DOCSLIB.ORG

Herbert Hoover Dike Major Rehabilitation Palm Beach County, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Herbert Hoover Dike Major Rehabilitation Palm Beach County, Florida HERBERT HOOVER DIKE MAJOR REHABILITATION PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION REPORT (MRR) HHD Supplemental MRR EA June 2015 FONS! FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION REPORT PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Based on the information analyzed and presented in the Environmental Assessment attached hereto, dated March 2015, reflecting pertinent information obtained from agencies having jurisdiction by law and/or special expertise, I conclude that the proposed action would not significantly impact the quality of the human environment and does not require an Environmental Impact Statement. Reasons for this conclusion are, in summary: a. The proposed action is considered maintenance on an existing Federal project and construction would occur within the Federal right of way except for staging areas at sites currently owned by the sponsor. b. The goal of the rehabilitation of the Herbert Hoover Dike is to reduce risk to public safety and health. Levee seepage and stability have a direct effect on the capability of the levee to provide the authorized protection. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to operate and maintain the Herbert Hoover Dike levees and Federal culverts. c. Adverse impacts to protected species are not anticipated. Special measures would be incorporated during project construction to avoid or minimize adverse effects to any listed endangered, threatened, or species of special concern that may be present (see Environmental Compliance and Commitments Section 5). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is engaging in informal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through review of this Environmental Assessment and request for concurrence on species determination herein. If warranted by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Corps would initiate formal consultation as appropriate. Upon completion of coordination of this Environmental Assessment with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the proposed action would be in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. d. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is coordinating a consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Act through the circulation of this Environmental Assessment. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has determined that the proposed action is consistent with Florida's Coastal Management Program. The Consistency Determination can be referenced in Appendix A of this report. e. The proposed action has been coordinated with the Florida State Historic Preservation Officer in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. Consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer and appropriate federally recognized tribes was initiated 10 September 2010 and is ongoing. HHD Supplemental MRR EA June 2015 FONS! The Corps has determined the Preferred Alternative would have no effects to historic properties included in, or potentially eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places. The State Historic Preservation Office determined that no adverse effects would incur due to the Preferred Alternative in a letter dated 26 March 2015. f. The project will be in compliance with the Clean Water Act. The Corps will provide information to support issuance of a water quality certificate as designs and specifications are developed and coordinated with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. All State water quality requirements would be followed. Refer to Section 1.7, Permits, Licenses, and Entitlements for a list Water Quality Certificates obtained by the Corps. g. This finding has been coordinated with the public and agencies in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.4(e) and Engineer Regulation ER 200-2-2 (part 11 and Appendix A). The point of contact is Stacie Auvenshine at 904-232-3694 or [email protected]. In view of the above and after consideration of public and agency comments received on the project, I have concluded that the proposed action for the rehabilitation of Herbert Hoover Dike would not result in a significant adverse effect on the human environment. This Finding incorporates by reference all discussions and conclusions contained in the Environmental Assessment enclosed herewith. ALAN M. DODD Date Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander HHD Supplemental MRR EA June 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................... 8 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 HISTORY OF HHD ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 PROJECT AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.4 LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULES .................................................................................. 16 1.5 AGENCY GOAL AND OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 16 1.6 HHD ENVIRONMENTAL AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ....................................................................... 16 1.6.1 Status of the Dam Safety Modification Study ............................................................................ 18 1.7 RELATED PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................... 19 1.8 PERMITS, LICENSES, AND ENTITLEMENTS ........................................................................................ 20 1.9 DECISION TO BE MADE ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................... 21 2.1.1 Alterative 1: No Action Alternative ............................................................................................ 