DOCSLIB.ORG

Decentralized Reputation System for Transaction Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decentralized Reputation System for Transaction Networks Decentralized Reputation System for Transaction Networks Dept. of CIS - Senior Design 2014-2015∗ Matthew Buechler Manosai Eerabathini Christopher Hockenbrocht [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Univ. of Pennsylvania Univ. of Pennsylvania Univ. of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia, PA Defu Wan [email protected] Univ. of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA ABSTRACT of a person's trustworthiness by others. In any interaction Peer-to-peer transaction networks such as Bitcoin have gained between two or more parties, reputation drives the ability traction in the past few years as they are touted as an anony- for each party to trust one another and facilitate a success- mous, safe, and secure way to make electronic payments with ful experience. By nature, reputation systems have been low transaction fees. Our goal is to improve these technolo- centralized with application developers defining their own gies by developing a reputation system that calculates reputa- standard of reputation in the context of their own use case. tion based on underlying network structure and allows users For example, a site like Quora would come up with a propri- to look up and record histories of transaction outcomes. We etary algorithm to determine the reputation score of every believe that this will facilitate a more honest market envi- Quora user but this reputation would not be the same as ronment. Beyond standard market transactions, developers a user's reputation on a site like Yelp. The landscape of will also be able to quickly build reputation components into reputation systems is fragmented with every company own- their applications by utilizing our work. Our main contri- ing a \secret sauce" that helps it make money by locking in butions comes in two parts: a reputation algorithm called users. Though this comes with strategic advantages for the net flow convergence and a decentralized system that records companies, it requires that a consumer have multiple repu- transaction outcomes. tations stored across different services on the web. Reputa- tion is inherently tied to identity and we believe there is a need to detach reputation from one specific company or site. 1. INTRODUCTION Rather, consumers should be able to determine reputation There is a growing demand for more aspects of the mod- in a distributed manner. We hope to build a decentralized ern Internet to be decentralized. Though Internet applica- reputation system that analyzes both the underlying trans- tions are built on top of decentralized protocols like TCP/IP action network structure and builds a history of transaction and HTTP, a large portion of the application stack remains outcomes to eliminate the need for 3rd parties to define what centralized. Much of the desire for more decentralized com- constitutes good and bad reputation. puting systems comes from concerns regarding mass surveil- lance over the web and limited access to information due to 1.2 Advantages censorship. Only 25 years old, the Internet is amidst an- This kind of reputation system will enable distinct advan- other radical shift in which open-source, decentralized tech- tages such as helping e-commerce businesses and Internet nologies are gaining traction in many aspects of application marketplaces develop faster by using a preexisting reputa- development. tion system. Software developers will no longer need to en- code their own reputation systems from scratch but rather 1.1 Motivation can leverage ours to serve the same purpose. Additionally, Historically, there are many online industries where we can reputation would be a global measure so that a user's rep- observe decentralized computing systems uprooting existing utation is not limited to one particular app or service. A businesses. With the rise of Bitcoin technology, industries decentralized reputation system will protect the consumer like online commerce have also seen decentralized alterna- from being exploited by exterior forces such as governments tives emerge such as Silk Road and OpenBazaar. The suc- or corporations. In general, using decentralized networks cess of these projects has resulted from the groundbreaking ensure the most ideal form of democracy, where the voice ability to transfer money online without requiring a third of the individual can be guaranteed through cryptographic party to verify transactions. Bitcoin technology enables security. Decentralizing the notion of reputation has not many such applications to support a variety of use cases been done in the current technological landscape and there in a decentralized manner. is great value in providing this ability to app developers. Payment, e-commerce, identity, and file-sharing are just a few areas that have been touched upon with decentralized 