A Framework for Modelling Tabletop Game Rules

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Framework for Modelling Tabletop Game Rules Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics A Framework for Modelling Tabletop Game Rules Bachelor’s Thesis Jan Pokorný Brno, Fall 2019 Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics A Framework for Modelling Tabletop Game Rules Bachelor’s Thesis Jan Pokorný Brno, Fall 2019 This is where a copy of the official signed thesis assignment and a copy ofthe Statement of an Author is located in the printed version of the document. Declaration Hereby I declare that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out on my own. All sources, references, and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Jan Pokorný Advisor: prof. RNDr. Jiří Barnat, Ph.D. i Abstract A framework for digitally describing tabletop game rules is proposed, implemented in a library, and evaluated on a case study of a real-world tabletop game. The framework uses a tree-like structure of tokens and fields to represent the physical aspects of the tabletop game. Custom dispatch logic is used for handling rules and their special cases. The framework was implemented as a JavaScript library and evaluated on a case study of a real-world game, Citadels (Faidutti 2000). Im- plementation turned out to provide a sufficient level of abstraction. Resulting digitized game rules are logically and semantically very close to the natural language counterparts. The library simplifies the process of tabletop game digitization and enables faster iteration in digital tabletop games development. ii Keywords tabletop games, board games, card games, rules, digitization, JavaScript iii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Context of digitizing tabletop games .............1 1.2 Goals of the developed framework and library ........2 1.3 Structure of this thesis ....................3 2 Prior art in representing tabletop game rules digitally 5 2.1 Board Game Arena ......................5 2.1.1 BGA Studio . .5 2.1.2 BGA Sandbox . .6 2.2 OCTGN ............................7 2.3 Vassal Engine .........................7 3 Analysis of requirements on the framework 9 3.1 Representing the game state ..................9 3.1.1 Feasibility of recording the exact positions of tokens . .9 3.1.2 Using a flat field-token structure . 10 3.1.3 Using a tree-like structure . 10 3.1.4 Representing state not contained in tokens . 11 3.2 Representing rules ...................... 11 3.2.1 Rule language . 11 3.2.2 Non-linearity . 12 4 Framework definition 13 4.1 Representation of physical state ................ 13 4.1.1 Example representation . 14 4.2 Representation of rules .................... 15 4.2.1 External framework behavior . 15 4.2.2 Rule definition . 15 4.2.3 Commands returned from rules . 15 4.2.4 Invocation types . 16 4.2.5 Interaction loop . 16 5 Library implementation 19 5.1 Technology used ........................ 19 5.2 Installation .......................... 20 v 5.3 Token definition ........................ 21 5.4 Rule definition ........................ 22 5.4.1 Command definition . 23 5.4.2 Special states . 24 5.4.3 Example rule . 24 5.5 API description ........................ 25 5.5.1 GameManager .................... 26 5.5.2 Token ......................... 27 5.5.3 Choice ........................ 29 6 Case study on the board game Citadels 31 6.1 Structure of the case study code ................ 31 6.2 Rules ............................. 31 6.2.1 Introduction . 32 6.2.2 Components . 32 6.2.3 Game round and player turns . 32 6.2.4 Game end and scoring . 32 6.2.5 Characters . 33 6.2.6 Special districts . 33 6.3 User interface ......................... 34 6.4 Modelling tokens ....................... 35 6.5 Modelling rules ........................ 35 6.5.1 Core game loop . 36 6.5.2 Play of 2, 3, and 7 players . 37 6.5.3 Collecting taxes . 37 6.5.4 Character powers . 37 6.5.5 District powers . 38 6.5.6 Rule ambiguity . 39 6.6 Example rule explanation ................... 39 7 Evaluation of the case study 43 7.1 Library evaluation ...................... 43 7.1.1 Generality and universality . 43 7.1.2 Closeness to the natural language rules . 43 7.1.3 Ease of writing rules . 44 7.2 Possible future improvements ................. 44 7.2.1 Direct support for client-server communication 44 7.2.2 Add debug visualizations . 45 vi 7.2.3 Rely on the programming language’s type system 45 7.2.4 Add direct integration with a presentation layer 45 8 Conclusion 47 Bibliography 49 vii 1 Introduction This thesis aims to design and implement a general framework1 for programmatically describing tabletop2 game rules. A data model to represent game tokens and related metadata is defined, as well asa system for coherently expressing rules. The framework is then implemented in an embeddable library. The goal of the developed library is to simplify the process of digitizing tabletop games by providing useful abstractions and enabling the digital rule expression to be semantically close to the natural language version. The library is published to GitHub3. As a case study, the library is used for digitizing the rules of the tabletop game “Citadels”. The case study is then used to evaluate design and usefulness of the framework and the library. 