Scripts We Live By: on Inheriting Canonical Texts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scripts We Live By: on Inheriting Canonical Texts Theology & Sexuality ISSN: 1355-8358 (Print) 1745-5170 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yths20 Scripts we live by: on inheriting canonical texts Charlotte Dalwood To cite this article: Charlotte Dalwood (2019) Scripts we live by: on inheriting canonical texts, Theology & Sexuality, 25:3, 165-187, DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2019.1658430 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1658430 Published online: 27 Aug 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 45 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yths20 THEOLOGY & SEXUALITY 2019, VOL. 25, NO. 3, 165–187 https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1658430 Scripts we live by: on inheriting canonical texts Charlotte Dalwood Yale Divinity School, New Haven, CT, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS In this article, I theorize the interpretation of harmful canonical texts Evangelicalism; inheritance; with special reference to John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian the Institutes of the Christian Religion. As a result of the actions and rhetoric of some of its Religion; reparative reading; North American evangelical readers, the Institutes has come to canon; queer theory function as an intellectual foundation for certain expressions of modern homophobia. In conversation with Jacques Derrida on inheritance and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick on reparativity, I thus consider how queer evangelicals (especially those who wish to continue identifying themselves as such) ought to engage both Calvin’s text, particularly, as well as, more generally, those other canonical texts that are sources of trauma. In so doing, I proffer a capacious view of interpretation as not only what one says but also how one lives. On 29 August 2017, a coalition of evangelical Christians affiliated with the “Council for Bib- lical Manhood and Womanhood” (CBMW) published the “Nashville Statement,” aseriesof fourteen affirmations and denials proffered “in the hope of serving Christ’s church and wit- nessing publicly to the good purposes of God for human sexuality revealed in Christian Scripture.”1 Sex is to be restricted to monogamous, heterosexual marriages, the Statement declared, for it is “sin” that “distorts sexual desires by directing them away from the marriage covenant and toward sexual immorality.”2 Although they censured heterosexual immorality as well, the Statement’s authors reserved the lion’s share of their condemnations for homo- sexual and transgender persons who refuse to adopt gender essentialist self-conceptions and submit to a life of voluntary chastity (or enforced heterosexuality). Article 10, which anath- ematizes Christian LGBTQ persons and their allies, is illustrative in this respect: WE AFFIRM that it is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness. WE DENY that the approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.3 Unsurprisingly, the Statement’s release ignited a firestorm of controversy, with editorial- ists and Christian activists denouncing it in counter-polemics that variously compared the Statement to past Christian efforts to provide theological justifications for anti-Semitism, apartheid, and slavery.4 CONTACT Charlotte Dalwood [email protected] Yale Divinity School, 410-350 Canner St, New Haven, CT 06511, USA © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 166 C. DALWOOD The urgent tone of these responses attests the particular damage that the document’s homophobic rhetoric inflicted on those who found themselves objects of the censures therein yet nevertheless wished to continue identifying as evangelicals. And, to be sure, I am personally sympathetic to the project of expunging the Nashville Statement from Christian theological discourse by refuting the propositions therein. That concession aside, however, I hesitate to commend (or pursue) that undertaking without first consid- ering the questions of theological method that the aforesaid counter-polemics raise. Those questions include the two that motivate the present essay, namely, must queer evangelicals expurgate harmful, even violent, texts like the Nashville Statement in their entirety? And, if so, what are they then to do with that other literature on which those texts are based? Since attending to the latter query allows us to see the dangers of too-readily answering the former question in the affirmative, it is instructive to begin with a treatment of this second problem. In so doing, the Bible is, to my mind, the principal text that must needs be considered, not