DOCSLIB.ORG

Subsistence Use of Birds in the Northwest Arctic Region, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Subsistence Use of Birds in the Northwest Arctic Region, Alaska Technical Paper No. 260 by Susan Georgette Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska July 2000 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information please write to ADF&G, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N. Fairfield Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22203 or O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-4120, (TDD) 907-465-3646, or (FAX) 907-465-2440. ABSTRACT This report summarizes information on subsistence harvests and uses of birds and eggs in the Northwest Arctic region of Alaska, based on surveys of households and interviews with bird hunters in 11 communities. The geographic area covered by this project corresponds to the Northwest Arctic Borough, which includes the coastal regions of Kotzebue Sound, the Selawik, Noatak, and Kobuk river drainages, and the arctic coast as far north as Kivalina. The report presents information on species harvested, timing of harvests, and numbers of birds and eggs taken at the community and regional levels. Descriptive information on local knowledge of birds from interviews with hunters is summarized for selected species. The report presents the first comprehensive description of subsistence bird patterns for communities in the Northwest Arctic region. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service funded the project. An estimated 33,160 birds were harvested annually by households in the 11 Northwest Arctic region communities. In terms of numbers, ducks accounted for the largest percentage of the harvest (39.9 percent), followed by upland game birds (29.6 percent) and geese (29.4 percent). Sandhill cranes, tundra swans, loons, seabirds, and snowy owls each represented less than one percent of the region’s bird harvest. The most common species of migratory birds harvested in the region were Canada geese, white-fronted geese, pintails, mallards, wigeons, and black scoters. By weight, geese accounted for most of the region’s bird harvest (50.1 percent), followed by ducks (31.9 percent), upland game birds (14.3 percent), and tundra swans (2.3 percent). An estimated 14,136 eggs were harvested annually by households in the region. Seabird eggs accounted for the largest percentage of the harvest (86.5 percent), followed by goose eggs (7.1 percent) and duck eggs (5.4 percent). Murre and gull eggs were the principal species of eggs gathered. Spring was the primary harvest season for migratory birds in the Northwest Arctic region with 67.6 percent of the harvest occurring in this season. About 24.3 percent of the harvest took place in fall and 6.9 percent in summer. The communities in the region exhibited variation in harvest seasons for migratory birds. Some harvested almost solely in the spring, one almost solely in the summer, and others fairly equally in both spring and fall. An estimated total of 1,015 households in the Northwest Arctic region hunted birds during the survey year, representing 63.3 percent of all households in the region. About 1,581 persons in the region hunted birds, or about 1 out of 4 residents. Because subsistence foods were widely shared, more households used birds than harvested them. An estimated 78.5 percent of households in the Northwest Arctic region used birds for food during the survey year. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... V Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................... vi Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 2 Project 1: Kiana, Selawik, and Shungnak (1994-95) ........................................................... 3 Project 2: Buckland, Kiana, Kivalina, Kobuk, and Noorvik (1997) .................................... 4 Project 3: Ambler, Deering, Kotzebue, Noatak, and Selawik (1998-99) ............................. 5 Subsistence Bird Harvests in the Northwest Arctic Region ..................................................... 5 Bird Harvests by Season .......................................................................................................... 7 Subsistence Egg Harvests in the Northwest Arctic Region ...................................................... 8 Participation in Bird Hunting .................................................................................................. .9 Bird and Egg Harvests by Species ......................................................................................... 10 Local Knowledge of Birds and Eggs ...................................................................................... 11 White-fronted Geese .......................................................................................................... 11 Canada Geese ..................................................................................................................... 11 Snow Geese ........................................................................................................................ 12 Emperor Geese ................................................................................................................... 13 Brant .................................................................................................................................. .14 Tundra Swan ...................................................................................................................... 14 Sandhill Crane .................................................................................................................... 15 Eiders .................................................................................................................................. 16 Other Ducks ....................................................................................................................... 17 Loons .................................................................................................................................. 18 Murres and Puffins ............................................................................................................. 19 Ptarmigan and Grouse ........................................................................................................ 20 Eggs .................................................................................................................................... 20 Community Reports .............................................................................................................. .22 References Cited .................................................................................................................... 23 Tables and Figures ................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................................. 63 Sample Survey Instrument ................................................................................................ .65 Sample Page from Color Bird Identification Guide .......................................................... .67 Key Respondent Interview Guide ...................................................................................... 69 Appendix 2: Community Reports .......................................................................................... 71 Ambler 1998.. ..................................................................................................................... 73 Buckland 1997 .................................................................................................................... 81 Deering 1998 ...................................................................................................................... 97 Kiana 1994 ....................................................................................................................... 113 ii Kiana 1997 ....................................................................................................................... 117 Kivalina 1997 ................................................................................................................... 125 Kobuk 1997 .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Departkent of the Interior United States Geological Survey