2. RELATED WORK technologies. Reputation can be defined as the perception Our work touches on a wide variety of research projects ∗Advisor: Jonathan M. Smith([email protected]). and academic papers. We studied other reputation algo- rithms to understand their strengths and weaknesses and useful to score nodes in a network so that we can use them use them as benchmarks. We built on top of decentralized as a baseline comparison to our algorithm. application platforms. We integrated ideas from other areas of decentralized applications. One of them is identity and 2.3 Bitcoin the OpenID project, which is an open standard and decen- A crucial technology for allowing peers in a network to ex- tralized protocol that allows users to be authenticated by change value in a trustless, electronic manner is Bitcoin[8]. certain co-operating sites using a third party service[4]. In Before this innovation, peers would have to use a non-electronic other words, it is a way for users to hold credentials with- form of payment, cash, without a decentralized ledger that out a third party having complete control over their use. handled the accounting computation, or a centralized form Reputation is inherently linked to identity as it cannot ex- of payment, credit cards, that would introduce a vital de- ist without identity. When it comes to sharing data with pendence on a third party and a point of failure in the decen- peers in a network, Persona, a decentralized social network tralized system[8]. We hope to provide two ways to interact with user-defined privacy, is our guide[1]. Namecoin is the with Bitcoin–first providing an easy way for apps to inter- decentralized public registry for identities that utilizes this act and make transactions with other devices and second, concept and we follow its implementation closely. This al- through graph analysis, provide naive measures of reputa- lows us to store already researched cryptographic tools, such tion. Giving apps an abstracted way to interact with Bitcoin as elliptic curve public key signatures which serve as identi- will alleviate the problems of interacting with a complicated fication tools. Attribute-based encryption is a relatively re- infrastructure. cent area of study in cryptography, which might allow such The Bitcoin transaction market is analyzed by the repu- a sharing of information based on attribute or access levels tation algorithm to ascertain the issuance and verification and will allows users in a network to allow for fine-grained of reputation in the network. The peer to peer computing access control of their data[5]. Of course, being a somewhat network that will compute this reputation will be based on new area of research, this might not be possible. protocols that are extensions of the Bitcoin protocol tech- nology. 2.1 EigenTrust EigenTrust is a reputation management algorithm that 2.4 Counterparty calculates reputation as a global trust value in peer to peer Counterparty is a protocol extension built on top of the networks.[6]. The aim was for the algorithm to be applied Bitcoin protocol. It allows for issuing assets and tokens as in file upload networks like Gnutella so malicious users who well for building decentralized exchanges and trustless bet- were uploading inauthentic files could be weeded out based ting[7]. While the processes are routed through the Bitcoin on their score. protocol, Counterparty uses an external native token issued The algorithm itself relies on building transitive trust by through an initial proof-of-burn IPO that acts as a fuel for examining a peer's history of uploads. A node A trusts some any action within the protocol. Using a native token other peer node B so therefore node A will trust any nodes trusted than Bitcoin allows the protocol more flexibility in its evolu- by B. The algorithm works by having node A calculate a tion while not detracting from the existing security benefits local trust value for all of its neighbors and then normalizing of the Bitcoin network in its current form. this value to prevent bad neighbors from colluding with their 2.5 Ethereum cohorts. All local trust values are then aggregated and a trust vector for the whole network is created. Ethereum is an entirely new blockchain with different proof This algorithm is very relevant to the premise of our net- of work and mining security. Its main innovation is that it work convergence algorithm. Flow of money and file uploads includes a Turing complete programming language for devel- can be abstracted in a similar way. However, EigenTrust fo- oping applications within the network[3]. These applications cuses on a reputation system that relies on user feedback, take the form of smart contracts, which are executable pro- but we believe that monetary transactions can themselves grams, and decentralized autonomous organizations, which provide a useful measure of reputation without any user in- are sets of executable programs that work in tandem to pro- put. vide value in the economy. Ethereum includes a native to- ken, ether, distributed in an initial IPO and then mined, that 2.2 Centrality as a Proxy for Reputation Mea- acts as "gas" necessary for executing smart contracts[3].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • P2P Business Applications: Future and Directions
