Field Checklist of Dragonflies and Damselflies of Oregon, Washington

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Checklist of Dragonflies and Damselflies of Oregon, Washington Field Checklist of Dragonflies and Damselflies of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho Prepared by Jim Johnson, [email protected] PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/fieldlists.htm O = Oregon, W = Washington, I = Idaho Anisoptera — Dragonflies Libellulidae continued . O W I Libellula nodisticta, Hoary Skimmer • • Aeshnidae — Darners O W I Libellula pulchella, Twelve-spotted Skimmer • • • Aeshna canadensis, Canada Darner • • • Libellula quadrimaculata, Four-spotted Skimmer • • • Aeshna constricta, Lance-tipped Darner • • • Libellula saturata, Flame Skimmer • • • Aeshna eremita, Lake Darner • • Pachydiplax longipennis, Blue Dasher • • • Aeshna interrupta, Variable Darner • • • Paltothemis lineatipes, Red Rock Skimmer • Aeshna juncea, Sedge Darner • • • Pantala flavescens, Wandering Glider • • • Aeshna palmata, Paddle-tailed Darner • • • Pantala hymenaea, Spot-winged Glider • • • Aeshna sitchensis, Zigzag Darner • • • Plathemis lydia, Common Whitetail • • • Aeshna subarctica, Subarctic Darner • • Plathemis subornata, Desert Whitetail • • Aeshna tuberculifera, Black-tipped Darner • • • Sympetrum corruptum, Variegated Meadowhawk • • • Aeshna umbrosa, Shadow Darner • • • Sympetrum costiferum, Saffron-winged Meadowhawk • • • Aeshna walkeri, Walker’s Darner • • Sympetrum danae, Black Meadowhawk • • • Anax junius, Common Green Darner • • • Sympetrum illotum, Cardinal Meadowhawk • • • Rhionaeschna californica, California Darner • • • Sympetrum internum, Cherry-faced Meadowhawk • • • Rhionaeschna multicolor, Blue-eyed Darner • • • Sympetrum madidum, Red-veined Meadowhawk • • • Petaluridae — Petaltails O W I Sympetrum obtrusum, White-faced Meadowhawk • • • Tanypteryx hageni, Black Petaltail • • Sympetrum pallipes, Striped Meadowhawk • • • Sympetrum semicinctum, Band-winged Meadowhawk • • • Gomphidae — Clubtails O W I Sympetrum vicinum, Autumn Meadowhawk • • • Erpetogomphus compositus, White-belted Ringtail • • • Tramea lacerata, Black Saddlebags • • • Gomphurus externus, Plains Clubtail • Tramea onusta, Red Saddlebags • Gomphurus lynnae, Columbia Clubtail • • • Octogomphus specularis, Grappletail • • Zygoptera — Damselflies Ophiogomphus bison, Bison Snaketail • Ophiogomphus morrisoni, Great Basin Snaketail • Calopterygidae — Broad-winged Damsels O W I Ophiogomphus occidentis, Sinuous Snaketail • • • Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing • • • Ophiogomphus severus, Pale Snaketail • • • Hetaerina americana, American Rubyspot • Phanogomphus graslinellus, Pronghorn Clubtail • • Lestidae — Spreadwings O W I , Pacific Clubtail • • • Phanogomphus kurilis Archilestes californicus, California Spreadwing • • • , Gray Sanddragon • Progomphus borealis Lestes congener, Spotted Spreadwing • • • , Olive Clubtail • • • Stylurus olivaceus Lestes disjunctus, Northern Spreadwing • • • Cordulegastridae — Spiketails O W I Lestes dryas, Emerald Spreadwing • • • Cordulegaster dorsalis, Pacific Spiketail • • • Lestes forcipatus, Sweetflag Spreadwing • • • Lestes stultus, Black Spreadwing • Macromiidae — Cruisers O W I Lestes unguiculatus, Lyre-tipped Spreadwing • • • Macromia magnifica, Western River Cruiser • • • Coenagrionidae — Pond Damsels O W I Corduliidae — Emeralds O W I Amphiagrion abbreviatum, Western Red Damsel • • • Cordulia shurtleffii, American Emerald • • • Argia agrioides, California Dancer • • Epitheca canis, Beaverpond Baskettail • • Argia alberta, Paiute Dancer • • Epitheca spinigera, Spiny Baskettail • • • Argia emma, Emma’s Dancer • • • Somatochlora albicincta, Ringed Emerald • • • Argia lugens, Sooty Dancer • Somatochlora franklini, Delicate Emerald • Argia nahuana, Aztec Dancer • Somatochlora minor, Ocellated Emerald • • • Argia vivida, Vivid Dancer • • • Somatochlora semicircularis, Mountain Emerald • • • Coenagrion interrogatum, Subarctic Bluet • Somatochlora walshii, Brush-tipped Emerald • • • Coenagrion resolutum, Taiga Bluet • • • Somatochlora whitehousei, Whitehouse’s Emerald • Enallagma anna, River Bluet • • Libellulidae — Skimmers