Evolutionary Transformations of the Reproductive System in Eubrachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary Transformations of the Reproductive System in Eubrachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda) EVOLUTIONARY TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM IN EUBRACHYURA (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) eingereicht an der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von M. Sc. Katja, Kienbaum, geb. Jaszkowiak Präsidentin der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. Sabine Kunst Dekan der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Bernhard Grimm Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Gerhard Scholtz 2. PD Dr. Thomas Stach 3. PD Dr. Christian Wirkner Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 03.05.2019 CONTENT C ONTENT A BSTRACT v i - vii Z USAMMENFASSUNG viii - x 1 | INTRODUCTION 1 - 11 1.1 | THE BRACHYURA 1 1.1.1 | OBJECT OF INVESTIGATION 1 - 5 1.1.2 | WHAT WE (DO NOT) KNOW ABOUT THE PHYLOGENY OF EUBRACHURA 6 - 10 1. 2 |MS AI 10 - 11 2 | THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM IN TWO 12 - 34 SPECIES OF SPIDER CRABS (DECAPODA: BRACHYURA: MAJOIDEA) AND THE ISSUE OF THE VELUM IN MAJOID REPRODUCTION. 2.1 | INTRODUCTION 13 - 14 2.2 | MATERIAL AND METHODS 14 - 16 2.3 | RESULTS 16 - 23 2.4 | DISCUSSION 24 - 34 3 | THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM IN THE CRAB 35 - 51 PERCNON GIBBESI (DECAPODA: BRACHYURA: GRAPSOIDEA) REVEALS A NEW COMBINATION OF CHARACTERS. 3.1 | INTRODUCTION 36 - 37 3.2 | MATERIAL AND METHODS 37 - 38 3.3 | RESULTS 39 - 46 3.4 | DISCUSSION 46 - 51 4 | THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM OF LIMNOPILOS NAIYANETRI INDICATES A 52 - 64 THORACOTREME AFFILIATION OF HYMENOSOMATIDAE (DECAPODA, EUBRACHYURA). 4.1 | INTRODUCTION 53 4.2 | MATERIAL AND METHODS 54 4.3 | RESULTS 55 - 59 4.4 | DISCUSSION 60 - 64 CONTENT 5 | DISCUSSION 65 - 98 5.1 | THE COPULATORY SYSTEM OF MALE BRACHYURA 65 - 77 5.1.1 | GONOPOD MORPHOLOGY – IT’S A MATTER OF FORM, RATHER THAN SIZE 65 - 72 5.1.2 | MUSCULATURE 72 - 74 5.1.3 | CONSIDERATIONS ON SPERM TRANSPORT 74 - 77 5.2 | THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM OF FEMALE BRACHYURA 78 - 98 5.2.1 | COMPARISON OF CHARACTER STATES IN EUBRACHYURAN GROUPS 79 - 89 5.2.2 |C ONSIDERATIONS ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS 89 - 98 6 | CONCLUSIONS 99 - 100 7 | REFERENCES 100 - 110 S ELBSTSTÄNDIGKEITSERKLÄRUNG xi D ANKSAGUNG xii ABSTRACT A BSTRACT The Brachyura comprise approximately 7000 species and belong to the most diverse groups of the decapods. The variability of their morphological traits is reflected in the male copulatory and the female reproductive systems that make them a challenging object of investigation. Numerous studies addressed the brachyuran phylogeny but complete and unambiguous results have yet to be presented. Still, even though it has been controversially debated, some studies still rely on the division of Brachyura into the Podotremata, the Heterotremata and the Thoracotremata (the latter two forming the Eubrachyura) that is based on the position of the male and female gonopores. In this work, the male copulatory and female reproductive systems of four species from three eubrachyuran groups were investigated. For an overview of the structures, the species were photographed with a digital microscope. In the first and the second study, the gonopods were µCT-scanned and 3D- reconstructed to analyse their internal morphology, including the position of muscles and tegumental glands. Additionally, in all studies scanning electron microscopy was used in order to obtain information about the surface structures of the gonopods. All investigations of the female system were conducted using approved histological methods and light microscopy. In the first and second study, this detailed structural analysis was complemented by 3D-reconstruction in order to attain a conception of the positional relationships of the system as a whole within the body. The first study examines Mithraculus sculptus (Lamarck, 1818) and Stenorhynchus seticornis (Herbst, 1788) from the heterotreme group Majoidea. Representatives of this group have been intensely studied and hypotheses concerning the structure of the seminal receptacle and a velum as a muscular diaphragm that divides two chambers within it, influenced the conception of