1.1 Context of digitizing tabletop games Many famous tabletop games were digitized [1, 2], including Settlers of Catan4, Carcassone5 and Agricola6. Game creators may decide to offer the digital versions for free, as a means of marketing forthe physical version. However, it is also common to sell digitized tabletop games in the same way as other video games. Most players prefer physical versions of tabletop games [3]. Fur- thermore, it has been confirmed by many studies that automating certain “boring” elements of tabletop gaming hinders enjoyment [4, 5, 6, 7]. Despite that, there is usually a demand for digital versions of popular tabletop games, sometimes even leading to the creation of unofficial ones by fans [1, p. 5, Digitising Agricola]. 1. This thesis uses the word “framework” to represent the abstract system for formal description of tabletop game rules, and the word “library” to represent the actual source code implementation. 2. This is a blanket term for board games, card games, pen and paper games and other types of turn-based games usually played at a table using physical props. 3. <https://github.com/JanPokorny/tabletop-engine> 4. <https://catanuniverse.com/> 5. <https://boardgamearena.com/#!gamepanel?game=carcassonne> 6. <http://www.asmodee-digital.com/en/agricola/> 1 1. Introduction As of the date of this writing, many platforms are providing the possibility to digitize a tabletop game. Some of them, like Vassal En- gine7, OCTGN8 or BoardGameArena9, each use a different proprietary system of describing rules. Others, like Battlegrounds Gaming En- gine10, Tabletopia11, and Tabletop Simulator12, have no way of imple- menting game rules at all, leaving the burden of conforming to game rules to players. The absence of automatic rule enforcement is usu- ally marketed as a feature, allowing faster iterations when designing games. However, many digital ports of tabletop games are realized through a conventional game engine, such as Unity13 or Construct14. Using general game engines enables almost unlimited possibilities of game mechanics but comes with a cost of high complexity, as these engines do not tailor to the specific limitations of tabletop games. 1.2 Goals of the developed framework and library The developed framework aims to be general enough to allow digiti- zation of virtually all “traditional”15 tabletop games. A library is developed aiming to be an embeddable, cross-platform component enabling various game platforms to enforce tabletop game rules digitally. Separating the rules from the presentation layer enables different software components to use the same rule code internally. Components that may benefit from this approach include client-side rule checking, online games with server-side rule checking, or AI players. 7. <https://www.vassalengine.org> 8. <https://www.octgn.net/> 9. <https://boardgamearena.com> 10. <http://battlegroundsgames.com/battlegrounds-gaming-engine/> 11. <https://tabletopia.com> 12. <https://www.tabletopsimulator.com/> 13. <https://unity3d.com/> 14. <https://www.construct.net/> 15. Such games primarily use physical tokens to represent the game state and have a clear set of rules for players to follow. Games that focus on role-playing or physical player interaction may not be a good fit for this library. 2 1. Introduction The library is developed to be a black-box, providing only the game state to the outside and accepting player choices. There are no assumptions made on how the player input is obtained (live player, AI, ...) and how the game state is presented to the player (rendered in a 2D/3D canvas, serialized and sent over the network, ...). Separation of the rule logic allows the game designer to focus on implementing the game rules and to stop worrying about things like user input or network code. Another aim of this library is to make the digitized tabletop game rules more human-readable and closer to the natural language version. A clear correspondence between the two simplifies the process of digitizing a board game as a whole. Having a close-to-reality digital representation may also allow easier prototyping and development of the rules themselves, by using the digitized version to evaluate different rule variants. The framework and the corresponding library are focused on pro- viding a black-box programmatic interface, with no assumptions on the presentation layer. The library thus does not provide any form of human interface. 1.3 Structure of this thesis This thesis first briefly examines the prior art in the field ofboard games digitization, focusing on the different systems to describe rules. Then, requirements for the framework are decided based on an analy- sis of general principles in board games.
