS/420-Hayley The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Maudsley, Elm Street parking and better access has address the concerns of local Business Park Association businesses and include Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Agrees with a mixture of 1, been raised by many of the policies and initiatives which Bar 2 and 3. Extra parking is business consultees. reinforce and develop Local

urgently needed along Elm Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm and St. The access via Lee Street, Daneshouse Street gives much better Economic Improvement Area Stoneyholme access and a turning circle - identifying key actions is a necessity. required and forming the basis for funding bids.

159/DS/421-Sara Badrock, Does not give any reasons No Area The Prince’s Trust Action Agrees with this option Plan

Burnley 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Noted Yes The Preferred Option will be

Planning and Environmental in accordance with Policy 13 - Services of the JLSP. Consultation

Borough

Policy 13 of the JLSP allows

for the replacement of

cleared dwellings on up to a Council one for one basis. Report Additional dwellings in 453 454 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

excess of one for one will be Stoneyholme counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP.

179/DS/485- Petty Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, In part The Preferred Option should Area Daneshouse Economic address the concerns of local Concerns relate to Elm Improvement Area - businesses and include Action Street Mill. At the time of recognises that older policies and initiatives which writing it is believed that only buildings can provide valuable reinforce and develop Local Plan 20% of accommodation is low cost floorspace for local Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm

vacant. This is the upper businesses. However, Street, Daneshouse - floors which is less suited to inadequate access Economic Improvement Area Consultation manufacturing but may suit arrangements; buildings in - identifying key actions office use. poor condition; and low required and forming the environmental quality basis for funding bids. constrain attractiveness for The preferred option should Report employers in the 21st century consider the and can have detrimental recommendations of the effects on local residents. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke There is demand to occupy Parts of Elm Street Mill have Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Bar this type of accommodation. been vacant for several years Stoneyholme heritage

Many businesses can and the mill has been divided appraisal. and overcome the inherent into 3 ownerships and further difficulties of northlight roof subdivided into smaller units. Stoneyholme stanchions and easily Although parts of the mill function. have been improved some sections of the mill are in poor Some companies do not and , in places, hazardous wish to be based on condition. One of the three Area Business Parks/Industrial divisions has an off street Estates that tend to be parking, manoeuvring and Action located out of town with poor service area the other 2 parts access and where bus

are serviced from narrow Plan Burnley services only add to the adjoining streets with no

employee and employer parking or manoeuvring - costs. provision. Consultation Borough

Some companies cannot afford to operate from Housing and environmental

modern industrial units. Elm conditions in this area of north Council Street Mill employs local Daneshouse, with a high Report people from the local degree of vacancy, 455 456 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

community who are able to abandonment, previously Stoneyholme walk to work and re-invest cleared sites, unfit properties their money within the area. and conflict between residential and industrial As rent and rates are uses, are some of the worst

relatively low companies are in the area and the Borough. Area able to employ more people

due to reduced outgoings. The Housing Market Renewal Action Initiative and the The majority of Elm St Mill complementary funding it property has been attracts for non housing Plan substantially improved over related projects provides an the years. It has an excellent - opportunity to tackle these Consultation yard and loading facilities, problems and the AAP ample parking and has been preferred option should re-roofed and is therefore consider the area and very appealing to a number surrounding areas as a whole

of modern day industries in order to achieve its Report sustainable regeneration. Within the mill there are currently 4 companies Heritage Appraisals have including a specialist been produced for each AAP anodising company who area in order to ensure that Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke employ at least 35 people, the historic character of each Bar an engineering company area is not lost however, the

employing 7, and significance of individual and engineering and foundry buildings must be balanced company employing 2. We against the need to create a Stoneyholme are informed the other parts well-planned and sustainable of the mill employ upwards neighbourhood. of 50 people.

Whilst we appreciate that Area access to this area needs to

be improved, the demolition Action of Elm Street Mill would not assist and to make more Plan

Burnley sense it would appear a

more direct route along Old -

Hall Street should be Consultation

Borough created. The mill retains

much character and is a source of local employment in an area where people are Council Report re-locating. 457 458 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

192/DS/510-D.T.M.Melland Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, Yes The Preferred Option, as part Stoneyholme Daneshouse Economic of the AAP process, should In favour of basic intentions Improvement Area - take a balanced and of AAP-to provide recognises that older sustainable approach to disadvantaged area with buildings can provide valuable regeneration and look at

improved housing; expand low cost floorspace for local wider issues for the area, the Area local employment; conserve businesses. However, Borough and the Region. It

worthwhile heritage inadequate access should address the concerns Action aspects. However deeply arrangements; buildings in of local businesses and concerned that Elm Street poor condition; and low include policies and initiatives Mill might be a possible environmental quality which reinforce and develop Plan target for demolition and this constrain attractiveness for Local Plan Policy EW6/1 - -

would be inappropriate employers in the 21st century Elm Street, Daneshouse Consultation because: and can have detrimental Economic Improvement Area effects on local residents. - identifying key actions 1. Elm Street Mill an Parts of Elm Street Mill have required and forming the industrially important been vacant for several years basis for funding bids.

building, which offers and the mill has been divided The preferred option should Report employment to many and is into 3 ownerships and further consider the of significant architectural subdivided into smaller units. recommendations of the merit, should not be Although parts of the mill Daneshouse, Duke Bar and threatened with demolition have been improved some Stoneyholme heritage sections of the mill are in poor appraisal. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke but should be supported and and , in places, hazardous Bar encourages as an example condition. One of the three

of successful regeneration. divisions has an off street and parking, manoeuvring and (a) History and service area the other 2 parts Stoneyholme transformation –Since Mr. are serviced from narrow Melland inherited the mill in adjoining streets with no 1971 he has sold the parking or manoeuvring southern half to fund provision. improvements to the Area northern part. With grant Housing and environmental

assistance he has created 3 conditions in this area of north Action units in part of the former Daneshouse, with a high weaving sheds and degree of vacancy, Plan

Burnley demolished part to form a abandonment, previously

fenced car cleared sites, unfit properties - park/yard/turning/servicing and conflict between Consultation

Borough area. These have been in residential and industrial

constant demand since uses, are some of the worst 1983. Phase II started in in the area and the Borough. 1990’s to improve and Council Report 459 460 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

secure the multi-storey The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme section facing Elm Street. Initiative and the The first floor is not currently complementary funding it let and there is scope for attracts for non housing creating a variety of different related projects provides an

types of user space. opportunity to tackle these Area problems and the AAP

(b) Modern use & preferred option should Action employment-The mill has consider the area and been used for a wide range surrounding areas as a whole of uses and its potential is in in order to achieve its Plan line with the key issue of sustainable regeneration. -

“preparing for a changing Consultation economy” (5.3.2.p27 Heritage Appraisals have consultation been produced for each AAP report-Community Strategy) area in order to ensure that and the Vision objectives “To the historic character of each

seek to ensure the area is not lost however, the Report development and re-use of significance of individual buildings that can meet buildings must be balanced different needs over time against the need to create a and that minimise the use of well-planned and sustainable resources” Commercially neighbourhood. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke the mill offers versatile The Council has an Bar space for small or large established property advice

businesses at a significantly team in place to help and lower cost than newly built businesses find suitable new units. Some 45 people work premises to meet their needs Stoneyholme on the premises in this half. and to deal with relocation The mill is close to the M65 issues. and to Burnley town centre. It is very much integrated The conflict between business into Elm Street Business and residential uses has been Area Park in that a major identified as a key issue in all occupant of Elm St Mill north consultation exercises from Action has their centre of both businesses and local residents. Access and parking

operations less than a Plan Burnley quarter of a mile away in problems were raised as

another mill on the Business particular issues. - Park. Elm St Mill south has Consultation

Borough also been developed over

the last 30 years where a further 50 or so are

Council employed. Report 461 462 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

(c)Heritage value – also Stoneyholme important for aesthetic, architectural and historical reasons. It is now rare to come across a 19C redbrick

mill with its multi-storey Area façade intact. The view

along Elm St is striking and Action there are many interesting features. Consultation report 5.4.2 p28. Plan -

(d)Arguments against Consultation demolition-Would involve massive dislocation to existing occupants and serious problems of

Road) Duke building that has benefited Bar from public grants. Would

the middle of the Business Plan Burnley Park down Old Hall Street,

a wide approach with good - turning space into both Elm Consultation

Borough and Abel St. See Option 1

link between Abel St and Colne Road via Lee St. Council Report 463 464 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

2. Elm Street Mill should Stoneyholme provide the nucleus for an expansion of employment in the area.

It cannot be sufficiently Area stressed that a high level of

employment is the key to a Action socially cohesive and well-adjusted community. High employment leads to Plan better public health and -

greater personal fulfillment Consultation to maintaining the motivation of the young in education training and to reducing levels of crime, anti-social

Road) Duke work full-time or part-time Bar and cutting down on travel

and transport. and

In Area 8 there is an existing Stoneyholme employment nucleus from which to expand. I understand this expansion would be through a suitable

combination of new units Area and different kinds of work

and/or live/work space which Action have yet to be formulated. I would therefore argue in Plan

Burnley favour of Option 1 provided

this involved the retention of - Elm Street Mill. This option Consultation

Borough gives scope for employment

and retail development. It

also offers the prospect of a

neighbourhood park which Council could be a valuable Report amenity. It appears to be in 465 466 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

line with objective number 8 Stoneyholme of 5.4.3. To foster economic growth within a diverse and modern local economy and improve access to

employment opportunities Area

The AAP is a marvelous Action opportunity to regenerate the housing stock and to boost the area economically. A Plan dynamic expansion of -

employment in Area 8 could Consultation be crucial to the plan as a whole. Elm Street Mill has already played a pioneering role in the development of

Road) Duke the Mill is of architectural Bar and historical importance as

well as being of good and practical value. For all these reasons I would ask that Elm Stoneyholme Street Mill be considered as a positive asset and should not be considered for demolition. Area

197/DS/521-Barton Willmore Heritage Appraisals have In part The preferred option should Action for Mr. D. Melland been produced for each AAP consider the area in order to ensure that recommendations of the Elm Street Mill should be the historic character of each Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Plan Burnley retained as it fits with the area is not lost however, the Stoneyholme Heritage vision at 5.4.2. (local - significance of individual Appraisal. Consultation heritage will be valued and buildings must be balanced The Preferred Option should

Borough

enhanced. Mr. Melland and against the need to create a take a balanced and his family have owned the well-planned and sustainable sustainable approach to

mill since it was constructed neighbourhood. Council

by his great grandfather in Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, Report 1884. Mr. Melland now Daneshouse Economic 467 468 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

50 people & recently Saco inadequate access EW6/1 - Elm Street, Area have leased additional arrangements; buildings in Daneshouse Economic

Road) Duke The Heritage Appraisal divisions has an off street Bar identified the mill chimney as parking, manoeuvring and

a landmark feature and service area the other 2 parts and Section 2.1 of the AAP are serviced from narrow identifies the loss of historic adjoining streets with no Stoneyholme character through clearance parking or manoeuvring as an issue. The façade of provision. the building is also intact and very striking Housing and environmental conditions in this area of north Area Additional comments Daneshouse, with a high

received 18th September degree of vacancy, Action 2007. Access to and from abandonment, previously Elm Street Business Park cleared sites, unfit properties Plan

Burnley can occasionally be and conflict between

problematic due to the long residential and industrial - traffic light junction at uses, are some of the worst Consultation

Borough Hebrew Rd/Colne Rd in the area and the Borough.

causing traffic to back up and block the roundabout at The Housing Market Renewal

Hebrew Rd/Abel Initiative and the Council St/Daneshouse Road. It complementary funding it Report attracts for non housing appears that this could 469 470 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

pavements), changing traffic surrounding areas as a whole Area light priorities or by in order to achieve its

to its narrowness and many of the business Consultation proximity to the constraint of consultees. the canal bridge on Colne Road. Densely packed terraced housing further

Road) Duke A strength of the area is that Bar it is well catered for in terms

promote sustainable modes Plan Burnley of travel to and from this

employment area. On a - separate note we believe Consultation

Borough that there may be some

concern about the safety of

Elm Street, west of Elm

Council Street Mill, due to its narrowness. In this Report instance, we urge the 471 472 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Council to seek Stoneyholme improvement to street lighting along Elm Street.

Option 3 - 10/DS/34-Sandra Parker Housing and environmental No Housing conditions in this area of north Area Disagrees with this option Daneshouse, with a high but agrees with option 2 degree of vacancy, Action which retains Clegg Street. abandonment, previously

cleared sites, unfit properties Plan and conflict between

residential and industrial - uses, are some of the worst Consultation in the area and the Borough.

The Housing Market Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it Report attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke consider the area and Bar surrounding areas as a whole

in order to achieve its and sustainable regeneration. Stoneyholme

14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Disagrees with houses being Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing pulled down. Concerns over

degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the Area taking out a mortgage in abandonment, previously area. order to buy another similar

cleared sites, unfit properties Action house. and conflict between residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst Plan Burnley in the area and the Borough. - Consultation The Housing Market Renewal

Borough Initiative and the

complementary funding it

attracts for non housing Council

related projects provides an Report opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP 473 474 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

preferred option should Stoneyholme consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area Other than in very exceptional

cases Elevate will not fund Action improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Plan

Affordability is a key issue - Consultation and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range of options for

affordable rent and purchase Report to meet housing need. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 45/DS/169-Peter Salts Housing and environmental In part The preferred option should Bar conditions in this area of north consider the

Disagrees with this option - Daneshouse, with a high recommendations of the and Clegg Street is part of degree of vacancy, Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Burnley's history (red bricked abandonment, previously Stoneyholme Heritage Stoneyholme terraces linked to Elm St cleared sites, unfit properties Appraisal. Mill) and should be retained and conflict between and improved residential and industrial uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Area

The Housing Market Renewal Action Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should

consider the area and

surrounding areas as a whole Council in order to achieve its Report sustainable regeneration. 475 476 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area Heritage Appraisals have

been produced for each AAP Action area in order to ensure that the historic character of each area is not lost however, the Plan significance of individual -

buildings must be balanced Consultation against the need to create a well-planned and sustainable neighbourhood 114/DS/322 & 115/DS/323- No details are given for No Report B A Khan preference and each option contains variables. Disagrees with this Option Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Bar for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the

AAP process and on any and All options for this area are planning applications likely to have a traffic impact submitted. Stoneyholme on the strategic highway network which is located adjacent to this Area which is being considered for a

variety of uses and has the Area potential to significantly

affect the trunk road network Action due to its proximity, the development proposed and Plan

Burnley the size of the development. -

Whichever option is taken Consultation

Borough forward the Agency will need

to be consulted on the

forthcoming stages of the

LDF process, with these Council stages being supported by Report assessments of the likely 477 478 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

impact of that traffic on the Stoneyholme highway network. The site needs to be developed in a sustainable manner to ensure that the need to

travel is reduced. Site Area should be developed with

attention to access by Action modes of transport other than the private vehicle in order that the traffic impact Plan of such developments is -

minimised. Improvements Consultation in public transport should be proposed where appropriate.

The Agency will need to be

consulted in more detail in Report order that the impact of that traffic on the strategic highway network can be assessed. Presently, the Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke AAP contains insufficient Bar detail for that appraisal to be

undertaken. and

Assessment of the impact of Stoneyholme the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG13 and

the relevant DoT Policy Area including the provision of

adequate Transport Action Assessment and Travel Plan reports Plan Burnley

120/DS/352- Mr & Mrs Syed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should - Consultation conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives

Borough Disagree with this option as Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing

prefers facelifting and not degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the

demolition (Clegg St) as has abandonment, previously area.

Council done work to house which is

cleared sites, unfit properties Report close to relatives and friends and conflict between and which took a lot of time 479 480 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

to find. Even thinking about residential and industrial Stoneyholme house being demolished is uses, are some of the worst upsetting. in the area and the Borough.

The Housing Market Renewal

Initiative and the Area complementary funding it

attracts for non housing Action related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP Plan preferred option should -

consider the area and Consultation surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Affordability is a key issue Report and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a range of options for affordable rent and purchase Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke to meet housing need. The Bar Council has an established

advice team in place to and support and help householders find suitable Stoneyholme new homes. 122/DS/359- Gren Logue Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should (Saco Ltd) conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Area Disagrees with this option as degree of vacancy, regeneration and the mix of

the area needs local jobs. abandonment, previously uses. It should tackle housing Action We employ a large cleared sites, unfit properties market renewal and address percentage of local people, and conflict between the concerns of local but more needs to be done. Plan Burnley residential and industrial businesses and include uses, are some of the worst policies and initiatives which -

in the area and the Borough. reinforce and develop Local Consultation

Borough Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm

The Housing Market Renewal Street, Daneshouse Initiative and the Economic Improvement Area

complementary funding it - identifying key actions Council attracts for non housing required and forming the Report related projects provides an basis for funding bids. 481 482 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

opportunity to tackle these Stoneyholme problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole

in order to achieve its Area sustainable regeneration. Action 126/DS/366-Mohammed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should

Bilal conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Plan Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to

Disagrees with all options. degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods - Appalled at the policy of abandonment, previously through redevelopment Consultation destroying communities in cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses this part of Daneshouse, and conflict between and should consider destroying these blocks residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would consisting of very large uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to Report properties (three into ones) in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. of superior quality for the sake of a park. The Council The Housing Market Renewal comes up with options Initiative and the complementary funding it Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke without any sort of research, attracts for non housing Bar evidence or consideration to related projects provides an

back up their proposals. opportunity to tackle these and problems and the AAP The area and its community preferred option should Stoneyholme is very unique within the consider the area and town where many successful surrounding areas as a whole 2 and 3 into 1 conversions in order to achieve its have taken place completely sustainable regeneration. changing the inner layout of Area the properties to the highest The Council has an

standards. Some of the established advice team in Action properties have been used place to help householders as examples by Urban find suitable new homes to Plan

Burnley Splash, Housing meet a wide range of needs

Associations and the - Council. Consultation

Borough

The community was planned

by the heart, built by the

residents desires and the Council willingness to dig deep into Report their pockets. 483 484 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 485 486 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 487 488 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 489 490 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 491 492 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 493 494 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 495 496 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 497 498 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 499 500 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 501 502 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 503 504 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 505 506 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 507 508 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 509 510 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into their pockets.

Council Report 51 1 512 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community problems and the AAP Bar is very unique within the preferred option should

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 513 514 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 515 516 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 517 518 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road) Duke The area and its community opportunity to tackle these Bar is very unique within the problems and the AAP

Burnley The community was planned

by the heart, built by the - residents desires and the Consultation

Borough willingness to dig deep into

their pockets. Council Report 519 520 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Our homes will NOT be Stoneyholme cleared our cohesive and sustainable community will not be shattered and our lives will not be destroyed. Area 153/DS/415-G. Gresham, Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should George Wilkinson (Burnley) conditions in this area of north address the concerns of local Action Ltd. Daneshouse, with a high businesses and include

degree of vacancy, policies and initiatives which Plan Disagrees with this option. abandonment, previously reinforce and develop Local

We cannot afford our cleared sites, unfit properties Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm - business activities to be and conflict between Street, Daneshouse Consultation impinged upon by the residential and industrial Economic Improvement Area compromise of working uses, are some of the worst - identifying key actions around domestic/private in the area and the Borough. required and forming the homes. basis for funding bids. The Housing Market Renewal Report Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke problems and the AAP Bar preferred option should

consider the area and and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its Stoneyholme sustainable regeneration.

The conflict between business and residential uses has been

identified as a key issue in all Area consultation exercises from

both businesses and local Action residents.

158/DS/420-Hayley The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Plan Burnley Maudsley, Elm Street parking and better access has address the concerns of local

Business Park Association been raised by many of the businesses and include Consultation business consultees. policies and initiatives which Borough Agrees with a mixture of 1, reinforce and develop Local

2 and 3. Extra parking is Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm urgently needed along Elm Street, Daneshouse Council

St. The Access via Lee Report Economic Improvement Area 521 522 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Street gives much better - identifying key actions Stoneyholme access and a turning circle required and forming the is a necessity. basis for funding bids.

159/DS/421-Sara Bradrock, Agree although other than in Yes The Preferred Option should The Prince’s Trust very exceptional cases consider policies/initiatives for Area Elevate will not fund improving properties, such as A number of the ideas for improvements to properties remodelling, limited clearance Action housing improvements in beyond facelifting to key to create gardens or parking option 3 have a great deal of gateway locations. and face lifting. Plan merit. - Consultation 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Noted Yes The Preferred Option will be Planning and Environmental in accordance with Policy 13 Services of the JLSP.

Policy 13 of the JLSP allows Report for the replacement of cleared dwellings on up to a one for one basis. Additional dwellings in excess of one for one will be Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke counted against the housing Bar provision of Policy 12 of the

JLSP. and Stoneyholme 179/DS/485- Petty Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, In part The Preferred Option should Daneshouse Economic address the concerns of local Concerns relate to Elm Improvement Area - businesses and include Street Mill. At the time of recognises that older policies and initiatives which writing it is believed that only

buildings can provide valuable reinforce and develop Local Area 20% of accommodation is low cost floorspace for local Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm vacant. This is the upper

businesses. However, Street, Daneshouse Action floors which is less suited to inadequate access Economic Improvement Area manufacturing but may suit arrangements; buildings in - identifying key actions office use. poor condition; and low required and forming the Plan Burnley environmental quality basis for funding bids.

There is demand to occupy -

constrain attractiveness for The preferred option should Consultation this type of accommodation. employers in the 21st century consider the Borough

Many businesses can and can have detrimental recommendations of the

overcome the inherent effects on local residents. difficulties of northlight roof

Council stanchions and easily

Parts of Elm Street Mill have Report function been vacant for several years and the mill has been divided 523 524 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Some companies do not into 3 ownerships and further Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme wish to be based on subdivided into smaller units. Stoneyholme heritage Business Parks/Industrial Although parts of the mill appraisal. Estates that tend to be have been improved some located out of town with poor sections of the mill are in poor

access and where bus and , in places, hazardous Area services only add to the condition. One of the three

employee and employer divisions has an off street Action costs. parking, manoeuvring and service area the other 2 parts Some companies cannot are serviced from narrow Plan afford to operate from adjoining streets with no -

modern industrial units. Elm parking or manoeuvring Consultation Street Mill employs local provision. people from the local community who are able to walk to work and re-invest Housing and environmental

their money within the area. conditions in this area of north Report Daneshouse, with a high As rent and rates are degree of vacancy, relatively low companies are abandonment, previously able to employ more people cleared sites, unfit properties due to reduced outgoings. and conflict between Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The majority of Elm St Mill residential and industrial Bar property has been uses, are some of the worst

substantially improved over in the area and the Borough. and the years. It has an excellent yard and loading facilities, The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme ample parking and has been Initiative and the re-roofed and is therefore complementary funding it very appealing to a number attracts for non housing of modern day industries. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Area Within the mill there are problems and the AAP

currently 4 companies preferred option should Action including a specialist consider the area and anodising company who surrounding areas as a whole Plan

Burnley employ at least 35 people, in order to achieve its

an engineering company sustainable regeneration. - employing 7, and Consultation

Borough engineering and foundry Heritage Appraisals have

company employing 2. We been produced for each AAP

are informed the other parts area in order to ensure that

of the mill employ upwards the historic character of each Council of 50 people. area is not lost however, the Report significance of individual 525 526 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Whilst we appreciate that buildings must be balanced Stoneyholme access to this area needs to against the need to create a be improved, the demolition well-planned and sustainable of Elm Street Mill would not neighbourhood. assist and to make more

sense it would appear a Area more direct route along Old

Hall Street should be Action created. The mill retains much character and is a source of local employment Plan in an area where people are -

re-locating. Consultation

192/DS/510-D.T.M.Melland Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, Yes The Preferred Option, as part Daneshouse Economic of the AAP process, should In favour of basic intentions Improvement Area - take a balanced and Report of AAP-to provide recognises that older sustainable approach to disadvantaged area with buildings can provide valuable regeneration and look at improved housing; expand low cost floorspace for local wider issues for the area, the local employment; conserve businesses. However, Borough and the Region. It worthwhile heritage inadequate access should address the concerns aspects. However deeply Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke concerned that Elm Street arrangements; buildings in of local businesses and Bar Mill might be a possible poor condition; and low include policies and initiatives

target for demolition and this environmental quality which reinforce and develop and would be inappropriate constrain attractiveness for Local Plan Policy EW6/1 - because: employers in the 21st century Elm Street, Daneshouse Stoneyholme and can have detrimental Economic Improvement Area 1. Elm Street Mill an effects on local residents. - identifying key actions industrially important Parts of Elm Street Mill have required and forming the building, which offers been vacant for several years basis for funding bids. employment to many and is and the mill has been divided The preferred option should Area of significant architectural into 3 ownerships and further consider the merit, should not be subdivided into smaller units. recommendations of the Action threatened with demolition Although parts of the mill Daneshouse, Duke Bar and but should be supported and

have been improved some Stoneyholme heritage Plan Burnley encourages as an example sections of the mill are in poor appraisal.

of successful regeneration. and , in places, hazardous - condition. One of the three Consultation

Borough (a) History and divisions has an off street

transformation –Since Mr. parking, manoeuvring and

Melland inherited the mill in service area the other 2 parts

1971 he has sold the

Council are serviced from narrow southern half to fund adjoining streets with no Report improvements to the 527 528 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

northern part. With grant parking or manoeuvring Stoneyholme assistance he has created 3 provision. units in part of the former weaving sheds and Housing and environmental demolished part to form a conditions in this area of north

fenced car Daneshouse, with a high Area park/yard/turning/servicing degree of vacancy,

area. These have been in abandonment, previously Action constant demand since cleared sites, unfit properties 1983. Phase II started in and conflict between 1990’s to improve and residential and industrial Plan secure the multi-storey uses, are some of the worst -

section facing Elm Street. in the area and the Borough. Consultation The first floor is not currently let and there is scope for The Housing Market Renewal creating a variety of different Initiative and the types of user space. complementary funding it

attracts for non housing Report (b) Modern use & related projects provides an employment-The mill has opportunity to tackle these been used for a wide range problems and the AAP of uses and its potential is in preferred option should line with the key issue of consider the area and Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke “preparing for a changing surrounding areas as a whole Bar economy” (5.3.2.p27 in order to achieve its

consultation sustainable regeneration. and report-Community Strategy) and the Vision objectives “To Heritage Appraisals have Stoneyholme seek to ensure the been produced for each AAP development and re-use of area in order to ensure that buildings that can meet the historic character of each different needs over time area is not lost however, the and that minimise the use of significance of individual Area resources” Commercially buildings must be balanced the mill offers versatile against the need to create a Action space for small or large well-planned and sustainable neighbourhood.

businesses at a significantly Plan Burnley lower cost than newly built The Council has an units. Some 45 people work - on the premises in this half. established property advice Consultation

Borough The mill is close to the M65 team in place to help

and to Burnley town centre. businesses find suitable new

It is very much integrated premises to meet their needs and to deal with relocation

Council into Elm Street Business Park in that a major issues. Report occupant of Elm St Mill north 529 530 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

has their centre of The conflict between business Stoneyholme operations less than a and residential uses has been quarter of a mile away in identified as a key issue in all another mill on the Business consultation exercises from Park. Elm St Mill south has both businesses and local

also been developed over residents. Access and parking Area the last 30 years where a problems were raised as

further 50 or so are particular issues. Action employed.

