I REG». GOA. 51
.",; ,.'" .1'-' !Panaji,11th December, 1985 (Agrahffycna 21, 1907) SERIES II No. 37 '. ."" OFFICIAL __ GAZETTE .: ; GOVERNMENT OF" GOA,DAlVlAN ,,ANDDIlJ
,", ,',->' . GOVERNMENT OF GOA, DAMAN' b~der No, ,6/3/81·PER(Vol.IV) AND Dill The AdminiStrator, of Goa, D~and DinISPI':'-, to transfer and post Shri s, ,p, Dlxlt",Addl;: Dy., ,C<>llectl!r, ,Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms Collectorate of Goa, Panaj~ as Fun~~rw. Manager;: District Industries Centre. Panaj~ with Immediate effect, thereby relieving Shri Vltorino RodrIgues, F'w\<;tioI)al 'Manager, of the addi_ charge of thiS post. Order '2. ThiS deployment of Shri Diidt shlil!11e ,on cd~puuition No. 3/17/74·PER (Vo!.IV) I)asis for a period of one year in the, first instant", and It The Administrator of Goa, Daman and Diu 'is pleased to shal! be, regulated as' per standard. terms of deputation. promote on ad·hoc basis, the following Grade II Office,.,. of By order and in the' name of the Admlnlstrato'b'of doa, Goa, Daman: and, Diu Civll Service to Grade I (Seleotlon' Daman a~d_ ,DIu. . -/:/ . Grade) ,post of ,the Sllme service with Immediate effeot:-'-- :::; -. N. P. GOJUJnekar, Under Secretary (Personnel). 29th'November, Sr. No. Name of the Officer Present ~Ung _' ·"':Ii;';';;31. 1985.' , ,. 1 2 .. ",,<,,:~,;,;" ,j,H6JneQeparlinenL • 1"', "Shri V. Aop.Mahajan' Managing Director, GOa,na· , , !Dan" &: Diu' TouriSm : General BranchjDivisi!,i> ' .. '.. , Deveiopmeilt <:of'ix>ratii>n Ltd., 'Panajl' and Direotor of TouriSm." '.>" ,Notification. 2. Shri Ashok S.' Ingle ,General Manager., (T&Al, ,N~, 2/86/82·HD(G)' Kadamba TranspOrt <:or poration Ltd., P~naji. In --~~~',-:6f- the:"Powers eonferred by sub·dause (c) ::_of 3.' Shri M. S. Sail AaslStant Secretary,. Goa, clause ,(8) .. Of ,~""2Of the Indian Official Secrets Acts Daman - and 'Diu Housing 1923 (Central Act 19 of 1923) read 'with the NotItl~on Board, . Panaji. of the Government 'of 1rulIa,MlniStry"of Home Affalm, N~w Deihl bearing No. F.2/3/67·UTL dated 24th July, 1967;'the AdmloIatrator of Goa, Daman and Diu herebY,declares the 2. The a~~e:.rid~hoc _promoti~ns wUl not ,b~sto~ . on "the places mentioned. in the Schedule -hereto as - "prohibited' promoted officers any clalm for regular appointments and places" for: .the I>urpos~s ·of ~Jte sai9. Act.on the ground that the' 'information' with .'reBi'ect thereto, ,or dan'lage"thereto, th.e,:semc~: rendered .. on ad~hoe basis in .the Grade,-wnl not .wo~.~ ~. US~i1~' ~t9'}1~ enemy. Thts:,No:t~i,~~io~, ~u~rS:iriIes count for. the. purpose of s'eniority '-·in that Gra~e - or for the' Government' order N(). Hl>!EMR/(1I)/16/86 dated ellgtblllty' for promotion to the next higher Grade. 24-10'0196!k' ,," ' ' , ,', ,. " .',", "
8'.-On their promotion~ StShri V;-A.-P. Mahajari,and A; S. SCHEDULE' Ingle shall continue to hold the posts as menUGned: in the -Col..No.'S as,above~' :,.:' :";'-:< .. 1"": "-,',.... '. 81. No. Name of p~" 4. Shri M. S. Sal!; Asststarit Secretary, GOa, Daman and Diu HOUSing board,' on hiS promotion·. to ,Grade I, is posted ' 7'l8wadl 7'aluka.: as Commissioner for Departmental Inquiries, Directorate of VlgUance,Panaji, tl)eJ;el>Y relieving Shrl R. I. Jai Prakash, L ~m~fVC)!r ~ 2S'"'capo;cjtj?ot AleO~' ~ ~ <>f C!H>perative. Societies,. of the additional charge <>f tb,is, post, 2. G.L. _R~rv_~r '. ~ .. l~~~. ~~pa.city. _~t""Ma.r~~.~' 3. G:L.' ReservOir of 150m3 capa~ty "at TOnca. Shli Sail shall h!UldoVer the charge of tl,e post of AssIstant 4. G.L. Reservoir of 150m3 capacity,: pump - house' and ,Secretary, Housing ,Board to one Of the Offlcem in the pumping installation at ·Navellm. -Diwar, 'Dhas.Goa. ,Housing Board; and join hiS new assignment immediately. 5. G:.-L. Reservoir- of 150m3 capacity, pump ·hoUse and His deputation period to the' HousingBoaro. stan.dscurtalled pumping- install,ation at _St. Matias;' -'Ilhas.Goa. . accordingly. . 6. G.L. Reservo!r .. of .. ,300m', capaclty" MOld, GOa, 7. Pump _hQuse, pultlping insta,11ation, tupe.. , wells at B)' 'order and in the' naIne of the .Administrator <>'fGOa, Gaunda~~: -,.-, --. :., .,-. lJ"",,,,,,·;"'i! DIIi, , ' 8. G.L. Reservoir: 9f 25m3 caPacitY4 -pump. house, pump. Jng iIultallationand open well il.t,Chorao.' :. .c N. P. ~.r, Under ~etii.fy(~ei), 9. 'Pump' ho·use. pumping installation, -'open -·weU--a.iad 1.50=a . '. - -'- '. ,"'. "'. _.-' ',; :G.L•. :.B~ryohf lat' Mandur; C .' __ ~.. " ':. 10. 300m3 G.L. Reservoir-at:.Sitida\i~;~/· ~~'. ': .. :.. 564 SERIES II No. ;37"
Sf. No. Name of place S1. No. Name of place ____-----~-:---'-'-C.:..~'-
11. Tube Well, pump house and Pump1ng Installation a;~ 3. Ground level Reservoir of 600n>:l capacity near Maha~ Talaullm. laxmi Temple at Mangor Hill. 12. Open wen, pump house and pumping installation a,t" 4. Ground level I:teservoir of 10,,>3 capacity at Midland Curca. . Sada, near MPT fire bridge station. m3 13. 150 G.L. Reservoir, pump house and pumping insw 5.. Pump house. and ground level reservoir of 300,,·:1 tallation at Murda, Merc;es. capacity and overhead ReServoir' of 150m3 capacity 14. 50m3- sump, 150'U3 Overhead at Nagali. behind Ayyappa temple at Mangor HID. 15. Open "well, and pump house at Bhatulem in Tiswadi.; 6. Pump house and ground level reservoir' . of 3OO"'~ Tainka. capacity and 15(}m3 O.H.R. at New Vaddem. 16. Sewage pump' house Zone at Mala, near Neugi Nagar, 7. 25m3 capacity O.H.R. near housing Board Colony at Panaji. New Vaddem. 17. sewage pump house Zon~ n at Mala, behind Ninho 8. 300m ' . capacity G.L.R. at Chlcalim. Infantil Institution. 9. 60m3 capacity O.H.R. bellind Cottage 'Hospital at 18. Sewage pump house Zone ,- m and IV near Matias Chicalim. Menezes. 10.. 300m3 capacity G.L.R. at Bogmalo near Hansa Petrol .1R . Se:w-age . pump· house Zone--- V. near Don Bosco -High Umk. . School. 111 Z.A.C. Valve of 5()()mm c;lia and Control room at Sancoale. 20- Sewage pump house near. Dempe College. 12. , :J:ube.:.:weU with, pump house for,' Rural: Wat~r SupPly 21. Sewage pump -house al' Sewage Treatment Plant. ./.1 'Scheme at San'COale. ~'.', :, 22. Sewage P~:_ .. ho.ll:s:a" .. at-- "Bha'tUlem/ near Government 13. 14 MLD Sewage Treatment, Plant, Katem, Raina. 'B' Type quarters. 14. Sewage Pumping' Station l'j'o•. 5 Katem, _. d!3.. ,ag/11·'KVSub.£tation "at·panaji•. 15. Sewage Pumping' Station ·No. '6 near .Desterro Baina . '24. 33/11:KV Sub-Station at COrlln'i; Road. "21>." S3/11 KV·Sub-stati<>li. at Bambollm.·: '. 16. 150tn~ capaCity overhead reservoir' head hind -Sada. 17. PiJmp house and sump of 10m3 capacity of Zari. . Poiula. 2'1>1_: 18. 33/11 KV Sub-Station-at Mormugao. 19, 33/11 KV Sub-Station 'aL Sancoale, Monnugao. 1. Pump houSE:. and pumping iJ~staJla~ion_,. ,spriqg.. at Vi~ zarmath:rn Panchwadt in Ponda Tiluka: ' Salcete T.alulva: 't 2. ,. Pump house -ahd pUffining' installation"open' weti.: at . Slttbnmath ili PancfrWa:-di, Ponda Taluka. " ,~ 1,., ,. '_Control' Room. of' A.C. line at Loutoliril. 3, ~P ,hQu$e and pUPl:ping installation ope~, W:~U at ',,2... , '·R~C;e~ .. Ground level·Reservoir of .150~~ a.t Chandor.. Gajem' in Ponda Taluka:' ", .: .' . ·3" ,·R.;.C.C. Ground·,lev.e} "ReserVoir of'loom3 at Macaiana. 4. G.L. Reservoir of 300"'s capacity ne~ Con~~Dt at 4.' ·R;:O.C. Ground level: Reservoir of lOOtm\.·· at DeUSsa. Ponda.,Goa.