DOCSLIB.ORG

Text of the Main Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Text of the Main Document ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR51 September 2009 Black River Assessment Robert C. Haas www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 51 Picture on front cover is courtesy of the Port Huron Museum. A logging crew cutting trees along Black River (Ca. 1880) for Howard & Son Lumber of Port Huron. Suggested Citation Format Haas, R.C. 2009. Black River Assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report ##, Ann Arbor. ii Black River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................... x LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ xiii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................xiv Introduction ........................................................................................................................xiv Geography .........................................................................................................................xiv History................................................................................................................................ xv Geology and Hydrology ..................................................................................................... xv Soils and Land Use Patterns ............................................................................................. xv Channel Morphology.......................................................................................................... xv Dams and Barriers.............................................................................................................xvi Water Quality .....................................................................................................................xvi Special Jurisdictions ..........................................................................................................xvi Biological Communities .....................................................................................................xvi Fishery Management ........................................................................................................xvii Recreational Use ............................................................................................................. xviii Citizen Involvement ......................................................................................................... xviii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 RIVER ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 4 Geography ........................................................................................................................... 4 Segment 1 (Headwaters).................................................................................................. 4 Segment 2 ........................................................................................................................ 4 Segment 3 ........................................................................................................................ 5 Segment 4 (Mouth)........................................................................................................... 5 History.................................................................................................................................. 5 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 8 Hydrology............................................................................................................................. 9 Daily Stream Flow .......................................................................................................... 11 Seasonal Stream Flow ................................................................................................... 11 Soils and Land Use............................................................................................................ 12 Channel Morphology.......................................................................................................... 13 Dams and Barriers............................................................................................................. 17 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 17 Special Jurisdictions ..........................................................................................................20 Biological Communities ..................................................................................................... 21 Original Fish Communities ............................................................................................. 21 Factors Affecting Fish Communities............................................................................... 22 Fish Community During Past 35 Years .......................................................................... 22 Segment 1 ......................................................................................................................24 iii Black River Assessment Segment 2 ...................................................................................................................... 25 Segment 3 ...................................................................................................................... 26 Segment 4 (Mouth)......................................................................................................... 27 Mill Creek (Lower Segment)........................................................................................... 27 Mill Creek (Upper Segment) and Other Tributaries........................................................ 28 Invertebrates .................................................................................................................. 29 Segment 1 ...................................................................................................................... 29 Segment 2 ...................................................................................................................... 30 Segment 3 ...................................................................................................................... 32 Segment 4 ...................................................................................................................... 33 Mill Creek ....................................................................................................................... 34 Mussels .......................................................................................................................... 35 Amphibians and Reptiles................................................................................................ 36 Birds ............................................................................................................................... 37 Mammals........................................................................................................................ 37 Other Natural Features of Concern ................................................................................ 37 Pest Species .................................................................................................................. 