Recommended publications
  • Flexible Games by Which I Mean Digital Game Systems That Can Accommodate Rule-Changing and Rule-Bending
    Let’s Play Our Way: Designing Flexibility into Card Game Systems Gifford Cheung A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: David Hendry, Chair David McDonald Nicolas Ducheneaut Jennifer Turns Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Information School ©Copyright 2013 Gifford Cheung 2 University of Washington Abstract Let’s Play Our Way: Designing Flexibility into Card Game Systems Gifford Cheung Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor David Hendry Information School In this dissertation, I explore the idea of designing “flexible game systems”. A flexible game system allows players (not software designers) to decide on what rules to enforce, who enforces them, and when. I explore this in the context of digital card games and introduce two design strategies for promoting flexibility. The first strategy is “robustness”. When players want to change the rules of a game, a robust system is able to resist extreme breakdowns that the new rule would provoke. The second is “versatility”. A versatile system can accommodate multiple use-scenarios and can support them very well. To investigate these concepts, first, I engage in reflective design inquiry through the design and implementation of Card Board, a highly flexible digital card game system. Second, via a user study of Card Board, I analyze how players negotiate the rules of play, take ownership of the game experience, and communicate in the course of play. Through a thematic and grounded qualitative analysis, I derive rich descriptions of negotiation, play, and communication. I offer contributions that include criteria for flexibility with sub-principles of robustness and versatility, design recommendations for flexible systems, 3 novel dimensions of design for gameplay and communications, and rich description of game play and rule-negotiation over flexible systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Different Paths for Tabletop Gaming in School Libraries
    Three Different Paths for Tabletop Gaming in School Libraries Teresa Copeland, Brenda Henderson, Brian Mayer, and Scott Nicholson Abstract Three school library staff members explore how they have used table- top games in different school library settings. Teresa Copeland (Tes- seract School, Paradise Valley, Arizona, USA) explores how tabletop and role-playing games have been integrated into the curriculum across a wide variety of grade levels. Brenda Henderson (Trinity High School Learning Resources Centre, Redditch, UK) discusses how a board game club has made a difference in a high school library in the United Kingdom. Brian Mayer (School Library System, Genesee Valley Educational Partnership, LeRoy, New York, USA) supports multiple school libraries in finding matches between the curriculum and authentic games and runs game design workshops. Introduction Gaming in school libraries is evenly split between two primary goals: ed- ucation and recreation (Nicholson, 2008). Some libraries have worked with teachers to integrate games into the curriculum. Other libraries have created recreational programs around games where students can engage with each other in a safe space. One advantage of gaming programs in school libraries is that tabletop games, if chosen properly, can be both ed- ucational and recreational. Good educational games are also good games, and recreational tabletop gaming facilitates social engagement, planning, decision making, and mathematics. The focus in this article is on nondigital games: board, card, and role- playing games that are played on tables instead of on screens. Most stu- dents are used to digital games but may not have familiarity with tabletop gaming. Tabletop games are inexpensive, have a long shelf-life, are porta- ble, and can be used in a much wider variety of classroom situations than LIBRARY TRENDS, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Developments in the Evolution of Tabletop Game Design
