F Submissions to the Birmingham City Council Electoral Review

Home , Erdington Abbey, Sarehole Mill

Local Residents D - F submissions to the Birmingham City Council electoral review

This PDF document contains submissions from local residents with surnames beginning with D - F.

Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks.

! ?? $ %& ' )(*7 ,*<

From: Sent: 21 June 2016 07:38 To: reviews Subject: B5 Edgbaston Residents Group

We at strongly object to the merger with Balsall Heath.

If we move then so shoud Edgbaston Cricket Cub who have the same post code ?

Regards Mohit

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

191 Cooper, Mark

From: Mayers, Mishka on behalf of reviews Sent: 11 May 2016 10:59 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: New ward boundaries

From: CD Sent: 11 May 2016 09:51 To: reviews Subject: New ward boundaries

Hi,

On first look, the revised new boundaries seem much more sensible than the previous version and, for the areas in which I live and work, more in keeping with the separate areas/communities in these parts of the city. I am hugely relieved as the previous ones seemed to cut every community in half and lumped unlikely areas together. Places like Nechells with distinctive community feeling and identity look to be more included within their own areas now, though I’d call some of what will be Newtown, Aston, particularly as the city‐centre end of Aston incorporation into Newtown means Aston University will appear cut‐off from the rest of its area. However, a great improvement overall.

Charlotte Davies

" #$% &

From: paul davies Sent: 13 May 2016 10:03 To: reviews Subject:

Dear Mayers Miska I am supporting Erdington Abbey Church in the Erdington ward and not the Stockland green ward. the church was concencrated in 1850 and is in the Doomsday book. The people of Erdington will be so distressed. If Erdington Abbey name is moved to another ward .So Birmingham city councillor and central government take notice.

The Abbey Church is a well attended church at every mass.

Leets keep Erdington Abbey in Erdington. ward. yours faithfully paul davies, I look forward to your response by letter 13/5/2016

* +)),! && */ 0 6(*( %#+()+(

From: Deb Davis Sent: 08 June 2016 15:41 To: reviews Subject: Proposed boundary changes ‐ Sutton Coldfield

Dear Sir,

I am writing because I believe that Sutton Coldfield is being adversely affected by boundary changes and deserves to have proper representation with a full compliment of 11 councillors due to its size of population and future housing developments. It would appear we are only 450 houses short currently and with so much proposed development in the area it is a mistake to let Sutton Coldfield be underfunded and unsupported for the future. There has been a gradual deterioration in the quality of the town over the years and it is high time the people and facilities were maintained and improved as befitting the area which the population thought they were buying into when they moved here.

Yours faithfully

Deborah Davis

! 8"8 $ %& ' (*7)*

From: Katy Jackson Sent: 20 June 2016 20:32 To: reviews Subject: Erdington Boundaries

Hello,

I am writing to register my wish to remain within the Erdington boundary in Birmingham.

I live at 11 Welwyndale Road and I have seen a leaflet telling me that our road is going to be changed to Pype Hayes ward. I would like our street to be left in Erdington ward, where it always has been.

I received the leaflet advising me to write to this email address if I wish to register my concern at the boundary change.

Kind regards,

Katy Dearn and family.

164 5/31/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: Carolyn de Chernatony E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

Thank you for considering the information sent by many Moseley residents when making your revised boundary changes. The revised boundaries better reflect the district of Moseley and we feel we have our "village" back where it belongs.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8154 1/1 8r Hh x

A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) %Er! % %)" U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )` p r rvrs7v vtuh h qCh i rRv

From: Sent: 05 June 2016 15:34 To: reviews Subject: Your current review of Birmingham wards ‐ Harborne v Quinton

A flier - unattributed and undated - came through our letter box today: "Do you want your property to be in Harborne or Quinton?". It claims that properties between Hagley Road (A456), Lordswood Road (A4040), Court Oak Road (A4123), and Baleen Road are in Harborne Ward, but "under threat" (sic) of becoming part of Quinton Ward. It says you (the so-called "Election Boundary Commission") are asking for representations by 20 June.

