City of Greater Sudbury 2016 Census Communities & Neighbourhoods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Greater Sudbury 2016 Census Communities & Neighbourhoods City of Greater Sudbury 2016 Census Communities & Neighbourhoods Legend Municipal Boundary Garson Rayside-Balfour Rural Community Hanmer SE Townships Azilda Levack Sudbury Blezard Valley Lively Val Caron Capreol McCrea Heights Val Therese Capreol Rural Capreol Rural NE Townships Valley East Rural Chelmsford Naughton Wahnapitae NE Townships Coniston Nickel Centre Rural Wahnapitae F.N. Copper Cliff Onaping Walden Rural Dowling Onaping Falls Rural Whitefish Wahnapitae F.N. Falconbridge Valley East Rural Capreol Onaping Falls Rural Levack Hanmer Val Therese Onaping Blezard Valley Val Caron McCrea Heights Falconbridge Dowling Chelmsford Nickel Centre Rural 4 4 1 Garson Rayside-Balfour Rural Azilda 17 Wahnapitae Copper Cliff Coniston Walden Rural 9 6 Lively 6 9 Naughton O ld SE Townships Sudbury W an u Whitefish 7 p 53 E s ta ir e Sudbury Neighbourhoods New Sudbury e m Legend Rural Sudbury a Lasalle D e r e t e n g o d Municipal Boundary w i N r o b n D o y lc r a Neighbourhoods Donovan r F a Flour Mill B Copper Cliff ay gsw Kin Donovan Elm Downtown Downtown Minnow Lake Flour Mill Kingsmount- t n Bell Park Kingsmount-Bell Park Copper Cliff West End e ne g r e Lo Minnow Lake R s i r a 7 New Sudbury P 1 Rural South End South End Rural Sudbury R e g e n South End t West End 17 L o n g L a k Rural South End e 6 9 7 ± 53 Source: Former Municipalities, Communities and Neighbourhoods are based on 2016 Census Dissemination Block, Statistics Canada, City of Greater Sudbury Prepared by the Analytics and GIS Section, City of Greater Sudbury February 13, 2018 City of Greater Sudbury 2016 Census Communities Former Municipalities Legend Municipal Boundary Rayside-Balfour Former Municipalities SE Townships Capreol Sudbury NE Townships Valley East Nickel Centre Wahnapitae F.N. Onaping Falls Walden 4 4 1 17 9 6 6 9 O ld W an u 7 p 53 E s ta ir e Source: Former Municipalities, Communities and Neighbourhoods are based on 2016 Census Dissemination Block, Statistics Canada, City of Greater Sudbury Prepared by the Analytics and GIS Section, City of Greater Sudbury February 13, 2018 ±.
Recommended publications
  • Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area
    GREATER SUDBURY SOURCE PROTECTION AREA UPDATED SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN PREPARED ON BEHALF OF THE GREATER SUDBURY SOURCE PROTECTION COMMITTEE UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, 2006 (ONTARIO REGULATION 287/07) IN EFFECT AS OF MARCH 16, 2021 The following amendments have been made to the original document Date Type of Amendment Description March 16, 2021 Amendment resulting Policy PL1EF-SA and PL2F-SA were added to from the review under manage the establishment and operation of liquid Section 36 of the Clean hydrocarbon pipelines where this activity could Water Act, 2006. pose a significant threat to drinking water. Update to Policy M1EF-M to include a sampling frequency for monitoring sodium and phosphorus. Update to Policies Sa1EF-EO and S8EF-EO to incorporate additional outreach methods. Update to Map 7.1 to incorporate additional wells brought online during the development of the Source Protection Plan. March 2018 Minor/Typographical Map 1.2: The vulnerability score for the lake amendment under O. bottom was corrected to “9”. Reg 287/07 section Map 2.2: The Intake Protection Zone 3 was 51(6) amended to correct buffers around regulated areas. Greater Sudbury Source Protection Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Plan to Protect Municipal Drinking Water Sources in the Greater Sudbury Watersheds Drinking water in Ontario comes from both surface water and groundwater sources which can be contaminated from human activities and natural processes. The Clean Water Act, 2006 was created by the Government of Ontario to protect drinking water sources. The Act includes provisions for the development and implementation of local Source Protection Plans to protect sources of municipal residential drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Submission of Terms of Reference
    NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF TERMS OF REFERENCE This notification is to announce the submission of the Cliffs Chromite Project Documents Available for Review Terms of Reference to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). Please read You may inspect the proposed Terms of Reference during below for further information about the Project. normal business hours at the following locations, please check with your nearest location for their specific hours of operation: Cliffs Natural Resources Ministry of the Environment Valley East Public Library Inc. (Cliffs) is undergoing a Approvals Branch 4100 Elmview Drive, provincial and federal Floor 12A, 2 St. Clair Ave West, Hanmer, P3P 1J7 Toronto, M4V 1L5 Environmental Assessment Capreol Citizen Service (EA) for the Cliffs Ministry of the Environment Centre & Library Thunder Bay District Office 1-9 Morin Street, Chromite Project. The Suite 331, 435 James Street South, Capreol, P0M 1H0 Thunder Bay, P7E 6S7 EA will assess the Brodie Resource Library following four components Ministry of the Environment 216 South Brodie Street, of the Project: Sudbury District Office Thunder Bay, P7E 1C2 Suite 1201, 199 Larch Street, Sudbury , P3E 5P9 Waverley Resource Library 1) The Mine Site, located 285 Red River Road, near McFaulds Lake; Ministry of the Environment Thunder Bay, P7B 1A9 Timmins District Office 2) An Ore Processing Ontario Govt. Complex Elsie Dugard Centennial Library Facility, co-located at Hwy 101 East, South Porcupine, P0N 1H0 405 Second Street West, the Mine Site; Geraldton, P0T 1M0 Greenstone Municipal
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Telecommunications Tower Report
