Labour Issues Coordinating Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Labour Issues Coordinating Committee Labour Issues Coordinating Committee 45 Speedvale Avenue East, Unit 7 Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1J2 T: 519 836-5495 ext 227 105-355 Elmira Road North, Guelph, ON, N1K 1S5 E: [email protected] T: 519-763-6160 E: [email protected] February 26, 2018 Hon. Patty Hajdu, Minister of Employment Workforce Development and Labour House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A6 Dear Hon. Patty Hajdu: Re: Educating Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program workers on legislated rights Training farm workers about their legislated rights has been identified by the federal government as a focus area. As farm employers, we agree with the principle of training workers on their rights. However, we feel very strongly that this training, particularly for workers on the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP), should be presented in an unbiased, neutral fashion, and not delivered by representatives from organized labour and other special interest groups. Those organizations have no direct role in our agricultural workplaces or in the administration of legislation. Past experience has proven that confrontational approaches and provocative claims based on selective truths are not constructive and should not be part of a training program for workers on their legislative rights. The attached background document demonstrates our concern with this approach. It is our recommendation that a cooperative approach involving employers, appropriate government agencies, worker consulates and workers could enhance the current training structure, which has proven to be successful over many decades. Language, cultural influences, and varying literacy levels are already accommodated for under the current structure; flexibility in training techniques and location are a must. We look forward to meeting with you to develop a cooperative approach to moving forward on this issue. Sincerely, Ken Linington Alison Robertson Policy Advisor, LICC Executive Director, OFVGA Cc: Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada Hon. Lawrence MacAulay, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Hon. Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development Hon. William Francis Morneau, Minister of Finance BACKGROUND Ontario Labour Relations Act/Wagner Act Ontario’s Labour Relations Act was established in the early 1940s. It mirrors the Wagner Act in the United States that was developed during World War II to resolve labour problems in manufacturing i.e. Ford Motor Company. The Act is highly confrontational; its main drawback is the loss of time and associated financial burden. It is significant that the International Labour Organization of the United Nations does not support or recommend the Wagner Model of collective bargaining because it is so confrontational and costly. The Wagner model is used only in Canada and the United States. Ontario’s Labour Relations Act was designed to balance the power between the employer and the worker in the workplace. The unique circumstances found in farming would swing the balance of power in favour of the worker. The unique circumstances include: i) care and maintenance of biological processes; ii) unpredictable impact of climatic and environmental conditions; iii) the seasonality of the industry; iv) need for a flexible management style; v) the family orientation of the business; v) functioning in a global market. As a result, farm workers were exempt from the Act. The provincial NDP government of Bob Rae (1990) made an ideological decision to remove the farming exemption but there was no ground swell of farm workers demanding change. The NDP government acknowledged the vulnerability of farm employers to strikes and developed the Agricultural Labour Relations Act (ALRA). The ALRA prohibited strikes and lockouts in favour of final offer arbitration. Labour Issues Coordinating Committee (LICC) The Labour Issues Coordinating Committee (LICC) is a coalition of agricultural commodity and farm organizations representing the interests of Ontario farm employers. It was formed in 1991 to develop consensus in the farm employer community on employment and labour-related issues, and to represent their collective positions to government. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) After the United Farm Workers Union of Cesar Chavez in California gained popularity in the 70s, the UFCW focused on farm workers in Ontario. They were ineffective until the NDP started to negotiate with farmers (LICC) around the ALRA. Union leadership threatened the lives of farm negotiators and their families if they did not support the development of the ALRA. Just as the union started to develop certification campaigns in the hatchery and mushroom commodities, the Rae government fell. The Conservative government of Mike Harris repealed the ALRA and re-instituted the exemption of farm workers in the LRA. The UFCW challenged the Ontario law, claiming it did not comply with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The case, named after a farm worker (Tom Dunmore), ultimately made it to the Supreme Court of Canada. Dunmore Ruling The court felt the total exclusion from all aspects of the LRA did prevent workers from their “rights of association”, but it did not remove the exclusion from the collective bargaining regime found in the Act. The Rights of Association are not limited to just the collective bargaining model found in the LRA. The Court gave the Ontario government 18 months to remedy the concern. Evidence placed before the court by the UFCW did not withstand scrutiny. James White and Associates prepared an extensive document claiming farm owners were getting extremely wealthy off the backs of poorly paid workers. Under the discovery process it was clear that the White report did not use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. White delivered the report that he was contracted to deliver. Agricultural Employees Protection Act 2002 (AEPA) Farm workers’ collective interests are protected by the AEPA. It reflects the Rights of Association found in the Charter. Some other key differences include: i) no duty to bargain; ii) no exclusive representation; iii) different dispute resolution mechanism (no strikes/lockouts, no grievance structure). The AEPA went beyond the Charter requirements by offering: a) an obligation on the employer to listen/respond to workers concerns; b) a dispute resolution structure; c) the burden of proof on the employer in claims of discrimination; and d) granting union organizers access to private farm property where workers are resident. The AEPA reflects a European model to labour relations/collective bargaining which is viewed as the international norm. Rol-Land Farms and Fraser cases The UFCW went to three farms and tried to organize workers under the LRA when they clearly knew farm workers were exempt. All three farms appealed the attempt. The UFCW (Fraser Case named after the president of the UFCW Canada) then challenged the Ontario government, claiming the AEPA did not comply with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Ontario Superior court supported the government's position, arguing the union did not try to function under the AEPA. The Rol-Land Farms case was an attempt to reinstate workers who were viewed as union supporters. The Rol-Land Case went before the dispute resolution structure (OMAFRA Agricultural Tribunal). Before the employer’s perspective was heard, the union claimed the tribunal was biased because it used the Attorney General’s expertise. The union challenged the authority of the tribunal before Divisional Court. They then withdrew from the case. In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled (Fraser Case) that the AEPA complied with the Charter. It was clear that the Charter does not identify a specific model (LRA) to obtain the Rights of Association found with the Charter. MedReleaf Case UFCW attempted a certification vote of a marijuana growing operation. The vote failed, so they went to the Ontario Labour Relations Board claiming unfair labour practices by the employer. The OLRB stated that growing marijuana was farming (not medical workers) and that they had no jurisdiction in the case. UFCW then took their concerns to the OMAFRA Agricultural Tribunal arguing that the tribunal and the AEPA did not comply with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The case remains before the tribunal. Other There are countless examples where unions and related special interest groups deliver misinformation and false claims about employers, governments and workers to advance their interests. Some of those examples include: Hampstead fatalities March 2012—a sad traffic accident involving foreign nationals El Contrato documentary 2003—filming was done under false pretense and no investigative journalism to show the perspective of other stakeholders Tigchelaar Berry Farm—claims of farmers having power to deport workers and compared the farm to the Holocaust in Germany during the Second World War. Gender Discrimination—claims before the Human Rights Commission without permission of the worker Migrant Dreams documentary 2016—lots of accusations but business and employer names blurred. Employer perspective, government administrators perspective and worker consulate perspectives where not included. OHCOW Brock Health Conference 2017—OHCOW Board of Directors dominated by organized labour Summary Farm employers want to work within the laws of the country, and support the concept that workers should be trained on their legislative rights. Employers would participate in a cooperative approach involving appropriate government
Recommended publications
  • Dealing with Crisis
