Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices 44023

cultural resources and sacred sites, proposed directives would not alter the in conflict with these proposed successes and additional opportunities budgetary impact of entitlements, directives or which would impede its for partnerships, socio-economic grants, user fees, or loan programs or the full implementation would be impacts, and customer (tribal) rights and obligations of recipients of preempted; (2) no retroactive effect satisfaction. such programs. would be given to these proposed Moreover, these proposed directives directives; and (3) it would not require 12—Compensation have been considered in light of the administrative proceedings before This proposed section adds additional Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 parties may file suit in court challenging funding authorities for compensation for et seq.), and it has been determined that its provisions. consultation, historic preservation. these proposed directives would not have a significant economic impact on Unfunded Mandates 13—Training a substantial number of small entities as Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded This proposed section encourages defined by the act because they will not Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. mandated training, including alignment impose recordkeeping requirements on 1531–1538), which the President signed with recommendations in the 2012 them; it would not affect their into law on March 22, 1995, the Agency Report to the Secretary, USDA Policy competitive position in relation to large has assessed the effects of these and Procedures entities; and it would not affect their proposed directives on State, local, and Review and Recommendations: Indian cash flow, liquidity, or ability to remain Indian tribal governments and the Sacred Sites in the market. private sector. These proposed directives would not compel the 13.3—Core Competencies Federalism and Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal expenditure of $100 million or more by This proposed section establishes core Governments any State, local, or Indian tribal competencies in Tribal relations. government or anyone in the private The Agency has considered these sector. Therefore, a statement under 14—Exhibits proposed directives under the section 202 of the act is not required. This proposed section provide copies requirements of Executive Order 13132, of additional authorities for Federalism, and has made an Energy Effects assessment that these proposed management of Indian sacred sites. These proposed directives have been directives conform with the federalism reviewed under Executive Order 13211, Regulatory Certifications principles set out in this Executive Actions Concerning Regulations That Order; would not impose any Environmental Impact Significantly Affect Energy Supply, compliance costs on the States; and Distribution, or Use. It has been These proposed directives would would not have substantial direct effects determined that these proposed establish direction for Forest Service on the States or the relationship directives do not constitute a significant staff in working with Indian tribes and between the national government and energy action as defined in the American Indian and Alaska Native the States, or on the distribution of Executive Order. individuals. Section 31.1b of Forest power and responsibilities among the Service Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR various levels of government. Therefore, Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the 43180, September 18, 1992) excludes the Agency has determined that no Public from documentation in an further assessment of federalism environmental assessment or implications is necessary at this time. These proposed directives do not environmental impact statement rules, These proposed directives have tribal contain any additional recordkeeping or regulations, or policies to establish implications as defined by Executive reporting requirements or other service-wide administrative procedures, Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and information collection requirements as program processes, or instructions. The Coordination with Indian Tribal defined in 5 CFR part 1320 that are not Agency’s assessment for these proposed Governments,’’ and the 120-day already required by law or not already directives falls within this category of consultation with Indian tribes and approved for use. Accordingly, the actions and that no extraordinary Alaska Native Corporations was review provisions of the Paperwork circumstances exist which would conducted from June 6, 2013 to October Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 require preparation of an environmental 6, 2013, as required. et seq.) and its implementing assessment or environmental impact regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not statement. No Takings Implications apply. Regulatory Impact These proposed directives have been Dated: July 6, 2015. analyzed in accordance with the Thomas L. Tidwell, These proposed directives have been principles and criteria contained in Chief, Forest Service. reviewed under USDA procedures and Executive Order 12630, Governmental Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Actions and Interference with [FR Doc. 2015–17911 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am] Planning and Review. It has been Constitutionally Protected Property BILLING CODE 3411–15–P determined that this is not a significant Rights, and it has been determined that action. These proposed directives will these proposed directives do not pose DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE not have an annual effect of $100 the risk of a taking of Constitutionally million or more on the economy nor protected private property. Forest Service adversely affect productivity, Civil Justice Reform competition, jobs, the environment, Newspapers of Record for the Pacific public health or safety, nor State or local These proposed directives have been Southwest Region: California governments. These proposed directives reviewed under Executive Order 12988, would not interfere with an action taken Civil Justice Reform. If these proposed AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. or planned by another agency nor raise directives were adopted, (1) all State ACTION: Notice. new legal or policy issues. Finally, these and local laws and regulations that are

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44024 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices

SUMMARY: This notice lists the Pasadena, California; and Foothill Inyo Register published three-times newspapers that will be used by all Leader, published in Glendale, weekly in Bishop, lnyo County, Ranger Districts, Forests, and the California. California. Regional Office of the Pacific Southwest San Gabriel River Ranger District: District Rangers Decisions: Region to publish legal notices required Inland Valley Bulletin, published Inyo Register published three-times under 36 CFR 214, 218, and 219. The daily in Los Angeles, Los Angeles weekly in Bishop, lnyo County, intended effect of this action is to County, California. California. inform interested members of the public Newspaper providing additional notice Klamath National Forest, California which newspapers the Forest Service of San Gabriel River District Ranger will use to publish notices of proposed decisions: Forest Supervisor Decisions: actions, notices of decision, and notices San Gabriel Valley Tribune published Siskiyou , published daily of opportunity to file an appeal/ in the eastern San Gabriel Valley, in Yreka, Siskiyou County, objection. This will provide the public West Covina, Los Angeles County, California. with constructive notice of Forest California. District Rangers Decisions: Santa Clara/Mojave Rivers Ranger Service proposals and decisions, Siskiyou Daily News, published daily District: provide information on the procedures in Yreka, Siskiyou County, Daily News, published daily in Los California. to comment, appeal, or object and Angeles, Los Angeles County, establish the date that the Forest Service California. Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, will use to determine if comments, Newspapers providing additional notice California and Nevada appeals, or objections were timely. of Santa Clara/Mojave Rivers Forest Supervisor Decisions: DATES: Publication of legal notices in District Ranger decisions: Tahoe Daily Tribune, published three- the listed newspapers will begin on the Antelope Valley Press, published in times weekly in South Lake Tahoe, date of this publication and remain in Palmdale, Los Angeles County, El Dorado County, California. effect until another notice is published California; and in the Federal Register. Mountaineer Progress, published in Lassen National Forest, California FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wrightwood, California. Forest Supervisor Decisions: Theresa Corless, Regional Appeals/ Cleveland National Forest, California Lassen County Times, published Objections Coordinator, Forest Service, Forest Supervisor Decisions: weekly in Susanville, Lassen Pacific Southwest Regional Office, 1323 San Diego Union-Tribune, published County, California. Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, (707) daily in San Diego, San Diego District Rangers Decisions: 562–8768. County, California. Eagle Lake Ranger District: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In District Rangers Decisions: Lassen County Times, published addition to the primary newspaper Descanso Ranger District: weekly in Susanville, Lassen listed for each unit, some Forest San Diego Union-Tribune, published County, California. Supervisors and District Rangers have daily in San Diego, San Diego Almanor Ranger District: listed newspapers providing additional County, California. Chester Progressive, published weekly notice of their decisions. The timeframe Palomar Ranger District: in Chester, Plumes County, for filing comment, appeal or an San Diego Union-Tribune, published California. objection shall be based on the date of daily in San Diego, San Diego Hat Creek Ranger District: publication of the notice in the first County, California. Intermountain News, published (primary) newspaper listed for each Newspaper providing additional notice weekly in Burney, Shasta County, unit. of Palomar District Ranger California. decisions: The newspapers to be used are as Los Padres National Forest, California follows: Riverside Press Enterprise, published daily in Riverside, Riverside Forest Supervisor Decisions: Pacific Southwest Regional Office County, California. Santa Barbara News Press, published Regional Forester Decisions: Trabuco Ranger District: daily in Santa Barbara, Santa Sacramento Bee, published daily in Riverside Press Enterprise, published Barbara County, California. Sacramento, Sacramento County, daily in Riverside, Riverside District Rangers Decisions: California, for decisions affecting County, California. Monterey Ranger District: Newspaper providing additional notice National Forest System lands and Monterey County Herald, published of Trabuco District Ranger for any decision of Region-wide daily in Monterey, Monterey decisions: impact. County, California. , published Santa Lucia Ranger District: Angeles National Forest, California daily in Santa Ana, Orange County, The Tribune, published daily in San Forest Supervisor Decisions: California. Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo Los Angeles Times, published daily in Eldorado National Forest, California County, California. Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Forest Supervisor Decisions: Santa Barbara Ranger District: California. Mountain Democrat published three- Santa Barbara News Press, published District Rangers Decisions: times weekly in Placerville, El daily in Santa Barbara, Santa Los Angeles Ranger District: Dorado County, California. Barbara County, California. Daily News, published daily in Los District Rangers Decisions: Ojai Ranger District: Angeles, Los Angeles County, Mountain Democrat published three- Ventura County Star, published daily California. times weekly in Placerville, El in Ventura, Ventura County, Newspapers providing additional notice Dorado County, California. California. of Los Angeles District Ranger Mt. Pinos Ranger District: decisions: lnyo National Forest, California The Mountain Enterprise, published Pasadena Star News, published in Forest Supervisor Decisions: weekly in Frazier Park, Kern