(c)Heritage value – also Plan important for aesthetic, -

architectural and historical Consultation reasons. It is now rare to come across a 19C redbrick mill with its multi-storey façade intact. The view

along Elm St is striking and Report there are many interesting features. Consultation report 5.4.2 p28. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke (d)Arguments against Bar demolition-Would involve

massive dislocation to and existing occupants and serious problems of Stoneyholme relocation. Costly & would result in considerable loss of employment in the area. Loss of economically priced units and destruction of Area successfully transformed building that has benefited Action from public grants. Would

be contrary to the AAP aims Plan Burnley 5.4.3. One argument

advanced for the Mill’s - demolition is that Elm Street Consultation

Borough should be widened to

improve access to the

remainder of the Business

Council Park – a costly exercise for a road widening as there Report would appear to be the 531 532 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

potential for good access to Stoneyholme the middle of the Business Park down Old Hall Street, a wide approach with good turning space into both Elm

and Abel St. See Option 1 Area link between Abel St and

Colne Road via Lee St. Action

2. Elm Street Mill should provide the nucleus for an Plan expansion of employment in -

the area. Consultation

It cannot be sufficiently stressed that a high level of employment is the key to a

socially cohesive and Report well-adjusted community. High employment leads to better public health and greater personal fulfillment to maintaining the motivation Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke of the young in education Bar training and to reducing

levels of crime, anti-social and behaviour, drug use and other social ills. Local Stoneyholme employment has the additional advantages of allowing easy access to work full-time or part-time and cutting down on travel Area and transport. Action In Area 8 there is an existing employment nucleus from Plan

Burnley which to expand. I

understand this expansion - would be through a suitable Consultation

Borough combination of new units

and different kinds of work

and/or live/work space which

have yet to be formulated. I Council would therefore argue in Report favour of Option 1 provided 533 534 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

this involved the retention of Stoneyholme Elm Street Mill. This option gives scope for employment and retail development. It also offers the prospect of a

neighbourhood park which Area could be a valuable

amenity. It appears to be in Action line with objective number 8 of 5.4.3. To foster economic growth within a diverse and Plan modern local economy and -

improve access to Consultation employment opportunities

The AAP is a marvelous opportunity to regenerate the

housing stock and to boost Report the area economically. A dynamic expansion of employment in Area 8 could be crucial to the plan as a whole. Elm Street Mill has Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke already played a pioneering Bar role in the development of

industrial units and seeks to and do so in the future. The former northlight sheds are Stoneyholme centres of industry, enterprise and employment. The multi-storey section of the Mill is of architectural and historical importance as Area well as being of good practical value. For all these Action reasons I would ask that Elm

Street Mill be considered as Plan Burnley a positive asset and should

not be considered for - demolition. Consultation Borough

Council Report 535 536 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

197/DS/521-Barton Willmore Heritage Appraisals have In part The preferred option should Stoneyholme for Mr. D. Melland been produced for each AAP consider the area in order to ensure that recommendations of the Opposes this option in the historic character of each Daneshouse, Duke Bar and relation to Elm Street Mill area is not lost however, the Stoneyholme heritage

which should be retained as significance of individual appraisal. Area it fits with the vision at 5.4.2. buildings must be balanced The Preferred Option should

(local heritage will be valued against the need to create a take a balanced and Action and enhanced. Mr. Melland well-planned and sustainable sustainable approach to and his family have owned neighbourhood. regeneration, address the the mill since it was Policy EW6/1 Elm Street, concerns of local businesses Plan constructed by his great Daneshouse Economic and include policies and -

grandfather in 1884. Mr. Improvement Area - initiatives which reinforce and Consultation Melland now owns only the recognises that older develop Local Plan Policy northern part having the sold buildings can provide valuable EW6/1 - Elm Street, the remainder in 1971. low cost floorspace for local Daneshouse Economic businesses. However, Improvement Area -

This northern part employs inadequate access identifying key actions Report 50 people & recently Saco arrangements; buildings in required and forming the have leased additional poor condition; and low basis for funding bids. space and employ about 40 environmental quality people. constrain attractiveness for Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The mill forms part of the employers in the 21st century Bar established Elm St Business and can have detrimental

Park. Retention of the mill effects on local residents. and for employment is therefore Parts of Elm Street Mill have important and would accord been vacant for several years Stoneyholme with the objectives of the and the mill has been divided AAP in para 5.4.3. into 3 ownerships and further especially “to seek to subdivided into smaller units. ensure that the development Although parts of the mill and re-use of buildings that have been improved some Area can meet different needs sections of the mill are in poor over time, and that minimise and , in places, hazardous Action the use of resources”. condition. One of the three

divisions has an off street Plan Burnley The Heritage Appraisal parking, manoeuvring and

identified the mill chimney as service area the other 2 parts - a landmark feature and are serviced from narrow Consultation

Borough Section 2.1 of the AAP adjoining streets with no

identifies the loss of historic parking or manoeuvring

character through clearance provision.

as an issue. The façade of Council the building is also intact and Report very striking 537 538 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Additional comments Housing and environmental Stoneyholme received 18th September conditions in this area of north 2007. Access to and from Daneshouse, with a high Elm Street Business Park degree of vacancy, can occasionally be abandonment, previously

problematic due to the long cleared sites, unfit properties Area traffic light junction at and conflict between

Hebrew Rd/Colne Rd residential and industrial Action causing traffic to back up uses, are some of the worst and block the roundabout at in the area and the Borough. Hebrew Rd/Abel Plan St/Daneshouse Road. It The Housing Market Renewal -

appears that this could Initiative and the Consultation potentially be solved by complementary funding it improving traffic flow on attracts for non housing Colne Road by street related projects provides an widening on Hebrew Road opportunity to tackle these

(which has wide problems and the AAP Report pavements), changing traffic preferred option should light priorities or by consider the area and introducing a roundabout at surrounding areas as a whole this junction instead. in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Access via Elm St would The need for additional car Bar seem to be impractical due parking as well as better

to its narrowness and access has been raised by and proximity to the constraint of many of the business the canal bridge on Colne consultees. Stoneyholme Road. Densely packed terraced housing further constrains the ability to improve traffic flow by road widening. In addition, Area industrial traffic would struggle turning into the Action narrow roads. Plan

Burnley A strength of the area is that

it is well catered for in terms - of car parking, with public Consultation

Borough car parks on Elm Street,

Travis Street and on Old Hall

Street. There are also a

number of private car parks. Council The area is sufficiently Report catered for in terms of car 539 540 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

parking and no further Stoneyholme parking should be sought in the area. Instead the Council should endeavour to promote sustainable modes

of travel to and from this Area employment area. On a

separate note we believe Action that there may be some concern about the safety of Elm Street, west of Elm Plan Street Mill, due to its -

narrowness. In this Consultation instance, we urge the Council to seek improvement to street lighting along Elm Street. Report Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 194/DS/516-Adele Stephens Unclear what "the growing No Bar trend and the economy"

Agrees with this option, relates to. and stating Accommodate the growing trend and the Housing and environmental Stoneyholme economy conditions in this area of north Daneshouse, with a high degree of vacancy, abandonment, previously

cleared sites, unfit properties Area and conflict between

residential and industrial Action uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Plan Burnley The Housing Market Renewal -

Initiative and the Consultation

Borough complementary funding it

attracts for non housing

related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these Council problems and the AAP Report preferred option should 541 542 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

consider the area and Stoneyholme surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Other Options? Area

05/DS/29-Ralph Woolnough Agree Yes The preferred option should Action consider policies and Area 8 more punishment for initiatives which address flytipping, more cctv, more environmental, social and Plan pedestrianisation and public safety issues raised. -

transport. Consultation

10/DS/34-Sandra Parker Agree although other than in Yes The preferred option should very exceptional cases consider policies and Proposes Alleygating, Elevate will not fund initiatives which address face-lifting and more improvements to properties environmental, social and Report cleaning up including back beyond facelifting to key safety issues raised. streets. gateway locations. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 11/DS/35-Carol Steele Other than in very exceptional Yes The preferred option should Bar cases Elevate will not fund consider policies and

Disagrees with certain improvements to properties initiatives which address and options including ones beyond facelifting to key environmental, social and keeping properties. gateway locations. safety issues raised. Stoneyholme Proposes face-lifting, alleygating, demolition of derelict houses and clean-up of dumped rubbish. Area

14/DS/38-Julie E Mackey Properties on Rectory Road Yes The preferred option should Action have not been upgraded: they consider policies and Upgrade properties as in are within an area designated initiatives which address

Rectory Road. Also for Employment and Work in environmental, social and Plan Burnley suggests alleygating, the adopted Burnley Local safety issues raised.

children friendly streets, Plan (EW1/5). - more police, community Consultation Borough activities and encourage

more multi-cultural activities. Council Report 543 544 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

45 & 55/DS/169 & 232-Peter Housing and environmental In part The preferred option should Stoneyholme Salts conditions in this area of north consider the Daneshouse, with a high recommendations of the Clegg Street is part of degree of vacancy, Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Burnley’s history- should be abandonment, previously Stoneyholme Heritage

retained and improved- red cleared sites, unfit properties Appraisal. Area brick terraces linked to Old and conflict between

Hall Mill. More should be residential and industrial The Preferred Option should Action made of the history of the uses, are some of the worst consider policies/initiatives area eg. Textile museum in the area and the Borough. that would enable existing –Burnley’s history. Also residents to remain in the Plan suggests facelifting or The Housing Market Renewal area. -

remodelling as a priority Initiative and the Consultation option for Areas 7 & 8 as this complementary funding it would enable no moving of attracts for non housing the local residents as related projects provides an majority are reluctant to opportunity to tackle these

move. Lived in house for problems and the AAP Report over 50 years and can’t preferred option should afford to move and can do consider the area and without the stress. surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Other than in very exceptional Bar cases Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties and beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Stoneyholme

Heritage Appraisals have been produced for each AAP area in order to ensure that

the historic character of each Area area is not lost however, the

significance of individual Action buildings must be balanced against the need to create a Plan

Burnley well-planned and sustainable

neighbourhood. - Consultation

Borough Affordability is a key issue

and the Council has an

Affordable Housing Policy and

is working with partners to Council provide a range of options for Report affordable rent and purchase 545 546 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

to meet housing need and an Stoneyholme established advice team in place to help householders find suitable new homes to meet a wide range of needs Area 56/DS/233-Uzma Noreen Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north consider policies/initiatives Action Instead of making major Daneshouse, with a high that would enable existing changes to improve the area degree of vacancy, residents to remain in the Plan (ie. Building new housing) abandonment, previously area.

more buildings and homes cleared sites, unfit properties - need facelifting. This will and conflict between Consultation cost less and improve the residential and industrial area image as well as uses, are some of the worst keeping the local residents in the area and the Borough. happy. Also suggests facelifting or remodelling as The Housing Market Renewal Report a priority option for Areas 7 Initiative and the & 8 as some of the houses complementary funding it look untidy. Remodelling attracts for non housing and facelifting will enable the related projects provides an local people or residents to opportunity to tackle these Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke stay put as most do not want problems and the AAP Bar to move or go through the preferred option should

stress of finding a new consider the area and and property which are not surrounding areas as a whole cheap. Most of us cannot in order to achieve its Stoneyholme afford to move. sustainable regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties Area beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. Action

Affordability is a key issue Plan

Burnley and the Council has an

Affordable Housing Policy and -

is working with partners to Consultation

Borough provide a range of options for

affordable rent and purchase to meet housing need and an established advice team in Council Report 547 548 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

place to help householders Stoneyholme find suitable new homes to meet a wide range of needs

110/DS/306-Alasdair Noted Yes The preferred option should Simpson consider these suggested Area routes and links. LCC Senior Cycling Officer Action

Suggests some quiet road cycle links along Elm St & Plan Abel St (north/south) and -

Lee St & Old Hall Street Consultation (east west) where safe crossing points of Colne Road would be important. - see plan for wider links. Possibly even a north south Report road through the area leading to Thursby Gardens involving a new bridge across the canal. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke LCC would like to get a Bar continuous cycle route up

Colne Road. Colne Rd is a and mixed use street– various councils such as Crewe & Stoneyholme Hull have carried out schemes on mixed used streets that might be worthwhile considering. Area

114/DS/322 & 115/DS/323- The high density traditional Yes The Preferred Option should Action B A Khan terraced streets with no consider the requirements for private garden areas are providing sustainable open Would like to see more play considered to be one of the space and play areas for a Plan Burnley areas for kids. contributory factors to low range of age groups in

housing demand. The accordance with National, Consultation Housing Market Renewal Regional and Local policies Borough Initiative provides and

opportunity to make better provision for open space and Council Report play. 549 550 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

120/DS/352- Mr & Mrs Syed Housing and environmental No Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north Would like to see Clegg Daneshouse, with a high Street face lifted. Would be degree of vacancy, ideal to have some terraced abandonment, previously

properties face-lifted. cleared sites, unfit properties Area and conflict between

residential and industrial Action uses, are some of the worst in the area and the Borough. Plan The Housing Market Renewal -

Initiative and the Consultation complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

Road) Duke Other than in very exceptional Bar cases Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties and beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Stoneyholme

121/DS/356-Ejaz Hussain Lack of car parking for is an Yes The Preferred Option should issue but should be balanced take a balanced and Would like to suggest car

with the need to encourage sustainable approach to Area parking on land adjacent to other modes of transport and regeneration and consider the Mosque on Grey Street. The

sustainability issues. parking requirements of Action stretch of land is not differing users in accordance currently in use and is with Local Plan Policies.

vulnerable to crime and Plan Burnley graffiti.

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 551 552 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

122/DS/359-Gren Logue Poor access, manoeuvring Yes The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme (Saco ltd) space is an issue raised by consider access and traffic many consultees. movement to, from and within No turning circle proposed An investigation into providing the employment area. on Option 1 for heavy good unrestricted access/egress at

vehicular traffic on Elm St. Junction 10 of the M65 has Area Poor access to M65-West revealed that it is not feasible

direction. because of the close Action proximity of Junction 11.

126/DS/366-Mohammed Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Plan Bilal conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to - Consultation If you really care about the degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods area and its multi-cultural abandonment, previously through redevelopment community and want to build cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses on the good work we started and conflict between and should consider a decade ago by enhancing

residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Report it with schemes such as uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to Homezones and Facelifting in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. and Remodelling we’ll consider talking, until then Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Bar maps as you like but we are Initiative and the

staying. complementary funding it and attracts for non housing related projects provides an Stoneyholme opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, Area in a balanced way in order to achieve its sustainable Action regeneration. Plan

Burnley Other than in very exceptional

cases Elevate will not fund - improvements to properties Consultation

Borough beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. Council Report 553 554 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

127/DS/367-M. Kamran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment

on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider

it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Action Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. consider talking, until then Plan you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal -

maps as you like but we are Initiative and the Consultation staying. complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

problems and the AAP Report preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke in a balanced way in order to Bar achieve its sustainable

regeneration. and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 128/DS/368-M. Zafran Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should

conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Action If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment Plan Burnley on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing - and conflict between and should consider Consultation it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Borough

Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area.

consider talking, until then Council

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Report maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it 555 556 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

attracts for non housing Stoneyholme related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should

consider the area and Area surrounding areas as a whole,

in a balanced way in order to Action achieve its sustainable regeneration. Plan Other than in very exceptional -

cases Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. 129/DS/369-M. Suleman Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Report conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke it with schemes such as and conflict between and should consider Bar Homezones and Facelifting residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would

and Remodelling we’ll uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and consider talking, until then in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. you can colour as many Stoneyholme maps as you like but we are The Housing Market Renewal staying. Initiative and the complementary funding it attracts for non housing

related projects provides an Area opportunity to tackle these

problems and the AAP Action preferred option should consider the area and Plan

Burnley surrounding areas as a whole,

in a balanced way in order to -

achieve its sustainable Consultation

Borough regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund Council Report improvements to properties 557 558 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

beyond facelifting to key Stoneyholme gateway locations. 130/DS/370-Gulzar Begum Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Area community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Action a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider

it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Plan Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. - consider talking, until then Consultation you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it attracts for non housing Report related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke surrounding areas as a whole, Bar in a balanced way in order to

achieve its sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. Area

131/DS/371-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Action conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan Burnley community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment

on the good work we started - cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Consultation a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider Borough

it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would

Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. Council Report consider talking, until then 559 560 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these Area problems and the AAP

preferred option should Action consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, in a balanced way in order to Plan achieve its sustainable -

regeneration. Consultation

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties

beyond facelifting to key Report gateway locations. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke 132/DS/372-Sultan Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Bar conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to and area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment Stoneyholme on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. Area consider talking, until then

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Action maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, Council Report 561 562 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

in a balanced way in order to Stoneyholme achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional

cases Elevate will not fund Area improvements to properties

beyond facelifting to key Action gateway locations.

133/DS/373-Mohd Ramzan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Plan conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to - area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Consultation community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Report Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. consider talking, until then you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke attracts for non housing Bar related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these and problems and the AAP preferred option should Stoneyholme consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, in a balanced way in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area

Other than in very exceptional Action cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties Plan

Burnley beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. - Consultation 134/DS/374-M. Arshad Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Borough

conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to

area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Council

community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment Report on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing 563 564 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

it with schemes such as and conflict between and should consider Stoneyholme Homezones and Facelifting residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would and Remodelling we’ll uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to consider talking, until then in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. you can colour as many

maps as you like but we are The Housing Market Renewal Area staying. Initiative and the

complementary funding it Action attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Plan problems and the AAP -

preferred option should Consultation consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, in a balanced way in order to achieve its sustainable

regeneration. Report

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke beyond facelifting to key Bar gateway locations. and 135/DS/375-Mrs. P. Roberts Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should

conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Stoneyholme If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses

a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider Area it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would

Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to Action and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. consider talking, until then you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Plan Burnley maps as you like but we are Initiative and the -

staying. complementary funding it Consultation

attracts for non housing Borough

related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these

problems and the AAP Council

preferred option should Report consider the area and 565 566 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

surrounding areas as a whole, Stoneyholme in a balanced way in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional Area cases Elevate will not fund

improvements to properties Action beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Plan 136/DS/376-Mr. C. Howard Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should

conditions in this area of north take a balanced and - If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to Consultation area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider Report it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. consider talking, until then Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Bar maps as you like but we are Initiative and the

Burnley Other than in very exceptional

cases Elevate will not fund - improvements to properties Consultation

Borough beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. Council Report 567 568 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

137/DS/377-Mrs. S. Akntar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment

on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Area a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider

maps as you like but we are Initiative and the Consultation staying. complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these

Road) Duke in a balanced way in order to Bar achieve its sustainable

regeneration. and

Other than in very exceptional Stoneyholme cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 138/DS/378-Nadeem Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should

Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

and Remodelling we’ll in the area and the Borough. remain in the area.

consider talking, until then Council

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Report maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it 569 570 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

attracts for non housing Stoneyholme related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option should

consider the area and Area surrounding areas as a whole,

in a balanced way in order to Action achieve its sustainable regeneration. Plan Other than in very exceptional -

cases Elevate will not fund Consultation improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. 139/DS/379-Afzal Iqbal Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Report conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke it with schemes such as and conflict between and should consider Bar Homezones and Facelifting residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would

related projects provides an Area opportunity to tackle these

problems and the AAP Action preferred option should consider the area and Plan

Burnley surrounding areas as a whole,

in a balanced way in order to -

achieve its sustainable Consultation

Borough regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund Council Report improvements to properties 571 572 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

beyond facelifting to key Stoneyholme gateway locations. 140/DS/380-A. Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should conditions in this area of north take a balanced and If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Area community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Action a decade ago by enhancing and conflict between and should consider

it with schemes such as residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would Plan Homezones and Facelifting uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

Road) Duke surrounding areas as a whole, Bar in a balanced way in order to

achieve its sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. Area

141DS/381-Mohamid Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Action Hussain conditions in this area of north take a balanced and Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to If you really care about the degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Plan Burnley area and its Multi-cultural abandonment, previously through redevelopment community and want to build -

cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses Consultation

on the good work we started and conflict between and should consider Borough a decade ago by enhancing residential and industrial policies/initiatives that would

it with schemes such as uses, are some of the worst enable existing residents to

Homezones and Facelifting in the area and the Borough. remain in the area. Council

and Remodelling we’ll Report consider talking, until then 573 574 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an

opportunity to tackle these Area problems and the AAP

preferred option should Action consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, in a balanced way in order to Plan achieve its sustainable -

regeneration. Consultation

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties

Road) Duke 142DS/382-Abdul-Haq Mian Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Bar conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

you can colour as many The Housing Market Renewal Action maps as you like but we are Initiative and the staying. complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides an - opportunity to tackle these Consultation

Borough problems and the AAP

preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, Council Report 575 576 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

in a balanced way in order to Stoneyholme achieve its sustainable regeneration.

Other than in very exceptional

cases Elevate will not fund Area improvements to properties

beyond facelifting to key Action gateway locations.

143DS/383-Mr. Gulzar Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Plan conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

Road) Duke attracts for non housing Bar related projects provides an

Other than in very exceptional Action cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties Plan

Burnley beyond facelifting to key

gateway locations. - Consultation 144DS/384-A.Khan Housing and environmental In part The Preferred Option should Borough

conditions in this area of north take a balanced and

If you really care about the Daneshouse, with a high sustainable approach to

area and its Multi-cultural degree of vacancy, regenerating neighbourhoods Council

community and want to build abandonment, previously through redevelopment Report on the good work we started cleared sites, unfit properties /retention of existing houses a decade ago by enhancing 577 578 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

maps as you like but we are The Housing Market Renewal Area staying. Initiative and the

complementary funding it Action attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these Plan problems and the AAP -

preferred option should Consultation consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole, in a balanced way in order to achieve its sustainable

regeneration. Report

Road) Duke beyond facelifting to key Bar gateway locations. and 150/DS/412-S. Sinniors, Isis This problem and high speed Yes The preferred option should

Mortgages & Finance joy riding along Elm Street is investigate the potential for Stoneyholme being tackled through various tackling known safety, There is increasing initiatives and the Housing security and anti-social anti-social behaviour in late Market Renewal Initiative and behaviour issues within wider evening at the car park the complementary funding it regeneration proposals.

facing Northbridge House attracts for non housing Area area – put in CCTV if related projects provides an

possible. opportunity to tackle these Action problems more comprehensively within the Plan

Burnley wider regeneration proposals.

152/DS/414-Jack Crabtree, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should - Consultation Discount Signs parking and better access has address the concerns of local

Borough been raised by many of the businesses and include

Suggests improved parking business consultees. policies and initiatives which

and Access should be reinforce and develop Local

Council provided over next ten Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm Report years. Street, Daneshouse Economic Improvement Area 579 580 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

- identifying key actions Stoneyholme required and forming the basis for funding bids. 153/DS/415-G. Gresham, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should George Wilkinson (Burnley) parking and better access has address the concerns of local Ltd. been raised by many of the businesses and include Area business consultees. policies and initiatives which Suggests improved access reinforce and develop Local Action and parking for businesses Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm

need to be provided over Street, Daneshouse Plan next ten years. Economic Improvement Area

- identifying key actions - Consultation required and forming the basis for funding bids. 156/DS/418-Ian Rhodes, The need for additional car Yes The Preferred Option should Rhodes Technical Services parking, better access and address the concerns of local through traffic has been businesses and include Report Through traffic needs to be raised by many of the policies and initiatives which considered in all the options. business consultees. reinforce and develop Local Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm Street, Daneshouse Economic Improvement Area Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke - identifying key actions Bar required and forming the

basis for funding bids. and

158/DS/420-Hayley Housing and environmental Yes The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Maudsley, Elm Street conditions in this area of north address the concerns of local Business Park Association Daneshouse, with a high businesses and include degree of vacancy, policies and initiatives which Change access so there are abandonment, previously reinforce and develop Local

no roads which can be used cleared sites, unfit properties Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm Area for racing. Develop green and conflict between Street, Daneshouse

spaces into maintained residential and industrial Economic Improvement Area Action areas people actually want uses, are some of the worst - identifying key actions to spend time in rather than in the area and the Borough. required and forming the fly tipping areas. Extend Plan Burnley basis for funding bids. planting and improve image The Housing Market Renewal -

of area by stopping flytipping Initiative and the Consultation and emptying bins. complementary funding it Borough

attracts for non housing

Expansion and better related projects provides an

identity for the Business opportunity to tackle these Council

Park is considered of prime problems and the AAP Report importance. In order for the preferred option should Business Park to expand 581 582 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

and exist alongside the consider the area and Stoneyholme proposed new housing and surrounding areas as a whole shopping areas it will be in order to achieve its necessary to allocate sustainable regeneration. sufficient areas of land to

provide adequate access, The need for additional car Area parking and scope for parking, better access and

expansion of existing through traffic has been Action businesses along with raised by many of the introduction of new business consult. industries. Plan Local Plan Policy EW6/1 Elm

Street, Daneshouse - Along with option 1 suitable Consultation signage giving directions to Economic Improvement Area the area and more details of recognises the potential of the Business Park at close this area to contribute to the range. Improved street diversification of the

lighting and traffic control Borough's economy. Report measures will address concerns of female employees who are nervous at travelling into the area at quiet times. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Extension of the existing Bar employment area

northwards along Elm Street and would provide an opportunity to create a designed turning Stoneyholme circle route for the many large vehicles that now visit the Business Park, at the same time forming an island site for development of “tin Area shed” industrial units and associated on the present Action Whalley St/Milner St sites.