38 Fisheries Management ...................................................................................................... 39 Segment 1 ...................................................................................................................... 39 Segment 2 ...................................................................................................................... 39 Segment 3 ...................................................................................................................... 40 Segment 4 ...................................................................................................................... 40 Recreational Uses ............................................................................................................. 41 Segment 1 ...................................................................................................................... 41 Segment 2 ...................................................................................................................... 41 Segment 3 ...................................................................................................................... 41 Segment 4 ...................................................................................................................... 42 Citizen Involvement ........................................................................................................... 42 MANAGEMENT OPTIONS ......................................................................................44 Geology and Hydrology.................................................................................................. 44 Soils and Land Use Patterns.........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Religion, Politics, and Sugar: the Mormon Church, the Federal Government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, 1907 to 1921
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2007 Religion, Politics, and Sugar: The Mormon Church, the Federal Government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, 1907 to 1921 Matthew C. Godfrey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the American Politics Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Godfrey, M. C. (2007). Religion, politics, and sugar: The Mormon Church, the federal government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, 1907-1921. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Religion, Politics, and Sugar The Mormon Church, the Federal Government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, 1907–1921 Matthew C. Godfrey Religion, Politics, and Sugar The Mormon Church, the Federal Government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company 1907–1921 Religion, Politics, and Sugar The Mormon Church, the Federal Government, and the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company 1907–1921 Matthew C. Godfrey Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2007 Utah State University Press All rights reserved. An earlier version of chapter 5 was fi rst published as “The Utah-Idaho Sugar Company: Political and Legal Troubles in the Aftermath of the First World War,” Agricultural History 75 (Spring 2001). Portions of chapter 6 were fi rst published as “The Shadow of Mormon Cooperation, The Businesss Policies of Charles Nibley, Western Sugar Magnate in the Early 1900s,” Pacifi c Northwest Quarterly 94 (Summer 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Sugar, Area Bank a Popular Area Banquet Hall Union Optimistic~ Has Bcen Sold to Signaturc Bank of Bad Axe
    -teamsgear up for season Pages S,6,7 i m n CAS SPRl N(;KxIT’ RTNnFRY VOLUME 92. NUMBER 23 --TY*. RONICLE - WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBERCHRONICLE 2,1998 FIFTY CENTS 14 PAGES SPRTNGPIW M N,W+ I Colony Contract vote near House sold Back to scho to Thumb Michigan Sugar, area bank A popular area banquet hall union optimistic~ has bcen sold to Signaturc Bank of Bad Axe. Michigan Sugar Company anything we could put in the employees and contracted crops. Signaturc Bank officials re- officials emerged from a con tract .” workers as it has since Aug. “We are committed to the ccntly confirmed the pur- marathon 12-hour bargain- Negotiators representing 7, when employees rejected 1,400 sugar beet growers who are the backbone of the chase of the Colony House, ing session Monday with Michigan Sugar and the the company’s settlement which was closed last year by some words of optimism, al- union spent more than 7 offer. agricultural community in long-time owners Marv and though no tentative agree- hours at the bargaining table The workers were subse- mid-Michigan. We will not Janice Winter. ment had been reached. Thursday after Don Power, a quently locked out of Michi- put their family farms and The facility, located miles Talks continued early this federal mediator, invited gan Sugar’s factories in Caro, livelihoods at risk.” 4 Negotiations began June 3 north of M-81 on M-53,for week as a lockout of some both sides to again try to Carrollton, Croswell and years hosted scores of trade 250 employees entered its work out their differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Plan 2020 Maximizing RWST and Increasing Efficiencies During Harvest, Delivery and Processing
    MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER-FALL 2019 • VOLUME 33, ISSUE 2 Game Plan 2020 Maximizing RWST and Increasing Efficiencies During Harvest, Delivery and Processing ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: ANNUAL EMPLOYEEE SERVICE AWARDS HIGHLIGHTS MEET MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY'S NEW VP OF OPERATIONS YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS AWARDED AND SUGAR QUEEN CROWNED COMMUNITY CORNER: LET'S GO TO THE COUNTY FAIR! MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER-FALL 2019 • VOLUME 33, ISSUE 2 Diversify Your Genetics With Seedex. Dave Wishowski | REGIONAL SALES MANAGER [email protected] | 989.513.4586 seedexseed.com | #hellosugar Sugarbeet_B&W.eps MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER-FALL 2019 • VOLUME 33, ISSUE 2 10 8 CONTENTS Root of the Business ..............................................................................5 Ag View .............................................................................................................7 Capitol Beet ..................................................................................................8 RESEARCH 16 MAXIMIZING RWST ..........................................................................10 THE BUSINESS OF BEETS Beet Logistics ....................................................................................16 Federal Crop Insurance ............................................................17 CORPORATE UPDATES Employee Spotlight: Jim Stewart Retirement ........18 Our History is Sweet .....................................................................20 20 36 How Our Cooperative Works .................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • “I Learned That I Am Important.”