-... ,:. ' _ . "'," .. ,; .'., . 5. ace. Ground level Reservoir of 100m3 at Velim. 5. G.L. Reservoir of 300m3 capacity at Curti ne~ D~ 6~' R.C.C; Over head' ReServoir of 100'''"3 capadty near' Ponda-Goa. " . " . -;: -,... :: .•..,-,.,' :::0,' ,:_'/';':-:':: .: Cl\urc.h" CunC9lim. ,. ,. 6. H.L. Reservoir of 50m3 capacity at Borim in PoneJa. 7. R.C.C. over head Reservoir of 100"'s capacity at Betal 7. O.L. Reservoir of 15&>'· ""-pacity -at Khandeapar. ·batim near Church. m 8. G.L. Reservoir of 150 ' capacity at Usgao TlslL 8. Aquem "Alto Reservoir (Two grdhndlevel and; one 9. G.L. Reservoir' of 800"". capacity 'near Meat Complex at overhead); Usgao. . ... 9.. .PJiE Compl~l\ 'B"rda Reservoir (Two.• groond level). m 10. Overhead reseJ:lTolr of 5O ' capacity opposite to M.R.F. ,:'1:0:. ,.>,.p'ator:da Res~rvQ.irj'" factory· at Usgao. 1:1:10. '. Co.lv.~ R~~iT..... ~:.'~; 11. G.L. Reservoir of 200m3 capacity and pump house and l~,!. ~.or~ R~el'Vo~r; :. pumping installatio¥, a,t F:~rp1agudi. , 13. CortaJlnj, ..Rl'S\'ryolr. m 12. Overhead reservoir of 150 ' capacity at Fannagudi 14. Mante, Reservoir. ('lWo ground level). ·1
.. ~:'1 ~p.~'~Il~S\ndReSefV6ir (2) Well and 1; ,Spring Collection Chafiiber. Pump''-holise With ~~pirig Pump house. _ '. _ , _ . installation and' '50m3 Ground Level'"reservolt at ReVora.. 8. 33/11 KV Sub·Statloh at curchorenl; Qu~pem. !( Tube well, Pump house with pumping, installatiOn· and rn , -'. - ," .-' 50 :, over head reservoir at Nachinola. ~',,:" ,Qanacona 'falukq.~ 3. ~,Op~:n well" pump .~ouse with pumpmg': iJlstaUatl:on 'and c 1p()~.3. ov~r head ,r€!$IerVoir at·, Moira.... · '.. " : .-' ' .. l~ ~. Treatment Plant~-arid' Reser\';oil~ at'Mok-hard itt ·Shrist.:'ll V;P.. '. , '4.' ~QD>3. .G~un4,levt# :Re~ervoir. dug Well, pump: 'house with 2. Raw Water. Pump house .at A:l'doPhi:tnd. pUfllPing im;taJlation. ;l.tKelpirna,. ." .... . '" . 3. .33fl1·KV· Sub-station at' Cah.acl>na.: 5. 15o.zn:i "Reservoir.. Pump house, well dug weH',f!.Ud'.,pump- ing Installation at Quitula, Aldona. ' Moimugoo Taiuk~: . 6. 150.,:,.3 ... :ae.s~rvoir, . Pumping. ,.b.O!lS€:,- well.;; dug ,·wen and pumping mstallatioD, 'at 'Santen<;et; AlI!O)l;t.", .. " :".1~. f";E{E··Complex.·at·Head r..an~ 'Sada COIl~pti:sJng"of pump 7. 150m3 Reservoir at Monte de Guiriln. ' house, ~ .. --GrO,und': level· 'Reservoir" of soom3, Overh~ad m3 8. 150 ~~Y,~~J~yel.~:s.~~yp!r .a.t~1:3:~t.o~~,: .... :.. ",:) .~, v . ,~olr <>i .150"". 9. 50m3 Ground level ReServOIr 2 Nos. at" Guirim. , 2: Pump House and Ground·' level ReserVoir ot ~m3 10. 5Om~ Ground level Reserv ,~--...,.. --..- ..-. -~-.'" 12TH DECEMBER, 1985 (AGRAHAYANA 21, 1907) 565 Sl. No. Name -of place S1. No. Name of place 12. 150m3 Ground level Reservoir at Colvale. 5. Tube Well, Punip house with' Pump41g'Installation at 13. 150m3 Reseryoir near Soccorro Panchayat. Petichewada, Pernem._ .' " 14. 150m~ Ground level Reservoir at Betim. 6. Tube Well, Pump -house_ with pumpirig installation. at 15. 300m3 over head Reservoir at Porvorim near Xavier Askawada, Mandrem, Pemem. Institute -of Historical Research (Salvador do .Mundo), 7. Tube Well, Pump house with pumpirig' installation at 16. 800n•3 Ground level Reservoir near O'Coquerio, Porvorim Madhlames, Mandrem-Pernem. ' 17. Tube- well, Pump house with pumping installation at 8. 50m3 ReS'eI."Voir, TuQe :well at Juneswada, -Mandrem, Olaulim. Pemem. 18. 150 Ov~r head Reservoir at Calangute near Tourist 9. 50m3 Ground level Reservoir, ·Tube wen; 'Pump house DOTmitory-. with pumping installation at -Mopa, Pemem. 19. Tube well, Pump house with pumping installation at 10. .50m3 Ground level Reservoir, Tube wen, Pump house Nerul. with pumping installation at Varkond, Perhem. 20. 150 Over head Reservoir near Candolim Hlll and Open 11. .33/11 KV Suo-StaJtion at Pemem. Well and Pump house with pumping installation at Candolim. Satari Taluka: .21; _300 m3 Reservoir at Siolim.- 22. Tube: well with pumping installation and pump house 1. Source of Valpoi Water Supply at Dabe Sattari Taluka at Anjuna. ' & Water Reservoir at Valpoi. 23.. 150m3 Ground level at Candolim. 2:. Valpoi - Spring at Bibem. 24. 800m3 4 Reservoirs at Assonora, Water Treatment . 3. Reservoir near MamlaJtdar Office. Plant and pUmping installation at Assonora. 4. Porye-Pumphouse. 25. 800m3 Grourid level Re~ervoir at Sinquerim, Bardez. 5. 'Zornem - Pump house. 26. 150m3 Ground level Reservoir. at Sinquerim, Bardez. 6.' Tanem - Pump house.. 27. 33/11 KV Sub-Station at Mapusa. 7. Area of Anjunem lITigation Project at AnjlU1eIU. 28. 33/11 KVSub-Station at Sallgao, Bardez. 8. 33/11 KV Sub-Station at ValpoL Penwm Taluka: .Daman District:. 1. 150m3 Ground level Reservoir at Pernem with Pump 1. 66/11 KB Sub"Station at Daman. house, Pumping. installation and- Fllteration Galley, etc. 2, 150 Ground level Reservoir, Primp nouse with Pump By order and in the name of the Administrator of Goa, ing installation at Tuem. Daman 'and Diu. 3. 50m3 Ground level ~eservoir,' Tube well, Pump house. with pumping installation at Tuem (Gaunkar waddo). K. N. S. Nair, Under Secretary (Home). 4. Open Well, Pump House with prunping instalJaJtlon at Harmal. Panajl, 25th October, ·1985. ••• the said, Act, be disregarded by him while assessing compensa:. Revenue Department tion for such parts of the :said land as,may be finally acquired. 3. If' the Govenunent is satisfied that the said' land is Nofif;c~tion needed fo.r the aforesaid purpose. _ a, declaratiop. to that effect under Section 6 of the said Act will be, published in No. 22/132/83-RD the Official Gazette, in due -course. If the acquiSition is abandoned wholly or in part, the fact Will be' notified. Whereas it appears to the Appropriate Goverrunent (here inafter referred to as "the, Go:veI"J:U:l1ent") . thaJt the land 4. The Government is further pleased to appoint under specified in the schedule' hereto ,(hereinafter referred to as clauSe - Sr. No. Taluka Village Plot NQ. Names of the persons believed to be interested Approximate area in sq. mts. 1 2 3 4 5 • 1. Daman Nani-Daman PTS-43/202 1) Mrs. Olga Ferreira Mascarenhas. 1437.00 2) Legal heirs of Maganlal D8.modar Rana (Lessee). 3) Legal heirs of Thakordas BrijlalKansara (Lessee). Total ...... 1437.()() By order and jn the ~e _of the,Lt. Governor of Goa,_ D~ and Diu •. P. S. Nadkarni, Under Secretary (Revenue). Panaji, 23rd October, 1985. 566 .. SERIES 11 No. 37 , Notification said Act,. that tbe said lan!i ,specified In· tbe schedule hereto ~s ~eeded to be acquired for the public purpose specified above. No. 22/263/84-RD Now, Therefore, 'the Goveriml~t is pleased to declare under Whereas. by G9v.enunent Notification No. 22/263/84-RD ijle provisions of Section 6 of the said Act-that the said land dated 18-1-85 published on _page 807 of Series II, No. 45 of is required for the public purpose speClified above~ the Official Gazette, dated 7".. 