MACDUFF HARBOUR MASTERPLAN

AUGUST 2015

FINAL REPORT

Fisher Assoc. Ltd (t/a Fisher Associates)

Fisher Associates, April House, Rowes Lane, Lymington, SO41 5SU, UK Tel: 44 1590 626 220 www.fisherassoc.co.uk Company Number: UK 7449155 CONTENTS

3 6 8 54 56 17 39 44

2

assessment

plan

impact time

steps and and

proposals

engagement

next cost and

overview

and

level summary

strategy

High Cost Stakeholder

: : : Harbour

summary C A B

Implementation Masterplan Macduff Introduction

. . . . Appendix Appendix Appendix 4

3 2

Executive 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

- of

fit the

and and and

of

and support

:

. number to

a amenity

flexible

success uses a harbour

Consolidating . visual management

the the

:

develop

.

infrastructure to

on

chain potential

around Developing

: . arbour Quayside of Improving

H

development harbour

and

. :

supply proposals

Building

in

and

:

Market :

area

Area on

activities

use marine Fish -

economic

Basin

improving

Leisure activities Identification

Measures the

focuses

and and :

and multi

shipyard

Industrial and .

and Royal .

Basin Street

areas

purpose - Masterplan

Maintaining Princess supporting Middle for Bankhead strengthening Tourism Aquarium Shore regeneration Supporting operations

specific • • • • • • • The

3

. on the the the

upon of

Macduff “Macduff over intended changing planning

guide

facilitating is

for to benefit the

building that capitalising

the serves,

is

and strategic meet

it

and for

harbour,

strategy to

Masterplan

. framework

future

this Harbour

working business

harbour’s

improving the

physical community in

of

the capabilities strategic

customers

the the a harbour,

thriving Macduff existing

arise

and

a

of for the out

for future as

principle

they

of

. regarding community” as

sets

assets and need interests the

2026 and

vision

flourish the efficiency – the

clarity with

summary

View View from Princess Royalthe North Pier, Basin in will existing harbour

and

2016 development

of

overall economy starts Masterplan

opportunities

provide

local new growth The Harbour period Harbour The needs This existing to future Recognising Executive EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

- in to be be be

fit

the the and and and

and

more . Social

fishing on will owned will marine

will

and

. build and

Coast repair for

required quays support

craft

to . amenity refurbish investment Road is

Market

to

inshore flexible and installed

buildings Aquarium

to

North

area a

these

Shipyard .

Heritage Fish

of be or

the

visual a the

way the

parking the passenger of

will proposed, safeguarded Bankhead to

Feasibility at

incremental

harbour making

. for along

.

and

is success

be of facilities

form Aquarium

support shipbuilding

the Developing

and on

points : steps effective

Trail’ the the to

Improving units

will

Basin, .

side the

:

other

in of

the Aquarium

location

Centre, quayside

proposed chain

cost around no water is

chain Market

the

area

Area

and

from Building the

south facility

initiatives Middle :

are ‘Harbour

business

facilities

at success supply use a

most Fish

fresh

-

from berthing

boards the the

Basin attraction, supply of

into the the

and

there in . the and particular

and Leisure

on

Market

– multi on .

in Industrial Interpretation

Marketing businesses harbour

running visitor Pier .

Middle and marine

area Fish Basin preferred

the the

new path

purpose - A History capitalise A Interpretation Development The purposes by determine facility equipment industry Electricity North attractive The in refurbished The redeveloped attract wider • • • • • • • Bankhead strengthening • Tourism Middle for

4

.

in .

the the

. and

and

work taken

Initial -

of for .

identify .

work be solutions

removing

explored channel non

alignment

placed

-

and slipway be

re . stock be points will by

can

Street

options

will

funding road

this

take entrance could owned

Consolidating - removing of Laing

and created to

capacity : the

nfrastructure electricity by

to i how

slipway

be

requirements infrastructure terms

Council and from

the

management

in

options Lane will boundaries at

harbour

the

Quayside arbour assess

are h

water improved

assessment

harbour future to

zone

zone :

removed and be berths

Watt’s

the

maintenance potential be

activities (continued) adding options of

extending

increasing

new where

review

will

from will of of improving Basin

term

the

and

required

structural

proposals two quayside and

will

.

Pier identify

is

dam and

long

shipyard what to

condition summary . access access Royal

depth

-

and

North feasibility Council possibility

coffer parking, in

shipyard

particular

Masterplan

The slipway The vehicle The constructing practice, and A public feasibility in The The forward An current short

•

• • • Princess supporting •

• • Maintaining The Executive EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

the the

with

2025

likely

-

£120,000 £225,000 £260,000 £150,000 £360,000 £285,000 £3,215,000 over £4,615,000 the £24,615,000

2016 capacity,

associated

account cost

harbour and

into programmed

is capital

. increase proposals

the

use use area Taking

m -

to 6 . .

24 £

Quayside: Consolidating

investment to

excluding capacity

, required

of

purpose multipurpose

- rises improving improving harbour

m

for 6 eisure: Building eisure: on of success - .

period 4 investment in increasing in investment increasing harbour fit

harbour £

Industrial Area: Improving visual

investment

over investment

Total Total in investment Masterplan Total in investment Masterplan proposals (including capacity) Proposal Proposal category Maintaining and infrastructure Princess RoyalBasin and and shipyardsupporting activities Middle Basinand Fish Market: Developing a flexible and Bankhead amenity and strengthening the chainsupply Tourism and L Aquarium Shore Street: Identification of potential uses Supporting Measures: Harbour management operations increasing capital total Just Masterplan

5

is

. the out and and and and

Shore wider of

set

support

support

property Street

the

Shipyards

facility to

to will

resource’) staffing

existing

around

Shore

within room

business

uses

grants on and which

of grow Macduff

management in policies,

implementation to

by

meeting range development

offering / facilities the

a

companies

potential

proposed,

by

. for used of

is and

properties

drive development

Harbour

.

to training be décor

management,

(‘business

Plan a

:

and .

demand responsibilities

. (continued)

Masterplan

could accommodation tenants economic

underway contractors,

namely frontage

and

harbour resource of

– markets

oversee Identification

facility Measures

Marketing and

and the

new of that

:

to

potentially

Harbour

new roles

summary

already

.

chain

is

.

is

Street

desking additional -

review Harbour

required Macduff action, develop An A skills A Improving owners Development Attracting Street supply hot There facilities, employees

• • • operations Supporting • •

• • regeneration Shore Executive 1. INTRODUCTION

. of

and

place

a related

-

terms

improving

economies in Masterplan :

of being

. marine

this

shipbuilding

follows

regional

economy as

Macduff

principle

of

shore services. shore

- customers to

harbour, harbour planning is planning harbour

to the

local . -

ones. successful

considerable

the

a the future

with its of town

summarised

by and

components and hosts

contributing starts are This requires the separation of the separation requires This

related ship related The main activities at Macduff at activities main The -

key

and benefitting and

This

port.

which existing as

.

harbour that the harbour and local economy do economy local and that the harbour

development of

supported

transportation, and make provision for provision make and transportation,

term the Street,

growth, practice, to

practicable.

Council, clusters needs

future important rule of thumb in of thumb rule important

long

Shore Macduff, minimising existing and potential impacts, such assuch impacts, potential and existing minimising

best

An to

alike the

of in a fenced area which contains only port activities.port only containswhich fenced area a changes in changes

point.

constraints.

economic

changing maritime

guide asset

medium 6 the

to

This means ensuring means This

and

Aberdeenshire businesses comprise

the This includes This international

support

meet by regeneration

port

and to for

to economic

the

way. in framework through

owned

Many ports Many visitors

planning role

primary ultimately

a

recognising

capabilities is from those areas where the public has access.has publicthe where areasthose from

key strategic harbour

a a

to improve the efficiency of existing assets than to create new to create than assets of existing the efficiency to improve and

established

attracting

draft of ships is a typical case in case a typical is draft of ships

strategic traffic. playing

as

for as towards

are

repair, with some inshore fishing, marine leisure and oil and leisure marine fishing, inshore somewith repair, also assets

term opportunity costs due to physicalcosts opportunity term well Masterplan

need

effective

and and - but commercial as and road and

harbour’s moving the

the

long

usually controlled in some in controlled usually recognised

cost

is

of

live, harbour

the jobs,

to masterplanning

thriving increasing size and size increasing masterplanning

- a already

shipbuilding shipbuilding practice port existing

is

is outcome proud creating

port

Recognising

regarding of Masterplan

. of a

are best

and

upon

.

for

desired meet market demand for port activities in the future. the in activities port for demand market meet and developments technological as practicable,far as anticipate, development. term for long the opportunities safeguard safeguard health and safety of the public and people working in and around the around and in working people and public of the safety health and safeguard areas. water and land of the present useof the efficiency maximise activities. port of impact the environmental minimise collect together the main harbour activities into distinct zones as far as far as zones distinct into activities harbour the main together collect activity. for industrial zone a secure create clarity

Harbour

Harbour

o chain business people

these. The ever Thethese. To and medium suffernot from industrial activities industrial from To To To more usuallyis that it To Access into the area is the area into Access To activities storage and activity industrial T are: Harbour To

the

Principles Need

principles

building

) ) 8. 6. 7. 4. 5. 3. 1. 2.

2 1 . .

1 1

The

where safeguarding Thus supply International Macduff and provides repair Macduff 1. INTRODUCTION

to to by

. the

chapter chapter chapter steps

Harbour,

.

operations harbour regard

This

This next

This .

the identified .

introduces

and with .

Macduff

.

steps assessment

enable for

ownership, .

plan proposals

chapter sources next its

will

overview

and : impact of time constraints

.

and that

This

and and

objectives funding .

and terms engagement responsibilities follows

strategy Harbour cost research

in

as

and

:

and proposals

. level desk summary

potential

issues of

vision

Introduction and Macduff

set High overview Cost Stakeholder

Implementation

roles

: : : . Masterplan a :

: structured

: A B C : develop 1 structure the 2

an

4 is

appendices 3

current with and

out

report Report

) Chapter Masterplan Chapter provides and stakeholders Chapter sets along grow Chapter considers implementation, Appendix Appendix Appendix 4 .

• • • • Supporting • • • 1 This

7

be

to

.

several identify

indicative

to .

formulating

harbour

involved

present the

opportunities proposals to to

.

. discussions

particularly and

visit

these

asterplan and

M site on

: indicative . workshop

Masterplan and

this

and

asterplan,

2015 views

the M constraints

workshop

of

May

the Masterplan

obtain research in

stakeholder

issues, to objectives

the

developing

in

of key and and

inalisation

Drafting Stakeholder Scoping Second programme

F

: : : : : on 3 2 4 5 1

commencing vision

process Work

) proposals Stage the Stage considered Stage Stage Stage views

3 . • • •

• • stages The 1 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

. - of to or

the

.

to within (Banff,

Macduff Council buildings leased

harbours

owned

remaining .

is

number is

Basin

Gourdon) the

are a

are

the

market of

seven and

ownership

West

that

these

with buildings

harbour

most

.

and the of

. leisure

the comprises and (“Aquarium”)

operates

several the from

in Most Road

buildings

assets

harbour,

Stonehaven . .

harbour

of land, Road of and

owns the

all

or in

. smaller Aquarium needs owns environs

Bankhead

stretching operating

. containers

its overview almost commercial

Rosehearty, two via

the

leases Bankhead

entities operate area, and an or

and Marine

Council main owns

operated business that

which one

along

other

Portsoy,

serving sheds the

Aquarium and by harbour are

ownership presents

is

Harbour

Macduff area main Council 1

the

largely The in Marine The Shipyards, There rented The garages, companies The owned

Aberdeenshire Macduff six Johnshaven, • • • • • Figure Macduff Harbour

8

. a a

the has few rich was Duff

now

.

great

1783 into

repair

berths

couple 2008 a

the

socially, services the in

a and very

and

In is

segments, effectively in years

.

and

by of constructed maintaining

shipbuilding shipbuilding

harbour construction is harbour

and

cradle

infrastructure the

in

shore It

- one work there

.

. created

the

industry the the developed

.

to

is being - it

four

deepened

over market industry,

residents and operation,

today

and major vibrant

repair and being

ship

1898

successful

constructed with a having harbour Macduff

and shipbuilding

were

),

a in

comprise

slipway and

declined, asset of

only

fishing harbour

supports

instrumental by the economically

basin

of

repair

town,

visitors,

were

and

with users shore

has important the - basins are the

years

that the slipway for

Council, first heart

social

in

of

and further

both

s, within

building 50

the

a uses infrastructure the

the basins

booming

and chain harbour

other

out harbour of Town overview last

at

dominated 1900

defines

industry

harbours town

with two

the success While with

the (mainly development

operated is

activity

.