    Communications and Network, 2012, 4, 248-260 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cn.2012.43029 Published Online August 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/cn) P2P Business Applications: Future and Directions Pankaj Pankaj, Micki Hyde, James A. Rodger MIS and Decision Sciences, Eberly College of Business & Information Technology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA Email: [email protected] Received May 20, 2012; revised June 18, 2012; accepted July 17, 2012 ABSTRACT Since the launch of Napster in June 1999, peer-to-peer technology (P2P) has become synonymous with file sharing ap- plications that are the bane of the recording industry due to copyright infringements and consequent revenue losses. P2P promised a revolution in business computing which has not arrived. It has become synonymous with illegal file sharing and copyright violations. Meanwhile the information systems industry has undergone a paradigm change, and we are supposedly living in a world of cloud computing and mobile devices. It is pertinent to examine if P2P, as a revolution- ary technology, is still relevant and important today and will be in future. One has to examine this question in the con- text of the fact that P2P technologies have matured but have however had limited adoption outside file-sharing in the consumer space. This paper provides a detailed analysis of P2P computing and offers some propositions to answer the question of the relevancy of P2P. It is proposed that P2P is still a relevant technology but may be reshaped in the com- ing years in a different form as compared to what exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • From Technology to Society: an Overview of Blockchain-Based DAO
    > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER < 1 From Technology to Society: An Overview of Blockchain-based DAO Lu Liu, Sicong Zhou, Huawei Huang1, Zibin Zheng1 Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is believed to play a significant role in our future society governed in a decentralized way. In this article, we first explain the definitions and preliminaries of DAO. Then, we conduct a literature review of the existing studies of DAO published in the recent few years. Through the literature review, we find out that a comprehensive survey towards the state-of-the-art studies of DAO is still missing. To fill this gap, we perform such an overview by identifying and classifying the most valuable proposals and perspectives closely related to the combination of DAO and blockchain technologies. We anticipate that this survey can help researchers, engineers, and educators acknowledge the cutting-edge development of blockchain-related DAO technologies. Index Terms—Blockchain, Contracts, DAO, Fault Tolerant System, Governance I. INTRODUCTION Blockchain-based technologies have been deeply adopted by User multiple applications that are closely related to every corner of User Contract our daily life, such as cryptocurrencies, tokenomics, business User applications, Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications, and etc.. Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), as one of the Exchange blockchain applications shown in Fig. 1, is growing rapidly Miner Developer and drawing great attention from both academia and the Contract governments around the world. Although DAO has brought Developer a lot of opportunities to blockchain technologies, we are sur- prised to find out that an overview of DAO in the perspective Contract Exchange Miner of blockchains is still missing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technology Copyright © ${Date}
    1 The Technology Copyright © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. All rights reserved. © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. Copyright Copyright © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. All rights reserved. © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. Copyright 1 Blockchains, Bitcoin, and Decentralized Computing Platforms At their core, blockchains are decentralized databases, maintained by a dis­ tributed network of computers. They blend together a variety of dif er ent technologies— including peer-­to-­peer networks, public-­private key cryptography, and consensus mechanisms—to create a novel type of database. We provide he re a short description of how blockchains work, and unpack and contextualize their key technological components. ­UNTIL THE BIRTH of the Internet, computers suffered in isolation. They were islands, lacking a way to connect to one another except by using cumber- some cables. That all changed in the late 1950s. With