DOCSLIB.ORG

Council and Participants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The American Law Institute OFFICERSt Roswell B. Perkins, Chair of the Council Charles Alan Wright, President Michael Traynor, 1st Vice President and President Designate Conrad K. Harper, 21id Vlice President Bennett Boskey, Treasurer Lance Liebman, Director Elena A. Cappella, Deputy Director Michael Greenwald, Deputy Director COUNCIL Kcnneth S. Abraham Charlottesville Virginia Shirley S.Abrahamson Madison Wisconsin Philip S.Anderson Little Rock Arkansas Susan Frelich Appleton St. Louis Missouri Richard Sheppard Arnold Little Rock Arkansas Sheila L. Birnbaum New York New York Allen D. Black Philadelphia Pennsylvania Bennett Boskey Washington District of Columbia Michael Boudin Boston Massachusetts William M. Burke New York New York Elizabeth J. Cabraser San Francisco California Hugh Calkins Cleveland Ohio Gerhard Casper Stanford California William T Coleman, Jr. Washington District of Columbia Edward 11. Cooper Ann Arbor Michigan N. Lee Cooper Birmingham Alabama Roger C. Cramton Ithaca New York Lloyd N. Cutler Washington District of Columbia George I.T. Dudley St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands Christine M. Durham Salt Lake City Utah William If. Erickson Denver Colorado Thomas E. Fairchild Madison Wisconsin John P.Frank Phoenix Arizona George Clemon Freeman, Jr. Richmond Virginia Paul L. Friedman Washington District of Columbia Antonio Garcfa-Padilla San Juan Puerto Rico Jamie S. Gorelick Washington District of Columbia Conrad K. Harper New York New York Geoffrey C.Hazard, Jr.* Philadelphia Pennsylvania D. Brock lornby Portland Maine tAs of March 20, 2000 *Director Emeritus THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Vester T. Hughes, Jr. Dallas Texas Mary Kay Kane San Francisco California Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Princeton New Jersey Herma lill Kay Berkeley California Carolyn Dineen King Houston Texas Carolyn B. Lamm Washington District of Columbia Pierre N. Leval New York New York Betsy Levin Washington District of Columbia I lans A. Linde Salem Oregon Martin Lipton New York New York Robert MacCrate New York New York Margaret I. Marshall Boston Massachusetts John W. Martin, Jr. Boca Grande Florida John J. McKetta, Ill Austin Texas Vincent L. McKusick Portland Maine Daniel J. Meltzer Cambridge Massachusetts Robert H. Mundheim New York New York Roswell B. Perkins New York New York Ellen Ash Peters I lartford Connecticut Louis 1-. Pollak Philadelphia Pennsylvania Roberta C. Ramo Albuquerque New Mexico Ernest J. Sargeant Boston Massachusetts Mary M. Schroeder Phoenix Arizona Sherwin P.Simmons Miami Florida Win. Reece Smith, Jr. Tampa Florida Robert A. Stein Chicago Illinois John T. Subak Philadelphia Pennsylvania Michael laynor San Francisco California Bill Wagner Tampa Florida Patricia M. Wald Washington District of Columbia Elizabeth Warren Cambridge Massalhusetts William H. Webster Washington District of Columbia George Whittenburg Amarillo Texas Herbert P.Wilkins Boston Massachusetts James H. Wilson, Jr. Atlanta Georgia Charles Alan Wright Austin Texas Emeritus Council Members Joseph F.Johnston Birmingham Alabama Hale McCown Lincoln Nebraska Lawrence E. Walsh Oklahoma City Oklahoma Herbert Wechsler* New York New York *DirectorEmeritus REPORTERS WILLIAM C. POWERS, JR., The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, Texas MiciA. , D. GREEN, University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa ADVISERS ANDREW T. BERRY, Newark, New Jersey DENNIS R. CONNOLLY, New York, New York [from 19941 EDWARD H. COOPER, University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, Michi- gan WILLIAM A. DREIER, Somerville, New Jersey; formerly Judge, New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division NOEL FIDEL, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals, Phoenix, Arizona WAYNE FISIER, Houston, Texas GEORGE CLEMON FREEMAN, Jr., Richmond, Virginia JAMES A. HENDERSON, Jr., Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York STEPHEN J. HOLTMAN, Cedar Rapids, Iowa MICIhAEL ALEXANDER KAIIN, San Francisco, California MARY KAY KANE, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, California ROBERT E. KEETON, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts PIERRE N. LEVAL, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Cir- cuit, New York, New York EUGENE F. LYNCII, San Francisco, California; formerly Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California RICHARD L. REVESZ, New York University School of Law, New Yurk, New York ANTHONY Z. ROISMAN, Lyme, New Hampshire GARY T. SCIIWARTZ, University of California at Los Angeles School of Law, Los Angeles, California VICTOR E. SCHWARTZ, Washington, District of Columbia SUSAN Ross STEINGASS, Madison, Wisconsin LARRY S. STEWART, Miami, Florida [from 19981 MICIIAEL TRAYNOR, San Francisco, California BILL WAGNER, Tampa, Florida MALCOLM