    Departkent of the Interior United States Geological Survey

    DEPARTKENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OCCURRENCES OF TUNGSTEN MINERALS IN ALASKA Compiled by Edward B. Cobb Open-File Report 82-785 1982 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. REFERENCE LIST The following references give data, as of May 1, 1982, on localities where tungsten minerals have been found in Alaska. References are keyed by number to locations shown on the accompanying map. An asterisk (*) preceding a locality name indicates recorded production. Localities 93-161 (in the Tanacross quadrangle) and 183-197 (in the Chignik and Sutwik Island quadrangles) are the sites of samples collected during geochemical investigations that were part of the Alaska Mineral Resource Assessment Program (AMRAP). Tungsten minerals were identified during microscopic study of the nonmagnetic fractions of the heavy-mineral concentrates of samples from these localities. In most instances the report(s) cited for each occurrence is a summary of data in older reports and was compiled since 1975. Most of the summary reports contain lists of the reports used in their compilation. Citations are in standard bibliographic format with the exception that each includes, in parentheses, an abbreviation for the report or map series and the number of the report or map. Abbreviations used are: AOF, State of Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Open-File Report; B, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin; BMOF, U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report; C, U.S. Geological Survey Circular; MF, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map; OF, U.S.
  • Bird Studies Overview

    Bird Studies Overview

    Chapter 7. Bird Studies Overview teigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge provides a variety of habitats for many species of birds. Thousands of breeding birds rely on the resources of the refuge to Srest, eat, and raise their young. In addition, the refuge supports wetlands that are vital to the survival of migratory birds. The activities that follow offer an excellent opportunity for students to learn about and to observe the different species of birds — their behaviors and adaptations to the habitats on the refuge. Background The actively managed refuge wetlands and grasslands, when combined with the natural floodplain vegetative communities, provide habitat that supports over 200 species of birds. Hundreds of thousands of birds migrate along the lower Columbia River every year. The refuge hosts thousands of migratory birds that fly thousands of miles from their breeding grounds in Arctic Canada and Alaska to their wintering grounds in Baja California or South America, a route known as the Pacific Flyway. The few remaining areas of wetland habitat along the lower Columbia River are vital to the flyway. Some birds spend their winter on refuge wetlands, returning north to nest; some nest here but migrate to milder climates in the south for the winter; and some do not migrate at all but remain in the area as permanent residents. Several of the songbirds found in the summer spend our winters in Central and South America, migrating thousands of miles annually between their summer and winter habitats. Birds using the refuge are specifically adapted to the type of food they eat and the type of habitat they occupy (open water, freshwater wetland, field, riparian woodland, or upland woodland).
  • Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area

    Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area

    OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
  • King Eider (Somateria Spectabilis) French: Eider À Tête Grise

    King Eider (Somateria Spectabilis) French: Eider À Tête Grise

    Sea Duck Information Series King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) French: Eider à tête grise Description King eiders are a moderately large sea duck, weighing 1200-2100 g (2.6 – 4.6 lbs). Male king eiders are one of the most ornately plumaged ducks in North America. In breeding plumage (late fall through mid- summer), males sport a large orange- yellow knob between their bill and forehead. Their forehead, crown, and nape is pearl blue, with iridescent pale green cheeks and a reddish- orange bill. The lower portion of their head, neck, upper back, and breast is white with the remainder of the body black. The longest feathers along their upper flanks have triangular extensions that form a sail-like projection on their back. Female king eiders in breeding plumage are mostly dark reddish brown with extensive black barring Photo: USFWS along their sides and flanks. Their King Eiders in breeding plumage bill is olive or yellowish-gray and lacks the knob that the male has. In eastern North America, nest-building and egg laying within a King eiders migrate in large king eiders winter primarily at week of arrival. Females lay one egg undulating flocks and their wings sea along the coasts of Labrador per day and clutch size averages 4-5 whistle in flight. On the water, it’s and Newfoundland, with smaller eggs. Incubation lasts about 23 days. mostly the male that makes sounds, numbers south to Virginia and in the Ducklings can fly when about 50 days including a soft dovelike urrr urrr eastern Great Lakes. Some unknown old.
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131

    Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131

    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
  • Free Download! the Trumpeter Swan

    Free Download! the Trumpeter Swan

    G3647 The Trumpeter Swan by Sumner Matteson, Scott Craven and Donna Compton Snow-white Trumpeter Swans present a truly spectac- Swans of the Midwest ular sight. With a wingspan of more than 7 feet and a rumpeter Swans, along with ducks and geese, belong height of about 4 feet, the Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buc- to the avian Order Anseriformes, Family Anatidae. cinator) ranks as the largest native waterfowl species in T Trumpeters have broad, flat bills with fine tooth-like North America. serrations along the edges which allow them to strain Because the Trumpeter Swan disappeared as a breed- aquatic plants and water. The birds’ long necks and ing bird in the Midwest, several states have launched strong feet allow them to uproot plants in water up to 4 restoration programs to reintroduce it to the region. This feet deep. publication will provide you with background informa- Most Trumpeter Swans weigh 21–30 pounds, tion on the Trumpeter Swan’s status and life history, and although some males exceed the average weight. The on restoration efforts being conducted in the upper male is called a cob; the female is called a pen; and a swan Midwest. in its first year is called a cygnet or juve- nile. The Trumpeter is often con- fused with the far more common Tundra Swan (formerly Whistling Swan, Cygnus columbianus), the only other native swan found routinely in North America. Tundra Swans can be seen in the upper Trumpeter Swan Midwest only during spring and fall migration. You can distinguish between the two native species most accurately by listening to their calls.
  • 03/16/2020 9:21 Am

    03/16/2020 9:21 Am

    ACTION: Withdraw Proposed DATE: 03/16/2020 9:21 AM 1501:31-7-05 Seasons and limits on rail, common snipe (Wilson's snipe), woodcock, gallinules (common moorhens), teal, geese and mourning doves. (A) Throughout the state, it shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, kill, wound, take, or attempt to take, or to possess any of the migratory game birds specified in this rule except as provided in this rule or other rules of the Administrative Code. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess any rails except sora and Virginia, which may be hunted and taken from September 1, 20192020 through November 9, 20192020. (2) It shall be unlawful for any person to take or possess more than twenty-five rails singly or in the aggregate in one day, or to possess more than seventy-five rails singly or in the aggregate at anytime after the second day. (3) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess common snipe (Wilson's snipe) at any time, except from September 1, 20192020 through November 26, 201924, 2020 and December 14, 201912, 2020 through January 2December 31, 2020. (4) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess woodcock at any time, except from October 12, 201910, 2020 through November 25, 201923, 2020. (5) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt or take rails, common snipe (Wilson's snipe), woodcock, or gallinules (common moorhens) at any time, except from sunrise to sunset daily during the open season.
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

    FACT SHEET Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ARCTIC BIRDS IN YOUR STATE The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a place unlike any Alabama - Ruby-crowned Kinglet Alaska - Redpoll other in the world. The Alaskan refuge, often referred to Arizona - Fox Sparrow as “America’s Serengeti,” is a remote sanctuary for diverse Arkansas - Mallard California - Snow Goose populations of migratory birds, fish, mammals, and marine Colorado - Bohemian Waxwing Connecticut - Greater Scaup life. The Refuge spans an area roughly the size of South Delaware - Black-bellied Plover Carolina and boasts snow-capped mountains, arctic tundra, Florida - Peregrine Falcon Georgia - Gray-checked Thrush foothills, wetlands, boreal forest, and fragile coastal plains. Hawaii - Wandering Tattler America’s Arctic Refuge was set aside as a safe haven for Idaho - Short-eared Owl Illinois - Northern Flicker wildlife in 1960, and it has remained wild in its more than Indiana - Dark-eyed Junco 50 years as a Refuge. Iowa - Sharp-shinned Hawk Kansas - Smith’s Longspur Kentucky – Merlin AMERICA’S LAST GREAT WILDERNESS Louisiana - Long-billed Dowitcher Maine - Least Sandpiper Maryland - Tundra Swan The Arctic Refuge is often mischaracterized as a blank, frozen void Massachusetts - Golden Plover of uninhabited tundra. Although winter frequently coats the Arc- Michigan - Long-tail Duck tic with snow and freezes the ground, it gives way to lush, vibrant Minnesota - Snowy Owl Mississippi – Northern Waterthrush growth in warmer months. In fact, the Refuge’s unparalleled diver- Missouri - American Pipit sity makes it the most biologically productive habitat in the North. Montana - Golden Eagle Nebraska - Wilson’s Warbler Landscape Nevada - Green-winged Teal The majestic Brooks Range rises 9,000 feet, providing sharp contrast New Hampshire - Dunlin New Jersey – Canvasback to the flat, wetlands-rich coastal plains at its feet.
  • Foraging Flight Distances of Wintering Ducks and Geese: a Review