2:85 it was notfified under Section 4 of the- Land· Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter 2. The Government is also -pleased to appoint under referred to as "the said- 4:-ct") -that the land,- specified in the clause (c) of Section 3 of tbe said Act, the Additional Deputy schedule appended to the said Notific.ation -(hereinafter refer Collector 2-South Goa, Margao to perform the functions of red to as the- "said land') was likely to. be needed for the a Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be taken' in public purpose viz. construction of approach road to Mirabag respect of the· said land, and to direct him under' Section 7 of the said .Act to take order for the acquisition of the said Bridge at Sanguem Pontimol side. land. .' .. And' Whereas the appropriate Governnlent (hereinafter 3. A plan of the said land can be linspected ,at the office referred to as "the Government") is satisfied after considering .of the said Additional Dy. Collector 2-Soutb· Margao till the the report made under sub-section (2) of Section 5A of the award is made under Section 11. SCHEDULE (Description of tbe said land) App"roximate Taluka ViUage/Vvard Survey No. Sub. Div. No. Names o! .the persons believed to be interested area in sq. mts. 1 2 3 4 • 6 .Quepem CUrchorem 119 13 part ~ga Sanvordekar 1315.00 Caretaker: SimOes Coutinho. 14 part Jiva Chandra Ghadi. 600,00 C.aretaker: Antonio Costa. 15 part Ganesh Morto Ghadi. 500.00 Caretaker: Agostinho Silva. 120 Dattaram Siinai Cuvelkar. 425.00 part Total ...... 2840,00 By order and in the name of the Lt. Governor of Goa, Daman .and Diu.' P. 8. "Nadkarni, Under Secretary (Revenue)" Panaji, 3rd October, 1985. Notification said Act, that the Said land, specified in the schedule hereto. is needed to be acquired for the public purpose specified No. 22/6/85-RD above. Whereas by Government Notification No. 22/6/85-RD dated Now, Therefore, the Government is pleased to declare under 16-2-1985 published on page 10-11 of Series II, No.· 2 of tbe the provisions of Section 6 of the said Act that the said land Official_Gazette, dated 11-4-1985.it was notified under Section is required for the public purpose specifted above. 4 of the Land AcquiSition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the: said Act") that the land~ speci.f1ied in the schedule ap 2. The Government is also pleased to appoint under pended to the said Notification. (hereinafter referred to as the cla).lse (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Deputy Collector "said land") was_likely to be needed for the-public purpose (South) Margao to perform the functions .of a Collector for.all viz; for allotment ·of House Sites at Bhati sanguem under . _proceedin,gs' hereinafter to -be taken in .respect of the said 20,polnt Progranune. land, and to direct him under Sect1l.on 7 of the Said Act to take order for the acquisition of the said land. Alid Whereas the app~pdate Government (hereinafter 3. A plan of the said land can be inspected at the office referie4 to, as· .. the Government") is satiSfied after cOl).sidering of tbe said Deputy Collector (Soutb) M.argao till tbe award the report made, under sub-section (2) of Section 5A of the IS made under Section 11. > SCHEDULE (Description o{the said land) Taluka Village/Ward Plot No.- S1.J.l'\·ey No. Approximate Name of the person b'elieved to be interested area in sq. mts. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sanguem Bhati 4 74 Shri Jaikrishna Bhatikar. 4950.00 Total "" ...... 4950.00 By order and in the name of the Lt. Governor of Goa, Daman and Diu. P. S. Nadkarni, Under Secretary (Revenue). Panaji, 1st November, 1,985. " .12THDEGEMBER,1985 (AGRAHAYANA 21,1907)- 567 Notification after the da~ of the publication- of this Notification; ,wilJ under clause -(seventh) of Section 24 of the. said Act, be No. 22/162/85-RD disregarded _by him while assessing compensation for such partS of the 'said land as-may be'finally acquired. whereas it appears to the Appropriate Government (herein~ _.after referred to as "the Government") that-the land specified 3. If the Government is satisflied th.at- the said land is in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "said needed for the aforesaid purpose, a declaration to that effect land")" "is likely to be needed for public purpose viz. Land under SectiQn 6 of the said Act will be published in the Official Acquisit~on for widening and Improvement of N. H. 17 from Gazette in due course. If the acquisition_ tis abandoned wholly Km. 86/300 to 93/800. or in part, the fact will be notified. And 'Whereas in the opinion of the Government. the provi~' 4. The ~~ernment is fUrther pleased to ~ppoint under ,sions-of~sub-section (I) of Section 17-of the Land Acquisition Clause (c) of Section 3 -of the said Act the Additional ])y. Act, .:1894 (hereinafter referred to .as the sald Act) are Collector· (3-South) Quepem to perform the functions, of a applicabl~. , Collector under the said Act in respect of the said land. Ther.e;f~re the GoveI'Illllent 'is pleased- t~ notify under sub~ 5. The; GoYe~t is also pleaSed to. authorise _under sub - -sectlo,n-.. (1l. of Section 4 of the Land .Acquisition Act, 1894.' -section (2)-' of Section 4 of thei said Act, the following (herelinafter. referred to as the "said Act") that the said land Officers to do the act, specified therein in respect of the is likely to be needed for the purpose -specified above. said land. .' The Government is pleased to direct Under sub-section (4) 1. The Collector of . Goa, Panaji. · of Section 17 of the said Act that the -provisions of Section 5A 2. The Additional Dy. Collector (3-South) Quepem. of. the s~d -Act shall not apply in respect of the said land. 3. The_ :E-Xecutive -Engineer, Works. Division 'XIV P.W.D. 2. All persons interested in the said land are hereby warned Fatorda Margao. . not to obstruct or interfere wlith any surveyor or other persons 4. The Director of Land Survey. Panaji. < employed upon the said laIid for the purpose of the said acquisition. Any contracts- for the disposal of the said land by . 6. 4 rough plan of the said. land is avalilable for inspection sale. lease, mortgage, assignment, exchange or otherwise or in the office of the Additional Dy. Collector (3-South) Quepem · any outlay commenced or dmprovements made thereon without from the date of publication of this Notification- in the Official · the sanction of the Collector appo~ted in paragraph 4 below, Gazette. SCHEDULE (Description of the said land)" Sub-Div. Approximate Taluka Village Survey No. No; Names of the persons believed to be interested area in sq. mts. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Canacona Loliem 280 1 1. Mahadev KeshaV Bhat. 400.00 Polem 2. AntOnio Jacint Fernandes. 1$ 2 1. AntoniO Jacint Fernandes. 3400.00 3 Luis Fernandes. 950.00 4 Devidas Vidhyadhar Bhat Pinge. 675.00 5 1. Shankar Shrinivas PrabhU Desai. 825.00 2. Magdalina Fernandes. 6 Raya Ragunath Prabhu Dessai. 950.00 7 Damodar Narayan Prabhu Dessai. 825.00 8 Francis Fernan(,les. 825.00 9 Antonio Dias. 500.00 10 Eugenio Fernandes. 500.00 11 Maria Filiciadade Fenmndes. -650.00 12 Datta Bicu Prabhu Dessai. 2550.0() A. House of Shri Cactunio Franc~ Fernandes 13 Ramachandra Padplanabai .Ehat. 1000.00 327 1 Mohan R. Bhat. 525.00 281 13 Raguchandra Padmanath Bhat. 275.00 282. 1 Mohan Ramchandra Bhat. 1300.00 2 Shrinivas Ramchandra Bhat Gaonkar. 600.00 3 1. (iovind Laximan Bhat Gaonkar. 400.00 2. Ram Anant Prabhu Gaonkar. 4 Purushottam Raghavendra Bhat Gaonkar. 425.00 5 1. .. Vithal Janardhan Bhat. 725.00 2. Shridhar J. Ebat. 3. Savitri A. Bhat. 4. Radhabai A. Bhat. 6 Ragunath Keshav Prabhu Dessai. 