E. WHEELER, Denver, Colorado RICHARD W. WRIGHT, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Tech- nology, Chicago, Illinois EX OFFICIOt RoSW ELL B. PERKINS, New York, New York Chairof the Council, The American Law Institute CHARLES ALAN WRIGI', Austin, Texas President, The American Law Institute *GEOFFREY C. HAZARD, JR., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Director,The American Law Institute tAs of May 18, 1999 *Be(aneDirector Emeritus on May 20, 1999; succeeded as Directorby Lance Liebman MEMBERS CONSULTATIVE GROUT (as of April 1, 1999) ROBERT E. AUSTIN, Jr., Leesburg, JAY DRATLER, JR., Honolulu, Hawaii Florida VICTOR M. EARLE III, New York, FREDERICK M. BARON, Dallas, Texas New York FORTUNATO 1). BENAVIDES, United J. HADLEY EDGAR, Lubbock, Texas States Court of Appeals for the NORMAN L. EPSTEIN, California Fifth Circuit, Austin, Texas Court of Appeal, Los Angeles, ROBERT DALE BICKEL, St. Peters- California burg, Florida JEFFREY M. FELDMAN, Anchorage, BERT BLACK, DALLAS, Texas Alaska ANTHONY J. BocchiiNO, Philadelphia, STEPHEN F. FINK, Dallas, Texas Pennsylvania DAVID A. FISCIIER, Columbia, Mis- GERALD W. BOSTON, Lansing, souri Michigan JOHN J. FRANK, St. Louis, Missouri PIIILLIP D. BOSTWICK, Washington, HALEY J. FROMHOLZ, Superior Court D.C. of California, Los Angeles HILDY BOWBEER, St. Paul, Minnesota County, Pasadena, California MYRON J. BROMBERG, Morristown, BRUCE E. GAGNON, Anchorage, New Jersey Alaska ELIZABETH JOAN CABRASER, San WILLIAM L. GARWOOD, United States Francisco, California Court of Appeals for the Fifth SAMMY CACCIATORE, Melbourne, Circuit, Austin, Texas Florida JOHN M. GERRARD, Nebraska JORDAN B. CHERRICK, St. Louis, Supreme Court, Lincoln, Missouri Nebraska MICHAEL MARKS COHEN, New York, JANINE P. GESKE, Wisconsin New York Supreme Court, Madison, Wis- NEIL B. COHEN, Brooklyn, New York consin ROXANNE B. CONLIN, Des Moines, JAMES D. GIIIARDI, Milwaukee, Iowa Wisconsin THE RT. HON. THE LORD COOKE OF R. NICHOLAS GIMBEL, Philadelphia, TIIORNDON, Wellington, New Pennsylvania Zealand DENNIS E. GLAZER, New York, New ALFRED W. CORTESE, JR., York Washington, D.C. MARTIN GLENN, New York, New M. MICHAEL CRAMER, Rockville, York Maryland JOSEPH GOLDBERG, Albuquerque, ROBERT A. CREAMER, Chicago, New Mexico Illinois MURRAY C. GOLDMAN, Pennsylvania ERIC R. CROMARTIE, Dallas, Texas Court of Common Pleas, First CHRISTOPHER SCOTT D'ANGELO, Judicial District, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Pennsylvania KEITH L. DAVIDSON, Chicago, Illinois OSCAR S. GRAY, Baltimore, Maryland ANIIONY E. DIRESTA, Washington, RIDGWAY M. HALL, Jr., Washington, D.C. D.C. Aug 18, 1993 2:17 PM Coor 28x53 MEMBERS CONSULTATIVE GROUP PHILIP LEE HARRIS, Chicago, Illinois SYBIL H. LANDAU, New York, New RIC lARD E.V. HARRIS, Piedmont, York California HOWARD I. LANGER, Philadelphia, HARRIS L HARTZ, New Mexico Court Pennsylvania of Appeals, Albuquerque, New MICHELE LANGER, Philadelphia, Mexico Pennsylvania CIIARLES A. HARVEY, JR., Portland, RICHARD W. LANGERMAN, Phoenix, Maine Arizona NATILAN L. HECIIT, Texas Supreme PAUL A. LEBEL, Tallahassee, Florida Court, Austin, Texas CIIARLES F. LETTOW, Washington, I.OGER C. HENDERSON, Tucson, D.C. Arizona WILLIAM G. LEVI, Kansas City, Mis- souri MARIA TANKENSON HODGE, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands VICTOR B. LEVIT, San Francisco, Cal- ifornia ERIC MILLS HOLMES, Grundy, Virginia CARL D. LIGGIO, Chicago, Illinois ROGER F. HOLMES, Anchorage, WILLIAM PARKER LIGIITFOOT, Wash- Alaska ington, D.C. W. CULLEN MACDONALD, New York, EDWIN E. HUDDLESON III, Washing- New York ton, D.C. DIANE STOAKES MACKEY, Little Rock, MICHAEL JOHN HUTTER, JR., Albany, Arkansas New York M. STUART MADDEN, White Plains, RICiARD L. JACOBSON, Washington, New York D.C. JOANNE MARTIN, Chicago, Illinois VINCENT R. JOHNSON, San Antonio, DAVID C. McBRIDE, Wilmington, Texas Delaware PAUL F. JONES, Buffalo, New York JAMES T. MCCARTT, Houston, Texas SIDNEY K. KANAZAWA, Los Angeles, FRANK MCCLELLAN, Philadelphia, California Pennsylvania JOETTE KATZ, Connecticut Supreme JAMES C. MCKAY, JR., Washington, Court, Hartford, Connecticut D.C. MARK R. KILLENBECK, Fayetteville, JOHN J. MCKETTA III, Austin, Texas Arkansas MARY A. MCLAUGIILIN, Philadelphia, DAVID G. KLABER, Pittsburgh, Penn- Pennsylvania sylvania WILLIAM J. McNICHOLS, Norman, ANDREW R. KLEIN, Birmingham, Oklahoma Alabama JAMES E. MEEKS, Columbus, Ohio MARTIN A. KOTLER, Wilmington, A. DOUGLAS MELAMED, Washington, Delaware D.C. NOEL A. KRAMER, Superior Court of RICHARD S. MILLER, Honolulu, the District of Columbia, Hawaii Washington, D.C. J. W. MONTGOMERY, I1, Pittsburgh, PETER B KUTNER, Norman, Pennsylvania Oklahoma IRVIN B. NATHAN, Washington, D.C. MEMBERS CONSULTATIVE GROUP RICHARD L. NEUMEIER, Boston, CARL M. SELINGER, Morgantown, Massachusetts West Virginia FERN P. O'BRIAN, Washington, D.C. MARC M. SELTZER, Los Angeles,
Recommended publications
  • Doing Right by Charles Alan Wright Carl W