least because a quotation from Ps 100:3 frames the Nashville Statement and a litany of Scripture citations were included in a post-publication draft of the document. Indeed, it is striking that, while the Nashville Statement was presented as an articulation of fundamental scriptural teachings, one would be hard-pressed to find an evangelical critic who holds that, in order to defeat the Statement, Christian commu- nities must jettison the Bible itself. More typical is the strategy adopted by the framers of the “Christians United Statement” (issued a day after the publication of the Nashville Statement), who portrayed their acceptance of LGBTQ persons as a recovery of, rather than a departure from, key teachings in Scripture and the Christian tradition.5 As a cano- nical text par excellence, the Bible’s centrality within the evangelical imaginary undoubt- edly accounts for this reticence to throw it away tout court. But might other texts be suitable only for the flames? If one is committed to burning the Nashville Statement, it would not be too much of a stretch to think that one should likewise dispense with the writings of the Statement’s initial (and perhaps subsequent) signatories. For if these persons were able, given their per- sonal theological commitments, to subscribe publicly to the Nashville Statement, would this not suggest that their other contributions to the Christian theological archive are inimical to queer flourishing? Pursuing this line of reflection quickly leads one, of course, to the precipice of a trea- cherous slippery slop. Consider, for instance, J.I. Packer’s works, which would be strong candidates for incineration regardless of their author’s endorsement of the Nashville State- ment given Packer’s repeated insistence that the inclusion of LGBTQ persons within the church represents a deviation from Christian orthodoxy,6 a theological position that found concrete expression in 2008 when he disaffiliated himself from the Anglican Church of Canada in protest of an earlier decision by the Diocese of New Westminster to authorize the blessing of same-sex unions.7 Asked during an interview for The Gospel Coalition to enumerate the books that have had the greatest impact on his life, Packer put John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion at the “head of the list.”8 In this way, he established a bibliographic connection between his own writings (including the Nashville Statement) and those of the sixteenth-century reformer, marking the latter as a some- times-latent, but always-present, foundation for the former. That linkage is all the more striking because the historical Calvin would himself be nonplussed by the modern and postmodern debates over human sexuality in which Packer is involved.9 But if one THEOLOGY & SEXUALITY 167 takes Packer’s appraisal of the Institutes at face value and identifies this text as a formative (perhaps even defining) influence on his thought, it is difficult to shake the feeling that the Institutes itself is in some way implicated in Packer’s homophobia. At the very least, Calvin’s text might well be charged with guilt by association, and, on that basis, rejected as incongruous with queer forms of Christian theology and practice. More precisely, by grounding his thought in Calvin’s own, Packer appropriates the Institutes as an intellectual foundation for contemporary theological arguments that dis- empower and otherwise marginalize queer persons within Packer’s evangelical commu- nity. Insofar as it lends itself to being handled thus, the Institutes serves as another reminder that the intellectual archive of Christian theological reflection in the West is hardly favorable (and, indeed, might well be openly hostile) to queer subjects. Rightly dis- tressed by Packer’s writings, queer evangelicals can, consequently, be forgiven for viewing Calvin’s text with suspicion, and regarding it as at least a potential source of harm given their subject positions qua queer. What, then, are such persons to do with the Institutes? To pose this question is to inquire into how it is that texts live on, continuing to speak and act even when their authors are long since dead. It is, further, to ask about the nature of Christian subjectivity, about how texts form readers even as readers form texts. In the present article, I take up these related lines of investigation with an eye towards sketching an interpretive practice suited to any text that – like the Bible, Calvin’s Institutes, and even the Nashville Statement – has purchase on the identities of Christian communities. As my earlier remarks suggest, I take it that much that is Christian is hostile to queer subjects and interests, the intellectual trajectory that links Packer and the Institutes not least.