    Foraging Flight Distances of Wintering Ducks and Geese: a Review

    VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, ARTICLE 2 Johnson, W. P., P. M. Schmidt, and D. P. Taylor. 2014. Foraging flight distances of wintering ducks and geese: a review. Avian Conservation and Ecology 9(2): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00683-090202 Copyright © 2014 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Research Paper Foraging flight distances of wintering ducks and geese: a review William P. Johnson 1, Paige M. Schmidt 1 and Dustin P. Taylor 2 1U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System, Division of Biological Sciences, 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge ABSTRACT. The distance covered by foraging animals, especially those that radiate from a central area when foraging, may affect ecosystem, community, and population dynamics, and has conservation and landscape planning implications for multiple taxa, including migratory waterfowl. Migrating and wintering waterfowl make regular foraging flights between roosting and feeding areas that can greatly impact energetic resources within the foraging zone near roost sites. We reviewed published studies and gray literature for one- way foraging flight distances (FFDs) of migrating and wintering dabbling ducks and geese. Thirty reviewed studies reported FFDs and several reported values for multiple species or locations. We obtained FFD values for migration (n = 7) and winter (n = 70). We evaluated the effects of body mass, guild, i.e., dabbling duck or goose, and location, i.e., Nearctic or Palearctic, on FFDs. We used the second-order Akaike’s Information Criterion for model selection. We found support for effects of location and guild on FFDs.
  • National Wildlife Refuge System Koyukukinowitna

    National Wildlife Refuge System Koyukukinowitna

    U.S. Department of the Interior '·- . Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM KOYUKUKINOWITNA REFUGE COMPLEX Galena, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1995 PEC OLL ARR Y/NNWR 395 __gp~ (!.ou_ tJAil. K~ /~tJco' l~ ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT 1995 KOYUKUKNWR NORTHERN UNIT, INNOKO NWR KOYUKUK/NOWITNA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX Galena, Alaska REVIEW AND APPROVALS AJtLIS . US FISH ~ WILDLIFE SERVICE--ALASKA Alaska Resources Lihrary & In f~Jrmation Services Ubraf\' Building. Sml~ Ill 32l i PNwidcnce Onvc 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 }\nchoragc,AJK 99508-t614 3 4982 00022838 6 INTRODUCTION This Annual Narrative Report is for the Koyukuk, Northern Unit of lnnoko and Nowitna Refuges. These three refuges are administered collectively as the Koyukuk/Nowitna Refuge Complex. Narrative items common to all three units are discussed in the Koyukuk and Northern Unit of Innoko report. Any additional events are reported in respective sections. The Koyukuk National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is located in west central Alaska, about 270 air miles west of Fairbanks and 330 air miles northwest of Anchorage. The exterior boundaries encompass 4.6 million acres. This refuge lies within the roughly circular floodplain basin of the Koyukuk River. The extensive forested floodplain is surrounded by hills 1500' - 4000' to the north, east, and west, and the Yukon River to the south. The Koyukuk NWR was established December 2, 1980 with passage of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). The refuge was established and is managed for the following purposes: 1. To conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity including, but not limited to, waterfowl and other migratory birds, moose, caribou, furbearers and salmon; 2.
  • Northern Shoveler Anas Clypeata

