Rfluilruuuuilululuilruuuiluuuil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rfluilruuuuilululuilruuuiluuuil HAR 357 D*L7 rfluilruuuuilululuilruuuiluuuil TheJoan Shorenstein Center PRESS. POLITICS . PUBLICPOLICY. HarvardUniversily JohnF. KennedySchool of Government INrnorucrroN rilurilill|utul4ilillillll|4il|iltiluruiluuluril A decadeago, the Indian city of Bhopal sud- industrial accident ever recorded. " denly joined a list of infamous place names that But there the story" of Bhopal might have haunts the Twentieth Century. As this century stopped, without an enterprising group of report- dawned, the popular confidence in human reason ers, editors, legislatorsand envi,ronmentalists.In - expressedin the technologicalwonders of the last twenty yearstthe century's growing steam/ electricity, the telephone, and the inter- doubts about the human manipulation of the nal combustion engine- seemedalmost un- natural world has given rise to an environmental bounded.As this century moves toward its end, movement of unprecedentedscope and influ- wonder has been replaced with worry, and ence.By pursuing the Bhopal story, not as an limitless confidencewith concern. isolated tragedybut as part of a pattern of dan- The shattering effects of technology'suses in gersthat touches not only the relatively under- two World Wars, the haunting fears of a half- developedThird World, but reachesinto the century spent in the nuclear shadow,and con- heart of the industrialized West, those reporters stant new discoveriesabout the unintended and editors were able to help set a public agenda. consequencesof DDT, dioxin, thalidomide, and In turn, that new public agenda- about other human inventions meant to make the control of dangerouschemicals, their manufac- world safer,more useful, and more productive - ture/ transportation and storage- helped, have left indelible stains on the human imagina- through an intricate and delicate danceof tion. legislation, to passan important new set of iaws Modern researchon risk assessmentmakes in the United Statesmeant to limit those dan- clear that the public now distrusts science's gers,laws that have since been duplicated progeny.To the dismay of statisticians, when around the world. natural and man-made threats are ranked for Sanjoy Hazarika was among the first reporters dangerby averagecitizens, those made by man to reach Bhopal within hours after tragedyfirst always seem more threatening than those arising struck, and he has pursued the story that has from nature. The researcherspore over their grown out of it with the persistencethat distin- probability tables, and point out the misjudg- guishesall great reporters.As New Delhi corre- ments involved - to no avail. But the issue isn't spondent for the New York Times, he helped one simply of abstractprobabilities, in a case-by- shapehis own paper'searly coverage,and casesense. Something about the hubris of watched proudly as the paper continued its human-made dangerstouches deeply in reporting - along with a handful of others - mankind's collective imagination. Perhapsit is well after the defining moment of disasterhad the seeminginescapability of natural disasters, passed. their senseof being associatedwith forcesIarger As a Fellow of the foan ShorensteinCenter on than humankind - versus the perverse the Press,Politics and Public Policy, Hazarlka inventednessof man-maderisks - that touches steppedback to examine the effectsof press the chord that warns us that we are defying laws coverageof the Bhopal disasternot only on not meant to be challenged.Perhaps it is the gulf public awarenessof technology's dangers,but of of mistrust left by the misplaced certainty that its aftermath when a similar disasternearly the scientists themselvesfostered, by promising occurredhere in the United States.Combining no ill effects.Whatever the reason,the di- extensive interviewing with careful reconstruc- chotomy of fear persists. tion of chronologies,he revealshow the Bhopal The Faustian dimensions of the bargain we disasterultimately led to important new public have made with Progresswas never clearer than checks on a misplaced technological freedom.In in Bhopalon the morning of December3,1984. doing so, he castsimportant new light on the While citizens of that city slept, a silent, invis- intersection between technology, the public ible cloud spreadout among them, carriedby the interest, and the role of reporting. morning breezes.It came from the Union Car- bide plant meant to process fertlltzer for the Richard Patker country's Green Revolution; instead, it killed Senior Fellow, |oan ShorensteinCenter on the more than 4,000 and hospitalized 200,000more. Press,Politics and Public Policy It achieved, in a century filled with achieve- fohn F. Kennedy School of Government ments, a landmark of sorts: the worst single Harvard Univetsity htsNNEDYSCHOOL OF GOVERNMEI$T Li*RAft 1 FROM BHOPAL TO SUPERFUND: The News Media and the Environment INTRODUCTION for India: that summer, hundreds had died in a The first news of the Bhopal disasterlanded in Central Government crackdown on Sikh extrem- New Delhi early on December3,1984.I was at ists at the Golden Temple in Amritsar, the the NewYork Times bureau when an Indian holiest shrine of the Sikh faith. A few months gunned news agency ran a flash on the incident, saying later, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was that scoreshad died in a gasleak and many more down by two of her Sikh guards, angeredby the were iniured. It was not immediately clear what assaulton the temple. In consequentriots, more had causedit - even a claim by Sikh extrem- than 3,000 Sikhs were battered and burned to ists that they had blown it up drew some public- death in Northern India, most of them in New gas rty - but it was soon establishedthat the city Delhi. The disaster briefly interrupted a general had been overwhelmed by toxic fumes from a campaign for elections called by Indira Union Carbide pesticide plant. Gandhi's untested son and successor/Rajiv. As the toll mounted by the hour and reporters Someimages endure for life. And for me, there caught planes, trains or just drove there, it is one that is a constant reminder of the horror of became clear that this was no ordinary tragedy those days. but a cataclysmic event. Bhopal beganto force In the state-run Hamidia Hospital, the main peopleacross the world, at least briefly, and focus of the battle to savelives during those policymakers in industry and the environment/ traumatic weeks, I walked into a roomful of glucose at greaterlength, to re-examine the paradigm of frightened children, with drips on their gasping development and the relevance of certain tech- arms and oxygen masks on thefu faces, nologies. f.or air, turning restlesslyon soiled beds,unable The unthinkable had come to pass,forcing the to understand what was happening to them and asking of the question: Can it happenhere? even more frightened by the helplessnesson the "What happenedin 1984 at one plant in one facesof their parents and doctors. Indian city prompted a worldwide reexamination The benefits of technology are not worth that price of industrial policy and practice,"r saysSheila anywhere, artymore. fasanof{, of the Program on Science,Technology and Society at Cornell University, who has edited a set of essayson the Bhopal disasterand AN EVENT HAS HAPPENED the community right to know. Edmund Burke once said, "An event has Bhopal would seizethe attention of the world happened upon which it is difficult to speak and and hold it firmly for some days.The disaster impossible to be silent." He could have been lent itself to front-pagecopy and television speakingof Bhopal. footage.There were dramatic figures on center Nine days after the world's worst industrial stage:a giant American multinational corpora- disaster,back in the United States,Rep. Henry tion struck by calamity, doctors desperately Waxman (D-California) called a specialmeeting trying to save lives, the images of blinded, gassed of the subcommittee on Health and the Environ- victims, of relatives and friends searchingfor one ment of the House of Representativesto order another, of bodies laid out on the ground because with those words. the main mortuary was full, of funeral pyres "What happened in India was a terrible, lighting the night sky. The people of Bhopal terrible tragedy of a magnitude that is difficult spoke of grief, incomprehension,fear and aimless for us to grasp. Out of this tragedy we all must anger. make sure that an accident such as happened in Reportersworked the phones,hammered out Bhopal ... will not be repeatedanywhere ... As copy for stuttering telex machines and stayed up horrible as Bhopal is, we must face it and learn late every night to file copy {nothing new for from it," Waxman added. most reporters).A few hours of exhaustedsleep His words - spoken at a state college at merged into another rushed day of travel, inter- Institute, West Virginia, where the subcommit- views, meeting and writing in time for deadlines. tee was meeting - were especiallyresonant, for Bhopal came at the end of a nightmarish year they werespoken a short distancefrom a Union Sanioy Hazafika 1 Carbide pesticideplant. The factory used the ally have an impact on the laws and regulations same chemicals that had erupted in a gascloud that were later passedto insure better chemical thousandsof miles away.Union Carbide had safety? perhaps shut the Institute Iactory to allow federal inspec- The media's role in this caseis the free- tors to conduct safetYaudits. most difficult to measure:by nature, it is a hard to Out of that meeting, where lawmakers and floating agent that is event-specificand is leadersof
Recommended publications
  • The Dow Chemical Company Incoming Letter Dated February 7, 2014
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE March 18, 2014 Ronald 0. Mueller Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP [email protected] Re: The Dow Chemical Company Incoming letter dated February 7, 2014 Dear Mr. Mueller: This is in response to your letter dated February 7, 2014 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to Dow by Amnesty International USA, the Unitarian Universalist Association and Calvert Investment Management, Inc. on behalf of the Calvert VP SRI Large Cap Value Portfolio, the Calvert S&P 500 Index Portfolio, the Calvert Large Cap Value Fund and the Calvert Equity Income Fund. We also have received a letter on behalf of the Calvert VP SRI Large Cap Value Portfolio, the Calvert S&P 500 Index Portfolio, the Calvert Large Cap Value Fund and the Calvert Equity Income Fund dated March 7, 2014. Copies of all ofthe correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/comfin/cf-noaction/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division's informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address. Sincerely, Matt S. McNair Special Counsel Enclosure cc: Cheryl Barth Amnesty International USA [email protected] Timothy Brennan Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations [email protected] Sanford Lewis *** FISMA & OMB Memorandum M-07-16 *** March 18,2014 Response ofthe Office ofChief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: The Dow Chemical Company Incoming letter dated February 7, 2014 The proposal requests that the company prepare a report to shareholders assessing the short- and long-term fmancial, reputational and operational impacts that the legacy of the Bhopal disaster may reasonably have on Dow's Indian and global business opportunities and reporting on any actions Dow intends to take to reduce such impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Dow Chemical Company?
    What Is The Dow Chemical Company? The Dow Chemical Company is headquartered in Midland, USA, and was formed in 1897. The Dow Chemical Company is a diversified, worldwide manufacturer of more than 3,500 basic and performance chemicals and plastics, and agricultural products that are primarily used by customers as raw materials to manufacture a diverse range of products that serve various consumer markets. The Company serves the following industries: appliance; automotive; agricultural; building and construction; chemical processing; electronics; furniture; housewares; oil and gas; packaging; paints, coatings and adhesives; personal care; pharmaceutical; processed foods; pulp and paper; textile and carpet; utilities, and water treatment. Dow conducts its worldwide operations through global businesses that are organized in six operating segments: Performance Plastics, Performance Chemicals, Agricultural Sciences, Plastics, Chemicals, and Hydrocarbons and Energy. The Dow Chemical Company is the world’s largest manufacturer of chemicals, with annual sales exceeding USD30 billion. As the world's largest producer of chlorine, an essential component of the potential cancer-causing chemical, dioxin, Dow is undoubtedly the largest root source of dioxin on the planet. In addition, through its subsidiary Dow AgroSciences, Dow is one of the largest producers of insecticides (Dursban), herbicides (Clincher) and fungicides, and has produced some of the most dangerous pesticides known to man, including DDT, Dursban, and 2,4,5-T, the active ingredient of Agent Orange. Dow is now increasing its investment in genetically modified crops that can withstand high doses of its pesticides. About Dow South Africa Dow's headquarters in Africa are located in Bryanston (Johannesburg), South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bhopal Disaster of 1984
    BULLETIN OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE /10.1177/0270467604273822Varma, Month 2005 Varma / BHOPAL DISASTER The Bhopal Disaster of 1984 Roli Varma University of New Mexico Daya R. Varma McGill University The 20th anniversary of the Bhopal calamity fell on ter for Human Resources and Development, was the December 3, 2004. The world’s worst industrial disas- Chief Minister of MP in 1984. Singh played a key role ter in Bhopal, India, happened because of inadequate in having the agricultural office of Union Carbide maintenance by Union Carbide and poor monitoring India Limited (UCIL) move from Bombay to Bhopal by the Indian authorities. Malfunctioning safety mea- in 1968. It was supposed to help in the development of sures, inappropriate location of the plant, and lack of MP.In 1969, the Bhopal plant was built as the formula- information about the identity and toxicity of the gas tion plant: The Sevin Technical Concentrate was worsened the effects of the accident on people and imported from the United States, and the work of livestock. The Bhopal disaster has raised questions blending and grinding was done in Bhopal. The manu- about the implications of the transfer of potentially facture of the pesticide Sevin using methyl isocyanate hazardous technology to the developing countries. (MIC) was started in 1980. Even after 20 years, Bhopal has not recovered. In this Within 4 years of operation, on December 2, 1984, article, we present what happened and why and what 30 metric tons of highly poisonous MIC gas spewed lessons can be learned at this terrible cost. from the UCIL plant.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BHOPAL LEGACY Toxic Contaminants at the Former Union Carbide Factory Site, Bhopal, India: 15 Years After the Bhopal Accident