    “I learned that I am important.” Girls Adults 20,055 6,184 of girls reported that they worked together to get things done in 89% their troops. of girls served through outreach said that Girl Scouts helped them 87% feel like leaders. 2013-2014 Annual Report Girl Scouts Heart of Michigan Annual Report 2013-2014 1 Who We Are The Girl Scout Leadership Experience 4 Community Outreach 6 Girl Scout Troops 7 Financial Literacy 8 Outdoor Adventures 10 Our Donors At Girl Scouts Heart of Michigan, we’re dedicated to delivering meaningful, high-quality programming for all girls in every community we serve. Each year, girls at every Girl Scout Grade Level Girls Adults are asked to complete verbal and written surveys administered by our evaluation department and field staff. Every survey is designed to empower girls and give them a voice in Girl Scouting. It also 20,055 6,184 allows us to measure the success of our program delivery and engages our entire staff team in continuous improvement. These 26,239 Served evaluation tools provide us with the data and feedback needed to create a tangible and clear picture of how Girl Scouting is positively impacting girls in the Heart of Michigan. 370 Events 65 or 18% of program offerings welcome families to join in on the fun. We are 6th in the nation Approximately 73% of respondents in the Heart of Michigan agreed or strongly agreed that in Girl Scouts they (115 councils) get more of a say than in other groups of which they’d been for membership growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Quarter Report 2018
    3rd Quarter Report 2018 REPORT TO THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE THIRD QUARTER, 2018 The following reports for the 3rd quarter of 2018 are presented to the County Executive: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Attended the Michigan Pet Fund Alliance Annual Conference. Worked with various County offices in processing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) responses for the Third Quarter. Many responses were took coordination between several departments including the Sheriff Department, 911 Dispatch, Animal Control, and the Health Department. Worked with various departments and submitted the 2019 MMRMA renewal. Coordinated SSRC meetings for the 3rd quarter. Worked with MMRMA and various departments regarding automobile damage claims. Assisted with requesting and advertising for a Clear the Shelter event in September. Attended the September Township Supervisor Meeting. Met and discussed various Soldiers & Sailors topics with staff. Assisted the Veterans Offices with coordinating financial processing expenditures through & Sailors Relief and Veteran Transportation Services. Resolved a number of constituent inquiries and communications made to the Administrative Services office. Attended the 401(K) Board Meeting in August. Met with Saginaw County FOIA Coordinator. Reviewed two RAP Grant submissions from departments that were submitted to MMRMA. Researched and discussed various training opportunities for Bay County that would be provided through MMRMA on an annual basis. Attended the first annual health fair through the Department of Aging. Toured the Riverside Kitchen with staff. Reviewed various opportunities for FOIA software packages. Met with Animal Control and Prosecuting Attorney’s staff. Reviewed BCTV Sponsorship Agreement Renewals. Submitted 2018 County Veteran Service Fund Grant Letter of Intent to Apply. 1 3rd Quarter Report 2018 Animal Control The Shelter took in 195 cats and 222 dogs and 6 other animals for a total of 423 animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2004 Root of the BUSINESS
    Fall 2004 root of the BUSINESS By Mark Flegenheimer, President and CEO As I write this “Root of the I look forward to integrating these two entities Business” article the sugar industry into one of the premier sugar cooperatives in in Michigan is on the verge of America. Michigan’s fertile soils, normally abundant embarking on one of the most rainfall and geographic proximity to our customers important events in its 100+ year history. If the gives us a solid foundation upon which to build the acquisition/merger of Monitor Sugar is completed, cooperative. In an industry where volume and as scheduled, all sugar grown and processed in throughput are crucial, the combining of these two Michigan will be owned by the growers; thus giving companies provides the critical mass needed to the producers control over the destiny of this valuable survive in an ever-increasingly competitive industry. crop. The combining of Michigan Sugar Company The Board of Directors of both Michigan Sugar and Monitor Sugar Company will create the third Company and the Monitor Sugar Beet Growers largest beet sugar company in the U.S. which Association should be commended for their foresight positions us to compete and prosper for another and diligence in pursuing this acquisition. Have a 100 years. safe harvest. TABLE OF CONTENTS Root of the Business . 2 Financial Ratios . 20 2004 Crop Update . 3 Summer 2004 Factory Repair . 22 The Washington Scene . 4 Ethanol and Michigan Sugar Co. 24 BeetCast . 6 Grower in the News: Calvin Rhoades . 26 Research Update . 8 Grower in the News: Vader Farms .