eubrachyuran reproduction for decades. The two majoid species were investigated to complement to the growing knowledge of eubrachyuran reproductive systems. Additionally, it is the intent of this study to re-evaluate the interpretation of the velum and to assess its value for future studies. The male gonopods are similar in their general morphology and in the distribution of setae. The tubular first gonopod is longer than the short and stout second gonopod. The general structure of the female reproductive system of M. sculptus and S. seticornis is the same as in other Eubrachyura. It consists of paired ovaries, oviducts, seminal receptacles and vaginae. In contrast to the prevailing hypothesis, a division of the seminal receptacle into two separate chambers was not observed and the velum might be a character which needs to be re-evaluated. The second study examines Percnon gibbesi (H. Milne Edwards, 1853) from the thoracotreme group Percnidae. The position of the Percnidae is ambiguous. They are probably nested within the polyphyletic Grapsoidea. This study aims to provide comparable characters of the copulatory and reproductive systems of a thoracotreme species in order to find consistencies and differences to heterotreme species. The first gonopod of the male copulatory system is longer than the second vi ABSTRACT gonopod. Its bent terminal process with a terminal ejaculatory canal opening is a character that is present in other grapsoid species. The female reproductive system reveals a new combination of characters in thoracotremes. The oviduct runs into a separate cuticular duct that transits into the vagina. A direct transition of the oviduct into the seminal receptacle as in other Eubrachyura is absent. Additionally, a bursa that has previously only been described in heterotreme crabs, is connected to the vagina. These morphological characters reveal a higher diversity of thoracotreme reproductive systems than anticipated. The third study examines the copulatory and reproductive system of Limnopilos naiyanetri Chuang and Ng, 1991 from the group Hymenosomatidae. The position of the Hymenosomatidae has been controversially debated for a long time. They have been argued to be a heterotreme group, possibly closely related to the Majoidea. However, the male gonopores have a sternal position, which is a thoracotreme apomorphy. The results are compared with both, data of heterotreme and thoracotreme systems in order to find character states that support an affiliation with either one of the groups. In males, the first gonopod is longer than the second gonopod and the gonopore is sternal. The combination of both characters resembles the thoracotreme condition. In the female reproductive system, the seminal receptacle is lined by a mono-layered glandular epithelium and by a very thin cuticle that is continuous with the vagina. Additionally, a bursa is present. Thus, both systems indicate that Hymenosomatidae are most likely part of the Thoracotremata. The results of these studies are evaluated in comparison with the existing literature in order to define characters of the male copulatory and female reproductive system and discuss their potential for phylogenetic investigations. Additionally, an evolutionary scenario of the transformations of the herein proposed character states of the female reproductive system is discussed. Without additional information from the female reproductive system, the gonopod morphology is valuable to identify species affiliations to certain groups but remains inconclusive for large-scale brachyuran phylogeny. The last decades brought an increasing number of detailed investigations of the eubrachyuran female system. Some of the characters found in these studies can explicitly be assigned to heterotreme or thoracotreme females (for example the pattern and distribution of tissue in the seminal receptacle, the position of the oviduct transition into the seminal receptacle and the shape of the vagina). The proposed scenarios suggest, that some, if not all of these characters probably have evolved multiple times. In future studies, it needs more strong efforts and the utilisation of modern technology and new approaches to promote the knowledge of these diverse, unique and most beautiful structures in order corroborate the assumptions and reasoning of this study. vii ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Z USAMMENFASSUNG