One Way School SOCIAL STUDIES NOTES TOPIC 1: LIVING TOGETHER

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One Way School SOCIAL STUDIES NOTES TOPIC 1: LIVING TOGETHER One Way School SOCIAL STUDIES NOTES TOPIC 1: LIVING TOGETHER A. LIFE IN THE PAST The Early People -Long ago, the land between the Zambezi and the Limpopo Rivers was occupied by the San or Khoisan people. They were very short and we call themMandionerepi people or the Bushmen. - The Bushmen were nomadic, that is, they moved from place to place in search of food. - They were hunters and gatherers, that is, the men hunted animals for meat using bows and arrows and the women gathered fruits, edible roots and leaves. - They lived in caves where they painted rock painting we see today. - They wore animal skins. - They made their tools from stones; hence they belong to theStone Age period. - Today the Bushmen are still found in Botswana especially in the Kalahari Desert. The Iron Age As time went on, people began to settle in permanent places where they grew crops and kept domestic animals. -People later discovered iron and they then made their tools from iron. These people belonged to the Iron Age period. -the Iron Age people migrated into Zimbabwe from the north across the Zambezi River around 200AD. - They conquered the Khoisan and assimilatedthem because they had better weapons. The Pre-colonial States -The Shona-speaking people lived in villages with strong chiefs who made rules and kept their people together. (a) The Great Zimbabwe -It is believed to have been made around 1100AD. -It grew into a large, powerful settlement. -It was made of stones without mortar to stick the stones together. -People there became too many; hence some migrated from Great Zimbabwe to form other states like Mutapa in the Zambezi valley and Khami in south west of Zimbabwe. (b) The Mutapa State -One of the people of Great Zimbabwe, Nyatsimba Mutota, migrated to the north and settled in the Dande area of the Zambezi Valley. His kingdom became known as Mutapa State. -The state later became so powerful that it controlled much part of Zimbabwe and Mozambique. -The Mutapa ruler or king was called Munhumutapa. Some of the rulers were Gatsi Rusere and his two sons:Nyambo Kapararidzeand Mavhura. Resistance against the Portuguese Colonialism -The Portuguese were the first Europeans to come to Mutapa State through Mozambique. -They wanted (i) goldand other precious minerals (ii) ivory, (iii) to spread Christianity -The blacks were given (i) cloth, (ii) beads. -The Portuguese wanted to take control of the Mutapa Empire. -The Africans were not happy with the Portuguese. They killed the Portuguese missionary or priest called Father Goncalo da Silveira. The Portuguese in Portugal (a country in Europe) were angry and they sent 1 000 soldiers who were defeated by Gatsi Rusere and the Mutapa people. -More and more Portuguese were sent and some of them were defeated. However, The Mutapa people later agreed to be ruled by the Portuguese especially King Mavhura who was converted to be a Christian. -The Portuguese were finally driven out of Zimbabwe when the Mutapa and the Rozvipeople, under Changamire Dombo, combined effort to fight them. -Heroes of the war against the Portuguese were (i) Gatsi Rusere (ii) Nyambo Kapararidze who was killed at Mt Fura (iii) Changamire Dombo of the Rozvi State (c) The Ndebele State -The Ndebele people came from South Africa under King Mzilikazi who was the chief of the Khumalo people. They were called the maTebele by the Sotho people and they later called themselves the Amandelele or Ndebele. -They came and settled in the south west of Zimbabwe. -They arrived in Zimbabwe in 1838 and defeated the Rozvi and other tribes. -King Mzilikazi died in 1868 and his son, Lobengula, became king in 1870. -Lobengula continued to expand the Ndebele Kingdom until the arrival of the whites. Coming of the Europeans to Africa -Africa was mainly colonized by the whites who came from Britain, Germany, France and Portugal. -The whites who came to Zimbabwe wanted to: 1. spread Christianity. This was done by missionaries like da Silveira (Portuguese), Robert Moffat (British) who became Mzilikazi’s best friend and was allowed to open a mission station at Inyathi in 1859. 2. mine minerals such as gold, copper, iron, silver, etc for their industries in Europe. 3. explore Africa to find out more about its vast areas. This was done by the explorers like David Livingstone who became the first white man to see Mosi-oa-Tunya (meaning theSmoke that Thunders) which he named Victoria Falls after his British Queen Victoria. 4. open more trade markets for their products from their industries. They took raw materials from Africa, processed them in Europe and then sold finished goods in Africa. 5. hunt animals for ivory, animal skins and even meat. The Colonisation of Zimbabwe -Zimbabwe was colonized by the British. -A British called Cecil John Rhodes led to the colonisation of Zimbabwe. He was a businessman who wanted to build a railway line from Cape Town (in South Africa) to Cairo (in Egypt) through British colonies. -Rhodes sent Charles Rudd, Francis Thompson(interpreter) and RockfordMaguire (a lawyer) to Lobengula to sign an agreement which would allow Rhodes to dig mineralsin his kingdom. -Lobengula and Charles Rudd then signed the Rudd Concession in1888 which led to the colonisation of Zimbabwe. A concession is a special right (permission) given to a person or company. -The Rudd Concession stated that: • Lobengula would give mining right to Cecil Rhodes. • Lobengula would grant power to Rhodes to do all things necessary to promote his mining activities. • The British Government would give Lobengula 100 pounds per month. • The British Government would give Lobengula a gunboat to be placed on Zambezi River. • The British Government would give Lobengula 1 000 guns and 10 000 rounds of ammunition. NB. The British did not honour their promises in the Rudd Concession and Lobengula later knew that he was cheated. He tried to cancel the agreement but failed. -Rhodes had a companycalled British South African Company (BSAC). -The army which was made up of BSAC men, the police and some mercenaries, came to colonize Zimbabwe as The Pioneer Column. There were 700 men in the Pioneer Column. -The Pioneer Column came from South Africa to Mashonaland and arrived at present day Harare on 12 September 1890 where they raised the Union Jack (British Flag) and called the place Fort Salisbury, after their British Prime Minister, Lord Salisbury. -The places where the Pioneer Column rested on their way to Mashonaland were Fort Tuli, Fort Victoria and Fort Charter. -After the colonisation of Mashonaland, other places like Manicaland and Matabeleland were later colonized. Resistance to British Colonisation -When the whites colonized Zimbabwe, they drove the blacks to reserves where the soil was not good for farming. The whites also took their cattle. The blacks were not happy with the invasion of the country. They fought with the invaders because of: 1. Loss of their cattle which were taken by the settlers. 2. Loss of good and arable land. 3. Racial segregation where the laws favoured the whites and oppressed the Africans. 4. Forced labour on farms and mines. 5. Hut taxes which were introduced to force the blacks to work for the whites. 6. Natural disasters like droughts which were blamed on the whites by spirit mediums. -In 1893 the Ndebele people fought the settlers, but were defeated because of poor weapons. The First Chimurenga of 1896-1897 -It was started in 1896. -It took place in Matabeleland, Mashonaland and Manicaland. -It was led by spirit mediums likeChaminuka, Mkwati,Mbuya Nehanda and Sekuru Kaguvi. -It ended when Mbuya Nehanda and Sekuru Kaguvi were arrested in 1897. -The Africans were defeated because they had poor weapons. -Mbuya Nehanda and Sekuru Kaguvi were killed by hanging on 27 April 1898 in Salisbury. -Heroes of the First Chimurenga included Mbuya Nehanda, Sekuru Kaguvi, Chief Makoni, Chief Mapondera, Umlugulu and Mkwati. Colonial Rule -Zimbabwe was named Rhodesia after John Rhodes. -The Africans were not allowed to vote and they could not take part in the way the country was ruled or governed. -After the First Chimurenga, the whites made harsh laws to prevent other wars or uprisings. -In 1923. Rhodesia was named Southern Rhodesia because Zambia was called Northern Rhodesia. The Rise of Nationalism -The blacks in Zimbabwe were not happy because they were oppressed by the British rulers. -The following table shows the early movements and political parties formed to voice the harsh living conditions faced by the blacks. Party or Movement Year Founder Reasons for forming the party or movement The Industrial & Commercial Masotsha Ndlovu, Thomas To improve workers’ conditions Workers Union (ICWU) 1927 Mazula, Job Dumbutshena, in towns Charles Mzingeli The Bantu African Voice 1940 Benjamin Burombo To organize strikes and to fight Association (BAVA) for better wages The Southern Rhodesia 1934 Thompson Samkange, To put more pressure on the African National Congress Aaron Jacha settler government to change (SRANC) racist laws The City Youth League (CYL) 1955 James Chikerema, Edson To fight for improvements in Sithole, George Nyandoro, workers’ housing conditions and Henry Hamadziripi wages. The African National 1957 Joshua Nkomo and members To oppose all racial laws and to Congress (ANC) of the CYL unite all the people of Zim in their desire to regain freedom. National Democratic Party 1960 Michael Mawema, J Nkomo, To form a new party after the (NDP) R Mugabe, L Takawira ANC was banned. To fight for one man one vote Zimbabwe African People’s 1961 J Nkomo, R Mugabe, E Nkala, To give control back to Union (ZAPU) G Silundika, S Parirenyatwa. Zimbabweans Zimbabwe African National 1963 R Mugabe, L Takawira, To fight for independence of Union (ZANU) E Nkala, Ndabaningi Sithole Zimbabwe The Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland -It was formed in 1953.
Recommended publications
  • Consolidated Gold Fields in Australia the Rise and Decline of a British Mining House, 1926–1998
    CONSOLIDATED GOLD FIELDS IN AUSTRALIA THE RISE AND DECLINE OF A BRITISH MINING HOUSE, 1926–1998 CONSOLIDATED GOLD FIELDS IN AUSTRALIA THE RISE AND DECLINE OF A BRITISH MINING HOUSE, 1926–1998 ROBERT PORTER Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463496 ISBN (online): 9781760463502 WorldCat (print): 1149151564 WorldCat (online): 1149151633 DOI: 10.22459/CGFA.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph John Agnew (left) at a mining operation managed by Bewick Moreing, Western Australia. Source: Herbert Hoover Presidential Library. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS List of Figures, Tables, Charts and Boxes ...................... vii Preface ................................................xiii Acknowledgements ....................................... xv Notes and Abbreviations ................................. xvii Part One: Context—Consolidated Gold Fields 1. The Consolidated Gold Fields of South Africa ...............5 2. New Horizons for a British Mining House .................15 Part Two: Early Investments in Australia 3. Western Australian Gold ..............................25 4. Broader Associations .................................57 5. Lake George and New Guinea ..........................71 Part Three: A New Force in Australian Mining 1960–1966 6. A New Approach to Australia ...........................97 7. New Men and a New Model ..........................107 8. A Range of Investments. .115 Part Four: Expansion, Consolidation and Restructuring 1966–1981 9. Move to an Australian Shareholding .....................151 10. Expansion and Consolidation 1966–1976 ................155 11.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biographical Study of Bishop Ralph Edward Dodge 1907 – 2008
    ABSTRACT Toward a New Church in a New Africa: A Biographical Study of Bishop Ralph Edward Dodge 1907 – 2008 This biography of a Methodist Bishop, Ralph Edward Dodge is an extensive look into how, as a missionary, mission board executive, and bishop, Dodge applied principles of indigenization he embraced as a young man preparing for missionary work to the complexities of ministry in Southern Africa when empires were withdrawing and new nations were forming. Written by an African, the dissertation examines Dodge’s impact upon the several countries in which he was involved as a churchman ‒ countries that would soon move from imperial subjugation to independence. Ralph Edward Dodge (1907–2008) was an American missionary and Bishop of the Methodist Church and United Methodist Church. He was born in Iowa and went to Africa in 1936 at age 29. He began his missionary career in the Portuguese colony of Angola. Except for four years during World War II, he would serve there until 1950. During the war, he continued his postgraduate work, obtaining two more degrees, including a PhD. Afterwards, Dodge and his family returned to Africa. In 1950, he was asked to serve as Executive Secretary for Africa and Europe at the Methodist Church’s Board of Missions in New York. Six years later, the Reverend Doctor Dodge would return to Africa as Bishop Dodge, the first Methodist Bishop elected by the Africa Central Conference, and the only American. His Episcopal Area included the colonial territories of Angola, Mozambique, and Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). When his twelve-year term was ended, he was elected “Bishop for Life.” Bishop Dodge remained in Africa until his “retirement” in 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Child-Headed Households in Rural Zimbabwe: Perceptions of Shona Orphaned Children Eucharia Gomba University of the Incarnate Word, [email protected]
    University of the Incarnate Word The Athenaeum Theses & Dissertations 5-2018 Child-headed Households in Rural Zimbabwe: Perceptions of Shona Orphaned Children Eucharia Gomba University of the Incarnate Word, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds Part of the Organization Development Commons Recommended Citation Gomba, Eucharia, "Child-headed Households in Rural Zimbabwe: Perceptions of Shona Orphaned Children" (2018). Theses & Dissertations. 331. https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds/331 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The theA naeum. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The theA naeum. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHILD-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS IN RURAL ZIMBABWE: PERCEPTIONS OF SHONA ORPHANED CHILDREN by Sr. EUCHARIA GOMBA SJI A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of the Incarnate Word in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD May 2018 ii Copyright by Sr. Eucharia Gomba 2018 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank God, The Almighty who made it possible for me to get it this far. My special thanks are in order to Dr. Judith Beauford, PhD, my dissertation chair, for her time and directing me with patience and expertise. My gratitude goes to Dr. Sharon Herbers, PhD, and Dr. Maria-Felix Ortiz, PhD. for accepting to be on my dissertation committee and their invaluable comments. I would also like to express my appreciation to everyone who has helped me with this work. This includes all those who taught me in the Dreeben School of Education at the University of the Incarnate Word, the Library Staff and all those who cheered me up and encouraged me during my academic journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Beit – Kimberley – 20 November 2017 Alfred Beit – South Africa’S Financial Genius
    Alfred Beit – Kimberley – 20 November 2017 Alfred Beit – South Africa’s financial genius Part 1 Kimberley The Right Man, in the Right Place, at the Right Time! The Man – was Alfred Beit, born in 1853, into a Jewish family in Hamburg. He was arguably the single most effective person in the transformation of Southern Africa from a sleepy dry agricultural backwater, into not one, but several modern industrial countries. But you would probably never know it – he hated publicity and preferred others to shine in the foreground. He did not set out to be a rich or powerful man. He just loved to make things happen in the most effective way to benefit as many people as possible and he relished the work involved. He was popular and attracted business like a magnet. He had an enviable reputation for generosity, integrity and fair play. Nevertheless, when he died at the age of just 53 he was possibly one the wealthiest men in the world. The place was the desert in the middle of South Africa where this boyish, fun- loving, young German arrived at the age of 22 to deal in diamonds. Kimberley is where he joined the influential French Diamond company J Porgès and Co and grew into a hugely successful organiser of and investor in mining companies as well a major diamond merchant – and became a great friend and colleague of Cecil John Rhodes. Figure 1: Alfred Beit at his home in Park Lane with his beloved pet terrier Jackie The Time was 1875 – nearly a decade after diamonds had been discovered in such abundance in what became Kimberley.
    [Show full text]
  • University of the Witwatersrand
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African Studies Seminar Paper to be presented in RW 4.00pm AUGUST 1982 Title: The Making of Colonial Zimbabwe, Speculation and Violence 1890-1902. by: Ian Phimister No. 122 •UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African Studies Seminar Paper to be presented at Seminar in RW 319 at 4.00 pm on Monday, the 16th August, 1982. THE MAKING OF COLONIAL ZIMBABWE, SPECULATION AND VIOLENCE 1890-1902. Ian Phimister NOTE This paper does not follow the usual seminar format as it is a chapter out of a forthcoming book by Dr. Phimister. ************************ THE MAKING OF COLONIAL ZIMBABWE: SPECULATION AND VIOLENCE 1890-1902 Ian Phimister 'The relationship between a good or bad share market on the one side and a British Colony in the stage of tender infancy on the other is to be studied, if anywhere, in this country of Rhodesia, Rhodesia is a country which, . almost avowedly is intended to be built up, or at least forced upward, by aid. of gold mining and land dealing on the £1 share limited lia- bility principle1 {Rhodesia Herald, 1898) The immediate genesis of colonial Zimbabwe grew out of the discovery of the main gold reef on the T-Jitwatersrand in 1886. When news of the find reached the diamond mining centre of Kimberley, reaction was mixed. Some entrepreneurs, particularly those bruised in the on-going fight to amalga- mate the diamond industry, made their way as fast as possible to the Rand. Others, with much less reason to gamble, like Cecil Rhodes, held back.
    [Show full text]
  • The Randlords, Art and South Africa
    OLD MASTERS AND ASPIRATIONS: THE RANDLORDS, ART AND SOUTH AFRICA MICHAEL STEVENSON Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art History, University of Cape Town, September 1997 University of Cape Town r·~ i.·;:~:t·;:·.:~; s.; Yt.:, :·.; ::,f:~:i·~; L cr In ;)c .. I.. C-·1-o•''::i'" !.:.· !<·.·:~ wY •. .!-.:. w..... •ll.;-!. ,1 t~:-;:;--:-:;_:,--::;-r-:_,_-:--:-.\:.>{<:'-:-'>,:7.-:~~.., ·---:;: ~-._.' •• j":".. • ,·, ::-- -::~ ....--:' ··_ • .:..""·.-:--_--::::;~-:-.'~.:_:JJ The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................. ~ ..................•.•..•....................•......• i CONVENTIONS •...•.•.........•.•••••••••.•..•....................•.....••....••••••••••.•.••..............••••••.••••••••••................••..•••••• vii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE: SIR JULIUS AND LADY WERNHER ••.•...•.••••.....••.•..••••.•••••.•.•••.•.••.•..•.•.•.•.••• 37 CHAPTER TWO: ALFRED AND SIR OTTO BElT .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Goffal Speaks: Coloured Ideology and the Perpetuation of a Category in Post-Colonial Zimbabwe
    The Goffal Speaks: Coloured Ideology and the Perpetuation of a Category in Post-Colonial Zimbabwe By Kelly M. Nims Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 ©2013 Kelly M. Nims All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Goffal Speaks: Coloured Ideology and the Perpetuation of a Category in Post-Colonial Zimbabwe Kelly M. Nims Significant changes for the Coloured community1 have occurred and continue to occur as a result of an ever-changing political landscape in Zimbabwe. These changes reveal a group2 consciousness or ideology that often translates into daily practices of methods of inclusion and exclusion based on ethnic affiliation and racial organization. Many Coloureds have historically denied the reality of the boundaries that have separated them from whites or Europeans, and more recently, have reinforced the boundaries that have separated them from black Africans. Zimbabwe at Independence was the poster child for progress and change on the African continent. It was a place where, “the wrongs of the past [would] stand forgiven and forgotten… [and] oppression and racism were inequalities that [would] never find scope in the political and social system.”3 Yet thirty years later, amid growing disillusionment over promises of a unified Zimbabwe, a destitute economy, and the perpetuation of racial inequality and oppression, there is an effort among Coloureds themselves to reify the Coloured category4. The categorization of people tends to develop in the course of specific histories of particular places. Local nuances color this. In Southern Africa, following the victory of the South African National Party (NP) in 1948, the term “community” was used as a euphemism for racial exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Colonial Encroachment / Invasion: British Penetration
    Response to Colonial encroachment / invasion: British Penetration: Central Africa: NDEBELE STATE During the 19th Century European penetration into Central Africa had taken the form of individual hunter – explorer for example F. C. Selous, small traders like Webtebeach and missionaries who had followed Livingstone. There was no serious consideration of large – scale European settlements and colonial expansion until the 1880s. The reason behind this was that the area was occupied by the Ndebele, the Rozvi and Shona chieftaincies. However in the 1880s, within the context of the atmosphere of the Scramble, renewed European interests gradually began to gain momentum. Countries showing interest here were Portugal, Britain, and the Boers of the Transvaal. The Concession Seekers: The wake of mineral discoveries in South Africa also inspired by the reports of hunter – explorers, individual fortune hunters and prospectors entered the area seeking concessions especially from Lobengula and Khama. The rumour grew rapidly that they must be a Second Rand in the area between the Zambezi and Limpopo rivers. Among the later concession seekers, there were government officials from Germany and the Transvaal Boers as well as agents of very rich capitalists who also had imperialist aims (for example capitalists like Rhodes, Alfred Maguire and Rudd). The capitalist urged Britain to colonise the Transvaal so that Britain could be in a position to take over the gold fields. They urged Britain to annex Bechuanaland. These people were not just were individuals. They were agents of imperialism. Lobengula, for as long as he could, avoided granting any concessions whatsoever, but as pressure mounted, he was forced into coming to terms with the imperialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories and Contestations of the Scramble for Zimbabwe: Chivi (Mashonaland), C.1870-1892 Gerald Chikozho Mazarire
    Memories and Contestations of The Scramble For Zimbabwe: Chivi (Mashonaland), c.1870-1892 Gerald Chikozho Mazarire To be published in F. Kolapo (ed.) Essays in Honour of Kanya Forstner (July 2006) This chapter discusses the events unfolding in Chivi in southern Zimbabwe on the eve of colonisation as they are remembered by the local people. This is placed in the wider context of Chivi’s position as a contested terrain fought over between the British and the Transvaal Boers. Emphasis is placed on the implications of this conflict on the validity of the Rudd Concession that was used by the British South Africa Company to occupy what eventually became Zimbabwe. Because Chivi lay also on the route used by the British occupying force, the Pioneer Column, to enter Mashonaland, much of the memories of this episode and the Anglo-Boer conflict are still embodied in its landscape in the form of roads, graves and forts. It is possible to reconstruct the history of colonial conquest and all its contradictions and ambiguities by analysing the peculiarities written in these local landscapes and oral traditions decades after the Scramble with new insights on the subject.1 Introduction From the 18th century onwards the South has been the major route used to penetrate the Zimbabwean plateau. It is important to highlight the significance of the area between the Runde and Tugwi rivers, modern Chivi district, in south- central Zimbabwe as a place on this historic route through which most contacts between the plateau and the south have been made. Traversing its rugged landscape and the maze of dusty roads in a southwesterly direction just close by ‘Mafuta’2 and Chikofa townships, the most spectacular feature noticeable on its commanding landscape is the Pioneer Road or mugwagwa waMapasure: literally Mapasure’s Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodes, De Beers, and Monopoly
    The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History ISSN: 0308-6534 (Print) 1743-9329 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fich20 Rhodes, de beers, and monopoly Rob Turrell To cite this article: Rob Turrell (1982) Rhodes, de beers, and monopoly, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 10:3, 311-343, DOI: 10.1080/03086538208582623 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03086538208582623 Published online: 01 Jul 2008. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 252 Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fich20 Rhodes, De Beers, and Monopoly by Rob Turrell 'Poor Rhodes', wrote John Merriman, the distinguished Cape Parliamen- tarian; '[his] was a curiously duplex nature and the best side was very good — the worst was due to finance'.1 The bulk of the literature on Rhodes has concentrated on is 'best side'; it has genuflected to the diamond mines as the source of his wealth and moved on to worship at the shrine of imperialism or the personal image of the Colossus.2 'Remarkably', Ian Phimister wrote in an important article, 'despite the considerable attention paid by historians to the career of Cecil Rhodes, it would seem that equally their studies have been based on no more than a cursory glance at Rhodes' financial interests and especially the interaction between them'.3 Phimister succinctly spelt out the interaction between two apexes of Rhodes' triangular interests — Southern Rhodesia and the Rand — and concluded that Rhodes 'utilized British imperialism for the benefit of his private fortune'.4 Phimister ignored the genesis of Rhodes' wealth in the diamond mines and this essay hopes to provide the missing apex to Rhodes' financial interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Generations and the Future of Distance Workers,The Ndebele Nation,Love Letters in a Networked
    Generations And The Future Of Distance Workers Henk A. Becker A distance worker performs his work at the ‘production position’. The results of his work emerge at the ‘outcome position’, at a distance from the production position. An example is a series of guest lectures I presented at the University of Johannesburg. I lectured in Utrecht in a video conference center. The students were located in South Africa. After a few minutes, I forgot that I was speaking to a glass screen. I could see and hear the students’ reactions to my presentation. The male students participated a bit more actively than their female colleagues. To support my lectures, I had distributed a set of handouts in advance. In this essay, I will first discuss the dynamics of the Pattern of Generations. These dynamics will structure the future of distance workers substantially. I will base this discussion on my research program on generations, active since 1983. Secondly, I will present several examples of distance activities. Thirdly, the future of distance workers will be discussed in detail. The Pattern of Generations and its Dynamics The concept of generations has been a part of our cultural heritage for many centuries. We can define a generation as: ‘the clustering of a set of birth cohorts as an effect of one or more major events in society’. [1] The impact of major events is particularly strong during the formative period of the life course. The formative period is from around age twelve to twenty-three. In this period intelligence and memory capacity reach their highest level in the life course.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Arts
    FACULTY OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND INTENATIONAL STUDIES THE 19TH CENTURY NDEBELE STATE IN THE EYES OF CONTEMPORARY OBSERVERS FROM 1829 TO 1893 By ALLINGTON NDLOVU R146851W SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR G.C MAZARIRE Being a dissertation submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and International Studies at Midlands State University. JUNE 2018 APPROVAL FORM The undersigned certify that they have supervised the student ALLINGTON NDLOVU dissertation entitled: The 19th century Ndebele State in the eyes of contemporary observers from 1829-1893. Submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Arts in History and International Studies Honors Degree at Midlands State University. ……………………………… ………………………………. SUPERVISOR DATE …….……………………………………… …………………………… CHAIRPERSON DATE ….………………………………………… …………………………….. EXTERNAL EXAMINER DATE i DECLARATION FORM I Allington Ndlovu, Registration Number R146851W do hereby declare that this entire research is a product of my own work. It is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors Degree in History and International Studies, in the Faculty of Arts at Midlands State University. …………………………………. ………./………/…….. Allington Ndlovu Date ii DEDICATIONS This work is dedicated to my mother Viona Ndlovu and the entire family. I love you all. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly I would like to thank my supervisor Professor G. C Mazarire for his supervision and dedication throughout the whole project study. I am forever thankful to the Almighty God for granting me the gift of life and most importantly for giving me dedicated hardworking and ever supporting parents. To my family, that is my mother Viona Ndlovu, my father Shakespeare Ndlovu, Aunt Precious Ndlovu and SibhekileNcube, I say thank you for your support.
    [Show full text]