    Major Developments in the Evolution of Tabletop Game Design Frederick Reiber Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences University of California Irvine Irvine, USA [email protected] Abstract—Tabletop game design is very much an incremental these same concepts can and have been used in video game art. Designers build upon the ideas of previous games, often design. improving and combining already defined game mechanics. In Although some of these breakthroughs might be already this work, we look at a collection of the most impactful tabletop game designs, or games that have caused a significant shift in known by long time game designers, it is important to formally the tabletop game design space. This work seeks to record those document these developments. By doing so, we can not only shifts, and does so with the aid of empirical analysis. For each bridge the gap between experienced and novice game design- game, a brief description of the game’s history and mechanics ers, but we can also begin to facilitate scholarly discussion on is given, followed by a discussion on its impact within tabletop the evolution of games. Furthermore, this research is of interest game design. to those within the tabletop game industry as it provides Index Terms—Game Design, Mechanics, Impact. analysis on major developments in the field. It is also our belief that this work can be useful to academics, specifically I. INTRODUCTION those in the fields of game design, game analytics, and game There are many elements that go into creating a successful generation AI. tabletop game.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncrl Teen Tabletop Game Collection Title # Players
    NCRL TEEN TABLETOP GAME COLLECTION Requesting Games ➔ To request games, email [email protected] ➔ Games are for in-branch use only. Games are NOT to be checked out to patrons. ➔ Games can be borrowed for up to 3 months at a time. Returning Games ➔ Games will be sent out by the 1st of the month and should be returned by the 15th of the following month. ➔ Return games to “Distribution Center Attn. Service Managers” ➔ All game materials must be included in labeled bag/tub when returned. Double check the inventory list to make sure all items are present before sending back. ➔ If there are any issues with the games, please notify [email protected] AGE TITLE # PLAYERS SUGGESTION PLAY TIME APPLES TO APPLES 4-10 12+ 30 min BEARS VS BABIES 2-5 10+ 20 MIN BOSS MONSTER: THE DUNGEON BUILDING CARD GAME 2-4 13+ 20 MIN CARCASSONNE 2-5 8+ 30-45 MIN CATAN 3-4 10+ 1 HOUR CATAN: 5-6 PLAYER EXPANSION UP TO 6 10+ 1.5 HOURS CHESS TEACHER 2 6+ 30 MIN - 1HR CHICKAPIG 2-4 8+ 25-60 MIN CODENAMES 2-8 14+ 15 MIN CODENAMES: PICTURES 2-8 10+ 15 MIN DIXIT 3-6 8+ 30 MIN DOCTOR WHO MONOPOLY 2-6 8+ 1-1.5 HOURS DUNGEON MAYHEM 2-4 8+ 5-10 MIN Updated Aug. 2019 1 EXPLODING KITTENS 2-5 7+ 15 MIN (EXPLODING KITTENS EXPANSION) IMPLODING KITTENS 2-5 7+ 15 MIN FLUXX (DOCTOR WHO) 2-6 8+ 5-30 MIN FLUXX (STAR) 2-6 8+ 5-30 MIN FORBIDDEN ISLAND 2-4 8+ 30 MIN GOAT LORDS 3-6 7+ 30 MIN GOAT LORDS: CELEBRITY EXPANSION 4-8 7+ 30 MIN HANABI 2-5 8+ 30 MIN JUMBO PLAYING CARDS 1+ 3+ ~ KING OF TOKYO 2-6 8+ 30 MIN MUNCHKIN DELUXE 3-6 10+ 1-2 HOURS ONE NIGHT ULTIMATE WEREWOLF 3-10 8+ 10 MIN OREGON TRAIL 2-6 12+ 30 MIN OREGON TRAIL: HUNT FOR FOOD 2-6 12+ 30 MIN PANDEMIC 2-4 8+ 45 MIN POOP THE GAME 2-10 5+ 15 MIN QUELF 3-6 12+ 1 HOUR REVERSE CHARADES 6+ 6+ 30 MIN SEQUENCE 2-12 7+ 30 MIN SMART ASS 2-6 12+ 30 MIN SNAPPY DRESSERS 1-10 7+ 15 MIN SPLENDOR 2-4 10+ 30 MIN SUPERFIGHT 3-10 5+ 30 MIN SUSHI GO PARTY 2-8 8+ 20 MIN TELESTRATIONS 4-12 12+ 30 MIN Updated Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquire: Fun-And-Fortune Game for 2 Players. 1 Hour 15 Min Game Time