    Presented To: Planning Committee Request for Decision Presented: Monday, May 26, 2014 Report Date Tuesday, May 13, 2014 Proposed Telecommunications Tower, PIN 73504-2043, Parcel 24564 S.E.S., Part of Lot 5, Type: Routine Management Concession 3, Hanmer Township, (4980 Municipal Reports Road 80), City of Greater Sudbury, Rogers Communications Inc Recommendation Signed By THAT the City of Sudbury advise Industry Canada that they concur with the issuance of a licence for the development of a 80 metre high self support telecommunications tower at PIN 73504 Report Prepared By 2043, Parcel 24564 S.E.S., Part of Lot 5, Concession 3, Hanmer Eric Taylor Manager of Development Approvals Township, City of Greater Sudbury by Rogers Communications Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Inc. Recommended by the Division Mark Simeoni Acting Director of Planning Services Background Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Applications for telecommunications facilities are under the Recommended by the Department Paul Baskcomb jurisdiction of Industry Canada. Industry Canada requires that the Acting General Manager of Growth & proponent of a new telecommunication facility must consult with Development the municipality and indicate whether the municipality concurs Digitally Signed May 13, 14 with the application. It is noted that telecommunications facilities Recommended by the C.A.O. are not subject to municipal zoning regulations and municipal Doug Nadorozny concurrence is not necessarily required in order for Industry Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed May 13, 14 Canada to issue a licence. Rogers Communications is proposing the construction of a 80 m (262 ft.) high telecommunications self-support tower on a 30 ha (74.8 acre), property located on the north side of Municipal Road 80 in the community of Val Therese.
    [Show full text]
  • FALCONBRIDGE WIND FARM PROJECT Site Considerations Information Renewable Energy Systems Canada Inc
    FALCONBRIDGE WIND FARM PROJECT Site Considerations Information Renewable Energy Systems Canada Inc. July 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction to Site Considerations Information 1 2.0 Site Considerations Information Mapping 3 Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Natural Features Figure 3: Property Boundaries Figure 4: Municipal and Geographic Township Boundaries 3.0 Site Considerations Information Background Information and Data Sources 8 Site Considerations Information – Falconbridge Wind Farm Project July 2015 1.0 Introduction to Site Considerations Information The Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) in Ontario has asked proponents of renewable energy projects to submit applications (proposals) for energy contracts. In response to the IESO’s request for proposals (RFP) for phase one of the large renewable procurement (LRP I), Renewable Energy Systems Canada Inc. (RES Canada) is proposing a wind energy project, to be known as the Falconbridge Wind Farm project, which would be located in the City of Greater Sudbury (see Figure 1). The project is expected to be up to 150MW in size, include a transformer substation, low-voltage electrical collector lines, access roads, and a transmission line and construction laydown and work areas. The RFP I LRP requires that specific activities be undertaken prior to submitting a proposal to the IESO. These activities include public, municipal, Aboriginal and other stakeholder consultation and the presentation of Site Considerations mapping and Site Considerations Information (SCI). The SCI
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Guide
    1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT GREATER SUDBURY ................................................................................................................................................. 1 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 POPULATION ........................................................................................................................................ 2 AGE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................................... 3 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 4 MARITAL STATUS .................................................................................................................................. 4 FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 5 2016 NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ................................................................................................................................. 6 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 EDUCATION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Background Business Case for Valley East Twin
    Background At the June 19, 2017 Community Services Committee meeting, resolution CS2017-16 was passed stating “that the City of Greater Sudbury Council directs staff to prepare a business case to replace various arenas and/or ice pads, with the build of a multi- pad/multi-purpose arena facility in Valley East, indicating the cost of the build, recommended location, efficiencies to be had, financial options for the build, and any/or all other information to assist Council with its deliberations, to be included in the 2018 budget process.” As part of the 2018 budget process, Council received a business case for a Valley East Twin Pad arena. The business case identified the Howard Armstrong Recreation Centre location as a potential location for a new twin pad facility. Business Case for Valley East Twin Pad At the December 5th, 2017 Finance and Administration meeting staff presented a business case titled Valley East Twin Pad for Council’s consideration. The business case informed Council of the following: The City of Greater Sudbury (City) operates a total of sixteen (16) ice pads that are contained in fourteen (14) municipal arenas, with Capreol Arena and Gerry McCrory Countryside Sports Complex being twin pad facilities. The average age of the ice facilities in the City is more than 40 years, with the majority being constructed between 1950 and 1978. The City has a surplus of 1.8 ice pads at present and data suggests insufficient support for expanding the supply of municipal arenas. Capital requirements over the 10 years for the existing inventory of arenas in Valley East (Raymond Plourde, Centennial, and Capreol - Side 1 Arenas) amount to $6.67 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Wahnapitae First Nation
