Report on the Exchange Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Exchange Programme REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE PROGRAMME IDENTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANT: NAME: FIRST NAME: NATIONALITY: ROMANIAN COUNTRY OF EXCHANGE: SLOVAKIA FUNCTION: JUDGE LENGTH OF SERVICE: 10 years IDENTIFICATION OF THE EXCAHANGE: HOSTING JURISDICTION/INSTITUTION: SLOVAK JUDICIAL ACADEMY, DISTRCIT COURT IN MIHALOVCE CITY: BRATISLAVA/MIHALOVCE COUNTRY: SLOVAKIA DATES OF EXCHANGE: 09-20.07.2012 TYPE OF EXCHANGE: ONE TO ONE EXCHANGE REPORT PROGRAMME OF THE EXCHANGE: During my exchange programme I visited several institutions in several cities and I had informative discussions with several judges and prosecutors: District Court in Mihalovce, District Court in Preslov, Court of Appeal in Preslov, Prosecutor Office in Preslov, District Court and Court of Appeal in Kosice, Detention Center in Kosice, Judicial Academy in Pezinok, Special Criminal Court in Pezinok, Supreme Court and Ministry of Justice in Bratislava. All these discussions revealed precious information on judicial system in Slovakia that made me reach the conclusion that it is rather similar to the one in Romania. THE HOSTING INSTITUTION The courts in Slovakia are organized on hierarchical level: district courts that have general competence, courts of appeal that rule on appeals and the Supreme Court that is competent to decide on extraordinary remedies (concerning legal issuses). There is one district court in the main city of each of the 8 regions (e.g. District Court 1 in Kosice) that deals with most serious crimes for which the minimum penalty is 10 years imprisonment. The courts of appeal are also competent to issue decisions on extradition, EAWs and transfer of the convicted persons in order to continue executing the penalty. There is also an autonomous court, The Special Criminal Court in Pezinok that deals with organized crime, corruption of public reprezentatives and murders in the first degree and its decisions can be appealed at the Supreme Court. There are 8 Courts of Appeal and in each of them 5 to 8 district courts. In criminal matters, the district courts judge in panels of 3 (one professional judge and 2 non-professional judges) misdemenours and crimes punished with less than 5 years imprisonment comitted with intent or by neglijence and in panels of a single professional judge in all the other cases. The Courts of Appeal judge in panels of 3 professional judges. The judges are recruited on an interveiw basis before a comission made of several members amongst whom the President of the Court and a person designated by the Minister of Justice and by the Council of Judges, after which they function as assitant of judge for a period of at least 3 years in the court for which they applied. During this period of three years they also attend courses organized by the Judicial Academy preparing the judicial exam, also organized by this institution. After passing the judicial exam they are appointed by the President of the Republic, provided that they are at least 30 years old. Prosecutors are recruited through a similar system and there is no age condition for them. Judges may express their option to become prosecutors during their professional career (prosecutors also may request switching to judges). The Judicial Academy of the Slovak Republic was set on the 1st of September 2004. Before this date there was the Slovak Association of Judges that was organizing the initial and continuous training of judges. It is an educational institution with nation-wide coverage, an independent legal entity, a non-profit budgetary organization under the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic. It manages funds specifically allocated for the purpose of education of judges, prosecutors and court officials. The legal seat and the administration of the Academy is in the municipality of Pezinok, 30 kilometers away from the Slovak capital, Bratislava. The courses are organized in a different location in the Slovak countryside, in Omšenie, next to the spa town of Trenčianske Teplice in West Slovakia. In order to ensure the training regional centers were set in Pezinok, Banska Bystrica and Kosice. The academy prepares and subsequently verifies the professional knowledge of the future judges, prosecutors and court officials organizing the professional judicial exam. It also creates, administrates and protects the data base of files concerning criminal law, administrative law, labour law, family law, commercial law and civil law that can be consulted by the candidates when preparing the judicial exam. The pedagogical staff comprises of heads of departments (permanently working at the Academy) and external members (mainly judges, prosecutors and other experts who are chosen by the Board of the Academy). The Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic was established by Constitution of the Slovak Republic. The powers of the Court are regulated by Articles 124 to 140 of the Constitution and details on organisation of the Constitutional Court, on the proceedings