Geology of the Sierra Diablo Region Texas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of the Sierra Diablo Region Texas Geology of the Sierra Diablo Region Texas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 480 Geology of the Sierra Diablo Region Texas By PHILIP B. KING With SPECIAL DETERMINATIVE STUDIES OF PERMIAN FOSSILS By L. G. HENBEST, E. L. YOCHELSON, P. E. CLOUD, JR., HELEN DUNCAN, R. M. FINKS, and I. G. SOHN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 480 Description and interpretation of the varied rocks and structures of a mountain range and its foothills in the Trans-Pecos Region^ with special emphasis on the Lower Permian UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. OS 66-227 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Stratigraphy Continued Fage Abstract.-_ __-__-__-_-__-__..___-________..__________ 1 Permian_______-__-___--_--_____-_-____--_.___. 46 Introduction.._____________________________________ 2 Presentation of paleontologic data ______ 49 Present investigation___--__--___.___--_________ 2 Hueco Limestone____-_-____---_----.----_-_. 49 Acknowledgments__ ___________________________ 3 Southern part of report area_-________-_. 50 Related investigations.._________________________ 4 Baylor Mountains._____________________ 52 Previous investigations._______________________ 4 Central Sierra Diablo__________________. 54 Annotated bibliography.____________________ 5 Apache Canyon area___________________. 54 Geography ___________________________________ 11 Fossils and correlation__________ _____ 55 Mountain areas _______________________________ 13 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 57 Lowland areas ________________________________ 14 Bone Spring Limestone___-_-____----_--__-_. 60 Human geography and history.__________________ 16 Sierra Diablo escarpment________________ 61 Stratigraphy _____________________________________ 17 Northern marginal belt_________________ 64 Precambrian and Precambrian(?) rocks.___________ 19 Southern marginal belt____-_-_-_------_. 65 Carrizo Mountain Formation_________________ 19 Baylor Mountains._____________________ 66 Sequence in Carrizo Mountains.__________ 20 Fossils and correlation_________________ 66 Metamorphic features.__________________ 21 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 72 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 22 Victorio Peak Limestone-____----_---_---__-. 73 Igneous rocks intrusive into Carrizo Mountain Northeastern calcitic facies_____________ 73 Formation _________________________ _ ... 22 Southwestern dolomitic fades.___________ 74 Metarhyolite. __________________________ 22 Fossils__________--___._-_--____. 74 Greenstone ___________________________ 23 Stratigraphic relations.__________________ 74 Veins..________________________________ 23 Cutoff Shale._._________________. 74 Allamoore Formation..______________________ 23 Brushy Canyon Formation_____ ______ 78 Limestone _____________________________ 23 Sandstone tongue of Cherry Canyon Formation. 79 Volcanic rocks..________________________ 24 Goat Seep Limestone_____________________ 79 PhyUite___________________________ 24 Cretaceous______ _______________________________ 80 Hazel Formation ___________________________ 25 Pre-Cretaceous surface.__________--__---__-- 81 Conglomerate __________________________ 26 Yucca Formation_________________________ 82 Red sandstone.________________________ 26 Bluff Mesa Formation_________________ 82 Van Horn Sandstone____-_-__--______-______ 27 Campagrande Limestone________________ 83 Conglomerate __________________________ 28 Sierra Diablo foothills_________________ 83 Sandstone _____________________________ 28 Western Sierra Diablo_____________ . 83 Ordovician_ __________________________________ 30 Fossils and age____________-__---------- 84 Bliss Sandstone___________________________ 30 Cox Sandstone_________________________ 84 Main body of formation_________________ 30 Southwest of Eagle Flat.________-___. 84 Calcareous division.____________________ 30 84 El Paso Limestone_________________________ 32 Sierra Diablo foothills and Cox Mountain. Outlying areas_______________________ 85 Division A____________________________ 32 Sierra Prieta___________________________ 85 Division B_____________________________ 32 Fossils and age_____--___-___-________ 85 Division C_____________________________ 33 Finlay Limestone___._______.___ __. 85 Beds of Middle(?) Ordovician age___________ 34 Local features..-___-_._-______- ____. 86 Montoya Dolomite.________________________ 35 Fossils and age________________-_-__. 86 Cable Canyon(?) Sandstone Member____ 36 Kiamichi Formation._______________________ 87 Upham Member______________________ 36 Washita Group_________________________ 87 Aleman Cherty Member_______________ 36 Southwest of Eagle Flat____________ 87 Silurian_____________________________________ 38 Sierra Prieta___________________________ 88 Fusselman Dolomite._______________________ 38 Fossils_________________________. 88 Devonian___________ ___________________________ 39 Eagle Ford Formation__________________ 88 Beds of Devonian age_______________________ 39 Igneous rocks____________________________________ 89 Mississippian____ _ ______________________________ 41 I _ Marble Canyon-Mine Canyon intrusive complex . 90 Barnett Shale._____________________________ 41 Marble Canyon stock__________-_-___---___- 90 Pennsylvanian_______________________________ 42 Mine Canyon stock_____________________ _ 91 Beds of Pennsylvanian age___-____-_-_-_---__ 42 Outlying igneous rocks___-___---__--__---__- 92 in IV CONTENTS Igneous rocks Continued Page | Descriptions of stratigraphic sections, etc. Continued Page Marble Canyon-Mine Canyon intrusive complex Con. Stratigraphic sections and fossil collections of Ordovi- Metamorphic rocks_________________________ 92 cian, Silurian, and Devonian rocks Continued Interpretation______________________________ 94 Sections. Hawkins Tank___________ 130 Sierra Prieta intrusive-------------------.-------- 94 Section 9. Point of mountains._______________ 131 Igneous rocks_______________-----__-___-_-- 95 Section 10. Apache Spring___________________ 132 Metamorphic rocks_______-_____--__________ 95 Ordovician and Silurian fossils, not collected Structure-_______________________________ 95 along courses of stratigraphic sections _______ 133 Regional relations__________________________ 96 Stratigraphic sections and fossil collections of Intrusive rocks in southern part of report area__.___ 96 Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks__________ 133 Basaltic volcanic rocks__________-___-___________ 96 Section 11. Mine Canyon_______-______ 133 Unconsolidated deposits of Quaternary age.____________ 96 Section 12. Marble Canyon____ __._ 134 Landslide deposits____----__-_---_-_-_______---- 97 Stratigraphic sections and fossil collections of Permian Deposits of floor of Salt Basin_--__________.______ 97 rocks _____________________________________ 134 Fanglomerate __________________________________ 98 Section 13. Wylie Mountains____________ 134 Older alluvial deposits__--_______--______-_____ 98 Section 14. Bass Canyon______---__--__.___ 136 Younger alluvial deposits_______________________- 98 Section 15. Threemile Mountain____________ 136 Tectonics-.__-________---_-----__ _______________ 99 Other fossil collections from Hueco Limestone Structure of Precambrian and Precambrian(?) rocks_ 100 in Threemile Mountain area. __--______ 137 Streeruwitz thrust fault _____ ___________ 100 Section 16. Beach Mountain________-_______ 137 Structure of Allamoore and Hazel Formations. _ 101 Section 17. High point of Baylor Mountains. _ 138 Faults with strike-slip displacement-__________ 102 Other fossil collections from Bone Spring Lime­ Fracture zones in Hazel Formation__________ 103 stone near high point of Baylor Mountains. __ 139 Structure of Van Horn Sandstone.____________ 103 Section 18. Northeastern Baylor Mountains_ 139 Structure of the Precambrian surface._________ 103 Section 19. Northwestern Baylor Mountains 141 Structure of pre-Permian Paleozoic rocks __________ 104 Section 20. Eagle Flat_______ _ ______ 141 Structures of Permian and early Mesozoic age______ 105 Section 21. Streeruwitz Hills__ ____ ____ 142 Structures of Late Cretacious or early Tertiary age__ 106 Section 22. McAdoo Ranch__________.______ 143 Structures of late Tertiary and Quaternary age_____ 107 Section 23. West of Old Circle Ranch_____ 144 General features_____-__--_---_--_______---- 107 Section 24. Old Circle Ranch.___________ 144 Faults bordering the mountains.._____________ 107 Section 25. Hazel mine_____________________ 144 North Diablo fault zone_____-_______ 107 Section 26. Bat Cave________________ 145 East Diablo fault_____-_________ 109 Fossil collections from Hueco Limestone near North Baylor fault.__.___._____. 109 Sheep Peak.___________________ 146 East Baylor fault______________ 110 Section 27. Second section south of Victorio Faults on east side of Salt Basin__________ 110 Peak.______.__._._-___________ 146 Faults and related structures within the moun­ Section 28. First section south of Victorio tains_______ ________ ______ 111 Peak________________________ 147 Northern part of Sierra Diablo ___________ 111 Collections from Hueco and Bone Spring Lime­ Southern part of Sierra Diablo_________ 112 stones on Victorio flexture west of Victorio Baylor Mountains.-._____________ 113 Canyon___________________________ . 148 Beach Mountain and vicinity ____________ 113 Section 29. Victorio Peak___
Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Correlation of Lower Cretaceous Exposures in Southeastern New Mexico Barry S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Stratigraphy, paleontology and correlation of lower Cretaceous exposures in southeastern New Mexico Barry S. Kues and Spencer G. Lucas, 1993, pp. 245-260 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Potential of H Serpentine Plugs" and Associated Rocks, Central and South Texas
    BAYLOR FALL 1986 ulletin No. 44 The Petroleum Potential of H Serpentine Plugs" and Associated Rocks, Central and South Texas TRUITT F. MATTHEWS Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer Jenness, M.S., Ed.ttpr environmental and medical geology CONTENTS Page O. T. Hayward, Ph.D., Advisor. Cartographic Editor Abstract .............................................................. 5 general and urban geology and what have you Introduction. .. 5 Peter M. Allen, Ph.D. Purpose ........................................................... 5 urban and environmental geology, hydrology Location .......................................................... 6 Methods .......................................................... 6 Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D. Previous works. .. 7 stratigraphy, petroleum geology Acknowledgments .................................................. 11 Regional setting of "serpentine plugs" ..................................... 11 Rena Bonem, Ph.D. Descriptive geology of "serpentine plugs" .................................. 12 paleontology, paleoecology Northern subprovince ............................................... 13 Middle subprovince ................................................. 15 William Brown, M.S. Southern subprovince ............................................... 18 structural tectonics Origin and history of "serpentine plugs" ................................... 26 Robert C. Grayson, Ph.D. Production histories of "serpentine plugs" ................................. 30 stratigraphy, conodont biostratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • QUATERNARY GEOLOGIC MAP of AUSTIN 4° X 6° QUADRANGLE, UNITED STATES
    QUATERNARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF AUSTIN 4° x 6° QUADRANGLE, UNITED STATES QUATERNARY GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF THE UNITED STATES MAP I-1420 (NH-14) State compilations by David W. Moore and E.G. Wermund, Jr. Edited and integrated by David W. Moore, Gerald M. Richmond and Ann Coe Christiansen 1993 NOTE: This map is the product of collaboration of the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology and the U.S. Geological Survey, and is designed for both scientific and practical purposes. It was prepared in two stages. First, the map and map explanations were prepared by the State compiler. Second, information on the map was integrated with that of adjacent maps, locally supplemented, and related to a uniform map symbol classification by the editors. Map unit descriptions were edited, supplemented, and coordinated with those of other maps of this series so that individual unit descriptions are applicable throughout both this map and all other maps of the series. Problems of mapping or interpretation in different areas were resolved by correspondence to the extent possible; most simply reflect differences in available information or differences in philosophies of mapping and serve to encourage further investigation. Less than forty percent of the surficial deposits of the United States have been mapped and described. Traditionally, mapping of surficial deposits has focused on glacial, alluvial, eolian, lacustrine, marine, and landslide deposits. Slope and upland deposits have been mapped in detail only in restricted areas. However, an enormous amount of engineering construction and many important problems of land use and land management are associated with regions that have extensive slope and upland deposits (colluvium and residuum, for example).