    MULTI-SECTOR SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2017 SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT with Wahnapitae First Nation Effective Date: April 1, 2014 Index to Agreement ARTICLE 1.0 - DEFINITIONS & INTERPRETATION ARTICLE 2.0 - TERM AND NATURE OF THIS AGREEMENT ARTICLE 3.0 - PROVISION OF SERVICES ARTICLE 4.0 - FUNDING ARTICLE 5.0 - REPAYMENT AND RECOVERY OF FUNDING ARTICLE 6.0 - PLANNING & INTEGRATION ARTICLE 7.0 - PERFORMANCE ARTICLE 8.0 - REPORTING, ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW ARTICLE 9.0 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LHIN SUPPORT ARTICLE 10.0 - REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS ARTICLE 11.0 - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, INDEMNITY & INSURANCE ARTICLE 12.0 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 13.0 - NOTICE ARTICLE 14.0 - ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 15.0 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT Schedules A - Detailed Description of Services B - Service Plan C - Reports D - Directives, Guidelines, Policies & Standards E - Performance F - Project Funding Agreement Template G - Compliance THE AGREEMENT effective as of the 1st day of April, 2014 BETWEEN : NORTH EAST LOCAL HEALTH INTEGRATION NETWORK (the “LHIN”) - and - Wahnapitae First Nation (the “HSP”) Background: The Local Health System Integration Act, 2006 requires that the LHIN and the HSP enter into a service accountability agreement. The service accountability agreement supports a collaborative relationship between the LHIN and the HSP to improve the health of Ontarians through better access to high quality health services, to co-ordinate health care in local health systems and to manage the health system at the local level effectively and efficiently. In this context, the HSP and the LHIN agree that the LHIN will provide funding to the HSP on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement to enable the provision of services to the local health system by the HSP.
    [Show full text]
  • 1989, December
    LUbUtt INCO PUBLIC Y DECEMBER Ontario Divison 1989 Entry wins first place Batman float a crowd pleaser The floaters at Environmen- turn the groundskeeping tractor fitted as Batman and agriculture tal Control have done us proud into a convincing Batmobile department employee Jerry • . again. from pieces of plywood, metal Zanuttig was transformed into Once again, the folks at the and even a roof vent. the Joker. agriculture section of En- "We never worry about run- Jerry voluntarily shaved off vironmental Control and Oc- ning out of ideas," mused Dad. a muchioved beard to play the cupational Health have put "It hasn't been a problem so role, which is perhaps one in- down their gardening tools and far. I guess you have to be a bit dication of the strength of the turned their fertile minds to of a kid at heart." Christmas spirit at lnco. create the winning float in this It took just two weeks for Ray Beaudreault, a musician year's Santa Claus Parade. the department's crew to build who plays with the Old South It took no little imagination the 18-foot finned creation, Band in his spare time, added to combine the Yuletide complete with a metal frame, the finishing touches to this festivities with this year's Bat- sleek black paint job and a year's entry by writing a song to mania to create a "Christmas front-end air intake for the jet go with the float. The song was Cruise with Batman," a float engine made from a roof vent. recorded (recording studio ex- that transformed one of the "We worked from a Bat- penses were paid by inco) and department's tractors into a Bat- mobile model," said Dan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 OMBI Public Report
    Musk of Toronto • Regi urham • 2007Regional Performa ce Benchmarking Municipality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS tawa • Regional Municipality of Peel • City of Windsor • RegionalLETTER FROM THE Municipality CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS of York AND CITY • MANAGERS County .. .......... of Brant 1 INTRODUCTION .. ............................................................. 3 City of London •THE District OMBI BENCHMARKING of Muskoka PROCESS............................................. • Regional Municipal 5 • City of Thunder2007 COMPARATIVE Bay RESULTS • City of Toronto • Regional Munici • Regional Municipality WHO DOES of WHAT?............................................. Durham • Regional Municipalit. 10 HOW TO READ THE GRAPHS .. ................................... 11 ality of Niagara • City1 Building of ServicesOttawa .. ............................................. • Regional Municipality. 12 o ality of Waterloo • 2City By-law ofEnforcement Windsor Services . .• . .Regional . .Municipality . 15 3 Child Care Services. 18 f Halton • City of Hamilton • City of London • District of M 4 Culture Services .. .............................................. 21 of Peel • City5 ofEmergency Greater Medical Services Sudbury . .• . .City . .of . .Thunder . 24 Bay • C 6 Fire Services .. ................................................. 28 cipality of York 7• CountyHostel Services .................................................of Brant • Regional Municipality. 32 8 Library Services .. .............................................. 35 t of Muskoka • Regional9
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]