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Notices 44025

County, California. Portola Reporter, published weekly in The Two Rivers Tribune, published Portola, Plumas County, California. weekly in Hoopa, Humboldt Mendocino National Forest, California County, California. Forest Supervisor Decisions: San Bernardino National Forest, Chico Enterprise-Record, published California Mad River District: daily in Chico, Butte County, Forest Supervisor Decisions: Times Standard, published daily in California. San Bernardino Sun, published daily Eureka, Humboldt County, District Rangers Decisions: in San Bernardino, San Bernardino California. Grindstone Ranger District: County, California. Stanislaus National Forest, California Chico Enterprise-Record, published District Rangers Decisions: daily in Chico, Butte County, Mountaintop Ranger District— Forest Supervisor Decisions: California. Arrowhead Area: Upper Lake and Covelo Districts: The Union Democrat, published daily , published daily Mountain News, published weekly in Blue Jay, San Bernardino County, (five-times weekly) in Sonora, in Ukiah, Mendocino County, Tuolumne County, California. California. California. Mountaintop Ranger District—Big Bear District Rangers Decisions: Modoc National Forest, California Area: The Union Democrat, published daily Forest Supervisor Decisions: Big Bear Life and Grizzly, published (five-times weekly) in Sonora, The Modoc County Record, published weekly in Big Bear, San Bernardino Tuolumne County, California. weekly in Alturas, Modoc County, County, California. California. Front Country Ranger District: Tahoe National Forest, California District Rangers Decisions: San Bernardino Sun, published daily All districts: in San Bernardino, San Bernardino Forest Supervisor Decisions: The Modoc County Record, published County, California. The Union, published daily (except weekly in Alturas, Modoc County, San Jacinto Ranger District: Sunday) in Grass Valley, Nevada California. Idyllwild Town Crier, published County, California. Doublehead and Big Valley Districts: weekly in Idyllwild, Riverside District Rangers Decisions: Klamath Falls Herald and News, County, California. published daily (except Mondays) American River Ranger District: Sequoia National Forest, California in Klamath Falls, Klamath County, Auburn Journal, published daily in Oregon. Forest Supervisor Decisions: Auburn, Placer County, California. Plumas National Forest, California Porterville Recorder, published daily (except Sunday) in Porterville, Sierraville Ranger District: Forest Supervisor Decisions: Tulare County, California. Mountain Messenger, published Feather River Bulletin, published District Rangers Decisions: weekly in Downieville, Sierra weekly in Quincy, Plumas County, Porterville Recorder, published daily County, California. California. (except Sunday) in Porterville, Newspapers providing additional notice Newspaper providing additional notice Tulare County, California. for Environmental Impact of Sierraville District Ranger Statements: Shasta-Trinity National Forest, decisions: Sacramento Bee published daily in California Sierra Booster, published weekly in Sacramento, Sacramento County, Forest Supervisor Decisions: Loyalton, Sierra County, California; California. Record Searchlight, published daily and District Rangers Decisions: in Redding, Shasta County, Beckwourth Ranger District: Portola Recorder, published weekly in Portola Reporter, published weekly in California. Portola, Plumas County, California. District Rangers Decisions: Portola, Plumas County, California. Truckee Ranger District: Newspaper occasionally providing Record Searchlight, published daily additional notice of Beckwourth in Redding, Shasta County, Sierra Sun, published five times District Ranger decisions: California. weekly in Truckee, Nevada County, California. Feather River Bulletin, published Sierra National Forest, California weekly in Quincy, Plumas County Yuba River Ranger District: Forest Supervisor Decisions: California. The Union, published daily (except Feather River Ranger District: Fresno Bee, published daily in Oroville Mercury Register, published Fresno, Fresno County, California. Sunday) in Grass Valley, Nevada daily in Oroville, Butte County, District Rangers Decisions: County, California. California. Fresno Bee published daily in Fresno, Newspaper providing additional notice Newspaper occasionally providing Fresno County, California. of Yuba River District Ranger additional notice of Feather River Six Rivers National Forest, California decisions: District Ranger decisions: Mountain Messenger, published Feather River Bulletin, published Forest Supervisor Decisions: weekly in Quincy, Plumas County, Times Standard, published daily in weekly in Downieville, Sierra California. Eureka, Humboldt County, County, California. Mt. Hough Ranger District: California. Dated: July 13, 2015. Feather River Bulletin, published District Rangers Decisions: Barnie Gyant, weekly in Quincy, Plumas County, Smith River National Recreation Area: Deputy Regional Forester, Pacific Southwest California. Del Norte Triplicate, published daily Region. Newspaper occasionally providing in Crescent City, Del Norte County, additional notice of Mt. Hough California. [FR Doc. 2015–18112 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am] District Ranger decisions: Orleans and Lower Trinity Districts: BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM 24JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES