Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net Satisfaction “Good

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 1 of 29

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465 Website: www.sws.org.ph Fax: 920-2181

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net Satisfaction “Good” for Vice-President Robredo, “Very Good” for Senate President Sotto, “Good” for Speaker Cayetano, and “Moderate” for Chief Justice Bersamin • “Very Good” for the Senate; “Good” for the House of Representatives, Supreme Court, and Cabinet

Social Weather Stations

The Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey, conducted from September 27-30, 2019, found 56% satisfied and 23% dissatisfied with the performance of Vice-President Leni Robredo, 72% satisfied and 11% dissatisfied with Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III, 64% satisfied and 14% dissatisfied with Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, and 35% satisfied and 19% dissatisfied with Chief Justice Lucas Bersamin [Tables 1 and 2]. The resulting net satisfaction ratings (% satisfied minus % dissatisfied) were a "good" +33 for Vice-Pres. Robredo, a "very good" +61 for Senate President Sotto, a "good" +49 (correctly rounded) first rating for Speaker Cayetano, and a "moderate" +16 for Chief Justice Bersamin. The September 2019 survey also found 69% satisfied and 13% dissatisfied with the performance of Senate, 57% satisfied and 14% dissatisfied with the House of Representatives, 57% satisfied and 16% dissatisfied with the Supreme Court, and 51% satisfied and 16% dissatisfied with the Cabinet as a whole [Tables 3, 4, and 5]. The resulting net satisfaction ratings were a "very good" +56 for the Senate, a "good" +43 for the House of Representatives, a "good" +41 for the Supreme Court, and a "good" +35 for the Cabinet as a whole. [SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69, "very good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to -9, "neutral"; -10 to -29, "poor"; -30 to -49, "bad"; -50 to -69, "very bad"; -70 and below, "execrable". SWS considers the movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade".]

pr20190115 - SWR2018-IV Satisfaction with Top Officials (media release).doc 3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 2 of 29

Vice-President Robredo rises to “Good” +33 Vice-President Robredo's net satisfaction rating rose from moderate to good, up by 5 points from +28 in June 2019 to +33 in September 2019 [Chart 1, Tables 6 and 7]. The 5-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Vice-Pres. Robredo was due to increases in all areas, especially in Mindanao. Vice-Pres. Robredo's net satisfaction rating rose from moderate to good in Mindanao, up from +15 in June to +32 in September. It stayed good in the Visayas, up from +44 in June to +46 in September. It also stayed good in Balance Luzon, up slightly from +33 in June to +34 in October. It stayed moderate in Metro Manila, up slightly from +14 in June to +15 in September. Urban net satisfaction stayed moderate, up from +12 in June to +20 in September. Rural net satisfaction stayed good, although down slightly from +41 in June to +40 in September. By basic demographics, Vice-Pres. Robredo’s net satisfaction rating rose from good to very good among class E, up from +42 in June to +51 in September. It rose from moderate to good among class D, up from +25 to +31, among women, up from +27 to +35, among 25-34 year olds, up from +25 to +31, among 35-44 year olds, up from +29 to +34, and among 45-54 year olds, up from +26 to +36. However, it fell from moderate to neutral among class ABC, down from +28 in June to +6 in September. Senate Pres. Sotto stays “Very Good” at +61 Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating stayed very good, up slightly from +60 in June 2019 to +61 in September 2019 [Chart 2, Tables 8 and 9]. The 1-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Senate Pres. Sotto was due to increases of 4 points in Balance Luzon and 1 point in Mindanao, combined with a 2-point decrease in the Visayas and a steady score in Metro Manila. Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction rating stayed very good in Balance Luzon, up from +60 in June to +64 in September. It stayed very good in Mindanao, up slightly from +50 in June to +51 in September. It stayed at very good +68 in Metro Manila from June to September.

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 3 of 29

It also stayed very good in the Visayas, although down slightly from +63 in June to +61 in September. Urban net satisfaction with Senate Pres. Sotto stayed very good, up from +60 in June to +64 in September. Rural net satisfaction also stayed very good, although down slightly from +60 in June to +59 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit increases in Senate Pres. Sotto’s net satisfaction ratings among class ABC, up from very good +56 to very good +68, and among the college graduates, up from good +40 to very good +57. Speaker Cayetano’s first net rating a “Good” +49 Speaker Cayetano’s first net satisfaction rating was a good +49 [Chart 3, Tables 10 and 11]. It was highest in the Visayas at very good +57, followed by Mindanao at very good +52, Metro Manila at good +48, and Balance Luzon at good +45. It was very good in urban areas at +51, and good in rural areas at +49. By class, it was highest among class E at very good +52, followed by classes ABC and D, both at good +49. It was very good among men at +50, and good among women at +49. By age group, it was highest among 35-44 year olds at very good +55, followed by 25-34 year olds at very good +51, 45-54 year olds at good +48, 55 years old and above at good +48, and 18-24 year olds at good +43. It was highest among high school graduates at very good +55, followed by college graduates at good +49, non-elementary graduates at good +46, and elementary graduates at good +43. Chief Justice Bersamin stays “Moderate” at +16 Chief Justice Bersamin’s overall net satisfaction rating stayed moderate, up from +13 in June 2019 to +16 in September 2019 [Chart 4, Tables 12 and 13]. The 3-point increase in the overall net satisfaction rating of Chief Justice Bersamin was due to increases of 8 points in Mindanao, 4 points in Balance Luzon, and 2 points in Metro Manila, combined with 3-point decline in the Visayas. Net satisfaction with Chief Justice Bersamin rose from neutral to moderate in Mindanao, up from +6 in June to +14 in September. It stayed moderate in Balance Luzon, up from +14 in June to +18 in September.

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 4 of 29

It stayed moderate in Metro Manila, up from +13 in June to +15 in September. It also stayed moderate in the Visayas, although down slightly from +21 in June to +18 in September. Rural net satisfaction with Chief Justice Bersamin stayed moderate, up from +15 in June to +19 in September. Urban net satisfaction also stayed moderate, up slightly from +11 in June to +12 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit increases in Chief Justice Bersamin’s net satisfaction rating among class ABC, up from neutral net zero to good +31, among 18-24 year olds, up from moderate +11 to moderate +22, and among 55 years old and above, up from neutral +2 to moderate +19. However, the survey found a double-digit decline among 35-44 year olds, down from moderate +29 to moderate +16. Senate stays “Very Good” at +56 The net satisfaction rating of the Senate stayed very good, although down from +63 in June 2019 to +56 in September 2019 [Chart 5, Tables 14 and 15]. The 7-point decline in the overall net satisfaction with the Senate was due to decreases of 16 points in Mindanao, 8 points in the Visayas, and 4 points in Balance Luzon, combined with a 2-point increase in Metro Manila. It fell from excellent to very good in Mindanao, down from +72 in June to +56 in September. It stayed very good in the Visayas, although down from +65 in June to +57 in September. It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, although down from +59 in June to +55 in September. It also stayed very good in Metro Manila, up from +56 in June to +58 in September. It stayed very good in overall urban areas, down slightly from +57 in June to +56 in September. It also stayed very good in overall rural areas, although down from +67 in June to +56 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit declines in the Senate’s net satisfaction rating among 55 years old and above, down from very good +63 to very good +50, and among elementary graduates, down from very good +63 to very good +53.

