ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMERICAN CREOSOTE CHEMICAL SITE, WINNFIELD. LOUISIANA
April 5, 1988
H.O. # 0-54
FINAL DRAFT REPORT
Prepared for: EPA/ERB Harry Compton George Prince
Prepared by: Kenneth Tyson Kwasi Boateng
rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures List of Tables 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Project 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.1 General Setting 2.2 Climate 2.3 General Geology 3.0 Field Program 3.1 Field Program Objectives 3.2 Scope of the Field Work 3.3 Analytical Requirements 3.4 Field Investigation 3.4.1 Chronology of Site Activities 3.4.2 Health and Safety 3.4.3 Methodology 3.4.3.1 Lagoon Sampling 3.4.3.2 Soil and Tar Pit Boring and Sampling 3.4.3.3 Well Point Installation and Groundwater Sampling 3.4.3.4 Surveying 4.0 Results and Discussions 4.1 Subsurface Conditions 4.1.1 Groundwater 4.1.2 Description of Areas Where Obvious Creosote Contamination was Encountered. 4.1.3 Volume Estimates of Waste 4.2 Interpretation of Chemical Results 4.2.1 Partition Coefficient 4.2.2 Results of Soil, Sediment, and Tar Samples
rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONFD)
4.2.2.1 Results of Soil Samples 4.2.2.2 Results of Lagoon Sediments and Tar Pit Samples 4.2.3 Results of Groundwater Samples 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 6.0 References Appendix A Health and Safety Plan Appendix B Soil Boring Logs Appendix C Table of Sample Types and Locations Appendix D Survey Results Appendix E Volume Estimate Calculations Appendix F Analytical Results
rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title
General Site Location Map American Creosote Base Nap Borehole, Well Point, and Sample Locations Sampling Locations in the Settling Lagoon Typical Well Point Construction Diagram Cross Sections A-A and B-B Cross Section C-C Approximate Groundwater Flow Direction Map Showing Approximate Extent of Contamination 10 Settling Lagoon Sludge Thickness
I. rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Wafer Table Elevations Table 2 Volume Estimates of Contaminated Material Table 3 Water Quality Criteria Table 4 Calculation of Partition Coefficient Table 5 Base/Neutral/Acid Extractable Analysis Soil Sample Concentrations Table 6 Total Phenols Analysis Soil Sample Concentrations Table 7 Base/Neutral/Acid Extractables Analysis Lagoon Sampling Table 8 Total Phenolics Analysis Lagoon and Surface Tar Area Table 9 Base/Neutral/Acid Extractables Analysis - Surface Tar Area Table 10 Results of Dioxin Analysis Table 11 Volatile Organics Analysis Water Sample Concentrations in (ug/L) Table 12 Base/Neutral/Acid Extractables Analysis Water Sample Concentrations in (ug/L)
II. rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ^ ') ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY WINNFIELD, LOUISIANA 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The ERT field involvement in this project began on 18 August 1987 with a meeting between the EPA Region 6 On-Site-Coordinator (OSC), Jim Staves, and the ERT representative. Harry Compton. The general site layout and the suspected extent and type of contamination was discussed. An extensive field program involving a soil gas survey, a complete bioassessment, and an air monitoring program commenced on 23 August 1987 and was completed on 29 August 1987. Analytical data from the soil gas survey (Compton, 1987) showed the presence of elevated concentrations of two volatile organic compounds;- toluene and benzene. These compounds are commonly associated with creosote and other petroleum products. Most of the contamination is located around the plant itself. There is an apparent plume stretching east of the main building duster. This is most likely associated with two covered tar pits in that area. Ambient air monitoring was conducted at the site throughout the week of 24 August 1987. No elevated concentrations of any of the suspected volatile organic compounds (primarily toluene and benzene) were found during the air monitoring. Bioassessment was also conducted during the week of 24 August 1987. The relative toxicity of sediment samples collected from Creosote Creek and the site pond was determined by exposure to the species Dalphina magna (a type of water flea) and Selenastrum capricornutum (green algae). Most of the samples taken show very low toxicity. The relative toxicity of water samples taken from Creosote Creek, the two main drainage ditches, the site pond, and the Black Lagoon was determined by microtox analysis (Burchette, 1987). The majority of the samples show low to moderate toxicity. Based on the results of these studies, additional field testing and sampling was initiated. The current investigation consists of sludge sampling from the on-site settling lagoon, soil and tar pit boring and sampling, installation of well points, and groundwater sampling. This report summarizes the field investigations. 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Project The major objective of this work is to define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the site. The scope includes: 1) a description of the area where obvious contamination was encountered 2) volume estimates of the creosote waste in the settling lagoon, the tar pits, and the surrounding soils; 3) a summary of the analytical data; 4) summary of the extent of soil and groundwater contamination; and 5) preliminary recommendations for mitigative actions. 1-1 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ;) •-) 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 General Setting The American Creosote site is located in Winnfield, Louisiana (see Figure 1) and is part of the flood plain of the Mississippi River. The region is heavily forested mostly with tall standing white pines and some cedar. It is located within easy access to several major truck routes and railroad lines. The property is relatively flat with a total relief of 19 ft. Drainage is to the north and west into Creosote Creek and is enhanced by the presence of two major drainage ditches (Figure 2). 2.2 Climate The climate is subtropical. The average temperature (1951-1980) ranges ,^ from 47 degrees Fahrenheit in January to 81 degrees Fahrenheit in July.and August. The average annual rainfall is 50 inches. The heaviest rainfall is in April and May and the lightest is in October. Tropical storms and hurricanes occasionally pass through this area. Flood-producing rains may occur during any month of the year. 2.3 General Geology Winnfield, Louisiana is well within the Mississippi embayment section of the Gulf Coastal Plain. Deposits in that region consist mainly of braided stream channel material (sand, silts, and clays with associated interspersed gravels). The American Creosote facility is located on the Cockfield Formation. This formation was deposited during the Tertiary epoch (65 to 10 million years before present). It consists primarily of lignite bearing clays, silts, and sands (Snead and McCulloh, 1984). The surface deposits at the site have been extensively disturbed by facility operations. Much of the surface has been excavated and/or mixed with road fill material or wood chips. In general, the surface deposits are composed of brown to light gray sands, silts, and days. 3.0 FIELD PROGRAM 3.1 Field Program Objectives The primary objective.of the field program was to determine the horizontal and vertical extent of the contamination using information obtained from the soil borings and the lagoon sludge samples. The secondary objective was to determine groundwater quality and the direction of groundwater flow. 3.2 Scope of the Field Work The scope of the field work included: 1) the completion of 23 borings, 8 of which were installed with well points; 2) the collection of groundwater samples; 3) the collection of soil samples; 4) the collection of bottom sludge samples from the settling lagoon; and 5) surveying the boring locations, soil gas locations, and salient site features. 2-1 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE SCALE
MLES"
1:24,000 Figure 1. General Site Location Map, American Creosote Facility FIGURE 2. AMERICAN CREOSOTE BASE MAP
rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE 3.3 Analytical Requirements The selection of compounds for chemical analysis was based on analytical results from the bioassessment and the soil gas survey. The ground water samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOC), base neutral and acid extractabtes (BNA), and polychlorinated phenols (PCP). The soil and sludge samples were analyzed for BNAs and total phenols. 3.4 Field Investigation 3.4.1 Chronology of Site Activities Preparations for the field work began the week of 26 October, 1987. An equipment list was assembled which included the following: a hand-held power auger; 10 well points; a large recreational vehicle (R.V.) to be used as a field office; a covered equipment transport truck; level C protection equipment; lagoon sampling equipment, including a boat with oars and an acetate-lined core sampling device; and a steam generator to be used for decontamination. On 30 October the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) representative flew to Winnfield to arrange for the rental of the power auger, boat, recreational vehicle, and the equipment transport truck. On the evening of 2 November ERB and REAC personnel arrived in Winnfield. That night there was a meeting of all field personnel to discuss the sampling strategy. Field personnel were divided into two crews; three people were assigned to complete the soil and tar pit boring and sampling and three people were assigned to complete the lagoon sampling. The field activity commenced on 3 November with the installation of soil borings Al through A6 and Bl. The lagoon crew measured water depths and collected bottom sludge samples at three sites along a transect across the settling lagoon. i On 4 November thirteen borings were completed at sites CO through C7 and at sites Dl through D5 and well points were installed at locations WB1, WC1, WC2, and WD5. The lagoon crew secured additional supplies for the well points, packed samples, and assisted in the boring operation. Site activity was concluded on 5 November, 1987. Well points were installed at locations WA1. WE1, WD2, and WD6. The water levels were also measured and recorded. The remainder of the afternoon was spent packing up the equipment and preparing for departure. That evening all of the samples were sorted and repacked. A11 of the rental equipment was returned the morning of 6 November, 1987. REAC and ERB personnel returned to Edison, NO, that afternoon. Sample locations are shown in Figure 3. 3.4.2 Health and Safety A copy of the site health and safety plan is included in Appendix A. There were several aspects about this site that required special attention. Benzene and toluene were the anticipated volatile organic compounds. The presence of these contaminants necessitated level C protection. 3-1 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE FIGURE 3. BOREHOLE, WELL POINT, AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS
3-2 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE The level C safety equipment used at this site is listed in Appendix A. The use of level C protection was required in the heavily contaminated areas such as the tar pits. Level D protection was used in areas with no visual surface contamination, such as some of the group C borings, which were located along Creosote Creek (see Figure 3). Teams of at least two people were used at a11 times during the boring operations to guard against injury and/or heat exhaustion. Due to the complex nature of the lagoon sampling, special precautions were taken. Shower facilities were available in the R.V. in the event of a man overboard. The buddy system was used at all times. Level C protection was required for a11 lagoon sampling operations. Other site hazards included hunters (squirrel hunting is quite common near and on the property) and many trip and fall hazards. 3.4.3 Methodology 3.4.3.1 Lagoon Sampling An acetate-lined coring device was used for the lagoon sampling. A transect was set up across Black Lagoon as shown in Figure 4. The depth of the water and the thickness of the bottom sludge were measured along the perimeter of the lagoon with the acetate coring device. The coring device was lowered until it came to rest on the top of the sludge. At that point the water level was measured and recorded. The coring device was then driven in until resistance was met. This was interpreted as being the top of the day layer. The estimated thickness of the sludge was then calculated. Three samples were taken along the transect across the lagoon (see Figure 4). The coring device was pushed through bottom sludge and then carefully withdrawn and brought up to the surface. The acetate core was removed and the sample was examined and logged. (Sample descriptions are included in Appendix B.) The plastic liner was then removed and the sample was placed into a labeled jar. All of the samples were then preserved with ice. 3.2.3.2 Soil and Tar Pit Boring and Sampling The soil and tar pit boring process first involved flagging the 23 locations. The locations shown in Figure 3 were selected on the basis of the results of the soil gas survey and on the basis of field observations. Boring locations were centered in areas where high levels of VOCs in the soil vapors were detected, as well as in areas that were visibly contaminated. Once the locations were selected, the boring crew used the hand power auger to advance the holes to a depth of approximately 9 ft. below ground surface. The holes were completed to depths ranging from 12 to 15 ft. below ground surface using a bucket auger. The entire hole was logged during the boring process by examining cuttings as they came up the auger. A physical description of the sample was recorded, which included color, texture, notation of moisture content, and odors or other signs of contamination. The logs are shown in Appendix B. Samples were taken with a bucket auger at the top of the contamination zone, at the top of the water table, at the bottom of the hole, and at any other point of interest. Samples were analyzed for base/neutral/acid extractables (BNAs) and total phenolics. One sample from the tar pit area (PO-1) was analyzed for dioxin. A table of sample types and locations is included in Appendix C. 3-3 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE )
FIGURE 4.
VD = 4.757 ST = 27
N T
Figure 4 . Water Dep-th = VD Bottom Sludge Thickness = ST BL 1, BL2, and BL3 are sample locations.
Scale l- 100 ft.
3-4 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE 3.4.3.3 Hell Point Installation and Groundwater Sampling Well points were constructed using 2-in diameter screened (0.010 in slot size) drive points (see Figure 5). The annular space between the drive point and the bore wa11 was filled with pea gravel to a level about 2 ft. above the screen. Cement/bentonite grout was emplaced to the surface. A small drainage apron was then built up around the base of the surface casing. Once the water in the well reached static equilibrium, the water level was measured using an M-scope water level recorder. Samples were then taken from all well points using a 2 in diameter bailer. The bailers were decontaminated between each site using the following sequence: detergent scrub, distilled water rinse, hexane rinse, and air dry. The samples were submitted to the laboratory for analyses of VOCs and BNAs. Due to the low volume of water in well points Al and D6, water samples were collected for analyses of VOCs only in these two wells. Two field blanks were collected FIGURE 5. TYPICAL WELL POINT CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM Stickup Pipe Ss. Ground Sur-Face Cenent Grout Pea Gravel Filter Pack •Screen (0.010 In. slot size) Figure 5. •Borehole Wall Typical Well Point Construction Diagram Drive Point 4-2 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE -DPI WC1 WC.- B D5 D4 D2 TP2 Dl C5 B1 inn Ft. Scale Vert. Ex. 20x 10 Ft | Wood Chips and Fill Material Figure 6. Sandy Clay DDl. = Drainage Ditch 1 Cross Sections A - A' |__| Medium Grained Sand DD2 = Drainage Ditch 2 and B - B' |H Black Tar DD3 = Drainage Ditch 3 123 Heavy Creosote Ordor In Catlings TP2 = Tar Pit 2 c VD2 D3 P2 Figure 7 . Cross Section C - C'. 100 ft. Scale 10 ft. Vert. Ex. a0x P4 Heavy Creosote ddor A^ Wood Chips and Fill Material Black Tar Medlun Grained Sand . -tWO 7 4 ^ 4.1.1 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered within 10 feet from ground surface. Due to the limited number of wells installed at the site, it was not possible to construct a detailed groundwater level contour map. Therefore, the estimation of the direction of groundwater movement and velocity calculations are based on the triangutation method, using wells ND5, W02, and WB1. Water level elevations are shown in Table 1. The direction of groundwater movement is generally towards the north into Creosote Creek, as shown in Figure 8. Groundwater seepage velocity, Vs, is related to the hydraulic gradient, I, and the hydraulic conductivity, K, of the sediments by the following relationship: KI Vs « n where n is the effective porosity of the sediments. The head difference between wells WD5 and WD2 is calculated to be 0.269 or 5.38 feet of head loss over a horizontal distance of approximately 200 feet. Porosity for sandy sediments may be estimated at 0.3 without producing significant error. Based on hydraulic conductivity for fine sands of 10 feet/day (Todd, 1980), an estimate of groundwater velocity at the American Creosote Site may be calculated to be: flO feet/day) (0.027) . 0.9 ft/day Vs = 0.3 or 328 feet per year. This means that contaminants in the groundwater at well WD5 will reach Creosote Creek, a distance of 640 feet, in approximately 2 years. This estimate assumes that the contaminants will move at the same average velocity as the groundwater. 4.1.2 Description of Areas where Obvious Creosote Contamination was Encountered. Determinations of the contaminated areas were made based on information obtained from the soil borings and from visual observations. Two main types of contamination were observed in the field. The first was heavy Mack tar and wood chips. The second was made up of lighter colored liquids often found in gray sand units. The lighter liquids were identified by a distinct creosote odor and were usually encountered in or near the water-bearing zones. The presence of creosote wastes in these areas are probably the result of runoff and seepage from the heavily contaminated areas. 4-5 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 1. WATER TABLE ELEVATIONS i1/5/87 Well Point Stick Up (ft) Water Table Elevation (ft) WC1 1.60 86.03 WB1 5.19 85.37 WA1 2.88 ' 85.24 WC2 1.40 86.69 WE1 Well Casing Not Surveyed WD6 Well Casing Not Surveyed WD2 0.21 89.67 WD5 0.85 95.25 4-6 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE Figure 9 shows several areas of heavy creosote contamination. Thick black tar was found around suspect tarpits 1, 2, and 3, in the surface tar area, in the settling lagoon, in the tar drippings area, and along major segments of drainage ditches 2 and 3. Many minor tar seeps were also found along Creosote Creek. 4.1.3 Volume Estimates of Wastes Summary of volume estimates of contaminated materials are shown in Table 2. Appendix E contains details of the calculations. In order to estimate the volume of the contaminated material, the site was divided into several main areas based on the type of contamination encountered (see Figure 9). An average thickness value for the contaminated material was assigned to each area. The aerial extent of each area was then determined using the AutoCAD Software (1986) package. The aerial extent was then multiplied by the assigned average thickness value to obtain the volume of contaminated material for each area. Bottom sludge thickness values for the settling lagoon were determined as described in Section 3.4.3. Figure 10 graphically displays the variation in thickness. The lagoon was divided into 4 main areas, a thickness value was assigned to each area, and the volume was estimated by multiplying the aerial extent of each area by its assigned thickness values. The total volume of contaminated material at the American Creosote Site is calculated to be 49,806 yd3 of which 21,441 yd- is considered heavily contaminated. 4.2 Interpretation of Chemical Results The major objective of this assignment is to define soil and groundwater contamination at the American Creosote Site in order to make preliminary recommendations for mitigative actions. Thirty-six (36) soil, sediment, tar, and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for BNAs, total phenolics, VOCs, and dioxin. The following subsections discuss analytical results based on applicable environmental criteria. There are currently no Federal or Louisiana State soil quality guidelines for the majority of contaminants with the exception of a U.S. EPA action level of 50 mg/kg for PCBs. Therefore, for cleanup purposes, guideline concentrations of specific contaminants are usually established on a case-by-case basis by the jurisdictional regulatory agency. Groundwater samples are compared to the Federal Water Quality Criteria (Table 3). A summary of analytical results is shown in Table 4 through Table 12. Appendix F contains analytical results, QA/QC protocol, and sample documentation. 4-8 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 2. VOLUME ESTIMATES OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL Heavily Contaminated Area Light Contaminated Area Area Volume (ft3) Volume (yd3) Area Volume (ft3) Volume (yd3) Suspect Tarpit 1 172502 6389 Light Contamination Area 1 562570 20836 Suspect Tarpit 2 176437 6535 Light Contamination Area 2 58569 2169 Suspect Tarpit 3 26728 990 Light Contamination Area 3 144729 5360 Surface Tar Area 42830 1586 Drainage Ditch 2 13090 485 Drainage Ditch 3 28070 1040 Tar Drippings Area 112629 4171 Settling Lagoon 6626 245 TOTALS 578912 21441 765868 28365 4-10 FIGURE 10. SETTLING LAGOON SLUDGE THICKNESS VD = 4.75' ST = Z' N t Figure 10 . Settling Lagoon Sludge Thickness Water Depth = VD Bottom Sludge Thickness = ST BL 1, BL2, and BL3 are sample locations. Thickness value assigned to area A 0.50 ft. Thickness value assigned to area B 1.00 ft. Thickness value assigned to area C 1.50 ft. Thickness value assigned to area D 2.00 ft. Scale ur Hi 4-11 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE -\ TABLE 3. WATER QUALITY CRITERIA (ug/L)* Parameter MCL RMCL SNARL1 AWQC2 BNAs Acenaphthene - -- 1.700 F1uoranthene ------3,980 Naphthalene ------2,300 Pentachlorophenol -- 220 -- 55 VOCs Methylene Chloride 35,000 193,000 Benzene 5 0 -- 5,300 Toluene -- 2,000 420,000 17,500 Ethyl benzene -- 680 -- 32,000 Chlorobenzene -- 60 -- 19,500 Trichloroethene 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 45,000 1. Suggested no adverse response level; acute. 2. Ambient water quality criteria for protection of aquatic life; acute. * Parameters not listed here do not have established water quality criteria. 4-12 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE 4.2.1 Partition Coefficient Calculation Partition or adsorption coefficient (K) may be defined as the ratio of the amount of a chemical adsorbed in soil or sediment to the concentration of the chemical in solution at equilibrium. A value of K can be determined for a particular soil using available chemical data. Factoring in the percentage of organic carbon in the soil results in the calculation of the adsorption coefficient Kgpi which is then independent of the properties of the soil. In this particular project, the amount of organic carbon in the soil was not measured, therefore, the partition coefficient is representative of the soil types found at the American Creosote Site. There can be a lot of variation in the measurement of a partition coefficient due to variables such as analytical techniques, suspended particulate matter in water, pH of soil and water, and sampling procedures. After ensuring that all variable factors have been minimized to the extent possible; the adsorption coefficient may be calculated by dividing the concentration in soil by the concentration in groundwater, making sure both are in similar units. The procedure is as follows: o Collect a soil sample from the top of the saturated zone; o Collect a groundwater sample (should be filtered); o Complete laboratory analyses on samples; o Select a parameter which was detected in both soil and water. A partition or adsorption coefficient for a particular compound may be used to: o Predict or estimate the concentration of that compound in water at some other point knowing the concentration of soil at that point, and vice versa. o Predict or estimate the compound's behavior based on its K-value. For example, compounds with low K value may be considered hydrophilic, with high water solubility and small bioconcentration factors for aquatic life. Conversely, those with high K-value (greater than 10') are considered hydrophobic. Table 4 contains calculations of partition coefficient of some of the compounds based on the analytical data. Our calculations show that partition coefficients of most of the compounds fall within the low range indicating that they are hydrophilic. 4-13 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE .') ) TABLE 4. CALCULATION OF PARTITION COEFFICIENT Sample GW Soil Depth Soil Cone. Water Cone. # Depth (ft) (ppm) (ppm) K NAPHTHALENE Bl 3.35 7.0 1400 35.1 40 Gravel D2 4.3 10.0 210 7.04 30 Silt Sand D5 4 9.0 4.6 18.3 0.25 Clay & Clayey Sand PHENANTHRENE - Bl 3.35 7.0 1000 21.8 46 D2 4.3 10.0 420 0.96 440 D5 4 9.0 8.6 19.7 0.44 PYRENE Bl 3.35 7.0 280 5.5 51 D2 4.3 10.0 130 .287 452 D5 4 9.0 ND ND FLUORENE Bl 360 7.37 49 D2 120 7.68 16 D5 3.3 ND ACENAPHTHENE Bl 300 6.24 48 D2 96 0.53 181 D5 3.2 8.16 0.39 FLUORANTHENE Bl 430 8.83 49 D2 200 0.36 555 4-14 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 4. PARTITION COEFFICIENTS (CONT'D) Soil Cone. Water Cone. S;impte # (ppm) (ppm) K 2-Methyl Naphthalene Bl 310 6.43 48 02 70 0.86 81 1-Methyl Naphthalene Bl 150 3.15 48 02 40 N0 2-6-Oimethyl Naphthalene Bl 63 1.05 60 02 23 N0 Anthracene Bl 230 3.75 61 02 63 0.30 210 Benzo(a)anthracene Bl 71 1.31 54 02 (31) 0.064 484 Bl (K) » 50 02 (K) - 300 4-15 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ") --) 4.2.2 Results of Soil, Sediment, and Tar Samples A total of twenty-eight (28) soil, lagoon sediments, and tar pit samples were analyzed for BNAs, total phenolics, and dioxin. Sample locations are shown in Figure 3. Chemical results are presented in Tables 5 through 10. 4.2.2.1 Results of Soil Samples Analytical data show that naphthalene was detected at 580 ing/kg, 940 mg/kg, and 1600 mg/kg in borings WA1, A2, and AS, respectively. Concentrations of phenanthrene were found at 7000 mg/kg in A5; 6300 mg/kg in A2, and 240 mg/kg in WA1. Fluoranthene and pyrene were identified in borings A2 at 3000 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg; and in boring A5 at 3700 mg/kg and 2600 mg/kg, respectively. Minor amounts of both compounds were also detected in WA1. "p r- Acenaphthene levels in borings along transect A were identified at levels o ranging from nondetectable (in A3, A4, and A6) to 1400 mg/kg in A5. /.. Boring A2 contains fluorene at 1700 mg/kg and A5 at 1900 mg/kg. No BNAs .;, were detected in A6; and no quantifiable levels were found in A3 and A4. ^ Most of the BNAs were detected in WB1 at concentrations ranging from below quantification to 1400 mg/kg. None of the BNA compounds were detected in any of the transect C borings with the exception of C4. Boring C4 contains naphthalene at 900 mg/kg; 2-methylnaphthalene at 200 mg/kg; phenanthrene at 490 mg/kg and f1uoranthene at 210 mg/kg. The concentrations of the remaining BNA compounds in C4 range from below quantification to 170 mg/kg. Of the six (6) soil samples collected along transect D, only 02 showed significant amount of BNAs. Phenanthrene, naphthalene, and f1uoranthene were identified in WD2 at 420 mg/kg, 210 mg/kg, and 200 mg/kg, respectively. Sample Dl (6.5 ft), 01 (10 ft), WD5 and WD6 show no quantifiable levels of BNA. Minor amounts of BNAs were found in 01 (9 ft) and 04. WE1 does not contain any of the BNA compounds. Of the twenty-three (23) soil samples; only seven (7) show detectable levels of total phenolics. Concentrations range from 1.8 ug/g to 42.0 ug/g. The high concentrations of contaminants in borings WA1, A2, A5, WB1, C4, and WD2 were expected since these borings are located in the tar pit/suspected tar pit or areas with visual soil contamination. 4.2.2.2 Results of Lagoon Sediments and Tar Pit Samples Four (4) sediment (slurry, sludge, clay) samples from the settling lagoon and three (3) tar samples from the tar pit were analyzed for BNAs and total phenolics. Tar sample P01 was analyzed for dioxin. Sample locations are shown in Figure 4. Analytical results show very high concentrations of naphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene in almost all the samples. Napththatene in the lagoon samples was identified at levels 4-16 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 5. BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE ANALYSES Soil sample concentrations in (ing/kg) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample # WA1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 WB1 ID # 7979 7980 7981 7982 7983 7984 7985 Parameter Depth (ft) 9.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 7.5 7.0 NAPHTHALENE 580 940 ND ND 1600 ND 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 140 (400) ND ND 630 ND 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 77 (250) ND ND (370) ND 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE (28) (140) ND ND (200) ND 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE (14) (80) ND ND (100) ND ACENAPHTHALENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ACENAPHTHENE 99 1300 ND ND 1400 ND FLUORENE 100 1700 ND (10) 1900 ND PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND ND ND ND ND ND PHENANTHRENE 240 6300 (10) ND 7000 ND ANTHRACENE (43) 1900 (24) ND 1300 ND FLUORANTHENE 80 3000 . (7.2) (6.4) 3700 ND PYRENE 59 2000 (6.5) (5.7) 2600 ND BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE (14) (430) ND ND 630 ND CHRYSENE (13) (400) ND ND 640 ND BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE (8.6) (210) ND ND (330) ND BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND BENZO(A)PYRENE (6.3) (120) ND ND (220) ND INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE ND ND ND ND • ND ND DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE ND ND ND ND ND ND BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND Percent Moisture 14 6 43 39 10 9.2 13 Detection Limit (mg/kg) 12 100 17 15 110 11 11 () denotes the result was below the quantification limit and is considered to be approximate. ND denotes not detected. 4-17 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ) ') TABLE 5* BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE ANALYSES (CONFD) Soil sample concentrations In (nig/kg) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample # WC1 WC2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 CO ID # 7986 7989 7990 7991 7992 7993 7994 7988 Parameter Depth (ft) 11.3 9.0 10.0 9.0 14.5 12.0 12.9 10.5 NAPHTHALENE ND ND ND 900 ND ND ND ND ^^ 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE ND ND ND 200 ND ND ND ND i-\ 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE ND ND ND 94 ND ND ND ND ( <-» 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE ND ND ND (40) ND ND ND ND -^ 2,3-DIHETHYLNAPHTHALENE ND ND ND (17) ND ND ND N" t ACENAPHTHALENE ND ND ND (12) ND ND ND ND V ACENAPHTHENE NO ND ND 160 ND ND ND ND Percent Moisture 14 14 15 13 16 20 15 17 Detection Limit (mg/kg) 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 12 () denotes the result was below the quantification limit of 50 mg/kg and is considered to be approximate. ND denotes not detected. 4-18 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE '] ^ TABLE 5. BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACT-ABLE ANALYSES (CONT'D) Soil sample concentrations in (ing/kg) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample « Dl Dl Dl UD2 04 WD5 WD6 WE1 10 f 7995A 7995B 7995C 7996 7997 7967 7969 7968 Parameter Oepth (ft) 6.5 9.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 ^ NAPHTHALENE (14) 120 ND 210 (24) (4.6) ND ND P 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE (4.9) (26) ND 70 (11) ND ND ND £> 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE (4.6) (15) ND (40) ND ND ND ND 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE ND ND ND (23) ND ND ND ND b> 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE NO ND ND (11) ND ND ND ND 3 ACENAPHTHALENE NO ND ND (4.3) ND ND ND ND "^ ACENAPHTHENE (19) (50) ND 96 ND (3.2) ND ND -/•"- FLUORENE (19) (51) ND 120 (24) (3.3) ND ND PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND ND ND ND ND N0 ND ND PHENANTHRENE (58) 150 ND 420 74 (8.6) ND ND ANTHRACENE ND (28) ND 63 ND ND ND ND FLUORANTHENE (32) 65 ND 200 (34) ND ND ND PYRENE (25) (44) ND 130 (24) ND ND ND BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE ND (6.7) ND (31) ND ND ND ND CHRYSENE ND (6.7) ND (32) ND ND ND ND BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE ND ND ND (18) ND N0 ND ND „ BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND BENZO(A)PYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Percent Moisture 15 14 11 16 15 16 19 25 Detection Limit (mg/kg) 11 11 11 12 12 11 12 13 () denotes the result was below the quantification limit of 50 mg/kg and is considered to be approximate. ND denotes not detected. 4-19 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ) :) TABLE 6. TOTAL PHENOLICS ANALYSIS Soil sample concentrations in (ug/g) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample ID Description/ Detection Location # Depth Result Limit Al 7979 9.0 11 1.2 A2 7980 3.5 8.8 1.2 A3 7981 3.0 ND 1.1 A4 7982 3.0 ND 1.2 A5 7983 3.0 40 1.1 A6 7984 7.5 2.0 1.1 Bl 7985 7.0 6.6 1.2 CO 7988 10.5 . ND 1.1 Cl 7986 11.27 ND 0.93 C2 7989 9.0 ND 1.1 C3 7990 10.0 ND 1.1 C4 7991 9.0 42 0.96 C5 7992 14.5 ND 1.0 C6 7993 12.0 ND 1.1 C7 7994 12.9 ND 1.1 Dl 7995A 6.5 ND 0.84 Dl 7995B 9.0 ND 1.0 Dl 7995C 10.0 ND 1.1 D2 7996B 10.0 ND 1.1 D4 7997A 9.0 ND 1.0 D5 7967 9.0 1.8 1.2 06 7969 9.0 ND 0.84 El 7968 8.5 ND 1.1 4-20 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 7. BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSES Lagoon sampling (nig/Kg) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY BL1 BL2 BL3 Sample BL1 BL1 BL2 BL2 BL2 BL3 BL3 ID« 7964A 7964C 7965A 7965B 7965C 7966A 7966C Parameter Matrix Slurry Clay Slurry Sludge Clay Slurry Clay NAPHTHALENE 3.9 X 105 31,000 790.000 300,000 510 300,000 3,300 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 140,000 3,400 69,000 21,000 73 18,000 460 1-HETHYLNAPHTHALENE 63,000 1,500 (32,000) (10,000) (36) (9.100) 220 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE NO (320) (6.600) (2,100) ND N0 (51) 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE NO (120) ND N0 ND ND (22) ACENAPHTHALENE NO N0 ND ND ND ND (12) ACENAPHTHEME 110,000 2,700 59,000 20,000 78 21,000 470 FLUORENE (49,000) 1,300 (31,000) 11,000 (54) (12.000) 330 PENTACHLOROPHENOL NO N0 N0 ND N0 ND N0 PHENANTHRENE (58,000) 1,600 59,000 23,000 120 27,000 760 ANTHRACENE (1,000) (300) (12,000) (9.400) (24) (5.300) 380 FLUORANTHENE NO (370) (20,000) (8.000) (46) (11,000) 290 PYRENE NO (230) (13,000) (5,400) (30) (7,600) 200 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE NO N0 N0 ND ND ND <35) CHRYSENE NO ND N0 N0 ND N0 (33) BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE NO ND ND ND N0 N0 (14) BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE NO N0 N0 ND ND ND (13) BENZO(A)PYRENE NO ND ND ND N0 ND N0 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE NO ND ND ND ND ND N0 DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE NO ND N0 N0 ND ND N0 BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE NO ND ND ND ND ND ND DETECTION LIMIT 12,000 130 6,900 2,700 12 3,000 13 PERCENT MOISTURE 92 26 71 29 17 34 21 ( ) - Denotes the answer was below the lower limit of quantification. ND - Denotes not detected. 4-21 TABLE 8. TOTAL PHENOLICS ANALYSIS Lagoon and Surface Tar Area Concentrations in (ug/g) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample ID Description/ Detection Location # Depth (ft) Result Limit BL1 7964A S1urry 110 1.0 7964C Clay 34 1.2 BL2 7965A Slurry 180 4.4 7965B Sludge 510 1.1 7965C Clay 26 1.1 BL3 7966A S1urry 220 8.7 7966C Clay 30 1.1 Surface Tar Area P02 7852A 0.6-1.3 27 1.1 7852B • 1.7-2.2 21 1.1 P03 7853A 0.7-1.3 25 1.0 7853B 2.7-3.3 4.6 1.1 P04 7854A 0.5-1.1 ND 0.97 7854B 1.6-2.2 ND 1.1 Composite 7855 64 1.0 (P02, P03, P04) 4-22 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 9. BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE ANALYSES Surface Tar Area (ing/Kg) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sample P02 P02 PQ3 P03 P04 P04 COMPOSITE* IWf 7852A 78528 7853A 78538 7854A 78548 7855 Parameter Depth (ft) 0.6-1.3 1.7-2.2 0.7-1.3 2.7-3.3 0.5-1.1 1.6-2.2 NAPHTHALENE 1,200 1,300 2,300 720 110 150 10,000 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE (360) (420) 660 230 (48) 62 3,900 1-METHYLNAPNTHALENE (220) (240) (380) 130 (23) (32) 1,900 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE (120) (140) (240) 80 (15) N0 (1,300) 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE ND (44) (130) (38) ND ND (650) ACENAPHTHALENE N0 (33) ND (23) ND ND (300) ACENAPHTHENE 690 730 1,300 300 72 100 6,800 FLUORENE 800 860 1,300 300 69 100 8,100 PENTACHLOROPHENOL N0 ND N0 ND ND ND N0 PHENANTHRENE 3,300 3,300 5,100 1,000 210 320 30,000 ANTHRACENE (430) (430) 710 190 (24) (34) 6,300 FLUORANTHENE 1,700 1,600 2,900 550 87 130 15,000 PYRENE 1,200 1,200 2,100 410 (59) 88 10,000 BENZO(A)AtJTHRACENE (280) (270) (540) 130 (10) (15) 2,300 CHRYSENE (290) (300) (330) 110 (9.5) (15) 2,500 B£NZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE (180) (160) N0 84 N0 N0 (1,200) BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE N0 ND (260) N0 ND ND N0 BENZO(A)PYRENE (120) (120) ND 69 ND ND (820) INOENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE ND ND ND (32) ND ND N0 DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE ND ND ND ND ND N0 N0 BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE ND ND ND (27) N0 N0 ND PERCENT MOISTURE 17 14 13 12 18 15 43 DETECTION LIMIT 120 110 110 10 12 12 340 » - Composite of samples P02, P03, and P04 (Tar-Sludge). ND - Denotes not detected. ( ) - Denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification and are consider (. \ 4-23 • --) ') TABLE 10. RESULTS OF DIOXIN ANALYSIS Location: Surface Tar Area Sample ID 7851 Boring P01 Results NO 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 4-24 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE ranging from 510 mg/kg in BL2 (clay) to 390,000 nig/kg in BL1 (which is equivalent to 39 percent). Concentrations of 2-methylnaphthalene in the lagoon (slurry) samples were found at 140,000 mg/kg (BL1), 69.000 ing/kg BL2). and 18,000 ing/kg (BL3). As expected in the lagoon samples, there is a general decrease of contaminant concentration with depth. The highest concentrations are in the slurry (suspended solid phase) samples. For example, naphthalene was detected in BL2 at 790,000 mg/kg (slurry), 300,000 mg/kg (sludge), and 510 mg/kg (clay). Relatively minor amounts of total phenolics, ranging from 30 ug/g to 510 ug/g were found in a11 the lagoon samples. The most predominant compounds identified in the tar samples are naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene and phenanthrene with concentrations ranging from 110 mg/kg to 1300 mg/kg for naphthalene, 62 mg/kg to 660 mg/kg for 2-methylnaphthalene, and from 210 mg/kg to 5100 mg/kg for phenanthrene. Minor amounts of total phenolics (4.6 ug/g to 27 ug/g) were found in tar samples P02 and P03. One surface tarpit sample (P01) was collected and analyzed for only dioxin. Analytical data reported no 2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin. The high concentrations of naphthalene, methyl naphthalene, and phenanthrene as identified in the lagoon and tar samples are expected since these compounds are widely used in wood preserving/creosote industry. 4.2.3 Results of Groundwater Samples Eight (8) water samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs and BNAs. Sample locations are shown in Figure 3 and the summary of the analytical data is presented in Tables 11 and 12 . The results of the water quality analyses are summarized below. Table 3 presents a list of contaminants from the Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC), which were analyzed for at the American Creosote Site. The specific values presented in Table 3 are for protection of aquatic life, and drinking water from an ambient source. Concentrations of benzene were reported in WA1, WB1, WC2, and WD2 at 1060 ug/1, 376 ug/1, 95.0 ug/1, and 44.2 ug/1, respectively. These levels are in excess of the U.S. EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 ug/1, but below AWQC of 5300 ug/1. No benzene was detected in WD5, WD6, and WE1. Trichloroethene was found in WA1 at 42.0 ug/1 and in WC2 at 43.0 ug/1, both are above the MCL of 5.0 ug/1. Methylene chloride was identified at 469.0 ug/1 in WC2, at 235.0 ug/1 in WD2; and at 187.0 ug/1 in WB1; all of which are well below 35,000 ug/1 of the Suggested No Adverse Response Level (SNARL) and AWQC of 193,000 ug/1. Toluene concentrations were found at 2270 ug/1 in WA1 and 457.0 ug/1 in WB1, both are below the Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level (RMCL) of 2000 ug/1 and AWQC of 17,5000 ug/1. Ethyl benzene was also detected below the applicable environmental criteria. 4-25 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE •^ -) TABLE 11. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS Water sample concentrations in (ug/L) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Well Point # WA1 WB1 WC1 WC2 UD2 WD5 WD6 WE1 Parameter ID 7972 7971 7970 7973 7976 7977 7975 ^ ^- METHYLENE CHLORIDE 105.0 187.0 (4.1) 469.0 235.0 93.0 38.0 qs BROMODICHLORO- \i) METHANE* 268.0 179.0 ND 214.0 21.4 52.6 ND 10. 7 TRICHLOROETHENE 42.0 ND ND 43.0 ND ND ND ND, ? BENZENE 1060.0 376.0 2.84 95.0 44.2 ND ND ND. TOLUENE 2270.0 457.0 (3.54) ND 70.4 23.5 ND 8^ ETHYL BENZENE 566.0 459.0 (4.4) 149.0 49.4 29.4 ND ND^ CHLOROBENZENE ND ND ND ND 44.5 ND ND ND 1,2 DICHLOROETHANE ND ND ND ND 36.0 ND ND ND DETECTION LIMIT 222 22222 * Bromodichloromethane out of 10% control limits. () denotes approximate values between the detection limit and the quantification limit^ 4-26 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE TABLE 12. BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSES Water sample concentrations in (ug/L) AMERICAN CREOSOTE FACILITY Sampled WB1 WC1 UC2 UD2 UD5 UE1 Blank Blank Parameter ID » 7971 7970 7973 7976 7977 7974 1428A 1428B NAPHTHALENE 35,100 (42.0) 90.2 7,040 18.300 ND NO NO 2-METHYLMAPHTHALENE 6,430 ND (12.0) 859 4,660 N0 ND ND 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 3,150 N0 169 ND 2,520 ND ND NO 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 1,050 ND ND ND 2,840 ND NO ND 2,3-DIHETHYLNAPHTHALENE 781 ND N0 ND 1,880 ND ND NO ACENAPHTHALENE ND ND ND ND 802 ND ND ND ACENAPHTHENE 6,240 123 454 (533) 8,160 ND ND NO FLUORENE 7,370 ND (468) 7,690 ND N0 72 NO PENTACHLOROPHENOL ND ND ND ND N0 ND ND NO PHENANTHRENE 21,800 42.4 172 960 19,700 N0 ND NO ANTHRACENE 3,750 ND ND (304) 3,540 ND ND NO FLUORANTHENE 8,830 ND (33.0) (356) 10,600 ND ND ND PYRENE 5,500 ND (30.6) (287) 7,540 ND ND NO BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE (1,310) 11.3 (16.6) (64) 1,310 N0 NO ND CHRYSCNE (1,280) ND (72) 1.190 1,190 ND 13.9 NO BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE (626) N0 79.0 ND (515) N0 ND ND BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE N0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND BENZO(A)PYRENE (356) ND ND N0 (313) ND NO ND INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE NP ND ND ND ND ND ND NO DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE ND ND ND N0 ND N0 NO NO BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND DETECTION LIMIT 860 10 10 133 100 10 10 10 NO • Denotes not detected. ( ) • Denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification and is considered approximate. 4-27 •) ••) The highest concentrations of BNAs were reported in WB1 and WD5. Minor amounts of BNAs were found in WC1 and WC2. No BNA was detected in WE1. Naphthalene was identified at 35,100 ug/1 in WB1, at 7040 ug/1 in WD2, and at 18,300 ug/1 in WD5, all in excess of AWQC of 2300 ug/1. Acenaphthene was also detected above the AWQC of 1700 ug/1 in WB1 (6240 ug/1) and WD5 (8160 ug/1). Chemical results suggest that there is an impact on groundwater quality beneath the American Creosote Site. Levels of benzene, trichloroethene, naphthalene, and acenaphthene in the groundwater have exceeded applicable Federal Environmental guidelines. 