250 3 February 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

250 3 February 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean LIMITED LC/CAR/L.250 3 February 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REVIEW OF THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE (RECC) IN THE CARIBBEAN PROJECT: Phase I CLIMATE CHANGE PROFILES IN SELECT CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES __________ This document has been reproduced without formal editing. FOREWORD These reports are the result of consultations which were conducted in 2008 in Aruba, Barbados, Netherlands Antilles, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, Saint Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago. The objective was to obtain relevant information that would inform a Stern-type report where the economics of climate change would be examined for the Caribbean subregion. These reports will be complimented by future assessments of the costs of the “business as usual”, adaptation and mitigation responses to the potential impacts of climate change. It is anticipated that the information contained in each country report would provide a detailed account of the environmental profile and would, therefore, provide an easy point of reference for policymakers in adapting existing policy or in formulating new ones. ECLAC continues to be available to the CDCC countries to provide technical support in the area of sustainable development. Neil Pierre Director ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs in Aruba, Barbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, Netherlands Antilles, Saint Lucia, and Trinidad and Tobago in the preparations for the national consultations. ECLAC expresses appreciation for the support of all stakeholders who participated in the country consultations and shared important information on climate change adaptation and mitigation in their countries. A list of these persons is included in Section 10 of each country report. Table of contents I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 II. PROJECT INFORMATION............................................................................................................5 III. COUNTRY REPORTS....................................................................................................................8 A. Aruba...........................................................................................................................................9 B. Barbados....................................................................................................................................19 C. Dominican Republic..................................................................................................................38 D. Guyana ......................................................................................................................................47 E. Jamaica ......................................................................................................................................64 F. Montserrat..................................................................................................................................77 G. Netherlands Antilles..................................................................................................................89 H. Saint Lucia ..............................................................................................................................103 I. Trinidad and Tobago ................................................................................................................117 IV. REGIONAL INITIATIVES RELEVANT TO CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION.......................................................................................................................131 V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................139 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................142 List of tables Table 1 Schedule of consultations .................................................................................................. 7 Table 2 Institutions in Aruba with responsibilities linked to climate change............................... 12 Table 3 List of participants at the consultations in Aruba ............................................................ 18 Table 4 Institutions in Barbados with responsibilities linked to climate change.......................... 24 Table 5 List of participants at the consultations in Barbados. ...................................................... 36 Table 6 List of participants at the consultations in the Dominican Republic ............................... 46 Table 7 Schedule of consultations in Guyana............................................................................... 48 Table 8 List of participants at the consultations in Guyana.......................................................... 62 Table 9 Schedule of consultations in Jamaica .............................................................................. 65 Table 10 Jamaica’s legislation with relevance to climate change ................................................ 69 Table 11 List of participants at the consultations in Jamaica ....................................................... 75 Table 12 Institutions in Montserrat with responsibilities linked to climate change. .................... 81 Table 13 List of participants at the consultations in Montserrat................................................... 88 Table 14 Institutions in the Netherlands Antilles with responsibilities linked to climate change 93 Table 15 List of participants at the consultations in the Netherlands Antilles. .......................... 100 Table 16 Institutions in Saint Lucia with responsibilities linked to climate change. ................. 107 Table 17 List of participants at the consultations in Saint Lucia................................................ 