The facts are, I believe, very different: for some years, these properties have been in Quinton Ward though are historically, geographically, socially and demographically part of Harborne. Your recent Local Government Boundaries Review has received a number of representations (including three from residents' groups of whose committees I was then a member) that we move back to Harborne; the final decision is due in September.

While this anonymous flier is not from yourselves (it is far too biassed), I assume you would like to be aware of its existence.

Anyway, as it tells me that my "views will make a difference", allow me to record that I would like my property, below, to be in Harborne Ward.

I copy this for information to residents in the nearby roads and to the committee at the time of The Harborne Society.

Yours etc - Eric Deeson

Eric Deeson Editor: The Harborne Society

! ? $ %& ' ) 7 )* 5+ K>' *

From: Dr Clare Defty Sent: 20 June 2016 22:00 To: reviews Subject: Birmingham Boundiaries ‐ Harborne & Quinton Wards

Dear Sir/Madam,

Consultation on further recommendations for Birmingham City Council

I would like to comment on the proposed Harborne and Quinton wards. We live in Rosehead Drive, Harborne, B32 2HW. As the postal address we use suggests, we associate with the Harborne area and live and interact with this being our ‘hub’. I walk to drop by daughter off at school (St Peter’s Harborne) along with many other families living on Tennal Road all on the same school run to a Harborne school, us all interacting with this as our local community.

My neighbourhood is currently assigned to Quinton ward. It is my strong view that we would be most appropriately assigned to Harborne ward instead. Along with other local residents I feel my neighbourhood is much more closely associated with Harborne than Quinton for the following reasons:

1. My neighbourhood was part of Harborne village prior to Harborne being annexed into Birmingham in 1891. It remained an integral part of Harborne ward right up until 2004, when it was moved into Quinton ward. 2. Residents and local organisations have retained their association with Harborne; for example, they still use Harborne in their postal addresses (as do we). 3. The neighbourhood is adjacent to Harborne Golf Club and a short walk from Harborne High Street which is the closest location for shopping facilities and similar amenities. 4. West Boulevard is a major four‐lane highway that physically separates the neighbourhood from Quinton. This major barrier prevents natural movement and stops the area associating with Quinton 5. Minton Road, Doulton Close and Chelsea Close are accessed from Welsh House Farm Road and connected by a path to Wentworth Way. Residents on these roads associate with the 'Harborne Rise' area and note that the Boundary review has already listened to the residents of Wentworth Way, returning it to the Harborne ward. 6. Tennal Road takes its name from the historic Tennal Hall which was a major landmark in Harborne. 7. However, one side of Tennal Road is in the proposed Harborne ward and the other side in the proposed Quinton ward. The Quinton side includes the cul de sacs of Savoy Close, Copper‐beech Close and Rosehead Drive; these are only accessible from Tennal Road and face towards Harborne. This arrangement is illogical and it would be much better if the whole neighbourhood were in Harborne.

In summary, the proposal I am making will result in better, more appropriate representation for my neighbourhood and I urge you to give it serious consideration.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully

Dr Clare Defty

176 8r Hh x

A ) Cvq6yr Tr) %Er! % %)" U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )Ch i rRv7qh

Alex Hinds Review Officer Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor Millbank Tower London SW1P 4QP Tel: 0330 500 1274 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/LGBCE Email: [email protected] Web: www.lgbce.org.uk

 Think of the environment...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to

From: Mayers, Mishka On Behalf Of reviews Sent: 06 June 2016 16:29 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Harborne/Quinton Boundary

From: Nimeka de Silva Sent: 05 June 2016 21:30 To: reviews Subject: Harborne/Quinton Boundary

Dear Sir/Madame,

We would wish for our property at the above address to be considered part of the Harborne ward. I believe that most of Lordswood Road is considered a part of Harborne by its residents and it's inclusion in the Quinton ward is only as a consequence of historic administrative circumstance.