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The overall objective of the project was to determine the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the site. The field work included the installation and sampling of 15 soil borings and 8 well points, collection of samples in the surface tar areas, and collection of core samples from the settling lagoon. The surface and subsurface geology was documented in detail at each boring and sampling location. The main unit in the area is a tan, fine to medium grained, well rounded, poorly sorted sand. This unit is often mixed with varying amounts of fill material, black tar, and wood chips. In general, the groundwater flow direction is north toward Creosote Creek. The groundwater flow velocity was determined to be 0.90 ft/day or approximately 328 feet per year. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOC's and BNA*s. The most prominent VOC*s were benzene and trichloroethene. Lesser amounts of methylene chloride, toluene, and ethyl benzene were also detected. The most prevalent BNA compounds were naphthalene and acenaphthene. These chemical results indicate that the operation of the American Creosote facility has significantly, altered the local groundwater chemistry.. The levels of trichloroethene, benzene, naphthalene, and acenaphthene all exceed the applicable federal guidelines. The analytical data and field observations indicate extensive soil contamination at the site. Soil samples taken from the borings were analyzed for BNA's and total phenolics. The most common soil contaminants were napththalene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and acenaphthene. The highest concentrations were found in borings WA1, A2, A5, WB1, C4, and WD2 which are all located in the tar drippings or suspected tar pit areas. Napththalene and 2-methyl naphtha!ene, two compounds commonly used in wood preserving processes, were the most prominent compounds found in the settling lagoon sludge. Naphthalene, 2 methylnapththalene, and phenanthrene were also the primary compounds detected in the tar pit samples. The aerial extent of the soil contamination was determined by surface and soil boring observations. There are two general areas of contamination; the area east of drainage ditch 3 associated with suspect tarpit 1, suspect tarpit 2, and the surface tar area, and the area west of drainage ditch 2 associated with suspect tarpit 3 and the tar dripping area. There is also a small but heavily contaminated area immediately surrounding the 5-1 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE settling lagoon. The volume of the contaminated material in the various areas of the site is listed in Table 2. The volume of the heavily contaminated material west of drainage ditch 2 is 5646 yd- and the volume of the lightly contaminated material west of drainage ditch 2 is 7529 yd3. The volume of the heavily contaminated material east of drainage ditch 3 is 15550 yd0 and that of the lightly contaminated material Is 20836. The volume of the contaminated material in the lagoon is 245 yd3. These results yield a total volume of contaminated material for the site of 49806 yd3. Due to the large volume of contaminated material present at the site, on site treatment or site encapsulation would appear to be viable remedial options. These options include incineration, biodegradation, surface seating and capping, and construction of slurry walls. It must be noted however, that the data generated by this investigation is limited and that a more detailed hydrogeologic and geotechnical investigations, including cost benefit analyses must be completed before a final decision is made. 5-2 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE '5 :) 6.0 REFERENCES Autodesk, Inc., 1986. AutoCAD Reference Manual. AutoCAD, Inc., Sausallto, CA 94965. Compton, H.» 1987. Memorandum - American Creosote Preliminary Report. To: Jim Staves, O.S.C., EPA Region VI. Burchette, C., 1987. Final Report - American Creosote Site, Winnfield, LA. EPA Work Assignment No. 0-54, EPA Contract No. 68-03-3482, Roy F. Weston, Inc., Work Order No. 3347-01-01-1054. Snead, J.I., and McCuTloh, P.P., 1984. Geologic Map of Louisiana. Louisiana State Geological Survey. Todd, P.K., 1980. Groundwater Hydrology, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, and Singapore. Kimbroug, Renate etal. 1985: Health Implications of 2.3,7,8-TCDD Contamination of Residential Soils, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta. 6-1 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE APPENDIX A EPA Assignor: ^^^^^ C^^ Work Assignment No. ^^<^V \W\ Date of Field Activity:\^^^^^ \^ Prepared by: ^^^ ^^\^w Original Safety Plan: Yes __ No _ Modification No. ______^Y Site Name: ^S?^MA-^ Vs^u;^.<. \s^*^'&^A. t1^ ——————————————————~\——————————————~ ^ Site Address: Street No. ______c.. Q^y V^^^^^S^______0 :^--:^"'0 County Vs^v-^^ X c^s^v^______<^> State \^v>^^^^______^p rode _____ Site Contact: ______Phone^^^^^ '^»-'C>\\- Directtons to Site: ^•^\^< s^^^\<^s\£^^\< ^^\-'\<^\-^k^ ———————————————————————COPIED FRON POORQUAUTY / Map Attached: Yes _ No ^ Site History: \s'^.^ \'^<-'>\\-sc^ ^^^•»^\^^^\v^^ '^W.^ . ^^^<»«<^ \^ "\^\^^^ \^<^3^<^ ^^^^v^ ^^V^^^^S^Q ''-^^^-^NV.^S^ Q^O<^^ nii^t^rn.PHYSICAL DESCRIPTIONm.J\»i\^r l *un \ • \ Size of Site:^"^."^SJ ^ Terrain: ^^^ ^^eathcr: V^s^^. ^«i&^^ \^ws^^i>y.^ v^ rd/H&S-FORM ^ ^W»o^ ^^-"^^ ^^^!^^i*^^^A ^^ <^R.t<\<\< ______VS^^K ^y>^^v M>?c<. Instruments TLV I.D.L.H. Source/Quantity Route of Symptoms of Used to Monitor Contaminant fPPM) (PPM) Characteristics Exoosure, Acute E^ppsurg Cpntaminant \J«^^< ] V-^^T^K^ \^ ^^^ ^\^^c^ ^^^.^ '\.\tv^vats \\> ' \^ ' \0^ \A»\< 0^ N . ^ .,_- ^. \' \ ^^^ft^»^^\^'»» r" Njb^^s^. - \^0 \^ ^sw^?<^^o< YJ$^\^Vv^ Q C -^ €f Os^, ^S^A ^\^\< <3^^- rd/H&S-FORM PHYSICAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN Hazard Description locaiijia Applicable Precautions ^S^SsMiNi.S^te^1'^ %^>^\&^^y^ ^^ttifr ^^^<^<0^t^< \ ^^fc ^'^^^ ''\^ ^0^s> . ^ \»^<^N;«^K (M^V^Vt^ \<<^ 0^^^^ V^^^ ^T^^ ^s^^^ . ^Ssc»s«s S,^ C^^^'^K Ni^^^t^ \^A.\v.^ <^ \^^^ , \^a>»<.-<«.'!>s» . (J^\^\\ ^s^^^lS^^ f\ \ \ VJWSO^tsi,^ - G^ ^^ 'SOW^VV^ rd/H&S-FORM ACTIONS TAKEN ON SITE: Was Entry Made: Yes _ No _ Equipment Used: (Circle) Level A B C D Why: SCBA __ APR __ Model __ Cart./Can. Type __ Tyvek _ Poly Tyvek __ Saran Tyvek ^__ Acid Suit __ Rain Gear __ Cotton Coveralls __ Gloves: Inner __ Butyl __ Nitrile __ Viton __ Other Foot Gear: Safety Shoes __ Outer Boots __ Booties __ Other Description of Decontamination Used: * AIR MONITORING Performed bv: © • Instrument Readings: CGI/Og Rad Meter OVA Other Background ______Site Location: ______Site Location: ______Site Location: ______Site Location: ______Wind: Speed__ Direction__ Temp.__ Rel. Hum.__ B.P.__ Summarize Air Monitoring Data ______ rd/H&S-FORM SAMPLING Performed by: Sampling Plan (Y or N) No. of Samples: Solid Liquid __ Gas Other Laboratory: Has Lab Been Notified of Potential Hazard Level? Yes __ No Analyses: -^ ^--.- - Sampling Comments: DOCUMENTATION Performed by: Type: Photo __ Log Book _ Recorder __ Video PUBLIC IMPACT Distance to Nearest: Residence __ School _ Hospital Public Building Other Evacuation: Yes __ No __ Number _ By Whom: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Nearest Waterway: ______Distance: Condition Observed Potential Surface Water Contamination Ground Water Contamination Drinking Water Contamination Air Contamination Soli Contamination Stressed Vegetation PERSONNEL (Name and Phone, On or Off-Site) Site Manager: \^^'v \^c\ rd/H&S-FORM EMERGENCY INFORMATION Emergency Phone Numbers: Location Phone Notified (Y/N) Contact Fire ^^\^b V^^VV^VY______police ^^ ^ C§<^\^&^. -S\V^ - ^^\ Ambulance V^^^^^^^ ^- ^\\______^__ Hospital '^^^^^^^ \\V^VYOK\ ^C^V:}^ Nearest Phone V^^^ ^^< ^\V(Q>V^S\\______^ DIRECTIONS TO HOSPITAL: \^»^-^< ^^ ^^ <^.^^ . ^\ ^^ (ATTACH MAP) .^ , sV.^^ , ^^ ^ ^\o\ ^ \o^ •^Yo^^V^^'1-^\^ ^oC\ ^yJ^.\^^\^ \\^<^ \^^«\ \^^t^\^\ , (^\^< ^ ^^-N^ A \ ^—————< ^ ^ ) \—\—\——\ "-* ^ 'S*\\St—^———«. • Ys&y^\o\ \.s cK^.\^y^^\ rd/H&S-FORM APPENDIX B SOIL BOKENG LOGS ") ^^ ) AMERICAN CREOSOTE WQ M« . 1054 Borina No.: M/e^L-^.i Boring Cowrt^ MTMR t-Q DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLSAIV ~ »- 6.0-8.0 CH DftRK GRAX snax cuff NCXIE B-aassscK SOIL SAT. W/ BLACK CRE. 'AND OIL. STRONG ' ODOR ———»- """ * 8.0-8.5 FW MED. GFN, WELL END, MOD SRT SMC UNCONSOL. SAND CRE ODOR , TOIAL DEPTH 8.5 ft. 10. *7979 A SOIL • 7972 A, B, & C H^O II. • K 16. »•. L • f 20 •) 0^^ aMRRTFAN CTECSOTE W,0. No,: 1054 Boring No.; .A2 Boring Contr.; l.wtloni SEE MAP Boring Method: HEAVER HAND AUGER PKw; Qfi.A2 FT. n.»,,m- 100 FT. MOT. —g™ "vsruArM HAINAN Ditt ftfrt; lil-/3/87 Tlm*' R^ri P»p KEN TYSQN n*<« ebtteh 11/3/87 Tim*' Surtec« Condition: Qroundwfr Dwth: N0 WftTER———————— t DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS Mc CONTAM.x ' ^ UC END PEBBLES < ' ( 1.0-2.0 GC ClAX - SAND - GRWEL MIXTURE——• • NCUE FILL MATERIAL - OS1 - 2.0-3?0' GC CUff - SfiND - GRAVEL MIXTURE ; NGNE CTE CSX3S. < •> 3.0-4.0 GW CBS GBN GRAVEL : 7980-C FILL MATERIAL SAT < "> 4 SOIL W/ CRE . TC?TAL EEETH 4.0 FT. (. » — 8. 10. . • 11. • I*. . 16- »». « 20 D»^4. AMERICMI CTECSOTEL W.O. No.: 1054 Boring No.: A3 Boftno Contr.; NT-ME Location: Boring Mthod: BE&VER HflND MJGER El«v«: ? ? Datum: 100 FT- DrUtT. VPN TVWIWM Hai^MJ 0«t« Start: 11/3/87 Tinw FWd R«p. KEM lYSCH Oaf Floteh 11/1/87 Tinw Surtec* Condttion: Qroundwter 0«pth: NQ WfiTER SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS DEPTH SYM8OL FIELD DESCRIPTION HEC. 0 CONTAM. 0.0-2.0 SW i CLEAN ^L SRT SAND ^^ - C3 2.0-3.:1^J SW •CRS GOS, VEIL WD, fUUKLY b^' " 7981 A LKWK V11L WQSS^ r SAND W/ WOOD CHIPS SOIL CBE ODOR ° <2- •rarftL DEPTH 3.0 FIO? *^ • 6. „• 8. 10. • 11. • 1^. • 16' r. . • »• « 20 ;) ••"^ aMP-grCMi CREOSOTE W,0,No: ., 1054,—.. .Bering No: A4 Boring Contr.: —NfTff; l,(Wtlnn: SEE, MAP Boring Mthod: HEWER HAND AUGER Pl«u. ? BBtum' 100 FT. OriNor. OT-M TvsrM/*prM HypraN n.refrf. 11/3/87 Tim.. FWd Rep. KEM TySCM »•«• BLnt^i 11/3/87 Tim*' Surtec* Condition: Groundwtf Depth: .-NQ HaiER, „ „ MODE/ DEPTH SYMB)OL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE ncc. REMARKS CONTAM. (sV SANDY GRAVEL ' • CLEAN ^ 1.0-4.0 CES GEN, WELL RTO, POOBIX - LAGOCN Hll c 3"^ SRT SANEK GRAVEL W/ CRE MAIERIAL'- CRE c^ 2. SAT WOOD CHIPS •SAT ^ ' C3> 7982 A 6. „• 8. 10. • 11. • ft c — 14. 16- i r. f 20 1054 Rorina Na • A5- Profct AMERICAN CREOSOTE W •V*O I^V«Na«* — ?EE MAP Boring Cont?.! Boring Mlhod: BEAVER HAND AUGER El«v»: .. ? Datum- 100 FT. 11/3/87 DrU»T TfgM TVa-M/Ty^ H&TT-MJ D«f Start: PtoM n«p. KEN TYSCM DtfRnteh 11/3/87 QroundwaUfDwth;-l£UiilftTFB———————————- SYMBIOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS OEPTH nec. 0 CGNTAM. ^- ' ).0-0.5 Gfc> •FnxrwsEsnz——-- 0.5-3.0 ^ MED GBH, WEU. ?0, FUUHl^ SAT—— • • ^KE SKI 0 GRAVEL r- 2. c> "" ^ '7983 A <^ son. •—————4^- TCTEAL EEPIH 3.0 FT. 4. " • 6. 8. 10. • 11. • K 16. 18. ; » - 20 Project: AMERICAN CREOSOTE W.O. No.: 1054 Boring No.: ;-6 Boring Contr.: NTNF- Locitlon: SEE MftP Boring Mwthod: BEAVER HAND AUGER El«v.: ____2- , D»tum: 100 FT. DriUT ——if™ "vgrM/'rrM Him^N Oaf Start: n/Vfl7 Tlm»: FWd R«p. KEN TYSQN Date FIntoh 11/3/87 Tiw: Surfcc* Condition: Qroundwafr 0»pth: ^o WKTER DEPTH SYME10L FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS -^ • REC. 0 CONW.x 0.0-1.0 GP CBS GBN, iai iUU, RXM ^Rf ; i GRAVEL ; CLEAN to SANDY CLAY 'J* 1.0-7.5 SC EH GRM, WELL WD, POORLY SRT • 2. SANTO CLAY UNIT - CLEAN ^ 6. ,7984 A - SOIL 8. 10. • 11. • I*. 16- l». .. - » 20 i Or^- AMERICAN CREOSOTE WO No- 1054 . Varina Na • WELL I Raring Cantr.; WNE (rAWtinn; „ ••rina Uthfwt- BEAVER HAND AUGER Ffv.. 93 .91 patum; 100 FT. nriu^ WM -waru/TVM HATTAM n.r start! 11/3/87 Tlm»i Rid B^ KEN TYSCM D«f Hntah 11/3/87 T«I»»! fiuftee« CandHian; .„. Groundwtf 0«pth: —L -»«; DEPTH SYMISOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS REC. 0 OONTAM.s '''^C^ ! ( SOT GRAVEL ; CLEAN F ^ ' - r- 2. C5 c> i> 4. - 5.0-7.0 CT' CRS GEM, SUB HND,POQRLSf 7973A, "SEKn TAR SORTED GRAVEL B,C SLUDGE 6. • H^O 7985 B son, . TOI!AL EEPTH 7.0 FR; 8. 10. • 11. • I*. 16- l». .. - « 20 Pr^f ftMERICAN CREOSOTE W.O. NO.; , 1054 Boring No.: CO BoringContr.: NTNK LocctiOfl: SEE MftP B^i^, M«Mww«. BEAVER HAND AUGER Erv.: ——2iJfl— . Dttum: 100 FT- OriNw: iffN TysfM/nrM HAT*raN D.fSfrt: JJ^L TIfTW FWd R«p. KEN TySQH Tlm»; Surfac* Condition: Qroundwafr D«pth: .NO MKEER DEPTH OL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS SYMB HKC. 0 s, OCMTAM. 5"o"oT! % ' 0.8-3.( SP TAN, MED GFN, SUB BND, . NCNE . CLEAN 1,- MOD SRT SAND' • 2. 3.0-8.: SL •TAN, MED TO EH (SUN, SUB K®. ' NONE • CLKAN————————IT- POORLY SORTED SAND 4. : 6. 8. (.3-9.0 iP LIGHT TAN, MED GFN, SUB KND SAM CLEAN TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. 10. • 11, « 14. 16. r. . « 20 a^i. RMRRTCMI CREOSOTE W.O.NO.: 1()54 Boring No.: Cl Boring Conto.s Looetton: SEE MM* Boring Mthod: HEAVER HAND AUGER Etev.: ____? , Datum: 100 FT. OriMf: OTM TVsrM/nrM HyrpaN D«t» Start: 13/4/87 TInw gi^ri B>p KEN TYSCN D«t« Rntoh '''l^/«7 Tlm«: Surfw Condition: QroundwtT Dtpth: ,7t^ i DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS ^ 0 COOT-AM. T, • i \ TiTW1 ( 0 ).8-3.0" SM EN GEN, WELL BND, POORLY SRT, " • NONE • CLEAN C SILTY SAND 3.0-5.3 iP MED GBM, WELL RID, MX) SOT NCNE CLEAN *. SAND ' >.3-6.0 3C MED GEN, SUBANG CLAY RICH SAND NONE CLEAN S.o-9.^' GRW, MED GFM. StbANGULAR, FAIMT ODOR OP POORLY SRT SAND CRE - • 8. i— 5P LO-li.; GRAY, IRCN STAINED, MED GFM, 7970 STRCMG ODOR OF CRE SUBfiNGUIAR, WELL SRT SAND 10. . ' '.... 2. 11. • 'TOTAL DEPTH 11.3 FT. M- . 16- l». . « ^ 9 20 B^t. AMRRTCAN CREOSOTE W.O.NO.: J^i •orino No.: WELL C2 l^..«»^. SEE MftP H^^ U^h^. BEfiVER HAND AUGER El»v.: Q7-47 , Otum: - 100 FT. OniM: —CT-M wgrM/nrM H&'praM Of Start: 11/4/87 , Tkif! CL^ B«p KEN TySCN DateFlnteh 11/4/87 TImo: Suftac* Condition: - Qroundwtor D^th: —5-22- OEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS „- REC. 0 OCM'EAM.x ^ 0.0-1.0 CL SILTY CLM , q^ • 'NONE-' 1.0-2.0 OL HUMUS RICH SfiNEY CLKi - CLh-AN - r- 2 c? 2.0-4.5 SP TAN, MED CRN, SUBFUD, WEUi ; NONE CI£AN o SRI SAND © <. 4.5-6.0 SP TAN, MED (3X1, SUBKND, NCKE CLEAN———————— WEUi SRT SAND * 6.0-6.5 SM GRAY, FN GBN, POORLY SRT SAND NCNE 'CLEAN ,CLEAN 6.5-8.Q < SP GRAY, 'VERY FN GRN, WELL RMD, .NCKE •—' PCORLY SPT, CLAY RICH SAND „-„.,—»- DARK GRAY, MED TO FN GRN, WELL . 79g3~A7 cim^E uuuk— 8.0-9.0 SP w r^ SRT SAND, WET .^ TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT. 10. . • 11. • K . 16. 1B. ; # 20 B^^t. aMRRTFMJ CREOSOTE W.O.No.; .1054 Poring Np-: C-3 Borinfl Contf.s NfHK SEE MAP Boring Mlhod: BEWER HAND AUGER ^. 92.72 Datum: 100 FT. OriUT. —OTM 'rvgrNy*rrM Ha'praN D«t« Stert: 11/4/87 Tinw- PfaM H>p KEN TYSCN 0«f Rnteh 11/4/87 Tinw Surtec« Condition: Qroundwti»r Otpth: NO MBIER DEPTH SYMI»OL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS ! REC. I 0 OOMTAM.3; ! 0.0-l.C aL HUMUS RICH TOP SOIL ; NCNE CLEAN ^^ .—————————————^^, 1.0-5.C 3W (SKX, CRS GUN, SUBHND, POORLZ - TAR SAT - ^ 2. SRT SAND W/PEBBLES C5 €5 C5 4. - >.0-8.0 3M GBBY, MEU. URN, SUBANGULAR, ' NWE •CLI^AN——————————— POOKLr SRT SAND 6. ———I- ' 'TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FT; 10. • 11. • K 16- I». ; « 20 a.^*. &MRRTPM1 CREOSOTE W.O. No.: 1054 Boring No.: C-4 Boring Contr.: NTNR l^M^. SEE MAP Boring Mthod: HEAVER HflND AUGER Ekv.; Qa-^ , 0«tum; -100 FT. onNT. —Km-DacuAouamM. DifStert 11/4/87 TInw Bl^rf ft^p. KEN TYSCN D.f Flnt»h 11/4/87 Tlm»: Sunw Condition: GroundwtT Ofpth: DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE ^^OOE/ REMARKS ' COWTAM.x wc' SC SANCK TOP SOIL „ - .. , NCNE —————^4-dEan 1^ < ^ L.0-4.5 SM GBKS, VSED TO EN GEN, SUBfiNG, NONE - dEBN 1- 2. POOKLy SBT SM1D 0 p 4. 4.5-5.0' ac GRff, VETO 1:11 UyN SIL'i'X CLAX -NUNE 5.0-12.1 a. DARK GRft^ VETO 511 GCT1, WfcILL 7991 A —— CLUMffi W Om CTE— END, POORLT SKT, ClAX KTCH SBND soil 6. ' 8. 10. It • TOTAL EEPTH 12.0ft I*. 16. . It. • • " 9 • 20 W.O. No.: Boring No.: C5 - Boring Contr.: NaE Locfltion: Boring Method: BPA\TRP HANT> arrJ-p El«v.; ——Z Oltum: r^. KEN TySCMy*PCM HA3TON Daf Start 11/4/87 T(mr. R«k< Rep. CTTJ TvgrM D«f Fintett 11/4/87 Tlm»: Surl«c« Condition: Groundwfr D«pth: • . NO MKTER DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION MODE/ SAMPLE ftec. REMARKS 0 ^\ 0.0-1.0: QL DARK HUMUS TOP SOIL < NCNE ! CLEAN 5.0-6.0 SM GBftY, VETO EH GEN SIIJIY SftND NCNE CLEAN 6 6.0-12.( SC GBK£, VETO FH GFN, SUBAIK3, NONE CLEAN POOKLy SOBIED, CUff KI(B SftND • .'" 8. 10. . 11 • TOTAL DEPTH 12.0ft K 16. > 18. • « ^ ^ 20 i Brnj^t- AMERICAN CREOSOTE W.O.No.: - 1054 Boring No.: - C6 Bering Cantr.; NONE 1 ftftlft"" SEE MAP 7 Boring Mtthod- eEAVER HM^D AUGER P^y: D.tum- '100 FT. nriUf WTM "VtVTN/TYTM HATTAN D«t« Stfrt: 11/4/R7 Tlm«- FL>^ B«p. KEN TYSCN Oaf FInteh 11/4/87 TIm»- Surface CondHlan- - , Groundwtor Dtpth; „. NQ UftTEB——.-.,.. DEPTH SYMEiOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS /. ' REC. ... - - • - '^^-^"st ~ '. p r CONTW..T,' oTTCT 1% i W 1.0-12. GBPS, FtS GSSI, SUBANG, SUSS CIEAN r- SAND • 2. 4. • 6. 8. : 10. 7993 B 12 • SOIL TOTAL EEPTH 12.0 FT. I*. 16- »8. . • ' ' 20 1054 Projtcfc AMF-R-rqAN CREOSOTE W.O. NO.; Boring No.: .£.- C7 Boring Contr.: NTNR Location:. SEE MAP Boring M«thod: BEAVER HfiND M1GER Eley.: Dttum: 100 FT- DriMT —CT-N TygrN/^PTM wa-praM D«t« Start: TInr: FWd Rep. KEN TysCM Date FInM 11/4/B7 Tim«: Suri«c« Condition: Groundwtor D«pth: —ND waTT-R DEPTH SYME)OL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS ^^ NEC. 0 •» . • • OONTAM.x - ^T 0.0-0.8; ML SANTO TOPSOIL ; NONE ] TSS^S^^^^^^^r"' 0.8-3.0- SM ^ELLUW/T^ FN GRN, SUBR®, .NOKE .CLfcAN .•—————^ : POORLY SRT, SILTY SSND - 2. 3.0-12.1 yM YELLOW/TiW, FN GEN, SL^BRTO, NUML •CLt^AN—————————2- 4, POORLY SRT, CLAY RICH SAND 6. ^y-' 8. 10. • 12 • ''ruTAL lM»iU 12. U I:"!'. *• 1*- 16- 18. ^ 20 »^». &MPRTCAN CREOSOTE W.O.NO.: -l054- Boring No.: Dl Boring Contr.: —NtTff! t ~»,ny«' SEE MM? »^q u«Mu^. HEAVER HAND AUGER Elw.: 93.90————— Datum: _JLOO_FT_ OfMT —]sm-ssas/3au3£ax£iL 0«f Start 11/4/87———Tine: CW^ B«p KEN TYSCN Dato Rniih 11/4/87——— •nnc: Surtec* Cenattton: Qroiindwtf D^Xti: Nn MaTrr? DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS 'ftCC* 0 OOKTftM.x 0.0-4.5 i . T ' • r 2. ' 0 • 0 - 0 4. 4.5-6.^ SK GRAY, FN GRN, SUBANG, WELL SRT 7995 A CRE TAR SAND 'SOIL 6. 6.5-12. GRAY, FN GRN, SUBFND, OTE ODOR POORlY SRT, CLAX RICH SAND .—' 8. 10. 11 • TOTAL OEFIH 12.0 FT I*. 16. 18. - « 20 Dr«^ AMERICAN CREOSOTE w«^. 1054 Boring No.: IWT.T. [ •Aring &witr . ]^S l^tten. SEE MAP Bering Ulhari. BEAVER HAND ApGER Cl—.; qi-qs Datum; 100 ET. DdltoR ——WM "VRnJ/WM WATTAM D«f »»•**• 11/4/87 FWri R«p. KEN TYSCM nfn«teh 11/4/87 TInr; Stirtee* Candltifur * ..„ Qroundwtor 0«pth: JL.29 DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS ^ 0 KCC. 1 CONTAM.x ).0-3.0 iP ' MATERIAL ; , C-^ r-- 2. c^ 3.0-6.0 SM GRAY, FN GRN, SUBANG, ; NONE CRETAR • 4. POORLY SET, SIlaX SAND ; 6- 6.0-7.0 SM GRAY, FN GRN, SUBANG, POORLY "MOME 'BIACK TAR-T3YES— SRT, SILTY SAND ; 7.0-9.9: SM GRAY, FN GFN, SUBHND, POORLY STRCtIG CRE ODOR 8. SRT SILTY SAND 7976 'A.B.C H20 ———»s • T03aL DEPTH 9.9 FT. 11. •' I*. . 16- l». ; • 20 Pr^M. RMCTTCAN CREOSOTE W.O.No.: 1054 D3 Boring Contr.: NCMB Locrthm; SEE MAP Boring Mlhod: HEAVER HAND ADGER Etov.: .-... Datum' 100 fT, nriU^. CT-N TYSCN/TCM HMTfiN DcteStort: 11/4/87 TInw PtoM R«p KEN TySCN 11/4/87 TInr: Suitec« Condition: Groundwtof (tenth* DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS REC. 0 ^ 0.0-2.0: WOODCHIPS AND TAR ; caa»- qo (^ - r- L c? 2.0-3.0 FN GEN SILTy SAL-ID : dEAN <^ 3.0-3.5 BLACK TAR 4, TCTAL DEPTH = 3. 5 FT 6. 8. < 10. 11. • I*. • 16- »». ^ 20 D^^- &MF-RTCAN CREOSOTE W ^ M« • 1054 •«ring M^ . - D Boring Contr.: l^—M^f SEE MAP Boring Mthod: BEAVER HfiND ADGER Ft«w 99.21 n«*um; 100 FT. OriNw: —sQLJSSSSS^SSSSJasaSESL n...tt*^*. 11/4/87 TInr- PMri B«p KEN TYSCN B«t« BInhh 11/4/87 TInr' Surface Condition: - fir^ndmfr D*pth; MOWaTFy DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS KEC. 0 OONTAM.jS 0.0-3.0 SM GRBX, FN GFN, SUBRilD, POOELY ; CRETAIl^^ ss^T' SFT, Simy SAND GRADING INTO : yr- DARK GBK2, MED GBN, SUBmD, (^ POORIX SRT SAtID - 2. r- 0 o 3.0-12. VEKY FN GRN SIlaX CLAY ; 7997 A CRE RCCH <^> 4. SOIL t. 8. 10. IX • TOTAL DEPTH 12.0 FT. I*. 16- • l». ; f 20 a^-*- flMF-RICflN CREOSOTE WO No.: ,-1054 Boring No.: WELL £ Boring Contr.: Iwtfft"' SE]E MAP Boring Mlhod: HEAVER HAND MCER Pl.w.. 9^31. D«tnm. 100 ET. DriN^ ——JSESLSEWSaSJiSSSm. B.to Start- n/4/fi7—— Tl«- R^t B*p KEN TYSCN n.t. nnteh L1 /4/fl7 Tl«.. Suriw Condition: . Qroundwtf Dwtt): —Mn WATFT?. DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS MCC. 0 CONTAM.x 0.0-1.0: WOODCHIPS MIXED W/ SfiND ; NONE ] TSSSS^TiEnSSrS ^9- . 1.0-3.0" HE" GKff, VEH 3.0-6.0 sc GRftY-BLACK, VECT m GEN, ; NONE BLftCK TAR o i, MOD SRT, CLK2 RICH SBND •: - 6- 6.0-9.3 sc LIGHT GRAX, VERY m GRN, CRE ODOR MX) SRT, QJff RICH SffiND 7967 3 -- 8. - 50IL .7977 A, •• 'H^-> TOTAL DEPTH 9.25 FT. 10. - 11. •' I*. . 16. 18. ; * 20 0^4. &MRRTr»I CREOSOTE W.O. No.; :L054 Boring Nc -D •OffngContr.: _M1E- iEE MAP a^^, M«M^«. BEAVER HAND AUGER EftVi! ... i, Datum: 100 FT. OlWT ——TfT?M WgTM/TrM TWITON Dat* Start - n/^/R7 H^rf H«p. KEN TYSCM DatoFlninh 11/5/87 Surtec* Condition: Groundwtf Dwth:L.SR pr. DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS MEC. 0 •» CCNERM.x 0.0-2.5 SC SANEK TOP SOIL ; NONE ' TIEBN'"™*'""""^- ^ <3 (0 2. c^ 2.5-3.Q an POORTy SOT SILTY SAND NCNE CLEAN <•> 3.0-6.0 ML SILTY CLAY GRADING INTO tIcME TEEan—————^-" 4. HOMOGENEOUS YELLDW CLAY - < •CLEAN——————————— 6.0-7.0 d TAN SANDy CLAY NCNE CLEAN 7.0-9.0 Sf. MOITLED lid STAINED, VEB3T FN 7975 GRM, SUBRND, WELL SOT SAND B, C 8. • H^O 7969 A SOIL TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 PT. 10. , • II. • U. 16. r. L # • 20 Bm^f AMF-RICAN CREOSOTE W.O. No.: 1054 •Ortng No.: ^^ELL E; Borino Contra Location:. O^y Ito«w^. BEAVER HBMD MVSp Bw.: , Dtum: 100 FT- OrilT —g^ wgrM/nrM nwr^ Of Start: Tkno: CWri B«p. KEN TYSCM OrtoFinteh 11/5/87 Tln»: Surtec* Condition: Groundwfr 0«pth: AT GBOUHD LEVEI DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS RCC* 0 •» OCMTAM.x ^r\ ' ^ J <^ 2. C 3 2.5-3.5. ai GRAY, MED TO EN GFN, 74§4 OL^ ^ - SUBI^ID, WELL SR? SAND •^c 3.5-7AL OL DftEK GR?ff CLAY .CLEAN I 6. 7968 A SOIL TOT!BL EEPSH 7.0 ET. 8. 