21 2.1.2 Alternative 2: Cutoff Wall .......................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3 Alternative 3: Internal Drainage System .................................................................................... 23 2.1.4 Alternative 4: Property Acquisition and Relocation .................................................................. 24 2.2 ISSUES AND BASIS FOR CHOICE ........................................................................................................ 25 2.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED ................................................................................ 25 2.4 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................. 25 3.0 Affected Environment (Existing Conditions) ......................................................................................... 26 3.1 GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.1 Embankment .............................................................................................................................. 26 3.2 LAND USE .......................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS ............................................................................................................. 27 3.4 WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................ 34 3.5 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................... 37 3.6 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................ 38 3.7 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ....................................................................................... 38 3.7.1 Federally Listed Species Expected to Occur Within the Study Area.......................................... 42 3.7.2 State Listed Species Expected to Occur Within the Study Area ................................................ 51 3.8 NOISE................................................................................................................................................. 52 3.9 AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................... 52 3.10 TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES .................................................................................................. 53 HHD Supplemental MRR EA June 2015 Table of Contents 3.11 SOCIOECONOMICS .......................................................................................................................... 53 3.12 PUBLIC SAFETY ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: a Narrative of Confict Alanna L
    A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: A Narrative of Confict Alanna L. Lecher, Ph.D, Lynn University Abstract Lake Okeechobee is Florida’s largest lake, the largest lake in the Southeast United States, and the second largest lake contained entirely within the United States. The history of this inland sea is marked both by natural processes, and more recently human development and intervention. Adventurers can explore this behemoth of a waterway via the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail that enriches it, a part of the Florida National Scenic Trail. This paper synthesizes major natural and human-induced perturbations that shaped the lake and ultimately the trail that encircles it to create a narrative of Florida’s great lake. The story of Lake Okeechobee is a story of battles, frst between the land and sea, then between the lake itself and humankind. For the past few centuries Lake Okeechobee’s natural perturbations in water fow and fooding resisted the control of man, until recently when man triumphed, managing to control the fow of water in and out of the lake. Unfortunately, with this new found control a new bio- ecological threat in the form of harmful algal blooms has emerged, which again threatens the health and livelihood of South Floridians. Currently there are new eforts that seek to restore Lake Okeechobee towards a more natural state in an efort to thwart the blooms. Manuscript It’s a full moon weekend in February and runners lace up their shoes in preparation. They gather in the agricultural town of Clewiston southeast of Lake Okeechobee.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated
    Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated Environmental Assessment 23 July 2018 Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan DRAFT 23 July 2018 The attached Master Plan for the Okeechobee Waterway Project is in compliance with ER 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES and EP 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE POLICIES and no further action is required. Master Plan is approved. Jason A. Kirk, P.E. Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander i Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT [This page intentionally left blank] ii Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update PROPOSED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE GLADES, HENDRY, MARTIN, LEE, OKEECHOBEE, AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES 1. PROPOSED ACTION: The proposed Master Plan Update documents current improvements and stewardship of natural resources in the project area. The proposed Master Plan Update includes current recreational features and land use within the project area, while also including the following additions to the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW) Project: a. Conversion of the abandoned campground at Moore Haven West to a Wildlife Management Area (WMA) with access to the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail (LOST) and day use area. b. Closure of the W.P. Franklin swim beach, while maintaining the picnic and fishing recreational areas with potential addition of canoe/kayak access. This would entail removing buoys and swimming signs and discontinuing sand renourishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Meeting of the Hendry, Glades