These

the

are . interesting the ’s,

.

of right supply

terms for

the

and

the

is and

arbour were

carrying

Macduff shipbuilding amongst over

economic in fishing

H port mix lies

arguably of 1770

fishing

to leisure

working through

for

there

harbour business

with This . operation,

during

the

marine

the .

the there

pride

15 owned

heritage

- - the in

fishing

of into

heritage engine Macduff harbour

foundations harbour repair

marine

times 1791 important )

slipways 2014

1 sustainable .

history, sense remaining operation The extensive previously through the The and a particularly activities, While An came in Council developments of of flourished and Although major By transferred family The Rich 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

9

(continued)

overview

arbour H

arbour H

Macduff

1

Macduff

) Figure 1 .

2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

North Pier, Middle North Pier, Basin View View from Middle the North Pier, Basin

10

. a / a is

for the are the the out but has and

The 350

West . steps

inner Basin

depth At

and berths to

to .

activity a

offers

the . the

Shipyards

use channel this berths up

showers repairs enable crews

sorting . roof

this efficiencies

to and

slipway

Pier,

of

location,

access boarding

for along

and working ship and

will

craft boat

shipyard

The than

end Piers,

launching

West .

Macduff

of

create

that entrance and

provides asbestos

four

and boats

entrance berths

beam for of

the

toilets

East in fishing awaiting the

area

inner and

underutilised

and Other an here m

Smaller Pier

passenger with

on

. slipway

is

by

.

10 are as and

water fishing

and

the

tonnes, main

floor for

slipway built

those

berth Pier

At

North used Boatshed two

space

deep

the .

or

there 200 South slipway basin located be weather business

length, or is stone other

slipways the are

is

The

to a dedicated primarily

West

the

in vessels

West . Market

this its

the one bad

and up slipway m on

of

vessels Basin

to

with the .

would

the by used

which in building

which

25

operated comprises

Fish

Market,

-

, MLWS

rebuilt is

and

Fishing

.

to . road the

depth basins used berths space Royal increase MLWS

the

vessels along

boats

by

Basin serves up is

of

Basin Piers

Council below to

to The Market

facilities,

weight for berths

registered

Farmer’s

. out a

recently

and m below in

indoor

end

particularly

is a space

working

43 Harbour Fish West

Princess m . Middle North

vessels

) 2

2 04 . . tonnes for there Macduff working of with The monthly main gear, changing south The usable 3 alighting adjacent and carried The transported Previously capacity shipyard with basins The 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

is

Firth

. There

. Bankhead

Moray of

the Aquarium visitors

east

in

the

000

, . life at

45

located

is

facility

marine operated

around

and of

local

Aquarium

restaurant

owned footfall Macduff Marine Marine MacduffAquarium - or

celebrates

café Marine

Council annual

is

an

and

Macduff Aquarium has

permanent

Road The and no The

11

in

the the the the

next

units small

of

which of

or Princess from of

messy the

industrial

Aquarium,

.

of most

Towards the

.

the most

Bankhead, garage

small of , .

deepening a to

many of

reclaimed While

of somewhat end .

the

units Road

equipment

end is

was

housing size Shipyards or

east visitors owned, from

-

area west garages the area

of

nets

storage the

Bankhead the

The

The spoils

. Macduff . Council at . currently

from small roughly the context storing by

down are

domestic

area 1921 in

for

are

entities

runs

in with nine located

an

and

here drive Aquarium

is leased South of Bankheadside Road is

are

area These

the will Basin

.

suitable private

area to

street to out particularly there

station and

buildings

Royal

whom

constructed containers

the

Basin / of

and

Bankhead Bankhead

RNLI

storage

leased and rented

)

a

3 . character, many are land Across units container are Aquarium The to Princess sea Royal The 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

it in

are are

as mile have

there while

role supply Others

. 30 support who

there

. – key the to

some

a

there 25

Macduff

local,

region

equipment For a businesses

in . order

training

of plays base are .

the

in a or

base harnessed,

units

within several

chain

jobs be

storage . outside main

.

warrant . Macduff

businesses

for based

While storage

to . in supply

Fraserburgh)

from

their

are or crews area efficient specialist

the

Macduff

local

marine an of

of

from

possess

and

opportunities of Macduff

more more many

in and

mostly

(continued) contractors significantly

having Peterhead

is wind to

cluster elements in economy

trade Work Work in on progress the slipway and

businesses Macduff, equipment chain grow

operation

undertake chain Banff, the

shore

travel of . - main in

g to

.

benefit off

their (e

the could

staff

successful

sufficient vessels, Supply suppliers supply

the

) number 5

. premises radius A their isn’t see makes While also required Should chain new This supporting 2 The

12

- to In

the the the and and

ship

.

deck

well

along

street

in – - in survey supply opened

derelict

internal

external

business places on offer

and activities along

chandlery,

of

Street, refrigeration, few own

of

plus winches,

.

marine hotels,

located marine

services

engineering

recently

. operating its shipbuilding

are of primary is

range

a

fuel, Shore

combined

a safety, Lane), businesses

the has vacant

the

on

and chain

area regeneration There

owners

thriving

providers

is equipment

ancillary .

and

accommodation precision

which

Watt’s engines, of

and Group and

several

or

employs

vessel located supply

manufacture

(at

successful

parking and Council business

is are sites, health

do supporting

The

diesel

parts range

. of Shipyards

retail as . comprises

car

a

regeneration some

marine

there office

shipyard

harbour

vessel established little

focus Street has marine - profiling

chain

chandlery (free) electricians, harbour

the primarily the

Macduff

equipment, the

suppliers, and well .

of

undeveloped other

providing Shore

the Master’s is a

significant Street

this,

chain

and properties,

burgeoning Street public

supply

and

in

area and

for

to a

has services, drink,

craneage, Macduff,

.

along electronics,

chain,

prominent industry

Street is Shore

the

a main inspection

Shore Supply Harbour

and .

) )

Macduff

4 5 . . parking The industrial café with The eat seafront potential maintained buildings While in Shore 2

marine machinery and Thus painting contractors addition supply design, operating around repair There chain Macduff 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

is of by

the the the the

and this

fuel, gear it

East

their

allow

to

to in has

to with

and how year

the

along

close holding to

ensure on

bait supported

access length length group

is to

year for

facilities

identified

. Macduff) accuracy

located

fisheries

discussions

as

for

from well catch include

on

with

temporary

district district and operating and

facilities

need

the

78 91 50 89 51 82 community includes 96 inshore

doing

varies and .

of (based the is

predict Group required

is

this, Vessels <10m infrastructure

vessels storage to

Plan)

fishing

(which stocks Coast

port of

there with

mending

condition small

services unloading Despite

Fisheries

difficult . inshore Moray

of district for 2013 (Scottish Fisheries Statistics, Fisheries Scottish Statistics, 2013(Scottish

Scottish based vessels by based vessels Scottish is

The

suitable volume . the

it

and

addition rapid

Management

together

pristine

of

of

Inshore

In develop in and

areas ice and

.

and

No. No. active number

grounds will Firth

and

2.3

. Fisheries Fraserburgh

health safe viability

provision region,

Table Table Decemberat 31stas Government). Eyemouth Fraserburgh Peterhead Scrabster District Aberdeen Anstruther Buckie

the fishing water including equipment the maintained Moray Area The by sector Aberdeenshire The highest Coast The

13

of

to

six

for

and and and and less 150

local have daily

other

under

out

accept

Group,

landed a

.

. are provides and inside

1940 and

about on

can trucked

workers

other completely

and Buckie year particularly

Macduff

in

manufactures now present

to in

December boats . that the beyond

generally

ships

commercial

and operating at catch

waters

lorry . Shipyards Macduff and skilled almost and

employs

almost and

and

the over local

by port” -

boat

their 150 is coming into

Macduff vessels

occasionally

for . July facilities

vessels 1993

support

inshore

non

miles of Macduff which

repairs, catches are

Gardenstown

in Macduff

month

are have frequently

in circa

fleet

has come by in fishing

that

and larger

per yard, that boats,

not the scallops

and

services small “registered

between

also nautical numerous

Fraserburgh

There a boats

of

The

.

market founded

harbour .

12

times employs some

boats to catches

inshore

founded fisheries

fishing with lands

mostly though to

squid

design

predominately time the part

was

Group Macduff is 1966 longer

four

suit

fishing small one

complement

was conversions

in

at in a As repair

boat

larger to

is no ship

builds

The . lands is

few /

although out

catch

is

fishing operate winter

. inshore

call

Macduff, shellfish,

Design a

and markets

the

which

average

transported /

the

tends there

on

the

fishing use

Macduff

on which

activities

Ship miles, Shipyards

fishing in boats carries

sectors length,

and

vessels workers, to

while

This Macduff

ports architect machinery that catch

Scottish

. in local

Key

landings,

) present m

6 .

nautical scallop 10 The dependent boats prawns Macduff, Inshore At frequent, basis, One repairs their there fish While Fishing other Fraserburgh, fishing Macduff naval deck skilled vessels, moved Macduff Shipbuilding 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

–

in of the the

and and .

part local their

eight

There

year visitor

out . marine

for

to tourism develop

by

speaking of

of

Head

to

each

March due through year

tours important

.

December

summer marine

important

group is

Troup

average each

increasing

. for book the

an mission Generally

until

Harbour

particularly to ,

. undertaken a ) an

Harbour

angling

Charters

up between

% are

2020 up

market working

has 80 2013 during

a

and with

harbour by Banff

Macduff Guide trips in mostly Scotland

by m

this trips

framework /

overseas,

the at . daily

use

15 users) in (circa

summer

2014

are 145 continuing

£ call

uses wildlife visit

in

fishing and from and

to

Macduff of Cruises

the wildlife

almost

trips volume,

trips strategic

cannot m

(authored

and are for

trips yachts

in tourism mix

2014 yachts

101 .

customers that Puffin operate £ leaders

: of fishing in

Giant’ 160

offer during operate trip

Fishing of

frequent,

many broad

small

. wildlife 24

published visiting of from

a

sailing the

with ,

per

of of vessels

very

and

trips trips industry Harbour number

total Cruises . tourism

While 2015 are

businesses are

grow

majority a .

recently

in

the

number small

The ‘Awakening tourism and expenditure of Two Macduff Puffin fishing September, The internet wildlife groups Trips was passengers A A 19 these draft maintaining Provision

14

. in

m)

fish

% 10 along while 78 91 50 89 51 82 96

in

537 ‘Other’

19 tonnes suction Total (<

landings %

of

the in

31

400

, in million,

tonnes,

of

61 vessels - - 4 4 2 1

31 20 to Other 150

increase 250 dredging,

, £

increase 2 %

an 1 to

increase smaller

to

% by particularly

and 9

an 83 37 75 48 81 75

75

%

474 (continued) largest

Creel

.

. 71 active

Statistics, Government). Scottish Statistics,

m) the

mechanical 6 show of .

vessels district, 6

hand

£

decreased

rising saw

increased

harbour

by 8 9 1 1 2 1

,

10 32 2014 (to

the number

Nephrops

for squid

2014

landed in

registered fishing comprises value

shellfish

(Scottish Fisheries (Scottish

Fraserburgh Scottish based vessels by main fishing fishing asmain by at based method vessels Scottish in

and

of

shell

the 2013

statistics rise category

shellfish which substantial Scottish in

2013 value and activities %

a

of No. No. active this

by

36 is EastCoast

. - a Key

total

)

6 .

with between Within The volume value landed Provisional 31st December31st Table 2.5

dredging category operating There 2 Total Peterhead Scrabster Fraserburgh Eyemouth Buckie Aberdeen Anstruther District 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

-

:

provision of lifting provision

O&M activities O&M

, storage, warehousing, office office warehousing, storage, ,

shore wind developments and by developer. developer. by and developments wind shore - workforce. tends to require large purpose built facilities, purpose large require to tends to the wind farm site with favourable transfer transfer favourable with site farm wind to the there are some key criteria which might define might which criteria key some are there activities are more suited to Macduff Harbour. As Harbour. to Macduffsuited more are activities services and infrastructure requirements vary during during vary requirements infrastructureand services and other equipment other and fuel storage. and broadband facilities, restaurant / leisureand accommodationof Availability for facilities Proximity time. working maximise and sicknesssea to avoid times: accommodate to length quayside depth and Suitable vessels. transfer passenger vessels.for access 24/7 harbour for accessof road terms in both links Good transport population of areas and to airports access and equipment the workforce. for assuch craneage, services, Harbour • Harbour services and infrastructure requirements for off for requirements infrastructure and services Harbour activities O&M wind shore Port of off the stages Construction O&M while are the requirements develops, and grows the sector time. over changing themselves Nonetheless for port of choice a developer’s • • • • •

15

. to to

and have

wind these closer made sector

reality

weeks, Should .