the Soviets successfully launching Sputnik into space, and with fears of the Cold War mounting, re- searchers at the Rand Corporation began to explore a new computing para- digm—in hopes of developing a system that would be able to withstand a nuclear catastrophe.1 In August 1964, af ter years of research, Paul Baran, one of the Rand researchers, reported a breakthrough. By relying on a technology called packet switching, Baran was able to send fragments of information from one computer to another and have these fragments reassembled, almost like magic.2 Armed with Baran’s research, the Advanced Research Proj ects Agency Copyright © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. All rights reserved. © ${Date}. ${Publisher}. Copyright (ARPA) at the U.S. Department of Defense used this new technology to 13 14 BLOCKCHAIN AND THE LAW create the first network of computers, ARPAnet, later renamed DARPAnet after “Defense” was added to the beginning of the agency’s name, helping researchers and academics to share files and exchange resources with one an- other.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Problems of Decentralized Systems with Largely Autonomous Nodes
    RESEARCH PROBLEMS OF DECENTRALIZED SYSTEMS WITH LARGELY AUTONOMOUS NODES by Jerome H. Saltzer Massachusetts Institute of Technology A currently popular systems research project is to explore the possibilities and problems for computer system organization that arise from the rapidly falling cost of computing hardware. Interconnecting fleets of mini- or micro-computers and putting intelligence in terminals and concentrators to produce so-called "distributed systems" has recently been a booming development activity. While these efforts range from ingenious to misguided, many seem to miss a most important aspect of the revolution in hardware costs: that more than any other factor, the en_~ cost of acquiring and operating a free-standing, complete computer system has dropped and continues to drop rapidly. Where a decade ago the capital outlay required to install a computer system ranged from $150,000 up into the millions, today the low end of that range is below $15,000 and dropping. The consequence of this particular observation for system structure comes from the next level of analysis. In most organizations, decisions to make capital acquisitions tend to be more centralized for larger capita] amounts, and less centralized for smaller capital amounts. On this basis we may conjecture that lower entry costs for computer systems will lead naturally to computer acquisition decisions being made at points lower in a management hierarchy. Further, because a lower-level organization usually has a smaller mission, those smaller-priced computers will tend to span a smaller range of applications, and in the limit of the argument will be dedicated to a single application.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Customer Architecture for Blockchain
    Cloud Customer Architecture for Blockchain Executive Overview Blockchain technology has the potential to radically alter the way enterprises conduct business as well as the way institutions process transactions. Businesses and governments often operate in isolation but with blockchain technology participants can engage in business transactions with customers, suppliers, regulators, potentially spanning across geographical boundaries. Blockchain technology, at its core, features an immutable distributed ledger, a decentralized network that is cryptographically secured. Blockchain architecture gives participants the ability to share a ledger, through peer to peer replication, which is updated every time a block of transaction(s) is agreed to be committed. The technology can reduce operational costs and friction, create transaction records that are immutable, and enable transparent ledgers where updates are nearly instantaneous. It may also dramatically change the way workflow and business procedures are designed inside an enterprise and open up new opportunities for innovation and growth. Blockchain technology can be viewed from a business, legal and technical perspective: • From a business perspective, blockchain is an exchange network that facilitates transfer of value, assets, or other entities between willing and mutually agreeing participants, ensuring privacy and control of data to stakeholders • From a legal perspective, blockchain ledger transactions are validated, indisputable transactions, which do not require intermediaries or trusted third-party legal entities. • From a technical perspective, blockchain is a replicated, distributed ledger of transactions with ledger entries referencing other data stores (for additional information related to ledger transactions). Cryptography is used to ensure that network participants see only the parts of the ledger that are relevant to them, and that transactions are secure, authenticated and verifiable, in the context of permissioned business blockchains.