    JOINT MEETING OF THE HENDRY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, MAY 7, 2019, 6:00 p.m. OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA I. INTRODUCTIONS A. Lake Okeechobee Water Level Hendry County Commissioner Karson Turner said he serves as the Chair of the Lake “O” Coalition. He said this meeting is a result of conversations in counties surrounding Lake Okeechobee. Commissioner Turner said Lake Okeechobee is known as the ‘Liquid Heart of the Everglades’. He explained that people around the lake heard that there was a movement to artificially get the lake down to 10.5 feet. This motivated the Commissioners around the lake to organize a public forum to voice their concerns and to make sure the Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) heard that they want to allow science and facts to drive that conversation in regard to the levels of Lake Okeechobee. B. Introduction of Commissioners from Five Counties Commissioner Turner introduced Drew Bartlett, Executive Director of SFWMD, and Lt. Col. Jennifer Reynolds of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He recognized Steve Layton, who is one of the Chief Aides to Congressman Brian Mast. The Commissioners from each county introduced themselves and everyone stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. Those in attendance: HENDRY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman Mitchell Wills
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Realtors Water Quality Report 2018
    WATER QU LITY ISSUES OVERVIEW & ADVOCACY EFFORTS Presented by Florida Realtors® Water Quality Issue Brief lorida is experiencing a water crisis. Stakeholders F are asking, “How do the state and federal government manage the nation’s largest environmental restoration project? What is needed to help prevent excessive amounts of nutrients, such as nitrogen, from polluting two large estuaries on the east and west sides of Lake Okeechobee?” The answers are complicated and complex. To understand today, we must look to the past Florida’s water system stretches from Orlando to the north, to Florida “The miracle of the Bay to the south. In the early 1900s, the areas south of Lake Okeechobee light pours over the became known for fertile soil that was ideal for farming. These lands would flood during the wet season and dry out during the dry season. green and brown They were some of the most fertile farming lands in the world. expanse of sawgrass In what is now known as the Everglades Agriculture Area (EAA), state and of water, shining and federal government collaborated to create complex drainage and and slow-moving water movement structures. These structures were necessary to make sure that the towns forming around farmlands are safe from potentially below, the grass and dangerous flooding from Lake Okeechobee. A dam was constructed in water that is the 1915 to help with flood control. This human-made levee consisted of mud Prior to the construction of various meaning and the water management structures, the central fact of the lands south of Lake Okeechobee were prone to significant flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Options for Losom
    SCREENING OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE OPTIONS FOR LOSOM April 2020 SCREENING OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE OPTIONS FOR LOSOM SCREENING OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE OPTIONS FOR LOSOM Prepared for: The Nature Conservancy Stu Appelbaum Arcadis U.S., Inc. 2500 Maitland Center Parkway Suite 311 Maitland Florida 32751 Prepared by: Arcadis U.S., Inc. 1301 Riverplace Blvd. Suite 700 Jacksonville Florida 32207 Date: April 2020 This document is intended only for the use of the individual or entity for which it was prepared and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited . arcadis.com SCREENING OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE OPTIONS FOR LOSOM CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Project Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Everglades Restoration and Related Project Activities .......................................................................... 2 3.1 Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation Program ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Everglades Riddle: Addressing Water Quality and Quantity to Restore a Florida Legacy
    BACKGROUNDER Solving the Everglades Riddle: Addressing Water Quality and Quantity to Restore a Florida Legacy By Dan Peterson Director, Center for Property Rights at The James Madison Institute federal, and local governments have wrangled over funding A Florida Riddle it, and environmental activists have leveraged it. What singular policy issue has lingered in Florida, In 2014, voters approved Amendment 1 dedicating despite having been discussed for decades, hotly debated one-third of doc stamp revenue for the next 20 years for in multiple legislative sessions, and subject to expensive statewide environmental preservation purposes including lobbying efforts? What issue has induced emotional pleas, “to acquire, restore, improve and manage conservation received billions of dollars to spend on planning and lands…including the Everglades.” This action brought new projects, and continues to be a costly and complex effort? visibility to statewide environmental needs as well as further If you answered, “Restoring the Everglades” you win debate to the issue of Everglades restoration. In order to the prize. For decades, one of Florida’s top environmental more fully understand and appreciate the complexities of challenges has been the restoration of the Everglades. restoring the Everglades today, it is imperative to take a Scientists have studied it, legislators have debated it, state, brief look back in time for a helpful perspective. www.jamesmadison.org | 1 A Brief History of northern Everglades and many along the banks of Lake Okeechobee. While dairy farming and cattle ranching the Florida Everglades spread north of the lake, tomatoes, sugar cane, beans, The effort to subdue the Everglades area began as early peas, peppers and potatoes became the dominant as 1850 with the Swamplands Act, which transferred crops to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning About the Everglades