Cluster, vessels

journey

services near Offshore

segment . between to

servicing in

emerged, in

2

located

– earmarked reasonable

Firth

the were

Renewables wind

shore quicker

three NE

Shire for development -

is

has

pass

of and

off

be sites

ports support Scottish the . market

incentives

industry

and

( and ideally

site

. supplies

shore travelling

Moray vessels

support -

that 1 for

two

be can oil of

this itself City National . this

off

period )

up’ NE Macduff

other It - business

to a :

support Cluster logistical Outer the

business to tanker the

Aberdeen,

.

tankers, (continued)

2011

potential

would grow for

are horizon service

‘back in to

to

30

in

a

made and the Harbour delivery

to to servicing and Shire Aberdeen

: as growing time in site

installations, proximity

in Macduff Airport

there

and (“O&M”),

were and

no harbour Macduff Macduff

provide around Sites

off and is RIP)

sea vessels

. - to

sites

off

identified the Aberdeen

City trips

marketing

potential

International, closer comparison

(N

positioned

While

could in market

is

in 77

manufacturing

there in

changes . potential trips

into town

Aberdeen

north

supply wind right anchor

present

best Plan a

developed

located

this

Maintenance

time the 250 at

that

is

niche successful the

chain

Development albeit crew

be &

as

Aberdeen

and do from

Macduff

to off

many consent

was

significant A

Harbour

shore activities which

to

-

over sites Development

.

with

the

which is rig are

sites

them,

off

Key supply

crews development harbour

oil )

2014 these

6 .

serve of these the for proximity, Two received Scottish Renewables and within Operations Infrastructure Macduff Identified operations further There during In An compared for vessels, cheaper facilitating Aberdeen Macduff There anchored Developing 2 2. MACDUFF HARBOUR OVERVIEW

: the the

below

by some some by

. . Key .

perceived as perceived

, such such chill , a as be

captured

harbour

are

the

and

with only one or two fishing fishing or with two one only

the the harbour may within

–

and and management

Facilities research,

perception of lack lack of perceptioncare.of areas

:

equipment and rubbish around andscattered rubbish is equipment

desk

–

Operations space

industrial of

through

the

. of and Fish Market Fish Market is underutilised

enter VHF VHF is not always answered business’. for ‘open not not understood Harbour CommitteeRoleof Advisory stakeholders. The The using the space. boats industry Lack fishing facilities the support of to crane. machine davitarea,ice or facilitiesstorage Lack space/makes the / industrial units of users. to new unattractive and inefficient harbour Harbouris messy the around hamper andefficiencysafetydoesit only harbour. Not also harbour, a creates it at harbourskilled staff (appropriately) of Shortage duelack to resource. of arebeingpostponed activities

utilisation

• • • • • • • can

efficiency

16 that

. efficient stakeholders

by

and

vessel

potential

of

with other with

the

enter once enter - and will andwill continue

size

.

capacity identified

development of development - to re to the conflicts

with

reduces were

and : fishing boats are getting aregetting fishing : boats derelict or unused orunused derelict limits

. to build on the success the ofsuccess the on to build associated

constraints

nfrastructure harbour as no electricity or as fresh electricity nowateris

with the town the with

i

configuration slippery steps steps slippery are

capacity –

the and

at no disabled access except at Aquarium Aquarium pooraccess at / except disabledno

–

Linkages Harbour

. parking

harbour issues within for harbour operations and publicharbourand wider operations is for poor

constraints

too short for short small too boats. and the

operating

more in and

water

. is constrained by of by water constrained its depth a public public a roadthrough runs industrial area. the main

–

of

is at capacity and restricted to vessels up up tonnes. to to 350vessels restricted capacity andis at toilet facilities toilet

(although there have been no incidents to date) to incidentsno (although beenhave there layout

many

issues

issues

road slipway depth

and

Limited attractions amenities and attractions Limited Aquarium. poses a challenge. aposes of suffers Shore Street from concentrationa and sites properties properties along Shore Street, this issue along issue Shore this propertiesStreet, will pertinent. more become Limited forfacilities leisure craft. visiting activity and industrial people between interaction the Managing Current layout of road infrastructure limits the efficiency of the the of efficiency the limits roadinfrastructure layout of Current harbour Parking provision Should harbour grow in the alongsidebusiness re the Safety issues issues small with Safety craft vessels Some quays quays Some underutilised,are available. Access ladders Slipway Basic fabric condition,harbour is in of deteriorating and to investment unless approachmore a proactive deteriorate to is employed. maintenance Harbour is Harbour were Macduffin larger built that andmany struggle operational

Key

main

) • • • • • •

• • • • • • The The The

7 .

These

• • • The 2 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

- 3 of

fit the are

and and and

Basin of

and support

Figure

:

.

which number

to

West

a amenity

flexible while

success the

uses a harbour

Consolidating . visual management at

the proposals the

:

develop

.

above,

infrastructure to

.

the on

chain potential

of

around Developing

: . Quayside of Improving

Harbour

proposals development

harbour

and

. :

some described supply . proposals

Building

in

and developments : paragraphs

Market :

area

Area on

activities

about areas

use marine Fish slipway -

economic

Basin

improving

Leisure activities Masterplan Identification the

Measures the following

focuses

and and

and proposed

:

of and multi

shipyard

Industrial and .

the and Royal .

no

in

Basin shows Street

information facility

areas 2

are purpose

- Overview Masterplan

) Maintaining Princess supporting Middle for Bankhead strengthening Tourism Aquarium Shore regeneration Supporting operations 2 . described specific • • • • • • • There shipyard Figure provides 3 The

17

–

for the

2016 around

harbour harbour Harbour and

. facility the

that

.

period

so key amenity for :

Macduff

the Macduff

of

operations and

markets of

visual

over

strategy

daily objectives

and

position

existing infrastructure

serves, harbour

their the

it potential

safety and physical

core

following

. the community” new

conduct the

in

tourism out to improve

strengthen

by

commercial

: . improve repair

community

is

strategy

the able and sets arbour will flourish as a thriving working thriving as a flourish will arbour and

and the area and

growth

H

. well vision

successful are

enhance maintain underpinned

harbour a

interests maintain

safeguard facilitate

in the future for the benefit of the local economy and and economy local of the benefit the for future thein

“Macduff “Macduff

harbour, facilitating growth and efficiency of existing of existing efficiency and growth facilitating harbour, .

is Masterplan Masterplan

overall

) surrounding To To To the To users To as shipbuilding the

business and capitalising on new opportunities as they arise arise they as opportunities new on capitalising and business

1 .

• • • • • This

The 2026 in The 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

18

(continued)

proposals

areas

arbour H

Masterplan

of

Macduff

2

Overview

)

2 . Figure

3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

19

proposals (continued)

proposals

Masterplan

–

arbour H

Masterplan

of

Macduff

3

Overview

)

2 . Figure

3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

: a of in

in to be

will

with used to

with

cost

done be feasible,

they

entrance obtaining feasibility feasibility feasibility

need and

number

are can constructed, at a

could

that

been

: discounted

for full and

will

The . be a

. has dam work date and

progressed

this

options there

to

to be benefits . capacity

this

options internally sources

what actions

coffer of what

executed

:

likely breakwater

two regard the

any

should forward, funding

considered

.

funding harbour funding review and the

of

last

undertaken new

with

to

consider

a been taken and discussions

is

the

proposed .

is support

whether

exercise

agencies and

work

of

potential to are

have potential planned

step removal

increasing them,

EU

should :

Initial underway to option

be

case

and into first proposal m,

.

and identify

ascertain actions feasibility 20 outcome options

feasibility

the

£

a The to

. identifying of already

of

the for should attached

should is business to

example Whatever and

in construction

. past on -

inform

following

costs

Investigation work Review expansion the date to Investigation and excess for Government view buy strong

• • • Based exercise exercise the deliver a The

20

is to

for the the the

: that new

term

of enable a

case users forward,

harbour

harbour’s structural increased, would long

also subsequent issues the

around it

and

be photographic harbour,

of

taken the will and maintenance any

key that depth

condition creating - is

make

the

nfrastructure

i boats so in

could

for

. .

to or

of n what internal short of

A

. exercise . inform

option need an current stakeholders

arbour

harbour harbour . h

capacity

identifying

This

2 the assessment basins,

the .

P viability and identify

phases the

the positioned

many

attached By

maintenance determine

of

of

movement . . which to Whatever

both two

to

cost . enter

undertakes

in

inform identify

future better better

among of allocation improving

to

basis

stock’

.

capacity

be

to will

capacity

will

the

structural ways efficient and

approach example

boats

will Council ‘take

and

comprises annual investigations

significant funding requirements

schedule for to a

which

harbour overall

an aspiration

the

more infrastructure proposal .

several

deepening or larger Team be is

depth on an the

-

of

proactive jeopardise

are

is

as In

internal will

proposal

aim initial Maintaining

present ) Increase Enable Enable harbour

3 more 2 1 .

there breakwater, There such • • increase There P This more a Harbours maintenance might infrastructure The surveys maintenance assessment, This survey required At infrastructure P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

-

in

be . by

re . car

and

Two with

more

Street car . create

can number Macduff

by spaces

identified measures

to

A

owned

zone parking .

assessment to

Laing enable .

present, proposed

additional

been employees

Park new

at

to parking

. building spaces internal Street,

will

travelling .

require

the

have the car Car overspill

site support

:

will hipyard

to Street parking s issue Department Shore further

parking

Fishing

Area allocated within

parking of incorporates

employees car Ness this which with

leads additional industrial

planning

Aquarium of

Don

on Council

to

some

area space

issue

.

the identifying corner .

the

which travel Industrial additional

to accommodate

this of with number additional

yard identified,

station

.

the building relevant

to of Addressing for

incorporate of

of

the

general

. view bus the the on

to activities

been

Line Road a around

Chandlery of

spaces of

by

spaces, .

particular, areas spaces site Key more

recommended

reduce have

with

creation

locations area a

use

in provision

are

configuration

is shipyard -

might appraisal

Empty Pattersons Relocation Former Re additional Bankhead development parking residents The redeveloped

options :

c) d) e) f) insufficient visitors residential efficient actions Firstly, Shipyards that Secondly, of and Potential as a) b) There

21

supporting

of to as be

the the this and

with

park road and zone from main

point

Street Street

would can fenced

Lane Lane, car terms adjacent

how

residents the

along

be

residential alternative in arket, some

either

the Laing

Laing

scenario,

M

and through public

at

as of are Watt’s

industrial to Watt’s

one areas

Street

shipbuilding

would .

Lane, Fish on The ideal

zone an

through boundaries

on

ascertain

. all

. happen

Basin

Consolidating public sides for

an

from :

the to to

Laing

, to area

options

end

In

purchase

park points zone the

provided

to .

Watt’s remains

both for access

to Royal

of cutting the

be

entrance creating car The this

at

exit

quayside

on . access

to Street

locations

where Quayside Street shipyard required there

Market

For new

what and

road

park

. . a is public

parking intends

street

building

need open removal the

and a

Princess

Laing Fish

car

Laing zone

only

shipyard entry comprises of

from years

public The and parking, work the also the

the preferred of the

restrictions .

Laing

practice,

or the a

would

Basin

Council is

to ten from

at

in present area to

and

the is

of

to area access

alternative

at the

access

efficient

design . next

design access proposal

are of is

Royal

parking

There five . work

Lane end

parking

an to access stretch

.

there entrance

the

and

be practicable, works

This which working area public

can

Lane

.

next

alignment east able and - parking as closed

to Bankhead

activities will

Street

public

Watt’s

would

works re the

as Princess

be provision

be

existing

far the present )

Creating the

Watt’s

4 t 3 .

placed, road Feasibility proposal over property, At will and in There at (free) vehicular well zone the still from with closed quayside quayside Laing A P repair quayside As 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

is all the the one

zinc

This

.

for review

current

over

hot

enable costs

slipway the operates

options

service cover and

a of

the would

reduce

of

of changing slipway This

harbour review

.