116 Table 18 List of participants at the consultations in Trinidad .................................................... 129 LIST OF ACRONYMS ACCC Adapting to Climate Change in the Caribbean ACS Association of Caribbean States A-OGCM Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model AOSIS Alliance of Small Island States bPTT British Petroleum of Trinidad and Tobago CANARI Caribbean Natural Resources Institute CAP Common Agricultural Policy CARICOM Caribbean Community CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CBO Community-Based Organization CCCCC Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CDB Caribbean Development Bank CDEMA Caribbean Disaster and Emergency Management Agency CDM Clean Development Mechanism CEHI Caribbean Environmental Health Institute CEPEP Community-Based Environmental Protection and Enhancement Programme CERS Certified Emissions Reductions CFCS Chlorofluorocarbons CFLS Compact Fluorescents CGCED Caribbean Group for Cooperation in Economic Development CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CIMH Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species CNG Compressed Natural Gas CO2 Carbon Dioxide COP3 Third Session of the Conference of Parties CPACC Caribbean Planning for Adaptation to Climate Change CRIS Coastal Resource Information System CTO Caribbean Tourism Organization CZM Coastal Zone Management CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DFID Department for International Development of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland DRM Disaster Risk Management ECACC Enhancing Capacity for Adaptation to Climate Change in the Caribbean ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMA Environmental Management Authority EMLUP Environmental Management and Land Use Planning for Sustainable Development Project EOR Enhanced Oil Recovery ESDU Environment and Sustainable Development Unit of the OECS FAO Food and Agriculture Organization GCC Global Climate Change GDP Gross Domestic Product GEF Global Environment Facility GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic Information Systems GOF Global Opportunities Fund GPS Global Positioning System GRULAC Group of Latin America and Caribbean Countries IAST Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology IDB Inter-American Development Bank IMF International Monetary Fund IMO International Maritime Organization INSMET Institute of Meteorology (Cuba) IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LDCs Least Developed Countries LIS Land Information System MACCC Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships MEA Multilateral Environmental Agreements MSI Mauritius Strategy NCCA National Climate Change Adaptation NEMO National Emergency and Management Office NEPA National Environment and Planning Agency NEPP Nature and Environmental Policy Plan NICU National Implementation Coordinating Unit NISP National Integral Strategic Plan NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association OECS Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States PAHO Pan American Health Organization PDP Physical Development Plan PEO Public Education And Outreach PETROTRIN Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago PIOJ Planning Institute of Jamaica PRECIS Providing Regional Climates for Impacts Studies RECC Review of the Economics of Climate Change REDD Reduction of Emissions
Recommended publications
  • 'Good Governance' in the Dutch Caribbean
    Obstacles to ‘Good Governance’ in the Dutch Caribbean Colonial- and Postcolonial Development in Aruba and Sint Maarten Arxen A. Alders Master Thesis 2015 [email protected] Politics and Society in Historical Perspective Department of History Utrecht University University Supervisor: Dr. Auke Rijpma Internship (BZK/KR) Supervisor: Nol Hendriks Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. Background ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 From Colony to Autonomy ......................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Status Quaestionis .................................................................................................................... 11 Colonial history .............................................................................................................................. 12 Smallness ....................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Adapting Concepts to Context ................................................................................................. 19 2.1 Good Governance ..................................................................................................................... 19 Development in a Small Island Context ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Aruba, Continuity and Change Census 2000 Special Reports February 2002
    FOURTH POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS, ARUBA The People of Aruba, Continuity and Change Census 2000 Special Reports February 2002 CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS - ARUBA Census Statistics for progress 2000 FOURTH POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS ARUBA OCTOBER 14, 2000 The People of Aruba Continuity and Change CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Oranjestad, February 2002 Where to order Central Bureau of Statistics L.G. Smith Boulevard 160, Oranjestad, Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Phone: (297) 5837433 Fax: (297) 5838057 Preface From 14 October till 22 October 2000 the Fourth Population and Housing Census was conducted on Aruba. After a week of intensive work in which a group of 1256 enumerators visited all households on the island, the census team started with the data-processing, editing and tabulation of the census results. To speed up this process the Central Bureau of Statistics made use of some innovative techniques such as imaging and computer aided coding. Already in June 2001 the CBS was able to finish a CD-ROM with Selected Tables. Up to now results from the population census have been used by a large group of organizations from within and outside the public sector. A population census is an ideal opportunity to draw a picture of the social and demographic characteristics of a population. In this publication the CBS highlights some interesting changes that have taken place on Aruba during the last ten years. The rapid economic developments during the last decade of the previous century have triggered an enormous growth of the population. In less than ten years time the population increased from 66,687 in 1991 to 90,506 in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
