sign in sign up
<<
Home , Local Group

arXiv:1701.03465v1 [astro-ph.GA] 12 Jan 2017 itntsa lsesta eedsovdadexpanded and few dissolved a were of that remnants first the clusters be the may of (2016) distinct UFDs al. simulations some et that resolution of Lee Ricotti , high & fossils Recently Jang from 2016). be 2011a,b; suggested, al. to the Ricotti et & of Ricotti considered (Bovill 2014; reionization are galaxies the first UFDs as the been Thus, such have processes might . formation global star to of due quenching early this htfraino h tr nteeglxe a fin- was galaxies ( these ago in Gyr 11.6 the by , Way ished old of deep Milky from the mostly formation around found, that are UFDs (2014) six al. UFDs of et photometry in Brown parti- Spergel populations & stars. the Calabrese metal-poor Stellar explore (e.g., matter to dark (2016)). laboratories of ratios ideal properties nearby light cle be Thus to 2012). may mass McConnachie UFDs 2007; of 2015). Geha values al. & high et (Simon dark (Bechtol very by dominated UFDs having are as they matter, but called feeble, often optically are are They pc 20 = eddta h atr wr aaisfitrthan fainter galaxies Dwarf ex- latter. more than the much M fainter are even than they are albeit them tended 2013; of clusters, Some globular Belokurov typical 2016). 2012; al. et (McConnachie Martin galaxies known yn yo Lee Gyoon Myung H ANGECIAOHBL RGA:DSOEYO H MOST THE OF DISCOVERY PROGRAM: HUBBLE CARNEGIE-CHICAGO THE ic,1013 oa Italy Roma, 00133, 1 tifica, USA 91101, CA Pasadena, ton, Germany Potsdam, D-14482, 16, Sternwarte Korea versity, lr-an wr aais(Fs r h faintest the are (UFDs) galaxies dwarf Ultra-faint rpittpstuigL using 2018 typeset 12, Preprint August version Draft V 4 3 2 1 † = [email protected] nvri` iRm o egt,VadlaRcraScien- Ricerca della Via Vergata, Washing- Tor of Roma Institution Universit`a di Carnegie the der of Observatories An The (AIP), Potsdam Astrophysik f¨ur Uni- Leibniz-Institut National Seoul , and Physics of Department − nrcutrfil fVrob ag&Le(04.Fra F1i h m ubiquito are cluster. the UFDs is the headings: that UFD1 Subject in Fornax indicates discovered This (2014). be stars. Lee to resolved & by Jang confirmed by is of field intracluster and h i fteRBmto otema antd ftetobrightes two the of magnitude Spac br mean giant Hubble 19 the red galaxy, the Hub to metal-poor this Carnegie-Chicago method in t mostly to RGB the stars in being distance the of resolved kpc with of part g 55 consistent of tip as are of the a group obtained galaxy radius 1316, small 1316, this projected NGC a NGC in a of of as at Grou field outskirts found located halo Local the is is the in UFD galaxy beyond This UFD1, new them Fornax The find UFD, to cluster. an difficult of is discovery it brightness, surface h oo-antd iga fteesasi ace ya1 y is Gyr 12 a by matched is stars these of ([Fe/H] diagram color-magnitude The 8 lr-an wr aais(Fs r h anetkonglxe a galaxies known faintest the are (UFDs) galaxies dwarf Ultra-faint . a n agrthan larger and mag 0 r eff − ≈ 146 = 1. 