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 5 of 29

House of Representatives stays “Good” at +43 The net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives stayed good, although down from a record-high +48 in June 2019 to +43 in September 2019 [Table 16]. The 5-point decline in the overall net satisfaction rating of the House of Representatives was due to decreases of 11 points in Balance Luzon, 9 points in Mindanao, and 1 point in the Visayas, combined with an 11-point increase in Metro Manila. The House of Representatives’ net satisfaction rating fell from very good to good in Balance Luzon, down from +50 in June to +39 in September. It also fell from very good to good in Mindanao, down from +54 in June to +45 in September. However, it stayed good in Metro Manila, up from +33 in June to +44 in September. It also stayed good in the Visayas, down slightly from +49 in June to +48 in September. Net satisfaction with the House of Representatives fell from very good to good in rural areas, down from +57 in June to +44 in September. However, it stayed good in urban areas, up from +36 in June to +40 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit decreases in the House of Representatives’ net satisfaction rating among 45-54 year olds, down from very good +55 to good +43, and among non-elementary graduates, down from very good +50 to good +39. However, the survey found a double-digit increase among class ABC, up from moderate +17 in June to good +48 in September. Supreme Court declines to “Very Good” +41 The Supreme Court’s net satisfaction rating fell from very good to good, down from the record-high +54 in June 2019 to +41 in September 2019 [Chart 6, Tables 17 and 18]. The 13-point decline in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Supreme Court was due to decreases of 18 points in Mindanao, 17 points in Balance Luzon, and 8 points in the Visayas, combined with a 3-point increase in Metro Manila. The Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating fell from very good to good in Mindanao, down from +59 in June to +41 in September. It fell from very good to good in Balance Luzon, down from +56 in June to +39 in September. It also fell from very good to good in the Visayas, down from +56 in June to +48 in September. However, it stayed good in Metro Manila, up from +33 in June to +36 in September. It fell from very good to good in rural areas, down from +60 in June to +42 in September.

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 6 of 29

It stayed good in urban areas, although down from +45 in June to +39 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit declines in the Supreme Court's net satisfaction rating in all basic socio-demographics, except for the single-digit declines in class ABC, down from good +36 to good +34, and among 35-44 year olds, down from very good +50 to good +48. The Cabinet falls to “Good” +35 The Cabinet's net satisfaction rating fell from very good to good, down from the record-high +51 in June 2019 to +35 in September 2019 [Chart 7, Tables 19 and 20]. The 16-point decline in the overall net satisfaction rating of the Cabinet was due to decreases of 22 points in Balance Luzon, 17 points in Mindanao, and 15 points in the Visayas, combined with a 5-point increase in Metro Manila. The Cabinet’s net satisfaction rating fell from very good to good in Balance Luzon, down from +55 in June to +33 in September. It fell from very good to good in Mindanao, down from +50 in June to +33 in September. It also fell from very good to good in the Visayas, down from +55 in June to +40 in September. However, it stayed good in Metro Manila, up from +36 in June to +41 in September. It fell from very good to good in rural areas, down from +58 in June to +33 in September. However, it stayed good in urban areas, although down slightly from +43 in June to +40 in September. Compared to June 2019, the September 2019 survey found double-digit declines in the Cabinet's net satisfaction rating in all basic socio-demographics, except for the single-digit decreases among class E, down from good +46 to good +38, among 35-44 year olds, down from very good +51 to good +44, and among college graduates, down from good +44 to good +38.

Survey background The September 2019 Social Weather Survey was conducted from September 27-30, 2019 using face-to-face interviews of 1,800 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 600 each in Balance Luzon and Mindanao, and 300 each in Metro Manila and the Visayas (sampling error margins of ±2.3% for national percentages, ±4% each for Balance Luzon and Mindanao, and ±6% each for Metro Manila and the Visayas).

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 7 of 29

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population projections for 2019 to obtain the national estimates. The quarterly Social Weather Surveys on public satisfaction with the Vice-President, Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the top four government institutions, are not commissioned. They are done on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service. The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government officials next to the President are as follows: “Maaari po bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa pagganap ng tungkulin ni [NAME] bilang [POSITION]. Kayo ba ay lubos na nasisiyahan, medyo nasisiyahan, hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, medyo hindi nasisiyahan, lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol kay [NAME]?” [“Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are with the performance of [NAME] as [POSITION]. Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or you have not ever heard or read anything about [NAME]?”].

● Leni Robredo, Bise-Presidente ng Pilipinas (Vice-President of the Philippines) ● Vicente ''Tito'' Sotto III, Pangulo ng Senado (Senate President) ● Alan Peter Cayetano, Ispiker ng Kapulungan ng mga Kinatawan (Speaker of the House of Representatives) ● Lucas Bersamin, Punong Mahistrado ng Korte Suprema (Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) The survey questions on public satisfaction with the top government institutions are as follows: “Batay sa kabuuang nagawa nila, ano po ang pakiramdam o opinyon ninyo sa mga sumusunod na institusyon ng gobyerno? Kayo ba ay Lubos na nasisiyahan, Medyo nasisiyahan, Hindi tiyak kung nasisiyahan o hindi, Medyo hindi nasisiyahan, lubos na hindi nasisiyahan, o wala pa kayong narinig o nabasa kahit na kailan tungkol sa (institusyon)? Pakilagay po ang mga kard sa naaangkop na lugar dito sa rating board.” [“Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or not, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied or You have never heard or read anything about (institution)? You may indicate your answer by placing each card on the appropriate answer on this rating board.”].

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 8 of 29

• ANG SENADO (Senate) • KAPULUNGAN NG MGA KINATAWAN (House of Representatives) • KORTE SUPREMA (Supreme Court) • ANG GABINETE SA KABUUAN (Cabinet as a whole) SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S. Laroza.

