Molecular Epidemiology of House Dust Mites In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cystoidosoma Hermaphroditus Sp. N., the First Representative of the Quill
© Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre CAS Folia Parasitologica 2015, 62: 037 doi: 10.14411/fp.2015.037 http://folia.paru.cas.cz Research Article Cystoidosoma hermaphroditus [ of the quill mite family Ascouracaridae (Acari: Astigmata: Fabio Akashi Hernandes1 and Barry M. OConnor2 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil; 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Abstract: The mite family Ascouracaridae Gaud et Atyeo, 1976 contains large-sized mites (mostly > 1 mm) which live inside the quills of birds of several orders. To date, no representative of this family has been found associated with the order Strigiformes (owls). In this paper, a new species of this family, Cystoidosoma hermaphroditus sp. n., is described from the tropical screech owl, Megascops choliba (Vieillot) (Aves: Strigiformes) from Brazil. This species is unique in having an external spermaduct, a primary duct and a rudimentary bursa copulatrix[ to adults of the genus Cystoidosoma Gaud et Atyeo, 1976 of the world is presented. Keywords: feather mites, Megascops choliba, [ The family Ascouracaridae Gaud et Atyeo, 1976 (Acari: from Brazil (Valim et al. 2011): Ascouracarus chordeili Astigmata) contains large-sized mites (> 1 mm) that inhab- Mironov et Fain, 2003 from Chordeiles rupestris (Spix) it the quills of several bird orders (Gaud and Atyeo 1996, (Caprimulgiformes), Cystoidosoma psittacivorae Dabert !"##$%&[ et Ehrnsberger, 1992 from Aratinga aurea (Gmelin), and a subfamily of the Syringobiidae Trouessart, 1897 by Gaud Cystoidosoma aratingae Mironov et Fain, 2003 from Arat- and Atyeo (1976) and later was elevated to family by Gaud inga jandaya (Gmelin) (Psittaciformes). -
Host–Parasite Relationships and Co-Infection of Nasal Mites of Chrysomus Ruficapillus (Passeriformes: Icteridae) in Southern Brazil
Iheringia Série Zoologia Museu de Ciências Naturais e-ISSN 1678-4766 www.scielo.br/isz Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul Host–Parasite relationships and co-infection of nasal mites of Chrysomus ruficapillus (Passeriformes: Icteridae) in southern Brazil Fabiana Fedatto Bernardon1 , Carolina S. Mascarenhas1 , Joaber Pereira Jr2 & Gertrud Müller1 1. Laboratório de Parasitologia de Animais Silvestres (LAPASIL), Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. ([email protected]) 2. Laboratório de Biologia de Parasitos de Organismos Aquáticos (LABPOA), Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Caixa Postal 474, 96650-900 Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Received 14 December 2017 Accepted 8 May 2018 Published 21 June 2018 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4766e2018025 ABSTRACT. One hundred twenty-two Chrysomus ruficapillus were examined in southern Brazil, in order to research the presence of nasal mites and the parasite-host relationships. Nasal mite infections were analyzed for: presence of Ereynetidae and Rhinonyssidae considering the total number of hosts examined; Sexual maturity of males (juveniles and adults); Periods of bird collection and presence of co-infections. Were identified five taxa, four belongs to Rhinonyssidae (Sternostoma strandtmanni, Ptilonyssus sairae, P. icteridius and Ptilonyssus sp.) and one to Ereynetidae (Boydaia agelaii). Adult males were parasitized for one taxa more than juvenile males. Co-infections occurred in 22 hosts, between two, three and four taxa, belonging to Ereynetidae and Rhinonyssidae.The co-infections were more prevalent in austral autumn / winter. The host-parasite relations and co-infections by nasal mites in C. -
Rhinonyssidae (Acari) in the House Sparrows, Passer Domesticus
Short Communication ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) www.cbpv.org.br/rbpv Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., Jaboticabal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 597-603, oct.-dec. 2018 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-296120180064 Rhinonyssidae (Acari) in the house sparrows, Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Passeriformes: Passeridae), from southern Brazil Ácaros nasais Rhinonyssidae parasitos de Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Passeriformes: Passeridae) no extremo sul do Brasil Luciana Siqueira Silveira dos Santos1*; Carolina Silveira Mascarenhas2; Paulo Roberto Silveira dos Santos3; Nara Amélia da Rosa Farias1 1 Laboratório de Parasitologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas – UFPel, Capão do Leão, RS, Brasil 2 Laboratório de Parasitologia de Animais Silvestres, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas – UFPel, Capão do Leão, RS, Brasil 3 Centro Nacional de Pesquisa para a Conservação das Aves Silvestres – CEMAVE, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio, Pelotas, RS, Brasil Received March 29, 2018 Accepted August 7, 2018 Abstract We report the occurrence and infection parameters of two species of nasal mites in Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (house sparrow). Nasal passages, trachea, lungs, and air sacs of 100 house sparrows captured in an urban area at the city of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, were examined with a stereomicroscope. The mite, Sternostoma tracheacolum Lawrence, 1948 was present in the trachea and/or lungs (or both) of 13 birds (13%) at a mean intensity of 6.7 mites/infected host. Ptilonyssus hirsti (Castro & Pereira, 1947) was found in the nasal cavity of 1 sparrow (1%); coinfection was not observed in this bird. -