This route would also Plan Burnley service the existing bed

manufactures at the New - Hall St and of Elm St - Plan Consultation

Borough 1 submitted with

comments.

Future use of the existing Council nursery site for additional car Report parking and open space 583 584 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

would be an asset for the Stoneyholme public with recreational use for walkers on the canalside and users of the suggested marina area (option1) Area The existing road layout with

sewers & surface water Action draining would be reused as a peripheral turning circle for large vehicles and service Plan road to the island industrial -

development site. Consultation

All existing infrastructure would be available for use by the new units, reducing

the development cost and Report limiting disruption of existing businesses. Other closed streets adjacent to the site could be used as a basis for parking areas, having the Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke benefit of existing road Bar foundations and surface

water drainage. (See and additional plan received 20.11.06 showing details Stoneyholme of suggested car parks off Old Hall St and Myers St)

The existing canal bridges

at Old Hall St/New Hall St Area together with the suggested

new railway bridge could Action with further works link Elm St with the existing Hubie Plan

Burnley Street access onto Princess

Way/M65. (See Plan 2 - provided) This would be an Consultation

Borough excellent improvement for all

sectors and also solve

many problems in

separating traffic flow from Council the residential Brougham Report Street area, where many 585 586 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

difficulties have been Stoneyholme experienced. Improvements of this scale would transform the access and prestige of the Elm St Business Park

and greatly enhance the Area proposed residential

redevelopment of the Action surrounding area.

The Association believe that Plan the most useful and central -

position both before and Consultation after expansion of the Business Park would be on the area bounded by Elm St/Travis St/Old Hall Street

and the Chai Centre. This Report car park cold be linked to the current Elm Street car park. A further entrance/exit would lead on to Old Hall Street. In addition, the Chai Centre Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke car park could be merged Bar with the current Elm Street

Car park. and

The association believe that Stoneyholme whilst currently employment levels in the Business Park have been buoyant in the order of 1,000 jobs, there is

definite room for expansion Area given the right opportunities

and environment which the Action above recommendations will enable. Plan Burnley

159/DS/421-Sara Bradrock, Burnley Action Partnership's Yes The preferred option should - Consultation The Prince’s Trust vision is for ".... A Burnley that consider the area and Borough will become a place with a surrounding areas as a whole

Take whatever steps diverse and united in order to achieve its necessary to encourage community..." sustainable regeneration.

Council cultural integration and Report 587 588 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

community cohesion. Do The Housing Market Renewal Stoneyholme whatever you are legally Initiative and the able to prevent the BNP complementary funding it from advertising on attracts for non housing buildings. Give people back related projects provides an

their self respect and pride. opportunity to tackle problems Area and encourage further

Without a doubt housing is investment. Action the priority for investment. You can encourage investment and thus Plan employment but only -

financial investment will Consultation solve the dreadful state of housing in this area.

161/DS/430-Judith Agree In part The Preferred Option will Furlonger, Development consider all parts of the Report Manager, Elevate Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme AAP area Areas 7 & 8 need to be together and also the other considered together. There four Area Action Plans which are elements within these are being prepared. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke options which could be The Area Action Plan process Bar supported but likewise will examine the deliverability

elements which may not be of all proposals and the and deliverable unless funding availability of a range of from other sources rather funding sources. Stoneyholme than HMR can be found. EP funding is being sought for We would support the gap funding for new housing business activity focused on in the adjoining area 7 and

the Northbridge House, Elm for complementary works in Area Street area of Daneshouse, the wider area, including

developing the business improvements to Elm Street Action centre further. Further future Business Park, improvements expansion of the businesses to the public realm and green Plan

Burnley in this area needs to be routes through the area.

considered. Consideration - of how Elm Street can be In order to create the Consultation

Borough improved to provide further transformational and

parking for business users sustainable change to

would appear a reasonable overcome severe market

response. failure the Preferred Option Council should create redevelopment Report sites which can provide new 589 590 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

However there needs to be employment uses and a Stoneyholme a more detailed analysis of range of house types, sizes the area bounded by Hurtley and tenure. The need for a St and Old Hall St. There Development Brief in order are several important to achieve a well planned

buildings of historical merit area where residential and Area within this area, North Street employment uses can thrive

Mosque and other without conflict should be Action community buildings should considered. be retained. Improvements to the public realm and The Preferred Option should Plan potential green routes consider the area bounded by -

through could enhance and Hurtley St and Old Hall Street Consultation consolidate this historic and the retention of existing core. Retention of the houses to provide existing stock could provide accommodation for residents alternative accommodation who wish to remain in a

for residents in the clearance traditional terraced home and Report areas who wish to remain in assess the need for a range the area. Before further of open spaces and the comprehensive better use of existing facilities. redevelopment is considered Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke further evidence of Heritage Appraisals have Bar alternative options would been produced for each AAP

need to be produced. The area in order to ensure that and development of infill sites the historic character of each would however be area is not lost and the Stoneyholme supported. Preferred Option should consider the significance of A further analysis of open individual and groups of space and provision through buildings and balance them the area needs to be against the need to create a Area considered given potential well-planned and sustainable better utilisation of the neighbourhood. Action running track and new provision associated with Plan

Burnley Burnley Campus.

- Consultation 162/DS/433-Chapman EP funding is being sought for In part In order to create the

Borough Robinson Architects for gap funding (the exemplar transformational and Gleesons scheme) for new housing in sustainable change to the adjoining area 7 and for overcome severe market Council Report 591 592 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Part of this area (the complementary works in the failure the Preferred Option Stoneyholme retained housing stock) is wider area, including should create redevelopment included in the exemplar improvements to Elm Street sites which can provide new regeneration scheme. Business Park, improvements employment uses and a to the public realm and green range of house types, sizes

The existing housing stock routes through the area. and tenure. The need for a Area within the Nicholl St area is Development Brief in order

generally well maintained Discussions have taken place to achieve a well planned Action and will be retained. Some with the partner RSL about area where residential and facelifting may be carried out the potential for employment uses can thrive by our RSL partner. They improvements to properties without conflict should be Plan will also provide new bounded by Old Hall Street considered. -

housing on vacant infill sites, and Hurtley Street. Consultation generally as a stop end to The Preferred Option should existing terraces. Great Several consultees have also consider the retention places will also develop the expressed a desire for self and improvement of the area site adjacent to the Chai build sites but without defining bounded by Hurtley St and

Centre. They will purchase the term self build which can Old Hall Street. Report void properties to carry out cover a range of types. re-modelling and lateral conversion to create some larger houses. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke The possibility of allocating Bar a site for a self-build scheme

will be investigated in this and area. Stoneyholme Nicholl St is to be upgraded as a high quality landscaped pedestrian priority street incorporating homezone

principles. Area

The Business District will be Action clearly defined. A buffer zone of green space will Plan

Burnley provide a visual and physical

barrier between it and the -

residential areas. Consultation Borough

A dedicated HGV route will serve the industrial units, via Hebrew Road from Colne Council Report 593 594 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

Road and new turning an Stoneyholme loading facilities will be provided.

Improved access will be

provided to the Chai centre Area with greater presence within

the Business District. Action

A much larger, well planned

car park will be created to Plan serve the Business District.

This will be attractively laid - Consultation out and landscaped. Smaller industrial units and start-up units will replace Elm St mill as demand

increases. Report

Frontage improvements are proposed for the shops on Colne Road. Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Some redevelopment will Bar replace inappropriate and

worn out housing stock. and Stoneyholme 176/DS/462-Mareya Although Elevate funding Yes Subject to funding being Manawar policy supports facelifting to available the Preferred Option residential properties along should consider facelifting to Would like to see properties main through routes some non-residential properties along Colne Road (block

properties along this section along main through routes. Area including 46) facelifted of Colne Road are not complementing the

residential. The EP exemplar Action properties already done project may provide funding across the road. for this type of improvement. Plan Burnley 191/DS/509 – Anvic The Elm Street Nursery site Yes The long term use of the Elm -

Developments which will be vacated by Street Nursery School site Consultation

Borough Lancashire County Council should be considered as part

Proposes that to alleviate provides an opportunity to of the wider regeneration

the car parking shortage the integrate its redevelopment proposals for this area.

company acquire part of the into the proposals for the Council Elm Street Nursery Site a wider area. Report car park extension to the 595 596 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option

Borough (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option?

St/The Duke Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Council Road/ Hebrew Bar Road/Colne

Road) and

existing car park at The location of the school on Stoneyholme Northbridge car park to a key access route to the provide an additional 31 canal where there is potential spaces. It is suggested that to widen and green the the remainder of the site is routeway and canalside

developed for a seating/car should inform the Preferred Area park spaces for visitors who Option along with its potential

want to fish or walk along for use in conjunction with the Action the canal bank. A detailed Elm Street Business Park. plan of the car park is provided. Plan - 197/DS/521 - Barton The need for better access Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation Willmore for Mr. David and through traffic has been address the concerns of local Melland raised by many of the businesses and include consultees. policies and initiatives which Additional Comments reinforce and develop Local Report Received 18th Sept. 2007. Plan Policy EW6/1 - Elm Street, Daneshouse Suggests an additional Economic Improvement Area option to improve access to - identifying key actions the Elm Street Business Area 8 – Central Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Daneshouse on Preferred Option (Bounded by Preferred Hurtley St/Elm Option? Daneshouse, St/The Canal/Daneshouse Y/N Road/ Hebrew Road/Colne

Road) Duke Park - to create a new, required and forming the Bar straighter access along Old basis for funding bids.

Hall Street from a new and junction (traffic lights or roundabout) on Colne Stoneyholme Road. Many of the houses at the eastern end of Old Hall Street are empty and some are derelict. The new junction with Colne Road Area could potentially run adjacent to the Wheatsheaf Action Public House. Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 597 598 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.10 Area 9

Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred

Borough Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred

Rd/The Canal/ Option? Duke

Council Walshaw

Street/Colne Y/N Bar Rd/Hebrew Road and Option 1 – Landscape Stoneyholme Improvements 46/DS/170-M. Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should Summerscales & A. agreement. This option balance the needs of this area,

Girvan proposes minimum which has seen significant Area intervention as this area improvement in the past, with Agree with this option has had significant those of other areas Action investment in housing improvement in the past. Plan 117/DS/344-Faber Agree No

Maunsell for Highways - Agency Consultation

Unlikely to have a material impact on traffic flows on the strategic highway network Report

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should Society agreement. This option balance the needs of this area, proposes minimum which has seen significant Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

Option 1 Yes intervention as this area improvement in the past, with Duke has had significant those of other areas investment in housing Bar improvement in the past. and 196/DS/520- Kevin Quinn Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should

agreement. This option balance the needs of this area, Stoneyholme Prefers this option and proposes minimum which has seen significant states that the land at the intervention as this area improvement in the past, with rear of the Church could has had significant those of other areas. become a Community investment in housing The Preferred Option should

Garden supported by the improvement in the past. consider the community use for Area Emmaus Community who Planning consent has been the land to the rear which is

hope to set up in the given for the Emmaus suggested for housing use in Action Church. The area could Community use of the option 3. be enclosed & open to all church and any request to during the day and closed Plan Burnley use the land at the rear in by night, avoiding connection with the use

anti-social behaviour. It would be considered on its Consultation would also provide an

Borough merits. area for holding a variety

of events for local communities and Council Report charities. 599 600 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 198/DS/522-George Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should and Almond given for the Emmaus consider the community use for

Community use of the the land to the rear which is Stoneyholme Emmaus, an international church and any request to suggested for housing use in charity for the homeless use the land at the rear in option 3. is proposing to purchase connection with the use the Burnley Road would be considered on its

Methodist Church and merits. Area would like to purchase or

lease part of the open Action ground at the rear of the church for car parking and delivery purposes. It Plan would also landscape and -

maintain the area to a Consultation high standard.

199/DS/523-Peter Pike Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Chair of Burnley Emmaus Community use of the the land to the rear which is Report Group church and any request to suggested for housing use in use the land at the rear in option 3. Considering purchase of connection with the use Burnley Lane Baptist would be considered on its Church to convert into a merits. Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

home for 24 homeless Duke people & for a furniture and electrical renovation Bar place to sell and recycle

old furniture. Next stage and to apply for outline planning permission & Stoneyholme carry out a feasibility study.

Group would wish to

acquire land at the rear to Area develop better vehicle

access and provide a Action garden/rest area for the residents which is drug Plan

Burnley and alcohol free. Although

it would be secured at - night, during daytime it Consultation

Borough would be open to use by

the local residents and community and to make it an asset to the area. Council Report 601 602 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 200/DS/524-S.Williams Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should and given for the Emmaus consider the community use for

Emmaus Burnley are Community use of the the land to the rear which is Stoneyholme hoping to acquire the church and any request to suggested for housing use in Baptist Church to use the land at the rear in option 3. establish a self supporting connection with the use community for around 25 would be considered on its

formerly homeless people merits. Area (Companions). They will

live and work in the Action project supporting themselves through the operation of a successful Plan second-hand furniture and -

household goods Consultation business. Emmaus would like to lease or purchase ground immediately behind the Church, partly

for the business and partly Report as a garden for Companions and local residents. This would put the land into effective use as a local community Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

facility. The gardens Duke would be secured at night to avoid anti-social Bar problems. and This land is needed to ensure the success of the Stoneyholme project which will also provide an excellent community resource in terms of selling affordable

furniture and household Area items, providing a café for

local people and perhaps Action even a training/meeting venue. Emmaus may also Plan

Burnley be interested in acquiring

some of the properties -

mentioned for renovation Consultation

Borough and use within the project.

201/DS/525-Matthew Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Council

Ravenscroft given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Report Community use of the the land to the rear which is 603 604 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar Emmaus would support church and any request to suggested for housing use in and any option which retains use the land at the rear in option 3.

the possibility of the land connection with the use Stoneyholme at the rear of the Church would be considered on its (off Brief Street) being merits. made available to augment the proposed

scheme for the use of the Area Church as a home for

previously homeless Action people.

Emmaus Burnley is an Plan emerging group affiliated -

to the national Emmaus Consultation body which provides a home and support in a group environment. Often ‘companions’ have been

living on the streets, may Report have had drug/alcohol problems or be ex-offenders and lost confidence as well as their homes. Emmaus Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

provides and environment Duke where companions have a purpose-working in the Bar recycled furniture

business, the café or and workshop for example, and also have their own Stoneyholme self-contained accommodation with the scheme. The aims of an Emmaus scheme is to be financially self-sufficient, Area service a local community with recycled furniture, Action white goods etc., provide

other services such as a Plan Burnley café. -

Emmaus Burnley Consultation

Borough identified the Baptist

Chapel, Colne Road as a

potential site and has

been offered a 6 month Council option to purchase. The Report site would provide the 605 606 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar space for living and accommodation, kitchens

and café, workshop and Stoneyholme salesroom space.

The scheme would benefit the local community by

providing good quality Area recycled furniture and

other goods at affordable Action prices to local people. This can help those on low incomes to avoid Plan expensive loans. There -

will also be a café open to Consultation local people.

A key aspect of being able to progress the scheme

on this site is the land at Report the rear of the Chapel being made available to Emmaus Burnley, partly for car/van parking and loading/unloading. A Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

garden area will also be Duke needed and it is proposed that if the land could be Bar made available through

sale or other means the and garden area would be made open to local people Stoneyholme too. Emmaus would maintain the area and ensure its availability (perhaps in daylight hours only) to local people. Area CCTV could be provided if this was felt necessary. Action

Emmaus Burnley project Plan

Burnley has a commitment to

adding value and helping - local partners achieve Consultation

Borough their strategic priorities.

This sustainable project

will help reduce

homelessness, reduce Council pressure on health and Report social services, promote 607 608 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar community safety and and create a small,

self-sufficient, sustainable Stoneyholme community which will provide services to a deprived area.

There is also a Area commitment to local

people. The project will Action use renewable energy where possible and recycle goods for sale at Plan low prices. We would like -

to extend this to look at Consultation providing a garden or open space for local people to share with companions. Report

Option 2 – Development of Cleared Sites Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

46/DS/170-M. Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should Duke Summerscales & A. agreement. This option balance the needs of this area, Girvan proposes minimal which has seen significant Bar intervention for improvement in the past, with

Agree with this option improvement and those of other areas and development of small cleared sites. This area has Stoneyholme had significant investment in housing improvement in the past.

117/DS/344-Faber Noted No Area Maunsell for Highways

Agency Action

Unlikely to have a material impact on traffic flows on Plan Burnley

the strategic highway -

network Consultation Borough

Council Report 609 610 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are and Planning and being prepared at the same time

Environmental Services It is important that housing so that housing numbers and Stoneyholme land supply is managed in the mix of type, size and tenure Policy 13 of the JLSP a way that does not can be managed more allows for the replacement undermine the Housing strategically. of cleared dwellings on up Market Renewal Initiative

to a one for one basis. Area Additional dwellings in

excess of one for one will Action be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Plan - 198/DS/522-George Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation Almond given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is Emmaus, an international church and any request to suggested for housing use in charity for the homeless use the land at the rear in option 3. is proposing to purchase connection with the use Report the Burnley Road would be considered on its Methodist Church and merits. would like to purchase or lease part of the open ground at the rear of the Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

church for car parking and Duke delivery purposes. It would also landscape and Bar maintain the area to a

high standard. and Stoneyholme 200/DS/524-S.Williams This option does not Yes The Preferred Option should propose clearance of consider the community use for Would prefer to see existing houses. the land to the rear which is existing housing bring Planning consent has been suggested for housing use in brought back into use and

given for the Emmaus option 3. Area for the land at the rear of Community use of the the church to be used in

church and any request to Action connection with Emmaus use the land at the rear in proposed use of the connection with the use church as detailed in would be considered on its Plan Burnley option 1. merits. - Consultation

Borough 201/DS/525-Matthew Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Ravenscroft given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is Emmaus would support church and any request to suggested for housing use in Council

any option which retains use the land at the rear in option 3. Report

the possibility of the land connection with the use 61 1 612 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar at the rear of the Church would be considered on its and (off Brief Street) being merits.

made available to Stoneyholme augment the proposed scheme for the use of the Church as a home for previously homeless

people. Area

Emmaus Burnley is an Action emerging group affiliated to the national Emmaus body which provides a Plan home and support in a -

group environment. Often Consultation ‘companions’ have been living on the streets, may have had drug/alcohol problems or be

ex-offenders and lost Report confidence as well as their homes. Emmaus provides and environment where companions have a purpose-working in the Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

recycled furniture Duke business, the café or workshop for example, Bar and also have their own

self-contained and accommodation with the scheme. The aims of an Stoneyholme Emmaus scheme is to be financially self-sufficent, service a local community with recycled furniture, white goods etc., provide Area other services such as a café. Action

Emmaus Burnley Plan

Burnley identified the Baptist

Chapel, Colne Road as a - potential site and has Consultation

Borough been offered a 6 month

option to purchase. The site would provide the space for living Council Report 613 614 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar accommodation, kitchens and and café, workshop and

salesroom space. Stoneyholme

The scheme would benefit the local community by providing good quality

recycled furniture and Area other goods at affordable

prices to local people. Action This can help those on low incomes to avoid expensive loans. There Plan will also be a café open to -

local people. Consultation

A key aspect of being able to progress the scheme on this site is the land at

the rear of the Chapel Report being made available to Emmaus Burnley, partly for car/van parking and loading/unloading. A garden area will also be Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

needed and it is proposed Duke that if the land could be made available through Bar sale or other means the

garden area would be and made open to local people too. Emmaus would Stoneyholme maintain the area and ensure its availability (perhaps in daylight hours only) to local people. CCTV could be provided Area if this was felt necessary. Action Emmaus Burnley project has a commitment to Plan

Burnley adding value and helping

local partners achieve - their strategic priorities. Consultation

Borough This sustainable project

will help reduce

homelessness, reduce

pressure on health and Council social services, promote Report community safety and 615 616 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar create a small, and self-sufficient, sustainable

community which will Stoneyholme provide services to a deprived area.

There is also a

commitment to local Area people. The project will

use renewable energy Action where possible and recycle goods for sale at low prices. We would like Plan to extend this to look at -

providing a garden or Consultation open space for local people to share with companions.

Option 3 – Report Development/ Redevelopment Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

01/DS/11-Denise Blake Outline planning permission No Duke has been give for a house Residents have been on this Lawn Street site. calling for demolition of Bar

building on Lawn St which and has caused problems for 10 years Stoneyholme

46/DS/170-M. Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should Summerscales & A. disagreement. This option balance the needs of this area, Girvan proposes Redevelopment which has seen significant Area and development of improvement in the past, with Disagree with this option existing cleared sites. those of other areas. Action This area has had significant investment in

housing improvement in the Plan Burnley past. - 113/DS/319-Harry Gives no reason for Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation

Borough Brennand agreement. This option balance the needs of this area,

proposes Redevelopment which has seen significant

Agrees with this option. and development of improvement in the past, with

existing cleared sites. those of other areas. Council This area has had Report significant investment in 617 618 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar housing improvement in the and past. Stoneyholme 117/DS/344-Faber Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for Highways consulted at all stages of the Agency AAP process and on any planning applications submitted. This option has the potential to result in traffic Area impacts on the strategic highway network. The Action Agency will need to be

consulted on the Plan proposals for this area in

order to consider the likely - traffic impact of the new Consultation housing development on the strategic highway network. The Agency would be keen to ensure Report that the site is designed in a sustainable manner to encourage access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle. Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

The site should be Duke developed wholly in accordance with PPS3, Bar Housing to ensure that the

site is not over developed and resulting in negative impacts in traffic terms on Stoneyholme the trunk road network.

Development should be in a manner to ensure the

need to travel is reduced Area ensuring that traffic impact

is minimised. Action Improvements in public transport should be Plan

Burnley proposed where

appropriate. - Consultation

Borough Assessment of the impact

of the development on the

trunk road network will

need to be undertaken in Council accordance with PPG13 Report and the relevant DoT 619 620 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar Policy including the and provision of adequate

Transport Assessment Stoneyholme and Travel Plan reports.

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are Planning and It is important that housing being prepared at the same time Environmental Services land supply is managed in so that housing numbers and Area a way that does not the mix of type, size and tenure Policy 13 of the JLSP undermine the Housing can be managed more Action allows for the replacement Market Renewal Initiative strategically. of cleared dwellings on up Plan to a one for one basis.

Additional dwellings in - excess of one for one will Consultation be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Report 198/DS/522-George Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Almond given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is church and any request to suggested for housing use. Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

Emmaus, an international use the land at the rear in Duke charity for the homeless connection with the use is proposing to purchase would be considered on its Bar the Burnley Road merits.

Methodist Church and and would like to purchase or lease part of the open Stoneyholme ground at the rear of the church for car parking and delivery purposes. It would also landscape and maintain the area to a Area high standard. Action

200/DS/524-S.Williams This option proposes that Yes The Preferred Option should two short terraced streets balance the needs of this area, Plan Burnley Would prefer to see and the adjoining open which has seen significant existing housing bring - space/ car park be improvement in the past, with Consultation brought back into use and redeveloped to provide new those of other areas. Borough

for the land at the rear of housing. It should also consider the

the church to be used in Planning Consent has been community use for the land to

connection with Emmaus given for the Emmaus the rear which is suggested for Council

proposed use of the Community use of the housing use. Report church as detailed in church and any request to option 1. 621 622 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar use the land at the rear in and connection with the use

would be considered on its Stoneyholme merits. 201/DS/525-Matthew Planning Consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Ravenscroft given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is Emmaus would support church and any request to suggested for housing use. Area any option which retains use the land at the rear in the possibility of the land connection with the use Action at the rear of the Church would be considered on its

(off Brief Street) being merits. Plan made available to

augment the proposed - scheme for the use of the Consultation Church as a home for previously homeless people.

Emmaus Burnley is an Report emerging group affiliated to the national Emmaus body which provides a home and support in a group environment. Often Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

‘companions’ have been Duke living on the streets, may have had drug/alcohol Bar problems or be

ex-offenders and lost and confidence as well as their homes. Emmaus Stoneyholme provides and environment where companions have a purpose-working in the recycled furniture business, the café or Area workshop for example, and also have their own Action self-contained

accommodation with the Plan Burnley scheme. The aims of an

Emmaus scheme is to be -

financially self-sufficient, Consultation

Borough service a local community

with recycled furniture, white goods etc., provide

Council other services such as a Report café. 623 624 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar Emmaus Burnley and identified the Baptist

Chapel, Colne Road as a Stoneyholme potential site and has been offered a 6 month option to purchase. The site would provide the

space for living Area accommodation, kitchens

and café, workshop and Action salesroom space.

The scheme would benefit Plan the local community by -

providing good quality Consultation recycled furniture and other goods at affordable prices to local people. This can help those on

low incomes to avoid Report expensive loans. There will also be a café open to local people. Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

A key aspect of being able Duke to progress the scheme on this site is the land at Bar the rear of the Chapel

being made available to and Emmaus Burnley, partly for car/van parking and Stoneyholme loading/unloading. A garden area will also be needed and it is proposed that if the land could be made available through Area sale or other means the garden area would be Action made open to local people

too. Emmaus would Plan Burnley maintain the area and

ensure its availability - (perhaps in daylight hours Consultation

Borough only) to local people.

CCTV could be provided if this was felt necessary. Council Report 625 626 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar Emmaus Burnley project and has a commitment to

adding value and helping Stoneyholme local partners achieve their strategic priorities. This sustainable project will help reduce

homelessness, reduce Area pressure on health and

social services, promote Action community safety and create a small, self-sufficient, sustainable Plan community which will -

provide services to a Consultation deprived area.

