DOCSLIB.ORG

John and William Shakespeare the Sources and Acquisition of Their Wealth in Two Volumes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John and William Shakespeare the Sources and Acquisition of Their Wealth in Two Volumes 1 John and William Shakespeare The Sources and Acquisition of their Wealth in two volumes Volume 1 of 2 Thesis Submitted by David Fallow to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Research in Drama July 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (signature) ......................................................................................... David Fallow 2 Abstract This thesis explores the proposition that to comprehend William Shakespeare better in his social and creative contexts one has to understand both his and his family’s money - where it came from and where it went. The Shakespearian mythos1 posits that John Shakespeare came penniless to Stratford where he did well in business before losing his wealth. Thereafter, his son William went to London, wrote plays which made him rich and then made a number of investments in Stratford. Among the various errors in this statement there is one that stands out - the “rich” part. It is not simply the fact that he made the investments - his house New Place, land, tithes etc. are well documented - it is when he made them that is of significance. The bulk of the Shakespeare family investments were made before William became part owner of the Globe or Blackfriars theatres. This evaluation has focused on the tangible data from the period, chiefly legal and financial records. Its conclusions challenge many pre-existing notions of how money flowed into the Early Modern Theatre and into William Shakespeare’s pockets. The fable is that young Will Shakespeare, like the pantomime Dick Whittington, left his poverty-stricken family, walked to London and won his fortune. In neither case was this true. The Early Modern theatre in London was brutally commercial and the aim was the acquisition of wealth more than the pursuit of art. For William Shakespeare, Pope put it neatly Shakespeare (whom you and every playhouse bill Style the divine! the matchless! what you will), For gain, not glory, wing’d his roving flight, And grew immortal in his own despite.2 This thesis provides the evidence to dismiss many of the fantasies that surround William and John Shakespeare’s by replacing these with a clear financial picture of the sources and acquisition of their wealth. 1 mythos, A body of interconnected myths or stories, esp. those belonging to a … cultural tradition. OED. 2 Alexander Pope, Imitations of Horace (London: T. Cooper, 1737). I. ii. i. 69 3 Acknowledgements I am indebted to those who have supported, helped and inspired me in the preparation of this thesis. Firstly, to two great teachers who encouraged me to investigate the life and work of William Shakespeare - the late Mr. Robert B. Christie, English Master at Hutchesons’ School in Glasgow and Professor Peter Thomson of Exeter University. Secondly, to Professors Mick Mangan and Chris McCullough, both of Exeter University: Professor Mangan for being my adviser on this academic journey and Professor McCullough for sharing his sheer sense of fun along the way. Thanks are also due to Professor Graham Ley of Exeter University who stepped into Dr. Haas’s role as my co-advisor. Thirdly, to Kate Janman who bravely assisted in the proof reading of the final draft. Mairi Macdonald of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust for her excellent advice. Mark Hubbard for his comments on the financial tables. Peter Borschberg of the National University of Singapore for his timely views on the Madre de Dios. Sarah LeFanu, Royal Literary Fund Fellow, for her assistance. Lastly, to my wife and daughter who have always believed in me. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of the late Dr. Birgit Haas of Exeter University who, all too briefly, advised on this thesis. 4 Table of Contents Notes, Abbreviations and Defined Terms .....................................................................8 Introduction .................................................................................................................10 The Structure of this Thesis ....................................................................................16 The Body of the Thesis ...........................................................................................17 Chapter 1 - AN IMPERTINENT QUESTION...........................................................19 Placing this Thesis, Placing this Research ..............................................................21 The Benefit and Challenge of a Multi-Disciplinary Approach ...............................25 Chapter 2 – MONEY AND PERFORMANCE ..........................................................29 The Limitations of Certain Approaches to Theatre Finance .......................................29 The Nature and Function of Banks .........................................................................32 The Cost of Money..................................................................................................33 