500.00 7 1. .Baburao Varnan. 500.00 2. SUresh Datta Prabhu Gaonkar. 8 Sagun Ramchandra Bhat. 175.00 9 1. Keshav Venctesh Ehat. 275.00 2. Gajanand Govind Bhat. ·10 Comunidade of Loliem. 25.00 283 4 Jivottam Narayan Porob. 1400.00 5 Manjunath Sadanand Tengse. 1500.00 6 Comunidade of Loliem. " 100.00 284 12 Esak Fernandes. 600.00 13 Mohan Ramchandra Bhat Gaonkar. 500.00 14 Ratnakar Anant Bhat Gaonkar 725.00 (including cowsheq of Sada Dhaku Naik). .J,5 Ragunath Porcb• 150.00 16 Janardhan Nilkanth Pin~e. 500.00 5 1~ Raghunath Keshav Prabhu Desai.. 100.00 4 1. Santan Rodrigues. 200.00 'I' 1. Mahadev Pingue. 1850.00 hQuse belongs to Jose Rebello. 568, SERIES II .No. 37 ~. 2· ~ 4 • • Canacona Loliem 325 '1 1: Jivottatfi Narayan, Prabhu, D.esai. 99Q·00 Polem (including House o~ Anthony Ja'Cinto Ferna.nds). 3 JURO- Concecao Barreto. 3~5.0Q 2 Juao Conc'ecao Rebello. 250·00 (includirig ,House). 4 1. Jacint -Fernandes. 300.00 ·2: Janardhan Narayan Prabhu Desai. 5 Confraria of Our .Lady of Fatima". 100.00 6 Juao Vicent -Souza: 7.00, 324 1 Mohan Ramchandra -Bhat Gaonkar. 50.00 2 Shrinivas Ramchandra Bhat Gaonkar. 5QQ.00 3 Bien Raghuvir Gaonkar. 220.00 4 Santan ROdrigues. " 1150.00 6 Ragunath Keshav Prabhu Desai. 850.00 (including' house). ' '- 6 Janardhan Nilkant Pingue. 300.00 Madhav Krishna PinSUe. Janu Shaba Gaonkar•.. Janu Narayan Gaonkar. 285' 15 Libania 'Cairo. 4000.00 16 1. Bhieu Krishna Pr'abhu' Desai. 4300.00 House' beloni to A. Francisco Mathew Gonsalves. 286 28 80im Yesso Vai'ik. 900.00 287 1 Ramanath R~ma ·Rrabhu Gaonkar. 1100.00 T: Antonio Manuel Mathew Gonsalves. 288 1 Francisco Manuel Gaonsalves. 1000.00 4 ·Lionaza Gonsalves. 650.00 7 Clement Gonsalves. 450.00 8 Joao F. Gonsalves. 500.00 House of Perapeth Roza Gonsalves. 10 Antonio Manuel Sebastiao Avelina Gonsalves. 800.00 12 Clement Gonsalves. 1450.00 '11 Isidoro Furtade. 850.00 289 1 Baburao Vaman Prabhu. 2600.00 289, 2 1. Ragunath Keshav Prabhu Dessai. 1650.00- 2. Krishria V. Prabhu Shashtri. 322 3 Isac Fernandes." 900.00' " Loliem 328 1. Janu Gaonkar. 6000.00' 2. Laximan R. Gaonkar. 3. Yess6 -R. Gaonkar. 4. Madhu Timblo. 5. Janardhan N. Bhat. 6. Sebas~ian Colasso.. 7. Juao_ Jermo Colasso. 8. Ag1.stino -Colasso. 9. Co,munidade of Loliem. 317 1 Clement Gonsalves. 100.00' 311 2 1. Raghunath Keshav Prabhu Dessai. 1350.00 2. Baburao Vaman Prabhu. 3 Eugino Cairo. 2150.00· 293 1 -Krishna Vo Prabhu Shashtri. 1800.00' 3 -do- 800.00 T: Rama Mog Bandekar. 2 Krishna V. P. Shashtri. 1625.00· T: Dhaklo Pundalik Patti. 4 Krishna V. P. Shashtri. 1550.00 . 294 4 Krishna V: P. Shashtri. 125.00- T: Ram Mog Bandekar. Ii Krishna V. P. Shashtrl. 50.00' 'l Krishna V. P. Shashtrl.- 700.00 8 Krish;na V.' P; Shashtri. 250.00· .T: Pundalik Bima Naik. 9 Krishna V. ·P. Shashtri. 700.00: T: Babai Nagu Gaonkar. 3 Keshav V. P.rabhu Shashtri. 150.00 316 .4 Ragunath Vainkunth Prabhu Shashtri. 600.00 315 J. Ragunath yainkunth Prabhu Shashtri. 850.00 T-: Babai, Nagu G3:onk~r. 2 Ragunath V. P.Shashtrl. 225.00> T: Gunu Narayan Gaonkar. 3 Ragunath V. P. ShaShtri. 250.00- 4 Bhicaro Babu Gaonkar. 300.00 Demu Babu Gaonkar. Rama -Panu.-GaOnkar. 315 5 Jaya Bapuji Raikar. '300.0(1' 6 Milagrina Fernandes. 1700.(»' '1 Laximidhar 'Gangadhar Loliekar. 125.00' T: Rama Pandu Gaonkar. 810 1 Dad Devasthan .of- Polem: 25.00- T: Rama Pandu Gaonkar. 2 Dad Devasthan of Potern. 1l00.()(» House: A lsal Fernandes. B: Doming D'Souza and Bruno Viegas. Sia 12TH DECEMBER, 1985 (AGRAFIAYANA 21,1907) 569 1 2 "4 • 6 --~----~------_._------'-- _. 1 2 3 4 • 6 Canacona {Ahem 327 8. Sagun Ramchan~a Bhat. .::::" ·.100.00 9 Keshav VenkteshBhat. 25.00 Gajanan Govind Bhat Raguchandra Padm~naba Bhat. (includipg well). 10 Raghuchandra Padmanabha Bhat. 200.00 13 Contunidade of' Laliem. 75.00 357. .1 : .Comunidade- of Lollem. 1850.00 Rosario Filicidade' D'Souza. Terezinho Dias. 341 1 Mahandu Prabhu Desai. 6200.00 113 1 . Domingo -Carneiro. 50.00 : Julia Maria Carneiro. 1 Venkatesh Laxlmau Varik. 60.00 6 1. J;'\lndalik Vithal Bhat. 50.00 2. Narayan Pundallk Ehat. 5 1. Ra~chandra Govlnd Bhat. 100.00 2. Anusaya Govind Bhat. 116 9 1. Lalchandl'a Prabhu Desai. 220.00 ~. Narayan Vithal Prab.hu Gaonkar. 116 10 1. Datta Bhleu Prabhu Gaonkar. 175.00 2 .. Durgadas Narayan Prabhu Gaonkar. 3. Hemant Narayan Prabhu Gaonkar. 116 12 1. Anandibai Purushottam Prabhu Desai. 2200.00 2. Comunidade of Loliem. 3. Venktesh LaxilUan Varik. 4. Bhlcaro Nilu Satarkar Ghadi. 5. Day~nant Vithal Satarkar Ghadi. 6. Madhav Hari Prabhu Desal. 7 ..· Sita .GovlndPrabhu Gaonkar. • 117 3 1. Datta Bhieu Prabhu Gaonkar. 50.00 4 1. Durgadas Narayan Prabhli" -Gaonkar. 50.00 2. Hemant Narayan Prabhu -Gaonkar. ·118 1 1. Datta Bhicu Prabhu Gaonkar. 400.00 118 2 1. "Rantchandra Vasudev Prabhu Maliyar. 1000.00 2. Vinod Krishna Varik. ,',',~ 3. Vasudev Dhaklo Varik. 3 1. Babai Bhlcaro Sudlr. 300.00 118 4 1. Yeshwant Hari Sudhir. 125.00 2. Mahadev RaIna Sudhlr. 3. Harishchandra Babu Sudhir. 4. Keshav Peru Sudhlr. 5. Narayan Laximan Sudhir. 6 1. Shri Keshav Devasthan of Loliem. 100.00 7 1. Raghunath Vikunt Sudhlr. 10;00 123 16 1. Comunidade of' "Loliem. 2000.00 124 1. Comunidade o~ LOllem. 3100.00 358· 1 1 .. Comunidade of· Loliem. 19300.00 2. Especinta Fernandes. 3. Maria Marfina Fernan.des. 4 .. Antonio FloMra Barretto. 5. Krishna Kanu Naik. 6. Luis Francisco D'Spuza. 7. Margaride D'Souza•. 8. Durgabai D. Naik. 9. Siirat Krishna ·Chari. 110· IiMku .Naik. 11. ·Yeshwant Ganesh Pagi. 12. Vishnu Ghota Pagl. 13. Babu N. Pagl. 14., Vishrantl. Jaya Loliekar. . . 15. Mohan Bombo Pagl. 16. Ramdas Putu Pagi. 17. Pandu R. Pagl; 18. Nagesh Deu Pagi. 19.. Krlshna Mukund Pagl. 20. Laximan Putu Pagi.. · 21: CisiUa: Fernandes. 22. -; Caetano Fernandes. 23. Venktesh "Bhleu- Satarkar. 24> Khusha!! F. Naik. 25. .BabU Bhlca Bandekar. 26. Pedru Rodrigues. . 27. Purushottam Yesso. Pagi. 28. Rosha Burg Viegas. 29; Appa Rama PagI; 30. Sada Dhaku Naik. 31. Nlikant Bapu Pagl. 32. KrIshna D. Naik. 33. Babani Pagl. 12TH'DEOEMBER,1985 (AGRAHAYANA 21,1907) 571 , 1 '2 3 4 5 6 .4' Cana,c~na LOliero 308 1 34. NataUna Pereira. 35. Kusta Govln.d Pagi. 36. BaIaji Dhaku Pagi•. 37. Rama Nag-a Pagi. 38. Priska Pereira. 39. Maria Martina Fernandes. . 40. Harl NUu Pagi. . 41. Ano RosInho Rebello. 42. Prema Rama Pagi. 43. Vinayak .Bombo Pagi. 44. Sabestai Jose DiBS; 2 Nirakar Devasthan of Mashem. 4000.00 Boundarie8: North:. S. No. 1ui/1S. No. 351. South: SN. 301/4,5. Karnataka Border SNo; 338 328. . East: SN. part 116/l2, SN. 114. SN. 118, 117, 123, 124, 130, 131, 279, 280/1 to 11, 293, 289 Karnataka Border section.' . West: SN. part 350, 358, 341, 338, 328, 327, 325, 316. . -:-:::-.:-::c::-:-- Total ...... 1,82,000.00 By order and in the name of the Lt. Governor of Goa, Daman and Diu. P. B. Nadk~rni, Under Secretary (Revenue). Panaji, 26th November, 1985. Notification said Act, that· the said land specified iil the schedule hereto is needed to be acquired, for the public purpose specified a~ve. No. 22/173/84-RD Now, Therefore, the Government is ·'Pleased to declare- under Whereas by Government Notification No. 22/173/M-RD the provisions of Section 6 of the said Act thart; the said dated 5-9-84 published on page 437 of Series II, No. 25 of land is required for the public purpose specified above. the Official Gazette, dated 20'9-84 it was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter ·re~ 2. The Government is also pleased to ·appoint under clause ferred to as "the said Act") that the land, specified In the (c) of Section. 