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 9 of 29

Table 1 SATISFACTION WITH THE VICE-PRESIDENT AND SENATE PRESIDENT, PHILIPPINES

Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 LENI Satisfied 54% 57% 53% 63% 57% 56% ROBREDO Undecided 22 20 20 16 14 19 Vice- Dissatisfied 22 23 26 21 29 23 President Net* +32 +34 +27 +42 +28 +33

VICENTE Satisfied 67 68 72 71 72 72 SOTTO III Undecided 20 18 16 19 14 16 Senate Dissatisfied 12 13 11 10 13 11 President Net* +54 +55 +61 +61 +60 +61

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 2 SATISFACTION WITH THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES

Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Satisfied ALAN PETER 64% CAYETANO Undecided 19 House Dissatisfied 14 Speaker Net* +49

Satisfied 36 34 37 35 LUCAS Undecided 30 28 26 33 BERSAMIN Chief Justice Dissatisfied 25 20 24 19 Net* +11 +14 +13 +16

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 10 of 29

Table 3 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES

Sep 17 Dec 17 Mar 18 Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19

Satisfied 62% 69% 61% 57% 62% 71% 72% 74% 69%

Undecided 20 16 22 25 23 16 17 15 17 Senate Dissatisfied 17 14 16 17 14 13 10 11 13

Net* +46 +56 +45 +41 +48 +58 +62 +63 +56

Satisfied 52 59 52 45 53% 57 61 62 57

Undecided 28 24 30 33 29 25 25 22 26 House of Rep. Dissatisfied 18 16 17 20 17 17 13 14 14

Net* +34 +43 +35 +25 +36 +40 +47 +48 +43

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 4 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES

Sep 17 Dec 17 Mar 18 Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19

Satisfied 50% 54% 45% 43% 49% 54% 62% 66% 57%

Supreme Undecided 30 28 31 31 32 27 26 22 26 Court Dissatisfied 19 17 24 24 18 17 12 12 16 Net* +31 +37 +20 +19 +31 +37 +50 +54 +41

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 11 of 29

Table 5 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES

Sep 17 Dec 17 Mar 18 Jun 18 Sep 18 Dec 18 Mar 19 Jun 19 Sep 19

Satisfied 49% 53% 47% 43% 48% 52% 57% 64% 51%

Cabinet as a Undecided 31 31 32 37 33 29 29 23 29 whole Dissatisfied 17 15 19 18 16 17 12 13 16 Net* +32 +38 +28 +25 +32 +35 +44 +51 +35

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Chart 1 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO SEP 2019

100 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 90 80 + 70 60 + 50 40 Robredo Estrada + 30 +33 20 Binay + 10 Laurel De Castro 0 Guingona -10 Arroyo -20

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 12 of 29

Table 6 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) NET* NET* NET* NET* LAUREL ESTRADA (cont.) GUINGONA DE CASTRO OCT 86 +44 DEC 95 +41 MAR 01 +19 OCT 06 +32 OCT 87 - 5 APR 96 +46 JUL 01 + 8 DEC 06 +32 MAY 90 - 3 JUN 96 +55 SEP 01 + 8 FEB 07 +36 NOV 90 - 3 SEP 96 +53 NOV 01 +12 JUN 07 +30 JUL 91 + 5 DEC 96 +47 MAR 02 +11 SEP 07 +38 NOV 91 - 5 APR 97 +54 MAY 02 - 4 DEC 07 +41 FEB 92 + 4 JUN 97 +58 SEP 02 +17 MAR 08 +47 APR 92 -10 SEP 97 +44 NOV 02 +13 JUN 08 +37 ESTRADA DEC 97 +52 MAR 03 +16 SEP 08 +34 SEP 92 +78 FEB 98 +38 JUN 03 +15 DEC 08 +39 DEC 92 +70 MAR 98 +41 SEP 03 +16 FEB 09 +36 MAY 93 +78 ARROYO NOV 03 +13 JUN 09 +44 JUL 93 +87 SEP 98 +73 JUN 04 + 2 SEP 09 +32 SEP 93 +75 NOV 98 +81 DE CASTRO DEC 09 +23 DEC 93 +77 MAR 99 +81 AUG 04 +39 MAR 10 +14 APR 94 +82 JUN 99 +79 DEC 04 +31 JUN 10 +23 AUG 94 +75 OCT 99 +72 MAR 05 +19 BINAY SEP 94 +75 DEC 99 +60 MAY 05 +22 SEP 10 +58 NOV 94 +73 MAR 00 +70 SEP 05 +39 NOV 10 +57 MAR 95 +62 APR 00 +68 DEC 05 +34 MAR 11 +74 JUN 95 +47 SEP 00 +63 MAR 06 +29 JUN 11 +69 OCT 95 +46 DEC 00 - 4 JUN 06 +31 SEP 11 +63 Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF VICE-PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2) NET* NET* BINAY ROBREDO DEC 11 +70 SEP 16 +49 MAR 12 +70 DEC 16 +37 MAY 12 +70 MAR 17 +26 AUG 12 +76 JUN 17 +36 DEC 12 +70 SEP 17 +41 MAR 13 +62 DEC 17 +42 JUN 13 +76 MAR 18 +34 SEP 13 +69 JUN 18 +32 DEC 13 +62 SEP 18 +34 MAR 14 +73 DEC 18 +27 JUN 14 +67 MAR 19 +42 SEP 14 +52 JUN 19 +28 DEC 14 +44 SEP 19 +33 MAR 15 +31 JUN 15 +42 SEP 15 +33 DEC 15 +24 APR 16 +25 JUN 16 +22

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 13 of 29

Table 7 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19

Total PH 63% 57% 56% 16% 14% 19% 21% 29% 23% +42 +28 +33

NCR 47 50 47 21 12 19 33 37 32 +14 +14 +15 Bal. Luzon 64 59 56 18 16 21 18 26 22 +46 +33 +34 Visayas 77 65 65 11 14 15 12 21 19 +65 +44 +46 Mindanao 58 51 57 15 13 16 26 36 25 +33 +15 +32

Urban 56 49 49 17 14 19 26 36 29 +30 +12 +20 Rural 67 63 61 16 14 18 17 23 20 +50 +41 +40

ABC 71 53 39 23 21 27 6 25 32 +65 +28 +6 D 62 55 56 15 15 18 23 29 25 +39 +25 +31 E 64 67 65 22 7 19 14 26 14 +50 +42 +51

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH VICE-PRES. LENI ROBREDO: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 63% 57% 56% 16% 14% 19% 21% 29% 23% +42 +28 +33

