DOCSLIB.ORG

Evading Tracker Dogs and Drug Dogs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evading Tracker Dogs and Drug Dogs NOTES ON EVADING AND NEUTRALISING POLICE TRACKER DOGS Search Dogs Most of us have seen search and rescue dogs locating missing people on the TV. These dogs use any means possible to find a lost person, from sniffing for human scent in the air to being given an article of clothing and tracking that individual's unique scent. While search and rescue dogs are capable, in principle, of being trained as both air scent and trailing dogs, most dog handlers train their dogs to perform only one of these disciplines. Therefore, the most valuable dog team, in terms of obtaining a high probability of detection, is one with a dog that can switch back and forth between air scenting and trailing as conditions dictate. All humans, alive or dead, constantly emit microscopic particles bearing human scent. Millions of these are airborne and are carried by the wind for considerable distances. AIR SCENT DOGS The air scent dog is the type most frequently encountered. This dog finds lost people by picking up traces of human scent that are drifting in the air, and looks for the "cone" of scent where it is most concentrated. This dog will not normally discriminate scents, so there is the possibility of a "false alarm" if other people (searchers, citizens) are nearby. Airscent dogs work best in situations such as large parks or private lands that are closed at the time, since the dog will home in on any human scent. The success of an air scent dog will be affected by a number of factors, including wind conditions, air temperature, time of day, terrain, and presence or absence of contamination (auto exhaust, smoke, etc.). The best conditions for air scent dogs to work are early mornings or late afternoons on cool, cloudy days when there is a light wind Physiological Mechanisms of Tracking Primarily, dogs use their sense of smell, to find and follow a track. [2] Dogs have a highly sensitive olfactory system superior to humans, [3] and are able to discriminate between different human’s scents. [4] Moreover, dogs are also able to use visual cues to follow a track. [5] Phases of tracking There are three phases, [1] which complete the process of tracking: 1. Searching Phase This is the phase in which dogs attempt to find a track. They move quickly, and take short, quick sniffs. 2. Deciding Phase Once the dog has found the track, they move more slowly and take longer sniffs to determine the direction of the track. This is usually the most difficult phase for the dog. 3. Tracking phase After determining the direction, dogs follow the track by sniffing at a uniform pace, and moving at a speed similar to that of the searching. Factors’ influencing a dog’s tracking ability There are several factors which influences a dog’s ability to track: Physiological features of the dog are a factor. Some instances include with age, sex are influences. As a dog ages, their olfactory acuity decreases and decreases their ability to track. [2] Furthermore, male dogs have found to be better at tracking than females, possibly due to sex differences in olfaction. [2] Sniffing behaviour also influences olfaction, and therefore a dog’s ability to track. For example, a dog’s ability to sniff is higher when it is not panting due to fatigue – it is physically impossible for a dog to both pant and sniff at the same time and the mouth must be open or closed respectively [6] . However, dogs trained to track during physically demanding activities may have adapted their behaviour by increasing sniffing frequency to maximize olfaction, and tracking. [6] Also, different dog breeds have varying suitability to different tasks of tracking. [3] For example, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives use Labrador Retrievers for their tracking purposes. Besides the dog itself, there are other effectors influencing tracking ability. A track’s age [5] and cross-contamination of scents, [7] the range of the dog from the trail, [3] as well as the handler’s relationship with the tracking dog [7] can all have an impact on a dog’s tracking ability A police dog, often referred to as a "K-9" (which is a homophone of canine) in some areas, is a dog that is trained specifically to assist police and other law-enforcement personnel in their work. The most commonly used breed is the German Shepherd, although now Belgian Malinois are also fairly popular dogs to use. In many jurisdictions the intentional injuring or killing of a police dog is a felony,[1] subjecting the perpetrator to harsher penalties than those in the statutes embodied in local animal cruelty laws, [2] just as an assault on a human police officer is often a more serious offense than the same assault on a non-officer. A growing number of law-enforcement organizations outfit dogs with ballistic vests,[3][4] and some make the dogs sworn officers, with their own police badges and IDs. [1][5][6][7] Furthermore, a police dog killed in the line of duty is often given a full police funeral. [7][8][9] Some breeds are used to enforce public order by chasing and holding suspects, or detaining suspects by the threat of being