    [Show full text]
  • The Jurassic Pleurotomarioidean Gastropod Laevitomaria and Its Palaeobiogeographical History
    The Jurassic pleurotomarioidean gastropod Laevitomaria and its palaeobiogeographical history ROBERTO GATTO, STEFANO MONARI, JÁNOS SZABÓ, and MARIA ALESSANDRA CONTI Gatto, R., Monari, S., Szabó, J., and Conti, M.A. 2015. The Jurassic pleurotomarioidean gastropod Laevitomaria and its palaeobiogeographical history. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60 (1): 217–233. The genus Laevitomaria is reviewed and its palaeobiogeographical history is reconstructed based on the re-examination of its type species L. problematica, the study of material stored at the National Natural History Museum of Luxembourg, and an extensive review of the literature. The systematic study allows ascribing to Laevitomaria a number of Jurassic species from the western European region formerly included in other pleurotomariid genera. The following new combi- nations are proposed: Laevitomaria allionta, L. amyntas, L. angulba, L. asurai, L. daityai, L. fasciata, L. gyroplata, L. isarensis, L. joannis, L. repeliniana, L. stoddarti, L. subplatyspira, and L. zonata. The genus, which was once considered as endemic of the central part of the western Tethys, shows an evolutionary and palaeogeographical history consider- ably more complex than previously assumed. It first appeared in the Late Sinemurian in the northern belt of the central western Tethys involved in the Neotethyan rifting, where it experienced a first radiation followed by an abrupt decline of diversity in the Toarcian. Species diversity increased again during Toarcian–Aalenian times in the southernmost part of western European shelf and a major radiation occurred during the Middle Aalenian to Early Bajocian in the northern Paris Basin and southern England. After a latest Bajocian collapse of diversity, Laevitomaria disappeared from both the central part of western Tethys and the European shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(S): J
    Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life Author(s): J. William Schopf Reviewed work(s): Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 260, No. 5108 (Apr. 30, 1993), pp. 640-646 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2881249 . Accessed: 07/04/2012 21:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org REFERENCESAND NOTES 9. Y. Hiwatari,in Molecular Dynamics Simulations, F. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), vol. 1, p. Yonezawa, Ed., vol. 113 of Springer Series in 247. 1. H. Takayama, News Letter No. 1 (Research Group Solid State Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Heidel- 23. F. Yonezawa, S. Sakamoto, M. Hori, J. Non-Ctyst. on a new project, "Computational Physics as a berg, 1992), p. 32. Solids 137, 135 (1991). New Frontier in Condensed Matter Research" 10. S. Fujiwara and F. Yonezawa, in preparation. 24. F. Yonezawa and S. Sakamoto, Optoelectronics- under the support of the Grant-in-Aidfor Scientific 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brachiopod Antiquatonia Coloradoensis (Girty) from the Upper Morrowan and Atokan (Lower Middle Pennsylvanian) of the United States
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Brachiopod Antiquatonia coloradoensis (Girty) from the Upper Morrowan and Atokan (Lower Middle Pennsylvanian) of the United States U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1588 The Brachiopod Antiquatonia coloradoensis (Girty) from the Upper Morrowan and Atokan (Lower Middle Pennsylvanian) of the United States By Thomas W. Henry T OF EN TH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1588 TM E R I A N P T E E D R . I O S . R Taxonomic and biostratigraphic analysis of a widespread and U stratigraphically restricted, semireticulate productid brachiopod M 9 A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Henry, Thomas W. The brachiopod Antiquatonia coloradoensis (Girty) from the upper Morrowan and Atokan (lower Middle Pennsylvanian) of the United States / by Thomas W. Henry. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1588) Includes bibliographical references (p. – ). 1. Antiquatonia coloradoensis—United States. 2. Paleontology—Pennsylvanian. 3. Animals, Fossil—United States. I. Title. II. Series. QE797.S89H46 1988 564′.68—dc21 97–42005 CIP CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse of Some of the Geology and Mineral Resources: Sierra Blanca