    [Show full text]
  • Centralized Versus Decentralized Computing: Organizational Considerations and Management Options
    Centralized versus Decentralized Computing: Organizational Considerations and Management Options JOHN LESLIE KING Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Cahfornia, Irvine, Irvine, California 92717 The long.standing debate over whether to centralize or decentralize computing is examined in terms of the fundamental organizational and economic factors at stake. The traditional debate is evaluated, and found to focus predominantly on issues of efficiency versus effectiveness, with solutions based on a rationalistic strategy of optimizing in this trade-off. A behavioral assessment suggests that the driving issues in the debate are the politics of organization and resources, centering on the issue of control. The economics of computing depolyment decisions are presented as an important issue, but one that often serves as a field of argument in which political concerns are dealt with. The debate in this light appears to be unresolvable in the long run, although effective strategies can be developed when the larger issues are recognized. The current situation facing managers of computing, given the advent of small and comparatively inexpensive computers, is examined in detail, and a set of management options for dealing with this persistent issue is presented. Categories and Subject Descriptors: K.6.0 [Management of Computing and Information Systems]: General; K.6.1 [Management of Computing and Information Systems]: Project and People Management; K.6.4 [Management of Computing and Information Systems]: System Management
    [Show full text]
  • A Decentralized Marketplace Application on the Ethereum Blockchain
    2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing A Decentralized Marketplace Application on The Ethereum Blockchain R. Vishnu Prasad Ram Dantu Aditya Paul Paula Mears Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science University of North Texas University of North Texas University of North Texas University of North Texas Denton, USA Denton, USA Denton, USA Denton, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Kirill Morozov Department of Computer Science University of North Texas Denton, USA [email protected] Abstract—Modern centralized online marketplaces used as a platform to build truly decentralized such as eBay offer an alternative option for consumers to applications with no central point of failure and no both sell and purchase goods with relative ease. However, hierarchical ownership of user data. This has significant drawbacks to these marketplaces include the platform’s advantages for data security, privacy, and ownership, as ability to block merchants at their own whim, the fees paid well as the potential to dramatically reduce middle-man to the platform when listing a product and when selling a costs. The issue of user trust in decentralized product, and the lack of privacy of users’ data. In this applications that run on a blockchain platform is one that paper, we propose an application that remedies all three of has been studied [3] and developed on recently, and it is these drawbacks through use of the Ethereum blockchain now possible to build application that the user can trust platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking General-Purpose Decentralized Computing
    Rethinking General-Purpose Decentralized Computing Enis Ceyhun Alp∗ Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias∗ [email protected] [email protected] EPFL EPFL Georgia Fragkouli Bryan Ford [email protected] [email protected] EPFL EPFL Abstract 1 Introduction While showing great promise, smart contracts are difficult Decentralized systems have been studied extensively over to program correctly, as they need a deep understanding of the past decades [14, 17, 40, 44, 50]. One of the most recent, cryptography and distributed algorithms, and offer limited and arguably the most popular, decentralized system is the functionality, as they have to be deterministic and cannot blockchain and its most promising application is smart con- operate on secret data. In this paper we present Protean, tracts. Smart contracts are user-defined programs that are a general-purpose decentralized computing platform that executed by a network of nodes that reach consensus on addresses these limitations by moving from a monolithic program state. Ethereum, the world’s second largest cryp- execution model, where all participating nodes store all the tocurrency, claims to be a general-purpose decentralized state and execute every computation, to a modular execution- computer that can support execution of arbitrary code in model. Protean employs secure specialized modules, called smart contracts. However, Ethereum and its successors [1, 2] functional units, for building decentralized applications that fall short of their claim due to several shortcomings. First, are currently insecure or impossible to implement with smart they do not support non-deterministic operations and cannot contracts. Each functional unit is a distributed system that securely operate on private data.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized P2P Broker for M2M and Iot Applications †
    proceedings Proceedings Decentralized P2P Broker for M2M and IoT Applications † Iván Froiz-Míguez 1,2 , Paula Fraga-Lamas 1,2,* and Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés 1,2,* 1 Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain; [email protected] 2 CITIC Research Center, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.F.-L.); [email protected] (T.M.F.-C.); Tel.: +34-981-167-000 (ext. 6051) (P.F.