Thank you.

Regards,

Nimeka de Silva

Sent from my Samsung device

! " # $% & ' ( )*%% + , '

From: Judith Dewsbury Sent: 15 June 2016 12:09 To: reviews Subject: Support for the revised two (2)‐councillor Moseley, Birmingham ward

Thank you for hearing and responding to our responses. This 2-councillor proposal for Moseley, Birmingham is much more realistic.

I am grateful to you all.

Judy Dewsbury

6 ! 9/ # $% & 3 8

From: Sent: 12 June 2016 11:16 To: reviews Subject: Harborne or Quinton

I hear that the Election Boundary Commission is minded to put my address in Quinton Ward. My postcode is

According to the leaflet pushed through my door this would constitute a move from Harborne Ward. This is incorrect. My address is already in Quinton Ward on Council records in spite of the postal address being Harborne.

This is all very annoying. THE AREA WHERE I LIVE HAS ALWAYS HISTORICALLY BEEN IN HARBORNE. (For example it was part of the old parish which also included Smethwick and when a new parish was set up for Smethwick we were left in Harborne – Saints Faith and Lawrence ‐ and not moved to Quinton.) The Commission ought to already have this information. The local population thinks of itself as being in Harborne and the Ward boundary should match the postal boundary. The failure to do this leads to confusion when enquiring about Council services. In the past I’ve been given information about the wrong ward after saying where I live, which is HARBORNE.

PLEASE PUT THIS AREA IN HARBORNE and not Quinton. Thanks.

40 5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: Julian Dobson E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Feature Annotations

11:: W h hyy hhaveave a ssmallmall ppartart ooff OOrphanagerphanage RRoadoad aandnd tthehe rroadsoads lleadingeading ooffff iitt iinn a ddifferentifferent w a ardrd ttoo tthehe rrestest ooff OOrphanagerphanage RRoad?oad? I t w o oulduld mmakeake sensesense toto havehave OOrphanagerphanage RoadRoad fromfrom ChesterChester RRoadoad ttoo PPeen nnsns LaneLane inin oneone w a ard.rd.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013.

M ap Features:

Annotation 1: Why have a small part of Orphanage Road and the roads leading off it in a different ward to the rest of Orphanage Road? It would make sense to have Orphanage Road from Chester Road to Penns Lane in one ward.

Comment text:

Why have a small part of Orphanage Road and the roads leading off it in a different ward to the rest of Orphanage Road? It would make sense to have Orphanage Road from Chester Road to Penns Lane in one ward.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8034 1/1 8r Hh x

A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) %Er! % )! U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )7qh Srvr )Ch i rRv

-----Original Message----- From: Dolan Eileen

Sent: 06 June 2016 11:16 To: reviews Subject: Boundary Review : Harborne / Quinton

To Whomever it may concern,

I live in Earls Court Road Harborne. I have been informed that this road is to be proposed to be part of the Quinton Ward. I feel such a change would effect the value of my property. I purchased the property because it is in Harborne. Consequently, I want my my property to remain in the Harborne Ward.

Kind Regards,

Eileen Dolan BSc, MSc

***************************************************************************************************************** ***

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere

***************************************************************************************************************** ***

11 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: Stacey Downton E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

Ninfield road should be kept as Acocks green. If you reclass it as Tyseley then house prices will decrease and car insurance will go uo

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8443 1/1 5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: ANNA DRAISEY E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Feature Annotations

11:: SSuggesteduggested separationseparation ofof BournbrookBournbrook aandnd SellySelly PaP a rkrk

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013.