Factors Affecting Theatrical Earnings ........................................................................35 1. Theatre Closures..................................................................................................36 2. Alternative Sources of Revenue..........................................................................40 Alternative Sources of Revenue - Summary ...........................................................60 3. Certain Expenses of Playing ...............................................................................60 Expenses of Playing -The Rose Theatre .................................................................68 Expenses of Playing - Summary .............................................................................71 Usury ...........................................................................................................................72 Capitalists, Bankers or Usurers? .............................................................................75 Tax...............................................................................................................................79 Background to Early Modern Taxation in England ................................................79 Tax and Geese .........................................................................................................81 Analyzing the Takings ................................................................................................88 William Shakespeare's Theatrical Earnings ................................................................94 Portfolio Analysis, Income and Expenditure ..........................................................97 Income.....................................................................................................................98 Chapter 3 - JOHN SHAKESPEARE & STRATFORD-UPON-AVON.................105 Building a Theory..................................................................................................106 This Chapter ..........................................................................................................108 The Corporation ........................................................................................................110 The Very Civil Officer, 1556-79...........................................................................117 John Shakespeare, Businessman ...............................................................................141 The Law concerning Interest, Tax and Trade Credit ............................................147 Legal Records........................................................................................................149 The Seeming Fall from Financial Grace ...............................................................153 Making their marks ...................................................................................................171 Illiteracy ................................................................................................................176 Stratford’s “Middling Sort”.......................................................................................179 John Shakespeare – A Summary...........................................................................184 Chapter 4 – WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE IN LONDON........................................185 The Median Playwright.............................................................................................185 William Shakespeare and Tax...................................................................................191 Learning Financial Manipulation ..........................................................................193 William, The Artful (Tax) Dodger........................................................................196 Chapter 5 – IN SEARCH OF THE PLAYWRIGHT ..............................................202 5 The Criminal Theatre of the South Bank ..................................................................206 The Business of Organizing Crime .......................................................................206 Godfathers of Bankside.............................................................................................208 Francis Langley and William Gardiner.................................................................209
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’S Canon: Some Caveats
