Draft AMR 07-08

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft AMR 07-08 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 If you require this document or a summary version in large print, Braille, audiotape, cd or in another language, please contact our Equality and Diversity Officer on (01270) 537565. 1 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council Local Development Framework ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2008 CONTENTS Executive Summary Part 1 PAGE 1 Review of Local Development Scheme and progress of Local 6 Development Framework Part 2 PAGE 1 Characteristics of the Borough 12 2 Key Characteristics 13 3 The Natural Environment 34 4 The Built Environment 45 5 Employment 47 6 Housing 66 7 Transportation 85 8 Recreation and Tourism 92 9 Shopping Town Centres and Regeneration 100 10 Community Needs 106 11 Appeals 112 12 Saved Policies 119 13 Sustainability Appraisal Indicators Monitoring 120 Sources 128 Appendices 131 Glossary 143 2 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council Local Development Framework ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT 2008 Executive Summary One of the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 is for Local Planning Authorities (LPA) to produce an Annual Monitoring Report (AMR). This is the fourth AMR for the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich and contains information on the period 1st April 2007 – 31st March 2008. This report will address the following matters · Review actual progress in terms of local development document preparation against the timetable and milestones on the local development scheme. · Assess the extent to which policies in local development documents are being implemented. · Highlight specific issues that are relevant to the Borough of Crewe and Nantwich that may need to be addressed through policy intervention. · Where policies are not being implemented, explain why and to set out what steps are to be taken to ensure that the policy is implemented; or whether the policy is to be amended or replaced. · Identify the significant effects of implementing policies in local development documents and whether they are as intended; and · Set out whether policies are to be amended or replaced. The report is split into 2 parts, part 1 deals with the issues highlighted above, the review of the Local Development Scheme and progress of the Local Development Framework. The document will be submitted to the Secretary of State through the Government Office for the North West (GONW) by the 31st December 2008. The Local Plan The Local Plan was approved in February 2005 and covers the period up to 2011. The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 required LPA to make an application to ‘Save’ policies beyond the 3 year period after the adoption of the current Local Plan. The Borough Council applied for a number of Local Plan policies to be saved for longer than the 3 year period specified, using the protocol set out within the Planning and Compulsory Act. This protocol required the LPA to demonstrate that the policies set out within the Local Plan reflected the principles of Local Development Frameworks; were consistent with current national policy; and that it was not feasible or desirable to replace them. The Borough Council submitted a list of ‘Saved’ policies and their intentions for them to the GONW before the deadline of the 17th August 2007. A response was received on the 14th February 2008, from GONW. This response and attached schedule detailed those policies within the Adopted Replacement Local Plan 2011 deemed as ‘Saved’ beyond the three year period after the adoption of the Local Plan. A copy of the ‘Saved’ policies direction received from GONW and the list of policies ‘Saved’ beyond the three year period have been reproduced within this AMR document, see Appendix 2. 3 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 The Local Development Framework The Borough Council’s first Local Development Scheme (LDS) came into force on 31st December 2004. A First Review of the LDS was submitted to the GONW in October 2006 and came into effect on 21st November 2006. A Second Review of the LDS came into force on the 20th April 2007. The revised LDS documents altered some of the timescales in order to provide more achievable targets for the production of the relevant DPDs. Indicators Part 2 is divided into 12 chapters which reflect chapters contained within the Local Plan, this part contains information relating to the Core Indicators set out by the Government Office and other indicators suggested for inclusion by Communities and Local Government guidance documents. The list below shows all of the Core Indicators and their location within the report, there has also been considerable use of local indicators to give a clear picture of the Borough. The “Regional Spatial Strategy and Local Development Framework Core Output Indicators – Update 2/2008” published by CLG in July 2008 contains the Core Output indicators for Local Planning Authorities to report on in their Annual Monitoring Reports. This revised set of Core Output Indicators replaced the “Local Development Framework Core Output Indicators Update 1/2005” (October 2005) and Table 4.4 and Annex B of the “Local Development Framework Monitoring: A Good Practice Guide” (March 2005) documents. Revision to the Core Output Indicators has been limited to the rationalisation, clarification and update of indicator definitions to reflect current government guidance. It is acknowledged within the document that due to the timing of the publication of the revised indicators there may be limited scope to incorporate a number of the changes within this year’s version of the AMR. Subsequently, changes to the Core Output Indicators not reflected in this year’s AMR should be incorporated in future AMR documents. Core Output indicators reported on in previous AMR documents which have now been subsequently removed as a result of the revision process will on the whole continue to be reported on within this and future versions of the AMR document, as contextual and local indicators. The AMR has the function of helping LPA understand the wider social, environmental and economic issues affecting their areas through the use of appropriate indicators. 4 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 Core indicator / Paragraph ODPM Ref. number Business development and town centres BD1 Total amount of additional employment floorspace – by type 5.34 BD2 Total amount of employment floorspace on previously developed 5.37 land – by type BD3 Employment land available – by type 5.39 BD4 Total amount of floorspace for ‘town centre uses’ 5.41 Housing H1 Plan period and housing targets 6.2 H2(a) Net additional dwellings – in previous years 6.2 H2(b) Net additional dwellings – for the reporting year 6.2 H2(c) Net additional dwellings – in future years 6.2 H2(d) Managed delivery target 6.2 H3 New and converted dwellings – on previously developed land 6.13 H4 Net additional pitches (Gypsy and Traveller) 6.17 H5 Gross affordable housing completions 6.24 H6 Housing Quality – Building for Life Assessments 6.27 Environmental Quality E1 Number of planning permissions granted contrary to Environment 3.3 Agency advice on flooding and water quality grounds E2 Change in areas of biodiversity importance 3.4 E3 Renewable energy generation 3.7 Minerals - Dealt with by Cheshire County Council Waste - Dealt with by Cheshire County Council 5 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich – Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Report 2008 PART 1 REVIEW OF THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME AND PROGRESS OF THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 1 Introduction 1.1 The first Local Development Scheme (LDS) was prepared in September 2004; and subsequently came into effect on 31 December 2004. It set out the rolling programme that the Borough Council intended to follow in the production of its Local Development Framework (LDF) over the subsequent three years. 1.2 Since then the LDS has been reviewed twice. The latest version came into force on 20 April 2007. 1.3 This part of the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) looks at what progress has been made in the production the Local Development Documents during the last twelve months. But as explained below, work on the Local Development Scheme has been severely affected by the proposals for Local Government Reorganisation in Cheshire. 2 Local Government Reorganisation 2.1 On 18 December 2007, Local Government Minister John Healey announced the decision to implement Government Reorganisation in Cheshire. This would result in two Unitary Authorities being formed as of 1 April 2009 to replace the existing county council and six borough councils. 2.2 Cheshire County Council and the six districts of Cheshire, Chester City, Ellesmere Port & Neston, Vale Royal, Macclesfield, Crewe and Nantwich and Congleton, will cease to exist. They will be replaced by two new unitary councils: · Cheshire West and Chester (Cheshire County Council, Chester, Ellesmere Port & Neston and Vale Royal); and · Cheshire East (Cheshire County Council, Congleton, Crewe & Nantwich and Macclesfield). 2.3 Congleton and Crewe and Nantwich Borough Councils disagreed with the government’s proposals; and took them to judicial review. This was eventually unsuccessful; and the statutory orders for the creation of the two new unitary authorities were finally confirmed on 4 March 2008. 2.4 In May 2008 elections to the new authorities were held. Cheshire East Council now operates as a Shadow Authority, with the powers and responsibility to create the new unitary authority which will be formally vested in April 2009. 2.5 During this transitional stage, the existing councils have been working to ensure a smooth transition to the new authorities, whilst continuing to deliver existing services. In addition a considerable amount of joint working has already taken place regarding the gathering of background evidence relating to planning policy; and a draft Local Development Scheme has been produced for Cheshire East.