1, INTRODUCTION 2 † A T nSn Jang Sung In , . ) oa antd n ffcierdu fFra F1are UFD1 Fornax of radius effective and magnitude Total 4). E ± tl mltajv 5/2/11 v. emulateapj style X z c hc r iia otoeo ig F1ta a icvrdrec discovered was that UFD1 Virgo of those to similar are which pc, 9 aais wr aais lses niiul(onxUD)—gala — UFD1) (Fornax individual clusters: galaxies: — dwarf galaxies: otn aais abundances galaxies: — content ≈ ) hysgetdthat suggested They 3). W R AAYI H OA UNIVERSE LOCAL THE IN GALAXY DWARF . r 0 eff 1,2 ± ahe Beaton Rachael , eetv radius) (effective 1 . p.Fra F1i rbbyamme fteFra cluster. Fornax the of member a probably is UFD1 Fornax Mpc. 3 rf eso uut1,2018 12, August version Draft ABSTRACT 3 akSeibert Mark , sarsle tla vrest.VroUD stefirst the is found UFD1 was Virgo overdensity. UFD1 stellar Virgo resolved (HST) archive. a Telescope as MAST Space the Hubble in cluster, the available Virgo of the images of deep field using intracluster the the in UFD1, outside Virgo UFDs the the facilities. about outside observational known Group. UFDs current Local is find the little to with Therefore difficult Group galaxies. very first Local is the of it the nature However, the al. resolving understanding et help and (Moore to 1999) field problem role dwarf the wide satellite important missing Local an in well-known future the play in discovered and can UFDs 2015; is Group current etc). be PANStarrs, from It LSST, will al. (e.g., soon surveys et al. UFDs Drlica-Wagner et Group Koposov 2016). more Local 2015; that al. 2015; et the expected Collaboration Cloud al. al. Survey et around et Energy Magellanic (Bechtol Kim Dark discovered Large 2015 been the 2015; in and have the many Galaxy (LMC) UFDs of as Way advent telescope, new 4m Milky al. recent et 17 CTIO With Laevens on as 2014; Camera 2012; 2016). Energy al. al. Dark et McConnachie et Belokurov Martin 2005a,b; 2012; Local 2014; and the al. in al. data, et M31 et Sand (SDSS) around (Willman later Survey found of Group were Sky Galaxy them overdensity Way Digital of Milky small more Sloan the a the around 2016). as stars, from Lee giant observa- discovered, al. & red et Jang first resolved current Collaboration 2014; were Survey 2012; our Energy al. They Dark et al. to a Laevens et Sand only 2014; iceberg 2014; today 2012; al. giant et revealing (McConnachie Belokurov a are facilities of they tional but tip universe, tiny the in UFDs. of size the to upiigy ag&Le(04 icvrdoeUFD, one discovered (2014) Lee & Jang Surprisingly, galaxies of type abundant most the be may UFDs 3 ispeBono Giuseppe , sadta oeUD remain UFDs more that and us ddet hi nrdbylow incredibly their to due nd .W eotaserendipitous a report We p. G tr,w siaethe estimate we stars, RGB t l rga.Rsle stars Resolved Program. ble nh(G)sas Applying stars. (RGB) anch crn ihlwmetallicity low with ochrone s itn nw F that UFD known distant ost esuhes fNC1316. NGC of south-east he atglx nteFornax the in galaxy iant eecp mgso a of images Telescope e M ITN ULTRA-FAINT DISTANT V − ≈ 4 n ar Madore Barry and , 7 . 6 nl nthe in ently is stellar xies: ± 0 . mag 2 3 2 Lee et al. 2016

