“Immune Therapy Is a Game Changer. We Need More Research to Take Us

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Immune Therapy Is a Game Changer. We Need More Research to Take Us THE SIDNEY KIMMEL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTE R AT JOHNS HOPKINS SPECIAL ISSUE BLOOMBERG~KIMMEL INSTITUTE for CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY “Immune therapy is a game changer. We need more research to take us the rest of the distance, but we don’t think there is a single cancer that the patient’s own immune system ultimately can’t beat .” –Cancer Immunologist Drew Pardoll , M.D., Ph.D. 2016/2017 2 PROMISE & PROGRESS JOHN RYAN IS AMONG THE MANY PATIENTS WHO HAVE BENEFITTED FROM A PROMISING NEW IMMUNE THERAPY CALLED ANTI-PD1. THE SIDNEY KIMMEL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER at JOHNS HOPKINS 3 The Final Frontier? Immune Therapies Break Through Cancer’s Protective Barriers Immune therapy is recognizably different from all conventional cancer therapies. Imagine a cancer treatment that works without making patients sick or causing their hair to fall out. Doctors and nurses agree it is unlike anything they have ever witnessed in the world of cance r medicine. Gone are the iconic bald heads that immediately identified a person—inside or outside of the hospital—as a cancer patient. Like no other disease, cancer has traumatized the human population with its lethality and toxic treatments. That’s all changing now, as therapies that empower the body’s own natural defenses are at last becoming a reality and providing unparalleled, long-lasting responses across many cancer types, and even in the most advanced and treatment-resistant cancers. PATIENTS ARE SAYING they don’t feel cells. Researchers and clinicians at the and others unleash the commands that like they have cancer. Knowing what Kimmel Cancer Center have worked send the immune cells to work against it. cancer treatment is “supposed” to be together with experts throughout Johns These types of immune therapies have like—many having already experienced Hopkins, using science to follow the had success alone, but perhaps their it—they worry that they feel too well. Man y clues and bring the world what may be greatest power will come in combining ask: “If I feel this healthy, could the treat - a universal treatment for cancer. Cancer them and, through precision medicine, ment really be working?” immunology and melanoma expert using the biological clues within each pa - The answer, experts say, is a resound - Suzanne Topalian calls immunotherapy tient’s cancer to guide treatment. ing “yes,” and the Kimmel Cancer Center “the common denominator.” Leading the way are scientists, like is leading the way with its unprecedent ed Drew Pardoll and Elizabeth Jaffee , findings echoing through the laboratorie s who have been at work for more than 30 and waiting rooms of medical instituti ons, years de ciphering the mechanisms of the community hospitals, and cancer clinics im mune system, how it works and why it all over the world. all too often does not work against can - “This is oncology of the future,” says cer. As students of the immune system, William Nelson , Kimmel Cancer Cente r Pardo ll, Jaffee, and others understood Director, “and the future is now.” that the characteristics of the immune system should make it the perfect anti - A Game Changer cancer weapon, but if the cancer cell was As long as cancer has been a recognized DREW PARDOLL AND ELIZABETH JAFFEE , CIRCA 1989. complex in its molecular construction, disease, doctors have believed the power the intricacies of the immune system to eliminate it existed within the immune were equally complicated. system, but attempt after attempt to Immune-based therapies reflect a dif - Unlike viruses and bacteria that are unlock this potential has largely failed. feren t approach to treatment. Instead of easi ly recognized by our immune system The potential always existed, but the key targeting cancer cells, the new therapies becaus e they are so different, cancer orig - information needed to turn this promise target immune cells in and around cance rs. inates from our own cells. As a result, it into real treatments was locked away Some treatments increase the number of has all of the cellular mechanisms that inside the DNA of tumor and immune immune cells summoned to the tumor, are used by normal cells at its disposal. 4 PROMISE & PROGRESS RESEARCHERS AND CLINICIANS AT THE KIMMEL CANCER CENTER HAVE WORKED TOGETHER WITH EXPERTS THROUGHOUT JOHNS HOPKINS, USING SCIENCE TO FOLLOW THE CLUES AND BRING THE WORLD WHAT MAY BE A UNIVERSAL TREATMENT FOR CANCER. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY AND MELANOMA EXPERT SUZANNE TOPALIAN CALLS IMMUNOTHERAPY “THE COMMON DENOMINATOR.” Cancer co-opts them selectively, using ability to dodge an immune attack are Immune Checkpoint them like superpowers to grow, spread, being revealed, and the results, though and cloak themselves from the immune admittedly early, are like nothing that has Blockades More than 8000 practicing oncologists system. ever been seen in cancer medicine. Utter and clinical cancer scientists from all It took time for the technology to destruction of the most resistant, lethal over the world filled the lecture hall at catch up with the scientific ideas, but the tumors is occurring across many cancer the 2015 annual meeting of the American invincible cancer cell may have finally types and with few side effects. Patients Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). met its match. This Kimmel Cancer who were months, even weeks, from It’s not the first time a standing-room- Center team of multispecialty collabora - dying are alive and well, some five years only crowd has come there to hear a tors—seasoned investigators and young or more after treatment. Kimmel Cancer Center cancer expert clinician-scientists—has figured out ho w It was what Pardoll and Jaffee imag - discuss one of the most promising new to reset the cellular controls hijacked by ined three decades ago when they first cancer therapies in decades—immune the cancer cell and restore power to the began studying the immune system— checkpoint blockade. This time, cancer immune system. In a convergence of perhaps even better. immunology expert Suzanne Topalian wa s immunology, genetic, and epigenetic there as the David A. Karnofsky Memoria l findings, the secrets of the cancer cell’s The secrets of the cancer cell’s ability to dodge an immune attack are being revealed, and the results, though admittedly ear ly, are like nothing that has ever been seen in cancer medicine . THE SIDNEY KIMMEL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER at JOHNS HOPKINS 5 “Cancer cells take control of a valuable immune response regulator and turn it on its head. The anti-PD-1 therapy allows us to seize that power back. ” Award and Lecture recipient for “out - types of therapy, oncologists wanted to ongoing after many years,” says Pardoll. standing contributions to the research, know more. Scholarly journals and the These long-lasting responses that contin - diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.” In news media alike were reporting on ued even after therapy was stopped and 2012, Thoracic Oncology Program Direc - drugs that caused lethal melanoma skin caused few side effects are the reason tor Julie Brahmer presented findings on cancers, kidney cancers, and lung can - the auditorium was filled to capacity an immune checkpoint blockade study in cers to melt away and stay away. with doctors anxious to learn how and lung cancer. It marks a changing tide in The therapies are so new—first teste d when they could get this new therapy for clinical cancer research. Immunology in patients in 2006—that the Kimmel their patients. studies had never before received this Cancer Center immunology team readily The source of the excitement is an level of attention at ASCO meetings. admits there is much left to learn. “We immune target called PD-1 and a related With remarkable and lasting results don’t know yet what the ultimate survival partner protein on tumor cells called in about 20 to 40 percent of patients with benefit will be, but for some patients in PD-L1. PD-1 is what immunology experts advanced cancers that resisted all other these first trials, the responses are still call an immune checkpoint. Par doll stops short of calling it an immune system AMONG NORMAL CELLS, PD-1 IS NOT A BAD ACTOR, EXPLAINS BLOOD AND BONE MARROW CANCER EXPERT AND IMMUNOLOG Y master switch, but the results in labora - COLLABORATOR JONATHAN POWELL . “IT’S ACTUALLY A GOOD THING. IT’S THE MEANS BY WHICH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM REGULATES ITSELF. IT MAKES SURE THE IMMUNE SYSTEM DOESN’T OVERDO ITS JOB.” tory research and these early clinical trials point to it as one of the strongest influ - encers of an immune response to cancer identified so far. It—and likely some othe r similar proteins—is responsible for can - cer’s ability to avert an immune attack. There are two main actions at play in an immune reaction. The first is a “go” signal. “Our cells are constantly present - ing our own proteins to our own immune system,” explains pathologist Bob Anders . One can think of DNA as the blueprint of a cell, and the proteins its genes encode are its building blocks. A protein from a mutated gene looks different than its normal counterpart. In the same way it recognizes bacteria and viruses, the pa - trolling immune system can recognize abnormal cells that don’t belong. “When immune cells come upon something that shouldn’t be there, they generate an im - mune reaction,” says Anders. This is the BOB ANDERS 6 PROMISE & PROGRESS Lessons from the RICHARD JONES EPHRAIM FUCHS, LEO LUZNIK First Immune Therapy SOME OF THE earliest research at the Kimmel Cancer Center that focused on the immune system was in blood and bone marrow cancers and bone marrow transplantation. Cancers of the blood and bone marrow, such as leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma, pro - vided a unique perspective of normal immune cells, malignant ones, and the magnitude of the immune system’s power system, usually found in a brother or almost all parents, siblings, and children In most cancers, the goal is to engag e sister.
Recommended publications
  • Gene, Vaccine and Immuno- Therapies Against Cancer: New Approaches to an Old Problem
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Scientific Technology Options Assessment S T O A Gene, Vaccine and Immuno- therapies against Cancer: New Approaches to an Old Problem Results of the project “Future Development of Cancer Therapy” Study (IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005-28/SC17) IPOL/A/STOA/ST/2006-21 PE 383.215 P This publication is the result of a project commissioned by STOA under Framework Contract IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005-28 on "Future Development of Cancer Therapy". It contains contributions and discussions arising from a workshop that took place at the European Parliament in Brussels in February 2007 under the title "Gene, Vaccine and Immuno- therapies against Cancer: New Approaches to an Old Problem". Only published in English. Authors: ETAG European Technology Assessment Group Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Danish Board of Technology (DBT), Copenhagen Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment (viWTA), Brussels Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), London Rathenau Institute, The Hague Volker Reuck, ITAS E-mail: [email protected] Arnold Sauter, ITAS E-mail: [email protected] Administrator: Mr Marcelo Sosa-Iudicissa Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy DG Internal Policies European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - ATR 00K066 B-1047 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2 284 17 76 Fax: +32(0)2 284 69 29 E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in February 2007. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and receives a copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Vaccines for Cancer: an Overview of Clinical Trials
    REVIEWS Therapeutic vaccines for cancer: an overview of clinical trials Ignacio Melero, Gustav Gaudernack, Winald Gerritsen, Christoph Huber, Giorgio Parmiani, Suzy Scholl, Nicholas Thatcher, John Wagstaff, Christoph Zielinski, Ian Faulkner and Håkan Mellstedt Abstract | The therapeutic potential of host-specific and tumour-specific immune responses is well recognized and, after many years, active immunotherapies directed at inducing or augmenting these responses are entering clinical practice. Antitumour immunization is a complex, multi-component task, and the optimal combinations of antigens, adjuvants, delivery vehicles and routes of administration are not yet identified. Active immunotherapy must also address the immunosuppressive and tolerogenic mechanisms deployed by tumours. This Review provides an overview of new results from clinical studies of therapeutic cancer vaccines directed against tumour-associated antigens and discusses their implications for the use of active immunotherapy. Melero, I. et al. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11, 509–524 (2014); published online 8 July 2014; doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.111 Centro de Investigación Medica Aplicada (CIMA) Introduction and Clínica Universitaria (CUN), Universidad de Immunotherapies against existing cancers include active, unstable leading to numerous changes in the repertoire Navarra, Spain (I.M.). passive or immunomodulatory strategies. Whereas active of epitopes (so-called neo-antigens) they present, sug- Department of Immunology, immunotherapies increase the ability of the patient’s gesting that, in theory, tumours should be ‘visible’ to The Norwegian Radium own immune system to mount an immune response T lymphocytes. Hospital, Cancer to recognize tumour-associated antigens and eliminate The mechanisms required to mount effective anti­ Research Institute, University of Oslo, malignant cells, passive immunotherapy involves admin- tumour responses have been reviewed by Mellman and Norway (G.G.).