Results of the Household Survey
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Save the Children External Evaluation of the SHO-Funded Program: Action to address emergency and recovery needs for children and families affected by typhoon Haiyan on Panay Island in the Philippines FINAL REPORT 24 September 2015 Maria Dolores Alicias-Garen, Gabrielle Dominique Garen & Ernesto Tomas, Jr. Photos by G. Garen and E. Tomas Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 14 Evaluation Objectives ........................................................................................................... 15 Evaluation Design & Methodology ..................................................................................... 15 Technical Approach ...................................................................................................... 15 Data Gathering Methods.............................................................................................. 16 PART 2: FINDINGS ................................................................................................................... 21 Assessment of Effectiveness ................................................................................................. 21 SHO 1: Shelter/NFI Kits .................................................................................................... 21 SHO 1: Cash Transfer for Boat Repair ........................................................................... 22 SHO 2: Education ........................................................................................................... 24 SHO 2: Food Security and Livelihood (FSL) ................................................................. 35 SHO 2: WASH ................................................................................................................... 45 Assessment of Organizational Effectiveness ...................................................................... 51 Achievement of Objectives: ........................................................................................ 51 Preparedness and Implementation: ........................................................................... 53 Data Management, Monitoring and Reporting: ....................................................... 56 Assessment of Relevance ..................................................................................................... 57 Shelter kits and NFIs ........................................................................................................ 57 Food Security and Livelihood ....................................................................................... 58 Education ........................................................................................................................ 60 WASH ................................................................................................................................ 61 Assessment of Sustainability ................................................................................................. 62 Food Security and Livelihood ....................................................................................... 63 Education ........................................................................................................................ 63 WASH ................................................................................................................................ 64 Assessment of Efficiency (Budget Utilization and Management) ................................... 65 Program Budget Management of SHO 1 ................................................................... 65 Program Budget Management of SHO 2 ................................................................... 67 Assessment of Coherence, Coverage and Participation ............................................... 71 Partnership and Coordination ...................................................................................... 71 Coverage and Participation ........................................................................................ 72 PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 76 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 79 ANNEX 1: List of Interviews and Focus Group Discussions ................................................ 80 ANNEX 2: Results of the Household Survey ......................................................................... 84 Part 1: Shelter, Non- Food Items and CCT -Boat Repair ........................................... 85 Part 2: Food Security and Livelihood (FSL) and Education Intervention ................ 88 Part 3. Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) ........................................................ 93 1 List of Tables and Figures Table 1. Survey Sampling Design 17 Table 2: List of SHO 1 FSL and Shelter Survey Areas 18 Table 3: List of SHO 2 – WASH Sample Barangays 18 Table 4: List of SHO 2 – FSL and Education Survey Areas 19 Table 5: List of Focus Group Discussions 20 Table 6: Support From other Organizations among SHO 1 Beneficiaries 21 Table 7. SHO 1 Beneficiaries’ Income Before Haiyan vs. Current (Past 6 mos.) 23 Table 8: SHO 1 Beneficiaries’ Assets & Wealth Before Haiyan vs. Current (Past 6 mos.) 23 Table 9: SHO 1 Beneficiaries’ Participation in Orientation/Trainings 24 Table 10: Survey Result of School Kit Receipt 27 Table 11: Time the Beneficiaries Received the School Kit 27 Table 12. Waiting time for the School Kit 28 Table 13: Rating Performance – Distribution of School Kit 28 Table 14. Most Useful Items in the School Kit 28 Table15: Distribution of UCT and CCT Beneficiaries 36 Table 16: Cash Grant Spending among UCT Recipients 37 Table 17: UCT Recipient Households’ Present Income Compared to Pre-Haiyan 37 Table 18: Cash Grant Spending among CCT Recipients 39 Table 19: Livelihood Activities Established by CCT Recipients 40 Table 20: Beneficiaries’ Income (last 6 mos.) 41 Table 21: CCT Recipient Households’ Present Income Compared to Pre-Haiyan 42 Table 22: UCT & CCT Recipient Households’ Present Income Compared to Pre-Haiyan44 Table 23. Construction of 25 Water Facilities in 6 Barangays 46 Table 24: Source of Drinking Water 47 Table 25. No. of Trips to Fetch Drinking Water and Water for Other Uses 48 Table 26. Demand for Water Containers for Collecting / Fetching 48 Table 27. Attended the WASH Activity 49 Table 28. Shelter, Non-Food Items, and CCT- Boat Beneficiaries 52 Table 29: SHO 1 Final Financial Report Summary (in Euro) 65 Table 30: SHO 2 Final Financial Report Summary (in Euro) 67 Figure 1: SHO 1 Actual Distribution of Expenses 67 Figure 2: SHO 2 Actual Distribution of Expenses 68 2 List of Acronyms ACF Action Against Hunger CAMPCO Caburihan Multipurpose Cooperative BSC Barangay Selection Committee CCT Conditional Cash Transfer CG Community Grant DAC Development Assistance Committee of OECD DepEd Department of Education ES Elementary School FSL Food Security and Livelihood HH Household ICT Information and Communications Technology MOA Memorandum of Agreement NFI Non-Food Items OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development SCI Save the Children International SCNL Save the Children Netherlands SCP Save the Children Philippines SCPPO Save the Children Panay Program Office SHO Samenwerkende Hulporganisaties or Dutch Cooperating Aid Agencies WASH Water, Sanitation and Health UCT Unconditional Cash Transfer UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UN United Nations ZODC Zero Defecation Campaign 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Save the Children Netherlands (SCNL), through Save the Children Philippines, carried out for 21 months (one year and 9 months) an emergency and early recovery humanitarian response to Typhoon Haiyan affected communities in Panay Island or Western Visayas. The interventions were implemented in the provinces of Iloilo and Capiz, with the bulk going to the municipality of Carles, Iloilo. The program is funded by SHO (Dutch Cooperating Aid Agencies). SHO-SCNL’s Typhoon Haiyan’s program was undertaken in two phases—phase 1 focused on emergency and early recovery and phase 2 focused on recovery. The first phase of the SHO funded intervention consists of providing shelter and non-food items and also providing direct conditional cash transfers to replace boats and other fishing inputs. The second phase of the SHO funded intervention has three components: food security and livelihood (FSL); education; and, water, sanitation and health (WASH). The FSL component consisted of providing resources to a thousand vulnerable households in the fishing communities, including non-boat owning households, geared at recovering their livelihood and/or starting an alternative livelihood. It also provided support to fishing associations to aid in coral recovery, and to small-scale traders for market recovery. The education program includes activities aimed at resuming learning and school activities. Moreover, the education component includes institutional and capacity building support to the education cluster. The WASH activities consists of repair or construction of WASH facilities in seven schools and provision of latrines to more than a thousand vulnerable households. The program has ended in June 2015 and this final external evaluation is needed for accountability