M ap Features:

Annotation 1: Suggested separation of Bournbrook and Selly Park

Comment text:

I would like to comment on the Bournbrook and Selly Park ward. Two councillors are proposed. Could one be specifically for Bournbrook and the other solely for Selly Park please? One are is full of University students , the other full of families with children. the two areas are very different with differing needs and issues.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7998 1/1 8r Hh x

A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) %Er! % %)"! U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )@78 hy7v vtuh

-----Original Message----- From: Benedict Duncan Sent: 05 June 2016 12:36 To: reviews Subject: EBC proposal - Birmingham

Dear Sir/Madam,

Please accept this e-mail as a submission to propose that Hampton Court Road, Harborne, Birmingham B17 9AE, remains in the Harborne Ward. This is as opposed to potential proposal to include Hampton Court Road in the Quinton Ward. I am opposed to the proposal and wish for this road to remain in the Harborne Ward.

Yours Faithfully, Mr Benedict Duncan

! 8"" $ %& ' )* 7

-----Original Message----- From: Veronica Earl Sent: 20 June 2016 17:22 To: reviews Subject: Boundary Changes

Dear Sirs

I am writing to express my wish to stay in Harborne ward. Beeches estate is very much part of the Harborne community.

I do feel this proposal has had enough publicity.

Kind regards

Veronica Earl

Sent from my iPad

158 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: Ian Edwards E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

As a resident of the Balsall Heath neighbourhood (to the east of the A435), I am pleased that the Commission has now accepted that there should be a Ward of Balsall Heath. However, your proposal does not go far enough. It only includes part of the Balsall Heath Neighbourhood and rather rudely moves the remainder into Sparkbrook and Moseley. I live in the area that you propose to call Sparkbrook Ward. As a resident of some 20-odd years, I have always considered myself to be a Balsall Heathan and in no way a member of the neighbouring community of Sparkbrook. I am not alone in this view – my neighbours and friends feel the same. In fact, I find the proposal to be upsetting in the extreme. The Neighbourhood of Balsall Heath has clearly defined boundaries and a strong community identity, thanks to faith groups, community organisations and active residents. We have a neighbourhood development plan – almost two and a half thousand voters turned out to vote at last year’s referendum – the Commission must not ride roughshod over such a loud and clear mandate for Balsall Heath’s existence as a community in its own right. I fundamentally believe that splitting Balsall Heath in two will undo years of positive community activism and continued improvement. I further believe that dividing the area against the will of the community will damage the ability of the local authority to engage with residents, breed resentment and thus prevent effective public administration. I wish to propose a radical solution: keep an active and innovative community whole. Allow it to continue to be a leader in community regeneration, cohesion and resilience. I support the proposals put forward by the Balsall Heath Forum – keep Balsall Heath whole and allow it to join with either Highgate or Sparkbrook in order meet the Commissions requirements but at the same time retain its own unique identity.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8500 1/1

) ( ( %** 00 ! " ' %%2" $

From: Clair Ellinor Sent: 22 June 2016 10:46 To: reviews Subject: Hall Green Ward

I just wanted to say thank you for listening. As far as I can see it looks like you have acted on our suggestions and I just wanted to say thank you.

Clair Ellinor

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

6 ! 9/ # $% & ;% 5 + , . 5% '

-----Original Message----- From: James Elliot Sent: 12 June 2016 11:22 To: reviews Subject: Electoral Review of Birmingham: Further Draft Recommendations

Further to your email dated 10 May 2016, overall I am happy with the proposed changes to your draft recommendations with the following exceptions. I strongly believe that : -Sarehole Mill should be included in the proposed Moseley Ward -Both sides of Swanshurst Lane should be included in the proposed Moseley Ward.

With thanks

James Elliot

Sent from my iPad

6 ! 9/ # $% & +' % ,+ , *

-----Original Message----- From: Linda Elliot Sent: 12 June 2016 11:51 To: reviews Subject: Boundary changes in Birmingham - response to proposals

Sir, I am in agreement with your changes in proposals for the Moseley ward. Thank for listening to our community.