Men 60 58 55 19 13 20 20 28 24 +40 +30 +30 Women 65 56 58 14 15 17 21 29 22 +44 +27 +35

18-24 56 56 56 16 18 22 27 26 22 +29 +30 +34 25-34 69 54 56 14 17 18 17 29 24 +52 +25 +31 35-44 60 58 56 19 12 19 21 30 22 +38 +29 +34 45-54 62 57 59 18 13 16 20 31 23 +42 +26 +36 55 + 64 59 55 15 13 19 20 27 24 +44 +31 +31

Some Elem 66 60 58 20 16 18 13 23 20 +53 +37 +39 Some HS 69 62 63 16 12 17 14 25 18 +55 +37 +45 Some Voc/Coll 62 54 53 16 14 20 23 31 26 +39 +23 +28 Coll. Grad 45 48 46 16 16 20 39 35 33 + 6 +13 +14

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of LENI ROBREDO as Vice-President of the Philippines. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 14 of 29

Chart 2 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES, APR 1990 TO SEP 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 70 Gonzales Sotto Gonzales 60Salonga Angara +61 Maceda Fernan Enrile + 50 Drilon Drilon Ople 40 Villar K. Pimentel + 30 Gonzales Drilon

20 N. Pimentel + 10

-10

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 8 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

NET* NET* NET* NET* SALONGA GONZALES (cont.) DRILON DRILON (cont.) MAY 90 +56 APR 96 +37 JUL 00 +48 MAR 05 +23 NOV 90 +47 JUN 96 +36 SEP 00 +47 JUN 06 +25 JUL 91 +39 SEP 96 +43 N. PIMENTEL VILLAR NOV 91 +32 MACEDA DEC 00 +22 OCT 06 +42 GONZALES DEC 96 +41 DRILON DEC 06 +39 FEB 92 +28 APR 97 +47 SEP 01 +30 MAR 07 +52 SEP 92 +61 JUN 97 +49 NOV 01 +39 JUN 07 +51 DEC 92 +59 SEP 97 +40 APR 02 +25 SEP 07 +47 ANGARA GONZALES MAY 02 +23 DEC 07 +59 MAY 93 +53 FEB 98 +31 SEP 02 +35 MAR 08 +53 JUL 93 +52 MAR 98 +50 NOV 92 +36 JUN 08 +52 SEP 93 +51 JUL 98 +48 MAR 93 +43 SEP 08 +43 DEC 93 +55 FERNAN JUN 93 +31 ENRILE APR 94 +54 SEP 98 +48 SEP 93 +33 DEC 08 +5 AUG 94 +47 NOV 98 +55 NOV 93 +28 FEB 09 +8 NOV 94 +45 MAR 99 +57 JUN 04 +32 JUN 09 +23 DEC 94 +48 JUN 99 +49 AUG 04 +28 SEP 09 +14 MAR 95 +36 DEC 04 +18 DEC 09 +19 OPLE JUN 95 +44 FEB 05 + 2 MAR 10 +19 OCT 99 +42 MAR 05 + 8 JUN 10 +41 GONZALES DEC 99 +28 SEP 05 +22 SEP 10 +39 OCT 95 +37 MAR 00 +33 DEC 95 +35 DEC 05 +24 NOV 10 +34 Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 15 of 29

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SENATE PRESIDENTS, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2) NET* NET* ENRILE (cont.) DRILON (cont.) MAR 11 +43 SEP 15 +42 JUN 11 +39 DEC 15 + 7 SEP 11 +35 APR 16 +38 DEC 11 +36 JUN 16 +36 MAR 12 +56 K. PIMENTEL MAY 12 +48 SEP 16 +37 AUG 12 +65 DEC 16 +30 DEC 12 +47 MAR 17 +29 MAR 13 +30 JUN 17 +33 JUN 13 +38 SEP 17 +46 DEC 17 +49 DRILON MAR 18 +41 SEP 13 +37 DEC 13 +25 SOTTO MAR 14 +17 JUN 18 +54 SEP 18 +55 JUN 14 +20 DEC 18 +61 SEP 14 +36 MAR 19 +61 DEC 14 +28 JUN 19 +60 MAR 15 +35 SEP 19 +61 JUN 15 +29

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 9 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 71% 72% 72% 19% 14% 16% 10% 13% 11% +61 +60 +61

NCR 73 79 77 12 10 12 16 11 9 +57 +68 +68 Bal. Luzon 72 73 73 21 13 16 6 13 10 +65 +60 +64 Visayas 71 74 72 16 15 15 11 11 11 +60 +63 +61 Mindanao 69 65 64 20 19 21 11 15 13 +58 +50 +51

Urban 73 73 73 16 13 15 11 14 10 +62 +60 +64 Rural 70 72 70 20 16 17 9 12 11 +61 +60 +59

ABC 65 71 73 26 14 22 8 15 5 +57 +56 +68 D 72 73 72 17 14 15 10 12 11 +62 +61 +61 E 68 70 70 22 13 18 8 15 10 +60 +56 +60

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 16 of 29

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SENATE PRESIDENT VICENTE ''TITO'' SOTTO III: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 71% 72% 72% 19% 14% 16% 10% 13% 11% +61 +60 +61

Men 70 72 72 20 14 15 9 14 11 +62 +57 +61 Women 72 73 71 17 15 17 11 11 10 +61 +62 +60

18-24 71 73 70 16 11 19 11 16 11 +60 +57 +59 25-34 75 67 66 15 16 19 10 15 14 +65 +52 +52 35-44 70 74 73 18 13 16 11 14 10 +59 +60 +63 45-54 68 79 74 23 9 14 9 12 10 +60 +67 +65 55 + 70 71 73 20 19 15 8 9 9 +62 +62 +64

Some Elem 70 70 64 22 20 22 6 9 10 +64 +62 +53 Some HS 71 72 73 20 13 15 8 13 10 +63 +59 +63 Some Voc/Coll 73 76 73 17 12 15 11 12 11 +62 +64 +63 Coll. Grad 67 60 69 17 19 18 15 20 12 +51 +40 +57

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of VICENTE ‘‘TITO’’ SOTTO III as Senate President. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Chart 3 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES, FEB 1990 TO SEP 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE + 70 60 Cayetano + 50 De Venecia Villar +49 40 + 30 Mitra Belmonte 20 Alvarez De Venecia + 10 0 Nograles -10 Fuentebella Arroyo -20 -30