Extraction Efficiency and Identification Guide to Common House
EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY AND IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO COMMON HOUSE DUST AND STORAGE MITES by ASHLEY ELIZABETH RODEN (Under the Direction of BRIAN T. FORSCHLER) ABSTRACT House dust mites (HDMs) and storage mites are serious indoor pests because they produce allergens that cause issues with allergy and asthma in humans. In order to study these animals they must be extracted from the urban landscape. Two methods of extraction were tested using D. pteronyssinus. The heat escape and flotation techniques were examined using samples of known numbers of mites directly from cultures, in dust, and kapok. Extraction efficiency was overall low, but the flotation method provided better efficiency than heat escape. An introductory identification guide and key was created using images from light, confocal, and SEM microscopy to illustrate common species of HDMs and storage mites. INDEX WORDS: House dust mites, Dermatophagoides, extraction efficiencies, kapok, identification guide, storage mites EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY AND IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO COMMON HOUSE DUST AND STORAGE MITES by ASHLEY ELIZABETH RODEN B.S.E.H., University of Georgia, 2010 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2012 © 2012 Ashley Elizabeth Roden All Rights Reserved EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY AND IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO COMMON HOUSE DUST AND STORAGE MITES by ASHLEY ELIZABETH RODEN Major Professor: Brian T. Forschler Committee: Joseph McHugh Donald Champagne Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2012 DEDICATION For my parents iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Brian Forschler, along with my committee members Joseph McHugh and Donald Champagne for providing me with guidance and assistance throughout this process. -
Genome-Resolved Metagenomic Analyses Reveal the Presence of a Putative Bacterial Endosymbiont in an Avian Nasal Mite (Rhinonyssidae; Mesostigmata)
microorganisms Article Genome-Resolved Metagenomic Analyses Reveal the Presence of a Putative Bacterial Endosymbiont in an Avian Nasal Mite (Rhinonyssidae; Mesostigmata) Carolina Osuna-Mascaró 1,*, Jorge Doña 2,3, Kevin P. Johnson 2 and Manuel de Rojas 4,* 1 Department of Biology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA; [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (K.P.J.) 3 Departamento de Biología Animal, Universitario de Cartuja, Calle Prof. Vicente Callao, 3, 18011 Granada, Spain 4 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle San Fernando, 4, 41004 Sevilla, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.O.-M.); [email protected] (M.d.R.) Abstract: Rhinonyssidae (Mesostigmata) is a family of nasal mites only found in birds. All species are hematophagous endoparasites, which may damage the nasal cavities of birds, and also could be potential reservoirs or vectors of other infections. However, the role of members of Rhinonyssidae as disease vectors in wild bird populations remains uninvestigated, with studies of the microbiomes of Rhinonyssidae being almost non-existent. In the nasal mite (Tinaminyssus melloi) from rock doves (Columba livia), a previous study found evidence of a highly abundant putatively endosymbiotic bacteria from Class Alphaproteobacteria. Here, we expanded the sample size of this species (two Citation: Osuna-Mascaró, C.; Doña, different hosts- ten nasal mites from two independent samples per host), incorporated contamination J.; Johnson, K.P.; de Rojas, M. Genome-Resolved Metagenomic controls, and increased sequencing depth in shotgun sequencing and genome-resolved metagenomic Analyses Reveal the Presence of a analyses. -
Endoparasitic Mites (Rhinonyssidae) on Urban Pigeons and Doves: Updating Morphological and Epidemiological Information
