New ISAT Cut Scores/Transition to PARCC Assessments Frequently Asked Questions for Parents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
An Exploration of Effects on Academically Vulnerable Students
EdWorkingPaper No. 20-213 Does the Common Core Have a Common Effect?: An Exploration of Effects on Academically Vulnerable Students Joshua Bleiberg Vanderbilt University Policymakers have sought to increase the rigor of content standards since the 1990s. However, the literature examining the effects of reforms to content standards on student outcomes is still developing. This study examines the extent to which the Common Core State Content Standards (CC) affected student achievement and the size of achievement gaps. To identify the effect of CC I compare early implementors of the CC to late implementors of the CC in a Difference-in-Differences framework. I conducted a document analysis to measure preparation for and implementation of the CC standards, which I merge together with the National Assessment of Educational Progress student-level data. I then exploit variation in the timing of state implementation of the CC to identify its effect on students overall and academically vulnerable groups. I find that the CC has a positive effect on math scores in 4th and 8th grade, but not in reading. The CC had a large positive effect on economically advantaged students, but a null effect for economically disadvantaged students. Demanding better results without addressing the structural issues burdening economically disadvantaged students may result in unintended consequences. VERSION: March 2020 Suggested citation: Bleiberg, Joshua. (2020). Does the Common Core Have a Common Effect?: An Exploration of Effects on Academically Vulnerable Students. (EdWorkingPaper: 20-213). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/v0an-cz33 DOES THE COMMON CORE HAVE A COMMON EFFECT? 1 Title Page Does the Common Core Have a Common Effect?: An Exploration of Effects on Academically Vulnerable Students By Joshua Bleiberg Ph.D. -
Download the Software Required Prior to the Training Sessions
National Council on Measurement in Education Here and There and Back Again: Making Assessment a Stronger Force for Positive Impact on Teaching and Learning 2018 Training Sessions April 12-13 2018 Annual Meeting April 14-16 Westin New York at Times Square New York, NY #NCME18 Welcome from the Program Chairs Welcome to New York, welcome to New York! Welcome, friends and colleagues, to the 2018 NCME Annual Meeting. We are pleased to present you with this year’s NCME program. Our goal in putting together this slate of sessions has been balance: we have sought to represent research from different testing contexts, from a wide range of perspectives, from behind-the-scenes test development efforts across topics in our field to activities that advance the ways that tests and test results can be made accessible and useful to stakeholders. This year’s conference theme of “Here and There and Back Again: Making Assessment a Stronger Force for Positive Impact on Teaching and Learning” seeks to cultivate the interplay between testing (in all its forms) and the processes of instruction and learning. Carrying on with NCME’s expanding consideration of issues relating to classroom assessment, this year’s program features several invited sessions related to this important topic. On Saturday, April 14, at 10:35am, The Past, Present, and Future of Curriculum-Based Measurement will be discussed, reviewing 30+ years of research in the areas of reading, mathematics, content areas, and writing, and a discussion of future directions and challenges for CBM. On Sunday morning at 10:35am, speakers Joanna Gorin, Margaret Heritage, and James Pellegrino will take on The Positive Impact of Assessment, in a conversation about ways that assessment has been a positive impact on teaching and learning as well as ways that it could become a more positive influence in the future. -
Common Core FAQ for ISAT and PARCC. July 2014
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS) FOR FAMILIES New ISAT Scoring/Transition to PARCC Assessments Q. What changes are coming to the Illinois Standards Assessment Test (ISAT)? A. Illinois is changing how the ISAT is scored by raising performance expectations for elementary and middle school students (grades 3-8). The change in ISAT scoring is similar to changing a grading scale where from 90-100 was considered an A to now 94-100 is considered an A. Q. Why is it necessary to change how the ISAT is scored? A. The previous lower ISAT expectations did not adequately measure students’ ability to succeed after high school. We’ve known for a while that many students who took the ISAT in 3rd-8th Grades and were classified as “meeting standards” did poorly when they took the Prairie State Achievement Examination (PSAE) and the ACT in high school. New expectations will align to the new learning standards (Common Core State Standards) focused on success in college and the workforce. Q. How will my child’s ISAT scores be affected? A. Your child will have to score higher in order to be categorized as “meeting” or “exceeding” standards. As a result, some students who previously met standards will now be classified as needing improvement. The higher expectations of the new ISAT cut scores will cause a decrease in the number of students who meet or exceed standards. This drop is a result of raising expectations, not a reflection of student or teacher performance. Q. What if my child’s ISAT scores drop? A. These new expectations do not mean that our students know less than they did before or are less capable than they were in previous years. -
Coming Together to Raise Achievement: New Assessments for the Common Core State Standards (March 2014)
PARCC and Smarter Balanced plus the Alternate and English Proficiency Assessment Designs Approved by the Consortia Coming Together to Raise Achievement New Assessments for the Common Core State Standards Updated March 2014 Prepared by the Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS Table of Contents Welcome to Our 5th Edition of Coming Together . 1 Looking Ahead: Field Testing this Spring Ushers in a New Era with New Challenges . 2-4 COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA Comprehensive Assessment Consortia: System Designs, Work to Date and Future Plans . 5 PARCC – Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers . 6-16 Smarter Balanced – Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium . 17-28 Key Similarities and Differences of PARCC and Smarter Balanced (Table 1) . 29-30 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA Alternate Assessment Consortia: System Designs, Work to Date and Future Plans . 31 DLM – Dynamic Learning Maps . 32-37 NCSC – National Center and State Collaborative . .. 38-44 Side-by-Side Comparisons of Assessment Systems (Table 2) . 45 ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA English Language Proficiency Assessment Consortia: System Designs, Work to Date and Future Plans . .. 46 ASSETS – Assessment Services Supporting English Learners through Technology Systems . 47-51 ELPA21 – English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century . 52-56 GETTING TO THE CLASSROOM Crossing the Chasm to Digital Teaching, Learning and Assessment . 57-59 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Consortia Timelines at a Glance . 60 State Memberships in Assessment Consortia (Table 3) . 61 Pascal (Pat) D. Forgione Jr., Ph.D. Distinguished Presidential Scholar and Executive Director Dear Colleague: As we publish this guide, our 5th and final edition of Coming Together to Raise Achievement, field testing of a new generation of student assessments is underway in classrooms across America.