    Northern Shoveler Anas Clypeata

    Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata Folk Name: Spoonbill, Broad-bill, Spoon Bill Teal Status: Migrant, Winter Resident/Visitor Abundance: Uncommon Habitat: Lakes, ponds Take one good look at a Northern Shoveler and you will quickly realize how it acquired its various common names. Its large, conspicuous, spoon-shaped bill is unlike the bill of any other duck in the Carolinas. When viewed from above, the bill appears a bit like a shoe horn, narrow at the base and flaring out widely towards its rounded end, which can be a tad wider than the duck’s head. The shoveler is a heavy-bodied dabbling duck related to our teal ducks, but at 19 inches long, it is 3 ½ inches bigger reported one at Cowan’s Ford Wildlife Refuge on the than the Blue-winged and 5 inches bigger than the Green- very early date of 7 August in 1988, and one was reported winged Teal. Like our other dabbling ducks, it prefers lingering in Charlotte on April 28, 2012. Usually fewer shallow waters for foraging but any size pond will do. than 10 birds are seen at a time; however, an impressive In 1909, T. G. Pearson shared this assessment of the total of 948 was counted at Pee Dee NWR on January 2, Northern Shoveler with readers of the Greensboro Daily 2010. Historically, this duck was more common in the News: region during migration, but many mid-winter reports have been received since the turn of the twenty-first The male shoveler is a striking bird and the green century. of his head often leads the hasty observer at a Mary Akers, a 12-year-old bird watcher in Charlotte, distance to believe that he is looking at a mallard, shared this story of a weekend encounter with a “Spoon the similarity also being heightened in part by the Bill Teal,” in 1940: large size of the bird.
  • Pd Films List 0824

    Pd Films List 0824

    PD FILMS LIST 2012/8/23 現在 FILM Title 日本映画名 制作年度 キャラクター ＮＯ 1 Sabouteur 逃走迷路 1942 2 Shadow of a Doubt 疑惑の影 1943 3 The Lady Vanishe バルカン超特急 1938 4 From Here Etanity 地上より永遠に 1953 5 Flying Leather Necks 太平洋航空作戦 1951 6 Shane シェーン 1953 7 The Thief Of Bagdad 1・2 （1924） バクダッドの盗賊 １･２ （1924） 1924 8 I Confess 私は告白する 1953 9 The 39 Steps 39夜 1935 10 Strangers On A Train 見知らぬ乗客 1951 11 Foreign Correspon 海外特派員 1940 12 The Big Lift 大空輸 1950 13 The Grapes of Wirath 怒りの葡萄 上下有 1940 14 A Star Is Born スター誕生 1937 15 Tarzan, the Ape Man 類猿人ターザン 1932 16 Little Princess 小公女 1939 17 Mclintock！ マクリントック 1963APD 18 Beneath the 12Mile Reef 12哩の暗礁の下に 1953 19 PePe Le Moko 望郷 1937 20 The Bicycle Thief 自転車泥棒 1948 21 Under The Roof of Paris 巴里の屋根の根 下 1930 22 Ossenssione (R1.2) 郵便配達は2度ベルを鳴らす 1943 23 To Kill A Mockingbird (R1.2) アラバマ物語 1962 APD 24 All About Eve イヴの総て 1950 25 The Wizard of Oz オズの魔法使い 1939 26 Outpost in Morocco モロッコの城塞 1949 27 Thief of Bagdad (1940) バクダッドの盗賊 1940 28 The Picture of Dorian Grey ドリアングレイの肖像 1949 29 Gone with the Wind 1.2 風と共に去りぬ 1.2 1939 30 Charade シャレード（２種有り） 1963 APD 31 One Eyed Jacks 片目のジャック 1961 APD 32 Hangmen ハングマン 1987 APD 33 Tulsa タルサ 1949 34 Deadly Companions 荒野のガンマン 1961 APD 35 Death Sentence 午後10時の殺意 1974 APD 36 Carrie 黄昏 1952 37 It Happened One Night 或る夜の出来事 1934 38 Cityzen Ken 市民ケーン 1945 39 Made for Each Other 貴方なしでは 1939 40 Stagecoach 駅馬車 1952 41 Jeux Interdits 禁じられた遊び 1941 42 The Maltese Falcon マルタの鷹 1952 43 High Noon 真昼の決闘 1943 44 For Whom the Bell tolls 誰が為に鐘は鳴る 1947 45 The Paradine Case パラダイン夫人の恋 1942 46 I Married a Witch 奥様は魔女