    Doing Right by Charles Alan Wright Carl W

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2004 Doing Right By Charles Alan Wright Carl W. Tobias University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Courts Commons, and the Jurisdiction Commons Recommended Citation Carl Tobias, Doing Right By Charles Alan Wright, 37 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1351 (2004) This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Doing Right by Charles Alan Wright' Reviewed by Carl Tobias .. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1352 I. HISTORY OF LAW OF FEDERAL COURTS ............................................ 1353 II. CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE SIXTH EDITION .......................................... 1354 III. SUGGESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE ........................................................ 1356 CONCLUSION································································································· 1358 . LAW OF FEDERAL COURTS xix, 929 (6th ed. St. Paul, Minn.). By Charles Alan Wright (The late Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts, University of Texas School of Law) and Mary Kay Kane (Chancellor, Dean and Distinguished Professor
  • A Modern Hamlet in the Judicial Pantheon

    A Modern Hamlet in the Judicial Pantheon

    Michigan Law Review Volume 93 Issue 6 1995 A Modern Hamlet in the Judicial Pantheon Charles Alan Wright University of Texas Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Charles A. Wright, A Modern Hamlet in the Judicial Pantheon, 93 MICH. L. REV. 1841 (1995). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol93/iss6/36 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A MODERN HAMLET IN THE JUDICIAL PANTHEON Charles Alan Wright* LEARNED HAND: THE MAN AND THE JUDGE. By Gerald Gunther. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1994. Pp. xxi, 818. $35. My son and his family gave me this massive book for my birth­ day. It was a splendid choice. The book is one that ought to inter­ est anyone who cares about law. It is a highly readable biography of an extraordinary judge.1 The book was of particular interest to me both because of the special concern I have for the federal courts and because I had the privilege of seeing Judge Hand in action. In the 1949-1950 term I clerked for Judge Charles E. Clark of the Second Circuit, during the time when Learned Hand was chief judge.
  • Council and Participants