10. • 11. •' 1*- 16' • l»- ; * 20 Pmtaet- AMERICAN CREOSOTE 1054 p04 "—I—*— nuMpnf—— W.O.NO.; Boring No.: . lorinaContr.: """"_____ Location: SQ-^ BEAVER HAND AUGER 88.90_____ D,^; 100 ft. ^.inriM0 U«thrw4^^zsarT'TCTTEA'nm- BEAVER HAND ALA^- utW9f* Daf Start: 11/3/87 •nm«. ptoMR,p. KENTYSOK Dif FInteh ll/3/87 Tlm«; Surtoc* Condition: Groundwter D«pth: _ DEPTH SYMf30L FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS KEC. 0 0.0-0.5 ffl CREOSOTE TAR. ROOTS ; 7854 ' BLAC; TAR ^ . ^flP 0.5-2.2 : • c: 2- CREOSOTE TAR BLAC:;: TAR - TOTAL DBOTK 2.2 ftt: '"' '7854 A 0.5-1.1 <:: 4^ .7854 3 1.6-2.2 • 6. 8. , 10. • 11. •' I*. • s 16. 18. . » •»• f - 20 W.O.NO.: - 1054 Boring No.: P01 coring Contr.: MQNE Locfltion: SEE Map a—»__ tJ«thnd'. BEAVE'"^"''•t-'"R- HANntWiUALXJit..D AUGE,R El»v,:- 89 .09 DX.inv 100 ft. 11-3-87 ».„- ^®[Tys6^ / T(^ HZWIX5N Oaf Start Tinr. Date Finteh 11-3-87 Tim*: Surtec* Condition: Groundwto4rD*pth> •• DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS REC. 0 0.0-1.0: GP CREOSOTE TAR ; 7581 BLACK 'EKB. ^ . 1.0-2.5 CH S?JSIDy CLAY 1'On'LED T 2. wrm TAR OIL .NOEIE , TAR 0 ' - '' 0 ' 0 • 6. 8. 10. II. • I*. 16- 18- . » ^" f 20 Project: M^-rpTrAM rnrrY-rfTT' W.O- MB . lOf^ Boring ^Ip-; P02 igContr.; HaNE Lo^.n«n. Sm MAP burtnB Method: B^VER l^D AUGER Elev.: 89.4Q D.h.m. 1UO ft. mi Driller: '^^ / 'IW llATim DfllftSlnrl' 11-3-H/ •rim«' FIdd Re^-iJ"^. Dal« Finl.h 11-3-87 Tima; Suriace Condition: Groundwaler Depth: '- DEPTH SYM8OL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS 0 REC. ' '* ' 1 06-2.3 • SANEy CLKH MDTOLED WITH TAR OIL - . TKR STMM IN SANt^ ^ C5 2. '• 03 ^» ' ,* ' 'S.- ''S.-S, C^ • TOCAL EEETH 2.3 ^ " <"> 4. 7582 A 0.6-1.3 ft. 7582 B 1.7 - 2.2 ft - 6. ~ 9. 8. 10- " '. - II. • 1A. 16- 18. tf 20 ' Projccli aMEKCCRH CREOSOTE W.O. No.: 1054 Boring No.: P03 wing Contr.: NCE3E Location:-2IZLL2£. ^«>lM Mrt*Mw DEPTH SYMBOL FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE MODE/ REMARKS 0 REC. ^'^ D.0-0.7 TftR AND SLUDGE ' 7583 TAR "D < 3 L7-3^ - ( 3 < 3 ( TAR AMD RTinYy3 , ^Tj&C'i'' TPP c ' 7853 A 0.7-1.3 ^. . 7853 B 2.7-3.3 • TOTKL DEPTH 3.0 6. 8. • 10. • 11. • I*. 16- 18. - » ^ ^ 20 LAGOON SLUDGE SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS BL1 A POURABLE LIQUID OFF TOP BL1 C 2 in. CLAY LAYER OFF BOTTOM OF 2 ft. ACETATE CORE BL2 A 2 ft. OF POURABLE CORE BL2 B A/A BL2 C 6 in. CLAY CORE BL3 A POURABLE OFF TOP OF CORE BL3 C CLAY PLUG IN BOTTOM APPENDIX C TABLE OF SAMPLE TYPES AND LOCATIONS APPENDIX C TABLE OF SAMPLE TYPES AND LOCATIONS Sample No • Borina No. •Depth (ft) Location Soil Samples 7979 A1 9.0 NU of main building, W of RR Track 7980 A2 3.5 At NE corner of main building 7981 A3 3.0 NE of A2, E of RR Track 7982 A4 3.0 N of A4, W of RR Track 7983 A5 3.0 N of A 4, W of RR Track 7984 A6 7.5 NE of A5, H of RR Track, on side of Creosote Creek, near RR bridge . 7985 B1 7.0 E of A2, near drainage ditch 2 C3 7988 CO 10.5 Near main entrance 0 7986 Cl 11.27 NE of CO, near W side 7989 C2 9.0 NE of Cl, on E side of drainage ditch lc^> 7990 C3 10.0 E of C2, near confluence of drainage ditch 1 E and Creosote Creek 7991 C4 9.0 SE of C3, E of A4. near W side of drainage ditch 2 7992 C5 14.5 NE of C4, near confluence of drainage ditch 3 and Creosote Creek 7993 C6 12.0 E of C5, near S bank of Creosote Creek 7994 C7 12.9 E of C6, near S bank of Creosote Creek 7995 Dl 6.5 S of C5, E of building facility 7996 D2 10.0 S of Dl 7997 D4 9.0 SW of D3 7967 D5 9.0 SW of D4 7969 D6 9.0 E of D3 7968 El 8.5 SW of D5 7851 PI 1.0 S edge of Surface Tar Area 7852 P2 1.7 E of PI - Surface Tar Area 7853 P3 2.7 E of P2 - Surface Tar Area 7854 P4 1.6 Middle of Surface Tar Area Water Samples 7972 A1 N/A NU of main building, W of RR Track 7971 B1 N/A E of A2, near drainage ditch 2 7970 Cl N/A NE of CO, near W bank of drainage ditch 7973 C2 N/A NE of Cl. on E side of drainage ditch 1 7976 D2 N/A S of Dl 7977 D5 N/A SW of D4 7975 D6 N/A E of D3 7974 El N/A SW of D5 rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE \ ^ APPENDIX C (CONT'D) TABLE OF SAMPLE TYPES AND LOCATIONS Sample No. Boring No. Depth (ft) Location Lagoon Sludge Samples 7964 BL1 4* Southern most station on lagoon transect 7965 BL2 5.5* 25 ft. N of BL1 on transect 7966 BL3 4.5* 25 ft. N of BL2 on transect ^y *VOC analysis only C3 0 ff> C? rd:eh/TYSON/TR-CREOSOTE APPENDIX D SURVEY RESULTS ~) APEEKDIX D FIELD SUIWEy REDUCED DMA 11/5/87 Shot#2 I FromsS TPA To: BM Elevation:: 100.00 Elevations 100.00 Transit Hgt:: 0.000 Bearing To; NO dO '0 "E Base Bearing:: NOOdOO* 00* 'E Horiz Dists 100 Azimuth:2 OOdOM <« X Coord; 1000 0 i st ance Read:: 100.00 <« Y Coords 1000 Vertical Angle:; -OOdOO* Ns TPA TO BENCH MARK Rod Reading:: BENCH MARK...X & V for '1 P^r\ Shot#: 2 From:: TPA To: 1 J. Elevation:: /OO.OO Elevation: 99.2133487 Transit Hgt : 0.000 Bearing To: SlldO '0 »»£' Base Bearing : NOOdOO'00*'E Honz Dist: 17.1038197 (0 Azimuth ; 169d00' X Coord: 1003.£6356 0 Distance Read : 17.14 Y Coord s 983.2104c;5 (^ vertical Angle s - £d38* N: BY D4, EDGE OF SE TARPL- Rod Reading Shot#; 3 From s TPA To: £ Elevat ion s /OO.OO Elevation: 99.3256965 Transit Hgt s 0.000 Bearing To: Sl d51*0 *»W Base Bearingss NOOdOO* 00* 'E Horiz Dist: 96.585£9£3 Azimuth:s 181d5l* X Coord: 996.8819£5 D i st ance Read:; 96.59 Y Coord: 903.465051 vertical Angle:s -00d£4'" N: EDGE OF TAR PIT, 05 BCJRIh Rod Reading:s 1 Shot#; 4 From:s TPA To: 3 Elevation:: ( 00.00 Elevation: 99.47470243 Transit Hgt:: 0.000 Bearing To: S18dl3'u ' •'W Base Bearing:: N00d00» 00* *E Horiz Dists lc:a.98786u Azimuth:: 198dl3* X Coord: 959.676955 Distance Read:: l£fl.99 Y Coords 877.476857 Vertical Angle:s -00dl41 N: EDGE OF TARPIT, NEAR CLE(- Rod Readingss Shot#: 5 From:; TPA To: 4 Elevation:: 100.00 Elevation: 101.369489 Transit Hgts: 0.000 Bearing To: S54d47'0 '^W Base Bear ing:: NOOdOO' 00'»E Horiz Dist: £04.690837 Azimuth:; £34d47* X Coord: 83£.77££37 Distance Read:: £04.7 Y Coord: 881.96096£ vertical Angless +00d£3* Ns SAME AS STA 3 Rod Reading: Shot#s 6 From: TPA To: 5 Elevat ion: 100.00 Elevat ion: 99.5863119 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S69d40* 0 ''M Base Bearing: NOOdOO* 00''E Horiz Dists 177.769037 Azimuth: £49d40» X Coord s 833.308288 Distance Reads 177.77 Y Coords 938.££8614 Vertical Angles -OOdOB* Ns S.G.30, ON EDGE OF TARPIT Rod Readings APPENDIX D FIELD SURVEY REDUCED DMA (CONT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#: 7 From; TPA To: 6 Elevation; 100.00 E1evat i on s 99.3462906 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To; S78d£ '»0 ' •'W Base Bearing: NOOdOO' 00''E Horiz Dist: 224.728098 Azimuth: 258d02' X Coord: 780.155609 Dist ance Read: 224.73 Y Coord: 953.404267 Vertical Angle: -OOdIO1 N: TOP OF DEEP DITCH, EAST ED Rod Reading: A Shot #; 8 From: TPA To: 7 Elevation; 100.00 Elevation: 100.510107 ''•- Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N62d48'0 » •• WO) Base Bearing: NOOdOO'00*'E Horiz Dist: 125.257922 <;> Azimuth: 297dl2» X Coord; 888.593566 Distance Reads 125.26 Y Coord: 1057.25516 vertical Angle: +00dl4' N; TOP OF E EDGE, DEEP DI^CH Rod Readings Shot#: 9 Froms TPA To: 8 Elevat ion: 100.00 Elevation: 99.8910770 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To: N50d59* 0 »'W Base Bearing: NOOdOO' 00''E Horiz Dist: 74.8898415 Azimuth 309d01' X Coord: 941.813371 Distance Read 74.89 Y Coord: 1047.14662 vertical Angle -00d05* N: NW CORNER OF SE TARPIT Rod Reading Shot#: 10 From TPA To; 9 Elevation 100.00 Elevat ion: 99.9718682 Transit Hgt 0.000 Bearing To: Sl d39'0 ' •'W Base Bearing NOOdOO'00*'E Horiz Dist: 96.7099918 Azimuth 181d39» X Coord: 997.215343 D i st ance Read s 96.71 Y Coords 903.330107 vertical Angles -OOdOP N: WELL CASING D5 Rod Reading: Shot#: 11 From: TPA To: 10 Elevation: 100.00 Elevat ion: 97.2245958 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S42d39'0 ' •' E Base Bearing: NOOdOO* 00'* E Horiz Dist: 39.8567360 Azimuth: l37d21» X Coord: 1027.00365 Distance Read: 40. 05 Y Coord: 970.685122 Vertical Angles -03d59» N: TAR DISCHARGE FROM SE PIT Rod Reading: Shot#: 12 From: TPA To: 11 Elevations 100.00 Elevation: 94.0024583 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S48dl2*0 * •'E Base Bearing: NOOdOO* 00'* E Horiz Dist: 54.7631623 Azimuths 131d48* X Coord: 1040.82461 Distance Read: 55.42 Y Coord: 963.498570 Vertical Angles -06dl5' N: SAME AS STA 10 Rod Read i ng s APPENDIX D FIELD SUIWEY REDCCED EftTA (CCOT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#: 13 From: TPA To: 12 Elevations 100.00 Elevation: 92.3734336 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S55d1 ' 0 " E Base Bearing: NOOdOO* 00''E Horiz Dist: 144.718083 Azimuth: 124d59' X Coord: 1118.57025 D i stance Read: 145.IS Y Coord: 917.027606 Vertical Angle: -03d01' N: CORNER OF DISCHARGE Rod Reading: Shot#: 14 From: TPA To: 13 Elevations 100.00 Elevat ion: 92.6038959 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S57d27' 0 " E Shot#: 15 From: TPA To: 14 Elevation: 100.00 Elevat ions 93.5101267 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S58dl2*0 ''E Base Bearing: NOOdOO* 00'* E Horiz Dist: 77.8288322 Azimuth: 121d48' X Coords 1066.14615 D i st ance Read: 78.37 Y Coord: 958.987639 Vertical Angle: -04d46' Ns SAME AS STA 13 Rod Reading: Shc.t#; 16 From; TPA To; 15 Elevat ion: 100.00 Elevation: 96.7285002 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: N83dll'0 ' 'E Base Bearing: NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dist: 41.1096545 Azimuth: 083d11' X Coord s 1040.81905 D i st ance Read: 41.37 Y Coord: 1004.87941 Vertical Angle: -04d33' N: SAME AS STA 13, WDCP AREA Rod Reading: Shot#: 17 From: TPA To: 16 Elevat ion: 100.00 Elevation: 96.23^8847 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: N60d9'0''E Base Bear ing: NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dist: 71.8426786 Azimuth: 060d09' X Coord: 1062.31141 D i st ance Read: 72.04 Y Coord: 1035.75832 Vertical Angle: -03d00' N: EDGE OF FILL AREA Rod Reading: Shot#: 18 From: TPA To; 17 E1evat i on: 100.00 Elevat ion: 94.2826715 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To; N44d20'0 ' •• E Base Bearing: NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dist; Ibcf. 368681 Azimuth: 044d20' X Coord: 1113.46835 D i st ance Read: 162.57 Y Coord: 1116.140U9 Vertical Angle; -02d0l' N: EDGE OP LOWER TAR PIT Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIEIC SURVEY REDUCED DMA (OCMT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#; 19 Froms TPA Tos 18 Elevat ions 100.00 blevations 94. l689lt;6 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N44d£8'0 ' ' &. Base Bearings NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dists ibi-saysiuu Azimuths 044d£8' X Coord s 1113.l9£56 Distance Reads 161.S V Coords 1115.31971 Vertical Angle: -0£d04' Ns WELL CASING D 2-3 Rod Readings Shot#s 20 Froms TPA Tos 19 Elevations 100.00 Elevations 93.90£66bB Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N30d42"' 0' ' E Base Bearings NOOdOO* 00* * E Horiz Dists £55.574533 Azimuths 030d4£' X Coord s 1130.48177 D i st ance Read s £55.72 Y Coord s 1£19.75634 Vertical Angles -Old££' Ns BOREHOLE D-l-2, WATER D&M- Rod Readings 0 Shot#s £1 From s TPA Tos 20 Elevations 100.00 Elevat ions 100.939318 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N17d7'0"E Base Bearings NOOdOO* 00'* E Horiz Dists £93.556994 Azimuths 017d07* X Coords 1086.399£1 D i st ance Read s £93.56 Y Coords 1£BO. 554b<-» Vertical Angle: +00dll' Ns E EDGE DITCH, AT WUUDS Rod Readings 0 Shot#; ££ From: TPA Tos 21 Elevat ions 100.00 E1evation s 95.£991^31 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N9d5£'0' ' E Base Bearings NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dists 138.u6994a Azimuths 009d52' X Coords 10£3.65911 Distance Reads 138.£3 Y Coord s 1136.02776 Vertical Angles -Old57' Ns S.G. R 38 Rod Readings 0 Shot#s £3 Froms TPA Tos ££ Elevat ions 100.00 Elevations 96.99044/a Transit Hgt s 0.000 Bearing To; N10d31'0 ' 'W Base Bearing NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dists 1£4.6£73£4 Azimuth 349d29» X Coords 977.£5£839 Distance Read 124.7 Y Coords 11££.53381 Vertical Angle -Old23' Ns NE PIT, EDGE OF ROAD/FILL Rod Reading Shot#s £4 From TPA Tos £3 Elevat ion 100.00 Elevations 96.£596650 Transit Hgt 0.000 Bearing Tos N4 d51'0 ''W Base Bearing NOOdOO'00''E Horiz Dists 79. 313610,=: Azimuths 355d09' X Coord s 993.£94£31 0 i st ance Read s 79.49 Y Coords 1079.Uc:9fai=i Vertical Angle: -0£d4£' Ns SAME AS STA ££ Rod Readings APPENDIX D FIELD SURVEY REDUCED DMA (CCNT'D) 11/5/87 Shottt; £5 From TPA To: TPB Elevation 100.00 Elevation; 93.3215152 Transit Hgt 0.000 Bearing To: N55d29'0 ' •• E Base Bearing NOOdOO* 00'' E Honz Dists 191.246782 Azimuth 055d29« X Coords 1157.57996 Distance Read 191.48 Y Coord: 1108.36921 Vertical Angle -02d00'1 N; TPA-TPB NEAR TAR DISCHA^ Rod Reading Shot#s 26 From; TPB To: TPA Elevat ion: 93.32152 Elevat ions 99.93b4848 Transit Hgt s 0.000 Bearing To: S55d29» 0' •• W 0) 1 Base Bearing! S55d29 0 ' * W Honz Dist: 19l.0209c:b 0 Azimuth: X Coord: 1000.18608 OOMOOD G> D i stance Read: 191.25 Y Coord: 1000.12798 Vertical Angle: +01d59* N: TPB-TPA 0 Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot#: 27 Froms TPB To: 26 Elevation: 93.32152 Elevation: 90.1632827 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To: N56d53* 0 « •» E Base Bearing: S55d29' 0 ' » W Horiz Dist: 36.8392435 Azimuth: 181d24» X Coord; 1188.43502 0 i st ance Read: 37. 11 Y Coord: 1128.49bl7 Vertical Angle: -04d54* N: P-8, IN TAR PIT Rod Reading: Shot#: 28 From: TPB To: 27 Elevation: 93.32152 Elevation: 90.1786904 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N57d55'0 " £ Base Bearing: S55d29' 0 " W Honz Dist: 47.1103352 Azimuth: 182d26' X Coord: 1197.49543 D i st ance Read: 47.32 Y Coords 1133.39196 Vertical Angle: -03d49* N: NM CORNER TAR PIT Rod Reading: Shottt: 29 From: TPB To: 28 Elevations 93.32152 Elevations 89. 66164;=; 1 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing Tos N74d29'0 ' •' 6- Base Bearing: S55d29* 0 " W Honz Dist: 91. l£3U(-)4l Azimuth: 199d00' X Coord: 1245.38177 D i st ance Read: 91.27 Y Coords 1132.74631 Vertical Angle: -02dl81 Ns P-7, IN TAR PIT Rod Reading: Shot*; 30 From: TPB To: 29 Elevat ion: 93.32152 Elevat ion: 89.4924438 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N74d5610 ' •' E. Base Bearing: S55d29» 0 * ' M Hor i z Dist; 137.083U44 Azimuths l99d27* X Coords 1289.95063 Distance Reads 137.19 Y Coords 1144. OVc:96 Vertical Angles -Old 36' Ns P-6,IN TAR PIT,12»S OFNEDb Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SURREY FEDUCED DMA (OOMI'D) 11/5/87 Shot#: 31 From: TPB To: 30 Elevationg 93.3£15£ Elevation; 89.5838909 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N81dl0'0 ''£ Base Bearing; S55d£9* 0 " M Horiz Dist; 194. 658i=:33 Azimuth; £05d41* X Coord: 1349.9S939 0 i st ance Read: 194.73 Y Coord: 1138.£6106 vertical Angle: -Old06' N: AT EDGE, TAR FINGER £5''N Rod Reading: Shot#; 3£ From: TPB To: 31 EIe vat ion: 93.32152 E1evat i on: 88.903069£ Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; N86d56* 0 " £ Base Bearing: S55d£9* 0 " W Hor i z D i st: £53.13S875 Azimuth: £lld£7t X Coord: 1410.35033 D i st ance Read: £53.£1 Y Coord: ll£1.9lia^ vertical Angle: -OldOO' N: P-4 Rod Reading: Shot*: 33 From: TPB To: 3£ Elevation: 93.3£15£ Elevat ion; 89.0898584 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; N87d1 * 0 *'E Base Bearing: S55d£9* 0 " W Horiz Oisti £79.735986 Azimuth: £lld3£» X Coord; 1436.9368£ Distance Read: £79.8 Y Coords llci£.9£816 Vertical Angle: -00d5£' N: S.G.40.0 (IN TAR) Rod Reading: Shot#: 34 From; TPB To; 33 EIe vat ion: 93.3£15£ Elevat ion: 88.798££69 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S8£d4810 " E Base Bearing: S55d£9* 0 * ' W Horiz Dist; £63.53£361 Azimuth: ££ld43* X Coord: 1419.03429 D i st ance Read: £63.61 Y Coord; 1075.33986 Vertical Angle: -00d59* N: SE CORNER TAR PIT Rod Reading: Shot#: 35 From: TPB To: 34 Elevation: 93.3£15£ Elevat ion; 89. .564£lc::3 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S81d5£*0 ' •'£. Base Bearing: S55d£9* 0 " W Horiz Dist: 163.874437 Azimuth: £££d39» X Coord: 1319.80607 D i st ance Read: 163.97 Y Coord; 1085. 1847,=: Vertical Angle: -Old£3» N: P-5 £0'S TO EDGE OF PIT Rod Reading: Shot#: 36 From: TPB To: 35 Elevation: 93.3£l5£ Elevation: 89.4030777 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S88dl7'0 '*E Base Bearing: S55d£9* 0 '» M Horiz Dist; 1£4.686857 Azimuth: £16dl4» X Coord: 1£8£.£1085 0 i st ance Read: 1£4.81 Y Coord: 1104.63394 Vertical Angle: -Old48' N; P-2 Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SURVEY REDUCED DKTA (OGNT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#: 37 Proms TPB To: 36 Elevation: 93.3215£ Elevation: 89.75695b9 Transit Hgt 0.000 Bearing To: N77dl6»0» »E Base Bearing S55d£9» 0 " W Horiz Dist; 77. 997U'9S(J Azimuth £01d47» X Coord: 1£33.65883 Distance Read 78. 16 Y Coord: 1125.56082 Vertical Angle -02d37'1 N: S.G. 39 Rod Read i ng 0.0 Shot#: 38 From: TPB To: 37 Elevations 93.32152 Elevation: 89.6865180 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: S80d47* 0 ' •' E Base Bear ing: S55d£9» 0 * » W Horiz Dist: bl.1840410 Azimuths 223d44» X Coord: 1217.97409 c? D i st ance Read s 61.4 Y Coord: 1098.56945 Vertical Angle: -03d£4* N: P-l, 15* TO S EDGE Rod Reading: Shot#: 39 From: TPB To: TPC E1evat i on: 93.32152 Elevation: 102.104731 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N73d6 * 0 " W Base Bearing: S55dS9* 0 " W Horiz Dist2 185.103233 Azimuth: 051d£5* X Coord: 980.470674 D i st ance Read: 185.52 Y Coord: 116£.1/913 Vertical Angle: +0£d43» N: TPB-TPC,TOP OF DITCH £ SIU Rod Reading: Shot#; 40 From; TPC To: TPB Elevation: 10£.1047 Elevation: 93.4242638 Transit Hgt: 0. 000 Bearing To: S73d6 * 0 " E Base Bearing: S73d6 '0 * * E Horiz Dist: 185.213171 Azimuth: OOOdOO1 X Coord: 1157.68514 Distance Read: 185.62 Y Coord: 1108.33724 Vertical Angle: -0£d41* N: TPC - TPB Rod Reading: Shot#: 41 Prom: TPC To: 40 Elevation: 102.1047 Elevation: 80.2560005 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N68d44* 0 *'W Base Bearing: S73d6 '0 '* E Horiz Dist: 360.666434 Azimuth: 184d22* X Coord: 644.364768 Distance Read: 361.99 Y Coord: 1292.99616 Vertical Angle: -03d28* N: ML,CREOSOTE CREEK Rod Reading: Shot#: 42 From: TPC To: 41 Elevation: 102.1047 E1evat i on: 82.624496.1 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N21d49'U ' 'E. Base Bearing: S73d6 '0 '» E Horiz Dist: 91.1256587 Azimuth: 274d55* X Coord: 1014.33641 D i st ance Read: 95.29 Y Coord: 1246.77816 Vertical Angle: -l£d04» Ns WL,DD-OIL SEEP Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SUTVEX KEDUCED DKTA (COn"D) 11/5/87 Shot#s 43 From 8 TPC To: 4£ Elevations 102.1047 Elevations 84.64£9319 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S61dl9'0' »W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 » ' E Horiz Oists 87.£555119 Azimuth: 134d£5» X Coord s 903. 9££64^. D i stance Read: 90. 75 Y Coords ll£(.».c:99i=:5 Vertical Angles -lldl9* Ns ML,DD,8»OIL SEEP Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot#: 44 Froms TPC To: 43 Elevations 102.1047 Elevations 88.££43162 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S47d4£* 0 ' •' W Base Bearings S73d6 * 0 *'E Horiz Dist: £88.973£77 Azimuths l£0d48* X Coord s 766.737030 Distance Reads £89.64 Y Coord: 967.6965£1 vertical Angles -0£d45' Ns MI_,DD,S END OF SEEP Rod Readings Shot#s 45 Froms TPC Tos 44 Elevations 10S.1047 Elevat ions 91.1367966 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing Tos S47dl6'0 '»W Base Bearings S73d6 » 0 » * E Hor i z D i st s 538.566638 Azimuths l£0d££' X Coords 584.88£708 D i st ance Read s 538.79 V Coords 796.714786 vertical Angles -OldIO' N s WL,DO Rod Readings Shot#s 46 Froms TPC Tos 45 Elevations 10£.1047 Elevations 98.8164£5t» Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S68d59* 0 ''W Base Bearings S73d6 * 0 " E Horiz Dists 313.995S64 Azimuths 14£d05' X Coord s 687.36331U D i st ance Read s 314.03 Y Coord s 1049.56790 Vertical Angles -00d36* Ns PRESSURE COOKER ttl Rod Readings Shottts 47 Froms TPC Tos 46 Elevat ions l0£.1047 Elevations 95.9086603 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S80d45* 0 'iW Base Bear ings S73d6 ' 0 ' ' E Horiz Dists 373.657£56 Azimuth s 153d51< X Coord8 611.67£310 D i st ance Read s 373.76 Y Coords 110£.11656 vertical Angles -00d57* Ns P.COOKER ttl,N END OF BLDG Rod Readings Shot#s 48 Froms TPC Tos 47 Elevat ions 10£.1047 Elevat ions 96.84l8£74 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos S69d3£'0 " W Base Bearings S73d6 * 0 " E Honz Dists 335.0173£4 Azimuths 14£d38» X Coord s 666.601057 D i st ance Read s 335. 1 Y Coord s 1045.03bl7 vertical Angle: -00d54» N» TOP OF BERM,N END OF L.fll3(JO Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SUIWEX REDUCED DMA (OCNT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#s 49 Froms TPC To; 48 Elevat ions 10£.1047 Elevations 95.630001 £ Transit Hgt i 0.000 Bearing Tos S87dl0'0 •' ••W Base Bearing: S73d6 » 0 " E Horiz Dist i i;:6l.a09877 Azimuth: 160dl6' X Coords 718.980846 D i st ance Read: £61.97 Y Coords 11^9.2376^ Vertical Angle: -Old£5' Ns TANK #7,E EDGE OF TANK F( Rod Reading: Shot#s 50 From: TPC Tos 49 Elevations 10£. 1047 Elevations 94.5413tf6b Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To: N89d£8'0 " W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 * * E Horiz Dists £13.031477 Azimuths 163d38'» X Coord: 767.4484£5 0 D i st ance Read s £13.3 Y Coord: 1164.16£U9 0 Vertical Angles -0£d0£1 Ns SE CORNER BLDG (" > Rod Reading: Shot#s 51 Froms TPC To: 50 Elevations 10£.1047 Elevations 93.6509661 Transit Hgti 0.000 Bearing Tos N83dl7'0 * 'W Base Bearings S73d6 * 0 " E Horiz Dists 19£.338438 Azimuth s 169d49* X Coord s 789.45£318 D i st ance Read: 19£.71 Y Coords 1184.67496 Vertical Angle: -0£d31' Ns NE CORNER OF BLDG Rod Reading: Shot#: 5£ From: TPC Tos 51 Elevation: 10£.1047 Elevat ions 96.1017881 Transit Hgti 0.000 Bearing Tos S8£d53* 0'T W Base Bearing: S73d6 * 0 »'E Horiz Dists 16£.418134 Azimuths 155d59' X Coords 819.303815 Distance Read: 16£.64 Y Coord s ll^ci.0571^ Vertical Angle: -0£d07» Ns S.G. 37 Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot*; 53 From: TPC Tos 5£ Elevation: 10£.1047 Elevations 93.7599&^1 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N77d54» 0''W Base Bearings S73d6 » 0 * » E Horiz Dists 151.63U7fc> Shot#s 54 From: TPC Tos 53 Elevat ions 10£.1047 Elevations 94.4608958 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N58d£8'0 ''W Base Bearings S73d6 ' 0 ' * E Horiz Dists 177.440719 Azimuths 194d38» X Coord s 8£9.£31554 Distance Reads 177.77 Y Coord s l£54.979b5 Vertical Angle: -0£d£a1 Ns N END, NE PCOOKER »8 Rod Readings APPENDIX D FIELD SURTEY SEDUCED, DMA (OOSn'D) 11/5/87 Shot*: 55 From: TPC Tos 54 Elevations l0£.1047 Lie vat ions 99. l0,3i5804 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N44dl5*0 '»W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 ' » E Honz Dists 163.744995 Azimuth: 208d5l* X Coords 866.2l099b D i st ance Read: 163.80 Y Coord: 1£:79.4700U Vertical Angle: -Old03* Ns W£L.L CASINO B-l Rod Reading: Shot#: 56 From : TPC To: 55 Elevation; 102.1047 Elevations 90.3066515 Transit Hgt: 0. 