The Human Cost of Conservation in Republic of Congo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE HUMAN COST OF CONSERVATION IN REPUBLIC OF CONGO CONKOUATI-DOULI AND NOUABALÉ- NDOKI NATIONAL PARKS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE RIGHTS AND LIVELIHOODS OF FOREST COMMUNITIES Inès Ayari and Simon Counsell December 2017 PART OF THE ‘UNDER THE CANOPY SERIES’ CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 13 2. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF PROTECTED AREAS IN REPUBLIC OF CONGO 17 3. THE TWO PROTECTED AREAS AND THE SIX VILLAGES COVERED IN THIS STUDY 23 3.1 Conkouati-Douli National Park (CDNP) 24 3.1.1 Villages in and around Conkouati-Douli National Park 28 3.2 Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (NNNP) 30 3.2.1 Villages at the periphery of Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park 32 4. LAND RIGHTS AND RELATED ASPECTS 35 4.1 Legal context for land rights and forestry in Republic of Congo 36 4.2 The impact of CDNP and NNNP on customary land rights 39 4.2.1 Sintoukola Potash and CDNP 40 4.3 Lack of clarity over protected areas’ boundaries 44 5. IMPACT ON LIVELIHOODS 49 5.1 Restricted access to resources and insufficiency of alternative measures 50 5.2 Restrictions on hunting practices 52 5.3 Farmer-wildlife conflict and absence of reparation 54 5.4 Increased pressure on fish stocks due to restrictions and farmer-wildlife conflict 57 5.5 Food insecurity and increasing reliance on external food stuffs 58 5.6 Lack of effective benefit-sharing plans related to ecotourism, failures of compensatory funds 60 5.7 Employment opportunities in the national parks 63 5.8 Rural exodus of young peoples 64 5.9 Impacts on women 65 5.10 The case of PROGEPP: The NNNP buffer zone project 66 6. BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS INCLUDING CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS 69 6.1 Tensions between communities and eco-guards 70 6.2 Community lack of access to justice 73 7. PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION 75 7.1 National context for local communities and indigenous peoples’ participation 76 7.2 Information or consultation? 77 8. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 81 8.1 Indigenous peoples’ rights: still languishing 82 8.2 Conservation-related policies around Nouabalé-Ndoki undermine indigenous peoples’ livelihoods and ways of life 84 9. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87 9.1 Some final considerations 88 9.2 Recommendations 93 REFERENCES/ANNEX 98 1 2 The Rainforest Foundation UK: The Human Cost of Conservation in Republic of Congo - December 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have been possible without the dedication of Ana Osuna Orozco, Research and Development Advisor who coordinated the fieldwork, based on a survey framework developed by consultant, Francesca Thornberry, as well as the involvement of our local partners in Republic of Congo. In particular, we would like to express our gratitude to the team that carried out the fieldwork with communities and compiled data which made this report possible: Nina Cynthia Kiyindou Yombo (Observatoire Congolais des Droits de l’Homme), Maixent Agnimbat (Forum pour la Gouvernance et les Droits de l’Homme), Lilian Barros (Comptoir Juridique Junior), Inès Gady Mvoukani (Comptoir Juridique Junior), Calvin Ampieh (Observatoire des Cultures Bantou, de la Biodiversité et de l’Education à l’Environnement) and Isaac Tchikaya (Collectif des Originaires du Kouilou). Our warmest thanks also go to our consultant, Martial Djinang, for his commitment and outstanding collaboration in the field project. We thank all survey respondents and key informants who kindly accepted to engage in conversation with our research team. We furthermore acknowledge the contributions of RFUK team members, including Samuel Diéval (Head of Programmes), Joe Eisen (Research and Policy Coordinator), Maud Salber (Policy Advisor and Campaigner), Rachel Agnew (Head of Media and Communications) and Rob Sangster-Poole (Communications Coordinator). The authors offer their personal thanks to Prof. Dr. Ellen Desmet (Human Rights Centre, Ghent University, Belgium; author of the book Indigenous Rights Entwined with Nature Conservation) and Dr. Mihály Fazekas (Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom) for their support and advice. Finally, we thank the Rainforest Fund as well as Tikva Grassroots Empowerment Fund, whose support made this research possible. 