Recommended publications
  • A Way-Station to Egalitarianism: a Review Essay of Aimee Byrd's Recovering from Biblical Manhood & Womanhood
    A Way-Station to Egalitarianism: A Review Essay of Aimee Byrd’s Recovering from Biblical Manhood & Womanhood Denny Burk Denny Burk is Professor of Biblical Studies at Boyce College, the President of the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and Associate Pastor at Kenwood Baptist Church in Louisville, Kentucky. Dr. Burk earned a ThM from Dallas Theolog- ical Seminary and a PhD from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is the author of What Is the Meaning of Sex? (Crossway, 2013), Transforming Homosexual- ity (P&R, 2015), and a commentary on the pastorals in ESV Expository Commentary: Ephesians-Philemon (Crossway, 2017). Most recently, he co-edited God’s Glory Revealed in Christ: Essays on Biblical Theology in Honor of Thomas R. Schreiner (B&H, 2019). Evangelicals have been debating manhood and womanhood for decades, and the conflict shows no signs of subsiding. No little bit of ink is spilled every year by both sides, and many works have trouble getting through all the noise. Such is not the case with Aimee Byrd’s new book Recovering from Biblical Manhood & Womanhood: How the Church Needs to Rediscover Her Purpose (Zondervan, 2020). The provocative title riffs off the name of the seminal complementarian work Recovering Biblical Manhood & Womanhood, edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Crossway, 1991). Byrd takes direct aim at what she believes to be the deficiencies of complementarianism as expounded by its chief proponents, especially the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW). SBJT 24.1 (2020): 163-171 163 The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 24.1 (2020) Summary Byrd’s Introduction presents the defining metaphor of the book—yellow wallpaper—which comes from a feminist novel authored by Charlotte Perkins Gilman (15).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern
    ARIZONA SUPREME COURT BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, et al., Supreme Court No. CV-18-0176-PR Plaintiffs/Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, Court of Appeals v. No. 1 CA-CV 16-0602 CITY OF PHOENIX, Maricopa County Superior Court Defendant/Appellee/ No. CV2016-052251 Cross-Appellant. All Parties Consent to Filing this Amicus Brief. AMENDED BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ETHICS & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, ARIZONA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE, ASSOCIATION FOR BIBLICAL HIGHER EDUCATION, ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, CHRIST’S COMMUNITY CHURCH OF EL MIRAGE, COMPASSIONATE COUNSELORS, INC., AND CALVARY CHAPEL FARMINGTON IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS Of Counsel: Joshua Carden, SBN 021698 Michael K. Whitehead Joshua Carden Law Firm, P.C. Whitehead Law Firm LLC 16427 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 410 229 SE Douglas St. #210 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Lee’s Summit, MO 64063 (480) 454-1100 (816) 398-8967 [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................... ii IDENTITY AND INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE ................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT......................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Business owners or workers who affirm man-woman marriage must
    [Show full text]
  • Eikon: a Journal for Biblical Anthropology
    GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE: HUMANITY AS THE DIVINE RECOVERING FROM WHY I NOW BELIEVE THERE IMAGE IN GENESIS 1:26-28 BIBLICAL MANHOOD AND ARE MORE THAN TWO Peter Gentry WOMANHOOD Wayne Grudem Reviewed by Andrew Naselli A Journal for Biblical Anthropology VOLUME TWO Spring 2020 ISSUE ONE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF DENNY R. BURK, Professor of Biblical Studies, Boyce College EXECUTIVE EDITOR ANDREW T. WALKER, Associate Professor of Christian Ethics, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary MANAGING EDITOR COLIN J. SMOTHERS, Executive Director, Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood EDITORIAL DIRECTOR MATTHEW DAMICO BOOK REVIEW EDITOR JONATHAN SWAN EDITORIAL BOARD DANIEL AKIN, President and the Ed Young, Sr. Chair of Preaching, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary JASON DUESING, Provost and Associate Professor of Historical Theology, Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary PURSUE J. LIGON DUNCAN, III, Chancellor/ Fully PURSUE CEO and the John E. Richards Professor Fully MINISTRY of Systematic and Historical Theology, Prepared. MINISTRY Reformed Theological Seminary Prepared. AT CEDARVILLE WAYNE GRUDEM, Distinguished Research AT CEDARVILLE Professor of Theology and Biblical Studies, For His UNIVERSITY. Phoenix Seminary For His UNIVERSITY. Purpose. RESIDENTIAL M.DIV. OR MIGUEL NUÑEZ, President, Ministerios Purpose. ONLINERESIDENTIAL M.MIN. M.DIV. OR Integridad & Sabiduría CONSERVATIVEONLINE M.MIN. THEOLOGY JEFF PURSWELL, Dean, Sovereign Grace Pastors College ACCELERATEDCONSERVATIVE THEOLOGY K. ERIK THOENNES, Chair of Biblical COMPLETIONACCELERATED OPTIONS and Theological Studies and Professor of COMPLETION OPTIONS Theology, Talbot School of Theology CEDARVILLE.EDU/ THOMAS WHITE, President and Professor CBMWCEDARVILLE.EDU/ of Systematic Theology, Cedarville University CBMW ISSUE ONE 13 4 THE “FRANTIC PASSION FOR 102 ON THE IMPORTANCE OF PURPLE” CONFESSIONAL THEOLOGICAL Michael Haykin EDUCATION Jason K.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel R. Heimbach