    THE EL.PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY I I GUIDEBOOK i FIFTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP I I I I A GLIMPSE OF SOME OF THE I GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES I I SIERRA BLANCA-VAN HORN COUNTRY HUDSPETH AND CULBEWSON COUNTIES TEXAS > APRIL 3, 1971 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS F - The Texas Lineament in Eagle Flat, Texas ------------- 28 INTRODUCTION The Trans Pecos region of West Texas has attracted the attention I it deserves as a source of useful minerals both metallic and nsn- metallic. Because of the preoccupation of the people of Texas with petroleum production, many have overlooked the fact that them have been several important metal mines tn this province and that talc deposi ts are s ti1 l being worked here. Undoubtedly othep economic mineral deposits exist in the region awai ting discovery by intensive geological prospecting. The af'fi cers of the El Paso Geological Society and the field trip leadek hope that this trip will heighten inteest in the finding and developing of mineral deposi ts in Trans Pecos Texas. We welcome all our visitcs~sand know that they will wish to jodn us in thanking all those who made thds trip possible. We wish especially to acknowledge the kindness of the Pioneer Talc Company in showing us through the mill at Allamore and allowlng the group to visdt the Texsla- Talc mine. We also wish to thank Mr. Sandy Neal of Van Haon for per- mission to cross the Neal Ranch on the way to the Hazel Wne. John M. Hills, President El Paso Geological Society EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS John M.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous Nautilid Beaks from Near-Shore/Shallow Water Deposits of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic)
    Acta Geologica Polonica , Vol. 60 (2010), No. 3, pp. 417 –428 Late Cretaceous nautilid beaks from near-shore/shallow water deposits of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic) MaRtiN KošťáK 1, RadeK VodRážKa 1,2 , Jiří FRaNK 1, MaRtiN MazuCh 1 aNd JaRosLaV MaReK 1 1Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, 128 43 Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 2Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Prague 1, Czech Republic aBstRaCt: Košťák, M., Vodrážka, R., Frank, J., Mazuch, M. and Marek, J. 2010. Late Cretaceous nautilid beaks from near- shore/shallow water deposits of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic). Acta Geologica Polonica , 60 (3), 417 –428 . Warszawa. More than 30 isolated nautilid jaws have been discovered in washed samples of late Cretaceous (turonian) near- shore/shallow water deposits located in the southern part of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (BCB). upper and lower jaws discovered in genetically-similar early turonian deposits are described in detail herein. the nautilid jaw appa - ratuses comprise rhyncholites (upper jaws) assigned to Nautilorhynchus simplex (Fritsch), and conchorhynchs (lower jaws) assigned to Conchorhynchus cretaceus Fritsch. some rhyncholites show signs of abrasion and corrosion, and may also form a substrate for sessile organisms. in one specimen, signs of acid digestion in the stomach of a preda - tor were recognized. N. simplex is synonymized with “ Rhyncholithus ” bohemicus (till), “ R.” curvatus ” (till), “ R”. rectus (till) and “ R” . curtus (till). the significant morphological variability observed in N. simplex is supported by biometric data. although the jaws were not found associated with body chambers, it is inferred from the extremely low nautilid biodiversity across the Cenomanian/turonian boundary interval in the BCB, and from the range and rel - ative abundance of the only early turonian nautilid taxon present, that the jaws are probably referable to the genus Eutrephoceras hyatt and specifically to the common and long-ranging species E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas
    Historical Studies Report No. 2003-03 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas By W. Dwayne Jones A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas by W. Dwayne Jones Prepared For Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Prepared by Knight & Associates October 2003 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Copyright © 2003 by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) All rights reserved. TxDOT owns all rights, title, and interest in and to all data and other information developed for this project. Brief passages from this publication may be reproduced without permission provided that credit is given to TxDOT and the author. Permission to reprint an entire chapter or section, photographs, illustrations, and maps must be obtained in advance from the Supervisor of the Historical Studies Branch, Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Teas, 78701. Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository requirements. For further information on this and other TxDOT historical publications, please contact: Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Affairs Division Historical Studies Branch Lisa J. Hart, Supervisor Historical Studies Report No. 2003-3 Bruce Jensen, Series Editor Editing and production of this report was directed by Knight & Associates 3470 Jack C. Hays Trail Buda, Texas 78610 ISBN 1-930788-51-7 A Field Guide to Gas Stations in Texas Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Looking at Gas Stations . 11 1910-1920: Drive-Up Gas Stations . 23 1920-1930: Full Service / Corporate Identification Gas Stations . 33 1930-1940: Machine Made / Streamlined – The Depression Era .