There is also a commitment to local

people. The project will Report use renewable energy where possible and recycle goods for sale at low prices. We would like to extend this to look at Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

providing a garden or Duke open space for local people to share with Bar companions. and

Option 4 – No 198/DS/522-George Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Stoneyholme Changes Almond given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is Emmaus, an international church and any request to suggested for housing use. charity for the homeless use the land at the rear in is proposing to purchase

connection with the use Area the Burnley Road would be considered on its Methodist Church and

merit. Action would like to purchase or lease part of the open

ground at the rear of the Plan Burnley church for car parking and

delivery purposes. It - Consultation would also landscape and

Borough maintain the area to a high standard. Council Report 627 628 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 199/DS/523-Peter Pike, Planning Consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should and Chair of Burnley Emmaus given for the Emmaus consider the community use for

Group Community use of the the land to the rear which is Stoneyholme church and any request to suggested for housing use. Considering purchase of use the land at the rear in Burnley Lane Baptist connection with the use Church to convert into a would be considered on its

home for 24 homeless merit. Area people & for a furniture

and electrical renovation Action place to sell and recycle old furniture. Next stage to apply for outline Plan planning permission & -

carry out a feasibility Consultation study.

Group would wish to acquire land at the rear to

develop better vehicle Report access and provide a garden/rest area for the residents which is drug and alcohol free. Although it would be secured at Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

night, during daytime it Duke would be open to use by the local residents and Bar community and to make it

an asset to the area. and

If Emmaus were able to Stoneyholme acquire land at the rear of the present Church it would enable them to:

1) acquire & Area maintain the present

3 chapel buildings Action 2) Help tackle genuine problem of Plan

Burnley homeless in Burnley in a positive way -

3) Improve the Consultation

Borough land & remove it from

the Council’s ongoing

revenue commitments to try Council Report and keep it 629 630 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar reasonably clear and and tidy. Stoneyholme 200/DS/524-S.Williams Planning consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Emmaus Burnley are Community use of the the land to the rear which is hoping to acquire the church and any request to suggested for housing use. Baptist Church to use the land at the rear in Area establish a self supporting connection with the use community for around 25 would be considered on its Action formerly homeless people merit. (Companions). They will

live and work in the Plan project supporting

themselves through the - operation of a successful Consultation second-hand furniture and household goods business. Emmaus would like to lease or purchase Report ground immediately behind the Church, partly for the business and partly as a garden for Companions and local Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

residents. This would put Duke the land into effective use as a local community Bar facility. The gardens

would be secured at night and to avoid anti-social problems. Stoneyholme

This land is needed to ensure the success of the project which will also

provide an excellent Area community resource in

terms of selling affordable Action furniture and household items, providing a café for Plan

Burnley local people and perhaps

even a training/meeting - venue. Emmaus may also Consultation

Borough be interested in acquiring

some of the properties mentioned for renovation and use within the project. Council Report 631 632 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 201/DS/525-Matthew Planning Consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should and Ravenscroft given for the Emmaus consider the community use for

Community use of the the land to the rear which is Stoneyholme Emmaus would support church and any request to suggested for housing use. any option which retains use the land at the rear in the possibility of the land connection with the use at the rear of the Church would be considered on its

(off Brief Street) being merit. Area made available to

augment the proposed Action scheme for the use of the Church as a home for previously homeless Plan people. - Consultation Emmaus Burnley is an emerging group affiliated to the national Emmaus body which provides a

home and support in a Report group environment. Often ‘companions’ have been living on the streets, may have had drug/alcohol problems or be Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

ex-offenders and lost Duke confidence as well as their homes. Emmaus Bar provides and environment

where companions have and a purpose-working in the recycled furniture Stoneyholme business, the café or workshop for example, and also have their own self-contained accommodation with the Area scheme. The aims of an Emmaus scheme is to be Action financially self-sufficient,

service a local community Plan Burnley with recycled furniture,

white goods etc., provide - other services such as a Consultation

Borough café.

Emmaus Burnley

identified the Baptist Council Chapel, Colne Road as a Report potential site and has 633 634 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar been offered a 6 month and option to purchase. The

site would provide the Stoneyholme space for living accommodation, kitchens and café, workshop and salesroom space. Area The scheme would benefit

the local community by Action providing good quality recycled furniture and other goods at affordable Plan prices to local people. -

This can help those on Consultation low incomes to avoid expensive loans. There will also be a café open to local people. Report A key aspect of being able to progress the scheme on this site is the land at the rear of the Chapel being made available to Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

Emmaus Burnley, partly Duke for car/van parking and loading/unloading. A Bar garden area will also be

needed and it is proposed and that if the land could be made available through Stoneyholme sale or other means the garden area would be made open to local people too. Emmaus would maintain the area and Area ensure its availability (perhaps in daylight hours Action only) to local people.

CCTV could be provided Plan Burnley if this was felt necessary. -

Emmaus Burnley project Consultation

Borough has a commitment to

adding value and helping

local partners achieve

their strategic priorities. Council This sustainable project Report will help reduce 635 636 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar homelessness, reduce and pressure on health and

social services, promote Stoneyholme community safety and create a small, self-sufficient, sustainable community which will

provide services to a Area deprived area. Action There is also a commitment to local people. The project will Plan use renewable energy -

where possible and Consultation recycle goods for sale at low prices. We would like to extend this to look at providing a garden or

open space for local Report people to share with companions.

Other Options? Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

01/DS/11-Denise Blake Alleygating is targetted to Yes The Preferred Option should Duke streets which have a high balance the needs of this area, Alleygating to Lawn Street level of recorded crime and which has seen significant Bar back alleys. where all residents are in improvement in the past, with

agreement and has proved those of other areas and take and effective in dealing with account of the recorded crime security/environmental statistics. Stoneyholme problems. 46/DS/170-M. The lack of garden and Yes The Preferred Option should Summerscales & A. parking space in traditional consider the need to provide

Girvan terraced housing areas is additional allotment, garden and Area a known issue which will, parking provision in this area, in

Allotments and gardens in part, be addressed by accordance with local, regional Action should be considered and providing new housing and national policies. more parking facilities for which makes provision for residents. Also more Plan Burnley private space. policing to rid the area of -

prostitution. Involve The Council works in Consultation

young people in the partnership with the local Borough

regeneration of the police force to tackle a

community. range of crime/social

problems including Council

prostitution where they are Report known to exist. 637 638 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar The Local Development and Framework Statement of

Community Involvement Stoneyholme sets out the Councils approach to involving a wide range of people, including young people, in

the future and Area development of the

Borough. A wide range of Action existing networks have been used and innovative techniques used to involve Plan young people. - Consultation

110/DS/306-Alasdair Agree although funding for Yes The Preferred Option should Simpson the suggested new bridge consider including the additional may be an issue. Some of suggested routes and their links LCC Senior Cycling the suggested routes are to improving the wider area Report Officer identified as key routes for improvements in the AAP Suggests a new canal (Route A - the canal; bridge linking Thursby Gardens/Monk Hall Street Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

with Devonshire Rd and Routes B & E - Colne Duke cycle routes along Elm St Road; Route and Abel Street where F-Daneshouse Road. Bar safe crossing of Colne

Road is important. and

LCC would like to get a Stoneyholme continuous cycle route up Colne Road. Colne Rd is a mixed use street– various councils such as

Crewe & Hull have carried Area out schemes on mixed

used streets that might be Action worthwhile considering. Plan

Burnley As the road is quite narrow it is difficult to see -

how Daneshouse Rd & Consultation

Borough Brougham St (Route F)

could be made more

pleasant for cyclists and

pedestrians without Council substantially reducing Report traffic using them. A 639 640 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar radical solution would be and to close the road at the

canal bridge but this Stoneyholme would disadvantage people living in the areas. Any alterations to the traffic calming on

Brougham St/Daneshouse Area Rd should be cycle

friendly. Action

161/DS/430-Judith Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Plan Furlonger, Development balance the needs of this area,

Manager, Elevate which has seen significant - improvement in the past, with Consultation Any extension of open those of other areas and should space needs to be consider wider strategic issues considered in a wider for the sustainable regeneration context. of Daneshouse, Stoneyholme, Report and Duke Bar. Facelifting to through routes has been supported as part of a wider plan creating linkages but facelifting of Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

properties overlooking Duke open space must be questioned in terms of the Bar wider strategic priorities

for the regeneration of the and area. Stoneyholme Redevelopment of vacant sites in Elm Street and Allen Street needs to be considered in terms of

potential sites to increase Area business and retail activity

in the area. The current Action work being undertaken by LCDL should help to Plan

Burnley inform further potential

expansion of the business -

and retail sector to Consultation

Borough increase job creation in

the area. We would not

necessarily see these areas as providing further Council Report new housing. 641 642 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar 162/DS/433-Chapman Agree except that the ball In part The Preferred Option should and Robinson Architects for park in area 5 balance the needs of this area,

Gleesons (Stoneyholme) is a new which has seen significant Stoneyholme and well used facility and improvement in the past, with Residential development could not be those of other areas and should is proposes for the vacant accommodated on the Elm consider wider strategic issues sites on Elm Street and St/Danehouse Road site. for the sustainable regeneration

Devonshire Road/Elm St. of Daneshouse, Stoneyholme, Area and Duke Bar. The ball park currently Action situated on the Dairy Site in Stoneyholme is to be

relocated to a cleared site Plan bounded by Daneshouse

Rd and Elm Street. - Consultation

Frontage improvements to the Colne Road properties will be delivered by Great Places. Report

Tree planting is proposed to upgrade the public realm. Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

201/DS/525-Matthew Planning Consent has been Yes The Preferred Option should Duke Ravenscroft given for the Emmaus consider the community use for Community use of the the land to the rear which is Bar Emmaus would support church and any request to suggested for housing use in

any option which retains use the land at the rear in Option 3. and the possibility of the land connection with the use at the rear of the Church would be considered on its. Stoneyholme (off Brief Street) being merit made available to augment the proposed scheme for the use of the

Church as a home for Area previously homeless

people. Action

Emmaus Burnley is an Plan

Burnley emerging group affiliated to the national Emmaus -

body which provides a Consultation

Borough home and support in a

group environment. Often

‘companions’ have been

living on the streets, may Council have had drug/alcohol Report problems or be 643 644 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar ex-offenders and lost and confidence as well as their

homes. Emmaus Stoneyholme provides and environment where companions have a purpose-working in the recycled furniture

business, the café or Area workshop for example,

and also have their own Action self-contained accommodation with the scheme. The aims of an Plan Emmaus scheme is to be -

financially self-sufficient, Consultation service a local community with recycled furniture, white goods etc., provide other services such as a

café. Report

Emmaus Burnley identified the Baptist Chapel, Colne Road as a potential site and has Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

been offered a 6 month Duke option to purchase. The site would provide the Bar space for living

accommodation, kitchens and and café, workshop and salesroom space. Stoneyholme

The scheme would benefit the local community by providing good quality

recycled furniture and Area other goods at affordable

prices to local people. Action This can help those on low incomes to avoid Plan

Burnley expensive loans. There

will also be a café open to - local people. Consultation

Borough

A key aspect of being able

to progress the scheme

on this site is the land at Council the rear of the Chapel Report being made available to 645 646 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option

Borough (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option?

Walshaw Duke Street/Colne Y/N Council Rd/Hebrew Road Bar Emmaus Burnley, partly and for car/van parking and

loading/unloading. A Stoneyholme garden area will also be needed and it is proposed that if the land could be made available through

sale or other means the Area garden area would be

made open to local people Action too. Emmaus would maintain the area and ensure its availability Plan (perhaps in daylight hours -

only) to local people. Consultation CCTV could be provided if this was felt necessary.

Emmaus Burnley project

has a commitment to Report adding value and helping local partners achieve their strategic priorities. This sustainable project will help reduce Area 9 –South Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Daneshouse on Option (Daneshouse Preferred Rd/The Canal/ Option? Daneshouse, Walshaw Street/Colne Y/N Rd/Hebrew Road

homelessness, reduce Duke pressure on health and social services, promote Bar community safety and

create a small, and self-sufficient, sustainable community which will Stoneyholme provide services to a deprived area.

There is also a

commitment to local Area people. The project will

use renewable energy Action where possible and recycle goods for sale at Plan

Burnley low prices. We would like

to extend this to look at - providing a garden or Consultation

Borough open space for local

people to share with companions. Council Report 647 648 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.11 Area 10

Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of

Borough Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred

Street Option? Duke Council

Y/N Bar and Option 1

–Facelifting and Stoneyholme Minimal Demolition 16/DS/40-Tariq Mahmood The Housing Market Renewal No Initiative aims to tackle Disagrees with this option as housing market decline not Area it would still leave the inside improve individual properties of the properties in poor and, other than in very Action condition. exceptional cases, Elevate

will not fund improvements to Plan properties beyond facelifting

to key gateway locations - Consultation which aim to give confidence to investors and stimulate further privately funded improvements.

17/DS/41-Anonymous Does not give any details or No Report reasons Agrees with Area 10 options Duke Bar Pheasantford/ Shackleton St Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

18/DS/42-Anonymous No reasons given for No agreement Duke Agrees with this option. Bar

19/DS/43-Kathleen Smith No reason given for No and preference. Prefers this option in relation Stoneyholme to Shackleton Street.

20/DS/44-Mr R M Chipps Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Would welcome the Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a Area clearance of 2-38 consultations related to the sustainable option or whether Pheasantford Street even numbered side of there are other options to Action because of the condition of Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems.

most of the rented problems associated with Plan Burnley properties (all but 5) and the tenants in these properties

anti social behaviour of the and residents proposed that -

Consultation tenants. this terrace of houses be Borough demolished.

25/DS/49-Ken Clayton No reasons given for No agreement Council Report Agrees with this option. 649 650 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 34/DS/60-Emma Howarth Affordability is a key issue Yes The Preferred Option should and the Council has an consider a wide range of and Agrees with all the options Affordable Housing Policy and proposals including initiatives Stoneyholme but is worried about the is working with partners to to tackle social problems and outcome as she lives in one provide a range of options for if redevelopment is proposed of the streets down to be affordable rent and purchase should consider policies/ demolished. Thinks the to meet housing need. initiatives that would enable changes being made are The Council has an existing residents to find Area great but the main problems established advice team in suitable alternative properties. are drugs and anti-social place to help householders Action behaviour, things that can't find suitable new homes. be dealt with by changing The causes of housing

the area. market failure are complex Plan and a range of solutions,

including tackling social as - Consultation well as physical problems, is essential. 35/DS/63-Mr A Kenyon The need for play areas has In part The Preferred Option should been raised in Neighbourhood consider the need for a play Agrees with most of this Action Plan consultations. area in this neighbourhood Report option. Disagrees in that it is Improvements to shop and its most appropriate not a good place for a play frontages on main routeways location. area and the shop would complement facelifting improvements should be carried out on Briercliffe Road done by the owners. and is intended to improve the Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

image of the area and give confidence to investors and Duke stimulate further privately funded improvements. Bar

39/DS/125-T Bottomley Many of the comments No and received on the previous Stoneyholme Doesn’t agree with the Neighbourhood Action Plan demolition of houses for consultations related to the parking areas. Parking area even numbered side of at bottom of Pheasantford St Pheasantford Street and the is hardly used. Most problems associated with Area residents are elderly and tenants in these properties don’t own cars. and residents proposed that Action this terrace of houses be demolished.

Shops on Colne Plan Burnley Road/Briercliffe Road lack

customer car parking and the - Consultation cleared site could give an

Borough opportunity to provide landscaped car parking. Council Report 651 652 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 43/DS/167-C Constantine Five Area Action Plans which No cover the next 10 to 15 years and Disagrees with this option are being prepared for areas Stoneyholme because it is just dressing where housing market up. Need to be more decline, environmental progressive over all the area problems and social for the next 25-50 years. deprivation are particularly concentrated. Across each Area area the conditions vary and the Area Action Plan aims to Action consider the area as a whole and also to consider the four

other Area Action Plans. With Plan limited resources available

difficult decisions have to be - Consultation made about their most effective use. 44/DS/168-Ms. C. Gauder Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Favoured option and least Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a Report expensive. The odd consultations related to the sustainable option or whether numbers on Cobden St are even numbered side of there are other options to mainly well kept properties. Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. Would like to see even problems associated with numbered side of tenants in these properties Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Pheasantford St demolished and residents proposed that as soon as possible. It is this terrace of houses be Duke occupied by drug addicts, demolished. prostitutes, thieves and Bar vagabonds. Rubbish is and constantly dumped including

used needles, condoms, Stoneyholme people urinating on the back street and rats and insects abound. The street looks like a war zone. Area

51/DS/209-G. Barrett No reasons given No Action Agrees – an all round much

better option than option 2. Plan Burnley -

54/DS/231-Josephine Brown Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should Consultation received on the previous consider whether clearance

Borough Happy with demolition of Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a even numbered side of consultations related to the sustainable option or whether

Pheasantford St as it has even numbered side of there are other options to

Council been a thorn in the side of Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. Report residents in the area for problems associated with years. 653 654 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar tenants in these properties and residents proposed that and this terrace of houses be Stoneyholme demolished. 57/DS/241-Ms Wendy Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should Middleton received on the previous consider whether clearance Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a

It would be lovely to see the consultations related to the sustainable option or whether Area even side of Pheasantford even numbered side of there are other options to

St demolished to enable us Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. Action to safely go on our back problems associated with street and not to have to see tenants in these properties Plan all the rubbish etc, plus foul and residents proposed that mouthed individuals and

this terrace of houses be - drug addicts. demolished. Consultation

111/DS/307-Mark Bevis Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Agrees with this option and of a single terrace is a Report whatever possible face-lifting sustainable option or whether on the odd numbered there are other options to tackle these social problems. Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

houses. The even side of Neighbourhood Action Plan If clearance is considered to Pheasantford Street houses consultations related to the be the preferred option the Duke many problem families with even numbered side of after use of the site should be anti-social behaviour. This Pheasantford Street and the carefully considered in order Bar demolition would give more problems associated with to meet need in the area and and open space, matching the tenants in these properties provide the most sustainable

rear of the odd numbered and residents proposed that use. Stoneyholme houses and would give this terrace of houses be those houses on Cobden demolished. Street more to look out Other than in very exceptional onto. However he is not in cases Elevate will not fund

favour of creating a car improvements to properties Area park. There is already a car beyond facelifting to key

park at the end of gateway locations. Action Pheasantford Street which Shops on Colne is never full. He suggests Road/Briercliffe Road lack Plan

Burnley another proposal for this customer car parking and the cleared site (see other cleared site could give an -

options below) opportunity to provide Consultation

Borough landscaped car parking. In

traditional areas of terraced

streets lack of open space is often an issue but Bank Hall Council Report Park lies immediately to the 655 656 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar south east of this neighbourhood. and

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be Stoneyholme for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the AAP process and on any Both options are likely to planning applications have a traffic impact on the submitted.

strategic highway network Area which is located adjacent to

this area. This area which Action is being considered for a variety of uses has the potential to significantly Plan affect the trunk road -

network, due to its proximity, Consultation the development proposed and the size of the development.

Whichever option is taken Report forward the Agency will need to be consulted on the forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these stages being supported by Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the Duke highway network. The site needs to be developed in a Bar sustainable manner to and ensure that the need to

travel is reduced. Site Stoneyholme should be developed with attention to access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle in

order that the traffic impact Area of such developments is

minimised. Improvements Action in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Plan Burnley

The Agency will need to be -

consulted in more detail in Consultation order that the impact of that Borough

traffic on the strategic highway network can be assessed. Presently, the Council Report 657 658 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be and undertaken. Stoneyholme

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG 13 Area and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of Action adequate Transport

Assessment and Travel Plan Plan reports - Consultation 124/DS/361-Joan Grimshaw Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Agrees with minimal Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a demolition but does not consultations related to the sustainable option or whether

agree with the proposed car even numbered side of there are other options to Report park (has concerns)– prefers Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. limited space/and rose problems associated with If clearance is considered to garden. Does not agree with tenants in these properties be the preferred option the play area – near sheltered and residents proposed that after use of the site should be housing? New housing is a carefully considered in order Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

good idea as is community this terrace of houses be to meet need in the area and use of 1 Cleaver St (old demolished. provide the most sustainable Duke police station building) use.

Shops on Colne Bar Road/Briercliffe Road lack customer car parking and the and

cleared site could give an Stoneyholme opportunity to provide landscaped car parking.

The need for play areas has been raised in Neighbourhood Area Action Plan consultations.

1 Cleaver Street, the old Action police station has been

granted planning permission Plan Burnley for a housing development

and demolition work has - Consultation

begun. Borough

146/DS/408-Henryck A Sustainability Assessment Yes The Preferred Option should

Peterson, Sport England of all options is carried out as consider the need to provide Council North West Region part of the Area Action Plan a safe environment which Report preferred option development. 659 660 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar This option preferred as In traditional areas of terraced encourages play and physical more sustainable. This streets lack of open space activity on street or close to and could still be combined with and play areas and the home in accordance with Stoneyholme home zone treatment to consequent loss of national, regional and local increase play/physical opportunity to engage in policies. activity on street. play/physical activity on street is often an issue. Area 163/DS/434-James Heelan This area was landscaped Yes The Preferred Option should

when the Pheasantford Green retain/improve the Action Agrees with this option. The housing site to the east was landscaped/green image of tree planted open space developed because it was the area between Allen Street and believed that this part of the Plan Pheasantford Street is a site was contaminated. -

very pleasant relief to the Consultation ‘ranks of terraced houses. Although it does provide a relief to the high density terraced housing and allows views towards Bank Hall Park

it also creates a significant Report gap in the built environment along this main route where the predominant character is Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

of rows of terraced properties built up to and alongside the Duke road. Bar Heritage Appraisals and Design Guides have been and

produced to guide the Stoneyholme regeneration of the area in a way that respects and enhances the area's character and creates the highest

quality new development. Area

Pheasantford Green is Action highlighted in the Heritage Appraisal as an area where

unsympathetic change has Plan Burnley occurred and it has design

issues related to its Consultation relationship to the Borough surrounding areas and the

lack of privacy and private space for residents of the Council Report houses. 661 662 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Area Action Plan process gives an opportunity to and reconsider the use of this Stoneyholme landscaped strip and the design of the existing houses and create a well planned and high quality development which will enhance the Area character of the area but also retain and improve the Action landscaped setting.

164/DS/435-Mr & Mrs This treed area was Yes The Preferred Option should Plan McCree landscaped when the retain/improve the -

Pheasantford Green housing landscaped/green image of Consultation Agrees with this option and site to the east was the area considers that preservation developed because it was of established trees is vitally believed that this part of the important and the protection site was contaminated.

and enhancement of the Report natural environment, Although it does provide a biodiversity and habitats relief to the high density terraced housing and allows views towards Bank Hall Park it also creates a significant Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

gap in the built environment along this main route where Duke the predominant character is of rows of terraced properties Bar built up to and alongside the and road. Stoneyholme Heritage Appraisals and Design Guides have been produced to guide the regeneration of the area in a

way that respects and Area enhances the area's character

and creates the highest Action quality new development including the natural Plan

Burnley environment. -

Pheasantford Green is Consultation

highlighted in the Heritage

Borough Appraisal as an area where

unsympathetic change has

occurred and it has design Council

issues related to its Report relationship to the 663 664 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar surrounding areas and the lack of privacy and private and space for residents of the Stoneyholme houses.

The Area Action Plan process gives an opportunity to reconsider the use of this landscaped strip and the Area design of the existing houses and create a well planned and Action high quality development

which will enhance the Plan character of the area but also

retain and improve the - landscaped setting and its Consultation potential to increase biodiversity and provide valuable habitats. Report 06/AL/345- Burnley Civic No reason given No Society

Option 1 yes Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree. It is important that Yes Five Area Actions Plans are Planning and Environmental housing land supply is being prepared at the same Duke Services managed in a way that does time so that housing numbers not undermine the Housing and the mix of type, size and Bar Policy 13 of the JLSP allows Market Renewal Initiative. tenure can be managed more and for the replacement of strategically.

cleared dwellings on up to a Stoneyholme one for one basis. Additional dwellings in excess of one for one will be counted against the housing

provision of Policy 12 of the Area JLSP. Action Option 2 –

Redevelopment Plan

Burnley for New Housing

03/DS/25-Mr. Tomlinson No reason given No Consultation

Borough Agrees with this option Council Report 665 666 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 16/DS/40-Tariq Mahmood Five Area Action Plans are No being prepared for areas and Agrees with this option where housing market Stoneyholme because houses are very old decline, environmental & in poor condition. Would problems and social prefer to live in a newer deprivation are particularly property. concentrated. Across each area the conditions vary and Area the Area Action Plan aims to consider the area as a whole Action and also to consider the four other Area Action Plans. With

limited resources available Plan difficult decisions have to be

made about their most - Consultation effective use. 17/DS/41-Anonymous No details or reasons given No

Agrees with Area 10 options Duke Bar Pheasantford/ Report Shackleton St Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

25/DS/49-Ken Clayton Following requests from local No residents an alleygating Duke Doesn’t think that alleygating scheme is being carried out would work, but suggests in the area. Security lighting Bar plenty of security lights back is not proposed as part of this and & front. Proposed housing proposal but some residents

off Colne Road – bad idea do install their own security Stoneyholme as road too busy, no car lighting. parking spaces. The Area Action Plan process gives an opportunity to reconsider the use of this

landscaped strip alongside Area Colne Road, the design of

the existing houses and to Action create a well planned and high quality development Plan

Burnley which will enhance the character of the area but also -

retain and improve the Consultation

Borough landscaped setting. The

access and car parking provision would need to be considered as part of the Council Report design. 667 668 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 34/DS/60-Emma Howarth Affordability is a key issue Yes The Preferred Option should and the Council has an consider a wide range of and Agrees with all the options Affordable Housing Policy and proposals including initiatives Stoneyholme but is worried about the is working with partners to to tackle social problems and outcome as she lives in one provide a range of options for if redevelopment is proposed of the streets down to be affordable rent and purchase should consider policies/ demolished. to meet housing need. initiatives that would enable The Council has an existing residents to find Area Thinks the changes being established advice team in suitable alternative properties. made are great but the main place to help householders Action problems are drugs and find suitable new homes. anti-social behaviour, things The causes of housing

that can't be dealt with by market failure are complex Plan changing the area. and a range of solutions,

including tackling social as - Consultation well as physical problems, is essential. 35/DS/63-Mr A Kenyon The Area Action Plan process No gives an opportunity to Agrees with most of this reconsider the use of this Report option including traffic landscaped strip alongside calming - By all means Colne Road, the design of update this area. Disagrees the existing houses and to Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

with the new housing along create a well planned and Colne Road but doesn't give high quality development Duke any reasons. which will enhance the character of the area but also Bar retain and improve the and landscaped setting. The

access and car parking Stoneyholme provision would need to be considered as part of the design. 39/DS/125-T Bottomley Many of the comments No Area received on the previous Doesn’t agree with the Neighbourhood Action Plan Action demolition of houses for consultations related to the parking areas. Parking area even numbered side of

at bottom of Pheasantford St Pheasantford Street and the Plan Burnley is hardly used. Most problems associated with

residents are elderly and tenants in these properties - Consultation

don’t own cars. and residents proposed that

Borough this terrace of houses be

demolished.