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 17 of 29

Table 10 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) NET* NET* NET* NET* MITRA DE VENECIA (cont.) DE VENECIA DE VENECIA (cont.) FEB 90 +33 SEP 96 +24 SEP 01 +16 JUN 07 - 1 NOV 90 +26 NOV 96 +24 NOV 01 +19 SEP 07 - 4 JUN 91 +13 MAR 97 +41 MAR 02 +15 DEC 07 + 1 OCT 91 +20 JUN 97 +46 MAY 02 + 9 NOGRALES FEB 92 +25 AUG 97 +34 SEP 02 +23 MAR 08 -12 DE VENECIA NOV 97 +43 NOV 02 +22 JUN 08 -15 SEP 92 +39 FEB 98 +25 MAR 03 +18 SEP 08 -12 NOV 92 +39 MAR 98 +28 JUN 03 + 9 DEC 08 -17 MAY 93 +40 VILLAR SEP 03 + 9 FEB 09 -22 JUL 93 +42 SEP 98 +22 NOV 03 + 7 JUN 09 -15 SEP 93 +41 NOV 98 +31 JUN 04 +15 SEP 09 -20 DEC 93 +41 MAR 99 +33 AUG 04 +14 DEC 09 -20 MAR 94 +33 JUN 99 +38 DEC 04 + 5 MAR 10 -19 AUG 94 +23 OCT 99 +31 MAR 05 - 8 JUN 10 -10 MAY 05 - 2 NOV 94 +26 DEC 99 +18 BELMONTE SEP 05 0 DEC 94 +27 MAR 00 +26 SEP 10 +9 DEC 05 0 MAR 95 +13 JUL 00 +42 NOV 10 +7 MAR 06 - 1 JUN 95 +20 SEP 00 +39 MAR 11 +17 JUN 06 + 9 SEP 95 +15 FUENTEBELLA JUN 11 +15 OCT 06 + 4 DEC 95 +24 DEC 00 - 4 SEP 11 + 9 DEC 06 + 2 APR 96 +23 DEC 11 + 8 MAR 07 + 5 JUN 96 +27 MAR 12 +18 Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

NET* NET* BELMONTE (cont.) ALVAREZ MAY 12 + 8 SEP 16 +22 AUG 12 +20 DEC 16 +10 DEC 12 +15 MAR 17 +12 MAR 13 +11 JUN 17 +16 SEP 17 + 8 JUN 13 +16 DEC 17 +14 SEP 13 +18 MAR 18 + 1 DEC 13 +16 JUN 18 + 8 MAR 14 - 1 JUN 14 + 2 MACAPAGAL-ARROYO SEP 14 +13 SEP 18 -4 DEC 14 +11 DEC 18 -21 MAR 15 +12 MAR 19 -17 JUN 19 -20 JUN 15 + 9 SEP 15 + 5 CAYETANO JUN 16 +18 SEP 19 +49

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 18 of 29

Table 11 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Total PH 64% 19% 14% +49

NCR 64 18 16 +48 Bal. Luzon 60 23 15 +45 Visayas 68 19 11 +57 Mindanao 68 13 15 +52

Urban 65 17 14 +51 Rural 63 21 14 +49

ABC 63 22 14 +49 D 64 18 15 +49 E 63 24 11 +52

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH SPEAKER ALAN PETER CAYETANO: SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Total PH 64% 19% 14% +49

Men 65 19 15 +50 Women 63 20 14 +49

18-24 59 23 15 +43 25-34 64 20 13 +51 35-44 68 17 14 +55 45-54 63 19 15 +48 55 + 63 19 15 +48

Some Elem 59 22 13 +46 Some HS 59 22 16 +43 Some Voc/Coll 68 17 13 +55 Coll. Grad 66 15 18 +49

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of ALAN PETER CAYETANO as Speaker of the House of Representative. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 19 of 29

Chart 4 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES, OCT 1986 TO SEP 2019

70 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE 60 Teehankee +50 Fernan Narvasa 40 Carpio +30 Carpio Davide Bersamin 20 Panganiban +16 +10 Puno 0 De Castro -10 Sereno -20 -30 -40 Corona -50

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 12 NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

NET* NET* NET* NET* TEEHANKEE DAVIDE DAVIDE (cont.) CORONA OCT 86 +52 DEC 99 +18 SEP 05 +13 JUN 10 -18 FERNAN MAR 00 +18 DEC 05 +10 SEP 10 -5 MAY 90 +40 JUL 00 +20 PANGANIBAN NOV 10 -7 NOV 90 +18 SEP 00 +20 MAR 06 - 3 MAR 11 -4 JUL 91 +35 DEC 00 +36 JUN 06 + 2 JUN 11 0 NOV 91 +31 MAR 01 +46 OCT 06 + 4 SEP 11 0 JUL 01 +26 DEC 11 -14 NARVASA DEC 06 + 4 SEP 01 +31 MAR 12 -28 APR 92 +20 PUNO NOV 01 +34 MAY 12 -44 MAY 93 +26 MAR 07 + 1 MAR 02 +22 APR 96 +19 JUN 07 + 3 CARPIO MAY 02 +19 JUN 96 +17 SEP 07 - 5 AUG 12 + 3 SEP 02 +35 SEP 96 +28 DEC 07 - 2 SERENO NOV 02 +32 DEC 96 +21 MAR 08 + 2 DEC 12 +14 MAR 03 +34 APR 97 +26 JUN 08 +3 MAR 13 + 9 JUN 03 +18 JUN 97 +37 SEP 08 - 3 JUN 13 +13 SEP 03 +15 SEP 97 +26 DEC 08 - 4 SEP 13 +17 NOV 03 + 5 DEC 97 +30 FEB 09 +3 DEC 13 +16 JUN 04 +18 APR 98 +35 JUN 09 +4 MAR 14 + 4 AUG 04 +21 SEP 98 +39 SEP 09 +2 JUN 14 + 6 DEC 04 + 8 NOV 98 +36 DEC 09 +1 SEP 14 +10 MAY 05 - 5 MAR 99 +40 MAR 10 0 DEC 14 +11

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 20 of 29

NET SATISFACTION RATINGS* OF CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

NET* NET* SERENO (cont.) CARPIO MAR 15 +10 JUN 18 +11 JUN 15 +11 SEP 15 + 4 DE CASTRO DEC 15 - 1 SEP 18 +4 APR 16 +13 JUN 16 +17 BERSAMIN SEP 16 +26 DEC 18 +11 DEC 16 +16 MAR 19 +14 MAR 17 +14 JUN 19 +13 JUN 17 +21 SEP 19 +16 SEP 17 + 9 DEC 17 + 6 MAR 18 - 7

