Leaf Litter Ant Communities in Tropical Lowland Rain Forests in Sabah, Malaysia: Effects of Forest Disturbance and Fragmentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leaf Litter Ant Communities in Tropical Lowland Rain Forests in Sabah, Malaysia: Effects of Forest Disturbance and Fragmentation Leaf litter ant communities in tropical lowland rain forests in Sabah, Malaysia: effects of forest disturbance and fragmentation Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Carsten A. Brühl Backnang Würzburg, 2001 Eingereicht am: ....................................................................................................... Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Goebel Gutachter : Prof. Dr. K. E. Linsenmair Gutachter: Prof. Dr. B. Hölldobler Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: ........................................................................... Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am: ................................................................. ‘At last they reached the primeval forest, huge trees swathed in luxuriant creepers, an inextricable tangle, and awe descended upon them. They cut their way through the undergrowth. They walked in twilight and only now and then caught through the dense foliage above them a glimpse of sunshine. They saw neither man nor beast, for the denizens of the jungle are shy and at the first sound of footsteps vanish from sight.’ William Somerset Maugham, Neil MacAdam Für meine Eltern CONTENT 5 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 9 2 STUDY SITES............................................................................................................................................. 16 2.1 DANUM VALLEY CONSERVATION AREA ............................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Location......................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Geology and soils.......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Forest type..................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.5 Research plots............................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 SEPILOK FOREST RESERVE..................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Location......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Geology and soils.......................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.4 Forest type..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Management history...................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.6 Research plots............................................................................................................................... 21 2.3 KEBUN CINA FOREST RESERVE ............................................................................................................. 22 2.3.1 Location......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Research plots............................................................................................................................... 22 2.4 DERAMAKOT FOREST RESERVE ............................................................................................................. 22 2.4.1 Location......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.2 Geology and soils.......................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.4 Forest type..................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.5 Management history...................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.6 Research Plots............................................................................................................................... 24 3 GENERAL METHODS.............................................................................................................................. 26 3.1 SAMPLING AND SPECIMEN PROCESSING.................................................................................................. 26 3.1.1 Research plots............................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.2 Transects ....................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.3 Winkler litter sifting ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.4 Sorting of the samples and species identification.......................................................................... 29 3.1.5 Species included in the analysis .................................................................................................... 29 3.1.6 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 STATISTICAL METHODS.......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Data entry...................................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.2 Species richness estimators........................................................................................................... 31 3.2.3 Alpha-diversity indices.................................................................................................................. 32 3.2.4 Beta-diversity index....................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.5 Multidimensional scaling .............................................................................................................. 33 3.2.6 Cluster analysis............................................................................................................................. 33 4 FOREST STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................. 34 4.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 34 4.2 METHODS............................