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    FINAL PROGRAM SOCIETY FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER 26 TH ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 4-6, 2011 • NORTH BETHESDA, MD www.sitcancer.org SITC Supporters (As of September 27, 2011) GENERAL EDUCATION SUPPORTERS SILVER BRONZE Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Health and Human Services COPPER ANNUAL MEETING SUPPORTERS PLATINUM GOLD SILVER BRONZE (Annual Meeting Abstract Book) COPPER (2 Young Investigator Awards) FINAL PROGRAM • SITC 26 TH ANNUAL MEETING November 4-6, 2011 • North Bethesda, MD • www.sitcancer.org Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION Message from the President . ........................2 INFORMATION Meeting at a Glance . ..............................3 GENERAL General Meeting Information . ..........................4 Hotel Information. ..................................7 Hotel Map . ......................................8 ASSOCIATED PROGRAM DETAILS Associated Programs . .............................9 26 TH ANNUAL MEETING DETAILS Early Career Scientists Committee Information . ..........11 Presidential and Travel Awards . ............................12 Richard V. Smalley, MD, Memorial Award and Lectureship. ..........14 Plenary and Concurrent Sessions. ....................15 Program Schedule . ...............................17 Faculty Listing . ...................................24 Disclosures . ....................................26 EXHIBIT INFORMATION Exhibit and Poster Hall Floor Plan . ..................29 Exhibitor Listing . ................................30 ABOUT SITC SITC Membership
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Vaccines: Promising Therapeutics Or an Unattainable Dream
    Review Cancer Vaccines: Promising Therapeutics or an Unattainable Dream Howard Donninger 1,2,†, Chi Li 1,3,†, John W. Eaton 2,4 and Kavitha Yaddanapudi 4,5,6,* 1 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Experimental Therapeutics Group, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (C.L.) 2 Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA 4 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Immuno-Oncology Group, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA 5 Department of Surgery, Division of Immunotherapy, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA 6 Department of Microbiology/Immunology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] † Contributed equally. Abstract: The advent of cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the field of cancer treatment and offers cancer patients new hope. Although this therapy has proved highly successful for some patients, its efficacy is not all encompassing and several cancer types do not respond. Cancer vaccines offer an alternate approach to promote anti-tumor immunity that differ in their mode of action from antibody-based therapies. Cancer vaccines serve to balance the equilibrium of the crosstalk between the tumor cells and the host immune system. Recent advances in understanding the nature of tumor-mediated tolerogenicity and antigen presentation has aided in the identification of tumor antigens that have the potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Cancer vaccines can either be Citation: Donninger, H.; Li, C.; prophylactic (preventative) or therapeutic (curative). An exciting option for therapeutic vaccines Eaton, J.W.; Yaddanapudi, K.
    [Show full text]
  • J. R. Verner C. W. Weiant R. J. Watkins
    RATIONAL BACTERIOLOGY J. R. Verner C. W. Weiant R. J. Watkins Copyright 1953 by J. R. Werner, C. W. Weiant, & R. J. Watkins Manufactured in the United States of America by H. Wolff, New York Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged CONTENTS PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION 1: Formal Bacteriology 1 BACTERIA IN GENERAL 2 METHODS OF STUDYING BACTERIA 3 PATHOGENICITY, INFECTION, AND IMMUNITY 4 BACTERIAL CLASSIFICATION 5 5THE STAPHYLOCOCCUS 6 THE STREPTOCOCCUS 7 PNEUMOCOCCUS—DIPLOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE 8 GRAM NEGATIVE COCCI—NEISSERIAE 9 THE COLIFORM GROUP—ENTEROBACTERIACEAE 10 SPORE-FORMING ANAEROBES—BACILLACEAE 11 CHOLERA—THE VIBRIOS 12 DIPHTHERIA BACILLUS—CORYNEBACTERIUM DIPHTHERIAE 13 THE TUBERCLE BACILLUS—MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULAE 14 THE SPIRAL FORMS 15 ANIMAL PARASITES 16 RICKETTSIAE 17 THE FILTERABLE VIRUSES 18 THE BACTERIOPHAGE 19 MISCELLANEOUS PATHOGENS 20 STATE BOARD EXAMINATION QUESTIONS 21 GLOSSARY 22 SUMMARY II : The French Revolution from Béchamp to Tissot 23 INTRODUCTION 24 BIOLOGY 25 STRUCTURE 26 FUNCTION OF THE "DUMB-BELLS" 27 CELL DIVISION 28 SPECIALIZATION 29 PATHOGENESIS 30 BACTERIOLOGY 31 CRYSTALLIZATION 32 INFECTION 33 RESISTANCE 34 PATHOLOGY (GENERAL) 35 PATHOLOGY (SPECIAL) 36 PATHOLOGY (SUMMARY) 37 CARRIER 38 CELLULAR PATHOLOGY 39 THE BIONT CYCLE 40 ETIOLOGY 41 HEMATOPOIESIS: THE RED BLOOD CORPUSCLE 42 HEMATOPOIESIS: THE WHITE BLOOD CORPUSCLE 43 PLATELETS AND COAGULATION 44 PHAGOCYTOSIS 45 NEUROLOGY 46 DOUBLE TROUBLE 47 ANIMAL-VEGETABLE RELATIONSHIP 48 IMMUNITY (NATURALLY ACQUIRED) 49 IMMUNITY (NATURAL) 50 IMMUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Presentations 2019 AANS Annual Scientific Meeting San Diego, CA • April 13–17, 2019
