"What Happens When 'The Sun Throws a Glitter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

"What Happens When ‘The Sun Throws A Glitter Bomb’" Excerpt Transcript Excerpt from May 5, 2017 episode of Science Friday. ​ ​ FLORA LICHTMAN: This is Science Friday. I'm Flora Lichtman. Every so often, people living in the upper ​ latitudes get a celestial treat, the Aurora. It's also known as the Northern or Southern Lights, depending on your hemisphere. But last year, something unexpected happened. Aurora chasers in Alberta, Canada saw a weird thing in the sky, a purplish streak, maybe a kind of Aurora. And they named it Steve. Of course they did. My next guest helped to create an app that connects observations made by citizen scientists with space weather researchers hungry for Aurora data. It's called Aurorasaurus. Joining me now is Dr. Liz MacDonald, space plasma physicist at NASA and founder of Aurorasaurus.org Welcome. LIZ MACDONALD: Hi, thanks for having me. ​ LICHTMAN: What is Steve? ​ MACDONALD: So Steve is a great story. It's something that was observed across Alberta, Saskatchewan. ​ And it was given a different name initially. It's a very thin, purplish kind of arc that can go across the sky in an east-west direction. LICHTMAN: It looks more like a Francesca to me. ​ MACDONALD: And it sometimes has a little bit of green to it as well. And it's quite a bit further south than ​ where most of the Aurora occurs. And people who are enthusiastic Aurora chasers, just like eclipse chasers, they actually captured it when they were out looking at Aurora. That was in Canada, much further north. And they said, what is this thing? And so, through citizen science projects, we've been connected to some of these enthusiast groups that are organized on Facebook and Twitter. Alberta Aurora Chasers is the one that discovered this phenomenon. And we had conversations with them about how this is not likely to be what the common name was, which was a proton arc. They connected with our team at Aurorasaurus and also scientists at the University of Calgary. And they just came up with a new name for it. It's actually based on an animated kids movie from Canada, where some characters don't know what something is. It's like different animals. And so this group is really fun. And they said, let's call it Steve for a while and collect more observations. And that's really where this became really exciting to document, that Steve is actually not a one-time thing. It's a scientific phenomenon that can be documented in a rigorous way through citizen science and further investigated. LICHTMAN: Is Steve an Aurora, though? What is Steve? ​ MACDONALD: So we are still working to figure out what is causing it. It is a long way further south than most ​ of the normal Aurora. And it's probably excited by light. Most aurora is excited by particles from way further out in space, following the Earth's magnetic field lines, and hitting the upper atmosphere, and causing some light. www.sciencefriday.com And so there are a couple that could be happening with Steve. Or it's possible that the upper atmosphere itself is chemically exciting some of the light here. And that's something that we're still piecing together from the satellite observations and some of these really interesting DSLR camera observations to further understand, as well as other ground-based camera observations, scientific observations. LICHTMAN: Was it in the sky before and just we didn't see it because we weren't looking in the visible range ​ or something? MACDONALD: We've been looking in the visible range, but not in this location, which the technical term is ​ sub-auroral. But really what this means is across the US border kind of latitudes. And the scientists missed it largely. Some people had seen it. But it hadn't been published that we know of yet. Now people have better cameras. They have smartphones. They have Facebook and Twitter. And so all of these things together have combined to really help us connect in unique ways and improve our understanding of the system and make a discovery, really, with people's help, for a much better understanding of this rare kind of Aurora. LICHTMAN: That's cool. Is there a simple way to describe how an Aurora is formed? ​ MACDONALD: The normal Aurora, as I said, is driven by the sun, starts up from the sun. One way I like to ​ describe it is thinking of a glitter bomb of charged particles coming from the sun. And-- LICHTMAN: Oh, I'm so glad that we asked. A glitter bomb. ​ MACDONALD: But the glitter is actually all invisible until the very end of this chain reaction that causes the ​ Aurora. And it travels an enormous distance. It travels 93 million miles out from the sun in all directions, and sometimes hits towards Earth, where it interacts with the Earth's magnetic field region. And, eventually, that energy is released in an oval shape at the high latitude regions, where it then creates the light of the Aurora and all of this beauty and dynamics that you can see. LICHTMAN: I'm really glad that you gave us the glitter bomb analogy. I will never look at an aurora the same ​ way. Thank you, Liz MacDonald. MACDONALD: Thank you very much. And thanks to all the citizen scientists who have been contributing to ​ Aurorasaurus and other projects like that. LICHTMAN: Liz MacDonald is a space plasma physicist at NASA and founder of Aurorasaurus-- ​ Aurorasaurus.org. Resource And you can download the Aurorasaurus app, too. Copyright © 2017 Science Friday Initiative. All rights reserved. Science Friday transcripts are produced on a tight deadline by 3Play Media. Fidelity to the original aired/published audio or video file might vary, and text might be updated or amended in the future. For the authoritative record of Science Friday’s programming, please visit the original aired/published recording. For terms of use and more information, visit our policies pages at http://www.sciencefriday.com/about/policies/ ​ www.sciencefriday.com .
Recommended publications
  • Global Environment Modeling December 2016 Volume 26, Issue 2 the Gemstone Notes from GEM Chair Inside This Issue Notes from GEM Chair