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................ 34 4.4 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................... 35 5 ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS...................................................................................................... 37 5.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2 TEMPERATURE ....................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.1 Air temperature ............................................................................................................................. 37 5.2.1.1 Methods..................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.1.2 Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.2 Leaf litter temperature .................................................................................................................. 40 5.2.2.1 Methods..................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.2.2 Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.3 Soil temperature ............................................................................................................................ 41 5.2.3.1
Recommended publications
  • New Species of Schizostachyum (Poaceae–Bambusoideae) from the Andaman Islands, India
    BLUMEA 48: 187–192 Published on 7 April 2003 doi: 10.3767/000651903X686169 NEW SPECIES OF SCHIZOSTACHYUM (POACEAE–BAMBUSOIDEAE) FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA MUKTESH KUMAR & M. REMESH Botany Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680-653, Trichur, Kerala, India SUMMARY Two new species of Schizostachyum Nees: S. andamanicum and S. kalpongianum, are described and illustrated. Key words: Schizostachyum, Andaman Islands, India. INTRODUCTION During the revisionary studies on Indian bamboos the authors could undertake a survey in the Andaman Islands. Five species of bamboos, namely Bambusa atra, Dinochloa an- damanica, Gigantochloa andamanica, Bambusa schizostachyoides, and Schizostachyum rogersii have so far been reported from the Andaman Islands (Munro, 1868; Gamble, 1896; Brandis, 1906; Parkinson, 1921). As a result of exploring different parts of the is lands two interesting bamboos were collected. Critical examination revealed that they belonged to the genus Schizostachyum Nees and hitherto undescribed. The genus Schizostachyum was described by Nees in 1829 based on Schizostachyum blumei. This genus is represented by about 45–50 species distributed in tropical and sub- tropical Asia from southern China throughout the Malaysian region, extending to the Pacific islands with the majority of species in Malaysia (Dransfield, 1983, 2000; Ohrnberger, 1999; Wong, 1995). The genus is characterised by sympodial rhizomes; erect or straggling thin-walled culms; many branches of the same length arising from the node; indeterminate inflores­ cence; absence of glumes in the spikelets; presence of lodicules; slender ovary with long, glabrous stiff style which is hollow around a central strand of tissue; anthers usu- ally with blunt apex. The bamboos collected from the Andaman Islands have straggling culms and are similar to Schizostachyum gracile (Munro) Holttum in certain characters but differ in several other characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Novel Basimandibular Gland in the Ant Genus Strumigenys (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
    insects Article Morphology of the Novel Basimandibular Gland in the Ant Genus Strumigenys (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Chu Wang 1,* , Michael Steenhuyse-Vandevelde 1, Chung-Chi Lin 2 and Johan Billen 1 1 Zoological Institute, University of Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, Box 2466, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (M.S.-V.); [email protected] (J.B.) 2 Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 50007, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Ants form a diverse group of social insects that are characterized by an over- whelming variety of exocrine glands, that play a key function in the communication system and social organization of the colony. Our focus goes to the genus Strumigenys, that comprise small slow-moving ants that mainly prey on springtails. We discovered a novel gland inside the mandibles of all 22 investigated species, using light and electron microscopy. As the gland occurs close to the base of the mandibles, we name it ‘basimandibular gland’ according to the putative description given to this mandible region in a publication by the eminent British ant taxonomist Barry Bolton in 1999. The gland exists in both workers and queens and appeared most developed in the queens of Strumigenys mutica. These queens in addition to the basimandibular gland also have a cluster of gland cells near the tip of their mandibles. The queens of this species enter colonies of other Strumigenys species and parasitize on them. We expect that the peculiar development of these glands inside the mandibles of these S. mutica queens plays a role in this parasitic lifestyle, and hope that future research can shed more light on the biology of these ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants in French Polynesia and the Pacific: Species Distributions and Conservation Concerns