000 Bearing To: N45dl7'0 ' •'W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 ' * E Moriz Dist: 13d.5654b4 Azimuth: 207d49'1 X Coord: 882. 00677.:!; Distance Read: 139.57 Y Coord: le:59.6739^ Vertical Angles -04d52'1 Ns S.D. WL Rod Reading: Shot#: 57 From: TPC To: 56 Elevations 102.1047 Elevation: B9.4010603 Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing Tos N15d5 '0 ''W Base Bear i ng: S73d6 » 0 * ' E Horiz Dist: l<:>7.003fc»S»9 Azimuth; 238d01* X Coord s 937.0123&& Distance Read: 167.97 Y Coord: 1323.4£9c:^ Vertical Angle: -04d21' N: S.D., ML Rod Reading: Shot^s 5Q From: TPC To: 57 Elevation: 102.1047 Elevation: 88.9846812 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N7 d23'0 ' ••M Base Bear ing: S73d6 ' 0 ' •f E Horiz Dist: 185. 30lU5i=: Azimuth: 245d43' X Coord: 956.65815Z Distance Read: 186.23 Y Coord: 1345.94377 Vertical Angle: -04d03» N; S.D WL Rod Reading: Shot#s 59 Prom: TPC To: 58 Elevations 102.1047 Elevation: 96. 4c:38y3c: Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To: N5QdS5'U ' '' W Base Bearing: S73d6 * 0 *'£ Horiz Dist; £5U. 33H.»a4 Azimuth: 202dll' X Coord s 786. l562.=:a Distance Read: 250.46 Y Coords 1320.COO^U Vertical Angles -Oldl8' N: BOREHOLE A2 Rod Reading: Shot#: 60 From s TPC To: 59 Elevations 102.1047 Elevation: 90.99 AT BASE Transit Hgts 0.000 Bearing To; N48d34'0 ' •' W Base Bearings S73d6 * 0 » * E Horiz Dist: 372.6557U4 Azimuths 204d32' X Coord: 701.080967 Distance Reads 372.9 Y Coord: 1408.78340 Vertical Angle: -Old28' N: WELL CASING Al, S.6. #38 Rod Readings APPENDIX D FIELD SUKVEX REDUCED DRTft. (OCKT'D) H/5/87 Shot*: 61 From: TPC To: 60 Elevation: 102.1047 Elevation: 95.3651941 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: N48d-42'1 O* •' W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 ' * E Hor i z D i st : 373.6^8439 Azimuth: 204d24» X Coord: 699.761987 D i st ance Read: 373.77 Y Coord: 1408.78//U Vertical Angle: -OldOS* N: WELL. Al, TOC Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot*: 62 From: TPC To: 61 Elevation: 10£.1047 Elevation: 93.8662951 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N43d6010 ' •' W Base Bearing: S73d6 ' 0 " E Horiz Dist; 435.664211 Azimuth: 209d06» X Coord: 677.832929 Distance Read: 435.82 Y Coord: 1475.56978 Vertical Angle: -Old05* N: WELL C-2, TOC Rod Reading: Shot#: 63 From: TPC To: 62 Elevation: 102.1047 Elevation: 92. 7169i±46 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N24d4lTO ' '' W Base Bearing: S73d6 '0 *'E Horiz Dist: 388. /533(-«-> Azimuth: 228d25* X Coord: 818.12626U D i st ance Read: 388.98 Y Coord: 1515.4119^ Vertical Angle: -Old23* N: BOREHOLE C3, NEAR TR^HM BK Rod Reading: Shot#: 64 From: TPC To: TPD Elevat ion: 102.1047 Elevat ion; 94. 642c;fc»Ub Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N54d47'1 0' ' W Base Bearing: S73d6 '0 »'E Horiz Dist: 351.371512 Azimuth: 198dl9' X Coord: 693.408170 Distance Read: 351.53 Y Coord; 136-t. 80^5^ Vertical Angle: -Oldl3' N: TPC-TPD Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot#; 65 From: TPD To: TPC Elevation: 94.64226 Elevation: l(->2.2068bl Transit Hgt: 0. 000 Bearing To: S54d4710' •' E Base Bearing: S54d47* O*'E Horiz Dist: 351. 3b7l^-l Azimuth: OOOdOO* X Coord: 980.467097 D i st ance Read: 351.53 Y Coord: 1162.l8l&^> Vertical Angle: +01dl4' N: TPD - TPC Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot#: 66 From: TPD To: 65 Elevation: 94.64226 Elevation: 98.SU91049 Transit.Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N80d40'1 U ' •' t- Base Bearing: S54d47» 0'* E Horiz Dist: 282.81/l30 Azimuth: 3l5d27* X Coord: 972.481244 Distance Read: 282.87 Y Coord: l^lU.b7ll/ Vertical Angle: +00d47'1 N: BOREHOLE C-4 Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SURREY REDUCED DATA (CONT'D) 11/5/87 Shot#; 67 Proms TPD To: 66 Elevation: 94.64££6 Elevation; 90. 100£840 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: N9 d£510 ' •• fc. Base Bearing! ti54d47'O* * E Horiz Dist: 173.451U64 Azimuth: £44dl£* X Coord: 7£l.7Q7UOc: D i st ance Read: 173.57 Y Cooro: l&3S.910c:a Vertical Angle: -Old30» N; S.G. 5£ Rod Reading: Shot*: £8 From; TPD To: 67 Elevation: 94.64££6 Elevat ion: 95.097^540 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: N80d47'0 ' ' W Gift Base Bearing: S54d47'0»'E Horiz Dist: 195.518941 Azimuth: 154d00' X Coord: 500.413434 D i st ance Read: 195.5£ Y Coord: 1396.1£048 Vertical Ongle: +00d081 N: C-l WELL CASING Rod Reading: Shot#: 69 From: TPD To: 68 Elevation; 94.64££6 Elevat ion; 95.071366£ Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing TO! S73d30* 0 ' •• W Base Bearing: S54d47,» O* * E Horiz Dist: 368.789500 Azimuth: l£8dl7'» X Coord! 339.805501 D i st ance Read: 368.79 Y Coord! lci60. t.»faci7l Vertical Angle: +00d04* N: BOREHOLE C-00 Rod Reading: Shot#: 70 From: TPD To: 69 Elevation; 94.b4££6 Elevat ion: 94.Ul£636y Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: S67ai.£'0 •' 'W Base Bearing: S54d47* 0'* E Horiz Dist: 43e:. 759084 Azimuth: l£ld59' X Coord: £94.4635£0 Distance Read: 43£.76 Y Coord: 1197.10363 Vertical Angle: -00d05' N: S.G. £8 Rod Reading: Shot#: 71 From: TPD To: 70 Elevation: 94.64££6 Elevat ion; 96.1496£94 Transit Hgti 0.000 Bearing To; S50dl4'0 ' 'W Base Bear ing: S54d47'O*'E Hor i z D i st : £7£.731668 Azimuth: 105d01' X Coord s 483.77127 u- D i st ance Read: £7£.74 Y Coord; 1190.34830 Vertical Angle: +00dl9* N: S.G. £7, NEXT TO POLE Rod Reading: Shot<»: 72 From: TPD To: 71 Elevation: 94.64££6 Elevation; 93.9114117 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S59dl3'0 ' •'W Base Bearing: S54d47'O* * E Horiz Dist: 314.058^99 1 Azimuth: 113d48' X Coord: 4£4.160610 Distance Read: 314.06 Y Coord; li=:03. l3oa-=» Vertical Angle: -00d08* N: NM CORNER POLE BURN Rod Reading: APPENDIX D FIELD SUR/EY REDUCED DMA (GONI'D) 11/5/87 Shot#: 73 From i TPD To: 72 Elevation; 94.64226 Elevation; 96.0605216 Transit Hgt; 0.000 Bearing To: S35d25'1 0 ' •» W Base Bearing: S54d47'0''E Honz Dist: i=:H.98USill Azimuth: 090dl2* X Coord: 570.561595 D i stance Read: £11.99 Y Coord: 1192. U*»9Ub Vertical Angle: +00d23' N: SW EDGE PCQOKER #2 Rod Readings Shot#: 74 From: TPD To: TPE Elevation: 94.64226 Elevation; 97.2294yuu Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing Fo: S35d52-' (J1 * W Base Bearing: S54d471O* * E Horiz Dist; 635. 2994b.A Azimuth: 090d39' X Coord: 321.185547 D i atance Read: 635.31 Y Coord: 849.9689U/ Vertical Angle: +00dl4' N: TPD - TPE Rod Reading: 0.0 Shot#; 75 From: TPE To: TPD Elevation! 97.£2949 Elevation: 94.8261508 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; N35d52'0 "E Base Bearing: N35d52' O* » E Horiz Dist: 635.540911 Azimuth: OOOdOO' X Coord: 693.549586 Distance Read: 635.55 Y Coord: 1365. 000c:3 Vertical Angle: -00dl3' N: TPE - TPD Rod Reading: Shottt; 76 From: TPE To: 75 Elevation: 97.22949 Elevation; 97.8562817 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S55d20'0 ' ' t Base Bearing: N35d52* 0'* E Horis Dist: 107.736353 Azimuth: 088d48* X Coord: 409.796010 D i st ance Read: 107.74 Y Coord: 788. boa34i=: Vertical Angle: +00d20* N: S.G. STA 22 Rod Reading: Shot#; 77 From: TPE To; 76 Elevation: 97.22949 Elevat ion; 100.lO/uyy Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To; S8 d3 ' U ' •' fc- Base Bearing: N35d52* 0'* E Horiz Dist: £60. 3lBl9(.» Azimuth: l36d05* X Coord: 357. 639uu,a Distance Read: 260.35 Y Coord: 59£. £l583i=: Vertical Angle: +00d38* N: S.G. STA 20 Rod Reading: Shot*: 78 From: TPE To; 77 Elevat ion: 97.22949 Elevat ion: 103.098757 Transit Hgt: 0.000 Bearing To: Sl9dl '0 ' •'H Base Bearing: N35d52* 0*'E Hor i z D i st : 49£.099997 Azimuth: 163d09» X Coord: 160.838166 D i st ance Read: 492.17 Y Coords 384.725825 Vertical Angle: +00d41* N; WELL El, S6 16 Rod Reading: APPENDIX E VOUJME ESTIMATE OF CONTAMINKTED SOIL ) VOLUME ESTIMATE OF CONTAMINATED SOIL In order to perform this calculation, the contaminated areas were divided into two main types: light contamination areas, consisting mainly of highly odiferous gray stained sands, and the heavily contaminated areas, consisting of thick black tar. There are three light contaminated areas shown in Figure 9. The heavily contaminated areas consist of the three tarpits, the heavily contaminated area east of the railroad track, drainage ditches 1 and 2, and the tar drippings area (see Figure 9). It should be noted that the aerial extent of contamination shown in Figure 9 is a conservative estimate based on surface and borehole observations, so the following calculations yield conservative estimates of the total extent of contamination. Additionally, the values for average thickness of the tar layers and the creosote stained zones are based on the borehole observations and they do not account for fluctuations in thickness between the boreholes. (L Volume estimate for heavily contaminated area 0 0 SUSPECT TARPIT 1 (3 0 Area 15,682 ft2 Average contamination thickness from boleholes D4 and D5 11 ft Volume of contaminated material 172,502 ft3 = 6,389 yd3 SUSPECT TARPIT 2 Area 16,113 ft2 Average contamination thickness based on boreholes Dl and WD2 11 ft Volume of contaminated material 26,728 ft3 = 990 yd3 SUSPECT TARPIT 3 Area 6,168 ft2 Average thickness of contaminated material based on boreholes C4, A4, and A5 4 ft Volume of contaminated material 26,728 ft3 = 990 yd3 rd:eh/TYSON/vo1-est SURFACE TAR AREA Area 19,921 ft2 Average thickness of contaminated material based on samples P01, P02, P03, and P04 2.15 ft Volume of contaminated material 42,830 ft3 = 1,586 yd3 DRAINAGE DITCH 2 Area 13090 ft2 Average thickness of contaminated material based on surface observations 1 ft Volume of contaminated material 13090 ft3 - 485 yd3 DRAINAGE DITCH 3 Area 28070 ft2 Average thickness of contaminated material based on surface observations 1 ft Volume of contaminated material 28070 ft3 = 1040 yd3 TAR DRIPPINGS AREA Area ' 27,031 ft2 Average thickness of contaminated material based on boreholes C3, WA1, and WB1 4 ft Volume of contaminated material 112,629 ft3 - 4,171 yd3 VOLUME ESTIMATE FOR LIGHTLY CONTAMINATED AREAS Light contamination area 1 Area 56,257 ft2 Average thickness of creosote stained material based on boreholes Dl, WD2, and D5 10 ft Volume of creosote stained material 562,570 ft3 " 20,836 yd3 rd:eh/TYSON/vo1-est Light contamination area 2 Area 22,672 ft2 Average thickness of creosote stained material based on boreholes A4, A5, and A3 3 ft Volume of creosote stained material 58,569 ft3 = 2,169 yd3 ^ Light contaminatic)n area 3 ^b Area 48,243 ft2 . ' ^ < 0 Average thickness of creosote ' :> stained material based on boreholes . •"» WC1 and WC2 3ft £ Volume of creosote stained material 144,729 ft3 - 5,360 yd3 VOLUME ESTIMATE OF THE BOTTOM SLUDGE IN THE LAGOON Figure --- is a map of the thickness of the bottom sludge in the settling lagoon. The volume of the bottom sludge was estimated in the following manner. The lagoon was divided into four areas (A, B, C, and D). A thickness value was assigned to each area. The aerial extent of each area was estimated using the AutoCad software package. The bottom sludge volume for each area was then calculated by multiplying the aerial extent of each area by the assigned thickness value. The volume estimates for all the areas were then summed to yield the total volume of bottom sludge in the 1agoon. Calculations AREA THICKNESS (ft.) EXTENT (ft.2) VOL. (ft.3) VOL. (yd3) A 0.50 1797 895 33 B 1.00 1808 1808 67 C 1.50 2173 3260 24 D 2.00 330 660 121 ESTIMATED TOTAL VOLUME = 6626 245 rd:eh/TYSON/vo1-est APPENDIX F ANALYTICAL EESUUTS AMERICAN CREOSOTE SITE Min+ield, La. Project No. 3347-01-01-1054 February 12, 1988 Submitted to: Harry Compton Submitted by: Roy F. Weston-REAC Analysis tay: J. .E. T. Sysio A. Michaels IT Corp. NUS Corp. Envirotech Research Radian Corp. Prepared by; . Chang feston-REAC Sectio^ Chief J. E. I". Syslo Reviewed by: M. SECTION I •Table Analysis tables GC/MS Tahl 0^^ DP Isomer Spescific Anal ysis..Table , Dioxi ns Anal vest *s ...... Table ...... Table ' ( < SECTION II < c QA/QC Procedures QA/QC Results Volatile Organics Analysis: Surrogate Standard Recoveries...... •Table Matrix Spike Duplicate Analysis...... •Table EMSL Analysi s...... Table Base Neutral/Acid E^tractables Analysis: Surrogate Standard Recoveries...... •Table 10 Duplicate Analysis...... Table 11 Matri;; Spike Analysis...... •Table 1.2 Method Spike Analysis...... •Table 13 EMSL Analysis...... •Table 14 Dioxin Analysis: QA/DC Report: 2,3,7,8-TCDD Isomer Specific •Table 15 QA/QC Report: Total Dio>;ins ...... •Table 16 Total Phenolics Analysis: Duplicate Analysis...... •Table 17 Matrix Spike Analysis...... •Table 18 SECTION III VOA Raw Data SECTION IV Base Neutral/Acid Es/.tractables Raw Data (GC/FID) SECTION V Base Neutral/Acid Extractables Raw Data (GC/MS) SECTION VI Dio;-;in Raw Data SECTION VII Total Phenolics Raw Data SECTION VIII Chain o-F Custody Records INTRODUCTION On November 11, 1987, thirty seven soil and eight water samples with two blanks from the American Creosote site in winfield, LA, were received by REAC -for analysis. Samples were divided, and analyzed for the following parameters by the following laboratories: Base neutral/acid e>;tractables analysis using GC-FID by REAC; volatile organics analysis in water by REAC; One sample for dio;-;in analysis by International Technology Corporation, Kno>;ville TN; total phenolics analysis by Radian Corporation, Austin TX; percent ' moisture analysis by NUS Corporation, Pittsburgh PA; and si>; soil C^ and four water samples to be analyzed for base neutral/acid 0 e>;tractables using GC/MS by Envirotech Research, Edison NJ. This ^^ GC/MS analyses is performed as a confirmation analysis. Samples wer-n. analysed by GC/MS and for percent moisture by request of the EPA. All samples which were contracted out to other laboratories were extracted and analyzed according to Control Laboratory Program (CLP) protocols. The interlaboratory correspondence for these laboratories precede the raw data for each analysis. Results are presented in Tables 1-6. Raw data is contained in Sections III to Section vll. VOLATILE ORBANICS ANALYSIS Instrument Parameters The water samples were analyzed by purge and trap-FID-GC toll awing the guidelines of EPA Methods 601 and 602 of the Federal Register. Fhe following is a list of the test parameters: Methlylene chloride Trichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane Benzene r\ 1, 1-Dichloroethene Dibroniochioromethane ^SL' trans-1,2-Di chloroethene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane l T Chloroform cis—l,3—Dichloropropene j^ Bromoform 1,2-Di chloroethane C) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane C > Carbon tetrachioride Tetrachloroethene Bromodichloromethane Tol uene C ) trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl Benzene 0 Dibromochloromethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, and cis-1,3-dichloropropene are coeluting compounds, thus positive identification and quantification of these compounds are not possible. Tetrachloroethene and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane are also coeluting compounds. Since 1,1,2,2-fcetrachloroethane is rarely encountered in environmental samples, all peaks within this retention time window have been identified and quantified as tetrachloroethene. The percentage of tetrachloroethene was 84.9'/. in the standard mixture +Qr samples analyzed on November 23 through November 30. Quantification from a purgeables A + B mixture was based on this percentage. A Tekmar Purge and Trap concentrator equipped with automatic liquid sampler and interfaced with a Hewlett-Packard 5840 Bas Chrpmatograpn, ID No. 111061, was used for this analysis. The instrument conditions were set as follows: Oven Temp 1: 60°C Time 1: 3.0 min. Rate: 8.0°C/min. Oven Temp 2; 210°C Time 2: 10.0 min. Injection Temp; 225°C FID Temp: 300°C Chart Speed: 1.0 cm/min. Zero: 10.07. Slope Sens.: 0.07 Helium Flow: 34 mL/min. Column: 6 ); 2mm glass packed with 60/80 mesh Car bop ak B coated with I-/. SP-1000 C-ail or at ion Parameters .. riethc-d blanks and standards were- prepared using 10 milliliters of nitrogen purged organic-free water. A rive-point calibration range +rofri 5 to 200 ug/L was prepared from Supeico PLirgeable A and B standards 3nd analyzed an November 12th through November 17, 1987. It was a recovered that the curve would not be linear at the higher ranga because the detector could not respond correctly to the amount o+ nariQqrams Tig) needed tor a 200 ug/L standard in a 10 niilliliter samale. There-Tore, a five-point calibration range +rom 5 to 100 ug/'L was ussd. The curve consists of standards run on November l2th <^ through November 17th., 1987. The center standard (25 ug/L;1 run on QB^ Novembber 17th., 1987 was compared to the days' 25 ug/L daily center » .. standard and the relative error was calculated, as well. The 25 ug/L daily standards for November 24, 27, and 30 had relative errors of less than 20>. e;;cept for 1,2-dichloroethane, trichloroethene, the ^) three coeiuters, and bromoform on November 27, however, only 0 fcrichioroethene was found in samples analysed on that day; traces of <• :> trichloroethene was detected in samples 7^70, 7972, and 7975 at levels below the detection limit, and 7973 below the lower limit of qucantif i cation. A background contamination consisting of bromodichloromethane and toluene was found in various water blanks and bromochioromethane (BCM? samples. This was subtracted from all standards and samples before any calculations of sample concentration were performed. After suotraction of contamination, bromodichloromethane still remained out of control, even by linear regression. The BCM —' csntamination was due to contaminated methanol used to prepare the •surra-Date standard. Sample calculations were based on the response o+ a 25 ug/L dai1 .' standard according to the following equation: Sample cone. (ug/L) = S.R. ;•; Std. C. ;•; D.F. Std. R. 3.R. —s Sample Response Std. R. •= Standard Response Std. C. = Standard Concentration (ug/L) D.F. = Dilution factor (ml/ml) Table 1 presents the results for this analysis. The peak at the approximate retention time of 15.90 was attributed to he;;ane contamination. This was due to the dilution and analysis or samples for PCB samples which were performed concurrently in the laboratory. • Determination of the Detection Limits The theoretical detection limits were known from prior analyses and were con-firmed by the analysis of Supeico A and B standards at the 2 ug/L level for all compounds e>;cept -for bromo-form which was con-Firmed at 5 ug/L. \ BASE NEUTRAL/ACID ESTRACTABLES & tH:! EXTRACTION PROCEDURE y This procedure follows the EPA Method 625 -For Base Neutrals and Acid f| Extractables. WATER SAMPLES <£V One liter of water sample (or approximate volume) was placed in c^a ^ solvent rinsed 2000ml separatory funnel, and lOOul of surrogate sp-ke was added. The surrogate spike contained a mixture of 1000 ug/ml ^\ 2-fluorobiphenyl + 5000 ug/ml 2,4,6-tribroroophenol. 0) C5 The sample was adjusted to pH>ll with ION NaOH. The basic fraction<-> was then shake extracted with three 60—ml portions of methylene -, chloride. This extract was passed through a glass funnel containing glass wool and anhydrous sodium sulfate. The remaining water sample was acidified to pH<2 with concentrated sulfuric acid. The acidic fraction was shake extracted with three 60-ml portions of methylene chloride and passed through anhydrous sodium sulfate. Both the acidic and basic fractions were combined and concentrated on a steam bath using a Kuderna-Danish apparatus. The extracts were then blown down with nitrogen to a final volume of 10 ml. This 10 ml concentrate was analysed by gas chromatography. Due to high concentrations of compounds in some samples, the concentrate required dilution to keep the response within the limits of the calibration range. The methylene chloride extract was analysed by gas chromatography using the flame ionisation detector (FID). SOIL SAMPLES Approximately 10 grams of soil were placed in a serum vial, spiked with 1.0 ml of the two component surrogate spike and extracted with two 50ml-portions of methylene chloride. The extraction was performed by shaking the vials on a gyratory shaker for 45 minutes at 400RPM. The methylene chloride extract was analysed by gas chromatography using the flame ionisation detector. ANALYSIS PROCEDURE A five point calibration range from 5ppm to lOOppm was analyzed using a standard prepared from Supeico standards. Samples were initially screened for the full range of base neutral/acid extractable compounds, but were found to contain mainly the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds found in creosote. Upon the request of the EPA, the analytical scope included four additional compounds: l-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, 2,3-di methylnaphthalene, and 2,b-methylnaphthalene, which were prepared from Aldncn standards. A creosote standard was prepared, and samples were analyzed -for the following target compounds: NAPHTHALENE ANTHRACENE ' 2-ME THT LNAPHTHALEME FLUORANT HENE 1-ME THYLNAPH rHALEME PYRENE 2,&-DIMETHYL.NAPHTHALENE BENZO Sample e;-;tracts wers analyzed using a Shimadzu GC-9A Gas Chromatograph utilising the FID detector. Sample injections were performed with the Shimadzu AOC-9 Automatic Sampler. Samples were analyzed using a JS Results for the analysis are presented in Table 2. Most samples _/ contained the creosote compounds in the parameter list. Pentachlorophenol was not identified in any samples using GC/'FID method. It is suspected that pentachlorophenol coelutes with a hydrocar&cn and identification is tentative. Ten samples were analyzed using mass spectrometry to confirm the results obtained by the modified Method 625 using GC/'FID. Quantification of results for water samples were based on the following equations Cone. Cppb) = Sample Response K 25 * *» ;; Final Extract Volume Standard Response Initial Sample Volume Quantification of results for soil samples were based on the following equation: Cone. (ppm) = Sample Response ;•; 25 *l' >; Final Extract Volume Standard Response Initial Sample weight Soil sample results were adjusted for the percent moisture. <1) 25 ppm Daily Standard used for quantification. Some soil and water sample extracts required dilution to keep the response of compounds within the calibration range and/or to prevent overloading of the column. Sample dilution and concentration -factors for soil and water samples are presented in Table 2a for soil samples and Table 2b for water samples. CONFIRMATION OF SAMPLES BY BC/MS Six soil and four water samples were sent to Envirotech Research Laboratory for GC/MS analysis. Samples were selected which were fairly representative of the majority of samples. Sample c» concentrations from Envirotech were reported in total ug, which wer converted to ug/ml, and adjusted for sample dilution and 7. moisture The results of this analysis is presented in Table 3, comparing the GC/MS analysis to the 6C/FID analysis. All compounds identified by GC/FID were confirmed by GC/MS, with the exception of the methyl naphthalene and dimethyl naphthalene compounds. The GC/MS analysis was to include the entire base neutral/acid extractable parameters plus the 10 most significant unknown compounds. The methyl and dimethyl naphthalene compounds may not have been the most prominent peaks, and therefore not recorded. The identification of PAH compounds by the GC/MS and not the GC/FID method was due to the response on the FID being below the threshold of the integrator. In the latter cases, the response for these compounds was below the detection limit on the GC/MS, and result values are approximate. Pentachlorophenol was detected by the GC/MS in 'some samples. This was not possible using the GC/FID method since this compound coelute^s with a hydrocarbon, as determined chromatographically (GC/FID retention times), and by examination of the GC/MS ion spectrum. ;) DIOXIN ANALYSIS - One sample, #7851, was sent to the International Technology Corporation in Knoxville TIM, -for dioxin analysis. The sample was extracted and analyzed according to CLP methodology. A complete description of the extraction and analysis procedures is -found in the case narrative .in Section VI of this report. Data is reported in the form of a method blank, matrix spike, and matrix spike duplicate. The calculated detection limits for the sample and matrix spike duplicates are high due to the small amount of sample available for extraction. Significant matrix interferences have resulted in posif^ recoveries of surrogate and internal standards. The sample exhibit high levels of hepta- and acta- chlorinated dibenzofuran and dioxin, Method blank recoveries and detection limits are reasonable and s: within acceptable limits. Table 4a contains the results of the isonffir specific analysis for 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF. Table 4b 0 contains the results for the total dioxin and fur an analysis. ^) TABLE 1. RESULTS OF VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS ' '.coriceritrations reported as ua./L) Parameter 7970 7971 7972 7973 Dilution (1:25) <1:50) (1:20^ Methviene Chloride 1:4.13 187 105 469 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND • *,^ denote coelutinq compounds CJ denotes approximate values between the detection limit and the quanti+ication limit. '"ABLE 1 ccntd RESULTS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC5 ANAL-515 •.concentrations reported as uq / L ' arameters 7974 7975 7976 797-'• Dilution ( 1; 2) ( l.:5; ethylene Chloride 2.3 38 -";. 