-L.) † Presented at the 3rd XoveTIC Conference, A Coruña, Spain, 8–9 October 2020 Published: 20 August 2020 Abstract: The recent increase in the number of connected IoT devices, as well as the heterogeneity of the environments where they are deployed, has derived into the growth of the complexity of Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication protocols and technologies. In addition, the hardware used by IoT devices has become more powerful and efficient. Such enhancements have made it possible to implement novel decentralized computing architectures like the ones based on edge computing, which offload part of the central server processing by using multiple distributed low-power nodes. In order to ease the deployment and synchronization of decentralized edge computing nodes, this paper describes an M2M distributed protocol based on Peer-to-Peer (P2P) communications that can be executed on low-power ARM devices. In addition, this paper proposes to make use of brokerless communications by using a distributed publication/subscription protocol. Thanks to the fact that information is stored in a distributed way among the nodes of the swarm and since each node can implement a specific access control system, the proposed system is able to make use of write access mechanisms and encryption for the stored data so that the rest of the nodes cannot access sensitive information.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking General-Purpose Decentralized Computing
    Rethinking General-Purpose Decentralized Computing Enis Ceyhun Alp∗ Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias∗ [email protected] [email protected] EPFL EPFL Georgia Fragkouli Bryan Ford [email protected] [email protected] EPFL EPFL Abstract 1 Introduction While showing great promise, smart contracts are difficult Decentralized systems have been studied extensively over to program correctly, as they need a deep understanding of the past decades [14, 17, 40, 44, 50]. One of the most recent, cryptography and distributed algorithms, and offer limited and arguably the most popular, decentralized system is the functionality, as they have to be deterministic and cannot blockchain and its most promising application is smart con- operate on secret data. In this paper we present Protean, tracts. Smart contracts are user-defined programs that are a general-purpose decentralized computing platform that executed by a network of nodes that reach consensus on addresses these limitations by moving from a monolithic program state. Ethereum, the world’s second largest cryp- execution model, where all participating nodes store all the tocurrency, claims to be a general-purpose decentralized state and execute every computation, to a modular execution- computer that can support execution of arbitrary code in model. Protean employs secure specialized modules, called smart contracts. However, Ethereum and its successors [1, 2] functional units, for building decentralized applications that fall short of their claim due to several shortcomings. First, are currently insecure or impossible to implement with smart they do not support non-deterministic operations and cannot contracts. Each functional unit is a distributed system that securely operate on private data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Architecture in Decentralizing Computing, Storage, and Networking Aspect of Iot Infrastructure
    IoT Article A Conceptual Architecture in Decentralizing Computing, Storage, and Networking Aspect of IoT Infrastructure Yustus Eko Oktian , Elizabeth Nathania Witanto and Sang-Gon Lee * College of Software Convergence, Dongseo University, Busan 47011, Korea; [email protected] (Y.E.O.); [email protected] (E.N.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Since the inception of the Internet of Things (IoT), we have adopted centralized architecture for decades. With the vastly growing number of IoT devices and gateways, this architecture struggles to cope with the high demands of state-of-the-art IoT services, which require scalable and responsive infrastructure. In response, decentralization becomes a considerable interest among IoT adopters. Following a similar trajectory, this paper introduces an IoT architecture re-work that enables three spheres of IoT workflows (i.e., computing, storage, and networking) to be run in a distributed manner. In particular, we employ the blockchain and smart contract to provide a secure computing platform. The distributed storage network maintains the saving of IoT raw data and application data. The software-defined networking (SDN) controllers and SDN switches exist in the architecture to provide connectivity across multiple IoT domains. We envision all of those services in the form of separate yet integrated peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay networks, which IoT actors such as IoT domain owners, IoT users, Internet Service Provider (ISP), and government can cultivate. We also present several IoT workflow examples showing how IoT developers can adapt to this new proposed architecture. Based on the presented workflows, the IoT computing can be performed in a trusted Citation: Oktian, Y.E.; Witanto, E.N.; and privacy-preserving manner, the IoT storage can be made robust and verifiable, and finally, we can Lee, S.-G.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Whitepaper
    WHITEPAPER WWW.IAGON.COM v4.5 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................5 MARKET OUTLOOK OF CLOUD STORAGE SERVICES .............................................................6 MARKET OUTLOOK OF CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES ..........................................................7 IAGON’S AI-BASED COMPUTATIONAL PROCESSES ...............................................................8 IAGON’S MULTIPLE BLOCKCHAIN SUPPORT .........................................................................9 IAGON’S SECURE LAKE TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................................9 IAGON’S SMART COMPUTING GRID PLATFORM AND AI-TRACKER TECHNOLOGY .................11 CASE STUDY ........................................................................................................................12 REGULATIONS .....................................................................................................................13 REINFORCEMENT LEARNING ...............................................................................................13 DATA MINING ........................................................................................................................14 BLOCKCHAIN .......................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]