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Firenze University Press: E-Journals Journal of Early Modern Studies, n. 5 (2016), pp. 307-328 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-18094 Non-Traditional Authorship Attribution Studies of William Shakespeare’s Canon: Some Caveats Joseph Rudman Carnegie Mellon University (<[email protected]>) Abstract The paper looks at the problems in conducting non-traditional authorship attribution studies on the canon of William Shakespeare. After a short introduction, the case is put forth that these studies are ‘scientific’ and must adhere to the tenets of the scientific method. By showing that a complete and valid experimental plan is necessary and pointing out the many and varied pitfalls (e.g., the text, the control groups, the treatment of errors), it becomes clear what a valid study of Shakespearean non-traditional authorship attribution demands. I then come to the conclusion that such a valid study is not attainable with the limits of present-day knowledge. Keywords: Attribution, Authorship, Shakespeare, Statistics, Stylistics It is not possible, in the compass of a single essay, to deal with very many – let alone all – of the tests by which investigators in their wisdom or folly have sought to prove authorship by style. (Schoenbaum 1966, 197) 1. Introduction There are a few ‘givens’ framing this paper: 1) William Shakespeare was an actor and playwright – exactly who he was is not relevant here. 2) The First Folio constitutes the basis of what has come down to us as Shakespeare’s canon.1 1 Non-traditional authorship attribution studies are those that make use of stylistics, statistics, and the computer.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Shakespeare Authorship Doubt in 1593
    54 4. Shakespeare Authorship Doubt in 1593 Around the time of Marlowe’s apparent death, the name William Shakespeare appeared in print for the first time, attached to a new work, Venus and Adonis, described by its author as ‘the first heir of my invention’. The poem was registered anonymously on 18 April 1593, and though we do not know exactly when it was published, and it may have been available earlier, the first recorded sale was 12 June. Scholars have long noted significant similarities between this poem and Marlowe’s Hero and Leander; Katherine Duncan-Jones and H.R. Woudhuysen describe ‘compelling links between the two poems’ (Duncan-Jones and Woudhuysen, 2007: 21), though they admit it is difficult to know how Shakespeare would have seen Marlowe’s poem in manuscript, if it was, as is widely believed, being written at Thomas Walsingham’s Scadbury estate in Kent in the same month that Venus was registered in London. The poem is preceded by two lines from Ovid’s Amores, which at the time of publication was available only in Latin. The earliest surviving English translation was Marlowe’s, and it was not published much before 1599. Duncan-Jones and Woudhuysen admit, ‘We don’t know how Shakespeare encountered Amores’ and again speculate that he could have seen Marlowe’s translations in manuscript. Barber, R, (2010), Writing Marlowe As Writing Shakespeare: Exploring Biographical Fictions DPhil Thesis, University of Sussex. Downloaded from www. rosbarber.com/research. 55 Ovid’s poem is addressed Ad Invidos: ‘to those who hate him’. If the title of the epigram poem is relevant, it is more relevant to Marlowe than to Shakespeare: personal attacks on Marlowe in 1593 are legion, and include the allegations in Richard Baines’ ‘Note’ and Thomas Drury’s ‘Remembrances’, Kyd’s letters to Sir John Puckering, and allusions to Marlowe’s works in the Dutch Church Libel.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Events Concerning the Buildings of the Priory and Their Use by the Crown
    LIONEL GREEN has drawn up a table of CHRONOLOGICAL EVENTS CONCERNING THE BUILDINGS OF THE PRIORY AND THEIR USE BY THE CROWN. 1117 Chapel and claustral buildings constructed of wood on new site. (M&B. I. 245; Colker p 242) 1117 Founder’s mother buried in priory church. (Colker p.244) 1118 Founder Gilbert provides a second wooden chapel much larger than the former one. (Colker p.243) 1118 Queen Matilda and Prince William visit the new Priory. (H.4) 1121/2 New church given royal protection. (M&B.I 243; H.12) Now 23 canons. (Colker p.243) 1125 “Beautiful & sturdy church begun”. (Colker p 245). Founder Gilbert dies and buried in priory. Now 36 canons. (Colker p.245) Building work ceased. 1132 Completion of church in stone (took 15 years to build). (H.3/4) 1136 Claustral and other buildings completed. (Decem. Script. Col.1664; VCH Vol.ii p.95) c1156 Becket persuades Henry II to complete east end and transepts rebuilt further east (SAC 71 (1977) p.95; D Knowles Thomas Becket 1970 p.41) 1161 Infirmary chapel dedicated. (H.21) 1162/3 King assists ‘works of the church’. (Pipe Roll- 6/62) 1165 King completes and endows the priory. (SAC 71 (1977) p 98) 1174 Feb. Altar of St John the Baptist dedicated. (H.26) c1175 ?Guest house built. Norman entrance arch now at parish church. 1194 Nov. Altar of St Stephen and St Nicholas dedicated. (H.49) 1196 Enlarged priory completed. 1197 Oct. Altar of the Holy Cross dedicated. (H.50 with date corrected) 1202 King John visits priory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Basis of Family Relationships in the Plays of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries: a Study in Renaissance Ideas