(a) NGC 1316 (b) ACS field

(c) Fornax UFD1

5’ 5" 28 kpc 454pc

Fig. 1.— (a) Location of the HST field (square) in the inverted color image of the inner region of NGC 1316 provided in the ESO archive, embedded in the gray scale map of R-band image given by Richtler et al. (2012). North is up, and east to the left. A small galaxy in the north of NGC 1316 is NGC 1317, a . The position of the new UFD is denoted by a red circle. (b) A color image of the HST field. (c) A 15′′ × 15′′ section of the HST field centered on Fornax UFD1. Note that most resolved stars in the central region are red giants in this dwarf galaxy.

UFD found beyond the Local Group. Total magnitude (Lee et al. 1993), and detailed analysis of the data is and effective radius of Virgo UFD1 are MV ≈−6.5 ± 0.2 given in Jang et al. (2017). We use photometry of the mag and reff = 81 ± 7 pc, and its central surface bright- point sources derived from these images by Jang & Lee −2 ness is as low as µV,0 = 26.37±0.05 mag arcsec . Metal- (2017). The magnitudes of the point sources in the im- licity of the stars in this galaxy is estimated from their ages were derived using DAOPHOT (Stetson 1994). In colors, to be, on average, very low, [Fe/H] = −2.4 ± 0.4. this study we adopted a distance to NGC 1316 based on Virgo UFD1 is located at the distance of 16.4 ± 0.4 Mpc, the TRGB, given in Jang et al. (2017): (m − M)0 = being the most distant UFD at the time of discovery. 31.45 ± 0.05(ran) ± 0.06(sys) and d = 19.5 ± 0.5 Mpc. Later Crnojevi´cet al. (2016) reported detection of one Foreground and reddening values toward NGC UFD in the remote halo of NGC 5128 (Cen A), a mas- 1316 are small, AV = 0.057 and (E(V − I)= 0.026 sive at the distance of 3.8 Mpc. They (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011). used the images obtained as part of the Panoramic Imag- Figure 1(a) displays the location of the HST field ing Survey of Centaurus and () at the in the B,V,R and Hα color image of the inner region Magellan 6.5 m telescope. of NGC 1316 provided by the ESO archive, embedded In this Letter we report a serendipitous discovery of in the gray-scale map of the deep R-band image given an UFD, Fornax UFD1, breaking the distance record by Richtler et al. (2012). A smaller in the of Virgo UFD1. It is located in the outskirts of NGC north of NGC 1316 is NGC 1317 (SAB(r)a). This image 1316, a giant galaxy in the Fornax cluster. Fornax UFD1 shows various substructures including shells and ripples was detected as a small group of resolved stars in the around NGC 1316, which are probably merger remnants HST/ACS images for a halo field of NGC 1316, ob- (Schweizer 1980; Richtler et al. 2012). The HST field is tained as part of the Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program located at 9.′5 south-east of the NGC 1316 center, where (CCHP) (Beaton et al. 2016). diffuse stellar light of NGC 1316 is barely visible. It is expected that this HST field would be dominated by old 2. DATA halo stars in NGC 1316. A color image of the HST field The CCHP is an ongoing program to estimate the is also displayed in Figure 1(b). value of the Hubble constant (H0) with high precision 3. RESULTS using the population II distance indicators, using RR Lyrae and the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) 3.1. Discovery of a New UFD (Beaton et al. 2016). As part of the CCHP, deep F606W First, we searched for any dwarf galaxies with low sur- and F814W images of a halo field in the outskirt of face brightness in the HST images of NGC 1316, which NGC 1316 using HST/ACS were obtained. Total ex- would appear to be similar to the morphology of Virgo posure times for F606W and F814W are 14,676s and UFD1 (see Fig. 1 in Jang & Lee (2014)). Since the For- 24,396s, respectively. These data were used for esti- nax cluster is only slightly more distant than the Virgo mation of the distance to NGC 1316 using the TRGB cluster, it is expected that some of the brightest stars in Fornax Ultra-faint Dwarf Galaxy 3 26 (a) Fornax UFD1 (b) Control Field (c) UFD1 only (1) (d) UFD1 only (2) N stars: 19 N stars: 302 N stars: 15 N stars: 15 Area: 12.6"2 Area: ×50 of (a) Area: 12.6"2 Area: 12.6"2 27 I

28

29 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 V-I V-I V-I V-I 26 (e) Virgo UFD1 (f) Control Field (g) UFD1 only (1) (h) UFD1 only (2) N stars: 30 N stars: 284 N stars: 24 N stars: 25 Area: 28.3"2 Area: ×50 of (e) Area: 28.3"2 Area: 28.3"2 27 I

28

29 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 V-I V-I V-I V-I

Fig. 2.— (Upper panels) I − (V − I) CMDs of the resolved stars (a) at r ≤ 2′′ of the Fornax UFD1 and (b) in the control field at 5′′. 0