Die Brachyura umfassen etwa 7000 Arten und bilden eine der vielfältigsten Gruppen innerhalb der Decapoda. Die Variationsbreite ihrer morphologischen Merkmale spiegelt sich in den männlichen Kopulations- und den weiblichen Reproduktionssystemen wider und machen sie zu einem herausfordernden Untersuchungsgegenstand. Obwohl sich zahlreiche Studien mit der Phylogenie der Brachyura befasst haben, fehlen weiterhin vollständige und eindeutige Ergebnisse. Trotz der kontroversen Diskussion der Phylogenie der Brachyura, stützen sich manche Studien weiterhin auf deren Teilung in die Podotremata, die Heterotremata und die Thoracotremata (die beiden letzteren bilden die Eubrachyura), die auf der Position der männlichen und weiblichen Gonoporen basiert. In dieser Arbeit wurden die männlichen Kopulations- und weiblichen Reproduktionssysteme von vier Arten aus drei Gruppen der Eubrachyura untersucht. Für einen Überblick über die Strukturen wurden die Arten mit einem digitalen Mikroskop fotografiert. Zur Analyse ihrer inneren Morphologie, einschließlich der Position
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot
    New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot To cite this version: Danièle Guinot. New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 2019, 41 (1), pp.747. 10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a22. hal-02408863 HAL Id: hal-02408863 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02408863 Submitted on 13 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Changer fig. 19 initiale Inverser les figs 15-16 New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle GUINOT ISYEB (CNRS, MNHN, EPHE, Sorbonne Université), Institut Systématique Évolution Biodiversité, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, case postale 53, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] An epistemological obstacle will encrust any knowledge that is not questioned. Intellectual habits that were once useful and healthy can, in the long run, hamper research Gaston Bachelard, The Formation of the Scientific
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Years of Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos and the Taxonomy of Nine Families of Brachyuran Crabs
    FORTY YEARS OF TROPICAL DEEP-SEA BENTHOS AND THE TAXONOMY OF NINE FAMILIES OF BRACHYURAN CRABS Peter (Pedro) Castro Biological Sciences Department California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA TRAPEZIOIDEA: TRAPEZIIDAE & TETRALIIDAE Castro, P., 1997. Trapeziid crabs of New Caledonia, eastern Australia, and the Coral Sea. Le benthos des fonds meubles des lagons de Nouvelle-Calédonie (B. Richer de Forges, ed.). Ètudes et Théses, 3: 59-107. NEW SPECIES – 1 NEW RECORDS – 3 Castro, P., P.K.L. Ng & S.T. Ahyong, 2004 Phylogeny and systematics of the Trapeziidae Miers, 1886, with the description of a new family. Zootaxa, 643: 1-70. NEW FAMILY – 1 NEOTYPE - 1 Castro, P., 2005. A new species of Hexagonalia from the Solomon Islands. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 118: 539-542. NEW SPECIES – 1 Castro, P., 2009. Trapeziidae and Tetraliidae of the Philippines (PANGLAO 2004), New Guinea, and Vanuatu (SANTO 2006). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement 20: 271-281. NEW RECORDS – 18 Castro, P., 2013. Brachyuran crabs (Crustacea, Brachyura:) of the MAINBAZA, MIRIKI, and ATIMO VATAE expeditions to the Mozambique Channel and Madagascar. In: Ahyong, S.T, Chan, T.-Y, Corbari, L. & Ng, P.K.L. (eds.). Tropical Deep Sea Benthos, 27: 437-466). NEW RECORD - 1 Sphenomerides PALICOIDEA: PALICIDAE & CROSSOTONOTIDAE Castro, P., 2000. Crustacea Decapoda: A revision of the Indo-west Pacific species of palicid crabs (Brachyura Palicidae). In: Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM (A. Crosnier, ed.), vol. 21. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 184: 437- 610. NEW GENERA – 4 (= 50% of Palicidae) NEW SPECIES – 15 (= 24% of Palicidae; 38% of Indo-West Pacific species) NEW RECORDS – 51 Castro, P., 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
    Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiomes of Gall-Inducing Copepod Crustaceans from the Corals Stylophora Pistillata (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Ventalina