3 of the said Act, the AdditioD.a! Dy. Collector scl).edule appended to the said Notification (hereinafter re: (South-3) Quepem to perfonn the functions of a Collector ferred to' as the H said land") was likely to be needed for for all proceedings hereinafter to be taken In respect Of. the the public purpose viz. L.A. for -construction of play ground Said land, and to direct him -under Se'Ction 7 of the sald Act at Kalay V. P. Kalay In Sanguem Taluka. to take order for .the acquisition of the said land. And ·Whereas the appropriate Government (hereinafter re~ 3. A plan of the said land can be Inspected at the office of ferred to. ~ "the Govenunent") is satisfied after consIdering the said Additional Dy. Collector (South-3) Quepem till the the re-po~ made under sub~sectio:ri (2) of Section 5A of the award is made under Section 11. SCHEDULE (Description of the said land) Taluka Village/Ward_· Survey No. Sub. Dlv. No. Name' of the person-· beUeved,to be interested Approxlmate; area in -sq. _rots. 1 2 3 4 6 6 Sanguem Kalay 146 .(part) Ceasar Jo~ Maria Furtado. 20,000.00 Total .... : ...... ,. 20,000.00 By order and in the name of the Lt. Governor of Goa, Daman and Diu• .. ' \.. P. S. Nadkarni;t Under Secretary (Revenue). Panaji. 23rd October. 1985. ... Public Health Department Industries and Labour Department Order Order No. 11/3/80-PHD No. 28/77/84-ILD On the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion The following Award given by the IndustrlaJ. Tribunal, Co~ttee and with the approval of the Union Public Ser Goa, Damanaud Diu is hereby published as required under vice Conunission. the Administrator of Goa.. _ Daman· and the provisions of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. Diu is pl."..ed to confirm Shri S. N. Tripathi in the post of 1947 (Central Act· XIV of 1947). Asstt. Drugs Controller under J)jrectorate of He.ruth Ser vices with effoot from 6 ..11-1985. By order ·and in the name of the Administrator of Goa, Daman and Diu. By' order and In the name of the Administrator of Goa, Daman and J)ju. Sub1ia8h V. B"/ekar, Under Secretary (Industries and Subhash V. Elekar, Under Secretary (Health). Labour). panaji, 4th December, 1985. Panaji, 22nd November, 1985. 572 SERIES II. No•. 37 IN THE INDUSmIAL TRIBUNAL GOA, DAMAN & DIU, Fernandes by cheque today and shall be accepted PANAJJ GOA by him hi full and final settlement 'Of his claims against the Management in reference to IT/28/85. (Before Dr. Renato de Noronha, Hon'ble Presiding Officer) 3. It is further agreed that parties shall make a jDint Reference No.: IT/28/85. applicatien tD the HDneurable .Tribunal Goa, Daman _ Workman/Party I and Diu, refetTe-d tD earlier to make a consent Shri Domnie P. FernandeS award in the terms' of settlement al}d treat the ref,e Vis. rence as disposed 'Off accerdingly." Mis. Timblo Printers Pvt. Ltd. Employer/Party II 5. I have carefully cDnsidered the above -terms and arrived at the conclusiDn that they. are fair and just to both- the Workman/Party I represented by Adv. B.·G. l{<[mat. parties.· Hence, I a_ccept them and pass the f'OllDwing 'Order: Panajl. Dated: 4-11~1985 ORDER AWARD Consent Award- in terms-of the above settlement is hereby The Government of Goa, Daman and Diu, by its Order made and this reference is disposed off. Each party to bear No. 28/77/84-1LD dated 17th May, 1985, has referred for its 'Own cos~. the adjudication by this Tribunal' of an industrial dispute Dr. Rena'lq de Ncn-mzha between the above parties. The sChedule annexed to the order of reference reads as follows: Presidjng Officer ~dustri.al Tribunal "Whether the action of the employer Mis. Timblo Prin~ ters Private Limited; Margao, Salcete Goa,.in retrenching the services of Shri Donmic P. Fernandes, Electrician Order w.e.!. 16-5·1980·is legal and justified. No. 28/37/82-ILD If not, to what ~tel1ef the workllan is entitled to'? H The following Award given by the Industrial Tribunal, Goa, 2. After filing of the pleadings by the parties, issues Daman and Diu is hereby published as required under the were framed by the Tribunal and the matter was fixed -for prDVisiDns 'Of _SectiDn 17 of the Industrial -Disputes Act, 1947 of ftling list of evidence, but before any list was filed~ both the (Central Act XIV 1947). parties approached the court and stated that the matter By 'Order and in the name 'Of the Administrat'Or of Goa, has been settled between them amicably and prayed that D~ and-Diu. consent award be passed accordingly. Sub"luuJh V. Elekar, Under Secretary (Industries and 3. As per the memDrandum 'Of settlement filed by the Labour). . ·parties before the Tribunal, the short recital 'Of the case is_ as fDll'Ows: Pan.aji~ 29th Oct'Ober. 1985. "The workman Shri D'Omnic P. Fernandes wh'O was employed by M/s. TimbloPrinters Pvt. Ltd:, Margao Goa, as an Eflectrician, made cemplaint t'O H'Oneurable Tribunal IN THE INDUSmIAL TRffiUNAL GOA•. ·.I)AMAN AND under, Sec. 33A 'Of Industrial Dispute Act 1947 alleging DIU, PANAJJ GOA that the Management has terminated his services in c'On traventiDn of Sec. 33 'Of Industrial Dispute 1947 and claimed (~fo.re Dr. Renato de Noronha, Hon'ble Presiding OffiCer) reinstatement in service with continuity 'Of service and Reference No.: IT/54/82 back wages. ShU Shridar P. Sbertoi - Workman/Party . I The CDmplault was registered in the Industrial Tribunal Vis. 'Office as reference No. IT/27/80 which resulted in award by Industrial Tribunal dated 11-11-1981, ordering that Mis. Saroj stores '-'-Employer/Party II. dismissal of w'Orkman by management was set aside and Werkman/Party I represented by Adv. P. J. Kanlat. also 'Ordered that workman sh'Ould be reinstated with continuity of services and with full back wages. Manage EmplDyer/Party II represented by Adv. G. Shirodkar. ment meved the High Court by wrtt against the 'Order. Panaji. Dated: 10-1~1985 Honourable High Court of Judicature at -Bombay, Goa Bench by its order dated 8-8-1984 held that the tribunal AWARD has acted with'Out jurisdiction t'O entertain the cDmplaint under Sec.,33A 'Of I.D. Act 1947 and therefDre proceedings, The G'Overnment 'Of Goa, Daman and ,DiU, by its Order held in reference ND. IT/27/1980 were quashed and set No. 28/37/82-ILD dated 6th October, 1982, has referred for aside and remanded back the matter t'O the tribunal tD the adjudication by this TribUnal of an . industrial dispute enquire intD the complaint a fresh. between the above parties. The schedule annexed to .the 'Order of reference raeds as fDllows: In pursuance 'Of the above, the matter was re-'Opened .before -Asst. Lab. CommissiDner, Margao, and fresh refe "Whether the actien 'Of management .of Mis. S.aroj . rence carne to be made to HDnDurable Tribuna! Goa, Daman St'Ores, Panjim-Goa in· terminating the services 'Of Shri Shridhar P. Shenei, Salesman, with effect "frDm 10-4-1982 and Diu and this reference was regiStered in the Offic~ 'Of Industrial Tribunal Goa, Daman and Diu as reference is legal and justified? No. ·1T/28/85 and proceedings were pending before said If not, to what relief the WDrkman is entitleq t'O?" Tribunal.. H'Owever the matter was continued fDr discussion with concerned werkman and after prolDnged disCUssions 2. The case of the workman, as per hls s.tatement of claim, the matter was amicably settled. between the parties on is. as fDll'Ows: . tenns and c'OnditiDns stated here belew:" The WDrkman Party I -was appointed as' Salesman from 4. The tenns 'Of settlement as- per the memorandum are 12-2·1976 by tQ.e emplDyer Party II, but his name was as fellews: entered in the empleyment register w.e.f. 1-1-1977. The last drawn wages of party I were Rs. 225/- per menth·and 111s "1. "The Management 'Of Timble Printers Pvt. Ltd., duty heurs were frDm 9.30 ,a. m. to 1.30 p. m. and from Margao, agrees to pay the wDrkman Shri DDmniC P. 3 p. m. te 9 p. m. The empl'Oyer was not regular in. paying Fernandes the werkman cDncerned an amount 'Of the wages of the empl'Oyees and at any given time the wages' Rs. '10,500/w (RupeeS" Ten Th'Ousand Five Hundred 'of the-empleyees and at any given time the'wages foJ;' 3' to 'Only) in ful~ an.d final settlement 'Of the dispute 4 mDnths were always. 