    Ants in French Polynesia and the Pacific: species distributions and conservation concerns Paul Krushelnycky Dept of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii Hervé Jourdan Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, INRA/IRD, Nouméa, New Caledonia The importance of ants • In most ecosystems, form a substantial portion of a communities’ biomass (1/3 of animal biomass and ¾ of insect biomass in Amazon rainforest) Photos © Alex Wild The importance of ants • In most ecosystems, form a substantial portion of a communities’ biomass (1/3 of animal biomass and ¾ of insect biomass in Amazon rainforest) • Involved in many important ecosystem processes: predator/prey relationships herbivory seed dispersal soil turning mutualisms Photos © Alex Wild The importance of ants • Important in shaping evolution of biotic communities and ecosystems Photos © Alex Wild Ants in the Pacific • Pacific archipelagoes the most remote in the world • Implications for understanding ant biogeography (patterns of dispersal, species/area relationships, community assembly) • Evolution of faunas with depauperate ant communities • Consequent effects of ant introductions Hypoponera zwaluwenburgi Ants in the Amblyopone zwaluwenburgi Pacific – current picture Ponera bableti Indigenous ants in the Pacific? Approx. 30 - 37 species have been labeled “wide-ranging Pacific natives”: Adelomyrmex hirsutus Ponera incerta Anochetus graeffei Ponera loi Camponotus chloroticus Ponera swezeyi Camponotus navigator Ponera tenuis Camponotus rufifrons
    [Show full text]
  • ACANTHOMYRMEX Basispinosus
    ACANTHOMYRMEX basispinosus. Acanthomyrmex basispinosus Moffett, 1986c: 67, figs. 8A, 9-14 (s.w.) INDONESIA (Sulawesi). Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 53; Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 10. careoscrobis. Acanthomyrmex careoscrobis Moffett, 1986c: 78, figs. 39A, 40-43 (w.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak). Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 7, 18 (s. ergatoid q., m.). Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 53; Pfeiffer, et al. 2011: 44; Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 15 (redescription). concavus. Acanthomyrmex concavus Moffett, 1986c: 80, figs. 39B-C, 44-47 (w.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak, Sabah). Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 53; Pfeiffer, et al. 2011: 44; Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 10. crassispinus. Acanthomyrmex crassispina Wheeler, W.M. 1930a: 101, fig. 2 (w.) TAIWAN. Moffett, 1986c: 69 (s.). Status as species: Chapman & Capco, 1951: 114; Moffett, 1986c: 69 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 53; Lin & Wu, 1998: 86 (redescription); Lin & Wu, 2003: 64; Terayama, 2009: 187; Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 10. dusun. Acanthomyrmex dusun Wheeler, W.M. 1919e: 89 (s.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak). [Misspelled as dusan by Chapman & Capco, 1951: 115.] Status as species: Chapman & Capco, 1951: 115; Moffett, 1986c: 70 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 53; Pfeiffer, et al. 2011: 44; Yamada, Ito, et al. 2018: 10. dyak. Acanthomyrmex dyak Wheeler, W.M. 1919e: 86 (s.w.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak). Status as species: Chapman & Capco, 1951: 115. Junior synonym of ferox: Moffett, 1986c: 70; Bolton, 1995b: 53. ferox. Acanthomyrmex ferox Emery, 1893f: 245 (footnote), pl. 6, fig. 11 (w.) WEST MALAYSIA. [Acanthomyrmex ferox Emery, 1893a: cclxxvi. Nomen nudum.] Moffett, 1986c: 72 (s.q.m.). Status as species: Emery, 1900d: 678; Emery, 1924d: 235; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 115; Moffett, 1985a: 165; Moffett, 1986c: 70 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 53; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata, 2005: 10; Pfeiffer, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Ants of Sabangau
    A Guide to the Ants of Sabangau The Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project November 2014 A Guide to the Ants of Sabangau All original text, layout and illustrations are by Stijn Schreven (e-mail: [email protected]), supple- mented by quotations (with permission) from taxonomic revisions or monographs by Donat Agosti, Barry Bolton, Wolfgang Dorow, Katsuyuki Eguchi, Shingo Hosoishi, John LaPolla, Bernhard Seifert and Philip Ward. The guide was edited by Mark Harrison and Nicholas Marchant. All microscopic photography is from Antbase.net and AntWeb.org, with additional images from Andrew Walmsley Photography, Erik Frank, Stijn Schreven and Thea Powell. The project was devised by Mark Harrison and Eric Perlett, developed by Eric Perlett, and coordinated in the field by Nicholas Marchant. Sample identification, taxonomic research and fieldwork was by Stijn Schreven, Eric Perlett, Benjamin Jarrett, Fransiskus Agus Harsanto, Ari Purwanto and Abdul Azis. Front cover photo: Workers of Polyrhachis (Myrma) sp., photographer: Erik Frank/ OuTrop. Back cover photo: Sabangau forest, photographer: Stijn Schreven/ OuTrop. © 2014, The Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project. All rights reserved. Email [email protected] Website www.outrop.com Citation: Schreven SJJ, Perlett E, Jarrett BJM, Harsanto FA, Purwanto A, Azis A, Marchant NC, Harrison ME (2014). A Guide to the Ants of Sabangau. The Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project, Palangka Raya, Indonesia. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of OuTrop’s partners or sponsors. The Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project is registered in the UK as a non-profit organisation (Company No. 06761511) and is supported by the Orangutan Tropical Peatland Trust (UK Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Chusquea Section Chusquea, Section Swallenochloa, Section Verticillatae, and Section Serpentes (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Lynn G