Recommended publications
  • Police Report for the Parish Councils of Haslington, Crewe Green and Barthomley
    Police Report for the Parish Councils of Haslington, Crewe Green and Barthomley 1st December 2020- 31st December 2020 These councils have been grouped together due to their geographical proximity and size. The Dingle Primary School- On 4/12 there was a bomb hoax at the school. A call was made saying a bomb was on site but it was quickly ascertained by police that it was a hoax and there was no risk to the school. The offender has been identified and is currently being dealt with by PC Martin and PCSO Jolley for the specific offence of a Bomb Hoax contrary to Section 51 Criminal Law Act 1977. The offender is a juvenile who is being bullied and this has played into the incident. In addition to the offender being dealt with, the High School where the other involved parties attend and their parents will be spoken to and dealt with. An update will hopefully be available for the Parish Council around February 2021. Old Park Road, Crewe Green- Caller has reported that he has seen four suspicious males around his property and come out to find the gate has been damaged. There appears no reason for this. There is CCTV that is currently being reviewed by the attending officer to see if there are any lines of enquiry. Stephen Taylor- On 6/10 police received a report of a male in Haslington making sexual remarks to some minors. They had managed to capture him momentarily on video and he was identified by PCSO Jolley and PCSO Barlow as a registered sex offender.
    [Show full text]
  • A500 Dualling) (Classified Road) (Side Roads) Order 2020
    THE CHESHIRE EAST BOROUGH COUNCIL (A500 DUALLING) (CLASSIFIED ROAD) (SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2020 AND THE CHESHIRE EAST BOROUGH COUNCIL (A500 DUALLING) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2020 COMBINED STATEMENT OF REASONS [Page left blank intentionally] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Statement ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Statutory powers ............................................................................................................... 2 2 BACKGROUND AND SCHEME DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................... 3 2.1 Regional Growth ................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Local Context ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Scheme History .................................................................................................................. 5 3 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 6 3.1 Local Network Description ................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Travel Patterns ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Audlem Parish Council
    Summer/Autumn 2016 Audlem Parish Council Update on Recent Planning Parish Council News, July 2016 Applications Little Heath (120 dwellings) The Parish Council has Playing Field, Car Park sent a report indicating where the ‘reserved matters’ proposal conflicts with the Audlem Neighbourhood Plan, and Children’s Play Area and the Village Design Statement, and what modifications Parish Councillors were dismayed to learn Cheshire East it would like to see. We are still awaiting a response from Council is reviewing its policy on transferring assets to Cheshire East Council. Town and Parish Councils. Instead of the Playing Field complex being permanently transferred to the Parish Mill Lane (2 dwellings) This application was originally Council (as with the public toilets) playing fields may now refused by CEC, but has now gone to appeal. The Parish only be transferred on a 30 year lease. This is apparently in Council has submitted its case against the appellant’s case. order to protect recreational areas from development in (See Mill Lane bridleway below.) perpetuity. Councillors are concerned that residents would be liable for expensive maintenance which would require a higher local precept on an asset on which there would be no continuity of ownership. It would also be difficult to get grants towards costs on a relatively short lease. Additionally, there would be no reduction in council tax. Councillors recently met with representatives of Cheshire East Council to discuss their concerns. At the time of writing there is no definite news on whether the proposed change of policy has been adopted. Hedges It would be really appreciated if residents who have hedges or trees alongside pavements and paths could keep them trimmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy Main Modifications Habitats Regulations Assessment
    Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy Main Modifications Habitats Regulations Assessment Final Report February 2017 Cheshire East Council JBA Project Manager Rachel Brisley Bank Quay House Sankey Street Warrington Cheshire WA1 1NN Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Final Report / January / Cheshire East Council February 2017 Contract This report describes work commissioned by Allan Clarke, on behalf of Cheshire East Council. Rachael Brady, Helen Archer, Laura Thomas and Rachel Brisley of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Rachael Brady BSc MSc MIEEM Senior Ecologist Reviewed by ................................................. Rachel Brisley BA MCD MBA Technical Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a draft report for Cheshire East Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Cheshire East Council. HRA Consultation Report Jan 2017_Final i Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2017 Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 635g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 808g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to achieve carbon neutrality. HRA Consultation Report Jan 2017_Final ii Non-Technical Summary This report contributes to Cheshire East Council’s legal obligation under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 to carry out a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) on its plans for effects on European sites.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPASSPORT CUP/TROPHY HEAT LEVEL B Event Bickerton Hill
    Deeside Orienteering Club COMPASSPORT CUP/TROPHY HEAT LEVEL B event Sunday March 13 2016 Bickerton Hill FINAL DETAILS Travel The event centre is at Bickerton Village Hall MR SJ 509538, SY14 8AU. From the West join the A534 at its junction with the A41, Broxton; then in approx 2 miles take a right turn at SJ 508539. From the East join the A534 at its junction with the A49, then in about 3 miles take the left turn at SJ 508539. (Speed limits, camera at Bulkeley). O signs near final turnoff only. Parking In the Hall grounds and an adjacent field as directed by marshals. If the weather has been wet and the field becomes waterlogged, later arrivals may have to park at the roadside. Facilities Enquiries/collection of pre-hired SI cards, Toilets, Registration for EOD, Download and Results will be situated in the Village Hall. No spikes or muddy shoes in the Hall please. There are additional toilets near the Start. Compass Point will be at the event selling a full range of orienteering equipment. There will be no catering at the event. There a two pubs which do food; The Sandstone, about 1k W, and the Bickerton Poacher, about 2k E, both on the A 534. Entry Via club captains for competition courses (£8.50/£4); no EOD for these courses. EOD for Yellow and Light Green non-competitive courses. Registration will be open from 10.00 and will close at 12.00. Yellow maps will be issued at Registration. Seniors £6, Juniors/Students £3. SI card hire 50p; £30 for lost SI cards.
    [Show full text]
  • C/R/D Summary Skeleton Document
    Application No: 14/0128N Location: Land to the north of Main Road, Wybunbury Proposal: Outline planning application with all matters reserved (apart from access) for up to 40 dwellings, incidental open space, landscaping and associated ancillary works. Applicant: The Church Commissioners for England Expiry Date: 10-Mar-2015 SUMMARY The proposed development would be contrary to Policy NE.2 and RES.5 and the development would result in a loss of open countryside. In this case Cheshire East cannot demonstrate a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites. However, as Wybunbury Moss is identified as a Special Area of Conservation and a Ramsar Site the NPPF states that Wybunbury Moss should be given the same protection as a European site and an assessment under the Habitats Directives is required. As a result the presumption in favour of sustainable development (paragraph 14 of the NPPF) does not apply to this application. In this case specific policies in this Framework indicate development should be restricted on this site and as such the application is recommended for refusal due to its impact upon Wybunbury Moss. RECOMMENDATION REFUSE REASON FOR REFERRAL This application is referred to Strategic Planning Board as it includes an Environmental Statement. The application is also subject to a call in request from Cllr Clowes which requests that the application is referred to Committee for the following reasons: ‘This application has been brought to my attention by Wybunbury Parish Council and Hough and Chorlton Parish Council, together with the adjacent neighbours and the Wybunbury Moss Voluntary Warden. All parties object to this application on the following material grounds:- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Cheshire Way A4