. painting and/or

successfully

for A

. the

and slipway

of

whether slipway Basin construction

at operation

options internally

(continued)

the the

efficiencies part owns

/

particularly Royal

cover at Shipyard and Shipyard slipway as

ascertain

activities

Council increase to berth undertaken

comprises berths Princess

management of

the of

the

operations,

might being considered

management .

in north

shipyard

proposal

present the Review Provision being

8 7 This of weather spraying P At slipway future recommended, structure is currently P

22 supporting

is of of

the the the has

and

Pier

main likely along along

to works

. smaller

Princess

option to

currently

are the

the North

extension the consider

. increase

space

Pier

this is possibility property

berths

of

of available

efficiency of to the There the

the .

new one

end restricted Consolidating North should

on

: made

affected)

whether configuring

ways berths be

- slipway two

the

be assess be west

re

residential

of

and

on comprises

will to limitations

operational points not

or

exercise the

will northwards

replacing

Quayside at

the the

Pier as will

additional one, alternative operated

access than

water and supply

proposal

remaining

m required eastwards as

such

given and

North

construction

feasibility

access 10

is

and

increase locations the This rather

fresh

.

Basin

water the

well this and

The

. . vehicular will

two work on

as

Basin)

larger slipway slipway,

once

and extending

on

at fresh

with

pier Royal . owned a

of

- This

of capacity

the slipway of . (pedestrian

slipway and eastwards

Pier access Royal at shed

of

with

feasible,

the only feasibility

Basin Council

removed

Princess of

section

Electricity North

existing

)

Extension Restriction fact

4 ehicular 6 5 4 .

been boatyard cradles in capacity implications east extending complications Initial the operating The P access V P Royal this the Electricity (Princess P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

a

with to

. as installed

is up space on on up space Cons

associated

Long way to walk. Conflict with activities. shipyard Long to walkway Conflict with activities. shipyard May not prevent from boats blocking steps. Damage from other boats. on Takes up space deep water quay. Damage from other boats. Takes deep water quay. Long way to walk. refurbished

• • • • • • • • • • pontoon

cons

be stakeholders

no

and

by by will

that

pros

among

steps

can use.

are

Pros

Prevents Prevents other from boats blocking step. Close to town centre. RNLI Closeto town centre. Where boats may be berthed in weather. good Where boats are berthed at present. town Closer to than some other options. Steps are already used passengers. area

there

existing

• • • • • • • • consensus recommended use

-

and the

clear multi

rather

Fish

at Fish

no therefore location,

on on North slipwayat

is

is

time,

It Jetty (MiddleBasin)

. purpose - this

Pontoon Pontoon at Market steps Pontoon atWest Pier Pontoon on North Pier Pontoon Pier (Princess RoyalBasin) Pontoon (Princess Royal Basin) New steps Market Option for There preferred each at

-

fit 23

A in of and of at as

lay

the

and .

Fish

This Pier poor

West .

.

Royal Guide

water board at repair

Middle Middle

of

the business boats the

ascertain

by

here easier section ;

berthed flexible

the

the Basin at berthing

separate ship deep North

available

to

a on

craft)

be event

in in

to

wind

and

Princess this the so the

the

that shipbuilding berths :

the can

passengers

owned made

Middle for overspill the ; located

In

on being leisure shore the safer

done

. required - and

area along

or

in .

be berthed

the berthing water eveloping

is

is boats

time

off .

aim D those

steps too

use

from :

-

are

will than .

location access boats that

access

points any

at

the deep visiting

as

present

these

within –

area power repair

landed weather,

craft at

multi

and efficiency craft

the

and of identified a craft

larger rather Market make

this

supply needed Pier in

fish

craft water

Should (such

.

of is poor in

preferable . been

Fish

any types recognised Pier, berthed in

available

conditions, access North water

scheduled would berthing

craft already Cruises, is fresh

the of

passenger occur

smaller repair are Market

and and

have it

regularly Basin

is

operational

is

the these

upgrade

North wave for their

craft and fresh

and

that

Fish

difficult

Puffin the

. might some

time,

steps, Basin the Royal Basin smaller

Basin pontoon

currently it

along

and be

the

options used power until

A and a and/or

Basin) assessment

at of

conducted leisure

. same are

where activity can

along

practicable

is or

here

alight An

proposed Market increase Middle Middle points Passenger

Middle

.

Electricity

Princess

as )

the realised,

is

5

10 9 . number Passengers Market the weather Basin Basin, It P whether will pier two Electricity (Middle P Basin work At repair fishing, far The be Fish Quay Charters over and berths The 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

to or

can and

also . café,

time,

other shore

- fishing

is marine

/

off arise

It the same

for facilities .

centre, flexibility

harbour

promote they

office the

: to the support other At

. support facility

to quayside

heritage no should

maintain

to

that a

to Master’s the are area

as

so identified wind

at Market’ particular

.

undertaken such office there

in been

shore / equipment –

-

‘Fish (continued) are Harbour .

off fishing flexibility

have

a safeguarded

harbour and

the activity area is

activities, storage

.

from uses the

that / actions

demands some for

use

inshore

-

form by businesses

facilities

be fishing

that related

in

business to multi

market potential some working

mainly

related owned of - of

inshore O&M opportunities

marine - needs

recommended future .

purpose - is Investment industry, Potential wind Accommodation marine Non etc number

for

• • • • It purposes meet buildings recommended support there harness A -

fit 24

a at and

be

the the

new of

in can of specific

itself

utilised it flexible

by either

a

development

not

/

is

creation

. which building

reflected .

it

g facility,

. unit

)

in . the governed (e veloping

space

that

etc to was

De

new

is :

ways of

sector, industrial of

building regard

quayside

which Market

Market an

windows, Market

of

as

With . Fish

Fish . private

variety Fish

existing

doors,

the a the construction

the

forward,

of

creation

and

facility of

smaller is

to FishMarket with alongsideboats

and with

or and

the

Basin consultation going

partitions, : size . There

issue

are .

Middle Development main

Marketing opportunity criteria similar Demolition ceiling, Demolition Refurbishment

)

5 11 .

• •

• • stakeholder options developed present The P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

(continued)

area

use - multi

FishMarket and for passenger steps boarding Fishing boat crew sorting nets the inside FishMarket purpose

- for

-

fit 25

. It

and of in in

.

.

the and

cost chill

wind

pallet a

Plan)

fishing

Project time Plan)

that

machine

as collected potential

feasibility housed additional and flexible

more forward

the

ice shore be establishing a a

-

be some

such

given

. an any initiatives

By off and

can . Beatrice

crane

can Marketing in identify taken refurbishment

take

Marketing

is the build to that option of

support - the

veloping

utilised, will which davit in

which

at to

new De a Harbour cost

equipment,

Harbour

:

a .

marketing Harbour preferable

as

industry investment of

unlikely easily Banff, the

the

and

Market particular

the be base

is at be of storage, for

that

involved

in of cost such facilities Macduff

it Market

Fish infrastructure

fishing attendance

be to may .

:

in

case the

(part

decked to compare facilities would (part

the Fish run,

secure

to

a

fishing

with right

cost, to provision with of with

on a and

and

present with facility

ice equipment,

the

events at business effort .

at machine

specific created

of

built of recommended

inshore marketing investment

the ice

Basin build

for

is starting

building

required

chain made

coupled space smaller to and

is

and commencing

be building

development a

delivered -

Middle Market re

supply Augmented debate, Provision lifter, the demand area will Targeted Promotion or demand, existing

determining therefore )

5

.

4.

3. 2. 1. parallel, incremental industry is The Fish effective quayside While the exercise In 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

to

and with

.

. plots

owners

marketing

use debris

and

and

development - re

targeted tenants industrial

for

and for containers

area

existing chain

. entire

garages, with

units

supply the

permission for

development sheds,

. of all

marine

Domestic Domestic garages along Bankhead Road securing of

negotiation

:

areas demand planning

to

the

view actions

Ongoing a Removal Obtain parking Promotion identify • • • • Key

enhancing

26

- . and is

in of to

re

. and

with

It

wider stores one be

use

.

tenants

business to

. Bankhead and significant the tenants

amenity along

will

compound

Road

of support interested 3 to

Some their

P

the

Road

move

.

one to

be repair industrial

end

visual Road

to

be

existing Area

move for

with

similar under and

west to will might

location Bankhead

with parking, Bankhead willing

the along .

of units, this

they

Bankhead retained at further Improving are

and willing

: Industrial at

along

of proposal four be are

side

parking they shipbuilding dialogue

unit Area

units side

this in for whether

the least

that might constructed, proposed

stores

amenity

north of considered or Bankhead at

is

be

.

the

from of south they

be

the industrial business visual

already will that

Industrial

locations

that chain

the

to benefit indicated

will is

on

parking new location,

into

road, on

a

whether

for

supply businesses

up the

which

potential

already

envisaged area stores Council

Bankhead Development

area )

another

is secondary

6

12 .

It across other Road, An recommended have the taking to ascertain The A improvement marine attract developed The P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

. a is at

be

an

the the the the the the can

cost

works on to by on

also

be around

on content

you vantage there offers amenity

and proposal

environs

slipway detracting

and may

its

point that

what

the

same

This

boards could comprises

available

activities

managed . impeding Suitable

and .

Aquarium possibly

focusing

is the )

without . option from be photos

2

14

the This P

management

interpret where proposed

This

with

here, . board a

. deliver without

harbour observation proposal is

industries

metres (see

.

and from Option

achieved, It

the

point

.

can

interpretation attraction

the but . information

along its

and

from

a 500

point be

This

of identity path six

activities at

this

current .

new

and path

can of if activities

describe

where

reading

building : . the and viewed, Council

Aquarium

Basin

identified, existing

located heritage

repair be

repair boards option the would

that past while the places

be

shoreside

RNLI

identity

harbour

observation

Shipyard include approximately to a

to rich

can up and

–

Royal

few installation and board is

the

of of new

the which

the

construction .

of

need the look effective topics industry

very

of

Aquarium's on berths

alongside

form

will are . strong you

attractive area cost

the

Princess

recommended Aquarium Interpretation a Aquarium if

harbour,

Fishing Shipbuilding Harbour

is

14 15 the see points drawing Suggested • • • Council more and from more perspective P The the construction front some shipbuilding interpretation slipway access P There heritage comprises It

27

. a

. an be Aquarium for

car are the the the the

Gas

.

sites

. is . of

would cafe visitor Street of to the

on,

History

and

without Old

a

building,

people with would of

. these

Aquarium,

Macduff the Ness and new

area

there Centre

give town Social – Centre the in time success potential

success a

on Aquarium focusing

operations

shared area to

proximity

success

the

and and though the

of

Aquarium

over the the

attraction new

Two

be .

would of .

the to research on

tourism

on close to

this . identified

current The

on Building visitors : overlap, sites,

café

for

and

.

in

exhibition a

existing build

changed ‘Heritage heritage Interpretation

creation

benefit

000

been ,

Line

where to

attraction

the has proximity

building 45

uilding facilities the

development the

operation without on

it rich managed

B

Macduff

to

alone, Key located smaller explaining potential available :

have

of

include

History

a education

be

a

for

close and

in

how

the

an aim intended already

also stand

this

options

has repair, other

additional

their

former and as Social

Leisure would

industrial

Centre’,

are Aquarium are the

extension perhaps longer it comprises

an be use

Aquarium and new,

the

main the could

and enhance

incorporating

and

such

given

the An

A

to

It

how : the : construction with and stay

There

industry 2 . 1 and

and two may

. Harbour

to

: to

and

proposals

are proposal

year, Heritage Tourism

) incorporating preferable Option close Works There Aquarium, parking Option Interpretation Aquarium, Shipbuilding Fishing Harbour

7 13 . • • located There • • • complement example reason each attraction, Aquarium This P compromising opportunity Macduff Aquarium These 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS path

shoreside shoreside

from from Aquarium Shipyard to (continued)

Location of the proposed Locationof the proposed

28

to to to to . on

for Aquarium

the

that This

based

better would .

closely the town

view is

willing of be

a wrecks

the raising

drawing

This

exists

. boat work necessary to

to

.

industries may

with more organisations

be Trail, it

success will dive

the

or craft

– facility individual view already

visitors

the

a

Trail, or then other

one and

reef on

of

Heritage reef

existing Council

smaller diving

this Trail’ with . will

and

Pennan

the group

an

for it, of

a It to The

attracting

area

.