Fornax UFDs, if any, would be resolved in the deep HST bigger than that of the Fornax UFD1 field. The CMD of images. the point sources in the control field shows a broad red Through visual inspection of the images, we noticed giant branch (RGB), and these point sources are mostly the presence of a small group of faint resolved point RGB stars in the halo of NGC 1316 (Jang et al. 2017). sources embedded in diffuse stellar light in the south- We used statistical subtraction to remove the contribu- ern part of the HST field (at the position of the small tion of the foreground and background sources from the red circle in Figure 1(b)). A zoom-in image of the field CMD in (a), using the CMD of the control field. For centered on the new system in Figure 1(c) shows clearly this process we used bins with 0.3 mag in both magni- a faint fuzzy system embedding a small number of re- tude and color, which is similar to the mean errors of the solved stars, the diameter of which is about 4′′. This new RGB stars. Figure 2(c) and (d) show two realizations system looks much fainter and smaller than any other of the control field subtraction. Both CMDs look very typical dwarf galaxies in the Fornax cluster (Ferguson similar in general. In the lower panels of Figure 2, we 1989; Mieske et al. 2007; Mu˜noz et al. 2015). This sys- plotted similar CMDs but for Virgo UFD1 (Jang & Lee tem turns out to be, indeed, a new UFD, named as For- 2014) for comparison. nax UFD1, as shown below. Fornax UFD1 is located There are 12 resolved stars brighter than I = 28.5 mag 10.′1 (∼55 kpc) south-east of the NGC 1316 center in the in the net CMDs (Figure 2(c) and (d)). The number of sky. field contaminants with I < 28.5 mag in the area covered by the UFD field is estimated to be 4.8 ± 0.3, while there 3.2. Color-magnitude Diagrams of the Resolved Stars are 15 stars in the area of UFD. Thus the net number of in Fornax UFD1 the member stars in the area of the UFD is estimated to ± Figure 2(a) displays the color-magnitude diagrams be 10 4, which is consistent with the number derived (CMDs) of the resolved point sources in a circular region after CMD decontamination. Eight of the 12 stars have a with r ≤ 2′′ where r is the projected radial distance from narrow range of colors with 0.7 < (V − I) < 1.4, showing the center of Fornax UFD1. We plotted also the CMD of a vertical sequence, while three of them show much red- the control field in the annular region at 5′′ < r ≤ 15′′, der colors than the others. Therefore, these eight stars in Figure 2(b). The area of this control field is 50 times are considered to show the RGB of Fornax UFD1, while 4 Lee et al. 2016

10 r [pc] 100 10 r [pc] 100

V=23.8, MV=-7.6 ± 24 nI=0.49 0.07 24 ] 2

26 ± 26 nV=0.54 0.06

28 28 [mag/arcsec Total magnitude µ

I "

30 V 30 = 1.6 (146 pc) eff r

0.1 1.0 0.1 1.0 r [arcsec] r [arcsec] Fig. 3.— The radial profiles of the V (open circles) and I-band (open triangles) surface brightness (a) and cumulative integrated magnitudes (b) of Fornax UFD1. The arrows denote the location of the control region. The bands represent the errors. Filled squares with gray bands denote the radial number density profile of the resolved red giant stars (27