    TheThe BhopalBhopal LegacyLegacy THE BHOPAL LEGACY Toxic contaminants at the former Union Carbide factory site, Bhopal, India: 15 years after the Bhopal accident. Authors: Labunska, I., Stephenson, A., Brigden, K., Stringer, R., Santillo, D. & Johnston, P.A. Technical Note 04/99 Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter UK November 1999 Address: Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK Acknowledgements: Special thanks are due for assistance from the Bhopal Group for Information and Action and Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Udyog Sanghatan. Also the field work from Nityananand Jayaraman, Stan Vincent, Alan Greig and Shailendra Yashwant. ISBN: 90 73361 59 1 Front Cover: Victims of the Union Carbide disaster attend a weekly meeting. c Greenpeace/Yashwant Toxic contaminants at the former Union Carbide factory site, Bhopal, India: 15 years after the Bhopal accident. Labunska, I., Stephenson, A., Brigden, K., Stringer, R., Santillo, D. & Johnston, P.A. Technical Note 04/99 Greenpeace Research Laboratories Exeter 1999 Executive summary The Union Carbide India Ltd. (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, which used to manufacture (among other products) the pesticide Sevin (carbaryl) gained world-wide recognition as a result of the tragic chemical disaster on the night of 2-3rd December 1984. The accident, involving a massive release of methylisocyanate (MIC) gas, resulted in the death or injury of many thousands of people in the surrounding residential areas. A number of studies, conducted in the aftermath of the accident, understandably focused on the long-term consequences of acute exposure to MIC. Very little attention was paid then to the state of the UCIL site and immediate surroundings with respect to contaminants other than MIC which may have been present not only as a result of the accident, but also the routine operation of the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation File No
    Analysis of the Complaint and Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment The Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation File No. 9910301, Docket No. C-3999 I. Introduction The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) has accepted for public comment a Decision and Order (“Order”), pursuant to an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent Agreement”), against The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) and Union Carbide Corporation (“Carbide”) (collectively “Respondents”). The Order is intended to resolve anticompetitive effects stemming from the proposed merger of Dow and Carbide (the “Merger”). As described below, the Order seeks to remedy anticompetitive effects of the merger in polyethylene, ethyleneamines, ethanolamines and methyldiethanolamine (“MDEA”). The Order remedies those anticompetitive effects by requiring Respondents to divest and license certain intellectual property and other assets relating to polyethylene to BP Amoco plc (“BP”); to divest Dow’s worldwide businesses in ethyleneamines to Huntsman International LLC (“Huntsman”); and to divest Dow’s worldwide ethanolamines business and its MDEA business in the United States and Canada to Ineos Group plc (“Ineos”). The Commission has also issued an Order to Maintain Assets that requires Respondents to preserve the businesses they are required to divest as a viable, competitive, and ongoing operation until the divestiture is achieved. The Order, if finally issued by the Commission, would settle charges that the Merger may have substantially lessened competition in the markets for polyethylene and polyethylene technology, ethyleneamines, ethanolamines and MDEA. The Commission has reason to believe that the Merger would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The proposed complaint, described below, relates the basis for this belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Dow Chemical / Union Carbide Regulation
    EN Case No COMP/M.1671 – DOW CHEMICAL / UNION CARBIDE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 8(2) Decision Date: 03/05/2000 This text is made available for information purposes only and does not constitute an official publication. The official text of the decision will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Commission Decision of 03.05.2000 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement Case No COMP/M.1671 – DOW CHEMICAL/UNION CARBIDE (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 57(2)(a) thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/972, and in particular Article 8(2) thereof, 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1; corrected version OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13 2 OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1. Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877. Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels. This text is made available for information purposes only and does not constitute an official publication. Having regard to the Commission’s Decision of 22 December 1999 to initiate proceedings in this case, Having given the undertakings concerned the opportunity to make known their views on the objections raised by the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the Advisory Committee on Concentrations3, WHEREAS : 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment
    2014 National Air Toxics Assessment August 27, 2018 by Wilma Subra [email protected] Graphics by Michael Orr [email protected] On August 22, 2018, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released the 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA). The previous 2011 National Air Toxics Assessment, released December 17, 2015, focused on air emissions of Chloroprene. Chloroprene has been released into the air in St. John the Baptist Parish of Louisiana for 49 years from the DuPont/ Denka facility in LaPlace/Reserve. NATA estimated higher than expected levels of Chloroprene in the community of LaPlace/Reserve based on the 2011 NATA report and identified the DuPont /Denka facility as creating the greatest offsite risk of cancer of any manufacturing facility in the United States. The 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment focuses on Ethylene Oxide. Louisiana has 13 facilities that release air emissions of Ethylene Oxide. Three of the five facilities in the Unite State, releasing the largest quantities of Ethylene Oxide into the air, are located in Louisiana. The number two ranking air emissions facility of Ethylene Oxide in the US (Union Carbide in Hahnville) is located in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana, just down river from DuPont /Denka. The Ethylene Oxide air emissions from the Union Carbide facility along with the Ethylene Oxide air emissions from the Evonik Materials facility in Reserve, St. John the Baptist Parish, are responsible for St. John the Baptist and St. Charles parishes having the highest risk of cancer from Ethylene Oxide in all of Louisiana and all of the United States. St. John the Baptist Parish also has the highest risk of cancer in the United States from air emissions of Chloroprene.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Bhopal Plant Disaster
    International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Case Study Series Bhopal Plant Disaster – Situation Summary M.J. Peterson Revised March 20, 2009 During the night of 2-3 December 1984, a leak of some 40 tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas mixed with unknown other gasses from a chemical plant owned and operated by Union Carbide (India) Limited, a partly-owned subsidiary of the US-based Union Carbide Corporation, caused one of the highest-casualty industrial accidents of the 20th century. At least 2000 people died immediately and another 200,000 to 300,000 suffered respiratory and other injuries of varying severity. Property damage consisted mainly of contamination to nearby areas by various chemical residues. The defoliation of trees immediately afterward is clearly attributable to the gas leak; contamination in the nearby settlements may have multiple sources, the contamination of the plant site resulted from many years of general production activity. India’s Economic Ambitions When India attained independence from Great Britain in 1947, its new political leaders wanted to make the country wealthier by encouraging development of modern industry. It had strong support from the citizens, who generally agreed that India’s current lack of industrialization and economic development were the result of these colonial-era policies. Thus, the new government could expect widespread support for any policy that appeared to set the country on the path to industrialization. The new political elite brought to this task a set of beliefs about economic policy that sought a middle way between the heavy reliance on private enterprise that had characterized British industrialization in the 18th and 19th centuries and the reliance on central planning of the whole economy characteristic of the Soviet Union’s industrialization effort since 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Dowdupont: Justice out of Sight, the Bhopal Tragedy 1984-2017
    Greenpeace Justice for Section International People and Planet Case Studies DowDuPont: Justice out of sight, the Bhopal tragedy 1984-2017 Decades after the Bhopal disaster which killed Company 20,000, impacted half a million and contaminated Company: DowDuPont the local water supply, victims have been unable Union Carbide was founded in 1917 in Texas, USA and to secure adequate justice or remedies from became a subsidiary of Dow Chemical in 2001 (17 years chemical giant DowDuPont; a challenge made after the disaster in Bhopal). The Dow Chemical Company greater by a series of purchases and mergers. merged with DuPont on August 31, 2017.9 Problem Analysis Head office: DowDuPont is dually headquartered in a) Midland, Michigan and b) Wilmington, Delaware, United The Bhopal gas disaster was one of the biggest industrial States.10 accidents in history, a tragedy resulting from corporate gross negligence and insufficient security measures.1 Thousands Subsidiary: The Bhopal plant directly was owned died and many others are still affected by pollution from and operated by Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL),11 heavy metals in and around the company sites and the subsidiary of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC).12 groundwater.2,3,4,5 Bhopal has since become an example of how mergers and acquisitions create corporate impunity Company background by making it more difficult to prosecute the companies and Publicly traded company individuals who bear responsibility. Shareholders: Vanguard Group Inc (7.17%), Capital There is no regulatory framework in place that can prevent Research and Management Company (6.40%), Fidelity and provide redress for human rights abuses such as this Management & Research Company (2.28%), BlackRock one.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Company “Genealogy” February 2018