. for harbours diving sinking

Building leisure Harbour and

:

the

where

a

a the access the

‘Harbour

them

Cullen review market identify

for

project

of

Partnership

a into the to

Banff

artificial locations

and better Leisure from of

the

Harbour be

to

within

is creating an

comprises and of heritage will

further of

Trail

attraction

Trail’ lead

Tourism

it

closer there

comprises potential Macduff rich step

the

new

and of a

flourished

Banff proposal

Tourism

Creation Development first

purpose where

very

)

‘Harbour

7

17 16 .

positioned and evaluate define The the create This P profile develop with the have developing proposal A P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

- a a a a It

of

for

and . hot

calls, work

street travel that

in type

have visiting

access), copying

Master’s

business

company provide basis

to scale who perhaps this

high

some

phone facilities

a

for do and people

printer could

where

to and

operating internet,

larger

Harbour

regular

for and making shipyard shower

recommended a

akin businesses place the

facility

demand

be is

chain

the

internet,

space,

and

on

it no

work

Macduff of

test

that .

is the contractors

to

potentially enable this in to desk within

telephone

supply desking

- a

town of use of

kitchen something

and there hot

place

for many be the can a

whether facility

development

computer employees

even marine a number

internet,

absence

one developed

desk further with present -

work, provision

In would

is

using . demand

visiting

At hot space, mention .

the or . and convenient step

economic

a facilities, where

.

to

test of coffee sit telephone burgeoning

appropriately,

desk

office

one and facility

a and .

not solution with

. sites a Macduff,

g

. facility emails

can will

house, is

go (e

scanning have desk ideal

- service Creation

eveloped dedicated registered There around representatives business, between people reading An coffee and hot office which desking D versatile Macduff, and could •

29 regeneration

.

. as for for

this this two

was

here

Street chain

of facility or

hire

support training support through

that business

. chain, locations

ultimately Fife to employees

this

can facility

one or

persons

the

in

supply

. and activities

20 other uses

supply

reports . that

business suitability

equipped of

where identified

training wider of

Shipyards a the companies local

case and property

training workshops if the

Hall,

suitable,

been Council appropriately Shipyards, region

community

potential the the

elements

range

. .

that which of

a not

be testing the The

owned

Macduff

- Town within

.

have

is

in for decorated group exists

by within

meetings,

may specific Macduff

the

business

it Marketed

facility, forthcoming .

it firstly

uses

it as Council indicated

two the

used

facility with that

a facilities activities

and

hold

use – demand companies

be

holding

such have Identification to this

training

:

companies stakeholder within /

of and used

liaison appropriately - potential

accommodate

comprises exists could would

support

considers

training unaware

that

them be

with

of

is . Street

room wider or

can

under targeted, that they potentially

popular

Shipyards

is through purpose the facility event could

is

be

be

a proposal proposal

Shore as Business

contractors,

) the the activities Meeting number

8

18 . rooms could In facility encouraging This community facility workshop Such (Macduff) could available Macduff •

This facilities, and There P well discussions A 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

(continued)

development

economic

Shore Shore Street, from Middle the North Pier, Basin Shore Shore Street, from Middle the North Pier, Basin and

30 regeneration

a is to

fix’ the the are

café

with

more come range if a

such

a looking

visually a

suitable support

catering,

- there can

in If ‘quick

for where to

outcome

are

.

required a self and

that premises, the

and

create case

uses is to

They people

round

. painted for

incorporate particularly

to

likely

are

year from given is

- also additional where

complex, condition

business

. It demand activities, all potential

looking be

pastel,

. for

are is of to

could

space, poor

frontages

managed robust

could Macduff

related

-

a in market Street example

in

potential

accommodation, possibly and Festival

is

facility art

activities

. the for

. of

are property computer

the

grow Shore

in

and

/ hotel Coast

there Identification

front to

the :

for colours,

current the promoted tenants

room laptops, décor premises Consideration

found,

were .

gallery

be . luxury

be Street frontages internet

a issues

their

harbour are whether

assessment

their

whereby can or

an

chain

for may the example, the

potential

Shore use Accommodation Frontage Business

appropriate ) an extend

8 21 20 19 .

establish development Further supply budget There P of attractive solution unappealing While that P other and and/or to premises Festival space As P 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

. - to to At be an

the

. and

may

ship some chain

within on

sought

may

. users building

Harbour Harbour

: targeting

it

roles There be a

markets in as .

identified

new

existing

. supply and is of fuelling position

servicing business Alternatively new

may

Macduff Plan)

example the of .

such

of

role,

as actions, attract

for the

markets

grow

to grow of

this resource

. involvement

Council to develop out

such permanent Business

expertise and markets, a possibility

include cruise

directory the

development and sector little

set

sector

the

into support and

new right has resource the could

additional

Harbour to

will Shipyards lan

markets

within

role online P fishing

maintain

existing

marine an

wind the

a

Plan

implementation to Team

Banff an the exploring

new that

The

which grow the such

shore exploring with .

Macduff - available the inshore of

resource of

comprises

to

.

off development

actions

be across Marketing

the . drive

of with Harbours

Plan, (and

services,

extend

.

boats person

business may

to slipway, and the

available measure usiness

shore - recommended B Harbour

harbours an

Working new leisure Targeting Macduff Identifying to Exploration elements Compilation companies

is

24 23

oversee Masterplan be external Funding possible the This Marketing responsibilities present potential • • • • • P It P

31

. g of of . its

the the

Are and

that

and (e role,

skills of

operations

or and training chain

and

identified, and

the collection

staffing

effective? safety .

efficiency efficiently

watchman it : been

to

staffing

Is activities

recommended within identifying

communication?

more

Channel,

fulfilled? is

policies, appropriateness sit

have of

it

management example and

operations

relating

VHF improving

planning, done

and

for lines

of and

organised? to

be

management, those

are

operational

Harbours adequately

measures

Harbour

/ slipway

proposals, :

view them operation Board

address,

adequacy

management,

a does

up, some

the harbour

effective the

is

management of

management

relevant particularly ideally

with tidy ow

support

harbour

Measures Where H

supporting

harbour : How : Could Masterplan

:

of

that

review of reviews .

:

should harbour the

planning, policies,

up

- harbour of

descriptions

and

.

following

Review Supporting

review

harbour

)

recommended light budgeting)? holiday dues, Operation processes command? Management job Governance Organisation

bottom 9

22 . plans environment the In

• •

• • The needs is effectiveness A skills P concerning The 3 3.10) High level cost and impact assessment M 3.

The cost of delivering proposals has been estimated in The table overleaf present a summary of costs and impacts, discussion with Aberdeenshire Council Harbours Team. In using the following scales: ASTERPLAN some instances it is not possible to quantify costs until further feasibility work has been undertaken. Where this is the case an Cost Very High £300K or more 1 indicative budget has been allocated (see Appendices A and B). High £150K - £299K 2 Medium £50K - £149K 3 A qualitative assessment of potential impacts on the economy, Low <£50K 4

safety and environment has been undertaken, along with STRATEGY consideration of stakeholder buy-in (see Appendix A). Economic - No impact 0

• Economic impacts have been identified where jobs may be impact  Slight positive impact 1 created or safeguarded, efficiencies may be gained or where  Moderate positive impact 2 there might be an increase in harbour revenue or visitor  Significant positive impact 3

expenditure, for example.

Environmental +++ Significant negative impact -3 AND • The environmental scoping has broadly assessed the level of / Safety ++ Moderate negative impact -2

potential impact on the environment associated with each impacts + Slight negative impact -1

proposal – any proposal involving improvements or change - No impact 1 PROPOSALS to infrastructure may require its own environmental  Slight positive impact 2 assessment and should any environmental impact be  Moderate positive impact 3

identified going forward, mitigation measures would be  Significant positive impact 4 developed to deal with this. Stakeholder Very High Very high level of buy-in 4

• A qualitative assessment of potential safety impacts has buy-in High High level of buy-in 3 been carried out. Medium Medium level of buy-in 2 • With regard to stakeholder buy-in, the Consultant’s Low Low level of buy-in 1

assessment is supported with the results from a questionnaire distributed to workshop attendees (see In order to consider how proposals might rank against each Appendix C). other, an overall score has been assigned to each proposal using the above scale, where cost, impacts and stakeholder buy-in

have equal weighting.

32

3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

8 5 9 12 11 12 11 11 11 14 15 13 11 10 14 score Overall

in - High

High High High High High High buy Medium Medium Very High Very High Very High Very Very High Very High Very Very High Very Stakeholder Stakeholder

               Safety



     + +        + / + Environment

- -    

         33 Economic

Low Low Low Low Cost High High High High Medium Medium Medium Medium Very High Very High Very High Very (continued)

North

assessment

(equipment)

impact

additionalberths

and

cost

level

High

depth depth assessment structural - )

In

10 . P12 Development Development P12 of BankheadArea Industrial P11 Development Development P11 of the FishMarket P11 Development Development P11 of the FishMarket (building) P10 Passenger Passenger P10 berthing craft and access

P9 Electricity P9 and fresh water points on the North Pier (MiddleBasin) P8 Review Review P8 management of for slipway options P7 Provision of berth berth of Provision atP7 cover slipway P6 Extension Extension P6 of slipway and Pier P5 Restriction Restriction P5 on vehicular access on the P4 Electricity P4 and fresh water points on the North Pier (Princess RoyalBasin) P3 Creating Creating P3 an quayside zone efficient shipyard P2 Increase Increase P2 harbour (construction) capacity P2 Increase Increase P2 harbour (feasibility) capacity P1 Surveys Surveys andP1 maintenance P1 Proposal 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

5 11 10 10 10 13 10 11 11 12 12 12 score Overall

in - High High High High High buy Medium Medium Medium Very High Very High Very High Very High Very Stakeholder Stakeholder

            Safety Safety

   +    +     Environment

         34    Economic

Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Cost High High Very High Very (continued)

assessment

impact

and

cost

Shipyard path Shipyard and observation

– décor Marketing Marketing Plan

level

High

)

10 . P24 Business development Business P24 development resource P23 Harbour P23 P22 Review Review P22 harbour management, of etc. policies, P21 AccommodationP21 P20 Frontage P20 P19 Business Business premises P19 P18 Business support facilities Business P18 support P17 Creation Creation P17 of an artificial diving reef P16 Development Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’ P15 Interpretation Interpretation P15 boards

P14 Aquarium P14 point Centre P13 Heritage P13 Heritage and Social History Interpretation Proposal 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

or by

the

. with

North diving where safety,

results

for

. general

) a identifies in attendees

the -

on

17 the

.

P amenity

considerable management on supported

and by . buy

artificial . associated

and of

infrastructure traffic

identified

7 was impacts visual an Area

were

P

impacts

of

points ,

workshop the fishing .

’

of

6 Basin)

P mainly to

,

. been there supported 2

types

(Review Trail

stakeholder

water

improve (P

. 8 Industrial inshore of positive Middle

proposals

also

or P

facility .

improving (Creation impacts,

mostly

fresh

and

. Market, circulated environmental for the level

is different

17

impacts

have

‘Harbour

attract have P

of

and

proposals

was to capacity the Bankhead Basin

Fish with involve following

high

This

:

emissions

boards

negative .

and

a

of of

safety

that support between The that

the

be

in

.

Royal

- impacts

scoping and proposals

slight

to C)

reduce

harbour

Electricity

buy little

of those 9 slipway) something investment proposals

P

level may infrastructure respondents

conflicts

of do likely

for

for

was (Princess Interpretation Development Development positive all

Regarding

to is and

potential Increase

high Appendix . questionnaire 15 16 2 4 12

larger

number P P P P Pier P a

• • There options reef) support desire The some the Some proposals A particularly removing Stakeholder There majority of (see almost • • • Environmental

35

: of to

are and and

. others and

History impacts

jobs

regarded

proposals

are while impact . planning

achieved,

deliverability .

.

. Social comparison where (continued)

be facilities,

a zone potential

and

Area

example

some

and

can

berths

quickly,

and

cost economic For

.

greatest . costs,

of

. and enables . for is

quayside

involve

implemented :

in assessment

Industrial -

likely

be (Heritage Market .