    AANS 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts Oral Presentations 2019 AANS Annual Scientific Meeting San Diego, CA • April 13–17, 2019 (DOI: 10.3171/2019.7.JNS.AANS2019abstracts) Disclaimer: The Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) acknowledges that the preceding abstracts are published as submitted and did not go through JNSPG’s peer-review or editing process. 100. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Communication Between Pediatric Neurosurgery and Pediatric Nurses: A Team Communication Tool Pilot Elisha Peregino, RN, MS, CRNP PNP-AC, HTPA (Hershey, PA) Introduction: Surgical services that work in open admission units often encompass various difficulties with managing their patients related to daily work flow in comparison with traditional medical services. A Neurosurgery Nursing Communication Tool (NNCT) was adapted to the pediatric neurosurgery (NSGY) population to improve team communication and understanding of patient care. There is limited research on rounding tools amongst the multi-disciplinary care team especially NSGY with nurses (RNs). Methods: This is a prospective cohort study utilizing a pre/post-implementation surveys with RNs on the pediatric unit was distributed to assess perceptions of baseline team communication. Each NNCT was assessed for various data components. Results: The pre-implementation survey showed that 63% felt their concerns were addressed and 42% feel confident speaking in team rounds. In the first month, there was a NNCT completion rate of 65% with less than 50% of NCCT data completed. Admission diagnoses were only correct on 55.6% of NCCTs. Post implementation surveys showed 85.7% felt it was user friendly. All RNs felt it took less than 5 minutes to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Process Technology
    REVIEW Vaccine Process Technology Jessica O. Josefsberg,1 Barry Buckland2 1 BioEdge Consulting, LLC, 100 Jefferson Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 2 Department of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London, UK; telephone: 646-3692034; fax 305-675-2713; e-mail: [email protected] Received 2 December 2011; revision received 24 February 2012; accepted 27 February 2012 Published online 30 March 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/bit.24493 away from the traditional intramuscular injection by syringe ABSTRACT: The evolution of vaccines (e.g., live attenuated, approach. recombinant) and vaccine production methods (e.g., in ovo, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;109: 1443–1460. cell culture) are intimately tied to each other. As vaccine ß 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. technology has advanced, the methods to produce the vaccine have advanced and new vaccine opportunities KEYWORDS: vaccine process technology; fermentation; cell have been created. These technologies will continue to culture; purification; formulation; manufacturing evolve as we strive for safer and more immunogenic vaccines and as our understanding of biology improves. The evolu- tion of vaccine process technology has occurred in parallel to the remarkable growth in the development of therapeutic proteins as products; therefore, recent vaccine innovations Introduction can leverage the progress made in the broader biotechnology industry. Numerous important legacy vaccines are still in The earliest vaccines were relatively crude and consisted of use today despite their traditional manufacturing processes, partially purified live attenuated virus (e.g., smallpox, with further development focusing on improving stability (e.g., novel excipients) and updating formulation (e.g., rabies) or inactivated bacteria (e.g., pertussis).