O W I Enallagma annexum, Northern Bluet • • • Erythemis collocata, Western Pondhawk • • • Enallagma boreale, Boreal Bluet • • • Ladona julia, Chalk-fronted Corporal • • • Enallagma carunculatum, Tule Bluet • • • Leucorrhinia borealis, Boreal Whiteface • Enallagma civile, Familiar Bluet • • Leucorrhinia glacialis, Crimson-ringed Whiteface • • • Enallagma clausum, Alkali Bluet • • • Leucorrhinia hudsonica, Hudsonian Whiteface • • • Enallagma ebrium, Marsh Bluet • • Leucorrhinia intacta, Dot-tailed Whiteface • • • Ischnura barberi, Desert Forktail • Leucorrhinia proxima, Belted Whiteface • • • Ischnura cervula, Pacific Forktail • • • Libellula comanche, Comanche Skimmer • • Ischnura denticollis, Black-fronted Forktail • • Libellula composita, Bleached Skimmer • Ischnura erratica, Swift Forktail • • Libellula forensis, Eight-spotted Skimmer • • • Ischnura perparva, Western Forktail • • • Libellula luctuosa, Widow Skimmer • • Nehalennia irene, Sedge Sprite • • • Source: Oregon Dragonfly Survey and OdonataCentral.org Last updated 15 February 2021 Field Checklist of Dragonflies and Damselflies of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho Prepared by Jim Johnson, [email protected] PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/fieldlists.htm O = Oregon, W = Washington, I = Idaho Dragonflies — Anisoptera O W I Dragonflies continued . O W I Baskettail, Beaverpond (Epitheca canis) • • Skimmer, Eight-spotted (Libellula forensis) • • • Baskettail, Spiny (Epitheca spinigera) • • • Skimmer, Flame (Libellula saturata) • • • Clubtail, Columbia (Gomphurus lynnae) • • • Skimmer, Four-spotted (Libellula quadrimaculata) • • • Clubtail, Olive (Stylurus olivaceus) • • • Skimmer, Hoary (Libellula nodisticta) • • Clubtail, Pacific Phanogomphus( kurilis) • • • Skimmer, Red Rock (Paltothemis lineatipes) • Clubtail, Plains (Gomphurus externus) • Skimmer, Twelve-spotted (Libellula pulchella) • • • Clubtail, Pronghorn (Phanogomphus graslinellus) • • Skimmer, Widow (Libellula luctuosa) • • Corporal, Chalk-fronted (Ladona julia) • • • Snaketail, Bison (Ophiogomphus bison) • Cruiser, Western River (Macromia magnifica) • • • Snaketail, Great Basin (Ophiogomphus morrisoni) • Darner, Black-tipped (Aeshna tuberculifera) • • • Snaketail, Pale (Ophiogomphus severus) • • • Darner, Blue-eyed (Rhionaeschna multicolor) • • • Snaketail, Sinuous (Ophiogomphus occidentis) • • • Darner, California (Rhionaeschna californica) • • • Spiketail, Pacific Cordulegaster( dorsalis) • • • Darner, Canada (Aeshna canadensis) • • • Whiteface, Belted (Leucorrhinia proxima) • • • Darner, Common Green (Anax junius) • • • Whiteface, Boreal (Leucorrhinia borealis) • Darner, Lake (Aeshna eremita) • • Whiteface, Crimson-ringed (Leucorrhinia glacialis) • • • Darner, Lance-tipped (Aeshna constricta) • • • Whiteface, Dot-tailed (Leucorrhinia intacta) • • • Darner, Paddle-tailed (Aeshna palmata) • • • Whiteface, Hudsonian (Leucorrhinia hudsonica) • • • Darner, Variable (Aeshna interrupta) • • • Whitetail, Common (Plathemis lydia) • • • Darner, Sedge (Aeshna juncea) • • • Whitetail, Desert (Plathemis subornata) • • Darner, Subarctic (Aeshna subarctica) • • Damselflies — Zygoptera O W I Darner, Shadow (Aeshna umbrosa) • • • Bluet, Alkali (Enallagma clausum) • • • Darner, Walker’s (Aeshna walkeri) • • Bluet, Boreal (Enallagma boreale) • • • Darner, Zigzag, (Aeshna sitchensis) • • • Bluet, Familiar (Enallagma civile) • • Dasher, Blue (Pachydiplax longipennis) • • • Bluet, Marsh (Enallagma ebrium) • • Emerald, American (Cordulia shurtleffii) • • • Bluet, Northern (Enallagma annexum) • • • Emerald, Brush-tipped (Somatochlora walshii) • • • Bluet, River (Enallagma anna) • • Emerald, Delicate (Somatochlora franklini) • Bluet, Subarctic (Coenagrion interrogatum) • Emerald, Mountain (Somatochlora semicircularis) • • • Bluet, Taiga (Coenagrion resolutum) • • • Emerald, Ocellated (Somatochlora minor) • • • Bluet, Tule (Enallagma carunculatum) • • • Emerald, Ringed (Somatochlora albicincta) • • • Damsel, Western Red (Amphiagrion abbreviatum) • • • Emerald, Whitehouse’s (Somatochlora whitehousei) • Dancer, Aztec (Argia nahuana) • Glider, Spot-winged (Pantala hymenaea) • • • Dancer, California (Argia agrioides) • • Glider, Wandering (Pantala flavescens) • • • Dancer, Emma’s (Argia emma) • • • Grappletail (Octogomphus specularis) • • Dancer, Paiute (Argia alberta) • • Meadowhawk, Autumn (Sympetrum vicinum) • • • Dancer, Sooty (Argia lugens) • Meadowhawk, Band-winged (Sympetrum semicinctum) • • • Dancer, Vivid (Argia vivida) • • • Meadowhawk, Black (Sympetrum danae) • • • Forktail, Black-fronted (Ischnura denticollis) • • Meadowhawk, Cardinal (Sympetrum illotum) • • • Forktail, Desert (Ischnura barberi) • Meadowhawk, Cherry-faced (Sympetrum internum) • • • Forktail, Pacific Ischnura( cervula) • • • Meadowhawk, Red-veined (Sympetrum madidum) • • • Forktail, Swift Ischnura( erratica) • • Meadowhawk, Saffron-winged Sympetrum( costiferum) • • • Forktail, Western (Ischnura perparva) • • • Meadowhawk, Striped (Sympetrum pallipes) • • • Jewelwing, River (Calopteryx aequabilis) • • • Meadowhawk, Variegated (Sympetrum corruptum) • • • Rubyspot, American (Hetaerina americana) • Meadowhawk, White-faced (Sympetrum obtrusum) • • • Spreadwing, Black (Lestes stultus) • Petaltail, Black (Tanypteryx hageni) • • Spreadwing, California (Archilestes californicus) • • • Pondhawk, Western (Erythemis collocata) • • • Spreadwing, Emerald, (Lestes dryas) • • • Ringtail, White-belted (Erpetogomphus compositus) • • • Spreadwing, Lyre-tipped (Lestes unguiculatus) • • • Saddlebags, Black (Tramea lacerata) • • • Spreadwing, Northern (Lestes disjunctus) • • • Saddlebags, Red (Tramea onusta) • Spreadwing, Spotted (Lestes congener) • • • Sanddragon, Gray (Progomphus borealis) • Spreadwing, Sweetflag Lestes( forcipatus) • • • Skimmer, Bleached (Libellula composita) • Sprite, Sedge (Nehalennia irene) • • • Skimmer, Comanche (Libellula comanche) • • Source: Oregon Dragonfly Survey and OdonataCentral.org Last updated 15 February 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Spatiotemporal Pattern of Phenology Across Geographic Gradients in Insects
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 Spatiotemporal pattern of phenology across geographic gradients in insects Khelifa, Rassim Abstract: Phenology – the timing of recurrent biological events – influences nearly all aspects of ecology and evolution. Phenological shifts have been recorded in a wide range of animals and plants worldwide during the past few decades. Although the phenological responses differ between taxa, they may also vary geographically, especially along gradients such as latitude or elevation. Since changes in phenology have been shown to affect ecology, evolution, human health and the economy, understanding pheno- logical shifts has become a priority. Although phenological shifts have been associated with changes in temperature, there is still little comprehension of the phenology-temperature relationship, particularly the mechanisms influencing its strength and the extent to which it varies geographically. Such ques- tions would ideally be addressed by combining controlled laboratory experiments on thermal response with long-term observational datasets and historical temperature records. Here, I used odonates (drag- onflies and damselflies) and Sepsid scavenger flies to unravel how temperature affects development and phenology at different latitudes and elevations. The main purpose of this thesis is to provide essential knowledge on the factors driving the spatiotemporal phenological dynamics by (1) investigating how phenology changed in time and space across latitude and elevation in northcentral Europe during the past three decades, (2) assessing potential temporal changes in thermal sensitivity of phenology and (3) describing the geographic pattern and usefulness of thermal performance curves in predicting natural responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Olive Clubtail (Stylurus Olivaceus) in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Olive Clubtail Stylurus olivaceus in Canada ENDANGERED 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olive Clubtail Stylurus olivaceus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 58 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Robert A. Cannings, Sydney G. Cannings, Leah R. Ramsay and Richard J. Cannings for writing the status report on Olive Clubtail (Stylurus olivaceus) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Paul Catling, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le gomphe olive (Stylurus olivaceus) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Olive Clubtail — Photo by Jim Johnson. Permission granted for reproduction. ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/637-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18707-5 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2011 Common name Olive Clubtail Scientific name Stylurus olivaceus Status Endangered Reason for designation This highly rare, stream-dwelling dragonfly with striking blue eyes is known from only 5 locations within three separate regions of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices
    Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices A: Initial List of Important Sites..................................................................................................... 2 B: An Annotated List of the Mammals of Albemarle County........................................................ 5 C: Birds ......................................................................................................................................... 18 An Annotated List of the Birds of Albemarle County.............................................................. 18 Bird Species Status Tables and Charts...................................................................................... 28 Species of Concern in Albemarle County............................................................................ 28 Trends in Observations of Species of Concern..................................................................... 30 D. Fish of Albemarle County........................................................................................................ 37 E. An Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians of Albemarle County.......................................... 41 F. An Annotated Checklist of the Reptiles of Albemarle County, Virginia................................. 45 G. Invertebrate Lists...................................................................................................................... 51 H. Flora of Albemarle County ...................................................................................................... 69 I. Rare
    [Show full text]
  • Aeshna Subarctica (Odonata: Aeshnidae) in Northwestern Wisconsin
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 32 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 1999 Numbers Article 4 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 1999 April 1999 Aeshna Subarctica (Odonata: Aeshnidae) in Northwestern Wisconsin Robert D. DuBois Bureau of Integrated Science Services Robbye Johnson University of Wisconsin Shaun Putz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation DuBois, Robert D.; Johnson, Robbye; and Putz, Shaun 1999. "Aeshna Subarctica (Odonata: Aeshnidae) in Northwestern Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 32 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol32/iss1/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. DuBois et al.: <i>Aeshna Subarctica</i> (Odonata: Aeshnidae) in Northwestern Wis 1999 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 29 AESHNA SUBARCTICA (ODONATA: AESHNIDAEJ IN NORTHWESTERN WISCONSIN Robert B. DuBois 1, Robbye Johnson2 and Shoun Putz3 ABSTRACT Nine adult specimens of Aeshna subarctica, a boreal dragonfly typically associated "ith muskeg wetlands, were collected from Black Lake and Bre­ itzman Lake in northwestern Wisconsin (Douglas County). Viable popula­ tions likely exist in both lakes. Oviposition by three females is described. This represents the first published report of A. subarctica for the state of Wisconsin. Because Black Lake lies on the border of Wisconsin and Min­ nesota, A. subarctica likely occurs in Minnesota as well. Further sampling of acidic peatland habitats for aquatic macroinvertebrates is recommended to document populations of northern at the southern periphery of their ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And
    DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES STATUS RANKING AND PRELIMINARY ATLAS PAUL M. CATLING University of Ottawa 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...........................................................3 Methods ....................................................................3 The database .................................................................4 History .....................................................................5 Rejected taxa ................................................................5 Possible additions ............................................................5 Additional field inventory ......................................................7 Collection an Inventory of dragonflies .............................................8 Literature Cited .............................................................10 Appendix Table 1 - checklist ...................................................13 Appendix Table 2 - Atlas and ranking notes .......................................15 2 ABSTRACT: occurrences was provided by Dr. Rex Thirty-five species of Odonata are given Kenner, Dr. Donna Giberson, Dr. Nick status ranks in the Northwest Territories Donnelly and Dr. Robert Cannings (some based on number of occurrences and details provided below). General distributional area within the territory. Nine information on contacts and locations of species are ranked as S2, may be at risk, collections provided by Dr. Cannings
    [Show full text]
  • Subarctic Darner Aeshna Subarctica
    Natural Heritage Subarctic Darner & Endangered Species Aeshna subarctica Program State Status: Endangered www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION OF ADULT: The Subarctic Darner is a stunning insect species in the order Odonata, suborder Anisoptera (the dragonflies), and family Aeshnidae (the darners). The adult is a large dragonfly magnificently colored with greens, blues, and rich browns. The thorax (winged and legged segment behind the head) is mostly brown, with two green to blue dorsal stripes and two blue-green to yellowish lateral stripes. The abdominal segments are predominantly brown with green to blue markings. The Subarctic Darner has black legs and transparent to amber-tinged wings. The face is yellow with a thin black cross-line, and the eyes are dull blue- gray to green in color. Subarctic Darners range from 2.6 to almost 3 inches (66-76 mm) in overall length, with the females averaging somewhat larger. Wingspread ranges from 3.1 to 3.6 inches (78-92 mm). SIMILAR SPECIES: Ten species of blue darners (genus Aeshna) occur regularly in Massachusetts and the Subarctic Darner closely resembles many of them in appearance. The slight differences in pattern and and can be distinguished from other Aeshna using coloration distinguish the various species. The face of characteristics as per the keys in Walker (1958). the adult Subarctic Darner is yellow with a black cross- line. In addition, the lateral thoracic stripes are bent HABITAT: Sphagnum bogs and deep fens with wet forward in their upper halves, with the top of the stripe sphagnum.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonflies and Damselflies in Your Garden
    Natural England works for people, places and nature to conserve and enhance biodiversity, landscapes and wildlife in rural, urban, coastal and marine areas. Dragonflies and www.naturalengland.org.uk © Natural England 2007 damselflies in your garden ISBN 978-1-84754-015-7 Catalogue code NE21 Written by Caroline Daguet Designed by RR Donnelley Front cover photograph: A male southern hawker dragonfly. This species is the one most commonly seen in gardens. Steve Cham. www.naturalengland.org.uk Dragonflies and damselflies in your garden Dragonflies and damselflies are Modern dragonflies are tiny by amazing insects. They have a long comparison, but are still large and history and modern species are almost spectacular enough to capture the identical to ancestors that flew over attention of anyone walking along a prehistoric forests some 300 million river bank or enjoying a sunny years ago. Some of these ancient afternoon by the garden pond. dragonflies were giants, with This booklet will tell you about the wingspans of up to 70 