    Briefing on the New Parliament December 12, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Regional Seat 8 6 ON largely Flip from NDP to Distribution static 33 36 Bloc Liberals pushed out 10 32 Minor changes in Battleground B.C. 16 Liberals lose the Maritimes Goodale 1 12 1 1 2 80 10 1 1 79 1 14 11 3 1 5 4 10 17 40 35 29 33 32 15 21 26 17 11 4 8 4 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 BC AB MB/SK ON QC AC Other 2 Seats in the House Other *As of December 5, 2019 3 Challenges & opportunities of minority government 4 Minority Parliament In a minority government, Trudeau and the Liberals face a unique set of challenges • Stable, for now • Campaign driven by consumer issues continues 5 Minority Parliament • Volatile and highly partisan • Scaled back agenda • The budget is key • Regulation instead of legislation • Advocacy more complicated • House committee wild cards • “Weaponized” Private Members’ Bills (PMBs) 6 Kitchen Table Issues and Other Priorities • Taxes • Affordability • Cost of Living • Healthcare Costs • Deficits • Climate Change • Indigenous Issues • Gender Equality 7 National Unity Prairies and the West Québéc 8 Federal Fiscal Outlook • Parliamentary Budget Officer’s most recent forecast has downgraded predicted growth for the economy • The Liberal platform costing projected adding $31.5 billion in new debt over the next four years 9 The Conservatives • Campaigned on cutting regulatory burden, review of “corporate welfare” • Mr. Scheer called a special caucus meeting on December 12 where he announced he was stepping
    [Show full text]
  • March 23, 2020 the Honourable Patty Hajdu, PCMP Minister of Health 70
    March 23, 2020 The Honourable Patty Hajdu, P.C. M.P. Minister of Health 70 Colombine Driveway Tunney's Pasture Postal Location: 0906C Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Subject: COVID-19 and request to pause federal PMPRB regulations Dear Minister Hajdu, We are writing to urgently request, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic health crisis, that you and your Cabinet colleagues pause implementation of changes to the price control regulations of the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB) set to come into force on July 1, 2020. We are signing this letter on behalf of national patient organizations, including health charities and not-for-profits, which are part of Alliance des patients pour la santé, Best Medicines Coalition, Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Health Charities Coalition of Canada, and Regroupement québécois des maladies orphelines/Quebec Coalition of Orphan Diseases. Together, we represent millions of Canadian patients with all types of illness, conditions and unmet therapeutic needs. We fully recognize the significant challenges in addressing and mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 crisis to save lives, including communicating national efforts, and we commend you on your role in this vital work. We greatly appreciated the work to ensure the flow of live-saving medicines given the partial closure of the USA-Canada border. We fully support Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s statement today that it is time for all hands on deck. This effort must involve national leaders along with all stakeholders, including patient organizations that are a vital link and support to patients and indeed all Canadians. The COVID-19 crisis requires full, sustained and undivided attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental
    Back to normal is still a long way off Gwynne Dyer p. 12 What now of the Michael environmental Harris movement in Canada? p.11 Phil Gurski p. 11 Some MPs donating their salary increases to charities p. 4 THIRTY-FIRST YEAR, NO. 1718 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, APRIL 13, 2020 $5.00 News Remote caucus meetings Analysis Feds’ response Analysis: Did In the time of the pandemic, the feds flip- flop on closing Liberals holding national caucus the border or wearing meetings seven days a week masks amid The Liberals' daily Liberals meetings start with the COVID-19 are using a an update for MPs on new developments outbreak? regular daily and the government's initiatives from BY PETER MAZEREEUW conference Deputy House Leader Kirsty Duncan, he federal government says call for their left, International science and expert advice is Trade Minister Mary T caucus behind its decision to shut the Ng, and Minister border to travellers and its chang- meetings. The of Middle Class ing advice on whether Canadians Prosperity Mona should wear masks amid the CO- Conservatives Fortier. Usually, VID-19 outbreak. While Canada’s a member of the are using top health official pointed to COVID-19 cabinet new science related to using face Zoom and committee, or masks, one expert says there is another cabinet no scientific evidence that could the New minister also joins have informed Canada’s decision them in updating Democrats to close its border on March 16. caucus members. “There is no science about The Hill Times are using whether it works to restrict all photographs by travel into a country,” said Steven GoToMeeting.