    [Show full text]
  • From Rejection to Symbiosis. Human-Infectious Agents Relations : a General Theory of Physiology and Pathology
    From rejection to symbiosis. Human-infectious agents relations : a general theory of physiology and pathology. The contribution of tropical medicine. Francis Parc, Didier Vitrac, Jean-Pierre Cambus To cite this version: Francis Parc, Didier Vitrac, Jean-Pierre Cambus. From rejection to symbiosis. Human-infectious agents relations : a general theory of physiology and pathology. The contribution of tropical medicine.. 2012. hal-01448631 HAL Id: hal-01448631 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01448631 Preprint submitted on 28 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 From rejection to symbiosis. Human-infectious agents relations : a general theory of physiology and pathology. The contribution of tropical medicine Francis PARC †(1), Didier VITRAC (2)*, Jean-Pierre CAMBUS (3) (1) M.D., Medical biologist of military health service, Pathologist (2) Pharmacist, Medical biologist, Medical documentalist. Centre hospitalier universitaire Sud Réunion. B.P 350. 97448 Saint Pierre Cedex, France (3) M.D., University assistant professor, Medical hematologist. Centre hospitalier universitaire de Rangueil. 1, avenue du Pr Jean Poulhès 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France *Corresponding author : Didier VITRAC. Centre de documentation et télématique médicale. Centre hospitalier universitaire Sud Réunion. B.P 350.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine: Building the Future from Lessons of the Past
    Seminars in Immunopathology (2019) 41:69–85 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-018-0691-z REVIEW Therapeutic cancer vaccine: building the future from lessons of the past T. Tran1,2 & C. Blanc1,2 & C. Granier1,2 & A. Saldmann1,2 & C. Tanchot1,2 & Eric Tartour1,2,3,4 Received: 6 June 2018 /Accepted: 11 June 2018 /Published online: 5 July 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Anti-cancer vaccines have raised many hopes from the start of immunotherapy but have not yet been clinically successful. The few positive results of anti-cancer vaccines have been observed in clinical situations of low tumor burden or preneoplastic lesions. Several new concepts and new results reposition this therapeutic approach in the field of immunotherapy. Indeed, cancers that respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (20–30%) are those that are infiltrated by anti-tumor T cells with an inflammatory infiltrate. However, 70% of cancers do not appear to have an anti-tumor immune reaction in the tumor microenvironment. To induce this anti-tumor immunity, therapeutic combinations between vaccines and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 are being evaluated. In addition, the identification of neoepitopes against which the immune system is less tolerated is giving rise to a new enthusiasm by the first clinical results of the vaccine including these neoepitopes in humans. The ability of anti-cancer vaccines to induce a population of anti-tumor T cells called memory resident T cells that play an important role in immunosurveillance is also a new criterion to consider in the design of therapeutic vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • Tberapeuttcal Anb Lpbarnacolooical Section
    tberapeuttcal anb lPbarnacolooical section. OFFICERS FOR THE SESSION 1909-10. President- A, R. CUSHNY, M.D., F.R.S. Vice-Presidents T. E. BURTON BROWN, C.I.E., M.D. WILLIAM MURRAY, M.D. T. LL. BROWN. Sir JAMES SAWYER, M.D. Sir LAUDER BRUNTON, Bt., F.R.S. W. SOPER. W. T. PARKER DOUGLAS, M.B. R. B. WILD, M.D. Sir WILLIAM THISELTON DYER, JOHN INCE, M.D. K.C.M.G., F.R.S. Hon. Secretaries- J. GRAY DUNCANSON, M.B. H. CHARLES CAMERON, M.B. Foreign Secretary- J. GORDON SHARP, M.D. Other MUembers of Council Sir HUGH BEEVOR, Bt., M.D. C. SANGSTER. W. E. DIXON, M.D. F. H. SPOONER, M.D. HERBERT S. FRENCH, M.D. RALPH STOCKMAN, M.D. LEONARD GUTHRIE, M.D. FREDERICK TAYLOR, M.D. GEORGE HAYNES, M.D. W. BRAMLEY TAYLOR. ARTHUR F. HERTZ, M.D. NESTOR TIRARD, M.D. ROBERT HUTCHISON, M.D. CECIL WALL, M.D. Representative on Library Committee- HERBERT S. FRENCH, M.D. Bepresentative on Editorial Committee- J. GRAY DUNCANSON, M.B. IND1E X PR(OCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, Vol. III, 1910 INDEX (Prepared by Mr. A. L. CLARKE) Note.