    List of 2-player games available to borrow from Bowdoin Board Game Club: Acquire: fun-and-fortune game for 2 players. 1 hour 15 min game time. Beyond Baker Street: A card-based Sherlock Holmes mystery game. 30 min game time. Carcassonne the Castle: the two-player version of the classic. 30-45 min game time. Chess: two players battle to death. Game time varies. Clans: A board game set in late pre-history. Easy rules, challenging game. 30 min game time. Cosmic Encounter: the sci fi game for everyone. Very cool board. “A teeth-gritting, mind-croggling, marvelously demanding exercise in ‘what if’.” – Harlan Ellison Coup: Only one can survive. Secret identities, deduction, deception. 15 game time. El Grande Big Box – (includes 6 expansions): Spain in the late middle ages, win with cunning and guile. 60 min game time. Evolution: A dynamic game of survival. 60 min game time. FLUXX: The card game with ever-changing rules. 5-30 min game time. Forbidden Island: Adventure if you DARE! 30 min game time. Gobblet: The fun strategy board game for 2. 10-20 min game time. Grifters: are you devious enough to rob the corporations blink, swindle your opponent and pull off daring heists? 30 game time. Hanabi: A cooperative firework launching game for 2. 30 min game time. Inis: immerse yourself in celtic legends. A truly beautiful game. 60 min game time. Jaipur: A subtle trading game for 2 players. 30 min game time. King of New York: You are a giant monster and you want to become King of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Skills to Optimize Fun in Interactive Board Games
    Balancing Skills to Optimize Fun in Interactive Board Games Eva Kraaijenbrink, Frank van Gils, Quan Cheng, Robert van Herk, and Elise van den Hoven Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven [email protected] Abstract. Playing games against people with a different skill level can be boring or frustrating, which decreases fun. A solution is to introduce specific rules that balance a game. In this paper we describe a study in which we used an electronic board game with tangible interaction to investigate whether balancing a game indeed increases fun experienced. We also investigate whether balancing skill levels implicitly (players are unaware) or explicitly (players are aware) has an influence on the fun experienced. We found that players who lost a game felt more successful in the balanced game compared to the unbalanced game. The balanced game also offered the players more fun experience than they expected beforehand. Finally, players preferred to play an explicitly balanced game because it increased the feeling of effort and challenge. Keywords: Balancing skills, board games, tangible interaction, game balance, interaction design, fun experience, and social interaction. 1 Introduction In this paper we present a study that focuses on the balancing of differences in players’ skill levels in a game. Fun in games is influenced by three factors: fantasy, challenge and curiosity [14]. Offering a suitable amount of challenge can be difficult when people with different skills play together. When no effort is needed to beat an opponent a game is boring. Conversely, when an opponent is too challenging a game is frustrating.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabletop Games: Platforms, Experimental Games and Design Recommendations
    Tabletop Games: Platforms, Experimental Games and Design Recommendations Michael Haller1, Clifton Forlines2, Christina Köffel1, Jakob Leitner1, Chia Shen2 1Media Interaction Lab, Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences 2Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory INTRODUCTION While the last decade has seen massive improvements in not only the rendering quality, but also the overall performance of console and desktop video games, these improvements have not necessarily led to a greater population of video game players. In addition to continuing these improvements, the video game industry is also constantly searching for new ways to convert non-players into dedicated gamers. The recent success of Nintendo’s wii controller is often credited to its support of natural and intuitive gestural interactions, and much of the attention to this platform has come from its ability to attract people from markets not typically thought of as gamers. Indeed, stay-at-home parents, retirement homes, and working professionals make up a large portion of the Wii audience, which at the time of this writing is over 13 million (status Sept. 2007). Figure 1: (left) Desktop-based games are often an isolated