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Microbiomes of gall-inducing copepod crustaceans from the corals Stylophora pistillata Received: 26 February 2018 Accepted: 18 July 2018 (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Published: xx xx xxxx ventalina (Alcyonacea) Pavel V. Shelyakin1,2, Sofya K. Garushyants1,3, Mikhail A. Nikitin4, Sofya V. Mudrova5, Michael Berumen 5, Arjen G. C. L. Speksnijder6, Bert W. Hoeksema6, Diego Fontaneto7, Mikhail S. Gelfand1,3,4,8 & Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko 6,9 Corals harbor complex and diverse microbial communities that strongly impact host ftness and resistance to diseases, but these microbes themselves can be infuenced by stresses, like those caused by the presence of macroscopic symbionts. In addition to directly infuencing the host, symbionts may transmit pathogenic microbial communities. We analyzed two coral gall-forming copepod systems by using 16S rRNA gene metagenomic sequencing: (1) the sea fan Gorgonia ventalina with copepods of the genus Sphaerippe from the Caribbean and (2) the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata with copepods of the genus Spaniomolgus from the Saudi Arabian part of the Red Sea. We show that bacterial communities in these two systems were substantially diferent with Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria more prevalent in samples from Gorgonia ventalina, and Gammaproteobacteria in Stylophora pistillata. In Stylophora pistillata, normal coral microbiomes were enriched with the common coral symbiont Endozoicomonas and some unclassifed bacteria, while copepod and gall-tissue microbiomes were highly enriched with the family ME2 (Oceanospirillales) or Rhodobacteraceae. In Gorgonia ventalina, no bacterial group had signifcantly diferent prevalence in the normal coral tissues, copepods, and injured tissues. The total microbiome composition of polyps injured by copepods was diferent.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacean Diversity of Ildırı Bay (Izmir, Turkey)
    DOI: 10.22120/jwb.2020.131461.1164 Special issue 41-49 (2020) Challenges for Biodiversity and Conservation in the Mediterranean Region (http://www.wildlife-biodiversity.com/) Research Article Crustacean diversity of Ildırı Bay (Izmir, Turkey) Introduction Murat Ozaydinli1*, Kemal Can Bizsel2 1Ordu University, Fatsa Faculty of Marine Crustaceans are a critical element of the marine Science, Department of Fisheries Technology benthic ecosystem in terms of macrofauna Engineering, 52400, Ordu, Turkey, diversity and impact assessment. Many studies 2 Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Marine have been conducted on crustacean species in Sciences and Technology, 35340, Izmir, Turkey the Aegean Sea (Geldiay and Kocataş 1970, Geldiay and Kocataş 1973, Katağan 1982, *Email: [email protected] Ergen et al. 1988, Kırkım 1998, Katağan et al. Received: 22 July 2020 / Revised: 16 September 2020 / Accepted: 2001, Koçak et al. 2001, Ateş 2003, Sezgin 22 September 2020 / Published online: 21 October 2020. Ministry 2003, Yokeş et al. 2007, Anastasiadou et al. of Sciences, Research, and Technology, Arak University, Iran. 2020). These studies and more have been Abstract compiled by Bakır et al. (2014), who has given In this study, the crustacean diversity in Ildırı a checklist. A total of 1028 Crustacean species Bay, which is characterized by a high density of was reported along the Aegean Sea coast of aquaculture activity and tourism, was Turkey Bakır et al. (2014). investigated. Sampling was carried out by box- The Ildırı Bay is characterized by a high corer during four seasonal cruises (April, July, intensity of aquaculture and tourism activities November 2010, and February 2011) at eight (Demirel 2010, Bengil and Bizsel 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Sperm Limitation in the Blue Crab, Callinectes Sapidus