before the Court and on the status of its Judges are stipulated in law No. 38/1993. Pursuant to § 79 of law No. 38/1993, the Plenary Session of the Constitutional Court has approved the Procedure and standing order of the Constitutional Court No. 114/1993 Coll. as amended, defining the internal conditions of the Constitutional Court during the decision-making, the status of the Plenary session, Senates, Judges, Judges-Rapporteurs, Legal Advisors and other persons taking part in activities of the Constitutional Court, as well as disciplinary proceedings against the judges. The tasks connected with the organisational, personal, administrative and technical aspects of the activity of the Constitutional Court are carried out by the Chancellery of the Constitutional Court. Details on the organisation and activity of the Chancellery of the Constitutional Court and on the status of its staff are set out in the Organisation schedule, approved by the Plenary Session of the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court manages its finances from the state budget as an independent budget category in accordance with law No. 523/2004 Coll. on budgetary rules as amended. The Supreme Court is organized in 4 sections: commercial, civil, administrative and criminal and currently has 80 judges. The Court judges in panels of 3 or 5 judges and it decides on extraordinary remedies and appeals against the decisions issused by the Special Criminal Court or by the courts of appeals in cases concerning the recognition of a foreign judicial decision. Two or three times a year the judges from each section adopt in a general assemby general recomandations for the inferior courts. The Council of Judges is formed of 18 members: 9 members elected by judges, 3 appointed by the President of the Republic, 3 by the Governement and 3 by the Parliament and the candidates can be either judges or professors. The Council decides whether a candidate is competent to become a judge, on career of judges (transfer, promotions) and it is the disciplinary body for the judges. The Special Criminal Court in Pezinok was set in 1st of September 2004 and is dealing with corruption cases, organized crime, terrorism, first degree murder. There are 13 judges functioning in this Court that has the assistance of police and prosecutors specially designated. The cases are judged in panels of three judges and there is an average of 15-20 cases per year. In the District Court in Mihalovce are functioning 15 judges. Each judge has a secretary (who is typing the paper work) and an assistant (who does the research for the cases and writes down the decisions). In order to become an assistant of judge one must pass a written and oral exam, as well as a linguistic exam (translation from Slovak to English). The Court of Appeal in Preslov is organised in 4 sections: civil, commercial, administrative and criminal and has 40 judges. In the Prosecutor Office in Preslov- regional level are functioning 15 prosecutors: 4 in the organized Crime Division, 4 in the International Division and 7 in the Civil Division. The Detention Centre in Kosice started to function on 1st of July 1968, after the prisoners had helped with the construction of the building. Initially was a medium security facility, but nowadays it is a minimum security prison. Currently there are 660 inmates detained in this center. The cells were built to harbour 8/9 inmates, but currently, due to the lack of space, in each cell there are an average of 11 detainees and there are still 1500 convicted persons in the region awaiting outside to execute their sentence. The juvenils are held separatly, also the women are separated from men and the prime offenders from the ones with prior criminal record. The regime is decided by the judge in each case (whether the convicted person will execute the sentence in a maximum, medium or minimum security facility). For executing life imprisonment there are 2 separate facilities. A month before finishing the sentence, the inmate is prepaired for the release by the Pre- release Department and he has several meetings with a social worker, with a pedagog and a psychologist. The inmates can obtain a leave of absence of maximum 5 days to visit their families on the decision of the director of the penitenciary. In case of an inmate breaking the internal regulations, there is a disciplinary procedure that can end with sanctions as restriction of the right for shopping or isolation after work (the pedagog can decide a sanction up to 10 days of isolation and the head of departament up to 20 days isolation). The confiscation as a disciplinary sanction is decided solely by the director of the penitenciary. The inmates must work through executing the sentence (inside or outside the detention center) and they can be excused in case of illness. THE LAW OF THE HOST COUNTRY AND THE COMPARATIVE LAW The information obtained through the discussions I had with judges and prosecutors, as well with other representatives of the judicial system lead to the conclusion that in criminal matters the Romanina and Slovak systems are rather similar.