    INITIAL REPORT OF THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 8, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE INVOLVEMENT OF CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT Introduction The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict (New York, 25 May 2000) was approved for the entire Kingdom of the Netherlands by the Kingdom Act of 18 December 20081 and entered into force for the entire Kingdom on 24 October 2009. The Dutch translation of the Protocol was published in the Dutch Treaty Series 2001, 131. At the time of the ratification the Kingdom of the Netherlands consisted of the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. In 2010, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has undergone a process of constitutional reform, which has now reached fruition. The changes concern the Netherlands Antilles, a country that until recently was made up of the islands of Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba. The reforms are based on the results of referenda and on decisions taken by representative assemblies about the islands’ future status. The amended Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands entered into force on 10 October 2010, on which date the Netherlands Antilles ceased to exist. In the new constitutional structure, Curaçao and Sint Maarten have acquired the status of countries within the Kingdom (like the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba before the changes). Aruba retains the separate country status it has had since 1986. Thus, from 10 October 2010 the Kingdom consists of four, rather than three, equal countries: the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism and Development in the Senian Context: Does It Help Or Hurt SIDS? the Case of Aruba
    Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, May-June 2018, Vol. 6, No. 3, 100-108 doi: 10.17265/2328-2169/2018.06.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Tourism and Development in the Senian Context: Does It Help or Hurt SIDS? The Case of Aruba Don Taylor University of Aruba, Oranjestad, Aruba Tourism is the lifeblood of many small island independent states and those that are categorized as small non-independent jurisdictions (SNIJs) such as Aruba. The question that this paper proposes to address is whether and how tourism helps or hinders island development. Research has been conducted on the economic effects of tourism in a global context; however, our approach is to look at its effect in one destination, Aruba, and to contextualize this research by situating it among other Caribbean islands. The rationale is that tourism is of more significance to the Caribbean in terms of economic dependence and tourism intensity. Because of the density of tourism in Aruba and its mono-economical development paradigm this makes for an ideal case study.1 Our methodology is based on an ontological review of the relationship between tourism and economic development utilizing a contextualized definition of development that fits within the philosophical position of Amartya Sen. In that context defined not just in terms of GDP growth but the enhanced social welfare of its citizens also in the Senian sense as distance from unfreedom. The concept of unfreedom for purposes of this paper is based on the extent to which there is an inertia to shift paradigms even if the existing paradigm enhances vulnerability, fragility and restricts opportunities to its citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • ATA Corporate Plan 2020.Pdf
    Corporate Plan & Budget 2020 Aruba Tourism Authority 2 Corporate Plan & Budget 2020 Aruba Tourism Authority 3 From the CEO Reading Guide The worldwide travel and tourism sector is still going Aspects which can adversely impact or enhance our strong, outpacing the growth of global GDP in 2018 for quality of life and the tourism experience we offer. CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 4 the eighth year in a row, according to research from the The A.T.A.’s aspiration towards 2025 The A.T.A.’s strategic, organizational World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC). Ultimately everything rises and falls on tourism. and our strategic direction for the and operational priorities will continue As part of our Multi-Annual Corporate Strategy 2018- period 2018-2021 are the starting to evolve in line with MACS. The Aruba tourism industry has been able to maintain a 2021 (MACS), as well as the Corporate Plan and Budget point for the development of our 2020 stable GDP for Aruba, and has – together with partners for 2020, the A.T.A. willcontinue to pursue a ‘High Value Corporate Plan & Budget. – ensured that the development was strong enough Low Impact’ Growth Model, taking internal and external to counter three significant moments of crises over influences as much as possible into account. the past 10 years: 1) the global financial crisis in 2008; CHAPTER 2 2) the closure of the oil refinery in 2009 and 3) the In this regard, as part of the envisioned growth model, As part of our Priority Areas for 2020, collapse of the Venezuelan market, which decreased by it is key to continue with the pursuit of innovative which form an integral part of our 86% in 2018 in comparison to 2015 when it was at its pathways for sustainable tourism development.