    Council and Participants

    The American Law Institute OFFICERS * Roswell B. Perkins, President Edward T. Gignoux, 1st Vice President Charles Alan Wright, 2nd Vice President Bennett Boskey, Treasurer Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Director Paul A. Wolkin, Executive Vice President COUNCIL * Shirley S. Abrahamson Madison Wisconsin Philip S. Anderson Little Rock Arkansas Richard Sheppard Arnold Little Rock Arkansas Frederick A. Ballard Alexandria Virginia Bennett Boskey Washington District of Columbia Michael Boudin Washington District of Columbia Hugh Calkins Cleveland Ohio Gerhard Casper Chicago Illinois William T. Coleman, Jr. Washington District of Columbia Roger C. Cramton Ithaca New York Lloyd N. Cutler Washington District of Columbia R. Ammi Cutter** Cambridge Massachusetts William H. Erickson Denver Colorado Thomas E. Fairchild Madison Wisconsin Jefferson B. Fordham Salt Lake City Utah John P. Frank Phoenix Arizona George Clemon Freeman, Jr. Richmond Virginia Edward T. Gignoux Portland Maine Ruth Bader Ginsburg Washington District of Columbia Erwin N. Griswold Washington District of Columbia Conrad K. Harper New York New York Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr. Greenville South Carolina Vester T. Hughes, Jr. Dallas Texas Joseph F. Johnston Birmingham Alabama Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Morristown New Jersey Herma Hill Kay Berkeley California Pierre N. Leval New York New York Edward Hirsch Levi Chicago Illinois Betsy Levin Washington District of Columbia Hans A. Linde Salem Oregon Martin Lipton New York New York *As of December 1, 1987 ** Chairman Emeritus OFFICERS AND COUNCIL Robert MacCrate New York New York Hale McCown Lincoln Nebraska Carl McGowan Washington District of Columbia Vincent L. McKusick Portland Maine Robert H. Mundheim Philadelphia Pennsylvania Roswell B. Perkins New York New York Ellen Ash Peters Hartford Connecticut Louis H.
  • The Appellate Court of Illinois

    The Appellate Court of Illinois

    DePaul Law Review Volume 28 Issue 3 Spring 1979 Article 3 Stare Decisis among [Sic] the Appellate Court of Illinois Taylor Mattis Kenneth G. Yalowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Taylor Mattis & Kenneth G. Yalowitz, Stare Decisis among [Sic] the Appellate Court of Illinois , 28 DePaul L. Rev. 571 (1979) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol28/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARE DECISIS AMONG [SIC] THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS *Taylor Mattis **Kenneth G. Yalowitz What precedential impact should be accorded to decisions of the Appel- late Court of Illinois? Authors Mattis and Yalowitz examine the Illinois history of the stare decisis doctrine as it relates to Illinois appellate deci- sions. They demonstrate the inadequacy of the present Illinois approach, which requires trial courts to follow appellate court decisions of any divi- sion while those divisions remain free to adopt conflicting positions. Alter- native approaches to this question are then analyzed in detail. The authors conclude by recommending a two-pronged approach. First, all appellate court divisions should recognize decisions of coordinate divisions as bind- ing unless clearly erroneous. Second, if an appellate division decides that a decision of a coordinate division was erroneous, its contrary opinion should be regarded as having overruled the prior decision.
  • Memorial Minute in Memory of Wechsler