Recommended publications
  • Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in the Republic of Ireland
    Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in the Republic of Ireland INTRODUCTION The practice of pro bono is continuing to grow and develop in the Republic of Ireland (“Ireland”) and there are high levels of enthusiasm for pro bono opportunities among the legal profession. Nevertheless, there remains room for expansion in the provision of pro bono services, with Ireland arguably lagging behind several other comparable common law countries. OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM Constitution and Governing Laws Ireland has a parliamentary democracy, with the President of Ireland elected directly by the people as its head of state,1 and is a common law jurisdiction, derived from the English legal system. Irish courts are bound by precedent.2 As a member of the European Union (the “EU”), Ireland’s legal system is also influenced significantly by EU law, with certain provisions having “direct effect” and thus being directly enforceable in Irish courts.3 The Courts Ireland has a tiered court structure with the Supreme Court at the top, serving as the court of final appeal in civil and criminal matters. Beneath the Supreme Court is the Court of Appeal,4 and then the High Court, Circuit Court (with appeals going to the High Court) and, at the bottom of the structure, the District Court. The courts have jurisdiction over all civil and criminal matters with the District Court dealing with the most minor civil and criminal cases.5 Some specialist matters, such as employment and social welfare cases, are dealt with by tribunals, which are similar to courts but aim to be less expensive and formal.6 Judges for all courts are appointed by the President of Ireland upon the recommendation of the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board (the “Board”).7 Persons seeking to be appointed as judges must apply to the Board, with the Board then making submissions to the Minister for Justice who, in turn, advises the 1 See http://www.president.ie/en/the-president/constitutional-role (last visited on September 4, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE MATTERS Independence, Accountability and the Irish Judiciary TANYA WARD
    JUSTICE MATTERS Independence, Accountability and the Irish Judiciary TANYA WARD 22473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio1473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio1 1 111/07/20071/07/2007 111:26:561:26:56 Th e Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) is Ireland’s leading independent human rights watchdog, which monitors, educates and campaigns in order to secure full enjoyment of human rights for everyone. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: TANYA WARD is Senior Research and Policy Offi cer with the Irish Council for Civil Liberties. 22473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio2473_ICCL_Judiciary_cover_sectio2 2 111/07/20071/07/2007 111:26:581:26:58 CONTENTS ABOUT THE ICCL 5 SECTION 4 Personal Independence and the Irish Judiciary 45 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 4.1 Introduction 46 4.2 Appointments 46 4.2.1 Selection and Criteria 46 SECTION 1 Introduction 9 4.2.2 Th e Judicial Advisory Appointments Board 1.1. Introduction 10 (JAAB) 50 1.2. Aims and Objectives of Study 12 4.3 Conditions of Service and Tenure 54 1.3. Methodology 13 4.4 Adequate Remuneration 56 1.4. Report Outline 14 4.5 Freedom of Expression and Association 57 4.5.1 Representation and Association 57 4.5.2 Extra-Judicial Comment and Educating SECTION 2 International Human Rights the Public 58 Standards on Judicial Independence and 4.6 Competence, Diligence and Judicial Studies 60 Impartiality 15 4.6.1 Judicial Studies in Ireland 60 2.1 Introduction 16 4.6.2 Induction 62 2.2 What is Judicial Independence? 16 4.6.3 Human Rights Education 63 2.3 What is Judicial Impartiality? 18 4.6.4 Further Academic Studies 65 2.4 International
    [Show full text]
  • Courts Service Ireland
    Response questionnaire project group Timeliness Courts' Service Ireland 1 The Court System and Available Statistics 1.1 The Court System The Irish justice system consists primarily of four tiers of courts; the District Court, the Circuit Court, the High Court and the Supreme Court. The District Court is the lowest court, having jurisdiction over minor civil and criminal matters. The civil jurisdiction does not exceed €6,348.69. For criminal matters the Court only hears minor offences. It only hears criminal cases where the maximum custodial sentence permitted upon conviction is 12 months or up to 2 years where a consecutive sentence is imposed. The District Court also has some jurisdiction in the family law area. Proceedings in Family Law are not heard in open court and are as informal as is practicable. The District Court also has wide powers in relation to liquor and lottery licensing. The Circuit Court has jurisdiction in most criminal jury trials and civil matters with a jurisdiction not exceeding €38,092.14. It also hears appeals from the District Court. The Circuit and High Court have concurrent jurisdiction in the area of Family Law. The Circuit Court has jurisdiction in a wide range of family law proceedings, (judicial separation, divorce, nullity and appeals from the District Court). The High Court has full and original jurisdiction in all matters and is the constitutional Court of first instance. In terms of its criminal jurisdiction, it sits as the Central Criminal Court and has jurisdiction over the most serious criminal trials, including those relating to murder, rape and serious sexual offences.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting Vol. 6, Issue 3, Special
    Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting Vol. 6, Issue 3, Special International Issue, 2014 Forensic Accounting in a Constitutional Parliamentary Democracy: The Case of Ireland Niamh M. Brennan* This paper commences with a contextual overview of the economic geography of Ireland, followed in Section 2 by an overview of the Irish legal system. The paper concludes by examining the forensic accounting profession in Ireland. Sources used include Brennan et al. (1992) for the context material in Section 1 and some of the material on the accounting profession in Section 3; and Brennan and Hennessy (2001a) for the material on forensic accounting. The case law cited in the paper is entirely from the Irish courts. Many judgments of the United Kingdom courts and other common-law jurisdictions would have currency in the Irish courts. Brennan and Hennessy (2001a) is the seminal (and only) text on this subject in Ireland. It deals in-depth with all aspects of forensic accounting practice with extensive citation from judgments of the Irish (and other common-law) courts. The text is inter-disciplinary with both a strong accounting and legal focus. A number of shorter more accessible articles have being written by the authors, such as Brennan (2005) and Brennan and Hennessy (2001b, 2001c, 2001d, 2001e, 2001f). More recent articles on the subject include Hyland and McGloin (2008), Brown (2011), Fitzgerald (2011) and Idowu (2011). CONTEXT This short introductory context section summarizes the geography and population of Ireland and its political institutions. * Niamh M. Brennan is Michael MacCormac Professor of Management at University College Dublin, Ireland, and Academic Director of the UCD Centre for Corporate Governance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Plain English Guide to Citizenship Terms
    5655 Guide cover/back 9/23/05 12:16 PM Page 1 A Plain English Guide to Citizenship Terms 76 Lower Gardiner Street, Dublin 1 Tel: (01) 855 4332 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nala.ie 5655 Guide cover/back 9/23/05 12:16 PM Page 2 A Plain English Guide to Citizenship Terms 5655 Guide cover/back 9/23/05 12:16 PM Page 3 Published by National Adult Literacy Agency 76 Lower Gardiner Street Dublin 1 © 2005 National Adult Literacy Agency The copyright in this guide belongs to the National Adult Literacy Agency. ISBN 1-871737-55-9 The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily the views of the National Adult Literacy Agency. Disclaimer: Please note that these descriptions are a guide only and are not legal definitions. 5655 Plain english guide 9/23/05 12:16 PM Page 1 Foreword for NALA This publication aims to provide an introduction to an area that is not always agreed upon by everyone: the realm of ‘active citizenship’.Unlike the definitions in previous NALA plain English guides, which were accepted as standard, some of the definitions in this guide are contested.The very fact that this is the case raises a very important aspect of citizenship and citizenship education and that is the built-in notion of appreciating difference between ourselves and other ‘citizens’. Encouraging citizenship through education is what the 2005 European Year of Citizenship through Education is all about. One of the key goals of the Year is to raise awareness of how education can help develop democratic citizenship and participation, as well as greater understanding and respect for diversity and human rights.The Year is about how all of us can be encouraged and supported to take part more fully in the lives of our community and beyond, and how we can be confidently involved in the decision-making that affects our lives and the lives of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialised Anti-Corruption Courts a Comparative Mapping
    U4 ISSUE December 2016 No 7 This U4 Issue is part of a series that examines special courts for corruption cases. Specialised anti-corruption courts A comparative mapping Matthew C. Stephenson Professor of Law, Harvard Sofie A. Schütte Senior advisor, U4/CMI Anti- Corruption Resource Centre www.U4.no U4 is a web-based resource centre for development practitioners who wish to effectively address corruption challenges in their work. U4 is operated by the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) – an independent centre for research on international development and policy – and is funded by the DFAT (Australia), Danida (Denmark), DFID (UK), BMZ (Germany), Norad (Norway), SDC (Switzerland), Sida (Sweden) and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. All views expressed in this Issue are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U4 Partner Agencies or CMI/ U4. (Copyright 2016 - CMI/U4) Specialised anti-corruption courts: A comparative mapping Matthew C. Stephenson Professor of Law, Harvard Sofie A. Schütte Senior advisor, U4/CMI U4 Issue December 2016 No 7 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................4 About the authors ..............................................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY and DEVELOPMENT of the SPECIAL CRIMINAL COURT 1922-2005” (Four Courts Press, 2007) Fergal Francis Davis