Shops on Colne Council

Road/Briercliffe Road lack Report customer car parking and the 669 670 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar cleared site could give an opportunity to provide and landscaped car parking. Stoneyholme 43/DS/167-C. Constantine Many of the comments Yes received on the previous Agrees with redevelopment Neighbourhood Action Plan of Pheasantford St where consultations related to the

there is a known drug even numbered side of Area problem. Pheasantford Street and the

problems associated with Action tenants in these properties and residents proposed that Plan this terrace of houses be

demolished. - Consultation 51/DS/209-G. Barrett Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Disagrees unless the new Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a residential properties are on consultations related to the sustainable option or whether

the same design as existing even numbered side of there are other options to Report property it would destroy Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. look of area problems associated with If clearance is considered to tenants in these properties be the preferred option the and residents proposed that design of the new development would have to Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

this terrace of houses be take account of the Design demolished. Guidance and Heritage Duke Appraisal for the area. Bar 54/DS/231-Josephine Brown Five Area Action Plans which Yes The Preferred Option should cover the next 10 to 15 years consider whether clearance and Not happy with the are being prepared for areas of several terraces and the Stoneyholme demolition of odd numbered where housing market provision of a limited number side of Cobden Street decline, environmental of houses , albeit with a because they are mostly problems and social better mix of type, is a owner occupied and those deprivation are particularly sustainable response to that are rented have decent concentrated. Across each address the social problems Area occupiers who care about area the conditions vary and in this neighbourhood or the area. Objects to her the Area Action Plan aims to whether there are other Action home being demolished consider the area as a whole options. because it is paid for as are and also to consider the four

4 or 5 of neighbours. The other Area Action Plans. With Plan Burnley compensation would not limited resources available

purchase another home and difficult decisions have to be - Consultation does not want to start made about their most Borough renting and too old to get a effective use.

mortgage, the same with Many of the comments neighbours, (including a lady received on the previous

Council of 84). Wants to stay where

Neighbourhood Action Plan Report she is. Also happy with the consultations related to the neighbouring joinery works even numbered side of 671 672 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar – if this was to be developed Pheasantford Street and the into houses or flats it could problems associated with and create further anti-social tenants in these properties Stoneyholme behaviour problems similar and residents proposed that to those on Pheasantford St. this terrace of houses be demolished. This option created a larger site suitable for redevelopment in order to Area introduce a mix of house types. Action 57/DS/241-Ms. Wendy Five Area Action Plans which Yes The Preferred Option should Middleton cover the next 10 to 15 years consider whether clearance Plan are being prepared for areas of several terraces and the Disagrees with this option.

where housing market provision of a limited number - She has lived on the odd decline, environmental of houses , albeit with a Consultation numbered side of Cobden St problems and social better mix of type, is a for 23 years and owns the deprivation are particularly sustainable response to property, like several other concentrated. Across each address the social problems residents. Cobden Street is area the conditions vary and in this neighbourhood or one of the nicest streets in the Area Action Plan aims to whether there are other Report the area and we try to keep consider the area as a whole options. it nice and clean. The and also to consider the four problem we have is with other Area Action Plans. With Pheasantford Street which limited resources available backs onto Cobden St. This difficult decisions have to be Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

block is a disgrace and made about their most residents dump rubbish on effective use. Duke the back street bringing Many of the comments vermin into the area. We received on the previous Bar have complained many Neighbourhood Action Plan and times and had the back consultations related to the

street cleared but then more even numbered side of Stoneyholme rubbish is left out. Pheasantford Street and the problems associated with tenants in these properties and residents proposed that

this terrace of houses be Area demolished. This option

created a larger site suitable Action for redevelopment in order to introduce a mix of house Plan

Burnley types.

111/DS/307-Mark Bevis Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should - Consultation received on the previous consider whether clearance Borough Disagrees with this option. If Neighbourhood Action Plan of several terraces and the

all the terraced housing is consultations related to the provision of a limited number replaced affordable rented even numbered side of of houses , albeit with a

Council properties will disappear.

Pheasantford Street and the better mix of type, is a Report New houses would be problems associated with sustainable response to weaker, smaller and cost tenants in these properties address the social problems 673 674 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar £125 a week in rent. He and residents proposed that in this neighbourhood or couldn’t afford this and this terrace of houses be whether there are other and would have to relocate demolished. This option options. Stoneyholme elsewhere which he doesn’t created a larger site suitable If redevelopment is proposed want to do. Although Burnley for redevelopment in order to the Preferred Option should has a glut of (mostly introduce a mix of house consider policies/ initiatives inhabitable) housing, types. that would enable existing replacing it all with more Affordability is a key issue residents to find suitable Area expensive housing doesn’t and the Council has an alternative properties. help the population. Affordable Housing Policy and Action Terraced houses are not all is working with partners to that bad, they just need a bit provide a range of options for

more maintenance because affordable rent and purchase Plan they are over 100 years old. to meet housing need.

The Council has an - Consultation established advice team in place to help householders find suitable new homes. 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Agree Yes The Highways Agency will be for Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the Report AAP process and on any Both options are likely to planning applications have a traffic impact on the submitted. strategic highway network which is located adjacent to Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

this area. This area which is being considered for a Duke variety of uses has the potential to significantly Bar affect the trunk road and network, due to its proximity,

the development proposed Stoneyholme and the size of the development.

Whichever option is taken

forward the Agency will need Area to be consulted on the

forthcoming stages of the Action LDF process, with these stages being supported by Plan

Burnley assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the -

highway network. The site Consultation

needs to be developed in a Borough

sustainable manner to

ensure that the need to

travel is reduced. Sites Council should be developed with Report attention to access by 675 676 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar modes of transport other than the private vehicle in and order that the traffic impact Stoneyholme of such developments is minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate.

The Agency will need to be Area consulted in more detail in order that the impact of that Action traffic on the strategic

highway network can be Plan assessed. Presently, the

AAP contains insufficient - detail for that appraisal to be Consultation undertaken.

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need Report to be undertaken in accordance with PPG13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

adequate Transport Assessment and Travel Plan Duke reports Bar

118/DS/349-Mrs S Grennan Doesn't give a reason No and

Agrees with this option to Stoneyholme redevelop for new housing.

124/DS/361-Joan Grimshaw Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Area Does not agree with this Neighbourhood Action Plan of several terraces and the option – keep odd side of consultations related to the provision of a limited number Action Pheasantford St even numbered side of of houses , albeit with a Pheasantford Street and the better mix of type, is a

problems associated with sustainable response to Plan Burnley tenants in these properties address the social problems -

and residents proposed that in this neighbourhood or Consultation

this terrace of houses be whether there are other Borough demolished. This option options.

created a larger site suitable for redevelopment in order to Council

introduce a mix of house Report types. 677 678 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 163/DS/434-James Heelan Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance and Disagrees with this option as Neighbourhood Action Plan of several terraces and the Stoneyholme there are a substantial consultations related to the provision of a limited number number of empty houses even numbered side of of houses , albeit with a awaiting occupation within Pheasantford Street and the better mix of type, is a the borough. problems associated with sustainable response to tenants in these properties address the social problems Area and residents proposed that in this neighbourhood or this terrace of houses be whether there are other Action demolished. This option options. created a larger site suitable

for redevelopment in order to Plan introduce a mix of house

types. - Consultation 164/DS/435-Mr & Mrs This treed area was Yes The Preferred Option should McCree landscaped when the retain/improve the Pheasantford Green housing landscaped/green image of Disagree with this option. site to the east was the area The preservation of developed because it was Report established trees is vitally believed that this part of the important. site was contaminated. Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Although it does provide a relief to the high density Duke terraced housing and allows views towards Bank Hall Park Bar it also creates a significant and gap in the built environment

along this main route where Stoneyholme the predominant character is of rows of terraced properties built up to and alongside the road. Area Heritage Appraisals and

Design Guides have been Action produced to guide the regeneration of the area in a Plan

Burnley way that respects and

enhances the area's character -

and creates the highest Consultation quality new development Borough

including the natural environment. Council Report 679 680 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Pheasantford Green is highlighted in the Heritage and Appraisal as an area where Stoneyholme unsympathetic change has occurred and it has design issues related to its relationship to the surrounding areas and the Area lack of privacy and private space for residents of the Action houses.

The Area Action Plan process Plan gives an opportunity to

reconsider the use of this - landscaped strip and the Consultation design of the existing houses and create a well planned and high quality development which will enhance the Report character of the area but also retain and improve the landscaped setting and its Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

potential to increase biodiversity and provide Duke valuable habitats. Bar

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Agree. It is important that Yes Five Area Actions Plans are and Planning and Environmental housing land supply is being prepared at the same Services managed in a way that does time so that housing numbers Stoneyholme not undermine the Housing and the mix of type, size and Policy 13 of the JLSP allows Market Renewal Initiative. tenure can be managed more for the replacement of strategically. cleared dwellings on up to a one for one basis. Area Additional dwellings in excess of one for one will be Action counted against the housing

provision of Policy 12 of the Plan

Burnley JLSP.

- Consultation Other Options? Borough

04/DS/26- Ceridwen Five Area Action Plans which No Chapman cover the next 10 to 15 years

Council are being prepared for areas Report 681 682 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Even numbers of where housing market Pheasantford Street and Bar decline, environmental and Street to be demolished and problems and social Stoneyholme car parking and gardens for deprivation are particularly residents (see his concentrated. Across each drawings). Workshops on area the conditions vary and Cobden Street to be the Area Action Plan aims to demolished. consider the area as a whole Area and also to consider the four If there are shops, good other Area Action Plans. With Action clothes and shoe shops are limited resources available needed difficult decisions have to be

made about their most Plan effective use.

In traditional areas of terraced - Consultation streets lack of open space is often an issue but Bank Hall Park lies immediately to the south east of this

neighbourhood. Report The Council has no powers to specify the type of shops in the area other than controlling hot food shops in accordance with Local Plan policies. Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

16/DS/40-Tariq Mahmood The Housing Market Renewal No Initiative aims to tackle Duke Would like to see improved housing market decline not housing. improve individual properties Bar and, other than in very and exceptional cases, Elevate

will not fund improvements to Stoneyholme properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations which aim to give confidence to investors and stimulate

further privately funded Area improvements. Action 19/DS/43-Kathleen Smith Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance

Demolish both sides of Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single/two terraces is a Plan Burnley Pheasantford Street for consultations related to the sustainable option or whether

green spaces and car even numbered side of there are other options to - Consultation

parking, No new buildings. Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. Borough problems associated with If clearance is considered to

tenants in these properties be the preferred option the and residents proposed that after use of the site should be Council

this terrace of houses be carefully considered in order Report demolished. 683 684 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar to meet need in the area and provide the most sustainable and use. Stoneyholme 25/DS/49-Ken Clayton Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Drop all of Pheasantford Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a Street and use it as parking consultations related to the sustainable option or whether

and extend green area. Not even numbered side of there are other options to Area to put in too many trees as Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems.

they block views and problems associated with If clearance is considered to Action maintenance becomes a tenants in these properties be the preferred option the problem. Plenty of security and residents proposed that after use and design of the Plan lights back and front would this terrace of houses be site should be carefully be better than alleygating.

demolished. considered in order to meet - Reduce number of take Following requests from local need in the area and provide Consultation away establishments. residents an alleygating the most sustainable use. scheme is being carried out The Preferred Option should in the area. Security lighting also consider whether the is not proposed as part of this policies to control hot food proposal but some residents shops in this area should be Report do install their own security amended. lighting. Local Plan policies guide the control of hot food shops Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

35/DS/63-Mr A Kenyon The former pit - Bank Hall Yes The Preferred Option should Park - is outside the consider whether Bank Hall Duke Flatten out part of the old pit boundary of the AAP but has Park could provide play areas top land behind Bromsgrove the potential to provide play for the adjoining Bar to make a play area for kids. areas. neighbourhoods and consider and Although physical The causes of housing a wide range of proposals

improvements will help the market failure are complex including initiatives to tackle Stoneyholme key is sorting out people. and a range of solutions, social problems. including tackling social as well as physical problems, is essential. Area 43/DS/167-C. Constantine The Area Action Plan process Yes The preferred option should gives an opportunity to consider the potential for Action Erect fencing around elderly reconsider the use of the improving the design layout homes in Pheasantford landscaped strip alongside of Pheasantford Green.

Green preventing nuisance Colne Road and the setting Plan Burnley and loitering of youths. It is and design layout of

too open and occupants Pheasantford Green. -

would like small gardens Consultation Borough which would improve the Heritage Appraisals and

area. Design Guides have been

produced to guide the

Council regeneration of the area in a Report way that respects and 685 686 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar enhances the area's character and creates the highest and quality new development. Stoneyholme

Pheasantford Green is highlighted in the Heritage Appraisal as an area where unsympathetic change has occurred and it has design Area issues related to its relationship to the Action surrounding areas and the

lack of privacy and private Plan space for residents of the

houses. - Consultation

51/DS/209-G. Barrett Many of the comments Yes The Preferred Option should received on the previous consider whether clearance Whatever is done, Neighbourhood Action Plan of a single terrace is a

something needs to be done consultations related to the sustainable option or whether Report with Pheasantford Street as even numbered side of there are other options to it is the worst street in the Pheasantford Street and the tackle these social problems. area. problems associated with tenants in these properties and residents proposed that Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

this terrace of houses be demolished. Duke

54/DS/231-Josephine Brown The Housing Market Renewal In part The preferred option should Bar Initiative aims to tackle the consider creating a Home Improvements to properties housing market decline not Zone scheme to improve and on Cobden street to extend improve individual properties improve safety. Stoneyholme the back yards across the and, other than in very back street with wide gates exceptional , Elevate will not for residents to park their fund improvements to cars and get them off the properties, including street or those without cars extension of curtilages, Area to have flower beds or beyond facelifting to key gardens. It would also make gateway locations. The aim Action room for children to play not is to give confidence to having to be careful about investors and stimulate further

hitting cars. privately funded Plan Burnley improvements.

The Home Zone proposals in - Consultation option 2 is aimed at giving

Borough pedestrians priority over traffic. Council Report 687 688 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 110/DS/306-Alasdair Agree . Some of the Yes The Preferred Option should Simpson suggested routes are consider including the and identified as key routes for additional suggested routes Stoneyholme LCC Senior Cycling Officer improvements in the AAP and their links to improving (Routes B & E - Colne the wider area Suggests two new cycle Road; Route C - routes along quiet streets – Pedestrian/Cycle links to Sir Cobden St & Shackleton St John Thursby College and Area (w/e) into Bank Hall and Heasandford Industrial linking into the Brun Valley Estate; Route G - Briercliffe Action and beyond. Rd). LCC would like to get a Plan continuous cycle route up Colne Road but there is little -

potential for improving cycle Consultation facilities on Briercliffe Rd. Encouraging traffic to use alternative routes to Briercliffe Road such as Eastern Avenue might be an Report option, but as the main route to a hospital this is probably not realistic. Briercliffe Rd is a mixed use street and various councils such as Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Crewe & Hull have carried out schemes on mixed used Duke streets that might be worthwhile considering. Bar

At Duke Bar there could be and

a cycle path alongside the Stoneyholme west side of Briercliffe Road and the north side of Barden Lane to help cyclists make cross movements at the

junction. Area

111/DS/307-Mark Bevis Many of the comments In part The Preferred Option should Action received on the previous consider whether Bank Hall Suggests another option for

Neighbourhood Action Plan Park could provide play areas Plan

Burnley the cleared site of even consultations related to the for the adjoining numbered Pheasantford even numbered side of neighbourhoods and be -

Street and provides a Pheasantford Street and the whether improvements could Consultation

Borough sketch of the proposal. He problems associated with be made to improve the

says his proposal will 1) tenants in these properties setting of the AAP area and

and residents proposed that its wildlife diversity.

Council this terrace of houses be If clearance is considered to Report demolished. be the preferred option the 689 690 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar make the site look a lot nicer The Preferred Option will after use and design of the 2) provide individuality to consider whether clearance site should be carefully and remaining houses, 3) break of a single terrace is a considered in order to meet Stoneyholme the wind up 4) reduce the sustainable option or whether need in the area and provide street’s role as a rat run. there are other options to the most sustainable use. Remove the one row of tackle these social problems. houses and the road-replace both with a chicane type Five Area Action Plans are Area land that circles between being prepared for areas raised walled areas holding where housing market Action plants and interspersed with decline, environmental angled parking bays big problems and social

enough to fit a car. Perhaps deprivation are particularly Plan the house fronts could be concentrated. Across each

given a small garden front area the conditions vary and - Consultation plot in a low walled bay. the Area Action Plan aims to Some of the cleared area consider the area as a whole could be grassed for kids to and also to consider the four play on. The sunny (backs) other Area Action Plans. With limited resources available of Cobden Street houses Report could have the option to difficult decisions have to be have their back yard walls made about their most reduced in height to look effective and sustainable use. onto the area. Lighting Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

could be interspersed along In traditional areas of terraced the chicane to improve light streets lack of open space is Duke levels at night which would often an issue but Bank Hall add to safety. The chicane Park lies immediately to the Bar would reduce cars to 20mph south east of this and or less increasing child neighbourhood.

safety. Car sized bays Stoneyholme would prevent commercial Bank Hall Park is outside the vehicle parking outside Area Action Plan boundary houses. Carefully placed but has the potential to planting between the two provide play areas and

rows of houses could additional/improved wildlife Area provide some privacy and habitats.

will break the wind up Action reducing the wind blown Street cleanliness, litter and litter problems or litter will flytipping are issues across many areas of the Borough Plan Burnley collect at the edges of the walled sections. and Burnley Action -

Partnership's Sustainable Consultation Would also like to see the Community Strategy vision for Borough

edges of Bank Hall Park the Borough is for " ...... a improved. He has seen healthy, safe and clean

variety of wildlife increase on environment and quality Council the River Brun. Has seen a services which work together Report for the good of the public" plan suggesting adding a 691 692 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar basketball park and does not agree with this because it and would spoil aspect of area. Stoneyholme The canal bay which sticks into the park area needs regular cleaning.

Also comments on Biffa and need for walking cleaners Area (rather than cleaning mini vehicles). Suggests roving Action regular cleaner (and

volunteers his services) as Plan a solution and who would

also be another pair of eyes - for security purposes and Consultation reporting little problems before they get bigger. Adding to the sense of community being rebuilt Report through Elevate. Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

124/DS/361-Joan Grimshaw The causes of housing Yes The Preferred Option should market failure are complex consider a wide range of Duke People-anti social and a range of solutions, proposals including initiatives behaviour. Calico have including tackling social as to tackle social problems Bar been successful in dealing well as physical problems, is and with this in their property but essential.

its moved to terraced areas. Stoneyholme

161/DS/430-Judith Noted No Furlonger, Development Manager, Elevate Area We would not support further

new housing in this area Action unless demand in future years can be demonstrated. Plan

Burnley Facelifting will only be

supported along gateways -

or along through routes. Consultation

Borough Redevelopment of the mill to

provide alternative uses would have to be considered as part of a wider strategic Council Report 693 694 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar view of the area. We are unable at this point to give a and view either way. Stoneyholme

163/DS/434-James Heelan Browhead Court is outside the No Boundary of the Area Action Whilst keeping the ‘treed’ Plan and on the border of

area, could there be an Bank Hall Park which is Area extension of the retirement designated as an Major Open

homes which overlook Bank Area where development Action Hall Park. This is a good would only be permitted in location for most amenities exceptional circumstances. and much appreciated by National policy and housing Plan the elderly. market drivers promote -

independence in retirement Consultation and where possible aim to allow people to remain in their own home. Funding availability is channeled into aids, adaptation and support Report within the community. 162/DS/433-Chapman The Colne Road/Duke Bar In part The Preferred Option should Robinson Architects for district centre is fragile and define the District Shopping Gleesons has been recognised in the Area and consider the Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Frontage development is Local Plan as containing a potential for development of proposed on Colne Road. declining range and quality of the Colne Road/Earl St/Allen Duke This will provide retail units shops. The proposal to Street site and at ground floor level and provide retail units at ground complementary design Bar apartments above. Some floor level on the site between improvements to and houses will be developed on Allen Street and Earl Street Pheasantford Green.

the vacant land. would extend the shopping Stoneyholme area on this side of Colne The Preferred Option should Redevelopment of the Road. In addition new shops consider any issues raised by inappropriate existing would encourage more the Air Quality Management housing stock is proposed. vehicular activity and Area assessment.

manoeuvrings on this busy Area The permeable layout will main road. link into the adjoining Action existing streets and can be The Area Action Plan process phased as clearance takes gives an opportunity to

place. Plan

Burnley reconsider the use of this

Colne Road site and the Infrastructure works will - design of the existing houses Consultation remove the existing gyratory and to create a well planned Borough

road systems and modify the and high quality development which will enhance the character of the area. Council Report 695 696 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option

Borough Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar road junction. This will Heritage Appraisals and provide easier and safer Design Guides have been and access for pedestrians to the produced to guide the Stoneyholme Daneshouse retail shops regeneration of the area in a and community facilities. way that respects and enhances its special This is an attractive site with character and creates the an outstanding open aspect. highest quality new Area development . Pheasantford Stanley Mill is to be Green is highlighted in the Action redeveloped with new Heritage Appraisal as an area housing. where unsympathetic change

has occurred and it has Plan design issues related to its

relationship to the - Consultation surrounding areas and the lack of privacy and private space for residents of the houses. Report The traffic gyratory system was put in place to resolve issues of traffic flow in the area where two main road converge. This area has Area 10 – Duke Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Bar on Preferred Option Pheasantford/Shackleton Preferred Street Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

recently been declared an Air Quality Management area Duke and monitoring equipment is in place. Bar

Stanley Mill is a Statutory and

Listed Building and any Stoneyholme development proposal would have to take account of and retain/enhance its special character. Area Action Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 697 698 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.12 Area 11

Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred

Borough Duke Bar on Option Preferred

Option? Duke Council

Y/N Bar and Option 1 – 28/DS/52-Alan Sturdy Parts of this Yes The Preferred Option should take a

Minimal neighbourhood suffer from balanced approach to tackle the Stoneyholme Demolition Agrees with this poor housing and issues in this neighbourhood and the option-minimal environmental conditions area as a whole. demolition and green and from anti-social The Preferred Option should define space. He does not behaviour. It is a small, the District Shopping Area, assess

agree with demolition dense area surrounded by the need for a range of open spaces Area options. busy main roads and with and consider the need for a

little open space. Development Brief for the southern Action In recognition of the part of this area which has the severe problems in the potential to create links with area 7. wider Daneshouse area, Plan English Partnerships are -

supporting regeneration Consultation activity. EP support is being sought for gap funding for new housing in area 7 and for

complementary works in Report the wider area, including refocusing the retail activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

40/DS/139-Mrs A Live/work units is one of Yes The Preferred Option should consider Topping the options proposed by the potential to create live/work units Duke the Masterplan for within the plan area in order to create Thinks that the idea of Bishop's Mill. Bishop's more flexible living accommodation. Bar live/work units is good. Mill has since been and granted planning

permission for conversion Stoneyholme to a Lidl Store. 42/DS/161-June Proctor Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Disagrees with all poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Area options because environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle uprooting long standing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and Action residents is too upsetting behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. for all concerned. dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define

Houses should be busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess Plan Burnley improved. little open space. the need for a range of open spaces

The Housing Market and consider the need for a - Consultation Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern

Borough complementary funding it part of this area which has the

attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7.

related projects provides Council

an opportunity to tackle Report these problems and the AAP preferred option 699 700 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar should consider the area and surrounding areas as and a whole in order to Stoneyholme achieve its sustainable regeneration.

In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, Area English Partnerships are supporting regeneration Action activity. EP support is

being sought for gap Plan funding for new housing

in area 7 and for - complementary works in Consultation the wider area, including refocusing the retail activity and the possible creation of a public square Report in the south of Area 11. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The Council has an established advice team Duke in place to support and help householders find Bar suitable new homes. and

Affordability is a key issue Stoneyholme and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a

range of options for Area affordable rent and

purchase to meet housing Action need.

Other than in very Plan Burnley

exceptional cases Elevate -

will not fund Consultation improvements to

Borough properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Council Report 701 702 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 48/DS/176-Mr & Mrs. G. Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Leighton neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering and poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Stoneyholme Disagree with all 3 environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle Options. Demolition of and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and homes is sheer behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. vandalism and only the dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define property speculators will busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess Area benefit. There are little open space. the need for a range of open spaces adequate green areas The Housing Market and consider the need for a Action nearby – no additional Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern required. Despite complementary funding it part of this area which has the

problems we like the attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7. Plan area and our home and related projects provides

don’t want to move. an opportunity to tackle - Consultation Spent money adapting these problems and the the house for mobility AAP preferred option needs and would not be should consider the area able to get a similar and surrounding areas as house with a whole in order to Report compensation likely to be achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

given. Elevate should be In recognition of the improving people’s lives severe problems in the Duke not destroying them as wider Daneshouse area, proposed and causing English Partnerships are Bar anxiety and stress for supporting regeneration and years to come. activity. EP support is

being sought for gap Stoneyholme funding for new housing in area 7 and for complementary works in the wider area, including

refocusing the retail Area activity and the possible

creation of a public square Action in the south of Area 11. Plan

Burnley The Council has an established advice team -

in place to support and Consultation

help householders find Borough suitable new homes.