    [Show full text]
  • Into a Bright Future
    MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER 2017 VOLUME 31, ISSUE 2 Looking Back at the 2016 Growing Year Pushing Forward into a Bright Future ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: RESEARCH UPDATES: HERBICIDE RESISTANCE ON THE HORIZON 2017 MICHIGAN SUGAR QUEEN & COURT ANNUAL SCHOLARSHIPS AWARDED COMMUNITY CORNER: MICHIGAN SUGAR TRAILS SUCCESS Sugarbeet_B&W.eps MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER 2017 • VOLUME 31, ISSUE 2 CONTENTS Root of the Business ..............................................................................5 Ag View .............................................................................................................6 Washington Update ..............................................................................8 Ray VanDriessche Receives Recognition ...........................9 12 RESEARCH 18 REFLECTING ON A CAREER OF CHANGE AND GROWTH .............................................11 26 SPRAY CLINICS 2017 ....................................................................12 THE VALUE OF CROP RECORDS ............................................14 THE BENEFITS OF FACTORY LIME .......................................16 HERBICIDE RESISTANCE ISSUES ON HORIZON ........18 AG COMMUNICATIONS GMO Spokeswomen ....................................................................20 GROWER IN THE NEWS Darrin Siemen ..................................................................................22 PERSONNEL PERSPECTIVE Employee Service Awards .....................................................24 YOUTH PROGRAMS Sugarbeet_B&W_2.eps 53rd Michigan Sugar Queen
    [Show full text]
  • Minimizing Loss and Increasing Output
    MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER-FALL 2018 • VOLUME 32, ISSUE 2 FROM FIELD TO FACTORY Minimizing Loss and Increasing Output ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: RESEARCH: TARE ROOM UPGRADES, CLEAN FIELDS AND SATELLITE IMAGERY FACTORY UPDATES: MAKING IMPROVEMENTS 2018 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS AND MICHIGAN SUGAR QUEEN COMMUNITY COMMITMENTS Sugarbeet_B&W.eps MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER-FALL 2018 • VOLUME 32, ISSUE 2 CONTENTS Root of the Business ..............................................................................5 Ag View .............................................................................................................7 Washington Update ..............................................................................8 RESEARCH 12 TARE ROOM UPGRADES . .11 CLEAN FIELDS ..................................................................................12 18 22 SATELLITE IMAGERY AS A TOOL. .14 GET TO KNOW YOUR BOARD Clay Crumbaugh ............................................................................16 Adam Herford ..................................................................................17 FINANCIAL PLANNING Talking About Tax .........................................................................18 PERSONNEL PERSPECTIVE Employees Receive Service Awards ............................20 28 FACTORY FOCUS Want to Take a Factory Tour? .................................................22 The latest news from Bay City, Caro, Croswell and Sebewaing ....................................24 YOUTH PROGRAMS Sugarbeet_B&W_2.epsScholarships Awarded
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2003 Root of the LEVERAGING OUR CO-OP STRUCTURE BUSINESS
    Fall 2003 root of the LEVERAGING OUR CO-OP STRUCTURE BUSINESS By Mark Flegenheimer, and the knowledge of the risks and costs of not starting President and CEO in a timely fashion, we should have plenty of beets to slice in September. As our second crop under grower Joint marketing. Utilizing the Capper-Volstead ownership begins to mature, we con- exemption that allows cooperatives to jointly market, tinue to adapt, adjust and most impor- we have entered into a partnership with the three Red tantly realize efficiencies of our new River Valley Co-ops (Minn-Dak, Southern Minnesota cooperative structure. It continues to be a learning and American Crystal) to market our pulp and experience for the management, employees and molasses. Michigan Sugar Company and those co-ops growers alike. The Co-op structure, however, very now co-own Midwest Agri-Commodities, which markets clearly proves the old adage is true, “People have been all of the by-products of its four owners. In total, known to achieve more as a result of working with Midwest Agri-Commodities globally markets over 1.5 others than against them.” million tons of beet pulp, beet molasses and raffinates, Let me cite a couple of examples of how we have annually giving us substantial clout in the marketplace. utilized our new structure to our (growers and company) These are just two small examples of how we have advantage: leveraged our new ownership structure. As a coopera- Early delivery. We have put together a new, tive, we are working together with a common interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Judgment
    STATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 30TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT INGHAM COUNTY MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-000727-CE V HON. CLINTON CANADY, III MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY, Defendant. Neil D. Gordon (P56374) Peter A. Smit (P27886) Zachary C. Larsen (P72189) Matthew B. Eugster (P63402) Assistant Attorneys General Brion B. Doyle (P67870) Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Michigan Department of Attorney General Varnum LLP Environment, Natural Resources 333 Bridge Street NW and Agriculture Division P.O. Box 352 P.O. Box 30217 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 Lansing, MI 48909 (616) 336-6821 (517) 373-7540 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] bbdoyle @varnumlaw.com CONSENT JUDGMENT The Plaintiff in this case is the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The Defendant is Michigan Sugar Company, a Michigan corporation (Michigan Sugar). Michigan Sugar owns and operates a sugar production facility located at 2600 South Euclid Avenue, Bay City, Michigan (Bay City Facility). In the Complaint, the DEQ alleged that Michigan Sugar violated Rule 901 of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules, Mich Admin Code, R 336.1901 (Rule 901), by emitting odors that caused an unreasonable interference with the comfortable enjoyment of life and property. The D EQ also alleged that Michigan Sugar has created a public nuisance by emitting odors from the Bay City Facility that unreasonably interfere with the public's right to use their property. In addition, the DEQ alleged that Michigan Sugar violated effluent limitations and storm water requirements in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No.