    178 Judicial Studies Institute Journal [2009:1 BOOK REVIEW “THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPECIAL CRIMINAL COURT 1922-2005” (Four Courts Press, 2007) Fergal Francis Davis RONAN KEANE It is a melancholy reflection that, during the period of almost ninety years since the foundation of the State, the institution of the “special court” has been with us almost without interruption. As this exhaustive and thoughtful survey demonstrates, it has been present in a number of different forms, which have, however, one major feature in common: the assignment of at least some criminal trials of serious offences to tribunals sitting without a jury. Irrespective of one’s views on the merits of jury trials in criminal cases, the fact that successive governments and legislatures have considered it necessary to abrogate the right to them over so lengthy a period is, of itself, somewhat depressing. It can, of course, be said that the same period was dominated by the Civil War and its aftermath, the huge security problems of the Second World War, the “troubles” in Northern Ireland and, more recently, the growth of organised crime. That helps to explain the almost continuous recourse by successive executives to “special courts”, but is hardly of great comfort. Given that the distinguishing feature of these tribunals is the absence of the jury, it is understandable that Dr Davis at the outset should consider the arguments for and against the central role played by the jury in the Anglo-American criminal justice system. He is not fully persuaded by the arguments of those who, like de Tocqueville, see it as a valuable democratic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly of States Parties 11 February 2021 ENGLISH Original: English
    International Criminal Court ICC-ASP/19/19/Add.1 Distr.: General Assembly of States Parties 11 February 2021 ENGLISH Original: English Nineteenth session, second resumption New York, 12 February 2021 Election of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Addendum Annex II Alphabetical list of candidates (with supporting documentation) Contents Name Nationality Page 1. CASTRESANA FERNÁNDEZ, Carlos .... (Spain) ............................................... 2 2. GAYNOR, Fergal ..................................... (Ireland) ............................................. 10 3. KHAN, Karim ........................................... (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) ..................................... ……………………………………… 18 4. LO VOI, Francesco ................................... (Italy) ................................................. 26 19A1-E-110221 ICC-ASP/19/19/Add.1 Page 2 1. CASTRESANA FERNÁNDEZ, Carlos (Spain) [Original: English] Note verbale The Permanent Mission of Spain to the United Nations presents its compliments to the Secretariat of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court and, in connection with the process of election of the next Prosecutor and ultimately its Note with Reference: ICC-ASP/R19/SP/20 of 5 February, has the honour to inform that Spain nominates Mr. Carlos Castresana Fernández for the post of Prosecutor of the Court. Spain considers that Mr. Castresana Fernández fully meets the requirements of article 42(3) of the Rome Statute and, as such, he is the most suitable candidate to fill the post. Mr. Castresana Fernández's main qualities in relation to the requirements set out in the Rome Statute and in the published Terms of Reference are as follows: Mr. Castresana Fernández is of the highest moral character. He is of impeccable personal and professional integrity and has been the recipient of several prestigious awards and decorations in Spain and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Confidence in the European Union - Report to the General Assembly on the 6Th/7Th June 2007
    ENCJ Working Group on strengthening mutual confidence in the European Union - Report to The General Assembly on the 6th/7th June 2007 At the annual conference of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary in Wroclaw on 25 - 26 May, 2006, the General Assembly decided to establish six Working Groups. The topics of the Working Groups resulted from the interactive sessions which were organised on the first day of the Conference. The Working Group on Strengthening Mutual Confidence was established to consider methods of strengthening mutual confidence amongst the members of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary. Membership of the Working Group is set out in Appendix A, attached to this document. Terms of Reference It was noted that the work of the group would include: Clarification of the meaning of the term 'mutual confidence' Meeting representatives of the European Commission Considering the reality of mutual confidence from the point of view of the judicial decision maker Considering methods of assisting the development of mutual confidence amongst the judiciary of the European Union Objective It was envisaged that the objective would be to advise on methods of developing information, contacts and systems to enable the growth of mutual confidence amongst the judiciary in the European Union. Result A result anticipated of this Working Group was to present to the next General Assembly: 1. Suggestions on methods of developing mutual confidence and mutual co-operation between members of the judiciary in the European Member States. 2. Suggestions on methods by which the ENCJ could provide relevant expertise to the EU institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Donohoe Ireland