    Memorial Minute in Memory of Wechsler

    430 • 2000 PROCEEDINGS The Memorial Minute in memory of Herbert Wechsler was read by Chair of the Council Roswell B. Perkins. Herbert Wechsler December 4, 1909 - April 26, 2000 Out of the nine decades of the life of Herbert Wechsler, 46 years were ones of membership in The American Law Institute and 21 years were ones of extraordinary service as the third Director of the Institute. It is unlikely that the magnificence of his contributions to the Institute will ever be surpassed. In his oral interview with Paul Wolkin in 1989, Herb said (and I cannot refrain from calling him Herb in spite of the formality of this biographical memorial): I remember it took quite a lot of courage on my part, after I'd been a Reporter for a couple of years, to ask Judge Goodrich if he'd either propose me or get me proposed as a member. He looked at me with astonishment and said, "You mean you're not a member?" Of course Judge Goodrich, Herb's predecessor as Director, promptly remedied this institutional oversight in the same year, 1954. Herb's choice of a career in service of the law was attributable in part to the fact of his being the son of a lawyer, Samuel Wechsler. Herb was born in New York City, brought up in Manhattan, and entered City College of New York at the age of 15, graduating in 1928 with a degree in French. In a dialogue recorded in the Columbia Oral History Project, conducted between 1978 and 1982, Herb gave us this vignette of his col­ lege days: I was not only apolitical, but rather anti-political in col­ lege.
  • Fred Rodell's Case Against the Law

    Fred Rodell's Case Against the Law

    Florida State University Law Review Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 3 1996 Fred Rodell's Case Against the Law Ken Vinson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ken Vinson, Fred Rodell's Case Against the Law, 24 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 107 (1996) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol24/iss1/3 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW FRED RODELL'S CASE AGAINST THE LAW Ken Vinson VOLUME 24 FALL 1996 NUMBER 1 Recommended citation: Ken Vinson, Essay, Fred Rodell's Case Against the Law, 24 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 107 (1996). FRED RODELL’S CASE AGAINST THE LAW KEN VINSON* The society of lawyers is doing quite well, thank you, what with a great many of this country’s 900,000 lawyers paying their country club dues out of petty cash. Yet, for these proud toilers in the billable-hours trade—one attorney at law for every 300 Americans—and for the 50,000 new attorneys entering the legal profession annually, there’s a lining not so silvery. Anti-lawyer elements, agitated by the mumbo jumbo that lawyers use to lord it over the common herd, are raising lawyer-bashing to record heights. Bombarded by these negative reviews, a nervous lawyer is surely tempted of late to do a Richard Nixon and announce: “I am not a shyster.” Lawyer-bashing has so numbed the legal-eagle clan that re- form groups such as HALT (originally known as Help Abolish Le- gal Tyranny) are even winning a few battles to force lawyers to use plain English in writing deeds and contracts.
  • Download Biosketch [Pdf]

    Download Biosketch [Pdf]

    Philip Rubin: Biographical Sketch Philip Rubin, Ph.D. is the Chief Executive Officer emeritus and former Senior Scientist at Haskins Laboratories. Haskins is a private, non-profit research institute affiliated with Yale University and the University of Connecticut that has a primary focus on the science of the spoken and written word, including speech, language, and reading. Dr. Rubin is also an adjunct professor in the Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, at the Yale University School of Medicine, a Research Affiliate in the Department of Psychology at Yale, and a Fellow at Yale’s Trumbull College. In Dec. 2017, he was appointed by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to serve as a member of the UConn Board of Trustees, the governing body for the University of Connecticut. From 2012 through February 2015, Rubin was the Principal Assistant Director for Science in the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in the Executive Office of the President of the United States, where he also served as Assistant Director for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, led the White House neuroscience initiative, and was a senior advisor on national policy. During that period of time he was also a Senior Advisor in the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF). He is the former co-chair of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Committee on Science, with the Directors of the NIH and NSF, and co-chair of the interagency Common Rule Modernization Working Group. Dr. Rubin’s research spans a number of disciplines, combining computational, engineering, linguistic, physiological, and psychological approaches to study embodied cognition, most particularly the biological bases of speech and language.
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
  • The American Law Institute

    The American Law Institute

    University of Pennsylvania Law Review And American Law Register FOUNDED 1852 Published Monthly. November to June. by the University of Pennsylvania Law School, at 34th and Chestnut Streeth, Philadelphia, Pa. VOL. 72. NOVEMBER, 1923. No. I. THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE. The Law: "A few strong instincts and a few plain rules."-WVordsworth. The formation, under the laws of the United States applica- ble to the-District of Columbia, oii February 23, 1923, of a corporation under the name of TiE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, for cducational purposes and specifically "to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the bet- ter administration of justice, and to encourage and carry on scholarly and scientific legal work," marks a definite and important step in a movement which has been under discussion and in progress in England and America for a number of years past. The significance of this particular incorporation is indicated by the fact that it was authorized and directed at a meeting attended by the Chief Justice of the United States and two of the Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court, by five Judg.s of United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, by Judges of twenty-seven of the highest courts of. States of the American Union, besides the President and mene- 2 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW. bers of the Council of the American Bar Association, and rep- resentatives of seventeen State Bar Associations, of thirty-three law schools, of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws from twenty-two States, as well as by two hundred other lawyers from various parts of the Union.
  • American Law Institute Library