(Accommodation)

. additional

efficiencies terms is

will level,

easily buy

impact 21 can in 13

estimated catalysts Fish P and Plan harbour

P

impact

shipyard

infrastructure

and

assessment

high fairly where

capacity the Bankhead

they

the

and

and revenue

their cost of of

in

slipway

economic while on potential efficient stakeholder proposals

cost harbour

harbour

before of Marketing

created,

of structural of

harbour an

Centre) through

for

delivered

or the the main

level

based mix be impacts work increase level

of a trade depth the

-

considerable Development Development Harbour

an

is

can High Creating Extension In Increase

a

assessment,

potential )

likely 23 11 12 3 6 1 2

improve

P P P P P P P being

10 . Interpretation as Outside • • • • • • • to increase where safeguarded The Economic feasibility some have There Costs and proposals The 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

the

resource.

Shipyard path Shipyard and

–

depth depth assessment. structural

- P18 Business support facilities. Business P18 support Review P22 harbour management, of etc. policies, Business P24 development P2 Increase Increase P2 harbour (feasibility). capacity Creating P3 an quayside efficient shipyard zone. Electricity P4 and fresh water points on the North Pier. Restriction P5 on vehicular access on Pier. North Electricity P9 and fresh water points on the North Pier (MiddleBasin). Passenger P10 berthing craft and access. Development P11 of the FishMarket. Development P12 of Bankhead Industrial Area. Heritage P13 and SocialHistory Interpretation Centre. Aquarium P14 observation point. Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. P1 In P1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

mproving mproving harbour Shore Shore Street Supporting Measures i infrastructure Princess Royal Basin and Quayside Middle Basinand FishMarket Bankhead Industrial Area and Tourism Leisure Maintaining Maintaining and 36

berth

. diving

a

excluded

of

.

. been

artificial (continued) proposals

zone

Area an

have

provision

of

:

–

scoring .

are

. quayside

low assessment

Industrial

proposals

creation Market highest

overall

. and Fish these

impact

shipyard

) assessment

7 now noticeably

the Bankhead

highest and (P

of of for

reason

summarises

efficient

cost

scored this

structural an

scoring

slipway

level For

. opposite the )

Masterplan depth

- Development Development

17 at High Creating In

proposals the

)

(P

table proposals 12 3 11 1

P P P P

10 .

from reef Two cover The •

• • • The 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

been

have

priorities

key

of

number

a

Masterplan,

the

of

refurbishment).

zone.

North Pier.

. lifetime 37

the

additionalberths. resource. assessment during

. level

Bankhead IndustrialArea.

timescales forward

Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation

high

–

premises

and structural assessment. structural the

taken of

costs depth

- Development Development of

being

P18 Business support facilities. Business P18 support Frontage P20 décor. P13 Heritage Heritage P13 and Social History Interpretation Centre. Business P19 Accommodation.P21 Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. Aquarium P14 P6 Extension Extension P6 of slipway and Increase P2 harbour capacity. P22 Review Review P22 harbour management, of etc.. policies, Harbour Marketing P23 Plan. Business P24 development In P1 and P4 Electricity and P9 fresh water points on the (Princess RoyalNorth Pier Basin and Middle Basin). Restriction P5 on vehicular access on the Passenger P10 berthing craft and access. Development P11 of the FishMarket (facilities/equipment). P3 Creating Creating P3 an quayside efficient shipyard P12 Development P11 of the FishMarket (building outcome

are

proposals • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

the

indicative

upon

priority

proposals

proposals

wins’ all

proposals,

drawing

specific

- investment investment management

almost priority Final

)

11 . Priority ‘Quickwins’ Priority Priority investment investment Priority projects Priority feasibility Priority exercises Priority ‘quick Priority activities projects Priority Priority

Other

Harbour identified, While 3 3. MASTERPLAN STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS

the

.

2025

– m) £120,000 £225,000 £260,000 £140,000 £360,000 £285,000 £3,215,000 20 £4,605,000 £ £24,605,000

2016 of

improving

on

excess

in

be focused

to

be at least least £20m). at be likely

is proposals

North North Pier.

these which

of

most

capacity,

additionalberths.

with

harbour

period,

Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation

fresh fresh water points on the (Middle Pier North Basin). – 38 / Marketing Marketing Plan.

increase

to

depth depth assessment. structural (continued) -

Masterplan Development Development of the FishMarket.

In

the P21 Accommodation.P21 Review P22 harbour management, of etc. policies, Harbour P23 Business P24 development resource. P1 Increase P2 harbour (feasibility). capacity Creating P3 an quayside zone. efficient shipyard Electricity P4 and fresh water points on the North Pier (Princess RoyalBasin). on the accessRestriction on vehicular P5 Extension P6 of slipway and Review P8 management of for slipway. options Electricity P9 Passenger P10 berthing craft and access. P11 Development P12 of Bankhead IndustrialArea. Heritage P13 and Interpretation SocialHistory Centre. Aquarium P14 Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. facilities. Business P18 support Business P19 premises. Frontage P20 décor. P2 Increase harbour capacity (construction estimated to estimated (construction P2capacityharbour Increase

required

over

timescales

and

and

investment

costs

programmed

proposals

capital

is

the

use use area Quayside: Consolidating -

indicative

investment excludes

of improving improving harbour infrastructure

m total

Leisure: Building of Leisure: on success

6 investment in increasing in investment increasing capacity) . proposals,

purpose multipurpose

4 Industrial Area: Improving visualamenity -

£

(this

for - Final

fit

) over

11 . (including Total Total in investment Masterplan Total in investment Masterplan proposals Supporting Supporting Measures: Harbour management operations Shore Shore Street: Identification of potential uses Tourism and Tourism Aquarium Bankhead and strengthening chainthe supply Middle Basinand Fish Market: Developing aflexible and Princess Princess RoyalBasin and and shipyardsupporting activities Proposals Maintaining and

harbour Just 3 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS

- the the the

acting

by pivotal on partner

possible

harbour indicates a

proposals delivering

is

led

all

it

lead

play

and implement

on

other

support

role,

proposals,

to overleaf will On or

lead .

whole confirm resource,

a post the

table

lead

to

as

others

struggle supporting Masterplan

take

The

a . Plan

. the would dedicated

some

esource

.

r

a

of would required

as

the play

clearly

esource be Team for r

well

will

will

Team proposal managers

.

as Without a will

.

of

evelopment responsibilities

and Team Team time d

manager Harbours

on

and implementation

evelopment

Harbours d

proposals, proposals the

the discussion

usiness

the project b Roles Harbours in Harbours

)

a

2 . role as specific that Masterplan The specific the business Some organisations where implementation 4 The

39

; to to all

are the

Team for

view which

required a

in

proposals

partners

Harbours : with

the ways

actions

.

lead

the of

key

of

all steps

proposals

the

proposals steps

Not establish

of Identifying

next remit :

: to

next .

some Masterplan

and

sources Masterplan

funded the

necessary Identifying

the be

management is

: responsibilities

describes

it can

funding . deliver

the and steps

and

chapter Implementation

)

implementing proposals Next proposals Potential Roles within therefore

1 . •

• • manage This 4 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS

Support HT       

Lead HT    

Shipyard path Shipyard and point observation

– décor Marketing Marketing Plan

P13 Heritage P13 Heritage and Social History Interpretation Centre Aquarium P14 Interpretation P15 boards Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’ facilities Business P18 support Business P19 premises Frontage P20 AccommodationP21 Review P22 harbour management, of etc. policies, Harbour P23 Business P24 development resource HT = Harbours Team = Harbours HT Proposals

40

HT Support HT

Lead HT           

North Pier

(continued)

additionalberths

responsibilities

and

depth depth assessment structural Roles -

) In

2 . P12 Development Development P12 of Bankhead Industrial Area P11 Development Development P11 of the FishMarket P10 Passenger Passenger P10 berthing craft and access P9 Electricity P9 and fresh water points on the North Pier (MiddleBasin) P8 Review Review P8 management of for slipway options P6 Extension Extension P6 of slipway and P5 Restriction Restriction P5 on vehicular access on the Pier Pier (Princess RoyalBasin) P4 Electricity P4 and fresh water points on the North P3 Creating Creating P3 an quayside zone efficient shipyard P2 Increase Increase P2 harbour capacity P1

4 Proposals 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS

purpose, purpose, sustainable

- areas. operation.

-

co

operation. diversification from from agriculture. diversification within and diversification -

priority sector sector competitiveness priority

assets.

facilities.

Adding value, creating jobs and promoting promoting value, Addingandjobs creating Development of multi Development

diversification and other development efforts. development andother diversification or facilities, activities 4.2bespokeof Provision socially supporting at targetedservices excluded people. 5.1 International co 5.2 National facilities, particularly facilities, particularly using derelict sites. upgradedor culture new1.2of Provision / tourism activities. 1.3promotion marketing Placeand 1.4 enhancingAssessing, andmanaging biodiversity solutions. travel active and/or2.1 Sustainable 2.2eServices.of and delivery Access to 3.1 Improving collaboration. and 3.2 Facilitating 3.3 Facilitating the fisheriesof sector. outside 3.4 Supporting lifelong learningandjob fisheriesin creation 3.5 seafoodfisheries the of at stages all innovation supply chain. employability / 4.1training of Provision support which sectoral complements Actions 1.1 business and/or community productive and

-

excluded to people - operation: To To cooperate operation: - Business Business Competitiveness:

for all all for with particular afocus connecting andintegrating on socially the local community. 5. Co other F/LAGs with / facilitate in involvementgreater co international/ national operation. and make better use use our of make better and facilities to improve assets encouragegrowth andof the tourism economy. To value add2. Connectivity: improve efforts to wider to external / internal connectivity. 2. To encouragesustainable the economyof diversification through business support for social enterprises, and tourism, andespeciallyin food energy,drink, and renewable of provisionin the and local communities. to services To 4. opportunities: Better opportunities better ensure Strategic Strategic Objective Place: 1the To enhance environment built and natural 41

3 of

. will and

grant

6 Axis

P priority

number

,

fisheries

. a 4

1 number . P

five 4 , a

. identified and 3 under

P external by

. are

and

coordinator g against .

4 been .

for (e 3

, (EMFF) eligible

3 there

opposite) .

maritime have 3

4

EMFF ,

funding be

1

. Fund eligible

3 table

. facilities for ,

underpinned EU’s Axis the

Interpretation Interpretation Centre.

3

.

may

be

sources 1

(see additionalberths. , case

the port 2

.

with 1 Under

the eligible may ,

Fisheries . for

1 . is sources

: be 1

potential to proposals

and

2020

this

supported

fund Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation of including

may Aberdeenshire

–

–

development development resource. be

discussion funding the proposals

above

relevant 2014 will

is North

whether

Maritime number particularly

the

Interest, the be

A

for

for proposals . that

of of

Further

EMFF may Potential

P18 Business support facilities. Business P18 support Frontage P20 décor. Business P24 P15 Interpretation Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. P11 Development Development P11 of the FishMarket. Heritage P13 and SocialHistory Aquarium P14 P4 and P4 Electricity and P9 fresh water points on the North Pier. Extension P6 of slipway and Passenger P10 berthing craft and access. P3 Creating Creating P3 an quayside zone. efficient shipyard

. ) ) actions,

3 . 9 • • • • • • • • • • • •

determine Common P Some

This of Several themes actions policies The European funding Many 4 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS

. a in to to

new help

costs

to

make most

regard

staff

aim

necessary

development that

activities,

and .

be

people with

that

and

of

may costs

it events, projects

lives projects

applicants feasibility

communities for

the

transport

for is

. on

instances including and

) supports

and

role Scotland

000 History Interpretation History Interpretation Centre. , made

some

All

Fund

10 : : people

be

In

expenses, £

.

to to

activities for –

partner

Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation path Shipyard and point. observation

can

restrictions

of Fund – –

500 communities Lottery lead

£

heritage,

(

relevant relevant Awards

some volunteer

range

the

for

Lottery be be local a applications

are or

Applications

Heritage funding . may may

P16 Development Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. P13 Heritage Heritage P13 and Social Aquarium P14 Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. Aquarium P14 Interpretation P15 boards. Lottery

• • • • • • •

The difference This Big This improve need costs, equipment, There previous reconsider This Heritage

42

to

the

and may

newly within

Centre

sources funding a

followed Planning

economic

There funding

. that local necessary support of

grant Town

be funded,

departments to

from

departments

be

example make Community

will

sources

Macduff for understood the

will other transportation,

is

relevant

should

available

it

and and

(continued)

earmarked from partners the

Fund potential and

roads,

and . learning,

Funds

Banff funding lead History Interpretation Interpretation Centre. History with

other

: and could

with sources

: of

: :