    CONTENTS The Mid-Cheshire Footpath Society Page Waymarked Walks in Central Cheshire About the South Cheshire Way 3 Using this guide (including online map links) 6 Points of interest 9 Congleton Sandbach Mow Walking eastwards 15 Cop Grindley Brook to Marbury Big Mere 17 Scholar Green Biddulph Marbury Big Mere to Aston Village 21 Crewe Aston Village to River Weaver 24 River Weaver to A51 by Lea Forge 26 Nantwich Kidsgrove A51 by Lea Forge to Weston Church 29 Weston Church to Haslington Hall 33 Haslington Hall to Thurlwood 37 Thurlwood to Little Moreton Hall (A34) 41 Little Moreton Hall (A34) to Mow Cop 43 Stoke on Trent Grindley Brook Audlem Walking westwards 45 Mow Cop to Little Moreton Hall (A34) 47 Whitchurch Little Moreton Hall (A34) to Thurlwood 49 Thurlwood to Haslington Hall 51 Haslington Hall to Weston Church 55 Weston Church to A51 by Lea Forge 59 A51 by Lea Forge to River Weaver 63 River Weaver to Aston Village 66 THE SOUTH CHESHIRE WAY Aston Village to Marbury Big Mere 69 Marbury Big Mere to Grindley Brook 73 From Grindley Brook to Mow Cop Update information (Please read before walking) 77 About The Mid-Cheshire Footpath Society 78 A 55km (34 mile) walk in the Cheshire countryside. South Cheshire Way Page 2 of 78 Links with other footpaths ABOUT THE SOUTH CHESHIRE WAY There are excellent links with other long distance footpaths at either end. At Grindley Brook there are links with the 'Shropshire Way', the 'Bishop Bennet Bridleway', the 'Sandstone Trail', the 'Maelor Way' and the (now The South Cheshire Way was originally conceived as a route in the late unsupported) 'Marches Way'.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenbury Together and Audlem ADCA
    Wrenbury Together and Audlem & District Community Action – Support in the Newhall Parish - April 2020 – CORONAVIRUS HOME SUPPORT SERVICES We are providing support to local residents who may need help, are self-isolated or live alone and whose family, friends or neighbours are unable to help. For those needing support it is important that you, as well as distant family and friends, know you are getting it from people you know or trust. Our services cover the areas of Wrenbury and its surrounding parishes and Audlem and its surrounding parishes. We are working together to cover the Newhall Parish area with the support of the Parish Council. Our volunteers are all registered and checked and we are working closely with Cheshire East Council and Cheshire Community & Voluntary Services We can help you with: - Prescription collections - Food Shopping - Post Office and posting letters - A friendly telephone chat We want to support our local businesses and ensure their long term future within our community. We will be using local providers where we can, some of whom are offering home delivery services including hot meals. If you don’t have anyone close by to help and are in need of assistance or are a carer who needs further support at this time, then please do contact: Wrenbury Together Audlem & District Community Action Julie Wynne 07984 785907 07802 429025/01270 780002 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Covering Audlem and surrounding covering Wrenbury and surrounding areas including Audlem Coop, areas including Wrenbury Stores & Boots Chemist, Post Office, Butchers Post Office and GP Prescriptions and Lord Combermere Market Thank you to all the volunteers who have already come forward to help us and our local communities– we have not needed to use them all yet – but we will be ready as and when services are required.
    [Show full text]
  • Counciltaxbase201819appendix , Item 47
    APPENDIX A COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 BAND D TAX BASE BAND D TAX BASE CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% Acton 163.82 162.18 Kettleshulme 166.87 165.20 Adlington 613.67 607.53 Knutsford 5,813.84 5,755.70 Agden 72.04 71.32 Lea 20.78 20.57 Alderley Edge 2,699.00 2,672.01 Leighton 1,770.68 1,752.97 Alpraham 195.94 193.98 Little Bollington 88.34 87.45 Alsager 4,498.81 4,453.82 Little Warford 37.82 37.44 Arclid 154.71 153.17 Lower Peover 75.81 75.05 Ashley 164.05 162.41 Lower Withington 308.54 305.45 Aston by Budworth 181.97 180.15 Lyme Handley 74.74 74.00 Aston-juxta-Mondrum 89.56 88.66 Macclesfield 18,407.42 18,223.35 Audlem 937.36 927.98 Macclesfield Forest/Wildboarclough 112.25 111.13 Austerson 49.34 48.85 Marbury-cum-Quoisley 128.25 126.97 Baddiley 129.37 128.07 Marton 113.19 112.06 Baddington 61.63 61.02 Mere 445.42 440.96 Barthomley 98.14 97.16 Middlewich 4,887.05 4,838.18 Basford 92.23 91.31 Millington 101.43 100.42 Batherton 24.47 24.23 Minshull Vernon 149.65 148.16 Betchton 277.16 274.39 Mobberley 1,458.35 1,443.77 Bickerton 125.31 124.05 Moston 277.53 274.76 Blakenhall 70.16 69.46 Mottram St Andrew 416.18 412.02 Bollington 3,159.33 3,127.74 Nantwich 5,345.68 5,292.23 Bosley 208.63 206.54 Nether Alderley 386.48 382.61 Bradwall 85.68 84.82 Newbold Astbury-cum-Moreton 374.85 371.10 Brereton 650.89 644.38 Newhall 413.32 409.18 Bridgemere 66.74 66.07 Norbury 104.94 103.89 Brindley 73.30 72.56 North Rode 125.29 124.04 Broomhall 87.47 86.59 Odd Rode 1,995.13 1,975.18 Buerton