Affordability is a key issue Council

and the Council has an Report Affordable Housing Policy 703 704 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar and is working with partners to provide a and range of options for Stoneyholme affordable rent and purchase to meet housing need.

Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate Area will not fund improvements to Action properties beyond

facelifting to key gateway Plan locations. - Consultation 117/DS/344-Faber MaunsellAgreefor Highways Agency Yes The Highways Agency will be consulted at all stages of the AAP All options are likely to have a traffic impact on the process and on any planning strategic highway network which is located applications submitted.

adjacent to this area. This area which is being Report considered for a variety of uses has the potential to significantly affect the trunk road network, due to its proximity, the development proposed and the size of the development. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Whichever option is taken forward the Agency will Duke need to be consulted on the forthcoming stages of the LDF process, with these stages being supported by assessments of the likely impact of Bar

that traffic on the highway network. The site needs and to be developed in a sustainable manner to ensure that the need to travel is reduced. Sites should be Stoneyholme developed with attention to access by modes of transport other than the private vehicle in order that the traffic impact of such developments is minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Area

The Agency will need to be consulted in more Action detail in order that the impact of that traffic on the strategic highway network can be assessed. Plan

Burnley Presently, the AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be undertaken. -

Consultation

Borough Assessment of the impact of the development on

the trunk road network will need to be undertaken

in accordance with PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of adequate Council Report Transport Assessment and Travel Plan reports 705 706 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 146/DS/408-Henryk Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Peterson , Sport England neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering and North West Region poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Stoneyholme environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle This option preferred. and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and Suggest this be behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. combined with an option dense area surrounded by The preferred option should consider to introduce home busy main roads and with ways of making streets safer for play Area zones. This would little open space. and giving priority to pedestrians and represent a more The Housing Market cyclists rather than motor vehicles.. Action sustainable option than Renewal Initiative and the The Preferred Option should define redevelopment. complementary funding it the District Shopping Area, assess

attracts for non housing the need for a range of open spaces Plan related projects provides and consider the need for a

an opportunity to tackle Development Brief for the southern - Consultation these problems and the part of this area which has the AAP preferred option potential to create links with area 7. should consider the area and surrounding areas as

a whole in order to Report achieve its sustainable regeneration. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

In recognition of the severe problems in the Duke wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are Bar supporting regeneration and activity. EP support is

being sought for gap Stoneyholme funding for new housing in area 7 and for complementary works in the wider area, including

refocusing the retail Area activity and the possible

creation of a public square Action in the south of Area 11. Plan Burnley 148/DS/410-Arthur Daley No reason given No

- Agrees with all Duke Bar Consultation

Borough Area options

Council Report 707 708 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 149/DS/411-R. W. Oats Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering and Does not agree with any poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Stoneyholme of the 3 options. You will environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle be demolishing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and reasonable housing and behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. leaving derelict/semi dense area surrounded by derelict rented housing busy main roads and with Area with absentee landlords. little open space. The Housing Market Action Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it

attracts for non housing Plan related projects provides

an opportunity to tackle - Consultation these problems and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as

a whole in order to Report achieve its sustainable regeneration. In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

English Partnerships are supporting regeneration Duke activity. EP support is being sought for gap Bar funding for new housing and in area 7 and for

complementary works in Stoneyholme the wider area, including refocusing the retail activity and the possible creation of a public square

in the south of Area 11. Area 06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Action Society

Option 1 yes Plan Burnley -

12/AL/427-Lancashire Agree. It is important that Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being Consultation

CC, Planning and housing land supply is prepared at the same time so that

Borough Environmental Services managed in a way that housing numbers and the mix of type,

does not undermine the size and tenure can be managed

Policy 13 of the JLSP Housing Market Renewal more strategically. Council allows for the Initiative. Report replacement of cleared 709 710 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar dwellings on up to a one for one basis. Additional and dwellings in excess of Stoneyholme one for one will be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Area 175/DS/461-Shelley Gill Parts of this No

neighbourhood suffer from Action Disagrees with this poor housing and option. Has recently environmental conditions purchased the property and from anti-social Plan as a first time buyer and behaviour. It is a small, -

has spent a considerable dense area surrounded by Consultation amount of money on the busy main roads and with property. As a first time little open space. buyer, choice of property The Housing Market was limited due to the Renewal Initiative and the increasing house prices, complementary funding it Report placing many properties attracts for non housing out of her range. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

should consider the area and surrounding areas as Duke a whole in order to achieve its sustainable Bar regeneration. and

In recognition of the Stoneyholme severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration

activity. EP funding is Area being sought for gap

funding to develop new Action housing in area 7 and for complementary works in Plan

Burnley the wider area, including refocusing the retail -

activity and the possible Consultation creation of a public square Borough in the south of Area 11.

Council Report 71 1 712 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Council has an established advice team and in place to support and Stoneyholme help householders find suitable new homes.

Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy Area and is working with partners to provide a Action range of options for

affordable rent and Plan purchase to meet housing

need. - Consultation

Option 2 – Employment and Redevelopment Report 02/DS/12- Mr. It is recognised that, like In The Preferred Option should take a K.Cheetham many areas of traditional part balanced approach when considering terraced housing, this regeneration proposals to tackle the area lacks open space. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Disagrees with this Parts of this issues in this neighbourhood and the option because no green neighbourhood suffer from area as a whole. Duke spaces, too much poor housing and The Preferred Option should define employment and not environmental conditions the District Shopping Area, assess Bar enough housing. and from anti-social the need for a range of uses and and behaviour. It is a small, open spaces and consider the need

dense area surrounded by for a Development Brief for the Stoneyholme busy main roads with the southern part of this area which has main housing areas at the the potential to create links with area northern and southern 7. ends and a range of other

uses in the central area. Area

The Housing Market Action Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides -

an opportunity to address Consultation a range of issues and the Borough

AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as Council Report 713 714 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar a whole in order to achieve its sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme

In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration Area activity. EP funding is being sought for gap Action funding for new housing

in area 7 and for Plan complementary works in

the wider area, including - refocusing the retail Consultation activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Report 23/DS/47-Mr R Walker No reason given No

Agrees with this option. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

40/DS/139 –Mrs. A. This option proposes two No Topping thinks this redevelopment sites for Duke option should be priority new housing, and for investment in relation redevelopment for new Bar to the new housing site. employment uses around and She objects to the the Heap Street area.

demolition of Heap Parts of this Stoneyholme Street where she has neighbourhood suffer from lived for 40 years and poor housing and where people get on environmental conditions well. and from anti-social

behaviour. It is a small, Area dense area surrounded by

busy main roads and with Action little open space. The Housing Market Plan

Burnley Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it -

attracts for non housing Consultation

Borough related projects provides

an opportunity to tackle

these problems and the

AAP preferred option Council should consider the area Report and surrounding areas as 715 716 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar a whole in order to achieve its sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme

In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration Area activity. EP funding is being sought for gap Action funding for new housing

in area 7 and for Plan complementary works in

the wider area, including - refocusing the retail Consultation activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11.

The Council has an Report established advice team in place to support and help householders find suitable new homes. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Duke Affordable Housing Policy and is working with Bar partners to provide a and range of options for

affordable rent and Stoneyholme purchase to meet housing need.

42/DS/161-June Proctor Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Area Disagrees with all poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing options because environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle Action uprooting long standing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and

residents is too upsetting behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. Plan Burnley for all concerned. dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define

Houses should be busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess - improved. little open space. the need for a range of open spaces Consultation

Borough The Housing Market and consider the need for a

Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern

complementary funding it part of this area which has the

Council attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7. Report related projects provides an opportunity to tackle 717 718 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar these problems and the AAP preferred option and should consider the area Stoneyholme and surrounding areas as a whole in order to achieve its sustainable regeneration.

In recognition of the Area severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, Action English Partnerships are

supporting regeneration Plan activity. EP funding is

being sought for gap - funding for new housing Consultation in area 7 and for complementary works in the wider area, including refocusing the retail Report activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The Council has an established advice team Duke in place to support and help householders find Bar suitable new homes. and

Affordability is a key issue Stoneyholme and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a

range of options for Area affordable rent and

purchase to meet housing Action need.

Other than in very Plan Burnley

exceptional cases Elevate -

will not fund Consultation improvements to

Borough properties beyond facelifting to key gateway locations. Council Report 719 720 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 47/DS/171-Z Mehmood Other than in very No exceptional cases Elevate and Agrees with this option will not fund Stoneyholme to retain part of Mark St improvements to and include them in properties beyond facelifting process. facelifting to key gateway locations. Under this policy Mark Area Street would not be supported for facelifting. Action 48/DS/176-Mr & Mrs. G. Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Leighton neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Plan poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Disagree with all 3

environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle - Options. Demolition of and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and Consultation homes is sheer behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. vandalism and only the dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define property speculators will busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess benefit. Proposes little open space. the need for a range of open spaces demolition of houses The Housing Market and consider the need for a Report south of Brennand St Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern which are occupied and complementary funding it part of this area which has the in quite good condition attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7. while facelifting north related projects provides side of Brennand St an opportunity to tackle Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

where there are derelict, these problems and the boarded up properties AAP preferred option Duke subject to previous should consider the area subsidence. Surely it and surrounding areas as Bar would be more a whole in order to and economical to refurbish achieve its sustainable

rather than rebuild. regeneration. Stoneyholme Despite problems we like the area and our home In recognition of the and don’t want to move. severe problems in the Spent money adapting wider Daneshouse area,

the house for mobility English Partnerships are Area needs and would not be supporting regeneration

able to get a similar activity. EP funding is Action house with being sought for gap compensation likely to be funding for new housing Plan

Burnley given. Elevate should be in area 7 and for

improving people’s lives complementary works in -

not destroying them as the wider area, including Consultation refocusing the retail Borough proposed and causing

anxiety and stress for activity and the possible years to come. creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Council Report 721 722 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Council has an established advice team and in place to support and Stoneyholme help householders find suitable new homes.

Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy Area and is working with partners to provide a Action range of options for

affordable rent and Plan purchase to meet housing

need. - Consultation Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to properties beyond Report facelifting to key gateway locations. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

117/DS/344-Faber MaunsellAgreefor Highways Agency Yes The Highways Agency will be consulted at all stages of the AAP Duke All options are likely to have a traffic impact on the process and on any planning strategic highway network which is located applications submitted. Bar

adjacent to this area. This area which is being and considered for a variety of uses has the potential

to significantly affect the trunk road network, due Stoneyholme to its proximity, the development proposed and the size of the development.

Whichever option is taken forward the Agency will

need to be consulted on the forthcoming stages Area of the LDF process, with these stages being

supported by assessments of the likely impact of Action that traffic on the highway network. The site needs to be developed in a sustainable manner to ensure Plan

Burnley that the need to travel is reduced. Site should be

developed with attention to access by modes of -

transport other than the private vehicle in order Consultation

Borough that the traffic impact of such developments is

minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Council Report 723 724 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Agency will need to be consulted in more detail in order that the impact of that traffic on the and

strategic highway network can be assessed. Stoneyholme Presently, the AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be undertaken.

Assessment of the impact of the development on the trunk road network will need to be undertaken Area in accordance with PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of adequate Action Transport Assessment and Travel Plan reports Plan

148/DS/410-Arthur Daley No reason given No - Consultation Agrees with all Duke Bar Area options

149/DS/411-R. W. Oats Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Report neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Does not agree with any poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing of the 3 options. You will environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle be demolishing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and reasonable housing and behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

leaving derelict/semi dense area surrounded by derelict rented housing busy main roads and with Duke with absentee landlords. little open space. The Housing Market Bar Renewal Initiative and the and complementary funding it

attracts for non housing Stoneyholme related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the AAP preferred option

should consider the area Area and surrounding areas as

a whole in order to Action achieve its sustainable regeneration. Plan

Burnley In recognition of the severe problems in the -

wider Daneshouse area, Consultation

Borough English Partnerships are

supporting regeneration

activity. EP funding is

being sought for gap Council funding for new housing Report in area 7 and for 725 726 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar complementary works in the wider area, including and refocusing the retail Stoneyholme activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. 12/AL/427-Lancashire Agree. It is important that Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being

CC, Planning and housing land supply is prepared at the same time so that Area Environmental Services managed in a way that housing numbers and the mix of type,

does not undermine the size and tenure can be managed Action Policy 13 of the JLSP Housing Market Renewal more strategically. allows for the Initiative. replacement of cleared Plan dwellings on up to a one -

for one basis. Additional Consultation dwellings in excess of one for one will be counted against the housing provision of Policy 12 of the JLSP. Report Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

175/DS/461-Shelley Gill Parts of this No neighbourhood suffer from Duke Disagrees with this poor housing and option. Has recently environmental conditions Bar purchased the property and from anti-social and as a first time buyer and behaviour. It is a small,

has spent a considerable dense area surrounded by Stoneyholme amount of money on the busy main roads and with property. As a first time little open space. buyer, choice of property The Housing Market was limited due to the Renewal Initiative and the

increasing house prices, complementary funding it Area placing many properties attracts for non housing

out of her range. related projects provides Action an opportunity to tackle these problems and the Plan

Burnley AAP preferred option

should consider the area -

and surrounding areas as Consultation

Borough a whole in order to

achieve its sustainable regeneration. Council Report 727 728 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar In recognition of the severe problems in the and wider Daneshouse area, Stoneyholme English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is being sought for gap funding for new housing Area in area 7 and for complementary works in Action the wider area, including refocusing the retail

activity and the possible Plan creation of a public square

in the south of Area 11. - Consultation

The Council has an established advice team in place to support and help householders find Report suitable new homes.

Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

and is working with partners to provide a Duke range of options for affordable rent and Bar purchase to meet housing and need. Stoneyholme

195/DS/517 – Myra Hird Answered 17th April and No All organisations and individuals who no further comment have made representations will be enquiry about 47 received other than consulted on the Preferred Option Brennand street, whether wanting to see preferred AAP. its on north or south. option when available. Area Action Option 3 – Redevelopment Plan

Burnley for New Housing

02/DS/12-Mr. Agree but this option has Yes The Preferred Option should take a -

K.Cheetham significant funding balanced approach to tackle the Consultation Borough implications and must be issues in this neighbourhood and the

Gives the best balanced with the needs area as a whole and assess the need

opportunity for housing in the wider area. for a range of uses including open

Council & green spaces with space. Report some employment but 729 730 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar would like to see more green spaces for the and environment. Stoneyholme

21/DS/45-Anonymous No reason given No

Agrees with this option. Area 23/DS/47-Mr R Walker This is a relatively small No area which is surrounded Action Agrees with this option, by busy main roads and but housing needs to be

with little open space. Plan for single people, roads are too busy for family The Housing Market -

housing. Renewal Initiative and the Consultation complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the Report AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

a whole in order to achieve its sustainable Duke regeneration. Bar In recognition of the severe problems in the and

wider Daneshouse area, Stoneyholme English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is being sought for gap

funding for new housing Area in area 7 and for

complementary works in Action the wider area, including refocusing the retail Plan

Burnley activity and the possible creation of a public square -

in the south of Area 11. Consultation

The Housing Market Borough

Needs Assessment

undertaken in 2007 and

current housing policy Council which requires a mix of Report house types and tenure 731 732 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar will inform the provision of new housing to meet need and within the Borough. Stoneyholme

40/DS/139-Mrs A Parts of this No Topping neighbourhood suffer from poor housing and

Disagrees - Has lived on environmental conditions Area Heap Street for 40 years and from anti-social

and people all get on behaviour. It is a small, Action well, thinks that the dense area surrounded by street is fine how it is. busy main roads and with little open space. Plan The Housing Market -

Renewal Initiative and the Consultation complementary funding it attracts for non housing related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the Report AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding areas as a whole in order to Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

achieve its sustainable regeneration. Duke

In recognition of the Bar severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, and

English Partnerships are Stoneyholme supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is being sought for gap funding for new housing

in area 7 and for Area complementary works in

the wider area, including Action refocusing the retail activity and the possible Plan

Burnley creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. - Consultation

The Council has an

Borough established advice team

in place to support and

help householders find Council

suitable new homes. Report Affordability is a key issue 733 734 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and and is working with Stoneyholme partners to provide a range of options for affordable rent and purchase to meet housing need. Area

42/DS/161-June Proctor Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Action neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Disagrees with all poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing options because environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle Plan uprooting long standing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and -

residents is too upsetting behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. Consultation for all concerned. dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define Houses should be busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess improved. little open space. the need for a range of open spaces The Housing Market and consider the need for a Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern Report complementary funding it part of this area which has the attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7. related projects provides an opportunity to tackle these problems and the Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

AAP preferred option should consider the area Duke and surrounding areas as a whole in order to Bar achieve its sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are

supporting regeneration Area activity. EP funding is

being sought for gap Action funding for new housing in area 7 and for Plan

Burnley complementary works in

the wider area, including -

refocusing the retail Consultation activity and the possible Borough

creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Council Report 735 736 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar The Council has an established advice team and in place to support and Stoneyholme help householders find suitable new homes.

Affordability is a key issue and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy Area and is working with partners to provide a Action range of options for

affordable rent and Plan purchase to meet housing

Y/N

48/DS/176-Mr & Mrs. G. Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Leighton neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Duke poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing Disagree with all 3 environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle Bar Options. Demolition of and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and and homes is sheer behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole.

vandalism and only the dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define Stoneyholme property speculators will busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess benefit. Despite little open space. the need for a range of open spaces problems we like the The Housing Market and consider the need for a area and our home and Renewal Initiative and the Development Brief for the southern

don’t want to move. complementary funding it part of this area which has the Area Spent money adapting attracts for non housing potential to create links with area 7.

the house for mobility related projects provides Action needs and would not be an opportunity to tackle able to get a similar these problems and the Plan

Burnley house with AAP preferred option

compensation likely to be should consider the area -

given. Elevate should be and surrounding areas as Consultation improving people’s lives Borough a whole in order to

not destroying them as achieve its sustainable regeneration. Council Report 737 738 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar proposed and causing In recognition of the anxiety and stress for severe problems in the and years to come. wider Daneshouse area, Stoneyholme English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is being sought for gap funding for new housing Area in area 7 and for complementary works in Action the wider area, including refocusing the retail

activity and the possible Plan creation of a public square

in the south of Area 11. - Consultation

The Council has an established advice team in place to support and help householders find Report suitable new homes.

Y/N

and is working with partners to provide a Duke range of options for affordable rent and Bar purchase to meet housing and need. Stoneyholme Other than in very exceptional cases Elevate will not fund improvements to

properties beyond Area facelifting to key gateway

locations. Action

117/DS/344-Faber MaunsellAgreefor Highways Agency Yes The Highways Agency will be Plan Burnley consulted at all stages of the AAP

All options are likely to have a traffic impact on process and on any planning -

the strategic highway network which is located applications submitted. Consultation

Borough adjacent to this area. This area which is being

considered for a variety of uses has the potential

to significantly affect the trunk road network, due

Council to its proximity, the development proposed and the Report size of the development. 739 740 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Whichever option is taken forward the Agency will need to be consulted on the forthcoming stages and

of the LDF process, with these stages being Stoneyholme supported by assessments of the likely impact of that traffic on the highway network. The site needs to be developed in a sustainable manner to ensure that the need to travel is reduced. Sites should be

developed with attention to access by modes of Area transport other than the private vehicle in order

that the traffic impact of such developments is Action minimised. Improvements in public transport should be proposed where appropriate. Plan The Agency will need to be consulted in more -

detail in order that the impact of that traffic on the Consultation strategic highway network can be assessed. Presently, the AAP contains insufficient detail for that appraisal to be undertaken.

Assessment of the impact of the development on Report the trunk road network will need to be undertaken in accordance with PPG 13 and the relevant DoT Policy including the provision of adequate Transport Assessment and Travel Plan reports Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

148/DS/410-Arthur Daley No reasons given No Duke Agrees with all Duke Bar

Area options Bar and 149/DS/411-R. W. Oats Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Stoneyholme Does not agree with any poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing of the 3 options. You will environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle be demolishing and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and reasonable housing and behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. leaving derelict/semi dense area surrounded by Area derelict rented housing busy main roads and with with absentee landlords. little open space. Action The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative and the Plan

Burnley complementary funding it

attracts for non housing - related projects provides Consultation

Borough an opportunity to tackle

these problems and the

AAP preferred option

Council should consider the area and surrounding areas as Report a whole in order to 741 742 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar achieve its sustainable regeneration. and In recognition of the Stoneyholme severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is Area being sought for gap funding for new housing Action in area 7 and for complementary works in

the wider area, including Plan refocusing the retail

activity and the possible - Consultation creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. 12/AL/427-Lancashire Agree Yes Five Area Actions Plans are being CC, Planning and prepared at the same time so that Environmental Services It is important that housing housing numbers and the mix of type, Report land supply is managed in size and tenure can be managed Policy 13 of the JLSP a way that does not more strategically. allows for the undermine the Housing replacement of cleared Market Renewal Initiative. dwellings on up to a one Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

for one basis. Additional dwellings in excess of Duke one for one will be counted against the Bar housing provision of and Policy 12 of the JLSP. Stoneyholme

175/DS/461-Shelley Gill Parts of this No neighbourhood suffer from Disagrees with this poor housing and option. Has recently environmental conditions purchased the property and from anti-social Area as a first time buyer and behaviour. It is a small, has spent a considerable dense area surrounded by Action amount of money on the busy main roads and with

property. As a first time little open space. Plan Burnley buyer, choice of property The Housing Market

was limited due to the Renewal Initiative and the - increasing house prices, complementary funding it Consultation

Borough placing many properties attracts for non housing

out of her range. related projects provides

an opportunity to tackle

Council these problems and the Report AAP preferred option should consider the area 743 744 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar and surrounding areas as a whole in order to and achieve its sustainable Stoneyholme regeneration.

In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are Area supporting regeneration activity. EP funding is Action being sought for gap

funding for new housing Plan in area 7 and for

complementary works in - the wider area, including Consultation refocusing the retail activity and the possible creation of a public square in the south of Area 11. Report Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The Council has an established advice team Duke in place to support and help householders find Bar suitable new homes. and

Affordability is a key issue Stoneyholme and the Council has an Affordable Housing Policy and is working with partners to provide a

range of options for Area affordable rent and

purchase to meet housing Action need. Plan

Burnley 195/DS/517 – Myra Hird Parts of this No

neighbourhood suffer from - concerned if 47 poor housing and Consultation

Borough Brennand St is to be environmental conditions

demolished because has and from anti-social

invested in new leaded behaviour. It is a small,

upvc windows, central

Council dense area surrounded by heating. busy main roads and with Report little open space. 745 746 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Property owners who are displaced by and redevelopment proposals Stoneyholme have statutory rights to be compensated for the loss of their homes at full market value

Other Options? Area

15/DS/39-Mr Ray Winter No explanation given No Action

Has no preference for

any of the options. Plan -

22/DS/46-Mr&Mrs Other than in very No Consultation Thomas exceptional cases Elevate will not fund Happy where they live improvements to (Ford St), but would properties beyond prefer to see the facelifting to key gateway Report properties knocked locations. through to make them larger. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

28/DS/52-Alan Sturdy The key aim of Burnley's Local Plan Strategy is to Duke Says there is a need for promote growth and employment as there are diversification in the local Bar no big companies left economy. Elm Street and within the area. Business Park (EW6/1) in

areas 7and 8 is identified Stoneyholme as an Economic Improvement Area because of its potential to contribute to

diversification. Area

The Housing Market Action Renewal Initiative and the complementary funding it Plan

Burnley attracts for non housing

related projects provides -

an opportunity to address Consultation local employment issues Borough

and the AAP preferred option should consider the area and surrounding Council Report 747 748 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar areas as a whole in order to achieve sustainable and regeneration. Stoneyholme

In recognition of the severe problems in the wider Daneshouse area, English Partnerships are supporting regeneration Area activity. EP funding is being sought for gap Action funding for new housing

in area 7 and for Plan complementary works in

the wider area, including - refocusing the retail Consultation activity and the possible creation of other commercial uses and a public square in the south Report of Area 11.

40/DS/139-Mrs A Parts of this No Topping neighbourhood suffer from poor housing and Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Her house is well looked environmental conditions after, and with face-lifts and from anti-social Duke on the rest of the behaviour. Well properties on Heap St maintained properties can Bar will make them look nice be found amidst those and rather than demolition which are poorly

and landscaping. Very maintained and vacant or Stoneyholme angry as she has spent abandoned. It is a small, a lot of money on her dense area surrounded by property. busy main roads and with little open space. Area The Housing Market

Renewal Initiative and the Action complementary funding it attracts for non housing Plan

Burnley related projects provides an opportunity to tackle -

these problems and the Consultation

AAP preferred option Borough should consider the area

and surrounding areas as a whole in order to Council achieve its sustainable Report regeneration. 749 750 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

activity and the possible Plan creation of a public square

in the south of Area 11. - Consultation

Property owners who are displaced by redevelopment proposals have statutory rights to be Report compensated for the loss of their homes at full market value Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

42/DS/161-June Proctor Other than in very In The preferred option should clearly exceptional cases Elevate part define the Colne Road District Centre Duke Says that present will not fund and consider means of encouraging housing should be improvements to property maintenance/ Bar upgraded not pulled properties beyond improvements, controlling traffic and down – improvement facelifting to key gateway using Brennand Street and of

grants for internal & locations. resolving social issues such as crime, Stoneyholme external work. 1-21 anti-social behaviour and nuisance. Bracewell Street, garden Local Plan policies seek houses would benefit to improve the vitality of from refurbishment. district and local centres

including Colne Road Area Another supermarket District Centre (CF11/1) (Lidl) is not needed. and support] new retail Action development of a scale Brennand Street – traffic and character consistent

calming – present ones Plan

Burnley with the size and function not effective. of the centre.