Just two suggestions however:

Why not include historic Sarehole Mill in Moseley ward? It is closely associated with the SSI of nearby Moseley bog which is included in Moseley.

It makes no sense to split Swanshurst Lane. Why not include both sides of the road in Moseley. As residents of the road we have strong community activities such as Neighbourhood Watch and strong ties to local police. Splitting the road means each side will relate to different counsellors, different police teams and council officers. That mitigates against our sense of community in the road.

Thank you for the opportunity to respond, and I hope you will at least consider the amendments listed above.

Yours. Linda Elliot

Sent from my iPad

! ? ! $ %& ' (& , ) 7 5 * & *

-----Original Message----- From: Joyce Elliott Sent: 17 June 2016 16:23 To: reviews Subject: Electoral Review of Birminghm - Further draft recommendations

The Review Officer (Birmingham) Local Government Boundary Commission for England

Dear Sir

Thank you for letting me have details of the revised draft recommendations of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England on the future electoral arrangements for Birmingham City Council.

I am very pleased that you have listened to and taken heed of the many submissions that were made to you, in particular in connection with the Moseley Ward and wish to express my support for the proposed two councillor ward. I now consider that the proposed new Moseley Ward will reflect the interests and identity of the local community, with just two minor issues which I would ask you to reconsider:-

1) the proposed new ward does not include one side of Green Road and the two cul de sacs off it, Burke Avenue and Keel Drive. I think it should, it does not make sense to have the boundary down the middle of Green Road.

2) you have included parts of what is currently Balsall Heath in the proposed Moseley Ward including Balsall Heath Park and Brighton Road and surrounding roads, all in postal district B12 (Moseley is B13). I believe our neighbours in Balsall Heath do not think that this is appropriate and I would support them in that.

Thank you for taking into account the vast majority of the concerns and representations of people who live here in Moseley.

Yours faithfully

Joyce Elliott

!"# $ %& ' (&)*

-----Original Message----- From: Ann Evans Sent: 15 June 2016 13:25 To: reviews Subject: Election Boundary Commission

To whom it may concern.

With regard to your recent circular relating to the above, i personally think this is appalling for the following reasons.

For the General Election we are placed in the Edgbaston ward, probably because we come under The Calthorpe Estate,Edgbaston.

It has always been that we are p[laced in the Quentin ward for local elections.

Since they are re-defining electoral boundaries all over the country it would be more sensible to amend the local election boundary to HARBORNE WARD to tie in better with Edgbaston remaining the same for General Elections. \ It is definitely not good to emphasise Quinton as I believe this could eventually lead to our postal address being redefined. This would devalue our homes and the whole estate and I vigorously appose such a decision.

Whilst writing could you please let me know why this circular has not gone out to all households affected. After asking neighbours and friends areas such as Sir Richards Drive,. Kenward Croft, Green Walk and many more have not received this document which does not enable them to object or otherwise.

I have worked all my life to be able to afford and live in the Harborne area, and am horrified to think that my home and area will be devalued by this change just because of an election boundary status!!!!!!!

Ann Evans

6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: JOHANNE EVANS E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

Have worked hard to be able to afford a house in Harborne and don't see the benefits of changing the area to Quinton. If i'd wanted to live in Quinton i would have bought a house there!! By moving boundaries my house will be devalued and its potential for resale would be reduced. I am dissappointed that i myself didn't receive any communication advising me of this proposal and know several other roads haven't received it either .Therefore feel that people have not been given the opportunity to raise their concerns. i only found out about this as i have relatives that live on the estate. I feel this communication should have been classed as more important than a leaflet through the door and each homeowner should have received a letter accordingly. Many properties on the estate a rented properties so landlords will have no idea of the proposals. Is this fair!! i hope that if this change does go ahead that it is reflected in the council tax we pay and that we will pay a Quinton council tax to reflect such a change!! A very unhappy and disappointed resident