-The references are to the Sectional Proceedings, which are paged independently. The Proceedings of the Society as a whole are indicated by the letters R.S.M., and are placed first in the bound volumes under the heading "General Reports." They are followed by the Proceedings of the Sections, which are arranged alphabetically. Aachen, treatment of syphilis at, Surg. 216, 243, 245 AARONS, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Clinical and Climatological Association: 1884-1984 C~~~~~ A
    THE AMERICAN CLINICAL AND CLIMATOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: 1884-1984 C~~~~~ A. McGehee Harvey I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply indebted to R. Carmichael Tilghman, Richard J. Johns and Nicholas P. Christy for reviewing the manuscript and making helpful suggestions; to Theodore E. Woodward, John B. Graham and the Count­ way Library in Boston for access to photographs. For furnishing me with comments about the activities of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, I wish to express my apprecia­ tion to William B. Bean, F. Tremaine Billings, Jr., David P. Earle, Jr., Lewis B. Flinn, James W. Haviland, John E. Howard, Rudolph H. Kampmeier, Roger S. Mitchell, Edward S. Orgain, Stewart Wolf, and C.C.J. Carpenter. The preparation of the manuscript was made possible by a grant from the Kaiser Family Foundation. I greatly appreciate the excellent assistance of Susan Abrams and Patricia Oldewurtel in the assembling of the manuscript and its prepa­ ration for publication. CONTENTS PREFACE "; . : 'I' : . .. 11l ACKNOWLEDGMENTS · v CHAPTER 1 Introduction: The State of Medical Science in 1884 .....'..... '. 1 CHAPTER 2 The First Annual Meeting: May 3, 1884 . 9 CHAPTER 3 The Early Years ........................................ .. 23 CHAPTER 4 The Second Decade: 1894-1903 48 CHAPTER 5 The Third Decade: 1904-1913 62 CHAPTER 6 The Advance of Clinical Medicine ......................... .. 77 CHAPTER 7 Forces for Change 103 CHAPTER 8 Growth and Stability: The Second Half-Century Begins 120 CHAPTER 9 The Fourth Quarter Century 170 CHAPTER 10 Epilogue 219 ApPENDIX A Secretary-Treasurers of the Association 223 ApPENDIX B The Gordon Wilson Lectureship 236 ApPENDIX C The Jeremiah Metzger Lectureship 243 ApPENDIX D Some Autumnal Recollections 245 ApPENDIX E Former Officers 249 ApPENDIX F Deceased Members .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mrna Therapeutics in Cancer Immunotherapy Jan D
    Beck et al. Molecular Cancer (2021) 20:69 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01348-0 REVIEW Open Access mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy Jan D. Beck1† , Daniel Reidenbach2† , Nadja Salomon2† , Ugur Sahin1 , Özlem Türeci1, Mathias Vormehr1† and Lena M. Kranz1*† Abstract Synthetic mRNA provides a template for the synthesis of any given protein, protein fragment or peptide and lends itself to a broad range of pharmaceutical applications, including different modalities of cancer immunotherapy. With the ease of rapid, large scale Good Manufacturing Practice-grade mRNA production, mRNA is ideally poised not only for off-the shelf cancer vaccines but also for personalized neoantigen vaccination. The ability to stimulate pattern recognition receptors and thus an anti-viral type of innate immune response equips mRNA-based vaccines with inherent adjuvanticity. Nucleoside modification and elimination of double-stranded RNA can reduce the immunomodulatory activity of mRNA and increase and prolong protein production. In combination with nanoparticle-based formulations that increase transfection efficiency and facilitate lymphatic system targeting, nucleoside-modified mRNA enables efficient delivery of cytokines, costimulatory receptors, or therapeutic antibodies. Steady but transient production of the encoded bioactive molecule from the mRNA template can improve the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties as compared to the respective recombinant proteins. This may be harnessed for applications that benefit from a higher level
    [Show full text]