    [Show full text]
  • April 21, 2016 the Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos Minister For
    April 21, 2016 The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos Minister for Families, Children and Social Development House of Commons Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A6 Dear Minister, I am writing to you today on behalf of the Canadian Network of Women’s Shelters and its 13 provincial and territorial shelters associations. The Network provides a unified voice on the issue of violence against women and brings forward the issues and concerns of the shelter sector. As a sector, we are encouraged by your government’s recent announcement to commit 89.9 million dollars over the next two years for shelter construction and renovation. We do, however have several questions and concerns and do feel that it was a lost opportunity that our Network was not consulted following this announcement. We are well positioned to provide advice and expertise in terms of how to ensure that these funds maximize their potential outcomes. This being said, it is not too late and we hope we will have the opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue in the very near future. As a Network working at the pan Canadian level we appreciate the challenges and the rewards of collaboration. The Budget indicates that the funds will be provided under the Affordable Housing Initiative (AHI) and that provinces and territories will not be required to cost-match these investments. The following questions are, however, not addressed: . How will the funds be rolled out - though a federal mechanism or via the provinces and territories? . How will allocations be made, what is the funding formula to be used? . Will the funds cover infrastructure costs associated to Second Stage Shelters and Shelter outreach programs? In figures provided by your Department, we noticed that under the IAH initiative, Federal contributions to create or renovate shelter beds in Nunavut between 2011-12 and 2014-15 totaled a mere $40,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 8 Most Generous Ridings Giving $$$ to Anti-Choice Groups
    Top 8 Most Generous Ridings Giving What happened $$$ to Anti-Choice Groups with the Canada Summer Jobs Human Rights Wall of Shame program? Individual Members of Parliament can direct Canada In April 2017, the Abortion Summer Jobs funding to Rights Coalition of Canada groups in their ridings. Some reported that many anti- ridings scored consistently choice groups had been getting federal government high for anti-choice grants. funding to hire summer How generous are these students under the Canada ridings to anti-choice groups? Summer Jobs (CSJ) program – about $1.7 Too generous! million since 2010! The top eight alone has given (Here’s the list with $760,000 to them from 2010 amounts and years: to 2017. We dug up the data https://goo.gl/4C1ZsC) below. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Employment Minister Patty Hajdu Riding MP Anti-choice Groups Amount quickly announced that Moncton-Riverview- ● Robert Goguen, ● Pregnancy & Wellness $285.6K Liberal ridings would no Dieppe CPC, to 2015 Centre of Moncton longer award CSJ funding ● Ginette Petitpas- ● Birthright to anti-choice groups, and Taylor, LPC, current that the government would Calgary Centre ● Joan Crockatt, CPC, ● Calgary Pregnancy Care $84.7 K look at ways to to 2015 Centre permanently change the ● Kent Hehr, LPC, program to prevent any current MP from allocating public Calgary Northeast ● Devinder Shory, ● Canadian Centre for Bio- $81.5 K CPC, to 2015 Ethical Reform funds to anti-choice groups. Guelph ● Frank Valeriote, ● Alliance for Life $67.9 K LPC, to 2015 ● Beginnings Family
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2020 Table of Contents
    October 9, 2020 Table of Contents Research No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session INTERVIEW: Health minister Hajdu currently ‘not open to delaying’ drug pricing changes Upcoming Events Webinar: “Using Data to Make Public Health Decisions” Press Releases Intergovernmental Aairs Jack.org Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario Canadian Institutes of Health Research Indigenous Services Canada Statistics Canada The Royal Society of Canada October 9, 2020 RESEARCH No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session RESEARCH EXCLUSIVE | OCTOBER 9, 2020 After two and a half hours of continuous debate on the merits of a broad COVID-19 study proposed by Conservative health critic Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill, Alta.), the health committee’s rst meeting was adjourned with no decisions made. Rempel Garner proposed the health committee (HESA) undertake a study to look at 17 different elements, including rapid, at-home testing; vaccine development; long-term care protocols within federal jurisdiction; the Public Health Agency of Canada ’s Global Public Health Intelligence Network; contact tracing protocol; and Canada’s level of preparedness for future pandemics. The motion also proposed that various ministers, including those for health, procurement and public safety, be required to appear before the committee separately for three hours each in order to answer questions about the government’s response to COVID-19. Rempel Garner’s motion was introduced after opposition members of the committee voted to adjourn the debate on a motion presented by Liberal MP and committee member Tony Van Bynen (Newmarket-Aurora, Ont.), who was calling for a study on the mental health impacts of COVID-19 on Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Win Poses Major Challenges to Trudeau Government, World Economy