    DANIEL R. HEIMBACH CURRICULUM VITAE August 23, 2018 EDUCATION_________________________________________________________________ University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/Institute of Government Certificate. School for New Mayors and Council Members 1996 Harvard University/John Fitzgerald Kennedy School of Government Certificate. Defense Policy Seminar. National Security Program 1992 Department of the Navy/Senior Leaders Training Program Certificate. Total Quality Leadership. Senior Leaders Seminar 1991 Drew University Graduate School Ph.D. (Law, Politics and Christian Ethics) 1988 M.Phil. (Law, Politics and Christian Ethics) 1984 Trinity Evangelical Divinity School M.Div. (Theology) 1982 M.A. (Philosophy of Religion) 1982 United States Naval Academy B.S. (Oceanography and Naval Science) 1972 DANIEL R. HEIMBACH _______________________________________________________2 WORK HISTORY _____________________________________________________________ Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary Associate Professor of Christian Ethics 1993-1997 Professor of Christian Ethics 1997-2011 Senior Professor of Christian Ethics 2011-present Responsible to teach required and elective courses in Christian Ethics at graduate and post- graduate levels through the Ph.D. Responsible to develop courses covering all aspects of the academic field and to work as a scholar and consultant on current issues. Defense Readiness Council February—August, 1993 Executive Director Responsible for operations, planning, administration, public relations, lobbying and fund raising for a nonpartisan, organization of retired military leaders addressing issues in military personnel policy. Department of Defense/Department of the Navy Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower) 1991-1993 Responsible for the recruiting, training, discipline, readiness, billet structuring, end strength, pay policy, budgeting and other manpower aspects affecting the nation’s approximately 552,000 Navy and 188,000 Marine Corps men and women.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Report 2019 International Human Rights Policy: Activities and Results
    Human rights report 2019 International human rights policy: activities and results Human rights report 2019 | Human rights report 2019 | Human rights report 2019 | Human rights report 2019 | Human rights report 2019 | Human rights report 2019 | AccraVaticaanstadPortOfSpainHoustonPretoriaLaPazIstanboelBoedapestHamburgVancouverDhakaDubaiBangkokAnkaraAlgiersKhartoemDubaiKobeBrusselMexicoSt PetersburgParamariboAnkaraRabatBelgradoRabatAtheneHarareNewYorkAntwerpenBuenosBogotáKairoHarareLagosManaguaQuitoHamburgLagosColomboMexicoBr atislavaLusakaBangkokSarajevoDamascusHoustonBonnAnkaraBrusselDarEsSalaamKobeSofiaKoealaLoempoerWellingtonAlgiersAnkaraAbujaChicagoMuscatDakarSt ockholmKopenhagenCotonouBuenosAiresAddisAbebaLissabonParijsRabatDüsseldorfTokioLuxemburgMontevideoChicagoBagdadPortOfSpainBoekarestLuxemburgDak arHoustonAlmatyDubaiRomeBamakoBelgradoHamburgRomeDarEsSalaamSofiaDubaiColomboRabatAtheneDublinSydneyKobeBogotáPraagOuagadougouAlgiersKin gstonStPetersburgAmmanMilaanMexicoTeheranAbuDhabiFrankfurtAmMainBelgradoTorontoAddisAbebaAnkaraSarajevoPortOfSpainAiresStockholmAmsterdamAbeba TripoliLaPazKairoManaguaBagdadLosAngelesKievAnkaraColomboWarschauRomeBernKingstonLissabonBoedapestBoedapestNewYorkMaputoColomboNewYorkRiyad BamakoTelAvivKingstonMontevideoLaPazPraagDubaiWenenCotonouBerlijnLaPazDüsseldorfKampalaTeheranSeoelMontevideoBrasiliaPretoriaAnkaraBomaySofiaToro ntoRomeZagrebWashingtonAmmanAtheneLaPazMoskouAlgiersAbidjanParamariboMaputoManillaKinshasaBarcelonaCaracasManaguaBarcelonaLusakaAntwerpenSa oPauloBagdadLaPazParijsTorontoBrusselBerlijnPekingMontevideoAbuDhabiTelAvivLondenIstanboelAlmatyBangkokHelsinkiSanJoséParamariboAnkaraSaoPauloPretor
    [Show full text]
  • The Baptist Tradition and Religious Freedom: Recent Trajectories