activity – even when gamers play in a multi-player mode. Therefore, traditional board games are still very popular (right). In addition to the popularity of gestural interaction, the multi-player nature of console games makes them more communicative than single-player desktop games. Even when desktop games are played in a multi-player mode, individual players are still separated from one another in front of their personal displays (see Figure 1, left). Despite the growing popularity of computer- based video games, people still love to play traditional board games, such as Risk, Monopoly, and Trivial Pursuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Game Accessibility for Persons with Visual Impairment by Frederico
    Board Game Accessibility for Persons with Visual Impairment by Frederico Da Rocha Tomé Filho A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Computer Science The Faculty of Science University of Ontario Institute of Technology Supervisors: Dr. Pejman Mirza-Babaei Dr. Bill Kapralos Oshawa, Ontario, Canada December 2018 Copyright © Frederico da Rocha Tomé Filho, 2018 THESIS EXAMINATION INFORMATION Submitted by: Frederico da Rocha Tomé Filho Master of Science in Computer Science Thesis title: Board Game Accessibility for Persons with Visual Impairment An oral defense of this thesis took place on December 5, 2018 in front of the following examining committee: Examining Committee: Chair of Examining Committee Dr. Karthik Sankaranarayanan Research Supervisor Dr. Pejman Mirza-Babaei Research Co-supervisor Dr. Bill Kapralos Examining Committee Member Dr. Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo External Examiner Dr. Loutfouz Zaman The above committee determined that the thesis is acceptable in form and content and that a satisfactory knowledge of the field covered by the thesis was demonstrated by the candidate during an oral examination. A signed copy of the Certificate of Approval is available from the School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies. Abstract Despite the huge popularity and benefits of traditional board games, they present serious accessibility issues to players, particularly those with visual impairments, due to the heavy use of visuals to communi- cate gameplay information. Limited research investigating
    [Show full text]
  • One Letter Off Video Games
    One Letter Off Video Games Icteric Shurwood incandesces wakefully while Merrel always housel his porpoise vet overnight, he operatizes so bearably. Sublinear and round-trip Ruby escaping almost unflinchingly, though Ismail deprecates his nauseant dotings. Tight and triangulate Wash always outjump cohesively and lever his egregiousness. Watch Clip art Letter Off Video Games Prime Video. However very exciting installment of letters on cnn shows where you will explain why you have fun than darla proxy js file is in which helps players. Your experience on the dealer delves out how that letters, you the game. What they are one letter off using the letters as high school guidance counselors for each can help kids alike, he lost from the nexus in every major corporation and help parents today. Hangman Play for now at CoolmathGamescom. Fus Ro Dah Skyrim Dragons Video Games Aluminum. Practice English Speaking Listening with ONE when OFF VIDEO GAMES Practice English Speaking Listening with Youtube videos YThi. Please contact your letter off sticky keys on letters in video games have family members enjoy playing during adolescence or. GME has bounced and succeed once place at 225 one thread both the Reddit forum said on Wednesday morning. 25 Word Board Games That trigger Like Scrabble But thinking Better. Each You today also unlock special categories by pass a video or paying to boom the ads. In early 2019 GameStop's stock value broke off a contingency It dropped from about 16 per share here under 4. Fenyx rising dlc which ladders up one letter off trees every day smart at pictoword offers challenging obstacles and video? Need to video games? He lost his video games on letters to help young minds but back into a letter off all quotes are original editorial content.
    [Show full text]
  • Tabletop Games As Social Catalysts by Huong Thu
    TABLETOP GAMES AS SOCIAL CATALYSTS BY HUONG THU NGUYEN THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006 Urbana, Illinois ii ABSTRACT In this thesis, we explore social catalysts that encourage interaction between people in a public space in the form of play. Ordinary objects already integrated in the public and semi-public spaces, such as tables, can be transformed into playful interactive devices and serve as social catalysts to encourage conversation and socialization. Many early applications of interactive tables focused on ambient devices, information displays and browsers, and computer supported collaborative work spaces. In this thesis, we present an iterative design process for two interactive tabletop games: the concept, low-fidelity prototypes, high-fidelity prototypes, and current implementations. We conclude with a discussion of critiques conducted throughout the design process and a preliminary evaluation of the current implementation of one of the games. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support of many people. Many thanks to my adviser, Karrie Karahalios, who read my numerous revisions and helped make some sense of the confusion. And finally, thanks to my boyfriend, family, and numerous friends who endured this long process with me, always offering support and love. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Whole Different Ball Game: Playing Through 60 Years of Sports Video Games
    EXHIBITION OVERVIEW A Whole Different Ball Game: Playing through 60 Years of Sports Video Games Exhibition dates: September 14, 2018–March 10, 2019 Location: Museum of the Moving Image, 36-01 35 Ave, Astoria (Queens), NY 11106 Summary: Ever since the first video game, Tennis for Two, debuted at the Brookhaven National Laboratory’s public exhibition in 1958, video games have sought to recreate, adapt, and build upon the games Americans most regularly encounter: sports. A Whole Different Ball Game presents a selection of 44 playable sports video games spanning the last six decades, examining the complex relationships between game, sport, media, and culture. The exhibition considers what it means for full-body sports to be transposed to screens and controllers in the service of realism, who is or is not represented in sports video games, the ways broadcast sports and video games reflect one another, and the primacy of statistics in professional sports and sports simulators. Contents: The exhibition is organized in seven sections (see below for details and game list) plus a new video installation, an interactive experience, and a video screening area with bleachers. There are 44 playable games, including hand-held devices, arcade games, console and PC games played on monitors and wall projections. Additional games that are not playable are included for historical context. In addition, there is video content in the exhibition for documentation of game play and comparison to televised sports. Curators: Curator of Digital Media Jason Eppink and John Sharp (Associate Professor in the School of Art, Media, and Technology at Parsons School of Design at The New School).
    [Show full text]
  • Hello, Scouts! I'm Excited to Teach the Game Design Merit Badge, and I
    Hello, Scouts! I’m excited to teach the Game Design Merit Badge, and I hope you are all excited to be taking it as well. The biggest part of this merit badge is the independent project (requirements 5, 6, and 7). It’s a good idea to already start thinking about what kind of games you like to play and what kind of game you want to make. Remember, this is the “Game Design” Merit Badge, not just “Video Game Design” or “Board Game Design.” That means any game - video game, board game, card game, sport, tabletop game, visual novel, wargame, ARG, escape room, etc. - is on the table for this, so long as you can put in the work to prototype it. I made a sample game design notebook and appended it to this letter. Read over it so you can know what will be required in the project. You don’t need to do anything just yet; we will discuss more at our first meeting. See you on Monday! Jackson [email protected] Game Design Notebook Scout Name: Game Name: Overview: Medium: Player Format: Objective: Theme: Setting: Story: Characters: (b) Play Value: ​ (c) Rules: ​ (c) Resources/Materials: ​ Drawings and Diagrams: Prototype Playtest 1: Date: Players: Notes: Prototype Playtest 2: Date: Players: Rule Changes (with reasons): Notes: Were the rule changes successful? Prototype Playtest 3: Date: Players: Rule Changes (with reasons): Notes: Were the rule changes successful? (7) Blind Test: ​ Date: Players: Write an instruction sheet for your players. Clearly describe how to set up, play, and end the game.
    [Show full text]