35 °3 ;.s ,l-Dichloroetnene MD ND ND ND i .< ,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND « (1 -ans-1 ,2--Dichlorc«ethene ND ND ND ND | rilorD+orm ND ND ND ND , 2—L'i chl oroethane ND ND 36 ND ^V .1,1- l"ri chl oroethane ND ND ND ND ^ > aroon I'etrachioride ND ND ND ND C 4 '-omodichioromethane 10.7 ND 21.4 52.6 <; 3- ND ND ND .. ,2-DichloroDropane ND 3 rans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND -"ichloroethene ND ND ND ND l- 3 •enzene ND ND 44.2 ND C > •- bromochioromethane* C S . ,1,2-Trichloraethane* ND ND ND ND 1.5-1,3-Dichloropropene* . '-omo+orni ND ND ND ND ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethanett ND ND ND ND strachloroethenett ND ND ND ND oluene 8.65 ND 70.4 23.3 Lhiorobensene ND ND 44.5 ND ["LthYl Benzene ND ND 49.4 29.4 --,# denote coelutinq compounds J denote approximate values between the detection limit and the ..i-ianti+1 cation limit. ') IrtBLE 2. RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ttMAL. •', b; AND PERCENT MOIS CURE ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg o+ sample. SAMP•LE NUMBER PARAMETER - ! A-07969 07854A B-07967 07854B £3-0 7'-7s? 4 ^ ^" NAPHTHALENE nd 110 C4.63 150 '? 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C483 nd 62 "^ 1- 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C233 nd C323 rn 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C153 nd nd rC ? 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd n: P ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd r< & ACENAPHTHENE nd 72 1:3.23 100 ^!> FLUORENE nd fa9 C3.33 100 n i PENTACHLOROPHENaL nd nd nd nd ncd PHENANTHRENE nd 210 C8.63 320 nrd ANTHRACENE nd C243 nd - L343 nd FLUORANTHENE nd 87 nd 130 nd PYRENE nd C593 nd 88 n-1 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd C103 nd C153 nd CHRYSENE nd C9.53 nd C153 n•j BENZQ(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd n-j BENZQ(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)PVRENE nd nd nd nd nd INDENO(1,2.3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd n^ DIBENZO •; A, H'ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO •; G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd n-1 Percent Moisture 197. 187. lo'/: 157. 15'. All samples have an initial dilution o-f 10 x due to the e>;traction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit -for analysis is 10 ing/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing large amount o+ contamination. I" 3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quant i-fi cat ic.n o+ 50 mg/Kg and is considered appro;-; i mate. This limit also varies with sample dilution. TABLE 2 (cont.) RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANAL'/SI- AND PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER 07984A A-07995 07966C B-07995 07965C NAPHTHALENE nd C143 3400 120 Slo 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C4.93 460 1:263 0?3 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C4.63 220 C153 W^ 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 1:513 nd (^ 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 1:223 nd ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd C123 nd <7nd^ ACENAPHTHENE nd C193 470 C503 78 FLUORENE nd C193 330 C513 1:543 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE nd C5Q3 760 150 120 ANTHRACENE nd nd 380 C293 C243 FLUORANTHENE nd C323 290 65 C463 PYRENE nd C253 200 C443 C303 BENZD(A)ANTHRACENE nd nd C353 C6.73 nd CHRYSENE nd nd C333 C6.73 -nd BENZQ(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd C143 nd nd BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd 1:133 nd nd BENZCH A)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd INDENO(l,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd DIBENZQ PBrcant Moi»tur» 9.27. 15'/. 217. 147. 177. All samples have an initial dilution of 10 >; due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit -for analysis is 10 mg/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution o-F samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 mg/Kg and i" a considered approximate. TABLE 2 Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. ! SAMPLE NUMBER I PARAMETER i 07981 A A-07982 B-07988 B-07990 "<• ta. ————————I =V-—— NAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ^nd 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd C ^hd 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd < 3nd 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ( yd 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ^ ^d ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd -'nd ACENAPHTHENE nd nd nd nd nd FLUORENE nd C103 nd nd nd PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE C103 nd nd nd nd ANTHRACENE C243 nd nd nd nd FLUORANTHENE C7.23 C6.43 nd nd nd PYRENE [A.53 C5.73 nd nd nd BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd CHRYSENE nd nd nd ndnd BEN ZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd nd BEN20(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd nd Percent Moisture 437. 397. 177. 157. 20Z All samples have an initial dilution of 10 x due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit -for analysis is 10 ing/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 mg/Kg and is considered approximate. TABLE 2 (cent.) RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALfSI; AND PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg o-f sample. 4 SAMPLE NUMBER 1 PARAMETER ! A-07997 0-07*995 07965B 07965A 07966A 2000>;d 2000>;d i30>;d ^ 3 NAPHTHALENE . 1:24] nd 300000 790000 3000 ?° 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE C113 nd 21000 69000- 180 X) 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd C100003 C320003 C9? ki: 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd C21003 C66003 C »d 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd C )d ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd ^ ACENAPHTHENE nd nd 20000 59000 210<®0 FLUORENE C243 nd El 10003 C310003 C12<0003 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd rnd PHENANTHRENE 74 nd 23000 59000 270(00 ANTHRACENE nd nd [94003 C120003 C53(003 FLUORANTHENE C343 nd C80003 C200003 C110003 PYRENE C243 nd C54003 C130003 1:76 X»3 BEN20(A)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd CHRYSENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd ,-nl d BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd .nd nd nd DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(G,H.I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd nd Percent Moisture 157. 117. 297. 717. 347. All samples have an initial dilution of 10 x due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit for analysis is 10 mg/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 mg/Kg K the dilution factor, and is considered approximate. '.\ 1 ^) TABLE 2 (cont.) RESULTS tOF BASE NEUTtRAL/ACID E£XTRACTABLE£3 IN SOIL ANALT ANID PERCENT MO ISTURE AWftLYSIS ^ Concentralfcions reportsad in mg/^ PARAMETER ! 07966C1 E3-07996 ^2k-07989 A--07991 1 I lOOxd ^. - ^^ £. Is NAPHTHALENE 3300 210 nd 900 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd 70 nd 200 's; 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C403 nd 94 00 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd 1:233 nd C403 0 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd 1:113 nd 1:173 c> ACENAPHTHYLENE nd 1:4.33 nd C123 c- » ACENAPHTHENE nd 96 nd 160 FLUORENE nd 120 nd 170 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE nd 420 nd 490 ANTHRACENE nd 63 nd 87 FLUORANTHENE nd 200 nd 210 PYRENE nd 130 nd 140 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd C313 nd C353 CHRYSENE nd C323 nd C303 BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd C183 nd C163 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd • BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd nd E133 INDENO <1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd Percent Moisture 167. 167. 147. 137. All samples have an initi al dilution of 10 K due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection 1imit -for analysis is 10 mg/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limi t of quanti fi cation o-f 50 mg/Kg and is considered approximate. (1) Sample was diluted to obtain the response for naphthalene only whict was outside the calibration range on the initial analysis. TABLE 2 (cont.) RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANAL/S AND PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. 6 SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER i B-07992 A--07986 B-07985 07852A S52B 100>;d CT:);;d NAPHTHALENE nd nd 1400 1200 f too 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 310 C3603 IP fc-03 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 150 C2203 K Pt03 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 63 C1203 C£ 3»03 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd C293 nd •^43 ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd C183 nd C333 ACENAPHTHENE nd nd 300 690 730 FLUORENE nd nd 360 800 B60 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE nd nd 1000 3300 3300 ANTHRACENE nd nd 230 C4303 C 4303 FLUORANTHENE nd nd 430 1700 1600 PYRENE nd nd 280 1200 1200 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd nd 71 C2803 C 2703 CHRYSENE nd nd 62 C2903 C 3DO 3 BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd C313 C1803 L 1603 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd E253 C1203 C 1203 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd • nd DI BENZ0(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(G, H, I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd nd Percent Moisture 16% 14V. 137. 177. 14X All samples have an initial dilution o-f 10 y. due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit -For analysis is 10 mg/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 ing/Kg and i5 considered approximate. TABLfc. U (con-.1 RESULTS"OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTAELES IN SOIL ANAL, AND PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS ' Concentrations reported in mqyKg of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER 07964A y 07B55 '07980B 07S53B A-079R3 l000;-;d 200>;d lOOKd 100*.! NAPHTHALENE 390000 10000 940 720 160 y 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 14-0000 3900 C4003 230 - 63 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 63000 1900 1:2503 130 L-37' 3 2,6-D i METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C13003 1:1403 SO C26M 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd C6503 CS03 1:383 1:10(p ACENAPHTHYLENE nd C3003 nd C233 ni0 ACENAPHTHENE . nopoo 6800 1300 3.00 140 , FLUGRENE 1:490003 8100 1700 - 300 1900- PENTACHLORGPHENOL nd nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE C580003 30000 6300 1000 7000 ANTHRACENE 1:100003 6300 1900 ^ . 190 1300 FLUORANTHENE nd 15000 3000 550 -3700' PYRENE . nd 10000 2000 410 2600 . EENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd 2300 C4303 130 630. CHRYSENE . . nd 2500 £: 400 3 110 640 BENZG\BiFLUORQANTHENE nd C12003 [:2103 84 L330^' EENZG CK< FLUGROANTHENE nd nd nd nd lid BENZG(A;PYRENE nd C8203 1:1203 69 L 220 '3 INDENG S1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd C323 nd D.CBENZu'A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZG(G,H, DPERYLENE nd nd nd C273 r-id Percent Moisture 92-/: 437. 6.oy. All san-iples have an initial dilution of 10 >; due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit -for analysis i's 10 mg/'Kg. Sample detection limits may vary wi.th dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 iTig/Kg and is considered approximate. TABLE 2 (cont.) RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE3 IN SOIL ANALVS AND PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. 8 1 SAMPLE NUMBEF^ 1 PARAMETER ! 07979C <37964C. 1 07964C 07853A A-C 7968 1 1000;;d 100>;d 100>;d •^ < NAPHTHALENE 5SO :31000 38000 2300 |nd 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 140 nd 3400 660- ( &d 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 77 nd 1500 1:3803 d 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C283 nd C3203 C2403 3nd 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 1:143 nd 1:1203 C1303 < ?d ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd < Fte ACENAPHTHENE 99 nd 2700 1300 nd FLUORENE 100 nd 1300 1300 nd PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE 240 nd 1600 5100 nd ANTHRACENE C433 nd C3003 710 nd FLUORANTHENE 80 nd C3703 2900 nd PYRENE 59 nd 1:2303 2100 nd BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE C143 nd nd C5403 nd CHRYSENE C133 nd nd C3303 nd BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE 1:8.63 nd nd nd rf'd BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd C2603 nd BENZO(A)PYRENE 1:6.33 nd nd nd nd INDENO(1,2.3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd nd DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd nd BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd nd Percent Moisture 147. 267. 267. 137. 25% All samples have an initial dilution of 10 K due to the extraction procedure. nd denotes not detected. Detection limit for analysis is 10 mg/Kg. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution of samples containing a large amount of contamination. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 mg/Kg and is considered approximate. (1) Sample was diluted to obtain the response for naphthalene only whici- was outside the calibration range on the initial analysis. TABLE 2. RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE IN WATER ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in ug/L of sample. 1 SAMPLE NUMBER 1 1 PARAMETER 1 142BA 7970C 7974 1428B NAPHTHALENE nd C42.03 nd nd •' 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd i "\ 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd " ( 3 nd nd nd 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd 3 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd < 5 ACENAPHTHENE nd 123 nd nd C > FLUORENE nd 72.0 nd nd 7 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE nd 1:42.43 nd nd ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd FLUORANTHENE nd nd nd nd PYRENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd Ell.33 nd nd CHRYSENE nd 1:13.93 nd nd -"? BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd' BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd •""' ~ BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd nd nd INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd •nd nd BENZO nd denotes not detected. Detection limit for analysis is 10 ug/L. Sample detection limits may vary with dilution and concentration of samples containing a large amount of contaminant!on. C3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 ug/L and is considered appro;-;! mate. :! i I [ 7ABLE 2 (contd.) RESULTS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE IN WATER ANAL/SI ! ' Concentrations reported in ug/L of sample. [ ^s. tj Sj ! SAMPLE NUMBER ) ! PARAMETER ! 7971 7973C 7976 7977 7977«1* ! 1.2;-; cone 7.5>; cone 9.3>; cone 1.36>; con -————-————————————————————————————-——————„—— -S^.--^C\ - 1APHTHALENE 35100 90.2 7040 18300 M.SOO -:-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 6430 1:12.03 859 4660 -H L-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 1:31503 169 nd 2520- ho :,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C10503 nd nd 2840 ^ :,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 781 nd nd 1880 IL -.CENAPHTHALENE nd nd nd 802 ^ -tCENAPHTHENE 6240 454 C5333 8160 ^ -^LUORENE 7370 213 1:4683 7690 7. -•-ENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd ^HENANTHRENE 21800 172 960 19700 20600 ANTHRACENE C37503 nd C3043 3540 PLUQRANTHENE 8830 C33.03 C3563 10600 P-YRENE 5500 C30.63 C2873 7540 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE C13103 C16.63 C643 1310 3HRYSENE C 12803 C22.03 1:723 1190 ?. 3ENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE C6263 C79.03 nd [:5153 3EN20(K)FLUQROANTHENE nd nd nd nd 3EN20(A)PYRENE C3563 nd nd C3133 INDENO(l,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd DIBENZQ(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd 3EN20(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd nd denotes not detected. Detection limit for analysis is 10 ug/L. sample detection limits may vary with dilution and concentration of samples containing a large amount of contamination. :3 denotes the result was below the lower limit of quantification of 50 ug/L and is considered approximate. (1) Sample 7977 concentrate was diluted to obtain responses for naphthale and phenanthrene which were within the calibration range. j TABLE 2a. DETECTION LIMITS AND CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Extract Final E>; tract Detection Weight Volume Dilution Limit Moisture Factor (mg/Kd^ Sample # (grams) (ml) •/. B-07985 10. 15 100 13 —— 11 l B-07990 10.44 100 15 —— 11 C A-07991 9.94 100 13 •—— 12 C A-07969 10.45 100 19 —— 12 C A-07997 10.22 100 15 —— 12 A-07982 10.98 100 39 ——— 15 3 07979C 10.05 100 14 —— 12 07853B 10.95 100 12 —— 10 07981 A 10. 18 100 43 —— 17 C-07995 10.25 100 11 —— 11 B-07967 10.55 100 16 —— 11 B-07996 10.37 100 16 —— 12 A-07986 10.37 100 14 —— 11 B-07993 10.05 100 20 —-— 12 B-07994 10.50 100 15 ——— 11 - A-07991 d 10.02 100 13 —— 12 B-07996 d 10. 14 100 16 ——— 12 07853B d 10.06 100 12 —— 11 07854A 3p 10. 16 100 18 —— 12 B-07996 sp 9.96 100 16 ——— 12 07853B sp 10.04 100 12 —— • 11 d denotes a duplicate sample sp denotes a spiked sample Instrument detection limit is 1.0 mg/Kg for all compounds except pentachlorophenol, which is 5.0 mg/Kg. Detection limit calculated using the following formulas Detection Limit = 1.0 mg/Kg >; Fin.vol x 1 ^ EDL Ext.wt (1-7.M) 1.0 mg/Kg = instrument detection limit Fin.vol = final extract volume before dilution E>;t.wt = weight of soil extract 7. M = percent moisture EDL = extract dilution factor; if extract needed dilution to keep the response within the calibration range. TABLE 2a (cont.) DETECTION LIMITS AND CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Extract Final Extract Detecti on Weight Volume Dilution Limit Sample ft (grams) (ml) •/f. Moisture Factor (mg/Kg ) 07964A 10.07 100 92 100 12000 07B52A 10.02 100 17 10 ia^ ?~*» A-07983 10.02 100 10 10 1^ 07965B 10.28 100 29 200 270C 07966A 10.20 100 34 200 300(E "'» 07S54B 10.04 100 15 5 07965A 10.02 100 71 200 690^ 07964C 10. 15 100 26 10 130 > A-07989 10.02 100 14 1$ ) 07965C 10.04 100 17 —— IE » 07966C 10. 14 100 21 —— 13 07853A 10.23 100 13 10 110 07852B 10.67 100 14 10 110 07854A 9.90 100 18 —- 12 B-07992 10.34 100 16 —— 12 07984A 10.10 100 9.2 —— 11 07890B 10.71 100 6.0 10 100 A-07995 10.33 100 15 —.- 11 . B-07995 10.02 100 14 —— 11 A-07968 10.07 100 25 —— 13- 07855 10.21 100 43 20 340 B-0798B 10. 17 100 17 •-—— 12 Instrument detection limit is 1.0 mg/Kg -for all compounds except pentachlorophenol, which is 5.0 mg/Kg. Detection limit calculated using the following formula: Detection Limit = 1.0 mg/Kg 'A Fin.vol >; 1 x EDL Ext.wt (1-7.M) 1.0 mg/Kg = instrument detection limit Fin.vol = final extract volume before dilution Ext.wt = weight of soil extract 7. M = percent moisture EDL = extract dilution factor; if extract needed dilution to keep the response within the calibration range. TABLE 2b. DETECTION LIMITS AND CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE3-IN MATER ANALYSIS Extract Final Concentrati on Detection Sample tt Volume (ml ) Volume (ml) Factor Limit (ug/L) BW1428A 1025 10. 