    LAWRENCE MACAULAY, AND MORE, IN AGRICULTURE POLICY BRIEFING PP. 17-28 GWYNNE DYER P. 4 HILL CLIMBERS P. 37 PHIL GURSKI P. 10 PARTY CENTRAL P. 40 JOHN CHENIER P. 32 MICHEL DRAPEAU P. 31 The biggest Dominic LeBlanc Data retention Culinary scene Look out, it’s the Civilian review F-U vote in hires new and counter- shines at Gold past disguised of military history D-comms terrorism Medal Plates as the future justice system TWENTY-EIGHTH YEAR, NO. 1386 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2016 $5.00 CANADA & THE 21ST CENTURY OPINION NEWS SENATE Trudeau government could Trump win poses prorogue to get Independents fair representation on Senate major challenges to committees BY AbbaS RANA committees, the Justin Trudeau government could prorogue If the Conservative and Liberal Parliament in the summer so that Senate leadership fail to provide all Senate committees are re- Trudeau government, fair representation to Inde- pendent Senators on standing Continued on page 39 world economy NEWS FINANCE MINISTER There’s a real danger that Donald Trump could trigger a trade war Feds creating confusion with China if he goes ahead with his contract with the American voter to immediately ‘label China a currency manipulator.’ in way it forecasts See David Crane on page 13. deficits: experts BY DEREK ABMA Experts say the way the govern- ment has forecast deficits this year in its fall economic update and March budget has created confu- sion, and there is a need for clearer standards for how contingencies are factored into projected deficits. On Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Secure Canada [email protected]
    Minister Ministre of Agriculture and de !'Agriculture et de Agri-Food l'Agroalimentaire Ottawa, Canada K1A OC5 Quote: 24 7280 JAN 16 2019 Ms. Diana Bronson and Co-Signatories Executive Director Food Secure Canada [email protected] Dear Ms. Bronson and Co-Signatories: I am writing in response to your correspondence to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau regarding leadership on A Food Policy for Canada and other federal policies, which was forwarded to me for consideration. As you know, the Office of the Prime Minister forwarded a copy of your correspondence to the Honourable Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Minister of Health, and the Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs. I appreciate being made aware of the concerns that members of Food Secure Canada and other organizations have regarding the timely announcement of A Food Policy for Canada. As the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, I am honoured that the Prime Minister asked me to lead on a food policy that promotes healthy living and safe food by putting more healthy, high-quality food produced by Canadian ranchers and farmers on the tables of families across the country. A Food Policy for Canada is expected to be a federal, whole-of-government initiative that will establish a long-term vision for a coordinated and systems-based approach to addressing a broad scope of food-related issues in Canada. Throughout the public consultations held in 2017 on this food policy, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) heard from many participants about the importance of taking a balanced approach toward addressing the interconnected themes of food security, health and food safety, environmental sustainability, and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Minister Macaulay
    Rachel Blaney Member of Parliament North Island-Powell River The Honourable Lawrence MacAulay Minister of Veterans Affairs Via Email Campbell River BC July 8, 2020 RE: Veterans Accessing CERB as Gap-Funding Dear Minister, It has been brought to my attention that there are a number of veterans accessing the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) when they are not legally eligible to do so. They have made the decision to apply for the CERB despite their ineligibility because of the lengthy delays within Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) due to the extreme backlog in disability benefit applications. From what I have been told, their plan is to use the money from the CERB to support themselves right now, and hopefully by the time they have to repay the CERB, VAC will have processed their disability claims and thus they will have the money to pay back the CERB. These actions are probably also due to the fact that a number of Ministers and other government MPs initially told Canadians to apply for the CERB, even if they didn’t meet the eligibility criteria. The government later tried to criminalize those who applied without being eligible, though fortunately this has not gone through as of yet. I think we can both agree that we do not want to see veterans criminalized or punished by the government simply for accessing government money from one source when the source they are legally entitled to is simply moving too slowly to meet their needs. Because of this situation, I hope you will agree with me in saying that criminalizing ineligible CERB applicants is completely inappropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobbyists, Non-Profits Clamour to Be Heard P. 6