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 13 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH LUCAS BERSAMIN, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 34% 37% 35% 28% 26% 33% 20% 24% 19% +14 +13 +16

NCR 23 38 35 34 23 34 34 25 20 -11 +13 +15 Bal. Luzon 37 34 35 33 27 37 12 20 17 +25 +14 +18 Visayas 40 45 39 20 27 26 23 24 22 +16 +21 +18 Mindanao 32 35 34 22 26 32 22 29 20 +10 + 6 +14

Urban 34 35 33 29 26 33 22 25 21 +12 +11 +12 Rural 34 38 37 27 26 33 18 23 18 +16 +15 +19

ABC 29 27 43 32 20 41 22 27 11 + 8 0 +31 D 34 36 35 27 25 33 20 24 19 +14 +12 +16 E 35 39 35 28 30 35 20 19 20 +16 +20 +16

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 21 of 29

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH LUCAS BERSAMIN, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 34% 37% 35% 28% 26% 33% 20% 24% 19% +14 +13 +16

Men 36 34 36 29 28 34 21 25 19 +15 + 9 +17 Women 32 40 35 26 24 33 19 22 19 +13 +17 +16

18-24 46 37 36 24 26 44 17 26 14 +30 +11 +22 25-34 37 36 29 26 26 38 19 23 17 +18 +12 +11 35-44 33 45 38 28 24 33 23 16 22 +10 +29 +16 45-54 35 39 34 30 22 35 22 24 19 +13 +15 +16 55 + 27 29 39 29 31 26 18 27 20 + 9 + 2 +19

Some Elem 31 37 35 34 28 30 19 27 18 +11 + 9 +17 Some HS 36 39 33 25 24 35 20 23 18 +16 +16 +15 Some Voc/Coll 34 36 38 26 28 34 22 22 19 +12 +14 +19 Coll. Grad 33 34 32 34 22 31 13 26 22 +20 + 9 +9

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. Please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are in the performance of LUCAS BERSAMIN as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Are you very Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Chart 5 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1988 TO SEP 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 +60 Senate +50 +56 +40 +43 +30 House of Rep. +20 +10 +0 -+10- -+20

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys). [INS-RATE.PRS] Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 22 of 29

Table 14 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2) House House House House Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. C. AQUINO RAMOS (cont.) ARROYO ARROYO (cont.) SEP 88 +26 +22 DEC 95 +14 + 8 MAR 01 +24 +20 OCT 06 +14 + 5 FEB 89 +5 + 8 APR 96 +13 + 5 JUL 01 +28 +21 DEC 06 +18 + 7 SEP 89 +11 +12 JUN 96 +18 +11 SEP 01 + 4 + 4 FEB 07 +26 +11 NOV 90 + 2 + 3 SEP 96 +15 + 8 NOV 01 +18 +15 JUN 07 +29 +20 JUL 91 + 5 + 5 DEC 96 +15 +11 MAR 02 + 9 + 5 SEP 07 +32 +18 NOV 91 - 1 + 2 APR 97 +29 +25 MAY 02 + 8 + 1 DEC 07 +19 + 3 FEB 92 + 7 +11 JUN 97 +34 +27 SEP 02 +17 +12 MAR 08 +27 + 8 APR 92 +13 +11 SEP 97 +18 +13 DEC 02 +17 +12 JUN 08 +27 +10 RAMOS DEC 97 +27 +23 MAR 03 +23 +19 SEP 08 +21 +11 OCT 92 +34 +25 FEB 98 +19 +17 JUN 03 +25 +18 DEC 08 +26 +9 DEC 92 +27 +25 MAR 98 +19 +17 SEP 03 +20 +11 FEB 09 +23 +2 MAY 93 +20 +22 APR 98 + 9 NOV 03 + 7 + 3 JUN 09 +30 +12 JUL 93 +32 +26 ESTRADA MAR 04 +25 +17 SEP 09 +30 +10 SEP 93 +21 +17 SEP 98 +22 +19 JUN 04 +19 +11 DEC 09 +27 +9 DEC 93 +30 +32 NOV 98 +31 +24 AUG 04 +17 +13 MAR 10 +25 +7 APR 94 +26 +21 JUN 99 +30 +26 DEC 04 +12 + 7 B. AQUINO AUG 94 +16 +13 OCT 99 +16 +13 MAR 05 + 1 - 4 SEP 10 +48 +30 NOV 94 +18 +14 DEC 99 + 1 - 2 MAY 05 - 3 - 9 NOV 10 +51 +33 DEC 94 +15 +10 MAR 00 +21 +16 AUG 05 +20 +12 MAR 11 +49 +30 MAR 95 +13 +12 JUL 00 +28 +25 DEC 05 +14 + 7 JUN 11 +47 +31 JUN 95 +17 + 7 SEP 00 +25 +16 MAR 06 + 9 - 1 SEP 11 +50 +31 OCT 95 0 0 DEC 00 +28 +20 JUN 06 +17 +12 DEC 11 +44 +27 Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

House House Senate of Rep. Senate of Rep. B. AQUINO (cont.) B. AQUINO (cont.) MAR 12 +58 +40 APR 16 +41 +29 MAY 12 +49 +30 JUN 16 +52 +42 AUG 12 +67 +42 DUTERTE DEC 12 +51 +31 SEP 16 +52 +38 MAR 13 +45 +29 DEC 16 +48 +36 JUN 13 +54 +37 MAR 17 +52 +39 SEP 13 +36 +27 JUN 17 +49 +34 DEC 13 +33 +26 SEP 17 +46 +34 MAR 14 +26 +18 DEC 17 +56 +43 JUN 14 +12 +13 MAR 18 +45 +35 SEP 14 +28 +21 JUN 18 +41 +25 DEC 14 +26 +20 SEP 18 +48 +36 MAR 15 +31 +20 DEC 18 +58 +40 JUN 15 +33 +20 MAR 19 +62 +47 SEP 15 +44 +26 JUN 19 +63 +48 DEC 15 +30 +16 SEP 19 +56 +43

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. (Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys.)