    Herbicide Company “Genealogy” February 2018 The following chart is intended to show the history of the major U.S. herbicide companies. The information depends largely on people’s memories, which sometimes can be inexact, on records from the headquarters of major companies, and from histories on the internet. No guarantees are made for accuracy, although I think it is pretty close. The dates of the founding of companies or of acquisitions and mergers sometime vary slightly from one reference to another, so they should not be considered as solid historical facts. Only U.S. companies are listed. International companies are listed only if they had subsidiaries in the U.S., such as Bayer or BASF. I have tried to include mergers or acquisitions of entire companies or the ag divisions of companies, but acquisition of individual products are mentioned only occasionally. In many cases, the major company continues in existence and it is the agricultural division that becomes part of another company. Example: Aventis sold its ag products division to Bayer while the pharmaceutical portion of Aventis continues. Acquisitions of seed companies are not included. The major companies included are those with a history of synthesis, screening, and development of herbicides in the U.S., even if their parent company is overseas. This excludes marketing companies, post-patent distributors, and those companies dealing only with non-herbicide pesticides. Some companies have a distinguished herbicide history but no longer develop new herbicides. These are so noted. Numerous companies and individuals have been consulted and have been very helpful. But I have not always followed suggestions exactly if I felt I had more accurate information from a different source, so all the errors and omissions are mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Trap-Telegraph
    he immensity of the death toll would seem to demand silence, but nature is indifferent to suffer- ing. As you walk through the derelict Union DEATH TRAP TCarbide factory in Bhopal there is the sound of birdsong and the chirruping of cicadas. Sunlight streams through the trees, dappling the vines that creep over the Twenty-five years since lethal gas escaped from the Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, rusting gantries, pipelines and towers. Grass has overgrown the killing thousands and injuring hundreds of thousands, the poison still lingers. Mick Brown paved footpaths. In any other country in the world, you think, all travelled to India to meet the victims of the world’s worst industrial accident who have not given up this would have been demolished long ago, all trace of its terrible history swept into oblivion, but here it stands, like a surreal art the fight for compensation, justice and their lives. Photographs by David Graham exhibit of industrial catastrophe. Few people come here nowadays. At the main gate, guards in khaki uniforms, killing time over a game of cards, scrutinise your papers with bored expressions before waving you through. Lizards scuttle into the undergrowth as you pass. In the old control room, the floor is strewn with rubbish. Along one wall, the dials that signalled the disaster have long since been ripped from their panel, leaving a row of neat, circular holes. A sign attached to the wall mockingly announces safety is everybody’s business. ‘And this is tank number 610,’ said TR Chouhan, who worked here as an engineer for nine years before that fateful night of December 2 1984, and whose life ever since has been dedicated to telling the world the truth about what happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Carbide: Disaster at Bhopal
    Jackson Browning Report - Union Carbide Corp. UNION CARBIDE: DISASTER AT BHOPAL by Jackson B. Browning Retired Vice President, Health, Safety, and Environmental Programs Union Carbide Corporation Copyright 1993 Reprinted with permission from Crisis Response: Inside Stories on Managing Under Siege, edited by Jack A. Gottschalk, Visible Ink Press, a division of Gale Research, Detroit, Michigan. THE TRAGEDY In the early hours of Monday, Dec. 3, 1984, a toxic cloud of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas enveloped the hundreds of shanties and huts surrounding a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India. Later, as the deadly cloud slowly drifted in the cool night air through streets in surrounding sections, sleeping residents awoke, coughing, choking, and rubbing painfully stinging eyes. By the time the gas cleared at dawn, many were dead or injured. Four months after the tragedy, the Indian government reported to its Parliament that 1,430 people had died. In 1991 the official Indian government panel charged with tabulating deaths and injuries updated the count to more than 3,800 dead and approximately 11,000 with disabilities. Although it was not known at the time, the gas was formed when a disgruntled plant employee, apparently bent on spoiling a batch of methyl isocyanate, added water to a storage tank. The water caused a reaction that built up heat and pressure in the tank, quickly transforming the chemical compound into a lethal gas that escaped into the cool night air. The plant was operated by Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL), just over 50 percent of which was owned by Union Carbide Corporation. The first report of the disaster reached Union Carbide executives in the United States more than 12 hours after the incident.
    [Show full text]