    Coming out on the other side of COVID-19 Lobbyists, Wage subsidies critical for post- non-profi ts coronavirus clamour to survival, say be heard p. 6 businesses p. 3 THIRTY-FIRST YEAR, NO. 1715 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 2020 $5.00 News Health care Mental health a ‘missing piece’ in feds’ COVID-19 response, say critics, advocates NDP MP Don Davies says the situation calls for an ‘extraordinary response’ and supports for mental health, which one advocate says should come ‘imminently.’ Health Minister Patty BY SAMANTHA WRIGHT ALLEN At least one organization said Hajdu told Senators they expect an announcement on March 25 that the s the government rapidly “imminently,” though neither federal government was Aresponds to the immediate Health Canada nor Health Minis- working on a virtual health and economic needs of ter Patty Hajdu (Thunder Bay- mental health tool Canadians affected by CO- Superior North, Ont.) responded as part of Canada's VID-19, more than two weeks to requests to confi rm the details. COVID-19 response, after the country adopted strict On March 25, Ms. Hajdu said which one group says isolation measures, advocates the government would launch a should be announced say now is the time to address free virtual mental health tool in 'imminently.' The Hill the mental health toll more are Times photograph by Andrew Meade likely to face. Continued on page 16 News Trade News COVID-19 Food supply, emergency vehicle repair: Introduction of electronic, remote voting not Publications Mail Agreement #40068926 keeping Canada-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honourable Lawrence Macaulay, PC, MP Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
    The original version was signed by: The Honourable Lawrence MacAulay, PC, MP Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence Cette publication est également disponible en français. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Veterans Affairs, 2021. __________________________ Catalogue No. V1-9E-PDF ISSN 2371-7033 __________________________ Departmental Plan 2021–22 Table of contents From the Minister ....................................................................................... 1 Plans at a glance .......................................................................................... 3 Core responsibilities: planned results and resources .................................. 5 Background: what is a Departmental Results Framework? .......................................... 5 CR1: Benefits, Services and Support ........................................................................ 6 CR2: Commemoration ............................................................................................ 13 CR3: Veterans Ombudsman .................................................................................. 16 Internal Services: Planned results and resources ........................................................ 19 Our internal services .............................................................................................. 19 Spending and human resources ................................................................ 23 Planned spending ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 149 No. 032 Tuesday, March 24, 2020 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2067 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, March 24, 2020 The House met at 12 p.m. [English] I wish to inform the House that pursuant to Standing Order 28(3), the Speaker sent a notice calling the House to meet this day, Prayer and I now lay this on the table. [Translation] ● (1200) What is more, on Sunday, March 22, the Speaker sent every [English] member a message explaining why the House was being recalled. I would also like to inform the House that as part of the steps taken RECALL OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS by the government under Standing Order 55(1), the Speaker pub‐ The Deputy Speaker: Colleagues, before we begin our proceed‐ lished a special Order Paper and Notice Paper giving notice of a ings, I would like to say a few words. government bill. [English] We all recognize that this is a highly unusual sitting, given the extraordinary circumstances in which we all find ourselves present‐ I also wish to lay upon the table a letter from the Leader of the ly. Government in the House of Commons, dated March 22, 2020. [Translation] [Translation] I recognize the Leader of the Government in the House of Com‐ As a result, you will notice that the arrangements we are used to mons. are different today. We are fewer in number and other special mea‐ sures have been put in place based on the recommendations of pub‐ [English] lic health officials.
    [Show full text]