released, either by direct apprehension or a method known as Bark and Hold. German Shepherd Dogs and Belgian Malinois are most commonly used because of their availability (see List of police dog breeds); however other dog breeds have also contributed, such as Dutch Shepherds, Rottweilers, Boxers, Doberman Pinschers, Giant Schnauzers, American Pit Bull Terriers, and American Staffordshire Terriers. • Search and rescue dog (SAR) - This dog is used to locate suspects or find missing people or objects. Bloodhounds are often used for this task. • Detection dog or explosive-sniffing dog - Some dogs are used to detect illicit substances such as drugs or explosives which may be carried on a person in their effects. In many countries, Beagles are used in airports to sniff the baggage for items that are not permitted; due to their friendly nature and appearance, the Beagle does not worry most passengers. [10] • Arson dogs - Some dogs are trained to pick-up on traces of accelerants at sites of suspected arson. Popular breeds • Argentine Dogo (protect the officer, attack dog, sniff out bombs, sniff out drugs, sniff out food) • German Shepherd (protect the officer, attack dog, ground based tracking and air based tracking, locating human remains, locating drugs, locating IEDs, locating evidence) • Dutch Shepherd (protect the officer, attack dog) • Belgian Malinois (protect the officer, attack dog, locating IEDs, locating evidence, locating drugs, prisoner transport, human tracking) • Boxer (protect the officer, attack dog) • Labrador Retriever (sniff out bombs, sniff out drugs) • Doberman Pinscher (protect the officer, attack dog) • Springer Spaniel (sniff out bombs, sniff out drugs) • Bloodhound (odor-specific ID, trackings, sniff out bombs, sniff out drugs, locating evidence) • Beagle (sniff out bombs, sniff out drugs, sniff out food) • Rottweiler (protect the officer, attack dog) • Giant Schnauzer (protect the officer, attack dog) • Bernese Mountain Dog (finds missing people) Usage by country Continental Europe overview Official use of police dogs was recognized as being of value on the European Continent as early as 1859, with the Belgium Police in Ghent using dogs to officially patrol with the night shift. Germany, France, Austria and Hungary soon followed with dogs becoming an accepted part of the official police establishment. The dogs employed at this time were hard aggressive animals that could inspire fear, protect their handler against attackers and be prepared to tackle courageously anyone found lurking in the ill-lit streets or open spaces. The breeds most commonly used by the end of the nineteenth century in these countries were Belgian & German Shepherds, Boxers, Dobermans and Airedales (imported from England). The first major step forward in the development of the modern police dog came in the 1890s in Germany where serious attempts had been made to introduce recognised training programmes for the dogs purchased by the police, army and customs authorities. Rapid progress was made in the field of dog training with the development of the German Shepherd Dog as a breed and the formation on 22 April 1899 of the Verein für Deutsche Schäferhunde or SV (The German Shepherd Dog Society) . In 1903 the SV staged civilian police dog trials that encompassed control, criminal work and nose work exercises. The police authorities were not convinced dogs were cost effective. The primary object of the police dog at this time was still seen as that of deterrent. Belgium The Belgian Canine Support Group is part of the country's federal police. It has 35 dog teams. Some dogs are trained to detect drugs, human remains, hormones or fire accelerants. About a third are tracker dogs trained to find or identify living people. These teams are often deployed to earthquake areas to locate people trapped in collapsed buildings. The federal police's explosive detector dogs are attached to the Federal Police Special Units. Hong Kong The Police Dog Unit, (Abbreviation: PDU; Chinese: 警犬隊 ) established in 1949, is a specialist force of the Hong Kong Police under the direct command of the Special Operations Bureau. Its role is in crowd control, search and rescue and poison and explosive detection. In addition, the Police Dog Unit works in collaboration with other departments for anti-crime operations. Netherlands The Dutch Mounted Police and Police Dog Service (DLHP) is part of the Korps landelijke politiediensten (KLPD; National Police Services Agency) and supports other units with horse patrols and specially trained dogs. The DLHP's dogs are trained to recognize a single specific scent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Kids: Healthy and Safe Vol. 3