Street, available

owners funding

Good to to

with

Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation Shipyard path Shipyard and point. observation . deal

Investment skills – –

Council Shore Council

funding

funding amounts and proposals

that of

discussions

property relevant relevant

locally

already

Common be

.

be be for

discussion Property how is Heritage Heritage and Social the small

Plan

may

as may may be Potential

Council,

P15 Interpretation Interpretation P15 boards. Development P16 of the ‘Harbour Trail’. P14 Aquarium P14 P21 Accommodation.P21 P18 Business support facilities. Business P18 support Business P19 premises. Frontage P20 décor. P13 Aquarium P14 Interpretation P15 boards.

targeted

)

3 . • • • • • • • • • •

This personnel by Further identify Partnership such also the development There Aberdeenshire

This created available regeneration There Action Aberdeenshire 4 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS

be for Set

and and .

post, their Until filled,

. should will

usiness of in funding is oversee internal Macduff

enabling b

is %

in of leading to

to an

Council post who

50

fashion

timetable

milestones not

role

the

proposals time prepare is

critical esource key

the

r

esource timely to r

are on resource currently

a their

within managers which . dedicating

is in harbour of to

take

management and lead which

to

. % the

identifying

partners funding a identify

view evelopment

there 50

d

a

steps availability development

and

project where grant lead

and

partners relevant

available with a

of next

implemented

proposals, identify

be whether of

business lead

be with

funding all

business

where

to

of source .

the

Harbour proposals

the must

would develop resource,

organisations

for . number Work

Identify . groups Confirm a

that Confirm steps Once

:

which who :

Banff

:

: : . 4 1

2 3 5 are

for

should to

Council time partner Next

Masterplan actions

)

project

4 . evelopment key the such the implementation Action resource d time Harbour Action responsible up Action lead apply Action applications Action they implementation 4 There

43

at .

and and stay

. to

sources Interreg

and

Group

Infrastructure Sea Aberdeen

commenced

these

is

for funding North

: from Fisheries

for and

Renewable T -

dialogue

a sources case (continued)

Inshore

TEN

partnership identified

that the

as

National Coast

funding

/ sources . been

such

make

new

North has

transport to

.

sources . .

any

and funding

sources, the

recommended both

Enterprise RIF)

Government - is

funding

Estate Firth about

it (N

no potential funding

Potential

) Crown EU Aberdeenshire Scottish Fund Nestrans, Moray Scottish

3 .

• • • •

• • informed maintained, present, While Other 4 APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

for the the for

could could potentially

identifying any key issues issues key andanyidentifying

positive impact. positive positive impact. positive

of the assessment may result result repair may inassessment and of the k k collision of running /aground.

impact by impact

positive impact (construction phase). (construction impact positive More space to manoeuvre vessels spaceto Moremanoeuvre ris reduce Slight Increasing harbour capacity will enable more throughput, will harbour capacityIncreasingmore throughput, enable harbour and there will the enterbigger to boats ablebe will of moving more Jobs bevessels. efficient spacefor will there created,safeguardedwill be andincreasedbe business harbour andforincreased revenuethe shipyard. Significant increasethroughput Anin will result anin potentially in emissions. increasevessel phase). (construction impact Slight negative Safeguard the viability of harbour infrastructure of andits infrastructure harbour Safeguardviability the well as for the caseas operation,further make investment. Significant Outcomes environmental to are subject that activities maintenance assessment. impact impact. No Positive maintenance approachto proactive aestablishing impact. positive Moderate

impact

proposals

Safety impact Safety Economic Economic impact Environmental impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety 44

Masterplan

of

assessment

in. in. - -

present.

impact

felt that the cost is too high high is cost too and the felt that

and

cost

to estimate as will will as preferred on estimate dependto and maintenance over Masterplan period:overMasterplan maintenanceand

or structural resolved.structural or be cannot that issues

very high veryhigh level buy of

K level

ifficult to estimate as outcome of assessment andassessment ofoutcome as ifficult estimate to that there would forwould value be moneythere that not would development infrastructure major Any include public consultation. Technically Technically complex expensive.and proven.value not /moneyBusiness for case Likely veryhigh level buy of (22/22). support from 100%workshop attendees Some stakeholders £150K (feasibility) / £20m+ (construction) £20m+/ (feasibility)£150K Difficult of (e.g. versus breakwaterdeepeningnew option basins). Likely (18/22). from workshop 82% support attendees £200K. D unknown atsurveys is to light bring expensive may Assessment difficult be may that to requirements maintenance finance £210 Structural £10K. assessment: Surveys High

:

A

depth structural structural depth harbourofassessment infrastructure -

in in - - Increase Increase harbour capacity In

Stakeholder buy Deliverability

Estimated cost Estimated P2 Appendix Stakeholder buy Deliverability

P1 cost Estimated APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

-

impact.

positive impact. positive

Shipyard can create a more efficient working more acreatespace,Shipyardcan efficient while incomeland from increasecanthe harbour rental. Significantpositive Through to able be planning the shipyardmay travel visitors. andcarreduce among travel its employees Slight non industrial andThe conflict ofbetween removal will industrial activities the risk reduce andaccidentsof thus improvesafety. impact. Significantpositive generatorsrunning. Slight impact. positive impact. No With electricity and water, the North Pier can be utilised utilised North and water, Pierbe the can electricity With and easily, the basinofmoreincreasing the utilisation the shipyard.of operation increasingandthe efficiency impact. positive Moderate will North Pierkeepthe on longer to berthed no needBoats (continued)

impact

proposals

impact impact Safety Economic Economic impact Environmental

Economic Environmental impact impact Safety 45 Masterplan

of

can be mitigated becan

Laing Street) –

assessment

–

in. - include purchase and

in. - impact

and

zone to Fish to Fish ofMarket relocationzone+

enefits all all harbour users enefitsandnoise b

cost

concern from residents with concernfrom regardwith residents to

very high veryhigh level buy of high high level buy of

associated with layingwith along cables pierandassociated

level

91% support from workshop attendees (20/22). from workshop 91% support attendees Potentially will residents.reduction benefit installation of two cabinets andcovers. two ofcabinets installation issues. No Likely £50K Costs Macduff Shipyards fully support proposal. closure closure andrestrictions parking long is parkingas created.additional as Likely (17/22). from workshop 77% support attendees Possible andtraffic parking. public public parking) Difficult Costs estimate. to property, remainingresidentialofdemolition closure androadplanningofparking feasibilityand of fencing,provision restrictions, security and parking. alternative regarding the planningroadof objectionsbeMay £15K (feasibility)£15K Lane from Watt’s (zone£100K (extend£250K High

:

A

in in - -

Stakeholder buy Deliverability

Estimated cost Estimated P4 Electricity and fresh fresh Electricity andP4 water points onthe North Pier (Princess Basin) Royal Appendix Stakeholder buy Deliverability

P3 Creating Creating P3 shipyardefficient an quayside zone cost Estimated APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

this this could leadto jobs, new

-

egarding movement of boats on the the on boats egardingof movement r

impact.

work related vehicles will relatedvehicles will work reduce safety -

flexibility

be some impact on flora and fauna, if andimpact florafauna, on extendingsome be

impact.

No There will less vehicles bePier.travelling the North on Slight impact. positive Removingnon risk. Slight impact. positive slipwayof will potentially shipyardto Extension enable 30%by its business increase well as The safeguarding existing as ones. cradles new handled.be to would widerboats enable Significantpositive May impact environmentalAn option. an seawardbecomes required. would be likely assessment Slight impact. negative Increased slipway which will risk reduce accident.of Slight impact. positive continued) (

impact

proposals

46 Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety Masterplan

of

work work requiredto

assessment

in.

-

in. - impact

and on the onthe North Pier

addsignificantcost.

cost

additional berths additional high high level buy of £4m (construction) £4m

-

level

Complex Complex to possible iftechnical issues: is not it eastwards, will the cost extendrise significantly. It station, RNLI the move to necessary also be may which would Likely medium level buy of (15/22). from workshop 68% support attendees £50K (feasibility)£50K £3m feasibilityDifficult as estimate, to are. the realistic what optionsestablish No issues. No Likely (13/22). from workshop 59% support attendees £0.5K Pierplus the North of ofthe end sign a at Erection Master. Harbour by enforcement High

:

A

in in - -

buy Stakeholder Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P6 Extension Extension slipwayofandP6 buy Stakeholder Deliverability

P5 Restriction Restriction P5 onvehicular access cost Estimated Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

it would it would zinc hot enable

–

positive impact. positive impact. negative

Slipway is already operating at capacity. All All weather capacity. at operating Slipway is already cannotbut efficientmore berth makes operation it significantly increase sprayingwhich could result four aroundextra in boats beinghandledperyear. Slight impact negative aThe have berth covermay of height the visual amenity. on Slight in all will The weather berth saferoperations enable conditions. Slight impact. positive this could is how tendered, Dependingthe operationon the Council for beneficialterms andbeinsavings cost of the slipwaymoreoperation. for of terms efficientin Slight impact. positive impact. No impact. No continued) (

proposals

Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety 47 Masterplan

of

assessment

in. in. - - likely likely high becost. into

impact

and

cost

in service review which which servicereviewin is currently

.

medium medium level buy of

level

Likely (7/22). from workshop 32% support attendees some stakeholders would possible that not is It the slipway of the operationsee to want sector. private to the transferred £0 Included beingprogressed. issues. No Likely Likely medium level buy of (10/22). attendees workshop from 45%support andslipwaynew extended an Less desirablethan berths May be issue with is issue with berequired.Maycoverthat ofheight £300K but Difficult estimate to High

:

A

in in - -

buy Stakeholder Deliverability

Estimated cost Estimated P8 Review of management options ofReview for P8 slipwaymanagement buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P7 Provision P7 berth ofcoverslipway at Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT this this issue

–

in the the basin.in

With electricity and water, the North Pier can be utilised utilised North and Pierwater, becan the electricity With and easily, the basin ofincreasingmore the utilisation shipyardandthe of operation increasingand the efficiency other activities impact. positive Moderate will North Pierkeepthe on longerto berthed no needBoats generatorsrunning. Slight impact. positive impact. No and use existing Passengerssteps boardingalready for alighting. impact. No impact. No andslipperybedangerouscan steps Existing refurbishment. the with in will dealt be impact. safety Moderate continued) (

proposals

48 Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety

Masterplan

of

in. in. - reduction

assessment

in. -

(based on cost newofcost on (based

in. -

steps impact

A scopingA exerciseis

and

level buy of

. As this proposal will As proposalwill this . the improve

cost

high were mixed views on where pontoon where a on views mixed were

very high high buy level veryof

level

should should placed, be of resulting selection the in option this there is current infrastructure that envisagedit high abe levelmay stakeholder ofbuy Cost refurbishing ofCost a at neighbouring harbour). steps issues. No Likely There £30K 86% support from workshop attendees (19/22). from workshop 86% support attendees harbour users noise many andBenefits residents. benefit may is needed. powerwhich sufficientbe not May will require capacity.in increasean Likely £100K Difficult estimate. to whether powerupgradeadetermine requiredto High

:

A

in in - -

buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P10 Passenger Passenger P10 craft berthing access and Stakeholder buy Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P9 Electricity and fresh (Middle Pier North fresh the Basin) onand water points Electricity P9 Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

positive impact. positive

the right the right Fish facilities, could the Market attract build build could environmentalincorporate

- Significant improvement in visual visual in amenity. Significantimprovement impact. positive Moderate impact. No With through business more the harbour, andincreasingjobs revenue. impact. Significantpositive New such energy renewableinsulation improvements, andas heating. Slight impact. positive impact. No safeguard existing may jobs units business ofCreation to through ones, newcreateattracting businesses and the harbour. harbour will The revenue also increase through units. leasing the Significant continued) (

proposals

Environmental impact impact Safety Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic 49 Masterplan

of

–

support support fishing

assessment

59% support from from 59% support

in. -

and one compound: one and

in.

- impact locate some tenants from from tenants some locate

-

and

shore wind. shore - cost

£255K (building) £255K igh igh level buy of

-

very high high buy level veryof h

build: build: £250K.