    Y Y HI FRIENDS.MY NAME IS WAYNE DROP.I KNOW, YOU MAY THINK IT’S RAIN DROP, BUT NO, IT’S WAYNE.I HAPPEN TO BE A WATER DROP WHO LIKES R R to tell stories, particularly about my favorite topic: south Florida’s fascinating natural environment. O O I have been asked by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to tell you about Lake Okeechobee. Why me? Simple! I’ve been around for thousands of years, as liquid water and vapor, and I know Lake Okeechobee very well. Through my unique abilities to travel through time and transform myself, I see things from different perspectives. You could say I view life from a birds-eye point of view. I may be able to show you some things about the lake and Herbert Hoover Dike that you may not learn about otherwise. Of course, it requires a little imagination to pay attention to a water drop, ST ST but believe me, the story is pretty interesting! I I I’ve been around for thousands of years, as liquid water and vapor, and Y H Y H I know very L Lake Okeechobee L well. R R EA EA Y Y R R E E V V Lake Okeechobee and its littoral zone LAKE OKEECHOBEE has a RICH and INTERESTING PAST 1 Dense vegetation once Some of Florida’s surrounded the lake. earliest inhabitants TO UNDERSTAND lived near Lake Okeechobee. There is evidence that this remarkable resource that Native American tribes settled close to the lake we call Lake Okeechobee, we have to travel back 4,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 – 2020 Momentum: Report to Congress
    2015 - 2020 MOMENTUM REPORT TO CONGRESS COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN Central and Southern Florida Project THE 2015 – 2020 REPORT TO CONGRESS details the momentum that has sprung from previous years of Everglades restoration efforts – that will in turn, set the initial pace for further restoration progress in 2020 and beyond. The report is structured to mirror the multi-faceted aspects of the restoration program, and to highlight the collaboration of the many partners, team members, and stakeholders so vital to restoration success and its current and future momentum. Cover Images: Front: Tricolored Heron Back: Record Bird Colonies at the Broad River Photo Credits: Mark Cook, South Florida Water Management District RTC 2020—Agency Letters Final December 2020 AGENCY LETTERS Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2000 approved the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), which is the framework for modifications and operational changes to the Central and Southern Florida Project needed to restore, preserve, and protect the south Florida ecosystem while providing for other water-related needs of the region, including water supply and flood protection. Section 601(l) of WRDA 2000 requires that the Secretaries of the Army and the Interior jointly submit a Report to Congress not less than every five years on the implementation of the plan. This report covers progress made between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. In accordance with Section 601(l)(1) of WRDA 2000, this report includes: “…the determination of each Secretary, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, concerning the benefits to the natural system and the human environment achieved as of the date of the report and whether the completed projects of the Plan are being operated in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of subsection (h)...” Following are these determinations and a letter of support signed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
    [Show full text]
  • The Herbert Hoover Dike a Discussion of the Vulnerability of Lake Okeechobee to Levee Failure; Cause, Effect and the Future 2
    RISKS LLOYD’S EMERGING RISKS TEAM REPORT THE HERBERT HOOVER DIKE A DISCUSSION OF THE VULNERABILITY OF LAKE OKEECHOBEE TO LEVEE FAILURE; CAUSE, EFFECT AND THE FUTURE 2 Disclaimer This document is intended for general information purposes only. Whilst all care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information, Lloyd’s does not accept any responsibility for any errors and omissions. Lloyd’s does not accept any responsibility or liability for any loss to any person acting or refraining from action as the result of, but not limited to, any statement, fact, figure, expression of opinion or belief contained in this document. Contact details Director of Franchise Performance Rolf Tolle 020 7327 6743 [email protected] Manager of Emerging Risks Trevor Maynard 020 7327 6141 [email protected] Exposure Management Paul Nunn 020 7327 6402 [email protected] Vinay Mistry 020 7327 5935 [email protected] Liz Lotz 020 7327 5583 [email protected] Junsang Choi 020 7327 6496 [email protected] Arvin Zolfaghari 020 7327 5983 [email protected] Acknowledgement With thanks to James Boyce for undertaking much of the research for this paper. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Hurricane Katrina caused wide-scale damage to the Louisiana coast and New Orleans in particular, (Lloyd’s share was USD 3.4bn). However, there are other less well-known areas that are also extremely vulnerable to hurricanes. Lake Okeechobee in Florida is ranked second by the International Hurricane Research Center in a list of the most vulnerable US mainland areas to hurricanes.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Conservation of Water for Water Supply to South Florida (During the Dry Season)