cm. biology and life-cycles of dragonflies and damselflies, help you to identify some common species, and tell you how you can encourage these insects to visit your garden. Male common blue damselfly. Most damselflies hold their wings against their bodies when at rest. BDS Dragonflies and damselflies belong to Dragonflies the insect order known as Odonata, Dragonflies are usually larger than meaning ‘toothed jaws’. They are often damselflies. They are stronger fliers and referred to collectively as ‘dragonflies’, can often be found well away from but dragonflies and damselflies are two water. When at rest, they hold their distinct groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R
    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Urban Ponds for Odonata and Plant Biodiversity
    The Value of Urban Ponds for Odonata and Plant Biodiversity Mary Ann Perron Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research University of Ottawa In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree in the Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5 Thèse soumise à l’École des Études Supérieures et de la Recherche Université d’Ottawa En vue de l’obtention du diplôme de doctorat (Ph.D.) au Département de Biologie, Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5 Mary Ann Perron, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 I dedicate this thesis to my father, Jules Perron, who is my biggest inspiration. I love you dad. ii Abstract Urbanization involves the conversion of natural areas to impervious surfaces, which can lead to an increase in the frequency and severity of flood events in cities. To mitigate flood risk, stormwater ponds are constructed to manage urban runoff. Stormwater ponds can also be colonized by wildlife, but their suitability as habitat is disputed due to potential toxicological risks. This study assessed the suitability of stormwater ponds as habitat for the bioindicators Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) and determined environmental factors that impact their community structure. Odonata (adults, nymphs and exuviae) were sampled at 41 stormwater ponds and 10 natural reference ponds across the National Capital Region of Canada, with a subset of ponds sampled over four years (2015-2018). Plant communities, water quality and surrounding land cover were analyzed at each pond to determine their impacts on Odonata community structure. Overall, stormwater ponds had lower Odonata abundance and a greater variation in species richness and community structure compared to natural ponds but had comparable dragonfly reproduction rates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 38, No 1 Summer 2019
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 38(1) Summer 2019 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit In this issue group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. From the editor’s desk.......2 Seeking a new webmaster for the BSC..........................2 Feature Article: Information on Are dragonflies moving into the western tundra? Membership ......................3 Paul M. Catling, Brenda Kostiuk, Robert A. Cannings, President’s Report .............4 Ryan Lucas, Donna Giberson, Sydney Cannings, and Cameron Eckert.......................................................10 BSC on facebook & twitter .............................................6 Contributing to the BSC Newsletter...........................6 Report on the 2019 AGM....7 Project Update Biota of Canada: Terrestrial Arthropods - first volume of the Biota of Canada project published ..............................................8 Project Update Request for specimens: Biota of Canada Project: Publication of Terres- Carabidae from across Canada; trial Arthropods Volume from Kevin Floate .....................9 Dave Langor and Cory Sheffield.................................8 Feature Article Are dragonflies moving into the western tundra? by PM Catling, B Kostiuk, RA National Biodiversity Cryobank of Canada Cannings, R Lucas, D Giber- Robert Anderson, Canadian Museum of Nature........18 son, S Cannings, and C Eck- ert........................................10 Request for specimens: Carabidae
    [Show full text]