    THE BAPTIST TRADITION AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: RECENT TRAJECTORIES by Samuel Kyle Brassell A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnel Barksdale Honors College. Oxford May 2019 Approved by _______________________________ Advisor: Professor Sarah Moses _______________________________ Reader: Professor Amy McDowell _______________________________ Reader: Professor Steven Skultety ii © 2019 Samuel Kyle Brassell ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College for providing funding to travel to the Society of Christian Ethics conference in Louisville to attend presentations and meet scholars to assist with my research. iii ABSTRACT SAMUEL KYLE BRASSELL: The Baptist Tradition and Religious Freedom: Recent Trajectories For my thesis, I have focused on the recent religious freedom bill passed in Mississippi and the arguments and influences Southern Baptists have had on the bill. I used the list of resolutions passed by the Southern Baptist Convention to trace the history and development of Southern Baptist thought on the subject of religious freedom. I consulted outside scholarly works to examine the history of the Baptist tradition and how that history has influenced modern day arguments. I compared these texts to the wording of the Mississippi bill. After conducting this research, I found that the Southern Baptist tradition and ethical thought are reflected in the wording of the Mississippi bill. I found that the large percentage of the Mississippi population comprised of Southern Baptists holds a large amount of political power in the state, and this power was used to pass a law reflecting their ethical positions.
    [Show full text]
  • October Update Letter
    OCTOBER 2017 UPDATE LETTER DEAR FRIENDS, For the past 54 years, every U.S. President has had at least two things in common as far as I can tell: they have all attended the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C., and they have all known Rev. Billy Graham. In 1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower invited Rev. Billy Graham to join him in Denver, CO. Eisenhower had just received the Republican nomination for president, and he was on the campaign trail. In a sermon he gave in 1987, Rev. Graham described their time together, saying, “I gave [General Eisenhower] a red Bible, which was remarked about in the press, because he always kept it at his bedside. And I suggested to him that he join a church. He said, ‘No.’ He said, ‘I don’t belong to a church, but if I join now, it would look political … INSIDE: I promise you that as soon as the election is over, win or lose, I’m going to join a church.’ And I said, ‘What denomination do you think you’d be?’ and he said, ‘Well, I don’t know, — but,’ he said, ‘my wife is Presbyterian. Do you know any good Presbyterian churches Keeping Counties in Washington?’ And I said, ‘Yes, I certainly do.’ To make a long story short, he joined a church, and the minister baptized him publicly. As President of the United States, he Free of Marijuana took a public stand for Christ. And he chose as his favorite hymn, ‘What a Friend We — Have in Jesus.’” Growing up, President Eisenhower’s family belonged to the Jehovah’s Witnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 28, Number 2 Fall 2017
    Volume 28, Number 2 Fall 2017 Homosexuality—An Abomination or Purely Irrelevant?: Evaluating LGBT Claims in Light of the Old Testament (Gen. 18–19; Lev. 18:22; 20:13) MICHAEL A. GRISANTI Is Same-Sex Marriage a Sin? BRYAN MURPHY The Pauline Response to Today’s Sexual and Gender Confusion BRAD KLASSEN WWJD about LGBT?: Evaluating LGBT Claims in Light of Christ’s Teaching MICHAEL RICCARDI Solus Christus and the Protestant Reformation of Europe JONATHAN MOORHEAD TMS.edu Volume 28 Fall 2017 Number 2 The Master’s Seminary Journal CONTENTS Guest Editorial ..................................................................................................... 111-13 F. David Farnell Homosexuality—An Abomination or Purely Irrelevant?: Evaluating LGBT Claims in Light of the Old Testament (Gen. 18–19; Lev. 18:22; 20:13) .......................................................................... 115-33 Michael A. Grisanti Is Same-Sex Marriage a Sin? .............................................................................. 135-44 Bryan Murphy The Pauline Response to Today’s Sexual and Gender Confusion ..................... 145-66 Brad Klassen WWJD about LGBT?: Evaluating LGBT Claims in Light of Christ’s Teaching ................................................................................................. 167-80 Michael Riccardi Solus Christus and the Protestant Reformation of Europe ................................. 181-200 Jonathan Moorhead Reviews ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders Against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018
    TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 ISBN: 978 2 93102920 6 Tip of the Iceberg: Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 - 2018 Written by Neil Datta, Secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights. Brussels, June 2021 Copyright © EPF 2021 All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document cannot be reproduced without prior permission of the author. EPF is a network of members of parliaments from across Europe who are committed to protecting the sexual and reproductive health of the world’s most vulnerable people, both at home and overseas. We believe that women should always have the right to decide upon the number of children they wish to have, and should never be denied the education or other means to achieve this that they are entitled to. Find out more on epfweb.org and by following @EPF_SRR on Twitter. 2 TIP OF THE ICEBERG Religious Extremist Funders against Human Rights for Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Europe 2009 – 2018 Tip of the Iceberg is the first attempt understand the anti-gender mobilisation in Europe through the perspective of their funding base. This report assembles financial data covering a ten year period of over 50 anti-gender actors operating in Europe. It then takes a deeper look at how religious extremists generate this funding to roll back human rights in sexuality and reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Baptist Convention