diversity Article Endoparasitic Mites (Rhinonyssidae) on Urban Pigeons and Doves: Updating Morphological and Epidemiological Information Jesús Veiga 1 , Ivan Dimov 2 and Manuel de Rojas 3,* 1 Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Experimental Station of Arid Zones (EEZA-CSIC), 04120 Almería, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departament of Human Anatomy, State Pediatric Medical University, Litovskaya st. 2, 194100 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 3 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, Profesor García González 2, 41012 Sevilla, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-954-556-450 Abstract: Rhynonyssidae is a family of endoparasitic hematophagous mites, which are still largely unknown even though they could act as vector or reservoir of different pathogens like dermanyssids. Sampling requirements have prevented deeper analysis. Rhinonyssids have been explored in a few host specimens per species, leading to undetailed morphological descriptions and inaccurate epidemi- ology. We explore the relationships established between these parasites in two Columbiformes urban birds (domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto)), assesing 250 individuals of each type in Seville (Spain). As expected, Mesonyssus melloi (Castro, 1948) and Mesonyssus columbae (Crossley, 1950) were found in domestic pigeons, and Mesonyssus streptopeliae (Fain, 1962) in Eurasian collared doves. However, M. columbae was found for the first time in Eurasian collared doves. This relationship could be common in nature, but sampling methodology or host switching could also account for this result. An additional unknown specimen was found in a Eurasian collared dove, which could be a new species or an aberrant individual. We also provide an Citation: Veiga, J.; Dimov, I.; de Rojas, epidemiological survey of the three mite species, with M. -
Environmental Assessment and Exposure Control of Dust Mites: a Practice Parameter
HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Ann Allergy Manuscript Author Asthma Immunol Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 December 14. Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 December ; 111(6): 465–507. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2013.09.018. Environmental assessment and exposure control of dust mites: a practice parameter Jay Portnoy, MD, Jeffrey D. Miller, MD, P. Brock Williams, PhD, Ginger L. Chew, ScD*, J. David Miller, PhD, Fares Zaitoun, MD, Wanda Phipatanakul, MD, MS, Kevin Kennedy, MPH, Charles Barnes, PhD, Carl Grimes, CIEC, Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, MD, James Sublett, MD, David Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Khan, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Christopher Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon Spector, MD, Stephen A. Tilles, MD, and Dana Wallace, MD This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Classification of recommendations and evidence There may be a separation between the strength of recommendation and the quality of evidence. Recommendation rating scale Statement Definition Implication Strong A strong recommendation means the benefits of the Clinicians should follow a strong recommendation recommended recommendation approach clearly exceed the harms (or that the harms unless a clear and compelling clearly exceed rationale for an the benefits in the case of a strong negative alternative approach is present. recommendation) and that the quality of the supporting evidence is excellent (grade A or B). -
Beaulieu, F., W. Knee, V. Nowell, M. Schwarzfeld, Z. Lindo, V.M. Behan
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 77–168 (2019) Acari of Canada 77 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.28307 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Acari of Canada Frédéric Beaulieu1, Wayne Knee1, Victoria Nowell1, Marla Schwarzfeld1, Zoë Lindo2, Valerie M. Behan‑Pelletier1, Lisa Lumley3, Monica R. Young4, Ian Smith1, Heather C. Proctor5, Sergei V. Mironov6, Terry D. Galloway7, David E. Walter8,9, Evert E. Lindquist1 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Otta- wa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 2 Department of Biology, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada 3 Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 0G2, Canada 4 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 5 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada 6 Department of Parasitology, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya embankment 1, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia 7 Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada 8 University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, 4556, Queensland, Australia 9 Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, 4101, Queensland, Australia Corresponding author: Frédéric Beaulieu ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 11 July 2018 | Accepted 27 September 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/652E4B39-E719-4C0B-8325-B3AC7A889351 Citation: Beaulieu F, Knee W, Nowell V, Schwarzfeld M, Lindo Z, Behan‑Pelletier VM, Lumley L, Young MR, Smith I, Proctor HC, Mironov SV, Galloway TD, Walter DE, Lindquist EE (2019) Acari of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. -
Abhandlungen Und Berichte