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 23 of 29

Table 15 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19

Total PH 72% 74% 69% 17% 15% 17% 10% 11% 13% +62 +63 +56

NCR 65 69 72 18 17 14 16 13 13 +49 +56 +58 Bal. Luzon 72 71 68 18 17 18 9 12 14 +63 +59 +55 Visayas 72 75 68 17 16 18 10 9 11 +62 +65 +57 Mindanao 76 80 68 13 11 17 10 8 12 +66 +72 +56

Urban 71 70 68 16 16 17 12 13 13 +58 +57 +56 Rural 73 76 69 17 15 17 9 9 13 +64 +67 +56

ABC 64 69 67 21 18 16 9 13 16 +54 +56 +51 D 74 75 69 15 15 17 10 10 13 +63 +64 +55 E 65 70 69 23 17 18 11 13 11 +54 +58 +59

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Dont Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SENATE)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SENATE: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 72% 74% 69% 17% 15% 17% 10% 11% 13% +62 +63 +56 Men 72 74 69 16 16 17 11 10 13 +61 +63 +56 Women 72 74 68 18 15 18 10 11 12 +62 +62 +55 18-24 78 73 74 12 16 16 10 11 9 +68 +61 +66 25-34 72 74 69 17 13 14 11 14 16 +61 +60 +53 35-44 72 76 71 18 13 14 10 11 13 +62 +65 +58 45-54 71 73 69 17 16 19 11 10 10 +61 +63 +58 55 + 70 72 64 17 18 21 11 9 14 +59 +63 +50 Some Elem 70 68 64 19 19 20 9 12 12 +61 +56 +52 Some HS 74 73 66 17 16 19 8 11 14 +66 +63 +53 Some Voc/Coll 73 76 71 15 15 16 12 9 12 +61 +67 +59 Coll. Grad 67 73 69 19 11 16 15 16 14 +52 +56 +54

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 24 of 29

Table 16 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19

Total PH 61% 62% 57% 25% 22% 26% 13% 14% 14% +47 +48 +43

NCR 56 53 60 24 25 22 19 20 16 +37 +33 +44 Bal. Luzon 59 64 54 28 21 28 12 14 15 +47 +50 +39 Visayas 66 63 62 21 23 21 13 14 14 +54 +49 +48 Mindanao 63 65 57 23 23 28 13 11 11 +50 +54 +45

Urban 60 54 56 24 26 26 16 18 16 +44 +36 +40 Rural 61 69 58 26 20 26 12 11 14 +49 +57 +44

ABC 49 41 62 31 34 24 20 24 14 +29 +17 +48 D 63 64 57 24 21 26 13 14 15 +50 +50 +42 E 55 60 58 30 26 25 14 14 13 +41 +46 +46

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 61% 62% 57% 25% 22% 26% 13% 14% 14% +47 +48 +43

Men 58 62 59 26 22 24 15 16 16 +43 +46 +43 Women 63 63 55 24 23 29 12 13 13 +52 +50 +42

18-24 68 59 58 26 26 29 6 14 11 +61 +45 +48 25-34 60 62 56 23 21 27 16 17 15 +44 +45 +41 35-44 65 67 60 21 17 24 14 15 12 +51 +52 +48 45-54 63 66 58 24 24 24 14 10 15 +49 +55 +43 55 + 54 59 54 30 25 27 14 15 16 +40 +45 +38

Some Elem 59 61 50 31 28 31 9 11 11 +49 +50 +39 Some HS 59 63 55 30 23 30 10 13 12 +49 +50 +43 Some Voc/Coll 62 64 60 21 20 23 16 15 16 +46 +50 +45 Coll. Grad 62 54 58 22 22 22 16 22 18 +47 +32 +40

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 25 of 29

Chart 6 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO SEP 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 +60 Supreme +50 Court +40 +41 +30 +20 +10 +0 -+10-

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys. [INS-RATE.PRS] Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 17 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT: PHILIPPINES

C. AQUINO RAMOS (cont.) ARROYO ARROYO (cont.) B. AQUINO (cont.) NOV 90 +14 JUN 97 +30 JUN 03 +21 DEC 09 +18 APR 16 +36 JUL 91 +15 SEP 97 +19 SEP 03 +16 MAR 10 + 9 JUN 16 +44 NOV 91 +11 DEC 97 +28 NOV 03 + 8 B. AQUINO DUTERTE FEB 92 +18 FEB 98 +23 MAR 04 +23 SEP 10 +33 SEP 16 +40 APR 92 +16 ESTRADA JUN 04 +20 NOV 10 +36 DEC 16 +38 RAMOS SEP 98 +24 AUG 04 +17 MAR 11 +26 MAR 17 +40 AUG 92 +32 NOV 98 +29 MAR 05 + 5 JUN 11 +26 JUN 17 +38 DEC 92 +24 MAR 99 +39 MAY 05 - 1 SEP 11 +29 SEP 17 +31 MAY 93 +18 JUN 99 +30 AUG 05 +13 DEC 11 +21 DEC 17 +37 JUL 93 +23 OCT 99 +16 DEC 05 +12 MAR 12 +27 MAR 18 +20 SEP 93 +22 DEC 99 + 6 MAR 06 + 6 MAY 12 +13 JUN 18 +19 DEC 93 +30 MAR 00 +31 JUN 06 + 9 AUG 12 +35 SEP 18 +31 APR 94 +26 JUL 00 +31 OCT 06 + 4 DEC 12 +36 DEC 18 +37 AUG 94 +29 SEP 00 +18 DEC 06 +13 MAR 13 +34 MAR 19 +50 NOV 94 +19 DEC 00 +41 FEB 07 +16 JUN 13 +37 JUN 19 +54 DEC 94 +17 JUN 07 +12 SEP 13 +41 SEP 19 +41 ARROYO SEP 07 +24 MAR 95 +18 MAR 01 +37 DEC 13 +36 JUN 95 +15 DEC 07 + 5 MAR 14 +35 JUL 01 +33 MAR 08 + 9 OCT 95 +17 SEP 01 +16 JUN 14 +30 DEC 95 +25 JUN 08 +6 SEP 14 +32 NOV 01 +21 SEP 08 +9 MAR 96 +16 MAR 02 +15 DEC 14 +26 JUN 96 +14 DEC 08 +8 MAR 15 +34 MAY 02 +11 FEB 09 +4 SEP 96 +16 SEP 02 +19 JUN 15 +32 DEC 96 + 5 JUN 09 +17 SEP 15 +27 DEC 02 +25 SEP 09 +14 APR 97 +26 MAR 03 +26 DEC 15 +22 Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 26 of 29

Table 18 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 62% 66% 57% 26% 22% 25% 12% 12% 16% +50 +54 +41

NCR 50 53 56 29 25 23 20 20 20 +30 +33 +36 Bal. Luzon 62 66 54 29 23 29 9 10 15 +54 +56 +39 Visayas 67 70 63 22 16 20 11 14 14 +56 +56 +48 Mindanao 63 69 58 21 20 20 14 10 18 +49 +59 +41