0 103 '"10«A BW1428B 1025 10. 0 103 ~1<^^- 7970C 1000 10. 0 100 '"lO^ '> 7971C 1050 900 1.16 ''•860 l i 7973C 1050 10. 0 105 ~10.t r^ 7974C 1050 10. 0 105 - •"10.^ 7976C 750 100 7.5 •VI -—' 0 7977C 930 100 9.3 •"100, 0 Method Blank 1000 10. 0 100 '"10.©) Method Spike 1000 10. 0 100 ~10.0 7970D d 700 10. 0 70 '"14.3 7974D d 1025 10. 0 107 •"lO.O 7970C sp 980 10. 0 98 '"10.0 Instrument detection limit -for all creosote compounds is 1.0 ug/ml , and 5.0 ug/ml -for pentachlorophenol. d denotes a duplicate sample sp denotes a spiked sample T LE 3. RESULTS OF GC/MS M- VSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Con cent rat ions reported in mg/Kg of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER i PARAMETER i B-079?85 i i BC/FID GC/MS NAPHTHALENE 1400 1300 ^P- 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 310 360* ^ 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 150 170* U\ 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 63 nd 0 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C29] nd 0 ACENAPHTHVLENE C183 C263 0 ACENAPHTHENE 300 320 FLUORENE 360 380 0 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd PHENANTHRENE 1000 970 - ANTHRACENE 230 210 FLUORANTHENE 430 430 PYRENE 280 230 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 71 C663 CHRYSENE 62 1:663 BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE C313 C623 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd , BENZO(A)PYRENE C253 C303 INDENO •; 1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd C113 DrBENZO(A,Hi ANTHRACENE nd nd. BENZO(G.H,I)PERYLENE nd C 10 3 OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in nig/Kg COMPOUND DIBENZOFURAN 230 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 150 UNKNOWN 110 METHYL PHENANTHRENE ISOMER 75 METHYL PHENANTHRENE ISOMER 76 UNKNOWN PAH 100 Ci^His PAH 89 C,..7Hi= PAH 67 - - Concentrations reported -for this compound is an approximate value based on the internal standard used. TABLE 3 (cent.) RESULTS OF GC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. __-_-._-_—__——-.-_—^-____-^^^-^^^^^-__———_——. PARAMETER ! 079&6C 1 ! EC/FID GC/MS NAPHTHALENE 3400 4200 m 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 460 370730* " Jb 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 220 * 6 2,6~DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C513 110* T 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C223 nd 3 ACENAPHTHYLENE 1:123 C223 «^ ACENAPHTHENE 470 660 FLUORENE 330 430 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd PHENANTHRENE 760 990 ANTHRACENE 380 490 FLUORANTHENE 290 410 PYRENE 200 230 BEN 20(A)ANTHRACENE 1:353 1:513 CHRYSENE C333 C513 BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE C143 C413 BENZO tK)FLUOROANTHENE 1:133 C193 BENZO •;A) PYRENE nd nd INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE. nd nd DIBENZO CA,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd ' BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in n-ig/Kg COMPOUND TRIMETHYL-BICYCLOI:3. 1. 13HEPT-2-ENE ISOMER 240 UNKNOWN 180 1,1'-BIPHENYL 220 DI BEN Z OFURAN 350 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 90 UNKNOWN 200 UNKNOWN PAH 73 * - Concentrations reported for this compound is an approximate valu.a based on the internal standard used. TABLE 3 (cont.'r RESULTS OF GC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER B-07996 BC/'FID GC/'MS NAPHTHALENE 210 310 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 70 110* 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE C403 56* 2,6~DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C233 nd 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 1-113 . nd ACENAPHTHALENE 1:4.33 C6.93 ACENAPHTHENE 96 140 FLUORENE - -120 170 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd PHENANTHRENE 420 550 ANTHRACENE 63 S7 FLUORANTHENE 200 270 PYRENE 130 140 BEN 20(A)ANTHRACENE C313 C393 CHRYSENE 1:3.23 C4B3 BENZO •:B) FLUOROANTHENE - 1:183 C483 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE L123 nd BENZO(A)PYREME nd 1:213 INDENQ(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd C9.23 D I BENZO (A,!-15 ANTHRACENE nd nd BENZO •; G,H.I)PERYLENE nd C3. 13 OTHER IDENTIFIED COHPOUHDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in mg/Kg COMPOUND DIBENZOFURAN 76 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 57 UNKNOWN 38 CxaHiz PAH 33 CisHia PAH 39 UNKNOWN PAH 50 Cx-^Hzs PAH 39 Concentrations reported -for this compound is an approximate value based on the internal standard used. TABLE 3 Concentrations reported in mg/Kg o-f sample, ! SAMP LE NUMBER 1 1 PARAMETER 1 A-07991 I GC/FID GC/MS ^ N^'> - ( 1 NAPHTHALENE 900 1100 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 200 260-i- 1'^ 1-METKYLNAPHTHALENE 94 130* 0 2,6--D I METHYLNAPHTHALENE C403 70* OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOi.'HDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in mg/Kg COMPOUND DIBENZOFURAN 130 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 68 UNKNOWN 41 CisHia PAH 32 UNKNOWN PAH 60 Cr^-Hia PAH 46 Concentrations reported -for this compound is an ap p r o;; i m a t e v a 1 u e based on the internal standard used. TABLE 3 (cont.; RESULTS OF SC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID E^XTRACTABLES IN SOIL ANALYSIS Conc'entrati c.ns reported in ing/Kg of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER 07852B ; BC/FID GC/MS -S| NAPHTHALENE 1300 1300 ^ D 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE C4203 580* ( 3 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 1:240"J 330* 3 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C140T nd 3 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C443 nd ACENAPHTHYLENE £33 3 C553 5 - ACENAPHTHENE ' 730 . 710 ' FLUORENE 860 7 SO PENTACHLORDPHENOL nd C9.03 PHENANTHRENE 3200 . 3400 . . ANTHRACENE C 430:1 - 430 FLUORANTHENE 1600 ' , 1500 PYRENE 1200 770 BEN20 •:A) ANTHRACENE C2703 250 CHRYSENE C3003 300 . BEN Z 0 (B)FLUOROANTHENE 1:1703 340 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE • C1203 1:1503 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd C653 DIBENZO •: A,H)ANTHRACENE nd 1:213 BENZO' G , H, I)PERVLENE nd C593 OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in mg/Kg COMPOUND DIBENZOFURAN 480 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 450 UNKNOWN 240 Ci=Hi=. PAH 210 Ci»Hi3 PAH 240 UNKNOWN PAH 420 Ct7Hi= PAH 330 C^Hi., PAH 250 Concentrations reported for this compound i s an appro;-; i mate -value based on the internal standard used. ') ) TABLE 3 (cont.) RESULTS OF GC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE IN SOIL ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg of sample, ! SAMPLE NUMBER I PARAMETER ! A-079S3 I ! GC/'FID GC/MS ^ 0 NAPHTHALENE 1600 1800 '' 3 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 630 720* \ 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE C3703 nd - 0 ) 2.6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE C200:1 nd C > 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 1:1003 nd ^ ? ACENAPHTHALENE nd 1:893 < •> ACENAPHTHENE 1400 1700 FLUORENE 1900 2000 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd PHENANTHRENE 7000 6600 ANTHRACENE 1300 1300 FLUORANTHENE 3700 3700 PYRENE 2600 1900 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 630 C5203 CHRYSENE 640 C6203 BEN20(B)FLUOROANTHENE 1:3303 C5903 -W" BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE . C2203 C2403 I NDENO (1,2, 3.-CD) PYRENE nd C1003 DI BEN ZQ(A,H)ANTHRACENE nd nd . BENZO(G,H,13PERYLENE nd C443 OTHER IDENTIFIED COHPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in mg/Kg COMPOUND DIBENZOFURAN 890 DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 690 UNKNOWN 510 C.t=Hi2 PAH 410 Ci=Hi= PAH 490 UNKNOWN PAH 880 CiT-Hiz PAH 630 Ci^His PAH 490 * - Concentrations reported for this compound i< an appro;-; i mate value based on the internal standard used. TABLE- J (cont. ) RESULTS OF GC/Mfa ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN WATER ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in ug/L of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER 7976 7.5>i cone 6C/FID G-C/MS NAPHTHALENE 7040 6530 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 859 nd 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd 2,3-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd ACENAPHTHYLENE nd C53.33 ACENAPHTHENE 1:5333 C6003 FLUORENE C4683 1:4803 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd 1:28103 PHENANTHRENE 960 C10403 ANTHRACENE 1:'3043 C1873 FLUORANTHENE 1:3563 C4133 PYRENE 1:2873 C2273 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE C 64 3 1:80.03 CHRYSENE C723 1:80.03 BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd C66.73 BENZO(K)FLUOROANTKENE nd na BENZO'; A)PYRENE " nd L ^J'^f. •^> J INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE n d nd DI BEN Z 0(A,H)ANTHRACENE n d nd BEN Z 0(G,H,I)PERYLENE n d nd OTHER IDEHT1FIED COsiFOUHDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in ug/L COMPOUND METHYL PHENOL ISOMER 10800 METHYL PHENOL ISOMER 18700 DIMETHYL PHENOL ISOMER 18700 DIMETHYL PHENOL ISOMER 4000 ETHYL-METHYL-PHENOL ISOMER 4000 UNKNOWN 2400 UNKNOWN 2930 UNKNOWN 7330 S-QUINOLINOL 6530 UNKNOWN 1870 PHENOL 4890 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 16400 Concentrations reported -for this compound is an approximate value based on the internal standard used. '.) TABLE 3 (cont.) RESULTS OF GC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRAC7ABLES IN WATER ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in ug/L of sample. SAMPLE NUMBER PARAMETER 7977 9.3>; cone ! GC/FID GC/MS NAPHTHALENE 18300 18400 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 4660 5480* 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2520 nd 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 2S40 4730* 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 1880 nd ACENAPHTHYLENE 802 C2903 ACENAPHTHENE 8160 6770 FLUORENE 7690 6350 PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd 9250 PHENANTHRENE 19700 23100 ANTHRACENE 3540 2600 FLLIORANTHENE 10600 9160 FYRENE 7540 4870 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 1310 1086 CHRYSENE 1190 1180 BENZO •: B)FLUOROANTHENE C 515 3 C9133 BENZO •; K)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd BENZD(A)PYRENE C3133 1:312:3 TNDENOd,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd 1:96.73 DI BEN Z 0/A,H)ANTHRACENE n d 1:32.33 BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd C75.33 OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimat'ed concentration, in ug/L COMPOUND DIBEN20FURAN 4090 UNKNOWN 3120 HEPTADECANE Ci^H^ 6670 NONODECANE Ci,H,o 6450 METHYL PHENANTHERNE ISOMER 2580 UNKNOWN PAH 3870 UNKNOWN ALKANE 7420 UNKNOWN 3230 Concentrations reported for this compound is an appro;-; i mate value based on the internal standard used. TABLE 3 (cont.) RESULTS OF GC/MS ANALYSIS OF BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN WATER ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in ug/L o-f sample. SAM1PLE NUMBER PARAMETER ! 1428A 1428B GC/FID GC/MS GC/FID GC/MS ^L ------^ NAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd "^ 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd vj:» 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ^ 2,6-DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd ,.: 2,3-D IMETHYLNAPHTHALENE nd nd nd nd c ACENAPHTHYLENE nd nd nd nd C' ACENAPHTHENE nd nd nd nd C> FLUORENE nd nd nd nd PENTACHLOROPHENOL nd nd nd nd PHENANTHRENE nd nd nd nd ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd FLUORANTHENE nd nd nd nd PYRENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd CHRYSENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(B)FLUOROANTHENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(K)FLUOROANTHENE . nd nd nd nd BENZO(A)PYRENE nd nd nd nd INDENO <1,2,3-CD)PYRENE nd nd nd nd D I.BENZO (A, H) ANTHRACENE nd nd nd nd BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE nd nd nd nd OTHER IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Concentration reported as estimated concentration, in ug/L COMPOUND DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE C5.33 C1.93 UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 2.4 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 4. 1 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 1.8 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 1.7 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 1.3 nd UNKNOWN 4.1 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 3.0 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 1.6 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 1.7 nd UNKNOWN PHTHALATE ESTER 2.8 nd » TABLE A. RESULTS OF 2.3.7, 8-TCDD/TCDF ISOMER &.'ECIFIC ANALYSIS Concentrati on reported in u9/L ^ • Client < 7851 7851 7851 RB IT • J4857R J4857RMS J4857RMSD BLK998R £05EH£B ^Cl-TCDD (» acc) 102 108 115 91 "C-TCOO ^ rec) 52 46 52 44 TCDD N0(5.0) 60.0 59.6 N0(0.16) PeCDD N0(6.3) 66.7 67.8 N0(0.091) 2.3,7,8-PeCOD N0(6.3) 66.7 67.8 N0(0.091) •-' HxCDD 73.3 108.0 160. N0(0.12) 2,3,7,8-HXCOD 27.8 79.8 102. N0(0.12) HpCDD 1,940 1,130 2,200 N0(0.072) 2,3,7,8-HpCDD 1,030 665.0 1,210 N0(0.072) OCDD 7,700 4,440 9,170 N0(0.083) TCDF N0(3.9) 77.6 73.5 N0(0.11) PeCDF N0(3.5) 65.4 62.9 N0(0.089) 2,3,7,8-PeCOF N0(3.5) 65.4 62.9 N0(0.089) HxCDF 96.4 120. 173. N0(0.070) 2,3,7,8-HxCDF —— 65.8 66.4 N0(0.070) 718. 506. 908 NOJO.jMO) HpCDF •set r\ f\ r\ 2,3,7,8-HpCDF 167. 166. < tfOA. •\} \J \J -^-wci^eyo) OCDF 928. 630. , 1310 N0(0.30) TABLE 5. RESULTS OF TOTAL DIOXIN AND FURAN ANALYSIS Concentration reported in uo/L rer^^^^^- /?- p1^ Sample ID 2,3,7,8-TCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF Surrogate Internal Standar Client f IT# Date Tine (ppb) (ppb) (» Accuracy) % Recovery 7851 J4857R2 11-19-87 15:46 N0(4.2) N0(3.0) 96 87 ^7851 J4857RMS 11-19-87 19:21 66.3 A 97 A 7851 J4857RMSD 11-20-87 11:70 60.3 A 96 A RB BLK998R 11-19-87 12:19 N0(0.92) N0(0.44) 78 48 ^ot calculable due to matrix interferences. ?'; I! ?\ ':) . ; \ 1 I 1- (AbLE b. RE.bULr.3 Uh 1 U 1 AL h-MLNUl-ICa ANAL •f:-> L^ A »'. H" 1 concentration reoorted as .-nenoi in u.3/..? u^t ^i-y.t ^ r~ MDL -AMPLE ID RESULTS ^ 0:) 07852A 27 1.1 <^ 1 07852B 21 I- 0 (b 07853A 25 1.0 07853B 4.6 1.1 ND 0.97 07854A 1 1 07854B ND - 07855 64 1.0 07964A 110 1-0 07964C 34 1.2 4 4 07965A 180 - 07965B 510 1-1 07965C 26 1.1 8 7 07966A 220 . 07966C 30 1.1 07967B 1.8 1-2 07968A ND 1-1 ND 0.84 07969A 07979C 11 1.2 '') ^ 1 AbLfc c- ^onccl. KESULro Uh IUIAL l-Ht-NULICo APIAL.Y-.3L'J L onc-entrat ion reDorted as t-'henoi in u-3/'-? wet weiaiit SAMPLE ID RESULTS MDL 07980B 8.8 1.2 ^ l 1 07981A ND . 0() \X » 07982A ND I-2 oo 07983A 40 1.1 co) 07984A 2.0 1.1 Cp 07985B 6.6 1.2 079 86A ND 0.93 07988B ND I.I 07989A ND 1.1 t 07990B ND 1 • 1 07991A 42 0.96 07992B ND 1.0 07993B ND 1.1 07994B ND - - 1.1 84 07995A ND °. 07995B ND 1.1 07995C ND 1.0 07996B ND 1.1 07997A ND 1.0 Volatile Organic Analysis QA/QC Procedures The surrogate standard recoveries for bromochloromethane are listed in Table 7. The recoveries range -From 83.7% to 116. The matrix spike of sample 7977 is shown on Table 8. The recoveries ranged from 56% -For toluene to 1007. for chloroform. The recoveries for toluene and ethyl benzene of the matrix spike duplicate were, somewhat, low due to instrument drifting, since the recovery for the same compounds of the matrix spike were within the acceptable range. recoveries except for toluene and ethyl benzene are considered acceptable. EMSL performance evaluation standard results are in Table 9.' The ^ recoveries ranged from 56% to 129% for the analysis on November 24tn. 1987, with the recovery for bromodichloromethane being 56%. Base Neutral/Acid Extractables QA/QC Procedures All soil and water samples were spiked with 1.0 ml of a surrogate mixture containing 100 ug/ml 2-fluorobiphenyl + 5000 ug/ml 2,4,6-tribromophenol to monitor extraction efficiency. Due to the high concentration of matrix interferents, surrogate recoveries were not obtained for samples requiring extract dilution. Surrogate recovery results are presented in Table 10. Soil samples A-07991, B-Q7996 and 07853A were split, extracted, and analysed in duplicate. Mater sample 7970C was extracted, and analysed in duplicate. Soil samples 07854A, B-07996, and 07853B, and water sample 7070E were spiked with the creosote mixture to monitor extraction efficiency and adverse matrix effects. Duplicate results are in Table 11, and spike results are in Tables 12 and 13. Table 12 contains the results of a method spike of the PAH mixture in water. An EMSL performance evaluation sample of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons was analyzed according to the methodology outlined in the EMSL instructions, values were within the 95% confidence interval established by EMSL. Table 14 contains the results of the EMSL analysis. ') '') TABLE 7.i SURROGATE STANDAF••iD RECOVERIES FOR V'OLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS Date Sarnole '/. Recovery 11-12-97 5 DDb A+B 92.2 10 DDb A+B 99.9 50 DDb A+B 103 11-16-87 50 DDb A+B 104 50 DDb A onl.y 98.2 100 DDb A+B 99.9 ^ 11-17-87 25 DDb A+B 105 "^^ 50 DPb A+B 109 0 11-24-87 25 DDb A+B ————3^——3^ EMSL 483 cone. #3 116 T 11-27-87 25 DDb A+B 108 CP 7970 86.8 d& 7971 97.7 7972 86.2 7973 113 7974 105 7975 83.7 7976 111 11-30-87 25 DDb A+B 108 7977 93.8 7977 DLID. 94.4 7977 Spike 10 DDb A+B 100 7977 SDike 10 DDb A+B DUD. 100 • TABLE 8. MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES FOR VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS Sample no. 7977 (DF 1:5) Sample Spike Reco'vered '/. Rec a very Parameter cone. added cornc. RP Methylene Chloride 18.4 10 18.4 12.4 0.00 0.00 0. 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 10 8.20 8.98 82.0 89.8 9.0 1,1-Di chloroethane ND 10 8.58 9.07 85.8 90.7 Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 10 7.78 8.25 77.8 82.5 ?! Chloroform ND 10 8.75 10.0 87.5 100 l3t < 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 10 9.68 9.42 96.8 94.2 2•'^. 1,1,1—Tri chloroethane ND 10 9.43 8.68 94.3 86.8 8J ——————————————— £, Carbon Tetrachloride ND 10 8.87 8.21 88.7 82.1 7.7 Bromodi chloromethane 10.5 10 18.4 18.4 79.0 79.0 O.t 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 10 8.94 8.90 89.4 89.0 0.4' Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 10 8.68 8.71 86.8 87. 1 0.3 Trichloroethene ND 10 8.82 0 • 0^- 88.2 88.2 0. Benzene ND 10 9. 10 8.98 91.0 89.8 1.3 Dibromochloromethane** • 1,1,2-Trichloroethane* ND 10 10. 1 9.50 101.0 95.0 6. 1: cis-l,3-Dichloropropene- Bromo-form ND 10 0 • •w't-* 8.33 83.3 0^2*. •w> 0.( 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane4* Tetrachioroethene** ND 10 8.33 8.33 83.3 83.3 O.t Toluene 1:4.8] 10 12.2 10.4 74.0 56.0 27. Chlorobenzene ND 10 7.80 7.62 78.0 76.2 2.3: Ethyl Benzene 7.6 10 15.4 12.4 78.0 48.0 47. < »,ft denotes coelutinq compounds C3 denotes approximate values between the detection limit and the quantitation limit. TABLE 9. EMSL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS (concentrations reported as ug/L) Parameter Recovered " True ^Recovery cone. cone. 88.8 75.5 117.6 Chloroform 1,2-Di chloroethane 20.0 15.5 129.0 1,1,l~Trichloroethane .11.8 9.5 124.2 32.0 28.0 114.3 Carbon Tetrachloride 4.2 7.5 56.0 Bromodichloroethane 8.85 7.5 118.0 Trichloroethene 20.0 19.5 102.6 Bromoform 11.2 12.5 89.6 <^. Tetrachloroethene I- 00 ._> TABLE 10s SURROGATE STANDARD K^JOVERIES BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES 2--Fit.iorobiphenyl 2,4,6--Tr'-ibromophenol Sample Number 7. Recovery 7. Recovery Soil Samples A-07969 87. 2 101 07854A 96. 6 107 B-07967 92. 7 104 07S54B 99. 1 108 r^ B-07994 93. 9 108 '^^ 07984A B7. 3 98.7 <^ A-07995 101 111 P 07966C 107 111154 r- B-07995 101 " cb 07965C 99. 4 106 9 07981 A 84. 8 102 < 3 A-07982 89. 7 104 <& B-07988 85. 0 98. 1 B-07990 86.0 96.2 B-07993 88. 2 103 A-07997 99. 9 110 C-07995 87. 1 98.6 07965B •)(••» »* 07965A •»* ** 07966A •)(••»• *•» B-07996 99. 2 109 -' A-07989 78. 7 89. 1 A-07991 97. ..;• 106 B-07992 79. 7 92.6 »* denotes samples have no surrogate recoveries because of sample extract dilution due to high sample responses outside the calibration range; surrogate response was diluted below a detectable limit. {-• "'•" 1 1• t l TABLE 10 (cont.) SURROGATE STANDARD RECOVERIES ( BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES t 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2,4,6-Tribromopheno i Sample Number 7. Recovery V. Recovery yH t »———•———————————— Sf Soil Samples (4 § A-07986 84.9 95.6 H B-07985 94.2 ' 111 07852A 76.0 112 -^ 07B52B 76.1 113 ^ 07964A ** ** . 07855 ** " ** 07980B 79.5 90.3 ( 078S3B 98.9 116 < A-07983 86.6 1641 < 07979C 94. 1 102 < 079&4C 80.0 92.6 ' 07853A 82.1 1431 A-07868 70.5 85.4 07853B d 78.0 91.7 B-07996 d 92.0 99.8 A-07991 d 88.6 98.4 07854A sp 84.3 94.9 B-07996 sp 92.3 101 07853B sp 87.0 100 ** denotes samples have no surrogate recoveries because of sample extract dilution due to high sample responses outside the calibratio range; surrogate response was diluted below a detectable limit. d denotes a duplicate sample sp denotes a spiked sample (I) Sample contained a large amount o-f unidenti-fied hydrocarbon peak which may have coeluted with the surrogate standard. | t •i I ' ; I '^ - ^, TABLE 10 (cent.) SURROGATE STANDARD RECOVERIES BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES 2-F1uorobi phenyl 2,4,6-Tr i bromophenol Sample Number 7. Recovery 7. Recovery Water Samples 7971C «« 7977D »* 7970E sp 76.5 Method Blank 64.5 Method Spike 87.0 1428A 63.8 7970C 82.2 7974C * 64.9 142BB 81.4 7974D d 73.3 7970D d 57.9 7973C 81.3 7976C ** 7977C »* ** denotes samples have no surrogate recoveries because of sample extract dilution due to high sample responses outside the calibration-' range; surrogate response was diluted below a detectable limit. d denotes a duplicate sample sp denotes a spiked sample TABLE 11. RESULTS OF DUPLICATE BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLE5 ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg Sample no. 07996B Parameter Run #1 Run #2 Difference RPD -——^\ r?< Naphthalene 210 200 10 *-? 2-Methylnaphthalene 70 68 *L . 7\ 1-Methyl naphthalene C403 C393 1 - J-' . •4.3-'. 2,6-Dimethyl naphthalene C233 F233 0 O.CC2 2,3-Dimethyl naphthalene Cll 3 C113 0 0. Qg Acenaphthylene 1:4 .33 C4.43 0. 1 2.2S Acenaphthene 96 94 2 2.1J Flourene 120 110 10 3.0't ——— Pentachlorophenol nd nd ——— Phenanthrene 420 390 30 7.41 Anthracene 63 61 2 3.22 Fluoranthene 200 200 0 0.00 Fyrene 130 120 10 8.00 Benzo(A)anthracene C31 3 C263 5 17.5 Chrysene C323 C313 1 3. 