ISSN 1618-8977 Mesostigmata Band 7 (1) 2007 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz ACARI Bibliographia Acarologica Herausgeber: Dr. Axel Christian im Auftrag des Staatlichen Museums für Naturkunde Görlitz Anfragen erbeten an: ACARI Dr. Axel Christian Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz „ACARI“ ist zu beziehen über: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz – Bibliothek PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz Eigenverlag Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Alle Rechte vorbehalten Titelgrafik: E. Mättig Druck: MAXROI Graphics GmbH, Görlitz Editor-in-chief: Dr Axel Christian authorised by the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Enquiries should be directed to: ACARI Dr Axel Christian Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany ‘ACARI’ may be orderd through: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz – Bibliothek PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany Published by the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz All rights reserved Cover design by: E. Mättig Printed by MAXROI Graphics GmbH, Görlitz, Germany ACARI Bibliographia Acarologica 7 (1): 1-27, 2007 ISSN 1618-8977 Mesostigmata Nr. 18 Axel Christian und Kerstin Franke Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Jährlich werden in der Bibliographie die neuesten Publikationen über mesostigmate Milben veröffentlicht, soweit sie uns bekannt sind. Das aktuelle Heft enthält 316 Titel von Wissen- schaftlern aus 42 Ländern. In den Arbeiten werden 92 neue Arten und Gattungen beschrie- ben. Sehr viele Artikel beschäftigen sich mit ökologischen Problemen (30%), mit der Taxo- nomie (20%), mit der Faunistik (10%) und der Bienen-Milbe Varroa (10%). Bitte helfen Sie bei der weiteren Vervollständigung der Literaturdatenbank durch unaufge- forderte Zusendung von Sonderdrucken bzw. Kopien. Wenn dies nicht möglich ist, bitten wir um Mitteilung der vollständigen Literaturzitate zur Aufnahme in die Datei. -
Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites
1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2012. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 13.0 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last updated: 20.06.2012 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. For an overview see Dunlop & Penney (2012). Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. -
NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian Marine & P
1 NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): B. duffeyi (Millidge,1954) South Scandinavian marine & maritime Chelicerata & Uniramia = Praestigia duffeyi Millidge,1954 South Scandinavian marine & maritime Chelicerata & Uniramia SE England, Belgium Check-List B. maritimum (Crocker & Parker,1970) compiled at TMBL (Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory) by: Belgium Hans G. Hansson 1990-04-11 / small revisions until Nov. 1994, when it for the first time was published on Internet. Republished as a pdf file February 1996 and again August 1998. Satilatlas Keyserling,1886 =? Perimones Jackson,1932 Citation suggested: Hansson, H.G. (Comp.), 1998. NEAT (North East Atlantic Taxa): South Scandinavian marine & P. britteni (Jackson,1913) maritime Chelicerata & Uniramia. Check-List. Internet pdf Ed., Aug. 1998. [http://www.tmbl.gu.se]. Britain, Belgium Denotations: (™) = Genotype @ = Associated to * = General note Trichoncus Simon,1884 N.B.: This is one of several preliminary check-lists, covering S. Scandinavian marine animal (and partly marine T. hackmanni Millidge,1955 protoctist) taxa. Some financial support from (or via) NKMB (Nordiskt Kollegium för Marin Biologi), during the last S England years of the existence of this organisation (until 1993), is thankfully acknowledged. The primary purpose of these checklists is to facilitate for everyone, trying to identify organisms from the area, to know which species that earlier Lycosoidea Sundevall,1833 "Jaktspindlar" have been encountered there, or in neighbouring areas. A secondary purpose is to facilitate for non-experts to find as correct names as possible for organisms, including names of authors and years of description. So far these checklists Lycosidae Sundevall,1833 "Vargspindlar" are very preliminary. Due to restricted access to literature there are (some known, and probably many unknown) omissions in the lists. -
Mesostigmata No
14 (1) · 2014 Christian, A. & K. Franke Mesostigmata No. 25 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 – 40 Acarological literature .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2014 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Publications 2013 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Publications, additions 2012 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Publications, additions 2011 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Publications, additions 2010 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Publications, additions 2009 ......................................................................................................................................................................