    The Moral Basis of Family Relationships in the plays of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries: a Study in Renaissance Ideas. A submission for the degree of doctor of philosophy by Stephen David Collins. The Department of History of The University of York. June, 2016. ABSTRACT. Families transact their relationships in a number of ways. Alongside and in tension with the emotional and practical dealings of family life are factors of an essentially moral nature such as loyalty, gratitude, obedience, and altruism. Morality depends on ideas about how one should behave, so that, for example, deciding whether or not to save a brother's life by going to bed with his judge involves an ethical accountancy drawing on ideas of right and wrong. It is such ideas that are the focus of this study. It seeks to recover some of ethical assumptions which were in circulation in early modern England and which inform the plays of the period. A number of plays which dramatise family relationships are analysed from the imagined perspectives of original audiences whose intellectual and moral worlds are explored through specific dramatic situations. Plays are discussed as far as possible in terms of their language and plots, rather than of character, and the study is eclectic in its use of sources, though drawing largely on the extensive didactic and polemical writing on the family surviving from the period. Three aspects of family relationships are discussed: first, the shifting one between parents and children, second, that between siblings, and, third, one version of marriage, that of the remarriage of the bereaved.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    ELIZABETH E. TAVARES, PHD HUDSON STRODE PROGRAM IN RENAISSANCE STUDIES • UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA 211 ROWAND -JOHNSON HALL TUSCALOOSA, AL 35487-0244 [email protected] elizabethetavares.com @ElizETavares PROFESSIONAL HISTORY APPOINTMENTS 2020– Assistant Professor & Associate Graduate Faculty, English, University of Alabama 2016–20 Assistant Professor & Associate Graduate Faculty, English, Pacific University EDUCATION 2016 PhD, English Literature, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2010 MA, English Literature, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2009 BA, English and History, magna cum laude, DePaul University CERTIFICATIONS 2020 Program External Reviewer, Association of Departments of English 2019 Early Modern English Paleography, Folger Shakespeare Library 2018 Professional Editing, University of Chicago 2016 Criticism and Interpretive Theory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PUBLICATIONS BOOKS Playing the Repertory in Early Modern England (in preparation) Tracing the effects of the repertory system on the formation of the 1580s English theatre industry, Playing the Stock Market demonstrates that it was dramaturgical features—such as blocking, cosmetics, sound, and props— rather than thematic commitments by which early playing companies distinguished themselves and shaped the industry in which Shakespeare would come to train. Playing Conditions: Climate and the Rise of Early Modern English Drama (in preparation) Examining climatological phenomena affecting Britain in the sixteenth century, from archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • Macbeth on Three Levels Wrap Around a Deep Thrust Stage—With Only Nine Rows Dramatis Personae 14 Separating the Farthest Seat from the Stage
    Weird Sister, rendering by Mieka Van Der Ploeg, 2019 Table of Contents Barbara Gaines Preface 1 Artistic Director Art That Lives 2 Carl and Marilynn Thoma Bard’s Bio 3 Endowed Chair The First Folio 3 Shakespeare’s England 5 Criss Henderson The English Renaissance Theater 6 Executive Director Courtyard-Style Theater 7 Chicago Shakespeare Theater is Chicago’s professional theater A Brief History of Touring Shakespeare 9 Timeline 12 dedicated to the works of William Shakespeare. Founded as Shakespeare Repertory in 1986, the company moved to its seven-story home on Navy Pier in 1999. In its Elizabethan-style Courtyard Theater, 500 seats Shakespeare's Macbeth on three levels wrap around a deep thrust stage—with only nine rows Dramatis Personae 14 separating the farthest seat from the stage. Chicago Shakespeare also The Story 15 features a flexible 180-seat black box studio theater, a Teacher Resource Act by Act Synopsis 15 Center, and a Shakespeare specialty bookstall. In 2017, a new, innovative S omething Borrowed, Something New: performance venue, The Yard at Chicago Shakespeare, expanded CST's Shakespeare’s Sources 18 campus to include three theaters. The year-round, flexible venue can 1606 and All That 19 be configured in a variety of shapes and sizes with audience capacities Shakespeare, Tragedy, and Us 21 ranging from 150 to 850, defining the audience-artist relationship to best serve each production. Now in its thirty-second season, the Theater has Scholars' Perspectives produced nearly the entire Shakespeare canon: All’s Well That Ends
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2006 Shakespeare Matters Page 1