- Consultation Area 11 is Burnley Lane Brennand Street is used Borough not Duke Bar. as a vehicle 'rat run'

between Colne Road and More policing and street Briercliffe Road, two main cleaning. Council Report roads. 751 752 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar A youth centre for the Noted street corner kids. and Noted Stoneyholme Noted

48/DS/176-Mr & Mrs. G. Other than in very In The Preferred Option should consider Leighton exceptional cases Elevate part means of encouraging property Area will not fund maintenance/ improvements, Clean up the area, improvements to controlling traffic using Brennand Action facelift the buildings and properties beyond Street and of resolving social issues make grants available for facelifting to key gateway such as crime, anti-social behaviour

interior improvements. locations. and nuisance. Plan The Council operates a

Purchase all rented -

Vacants Property Initiative Consultation properties, refurbish and which aims to acquire sell to owner occupiers vacant properties, improve only. them and sell them on. A Selective Licensing Make the area for

scheme to tackle Report residents vehicles problems associated with access only to stop the private rented housing is use of Brennand St as a being implemented in the “rat run”. Speed calming South West Burnley Area has been a waste of time Action Plan area and if and money. A link road Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

around Rushworth St successful could be used East could be achieved in other areas which Duke without knocking down qualify under the any houses. regulations. Bar

Council has not invested Brennand Street is used and

in the area, as has been as a vehicle 'rat run' Stoneyholme done in Stoneyholme, between Colne Road and thereby creating the Briercliffe Road, two main problems and roads. deliberately driving down

property prices. Area

110/DS/306-Alasdair Noted Yes The preferred option should consider Action Simpson the inclusion of this quiet route to link

to the hospital. Plan

Burnley LCC Senior Cycling Officer - Consultation

Borough Proposes a cycle link

from Briercliffe Rd

Gyratory system

northwards to the Council hospital, across the Report cleared site of housing 753 754 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar from Heap to Rylands St, east of Bishops Mill and and along Bracewell Street. Stoneyholme

148/DS/410-Arthur Daley Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider open space and car parking needs The Council should in the area.

consider making more Area green spaces, thinks all

areas are in need of Action some improvements and suggests that more car park spaces and green Plan areas for children should -

be provided. Consultation

149/DS/411-R. W. Oats Other than in very In The Preferred Option should take a exceptional cases Elevate part balanced approach when considering The options should be will not fund redevelopment or improving existing for homezones or improvements to neighbourhoods in order to tackle Report remodelling or demolition properties beyond the issues in this neighbourhood and of Brennand Street and facelifting to key gateway the area as a whole. the area between locations. A range of The Preferred Option should consider Bracewell St and Colne redevelopment options in means of tackling social issues such Rd. Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The housing should be the Brennand Street and as crime, anti-social behaviour and removed from private Colne Road were included nuisance which experience has Duke landlords in favour of in the consultation shown can be linked to badly Housing Associations. options. managed private properties. Bar

A Selective Licensing and

scheme to tackle Stoneyholme problems associated with private rented housing is being implemented in the South West Burnley Area

Action Plan area and if Area successful could be used

in other areas which Action qualify under the regulations. The Council Plan

Burnley is also working with a partner Registered Social -

Landlord in this area. Consultation

Borough

161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should take a

Furlonger, Development balanced approach when considering

Council Manager, Elevate redevelopment or improving existing Report neighbourhoods in order to tackle 755 756 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar We recognise that this the issues in this neighbourhood and area is affected by the the area as a whole. and road system yet forms a Stoneyholme key position between Colne Rd and Briercliffe Rd. We require further analysis of the sustainability of the Area remaining stock before any further demolition Action was supported at this point in time. Facelifting

will only be supported Plan along gateways or along

through routes. - Consultation

162/DS/433-Chapman Parts of this In The Preferred Option should take a Robinson Architects for neighbourhood suffer from part balanced approach when considering Gleesons poor housing and redevelopment or improving existing environmental conditions neighbourhoods in order to tackle Report Most of this area will and from anti-social the issues in this neighbourhood and remain as existing. behaviour. It is a small, the area as a whole. Highway remodelling is dense area surrounded by The Preferred Option should define busy main roads and with the District Shopping Area, assess little open space. the need for a range of open spaces Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

to be carried out at the In recognition of the and consider the need for a junction of Barden severe problems in the Development Brief for the southern Duke Lane/Barden St/Colne wider Daneshouse area, part of this area which has the Road to remove the English Partnerships are potential to create links with area 7. Bar gyratory system and supporting regeneration and restore 2-way traffic flow. activity. EP funding is

being sought for gap Stoneyholme Barden Street frontage funding for new housing will be enhanced by in area 7 and for demolishing the terrace complementary works in which backs on to it. the wider area, including

Heap Street properties refocusing the retail Area will front on to Barden activity and the possible

St. These properties to creation of a public square Action be face lifted. in the south of Area 11.

Public realm Plan Burnley

improvements will -

provide an attractive Consultation setting for the church

Borough and create a new high quality pedestrian route between the new Council Report 757 758 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar development in Daneshouse and Duke and Bar. Stoneyholme

Proposals will take account of the new LIDL store to be developed on Colne Rd. Area

175/DS/461-Shelley Gill Other than in very In The Preferred Option should take a Action exceptional cases Elevate part balanced approach when considering Other options that could will not fund redevelopment or improving existing be considered are face improvements to neighbourhoods in order to tackle Plan lifting & public open properties beyond the issues in this neighbourhood and -

space, making the area facelifting to key gateway the area as a whole. Consultation more attractive and locations. desirable for first time buyers who are The Council has an struggling to get on the established advice team

property ladder. Believes in place to support and Report that the area of help householders find Daneshouse, Duke Bar suitable new homes. and Stoneyholme should Area 11 –North Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

be regenerated, but Affordability is a key issue more consideration and and the Council has an Duke advice needs to be Affordable Housing Policy generated for those who and is working with Bar could possibly end up partners to provide a and losing their homes to range of options for

‘redevelopment.’ affordable rent and Stoneyholme purchase to meet housing need.

Table 2.13 Area 12 Area

Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Action Duke Bar on Option Preferred

Option? Plan Burnley

Y/N - Consultation Borough

Option 1 – Facelifting Council Report 759 760 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 38/DS/120-N Chowdhary Funding to acquire and No treat the former garage and Landscaped courtyard is site could be an issue. Stoneyholme a very good idea, but Design of the courtyard could attract youngsters would aim to deter to play ball games and nuisance to adjacent hang around at night. houses. Area 117/DS/344- Faber Noted No

Maunsell for the Highways Action Agency

Unlikely to have a material Plan impact on the trunk road -

network, therefore the Consultation Agency makes no comments.

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society Report

Option 1 yes Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Option 2 – Business Duke Improvement Bar 83/DS/272-Mr Starkie Alleygating schemes are Yes The Preferred Option should carried out at the rear of consider whether crime levels and Agrees with this option as streets which have high warrant alleygating under Stoneyholme it contains something for levels of reported crime. existing priorities. everyone. Wants Option 2 to include alleygating to stop people congregating at the rear of properties at night. Area Action 117/DS/344- Faber Agree No Maunsell for the Highways Plan

Burnley Agency -

Unlikely to have a material Consultation

impact on the trunk road

Borough network, therefore the

Agency makes no comments.

Council Report Other Options? 761 762 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 38/DS/120-N Chowdhary Bright Street is outside the In The Preferred Option should AAP boundary. part consider the potential for and Traffic calming measures improvement of the traffic gyratory Stoneyholme on Barden Lane, Newman Barden Lane and system at Barden Lane, Newman St and Bright Street. Newman Street are part Street, Colne Road, Briercliffe of a one way system Road and Rylands Street. linked to the gyratory traffic system at Duke Bar. Area It is proposed that this traffic system be Action re-assessed in the light of

redevelopment proposals Plan for Areas 7 and 11. - Consultation 161/DS/430-Judith Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Furlonger, Development define the Colne Road District Manager, Elevate Centre and the potential for improvement of the traffic gyratory

The extent of the system at Barden Lane, Newman Report retail/neighbourhood Street, Colne Road, Briercliffe centre along Colne Road Road and Rylands Street. needs to be designed more clearly in relation to creating a new district Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

centre for the area. Treatment of this section Duke of Colne Road links to potential improvements to Bar Route G options and Area and 7 options. Facelifting

would not be supported Stoneyholme unless part of a gateway or principle through route.

162/DS/433-Chapman Agree Yes The Preferred Option should Robinson Architects for consider improvements to the Area Gleesons Colne Road shops in order to improve this main route through Action Frontage improvements the area.

will be carried out to The Barden Lane frontage facing Plan Burnley sustain the Colne Road the proposed redevelopment site

shops. in area 7 is a key frontage and - should be considered for Consultation

Borough Some of the existing redevelopment, together with the

housing stock fronting garage site at the rear.

Barden Lane will be

re-developed with new Council housing. This will be Report slightly set back from the 763 764 Burnley Daneshouse, Area 12 – West Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Duke Bar on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar road to create a more spacious setting and allow and for landscaping. The site Stoneyholme for redevelopment will include the garages behind the Barden Lane properties. Area

Table 2.14 Other Areas Action Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option Plan Preferred

Option? - Consultation Y/N

55/DS/232-Peter Salt Other than in very No exceptional , Elevate will Report Some of the other areas not not fund improvements to suggested also need a face properties beyond lift facelifting to key gateway locations. Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

160/DS/422 & The site is on the edge of No 177/DS/463-RPS Planning for the AAP area, and is an Duke Bett Homes urban fringe site, part of which (garage site/yard) Bar In response to consultation has been refused planning and have submitted proposals for permission on appeal for

land in Area 5 and Local Plan residential use. Stoneyholme Site E2 together with land to the west (Old Hall Farm site It is important that housing and adjacent garage/yard land supply is managed in site) off Oswald Street. (see a way that does not

Plan forwarded with letter) undermine the Housing Area Market Renewal Initiative The site is promoted for and five Area Actions Plans Action residential development, are being prepared at the together with open space and same time so that housing

possibly other Plan

Burnley numbers and the mix of sports/community facilities. type, size and tenure can -

The site is considered to be be managed more Consultation an excellent housing strategically.

Borough opportunity for the following

reasons: There are sufficient

redevelopment and

Council It is centrally located within development sites within Report the Elevate HMR boundary where housing and its 765 766 Burnley Daneshouse, Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar associated regeneration the core of the urban area benefits are promoted. This to meet the housing and is clearly a major requirement . Stoneyholme consideration for the future use of the site.

It is central within the Area Action Plan and is seen as an area demanding special focus Area and intervention, dovetailing with the HMRI. Action

The Council itself has Plan promoted with site (2004/5)

as a housing opportunity site. - Consultation The above factors lead us to the view that the site is ideally suited for residential development and particularly where that would deliver a Report type of housing that is currently not available in the locality. Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Careful soundings have been taken from a number of Duke community representatives working in or close to the Bar Daneshouse area. The and overall response has been

entirely positive, particularly Stoneyholme if the proposal was to deliver a significant element of houses designed to accommodate large families.

It is very evident that there is Area a serious shortage of large

family units in the local area Action and the result of this is either overcrowding of properties of Plan

Burnley insufficient size or the loss of more affluent residents who -

can afford to purchase larger Consultation

Borough properties outside the area.

It is apparent that this housing

problem is one of

considerable sensitivity to Council many local people and their Report representatives. The land at 767 768 Burnley Daneshouse, Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Oswald street is ideally located adjacent to the and established residential area Stoneyholme to deliver the type of housing aspired to by the community and possibly additional planning gains needed by and aspired to the local Area community on the site or adjacent land. Bett Homes Action intend to obtain more empirical information via

surveys of the local Plan community and /or community

consultation event which will - Consultation be provided to the Council in due course, probably as a Statement of Community Involvement to reflect best

practice on ‘front loading’. Report

Bett Homes acknowledge two important matters to be addressed as part of any development scheme: Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

First the Biological Heritage Site designation. Two Duke independent advice notes prepared by qualified Bar ecologists, suggest that this and designation is not warranted,

or at the very least Stoneyholme questionable. Bett Homes intend to properly consider the ecological value (if any) of the site and perhaps retain

a managed proportion as part Area of a future development

scheme. Action

Secondly requiring further Plan

Burnley consideration, the use of the site for the deposit of clay.

Discussions have taken place Consultation about the need for planning Borough

permission for removing clay

deposits. If permission is not required for removal it would Council Report arguably render the site as 769 770 Burnley Daneshouse, Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar previously developed land, regardless of its current and ‘greened over’ appearance. Stoneyholme

166/DS/439-De Pol The site is on the edge of No Associates Ltd, Planning and the AAP area, and is an Development Consultants, for urban fringe site, part of

Keyworker Homes (NW) Ltd. which (garage site/yard) Area has been refused planning

The area of particular interest permission on appeal for Action is located immediately to the residential use. east of Oswald St, south of Area 6, North of Area 5 and It is important that housing Plan west of Area E” (identified on land supply is managed in -

a plan attached to the a way that does not Consultation comment and consisting of undermine the Housing Old Hall Farm and garage Market Renewal Initiative site/yard to the north) and five Area Actions Plans are being prepared at the

The site comprises a variety same time so that housing Report of somewhat unsightly numbers and the mix of buildings and structures to the type, size and tenure can north and Old Hall Farm and be managed more its cartilage to the south all of strategically. which are considered to Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

constitute previously There are sufficient developed land. It is also redevelopment and Duke understood that the overall development sites within site has had a relatively the core of the urban area Bar recent history of various to meet the housing and planning permissions for requirement .

residential development. In Stoneyholme light of the nature of the site and of its location it is felt that the site should be identified as an area of change. This is

particularly the case if Option Area 2 for Area 6 and Option 3 for

area 5 are pursued. In this Action respect it is requested that the site be identified as one for Plan

Burnley which there are opportunities

for change and whereby -

residential redevelopment Consultation

Borough would appear to be the most

appropriate form of development. Council Report 771 772 Burnley Daneshouse, Options for Other Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Areas on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar 01/N/172-Kenneth Neild These areas are outside No the boundary of the and Lower Brunshaw, Leyland Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Road and Albert Street should Stoneyholme AAP and of be included in the suggested the four other AAP's being areas for change. Better Play prepared. facilities should be provided Area

Table 2.15 Local Plan Allocations Action Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option Preferred Plan Option? -

Y/N Consultation EW1/5 – Princess Way Employment Site

12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Planning Permission Yes The Preferred Option will take into Report Planning and has been granted for account any developments Environmental Services redevelopment of part committed through the grant of of the Local Plan planning permission. Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse, Y/N The AAP correctly Employment site identifies the Local Plan EW1/5 for a new

employment allocation Burnley College site. Duke EW1/5. While the identification of this The remainder of the Bar allocation ensures site (7.3Ha) is the

conformity with the subject of a feasibility and existing Local Plan the study to create an Director of Strategic Education and Stoneyholme Planning and Transport is Enterprise Park. aware that the future of the site for this use is questionable given current proposals for part of the Area area. The AAP proposals are not therefore reflective Action of what is actually being

proposed for the area. It Plan Burnley is recognised that the

identification of this - allocation ensures Consultation

Borough conformity with the Local

Plan on this issue. Council Report 773 774 Burnley Daneshouse, Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option

Borough Preferred Option?

Y/N Duke

Council E2 – Oswald Street

County Biological Bar Heritage Site and 160/DS/422 & The site is on the edge No Stoneyholme 177/DS/463-RPS of the AAP area, and Planning for Bett Homes is an urban fringe site which is protected in In response to the Burnley Local Plan consultation have as a Biological submitted proposals for Heritage Site. Area land in Area 5 and Local Plan Site E2 together with An up to date Action land to the west (Old Hall ecological assessment

Farm site and adjacent is being carried out Plan garage/yard site) off and the final report is

Oswald Street. (see Plan expected by the end - forwarded with letter) of 2007. Consultation

The site is promoted for It is important that residential development, housing land supply is together with open space managed in a way that and possibly other does not undermine Report sports/community the Housing Market facilities. The site is Renewal Initiative and considered to be an five Area Actions Plans are being Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse, Y/N excellent housing prepared at the same opportunity for the time so that housing

following reasons: numbers and the mix Duke of type, size and It is centrally located tenure can be Bar within the Elevate HMR managed more

boundary where housing strategically. and and its associated regeneration benefits are There are sufficient Stoneyholme promoted. This is clearly redevelopment and a major consideration for development sites the future use of the site. within the core of the urban area to meet the

It is central within the Area housing requirement . Area Action Plan and is seen

as an area demanding Action special focus and intervention, dovetailing Plan

Burnley with the HMRI.

The Council itself has Consultation promoted this site Borough

(2004/5) as a housing opportunity site. Council Report 775 776 Burnley Daneshouse, Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option

Borough Preferred Option?

Y/N Duke

Council The above factors lead us

to the view that the site is Bar ideally suited for and residential development

and particularly where that Stoneyholme would deliver a type of housing that is currently not available in the locality. Area Careful soundings have

been taken from a number Action of community representatives working in or close to the Plan Daneshouse area. The -

overall response has been Consultation entirely positive, particularly if the proposal was to deliver a significant element of houses

designed to accommodate Report large families. It is very evident that there is a serious shortage of large family units in the local Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse, Y/N area and the result of this is either overcrowding of

properties of insufficient Duke size or the loss of more affluent residents who can Bar afford to purchase larger

properties outside the and area. It is apparent that this housing problem is Stoneyholme one of considerable sensitivity to many local people and their representatives. The land at Oswald street is ideally Area located adjacent to the established residential Action area to deliver the type of

housing aspired to by the Plan Burnley community and possibly

additional planning gains - needed by and aspired to Consultation

Borough the local community on

the site or adjacent land.

Bett Homes intend to

Council obtain more empirical information via surveys of Report the local community and 777 778 Burnley Daneshouse, Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option

Borough Preferred Option?

Y/N Duke

Council /or community

consultation event which Bar will be provided to the and Council in due course,

probably as a Statement Stoneyholme of Community Involvement to reflect best practice on ‘front loading’.

Bett Homes Area acknowledges two

important matters to be Action addressed as part of any development scheme: Plan First the Biological

Heritage Site designation. - Consultation Two independent advice notes prepared by qualified ecologists, suggest that this

designation is not Report warranted, or at the very least questionable. Bett Homes intend to properly consider the ecological value (if any) of the site Local Plan Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred Allocations on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse, Y/N and perhaps retain a managed proportion as

part of a future Duke development scheme.

Secondly, requiring Bar

further consideration, the and use of the site for the deposit of clay. Stoneyholme Discussions have taken place about the need for planning permission for removing clay deposits. If

permission is not required Area for removal it would

arguably render the site Action as previously developed land, regardless of its Plan

Burnley current ‘greened over’

appearance. - Consultation Borough

Council Report 779 780 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.16 Route A

Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred

Borough on Option Preferred

Option? Duke Council

Y/N Bar and Option 1

–Environmental Stoneyholme Enhancement 110/DS/306-Alasdair Agree Yes The preferred option should Simpson consider improvements to the canal towpath and potential links LCC Senior Cycling to a range of facilities in order to Area Officer encourage cycling Action Highlights the canal towpath as an opportunity Plan to encourage cycling

through tow path - improvements. Links to a Consultation variety of places- Railway Station, Town Centre, Retail Park. Nearby links to the Greenway which is being created along the Report Brun Valley-see Route C

117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for the Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Agency process and on any planning applications submitted. Duke The Agency welcomes the

proposals to increase Bar access by alternative modes of transport other and

than the private car. Stoneyholme Where proposals are likely to result in changes in traffic flows, queuing and delays at junctions for

vehicles the Agency will Area need to be consulted in

order to ensure that the Action proposals do not result in an adverse impact on the Plan

Burnley trunk road network. - 161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation

Borough Furlonger, Development consider environmental

Manager, Elevate enhancements to main vehicular,

cycling and pedestrian links.

Broadly support Council environmental Report enhancements to main 781 782 Burnley Daneshouse, Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar vehicular, cycling and pedestrian links. and Stoneyholme 165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Cowley, Planning Officer, consider links to the Brun Valley Lancashire County Greenway Council Area The proposed Brun Valley

Greenway Improved Action Route which links Burnley Central Station with Harle Syke, Pike Hill and Plan Brownside through parks -

and open space will open Consultation up the Brun and Don Valleys to public access, create a green corridor leading into the centre

Burnley and create a Report cycle, bridle and walking route into the town. It will be an important leisure asset for the area enabling easy access to Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

the countryside from local urban areas. The project Duke has secured £150k grant from SITA Trust, a landfill Bar tax credit scheme, and and awaits a decision from

LEP on further funding to Stoneyholme meet the outstanding costs of £150k.

There has been a positive

response to consultation Area with 7 local schools

wanting to be involved Action with potential environmental arts and Plan

Burnley conservation projects and over 70 responses -

supporting the Greenway Consultation

from a variety of users Borough across the area.

The Greenway links into Council

the Daneshouse Duke Bar Report and Stoneyholme area 783 784 Burnley Daneshouse, Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar from Thursby Gardens and the Leeds Liverpool and Canal and would be Stoneyholme complementary to the proposals in the area action plan and a great recreational asset for the area. It supports the Area opportunities identified in the Environmental Action Section, particularly access to the canal and

areas of open space. Plan

A number of - improvements would be Consultation carried out along the canal as part of the enhancement of the Burnley Way including Report repairs to stone seating, better signage and interpretation. This could complement the proposals in this option. Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

174/DS/460-Jenny Noted Yes The preferred option should Slaughter, Burnley consider the Community Farm Duke Community Farm. proposals and the potential links with the use and the improvement Bar Burnley Community Farm of the canalside. Trust proposes to make and

use of the Canal Corridor A new link across the rail line Stoneyholme from Brougham St through from Old Hall Street in to Barden Mill, as part of Daneshouse to Stoneyholme the overall strategic should be investigated. Community Farm plan,

which would enhance Area current parkland, amenity,

recreation and wildlife Action uses.

Some initial discussions Plan Burnley with BWB and a local -

canal boat business have Consultation

been pursued, to

Borough potentially allow

Community Farm users to

use the canal to link the Council

proposed Community Report Farm sites together, as 785 786 Burnley Daneshouse, Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar part of enhanced visitor facilities and activities to and be developed with other Stoneyholme partners.

This proposal would include enhanced use of the Byerden Holme Linear park alongside the canal. Area

The Community Farm Action proposals would tie

together canalside uses Plan and amenities and

facilitate improved use of - this part of the canal Consultation corridor.

There is potential for a link from the proposed Community Farm site next Report to the Gasworks to the new Sixth Form College and Special needs educational site at Barden. Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

The “Greenway” route proposals linking Duke Stoneyholme and Daneshouse with a Bar pedestrian bridge over the and existing railway line, next

to the proposed Stoneyholme Community Farm site on the Oswald Street Coal yard would further improve access between

the communities and Area amenity areas. Action BCF will be discussing these options with other Plan

Burnley agencies, as part of its strategic development -

plan. Consultation

Borough

03/ALL/219-Norma Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

Duckett, Hon Secretary, consider supporting

Council Burnley & Pendle Section, environmental, pedestrian and Report CTC cycling facilities in the area. 787 788 Burnley Daneshouse, Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option

Borough Preferred Option? Duke Y/N Council Bar Agree with option 1 because it supports and environmental, pedestrian Stoneyholme and cycling facilities in the area.

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No

Society Area

Option 1 yes Action

Option 2 – No Plan Changes -

174/DS/460-Jenny Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Consultation Slaughter, Burnley consider enhancements of the Community Farm. canal corridor to achieve overall environmental and amenity The BCF Trust believes improvements as part of the

that canal corridor overall strategy for the area's Report enhancements are regeneration. necessary to achieve overall environmental and amenity improvements to the Daneshouse Route A – Canal Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred on Option Preferred Option? Daneshouse,

Y/N

Stoneyholme area, as the corridor is the Spine for Duke the whole area. The corridor should therefore Bar not be neglected as part and of the overall strategy for

the area’s regeneration. Stoneyholme

Table 2.17 Route B

Route B – Area Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Town Action Centre Option 1 – Plan

Burnley Improvements to

Pedestrian and - Cycle Access to Consultation

Borough the Town Centre

Council Report 789 790 Burnley Daneshouse, Route B – Pedestrian/Cycle

Borough Links to the Town Centre

110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Duke

Council Simpson consider improved cycle links to the

town centre and the potential to Bar LCC Senior Cycling provide a continuous cycle route on and Officer highlights the Colne Road and an alternative cycle

potential for routes D & B route along Briercliffe Road Stoneyholme for improved cycle links to town centre – see also other options for additional links. Area LCC would like to get a continuous cycle route up Action Colne Road. Little potential to improve cycle

facilities on Briercliffe Plan Road. Encouraging traffic

to use alternative routes - Consultation to Briercliffe Road such as Eastern Ave might be an option, but as the main route to a hospital this is

probably not realistic. Report Colne Rd & Briercliffe Rd are mixed use streets. Various councils such as Crewe and Hull have carried out schemes on Route B – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Town Centre Daneshouse, mixed used streets that might be worthwhile considering. Duke 117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be

Maunsell for the Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP Bar Agency process and on any planning applications submitted. and The Agency welcomes the Stoneyholme proposals to increase access by alternative modes of transport other than the private car. Where proposals are likely Area to result in changes in traffic flows, queuing and Action delays at junctions for vehicles, the Agency will

need to be consulted in Plan Burnley order to ensure that the

proposals do not result in - Consultation

an adverse impact on the

Borough trunk road network.