    Global Environment Modeling December 2016 Volume 26, Issue 2 the Gemstone Notes from GEM Chair Inside This Issue Notes from GEM Chair

    Global Environment Modeling December 2016 Volume 26, Issue 2 The GEMstone Notes from GEM Chair Inside this issue Notes from GEM Chair ........................ 1 Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction Michael Wiltberger RA Report ........................................... 3 Transient Phenomena FG ................. 3 It’s been over a year since I took over the reigns Dayside Kinetic Processes FG ............ 5 as chair of the GEM program and I’m pleased to Magnetotail and Plasma Sheet RA Report ............................................................ 8 report that because of the active involvement of TIMI FG ............................................. 8 you in the GEM community the program re- Testing Proposed Links FG ............... 8 mains strong and ready to tackle the upcoming Lunar Distances FG .......................... 10 challenges. Inner Magnetsophere RA Report ........ 12 IMCEPI FG ........................................ 12 This last summer we had a very success- ful joint meeting with the CEDAR community in QARBM FG ....................................... 13 Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling RA Santa Fe. Let me start, by thank the members of Report ................................................ 15 the joint planning committee that worked tire- SIMIC FG .......................................... 15 lessly to ensure that this meeting was not a sep- M3-I2 FG .......................................... 16 arate GEM and CEDAR meetings in the same Global System Modeling RA Report .... 21 Magnetic Reconnection FG .............
  • Hindawi Scicomm Guide

    Hindawi Scicomm Guide

    A comprehensive guide to Science Communication Hindawi Limited April 2021 Edited by Fani Kelesidou and Elodie Chabrol Design by David Jury 1 Table of contents Introduction 4 Part A 5 What is science communication and how it can make me a better scientist The Science of Science Communication: What it is and why it matters 6 The Science of Communication: what’s in it for researchers 10 Scicomm and fake news 12 Science communication: key networks and initiatives around the world 15 Where to find funding for Science Communication 18 Is scicomm making me a better scientist? 21 Citizen science: scientists and the public working together 23 Part B 26 Practical tips and advice from science communication experts Speak, write, tweet: ways to communicate science 27 Your message is in your hands 29 Three steps for breaking out of the scicomm echo-chamber 31 Captivate the public by finding your research story 34 Communicating science and inspiring audiences of different ages 37 Pitch your research in three minutes 40 I’m a scientist and I want to use social media. Now what? 42 Practical tips for scientists using Twitter 46 How to organize a science communication event, a few practical tips 49 How to organize an online science communication event, a few practical tips 52 Attract more readers with a lay summary 55 Make an impact with a video abstract 57 Podcasting 101: that sounds like science 60 2 Communicate well with the media, or someone else will 63 The merits of getting help with your scicomm 66 Part C 68 Conversations with science communication
  • Annu Al Report 20 17–20