    A M I C US C URI A E SUB M ISSI O N European Court of Human Rights D O N O H O E Applicant V IR E L A ND Respondent Application No. 19165/08 W RI T T E N C O M M E N TS B Y T H E IRISH H U M A N RI G H TS C O M M ISSI O N PURSU A N T T O A R T I C L E 36 § 2 O F T H E E UR OPE A N C O N V E N T I O N O N H U M A N RI G H TS A ND RU L E 44 § 3 O F T H E RU L ES O F T H E E UR OPE A N C O UR T O F H U M A N RI G H TS 9 May 2012 IND E X T O SUB M ISSI O N Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Background to the Application ...................................................................................................... 2 The Special Criminal Court ........................................................................................................... 3 Evidence before the Special Criminal Court ................................................................................. 3 Belief Evidence and Informer Privilege ........................................................................................ 4 Inference Drawing and the Right to Silence ................................................................................. 6 The Hederman Committee - Belief Evidence and the Right to Silence ....................................... 7 Article 6 and Disclosure ................................................................................................................. 8 Article 6 and Access to a Lawyer ................................................................................................. 10 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 11 1 Introduction 1. The Irish Human Rights Commission (“IHRC”) is Ireland’s National Human Rights Institution (“NHRI”), established pursuant to the Human Rights Commission Acts 2000 and 2001. The IHRC has a statutory remit to promote and protect the human rights of all persons in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Balance in the Criminal Law Review Group Final Report
    BALANCE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW GROUP FINAL REPORT BALANCE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW GROUP FINAL REPORT 15 MARCH 2007 Letter from Chairman to Tánaiste . 3 Introduction . 5 Issue 1 - The Right to Silence . 17 Issue 2 – Character Evidence . 100 Issue 3 – Infringements of Constitutional Rights – The Exclusionary Rule . 147 Background . .. 147 Arguments for Change . 155 Arguments against Change . 160 Options for Change . 161 Issue 4 – Requiring a Defence Statement . 167 Advance disclosure of the defence case . 167 Disposal of Admissibility Issues pre-trial . 174 Issue 5 – Extending Alibi Evidence Rules . .. 176 Issue 6 – “With Prejudice” Appeals . 177 Introduction . 177 Constitutional considerations . .. 179 With Prejudice Appeals on indictment . 192 Appeal in respect of District Court Decisions . 198 Issue 7 – Re-opening acquittals following new evidence . 203 Issue 8 – Nullifying acquittals tainted by Trial Tampering . 211 1 Options for Change . 213 Issue 9 – Prosecution Submissions on Sentence . 215 Introduction . 215 The Problem . 219 Options . 220 Views of the Review Group . 221 Issue 10 - Hearsay evidence . 228 Issue 11 – Other Proposals . 233 Identity Parades . 233 The judge’s charge . 234 Victim Impact Reports . 235 Implications for Defence Acts . 240 Other issues which came to the attention of the Group . 240 Summary . 243 Appendices . 255 Appendix 1 - List of submissions made to Group and persons with whom the Group met. 255 Appendix 2 - Draft heads of legislation relating to inferences from silence . 258 Note of Dissent on Right to Silence: Nora Owen and David Gwynn Morgan . 274 Note of Dissent on Exclusionary Rule: Gerard Hogan . 287 2 Letter from Chairman to Tánaiste Michael McDowell, SC, TD, Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Courts
    Supreme Court The court of final appeal in civil and criminal matters. Appeals may be made only where the Court grants permission in limited circumstances as set out in the Constitution. Can decide on the constitutionality of a bill if referred to it by the President. Can determine a question of the permanent incapacity of the President if it arises. Most cases are dealt with by three judges though up to seven judges can sit. Court of Appeal Deals with appeals from the High Court in High Court Central Criminal Court civil cases and appeals from the Circuit Criminal Court, the Central Criminal Court, Has full original jurisdiction in, and power to Criminal division of the High Court. or the Special Criminal Court in criminal determine, all matters, whether of law or fact, civil Tries serious crime including murder, cases. Cases are dealt with by three judges. and criminal. rape, treason and piracy. Power to determine the validity of any law having regard to the Constitution. Appeal court from the Circuit Court in civil matters. Special Criminal Court Established for the trial of offences in cases where it is determined that the ordinary courts are inadequate to secure the effective administration of justice and the preservation of Circuit Court public peace and order. Cases are dealt with by Court of limited and local jurisdiction organised on a regional basis. three judges. Civil: Claims up to the value of €75,0000. Family Law: Divorce, judicial separation, nullity and other ancillary matters. Criminal: Jury trial of offences other than those triable in the District Court Central Criminal Court.
    [Show full text]