    Impacts of Operating Lake Okeechobee at Lower Water Levels The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers implements the lake’s regulation schedule for flood control, navigation, water supply and the environment. The federal regulation schedule prescribes operational action to manage Lake Okeechobee’s water levels between 10.5’ and 17.25’. The purpose of these operations range from the release of water for the protection of communities (during the wet season) to the conservation of water for water supply to South Florida (during the dry season). Below is a breakdown of the impacts of operating the lake as water levels are lowered. 17.25’ – 15.5’ Upper operational band for lake’s water levels. Above 15.5’, the lake water is against the Herbert Hoover Dike, surrounding the lake. As water levels increase, releases are prescribed to protect communities because the integrity of the dike becomes a concern. 17.25’ – 15.5’ 15.5’ – 12.5’ 15.5’ – 12.5’ Ecologically preferred operating band for water levels in the lake, which provides depths that facilitate fisheries habitat and the growth of desirable aquatic vegetation. Within this 12.5’ – 10.5’ operational band, water managers balance flood control, water supply and environmental needs. Implementation of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) will 10.5’ – 9.5’ significantly enhance water management operational flexibility. 12.5’ – 10.5’ 9.5’ – 8.0’ When the lake falls into the water shortage band, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) orders water use cutbacks and mandatory restrictions. Water deliveries to all Lake are reduced. Okeechobee Ecological impacts can occur when the lake’s water level goes below 11’ for more than 80 days – a violation of the Lake Okeechobee minimum flow and minimum water level rule.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Lake Okeechobee Operating Criteria
    History of Lake Okeechobee Operating Criteria James Vearil GEER 2008 1 Introduction – Why History? z Anthropologist Eric Higgs (2005) - scientific and technological skill is necessary, but insufficient for ecological restoration, need broader approach that also includes social sciences and humanities z Environmental Historian William Cronon (2000) – both ecosystems and human societies are dynamic with complex histories where change is an essential feature, ecosystem management needs inter- and trans-disciplinary approach z Civil Engineer Henry Petroski (1994) - history is relevant for teaching and refinement of engineering thinking and judgment 2 Early Drainage Efforts (CSFFCD, 1950) 3 Everglades Drainage District z Early 1900’s Everglades Drainage District (EDD) construction z EDD for many years used regulation range 14-17 feet, Lake Okeechobee Datum (or 12.56 - 15.56 feet, NGVD) z War Department Permit to EDD for St. Lucie Canal required standard low stage of 15 feet, Lake Okeechobee Datum (Corps of Engineers, 1978) 4 Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee Drainage Areas (CR&LODA) Project z After Hurricanes of 1926 and 1928 Congress in 1930 Rivers and Harbors Act authorized Corps of Engineers to construct protective works for Lake Okeechobee as part of a navigation project z In 1930’s Herbert Hoover Dike constructed along Lake’s south shore and on the north shore around town of Okeechobee z In 1940 plan of operation z Army Corps of Engineers implemented used R-E formula continued to use Lake developed from study of Okeechobee Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT Stephen Duba, P
    HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT Stephen Duba, P. E. Chief, Construction Division Jacksonville District Juan Sanchez-Bulted, P. E. Resident Engineer, HHD South Office Jacksonville District Mario Fuquene, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Jacksonville District August 30, 2017 Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow CHARLESTON JACKSONVILLE MOBILE SAVANNAH WILMINGTON US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Herbert Hoover Dike Overview BUILDING STRONG . Lake Okeechobee covers 730 square miles . Basin exceeds 5,600 square miles . Average water depth is 9 feet . One foot of rainfall runoff from the basin can result in a three to four- foot rise on the lake Lake Okeechobee Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow Herbert Hoover Dike Overview BUILDING STRONG . Hurricanes in 1926 and 1928 . Several thousand fatalities . Impact to numerous towns around the lake Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow Herbert Hoover Dike Overview BUILDING STRONG . 143 miles of embankment around Lake Okeechobee 32 federal culverts 5 spillway inlets 5 spillway outlets 9 navigation locks 9 pump stations . Constructed between 1932 and 1938 . Embankment built by hydraulic dredge and fill methods, unacceptable by today’s construction standards Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow 4 Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation BUILDING STRONG Purpose: Review the Herbert Hoover Dike (HHD) Rehabilitation Project including background, ongoing work and path forward to project completion. Project Goals: Safeguarding human life while reducing the risk of adverse social, economic and environmental impacts to South Florida and the Everglades ecosystem due to failure of the Dike. Dam Safety Action Classification (DSAC) Level 1 - assigned 2006 . $1.70B estimated Total Project Cost with implementation of the Dam Safety Modification Report (DSMR) .
    [Show full text]