'Outstanding. SIinllarly, .} the with the above payment. ' emplDyer did net pay wages and 'Overtime to the w'Orkman and other empleyees since December 1981 tin March 1982: The wDrkman agrees to treat that dispute under The wDrkman,. alengwith one 'more employee,' demantled reference befDre' HDnourable TribUnal Goa, Daman from the emp~'Oyer the payment, 'Of their 'Outstanding-wages and- Diu in the reference No. IT/28/85 as finally and 'Overtime in the first week 'Of April 1982.- -The empl'Oyer "Settled and closed. amicably between the parties. got anneyed and verbally terminated the' services 'Of beth the empleyees from 10-4-1982, withDUt cemply!ing with the 2. The, payment referred to clause No. I ab'Ove shall provisions of the Goa, Daman and Diu Shop& and Establish be' paid to the concerned: wDrkman Shri Domnic P. ments Act, 1973 ~d Rules made thereunder. Thereupen. 12TH DEOEMBER, 1985 (AGRAHAYANA 21, 1907) 573 the .workman and the -other employees raised separate dis~ 6. Shri .Mohan Naik is one of the partners of the employer's p:utes with the employer and approached also the Com firm and has stated that the workman was 'working in their missioner. Labour and Employment. The -workman sent a Shop as Salesman for about 4-5 years and he abandoned the letter to the employer· dated 12-4-1982, which was received services in the month of April 1982. The workman used to by him on 14-4-1982. Ih order to cover up its illegal action, take advances" against his pay which were adjusted when ,he vvrote a back' dated, letter of 13-4.-1982 alleging that the he was paid his $alary, between the 9th and' 10th of eac:q workman had . r_einained absent fr6m 10-4-1982 without month and, at that time, his signature was obtained on the pe.rmiss1on and without information. This letter was pay sheet. 3-4 months prior to his abandonment of setviqes, received by the workman on _19-4-1982. There was further the workman neglected to get the adJustment of his advanc'es correspondence _exchanged between the parties. The conci.:. and so he did not sign the pay sheets du,ring those 3-4 months. liation, proceedings were taken up by_ the Labour Commis On 9-4-1982, the workman was asked to adjust the advances sioners office and the' workman waS asked to resum~ and sign the pay sheets but he refused and walked out.- As duties on 7-5-1982 alongwith the other employee \vhose he did not report for duty -for 3-4 days' a registered letter ~e is Premanand Jalmi. Accordingly, both of them Exh E-2, dated 13-4-1982, was sent to him. He did not report approached the employer on 7-5-1982 in the afternoon around and further correspondence Wa.$ exchanged between the, parties 5.00 :p.-m. to jOin their duties, but the employer, namely (vide Exh E-3 and E-7). He has -produced a register .of wages Shri Mohan Naik and his elder "brother did not allow _the . for the relevant period. As per the register, the salary of the workman to join duties as agreed upon~ The employer workman for March 1982 was Rs. 225/- per month. The said and his brother, started ,abusing the workman and drove register also ~hows that the workman has not sigiled the them' out saying: -"You are no more our -employees and receipt of his pay from December 1981 to March 1982. you can go to the Labour COnunissioner". The--matter was linunediately brought to the notice of -the Asst. Labour In his cross: All the workers who wanted advances were Conunissioner by letter dated 7-5-1982, who agreed to given advances against their pay. It is true that nothing is hold discussions, with the parties .and since no settlement mentioned: in the written statement about the advances to could. be reached, ,a failure report was sent on 7--6-1982, by ,the workman against his wages and the adjustments to be the' Labour Commissioner's office. It is stated that the made. Exh W~2 are the minutes of the 'meeting of the em tennination of services of the workman is illegal and ployer and the workman before the "Asst., Labour Conunis without' compliance of the provisions of law. Assuming sioner. It is true that there is a column in' the wage~ register without .admitting' that the workman had abandoned the (Exh E;l"-8) fOr recording the ,advances made and .that the services w.- e. ·f. 10-4-1982, as' contended by the employer', said column is kept blank. Whatever advances were given the latter had to pay him retrenchment compensation, and were recorded, according to th~ witness, in a rough register. other legal dues as per law, which he has faliled to do. It There was no system of collecting' the signatures of the work-: is submitted that he may be reinstat-ed with ft,ill bitck men on the rough registers against any advances _made to 'wages and costs: him. It is true that -the Labour Inspector had at the time of inspection linvited his attention for the 'maintenance of 3. The employer, in its "Written statement, has stated that advance -register -as required by law. He has- denied the the workman was employed .as Salesman in his cloth shop suggestion that, on 7th May, the workman reported for work at Panaji. On 10-4-1982,. the workman all of a sudden re . in their shop and was .not allowed to work. He has further denied - that Since no _ advances were made to him nothing mained absent from duties ~d did not report for work until 13-4-1982; he also did not -seek prior permission from was "Written in the adv,ance column of -the register. He has finally denied that -the workman demanded his - wages, for the employer, nor did he sub~t his 'leave application. As the month of April is of maximum sales due to the marriage December .1981 to March 1982, which' were d~e to him.