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1986 Systematics of Chusquea section Chusquea, section Swallenochloa, section Verticillatae, and section Serpentes (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Lynn G. Clark Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Lynn G., "Systematics of Chusquea section Chusquea, section Swallenochloa, section Verticillatae, and section Serpentes (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) " (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7988. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7988 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques Is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing jiages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Silvestrii and Its Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species
    Entomological Science (2010) 13, 328–333 doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2010.00385.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE The army ant Aenictus silvestrii and its related species in Southeast Asia, with a description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae)ens_385 328..333 Weeyawat JAITRONG1,2 and Seiki YAMANE1 1Department of Natural Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan; and 2Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand Abstract Three species of Aenictus with reduced numbers of antennal segments (8–9) occur in Southeast Asia: A. jarujini sp. nov., A. latifemoratus and A. silvestrii. Aenictus latifemoratus is new to Java and Borneo, while A. silvestrii is recorded for the first time from Borneo. Key words: Aenictus jarujini sp. nov., army ants, southeast Asia, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION & Yamane (1989) (Sumatra, Indonesia); Terayama & Kubota (1993) (Vietnam and Thailand); Yamane The genus Aenictus Shuckard, 1840 (subfamily Aenicti- & Hashimoto (1999) (Sarawak, Borneo); Shattuck nae) is one of the large ant genera in the world. Currently (2008) (Australia). Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata (2005) 149 valid species and subspecies are listed (Bolton et al. listed the known species of Thailand. 2006). They are mainly distributed in the Old World During our survey on the Asian species of Aenictus, tropics and subtropics, from Africa through the Middle we have recognized a well-defined species group of three East, India, South China, southernmost part of Japan, Southeast Asian species comprising the two species various countries in Southeast Asia to New Guinea and above mentioned and a new species from Thailand. In Australia (Gotwald 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • CALYPTOMYRMEX Arnoldi
    CALYPTOMYRMEX arnoldi. Dicroaspis arnoldi Forel, 1913a: 115 (w.) ZIMBABWE. Combination in Calyptomyrmex: Arnold, 1917: 360. Status as species: Arnold, 1917: 360; Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 887; Emery, 1924d: 225; Arnold, 1948: 220; Bolton, 1981a: 66 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 83. asper. Calyptomyrmex asper Shattuck, 2011a: 4, figs. 2, 18 (w.) BORNEO (East Malaysia: Sarawak). Status as species: Akbar & Bharti, 2015: 8 (in key). barak. Calyptomyrmex barak Bolton, 1981a: 62, figs. 28, 33 (w.q.) GHANA, NIGERIA, IVORY COAST, GABON. Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 83. beccarii. Calyptomyrmex beccarii Emery, 1887b: 472, pl. 2, fig. 23 (w.) INDONESIA (Ambon I.). Szabó, 1910a: 365 (q.). Status as species: Dalla Torre, 1893: 136; Szabó, 1910a: 365; Emery, 1924d: 225; Brown, 1951: 101; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 111; Baltazar, 1966: 253; Taylor, 1991b: 600; Bolton, 1995b: 83; Clouse, 2007b: 251; Shattuck, 2011a: 5 (redescription); Akbar & Bharti, 2015: 7 (in key). Senior synonym of emeryi: Shattuck, 2011a: 5. Senior synonym of glabratus: Shattuck, 2011a: 5. Senior synonym of rufobrunnea: Brown, 1951: 101; Bolton, 1995b: 83; Shattuck, 2011a: 5. Senior synonym of schraderi: Taylor, 1991b: 600; Bolton, 1995b: 83; Shattuck, 2011a: 5. brevis. Calyptomyrmex (Calyptomyrmex) brevis Weber, 1943c: 366, pl. 15, fig. 1 (w.) SOUTH SUDAN. Status as species: Weber, 1952a: 23; Bolton, 1981a: 63 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 83. brunneus. Calyptomyrmex brunneus Arnold, 1948: 221 (w.) SOUTH AFRICA. Status as species: Bolton, 1981a: 70 (redescription); Bolton, 1995b: 83; Hita Garcia, et al. 2013: 208. caledonicus. Calyptomyrmex caledonicus Shattuck, 2011a: 7, fig. 4 (w.) NEW CALEDONIA. cataractae. Calyptomyrmex cataractae Arnold, 1926: 283 (w.) ZIMBABWE. Wheeler, G.C. & Wheeler, J.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Indian Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Himender Bharti
    List of Indian Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Himender Bharti Department of Zoology, Punjabi University, Patiala, India - 147002. (email: [email protected]/[email protected]) (www.antdiversityindia.com) Abstract Ants of India are enlisted herewith. This has been carried due to major changes in terms of synonymies, addition of new taxa, recent shufflings etc. Currently, Indian ants are represented by 652 valid species/subspecies falling under 87 genera grouped into 12 subfamilies. Keywords: Ants, India, Hymenoptera, Formicidae. Introduction The following 652 valid species/subspecies of myrmecology. This species list is based upon the ants are known to occur in India. Since Bingham’s effort of many ant collectors as well as Fauna of 1903, ant taxonomy has undergone major myrmecologists who have published on the taxonomy changes in terms of synonymies, discovery of new of Indian ants and from inputs provided by taxa, shuffling of taxa etc. This has lead to chaotic myrmecologists from other parts of world. However, state of affairs in Indian scenario, many lists appeared the other running/dynamic list continues to appear on web without looking into voluminous literature on http://www.antweb.org/india.jsp, which is which has surfaced in last many years and currently periodically updated and contains information about the pace at which new publications are appearing in new/unconfirmed taxa, still to be published or verified. Subfamily Genus Species and subspecies Aenictinae Aenictus 28 Amblyoponinae Amblyopone 3 Myopopone