    American Law Institute Library

    Includes Restatement tool locator! American Law Institute Library The American Law Institute is the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law. The Institute is made up of lawyers, judges, and law professors of the highest qualifications. It drafts, discusses, revises, and publishes Restatements of the Law, model statutes, and principles of law that enormously influential in the courts and legislatures, as well as in legal scholarship and education. ALI has long been influential internationally and, in ecentr years, more of its work has become international in scope. FEATURING: • Restatements & Principles of the Law • Proceedings of ALI Annual Meetings • ALI-CLE Publications • Uniform Commercial Code • ALI Reporter • Scholarly Articles • ALI Annual Reports • Model Penal Codes • Links to current case law “This is the most prestigious legal group in the United States. The American Law Institute is the leading institution in forming written expression of legal principles that have evolved in many areas of the law.” – Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, ALI Annual Meeting, May 2002 RESTATEMENTS OF THE LAW Includes current Restatements! The Restatements of the Law is one of the most respected and well-used sources of secondary authority, covering nearly every area of common law. We have reordered this subcollection to be listed by category. Each category includes a “More Information” link along with a description of the agency. HeinOnline Categories Include:
  • The American Model Penal Code: a Brief Overview

    The American Model Penal Code: a Brief Overview

    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 7-27-2007 The American Model Penal Code: A Brief Overview Paul H. Robinson University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Markus D. Dubber University at Buffalo Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Criminal Law Commons Repository Citation Robinson, Paul H. and Dubber, Markus D., "The American Model Penal Code: A Brief Overview" (2007). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 131. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/131 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AMERICAN MODEL PENAL CODE: A BRIEF OVERVIEW Paul H. Robinson* and Markus D. Dubber** Ifthere can be said to be an ':A.merican criminal code, "the ModelPenal Code is it. Nonetheless, there remains an enormous diversity among the fifty-two American penal codes, including some that have never adopted a modern code format or structure. Yet, even within the minority of states without a modern code, the Model Penal Code has great influence, as courts regularly relyupon it to fashionthe law that the state'scriminal code failsto provide. In this essay we provide a briefintroduction to this historic document, its origins, and its content. INTRODUCTION Within the United States, there are fifty-two American criminal codes, with the federal criminal code overlaying the codes of each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia.
  • Connecticut Bar Association Virtual Awards Celebration

    Connecticut Bar Association Virtual Awards Celebration

    2020 Connecticut Bar Association Virtual Awards Celebration Wednesday, July 22 Zoom Video Conference Congratulations to all of this year’s award recipients from Kronholm Insurance Services, proud Headline Sponsor of “Celebrate with the Stars.” A division of Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc. A division of Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc. 55 Capital Boulevard • Suite 102 • Rocky Hill, CT 06067 55 Capital Boulevard • Suite 102 • Rocky Hill, CT 06067 (860) 665-8463 (860) 665-8463 Leading Attorneys and Consumers to Insurance Solutions for Over 30 Years Thank You for Supporting Our Stars! Headline Sponsor Gold Sponsor Silver Sponsor Supporter Agenda Presiding Amy Lin Meyerson, President Cecil J. Thomas, President-elect Ndidi N. Moses, Immediate Past President Daniel J. Horgan, Vice President Welcome Keith J. Soressi, Executive Director Recognition Officers of the Connecticut Bar Association Board of Governors and House of Delegates members of the Connecticut Bar Association Past Presidents of the Connecticut Bar Association Past Award Recipients Headline Sponsor Comments John Kronholm, Kronholm Insurance Services Recognition of the October 2019 Pro Bono Clinic Volunteers Recognition of 50-Year Honorees Signature Awards Henry J. Naruk Judiciary Award Hon. Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Edward F. Hennessey Professionalism Award Hon. Kenneth L. Shluger, New London District Superior Court Tapping Reeve Legal Educator Award Jennifer G. Brown, Interim Executive Vice President and Provost, Quinnipiac University John Eldred Shields Distinguished Professional Service Award John Rose, Jr. Charles J. Parker Legal Services Award Erin E. Kemple, Connecticut Fair Housing Center Citizen of the Law Award Audrey B. Blondin, Blondin Law Office LLC Citizen for the Law Award Judith Altmann, Holocaust Survivor and Educator Young Lawyers Section Vanguard Award Austin Berescik-Johns, Law Office of Austin B.