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8389 1/1

5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: Joseph Eveson E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

Myself and my wife bought a house in the Sutton New Hall area (right next to New Hall Hotel and Spa) and currently our house comes under the Sutton Trinity Ward, according to the refuse department of Birmingham Council. We live in Bilberry Crescent and consider ourselves to be residents of Walmley (when we bought our house, it was advertised as being part of Walmley). We feel a part of the Walmley community; our doctor is located in Walmley, not Sutton Coldfield town centre, we receive the Walmley pages and we complete most of our shopping in Walmley. We are not happy that under the new boundaries, our cul-de-sac will come under the Sutton Reddicap Ward. The Reddicap Estate is a high-crime area, considered dangerous and 'a no go area' by many people we know and we feel that our property will be devalued if it is listed as part of the Reddicap area. Furthermore, we don't understand why the boundary 'dips in' to capture our cul-de-sac, when Sir Alfreds Way provides a sensible boundary line for separating Sutton Reddicap from Sutton Walmley and Minworth Ward. We feel that there are to solutions; change the name Sutton Reddicap to a name with less negative associations e.g. just Sutton Trinity, or move the boundary line to Sir Alfreds Way, so that our property and our neighbours' properties come under Walmley and Minworth, or New Hall. Thank you, Mr. and Mrs. Eveson,

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8031 1/1

6 ! 96 # $% & : '#+'

From: BERNARD FAGAN Sent: 12 June 2016 21:09 To: reviews Subject: Swanshurst Lane and The Boundary Commission

Dear Sirs

Swanshurst Lane, Birmingham B13 Proposed Boundary Changes and Address

It has been brought to our notice by a neighbour in Swanshurst Lane that under the new proposal our side of the Lane will be in the Billesley Ward and, presumably, have a Billesley address and postcode rather than a Moseley address as at present. We have lived at this Moseley address for over forty years and object in the strongest terms to any change to our address.

We understand that at the present time the proposals are draft proposals subject to consultation and we would ask you to take our views into consideration.

There is no question in our minds that a change of address from Moseley to Billesley would result in a reduction in sales value of our property. It is also important that the Swanshurst Lane community is under one 'umbrella' and brought together as neighbours of Moseley to live and work together for our common environment.

Please do not split us in half.

Yours faithfully

Bernard & Diana Fagan

51 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: SUSAN FAIRER E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

I worked and saved very hard to buy my property in 1989 to have a B17 postcode ,this was my choice and now this choice may be taken away (I hope not ) . If the proposal goes through will my Council House Tax Band change in line with the postcode change ?? I strongly oppose that my property be part of the Quinton Ward

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8375 1/1

5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: David Fouracre E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

Excellent.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7984 1/1

8r Hh x

A ) Cvq6yr Tr) %Er! % %)" U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )Ch i rXh q

-----Original Message----- From: Mayers, Mishka On Behalf Of reviews Sent: 06 June 2016 16:30 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Harborne Ward

-----Original Message----- From: Adriana Nicholson Sent: 05 June 2016 18:23 To: reviews Subject: Harborne Ward

We wish to keep our property in the Harborne Ward as we have lived in Harborne ever since we moved to Birmingham 53 years ago. We bought our current house at a Harborne premium therefore we don't want our property to now be in the Quinton Ward, as we believe the property value to be significantly greater in Harborne than Quinton. We believe it would affect the resale value of our property which is unfair.

Kind regards

Mr & Mrs A Franchi

Sent from my iPhone

44 5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Birm ingham District

P ersonal Details:

Nam e: David Francome E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e:

Comment text:

I am very pleased that you have taken the views of the residents of Yardley seriously and amended the proposals so that we are recognised as Yardley, an historic village of great local importance in the past. It is reassuring to know that the petition I sent and the submissions of my fellow residents have achieved the hoped-for result. I support the renaming of this electoral ward Yardley East.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8077 1/1