13 Benzo (B) fluoranthene C183 C173 1 5.71 Benzo(K)fluoranthene nd nd ——— -———— —.——— Benzo(A)pyrene nd nd -—— ——— ——" Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene nd nd Dibenzo(A,H)anthracene nd nd —— --——- Benzo(B,H, Dperylene nd nd • ' —— —-- nd denotes not detected RPD denotes relative percent difference TABLE 11 (cont.) RESULTS OF DUPLICATE BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations reported in nig/Kg Sample no. 07853B Parameter Run #1 Run#2 Dif-Ference R^ 1- C "* r •• Naphthalene 720 650 70 - 10.,, 2-Methylnaphthalene 230 210 20 ''•i^ 1-Methylnaphthalene 130 110 . 20 16.'"' 2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene 80 71 9 n. Phenanthrene 1000 860 140 15.1 Anthracene 190 170 20 11. 1 Fluoranthene 550 490 60 11.5 Pyrene 410 350 60 15.8 Benzo(A)anthracene 130 100 30 26.0 Chrysene 110 110 0 0.00 Ben2Q RPD denotes relative percent dif-ference TABLE 11 (cont.) RESULTS OF DUPLICATE BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES - ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations reported in mg/Kg Sample no. 07991 A Parameter Run #1 Run #2 Difference ^0 Naphthalene 900 860 40 4^5• %. -^*-* 2-Methylnaphthalene 200 180 20 10^ I-Methyl naphthalene 94 86 8 8.^9 2,&-Dimethylnaphthalene C403 C363 4 10 0 2,3-Dimethylnaphthalene [:173 C173 0 0<^:i Acenaphthylene C123 C113 1 8^0 Acenaphthene 160 150 10 6.'45 Flnorene 170 170 0 0.00 Pentachiorophenol nd nd —— —— Phenanthrene 490 460 30 6.31 Anthracene B7 70 13 16.6 Fluoranthene 210 180 30 15.4 Pyrene 140 120 20 15.4 Benso(A)anthracene C353 1:293 6 18.8 Chrysene [:303 C283 2 6.9 Benso(B)fluorahthene C163 C153 1 &.J-5 Ben2o(K)fluoranthene nd nd —— ——— Benzo(A)pyrene 1:133 nd 13 ——— Indeno'. 1,2,3-cd)pyrene nd nd —— ~——— Dibenso(A,H)anthracene nd nd —— ———~ Benso(G,H,I)perylene nd nd nd denotes not detected RPD denotes relative percent difference. RPD was not calculated for any sample responses with nd. ' . i f I i TABLETABLE 11 (cont.) RESULTRESULTSS OOFF DUPLICATDUPLICATEE BASBASEE NEUTRNEUTRAL/ACIDAL/ACID EXTRACEXTRACTABLE3T ABLE3 IINN WATEWATERR ANALYSISANAlLVSIS »^ < ConcentrationsConcentr ations reporeportedr :ed iinn ugug/L/ L »5 »tl• ';»i SamplSamplee no.. 7974D7974D ;! ? Parameter Run #1 Run #2 Di -F-ference - I" 00 Naphthalene nd nd 0 2-Methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 ^OJ 5 1-Methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 0^ 2,6~Di methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 ocb 2,3-Dimethylnaphthalene nd nd 0 . 0 •• Acenaphthylene nd nd 0 0 Acenaphthene nd nd 0 0 Fluorene nd nd 0 0 Pentachiorophenol nd nd 0 0 Phenanthrene nd nd 0 0 Anthracene nd nd 0 0 Flouranthene nd nd 0 0 Pyrene nd nd 0 0 , 3enzo id denotes not detected ^PD denotes relative percent di-Fference TABLE 11 (cent.) RESULTS OF DUPLICATE BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN WATER ANALYSIS Concentrations reported in ug/'L Sample no. 7970D Parameter Run #1 Run#2 Di fference RPE) Naphthalene 42.0 3.9.9 2. 1 5-1 2-Methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 0 1-Methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 0 C 3 2,6—Di methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 0 < 3 2,3—Di methylnaphthalene nd nd 0 0 < 3 Acenaphthylene nd nd 0 0 < 3 Acenaphthene 123 125 2.0 Flnorene 72.0 76.0 4.0 5!•<. *§ Pentachlorophenol nd nd 0 0 Phenanthrene 42.4 71. 1 28.7 50. E Anthracene nd nd 0 0 Fluoranthene nd nd 0 0 Pyrene nd nd 0 0 Benzo(A)anthracene 11.3 10.7 0.6 5.415 Chrysene 13.9 10.9 3.0 24. 1 Benzo(B) -fluoranthene nd nd 0 0 Benzo (K) -Fluoranthene nd nd 0 0 ^ - Benzo(A)pyrene nd nd 0 0 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene nd nd 0 0 Dibenzo(A,H)anthracene nd nd 0 0 Benzo(6,H,I)perylene nd nd 0 0 nd denotes not detected RPD denotes relative percent difference .'") TABLE 12. RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations Reported in mg/Kg based on wet weight Sample No. 07853B Parameter Sample Spi ke Recovered Percent^ Cone. Cone. Cone. Recovery ) Q ) > Naphthalene 630 500 1200 114 ^ 2-Methylnaphthalene 200 ns 200 ) 1-Methyl naphthalene 110 ns 110 —— <" > 2,6-Dimethyl naphthalene 70 ns 69 —— 2,3-Dimethylnaphthalene C333 ns C353 —— Acenaphthylene C203 500 550 106 Acenaphthene 260 500 770 102 Fluorene 260 500 780 104 F'entachi orophenol nd 500 840- 168 Phenanthrene 840 500 1300 92 Anthracene 170 500 730 112 Fluoranthene 480 500 940 92 Pyrene 360 500 860 100 ~"' Benzo(A)anthracene 110 500 610 100 Chrysene 100 500 650 110 Benzo(B)fluoranthene 74 500 610 107 Benzo (K) -Fluoranthene nd 500 660 132 Benzo(A)pyrene 61 500 630 114 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene C283 500 550 104 Dibenzo nd - denotes not detected. ns - denotes not spiked. * a high response is observed due to a coeluting hydrocarbon peak. TABLE 12 (cont.) RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations Reported in nig/Kg based on wet weight Sample No. B-07996 Parameter Sample Spi ke Recovered Percent Cone. Cone. Cone. Recova^ 0 Naphthalene 180 250 430 2-Methylnaphthalene 59 ns 56 ' 1°° 0 1-Methyl naphthalene C343 ns C333 — C 2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene 1:193 ns C193 —— C 2,3-Di methylnaphthalene 1:9.43 ns C6.53 —— C Acenaphthylene 1:3.63 250 250 99 Acenaphthene 81 250 330 100 Finerene 99 250 340 96 Pentachlorophenol nd 250 310 124 Phenanthrene 350 250 600 100 Anthracene 53 250 310 103 Pluoranthene 170 250 410 96 Pyrene 110 250 360 100 Benzo(A)anthracene C263 250 270 98 Chrysene C273 250 290 105 -• Benzo(B) -fluoranthene C153 250 270 102 Benzo(K)fluoranthene nd 250 250 100 Benzo(A)pyrene nd 250 270 108 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene nd 250 250 100 Dibenzo(A,H)anthracene nd 250 250 100 Benzo(G,H, Dperylene nd 250 250 100 nd - denotes not detected. ns - denotes not spiked. TABLE 12 (cont.) RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES ANALYSIS IN SOILS Concentrations Reported in mg/Kg based on wet weight Sample No. 07854A Parameter . Sample Spike Recovered Percen/t. Cone. Cone. Cone. Recovery Naphthalene 87 100 180 93 2-Methylnaphthalene C393 ns C383 1-Methylnaphthalene 1:193 ns 1:203 2,6—Di methylnaphthalene 1:123 ns C113 2,3-Di methylnaphthalene nd ns 1:5.23 Acenaphthylene nd 100 96 96 Acenaphthene 59 100 160 101 Fluorene 57 100 160 103 Pentachiorophenol nd 100 120 120 Phenanthrene 170 100 270 100 Anthracene C203 100 120 100 Fluoranthene 71 100 170 99 Pyrene C483 100 140 - 87 Benzo(A)anthracene C8.33 100 96 88 Chrysene 1:7. S3 100 100 92 Benzo(B)fluoranthene nd 100 100 100 Benzo (K) -Fluoranthene nd 100 93 93 Benzo(A)pyrene nd 100 91 91 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene nd 100 92 92 Dibenzo(A,H)anthracene nd 100 81 81 Benzo(G,H,I)perylene nd 100 89 89 ND - denotes not detected. NS - denotes not spiked. ii §< » ( TABLE 12 (cont.) RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN MATER ANALYSIS f Concentrations Reported in ug/L r ^, Sample No. 7970E H 15 Parameter Sample Spike Recovered Percent <: Cone. Cone. Cone. Recov^ X, « Naphthalene E42.03 100 148 104,o 1I 2-Methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns -—-i D 1-Methyl naphthalene 0 ns ns ———- 2,6-Dimethyl naphthalene 0 ns ns •——— 2,3-Di methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns ——— Acenaphthylene 0 100 111 111 Acenaphthene 123 100 218 97. Fluorene 72.0 100 168 97. 7 F'entachi orophenol 0 100 145 1451' Phenanthrene C42.43 100 149 105 Anthracene 0 100 130 130 Fluoranthene 0 100 103 103 Pyrene 0 100 106 106 Benzo nd - denotes not detected. ns - denotes not spiked. * denotes result af-fected by coeluting hydrocarbon peak in sample TABLE 13. RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES FOR BASE NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES IN MATER ANALYSIS Concentrations Reported in ug/L Sample No. Method Synthetic Spike Parameter Sample Spi ke Recovered Perd t Cone. Cone. Cone. Reco^ ^y Naphthalene 0 500 405 81. 2-Methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns ——- I-Methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns ——— 2,6—Di methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns ——- 2,3-Di methylnaphthalene 0 ns ns ——- Acenaphthylene 0 500 448 89. 6 Acenaphthene 0 500 459 91. 8 Fluorene 0 500 472 94. 4 Pentachlorophenol 0 ns ns ——— Phenanthrene 0 500 459 91. 8 Anthracene 0 500 383 76. 6 Fluoranthene 0 500 494 98. 8 Pyrene 0 500 469 93. 3 Benzo(A)anthracene 0 500 468 93. 6 Chrysene 0 500 504 101 Benzo (B) -Fluoranthene 0 500 477 95. 4 Benzo nd - denotes not detected. ns - denotes not spiked. TABLE 14. RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONOTORINB AND SUPPORT LABORATORY (EMSL) SAMPLE ANALYSIS Concentrations Reported in mg/L WP 8SO Concentration #1 / Tri.ie«l' Recover ed {•^verage<=> 95'/. Con-fidesnce * i^r Parameter Val ue value Value Interva] ^ C Naphthalene 75 44. 1 42. 1 6.1- 78. oo Pyrene 19 9. 14 13. 0 2. 1 - 23. ^c Chrysene 113 59. 1 96.8 MDL - 184 ^c Acenaphthene 56 30. 8 29. 7 MDL - o'^i • Anthracene 113 55. 4 75. 6 12.7 - 138 C Benzo (k) -fluoranthene 71 24. 6 41. 9 MDL - 99.71 (1) Values reported by EMSL (2) Average values reported by tested laboratories. MDL denotes minimum detection limit TABLE 15. DTOXIN QA/QC REPORT Surrogate Percent Accuracy Number of Data Points • 4 Mean Percent Accuracy « 92% Range -78 - 97% EPA Range - 60-140% Precision of Duplicate* Spike Value (b) -66.3 ppb Spike Dup. Value (a) •60.3 ppb Precision - •=? x 100% - 9.5% a±b 2 EPA Range • ± 50% Accuracy of Spike Orig. Value (a) - ND Observed Spike Value (b) -66.3 ppb Spike Level (c) •55.6 ppb Accuracy - -b- x 100% • 119% • a+c EPA Range - 60-1401 TABLE 16. DI OX IN QA/QC REPORT Surrogate Percent Accuracy Number of Data Points • 4 Mean Percent Accuracy — 104% Range - 91 - 115% EPA Range • 60-1401 Precision of Duplicates I£]2D Pfi£DD Spike Value (b) - 60.0 ppb 66.7 ppb Spike Dup. Value (a) - 59.6 ppb 67.8 ppb a 2 Precision - a+=jb x 100% - 0.7% 1.6% 2 EPA Range » ± TCDD PeCDD Accuracy of Spike Orig. Value (a) - NO ND Observed Spike Value (b) 60.0 ppb 66.7 ppb Spike Level (c) • 55.6 ppb 55.6 ppb Accuracy " -b- x 100% ' 108% 120% - a+c EPA Range • 60-140% 1 AfcSL'c. I ,• . > ?* , RESULTS OF DUPLICATE PHENOL ANALYSIS ( | All concentrations reported in ug/q .MPLE ID CONCENTRATION RPD ^ RUN 1 RUN 2 %'*•! n ^52 A 27 17 45.5 p.»65 A 243 181 29.2 '65 C 26 24 8.0 ^ ( 81 A ND ND --- ( 82 A ND ND -— c C «92 B ND ND —— C C )91 A 42 43 2.4 355 3 3 0.0 !D denotes not detected. (PD denotes relative percent difference. ') lAbLb. lc. RESULTS OF MATRIX SPIKE MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE PHENOL ANALYSIS All concnetratlons reported In ug/g SAMPLE ID SAMPLE SPIKE RECOVERED PERCENT RPD CONC. COMC. CONC. RECOVERY ______RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 1 RUN 2______ 7852 A 10.40 37.88 51.49 52.36 108 111 3.0 ^ 7965 A 165.39 64.93 246.27 250.76 124 131 S.C^T 7981 A ND 19.84 21.48 21.48 ^V^ ^s^'loSi. 0-0 (^ 7992 B ND 20.32 21.30 21.30 105 105 0.0 CD 0 ND denotes not detected. RPD denotes relative percent difference. c ROY F. l-JESTON-REAC (3SA Raritan Depot, Building 209, Anna;-; woodbridqe Avenue, Edison, New Jersey 08817 December 1, 1937 Envirotech Research 1095 Amboy Avenue Edison, Now Jersey 08837 Attn; Mike Urban ear Mike, This letter ie- to con-firm the delivery of ten (10) E The data package for the BC/MS should include; 1. Spectra and tabulation of ions for DFTPP for every twelve or twenty-four hours of analysis. 2. Total ion chromatograms for every blank, standard, sample, and matrix sp)ike. 3. Sperti-a for standards of any compounds with sample hits. 4. Spectra for hits in samples. 5. Response tabulation for each point in the most recently analyzed calibration range. 6. Response factors for each daily check standard. /- All surroqate and internal standards must be clearly labeled on the: t'otpl i r'n chromatocirams.. Each d.->ta sheet and chromatoqraiii of spectrum must be clearly labeled with the sample" identity and date and time of analysis plus dilution and/or concentration factors. 9. All sample analysis results must be presented in tabulated form- data sheets alone are not acceptable. G ) , -) 10. fill surrogate standards recoveries must be presented in tabulated farm. 11. Sample {natri;; spikes fi-mst be presented in tabulated form. 12. .tnstrume'nt and method detection limit for each parameter. The analysis will be performed under P.O. # 50225. Please siqn the attached chain of custody and return it to me with the final report by December 23, 1907. The cost of this analysis is not to e;-;ceed . <=2750.00. Results should be sent to me at the Following address: ROY F. MESTOM - REAC", GSA Raritan Depot, Bidg. 20':?, Anne;-: Moodhri dge A'/eru-ie, E:di sor., New Jerspy 06817 If there are .-»nv questions or problems concern inc; the analyses, ple^ase call me at (201) AJ^-^SSI . "incei-ol v, RF'nee G. Cohen ROY F. WESTON-REAC GSA Raritan Depot, Building 209, Bay F Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, New Jersey 08817 November 9, 1987 International Technology Corporation 65 Fieldcrest Avenue Edison, New Jersey 08837 Attention : Bill Sherman Dear Bill:• As per our conversation November 9, 1987, please find enclosed one (1) soil sample to be analyzed for isomer specific dioxins and 'i-benzofurans. This sample is to be analyzed according to EPA Test thods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Method 8280, and reported with a contract Laboratory Program (CLP) type data package. Please analyze one (1) matrix spike and one (1) matrix spike duplicate with this sample. The final report is due 15 working days from receipt of samples in your lab or December 3,1987. This due date takes into account Veterns Day and Thanksgiving and the day after Thanksgiving as non working days. The data package for the GC/MS should include: 1. Spectra and tabulation of ions for DFTPP for every twelve or twenty-four hours of analysis. 2. Total ion chromatograms for every blank, standard, sample, and matrix spike. 3. Spectra for standards of any compounds with sample hits. 4. Spectra for hits in samples. 5. Response tabulation for each point in the roost recently analyzed calibration range. 5. Response factors for each daily check standard. 7. All surrogate and internal standards must be clearly labeled on the total ion chromatograms. ^ ") ^W L 8. Each data sheet and chromatogram of spectrum roust be clearly labeled with the sample identity and date and time of analysis plus dilution and/or concentration factors. 9. All sample analysis results must be presented in tabulated form- data sheets alone are not acceptable. 10. All surrogate standards recoveries must be presented in tabulated form. o0\ 11. Sample matrix spikes must be presented in tabulated form. cJ" 12. Instrument and method detection limit for each parameter. ^F' The analysis will be performed under P.0.50164. The price is no.t to c\ exceed $3000.00. Please sign the attached chain of custody and 0) return it to me with the final report by December 3, 1987. Results 0 should be sent to .roe at the following address: 0 ROY F. WESTON - REAC GSA Raritan Depot, Bidg. 209, Bay F Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, New Jersey 08817 If there are. any questions or problems concerning the analyses, please call me at (201) 632-9551. Sincerely, ^^^J^W^-^ Renee G. Cohen i I ROY F. WESTON-REAC GSA Raritan Depot, Building 209, Bay F Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, New Jersey U8817 November 10, 1987 <§^- Rad an Corporation 851 Mo-Pec Blvd. AU£ :in, Texas 78720-1008 Att ation : Robert Richardson Dec- - Rob: As er our conversation on November 10, 1937, please find enclosed th: y seven (37) soil samples to be analyzed for Total Phenols. Tht -e samples are to be analyzed according to EPA Test Methods for Ev; Luating Solid Waste, Method 9066, and reported with a Contract Lad ratory Program (CLP) type data package. Please analyze one (1) ma-t -ix spike and one (1) matrix spike duplicate for every 10 samples Th. final report is due 15 working days from receipt of samples in yo' . lab or December 5,1987. This due date takes into account Ve arns Day and Thanksgiving and the day after Thanksgiving as non woi ting days. Th data package for this analysis should include: 1. Copies of all analyst's notebook data. 2. Tabulated sample results. 3. Tabulated duplicate results. 4. Copy of standard curve used. 5. Copies of all raw data. The analysis will be performed under P.O.ft 50165.. The price is not to exceed $900.00. Please sign the attached chain of custody and return it to me with the final report by December 5, 1987. Results should be sent to me at the following address: ROY F. WESTON - REAC GSA Raritan Depot, Bidg. 209, Bay F Woodbridge Avenue, Edison, New Jersey 08817 If there are any questions or problems concerning the analyses, please call me at (201) 632-9551. Sincerely, Renee G. Cohen Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request t /i.n Received By —————————— Client ______RFW t^ni^^^AuQ^ Hft^^jfc-" Date Client Contact Date Due Assigned to. Phone____ Project Number SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Sampte No. Cllml 10 No. wwsvfvwn Matrix Oaf Co«oct«d Contoki f/ Prwwvthf w. ^^. PUMO'. ^ D-R^ A» 6L IA ^6L-1A 1^ ^ iialw- 0<»iqlzss/(ce cnwg ftLIC' ^,- —n-aftf- Jl————— 11 rrHfe^O ^rK ^'BL.l C e-lflLr S It 3|^ 1 1 0-^SA Bt-'Z^ < BLZ/t lx». ^ 11 11 C??=|fcSfr BL-28 < SL.-28 sl- ——— —... -..-... .. - —— — ...... —HW * 0 ^5-3 A» P(7(-^ s u \( l ' ^ -^s^i ^ 9^ -' - < n ^ o^^su^ ?&-^ < t\ N 0-H^^ i^-i- < u <\ 1.4 3——————————————— 0^9)€1^ ^ - 3 r\ «.^ »-\ n'^{^ < I > L< ^ •i D^\eo^ MO t» 11 o^^»c A • V K' l.t U ^•yi^M'A A-C. ^ u t( Matrix: Special Inilructlom: S- Soil OS- Drum Solids W- Water OL- Drum Liquids 0- Oil X- Other 11—m/Rwion RllnqutotHMl By R««.«ivd By. Oaf Ttm» ll«m/RMwn Radnqutehad By R^cdvd By Data Tim* • /w/ff.7^,^ /'/^ r%::^ -0-7^————? ( -9-9-0-6 ^ /^ Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request /) T^ / o nM^ Received By ————————————— ClienClient______t RFRFWennteliO^ftJ/W ContaM i \ji ^CMfX^ Date. Clien^HAM*t Contac^AMtkJk*t Datr^A*«k.e nDu. uek — • n Assigned to. Phone___ Project Number SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED ft^arririfinn T A-0'Hg)^ C~\ ^ k 14 K-o^fte>' C-& < <« k << ^-oTi^r ^0 < (A H A-o^ft<\» C-2- < l( <1 B-OT-^C?' C.-3 < 4 LI U A -O^W 1 * C--M < l< L« n ^ 01^ ^ »A> \ f» (1. 0-^(,-^ ^-s- < kA . ^5-WC\c-, it \.?-\-^- < l» r n-o^^c'ii w^ < tA t-V • a-o'^cp^r u-c- •f. W M 7 RO^^^^I r,--? ^ I' LA . 11 Q-ow^ C'Cff ^ «l A-0-^^ JS^'\ ^ ^ il <-' - . o^flss-* < ^>rt\po$\rc^, M A ft n p Q fi^ ^ v ^ u-o'-gsy. ^———————————— ^LO Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request Received By ______Client S'^-______RFW nontext M^>/ T^a^ Date______Client Contact^jjttfiSl-^fiM&Ssr Date Due ______Assigned to______Phone————————————— Project Number______. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Sampto No. CItMil ID No. D—ccipttofl Matrix D«f CoHtctod Contatnf/ rffvttv 7977 A ' ve»4 /7-r /i/^rr fM^/ y^V ^Cf- 11 \ i fl »» 7^77 6 /• 7^?7 Cr ll 11 ii / / l/ ^ n 7^77 f7 ^^ 1' ^t •7^7ff ^ ^^ c -/ n ^e^/ ,^ ^e>rt 797^ • ft 11 •f /i 11 /i •7^700 A^ 'f X ^MA^Z/^^f ^. -7^7L A i/a^- /i--/ 11 ^of-/ /^e t^ / 7^7^-^ A ' 11 1 'i /1 797^ A- ^^ ^-t, /1 Ii If ^^ri.y^Jf^ \\/iuk: 0^ 0^———— { •T^ Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request Received By ______._^ ^"^-i^Tii 111 ~" « I" ^ w^^i'""^'^:"-'^—— Client Qo^&c\-^a&e£L££aeBB^ Date Due Assigned to. Phone————————————— Project Number SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Sampto No. Cllml ID No. 0—crfptfon Matrix Oato Coltactod ConUrifiw/PMM^WV ————————————E-7— 797^P A^*- ot,^u<^c tl/^T7 <4*Mc ff /• '. /i 7m ^ P"'^— t/o^- /ll^ ^/^ tf- ^ fl//^ /^"^ 7^^ yt^h- ^nu^^ \^iTH -A.^/^r^ ^/^ l/Yl // //^ /^ ' MSWK S- Soi l, ^OS' Drur. m Solid^ - s Sptctol Inilructlom: W- Waler OL- Drum Liquids 0. Oil X- Ottier imrr / R^won RrihiqufelMd By R«c»ivd By Oaf Tim* 11—m/R—wn Rllnqutohtd By R«c1vd By Oaf TInr ^JO'Y^^ ^ff6:^ ————Ttfk——————— ,——fLOO-^ -frf^ Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request y n Received By ______Client ______RFW fnniart n - r^€^L~t «\Q Date___ Client Contact Date Due ..____ Assigned to. Phone Project Number ^70^'T' SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Sample No. Client 10 No. Oescription Malrix Dale Collected Container/ Preservative J! By^ ///-? /^ ^lf>^/^ 1 AWl / ^ // *V A-?^^ ^ V Matrix: Special Instructions: S- Soil OS- Drum Solids •• fi^^y^ -TL> 6.r 2>o^fi- ^P-u F)^h6:^ ^ ^oi^-h^^ W- Water DL- Drum Liquids 0- Oil X- Other Items/Reason Relinquished By Received By Dale Time Items/Reason Relinquished By Received By Date Time • /3-5S> /^y^^ff / ^ /7r-~ —- } ///>^'.-/ ••^'^'v"^ ^ /^ f—^- / ^ ^ f^A •/' *• -Q-e-0-9-0-^ \ ^ nrr* ^< '•n f\r\i ' f o 'or h Custody Transfer Record/Lab Work Request y ^ Received By ______Client ______RFW Contact.nnntart /). ^W-lUQ Date___ Client Contact Date Due Assigned to. Phone Project Number '^y^^^r SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Sample No. Client 10 No. D—cription Matrix Date Collected Container/Preservative BWQ ^ ///3/6 7- BOnlplss./^ 'iC ^ \ x? m^ -\ S"'^, D8.DrumSoi.ds Sp.ciaHn.truc.ion.; ^ ( ^ g^ ^^J^. _ ^^/ /= <^^ ^ ^Tto^fK ^ W- Water DL. Drum Liquids ' 0- Oil X- Other Ifmi/Reason Reliciquisbed By Received By Date Time Items/Reason Relinquished By Received By Date Time 1 ,lM^ %^ /5~50 /r ^Z/ ^^.^^M/ -cw /v,« ^'/ \^-e.^-r) SHEET NO ENVIREOPONOC INC. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD PROJECT NAME te: SAMPLER(S) SIGNATURE PROJECT NO. SANPLE SAMPLING DATE SAMPLE TYPE VOLUME NO OF TIME i TIME ••i" 1 s TO BE COLLECTION COLLECTION »- LOCATION SANPLED 0 CONTAINERS COMMENTS IDENTIFICATION •m fOLIO «ltt OIL u g COLLECTED BEGAN z COMPLETED z '' OW^ • ^10 t^ O-ft^ ft-1 t^ on^ ^6 / •• - ^ /» i -» • RELINOUISHCD BY fKANE /l^Uf.IW^^ DATE/TIN•E ///cyy7' I^W BY NAME 'G^^/\N 1/Z/')L(^ nAT^TI^II-n-'T'?/ l^ KLIMQUISHCOeV Ukus DATE/TIM•» RECEIVED BY: NAME \-^ • ^•\ OATF/TlUE •ri M«MM*urn •«. u*ur DATE/TIM i^^cm •<•••«• —— .-«. .—...—^ .. ,,.i», ,«»„.,». ii.i^g..^. „.. ^h^ SHEET NO / ..„ OF ,.„'-<' •—— .ENViBSSI^Jk^wVA^tSf""*! » V^* CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORC) n.y^Jii^^a^ Or£^^ NflTllRF PROJECT NAME \r\^H SAMPLER(S) S1G PROJECT NO.————————,^..———————————————————————————— 01 ^ < SAMPLE TYPE VOLUME NO OF TIME TIME SAMPLE SAMPLIMS DATE 1 4 TO BE COLLECTION ^ COLLECTION >- COMMENTS LOCATION SAMPLED 0 CONTAINERS IDENTIFICATION Miff ML 10 Am OIL u 5 COLLECTED BEGAN z COMPLETED Z ^ ^ o ?W ft/ //?- ^ i, O^l^fy c>^ ^> ^ ^ ow '" 000s/—y—'./ °/ 0U M^' 1»^—-^ FORM HO. 15