161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Council Furlonger, Development consider the potential for Report Manager, Elevate improvement of the traffic gyratory 791 792 Burnley Daneshouse, Route B – Pedestrian/Cycle

Borough Links to the Town Centre

Broadly support system at Barden Lane, Newman Duke

Council environmental Street, Colne Road, Briercliffe Road

enhancements to main and Rylands Street (St Andrews Bar vehicular, cycling and Church island) . and pedestrian links. Stoneyholme A fundamental review is required of the vehicular circulation around the St Andrews Church island

including a review of the Area junction with Barden Lane

in view of the access to Action and from the new college campus. Plan

03/ALL/219-Norma Noted Yes The Preferred Option should - Duckett, Hon Secretary, support environmental, pedestrian Consultation Burnley & Pendle Section, and cycling facilities in the area. CTC

Agree with option 1 because it supports Report environmental, pedestrian and cycling facilities in the area. Route B – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Town Centre Daneshouse, 06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society

Option 1 yes Duke

Option 2 – No Bar Changes and

Other Options? Stoneyholme 110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Simpson consider a network of cycle links/greenroutes to a wide range LCC Senior Cycling of facilities and the countryside. Officer Area

Proposes cycle way Action links/quiet routes from Princess Way (also see Plan

Burnley routes D & B) along the

northern edge of the -

Industrial site and along Consultation

Borough Holme Road across the

river to Pendle Way as part of the Greenway Scheme along the Brun Council Report 793 794 Burnley Daneshouse, Route B – Pedestrian/Cycle

Borough Links to the Town Centre

Valley and linking to the Duke

Council Hospital/Heasandford

Area. Bar and

Table 2.18 Route C Stoneyholme

Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Heasandford Area Area

Option 1 – Action Improvements to Pedestrian and Plan Cycle Access to the East - Consultation 110/DS/306-Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Simpson consider links to Brun Valley Greenway, Town Centre, Catholic LCC Senior Cycling Schools, Wheeled Sports Facility,

Officer Sir Thursby School, Heasandford Report Industrial Estate and westwards to Highlights links to Brun Pendle Way. Valley Greenway, Town Centre, Catholic Schools, Wheeled Sports Facility, Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Heasandford Daneshouse, Area Sir Thursby School, Heasandford Industrial

Estate and westwards to Duke Pendle Way. Bar 117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for the Highways consulted at all stages of the AAP and

Agency process and on any planning Stoneyholme applications submitted. The Agency welcomes the proposals to increase access by alternative modes of transport other Area than the private car. Where proposals are likely Action to result in changes in traffic flows, queuing and

delays at junctions for Plan Burnley vehicles, the Agency will

need to be consulted in - Consultation order to ensure that the

Borough proposals do not result in an adverse impact on the trunk road network. Council Report 795 796 Burnley Daneshouse, Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle

Borough Links to the Heasandford

Area Duke

Council 161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

Furlonger, Development consider environmental Bar Manager, Elevate enhancements to main vehicular, and cycling and pedestrian links.

Broadly support Stoneyholme environmental enhancements to main vehicular, cycling and pedestrian links. Area 165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

Cowley, Planning Officer, consider links to the Brun Valley Action Lancashire County Greenway Council Plan

The proposed Brun Valley -

Greenway Improved Consultation Route which links Burnley Central Station with Harle Syke, Pike Hill and Brownside through parks and open space will open Report up the Brun and Don Valleys to public access, create a green corridor leading into the centre Burnley and create a Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Heasandford Daneshouse, Area cycle, bridle and walking route into the town. It will

be an important leisure Duke asset for the area enabling easy access to Bar the countryside from local

urban areas. The project and has secured £150k grant from SITA Trust, a landfill Stoneyholme tax credit scheme, and awaits a decision from LEP on further funding to meet the outstanding costs of £150k. Area

There has been a positive Action response to consultation with 7 local schools Plan

Burnley wanting to be involved

with potential -

environmental arts and Consultation

Borough conservation projects and

over 70 responses

supporting the Greenway from a variety of users Council Report across the area. 797 798 Burnley Daneshouse, Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle

Borough Links to the Heasandford

Area Duke

Council The Greenway links into

the Daneshouse, Duke Bar Bar and Stoneyholme and area from Thursby

Gardens and the Leeds - Stoneyholme Liverpool Canal and would be complementary to the proposals in the area action plan and a great

recreational asset for the Area area. It supports the

opportunities identified in Action the Environmental Section, particularly access to the canal and Plan areas of open space. - Consultation Links from the Greenway west into the Walshaw school sites and Heasandford Industrial

estate are being Report considered, which could link to the access out of the to the east. Route C – Pedestrian/Cycle Links to the Heasandford Daneshouse, Area 03/ALL/219-Norma Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Duckett, Hon Secretary, consider environmental, pedestrian

Burnley & Pendle Section, and cycling facilities in the area. Duke CTC

Agree with option 1 Bar

because it supports and environmental, pedestrian and cycling facilities in the Stoneyholme area.

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society Area

Option 1 yes Action

Option 2 – No Plan

Burnley Changes

Other Options? - Consultation Borough

Council Report 799 800 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.19 Route D

Route D –

Borough Princess Way Option 1 – Duke Pedestrian Council Enhancements Bar 110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should and Simpson consider improved cycle links

to the town centre and other Stoneyholme LCC Senior Cycling Officer areas and facilities. highlights potential for route D & B for improved cycle links to town centre – see also other options for additional Area links. Action 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be for the Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the Plan AAP process and on any The Agency welcomes the planning applications -

proposals to increase access submitted. Consultation by alternative modes of transport other than the private car. Where proposals are likely to result in changes

in traffic flows, queuing and Report delays at junctions for vehicles the Agency will need to be consulted in order to ensure that the proposals do Route D – Princess Way

not result in an adverse Daneshouse, impact on the trunk road network.

The Agency will need to be consulted on this option which Duke proposes improvements in pedestrian facilities from the M65 including the introduction Bar

of a road crossing to and complement/replace the existing underpass. The Stoneyholme Agency will need to assess the potential impact of these proposals to ensure that traffic capacity is not

impeded, or safety for all road Area users negatively affected by

the option tabled. Full Action consultation in the process is required. Plan Burnley

161/DS/430-Judith Furlonger, Noted Yes The Preferred Option should - Consultation Development Manager, consider environmental

Borough Elevate enhancements to main

vehicular, cycling and

Broadly support pedestrian links.

Council environmental enhancements Report to main vehicular, cycling and pedestrian links. 801 802 Burnley Daneshouse, Route D – Princess Way

Borough 165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Cowley, Planning Officer, consider links to the Brun Lancashire County Council Valley Greenway and the Duke

Council potential to make better

The proposed Brun Valley provision for horse riders to Bar Greenway Improved Route cross Princess Way in order and which links Burnley Central to access countryside routes.

Station with Harle Syke, Pike Stoneyholme Hill and Brownside through parks and open space will open up the Brun and Don Valleys to public access,

create a green corridor Area leading into the centre

Burnley and create a cycle, Action bridle and walking route into the town. It will be an important leisure asset for the Plan area enabling easy access to -

the countryside from local Consultation urban areas. The project has secured £150k grant from SITA Trust, a landfill tax credit scheme, and awaits a

decision from LEP on further Report funding to meet the outstanding costs of £150k. Route D – Princess Way

There has been a positive Daneshouse, response to consultation with 7 local schools wanting to be involved with potential environmental arts and

conservation projects and Duke over 70 responses supporting the Greenway from a variety Bar of users across the area. and The Greenway links into the Daneshouse Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Stoneyholme area from Thursby Gardens and the Leeds Liverpool Canal and would be complementary to

the proposals in the area Area action plan and a great

recreational asset for the Action area. It supports the opportunities identified in the Plan

Burnley Environmental Section,

particularly access to the - canal and areas of open Consultation

Borough space.

We are investigating a bridle

and cycle line from Thursby Council Gardens east (sic) to reach Report Crow Wood. The Greenway 803 804 Burnley Daneshouse, Route D – Princess Way

Borough would potentially widen the route through Thursby Gardens to 2.5m to allow Duke

Council multi-use. From Thursby

Gardens the route would link Bar to BW124, follow Monk Hall and Street and get to BW9 along

the tow path, or go down Stoneyholme Daneshouse Road along Oswald Street, down March Street to Princess Way to reach Crow Wood. Area In order to cross Princess

Way, bikes can use the Action subway from Daneshouse Road and Brougham St. However, it is not suitable for Plan horses, because it is too low -

and dismounting would be Consultation dangerous. A road crossing as proposed in your option 1 would therefore be beneficial to horse riders, as well as

pedestrians and cyclists. Report

The BHS have suggested a Pegasus crossing on the grass central reservation, which allow riders to get to Route D – Princess Way

Holme Road and Crow Wood Daneshouse, Equestrian Centre. From here riders could link to Ightenhill, Pendle Hall Farm, etc. Andrew Brown, owner of

Crow Wood is very supportive Duke of establishing this link. The Highways authority may be Bar able to contribute to the cost

of the crossing. and Stoneyholme 03/ALL/219-Norma Duckett, Noted Yes The Preferred Options should Hon Secretary, Burnley & consider environmental, Pendle Section, CTC pedestrian and cycling facilities in the area. Agree with option 1 because Area it supports environmental, pedestrian and cycling Action facilities in the area. Plan

Burnley 06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society - Consultation Option 1 yes Borough

Other Options? 110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should

Council Simpson consider cycle way links along the northern edge of Report LCC Senior Cycling Officer the Industrial site and along 805 806 Burnley Daneshouse, Route D – Princess Way

Borough Proposes cycle way links Holme Road across the river from Princess way (also see to Pendle Way as part of the routes D & B) along the Greenway Scheme along the Duke

Council northern edge of the Industrial Brun Valley and linking to the

site and along Holme Road Hospital/Heasandford Area. Bar across the river to Pendle and Way as part of the Greenway

Scheme along the Brun Stoneyholme Valley and linking to the Hospital/Heasandford Area.

Table 2.20 Route E Area

Route E – Colne Road Action Option 1 – Plan Pedestrian Enhancements - Consultation 41/DS/154-C Starkie Colne Road is a main route Yes The Preferred Option running north /south through should consider priorities Should be a priority for the Daneshouse Duke Bar for the wider area. investment as it will make and Stoneyholme area and is

a greater impact on Area seen as a key route for Report 10. improvement in order to improve the image of the area and encourage private investment. Route E – Colne Road

117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will Daneshouse, Maunsell for the Highways be consulted at all stages Agency of the AAP process and on any planning applications The Agency welcomes the submitted. proposals to increase Duke access by alternative modes of transport other than the private car. Where Bar

proposals are likely to and result in changes in traffic flows, queuing and delays Stoneyholme at junctions for vehicles, the Agency will need to be consulted in order to ensure that the proposals

do not result in an adverse Area impact on the trunk road

network. Action

161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option Plan Burnley Furlonger, Development should consider the

Manager, Elevate potential for improvement - Consultation

of the traffic gyratory

Borough Broadly support system at Barden Lane, environmental Newman Street, Colne

enhancements to main Road, Briercliffe Road and

Council vehicular, cycling and

Rylands Street (St Andrews Report pedestrian links. Church island) . 807 808 Burnley Daneshouse, Route E – Colne Road

Borough A fundamental review is required of the vehicular circulation around the St Duke

Council Andrews Church island

including a review of the Bar junction with Barden Lane and in view of access to and

from the new college Stoneyholme campus.

165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option Cowley, Planning Officer, should consider links to the Lancashire County Council Brun Valley Greenway, Area including better links to The proposed Brun Valley Thompson Park. Action Greenway Improved Route which links Burnley Central Plan Station with Harle Syke,

Pike Hill and Brownside - through parks and open Consultation space will open up the Brun and Don Valleys to public access, create a green corridor leading into the centre Burnley and create Report a cycle, bridle and walking route into the town. It will be an important leisure asset for the area enabling easy access to the Route E – Colne Road

countryside from local Daneshouse, urban areas. The project has secured £150k grant from SITA Trust, a landfill tax credit scheme, and

awaits a decision from LEP Duke on further funding to meet the outstanding costs of Bar £150k. and There has been a positive response to consultation Stoneyholme with 7 local schools wanting to be involved with potential environmental arts and conservation projects and

over 70 responses Area supporting the Greenway

from a variety of users Action across the area. Plan

Burnley The Greenway links into the Daneshouse, Duke Bar -

and Stoneyholme area from Consultation

Borough Thursby Gardens and the

Leeds - Liverpool Canal

and would be

complementary to the Council proposals in the area action Report plan and a great 809 810 Burnley Daneshouse, Route E – Colne Road

Borough recreational asset for the area. It supports the opportunities identified in Duke

Council the Environmental Section,

particularly access to the Bar canal and areas of open and space. Stoneyholme We have also identified the divisive effect of Colne Road in relation to users from Thompson Park. Any

improvements would be Area welcomed. Action 03/ALL/219-Norma Noted Yes The Preferred Option Duckett, Hon Secretary, should consider Plan Burnley & Pendle Section, environmental, pedestrian

CTC and cycling facilities in the - area. Consultation Agree with option 1 because it supports environmental, pedestrian and cycling facilities in the area. Report

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society Route E – Colne Road

Option 1 yes Daneshouse,

176/DS/462-Mareya Agree Yes The Preferred Option Manawar should consider facelifting Some of the properties on this to properties on Colne

Would like to see properties side of Colne Road are Road, subject to sources Duke along Colne Road (block commercial properties and of funding being identified.

including 46) facelifted, not eligible for facelifting Bar complementing the under the Elevate properties already done programme. Alternative and across the road. sources of funding would be Stoneyholme required.

Option 2 – No Changes Area Other Options? Action

Table 2.21 Route F Plan

Burnley Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse -

Road Consultation

Borough Option 1 – Pedestrian

Enhancements

Council Report 81 1 812 Burnley Daneshouse, Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse

Borough Road 110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider Simpson whether Brougham Street could be Duke

Council improved for cyclists and pedestrians

LCC Senior Cycling and any alterations to the existing Bar Officer traffic management system on and Brougham Street/ Daneshouse Road As the road is quite should consider cyclist provision. Stoneyholme narrow it is difficult to see how Daneshouse Rd & Brougham St could be made more pleasant for cyclists and pedestrians Area without substantially reducing traffic using Action them. A radical solution would be to close the

road at the canal bridge Plan but this would

disadvantage people - Consultation living in the areas. Any alterations to the traffic calming on Brougham St/Daneshouse Rd

should be cycle friendly. Report Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse Road Daneshouse, 117/DS/344-Faber Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be Maunsell for the consulted at all stages of the AAP Highways Agency process and on any planning applications submitted. The Agency welcomes Duke the proposals to increase access by alternative modes of transport other Bar

than the private car. and Where proposals are likely to result in changes Stoneyholme in traffic flows, queuing and delays at junctions for vehicles, the Agency will need to be consulted

in order to ensure that Area the proposals do not

result in an adverse Action impact on the trunk road network. Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 813 814 Burnley Daneshouse, Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse

Borough Road 161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider Furlonger, Development environmental enhancements to main Duke

Council Manager, Elevate vehicular, cycling and pedestrian

links. Bar Broadly support environmental and

enhancements to main Stoneyholme vehicular, cycling and pedestrian links.

165/DS/438-Katharine Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider

Cowley, Planning Officer, links to the Brun Valley Greenway. Area Lancashire County

Council Action

The proposed Brun Valley Greenway Plan Improved Route which -

links Burnley Central Consultation Station with Harle Syke, Pike Hill and Brownside through parks and open space will open up the Brun and Don Valleys to Report public access, create a green corridor leading into the centre Burnley and create a cycle, bridle and walking route into Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse Road Daneshouse, the town. It will be an important leisure asset for the area enabling easy access to the

countryside from local Duke urban areas. The project has secured £150k grant Bar from SITA Trust, a

landfill tax credit scheme, and and awaits a decision from LEP on further Stoneyholme funding to meet the outstanding costs of £150k.

There has been a Area positive response to

consultation with 7 local Action schools wanting to be involved with potential Plan

Burnley environmental arts and

conservation projects - and over 70 responses Consultation

Borough supporting the Greenway

from a variety of users across the area. Council Report 815 816 Burnley Daneshouse, Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse

Borough Road The Greenway links into the Daneshouse, Duke Duke

Council Bar and Stoneyholme

area from Thursby Bar Gardens and the Leeds and - Liverpool Canal and

would be complementary Stoneyholme to the proposals in the area action plan and a great recreational asset for the area. It supports

the opportunities Area identified in the

Environmental Section, Action particularly access to the canal and areas of open space. Plan -

As a potential route to Consultation Crow Wood, the pedestrian enhancements outlined in this option would be

beneficial to users of the Report Greenway. Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse Road Daneshouse, 03/ALL/219-Norma Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider Duckett, Hon Secretary, environmental, pedestrian and Burnley & Pendle cycling facilities in the area. Section, CTC Duke Agree with option 1 because it supports environmental, Bar

pedestrian and cycling and facilities in the area. Stoneyholme

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society

Option 1 yes Area

Option 2 – No Action Changes

Other Options? Plan Burnley

110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider -

Simpson the potential for directing all vehicular Consultation

Borough traffic accessing the employment site

LCC Senior Cycling via dedicated route in order to create Officer a residential only route along Brougham Street/Daneshouse Road. Council Report 817 818 Burnley Daneshouse, Route F – Brougham Street/ Daneshouse

Borough Road If land by Oswald St and by Elm St is developed Duke

Council for industry, an

alternative route might Bar be to join the proposed and access from Lee St with

that from the Oswald Stoneyholme Street area, and develop Daneshouse Rd/Brougham St as a central street for the

community but creating Area a new through route is

likely to bring its own Action problems. Plan

Table 2.22 Route G - Consultation Route G – Briercliffe Road Option 1 – Pedestrian Enhancements Report Route G – Briercliffe Road

41/DS/154-C Starkie Brierclifre Road is a main Yes The Preferred Option should Daneshouse, route running north /south consider priorities for the wider Should be a priority for through the Duke Bar area. investment as it will make a area from its junction with greater impact on Area 10. Colne Road and is seen

as an important route for Duke improvement in order to improve the image of the Bar area and encourage

private investment. and Stoneyholme 117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be for the Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the AAP process and on any planning The Agency welcomes the applications submitted. proposals to increase Area access by alternative modes of transport other than the Action private car. Where proposals are likely to result

in changes in traffic flows, Plan Burnley queuing and delays at

junctions for vehicles, the - Consultation Agency will need to be Borough consulted in order to ensure

that the proposals do not result in an adverse impact Council Report on the trunk road network. 819 820 Burnley Daneshouse, Route G – Briercliffe Road

Borough 161/DS/430-Judith Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Furlonger, Development consider the potential for Manager, Elevate improvement of the traffic Duke

Council gyratory system at Barden Lane,

Broadly support Newman Street, Colne Road, Bar environmental Briercliffe Road and Rylands and enhancements to main Street (St Andrews Church

vehicular, cycling and island) . Stoneyholme pedestrian links.

A fundamental review is required of the vehicular circulation around the St Area Andrews Church island including a review of the Action junction with Barden Lane in view of access to and from

the new college campus. Plan -

06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Consultation Society

Option 1 yes

Option 2 – No Report Changes

Other Options? Table 2.23 Route H

Route H – Barden Lane and New Daneshouse, Hall St/Francis St/ James St/Bond St Option 1 –Environmental

Enhancements Duke 36/DS/106-S Khan Francis Street is one of Yes The Preferred Option should several terraces which consider facelifting Francis Bar

Francis Street should be overlook the new 6th Form Street and other properties and worked on and improved. School development. which overlook the new school development. Stoneyholme 37/DS/118-Mrs M E Bailey James Street is one of Yes The Preferred Option should several terraces which consider facelifting James Agrees with this option to overlook the new 6th Form Street and other properties facelift James Street school development. which overlook the new school Area development.

41/DS/154-C Starkie Barden Lane gives access Yes The Preferred Option should Action to the new 6th Form school consider environmental

Should be a priority for development and borders improvements to Barden Lane Plan Burnley investment as it will make a the first phase of the Gateway route.

greater impact on Area 12 proposed redevelopment in - Daneshouse which is seen Consultation Borough as key to the regeneration

of the whole area. Council Report 821 822 Burnley Daneshouse, Route H – Barden Lane and New

Borough Hall St/Francis St/ James St/Bond St

117/DS/344-Faber Maunsell Noted Yes The Highways Agency will be Duke

Council for the Highways Agency consulted at all stages of the

AAP process and on any Bar The Agency welcomes the planning applications and proposals to increase access submitted.

by alternative modes of Stoneyholme transport other than the private car. Where proposals are likely to result in changes in traffic flows, queuing and

delays at junctions for Area vehicles, the Agency will need

to be consulted in order to Action ensure that the proposals do not result in an adverse impact on the trunk road Plan network. - Consultation 161/DS/430-Judith Furlonger, Noted Yes The Preferred Option should Development Manager, consider the potential for Elevate improvement of the traffic gyratory system at Barden Broadly support Lane, Newman Street, Colne Report environmental enhancements Road, Briercliffe Road and to main vehicular, cycling and Rylands Street (St Andrews pedestrian links. Church island) . Route H – Barden Lane and New Hall St/Francis St/ James St/Bond St Daneshouse, A fundamental review is required of the vehicular circulation around the St

Andrews Church island Duke including a review of the junction with Barden Lane in Bar view of access to and from

the new college campus. and Stoneyholme 06/AL/345-Burnley Civic No reasons given No Society

Option 1 yes Area Option 2 – No

Changes Action

Other Options? Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 823 824 Burnley Daneshouse, Table 2.24 Other Routes

Options for Comment Consideration Influence Effect on Content of Preferred

Borough Other Routes on Option Preferred

Option Duke

Council Y/N

110/DS/306 –Alasdair Noted Yes The Preferred Option should consider Bar

Simpson LCC Senior a greenroute/cycle and Cycling Officer Stoneyholme Proposes cycle way links from Princess Way (also see route D) along the northern edge of the

industrial site and along Area Holme Road across the

river to Pendle Way. Action

Table 2.25 Timetable and Next Steps Plan -

3.0 Timetable and Next Consultation Steps 3.1 Timetable Report 3.0 Timetable and Next Steps

3.2 The Next Steps Daneshouse,

Table 2.26 Area Action Plans

4.0 Area Action Plans Duke 4.1 Background Bar 4.2 Sustainability

Appraisal and Stoneyholme

Table 2.27 Area Action Plan Planning Context

5.0 Area Action Planning Context

5.1 National Area Action 5.2 Regional and Sub - Regional Plan

Burnley 12/AL/427-Lancashire CC, Noted Yes The documentation for the Planning and Environmental Preferred Option should clarify -

Services the regional, county and east Consultation

Borough Lancashire sub-regional

While reference to the Joint contexts

Lancashire Structure Plan

(JLSP) in the Planning Council Context section of the AAPs Report is supported, it should make 825 826 Burnley Daneshouse, 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

Borough clear that this is applicable to the whole of Lancashire and not just the sub-region of East Duke

Council Lancashire. The use of the

word sub-region within this Bar context is also considered to and be confusing given its use in

the Regional Spatial Strategy Stoneyholme (RSS) to refer to County Boundaries. Area Action Plan - Consultation Report 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

5.3 Local Daneshouse, 124/DS/361-Joan Grimshaw Noted No

Agrees with Community Plan and that the AAP must fit with

the Burnley Local Plan, as Duke set out in 5.3.1. & 5.3.2. Bar

5.4 Vision for and Danehouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Stoneyholme 112/DS/315-Mark Telfer Noted Yes The Preferred Option should take a balanced and Agrees with Vision but thinks Other than in very

sustainable approach to Area a larger percentage of original exceptional cases Elevate regenerating neighbourhoods housing should be retained will not fund

through redevelopment Action for refurbishment. Given the improvements to /retention of existing houses choice he would choose to properties beyond and should consider live in an original terrace; far facelifting to key gateway policies/initiatives that would Plan Burnley better longevity and appeal. locations. enable existing residents to -

remain in the area. Consultation Borough

149/DS/411-R. W. Oats Other than in very No exceptional cases Elevate

Vision should be for will not fund Council remodelling and improvements to Report refurbishment properties beyond 827 828 Burnley Daneshouse, 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

Borough facelifting to key gateway locations. Duke 153/DS/415-G. Gresham, Agree Yes The Vision should refer to Council

George Wilkinson (Burnley) employment in the area. Bar Ltd. and From a business view, the Vision does not refer to Stoneyholme employment in the area, and appears to exclude such activities for the future. Area 156/DS/418-Ian Rhodes, Agree Yes The Vision should refer to local

Rhodes Technical Services business and the Action encouragement of new There is no mention of the businesses.

existing local business or the Plan encouragement of new

business. - Consultation

Other Comments 147/DS/409-J & J Noted In The Preferred Option should

Cranwell-Ward, part take a balanced and Report Daneshouse Management Other than in very sustainable approach to Ltd exceptional cases Elevate regenerating neighbourhoods will not fund through redevelopment Are investors in the area improvements to /retention of existing houses including properties in properties beyond and should consider 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

Daneshouse Road and facelifting to key gateway policies/initiatives that would Daneshouse, Ardwick Street? They locations. enable existing residents to are accredited landlords and remain in the area. have seen a general English Heritage have improvement in the area with been involved informally and formally in the AAP

many private owners Duke investing in their properties process and will continue and improving them internally to be involved. Bar and externally. The Heritage Appraisals have properties that front and Daneshouse Road are very been produced to identify good stock, make attractive the special character of Stoneyholme homes whilst at the same each area so that this time still representing faithfully character is not lost and the historical past of is respected in any new Burnley. Indeed we believe development proposals. streets such as Daneshouse Area Affordability is a key issue Rd are historically important

and the Council has an Action to Burnley. Affordable Housing Policy There has also been a and is working with Plan

Burnley general improvement in the partners to provide a range of options for

overall community spirit in the - Daneshouse ward aided by affordable rent and Consultation purchase to meet housing Borough investment from private

owners and occupiers and need. Burnley Borough Council. The Council has an

This is reflected in the greatly established advice team Council increased demand and values in place to help Report householders find suitable of the present housing stock, 829 830 Burnley Daneshouse, 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

Borough a huge improvement from four new homes. years ago. We would encourage the continuation of Duke

Council sensitive schemes that would

continue to enhance the Bar general well being of these and areas, and promote the sense

of well being in the Stoneyholme communities that already exist, but we would be opposed to wholesale destruction of the present

housing stock to make way Area for “modern estates of new

homes” or factory units. You Action will understand our deep concern that whole areas “are to be redeveloped”. We Plan would like to know how -

investors can continue to Consultation develop their plans and remain in the Burnley area with so much uncertainty being generated by the local

plan. How will existing home Report owners be compensated. You will appreciate that the rental income represents our income. What will happen to existing home owners or long 5.0 Area Action Planning Context

term tenants and their families Daneshouse, if whole streets are redeveloped.

Has English Heritage been consulted or involved in the Duke redevelopment schemes? Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan Burnley

- Consultation Borough

Council Report 831 Daneshouse, Duke Bar and Stoneyholme Area Action Plan - Consultation Report

832 Burnley Borough Council