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 3-2003 Evidence for sperm limitation in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus AH Hines PR Jivoff PJ Bushmann J van Montfrans Virginia Institute of Marine Science et al Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hines, AH; Jivoff, PR; Bushmann, PJ; van Montfrans, J; and al, et, Evidence for sperm limitation in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus (2003). Bulletin of Marine Science, 72(2), 287-310. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1521 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 72(2): 287±310, 2003 EVIDENCE FOR SPERM LIMITATION IN THE BLUE CRAB, CALLINECTES SAPIDUS Anson H. Hines, Paul R. Jivoff, Paul J. Bushmann, Jacques van Montfrans, Sherry A. Reed, Donna L. Wolcott and Thomas G. Wolcott ABSTRACT Reproductive success of female blue crabs may be limited by the amount of sperm received during the female's single, lifetime mating. Sperm must be stored in seminal receptacles until eggs are produced and fertilized months to years after mating. Further, intense ®shing pressure impacts male abundance, male size and population sex ratio, which affect ejaculate quantity. We measured temporal variation in seminal receptacle contents in relation to brood production for two stocks differing in both ®shing pressure on males and latitudinal effects on repro- ductive season: Chesapeake Bay, Maryland and Virginia, experienced intensive ®shing and relatively short reproductive season; and the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, experienced lower exploitation and longer reproductive season.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Register of Marine Species
    BELGIAN REGISTER OF MARINE SPECIES September 2010 Belgian Register of Marine Species – September 2010 BELGIAN REGISTER OF MARINE SPECIES, COMPILED AND VALIDATED BY THE VLIZ BELGIAN MARINE SPECIES CONSORTIUM VLIZ SPECIAL PUBLICATION 46 SUGGESTED CITATION Leen Vandepitte, Wim Decock & Jan Mees (eds) (2010). Belgian Register of Marine Species, compiled and validated by the VLIZ Belgian Marine Species Consortium. VLIZ Special Publication, 46. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ): Oostende, Belgium. 78 pp. ISBN 978‐90‐812900‐8‐1. CONTACT INFORMATION Flanders Marine Institute – VLIZ InnovOcean site Wandelaarkaai 7 8400 Oostende Belgium Phone: ++32‐(0)59‐34 21 30 Fax: ++32‐(0)59‐34 21 31 E‐mail: [email protected] or [email protected] ‐ 2 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species – September 2010 Content Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... ‐ 5 ‐ Used terminology and definitions ....................................................................................................... ‐ 7 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species in numbers .................................................................................. ‐ 9 ‐ Belgian Register of Marine Species ................................................................................................... ‐ 12 ‐ BACTERIA ............................................................................................................................................. ‐ 12 ‐ PROTOZOA ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decapod Crustacea from the South-West Indian Ocean
    ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM CRUSTACEA LIBRARY Volume 52 Band SMlTHSm.,Jl/\N INSTITUTION r-T', J ~ -'-(~, t~ April 1969 April Rt,U ..~ lu ;J-119 Part 7 Dee! DECAPOD CRUSTACEA FROM THE SOUTH-WEST INDIAN OCEAN By B. F. KENSLEY are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material becomes available Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town word uitgegee in dele op ongeree1de tye na beskikbaarheid van stof OUT 01' PRINT/UIT DRUK I, 2(1, 3, 5, 7--s), 3(1-2, 5, t.-p.i.}, 5(2, 5, 7-9), 6(1, t.-p.i.}, 7(1, 3), 8, 9(1-2}, 10(1-3), 11(1-2, 7, t.-p.i.}, 21, 24(2), 27, 31(1-3}, 38, 44(4)· Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel R2.IO Trustees of the South African Museum © Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum 1969 Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd. Die Rustica-pers ,Edms., Bpk. Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg. Wynberg, Kaap DECAPOD CRUSTACEA FROM THE SOUTH-WEST INDIAN OCEAN By B. F. KENSLEY South African Museum, Cape Town Introduction Station list • Species list . Systematic discussion Distribution . Summary Acknowledgements References • The material dealt with in this paper comes from several sources. The greatest proportion was collected on the seventh cruise of the R/V Anton Bruun, in 1964, as part of the International Indian Ocean Expedition. The station numbers of the Anton Bruun are designated by the letters BRU, while catalogue numbers of the Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, are designated either as NAD (off the Natal coast) PED (offMoc:;ambique coast), MDD (off the south-western coast of Malagasy Republic), or WBS (Walter's Shoal).
    [Show full text]