Urban 58 60 56 28 23 26 13 15 17 +45 +45 +39 Rural 64 70 58 24 20 24 11 10 15 +53 +60 +42

ABC 68 53 51 16 29 28 16 17 18 +52 +36 +34 D 62 66 57 25 21 25 12 12 16 +50 +54 +41 E 58 65 59 33 24 23 9 11 14 +49 +55 +44

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SUPREME COURT)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE SUPREME COURT: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 62% 66% 57% 26% 22% 25% 12% 12% 16% +50 +54 +41

Men 62 65 57 26 22 23 12 13 18 +50 +52 +40 Women 62 66 57 25 22 26 12 11 15 +50 +55 +42

18-24 70 70 65 19 19 19 11 9 14 +60 +60 +50 25-34 63 67 56 29 21 25 9 12 19 +54 +54 +37 35-44 64 63 61 25 24 24 11 13 13 +52 +50 +48 45-54 62 65 54 22 26 28 15 9 15 +47 +56 +39 55 + 56 66 54 29 19 25 13 14 18 +43 +52 +36

Some Elem 58 64 53 32 27 28 7 8 11 +51 +56 +41 Some HS 61 68 58 29 18 25 10 12 15 +50 +56 +43 Some Voc/Coll 63 65 58 23 22 24 14 12 17 +49 +54 +41 Coll. Grad 65 62 55 20 20 23 14 17 21 +51 +45 +34

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE SUPREME COURT)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 27 of 29

Chart 7 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 TO SEP 2019

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +100 +90 +80 +70 +60 +50 Cabinet +40 +35 +30 +20 +10 +0 -+10- -+20 -+30-

* Net ratings = % Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied. Survey Data: Social Weather Stations surveys. [INS-RATE.PRS] Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 19 NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES (page 1 of 2)

C. AQUINO ESTRADA ARROYO (cont.) ARROYO (cont.) NOV 90 -16 SEP 98 +18 JUN 03 +10 SEP 09 -5 JUL 91 -13 NOV 98 +22 SEP 03 + 2 DEC 09 - 1 NOV 91 -14 MAR 99 +2 NOV 03 - 7 MAR 10 - 7 FEB 92 - 7 JUN 99 +21 MAR 04 +12 B. AQUINO APR 92 - 3 OCT 99 + 4 AUG 05 - 6 SEP 10 +22 RAMOS DEC 99 -15 DEC 05 - 6 NOV 10 +20 APR 94 +17 MAR 00 + 6 MAR 06 -10 MAR 11 +24 AUG 94 + 8 JUL 00 +15 JUN 06 - 5 JUN 11 +25 NOV 94 +12 SEP 00 +10 OCT 06 - 3 SEP 11 +24 DEC 94 + 9 DEC 00 +10 DEC 06 - 5 DEC 11 +22 MAR 95 - 6 ARROYO FEB 07 - 2 MAR 12 +26 JUN 95 - 1 MAR 01 +14 JUN 07 + 1 MAY 12 +19 SEP 96 + 5 JUL 01 +17 SEP 07 + 1 AUG 12 +33 DEC 96 + 7 SEP 01 + 2 DEC 07 - 9 DEC 12 +26 APR 97 +20 NOV 01 + 1 MAR 08 -10 MAR 13 +23 JUN 97 +27 MAR 02 - 1 JUN 08 - 9 JUN 13 +28 SEP 97 + 8 MAY 02 - 8 SEP 08 - 3 SEP 13 +27 DEC 97 +19 SEP 02 + 6 DEC 08 -1 DEC 13 +20 FEB 98 + 3 DEC 02 + 5 FEB 09 -7 MAR 14 +20 APR 98 + 1 MAR 03 + 7 JUN 09 +3 JUN 14 + 7

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 28 of 29

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: PHILIPPINES (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.) DUTERTE DUTERTE (cont.) SEP 14 +18 SEP 16 +36 SEP 18 +32 DEC 14 + 9 DEC 16 +32 DEC 18 +35 MAR 15 +13 MAR 17 +32 MAR 19 +44 JUN 15 +12 JUN 17 +34 JUN 19 +51 SEP 15 +16 SEP 17 +32 SEP 19 +35 DEC 15 +11 DEC 17 +38 APR 16 +22 MAR 18 +28 JUN 16 +37 JUN 18 +25

Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

Table 20 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 1 of 2) Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 57% 64% 51% 29% 23% 29% 12% 13% 16% +44 +51 +35

NCR 49 54 57 26 25 25 24 19 16 +25 +36 +41 Bal. Luzon 59 66 49 32 23 32 8 11 16 +51 +55 +33 Visayas 60 66 55 28 23 26 10 11 15 +50 +55 +40 Mindanao 54 64 50 26 21 26 16 14 17 +38 +50 +33

Urban 56 58 55 29 25 27 14 16 15 +42 +43 +40 Rural 57 68 49 29 21 30 11 10 16 +46 +58 +33

ABC 55 57 51 33 26 26 9 17 21 +46 +40 +31 D 58 65 51 27 23 29 13 12 16 +45 +53 +35 E 52 61 52 36 24 29 10 15 14 +42 +46 +38

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey

3rd Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey SWS MEDIA RELEASE 16 October 2019, page 29 of 29

PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH THE CABINET AS A WHOLE: MAR 2019 TO SEP 2019 (page 2 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net* Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Total PH 57% 64% 51% 29% 23% 29% 12% 13% 16% +44 +51 +35

Men 57 64 52 30 23 27 12 13 17 +45 +50 +35 Women 57 64 51 29 23 30 13 12 15 +43 +52 +36

18-24 53 66 49 32 18 32 12 13 14 +41 +53 +35 25-34 57 67 49 31 19 30 11 13 19 +46 +54 +30 35-44 63 65 58 23 20 26 13 14 13 +50 +51 +44 45-54 57 66 50 28 26 30 13 7 15 +44 +59 +35 55 + 53 58 50 31 27 28 12 14 17 +40 +43 +33

Some Elem 51 59 43 35 27 33 9 14 15 +42 +45 +28 Some HS 52 65 48 34 21 32 13 13 15 +39 +51 +33 Some Voc/Coll 60 66 55 25 23 25 14 11 17 +46 +55 +38 Coll. Grad 63 60 55 26 23 28 11 16 16 +53 +44 +38

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Q. Based on their overall performance, how do you feel about the performance of the following government institutions? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, VERY DISSATISFIED or YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OR READ ANYTHING about (THE CABINET AS A WHOLE)? Third Quarter 2019 Social Weather Report September 27-30, 2019 National Survey