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS ACFAP Agence Congolaise de la Faune et des Aires Protégées, Republic of Congo AGEDUREN Association de Gestion Durable des Ressources Naturelles AFD Agence Française de Développement CAR Central African Republic CARPE Central African Regional Programme for the Environment CAWHFI Central Africa World Heritage Forest Initiative (Congo Basin) CDC Caisse de Développement Communautaire CDNP Conkouati-Douli National Park CEESP Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy (IUCN) CIB Congolaise Industrielle du Bois (Olam Group) COFIBOIS Compagnie Forestière et Industrielle des Bois COGEREN Comité de Gestion des Ressources Naturelles de Conkouati COMIFAC Central African Forest Commission CSO Civil society Organisation DLH Dalhoff Larsen and Horneman ECOFAC EU sponsor Programme for Conservation and Rational Utilization of Forest Ecosystems in Central Africa ELM Elemental Minerals Limited (Sintoukola Potash) EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FFEM Fonds Français pour l’Environnement Mondial (French Global Environment Facility) FLEGT Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade FPIC Free, Prior, and Informed Consent FPP Forest Peoples’ Programme FSC Forest Stewardship Council FTNS Fondation pour le Tri-National de la Sangha (The Sangha Tri-National Foundation) GEF Global Environment Facility GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German Organisation for International Cooperation) IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature 4 The Rainforest Foundation UK: The Human Cost of Conservation in Republic of Congo - December 2017 M&P Maurel and Prom MEFDD Ministère de l’économie forestière, du développement durable, et de l’environnement MFT Man-Fan-Tai (SICOFOR) MNP Mayumba National Park (Gabon) NGO Non-governmental Organisation NNNP Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park NP National Park NTFP Non-timber forest products OCDH Observatoire Congolais des Droits de l’Homme OFAC Observatoire des Forêts d’Afrique Centrale PA Protected Area PACO Programme Aires Protégées Afrique Centrale et Occidentale PMU Park Management Unit PPP Public Private Partnership PROGEPP Projet de Gestion de la Périphérie du Parc National de Nouabalé-Ndoki RAPAC Réseau des Aires Protégées d’Afrique Centrale REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation RFUK Rainforest Foundation United Kingdom SDC Série de développement communautaire SGS Société Générale de Surveillance TNS Tri National Sangha TRIDOM Trinational Dja Odzala Minkébé UFA Unité forestière d’aménagement (Forest Management Unit) UNESCO United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organisation USAID United States Agency for International Development USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WCS Wildlife Conservation Society WHS World Heritage Site 5 6 The Rainforest Foundation UK: The Human Cost of Conservation in Republic of Congo - December 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 This report is based on investigations in Republic of Congo by our local civil society partners, mainly within six forest communities living in or on the periphery of Conkouati-Douli National Park (CDNP) and Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (NNNP). Both of these protected areas have largely been shaped by the intervention of the US-based Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). The aim of our investigations was to understand the impact of the protected areas on those communities and the evolution of the relationships between them. If not conceived in a participatory manner, protected areas can dramatically affect communities’ livelihoods and infringe upon their most basic rights; and may not even enhance biodiversity protection1. Although the Congolese legal framework offers some consideration of forest communities’ land and resources rights, this report highlights outstanding issues which need be addressed in order to avoid further infringements of forest peoples’ rights and foster an inclusive approach to conservation in the country. 1 See RFUK, 2016 8 The Rainforest Foundation UK: The Human Cost of Conservation in Republic of Congo - December 2017 The main findings of the report are as follows: • Both protected areas have outdated management plans and inappropriate zoning, failing to include communities or to understand their land use dynamics. Local inhabitants generally aren’t aware of the laws related to protected areas. When they are aware, there is confusion about which laws apply to them (such as in relation to the prohibition of species to be hunted) and about the geographical areas within which any laws may apply. Physical demarcation of park boundaries is neglected, which adds to the confusion. • Conservation-related restrictions prevent communities from accessing their traditional lands and resources, hampering villagers’ subsistence activities – such as hunting and gathering – and affecting their social identities. Difficulties encountered by communities to readjust their livelihoods to the imposed restrictions are often overlooked or ignored by conservation programmes. Livelihoods are further compromised by wildlife-human conflict, which is amplified by conservation programmes and often disregarded by the authorities. No defensive measures can be taken by farmers – often women – who suffer material damage and sometimes face physical danger due to the presence of elephants in proximity to their fields. They have