- level

Likely (20/22). from workshop 91% support attendees there is concernedthat be may residents Nearby parking anybusiness newspacefor adequate units. Construction four ofunits Construction £80K. £30K.area:parkingofCreation difficult beMayto re area. industry. £120K surveys, the areadevelopment,Preparingfor £10K.construction: planningand may not be suitable for weight weight bearingsuitable foractivitybe not may future facilitiesfor demandoverfor Uncertainty fishing andoff Likely Mixedthe workshop: at views to (13/22) workshop attendees identify most cost effective option. effective cost most identify £5K. Feasibility: Refurbishment: £100K. New (chill facility, Equipment storage, machine, ice £50K.crane,lifter): pallet davit floorSome complexity as is deckedpiledand £105K (equipment) £50K to feasibilityrequiredas Difficult estimate to High

:

A

in in - -

buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P12 Development of Bankhead Bankhead of Area Industrial Development P12 buy Stakeholder Deliverability

P11 Development of the the ofFish Development P11 Market cost Estimated Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

walking.

positive impact. positive positive impact. positive

Will improve the attractiveness of the area for the areaofvisitors. the attractiveness Will improve Slight impact. positive Encourages walking. Slight impact. No Creation of a new attraction in parallel in the Aquarium to attraction newaof Creation and expenditure will visitor jobs, increasenewcreate of generally the tourism offerMacduff.enhance impact. Significantpositive from benefit it Aquarium can to the is close centre If new from the car andvenues walking the two peoplebetween park which visitors andwill additionalimpacts of mitigate traffic. impact. No impact. No areaofvisitors. for attractiveness Will improve Slight Encourages Slight impact. positive this result that in scheme does not will It important be andshipyardoperations. tourists conflict between impact, No continued) (

proposals

Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety 50 Masterplan

of

at at least

assessment

hardcore and hardcore

in. in. in. - - -

£10Kis allocated.

impact

and

a budget of budget a

- point: costed in costed P15.point:

high high level buy of £15K.

: cost

will size facility.will ofand location dependon

very high veryhigh level buy of very high veryhigh level buy of

level

and quantity quantity and leadpartnerorganisation. to identifyNeed Likely (20/22). from workshop 91% support attendees £10K boards Difficult interpretationofCost estimate. to format significantly, the dependingonvary can chippings) Observation not do that points observation to identifyNeed conflict with shipyardactivities. Likely (17/22). from workshop 77% support attendees Likely Likely very (17/22). from workshop 77% support attendees £15K (tidy, path the of Development Need to identify lead partner organisation and organisation partner lead to identify Need suitable location. establish £200K likely costs, to Difficult be but estimate to £200K: Shipyard observationpath and point

High

– :

A

in in in - - -

Stakeholder buy Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P15 Interpretation boardsInterpretation P15 buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P14 AquariumP14 buy Stakeholder Deliverability

P13 Heritage P13 Heritage Social andHistory Centre Interpretation cost Estimated Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

these these

the tourism offerMacduff. in the tourism

positive impact. positive

No impact. No impact. No Improving the tourist offer of the coast may bring may more offer the coast oftourist the Improving spend.visitor increasethe area and to visitors Moderate impact. No impact. No and fishing tourism divefor potential Would increasethe enhance and impact. positive Moderate concerns, though There could environmentalbe and planning.would the feasibility inaddressedall be Slight impact. negative impact. No will businesses from visitingthese andResidentbenefit facilities, which will place make Macduffattractive more a dobusiness. to impact. positive Moderate continued) (

proposals

Environmental impact impact Safety Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic 51 Masterplan

of

assessment

in. - in.

-

in. - impact

of one Town Hall Town Hall room oneof(overhead

may be high. be may and

business community community particular. in business

cost

very high veryhigh level buy of medium level buy of

level

Likely high Likely high level buy of Will benefit included workshop Not in questionnaire. £30K Refurbishment whiteboards, flipcharts, projector, tables and chairs anddécor). Master’s desk’Harbour ‘hot of spaceat Creation officeinitially. issues. No Likely (7/22). workshop attendees from 32%support £300K ofcosts the planning Difficult but estimate, to feasibility and leadpartnerorganisation. to identifyNeed No issues. No Likely (20/22). from workshop 91% support attendees £0 resource liaising Internal Banffwith Coast other groups. andPartnership High

:

A

in in in - - -

Stakeholder Stakeholder buy Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P18 Business Business supportP18 facilities buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P17 Creation Creation anofP17 divingartificialreef buy Stakeholder Deliverability

P16 Development of the the of‘Harbour Trail’ Development P16 cost Estimated Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

expenditure.

positive impact. positive impact. positive

impact.

during the redevelopment, while while ofduring creation the redevelopment, the form whateverwill in and jobs accommodation create visitor impact. positive Significant impact. No impact. No Increasing the utilisation of properties on Shore Street will will Shore onStreet propertiesofutilisation the Increasing andthe economy. regenerationon impact positiveahave Slight No impact. No Shore alongthe frontageswill Improving Street make the visitors. to more attractive area impact. Slight positive alongwill frontages Improving Shore Street the area make attractive. more Slight impact. No Shore onwill site inStreet assist anyof Redevelopment will the area,there ofcreated jobs be the regeneration continued) (

proposals

52 Environmental impact impact Safety Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety impact Economic Masterplan

of

to to

assessment

in. -

in. - in, - to ten properties for properties ten to impact

persuading private owners persuading private

and

cost

f location. Indicative budget budget £20Kof location. Indicativef

difficult

medium medium buy level of high high level buy of

size o

level

May be May develop. high Likely buy level of included workshop Not in questionnaire. £200K high to Difficult but estimate, attached cost to or derelict unused property.renovating

to proposal. to Likely included workshop Not in questionnaire. £10K £1Kofferedof Grants frontages. painting to agreeowners difficult beMaygetting property allocated. andon tenants potentialof the needsonDepends suitable premises.of the availability Likely included workshop Not in questionnaire. £20K as will choice dependon estimate possible to Not and High

:

A

in in in - - -

Stakeholder Stakeholder buy Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P21 AccommodationP21 buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P20 Frontage Frontage P20 décor Stakeholder buy Deliverability

P19 Business Business premises P19 cost Estimated Appendix APPENDIX A: HIGH LEVEL COST AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

-

safety.

andimprove

aims to newto generate aims

the Council Council the will struggle to

enabler for the enablerthe Masterplan for

may lead to improved leadto may

impact.

/ changing / mix could trafficof risks increase

management

to improve visual amenity andenvironmental improvevisual amenity to

term also. Aterm crucial

Creation of one job in the short term and term potentially the short in job oneofCreation longest without itself this as proposal Masterplan. the deliver positive Moderate impact. No impact. No Potential to reduce costs, reduce revenueto costs, increasePotential practices. through efficiencymanagement improved impact. positive Moderate Potential through of monitoring the reviewandpoliciesplans. impact. positive Moderate role activemarketing in Harbour’s revenue. andbusiness impact. Significantpositive traffic vessel inin Increasecould leadto increase emissions. Slight impact. negative Increased through safetythese mitigated would berevised practices. management impact. No Improved Slight impact. positive

continued) (

proposals

53 Economic impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety Economic impact. Economic Environmental impact. impact. Safety impact Economic Environmental impact impact Safety Masterplan

of

it may be difficult difficult beit may

assessment

in. in. in. impact - - -

, with salary with of£30K.Cost of cost , and

cost

high high level buy of

level

No issues. No Likely high level buy of included workshop Not in questionnaire. £15K A full time position resource with sharedHarbour. Banff Continuity of business development resource developmentbusiness of Continuity implementation. oversee requiredto Likely high level buy of (16/22). from workshop 73% support attendees £0K the business by internally developedTo be below).resource (see development If review is undertaken internally is undertakenIf review the meet implement changes donot that to stakeholders. of expectations Likely (9/22). from workshop 41% support attendees £0K in completed Alreadybedueprogress into and 2015.November High

:

Marketing Marketing Plan

A

usiness development resource usiness development

B Harbour in in in

- - -

Stakeholder buy Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P24 buy Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P23 buy Stakeholder Stakeholder Deliverability Estimated cost Estimated P22 Review harbour ofReview P22policies,staffing skills andmanagement, Appendix APPENDIX B: COST SUMMARY AND TIME PLAN

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

54

2017

2016

£250K £250K £4m

- - - £0K £50K £30K £50K £50K £10K £5K/ £20m £0.5K plan £100K £200K £150K £15K/

£3m Total Total (£000s) £100K £100K time

and

summary

(feasibility)

maintenance Cost

:

B

NorthPier

depthstructural assessment - In

Appendix (equipment) P11 Development of theof P11Fish Development Market (building) P11 Development of theof P11Fish Development Market P10craft Passengerberthing and access on the on North(Middle Basin) Pier P9 ElectricityP9 waterandfresh points P8 ReviewP8managementof options slipway for additional berths additional P6 ExtensionP6 of slipway and P5 RestrictionP5 vehicularaccesson theon on North(PrincessRoyalon Pier Basin) P4 ElectricityP4 waterandfresh points P3 CreatingP3efficientan shipyard quaysidezone (construction) P2 IncreaseP2 harbourcapacity (feasibility) P2 IncreaseP2 harbourcapacity P1 SurveysP1 and P1 Proposal APPENDIX B: COST SUMMARY AND TIME PLAN

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

55 2017

2016

(continued)

£0K £0K £0K £15K £10K £30K £20K £10K £15K £200K £120K £200K plan

Total Total (£000s) time

and

summary

Shipyard path Shipyard and

– Cost

décor : Marketing Marketing Plan

B

Appendix resource P24 Business development Business P24 development P23 Harbour P23 management, management, etc. policies, P22 Review Review P22 harbour of P21 Accommodation P21

P20 Frontage P20 P19 Business P19 premises P18 Business support facilities Business support P18 Trail’ Trail’ P16 Development Development P16 of the ‘Harbour P15 Interpretation Interpretation P15 boards P14 Aquarium P14 observation point Interpretation Interpretation Centre P13 Heritage P13 Heritage and Social History P12 Development Development P12 of Bankhead Industrial Area Proposal APPENDIX C: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

in of 22

for the the the

and

that

), at out

of

Pier should . Middle

3 Market : and

options )

felt

capacity and

) (P reviewed (inshore) 17 attendees

)

22

)

the

– 17 . steps

out Fish 22

slipway ) of be North

13

22

(P in

15 support zone 7 of 22 (P

the pontoon

(

. (

of out the fishing

) pontoon

the increase

and of

of

and reef

)

out

22 the 20 .

)

8 on that the ( ) out

should

9 out and of how

( (P

22 level

or 22 Centre

that

support 18 13

quayside diving

of ( on of

out Trail

a points of

passenger

Aquarium 20 support

out out

( staffing Basin, some

harbour

highest for

to .

views the 20 though level the by 20

(

water

(

operation the the

and

Area shipyard

Harbours stakeholders

Royal

for

assessment a

and had

of

Interpretation . support the mixed

) Basin . facilities renewed of

boards

) . %

of expand )

between 14

be suggested

slipway 22

41

reasonable developed, (P to 22 very

Industrial support Princess

of

a Royal limited of

structural

History was path be

proposals management the Electricity the

only

. creation also it out

a point

should

least

9

out also

also in developing

– P

and

19 of

( depth 22 the

.

- (

aspiration Bankhead Interpretation Development

Princess was were should

was

was )

and

In

.

2 ) ) Market for harbour following

4 12 15 16 1

located The (P P the Basin P P P P )

22 11 supported industry There outsourcing respectively) Interestingly the (P • • • • • • There 22 Heritage creation observation There presented be Fish There (P The

56

. - of by on to

-

May

. in one identify

owners,

Harbour .

inclusion snapshot views

workshop workshop

to companies,

for informed departments

and

overleaf

their

vessel useful groups through

was

a

workshop second

representatives chain been

a . and

Council

discussions to Council first

proposals

has provide

presented

harbour, and on the provides

the

supply workshop stakeholder are

group

to

telephone invited the

this by community,

workshops to

by views first

of

groups 22

which other then

two Masterplan engagement

of individually

and

invited different

of

.

the

their at

fishing to

users

the and were addition of

and

identified

industry

the

of In across sample

person

results

.

asked of in provide in

-

the were constraints

to Stakeholder

small

included

: groups, buy objective

a stakeholders C

were

individuals

Shipyards and

Committee

2015

This Masterplan only

from

. main development

same

discussions

proposals,

the June potential

of While the in attendees in The problems community The Macduff representatives Advisory 2015 Stakeholders one input The Appendix APPENDIX C: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

57

(continued)

engagement

Stakeholder

: C

Appendix