    OREGON KIDS: HEALTHY AND SAFE Volume 3 E-Reference A health and safety guide for early care and education providers PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Office of Family Health ACCESSING VOLUME 3 AND VOLUME 4 OKHS Volume 3: E-Reference gives you detailed information about the health and safety subjects introduced in OKHS volumes 1 and 2. OKHS Volume 4 is an appendix to volume 3 that contains documents and forms to download and print. TO ACCESS ONE OR BOTH OF THESE DOCUMENTS Scan this quick response (QR) code with your smartphone, tablet or other handheld device to download the Volume 3, E-Reference, and Volume 4, Appendix to the E-Reference as either an interactive PDF or E-book OR Go to the following website: http://public.health.oregon.gov/HealthyPeopleFamilies/Babies/ HealthChildcare/Pages/OKHS.aspx Sign up for the OKHS Training Session — You will learn up-to-date information about: • Promoting children’s health; • Preventing common childhood illnesses and injuries. For trainings in your area, contact your local Child Care Resource & Referral office or visit the training calendar at http://www.oregonchildcaretraining.org. Oregon Kids, Healthy and Safe is a joint project among the following partners: State of Oregon Employment Department CHI LD C ARE PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION DIVISIO N Office of Family Health ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Oregon Kids: Healthy and Safe volumes 1, 2, 3 and 4 are the result of a collaborative effort among many early care and education and health care partners. We wish to thank the following individuals and organizations for guiding
    [Show full text]
  • Poisonous Plants of the Southern United States
    Poisonous Plants of the Southern United States Poisonous Plants of the Southern United States Common Name Genus and Species Page atamasco lily Zephyranthes atamasco 21 bitter sneezeweed Helenium amarum 20 black cherry Prunus serotina 6 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 14 black nightshade Solanum nigrum 16 bladderpod Glottidium vesicarium 11 bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum 5 buttercup Ranunculus abortivus 9 castor bean Ricinus communis 17 cherry laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 chinaberry Melia azederach 14 choke cherry Prunus virginiana 6 coffee senna Cassia occidentalis 12 common buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 25 common cocklebur Xanthium pensylvanicum 15 common sneezeweed Helenium autumnale 19 common yarrow Achillea millefolium 23 eastern baccharis Baccharis halimifolia 18 fetterbush Leucothoe axillaris 24 fetterbush Leucothoe racemosa 24 fetterbush Leucothoe recurva 24 great laurel Rhododendron maxima 9 hairy vetch Vicia villosa 27 hemp dogbane Apocynum cannabinum 23 horsenettle Solanum carolinense 15 jimsonweed Datura stramonium 8 johnsongrass Sorghum halepense 7 lantana Lantana camara 10 maleberry Lyonia ligustrina 24 Mexican pricklepoppy Argemone mexicana 27 milkweed Asclepias tuberosa 22 mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia 6 mustard Brassica sp . 25 oleander Nerium oleander 10 perilla mint Perilla frutescens 28 poison hemlock Conium maculatum 17 poison ivy Rhus radicans 20 poison oak Rhus toxicodendron 20 poison sumac Rhus vernix 21 pokeberry Phytolacca americana 8 rattlebox Daubentonia punicea 11 red buckeye Aesculus pavia 16 redroot pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus 18 rosebay Rhododendron calawbiense 9 sesbania Sesbania exaltata 12 scotch broom Cytisus scoparius 13 sheep laurel Kalmia angustifolia 6 showy crotalaria Crotalaria spectabilis 5 sicklepod Cassia obtusifolia 12 spotted water hemlock Cicuta maculata 17 St. John's wort Hypericum perforatum 26 stagger grass Amianthum muscaetoxicum 22 sweet clover Melilotus sp .
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Pet Poisoning Emergencies Top 10 Toxins and Poisons Common Household Items Such As Plants, Foods and Chemicals Can Harm Your Pet If Ingested
    Dedicated to every pet. Every time. Preventing Pet Poisoning Emergencies Top 10 Toxins and Poisons Common household items such as plants, foods and chemicals can harm your pet if ingested. Each year, thousands of pets suffer and many die from accidental household poisoning. Do you know what the top 10 pet toxins and poisons are in your home? Dogs 1. Chocolate 2. Mouse and rat poisons (rodenticides) 3. Vitamins and minerals (e.g. vitamin D, iron) 4. Human and veterinary pain relievers 5. Heart medications (e.g. calcium channel blockers, beta blockers) 6. Cold and allergy medications (e.g. pseudoephedrine phenylephrine) 7. Antidepressants (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) 8. Xylitol (e.g. sugar-free gum) 9. Acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol® ) 10. Caffeine pills Cats 1. Topical spot-on insecticides 2. Household cleaners 3. Antidepressants 4. Lilies 5. Insoluble oxalate plants (e.g. dieffenbachia, philodendron) 6. Human and veterinary pain relievers 7. Acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol® ) 8. Glow sticks 9. ADD/ADHD medications/amphetamines 10. Mouse and rat poisons (rodenticides) Contact Pet Poison Helpline If you suspect that your pet has ingested something harmful, seek immediate veterinary attention or call Pet Poison Helpline (855-289-0358). PPH is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. There is a one-time, per-incident consultation fee. * Be sure to have the following information ready when calling: • What your pet ingested and when • How much your pet ingested (how many pills, what milligram strength they were, etc.) • Pet’s current weight • Pet’s known medical history, including any medications (prescriptions and supplements) 855- 289- 0358 Pet Poison Helpline www.petpoisonhelpline.com 5815 80th Ave N ~ Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 ~ 763.566.6000 ~ www.bppethospital.com I Think My Pet’s been Poisoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Involved in Search Dog Training
