DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization of Suspended Sediment Loading to and from John Redmond Reservoir, East-Central Kansas, 2007–2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization of Suspended Sediment Loading to and from John Redmond Reservoir, East-Central Kansas, 2007–2008 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Characterization of Suspended Sediment Loading to and from John Redmond Reservoir, East-Central Kansas, 2007–2008 Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5123 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Outflow from John Redmond Reservoir, east-central Kansas (photograph taken by Ashli Maddox, U.S. Geological Survey). Characterization of Suspended-Sediment Loading to and from John Redmond Reservoir, East-Central Kansas, 2007–2008 By Casey J. Lee, Patrick P. Rasmussen, and Andrew C. Ziegler Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5123 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lee, Casey J., Rasmussen, Patrick P., and Ziegler, Andrew C., 2008, Characterization of suspended-sediment loading to and from John Redmond Reservoir, east-central Kansas, 2007–2008: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5123, 25 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................3 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................3 Previous Sediment Transport Investigations ...................................................................................3 Methods...........................................................................................................................................................4 Continuous Water-Quality and Streamflow Monitoring .................................................................4 Suspended-Sediment Sample Collection and Analysis .................................................................5 Quality Assurance.................................................................................................................................5 Regression Models ...............................................................................................................................5 Computation of Sediment Concentrations, Loads, and Yields.......................................................6 Characterization of Sediment Loading To and From John Redmond Reservoir ..................................7 Hydrologic Conditions ..........................................................................................................................7 Regression Models ...............................................................................................................................9 Stormflow Effects on Sediment Loading .........................................................................................10 Effects of Upstream Reservoirs on Sediment Loading .................................................................15 Trapping Efficiency and Storage Loss .............................................................................................16 Comparison to Historical Data ..........................................................................................................19 Summary and Conclusions .........................................................................................................................20 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................23 Figures 1. Map showing location of watershed boundaries, land use, and sampling sites upstream and downstream from John Redmond Reservoir, east-central Kansas, February 2007–2008 ......................................................................................................................2 2–11. Graphs showing: 2. Relation between cross-sectional median and in-stream turbidity readings at John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 ..........................................................................................6 3. Annual flow at John Redmond sites, 1964–2007 ......................................................................8 4. Time-series streamflow values and storms delineated by number, John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 ......................................................................................................................9 5. Streamflow duration curves at John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 ......................10 6. Regression models between optical sensors and suspended-sediment concentration at study area sites, February 2007–2008 .................................................................................13 7. Relation between sediment loading and streamflow volume during stormflow events at John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 ..............................................................................16 8. Suspended-sediment load duration curves at John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 .....................................................................................................................................17 9. Estimation of streamflow and sediment loading originating from Council Grove Reservoir at the Neosho River near Americus, April 8–26, 2007 ........................................19 10. Approximate suspended-sediment load to and from John Redmond Reservoir, February 2007–2008 ....................................................................................................................20 iv 11. Relations between streamflow and suspended-sediment load (SSL) for historic sediment samples at study area sites .....................................................................................22 Tables 1. Location and contributing drainage area of sampling sites upstream and downstream from John Redmond Reservoir, east-central Kansas, February 2007–08 ............................3 2. Approximate land use in riparian areas of various sized streams in the Neosho River basin, east-central Kansas, 2004 ...............................................................................................4 