~ season, the employer wrote a _letter to the workman on 7. Chandrakant Nallk, another partner, :'is the brother of 13-4-1982 calling upon hlim to report for duty inunediately. Mohan. He is an' engineer and has his offipe in the shop This letter was sent by registered- AID post and was recei itself, but during the day time he goes for his dutiies. Usually, ved by the workman on 20-4-1982. In the meantime,. the from 7.00 to 8.00 p. m. he is in the shop. Each time any workman, instead of reporting for work, engaged himself advance is made to the workman, it is recorded in a separate fu correspondence with the employer and with the Labour diary, commou to' all, and after 2-3 months the adjustments COmmissioner's office. A dispute was raised before. the Asst. Labour Commissioner, who took up concill1a.tion proceedings. ~~: =::s, ,:~s~~~. ~~t~~ :C:nc~~etr:o~~:~a~~~:se~o~ . The stand taken by the employer before the Lab9ur Com to settle the aq,v.a.nces and sign the wages register, but the missioner was that at no time he !lad terminated the servi workman used to go away as soon as the work lin the esta ces - of the workman and the claim of the workman for blishment was over. On 9-4-1982, the witness ·asked the' work back wages was denied by the employer and agreed to offer man as to why he was hesitating to sign the accounts; the continUity of services to the workman in case he resumes workman replied that he 'would sign it on the next day. At duties. 'Finally, the Asst. Lah This he did because Saroj Stores W3.$ paying him less salary. of the Written Statement, wherein it was stated that This talk was in the month of April about 2 years ago. (The the so called dispute does not in fact exist and was sought s~atement of the witness was recorded on 14"3·1984). to be created by the workman; that the concerned offlicer had not applied his mind while coming to the conclUSion that In his that cross: He has denied the suggestion the work a dispute existed' in terms of what ~s notified in the schedule. man never told him that he was working in Waglo's shop. He has further denied- the suggestion that he has made the But this. is not correct. Exh Ew13 is the failure report statement because, Gurudas told him that, lin case he did not suhmitted by the Conciliation Officer to the Government and depose in their favour, they would stop purchasing goods it is on the basis of this report that the Government has from him. made the referenCe in question.· The said report refers to the allegatiOns of the workman and termination of his serviceS 9. The workman, in his statement before the Court, has by the employer, and ~hat it was agreed before ·the Labour stated that, initially, he used to get his salary in time but, Commissioner's office .that the' employer would admit the subsequently. it was not so. In January 1982, he demanded, workman on 7-5w1982. That when the workman presented on several occasions, his salary for December 1981 but the himself before the employer on that day for resuming work, employer never paid it. This went on for 3 months. Si.rn1larly, he w.as refused work. The failure report nowhere· has men· another workman J aImi was not paid his wages for 4 months. tioned. that the employer's contention was that the workman On 7th April, he and Jalmi demanded the payment of the himself had abandoned the services and, therefore, the order wages for 4 months. On 9th Apr'il, the employer told them of reference could ·not refer to such abandonment. that' he was not going to pay and if the -workman wanted to work could work, otherwise go away. On 9th and 12. Since the order of reference pre;.supposes the termina 10th the workman went to the employer's establishment ,to tion· of services of the workman by the employer and since work but the employer refused to accept him. On the 12th, the Tribunal cannot travel beyond the. terms of the order he approached .the Labour COmmissioner's office. Exh· E~3 of reference~ fuis Tribunal cannot enter into the appreciation is the letter sent by him "t9 the employer. Before the Labour whether there has been any abandonment of services by the Commissioner a settlement was arrived at, by virtue ,of which workman·, as contended by the employer and, consequently, they had to resume work on that very day and the employer issue No.2, inadvertently framed by the Tribunal in this would pay them all· their dues. Accordingly, they went to the conneCtion and on which even evidence was led by the partlies, employer's shop at 5.00 p. m. but the employer refused to is of no effect. (Vide ruling of the Bombay High Court in the accept them. 2-3 cUstomers, who were present at that time, case of Sitaram Vlishnu Shirodkar and' the Administrator, undertook, at their request, to give them in writing such Government. of Goa and others reported in I. LLJ 1985 refusal witnessed by them. Mr. Mulla one of the customers,· page 480. wrote the document (Exh W-4), which was signed by Mulla 13. Regarding termination of the services of the workman, and by Samir Coutinho, the other customer, and Prem.anand there is convincing eV'ldence on record. It. is proved that wage JalmL Exh, W-4 was handed over in the Labour Comm!i.ssi register from December 1981 to .March' 1982 is not Signed by oner's office. There is an acknowledgement signed· by Mrs. the workman. The contention of the employer that the workM Kaunte. man did not want to adjust the advances received cannot be .accepted, as no· advances are rioted down· Iin the respective In his cross: The salaries were paid sometJimes on the 5th M of the next month or at a later date and sometimes within column of the wage register. The allegation that such adVall 2 months. He has denied the suggestion that the salaries were ces were noted down in a private diary, which " was ·liot paid till 9th invariably. After getting the salary, they used produced before the Court, and which does not contain the. to Sign the payment register on a revenue stamp. The em signature of the workman .as. per the statement of the ployer never gave any advance to the staff. The workman employer hlimself is of, no e{fect. The fact of non payment attended the work on 9th April in the morning and evening. of the wages for 3 months and the demand made by the worknu"n should have annoyed the employer, as contended He has denied the suggestion that, 'In that day, he demanded M the payment of the salary from the employer and that the by ,the workman, and this would be the re,ason for the termi employer replied that he was gding to pay on that day after nation of his services. The letters written by the employer adjUsting the advances, which the workman did not accept. calling the workm.a.il are only to cover up' his illegal action He has ,further, denied that because the employer did not. pay, of termination. It is to be noted that such letters were written the:, work.tn.an left the shop at about 5.00 p. m. and did not only after the workman complained to the Labour Commissio return any more. He has stated that, on that day, he worked ner ,and sent also a letter in this respect to the employer upto 9. p. m.. The employer terminated his services on 9th (Exh Ew3 colly). In Case the employer ·wanted to have the April by orally telImg him not to come for work. SinCe the workman in his establishment, as contended by him, he would employer, had .removed him from services and since his case have kept him wh6!l the Labour Commissioner directed the was pending before the ConciliatIon Officer, the workman did workman to go to the employer's establishment in the after· not report for work., inspite of the letters written by the noon of 7 M5-1982 . .As per this direction, the· workman presented employe.r. He has denied the suggestion that he and Mulla himself in the estabMshrnent at about 5.00. p. m. and was had joint business and