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description Of
    557 The Army AntAenictus hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species by Decha Wiwatwitaya1 & Weeyawat Jaitrong2, 3 ABSTRACT The Aenictus hottai group is established to include two species (a named and a new species) occurring in Southeast Asia: Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989 and Aenictus yamanei Wiwatwitaya et Jaitrong, sp. nov. Both are probably restricted to Sundaland and inhabit lowland primary forests. Key words: Taxonomy, Formicidae, Aenictinae, Aenictus yamanei, army ants, new species. INTRODUCTION Currently 95 species are listed in the army ant genus Aenictus from the Oriental, Indo-Australian, and Australasian regions (Jaitrong & Eguchi 2010; Bolton 2011). Among them 67 species are known only from the worker caste. All of those species except one have a smooth and shining gaster. The species with a finely reticulated gaster, Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989, is also characterized by a well-developed subpetiolar process with a poster- oventrally produced arm, and is found only in Southeast Asia (Terayama & Yamane 1989; Rościszewski & Mashchwitz 1994; Malsch et al. 2003; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata 2005). In the course of our examination of Aenictus specimens collected from Southeast Asia, we found another species from Malay Peninsula and Sarawak that is closely related to A. hottai but is much smaller than the latter. In this paper we describe this ant as a new species based on the worker caste and both species are classified into the Aenictus hottai group herein established. 1 Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 8900065, Japan 558 Sociobiology Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • New Distributional Records of Ants in Arkansas David M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UARK Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 62 Article 25 2008 New Distributional Records of Ants in Arkansas David M. General University of Arkansas at Monticello, [email protected] Lynne C. Thompson University of Arkansas at Monticello Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation General, David M. and Thompson, Lynne C. (2008) "New Distributional Records of Ants in Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 62 , Article 25. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol62/iss1/25 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 25 New Distributional Records of Ants in Arkansas D. General1,2 and L. Thompson1 1Arkansas Forest Resources Center, School of Forest Resources, University of Arkansas-Monticello, Monticello, AR 71656-3468 2Correspondence: [email protected] The importance of ants in environmental studies has the county totals from 1 species each (based on Warren been increasingly recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species of the Army Ant Genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines
    Z.Arb.Gem.Öst.Ent. 62 115-125 Wien, 19. 11. 2010 ISSN 0375-5223 Three new species of the army ant genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines Herbert ZETTEL & Daniela Magdalena SORGER Abstract Descriptions of three new species of army ants are provided: Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. from Sarawak, Borneo; Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. from Camiguin, the Philippines; and Aenictus carolianus sp.n. from Cebu, the Philippines. Key words: Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Aenictus, army ants, new species, taxonomy, Philippines, Malaysia, Borneo, Cebu, Camiguin. Zusammenfassung Diese Arbeit liefert die Beschreibungen von drei Ameisenarten aus der Unterfamilie der Aenictinae (Treiberameisen): Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. wird aus Sarawak, Borneo, beschrie- ben, Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. von der Insel Camiguin, Philippinen, und Aenictus caro- lianus sp.n. von der Insel Cebu, Philippinen. Introduction The islands in the western Pacific region still yield a wealth of undescribed ant species. Despite the interesting biology of army ants – a review was published by KRONAUER (2009) – their taxonomy and zoogeography are poorly studied and need much more atten- tion. To our knowledge, the “true” army ants of the genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (sub- family Aenictinae) are remarkably specious in the region. The described species are often recorded from a single island; this might be either an effect of reduced dispersal abilities or just a lack of information. Since WILSON’s (1964) taxonomic revision only a few species have been described from Southeast Asia, including one from Borneo (YAMANE & HASHIMOTO 1999), but none from the Philippines. In our present study we describe three species.
    [Show full text]