3. Suspended-sediment concentration, percent silt/clay (<63 um diameter), and grain- size distribution from discrete samples collected from John Redmond sites, Febru- ary 2007–2008 ..............................................................................................................................11 4. Regression models and statistics for estimating suspended-sediment concentration (SSC) from turbidity values at study area sites, February 2007–2008 ................................12 5. Dates, streamflow, and suspended sediment loading of stormflow for study period at John Redmond sites, February 2007–2008 ..............................................................................14 6. Streamflow, sediment load, and sediment yield from regulated and unregulated drain- age areas at monitoring sites upstream from John Redmond Reservoir, February 2007–08 ........................................................................................................................18 7. Estimate of storage lost in John Redmond Reservoir under varying estimates of bulk density, February 2007–08 .........................................................................................................20 8. Regression models and statistics for estimating suspended-sediment load (SSL) using historic (1964–1978) sediment and streamflow at study area sites, February 2007–2008 .....................................................................................................................................21 9. Comparison of total sediment loads estimated from turbidity (2007–2008) and historic (1964–1978) streamflow measurements , February 2007–2008 ...........................................23 v Conversion Factors Multiply By To obtain Length inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) foot per mile 0.1894 meter per kilometer mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) Area acre 4,047 square meter (m2) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) Volume gallon (gal) 3.785 liter (L) gallon (gal) 0.003785 cubic meter (m3) cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3/s) cubic foot per day (ft3/d) 0.02832 cubic meter per day (m3/d) million gallons per day (Mgal/d) 0.04381 cubic meter per second (m3/s) acre-foot 1,233 cubic meter (m3) acre-feet per square mile 476 cubic meters per square
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2021
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2021 Kansas Water Office September 2020 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Potential of Reservoir Outflow Management to Reduce
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES Hydrol. Process. 27, 1426–1439 (2013) Published online 23 April 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9284 Assessing the potential of reservoir outflow management to reduce sedimentation using continuous turbidity monitoring and reservoir modelling† Casey Lee* and Guy Foster US Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, 66049, USA Abstract: In-stream sensors are increasingly deployed as part of ambient water quality-monitoring networks. Temporally dense data from these networks can be used to better understand the transport of constituents through streams, lakes or reservoirs. Data from existing, continuously recording in-stream flow and water quality monitoring stations were coupled with the two-dimensional hydrodynamic CE-QUAL-W2 model to assess the potential of altered reservoir outflow management to reduce sediment trapping in John Redmond Reservoir, located in east-central Kansas. Monitoring stations upstream and downstream from the reservoir were used to estimate 5.6 million metric tons of sediment transported to John Redmond Reservoir from 2007 through 2010, 88% of which was trapped within the reservoir. The two-dimensional model was used to estimate the residence time of 55 equal- volume releases from the reservoir; sediment trapping for these releases varied from 48% to 97%. Smaller trapping efficiencies were observed when the reservoir was maintained near the normal operating capacity (relative to higher flood pool levels) and when average residence times were relatively short. An idealized, alternative outflow management scenario was constructed, which minimized reservoir elevations and the length of time water was in the reservoir, while continuing to meet downstream flood control end points identified in the reservoir water control manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • FLINT HILLS MTIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas
    FLINT HILLS MTIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1977 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM Pish and Wildlife Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR yr^mr ETLI^ fatioml I Bartfocpd, Ktosaa AHSDJIL HAHRimrg hspght CaOondar Tear 1977 mmOML WIWUM BBPUQ3 STE™ Flah and Wildlife Servloe 0,3, 0^ THB UfffiHIOK Bsraciunol 1. Harold B. Sbdpbard Tractor Operator WG-06-433 (Career Ssasoml) 2. 7, Amdt Clerk Typist GS-03-02 (CC-PPT) 3* Carltoil IU Freoburg Asst. Bsfugs mmm* GS-09-01 (P?T) U. Hon £• Thum l&lntsnaras Worker WG~07-01 {CC-OT?) - Hot Pictured - Iltohael J. Long Mfvim Manager (^-11-02(m) Joseph L. PXusisr Bio, Iteoh. 03-05-03 (TT) Bsslgnsd 10/27/77 Joseph J. Conrad Traotor Operator WG-0&-03 (FT} Betired 10/18/77 Berioi# and As/fif} £u.i' Kotfo $J? 7// y Bats FLINT HILLS Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE was established under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act on a part of the area acquired by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the John Redmond Dam and Reservoir. This flood control project is administered by the District Engineer, Tulsa, Oklahoma. PUBLIC ROADS SPECIAL RECREATION AREAS - NO HUNTING STRAWN HUNTING AREA FISHING ACCESS POINTS (1) DESIGNATED FIREARM TRAVEL ROUTE (During waterfowl hunting season. TABLES OF CCMSSTS I* GgKBaAL 3&ge A. Introduotlon 1 B. dim tic and Habitat Ccaiditiona 1 C. Land Acquisition. 2 B. System Status • 2 n* ocmmxiTim MD mnmmim A. Conatruotion k B. Maintenance 6 C. Wildfire .
    [Show full text]
  • Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10
    Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Upper left: Tuttle Creek Lake upstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Lower right: Tuttle Creek Lake downstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Note: On May 16, 2011, the water-surface elevation for Tuttle Creek Lake was 1,075.1 feet. The normal elevation for the multi-purpose pool of the reservoir is 1,075.0 feet. Back cover. Water-quality monitor in Little Blue River near Barnes, Kansas. Note active channel-bank erosion at upper right (photograph by Bill Holladay, USGS). Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 By Kyle E. Juracek Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks
    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 1, 2018 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, John Redmond Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, LaCygne Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Pomona Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 25 - 40 inch slot limit with no more than 1 fish 40-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and forty (40) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Milford Reservoir 25 - 35 inch slot limit with no more than 2 fish 35-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: El Dorado Reservoir 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andale-Renwick USD 267 Pond, Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City
    [Show full text]
  • FLINT HILLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas
    FLINT HILLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2004 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS FLINT HILLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2004 Refuge Manager' Date Refuge Supervisor Date ^Regional Chief, Refuges and Wildlife Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. HIGHLIGHTS 1 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS 1 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title : Nothing to Report 2. Easements Nothing to Report .3. Other Nothing to Report D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan Nothing to Report 2. Management Plans 2 3. Public Participation '. Nothing to Report 4. Compliance with Environmental and Cultural Resource Mandates Nothing to Report 5. Research -and Investigations " 3 E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel 3 2. Youth Programs 3 3. Other Manpower Programs Nothing to Report 4. Volunteer Programs Nothing to Report 5. Funding 6 6. Safety 6 • 7. Technical Assistance Nothing To Report 8. Other Items Nothing to Report F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General Nothing to Report 2. Wetlands ; 7 3. Forests 9 4. Cropland 12 5. Grasslands 13 6. Other Habitats 13 7. Grazing Nothing to Report 8. Haying Nothing to Report 9. Fire Management 14 10. Pest Control 16 11. Water Rights 16 12. Wilderness and Special Areas Nothing to Report 13. WPA Easement Monitoring Nothing to Report G WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity . Nothing to Report 2. Endangered and/or Threatened Species 18 3. Waterfowl ' ' 19 4. Marsh and Water Birds 20 5. Shorebirds, Gulls, Terns and Allied Species 20 6. Raptors '. 20 7. Other Migratory Birds 21 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2019
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2019 Kansas Water Office September 2018 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Final Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Hunting and Fishing Plan July 2020
    Final Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge Hunting and Fishing Plan July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge 530 West Maple, Hartford, KS 66854 Submitted By: Craig Mowry, Project Leader ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Concurrence: Barbara Boyle, Refuge Supervisor ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Approved: Maureen Gallagher, ARD, National Wildlife Refuge System ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 II. Statement of Objectives ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Description of Hunting Program .......................................................................................... 4 A. Areas to Be Opened to Hunting ........................................................................................ 4 B. Species to Be Taken, Hunting Periods, Hunting Access ................................................... 6 C. Hunter Permit Requirements (if applicable) ..................................................................... 6 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State ................................................................... 6 E. Law Enforcement .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 – 2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Outreach Program
    2014 – 2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Outreach Program Preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species through education and communication programs Created by: Kaila Schmidt Consultant for Missouri Department of Conservation [email protected] 913-744-5146 1 Agenda • What is an invasive species? • What Lakes and Rivers are infested with zebra mussels? • Why should you take action? • What resources are available? • Question and answers 2 What is an invasive species? • Invasive species defined as a species that is: – Non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and – Whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health – Invasive species can be plants, animals and other organisms • Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) includes both aquatic plant and aquatic animal species – Invasive aquatic plants are introduced plants that have adapted to living in, on, or next to water, and that can grow either submerged or partially submerged in water – Invasive aquatic animals require a watery habitat, but do not necessarily have to live entirely in water Invasive Species Examples 3 Aquatic Invasive Species • Plants http://www.MIPN.org (Hydrilla, Purple Loosestrife, Common Reed, Eurasian Milfoil, etc.) Hydrilla • Animals – Asian Carp Asian Carp – Asian Long-Horned Beetle – European Wood Wasp – Feral Hog – Gypsy Moth – Starling – Zebra Mussel Zebra Mussel 4 What is a zebra mussel? • Invasive species • Attach to any submerged hard surface in infested waters • Spreads via commercial and
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Kansas Fall & Spring Hunting Atlas Includes Walk-In Hunting Access (WIHA) Areas and Public Lands
    ATLAS COVER Pages 2020.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages 8/10/20 4:31 PM Page 1 2020-2021 Kansas Fall & Spring Hunting Atlas Includes Walk-in Hunting Access (WIHA) areas and Public Lands Celebrating 25 years of Walk-in Hunting Access ATLAS COVER Pages 2020.qxp_ATLAS COVER Pages 8/7/20 10:46 AM Page 2 WIHA Area Rules Obey all Kansas hunting rules and regulations. Using the WIHA atlas • WIHA tracts are for hunting purposes only. Other activities are • The maps included in the atlas are to be used for general refer- prohibited without landowner permission. ence only. Signs will designate actual WIHA boundaries. In • Hunting is by foot traffic only. No vehicular traffic is allowed. some instances, the boundary may be a creek, river, hedgerow, • Do not trespass on neighboring property. Hunt only on the side crop field, or CRP field where the boundary may be difficult enrolled in WIHA as designated by posted signs. to map. Use posted signs as the true boundary. • WIHA tracts are open to hunting either September 1 – January • This atlas also depicts state and federal areas that may be open 31, November 1 – January 31, September 1 – March 31 or to public hunting. Some of these areas have special regulations April 1 – May 31 as indicated in this atlas and on posted in effect, and some may have refuge areas that are closed to boundaries. Entering WIHA tracts prior to or after the contract hunting. Contact local staff for area-specific information prior period for any reason is trespassing. to accessing these properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City Lake, Bonner Springs - North Park Lake, Bourbon Co
    Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 10, 2008 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Carbondale East Lake, Fall River Toe Drain 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Milford Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City Lake, Bonner Springs - North Park Lake, Bourbon Co. Cedar Creek, Bourbon Co. Elm Creek Lake, Bourbon State Fishing Lake, Bronson City Lake, Brown State Fishing Lake, Butler State Fishing Lake, Carbondale East Lake, Chanute City Lake, Clinton State Park - Lake Henry, Clinton State Park - Picnic Area Pond, Columbus - VFW Pond, Colwich City Lake, Douglas State Fishing Lake, Emporia - Camp Alexander Ponds, Emporia - Jones Park Ponds, Emporia - Peter Pan Park, Fall River State Park Kids Pond, Fall River Toe Drain, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake Fern, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake West, Fort Scott - Lake Fort Scott, Fort Scott Community College Lakes, Frontenac City Lake, Gardner City Lake, Garnett City Lake North, Garnett City Lake South, Greenbush Community Lake, Gridley City Lake, Harvey Co. Camp Hawk, Haysville - Riggs Lake, Impounded F.I.S.H. Waters, Region 1 & 3, Johnson Co. - Kill Creek Park Lake, Johnson Co. - Shawnee Mission Park , Johnson Co.
    [Show full text]