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Cheshire Place-Names
    INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Acton, 12 Bowdon, 14 Adlington, 7 Bradford, 12 Alcumlow, 9 Bradley, 12 Alderley, 3, 9 Bradwall, 14 Aldersey, 10 Bramhall, 14 Aldford, 1,2, 12, 21 Bredbury, 12 Alpraham, 9 Brereton, 14 Alsager, 10 Bridgemere, 14 Altrincham, 7 Bridge Traffbrd, 16 n Alvanley, 10 Brindley, 14 Alvaston, 10 Brinnington, 7 Anderton, 9 Broadbottom, 14 Antrobus, 21 Bromborough, 14 Appleton, 12 Broomhall, 14 Arden, 12 Bruera, 21 Arley, 12 Bucklow, 12 Arrowe, 3 19 Budworth, 10 Ashton, 12 Buerton, 12 Astbury, 13 Buglawton, II n Astle, 13 Bulkeley, 14 Aston, 13 Bunbury, 10, 21 Audlem, 5 Burton, 12 Austerson, 10 Burwardsley, 10 Butley, 10 By ley, 10 Bache, 11 Backford, 13 Baddiley, 10 Caldecote, 14 Baddington, 7 Caldy, 17 Baguley, 10 Calveley, 14 Balderton, 9 Capenhurst, 14 Barnshaw, 10 Garden, 14 Barnston, 10 Carrington, 7 Barnton, 7 Cattenhall, 10 Barrow, 11 Caughall, 14 Barthomley, 9 Chadkirk, 21 Bartington, 7 Cheadle, 3, 21 Barton, 12 Checkley, 10 Batherton, 9 Chelford, 10 Bebington, 7 Chester, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 16, 17, Beeston, 13 19,21 Bexton, 10 Cheveley, 10 Bickerton, 14 Chidlow, 10 Bickley, 10 Childer Thornton, 13/; Bidston, 10 Cholmondeley, 9 Birkenhead, 14, 19 Cholmondeston, 10 Blackden, 14 Chorley, 12 Blacon, 14 Chorlton, 12 Blakenhall, 14 Chowley, 10 Bollington, 9 Christleton, 3, 6 Bosden, 10 Church Hulme, 21 Bosley, 10 Church Shocklach, 16 n Bostock, 10 Churton, 12 Bough ton, 12 Claughton, 19 171 172 INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Claverton, 14 Godley, 10 Clayhanger, 14 Golborne, 14 Clifton, 12 Gore, 11 Clive, 11 Grafton,
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Equality Impact Assessment Report
    High Speed Two Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Equality Impact Assessment Report High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square Canary Wharf London E14 5AB www.gov.uk/hs2 High Speed Two Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe Working Draft Equality Impact Assessment Report September 2016 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5AB Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2016, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT COUNTY BUILDINGS, MARTIN STREET, STAFFORD, ST16 2LH ON MONDAY 14 NOVEMBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Ms Margaret Gilmore, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ____________________________________________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 020 3585 4721/22 ____________________________________________________________ Time noted: 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning ladies and gentlemen. It is great to be here in Stafford and welcome to this public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for new parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands. My name is Margaret Gilmore, I am an Assistant Commissioner of the Boundary Commission for England and I was appointed by the Commission to assist them in their task of making recommendations for new constituencies in the West Midlands. I am responsible for chairing the hearing today and tomorrow and I am also responsible, with my fellow Assistant Commissioner David Latham, who is here, for analysing all of the representations received about the initial proposals and then presenting recommendations to the Commission as to whether or not those initial proposals should be revised. I am assisted here today by members of the Commission staff led by Glenn Reed, who is sitting beside me and Glenn will shortly provide an explanation of the Commission’s initial proposals for new constituencies in this region and he will tell you how you can make written representations and will deal with one or two administrative matters. The hearing today is scheduled to run from 10.00 am until 8.00 pm and tomorrow it is scheduled to run from 9.00 am until 5.00 pm and I can vary that timetable and I will take into account the attendance and the demand for opportunities to speak.
    [Show full text]