    FACTORS INVOLVED IN SEARCH DOG TRAINING A Thesis by MICHAEL BENJAMIN ALEXANDER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2009 Major Subject: Animal Science FACTORS INVOLVED IN SEARCH DOG TRAINING A Thesis by MICHAEL BENJAMIN ALEXANDER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, Ted Friend Committee Members, Heather Bortfeld Jon Hunter Lore Haug Head of Department, Gary Acuff May 2009 Major Subject: Animal Science ABSTRACT Factors Involved in Search Dog Training. (May 2009) Michael B. Alexander, B.S., Sam Houston State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Ted Friend Events of significant impact as recent as hurricane Ike yielded a consistent disturbing truth: we lack sufficient numbers of competent search dog [Canis familiaris] teams. This study was conceived to provide information in identifying factors involved in training competent search dogs. Obedience training methods, age training was initiated, previous handler canine training experience, and handler perception and emotional attachment to their search dog were examined through a sixty-six question survey. Achievement of a national certification was used as a measure of performance success. Association between factors and performance success was evaluated through Chi-Square testing. Surveys were announced through the National Search Dog Alliance (NSDA) and were available online; 177 were fully completed by respondents and used in the data analysis. Seventy-two percent of nationally certified canine team respondents preferred positive reinforcement methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Warriors United Against BSL Ontario Warriors
    Ontario Warriors United Against BSL WHAT IS A “PIT BULL”? THE FACTS VS THE MYTHS The following research will examine the most commonly discussed facts vs. myths of dogs known as “pit bulls”. Click on the hyperlinks to read more about the science and facts behind each statement. THE FACTS VS. THE MYTHS ABOUT “PIT BULLS” FACT: THERE IS NO SUCH BREED OF DOG CALLED “PIT BULL” The term “pit bull” describes virtually any dog with short hair, a blocky head, and a muscular build. The term includes 28 breeds of dogs who are often incorrectly labeled “pit bull” and includes countless mixes of those 28 breeds. The pure breeds included in the family of dogs generally referred to as “pit bulls” are: o The American Staffordshire Terrier, o The Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and o The American Pit Bull Terrier (which is the only accurate use of the term). MYTH: A “PIT BULL” HAS A JAW PRESSURE EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF A SHARK Measuring by the Pounds Per Square Inch (PSI) jaw strength testing, the following statistics have been identified: o A Bull Shark: 1250 PSI o A Great White Shark: 669 PSI o The Staffordshire Bull Terrier: 328 PSI o The American Staffordshire Terrier: 235 PSI o The American Pit Bull Terrier: 235 PSI MYTH: “PIT BULL” TYPE DOGS HAVE LOCKING JAWS It has been scientifically proven that the jaw of a “pit bull” type dog does not have any locking mechanism in their skulls. This is the case for all dogs, not just “pit bulls”. MYTH: “PIT BULL” TYPE DOGS HAVE AGGRESSIVE GENES; I.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Hero Dogs White Paper Working Dogs: Building Humane Communities with Man’S Best Friend
    Hero Dogs White Paper Working Dogs: Building Humane Communities with Man’s Best Friend INTRODUCTION Humankind has always had a special relationship with canines. For thousands of years, dogs have comforted us, protected us, and given us their unconditional love. Time and time again through the ages they have proven why they are considered our best friends. Yet, not only do dogs serve as our beloved companions, they are also a vital part of keeping our communities healthy, safe and humane. American Humane Association has recognized the significant contributions of working dogs over the past five years with our annual Hero Dog Awards® national campaign. Dogs are nominated in multiple categories from communities across the country, with winners representing many of the working dog categories. The American Humane Association Hero Dog Awards are an opportunity to educate many about the contributions of working dogs in our daily lives. This paper provides further background into their contributions to building humane communities. Dogs have served as extensions of human senses and abilities throughout history and, despite advancements in technology, they remain the most effective way to perform myriad tasks as working dogs. According to Helton (2009a, p. 5), “the role of working dogs in society is far greater than most people know and is likely to increase, not diminish, in the future.” Whether it’s a guide dog leading her sight-impaired handler, a scent detection dog patrolling our airports, or a military dog in a war zone searching for those who wish to do us harm, working dogs protect and enrich human lives.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Animal Guidelines
    New Jersey Animal Guidelines: Any of the following animals owned, kept by, in the care, custody or control of any occupants of the home are ineligible: 1. Any animal deemed dangerous, vicious or potentially dangerous under state statute. 2. Any exotic animal, wild or zoo animals (including but not limited to reptiles, primates, exotic cats and fowl). 3. Any of the following dogs: • Akita Inu • German Shepherd • Alaskan Malamute • Giant Schnauzer • American Bull Dog • Great Dane • American Eskimo Dog (member of the • Gull Dong (aka Pakistani Bull Dog) Spitz Family) • American Staffordshire Terrier • Gull terrier • American Put Bull Terrier • Husky or Siberian Husky • Beauceron • Japanese Tosa/Tosa Inu/Tosa Ken • Boerboel • Korean Jindo • Bull Mastiff/American Bandogge/Bully • Perro de Presa Canario Kutta (any other Mastiff breed) • Cane Corso • Perro de Presa Mallorquin • Caucasian Ovcharka (Mountain Dog) • “Pit Bull” • Chow Chow • Rottweiler • Doberman Pinsher (other than a • Rhodesian Ridgeback miniature Doberman • Dogo Argentino • Staffordshire Bull Terrier • English Bull Terrier • Thai Ridgeback • Fila Brasileiro (aka Brazilian Mastiff) • Wolf or Wolf Hybrid Or any mixed breed dog containing any of the aforementioned breeds. 4. A dog that has been trained as and/or used as a guard dog or attack dog. 5. A dog that has been trained or used by the military or police for enforcing public order by chasing and holding suspects by the threat of being released, either by direct apprehension or a method known as “Bark and Hold”. 6. A dog belonging to a breed that was historically bred for fighting. 7. A dog that has bitten anyone or has exhibited aggressive behavior towards people.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 11-817 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER v. CLAYTON HARRIS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONER DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR. Solicitor General Counsel of Record LANNY A. BREUER Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL R. DREEBEN Deputy Solicitor General JOSEPH R. PALMORE Assistant to the Solicitor General SONJA M. RALSTON Attorney Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 [email protected] (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an alert by a trained drug-detection dog is sufficient to establish probable cause for a search of an automobile. (I) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of the United States............................ 1 Statement............................................ 2 Summary of argument................................. 7 Argument: I. A dog’s detection of drug odor it is trained to iden- tify establishes probable cause to search.......... 10 II. A drug-detection dog’s reliability is established by its training.................................... 15 A. A drug-detection dog’s reliability is estab- lished by its performance in controlled set- tings......................................16 B. Courts should not constitutionalize canine training or certification standards............ 24 C. Officers need a clear rule to guide decisions in the field................................... 27 III. The drug-detection dog’s alert provided probable cause to search respondent’s truck............... 29 Conclusion .......................................... 30 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001) . 10, 27 California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991) ............. 27 Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000) ................... 22 Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SAR Dog News Published by the National Search Dog Alliance October 2018 Vol
    SAR Dog News Published by the National Search Dog Alliance October 2018 Vol. 12, No. 10 Article page Synopsis of Annual Meeting 16 2018 BOD Meeting Dates 1 Board of Directors & Founding Members 16 Bucky Says 1 Book Review: K-9 Teams: Beyond the Basics 17 NSDA Certifications 2 Things we don’t think about 18 Regional Testing Information 2 The Last Howl 19 Tests, Training and Seminars 20 Announcements 3 Disaster K-9 Training Scholarship 4 2018 Board Meeting Dates Kibbles and Bits 4 Nov. 1, Dec. 6 Shell Casings and Blood 7 Contact Corporate Secretary, Sue Wolff, at SAR in the Smokey’s 8 [email protected] for the call-in number for the Search for Missing Kotzebue Girl 9 meeting. Depressed K-9? 10 Making Your Own Dog Treats 11 Bucky Says: 2018 Hero Dog 12 Man of Many Trades & Passions-Terry Crooks 13 Don’t sleep alone. Irish SAR Dogs HRD Training 15 Get a dog. SAR DOG NEWS October 2018 Page 2 NSDA’S NEWEST CERTIFIED SAR K-9 HANDLERS Michigan Becky Monroe & Bella Michigan Trailing I Janice Johns & K-9 Blue Trailing I REGIONAL TESTING Don’t put off getting your NSDA certification. Bring NSDA Evaluators to you! NSDA will pay all expenses to deliver Evaluators to your centrally located test site for at least ten (10) tests or more to be given with a minimum of six (6) handlers. The costs of the Evaluator’s expenses will be reimbursed up to $500 per Evaluator with each Evaluator performing at least three (3) tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Multispecies Partnership, Security, and Affect Among Canine Search and Rescue Teams