    [Show full text]
  • Joyce Pereira Valorization of Papiamento
    Valorization of Papiamento in Aruban society and education, in historical, contemporary and future perspectives 1 2 Valorization of Papiamento in Aruban society and education, in historical, contemporary and future perspectives Proefschrift 3 ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de University of Curaçao dr. Moises da Costa Gomez op gezag van de rector magnificus dr. F.B.G. de Lanoy, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de aula van de universiteit op 15 november 2018 om 16.00 uur precies door Joyce Lomena Pereira geboren op 27 januari 1946 te Willemstad, Curaçao Promotiecommissie Voorzitter: Dr. Francis de Lanoy Rector Magnificus Promotoren: Prof. dr. Ronald Severing University of Curaçao Prof. dr. Ludo Verhoeven University of Curaçao; Radboud University Nijmegen Prof. dr. Nicholas Faraclas University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Leden van de manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. Wim Rutgers University of Curaçao Prof. dr. Eliane Segers Radboud University Nijmegen; University of Twente Dr. Elisabeth Echteld Decaan Algemene Faculteit University of Curaçao Overige commissieleden: Prof. dr. Lodewijk Rogier University of Curaçao Prof. dr. Flora Goudappel University of Curaçao; Erasmus University Dr. Rose Mary Allen, University of Curaçao Faculty of Arts; Algemene Faculteit 4 © 2018 Joyce Pereira, Valorization of Papiamento in Aruban society and education, in historical, contemporary and future perspectives ISBN: 978-99904-69-41-7 Cover design: Smile Art & Design Illustration on cover: The Kibrahacha tree, (in Papiamento literally “breaking axes”), the Yel- low Poui or Tabebuia billbergii, Armando Goedgedrag This research was made possible by support from the General Faculty of the University of Curacao Dr. Moises da Costa Gomez, the University of Aruba, the Radboud University and the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of the Netherlands Constitutional Law of the EU
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The Kingdom of the Netherlands Besselink, L.F.M. Publication date 2014 Document Version Submitted manuscript Published in Constitutional law of the EU member states Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Besselink, L. F. M. (2014). The Kingdom of the Netherlands. In L. Besselink, P. Bovend’Eert, H. Broeksteeg, R. de Lange, & W. Voermans (Eds.), Constitutional law of the EU member states (pp. 1187-1241). Kluwer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 The Kingdom of the Netherlands Leonard F.M. Besselink1 1. This chapter is based in part on this author’s Grundstrukturen staatlichen Verfassungsrechts: Niederlande, in: Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum, Band I: Nationales Verfassungsrecht, Armin von Bogdandy, Pedro Cruz Villalón, Peter M.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Profiles in Select Caribbean Countries
    Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean LIMITED LC/CAR/L.250/Corr.1 23 June 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REVIEW OF THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE (RECC) IN THE CARIBBEAN PROJECT: Phase I CLIMATE CHANGE PROFILES IN SELECT CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES __________ This document has been reproduced without formal editing. FOREWORD These reports are the result of consultations which were conducted in 2008 in Aruba, Barbados, Netherlands Antilles, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, Saint Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago. The objective was to obtain relevant information that would inform a Stern-type report where the economics of climate change would be examined for the Caribbean subregion. These reports will be complimented by future assessments of the costs of the “business as usual”, adaptation and mitigation responses to the potential impacts of climate change. It is anticipated that the information contained in each country report would provide a detailed account of the environmental profile and would, therefore, provide an easy point of reference for policymakers in adapting existing policy or in formulating new ones. ECLAC continues to be available to the CDCC countries to provide technical support in the area of sustainable development. Neil Pierre Director ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs in Aruba, Barbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, Netherlands Antilles, Saint Lucia, and Trinidad and Tobago in the preparations for the national consultations. ECLAC expresses appreciation for the support of all stakeholders who participated in the country consultations and shared important information on climate change adaptation and mitigation in their countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suburbanization of the Aruban Landscape