are friends. He knows Praveen Chanw refused employment by the employer, which is clear· from drashah· when he was working for the employer: He never the evidence of the workman, corroborated by. the letter . met Praveen at Waglo's shop. Exh W 4 written on the same day by the· workman to the Labour Commissioner, and also by the statement of Shri M. 10. Mudawar A. Mulla has confirmed Exh W-4 and stated A. Mulla, who wrote the salid letter at· the· instance of the that it is in his handwritlrig and bears his signature. On workman .and witnessed the incident in the employer's esta~ 7-5-1982, at about 4.3.0 p.m.; when he,was purchasing some blishment, when the workman went there to resume his duties materials, the workman ,alongwith one more person came to and was not ~owed by the employer. the shop. On seeing them, the owners of .the shop told· them .14. The statement ,of Shri P. ChandrMhah,' employer's that their services are not required. and that they should go witn,ess does not ·seem credit worthy•. to the Labour Conunissioner's office. "when the witneSs came . out of the shop, he met the workman and the other person. 15. FrOm the above evidence, I hold that it is the employer The workman requested him to accompany him till the Labour who had terminated the services of the workman because Coriunissioner's office to narrate the inCident he·had witnessed, the latter was demanding his wages whiCh were due for 3 but the witness replied that ohe was in a hurry to go to the months. Such tel"lll'ination effected without ·any previous hotel to resume his work. ';['hey then requested him ·to give notice or. payment in lieu thereQf and. without ·compliance atleast in writing that they had witnesses insid~ the shQP, with the further requirements of Section 25F of the Act, whicl?- he did. Exg W-4 is the said. writing. ' which are mandatory and conditions precedent to a valid retrenchment; is to be considered. as invalid ·and .inope~tive.. In ·his cross: He knows Mr. Shennoi· by name only from that day. The owners of the shop were inside .the counter 16. Hence, I, pass the following order: and told the workman and his· companion with a gesture to go away. He· has denied that the tincident referred to ORDER by the witness did not take place and that because of his The termination of the serVices of the' workman by the friendship and business relations with the workman, he employer without complying with the conditions. precedent has .fabricated the said docUment and added that he is not of .Section 25F of the Act is inval'id and inoperative. Hence, workman's friend nor does he have any bus1ness relations the e.Inployer is directed to reinstate·:the workman with with him. continuity of services and full~ba.ck wages. Costs of Rs. 300/w 11. This is. all the. evidence on .record. to be paid by ,the employer to the workman. Issue No.1 framed' by the Tribunal refers to the mai~tain· , Dr•. RwW-to,.de Noron/w, ability of the Order of Reference.· This issue was frani~ pn Presiding Officer the basis of the .allegations made by the employer in. para 8 IndUstrial TrIbunal 1:2THDEaEMBER., 19,85 (AGRAHAYANA 21, 1907) Order Finance Depantment 'No. 23/11/82-ILD On 'the '~eeommendaU9'" of the 'Departiiierital ).;,omotion ", -Conunlttee Shri G. S. Naik, Labour Inspector ""}.8 hereby promoted ~>n Pllrely ad-hOc basis for a period of six months to the post oC Assistant Laoour Commissioner- in the pay scale ofRs. 6W-i!o-74o-)!!>:-81O-EB-35-880-4o-1000-EB-40-1200 Order created 'vide ' o"'d~r • No, '5/14/68'LAB/Z076i' dated '3~'7'68 aiid '~ted'b;l 'tlie'oLrure'of the ComfulSsioner; Labour and Employment, : Panaji ; 'With effect from taking over the The Administrator _of Goa,. Daman' and Diu is' !~l"J:ked to charge. ' , . accept the _notice given by Shri C. ~; Sadhale, Accounts 9f- The above promotion will not bestow,~-on:.the'.Officer·' ffi).¥, fieer seeking voluntary retirement w. e. t. 1-2-1986 (A. N.) claim for regular appOintment and tile service rendered by in tenns of Rule 48 A of the e.C.S. Pension Rules. Shri Sa- him on .ad-hoo -'basis in the grade· Wilf':liot -'coUnt"' for the- :'" dhale;-therefore s~nds retired ,from GOvernment ,service w:e-.f. purpose of seniority in the grade and"f6r 'engibillty for' 1-2-1986 (A. N.). promotion to ~~} ,n:ext higher,_)~e: ,":. ;', ., I.".j : '. , .. By order and in the name of the Administrator-_-Oi Goa.,::,; B;" ~rdel;' and in the name of Ule' Administrator of"' d~a, Da:m.a.n and Diu. Daman and Diu. . , Subhash Under v. Ei:i""r, ~u.&'(~Il Notification No. 12/41/81-LGL In :p~" !n~tiop. o( the Government Notification of even number dated 1·6·1985, the Government of Goa, Daman and Diu Is pleased to extend the term India, And, whereas, ,the said candidates have either not fur· New Delhi is hereby published for general information. nished any reason or explanation for the. said fallure even M. Raghuchandar~ Add!. Chi~ El,ectoral Oflficer. after due notice -or the Election Co:mmissi.on, after <:ODS1... dering the representation made by them,.if any,- is satisfied Panaj~ 19th November, 1985. that they have no good reason or justification. for the ~d failure. Election Commission of India Ashok Road, New Delhi Now, therefore, in -pursuance of section lOA of the said Dated the 7 October~ 1985 15 AsVina~ 1907 ( k Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the persons Sa aJ specified in column (4) of the Table below to the disqUa_ No. 76/GOA/84(17.24) lified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of Whereas.theEI~on CoJnn:i~ is satlsfie4~lJW.t:'I:"l'!l !'f.",:,,~~~ :H0l"~~f'f the Parliament or of the Legislative AsSem the contestmg candidates specified In colmnn (4) of the Table, __ :' oly o~ LegIslative Council of a State for a period of three It, below at the General Election to the Goa. I>ama.il,"'~~$:'f?i'~;; ~'. :Y~#~i~6m the date "Of this order. . ~,-,~~,~'"",=, ======--~--" 576 TABLE 81. l'(p. and,l';ame N~e and address of the contesting SI.No."· Pa:tUcUlars of- -election , Reason· for disqualification' of the Constituency .candi~ate' -, '. -, -, <) 1. 2 5 ' ------, " 17, Gi>neral lplection ~ the Goa, Da 15-Ponila Shr>' Fons""" AnJ:hony Joseph, Falledtci ,Cxlg-eany ""co.mt rnan and Diu Legislative Assembly. Tlsk, (Sadar) Ponila-Goa, of ',election .. eXpe.nS_eS','re'-- ,19M, 'quired by law. . . ' -00- -do- Shri Kelekar Deven_th R., -do- P.O. Mardol,Ponila-Goa 19." -:do- 19-Caruwona ' Shri DeSai p,.;.ru.sh Shamba,Pon-' ,';"',do- sulem Clmltcona (~) 20. -do- ,,20-Quepem Shri Adel Vithoha Nagu;' Modd Cacom..(]oa 21. -do- -do- Shri ,.G;:tunso De~sai Manohar VltOba; H. No. ''''444-1,· Maldem (Damodar) Quepem-Goa 22. -do- ---- do- Shri Mohamed HaIqm YtJBUr;· Marallem Curchorem Goa 23. -do- 21-Cuncolim 'siiri Rebello FerdIno Aasla; VUla Falled. to lodge the account Rebello, Buieca, Cuncollm of eIectlon expenses In the' manner required by law. 24, -00- 28-Morl11~~ ; Shri , Dias· Victor Claude, Alto Failed to lodge any account 'Mangot,VIisco-da.-Gruna (Goa of -election expenses re-- , quired by law. By order, J, C. ChaudMry '(Jnd~ Jlecretary , ' Elect~on Com~iop. .of ;ID:~'I - ",.",' '; .~ ! .-' . i;~,: • 'c<"-.: ". --: i.:), : ; .. ' '.:" ".' . .': :. OOVT. P~Gl'ltE~;.,..GQ~ . (Imprena& Naefona.r·~·GO$.):' "',' ~:.' PalOE - RIo, 1-45 Pa: