CWALAC General 2nd Congressional District 2016 District Candidate Protect Restrict Support KS Support Judges Support Life Religious Marriage School Mandate U.S. 10th (Q1) Conscience Amendment Choice Funding Amendment (Q2) (Q3) (Q5) (Q8) (Q9)

Kansas Senate 1 Jerry Henry D 1 Dennis D. Pyle R YES NO YES YES NO YES 2 Marci Francisco D NO* YES* NO* 2 Meredith Richey R YES NO YES YES NO YES 3 Tom Holland D NO* YES* 3 Echo Van Meteren R YES NO NO* YES NO YES 5 Bill Hutton D 5 Steve Fitzgerald R YES NO YES YES NO YES 6 Jason Conley L 6 Pat Pettey D NO* 12 Christopher B. Johnston D 12 Caryn Tyson R YES NO YES YES NO YES 13 Lynn D. Grant D 13 Jake LaTurner R YES* YES* 14 Bruce Givens R 14 Mark Pringle D 15 Dan Goddard R 15 Chuck Schmidt D YES NO NO* ?* ?* YES 17 Susan G Fowler D 17 Jeff Longbine R YES* YES* 18 Dave Jackson R YES NO YES YES NO YES 18 Laura Kelly D NO* YES* NO* 19 Zach Haney R YES NO YES YES NO YES 19 Anthony Hensley D NO* YES* NO* 20 Candace Ayars D 20 Vicki L. Schmidt R NO* YES* NO / YES* Kansas Representatives 9 Patrick McMurray L 9 Kent L. Thompson R 12 R YES NO YES YES N0 YES 12 Jean Kurtis Schodorf D NO* YES* NO*/YES* 38 Willie Dove R YES NO* YES YES NO YES 38 Frederick Caleb Cristopher L 38 Mike Fonkert D 40 John Bradford R YES* NO* 40 Debbie Deere D 41 Tony Barton R YES NO YES YES NO YES 41 D 42 Jim Karleskint R 42 Kara Reed D District Candidate Protect Restrict Support KS Support Judges Support 45 Tom Sloan R NO*Life ReligiousYES* MarriageNO* School Mandate U.S. 10th 47 Michael D. Caddell D 47 Ronald B. Ellis R 50 Chris Huntsman D 50 Fred C. Patton R YES* NO* 51 R YES NO YES YES NO YES 51 Adrienne Olejnik D NO* NO* 53 Jim Gartner D NO NO NO NO * * 53 Richard Kress R YES NO YES YES NO YES 54 R YES* NO* 54 Renae Hansen D 56 D NO* YES* 56 Lane Hemsley R YES* NO* 61 Lauren Van Wagoner D 61 R YES NO YES YES NO YES 63 W. Brett Neibling D 63 John R. Eplee MD R YES* ?* YES* NO* ?* YES 76 Teresa Briggs 76 Eric L. Smith YES NO YES YES NO YES

*Comments Kansas Senate 2 Marci Francisco D Q1. SB95 Voted against bans on live dismemberment; HB2218 pain capable unborn child abortions; Q2. HB2523/H Sub for SB 62; SB175 (2015) Q3. KS Marriage Amendment SCR 1601 (2005) 3 Tom Holland D Q1. HB 2218 (2011):Pain-capable Unborn child; Q2. HB 2523/H Sub for SB 62

3 Echo Van Meteren R Q3. The KS Constitution can only be amended by citizens of KS. I support the will of the people 6 Pat Pettey D Q1. SB95 13 Jake LaTurner R Q1. SB95; Q2. SB175 15 Chuck Schmidt D Q3. No, the Supreme Court has ruled these marriages are constitutional. Q5. If 17 Jeff Longbine R Q1.private SB95; schools HB2218(2011); are held to Q2. the SB175same requirements(2015); HB2523/H as public Sub forschools SB62 ; Q8. They 18 Laura Kelly D Q1. SB95; HB2218(2011); Q2. SB175 (2015); HB2523/H Sub for SB62 19 Anthony Hensley D Q1. SB95; HB2218; Q2. HB2523/H Sub for SB62; SB175 20 Vicki L. Schmidt R Q1. SB95; HB2218; Q2. HB2523/H Sub for SB62; SB175; Q3. made the motion to amend SCR 1601-2005, KS Marriage Amendment to civil unions -it failed then voted for KMA.

Kansas Representative 12 Jean Kurtis Schodorf D Q1.HB2218; Q2. HB2523/H Sub for SB62 Q3. SCR1601 voted to amend 40 John Bradford R Q1. SB95; Q2. SB175; HB2453 (2014) 45 Terry Manies Q1., Q2. and Q9. (same comment for all three) this is an extremely complicated question. I cannot answer with a yes or a no response. 45 Tom Sloan R Q1. SB95; HB 2218 (2011); Q2. HB 2453 (2014); SB175; HB2523/H Sub for SB62; 50 Fred C. Patton R Q1.Q3. SB95;SCR 1601-(2005) Q2. SB175

51 Adrienne Olejnik Q1. & Q8. Trust Women voter guides-liberal pro-choice group-she rated 53 Jim Gartner D Q8. and Q9 Can not give a yes or no answer 54 Ken Corbet R Q1. SB95 and Q2. SB175; HB2453 56 Virgil Weigel D Q1. HB 2253; Q2. HB2453 56 Lane Hemsley R Q1. SB95; Q2. SB175 63 John R. Eplee MD R Q1. Yes, except threatened health status of the mother, rape, or incest, serious health issues i.e., the fetus will not survive outside of the womb. Q2. No, but it depends on how they wish to express their 1st amendment rights. Q3. I will always maintain the right to not dissrespect the views of others if they pose no immediate threat to our constitution & the health & welfare of others; Q5. If some parents wish to that is fine but not utilizing tax credits or vouchers from KS taxpayers; Q8. I disagree with wording of this question.