    Southern Methodist University SMU Scholar Anthropology Theses and Dissertations Anthropology Spring 5-15-2021 Making Scents: Multispecies Partnership, Security, and Affect Among Canine Search and Rescue Teams Kara Griffin [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/hum_sci_anthropology_etds Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Griffin, Kara, "Making Scents: Multispecies Partnership, Security, and Affect Among Canine Search and Rescue Teams" (2021). Anthropology Theses and Dissertations. https://scholar.smu.edu/hum_sci_anthropology_etds/14 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. MAKING SCENTS: MULTISPECIES PARTNERSHIP, SECURITY, AND AFFECT AMONG CANINE SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAMS Approved by: _______________________________________ Dr. Nicolas Sternsdorff-Cisterna Assistant Professor of Anthropology ___________________________________ Dr. Caroline Brettell Professor of Anthropology ___________________________________ Dr. Nia Parson Associate Professor of Anthropology ___________________________________ Dr. Sabine Frühstück Professor of Modern Japanese Cultural Studies University of California, Santa Barbara MAKING SCENTS: MULTISPECIES PARTNERSHIP, SECURITY, AND AFFECT AMONG CANINE SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAMS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Dedman College Southern Methodist University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Cultural Anthropology by Kara Griffin B.A., B.S. Texas Christian University M.A., Southern Methodist University M.A., Southern Methodist University May 15, 2021 Copyright (2021) Kara Griffin All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work could not have been accomplished without the support and input of numerous individuals and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Training and Reliability of the Narcotics Detection Dog Robert C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky Kentucky Law Journal Volume 85 | Issue 2 Article 4 1996 An Examination of the Training and Reliability of the Narcotics Detection Dog Robert C. Bird Boston University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Bird, Robert C. (1996) "An Examination of the Training and Reliability of the Narcotics Detection Dog," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 85 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol85/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Examination of the Training and Reliability of the Narcotics Detection Dog BY ROBERT C. BIRD* INTRODUCTION Dunng the past twenty years, the United States has been fight- mg one of the most difficult wars in its history- the war on drugs.' The narcotics detection dog has been a stalwart ally in that conflict, detecting illegal narcotics on countless occasions.2 Canine * Law Clerk, Massachusetts Superior Court 1996-97; M.B.A. Candidate, Boston University; J.D. 1996, Boston University School of Law. My thanks for comments and support to members of the Suffolk University 1996 Annual Convocation for Law Students: "Law In a Changing Society," at which I presented an earlier version of tis Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Canine Behavior
    ACTA VET. BRNO 2007, 76: 431-444; doi:10.2754/avb200776030431 Review article Genetics of Canine Behavior K.A. HOUPT American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Animal Behavior Clinic, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Received February 6, 2007 Accepted June 5, 2007 Abstract Houpt K.A.: Genetics of Canine Behavior. Acta Vet. Brno 2007, 76: 431-444. Canine behavioral genetics is a rapidly moving area of research. In this review, breed differences in behavior are emphasized. Dog professionals’ opinions of the various breeds on many behavior traits reveal factors such as reactivity, aggression, ease of training and immaturity. Heritability of various behaviors – hunting ability, playfulness, and aggression to people and other dogs – has been calculated. The neurotransmitters believed to be involved in aggression are discussed. The gene for aggression remains elusive, but identifi cation of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with breed-specifi c behavior traits are leading us in the right direction. The unique syndrome of aggression found in English Springer Spaniels may be a model for detecting the gene involved. Dog aggression, heritability, temperament Behavior is a result of nature (genetics) and nurture (learning or experience). We shall review the history of canine behavioral genetics and explore the latest fi ndings. The publication of the canine genome allows us to make some inferences (Kirkness et al. 2003). Foxes One of the most thorough studies of canid behavioral genetics deals with foxes, not dogs. Selection for a tame and for an aggressive strain of silver foxes over 30 years by Dmitry Belyaev and Lyudmila Trut resulted in large differences in behavior and in morphology (Trut et al.
    [Show full text]