(a) (b) 10000 Ellipticals UCDs

] 15 & Bulges 2 1000

Ellipticals

[pc] Bulges 20

eff 100

r UCDs

MW GCs [mag/arcsec

LG satellites 0,V 10 LG UFDs µ 25 DWs in nearby galaxies DWs in the Fornax cluster Virgo UFD1 1 Fornax UFD1 30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 MV MV Fig. 4.— (a) The effective radius versus absolute V total magnitude of the Fornax UFD1 (large red starlet symbol) in comparison with those for other stellar systems. We also plotted the Virgo UFD1 by the small yellow starlet symbol. (b) The V -band central surface brightness versus absolute V total magnitude of the Fornax UFD1. Circles and lenticular symbols are for the giant ellipticals and bulges in spiral galaxies, downward triangles for the ultra compact dwarfs (UCDs), pentagons for the globular clusters, squares and empty lozenges for the Local Group satellites and UFDs, and upward triangles for the dwarfs in M81 and M106 and the low surface brightness galaxies in M101, and pink diamonds for the NGFS dwarfs in Mu˜noz et al. (2015). tudes of Fornax UFD1. Corresponding absolute magni- gion of Fornax with Camera on CTIO 4m tudes of this galaxy are derived to be MV = −7.6 ± 0.2 as part of the program for the Next Generation Fornax mag and MI = −8.9 ± 0.2 mag. These results show that Survey (NGFS), discovering 158 new dwarf galaxies with this new system is indeed a genuine UFD. We list basic Mi < −8.0 mag. The effective radii and effective surface parameters of Fornax UFD1 in Table 1. brightness of these galaxies are reff =0.1 to 2.8 kpc and µ = 22.0 to 28.0 mag arcsec−2. Thus the parameters 4. i DISCUSSION of Fornax UFD1 are similar to the faint limit in their 4.1. Comparison with Previous Surveys of Fornax sample. However, none of the stars in Fornax UFD1-like Dwarf Galaxies dwarf galaxies can be resolved at the pixel scale of the Ferguson (1989) published the Fornax Cluster Cata- Dark Energy Camera images. log (FCC) based on the wide field photographic sur- vey of Fornax galaxies. Following this, several stud- 4.2. Comparison with Other Galaxies ies used CCD images to find new fainter galaxies in We compare scaling relations of Fornax UFD1 with Fornax and investigate their properties (Kambas et al. those of other early-type stellar systems in Fig- 2000; Hilker et al. 2003; Mieske et al. 2007; Mu˜noz et al. ure 4(a) and (b) (see Figure 4 for details of 2015). Kambas et al. (2000) imaged a long strip region the kinds of other early-type stellar systems). We from NGC 1399 to NGC 1291 (an area of 13.8 deg2) in use the data for effective radii, total magnitudes, Fornax, finding a large number of low surface brightness and central surface brightness of other stellar sys- dwarf galaxies with MB < −12.0 mag. These are unre- tems compiled in Jang & Lee (2014) (see the references solved faint galaxies. therein). We updated the data, adding data for new Later deeper surveys of the central region in Fornax UFD galaxies: the new UFDs in the Local Group found a number of fainter dwarf galaxies. The detection from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) (Bechtol et al. limits of the dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) in the 2015; Koposov et al. 2015; Drlica-Wagner et al. 2015; survey of Hilker et al. (2003) and Mieske et al. (2007) Kim et al. 2015; Kim & Jerjen 2015; Laevens et al. are V ≈ 23 mag (MV ≈ −8.5 mag), and µV (0) ≈ 27 2015), a new UFD in the group mag arcsec−2. Mieske et al. (2007) determined distances (Crnojevi´cet al. 2016) and Virgo UFD1 (Jang & Lee to early-type dwarf galaxies in Fornax using the surface 2014). We also added the data for the new brightness fluctuation (SBF) method, and confirmed that galaxies (Mu˜noz et al. 2015). 30 of the dEs with −16.6 < MV < −10.1 mag are the In the figure it is found that Fornax UFD1 is located in members of Fornax. Fornax UFD1 is about one mag- the region of the Local Group UFDs and that the prop- nitude fainter that the detection limits of Hilker et al. erties of Fornax UFD1 are very close to those of Virgo (2003) and Mieske et al. (2007). UFD1 (Jang & Lee 2014). These results show that For- Recently Mu˜noz et al. (2015) covered the central re- nax UFD1 is indeed a genuine UFD. The central surface 6 Lee et al. 2016

TABLE 1 Basic Parameters of Fornax UFD1

Parameter Value References R.A.(2000) 3h23m11.s374 1 Dec(2000) −37◦20′46′′. 53 1 Type UFD 1 Distance modulus, (m − M)0 31.37 ± 0.15 1 Distance, d [Mpc] 19.0 ± 1.3 1 Image scale 91.1 pc arcsec−1 1 Total magnitude V T = 23.8 ± 0.2 1 Color at effective radius (V − I)0 = 0.95 ± 0.05 1 Foreground reddening AV = 0.057, E(V − I) = 0.026 2 Absolute magnitude, MV −7.6 ± 0.2 1 Metallicity [Fe/H]≈−2.4 1 Sersic Index (n), V 0.54 ± 0.06 1 Sersic Index (n), I 0.49 ± 0.07 1 ′′ ′′ Effective radius (reff ), V 1. 6 ± 0. 1 (146 ± 9 pc) 1 −1 Central surface brightness, V µV,0 = 25.46 ± 0.06 mag arcsec 1 −1 Central surface brightness, I µI,0 = 24.66 ± 0.05 mag arcsec 1