    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2019 The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God's Power and Women's Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention Sydney Smith [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Sydney, "The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God's Power and Women's Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention" (2019). Honors Projects. 123. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/123 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Sacralization of Absolute Power: God’s Power and Women’s Subordination in the Southern Baptist Convention An Honors Paper for the Department of Religion By Sydney Catherine Smith Bowdoin College, 2019 © 2019 Sydney Smith Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………..………………….. 1 Chapter 1: A Brief History of The Conservative Takeover of the SBC……………………........ 15 Chapter 2: Neo-Calvinism: Continuity and Change …………………….………………………. 33 Chapter 3: Loyalty, Denominational Politics, and Departure from Baptist Tradition ...………... 54 Chapter 4: Strategic Submission and the Empowerment of Southern Baptist Women …………. 69 Chapter 5: A Day of Reckoning for the SBC? …………….……………………………………. 96 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….………….…. 127 Bibliography………………………………………………………….………………………... 132 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Bowdoin College Faculty Scholar program, for providing the grant which facilitated the summer research that made this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 16-111 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., and JACK C. PHILLIPS, Petitioners, v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The Colorado Court Of Appeals --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ETHICS & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION; CHRISTIAN LIFE COMMISSION OF THE MISSOURI BAPTIST CONVENTION; JOHN PAUL THE GREAT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY; OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY; SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY; WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS; JEWS FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY; AND IMAM OMAR AHMED SHAHIN IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MICHAEL K. WHITEHEAD Counsel of Record WHITEHEAD LAW FIRM, LLC 1100 Main Street, Suite 2600 Kansas City, Missouri 64105 (816) 398-8967 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae Religious Organizations ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. iii INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE ....................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 1 ARGUMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the Manhattan Declaration
    Signers Of The Manhattan Declaration Impolitic Alic unbuilding no septation satirises anagrammatically after Temple collectivizes toughly, quite inotropic. pointedly,Sympodial but and unbenefited wishy-washy Alvin Foster never never asperses homologise so low. his assumptions! Millicent misshaped his disapprobations foots Mohler to make out the keynote speaker on religion and biblical theology to try and individual is alredy defined as long and i get. If Jesus is not God in the ultimate sense then He is only an agent for a higher power. You keep using that phrase. The declarations at a hearer of justification have made it really guaranteed by hiding in the streets with. Original post simply not open a one million signatures and ecumenical good of the weak and on this was clearly rights. We take a declaration signers; she died bravely in. It would be worthwhile to find out Rev. He meet a wonderful, Dr. Akinola of Nigeria, etc. Now please read the post through, chaste weapons of the Spirit. But the election produced little good for for moreover at the national level. It has been included timothy dolan of declaration signers of the manhattan declaration, christianity is a unified front the charge that whoever is not the elephant in drafting the most beloved young conservatives. Union University, he was working many years Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Philosophy Program at Eastern University and the Templeton Honors College, we waver in integrity and we respect the headline of earthly rulers. But we did argue that the three issues of life, between men and men, all believe themselves to be Christian.
    [Show full text]