    Annu Al Report 20 17–20

    ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 ANNUAL Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research Studies and Investigations GESTAR STAFF Hanson, Heather Ng, Joy Yao, Tian Holdaway, Dan Norris, Peter Zhang, Cheng Achuthavarier, Deepthi Humberson, Winnie Nowottnick, Ed Zhang, Qingyuan Ahamed, Aakash Ibrahim, Amir Oda, Tom Zhou, Yaping Amatya, Pukar Jackson, Katrina Oddo, Perry Ziemke, Jerald Andrew, Andrea Jentoft-Nilsen, Marit Olsen, Mark Anyamba, Assaf Jepsen, Rikke Orbe, Clara ADMINISTRATIVE Aquila, Valentina Jethva, Hiren Patadia, Falguni STAFF Armstrong, Amanda Jin, Daeho Patel, Kiran Arnold, Nathan Jin, Jianjun Paynter, Ian Kuehn (Ball), Carol Barker, Ryan Jo, MinJeong Peng, Jinzheng Berard, Russell Beck, Jefferson Johnson, Leann Potter, Gerald Espiritu, Angie Bell, Benita Ju, Junchang Prescott, Ishon Gardner, Jeanette Bensusen, Sally Keating, Shane Prive, Nikki Houghton, Amy Bollian, Tobias Kekesi, Alex Radcliff, Matthew Morgan, Dagmar Bridgman, Tom Keller, Christoph Rama, Xhafer Nourieh, Carine Brucker, Ludovic Khan, Maudood Reale, Oreste Samuel Henry, Elamae Buchard, Virginie Kim, Dongchul Resende de Sousa, Carvalho, David Kim, Dongjae Celio Technical Editor ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Castellanos, Patricia Kim, Hyokyung Rousseaux, Cecile Amy Houghton Cede, Alexander Kim, Min-Jeong Sayer, Andrew Cetinic, Ivona Knowland, Emma Schiffer, Robert Graphic Designer Chang, Yehui Kolassa, Jana Schindler, Trent Ada Ruiz/Amika Studio Chatterjee, Abhishek Korkin, Sergey Seadler, Abigail Cheung, Samson Kostis, Helen-Nicole Seegers, Bridget Chittimalli, Sandeep Kowalewski,
  • CCMC Support of GEM Program: Status and Outlook, E. Macdonald

    CCMC Support of GEM Program: Status and Outlook, E. Macdonald

    CCMC support of the GEM program: Status and Outlook Dr. Elizabeth MacDonald, [email protected] NASA Goddard Code 673 April 3, 2014 GEM Focus Group Scientific Magnetic Mapping and Techniques co-leaders: Robyn Millan, Eric Donovan, Liz MacDonald bit.ly/gem_mapping Aurorasaurus: www.aurorasaurus.org CCMC support of the GEM program: blue sky ideas Dr. Elizabeth MacDonald, [email protected] NASA Goddard April 3, 2014 GEM Focus Group Scientific Magnetic Mapping and Techniques co-leaders: Robyn Millan, Eric Donovan, Liz MacDonald bit.ly/gem_mapping Aurorasaurus: www.aurorasaurus.org Introduction/Outline GEM: past steering committee member and Focus group leader for Scientific Magnetic Field Mapping • Example 1: Data-model and Techniques comparison • Example 2: Space ‘Local outsider’ experimentalist who weather modeling likes GEM because the modelers and simplified data analysts admit uncertainties • Also data-model comparison Van Allen Probes and • geosynchronous plasma data and Conclusion: What does instruments GEM want? Aurorasaurus PI, space weather interdisciplinary Goal: Improve nowcasting of auroral visibility for the public My personal views Nov 14, 2012 Lobe crossings GEM Mapping Group Challenge event E. MacDonald, P. Dixon, A. Glocer, S. Zou, and many others Can this test mapping? Can this facilitate data model comparison? Highly stretched, main phase of storm 10 5 IMF conditions 0 B (nTBx (nT) ) x -5 GSM -10 November 14, 2012 30 20 from 2:00 to 6:00 UT 10 Strong By (+ & -) and Bz (south) B (nT) 0 y By GSM (nT) GSM -10 -20 30 20 10 B (nT) 0 z Bz GSM (nT) GSM -10 -20 30 25 20 Density 15 High density 10 (#/cc) Density (/cc) 5 0 -300 -350 -400 Vx Vx (km/s) (km/s) -450 -500 18 23 04 09 14 Nov 13 to 14, 2012 UT Hours Noon • Tens of observations of crossing from closed to open field lines at flanks during highly stretched storm.