    Landscape series: 4 The suburbanization of the Aruban landscape 2010 Residential & Economic area ![ Hooiberg Main roads National Park Arikok Planned Salt Spray Park Salinas & rainwater plains Golfcourses Retention_reservoirs The Aruban landscape has undergone many changes in history. This paper is part of the landscape series: “Spatial Developments in the Aruban Landscape: A multidisciplinary GIS-based approach derived from geologic, historic, economic and housing information” 2016 1 “We must spare no effort to free all of humanity, and above all our children and grandchildren, from the threat of living on a planet irredeemably spoilt by human activities, and whose resources would no longer be sufficient for their needs”. —United Nations Millennium Declaration (2000) — Contents The historical perspective 3 Population growth 4 Recent GDP 6 Suburban sprawl and rising housing costs 6 Information derived from historic maps 8 The landscape in early 20th century 8 Infrastructure 8 Mining 8 Agriculture 8 Windmills 8 Plantations 8 Saltpans 9 The relation between geological substrate and early land-use in 1911 9 The extent of Aloe cultivation in 1911 9 The extent of agriculture in 1911 10 Housing in 1911 and 2010 11 Infomation from Housing Censuses 12 Impact from the shift in housing on the landscape 15 Infrastructure in 2010 and in 1911 15 A layout for traffic congestion 15 Final remarks 18 Works Cited 19 Author: Ruud R. W. M. Derix, PhD Head department Spatial and Environmental Statistics Central Bureau of Statistics Aruba 2016 We like to thank our colleagues at the CBS for their comments on the manuscript. Special thanks to Marlon Faarup, Director CBS, for the thorough review and remarks on the final manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos Aruba 2025 Action Plan
    Nos Aruba 2025 Action Plan 2010‐2013 National Integrated Strategic Plan “Shaping the Sustainable future of Aruba is not only the responsibility of government, but the responsibility of each individual living in Aruba”. “We Move from fragmentation to Integration” 1 February 2010 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 8 PART I THE PROCESS ..................................................................................................... 19 1.1 Why Nos Aruba 2025? .................................................................................................. 19 1.2 The Appreciative Inquiry approach, SOAR and Scenario Planning ............................. 21 1.3 Sustainable Development in Aruba ............................................................................... 24 1.4 Aruban Model for Development ................................................................................... 27 1.5 Institutionalization of the Strategic Planning process ................................................... 30 PART II ASSESSING THE PRESENT SITUATION .................................................... 34 2.1 The Strengths of Aruba ............................................................................................. 34 2.2 Current Challenges ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Муніципальне Право UDC 142.7 Cherevko Maryna Phd in Law Department of Constitutional Law and Human Rights National Academy of Internal Affairs
    International scientific journal "Internauka." Series: "Juridical Sciences" http://www.inter-nauka.com/magazine/law/ Конституційне право; муніципальне право UDC 142.7 Cherevko Maryna PhD in Law Department of Constitutional Law and Human Rights National Academy of Internal Affairs CONSTITUTIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO THE SEСRET OF CORRESPONDENCE IN THE STATES OF THE AMERICAN SPACE Summary. The article is devoted to the analysis of the legislation of the constitutional right to the secret of correspondence in the states of the American space at the national and international level. The author proposed a classification of constitutions of American states and grouped into six groups, namely: "British", "American", "Dutch", "French", "Spanish" and "Danish". Citizens of the American states that are members of the "Organization of American States" and have ratified the American Convention on Human Rights have legitimate reasons to defend their violated right to the secret of correspondence (Article 11 of the Convention) not only within the competence of the courts of their state, but also at the international, inter-American level requesting protection from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (San Jose, Costa Rica), after having undergone an agreement with the Inter- American Commission on Human Rights. The main results of the research are to determine the three forms of formulation of the constitutional norm: its legal form in the form of "freedom from interference with correspondence" (as part of the "freedom of expression") (the "British" group
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in Accordance with the Guidelines on Periodic Reports
    UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant Distr. on civil and GENERAL political rights CCPR/C/NET/1999/3/Add.2 4 January 2002 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Addendum ARUBA* [15 November 2001] * This report is issued unedited, in compliance with the wish expressed by the Human Rights Committee at its sixty-sixth session in July 1999. GE.02-40012 (E) 010302 CCPR/C/NET/1999/3/Add.2 page 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 Article 1: Right to self-determination ........................................................................ 4 Article 2: Non-discrimination .................................................................................... 4 Article 3: Equal rights of men and women ................................................................ 6 Article 4: Restrictions on derogations from the obligations under the Covenant .................................................................................... 6 Article 5: Prohibition on narrow interpretation of the Covenant ............................... 6 Article 6: Right to life ................................................................................................ 6 Article 7: Prohibition of torture ................................................................................. 7 Article 8: Prohibition of slavery ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]