    Summer 2006 Shakespeare Matters page 1 5:4 "Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments..." Summer 2006 “Stars or Suns:” The Portrayal of the Earls of Oxford in Elizabethan Drama By Richard Desper, PhD n Act III Scene vii of King Henry V, the proud nobles of France, gathered in camp on the eve of the battle of Agincourt, I speculate in anticipation of victory, letting their thoughts and their words take flight in fancy. While viewing the bedraggled English army as doomed, they savor their expected victory on the morrow and vie with each other in proclaiming their own glory. The dauphin1 boasts of his horse as another Pegasus, leading to a few allusions of a bawdy nature, and then a curious exchange takes place between Lord Rambures and the Constable of France, Professor William Leahy explains plans for a Shakespeare Charles Delabreth: Authorship Studies Master’s Program at Brunel University. Photo by William Boyle. Ram. My Lord Constable, the armor that I saw in your tent to-night, are those stars or suns upon it? Con. Stars, my lord. Brunel University to Offer 2 (Henry V, III.vii.63-5) Masters in Authorship Studies Shakespeare scholars have remarked little on these particular speeches, by default implying that they are words spoken in hile Concordia University has encouraged study of the passing, having no particular meaning other than idle chatter. Shakespeare authorship issue for years, Brunel One can count at least a dozen treatises on the text of Henry V that W University in England now plans to offer a graduate have nothing at all to say about these two lines.3 Yet numerous program leading to an M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Marlowe and the Golden Age of England
    The Marlowe Society Christopher Marlowe and the Research Journal - Volume 05 - 2008 Golden Age of England Online Research Journal Article Michael J. Kelly Christopher Marlowe and the Golden Age of England Poet, spy and playwright, Christopher Marlowe was the embodiment of the Elizabethan Golden Age. Marlowe’s work was the product of his ‘Erasmian,’ or Christian humanist, education, the state of affairs in England and his own ability and readiness to satirize the world around him. Marlowe and his fellow contemporaries were a testament to the development of English drama, its pinnacle at the end of the English Renaissance and its eventual decline and suppression at the outbreak of the English Civil War. Their work is historically important because it illustrates, in addition to the development of English theatre, the dramatic political and social events of the time through the public medium of the playhouse. Specifically, the development of the theatre helps explain key features of the English Renaissance such as the creation of English self-identity, adoption of humanistic ideal, the advancement of English over Latin, the role of religion, the intellectual development of a people and parliament and their gradual alienation from the monarchy, the ultimate assertion of parliamentary power, and Civil War. Furthermore, the development of commercial playwriting, acting, stage management and private investment in theatres, an aspect of life today taken for granted, began during this Golden Age in English drama. The history of English playwriting and performance stretches back to at least the ninth century trope ‘Alle Luia’ sung at Easter masses. However, post-classical Christian ritual performance itself probably developed from the ritualistic repetitions of the Empirical Roman Senate.1 This tradition, established in the Church at some point during the early formation of Roman successor states, likely spread to England from Spain, via Ireland, through missionaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tethys Festival As Royal Policy
    ‘The power of his commanding trident’: Tethys Festival as royal policy Anne Daye On 31 May 1610, Prince Henry sailed up the River Thames culminating in horse races and running at the ring on the from Richmond to Whitehall for his creation as Prince of banks of the Dee. Both elements were traditional and firmly Wales, Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester to be greeted historicised in their presentation. While the prince is unlikely by the Lord Mayor of London. A flotilla of little boats to have been present, the competitors must have been mem- escorted him, enjoying the sight of a floating pageant sent, as bers of the gentry and nobility. The creation ceremonies it were, from Neptune. Corinea, queen of Cornwall crowned themselves, including Tethys Festival, took place across with pearls and cockleshells, rode on a large whale while eight days in London. Having travelled by road to Richmond, Amphion, wreathed with seashells, father of music and the Henry made a triumphal entry into London along the Thames genius of Wales, sailed on a dolphin. To ensure their speeches for the official reception by the City of London. The cer- carried across the water in the hurly-burly of the day, ‘two emony of creation took place before the whole parliament of absolute actors’ were hired to play these tritons, namely John lords and commons, gathered in the Court of Requests, Rice and Richard Burbage1 . Following the ceremony of observed by ambassadors and foreign guests, the nobility of creation, in the masque Tethys Festival or The Queen’s England, Scotland and Ireland and the Lord Mayor of Lon- Wake, Queen Anne greeted Henry in the guise of Tethys, wife don with representatives of the guilds.
    [Show full text]
  • Streets Going to NFHS
    BUS ASSIGNMENTS BY STREET NAME FOR NFHS STREET NAME BUS # STREET NAME BUS # A Aberdeen Drive (WF Phase IV) None Anton Drive (Travis Ranch) 42 Acadia Lane (Park Trails) 34 Archer Way (Deerfield Heights) 28 Ackerly Drive (Travis Ranch) 65 Ash Drive (WF Phase II) None Ainsley Lane (Devonshire) 68 Ashby Circle (Devonshire) 68 Alexa Drive (Travis Ranch #1000-1004) 26 Ashland Court (WF Phase I) None Alexa Drive (Travis Ranch #1006-1012) 26 Ashland Drive (WF Phase I) None Alexandia Drive (WF Phase I) None Aster Trail (WF Phase II) None Antler Trail (Deerfield Heights) 34 Avondown Road (Devonshire) 68 B Bainbridge Lane (WF Phase I) None Black Hills Blvd (Travis Ranch) RISD Bald Cypress Street (Cypress Knoll) None Blackthorne Road (Devonshire) 68 Banbury Court (Devonshire) 68 Blanco Drive (Park Trails) 34 Bantham Way (Devonshire) 43 Bluebell Drive (WF Phase III) None Barley Court (Devonshire) 43 Bold Venture Drive (Trinity Crossing) 25 Barrix Drive (Lynx Hollow) 43 Bonham Drive (Park Trails) 34 Barzona Road (WF Phase IV) None Brackettville Drive (Travis Ranch) # 2001-2011 63 Baytree Bend (Devonshire) 68 Brackettville Drive (Travis Ranch) # 2013-2033 RISD Beefmaster Court (WF Phase IV) None Bradford Lane (WF Phase I) None Bell Court (WF Phase IV) None Branch Street (Deerfield Heights) 28 Belman Lane (Devonshire) 68 Brazoria Drive (Travis Ranch) # 2001-2019 RISD Bend Court (Travis Ranch) 52 Brazoria Road (Travis Ranch) 63 Berea Street (Trinity Crossing) 25 Brewers Lane 68 Berry Trail (Deerfield Heights) 34 Bridle Trail #14011-14093 RISD Bideford
    [Show full text]
  • Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Works and Shakespeare's Falstaff
    Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Works and Shakespeare's Falstaff Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors DiRoberto, Kyle Louise Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 08:47:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/203437 GROTESQUE TRANSFORMATIONS AND THE DISCOURSE OF CONVERSION IN ROBERT GREENE'S WORK AND SHAKESPEARE'S FALSTAFF by Kyle DiRoberto _____________________ Copyright © Kyle DiRoberto A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2011 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Kyle DiRoberto entitled Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Work and Shakespeare's Falstaff. and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Meg Lota Brown _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Tenney Nathanson _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Carlos Gallego Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Shakespeare's Children: the Cases of Richard III and King John Joseph Campana
    Campana, J. (2007). Killing Shakespeare’s Children: The Cases of Richard III and King John. Shakespeare, 3(1), 18–39. doi:10.1080/17450910701252271 Killing Shakespeare's Children: The Cases of Richard III and King John Joseph Campana This essay explores a series of affective, sexual and temporal disturbances that Shakespeare's child characters create on the early modern stage and that lead these characters often to their deaths. It does so by turning to the murdered princes of Richard III and the ultimately extinguished boy-king Arthur of King John. A pervasive sentimentality about childhood shapes the way audiences and critics have responded to Shakespeare's children by rendering invisible complex and discomfiting erotic and emotional investments in childhood innocence. While Richard III subjects such sentimentality to its analytic gaze, King John explores extreme modes of affect and sexuality associated with childhood. For all of the pragmatic political reasons to kill Arthur, he is much more than an inconvenient dynastic obstacle. Arthur functions as the central node of networks of seduction, the catalyst of morbid displays of affect, and the signifier of future promise as threateningly mutable. King John and Richard III typify Shakespeare's larger dramatic interrogation of emergent notions of childhood and of contradictory notions of temporality, an interrogation conducted by the staging of uncanny, precocious, and ill-fated child roles. Keywords: Children; childhood; seduction; sexuality; affect; temporality; Richard III; King John If it is fair to say that Shakespeare included in his plays more child roles than did his contemporaries (Ann Blake counts thirty; Mark Heberle counts thirty-nine), it is also fair to say Shakespeare provided a wide range of parts for those children: from pivotal roles in royal succession to trace presences as enigmatic markers of symbolic equations never perhaps to be solved.
    [Show full text]