    [Show full text]
  • AGWS3-1835 06.Pdf
    • I. THE UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION The United States Beet Sugar Association had its begin­ ning on March 30, 1911, when representatives of beet sugar companies formed an organization under the name "The United States Beet Sugar Industry." In 1914 the organi­ zation was incorporated under the laws of Utah as the United States Sugar Manufacturers Association. In 1926 the Assocation adopted its present name. Membership is limited to companies producing beet sugar in the United States. Canadian companies are also listed in this Direc­ tory, but they are not members of the Association. The Trustees of the Association are: A. E. Benning Ernest Flegenheimer President and Chief President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Officer The Amalgamated Sugar Co. Michigan Sugar Company Ogden, Utah Saginaw, Michigan C. W. Briggs Guy D. Manuel President President American Crystal Sugar Co. Spreckels Sugar Co. Denver, Colo. San Francisco, California John B. Bunker President Robert R. Owen President Holly Sugar Corporation The Great Western Sugar Colorado Springs, Colorado Company Rowland M. Cannon Denver, Colorado President and Chief Executive Officer John T. Stacey Utah-Idaho Sugar President Company Buckeye Sugars, Inc. Salt Lake City, Utah Ottawa, Ohio Hugh B. Eldred Philip Stauderman Executive Vice President Maine Sugar Monitor Sugar Co. Industries, Inc. Bay City, Michigan Easton, Maine Alden L. Stock President and Chief Executive Officer Union Sugar Division, Consolidated Foods Corporation San Francisco, California The Association maintains offices at: 1156 - 15th Street, N.W. Suite 1019 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 296-4820 where it is represented by: Robert H. Shields ···-·---·---·---President and General Counsel Phillip E.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspired by Growth
    MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER 2016 Inspired by Growth ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: Our mission is to see growth through research, FACTORY NEWS: The Addition of AmCane field scouting / crop consulting, and through AWARDS AND RECOGNITION: 2016 Service Awards, preserving the crop once it is delivered. Michigan Sugar Queen, and Scholarship Recipients Dedication and commitment. Rehmann salutes the growers in our region for their contributions to our economy and greater good in society. Today’s agribusiness enters a future of expansion and diversification that is expected to support growing industry revenue. But it won’t be easy – that’s why you need a firm with decades of experience helping growers expand their business. That’s why you need Rehmann. Our advisors can help with: • Creating new growth strategies • Developing succession plans • Minimizing taxes • Identifying operational efficiencies … and much more. We’re proud to be a partner of Michigan Sugar Company and hope we can become your trusted partner, too. To learn more, contact us today. James R. Gerding, CPA Keith Harder, CFP® Principal Principal 989.797.8302 989.799.9580 [email protected] [email protected] rehmann.com | 866.799.9580 Securities offered through Royal Alliance Associates, member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Rehmann Financial, a Registered Investment Advisor not affiliated with Royal Alliance Associates. 5800 Gratiot Rd., Suite 201, Saginaw, MI 45638. Sugarbeet_B&W.eps MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY • SUMMER 2016 • VOLUME 30, ISSUE 2 CONTENTS
    [Show full text]