    [Show full text]
  • An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration, Report of Investigations No
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Certification Application Reference 428 McGowen, J.H., and Groat, C. G. 1971. Van Horn Sandstone, West Texas: An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration, Report of Investigations No. 72. Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, TX. Submitted in accordance with 40 CFR 5194.13, Submission of Reference Materials. - t*- An Allurjial Fan kdel for Mineral Exploration J. H. McGowen and C. G. Groat BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 W. L. Fisher. Director Report of Investigations-No. 72 Van Horn Sandstone, West Texas: An Alluvial Fan Model for Mineral Exploration BY J. H. McGowen and C. G. Groat 1971 Second Printing, December 1975 Third Printing, October 1982 Abstract . .......... Proximal fan ........ Introduction ........... Mid-fan .......... General description .......... Distal fan ......... Geologic setting ........... Main braided channels .... Van Horn Sandstone: a large alluvial fan system Braided distributaries ..... Sedimrntology ........... Braided interlobe area .... Facies ............. Summary ........... Proximal f'acies......... Compositionandmineralogy ...... Massive l~oulder1. cds ....... Gravel composition ........ iilterriating gravel and thin sand beds . Sandstone petrography ....... Thick sand and muddy sand of the proxi- Quartz ........... mal facics .......... Feldspar ........... Other feat.urcs of the proximal facies . Rock fragments ........ Mid-fan l'acies .......... Hematite .......... F:tcies dcscrlptioli ........ Cement and matrix
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic and Hydrogeologic Framework of Part of the Coastal Plain of Texas
    Report 2361 I STRAT~ RAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEr ORK OF PART OF THE COAST, L PLAIN ·OF TEXAS TEXAS DE RTMENT OF WATER RESOURCE~S July 1979 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES REPORT 236 STRATIGRAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF PART OF THE COASTAL PLAIN OF TEXAS By E. T. Baker, Jr. United States Geological Survey This report was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the Texas Department of Water Resources. July 1979 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Harvey Davis, Executive Director TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD A. L. Black, Chairman John H. Garrett, Vice Chairman Milton Potts Glen E. Roney George W. McCleskey W. O. Bankston TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Felix McDonald, Chairman Dorsey B. Hardeman, Commissioner Joe R. Carroll, Commissioner Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publicatiun, i.e., not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. The Department would appreciate acknowledgement. Published and distributed by the Texas Department of Water Resources Post Office Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .. INTRODUCTION 3 Acknowledgements 3 Metric Conversions 35 STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK. 35 General Features of Deposition and Correlation Problems 35 Stratigraphic Units 35 Pre-Miocene 35 Miocene. 36 Post-Miocene 38 HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK 38 Catahoula Confining System (Restricted) . 38 Jasper Aquifer ..... 39 Burkeville Confining System 40 Evangeline Aquifer 40 Chicot Aquifer 40 SELECTED REFERENCES 42 TABLE 1. Stratigraphic and Hydrogeologic Framework of Part of the Coastal Plain of Texas ........... 4 FIGURES 1. Index Map Showing Location of Sections. 5 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS-Continued Page 2-15.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous Nautilid Juveniles of Cymatoceras Reussi and Eutrephoceras Aff
    SBORNÍK NÁRODNÍHO MUZEA V PRAZE ACTA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Řada B – Přírodní vědy • sv. 70 • 2014 • čís. 3–4 • s. 143–152 Series B – Historia Naturalis • vol. 70 • 2014 • no. 3–4 • pp. 143–152 LATE CRETACEOUS NAUTILID JUVENILES OF CYMATOCERAS REUSSI AND EUTREPHOCERAS AFF. SUBLAEVIGATUM – SCARCE FOSSILS UNDER RISK OF PYRITE DEGRADATION JIŘÍ FRANK JAN SKLENÁŘ BORIS EKRT National Museum, Department of Palaeontology, Václavské náměstí 68, 115 74 Praha 1, the Czech Republic; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Frank, J., Sklenář, J. Ekrt, B. (2014): Late Cretaceous nautilid juveniles of Cymatoceras reussi and Eutrephoceras aff. sublaevigatum – scarce fossils under risk of pyrite degradation. – Acta Mus. Nat. Pragae, Ser. B, Hist. Nat., 70(3-4): 143–152, Praha. ISSN 1804-6479. Abstract. The syntype collection of “Nautilus reussi” has been subject to a detailed revision resulting in confirmation of at least provisional validity of the species represented by a single juvenile specimen. This species, restricted now to the Late Coniacian, is inserted into the genus Cymatoceras Hyatt, 1884. The rest of the collection differs from the original description and is left separately as Eutrephoceras aff. sublaevi- gatum, being considered juveniles of the species. The lithology, geographic and stratigraphic position of the type locality of Cymatoceras reussi (FRITSCH IN FRITSCH ET SCHLÖNBACH, 1872) as well as the other sites are discussed here. The valuable material is endangered due to pyrite degradation as relics of this unstable sulphide are still at present hidden in the secondary limonitic material. The degradation products cause volumetric expansion resulting in formation of crevices and loss of integrity.
    [Show full text]