References. — (1) This study; (2) Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011). brightness of Fornax UFD1 as well as Virgo UFD1 cor- UFD1 are similar to those of Virgo UFD1. Fornax UFD1 responds to the upper range for the Local Group UFDs. is the most distant one among the known UFDs that This implies that UFDs are ubiquitous and that there have been confirmed by resolved stars. Fornax UFD1 may be many more UFDs with lower surface brightness and Virgo UFD1 are, respectively, only the first known and fainter magnitudes in Fornax and Virgo. UFD in each of Fornax and Virgo, and it is expected that many more will be discovered in the future. We just opened an window to the realm of the UFDs beyond the Local Group. 5. SUMMARY Taking advantage of high-resolution deep images of a The authors are grateful to anonymous referee for use- halo field in NGC 1316 obtained as part of the CCHP, ful comments. Tom Richtler is thanked for providing we discovered a new UFD in Fornax, Fornax UFD1. The deep CTIO 4m images of NGC 1316. MGL and ISJ are CMD of the resolved stars in this UFD shows that it is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea indeed a genuine UFD with low metallicity ([Fe/H] ≈ (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) −2.4) and that it is likely to belong to the Fornax cluster. (No. 2012R1A4A1028713). The size, luminosity, and surface brightness of Fornax Facilities: HST (ACS, WFC3/IR).

REFERENCES Beaton, R. L., Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, Laevens, B. P. M., Martin, N. F., Sesar, B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 832, 210 L3 Bechtol, K., Drlica-Wagner, A., Balbinot, E., et al. 2015, ApJ, Laevens, B. P. M., Martin, N. F., Bernard, E. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 50 813, 44 Belokurov, V. 2013, NewAR, 57, 100 Lee, M. G., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 1993, ApJ, 417, Belokurov, V., Irwin, M. J., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 553 441, 2124 Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., Lewis, G. F., et al. 2016, Bovill, M. S., & Ricotti, M. 2011a, ApJ, 741, 17 arXiv:1610.01158 Bovill, M. S., & Ricotti, M. 2011b, ApJ, 741, 18 McConnachie, A. W. 2012, AJ, 144, 4 Brown, T. M., Tumlinson, J., Geha, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 91 Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Infante, L., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2007, Calabrese, E., & Spergel, D. N. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4397 A&A, 463, 503 Crnojevi´c, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19 Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, L19 Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., et Mu˜noz, R. P., Eigenthaler, P., Puzia, T. H., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1270 L15 Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi´c, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, Richtler, T., Bassino, L. P., Dirsch, B., & Kumar, B. 2012, A&A, 89 543, A131 Drlica-Wagner, A., Bechtol, K., Rykoff, E. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, Ricotti, M., Parry, O. H., & Gnedin, N. Y. 2016, arXiv:1607.04291 813, 109 Sand, D. J., Strader, J., Willman, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 79 Fabrizio, M., Nonino, M., Bono, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A18 Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103 Ferguson, H. C. 1989, AJ, 98, 367 Schweizer, F. 1980, ApJ, 237, 303 Hilker, M., Mieske, S., & Infante, L. 2003, A&A, 397, L9 S´ersic, J. L. 1963, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Jang, I. S., & Lee, M. G. 2014, ApJ, 795, L6 Astronomia La Plata Argentina, 6, 41 Jang, I. S., & Lee, M. G. 2017, ApJ, in press (arXiv:161105040) Simon, J. D., & Geha, M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 313 Jang, I. S., Lee, M. G. et al. 2017, in preparation Spitzer, L. 1987, Dynamical evolution of globular clusters, Kambas, A., Davies, J. I., Smith, R. M., Bianchi, S., & Haynes, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press J. A. 2000, AJ, 120, 1316 Stetson, P. B. 1994, PASP, 106, 250 Kim, D., Jerjen, H., Mackey, D., Da Costa, G. S., & Milone, A. P. Willman, B., Blanton, M. R., West, A. A., et al. 2005a, AJ, 129, 2015, ApJ, 804, L44 2692 Kim, D., & Jerjen, H. 2015, ApJ, 808, L39 Willman, B., Dalcanton, J. J., Martinez-Delgado, D., et al. 2005b, Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., Torrealba, G., & Evans, N. W. ApJ, 626, L85 2015, ApJ, 805, 130