2010 and beyond sustainability: The case of Durban
eTHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY In 2005 we presented our 2010 and beyond strategy for Durban
Africa’s sporting and events destination Scale up infrastructure in city, region Attract investment Create jobs Develop sports infrastructure Urban renewal 1. Economically Sustainable Stadium
Financially sustainable Multi-functional to host sporting and other events (bowl and non-bowl) Tourist attraction, also through iconic design Had a flexible capacity: 70 000 seats for the FIFA World Cup 56 000 seats in legacy mode thereafter Can be extended to 85 000 seats in future Where we have come from?
Kings Park Soccer Stadium – June 2006
The vision of a new stadium....
Competition images What we built!!
The real thing! Oct 2009
1.1 Durban’s Sky Car 1.2 Moses Mabhida Stadium Adventure Walk 1.3 Big Three – end April 2010
Over 250 000 spectators Over 136 000 visitors Over R6m to date on Big 3 1.4 Adding opportunities: The Moses Mabhida Stadium Swing
1.5 Retail Area 2. MOSES MABHIDA STADIUM PRECINCT
Improved pedestrian Ablution facilities Restaurant – with walkway along outdoor seating Isaiah Ntshangase Change rooms Rd Emergency access road Open air amphitheatre
Imbizo Place - retail
Moses 1 Km run/walking Mabhida track Place Re-aligned M4 Upgrade to Access road Masabalala Yengwa Avenue
Moses Mabhida People’s Park - After
MOSES MABHIDA STADIUM PRECINCT
The Beach Link allows safe and easy pedestrian access to the stadium from the beachfront
3. Beachfront Upgrade Development Objectives: Design Principles: Integrating the Central Promenade 15-20m wide Beachfront 150m sight lines Providing amenity for a Activity node every 300m diverse range of beach with dedicated parking users. Improved Greening lighting/landscaping Safety through Increased east-west linkages environmental design Promoting a healthy lifestyle 766 000 Fans attended t FIFA FAN FEST Fan Park alone 1.3 million visitors to the beach festival Over 300 000 fans watched games at PVAs FIFA Fan Fest
Princess Magogo Stadium Kwamashu
Sugar Ray Xulu Stadium - Clermont
King Zwelethini StadiumUmlazi Princess Magogo Training Venue….Before
Sugar Ray Xulu Stadium - before
Sugar Ray Xulu Stadium - afterwards
King Zwelithini Stadium - before
King Zwelithini Stadium - afterwards
5. Ownership
Municipalities best placed to ensure strategy for usage fits into IDP and meets city’s economic objectives Stadia are economic entities Cities invested own funds in stadium Events Act quite onerous and requires municipalities to ensure it is implemented MFMA requires assets to be sold at market value 6. Management Stadia are complex entities requiring highly specialised and complex skills, from engineering to facilities management Suite holders expect professional servicing with clear standards and deliverables Each stadium is unique and requires its own strategy for sustainability City must have oversight of management to ensure city’s economic, social and environmental objectives are met. Institutional model to be finalised based on business case Management responsibilities
Appoint and manage services providers such as cleaning, security, and pitch maintenance. Responsible for maintenance and repairs of entire stadium and precinct. Provision of all stadium catering. Letting of private suites and manage suite contracts. Letting of retail shops and manage retail contracts. Operate stadium attractions: SkyCar, SkyWalk and stadium tours. Management responsibilities continued…
Letting the stadium for events and management of the events and/or event organisers. Act as project managers and appoint professionals where necessary for design aspects for all further capital expenditure at the stadium (e.g. reinstatement & repairs after FWC, further stadium fit-out). 7. Events legislation
This has had a huge impact and will result in significant increase in the costs of hosting events particularly related to the stadium’s security, health and safety Also there are significant cost implications for cities eg. Metro Police, disaster management, fire etc. 8. Income possibilities
The breakdown of the main revenue income streams up to the end of June 2010 is as follows: Event Income (excludes hospitality): R 5 822 030 Hospitality Income: R 8 051 446 Catering Income: R 6 311 641 Retail & Attractions: R 6 091 758 Other (e.g. recovery of costs from third parties): R 108 114 TOTAL INCOME TILL 30 JUNE 2010 R 26 384 990
Income owed by FIFA/OC for rental and utilities has not been paid or included in above income. 9. Expenditure
Fixed vs variable costs: Variable will depend on number of events/functions Event costs (excludes hospitality): Marketing Costs: Hospitality Costs: Catering Costs: Retail & Attractions: Finance & Admin & Management: Operational Expenses: Security Cleaning Electricity & Water Salaries, Wages & Consulting Fees Other Repairs & Maintenance 10. Moses Mabhida Model
In the short term, Amazulu and Lamontville Golden Arrows will play their major games at MMS Will continue to attract major matches Have also secured T20 international cricket match India and South Africa. Concerts, rallies, etc. on the events schedule Maximise revenue from retail areas, tourist attractions and non-bowl events/functions Stadium in-house catering model to be optimised Have a good working relationship with Sharks and exploring synergies for the future. The business case must work for everyone. Other Venue model
Multi-functional Minimum charge for use of facility and 10% ticket revenue share Maintenance programme fund Single strategy for all stadia Consolidated stadium management of 4 smaller venues 11. Dealing with sustainability
Short-term sustainability: Ticket revenue share to be more equitably apportioned with minimum of 50% of the ticketing revenue to the stadiums to ensure their sustainability Security costs to be paid for by teams Share of other match income such as TV rights to be considered National Treasury to set aside funding for structured maintenance of stadia so as to ensure stadiums remain world class facilities able to compete for global events Stadiums should submit detailed facility management plans showing planned maintenance costs Conclusion Strategies for the stadia must be linked to IDPs Stadia sustainability strategies must focus on what is possible There is a need for a national fund to assist, but not in ways that promote inefficient or uncompetitive situations to continue Thank-You